Agenda of Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

A black text on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Waitai

Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Monday 11 August 2025

Time: 2.32pm SCF Decision Meeting

Venue: Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

Present

Chairperson

Members

Jackie Simons

Tim Baker

Kelly Barber

Celeste Donovan

Alex Hewison

Yani Johanson

Greg Mitchell

Jo Zervos

Principal Advisor

Chris Turner-Bullock

Manager Community Governance

Tel: 941 8233

christopher.turner@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Cindy Sheppard

Community Board Advisor

Tel: 941 6547

cindy.sheppard@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00069

That the apologies from Paul McMahon for absence and Tim Baker for lateness, be accepted.

Greg Mitchell/Kelly Barber Carried

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Greg Mitchell declared an interest in Item 3, applications SCF25/26_070_CBL, Burwood East Residents’ Association and SCF25/26_083_CBL, Burwood Pegasus Community Watch and took no part in any discussion or voting on these items. Greg also noted that his daughter is a member of application SCF25/26_056_CBL Christchurch School of Gymnastics Incorporated.

Kelly Barber declared an interest in Item 3, application SCF25/26_083_CBL, Burwood Pegasus Community Watch and took no part in any discussion or voting on this item. Kelly also noted that he used to be a Trustee of application SCF25/26-59_CBL Avon Heathcote Estuary Ihutai Trust.

Yani Johanson declared an interest in Item 3, applications SCF25/26_007_CBL, Parklands United Sports Club and SCF25/26_033_CBL, Woolston Community Library and took no part in any discussion or voting on these items.

Jo Zervos declared an interest in Item 3, application SCF25/26_061_CBL, New Brighton Olympic Athletic Club Incorporated and took no part in any discussion or voting on this item.

Alex Hewison declared an interest in Item 3, application SCF25/26_054_CBL, The Bridge South Brighton Trust and took no part in any discussion or voting on this item.

Tim Baker arrived at 3.06pm during consideration of item 3.

3. Strengthening Communities Fund 2025-26

Council officers in attendance spoke to the accompany report and answered questions of clarification from members.

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00070 Officer Recommendation accepted with amendments to the following applications:

SCF25/26_024_CBL, Coastal Spirits Football Club from $2,000 to decline the application.

SCF25/26_032_CBL, Smith Street Community Farm Trust from $12,000 to $15,000.

SCF25/26_066_CBL, Dallington Residents’ Association from $1,500 to $1,615.

SCF25/26_070_CBL, Burwood East Residents’ Association from $1,500 to $1,835.

SCF25/26_072_CBL, South Island Tau Tag Football Incorporated from $4,000 to $3,500.

SCF25/26_074_CBL, Burwood Association Football Club Incorporated from $1,000 to $1,350.

SCF25/26_075_CBL, PIPS Pregnancy Infancy Parenting Support Trust from $7,500 to $10,000.

SCF25/26_079_CBL, Predator Free NB/Coastal Kaitiaki (umbrellered by New Brighton Project Inc) from $1,500 to $2,500.

SCF25/26_089_CBL, The Brighton Gallery Trust from $4,000 to $5,000.

SCF25/26_091_CBL, Stitch-O-Mat Charitable Trust from $4,000 to $5,000.

SCF25/26_095_CBL, Legacy Community Church from $10,000 to $9,500.

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Strengthening Communities Fund 2025-26 Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed at low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the 2025-26 Strengthening Communities Fund grants outlined in the following schedule:

No	Organisation Name	Project	Recommendation
SCF25/26_010_CBL	Social Service Council of the Diocese of Christchurch - Christchurch City Mission	Linwood Community Development Kaimahi and Men's Project Kaimahi	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $38,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Social Service Council of the Diocese of Christchurch - Christchurch City Mission towards the salaries for the two Community Development Kaimahi roles based at Te Whare Taonga o Ngā Iwi Katoa.
SCF25/26_016_CBL	Wainoni-Avonside Community Services Trust	Rent and wages for the Wainoni-Avonside Community Services Trust	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $11,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Wainoni-Avonside Community Services Trust towards Coordinator Wages.
SCF25/26_020_CBL	Anglican Parish of East Christchurch	Wages for community development workers.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $8,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Anglican Parish of East Christchurch towards Te Waka Aroha Staff Wages.
SCF25/26_022_CBL	Bromley Community Centre	Funding to deliver Bromley Community Centre events and programmes.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $40,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to the Bromley Community Centre towards Staff Wages, Events and Programmes.
SCF25/26_028_CBL	Eastern Eagles Rugby League Club	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $10,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Eastern Eagles Rugby League Club towards venue hire, first aid training and junior player affiliation and team entry fees.
SCF25/26_034_CBL	New Brighton Community Gardens Trust	Funding for wages for its three staff members.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $20,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Community Gardens Trust towards Wages.
SCF25/26_053_CBL	Helen Anderson Trust	Funding to increase their paid staffing hours.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $4,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Helen Anderson Trust towards Coordinators Wages.
SCF25/26_084_CBL	He Waka Tapu	Funding to deliver four free Whānau Days across 2025–2026	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to He Waka Tapu towards Salaries and Wages, Pounamu carving, Barbers/Braiders, Bouncy Castle Hire and Marketing.
SCF25/26_003_CBL	Compassion Trust	Funding for operational costs for its Financial Mentoring and Community Care programmes.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $12,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Compassion Trust towards Operational costs for Financial Mentoring and Community Care programmes.
SCF25/26_004_CBL	New Brighton Bowling Club	Power costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Bowling Club towards power costs.
SCF25/26_007_CBL	Parklands United Sports Club Inc	Funding for wages for its full time Operations Manager.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $13,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Parklands United Sports Club Inc towards Operations Manager Wages.
SCF25/26_008_CBL	Queenspark Community Trust	Wages to continue the delivery of its community-based programmes.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $17,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Queenspark Community Trust towards Wages.
SCF25/26_014_CBL	La Vida Youth Trust	Community Youth Drop-in Centre and 24-7 Youth Worker in Parkview Pārua School	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to La Vida Youth Trust towards Operational costs; wages and programme equipment.
SCF25/26_017_CBL	The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust	Equipment and materials.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust towards equipment and materials to help sustain their services in the Linwood area.
SCF25/26_018_CBL	Te Manawa Ora Trust	Equipment and materials.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Te Manawa Ora Trust towards equipment and materials for their maara kai based at Pā Whakaoranga Community Hub.
SCF25/26_019_CBL	Woolston Boxing Club Incorporated	Equipment and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Woolston Boxing Club Incorporated towards the purchase of essential gym equipment and a contribution towards the salary for the club secretary.
SCF25/26_023_CBL	Waimairi Beach Residents Association Incorporated	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Waimairi Beach Residents Association Incorporated towards Operational costs.
SCF25/26_025_CBL	Drug-ARM Christchurch	Operational costs and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $7,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Drug-ARM Christchurch towards Rent & Creative Mentor Wages.
SCF25/26_027_CBL	Spencerville Residents Association	Annual River Clean-up, Duck Race and Gala Day.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $800 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Spencerville Residents Association towards the costs of the annual Spencerville River Clean-Up and Gala event.
SCF25/26_029_CBL	Linwood Avenue Community Corner Trust	Operational costs and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $12,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Linwood Avenue Community Corner Trust towards the salary for the Community Coordinator role, operational and administration costs.
SCF25/26_030_CBL	St Albans Park Sports Club Inc	Operational costs and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to St Albans Park Sports Club Inc towards greenskeeper wages.
SCF25/26_031_CBL	The Pukeko Centre Incorporated	Wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $17,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Pukeko Centre Incorporated towards Salaries, Wages and Parklands @ Play.
SCF25/26_032_CBL	Smith Street Community Farm Trust	Operational costs and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $15,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Smith Street Community Farm Trust towards operation costs and garden manager wages.
SCF25/26_033_CBL	Woolston Community Library	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Woolston Community Library towards the day to day administration costs of running the library.
SCF25/26_044_CBL	SuperGrans SuperSkills Otautahi Charitable Trust	Wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $3,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to SuperGrans SuperSkills Otautahi Charitable Trust towards the salary for the Manager role.
SCF25/26_052_CBL	Pleasant Point Yacht Club inc	Insurance and maintenance costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Pleasant Point Yacht Club inc towards Rescue boat maintenance and operating costs and insurance.
SCF25/26_054_CBL	The Bridge South Brighton Trust	Operational costs and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Bridge South Brighton Trust towards Operational costs, wages and equipment.
SCF25/26_055_CBL	North Beach Tennis Club Inc	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,800 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to North Beach Tennis Club Inc towards junior tennis programme costs.
SCF25/26_056_CBL	Christchurch School of Gymnastics	Wages for manager.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $3,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Christchurch School of Gymnastics towards wages for its full time Gym for All Manager.
SCF25/26_057_CBL	Youthtown Inc	Wages for Programme Team Member based at Woolston Community Centre.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $12,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Youthtown Inc towards the costs of the salary for the Programme Team Members based at Woolston Community Centre.
SCF25/26_058_CBL	Edgeware Croquet Club Incorporated	Funds requested for lawn maintenance.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Edgeware Croquet Club Incorporated towards the operating costs for lawn maintenance.
SCF25/26_059_CBL	Avon Heathcote Estuary Ihutai Trust	The Estuary Trust are seeking funding towards wages for their restoration coordinator.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Avon Heathcote Estuary Ihutai Trust towards wages for the Wetland Reserve Restoration Coordinator
SCF25/26_061_CBL	New Brighton Olympic Athletics Club	New Brighton Olympic Athletics Club are seeking funding for a part time summer athletics coach.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Olympic Athletics Club towards Coach wages.
SCF25/26_062_CBL	Parklands Toy Library Incorporated	Parklands Toy Library Incorporated is seeking funding to support the wages of a part-time librarian.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Parklands Toy Library Incorporated towards Toy library operational costs and librarian wages.
SCF25/26_063_CBL	Tamai Sports Incorporated	Tamai Sports is seeking funding towards their operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Tamai Sports Incorporated towards operational costs.
SCF25/26_064_CBL	Shirley Toy Library	Shirley Toy Library is seeking funding for librarian wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Shirley Toy Library towards Librarian Wages.
SCF25/26_066_CBL	Dallington Residents Association	Insurance Costs and Community Newsletter.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,615 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Dallington Residents Association towards Insurance Costs and Community Newsletter.
SCF25/26_067_CBL	Linwood Rugby League Inc	Club administrator wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Linwood Rugby League Inc towards Club administrator wages.
SCF25/26_070_CBL	Burwood East Residents Association (BERA)	Meeting Room Hire, Insurance and a Community Skip Day.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,835 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burwood East Residents Association (BERA) towards Meeting Room Hire, Insurance and a Community Skip Day.
SCF25/26_071_CBL	The Marshland Hall Trust	Event related costs, Insurance and Signage.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Marshland Hall Trust towards Event related costs, Insurance and Signage.
SCF25/26_072_CBL	South Island Tau Tag Football Incorporated	Wages, volunteer recognition and referee training.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $3,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to South Island Tau Tag Football Incorporated towards wages, volunteer recognition and referee training.
SCF25/26_073_CBL	Tūhono Taonga, Tūhono Tāngata	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $8,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Tūhono Taonga, Tūhono Tāngata towards Operational costs.
SCF25/26_074_CBL	Burwood Association Football Club Incorporated	This funding request is to cover a portion of the general administration costs to our club.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,350 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burwood Association Football Club Incorporated towards administrative and operating costs.
SCF25/26_075_CBL	PIPS - Pregnancy Infancy Parenting Support	Salaries and Wages, Volunteer recognition and Operational Costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $10,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to PIPS - Pregnancy Infancy Parenting Support towards Salaries and Wages, Volunteer recognition and Operational Cost
SCF25/26_076_CBL	New Brighton Silver Band	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Silver Band towards Operational costs.
SCF25/26_077_CBL	Kiwistyle Kickboxing New Brighton	Equipment costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Kiwistyle Kickboxing New Brighton towards equipment.
SCF25/26_079_CBL	Predator Free NB/ Coastal Kaitiaki (umbrellered by New Brighton Project Inc)	Community wide pest control	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Project Inc towards Wages.
SCF25/26_080_CBL	South New Brighton Tennis Club	Equipment costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to South New Brighton Tennis Club towards equipment costs.
SCF25/26_081_CBL	Woolston Park Bowling Club	Greenkeeper wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Woolston Park Bowling Club towards greenkeeper wages.
SCF25/26_082_CBL	Seniornet New Brighton	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Seniornet New Brighton towards Operational costs.
SCF25/26_083_CBL	Burwood Pegasus Community Watch	Operational Costs, Volunteer Recognition and Uniforms.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $4,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burwood Pegasus Community Watch towards Operational Costs, Volunteer Recognition and Uniforms.
SCF25/26_085_CBL	South City Youth Trust	Salaries and Wages, Equipment.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to South City Youth Trust towards Salaries and Wages, Equipment
SCF25/26_086_CBL	Parklands Christchurch United Softball Club	Funding for equipment and venue hire.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Parklands Christchurch United Softball Club towards Equipment and Venue Hire.
SCF25/26_087_CBL	Lions Sports Community and Education Trust	Junior rugby league season.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Lions Sports Community and Education Trust towards operating costs for junior rugby league season.
SCF25/26_088_CBL	Adventure Specialties Trust	Mums on the Move programme for participants living in the East of Ōtautahi.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Adventure Specialties Trust towards the costs of delivering a Mums on the Move programme for participants living in the East of Ōtautahi.
SCF25/26_089_CBL	The Brighton Gallery Trust	The Brighton Gallery Trust is seeking funding for operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Brighton Gallery Trust towards Operational costs.
SCF25/26_091_CBL	StitchOMat Charitable Trust	Stitch O Mat Charitable Trust is seeking funding for Operating Costs; wages and rent.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to StitchOMat Charitable Trust towards Operational costs; wages and rent.
SCF25/26_092_CBL	Te Puna Oranga Incorporated	Funding towards the monthly kaumatua lunch they organise and run at Ngā Hau e Whā National Marae.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Te Puna Oranga Incorporated towards the costs of venue hire for the monthly kaumatua lunch.
SCF25/26_093_CBL	Te Waka Unua School	Connecting Community Through Culture project.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Te Waka Unua School towards costs supporting their Connecting Community Through Culture project.
SCF25/26_094_CBL	Growing New Brighton (umbrellered by New Brighton Project Inc	Rent and Equipment.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Project Inc towards Rent and Equipment.
SCF25/26_095_CBL	Legacy Community Church	Operational costs for Youth Drop-in Centre.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $9,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Legacy Community Church towards Youth Worker Wages and operational costs for Youth Drop-in Centre.
SCF25/26_096_CBL	New Brighton Netball Club	Equipment costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Brighton Netball Club towards equipment costs.
SCF25/26_097_CBL	Premiere Equipe Judo	Operating costs and volunteer recognition.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Premiere Equipe Judo towards operating costs and volunteer recognition.
SCF25/26_098_CBL	It Takes a Village Hub NZ	Funding for its Project Coordinator wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to It Takes a Village Hub NZ towards Wages.
SCF25/26_099_CBL	The Loft/Ki Te Tihi	Kaitūhono Hapori Community Connectors roles.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $8,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Loft/Ki Te Tihi towards the salary for the Kaitūhono Hapori Community Connectors roles.
SCF25/26_100_CBL	The Epic Sports Project NZ Charitable Trust	Salaries and wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $3,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Epic Sports Project NZ Charitable Trust towards salaries and wages.
SCF25/26_101_CBL	Burwood Park Tennis Club	Junior Hot Shots coaching costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burwood Park Tennis Club towards Junior Hot Shots coaching costs.
SCF25/26_102_CBL	Richmond Keas Softball Club	Venue hire for preseason training.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,800 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Richmond Keas Softball Club towards venue hire for pre-season training.
SCF25/26_103_CBL	Christ City Church Woolston	Equipment.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Christ City Church Woolston towards Equipment.
SCF25/26_104_CBL	Te Wero Gymnastics Club	Coach wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Te Wero Gymnastics Club towards coach wages.
SCF25/26_107_CBL	QEII Swim Club Incorporated	Coach wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to QEII Swim Club Incorporated towards coach wages.
SCF25/26_108_CBL	Waimairi Beach Golf Club	Junior golf coaching programme wages and subsidy.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Waimairi Beach Golf Club towards the junior golf coaching programme wages and subsidy
SCF25/26_109_CBL	Shirley Tennis Club Incorporated	Coach wages.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Shirley Tennis Club Incorporated towards coach wages.
SCF25/26_038_CBL	Kimihia Early Learning Trust	Resources for a newly built centre.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Kimihia Early Learning Trust towards the costs of purchasing new resources for their outdoor play space.

4. Declines the 2025-26 Strengthening Communities Fund applications outlined in the following schedule:

No	Organisation Name	Project	Recommendation
SCF25/26_006_CBL	New Brighton and Districts Museum Inc	Admin assistance project.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board declines the application to its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund from New Brighton and Districts Museum Inc towards the Administration assistance project.
SCF25/26_024_CBL	Coastal Spirit Football Club	Operational costs.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board declines the application to its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Coastal Spirit Football Club towards operating costs.
SCF25/26_065_CBL	The Linfield Cultural Recreational & Sports Club Inc	Tane Mahuta Wellbeing & Rugby 7's Development Initiative	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board declines the application to its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund from The Linfield Cultural Recreational & Sports Club Inc for assistance with their new initiative.
SCF25/26_105_CBL	Rebuild Repair Respect	Linwood community safety project.	That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board declines the application to its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund from Rebuild Repair Respect towards the Linwood community safety project.

5. Approves the transfer of the remaining balance of its 2025-26 Strengthening Communities Fund to the 2025-26 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Discretionary Response Fund.

Kelly Barber/Alex Hewison Carried

4. Board Projects Fund 2025-26

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00071 Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Board Projects Fund 2025-26 Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Allocates $500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Anzac Day Expenses.

4. Allocates $8,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Waitai Garden Pride Awards, Edible Garden Awards, End of Year Networking Function for Key Community Groups.

5. Allocates $5,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Koru Fund and approve the email delegation for applications up to $500 to Alex Hewison, Tim Baker and Jackie Simons.

6. Allocates $4,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Summer with your Neighbours.

7. Allocates $8,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Youth Development Fund and approve the email delegation for applications up to $500 to Jo Zervos, Greg Mitchell and Paul McMahon.

Greg Mitchell/Alex Hewison Carried

5. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Kawai Rangatahi

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00072 Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Kawai Rangatahi Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $3,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund to Kawai Rangatahi Trust towards Event Related Costs.

Jackie Simons/Celeste Donovan Carried

6. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2025-26 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Youth and Cultural Development

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00073 Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2025-26 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Youth and Cultural Development Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $7,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund to Youth Cultural Development towards Costs of staging the House of Hoopz and Outdoor Movie Events.

Jackie Simons/Celeste Donovan Carried

Karakia Whakamutunga

Kia tau te rangimārie

O te Rangi e tū iho nei

O Papatūānuku e takoto nei

O te Taiao e awhi nei

Ki runga i a Tātou

Tihei Mauriora

May the peace

of the sky above

Of the earth below

And the all-embracing universe

Rest upon us all

Behold, it is life!

Meeting concluded at 4.16pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025

Jackie simons

deputy Chairperson

A black text on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Waitai

Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Monday 11 August 2025

Time: 4.36 pm

Venue: Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

Present

Chairperson

Members

Jackie Simons

Tim Baker

Kelly Barber

Celeste Donovan

Alex Hewison

Yani Johanson

Greg Mitchell

Jo Zervos

Principal Advisor

Chris Turner-Bullock

Manager Community Governance

Tel: 941 8233

christopher.turner@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Cindy Sheppard

Community Board Advisor

Tel: 941 6547

cindy.sheppard@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Karakia Tīmatanga

Whakataka te hau ki te uru

Whakataka te hau ki te tonga

Kia mākinakina ki uta

Kia mātaratara ki tai

E hī ake ana te atakura

He tio, he huka, he hauhūnga

Tīhei mauri ora

Cease the winds from the west
Cease the winds from the south
Let the breeze blow over the land
Let the breeze blow over the ocean
Let the red-tipped dawn come with a sharpened air.
A touch of frost, a promise of a glorious day.

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00069

That the apology from Paul McMahon for absence be accepted.

Kelly Barber/Greg Mitchell Carried

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Jackie Simons declared an interest in Item 12, Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpawaho Heathcote River and took no part in any discussion or voting.

Alex Hewison declared an interest in item 9, Bus layover routes 5 and 135 – New Brighton and took no part in any discussions or voting.

Yani Johanson declared an interest in Item 12, Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpawaho Heathcote River and took no part in any discussion or voting.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00070

That the minutes of the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 7 July 2025 be confirmed.

Tim Baker/Greg Mitchell Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1

Waitakiri School - Burwood Road School Crossing

Greta Lewis, Ruby McLeod and Leighton Scott, students from Waitakiri School addressed the Board in relation to safety concerns outside Waitakiri School when crossing Burwood Road.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Greta, Ruby and Leighton for their presentation.

Part B

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Refers the issues raised in the presentation to staff for investigation and report back to the Board.

Attachments

a Waitakiri School Presentation

4.2

Winter Fireworks

Danette Wereta, local resident, addressed the Board in relation to impacts the Winter Fireworks Events in New Brighton have on the environment, wildlife and companion animals.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Danette for her update.

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Refers the issues raised in the public forum presentation to staff for response.

4.3

Public Health Support for Homeless in the Red Zone

Rebecca Robin withdrew her speaking request and will now present to Council.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1

Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolston CRAF

Zentarou Fukuhara, local resident addressed the Board in relation to item 7, Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolson CRAF.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Zenta for his update.

5.2

Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolston CRAF

John Sauer, local resident did not attend the meeting.

5.3

Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolston CRAF

Dianne Downward, local resident addressed the Board in relation to item 7, Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolson CRAF.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Dianne for her update.

Attachments

a Dianne Downward Statement - Chelsea Street Renewal

5.6 Chelsea Street Renewal - Linwood Woolston CRAF

Ma’a Faletanoai-Evalu local resident, addressed the Board in relation to item 7, Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood Woolston CRAF.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ma’a for his update.

5.4 Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River

Chrissie Williams and Malcolm Long on behalf of the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River Network, addressed the Board in relation to item 12, Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Chrissie and Malcolm for their update.

Attachments

a OHRN - Urban Forest planting plan Opawaho Heathcote River

5.5 Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road

Ann Ferrall, local resident, addressed the Board in relation to item 11, Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ann for her update.

Attachments

a Ann Ferral Statement - Broadpark Road

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Chelsea Street Renewal - Linwood Woolston CRAF
	Council officers in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board took into consideration the deputations received (5.1, 5.3 and 5.6 above) and decided to request a workshop as per the resolution below. Council Officers advised the Board that the decision to request a workshop may delay consideration of the item until the new electoral term.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board: 1. Receive the information in the Chelsea Street Renewal - Linwood Woolston CRAF Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to parking, stopping restrictions, traffic controls made pursuant to any Bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking, stopping and traffic controls restrictions described in recommendations 4 - 7 below. 4. Approves all kerb alignments, paths, buildouts, road surface treatments, traffic calming features and road markings on Chelsea Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for approximately 443 metres as detailed on plan TP366101, dated 14.07.2025, and attached to this report as Attachment A. 5. Approves all kerb alignments, paths, road surface treatments, traffic calming features and road markings on Russell Street, commencing at its intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a north westerly direction for approximately 20 metres as detailed on plan TP366101, dated 14.07.2025, and attached to this report as Attachment A. 6. Approves all kerb alignments, paths, road surface treatments, traffic calming features and road markings on Pamela Street, commencing at its intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a north westerly direction for approximately 14 metres as detailed on plan TP366101, dated 14.07.2025, and attached to this report as Attachment A. 7. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times as detailed on plan TP366101, dated 14.07.2025, and attached to this report as Attachment A: a. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres. b. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 80 metres north east of its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a north easterly direction until its intersection with Cuba Street. c. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 175 metres north east of its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. d. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 290 metres northeast of its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a north easterly direction until its intersection with Russell Street. e. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at its intersection with Russell Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres. f. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 74 metres north east of its intersection with Russell Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. g. On the north western side of Chelsea Street, commencing at its intersection with Pamela Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. h. On the south eastern side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 2 metres south west of its intersection with Pamela Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. i. On the south eastern side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 90 metres south west of its intersection with Pamela Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 47 metres. j. On the south eastern side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 130 metres south west of its intersection with Russell Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. k. On the south eastern side of Chelsea Street, commencing at a point approximately 11 metres south west of its intersection with Cuba Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. l. On the north western side of Russell Street, commencing at its intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. m. On the north eastern side of Russell Street, commencing at a point approximately 20 metres north west at its intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. n. On the north western side of Pamela Street, commencing at a point approximately 14 metres north west of it intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. o. On the north eastern side of Pamela Street, commencing at a point approximately 14 metres north west of its intersection with Chelsea Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. 8. Approves that these resolutions 4-7 take effect when signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
	Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00071 That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board let the Chelsea Street Renewal – Linwood-Woolston CRAF Report lay on the table until a workshop is held with the Community Board and Transport Staff to discuss changes to the plan based on submitters feedback and deputations received on 11 August 2025, specifically in regards to the narrowing of the intersections, speed humps, cycling infrastructure and the widening of paths. Yani Johanson/Greg Mitchell Carried

8. Grant of Electricity Easement over Linwood Park

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00072 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Grant of Electricity Easement over Linwood Park Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves, pursuant to Section 48(1) of the Reserves Act 1977, the granting of an electricity easement in favour of Orion New Zealand Limited over part of Linwood Park, legally described as Part Rural Section 437, held in Record of Title CB188/155 as shown “A” and highlighted yellow on the plan attached to this report.

4. Notes that the above approval is subject to Minister of Conservation consent, delegated to the Council’s Chief Executive under the Instrument of Delegation for Territorial Authorities dated 12 June 2013, and supports that delegation being exercised.

5. Delegates authority to the Manager Property Consultancy to finalise negotiations and sign all necessary easement documentation.

Kelly Barber/Tim Baker Carried

9. Bus layover for bus routes 5 and 135 - New Brighton
	Council and Environment Canterbury Officers in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board requested further advice as per the resolution below.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Bus layover for bus routes 5 and 135 - New Brighton Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Option 1 – Preferred option: Formalisation of current bus layover (Attachment A) 3. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 a. Approves that a bus stop be installed on the median of Oram Avenue commencing at a point 13 metres north of its intersection with Hood Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 74 metres. 4. Approves that any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they conflict with the parking and stopping restrictions described in clauses 3 above are revoked. 5. Approves that these resolutions, described in clauses 3 above, take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
	Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00073 That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board let the Bus layover for bus routes 5 and 135 – New Brighton report lay on the table and request staff provide advice on a long term bus layover solution for New Brighton, including Marine Parade, Hawke Street and other viable sites, and to explore options for Council to purchase or repurpose land for a permanent layover or bus interchange. Celeste Donovan/Kelly Barber Carried

10. Bus stop upgrades on Estuary Road near Bridge Street

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00074 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Bus stop upgrades on Estuary Road near Bridge Street Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to parking or stopping restrictions and traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions and traffic controls described in resolutions 4 to 6 below.

Bus stop 26557 – Relocated from outside 51 Bridge Street on Estuary Road to outside 85 and 91 Estuary Road (Agenda Attachment A)

4. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017:

a. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 57 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 8 metres.

b. Approves that a bus stop be installed on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 49 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

c. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 35 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 4 metres.

d. Approves that a bus stop on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 25 metres south of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 16 metres be revoked.

e. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 25 metres south of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 6 metres.

5.
Pursuant to Section 339(1) of the Local Government Act 1974:

a. Approves that a bus passenger shelter on the east side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 26 metres south of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of approximately 3.6 metres be revoked.

6. Approves that directional and warning tactile pavers and bus stop sign are installed at the above bus stop, as shown in Agenda Attachment A.

7. Approves that these resolutions, described in clauses 4 to 6 above, take effect when traffic controls or parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Tim Baker/Celeste Donovan Carried

Jo Zervos requested that her vote against the above decision be recorded.

The meeting adjourned at 6.08pm and reconvened at 6.14pm.

11. Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road
	Council Officers in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board took into consideration the deputation received at 5.5 above.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Agrees to implement the current trial of overnight parking restrictions (10pm-7am) as permanent parking restrictions on the 20 angled parks opposite 1-5 Broadpark Road 4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in 4 below. 5. Approves that, in accordance with clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited from 10pm-7am Monday through Sunday, applied to the angled parking on the east side of Broadpark Road in line with 1-5. The parking restrictions at Broadpark Road as shown on the plan in Attachment A.
	Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00075 Part C That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Agrees to implement the current trial of overnight parking restrictions (10pm-7am) as permanent parking restrictions on the 20 angled parks opposite 1-5 Broadpark Road 4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in 4 below. 5. Approves that, in accordance with clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited from 10pm-7am Monday through Sunday, applied to the angled parking on the east side of Broadpark Road in line with 1-5. The parking restrictions at Broadpark Road as shown on the plan in Agenda Attachment A. 6. Request staff to consult with the affected community and stakeholders on proposed options to extend the parking restrictions of the angled carparks along Broadpark Road down to Larnach Street and to report back to the Board prior to the end of the year if possible. Celeste Donovan/Jo Zervos Carried

The meeting adjourned at 6.25pm and reconvened at 6.34pm.

Kelly Barber assumed the Chair for consideration of item 12.

12. Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpawaho Heathcote River

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00076 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpawaho Heathcote River Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the updated Urban Forest Planting Plan and Guidelines June 2025 from Area 18 (Clarendon Terrace/ Richrdson Terrace) to Area 23 (The Cut) along the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River in Attachment B of the Agenda report.

Tim Baker/Alex Hewison Carried

Jackie Simons resumed the Chair.

13. Urban Forest Tree Planting Plan for Woolston Park

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00077 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Urban Forest Tree Planting Plan for Woolston Park Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the planting of trees within Woolston Park in alignment with the planting plan attached to the report in the agenda.

Tim Baker/Yani Johanson Carried

14. North Beach Surf Life Saving Club- approval for new build and lease

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00078 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the North Beach Surf Life Saving Club- approval for new build and lease Report.

2. Approve the demolition of the existing clubrooms and storage shed as shown in Attachment A of the agenda report.

3. Approve the re-build of the club rooms and storage shed in accordance with the plans shown in Attachment A of the agenda report.

4. Grant a ground lease to North Beach Surf Lifesaving Club pursuant to the Local Government Act 2002, for a lease period of 35 years including renewals for an area of approximately 1,106sqm of North Beach Park being part of RS37190, as shown on the plan described in Attachment B of the Agenda report.

5. Notes that approval is subject to the North Beach Surf Life Saving Club meeting all regulatory requirements including the Building Act 1991 and the Resource Management Act 1991.

6. Notes:

a. That the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

b. That appropriate consultation has been undertaken and the results of that support this proposal.

7. Requests that the Manager Property Consultancy do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above including approving final design, completing negotiations and administering the terms and conditions of the new lease.

Jo Zervos/Alex Hewison Carried

15. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Area Report - August 2025

Community Board Resolved CCBCC/2025/00079 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part B

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Area Report - August 2025.

Tim Baker/Alex Hewison Carried

16. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Members exchanged information on matters of mutual interest:

· Village Green Project Update.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Kia tau te rangimārie

O te Rangi e tū iho nei

O Papatūānuku e takoto nei

O te Taiao e awhi nei

Ki runga i a Tātou

Tihei Mauriora

May the peace

of the sky above

Of the earth below

And the all-embracing universe

Rest upon us all

Behold, it is life!

Meeting concluded at 6.45pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025

Jackie Simons

deputy Chairperson

9. Commercial Recreation Opportunity - QEII Park - Five Under Par - Lease Update
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/1771094
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Kathy Jarden, Team Leader Leasing Consultancy
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Anne Columbus, General Manager Corporate Services/Chief People Officer

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to update the Community Board following the 12 September 2022 decision to grant an Agreement to Lease and Deed of Lease to Five Under Par Limited and to approve the design for the establishment of a multi-sport training and entertainment complex located at QEII Park in the former location of the Ascot Golf driving range.

1.2 The report is staff generated to satisfy the resolution made by the Community Board:

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2022/00055 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1. Subject to Mana Whenua consultation and support of the proposal through Mahaanui Kurataiao Ltd, agrees to grant an Agreement to Grant a Lease to Five Under Par Limited, and Deed of Lease for the establishment of a multi-sport training and entertainment complex located at QEII Park for a period of up to 35 years including renewals, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report.

2. Notes that if Mahaanui Kurataiao Ltd. have concerns regarding the commercial proposal, officers will report back to the Community Board for further decision making.

3. Subject to resolution 1 above, requests the Manager Property Consultancy take all necessary steps to negotiate, agree and enter into all necessary lease documentation on behalf of the Council, as he shall consider necessary or desirable, to give effect to the resolution and consistent with the key commercial terms contained in this report subject to his satisfaction that:

a. Funding has been secured by Five Under Par Limited and is satisfactory to the Council within an acceptable timeframe.

b. Revised plans have been presented, and approved by the Head of Parks, showing that the proposed facilities are not outside of the permitted area in the QEII Master Plan area.

4. Approves the project to move into concept design stage and final design plans be brought back to the Waitai Coastal-Burwood Community Board for final sign-off as landlord.

1.3 This report addresses the matters of the resolution being:

1.3.1 Development boundary consistent with the QEII Master Plan

1.3.2 Funding

1.3.3 Concept Plans

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receive the information in the Commercial Recreation Opportunity - QEII Park - Five Under Par - Lease Update Report.

2. Notes that:

a. The decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

b. The Head of Parks confirms that the proposed development of a shop/café, event space, golf simulator and driving range with associated carparking and landscaping is within the area allocated in the QEII Master Plan.

c. Any future year expansion plans to develop ancillary activities e.g. the mini putt golf course and sack slide would require the use of land outside the area allocated in the QEII Master Plan and therefore the subject of a separate process and decision.

d. Five Under Par Limited has provided sufficient financial information including funding arrangements for the development to satisfy the Manager Property Consultancy that there are no concerns in proceeding.

3. Approves, as landlord, the final design plans for a shop/café, event space, golf simulator and driving range with associated carparking and landscaping for the Five Under Par Limited development at QEII Park depicted in agenda Attachment A.

4. Requests that the Manager Property Consultancy do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above including completing negotiations and administering the terms and conditions of the new lease.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The QEII Master Plan Hearings Panel and the Council reserved the southwest corner of the park for a two-year period for the investigation of commercial opportunities. That resulted in an Expression of Interest process followed by a Request for Proposal being carried out.

3.2 Five Under Par Limited was the successful respondent.

The proposal had merit but insufficient detail to support an unconditional recommendation that the Council enter into a lease with the respondent, and it was recommended that Council enter into an Agreement to Grant a Lease so that the respondent had a degree of certainty enabling the commitment of further time and resources to investigate funding opportunities and commercial viability to proceed with the development.

3.3 An extension was provided to the Respondent to arrange financing and finalise design and build plans.

3.4 The Manager Property Consultancy has reviewed the financial forecasts and budgets and is satisfied that the proposal is commercially viable.

3.5 The proposed development of a shop/café, event space, golf simulator and driving range with associated carparking and landscaping has been confirmed to sit within the land set aside in the QEII Master Plan.

3.6 The original response to the RFP included ancillary activities e.g. the mini putt golf course and sack slide. Due to design and safety issues these cannot be accommodated within the lease area defined in the QEII Master Plan. They remain an aspiration for Five Under Par Limited and at some stage in the next couple of years may become the subject of a separate process and decision.

3.7 The terms of the Agreement to Grant a Lease and the Deed of Lease have been in negotiation and are now ready to be formalised.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 QEII Master Plan Area

4.1.1 The Request for Proposal showed part of the development being outside of the QEII Master Plan area available. The Respondent was asked to present new plans showing the development within the area specified in the RFP as shown below:

4.1.2 The concept plans have been redesigned, and the Head of Parks confirms that the development as shown in Attachment A is not outside the permitted area.

4.2 Final Plan Approval

4.2.1 These updated plans provide for a shop/café event space, golf simulator and driving range with associated carparking and landscaping, refer to Attachment A.

4.2.2 The development will be built in stages with the first stage being the Driving Range and ancillary facilities including an equipment storage shed as shown on the plan.

4.2.3 The Respondent has provided detailed plans (Attachment A) showing how the golf simulator and coaching and club fitting area will be laid out internally alongside a café/refreshment area. The design enables both group and individual coaching to take place simultaneously, with appropriate space for equipment such as tripods and golf bags without compromising health and safety requirements. The Respondent is partnering with a local golf professional to deliver coaching programmes, including hosting international students who will train at the range and play courses throughout Canterbury. In the future, the space will also accommodate a golf simulator (Stage 2), offering players the opportunity to experience international courses in a virtual environment, along with interactive and family-friendly games designed to make the facility accessible, engaging, and fun for a wide audience.

4.2.4 Five Under Par Limited still have strategic vision to develop a further stage including a mini-putt golf course and sack slide, refer Attachment B. This will depend on the successful delivery and operation of the current development proposal. This further development would require land on the other side of Robin Tait Drive as originally proposed in the RFP response and would therefore require a separate consideration and decision at a future date. This is mutually exclusive to the current proposal and decision.

4.2.5 In presenting the final building plans, the Respondent has indicated that the design needed to be pushed out to accommodate car parking and the space utilised for the driving range to ensure room for the outfield/landing area.

4.2.6 Most golf driving ranges are 180-275 metres long from the teeing area to the far end of the outfield. Shorter urban ranges may be closer due to space limitations with full length ranges approximately 229-274 metres so players can use drivers without exceeding the boundary. In enclosed or netted ranges, the physical length can be shorter because nets can safely stop long shots. For safety and design, the width is also important to allow for shot dispersion (approximately 91-137 metres wide).

4.2.7 The outfield or landing area for the golf balls will be covered in astro turf as it offers a practical advantage for ball retrieval because the uniform, short, and consistent surface makes golf balls highly visible against the contrasting colour. On natural grass, balls can become partially embedded in divots, hidden in longer patches, or obscured by uneven growth, clippings, or debris, making collection slower and more labour-intensive. Astro turf also avoids muddy or worn patches that can bury or discolour balls, enabling faster, more efficient use of automated or manual collection equipment. This efficiency reduces staff time, machinery fuel use, and wear on collection equipment.

4.2.8 The Respondent has advised that the proposed mini putt golf area cannot be developed within the current lease site due to the space required for the driving range and associated safety measures. With modern range technology, including two levels of hitting bays, safety netting, GPS ball tracking, and boundary netting, the available site area is not large enough to safely accommodate both the driving range and a mini golf facility. Special range balls will be used which are flight restricted to limit carry distance while maintaining the feel of a standard ball, however safety requirements still prevent mini golf being incorporated into the leased site footprint.

4.2.9 The Respondent has developed a lighting plan to demonstrate the proposed layout of floodlighting for the driving range and associated facilities. The plan has been designed to ensure appropriate illumination for evening use while minimising potential effects on neighbouring properties and the wider park environment. Any lighting impacts, including brightness, spill, and operating hours, will be fully addressed through the resource consent process, which will require compliance with district plan standards and assessment of potential effects on amenity and ecology. This approach ensures the facility is functional and safe for users, while managing any adverse effects through regulatory oversight. Refer to Attachment C.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.3 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.3.1 Option 1 - Approve the Design Concept as Submitted – the Community Board approves the full design concept, including the golf driving range, café, retail shop, training facilities, noting that the Respondent has secured funding and met all other conditions to the satisfaction of the Manager Property Consultancy.

4.3.2 Option 2 – Approve the Design Concept with Conditions – the Community Board approves the design concept subject to specific conditions being met prior to construction. Such conditions could include further landscaping or traffic management measures, staged implementation milestones, or additional environmental mitigations.

4.4 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.4.1 Decline Approval of the Design Concept

· This was ruled out as the Respondent has now met all conditions set by the Council, including securing funding and presenting plans that comply with the QEII Master Plan requirements. Declining approval would cause unnecessary delays, risk the viability of the project, and damage relationships with the Respondent and other stakeholders. It would also represent a missed opportunity to deliver a recreational facility that has community support and aligns with Council’s strategic objectives.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.5 Preferred Option 1: Approve the Design Concept as Submitted

4.5.1 Option 1 Description: The Community Board approves the full design concept.

4.5.2 Option Advantages

· Supports and progresses the intentions of the QEII Master Plan and the process to date.

· Provides clarity and support for the Respondent to proceed.

· Allows the Respondent to apply for building and resource consents which will address issues such as drainage, traffic management and landscaping.

· Allows construction to commence without delay, as funding and lease arrangements are in place.

· Demonstrates the Council’s support for innovative and financially viable recreational developments.

4.5.3 Option Disadvantages

· Does not provide for additional conditions set by the Community Board that might address unforeseen operational or community impacts prior to construction.

4.6 Option 2 Description: The Community Board approves the design concept with Conditions.

4.6.1 Option Advantages

· Maintains forward momentum on the project while providing additional safeguards.

· Allows the Community Board to address any outstanding operational or amenity concerns.

4.6.2 Option Disadvantages

· May delay the start of construction while conditions are addressed.

· Could increase project costs of complexity for the Respondent.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.7 The analysis considered the need to provide clarity for the Respondent, maintain momentum on the development, and ensure community and environmental considerations are appropriate addressed.

4.8 Option 1 offers the most direct pathway to implementation, now that funding has been secured and lease documentation is ready. It eliminates uncertainty and allows the project to proceed without additional procedural steps.

4.9 Option 2 provides an additional layer of oversight by incorporating specific pre-construction conditions, which may better address residual risks or community feedback. However, it introduces potential delays and additional requirements for the Respondent as well as a duplication of the regulatory and consenting processes.

4.10 Both options represent practicable pathways to achieving the intended recreational and economic benefits of the project, with the preferred option being Option 1 due to its efficiency and the readiness of the project to proceed.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option Option 1	Option 2
Cost to Implement	No cost to Council	No cost to Council
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Tenant expenses	Tenant expenses
Funding Source	Tenant sourced	Tenant sourced
Funding Availability	Nil	Nil
Impact on Rates	Nil	Nil

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 The risk in approving the design plan and subsequent construction is that the respondent may face delays with obtaining the necessary building and resource consents. This is mitigated in the lease agreement to ensure that timeframes are adhered to and any request for an extension to those timeframes would need to be approved by the Manager Property Consultancy.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 The Community Board has the following delegations:

· To grant leases or licences for a maximum term of 35 years less one day to any person or body over parks, and to authorise staff to sign all required documentation.

· Authority to give (or decline) consent as landlord to any matter or request made by tenants/licensees under leases or licences of parks to other parties, and to authorise staff to sign all required documentation.

· The Community Board in resolution CBCB/2022/00055, restated in paragraph 1.2 of this report, requested the Manager Property Consultancy conclude the matters to finalise the lease.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision. The concluded matter will be documented in a Deed of Lease which has been prepared by the Council’s legal team.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decision:

6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by assessing that the possible outcomes of the recommended decisions have minimum impact on surrounding properties, the environment and the local community.

6.4.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Citizens and communities

6.6.1 Activity: Recreation, Sports, Community Arts and Events

· Level of Service: 7.0.3.1 Support citizen and partner organisations to develop, promote and deliver recreation and sport in Christchurch - 4,000 hours of staff support provided per annum.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 Previous consultation was carried out with the Draft QEII Park Master Plan in 2018 which identified an area at QEII Park to be investigated for commercial purposes. Given this the public nature of the RFP process and the fact there is no unmet statutory requirement, further public consultation on the proposed lease is not required.

6.8 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.8.1 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board.

6.9 The Community Board view is supportive of this development (refer to previous 2022 decision).

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.10 The decision (to approve the design plans) does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.12 There were no concerns raised by Manaanui (MKT) at the time of consultation to develop the site. They confirmed that there was no need for MKT to provide advice or seek further engagement from Rūnanga and no concerns with pursuing the granting of a lease for the development.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.15 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

6.16 The construction of the built facilities presented will not add material amounts of greenhouse gases and sympathetic landscaping and plantings will enhance the surrounding environment.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 Notification to respondent that concept plans are approved and confirmation of finances meets Council’s satisfaction.

7.2 Finalise Deed of Lease.

7.3 Respondent to apply for building and resource consents and commence construction.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Five Under Par - Developed Design	25/1665919	57
b ⇩	Five Under Par - Mini Golf Outside RFP Development Area	25/1665925	62
c ⇩	Five Under Par - Lighting Plan	25/1665937	63

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Kathy Jarden - Team Leader Leasing Consultancy

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Bruce Rendall - Head of Facilities & Property

10. North Beach - Proposed Carpark Improvements
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1582308
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Christina Weston, Traffic Engineer
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board to

1.1.1 Consider the results of consultation for proposed parking restrictions at North Beach car park; and

1.1.2 Make a decision regarding the implementation of parking restrictions at North Beach car park.

1.2 The report has been prepared in response to queries from the community about improving the safety and usability of this carpark.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the North Beach - Proposed Carpark Improvements Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in 4 to 7 below.

4. Approves that, in accordance with clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of all vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 180 minutes within the North Beach car park, as detailed in agenda Attachment A (TG150177a, dated 27/08/2025). This restriction is to apply between the hours of 7am and 7pm, Monday to Sunday.

5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, and in accordance with section 12.4 of the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, that parking be reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person’s parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, within the North Beach carpark, in the areas identified in agenda Attachment A (TG150177a, dated 27/08/2025). This restriction is to apply at all times, except between 7am and 7pm, Monday to Sunday.

6. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, and in accordance with section 12.4 of the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 180 minutes and be reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person’s parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, within the North Beach carpark, in the areas identified in agenda Attachment A (TG150177a, dated 27/08/2025). This restriction is to apply between the hours of 7am and 7pm, Monday to Sunday.

7. Approves that, in accordance with clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of all vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes, on the east side of Marine Parade, adjacent to the North Beach carpark, as detailed in agenda Attachment A (TG150177a, dated 27/08/2025). This restriction is to apply between the hours of 7am and 7pm, Monday to Sunday.

8. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 On 10 March 2025, a Notice of Motion was submitted to the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board, raising a number of requests about parking restrictions in the North Beach area. Staff advice was provided to the Community Board via a memo on 23 May 2025, which provided detail about the North Beach car park and suggested options for the Community Board to consider, ranging from minor improvements to a full redesign.

3.2 On 9 July 2025 transport staff presented an option for the management of parking issues at North Beach car park to the Community Board. The Community Board asked staff to design and consult on restrictions that could be implemented at low cost and before the summer period of 2025-2026.

3.3 The public were consulted on a proposal for a three-hour parking restriction at the car park (P180) at all times) and to formally mark the parking spaces on the road next to the car park and apply a 10-minute time limit at all times.

3.4 Following consultation and analysis of the submissions, staff recommend the three-hour parking restrictions apply between 7am-7pm to balance the competing use of the car park by the community, the surf lifesaving club and leases of the car park and its facilities. Staff also recommend the parking spaces on Marine Parade are marked out and a 10-minute time limit applied.

3.5 The amended plan for the proposed design is attached to this report as Attachment A. The aim for the recommended option is to increase the turnover of this carpark and improve safety and access of this space whilst facilitating provision for the community to use this space.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

Background

4.1 The North Beach car park services a surf lifesaving club and a community hall and provides access to the beach and a small park to the east, with Marine Parade to the west. The car park is a shared facility for users of the buildings and general beachgoers. As a busy car park, there can be times when the demand for parking is high.

4.2 On 10 March 2025, a Notice of Motion was submitted to the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board by Councillor Donovan, raising a number of requests about parking restrictions in the North Beach area.

4.3 Staff advice was provided to the Community Board via a memo on 23 May 2025. In regard to the request to investigate options for North Beach car park specifically, the memo provided detail on the facilities and users of the car park, including the surf life-saving club, the coffee cart, the Community Centre, freedom campers, as well as Council transport projects that are underway or planned for the North Beach area. Options for the car park were also included in the memo.

4.4 On 9 June 2025 staff presented multiple options of redesign of the car park to the Community Board during an information session/workshop to address the concerns of the local community. Due to the cost to implement two of the options (approximately $700,000), it was recommended to design and consult with an option that could be covered by internal budgets and implemented before the busy summer period.

Consultation and submissions summary

4.5 Consultation for the North Beach project included a proposal to limit parking to P180 at all times. This would limit the parking of all vehicles at all times, including overnight. It also proposed to formally mark the parking spaces on the road next to the car park and apply a 10-minute time limit.

4.6 Submissions indicate that parking availability at North Beach car park is an issue when activities are occurring in association with the surf lifesaving club, community hall, coffee cart and beach access. Demand is highest during the day (particularly at weekends and over summer) and in the evening (particularly over summer, and when events and club activities are on). Although overnight parking does occur, there are instances where freedom campers remain parked when other activities begin and the car park can become congested in the mornings, rather than there being a parking demand overnight. Further information on the consultation and a detailed summary of submissions is included in the Community Views section below.

4.7 Given the lack of overnight parking demand issues, staff recommend the P180 parking restrictions apply between 7am and 7pm year-round, instead of “at all times”. This ensures the parking restrictions address the identified problems, do not create unintended consequences and do not create inconsistencies. Unintended consequences from applying parking restrictions at all times may include:

· Displacement of freedom campers closer to residential properties.

· Conflict or confusion about the interaction between freedom camping restrictions[1] and parking restrictions.

· Other vehicles not being able to park overnight (e.g. to avoid driving under the influence from attending an event).

· Expectations that parking enforcement will be active overnight.

4.8 The following related information session/workshops and memo have taken place for the members of the meeting:

Date	Subject
23/05/2025	Staff response to Notice of Motion regarding North Beach Parking Restrictions
9/07/2025	North Beach Carpark

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.9 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.9.1 Option A (preferred). Implement P180 parking restrictions between the hours of 7am and 7pm to North Beach car park, including 4 parks being reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person’s parking permit, and P10 parking restrictions to parallel parking adjacent to the carpark on Marine Parade

4.9.2 Option B. Implement P180 parking restrictions at all times to North Beach car park as consulted on.

4.9.3 Option C. Do not implement any parking restrictions (status quo)

4.10 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.10.1 Parking restrictions of alternate lengths of time. There are numerous ways to set timed parking restrictions. For North Beach car park P180 was deemed the most appropriate length of time as the activities at the beach often require more than an hour or two, whether that is for a surf lesson, or recreational purposes, etc. Longer periods of time would discourage turnover. The on-street parking adjacent to the car park can also be used for long periods of time. Having a P10 allows for high turnover and an area that can be used for drop-offs/pick-ups.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.11 Preferred Option: Option A - Implement P180 parking restrictions between the hours of 7am and 7pm to North Beach car park, including 4 parks being reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person’s parking permit, and P10 parking restrictions to parallel parking adjacent to the carpark on Marine Parade

4.11.1 Option Description: Implement parking restrictions of P180 between the hours of 7am and 7pm within North Beach car park, including 4 parks being reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person’s parking permit and P10 on Marine Parade on 16 adjacent parks on road parallel to the North Beach car park, which will be defined by parking ticks.

4.11.2 Option Advantages

a) Addresses the request to provide restricted parking.

b) Encourages parking turnover at North Beach car park.

c) Allows for flexibility with parking in the morning and evenings.

d) Does not take away any of the current parking provisions.

e) Parking ticks on Marine Parade will help to make entry and exit point more visible.

f) Still allows provisions for freedom campers over the week and weekends over the winter months, consistent with the Freedom Camping Bylaw.

g) There was strong support from the community for the P180 restrictions.

h) Gives Council the ability to use enforcement and infringements in appropriate circumstances.

i) Does not pose changes to resourcing, financial and operational challenges that may impact service levels.

4.11.3 Option Disadvantages

a) Some of our community submissions do not support this option.

b) There is a risk that this could cause displacement of freedom campers closer to residential properties.

c) Cost of implementation.

d) Restricts users in how long they can use this space between 7am and 7pm.

4.12 Option B – Implement P180 parking restrictions at all times to North Beach car park as consulted on.

4.12.1 Option Description: Implement a parking restriction of P180 at all times to North Beach car park.

4.12.2 Option Advantages

a) Encourages parking turn over.

b) Close parking to facilities where there are no parking restrictions.

c) There was strong support from the community for the P180 restrictions.

d) Gives Council the ability to use enforcement and infringements in appropriate circumstances.

4.12.3 Option Disadvantages

a) There is a risk that this could cause displacement of Freedom Campers closer to residential properties.

b) May raise conflict or confusion about the interaction between freedom camping restrictions and parking restrictions for North Beach car park.

c) Other vehicles not being able to park overnight (e.g. to avoid driving under the influence from attending an event).

d) Implementation costs.

4.13 Option C – Do not implement any of the proposed parking restrictions

4.13.1 Option Description: This option would implement no changes to the current working of the car park and Marine parade.

4.13.2 Option Advantages

a) No implementation costs.

b) Full flexibility in how this space can be used.

4.13.3 Option Disadvantages

a) Does not address any of the community concerns.

b) Does not encourage turn over.

c) Does not give staff the ability to use enforcement and infringement measures.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

4.14 Early engagement with community facilities around the North Beach car park started in July 2025. Staff met representatives from the North Beach Surf Lifesaving Club, North Wai Boardriders Club, North Beach Coffee Shed, North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club, New Brighton Friendship Club, Pegasus Rangers, and New Brighton Seido Karate. They also emailed Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora about its Mobility Action Programme.

4.15 These discussions focused on how the groups use the car park and the current problems they face. This information, in addition to considerations about the enforceability of restrictions, informed the proposal that went out for public consultation.

4.16 Consultation started on 5 August and ran until 17 August 2025.

4.17 Project details including links to the Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage were advertised via:

· An email sent to 93 key stakeholders, including an invitation to meet sent to the North Beach Residents’ Association.

· Two signs in the car park.

4.18 The Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage had 556 views throughout the consultation period.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

4.19 The proposed restrictions consulted on were P180 to all parks in the North Beach Car Park and P10 to approximately 16 parallel parks on Marine Parade at all times.

4.20 Submissions were made by five recognised organisations/businesses and 88 individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage.

4.21 North Beach Residents’ Association and Nomadic Barbers did not support the proposed time restrictions, North Beach Community Preschool and Spokes Canterbury did support the proposed time restrictions, and the North Beach Coffee Shed supported the proposed P10 restrictions on the road and was not sure about the proposed P180 restrictions within the car park

4.22 On the proposed P180 restrictions in the car park, 48% of submitters supported, 38% did not support, and 14% were not sure.

4.23 Key things submitters liked about the P180 restrictions were:

· They would prevent freedom camping in the car park (21)

· They would make it easier for people to visit North Beach (10)

· They allow sufficient time to visit the area (9)

· They would prevent the car park being used as residential parking for the new housing development (7)

· They strike a good balance/are fair (6)

4.24 Key things submitters didn’t like about the P180 restrictions were:

· Three hours would not allow enough time to visit the area, especially if attending an event or on surf lifeguard patrol (28)

· They would restrict community members’ use of the area (14)

· They are unnecessary (5)

4.25 Submitters made the following requests for North Beach car park:

· Ban freedom camping (17)

· Allow overnight parking but require vehicles to move on in the morning (6)

· Only restrict overnight parking (5)

4.26 On the proposed P10 restrictions on the road alongside the car park, 41% of submitters supported, 41% did not support, and 18% were not sure.

A graph of a car park

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4.27 Key things submitters liked about the P10 restrictions were:

· They would make it easier to do drop-offs/pick-ups, including getting a coffee (16)

· It is safer to not have long-term parking on the road (5)

4.28 Key things submitters didn’t like about the P10 restrictions were:

· Ten minutes is not long enough to be useful (15)

· It is dangerous to have cars parked on the road alongside the car park (9)

· They would encourage more traffic movement, making the area more dangerous (5)

4.29 Submitters made the following requests for the road alongside the car park:

· Put in no parking restrictions (11)

· Mark the pathway between the car park and the road more clearly (8)

· Put in a pedestrian crossing on Marine Parade (8)

· Have fewer P10 parking spaces (6)

4.30 Across both proposed time restrictions, twelve submitters shared questions or concerns about how the restrictions would be enforced.

4.31 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

4.31.1 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

Analysis

4.32 Staff have considered different parking restriction timing. Investigation showed that in Christchurch there are no parking restrictions longer than the P180 restriction. To be consistent with other parking restrictions, enforcement and patrolling P180 was determined to be the longest recommended parking restriction.

4.33 Consultation also showed concerns from residents regarding one day events that occur annually and how parking restriction would influence these events. Event permits can be applied for all day which can apply to the car park through Temporary Traffic Management (TTM) meaning the restrictions during that event would be void (if approved with the permit and TTM).

4.34 Consultation with key stakeholders and the wider community have informed staff more of the current situation at North Beach car park. The issue with the carpark is primarily during the daytime and not over the evening period, and the restrictions for Freedom Camping through the summer months over the weekend has proven to be successful. This proposal has been amended to be in line with those restrictions. It also ensures there is no conflict with the provisions for North Beach car park under the Freedom Camping Bylaw.

4.35 There were 28 submitters who believed that three hours was not long enough for a parking restriction. Having the parking restrictions only apply only during the hours of 7am-7pm allows for unrestricted parking in the early morning and evenings. These hours are consistent with the District Plan noise provisions.

4.36 There were also comments from submitters regarding a housing development being built adjacent to the property. Staff acknowledge that this could have potential adverse effects in the future. It has not been a consideration for this report as the focus is for minor safety and accessibility improvements to the North Beach car park.

4.37 If approved, the recommendation will be implemented (signs with restrictions will be installed along with parking ticks on Marine Parade).

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2	Option 3 -
Cost to Implement	2000	2000	$0
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Will be added to and covered by the area maintenance contract	Will be added to and covered by the area maintenance contract	$0
Funding Source	Traffic Operations Team Traffic Signs and Markings budget	Traffic Operations Team Traffic Signs and Markings budget	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 There is a risk the parking restriction could become incompatible with the restrictions already in place from the Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021 [2]. This has been mitigated by proposing timed restrictions of P180 between 7am and 7pm.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.

6.2.2 The community boards have delegated authority for the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

6.4 The Freedom Camping Bylaw 2016 permits Freedom Camping in the City Coastal Restricted Zone; North Beach car parks is captured within this zone.

6.5 The carpark is a prohibited area for Freedom Camping during weekends over the summer period during 1 October – 1 May, 7pm Friday -7pm Sunday as per the Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021.

6.6 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.7 The required decision:

6.7.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.7.2 Are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the minor nature of the proposed changes.

6.7.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies, in particular the Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017. The proposed timed restrictions of P180 between 7am and 7pm mean that there is consistency with the Freedom Camping Bylaw provisions related to North Beach car park.

6.8 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.9 Transport

6.9.1 Activity: Transport

a) Level of Service: 16.0.13 Respond to customer service requests within appropriate timeframes. (The percentage of customer service requests relating to roads and footpaths to which the territorial authority responds within the timeframe specified in the Maintenance contracts) (DIA 5) - >=80% customer service requests are completed, or inspected and programmed within timeframes.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.10 The decisions do not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.15 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions. The decisions described are adding paint as signs to already existing infrastructure

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Community Board agrees to the proposed option, signs and white lines will be implemented by the contractor.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	North Beach Car Park Proposal	25/1731982	75
b ⇩	North Beach Car Park petition	25/745472	76

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Tina Weston - Traffic Engineer

Amy Rice - Engagement Advisor

Toni Dakers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Kathy Graham - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

12. Ferry Road/Hargood Road/Radley Street Pedestrian Improvements
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1661246
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Lachlan Beban, Principal Transportation Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Community Board for pedestrian improvements at the Ferry Road/Hargood Street/Radley Street intersection.

1.2 The report is generated in response to requests from the public to improve the safety of pedestrians using the signalised crossings at this intersection.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Ferry Road/Hargood Road/Radley Street Pedestrian Improvements Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves, pursuant to Section 334 of the Local Government Act 1974, the installation of hardware to facilitate traffic signal control of left and right turn turning movements for the protection of pedestrians.

3. Background/Context Te Horopaki

3.1 Concerns have been raised by members of the public about the safety of pedestrians using the signalised crossings at the Ferry Road/Hargood Street/Radley Street intersection.

3.2 The crossings at this signalised intersection are a key link in pedestrian journeys in the local area. The intersection is close to a several pedestrian attractors, such as Te Waka Unua School, Kindercare Learning Centre, and the Woolston town centre. The mix of pedestrians regularly using the crossings include pre-school and primary school children and their families.

3.3 There are also bus stops on Ferry Road on either side of the intersection providing connection to public transport.

3.4 In the five-year period 2021-2025 there have been six reported crashes at the intersection. Two of the crashes resulted in injuries (one serious, one minor). None of the crashes involved pedestrians.

3.5 To improve pedestrian safety, it is proposed to protect pedestrians using the crossings by adding red arrow signals to control vehicle turning movements.

3.6 Funding for these upgrades would come from the Minor Safety Interventions programme.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

3.7 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

3.7.1 Install red arrow signals to control the movement of vehicles when pedestrian crossing movements are active.

3.7.2 Do Nothing.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

3.8 Preferred Option: Install red arrow signals to control the movement of vehicles when pedestrian crossing movements are active.

3.8.1 Option Advantages

· Provides signal control to hold back drivers from turning across pedestrians while the crossing signals are active.

3.8.2 Option Disadvantages

· Cost to Council.

3.9 Option 2: Do Nothing

3.9.1 Option Description: Do Nothing.

3.9.2 Option Advantages

· No cost to Council

3.9.3 Option Disadvantages

· Does not address concerns raised by the community on the safety of pedestrians using the signalised crossings at this intersection.

4. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – Do Nothing
Cost to Implement	$27,000	$0
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	To be covered under the traffic signals maintenance contract.	$0
Funding Source	#65924 Delivery Package – Minor Safety Interventions	$0
Funding Availability	Funding available in the above‑named budget	$0
Impact on Rates	None	$0

5. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

5.1 There is a risk that people may continue to feel unsafe while crossing at the intersection if the proposed changes are not approved.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

5.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

Local Government Act 1974

5.2.1 Section 331 provides authority to approve concept plans to construct, remove or alter facilities for the health, safety or convenience of the public, or for the control of traffic or enforcement of traffic laws.

5.2.2 The installation of any signs, traffic signals and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

5.3 Other Legal Implications:

5.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

5.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

5.4 The required decision:

5.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework and Community Outcomes. Improving the safety of our roads aligns with the Strategic Priorities and Community Outcomes, in particular to be an inclusive and equitable city; build trust and confidence by listening to and working with our residents; and providing safe crossing points for people who walk and improved cycle infrastructure, will contribute to a green, liveable city, where our neighbourhoods and communities are accessible and well-connected.

5.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

5.5 The recommended option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies, in particular:

· LTP Activity Plan - Level of Service target to reduce the number of deaths or serious injuries (DSI) from all crashes by 40% in 2030.

· The changes made align with the safe and healthy streets for everyone goal in the draft Ōtautahi Christchurch Future Transport Strategy 2024-2054.

5.5.2 Improving safety on local roads is a priority for the Council.

5.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

5.7 Transport

5.7.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.5.1 Limit deaths and serious injury crashes per capita for cyclists and pedestrians - <=12 crashes per 100,000 residents.

· Level of Service: 16.0.10 Maintain the perception (resident satisfaction) that Christchurch is a walking friendly city - >=85% resident satisfaction.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

5.8 Due to the very minor nature of improvements at the intersection, consultation has not been undertaken.

5.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.10 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

5.11 The decision does not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

5.12 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

5.13 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

5.14 This is a minor proposal that is principally intended to improve accessibility and safety for people crossing at the intersection.

6. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

6.1 If approved, staff will proceed with the installation of the additional traffic signal displays.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments to this report.

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Lachlan Beban - Principal Advisor Transportation Signals

Gemma Dioni - Principal Advisor Transportation - Safety

Approved By

Kathy Graham - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

13. Cypress Garden/Bromley Old School Reserves - park improvements and renewals
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/780352
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Barbara Heise, Community Parks Project Manager
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board for the draft concept design for renewals and improvements at Cypress Garden and Bromley Old School Reserves:

1.1.1 Relocation and renewal of the skate ramp

1.1.2 Upgrade of the dirt pump track to asphalt pump track

1.1.3 Installation of new paths

· Cypress Garden Reserve to Maces Road

· Cypress Garden to Bromley Community Centre

· Bromley Community Centre to Maces Road

1.1.4 Installation of nature play area and new picnic table at Cypress Garden Reserve, which form part of the “Activate Bromley” activities which the Community Board is supporting via Better of funding (as allocated at the 7 October 2024 meeting).

1.2 The report is staff generated.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Cypress Garden/Bromley Old School Reserves - park improvements and renewals Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the concept plan for Cypress Garden and Bromley Old School Reserves including the skate ramp renewals, new paths, pump track upgrade, nature play area and picnic table installation as set out in agenda Attachment A.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The “Cypress Gardens Skate Ramp Renewal” project forms part of the Community Parks Renewal Programme, addressing aging assets that have reached the end of their service life. This project originated from the need to replace the aging Cypress Garden Reserve skate ramp, and from a broader review of how both Cypress Garden and Bromley Old School Reserves could better serve the community.

3.2 The works include relocating and renewing the skate ramp, upgrading the dirt pump track to asphalt, installing new paths to improve connectivity, and repurposing the current skate ramp site for a nature play space and picnic area as part of the “Activate Bromley” initiative.

3.3 These improvements will provide safer, more inclusive, and year-round recreational opportunities, strengthen the reserves’ role as a community hub, and better meet the needs of a broader range of users.

3.4 Early community engagement was undertaken in April 2025, with feedback informing the draft concept plan (Attachment A).

3.5 The estimated cost of the renewal is expected to be within the approved budget.

3.6 Upon approval of the draft concept design, the detailed design process will commence, with construction anticipated to begin in spring 2025.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Cypress Garden Reserve, located at 41 Keighleys Road, Bromley, sits close to Bromley Old School Reserve. Given their proximity, the community is likely to perceive the two as a single, larger reserve rather than separate spaces. For this reason, staff assessed the assets of both reserves in the context of the wider public open space.

Image 1 – Aerial of Cypress Garden and Bromley Old school reserve

4.2 The primary scope of project 74044 Cypress Garden Reserve Skate Ramp Renewal is to replace the existing skate ramp at Cypress Garden Reserve, which has reached the end of its useful life, and to ensure it remains safe for use. In addition, subject to available funding, the renewal of the bicycle pump track in the adjacent Bromley Old School Reserve was also considered.

4.3 Staff undertook site investigations and noted the following:

4.3.1 The skate ramp is currently positioned in the centre of the reserve and is not visible from Bromley Road. It is designed for experienced skaters due to its skill level requirements. The ramp is set within a bark safety surface with edging; however, much of the bark has deteriorated and now provides minimal impact absorption.

4.3.2 Although the skate ramp is located along the school route, it is unlikely to be used by school children due to its advanced skill level and its separation from other recreational facilities such as the playground, basketball court, and pump track, which are located further within Bromley Old School Reserve. The ramp does not present as an inviting space to spend time, and there are no seating options available for caregivers to supervise children using the facility.

4.3.3 The dirt pump track at Bromley Old School Reserve is currently in poor condition. Constructed from soil and lacking any hard surfacing, the track has become heavily worn in several areas, limiting its functionality and appeal. Its usability is restricted to drier weather condition. To restore and maintain the pump track as a recreational asset, resurfacing (asphalt) and reshaping are necessary to improve durability and enhance rider experience.

4.3.4 The Bromley Community Centre, the adjacent basketball court (moderate condition) and the play space (renewed 2024) appear well used and form a central hub for the community within the reserve.

4.3.5 A path extends from the north-western corner of Cypress Garden Reserve, running alongside Bromley School and past the skate park, before connecting to Raymond Road and the pedestrian path opposite within Bromley Old School Reserve. The path does not continue through Bromley Old School Reserve to the community centre. A separate short path links the play space to the community centre.

4.3.6 Staff observed strong desire lines throughout Bromley Old School Reserve, particularly from the park entrance at 117A Maces Road to the Bromley Community Centre. Additional desire lines run across the reserve towards its north-western corner, where people appear to cross into Cypress Garden Reserve, as well as further east towards the formal path within Cypress Garden Reserve. These desire lines are highlighted in Image 2 below.

Image 2 – Aerial of parts of Cypress Garden Reserve and Bromley Old School Reserve with highlighted desire lines

4.3.7 Staff also noted opportunities to plant additional trees in both reserves, consistent with the Urban Tree Plan. This aspect is not included within the scope of this project; however, it has been referred to Council arborists, who are developing a tree planting plan for consideration in a separate report.

4.4 Early engagement with the community started in April 2025 to better understand how the assets in both reserves were being used by the community and to validate the findings from the initial site investigations, for example seeking input on whether a relocation of the skate ramp would be considered useful.

4.5 In October 2024, the Community Board approved the allocation of Better Off funding to the Bromley Community Centre for Activate Bromley activities. While these activities fall outside the scope of this project, staff have worked with the Bromley Community Centre to explore re-using the current skate ramp space to enable nature play, which aligns with the activities included in the Activate Bromley initiative.

4.6 Staff have developed a concept plan that incorporates findings from the above outlined activities. The concept plan incorporates works across both reserves and reflects the Activate Bromley activities to show these in the wider context of the reserve.

4.7 While this report seeks approval on the use of the former skate ramp location for a nature play installation and the placement of a picnic table nearby for Activate Bromley, the delivery aspects of these initiatives will remain with Bromley Community Centre with support of the Council’s Community Partnership Rangers and Sports New Zealand’s Play Advocate.

4.8 The concept plan has been shared with submitters and additional feedback on the concept plan was collected from 13 August 2025 to 24 August 2025. The community feedback has been considered in the concept plan.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.9 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.9.1 Option 1 – The Community Board adopt the draft concept plan for the renewal of the skate ramp in the new location (for beginner to intermediate skill level), upgrade the pump track, install new paths and re-purpose former skate ramp space for nature play.

4.9.2 Option 2 – The Community Board does not approve the concept and request staff to consider alternative designs.

4.10 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.10.1 Option 3 – Do nothing, leaving all assets “as is”

This option was ruled out due to the condition of the skate ramp. As the asset is nearing the end of its useful life and will soon become unsafe, it would need to be removed from the reserve, leading to a reduction in the level of service available to the Bromley and wider skate community.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.11 Preferred Option: Option 1

4.11.1 Option Description: The Community Board adopt the draft concept plan for the renewal of the skate ramp in the new location (for beginner to intermediate skill level), upgrade the pump track, install new paths and re-purpose former skate ramp space for nature play.

4.11.2 Option Advantages

· The levels of service for the community will be better tailored to their needs by adjusting the skill level of the skate ramp and bringing it closer to the community centre where it has passive surveillance and allows more children to use it while attending programmes at the centre or visiting the playground.

· The upgrade to the pump track will provide for year-round use and offers a more challenging play and learning environment in line with the skate park.

· The extension of the path networks within Bromley Old School Reserve creates a better connection for the community to the Bromley Community Centre as well as for children walking to school (from Maces Rd and beyond) via Bromley Old School reserve. The new paths will also provide an opportunity for all ages to use the path network for walks and recreational activities as the new connections will create a loop path through the reserve and along the pedestrian path along Keighleys Road and Bromley Road. Overall, the parks become more accessible.

· The relocation of the skate ramp to Bromley Old School Reserve also creates an opportunity for Activate Bromley to re-purpose the current space with its timber edging and softfall area for a new nature play space that children can use on their way to and from school. An adjacent picnic table will invite families to relax socialise after school / while children are playing in the nature play area and wider park.

4.11.3 Option Disadvantages

· The skate community loses an asset for experienced skaters. Feedback from the skate community indicates that while the asset is not used often and for long periods of time, it provides one of the few more challenging assets in Ōtautahi. However, this disadvantage could be balanced by incorporating a similar ramp element when the nearby Linwood Park skate park is renewed.

· Any changes requested to the design past this point will likely incur increased costs and further delay the renewal of the assets in the reserve (skate ramp and pump track) and potentially make them unsafe to use until such time that an alternative design is agreed and delivered.

4.12 Alternative Option – Option 2

4.12.1 Option Description: The Community Board does not approve the concept and request staff to consider alternative designs.

4.12.2 Option Advantages

· The Community Board maintain flexibility to review the community feedback in more detail and suggest alternative design solutions.

· Other location options for the skate ramp could be investigated to continue to provide a ramp for skaters with a more experienced skill level.

· Funds not invested in new paths for Bromley Old School Reserve and the upgrade of the pump track could be distributed across other projects.

4.12.3 Option Disadvantages

· Not approving the concept will delay the project and likely push out the delivery of renewed / new assets until late autumn or spring 2026.

· Funding from the Community Parks New Asset Development is currently available to support the delivery of new paths, this may be re-allocated to other projects and no longer available in future years.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.13 The draft concept plan is shown below in figure 1 and attached to this report, refer to Attachment A.

Figure 1 – Draft Concept Plan Cypress Garden and Bromley Old School Reserve improvements

4.14 The new paths within Bromley Old School Reserve improve walking connections to the Bromley Community Centre as well as the wider reserve, Cypress Garden Reserve, Bromley School and the Ruru Lawn Cemetery. These enhancements will make the reserve more accessible and enjoyable for a broader range of users seeking recreation or active travel. The path layout in Cypress Garden Reserve will be amended so that the connection to the paths in Bromley Old School Reserve is higher up along Raymond Road to create a more direct route between the school, the Bromley Community Centre and the streets beyond. The link to the former skate park area and future nature play area, will be maintained and integrated in the path network. An additional path connection will be created along Raymond Road in Cypress Garden Reserve to provide additional walking routes for recreation and travel to school.

4.15 The existing pump track, formed from soil, has lost its appeal over time as it is difficult to maintain and unusable in wet conditions. Upgrading the asset to an asphalt surface will enhance the level of service, allowing year-round use by cyclists, scooter riders, and skaters. While the primary focus will be on pump track features, the design may also incorporate general riding skill elements at the entry and exit points. If budget allows, the skate park and pump track will be supported by bike and scooter parking, with the exact location still to be confirmed but expected to be in close proximity to both facilities.

4.16 The concept plan also proposes to relocate the skate ramp within Bromley Old School Reserve, closer to the Bromley Community Centre and in close proximity to the basketball court, pump track and playground—thereby creating a central activity hub within the reserve. The new skate ramp will be tailored for beginner to intermediate skaters to open up the asset for use by a broader user group, supported by the knowledge that many younger children spend time at the Bromley Community Centre and are likely to be developing their skills.

4.17 During the early stages of community engagement, many residents expressed a strong preference for recreational facilities to be concentrated around the Bromley Community Centre, emphasising the importance of optimising walking access to the site. This feedback directly informed the decision to centralise recreational assets in the proposed concept plan.

4.18 Staff acknowledge that there were also differing views raised by members of the skateboarding community. While some specifically advocated for retaining the existing ramp at its current location and difficulty level, the majority expressed concerns about the potential loss of a facility for advanced skaters in Ōtautahi. Many also pointed to the lack of a coordinated network plan to support skate progression across all skill levels citywide.

4.19 In this instance, staff propose relocating the skate ramp and introducing a progressive design featuring a smooth transition and two distinct sections with different heights. While the exact heights of the ramp sections will be determined during detailed design, we anticipate them to be in the range of 2 to 6 feet. This design will cater to users ranging from beginners to intermediates, thereby providing the greatest benefit to the wider community.

4.20 Importantly, the relocation of the skate ramp also enables the former ramp site within Cypress Garden Reserve to be repurposed for a nature play area and picnic space. This new space will be delivered by the Community Centre in collaboration with Council staff through the Activate Bromley initiative, which received Better Off funding from the Community Board. The relocation therefore not only supports the development of a more accessible and inclusive activity hub but also unlocks the opportunity to expand play and recreational offerings within the reserve.

4.21 At the same time, staff recognise the need to improve provision for intermediate to advanced skaters. To address this, it is recommended that the scope of the planned renewal of the nearby Linwood Park skate park be expanded to include a higher ramp and additional street-style skate elements, as suggested in consultation feedback.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – alternative design	Option 3 – Leave “as is”
Cost to Implement	$288,200	$120,000 - $300,000 (rough estimate, to be confirmed once alternative design confirmed)	Decommissioning of old assets, approximately $15,000-$25,000
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Covered by existing maintenance budget	Covered by existing maintenance budget	Covered by existing maintenance budget
Funding Source	Community Parks Renewal Budget and Community Parks Development of New Assets Budget	Community Parks Renewal Budget (and Community Parks Development of New Assets Budget)	N/A
Funding Availability	$289,122.00
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A	N/A

5.1 In addition to the overview provided above, table 1 below provides a breakdown of the estimated cost for the recommended option:

Table 1 – Cost breakdown option 1 – recommended option

5.2 The cost to implement is based on an initial estimate and is yet to be confirmed. For this reason, a 10% contingency is accounted for in the estimate. A more accurate costing usually occurs during the construction tender phase.

5.3 Council staff anticipate being able to manage small budget shortfalls through minor amendments to the scope.

5.4 The nature play space and adjacent installation of a picnic table will be funded through the Better of funding that was approved for the Bromley Community Centre for Activate Bromley activities (Total funding approved $16,400, Community Board meeting 7 October 2024).

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Implementation costs are based on anticipated installation and wider construction costs. There is a risk that these costs could change due to inflation rates and general availability of materials.

6.2 Final cost of construction will be confirmed during the tender phase and may vary from the current cost estimate. If costs escalate over the approved budget, Council staff will manage small shortfalls through minor amendments to the design. Should there by major implications to the level of service, Council staff will discuss these with the Community Board before proceeding further with the project.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.3.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96).

6.4 Other Legal Implications:

6.4.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.5 The required decisions:

6.5.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework that our residents have the opportunity to actively participate in community and city life, have a strong sense of belonging and identity, and feel safe.

6.5.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the level of decision impacting on a low number of residents and a small change to the reserve.

6.5.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies: Physical Recreation and Sports Strategy 2022.

6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.7 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.7.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.0.1 All Community Parks are managed and maintained in a clean, tidy, safe, functional, and equitable manner (Maintenance) - 90% Maintenance Plan key performance indicators are achieved.

· Level of Service: 6.3.5 Customer satisfaction with the recreational opportunities and ecological experiences provided by the City's Regional Parks - >=80%.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.8 Early engagement with Bromley Community Centre and local residents started in April 2025.

6.9 Staff ran a community drop-in session to understand the priorities for Cypress Gardens Reserve and Bromley Old School Reserve.

6.10 Signs, advertising the early engagement, were posted at the existing skate ramp to encourage feedback from skaters.

6.11 Staff met with Ōtautahi Skate Association to discuss the skate ramp and understand how skaters currently use the reserve.

6.12 Early feedback was used to design a concept plan for the two reserves.

6.13 Consultation started on 13 August and ran until 24 August 2025.

6.14 Project details including links to the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

· An email sent to seven key stakeholders, including Bromley Community Centre, Bromley School and skate advocacy groups, and early engagement submitters.

· Local community social media pages.

6.15 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk page had 282 views throughout the consultation period.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

Early engagement

6.16 Feedback was given by six organisations and 19 residents. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.17 Submitters were asked whether they supported the plan to renew the skate ramp in Cypress Gardens Reserve, for comments on the ramp’s new location and for comments on the target skill-level for the new skate feature.

6.18 Overall, 13 (52%) submitters, including Spokes Canterbury, Ōtautahi Christchurch Skateboard Association and Outsiders Skate store, said that they supported the plan. Five submitters (20%), including Bromley Community Centre, somewhat supported the plan. Seven submitters (28%), including Skateboarding NZ, didn’t state their support.

6.19 A range of suggestions were made to move the skate ramp:

· Next to the Bromley Community Centre (10)

· Next to other sports and recreation facilities (3)

· Next to Bexley BMX (1)

6.20 Four submitters said that the ramp should stay.

6.21 A range of comments were made about the current skill level of the ramp:

· The skate ramp is too advanced / there should be something for beginner skaters (12)

· The new skate ramp should cater to all ages – from beginner to advanced (10)

· Beginner and advanced level equipment should be balanced (6)

6.22 Three submitters requested street skate furniture and rails.

6.23 Five submitters were enthusiastic about the opportunity to seal the community-built bike track.

Public consultation

6.24 Submissions were made by three organisations and 17 individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.25 Submitters were asked whether they supported the proposed plan.

6.26 Four (20%) submitters, including Bromley Community Centre, said they supported the plan. 10 (50%) submitters, including Outsiders Skate and NAC BMX Club, somewhat supported the plan. Five (25%) submitters did not support the plan and one submitter didn’t know.

6.27 Three submitters made general positive comments about the plans.

6.28 Requests were made for the skate ramp:

· New ramp needs to cater to a wide range of abilities (9)

· If replaced, the new ramp should be a similar size to the current one (8)

· New ramp needs to consider skater progression (5)

· Resurface the ramp instead of replacing it (4)

6.29 Submissions also included individual requests which can be read on our Kōrero Mai webpage.

Supplementary information

6.30 To reduce barriers to participation, a quick poll was conducted on the Kōrero mai webpage. The poll received 16 responses.

· 5-star ratings (8)

· 4-star ratings (3)

· 3-star ratings (1)

· 1-star ratings (4)

6.31 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.31.1 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.32 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.33 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.34 The decisions in this report are likely to:

6.34.1 Contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that residents will continue to have access a wide range of recreational activities within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other reserves.

6.34.2 Also, by increasing the level of service and adding improved amenities to these Community Parks, a strong meeting hub for the community is created which may encourage families to utilise local facilities and walk/scooter to the park, rather than drive.

6.34.3 The improvements to the path network may also encourage more school aged children to choose to walk/scooter/cycle to school who would otherwise be driven by a caregiver, thereby assisting with the reduction of Co2 emissions.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Community Board approves the draft concept plan, Council staff will continue to the detailed design phase, followed by tendering contracts for delivery and beginning construction in spring 2025.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Draft Concept Plan - July 2025	25/1637913	113

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Barbara Heise - Project Manager - Community Parks

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

Rupert Bool - Head of Parks

14. QEII Master Plan updates - play space, basketball court and toilet development
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/896006
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Barbara Heise, Project Manager Community Parks Play and Recreation
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek Community Board approval for the recommended design of the QEII Park play space, basketball court and public toilets, so that the construction can proceed.

1.2 The report is staff generated and represents the next stage of redevelopment of QEII Park as outlined in the QEII Parks Master Plan 2019, dated 9 May 2019.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the QEII Master Plan updates - play space, basketball court and toilet development Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the changes to the concept plan for the development of the QEII Park play space as set out in agenda Attachment A.

4. Approves the development of a new toilet adjacent to the play space at QEII Park as set out in agenda Attachment A.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The QEII Park Master Plan 2019 includes a concept plan for the delivery of a new play space and a new full basketball court.

3.2 At its meeting on 9 May 2019, Council approved the QEII Park Master Plan 2019 and the delivery of funded items under Stage 1. Stage 1 included the junior play area of the play space. The basketball court, while approved in principle, was unfunded at that time.

3.3 At that meeting, Council approved delegating future decision-making on unfunded items within the master plan to the Coastal-Burwood Community Board, subject to funding becoming available through the 2021 Long Term Plan or another funding source.

3.4 The separate delivery of the toddler area as part of Stage 1 was later deemed inefficient and was therefore postponed until the remaining play space received funding and the full play space could be delivered together.

3.5 During planning for the delivery of the play space and the basketball court, staff identified several factors that made a revision of the concept necessary, including addressing trip hazards and underground services, collision risk, improved integration of basketball court and play space, and the proposed location of the toilet facilities.

3.6 The play space was tendered to the open market and tenderers were asked to provide an updated concept plan that incorporates necessary changes and will allow delivery for a fixed price, lump sum design/construction contract. Following tender evaluation, a contractor has been selected to design and build the new play space.

3.7 The QEII Park Master Plan proposed incorporating public toilets into the sports changing facility at the centre of the park and into the Ascot Community Centre near the local play space. However, relying on the Ascot Community Centre toilets, or adding public toilets to that facility, has proven unsuitable for play space users. The distance from the playground is too great for families with young children, there is no line of sight for caregivers, and it creates safety and accessibility challenges. To provide a safe, convenient, and family-friendly experience, a new public toilet has been incorporated into the design adjacent to the junior play space.

3.8 Both the toilet and basketball court will be designed to Council standard specifications and contracts for construction will be awarded once the detailed design is completed.

3.9 The report presents the recommended design and seeks approval for the concept changes and inclusion of a public toilet within the design.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 In 2019 the QEII Parks Master Plan 2019 was approved including the development of a wide range of assets and facilities within the park.

4.2 Planning for the development of the play space and basketball court is currently underway. Given the time that has passed since the master plan was approved, staff have revisited the concept design to ensure it aligns with recent community feedback, current best practices in play space development and safety standards, as well as observations on how QEII Park is being used by visitors.

4.3 Several issues were identified with the 2019 concept design:

4.3.1 Trip hazards on sports fields: A pedestrian and bicycle desire line has caused trip hazards on the nearby sports fields, indicating an additional path connection is necessary to mitigate this issue, which in turn has implications for the play space layout.

4.3.2 Underground Services Issue: Existing underground services below the play space area had not been fully investigated in for the 2019 concept plan and these hinder the ability to install foundation for play equipment in their proximity.

4.3.3 Collision Risk: The 2019 concept plan introduced running movement around the play space, creating a risk of collisions between children on the running track and children or caregivers entering/exiting the play area.

4.3.4 Youth-Oriented Play Area: Opportunity identified to improve flow between the play space and basketball court, creating a more cohesive space for youth play.

4.3.5 Visibility and access issue with toilets: The 2019 concept plan assumed toilets in the nearby Ascot Community Centre as well as the new Sports Changing Facility (unfunded at the time, not yet delivered) could be utilised for users of the play space and basketball court. However, both toilets at the Ascot Community Centre as well as the Sports Changing Facilities in the centre of the park would be located too far away from the play space, creating a safety concern.

4.4 An open market tender was published on GETS (22 May to 19 June 2025) with a request for proposal for design and delivery of the play space. As part of the tender, tenderers were asked to submit an updated concept plan, incorporating all key elements from the 2019 concept plan while adjusting the overall layout to address the above outlined issues, which could then be delivered under a fixed price, lump sum design/construction contract.

4.5 Following a robust tender evaluation, a contractor was selected to design and build the new play space. The winning tenderer’s concept plan meets all requirements and is the recommended concept plan subject to approval of this report.

Image 1: QEII Park Development - Revised Play Space Concept Plan

4.6 While the basketball court and toilet were not included in the recent tender, they are planned to be delivered in line with the play space development. The location of the full basketball court and toilets were incorporated in the updated concept plan to ensure all assets are linked well and provide for an optimal user experience.

4.7 The concept plan for the full basketball court remains unchanged from the QEII Parks Master Plan 2019, with the only modification being the orientation to accommodate a new path. The detailed design will follow standard specifications, and as part of this process, a surface design will be developed for the court that incorporates the play space’s colour scheme and reflects the sports history of QEII Park.

4.8 The detailed design of the toilet facilities will be developed in-house, following standard specifications for Parks toilets.

4.9 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
17 July 2025	QEII Park Development - Revised play space concept plan and overall project update

4.10 The following related information session/workshops have taken place for the members of the meeting:

Date	Subject
27 February 2025	Queen Elizabeth II Park - update
9 June 2025	Project updates: QEII Park Development and Parklands Reserve (helicopter play module renewal)

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.11 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

· Adoption of the updated concept plan for the delivery of the play space, basketball court and toilet development at QEII Park.

4.12 The following options were considered but ruled out:

· Delivery of the play space and basketball court in line with the QEII Parks Master Plan concept design.

· The option was ruled out due to the various issues that were identified in the design which would have provided a poor outcome for the community.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.13 Preferred Option: Adoption of the updated concept plan

4.13.1 Option Description: The updated concept design incorporates the development of a new play space, basketball court and toilet at QEII Park under consideration of all key elements as specified in the QEII Park Master Plan.

4.13.2 Option Advantages

· The updated concept design addresses the identified concerns and issues with the previous design, refer 4.4 above.

· The design allows for an improved utilisation of the space and better integration with the surrounding park.

4.13.3 Option Disadvantages

· There are no specific disadvantages to this option as it meets requirements that had been defined for the space as part of the QEII Park Master Plan 2019 and were incorporated in the earlier design.

· The design impacts the location of two disc golf baskets. However, this can be managed by agreeing a change to the disc golf course and updating current signage.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.14 The updated concept plan incorporates all key elements from the 2019 concept plan while adding value through inclusion of some additional elements. Concept design commentary is provided in Attachment B to this report and key aspects are outlined below.

2019 concept plan elements

4.14.1 The play space continues to host multiple swing sets, rockers, a mounted tunnel slide, musical play, sandpit, running tracks with podium and commonwealth logo on the surface.

4.14.2 A full basketball court, oriented along the new path, with a connecting seating area designed for both youth and families to rest and connect.

Additional conceptual elements

4.14.3 An accessible carousel has been added in the design to enhance the play space and provide greater opportunities for children of all abilities to participate in play.

4.14.4 Vegetation (trees and low-level planting) around the play space has been added to the design to create more natural shading.

4.14.5 Throughout the vegetation and alongside the standard play equipment, nature play elements are woven into the design to create connections with nature and allow kids to travel through the play space in a playful manner.

4.14.6 A new path has been incorporated into the play space design to connect with the wider path network and provide an alternative route to the informal desire line which has formed across the sports fields and is currently causing trip hazards on the sports fields. The new path is intended to guide park users away from the sports fields and onto the alternative new path instead. We will also strategically install planting to further encourage use of the new path.

4.14.7 The concept design now also provides a new toilet facility with two gender neutral accessible toilets, positioned to serve visitors to the play space, basketball court, adjacent disc golf area, sports fields, and other park users. While the 2019 Park Master Plan anticipated that public toilets, located at the Ascot Community Centre would be appropriate, their distance from the play space and lack of visibility from the playground indicated they were not well suited for families and caregivers. Installing toilets closer to the play space creates a safer, more convenient, and family-friendly environment. This is particularly important for families with young children or multiple children and reflects best practice in urban design by supporting longer, more enjoyable visits and inclusive access for all park users.

4.14.8 The relocation of toilets closer to the play space prompted a reconsideration of how the Ascot Community Centre integrates with the wider park. While the original plan proposed removing the fence and creating an open connection between the hub and play space, this was considered unsuitable due to the hub’s orientation and its use for private functions where some privacy is beneficial.

4.14.9 Following consultation with the Eastern Community Sports Inc., who manage the hub, staff agreed to lower the rear fence to 1200mm, clear shrubs to improve visibility, and add a path and gated entrance from the park.

4.14.10 These changes will allow passive surveillance from the hub’s kitchen into the play space and give hub users improved views into the park, which are currently blocked by the high fence. As these changes were discussed after the design was updated, they are not yet reflected in the concept plan.

4.14.11 The updated concept design was also shared with previous submitters and other key stakeholders. Responses received indicated support for the new design while raising some queries about other parts of the QEII Park development that staff will address independently from the currently planned works, refer to 6.9 below.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2	Option 3
Cost to Implement: Play space Basketball court Toilet	$ 750,000 $ 150,000 $ 300,000 $1,200,000	n/a	n/a
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	c. $ 20,000 p.a.	n/a	n/a
Funding Source	# 61787 QEII Park Development	n/a	n/a
Funding Availability	$ 6,260,962	n/a	n/a
Impact on Rates	n/a	n/a	n/a

5.1 The cost for the play space is confirmed as per the lump sum design and build contract which was awarded in August 2025. The cost to implement the basketball court and toilet are based on initial estimates and are yet to be confirmed. This will occur during the tender of the construction works.

5.2 The funding for this project is already accounted for in the current LTP.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 In terms of actual construction, there are no risks specifically identified beyond risk management associated with working in a public park environment.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96).

6.2.2 Further, at its meeting on 9 May 2019, Council resolved to delegate future decision-making on unfunded items within the QEII Park Master Plan to the Coastal-Burwood Community Board, subject to funding becoming available through the 2021 Long Term Plan or any other funding source.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

6.3.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decisions:

6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework that our residents have the opportunity to actively participate in community and city life, have a strong sense of belonging and identity, and feel safe.

6.4.2 Are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the fact that this is a construction project to build assets in the park without which the level of services agreed for the park in the QEII Park Master Plan 2019 cannot be provided.

6.4.3 Are consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies: Physical Recreation and Sports Strategy 2022.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.6.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City's parks and foreshore network - >= 70%.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 Feedback gathering started on 8 August and ran until 18 August 2025.

6.8 Christchurch Christmas Parade, Christchurch School of Gymnastics and Eastern Community Sports provided feedback:

6.8.1 Christchurch Christmas Parade had no objections to the planned development works but questioned what other developments were planned for the south-west corner of the park.

6.8.2 Christchurch School of Gymnastics commented that the recent new paths installations are great. Some additional picnic tables closer to the School of Gymnastics were requested and some concerns about school students parking in the public car park were also raised as these blocked large parts of the car park throughout the day.

6.8.3 Eastern Community Sports (Manager of Ascot Community Centre) supported the development of the play space, basketball court and new toilets but requested a partial integration of the Community Hub. The QEII Park Master Plan 2019 indicated a full integration with the park but due to how the hub is utilised, a partial integration (maintaining the fence but adding a gated entrance) was proposed.

6.9 The recommendation for the play space, basketball and toilet location are consistent with the feedback resulting from the stakeholder, public and community engagement carried out in 2018 and 2019.

6.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.11 The decisions do not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not have a direct impact on Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.12 However, the decisions do involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.13 The proposed development at Queen Elizabeth II Park focuses on enhancing recreational facilities and public amenities. Initial Kaitiaki feedback has been generally supportive, particularly of the walking and cycling tracks and the proposed indigenous forest on the western side of the site. They also suggested opportunities such as providing an area for flax weaving classes and further incorporating indigenous planting and landscape features.

6.14 In addition, Council has had regard to the Cultural Impact Assessment prepared by Mahaanui Kurataiao Ltd (December 2016). The assessment sets out recommendations of particular relevance to this project, including recognising cultural landscapes, integrating artwork that reflects the manawhenua status of Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri, applying Māori urban design principles, and incorporating indigenous planting to support biodiversity and mahinga kai.

6.15 To give effect to these values, Council will engage Whitiora to assist with the integration of culturally appropriate artwork into the park design and, if they are interested, to contribute to shaping the design of the basketball court. This approach will help ensure the development reflects and respects Mana Whenua values and aspirations.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.16 The decisions in this report are likely to:

6.16.1 Contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that residents will gain access to a new play facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other playgrounds.

6.16.2 The installation of garden beds and planting of trees around the play space will further assist in reducing Co2 emissions.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Community Board approves the proposed changes to the play space concept plan and addition of a new toilet facility, Council staff will continue to deliver the play space and progress to the detailed design phase, followed by construction in late spring 2025.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	QEII Park - Concept plan (play space, basketball and toilet)	25/1429950	123
b ⇩	QEII Play Space - Concept Design Commentary	25/1423395	124

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Barbara Heise - Project Manager - Community Parks

Megan Carpenter - Team Leader Parks & Recreation Planning

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

Rupert Bool - Head of Parks

15. South New Brighton Park development- design approval
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/831213
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Holly Whitaker- Project Manager, Parks Kiran Skelton- Engagement Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to request that the Waitai Community Board approve the concept plans for the development of the South New Brighton Park

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the South New Brighton Park development- design approval Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019.

3. Approves the concept design for the South New Brighton Park development set out in attachments A, B and C to the report in the agenda.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 South New Brighton Park is located at 74 Beatty street. The location of the plans in this report are at the northern end of the park between the play space and the community centre.

3.2 Current Park images:

3.2.1 Flooded basketball court and skate area

A playground with a basketball hoop and a basketball hoop

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.2.2 Beatty Street carpark

A wet road with trees and grass

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.2.3 Access road looking south towards playground

A road with grass and trees

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.2.4 Access road looking north towards community centre

A road with a cross painted on it

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.3 Building on the approved South New Brighton Reserves Concept Plan (2021) (see Attachment D), proposed changes and improvements for South New Brighton Park have been incorporated into an updated development plan for construction. The updated plan builds on the original concept and aims to strengthen connections between the park and the wider community. These changes include:

3.3.1 Two new pump tracks. The pump track designs are simple, aiming to compliment the nearby pump tracks.

3.3.2 Resurfacing the existing basketball court and adding new elements to better integrate it with the adjacent skate features.

3.3.3 A new pathway to be constructed along the existing bund and road edge. This is intended to connect with the estuary-edge pathway.

3.3.4 New tree planting.

3.3.5 Changes to car parking near the South New Brighton Community Centre and play space, with some spaces reallocated between the Community Centre car park and the play space car park.

3.3.6 New facilities including a second BBQ area, and new picnic table.

A map of a park

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.4 The concept plan remains largely the same as what staff proposed during consultation. However, skateable elements have been added to the basketball court, and the intermediate track has been connected to the basketball court skate area. This provides a versatile flat surface that can be used for a range of sports.

3.5 The increase in trees is in alignment with the South New Brighton Development Plan and is in response to the adoption of the Urban Forest Plan which seeks to increase canopy cover across the city by 40%.

3.6 The planting plan proposes to plant 70 new trees which will increase the canopy cover in South New Brighton Reserve from 15% to 32% once they reach maturity, in approximately 30 years. Tree species will primarily be hardy native trees with a small number of fast-growing exotic species to quickly provide shade and shelter.

3.7 The images below show the proposed planting, alongside modelling that illustrates how the area is expected to look once the trees reach maturity, compared with its current appearance.

Aerial view of a town

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The South New Brighton Reserves of Blighs Garden, Bridge Reserve and South New Brighton Park were significantly damaged by earthquakes. As a result, the South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan (see Attachment E) was approved by the Community Board in 2014.

4.2 The South New Brighton Development Plan aimed to identify four types of recreation zones—tranquil, active, conservation, and camp—provide concept plans for the three reserves/parks, and rank individual projects as high, medium, or low priority.

4.3 The South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan was then updated in 2021 because the decision made by Council regarding the treatment of the estuary edge was inconsistent with the approved management plan and development plan. The new plan includes an updated concept for the South New Brighton Park area, which serves as the basis for the design presented in this report.

4.4 In 2023, staff presented to the Community Board to seek an updated prioritisation of projects. This plan reflects the delivery of several key priorities identified through that process.

4.5 Delivery of the nature play, picnic area and removal of unused Parks building at Blighs Garden Reserve will be the next stage in the delivery of the South New Brighton Reserves Renewal Plan.

4.6 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
30/04/2025	South New Brighton Development Project memo

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.7 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.7.1 The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the development of South New Brighton Park.

4.7.2 The Community Board does not approve the proposed concept plan and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consult with the community.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.8 Preferred Option: The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the development of South New Brighton Park.

4.8.1 Option Description: The concept design incorporates the development of two new pump tracks, an upgrade to the Beatty Street car park, new parking options in close proximity to the existing BBQ area, a resurfaced and multi-use basketball court, more trees in line with the urban forest plan, a new BBQ area, increased seating options and improved pathways and track connections to the wider Park.

4.8.2 Option Advantages

· The design aligns with the approved 2021 South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan.

· The design achieves several of the top priorities in the 2014 South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan.

· The design allows for an improved utilisation of the space and better integration with the surrounding Park.

4.8.3 Option Disadvantages

· No additional changes to the concept plan can be made.

4.9 Option 2:

4.9.1 Option Description: The Community Board does not approve the proposed concept plans and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consult with the community.

4.9.2 Option Advantages

· The Community have the option to offer alternative suggestions to the proposed concept plan.

4.9.3 Option Disadvantages

· This option would impact the allocated budget as the new playground design and engagement costs would be funded from within the current budget.

· Dissatisfaction within the local community due to significant decision-making delays.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 - <enter text>
Cost to Implement:	Car parking $860,000 Pump track/ additions to basketball court $165,000 Pathways/ tracks $85,000 Planting $20,000 Picnic area and seating $60,000 Total: $1,190,000	To be determined based on new design
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Absorbed within current budgets.	TBD
Funding Source	South Brighton Reserves Development – CAPEX budget #43671	South Brighton Reserves Development – CAPEX budget #43671
Funding Availability	Yes	Yes
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A

5.1 The resurfacing of the basketball court is being funded from a separate CAPEX fund- Community Parks Recreation Surface Renewals- # 43697.

5.2 The tree planting is being funded through Better Off Funding.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Implementation costs are based on anticipated product supply, installation, and wider construction costs. There is a risk that these costs could change due to product availability and supply. If costs escalate beyond the approved budget, staff will manage small shortfalls through minor design amendments. If there are major implications to the level of service, staff will discuss these with the Community Board before proceeding further with the project.

6.2 South New Brighton Park falls into the following District Plan categories: flood management area; natural character in the coastal environment; a Ngai Tahu area of significance and a site of ecological significance. Therefore, the proposed construction work will require resource consents. In addition, existing assets such as the tennis courts and basketball may also trigger a requirement for retrospective consent. Budget has been set aside to account for this.

6.3 The site is also a known archaeological site and therefore requires an archaeological screening check, however these cannot be undertaken until the detailed design phase, when depth and quantity of excavation can be calculated. There is potential that an archaeological standover is required, which can add to the costs. Contingency has been built in for this within the budget.

6.4 The site has the possibility to contain contaminated soil and therefore a risk screening will need to be undertaken, however this cannot occur until detailed design is completed.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.5 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, 9 August 2024, the Community Board has the delegation to;

6.5.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96).

6.5.2 Other Legal Implications: There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to these decisions.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.6 The required decision

6.6.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.6.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the fact that this is a construction project to build assets in the park without which the level of services agreed to in South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan cannot be provided.

6.7 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.8 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.8.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City's parks and foreshore network - >= 70%.

· Level of Service: 6.8.2.1 Increasing tree canopy in Parks - A net increase in total number of trees is achieved (1:2 replacement policy), with a minimum of 50% of the trees being medium to very large species.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.9 Consultation started on 30 April and ran until 19 May 2025.

6.10 Project details including links to the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

· An email sent to previous submitters and 21 key stakeholders, including community organisations (Greater New Brighton, Sustain New Brighton and The Bridge Hub), residents’ associations (South New Brighton Residents’ Association and Southshore Residents’ Association) and local education providers (schools, preschools and kindergartens). Community organisations were sent leaflets to share with their community.

· Newsletters through schools, preschools and kindergartens.

· Local social media community groups.

· Signs at the South New Brighton Park.

6.11 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk page had 478 views throughout the consultation period.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.12 Submissions were made by two recognised organisations and 21 individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.13 Submitters were asked whether they supported the proposal overall and had the option to give feedback on six aspects of the proposal: the pump track, pathway, car park, new amenities, open space and tree planting.

6.14 Disabled Persons Assembly and Youth Alive Trust were both supportive of the overall plan.

Pump track

6.15 Of the 10 submitters who made comments about the proposed pump track, two were in support, seven were somewhat in support and one was not in support.

6.16 Five submitters who were somewhat in support suggested replacing one pump track with skate features. Three submitters wanted the pump tracks to suit users of all ages.

Pathway

6.17 Of the four submitters who made comments about the proposed pathway, two were in support and two were somewhat in support.

6.18 They requested accessible pathways with enough space for a wide range of users (wheelchair and mobility aid, cyclists and walkers) and resistant to environmental damage.

New amenities

6.19 New amenities included BBQ areas, seating, the basketball area and the playground. Of the four submitters who made comments about the new amenities in the park, one was in support, two were somewhat in support and one didn’t know.

6.20 They requested accessible seating and picnic tables, a mix of larger and smaller picnic tables for big groups and international standard hoop heights for the basketball court. One submitter raised concerns about the lack of flexibility in the plan for expanding the toilet block and playground.

Open space

6.21 One submitter who was somewhat in support requested the open space be used effectively to promote sports and other active play.

Car park

6.22 No feedback was received about the new car park.

Tree planting plan

6.23 The tree planting plan had one submitter in support, three were somewhat in support and one didn’t know. Submitters were asked how important certain aspects of the proposal were and which were of concern.

6.24 Submitters valued trees attracting birds and insects (3), providing shade (3) and native trees (3).

6.25 One submitter was concerned about trees potentially damaging infrastructure, one about hazards caused by trees and one about the ecological benefit of exotic trees.

Supplementary information

6.26 To reduce barriers to participation, a quick poll was conducted on the Kōrero mai webpage. The poll received two 5-star ratings.

6.27 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.27.1 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.28 The decision does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.29 The decision involves a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and could impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.30 The 2014 South New Brighton Reserves Plan was endorsed by Mana Whenua. Pages nine and ten specifically reference tangata whenua cultural and historical links to the area. As part of the Management plan Christchurch City Council committed to “work with Ngāi Tahu to develop an area of cultural and historical significance within South New Brighton Park, to establish a stand of coastal native forest, to restore estuary edge riparian margins and to determine an appropriate Māori name for the reserves.” Staff reached out to Mana Whenua via Whiti Ora, asking if there is an interest from Mana Whenua to provide direction on any elements of the current concept or to make suggestions as to how the historical and cultural korero can be better represented. No response was received.

6.31 Staff acknowledge that this concept plan does not yet address the requirements to ‘develop an area of cultural and historical significance within South New Brighton Park’ and to ‘determine an appropriate Māori name for the reserves.’ Opportunities remain to achieve this objective through the design of artwork on the basketball court, interpretation along the track network, and planting choices. Staff will therefore continue to connect with Mana Whenua during the detailed design process.

6.32 The tree planting is in alignment with the Councils Urban Forest Plan which sought feedback from Mana Whenua and is in alignment with the Iwi Management Plan.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.33 The decisions in this report are likely to:

6.33.1 Contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that residents will gain access to a new wheeled sport facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other facilities. Additionally, the improvement of track connection will hopefully encourage walking in the area.

6.33.2 The installation of garden beds and planting of trees will further assist in reducing CO2 emissions and increase the whenua ability to cope with the impacts of climate change.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Community Board approve the proposed concept plan, detailed design can be completed and consents sought. Subject to the granting of any required consents construction is planned for early/mid 2026. The construction is likely to be staged.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	South New Brighton Park landscape concept	25/1681560	137
b ⇩	South New Brighton Park recreation space concept	25/1681564	138
c ⇩	South New Brighton Park carpark concept	25/1681566	139
d ⇩	South New Brighton Park concept plan 2021	25/1681567	140
e ⇩	South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan 2014	25/1681569	141

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Holly Whitaker - Project Manager - Community Parks

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Toby Chapman - Manager Urban Forest

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

Rupert Bool - Head of Parks

16. Tree Removals - CRAF Marine Parade Street Renewal
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1531521
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Nic Catto, Project Manager Melissa Thompson, Arboricultural Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval to remove twenty-three (23) trees along Marine Parade (between Hawke Street and Bowhill Road), that are in Good to Poor condition, to facilitate street renewal reconstruction work, and replanting, as shown on the tender planting plan (Attachment A).

1.2 This report is written in response to the Council’s delegation to the Community Board Part B, Sub-Part 3 – Other Matters, Section 19 of the Delegations Register, as below.

1.2.1 In consultation with any other units affected, to authorise the following work on any tree from any reserve, park, open space or road corridor:

· Planting and maintenance;

· Removal of structurally unsound and unhealthy trees, trees causing damage to infrastructure or other safety concerns where there is no viable alternative other than to remove the tree.

1.3 The Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board is to be informed of any removals that have been carried out under this delegation.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Tree Removals - CRAF Marine Parade Street Renewal Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approve the removal of twenty-three (23) Council owned trees within the Coastal Regional Park, as outlined in Agenda Attachment B, to allow street renewal work to proceed.

4. Approves, in accordance with the Tree Policy, the replacement planting of forty-six (46) trees along the new shared pathway, within the Coastal Regional Park to replace more than what has been lost.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The Marine Parade (Hawke Street to Bowhill Road) Street Renewal Project is the primary project being undertaken with the portion of Christchurch Regeneration Acceleration Facility (CRAF) funding provided to New Brighton.

3.2 The project’s scheme design received approval by the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board in December 2024, and subsequently by Council in February 2025.

3.3 The street renewal work includes reconstruction and resurfacing, the installation of an on-road bi-directional cycleway, and the development of a new three-metre-wide sealed shared path. Additional infrastructure and safety improvements include the installation of speed humps, kerb buildouts, new crossing points, as well as enhanced lighting, landscaping and tree planting.

3.4 An arboriculture assessment was undertaken in July 2025, in parallel with the construction plans to assess potential impacts on existing trees. While pathway realignment and other alternatives were considered to minimise tree removal, some removals were unavoidable.

3.5 A detailed tree survey (within Attachment B) identified twenty-three (23) trees requiring removal due to factors such as poor health, structural concerns, or proximity to the proposed alignment. In some cases, removal is necessary to improve road visibility, increase user safety, and provide accessible beach access.

3.6 Several existing trees will be retained, with selective pruning planned to enhance sightlines and improve safety, particularly at intersections and access points.

3.7 All retained trees will be protected during construction, with a Supervising Arborist appointed by the contractor.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The street renewal project along Marine Parade (Figure 1) runs parallel to New Brighton Beach and North Beach through an area classed as a regional park. Specifically, from Hawke Street (near the New Brighton Pier) to Bowhill Road (north of Thomson Park).

4.2 The project was chosen as the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board’s top priority under the CRAF programme at their meeting in September 2022. The planned improvements as outlined in Section 3.3 align with the stated project objectives:

· Remediation of the pavement and footpath on Marine Parade

· Safety improvements for all road users

· Reduction in vehicle speed

· Construction of cycle infrastructure

4.3 The community and Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board have been consulted throughout the planning phase, including previously approved Community Board Decisions, scheme adjustments, and detailed traffic resolutions.

4.4 General feedback received forms the view that the planned improvements to Marine Parade align with the points of view of the local community.

4.4.1 During the second round of consultation, carried out in August 2024, 87% of respondents were supportive of the planned improvements.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.5 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.5.1 Option 1: Tree removal – remove twenty-three (23) Council-owned trees within the Regional Park, coastal environment.

4.5.2 Option 2: Tree retention – do nothing.

4.6 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.6.1 The option to realign the shared pathway was ruled out as the proposed design and location, which, while requiring the removal of some trees, provides improved sightlines, safer gradients and accessibility for all users. Fully integrated with the existing infrastructure, including drainage, it preserves nearby coastal zone plantings, and avoids significant redesign costs and project delays. Council’s level of service prioritises the renewal of assets that have reached the end of their life or are in a substandard condition, and both Council and the local Community Board are committed to progressing this street renewal project in a timely and efficient manner.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.7 Preferred Option: Option 1 – Tree Removal.

4.7.1 Option Description: Remove twenty-three (23) Council-owned trees within the Marine Parade Regional Park coastal environment to enable street renewal work to proceed.

4.7.2 Option Advantages

· Improves safety, accessibility, and the overall appearance of the area by replacing the existing gravel path with a sealed, high-quality shared pathway, enhancing the user experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles.

· Addresses safety hazards associated with overgrown vegetation, particularly at intersections and access points, by improving limited sightlines and enhancing overall visibility along the route.

· Redirects pedestrian and cyclist traffic onto a clearly defined, purpose-built pathway, reducing conflicts with vehicles and helping to protect coastal vegetation with designated beach access points.

· Incorporates key safety features including crossing points, kerb buildouts, and landscaping, while promoting ecological benefits using native plantings.

4.7.3 Option Disadvantages

· Loss of tree canopy cover in the short term.

4.8 Option 2 – Tree Retention.

4.8.1 Option Description: Retain the trees – do nothing.

4.8.2 Option Advantages

· No direct costs incurred with tree removal.

· Canopy would be retained for a longer period.

4.8.3 Option Disadvantages

· Delaying construction to reconsider the design alignment may lead to significant project delays or the potential inability to proceed altogether, as well as increased costs incurred to redesign.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.9 n/a.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – Tree Retention
Cost to Implement	$30,000	$0
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Achievable in existing maintenance contract	Achievable in existing maintenance contract
Funding Source	New Brighton CRAF	NA
Funding Availability	$5,400,000 remaining in project and programme	NA
Impact on Rates	NIL	NIL

5.1 The cost estimate for the tree removals comes from a design estimate and is not a tendered price from a contractor.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

6.1 There is potential risk of community objection to the proposed tree removals, which could result in delays to construction and impact the timely delivery of the street renewal project.

6.1.1 To mitigate this risk, the Council has undertaken ongoing engagement with both the community and the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board throughout all phases of the project.

6.1.2 This consultation process has ensured that community values and concerns are acknowledged and considered. Council have adopted a transparent and informed decision-making approach alongside the community and Community Board, to reflect the importance and benefits of this project to the wider community, ecological and coastal environments.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 Part B (Sub-Part 3), Section 19 of Council’s delegations register delegates Community Boards the powers to “remove trees causing safety concerns where there is no viable alternative other than to remove the tree”.

6.2.2 The proposed removal of trees is in line with Council’s Tree Policy:

· Section 4.7 states:

Approval by Council for the removal of trees to facilitate projects on Council land will take into account the value of the project to the community, including public health and/or the local environment and considerations taken for retaining existing trees compared with the loss of the benefits provided by the trees.

6.2.3 Global Consent RMA/2021/2059 can be used to remove the trees.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

6.3.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decisions:

6.4.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.4.2 Are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

6.4.3 Are consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034), Volume 2, Infrastructure Strategy, to provide;

6.5.1 A green, liveable city: Our neighbourhoods and communities are accessible and well-connected, supporting our goals to reduce emissions, build climate resilience and protect and regenerate the environment, especially our biodiversity, water bodies and tree canopy.

6.5.2 Fit-for-purpose infrastructure, such as roads, footpaths and wharves, that enable access to local areas, sites of significance, waterways and coastal waters.

6.6 If the preferred option is approved, the Council’s Tree Policy 1.9 will be met as two trees will be planted along the proposed design route for every tree removed, replacing the canopy which is lost within 20 years.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 The decision affects the following Community Board area:

6.7.1 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood.

6.8 In summary, the community feedback received, and the Community Board view is supportive of this project being constructed.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.9 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.10 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.11 This report relates to the removal of exotic and native tree species with no cultural significance, and the trees removed would be replaced in accordance with the Tree Policy.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.12 The decisions in this report are likely to:

6.12.1 Contribute positively to adaptation to the impacts of climate change in time.

6.12.2 Contribute positively to emissions reductions in the long term.

6.13 While removal of twenty-three (23) trees will return their stored carbon to the atmosphere in the short term, replacement of two trees for every one tree removed, as required by the Tree Policy, will gradually replace that which has been taken. The project is also expected to increase alternative transport uses which has a positive impact.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the preferred option to remove twenty-three (23) trees is approved, a contractor will be engaged to undertake the works.

7.2 Construction work is planned for late 2025/early 2026, and replanting in accordance with the Tree Policy planned to be completed in the 2026 planting season.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Design Concept Replanting Plan - CRAF Marine Parade Street Renewal	25/1631950	160
b ⇩	Tree Report - CRAF Marine Parade Street Renewal	25/1382096	169

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Melissa Thompson - Aboricultural Advisor

Nic Catto - Project Manager

Approved By

Nic Catto - Project Manager

Toby Chapman - Manager Urban Forest

Robbie Hewson - Head Ranger Coastal & Plains

Paul Devlin - Manager Regional Parks

17. OARC: Lake Kate Sheppard Sector and Bower Park Landscape Plan
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1651295
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Dave Little, Manager Residential Red Zone Hannah Ballantyne, Senior Engagement Advisor Angus Smith, Manager Property Consultancy
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 This report seeks the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board's approval of the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Lake Kate Sheppard Sector Landscape Plan, which includes the expansion and redevelopment of Bower Park.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the OARC: Lake Kate Sheppard Sector and Bower Park Landscape Plan Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019.

3. Approves the landscape plan as shown in agenda Attachment A.

4. Instructs staff to commence the formal road stopping process under the Local Government Act 1974 for:

a. Wattle Drive (between New Brighton Road and Willryan Ave); and

b. Willryan Ave (between Wattle Drive and 17 Willryan Avenue).

5. In the event that there are no objections received through the road stopping process, authorise staff to complete the road stopping.

6. In the event there are objections, authorise staff to manage those in accordance with the Local Government Act procedures.

7. Delegate authority to the Property Consultancy Manager to do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the above resolution.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 This report presents a landscape plan for the Lake Kate Sheppard sector of the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor (ŌARC). The plan provides a comprehensive vision for the area, focusing on significant ecological restoration around the lake, walking and cycling improvements and the redevelopment and expansion of Bower Park.

3.2 The plan addresses long-standing issues from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, including land subsidence, wet ground conditions and end-of-life community assets. Key objectives are to enhance the wetland habitats - including significant inanga spawning grounds - while providing upgraded, consolidated and safer recreational facilities for the community.

3.3 Developed through engagement with mana whenua, stakeholders, sports codes, and the local community, the plan has been refined based on public feedback. Key changes post-consultation include relocating the playground and amenities to a safer, more accessible location and removing a proposed through-road to prevent anti-social behaviour.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The Lake Kate Sheppard (LKS) sector is bordered by Anzac Drive to the west, New Brighton Road to the south and residential housing to the north and east. This area was severely damaged by subsidence and liquefaction during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, sinking by around a metre. The resulting lower, wetter ground conditions have seen parts of the sector naturally revert to wetlands, a process expected to accelerate with sea level rise.

4.2 This project was approved to commence by the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Co-governance Establishment Committee in September 2024. It aligns with the vision of the ŌARC Regeneration Plan, which identifies the natural environment as the defining feature of this area, and flags an expansion of Bower Park to the west.

Landscape Plan Details

4.3 The landscape plan integrates ecological restoration, recreational upgrades and climate resilience measures. Key components of the initial concept, which was presented to the Community Board in March/April this year included:

4.4 Ecological Enhancement: Creating a 'protection zone' in the wetter, western part of the site to enhance the ecological values of Lake Kate Sheppard and surrounding wetlands - particularly the inanga spawning grounds. The removal of former roads would be leveraged to create planted swales and ‘wetland ribbons’.

4.5 Bower Park Redevelopment: Expanding and reconfiguring the sports fields for designated summer season use to manage the site's challenging ground conditions, and providing a new playground and toilet block to replace end-of-life assets.

4.6 Access and Connectivity: Establishing a primary north-south shared path for walking and cycling, utilising former roads to create a key connection through the site. A ‘permission to play’ strategy would see nature play elements and a bike play features integrated along this path.

Post-Consultation Design Amendments

4.7 Following community and stakeholder consultation, several amendments have been made to the landscape plan to address feedback and improve the design. These changes include:

4.8 Relocation of Park Amenities: The playground, pump track, new toilets and (future) changing facilities have been relocated from a flood-prone area with poor surveillance to the north-east corner of the park, near Willryan Avenue. This improves safety (CPTED), provides better passive surveillance and serves a wider walkable catchment.

4.9 Playground Design: While retaining the ‘nature play’ concept, the detailed design will ensure that the new playground has a high play value, including a similar number of traditional play items (e.g. swings, slides, flying fox) to the existing facility.

4.10 Pump Track Upgrade: The pump track will be detailed with a hard surface (e.g. asphalt) instead of aggregate. This allows for wider use by scooters and skateboards and reduces ongoing maintenance.

4.11 Removal of Through-Road: The proposed vehicle link along the western boundary of Bower Park has been removed from the plan and will be returned to a shared path only. This addresses community concerns about potential 'rat-running', anti-social behaviour, and ongoing operational costs for Council. A clear corridor will be retained for potential future access to the 'trial housing' area if required. It should be noted that this route[3] is still technically a legal 'in-service' road, despite being physically closed for many years. Council’s Transport team is supportive of its formal stopping to enable the landscape plan. Resolutions 4-7 have been included to address this.

4.12 Revised Carparking: The carpark layout has been redesigned in conjunction with the relocated changing rooms to better serve sports field users.

4.13 Strengthened Pathway Connections: The design incorporates stronger pathway connections to New Brighton Road, improving links to the existing stopbank walkway, the City to Sea Pathway and the wider neighbourhood.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.14 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.14.1 (Recommended): Approve the amended (post-consultation) landscape plan.

4.14.2 Do nothing (Status quo).

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.15 Preferred Option: Approve the amended landscape plan.

Option Description: Approve the amended landscape plan, which has been revised to incorporate changes in response to community and stakeholder feedback. The plan guides the ecological restoration of the Lake Kate Sheppard wetlands, redevelopment of Bower Park and the creation of new walking and cycling connections.

Option Advantages

· Delivers significant ecological benefits by protecting and restoring a large wetland habitat within the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor.

· Replaces end-of-life community assets with modern, safe and well-located facilities.

· Provides improved and more reliable playing surfaces for summer sports.

· Improves recreational connectivity for walking and cycling.

· Has been refined through community feedback, ensuring strong local support.

Option Disadvantages

· Requires significant capital investment.

4.16 Option 2: Do nothing (status quo).

Option Description: Status quo retained.

Option Advantages

· No immediate capital cost.

Option Disadvantages

· Community assets (playground, toilets, fields) would remain end-of-life and require eventual replacement without the benefit of an integrated plan.

· Sports fields would continue to be subject to seasonal flooding, impacting their usability for much of the year.

· Opportunity for ecological restoration and enhanced connectivity would be missed.

· Decommissioned roads and other remnant assets within the red zone would continue to degrade, posing an ongoing risk of contaminants, such as coal tar from old road surfaces, leaching into the sensitive wetland environment.

· Fails to deliver on the vision of the ŌARC Regeneration Plan for this sector.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 -Do nothing
Cost to Implement	Total estimated project cost of $5.5M.	Nil.
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Potential increase in operational costs due to new assets, to be covered by red zone operational budgets.	Status quo, with increasing reactive maintenance for failing assets.
Funding Source	ŌARC Ecological Restoration Budget (CPMS #63952), which comprises a mix of CRAF and LTP funding.	N/A
Funding Availability	Yes, funding is allocated.	N/A
Impact on Rates	Nil. The project is funded from existing, approved capital budgets.	Nil (in the short term).

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Poor Ground Conditions and High Water Table

· Risk: The site's ground conditions present a construction/asset performance risk. The area has a documented history of liquefaction and subsidence, resulting in a high water table and poor drainage in places. Constructing assets such as buildings, sports fields and pathways on this ground without a good understanding of the subsurface conditions could lead to long-term issues like differential settlement and asset failure.

· Mitigation: Geotechnical investigations will be included as part of the detailed design phase. The findings will inform the foundation designs for all new structures, specifications for ground improvement where necessary and the construction methodologies for pathways and summer season sports fields surfaces to ensure they are resilient and fit for purpose.

6.2 Undiscovered Contamination

· Risk: The concept report notes that some former roads in the area are contaminated with coal tar. There is a risk that other undiscovered contaminants (e.g. asbestos from demolished houses, domestic fuel tanks) exist elsewhere on the site. Discovering contamination during construction can lead to project delays and budget overruns.

· Mitigation: A Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) will be undertaken as part of the detailed design phase to identify potential contamination hotspots. A financial contingency will be held within the project budget to manage any unexpected discoveries, and the Construction Management Plan will include protocols for handling contaminated material.

6.3 Consenting Delays or Onerous Conditions

· Risk: The project involves works within and adjacent to a sensitive ecological environment, including a valuable inanga spawning habitat. There is a risk that the resource consent process could be delayed or that restrictive consent conditions could be imposed (e.g. limiting construction to specific times of the year), impacting the project timeline and budget.

· Mitigation: Staff will engage early with regulatory bodies during the detailed design phase. A specialist ecological impact assessment will be commissioned to support the consent application, which will propose specific, proactive measures to protect the inanga spawning habitat during construction.

6.4 Future Interface Conflicts

· Risk: The landscape plan is being developed while two adjacent projects; the ‘trial housing’ area and potential future stopbank remain undefined. There is a risk that the final designs for these future projects could conflict with the layout of the new park amenities (e.g. paths, services, parking), requiring rework in the future.

· Mitigation: The amended plan addresses the trial housing area by retaining a clear, unencumbered corridor for potential future access. A 20-metre asset-free buffer has been included along New Brighton Road to protect the new park infrastructure from any future stopbank works.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.5 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.6 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, the Community Board has the delegation to:

“Approve and adopt any new landscape development plans for parks and reserves provided the design is within the policy and budget set by the Council.”[4]

6.7 Other Legal Implications:

6.7.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.8 The required decision:

6.8.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.8.2 Is of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the strong environmental benefits in a localised area.

6.8.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

· Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Regeneration Plan (2019)

· Climate Resilience Strategy 2021

· Biodiversity Strategy 2008 - 2035

· Public Open Space Strategy 2010 – 2040

· Ōtautahi Christchurch Future Transport Plan 2024–54

6.9 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.10 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.10.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.3.5 Customer satisfaction with the recreational opportunities and ecological experiences provided by the City's Regional Parks - >=80%

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.11 Early conversations were had with Eco Action Nursery Trust (who have carried out significant planting in the sector) and Avon-Ōtākaro Network. Emails were also sent to the New Brighton Residents Association and Burwood East Residents Association to discuss the plans and consultation timeline.

6.12 Consultation started on 5 May and ran until 25 June 2025. Note: this period was extended due to the rescheduling of an in-person engagement opportunity.

6.13 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

· An email sent to 122 identified stakeholders; including local sports groups, residents’ associations and environmental groups, as well as subscribers to Kōrero mai who elected to be notified when projects like this opened.

· A Newsline story published and shared to Council’s Facebook page.

· Seven signs erected at locations around Bower Park and Lake Kate Sheppard and posters were put up in the Bower Park toilets.

· Consultation documents delivered to 350 households.

· Documents left at Life Church QE2, QE2 Recreation Centre and New Brighton Library.

6.14 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage had 1,439 views throughout the consultation period.

6.15 Staff attended the Richmond Community Gala and a Burwood East Residents Association meeting to discuss the project.

6.16 A drop-in session was held at the park on Sunday 22 June. 28 residents attended. Feedback received at this session included:

· A strong desire to move the planned playground and toilet facilities (either closer to the playground or against New Brighton Road),

· Unhappiness of the inclusion of ‘trial housing’ on the plans or the potential for houses to be built at this location in the future,

· Support for the road between New Brighton Road and Willyran Avenue – but for it to be cyclist and pedestrian access only,

· Some concern about increase traffic on Willryan Avenue,

· Support for removing the roads within the Lake Kate Sheppard area and general regeneration efforts,

· Ideas of the playground, including a flying fox connected to a tower, a large scooter track, swings, all-year-round rugby posts, and painting on some of the wooden accents,

· Support for tidying up the shingle carpark across the road; and

· The desire to work with local contractors on the construction.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.17 Submissions were made by five organisations and 43 individuals. A full table of submissions received is available on the Kōrero mai webpage.

6.18 Organisational submissions were made by the Disabled Persons Assembly New Zealand, Spokes Canterbury, Canterbury Baseball Association, THE BOWER, and Play Preservation Trust. All organisations supported the plans, except the Play Preservation Trust who somewhat supported.

6.19 Most (38) submitters supported the plan for Bower Park and Lake Kate Sheppard (79%), 17% (8) somewhat supported it, while 4% (2) did not support.

Q: Overall, do you support the plans for Bower Park and Lake Kate Sheppard?

Playground:

6.20 When asked what submitters liked about the plan for Bower Park playground, the most common feedback was the connection to the natural environment and natural elements (6) and the inclusion of bike tracks/skills area (3).

6.21 Feedback on what they didn’t like was disparate.

Sports fields:

6.22 When asked what submitters liked about the plan for Bower Park sports fields the most common feedback was support for bringing together different sports codes (4).

6.23 When asked what they didn’t like, the most common feedback was concern that the fields were inconsistent with the neighbouring wetlands and that the area floods (3). A further three submitters requested more consideration of sports codes less commonly represented – baseball or skating.

Lake Kate Sheppard:

6.24 The community was asked to provide feedback on two potential alignments for the primary shared path. Option 1 proposed re-using the existing former road alignment, which created a clear buffer from the sensitive wetland areas, while Option 2 suggested a path alignment further west, allowing for more direct interaction with the ecological zone. 61% (8) of those who elected to respond chose option 2 while 39% (5) chose option 1.

A blue and white bar graph

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

6.25 When asked what submitters liked about the plan for Lake Kate Sheppard the most common feedback was enhancing the wetland to let nature take its course (4) and support for the shared path and/or connecting paths (3).

6.26 When asked what they didn’t like, four submitters mentioned the trial housing at the end of Willryan Avenue (out of scope). A further five submitters requested that the plans include a loop track around the area and three noted a preference for it to stay dog friendly.

Supplementary information

6.27 A quick poll that was conducted on the Kōrero mai webpage to reduce barriers to participate. 29 residents provided feedback from this form, with most (24) rating the plans 5-out-of-5 stars.

A graph with multiple colored bars

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

6.27.1

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.28 The decision involves a matter of significant interest to Mana Whenua and positively impacts our agreed partnership priorities with Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga.

6.29 The project area has high mahinga kai values. Staff have an agreed scope with Whitiora Centre Limited (representing Ngāi Tūāhuriri) to review the project, along with their appointed mahinga kai expert.

6.30 An initial review of this landscape plan has been completed, with feedback confirming they are generally comfortable with the proposed direction. The partnership will continue into the next stage, with further review and input scheduled during the detailed design phase to ensure cultural values are fully integrated into the final plans. The plan's focus on ecological restoration, particularly of the wetlands and expansion of the delta, strongly aligns with cultural aspirations for the Corridor.

6.31 Specific themes and topics raised by Whitiora for further exploration during the detailed design phase include:

· Detail on how the plan will futureproof the successful inanga spawning habitat against climate change, optimise planting to attract a wider range of native birds, and integrate long-term maintenance and weed control.

· Exploring how mahinga kai values/outcomes can be woven throughout the entire plan, rather than confined to a discrete location.

· Further understanding of the site's hydrology and how the design actively responds to long-term climate change impacts like tidal intrusion.

· A commitment to continue the partnership through briefings on future design iterations, involvement in ecology workshops and assistance with developing a te reo name for the area.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.32 The decisions in this report are likely to:

· Contribute positively to adaptation to the impacts of climate change by restoring natural wetland systems that can buffer the impacts of flooding and sea level rise.

· Have a positive influence on carbon sequestration by replacing mown grass with permanent native forest and wetland vegetation.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the landscape plan is approved, staff will proceed to the consenting and detailed design phases of the project.

7.2 Construction is anticipated to commence in summer 2026, with completion expected in mid-2027.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Lake Kate Sheppard and Bower Park Preliminary Concept Plan	25/1656456	197

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

David Little - Manager Residential Red Zone

Hannah Ballantyne - Senior Engagement Advisor

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Approved By

Rupert Bool - Head of Parks

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

18. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours 2025/26
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1638687
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Tim Samson, Support Officer
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board to consider applications received for the 2025-26 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours and to allocate funding as appropriate.

1.2 There is a balance of $4,500 allocated to the 2025-26 Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours.

1.3 The staff recommendations in this report total $3,333.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours 2025/26 Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Allocate its 2025-26 Summer with your Neighbours as follows:

#	Applicant/Organisation	Activity	# Attending	Amount Recommended
1.	Steven Muir	End of year celebration	40	$100
2.	Basil Paul	BBQ with kids’ activities	20	$50
3.	Jasper van der Meer	BBQ with Whānau and tamariki	50	$125
4.	Sarah Stapleton	Summer Street BBQ	30	$75
5.	Sarah Elicker	Easter hunt/morning tea	30	$75
6.	Betty Chapman	Residents BBQ	30	$75
7.	Samantha Stephens	Potluck afternoon tea with games	30	$75
8.	Natalie Jonkers	Open day with community and lawn bowls	50	$125
9.	Casey King	Teddy Bear’s Picnic	120	$200
10.	Margaret Jenkin	Carol singing event for the local neighbourhood	200	$200
11.	Vicki	Neighbourhood dog friends BBQ	15	$38
12.	Nicola and Stephen Gardiner	New Year BBQ with the neighbourhood	50	$125
13.	Mike Gibbs	Cul-de-sac BBQ with nearby neighbours	33	$82
14.	Tayanita Scott	Outdoor musical picnic to get to know more families	40	$100
15.	Elissa Smith	Residents’ afternoon tea	30	$75
16.	Hamish Kenworthy	Local cul-de-sac resident get together	30	$75
17.	Kylie Sullivan	Residents’ street BBQ	70	$175
18.	Robyn Kelly	Get together for residents and new neighbours	40	$100
19.	Georgia Richardson	The Stewarts Gully Community	50	$125
20.	Annete Hobby	Residents BBQ lunch	30	$75
21.	Stephanie Van Beynen	All local families and neighbours are welcome	30	$75
22.	Scott Blinman	Residents’ street BBQ	40	$100
23.	Stephanie Van Beynen	Community open day at Smith Street Farm	300	$200
24.	Matthew Wilson	Volunteer recognition BBQ for Avondale Community Garden	150	$200
25.	Helen Knowles	Carols in the carpark	70	$175
26.	Philip Sapsford	BBQ to celebrate warmer months	25	$63
27.	Jura Place Neighbourhood Support	Get together and kai sharing	20	$50
28.	David Collins	A series of 8 BBQ's held every Wednesday night in November and February 2026 to help neighbours get to know each other	1400	$400

4. Notes that the granted funds are to be used towards food, non-alcoholic drinks or invitation/advertising costs only.

5. Return any funding not required for the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2025-26 Summer with your Neighbours back to the 2025-26 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Discretionary Response Fund.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of Strengthening Communities. It will provide a strong sense of community, active participation in civic life, safe and healthy communities, celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport, valuing the voices of children and young people.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any Council-adopted policies, standards or criteria.

3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal or environmental court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations, or Community Board decisions.

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4 The significance level was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.6 At its meeting on 11 August 2025, the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board resolved to allocate $4,500 from its 2025-26 Discretionary Response Fund to its 2025-26 Summer with your Neighbours.

3.7 Local community groups and previous applicants were sent information inviting them to apply for Summer with your Neighbours funding as allocated by the Board.

3.8 Summer with your Neighbours will run from 25 October 2025 to 30 March 2026. Applications for funding opened on 12 July 2025 and closed on 10 August 2025.

3.9 At the closing date, 28 applications had been received. For comparison, the 2024-25 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours, 25 applications were received, with 25 being presented to the Board for consideration having met the guidelines and provided enough information to enable assessment of their application.

3.10 The 28 applications received for the 2025-26 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours were assessed to ensure that they meet the guidelines and staff have recommended an amount to be allocated to each application. All successful applicants will be told that the funding allocated to them can be used towards food, non-alcoholic drinks or invitation/advertising costs only.

3.11 The officer recommendations were based on the following, to maintain consistency over the allocation of recommendations city-wide:

3.12 A formula of $2.50 per person has been applied city-wide as a consistent approach to applications.

3.13 A maximum of $200 per event was applied to all applicants. The exception was Applicant 28, who is hosting eight separate events and requested $600 to engage with over 1,000 residents. In this case, a grant of $400 has been recommended.

3.14 Where two approximate attendee numbers have been noted, recommendations are based on the higher approximate figure.

3.15 When the requested amount is less than the $2.50 per head formula, the requested amount is what has been recommended.

3.16 Organisations have been recommended for funding by staff for the 2025-26 Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Summer with your Neighbours.

3.17 A decision matrix (refer Attachment A) outlines the applications and staff recommendations. Also included are the Summer with your Neighbours Guidelines (refer Attachment B).

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood - Summer With your Neighbours 2025-26 - Matrix and Evaluation	25/1675287	229
b ⇩	Summer with your neighbours Guidelines 2025-26	25/1661093	231

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Tim Samson - Support Officer
Approved By	Christopher Turner-Bullock - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood-Linwood

20. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Area Report - September 2025
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2271078
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Christopher Turner-Bullock, Community Governance Manager
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Area Report - September 2025.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Planter Boxes Bring Life to the Mall	The New Brighton Project recently coordinated the relocation of planter boxes from the Village Green site into the New Brighton Mall. Local group Growing New Brighton has been busy replanting them with a colourful mix of flowers and vegetables. The refreshed planters are helping to brighten the space, support local food growing, and contribute to making the mall feel safer and more welcoming for everyone.	Completed	New Brighton Mall
Naming the River project	New colourful stylised signs have been installed at foot and road-bridges which cross the Ōpāwaho, aimed at celebrating the river’s cultural and natural significance. The project is a collaboration between Christchurch City Council’s Parks Visitor Experience Team, and the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River Network. By seeing and recognising its name every time you cross the Ōpāwaho, it elevates the river’s profile, acknowledging its status as a taonga to be cared for. This project aligns with the Manaakitanga section of the Ōpāwaho Lower Heathcote Guidance Plan supporting increased interaction through developing positive messaging for visitors.	On-going	Enhancing Environmental Wellbeing: Supporting the Ōpāwaho/Heathcote River by advocating for the implementation of the Lower Heathcote Ōpāwaho River Guidance Plan.
Linwood Drain Working Bee	The second working bee event was held on Saturday 16 August with over a dozen residents volunteering to plant some seedlings, tidying the pathway edges and removing ivy from a fence. The Play Preservation Trust with support from UC Geography students, hosted a pop-up play space to get feedback on what improvements could be made for families and children to use the space more. The aim of the project is to engage with the local community, enhance the environment by cleaning up the walkway and improve the water quality to support the tuna living in the drain. The next two working bee events will be hosted on 18 October and 13 December 2025.	Ongoing	Enhancing Environmental Wellbeing: Improving health of our waterways, is a top priority focused on restoration and improving habitats for indigenous plants, animals and mahinga kai/mahika kai. Support protection of the Avon-Heathcote Estuary Ihutai Estuary as a top priority.
Play Box at Aranui Library	The Play Box at Aranui Library launched on 21 August 2025. Refer to the attached poster and photos of the box. The box was built by the New Brighton Menz Shed. The initiative seeks to address barriers to play - particularly access to equipment, while encouraging informal activation of Wainoni Park and strengthening the connection between the Library and the Park.	Trial from August to October 2025	Aranui / Wainoni Safety Initiatives Directly sponsor and support collaborative projects that aim to activate and increase usage of Wainoni Park.
Wainoni Park	Safety improvements to Wainoni Park with the installation of posts adjacent to Aranui Library carpark after a car drove onto the sports fields in July and damaged the turf (refer to the photo below).	August 2025	Aranui / Wainoni Safety Initiatives Directly sponsor and support collaborative projects that aim to activate and increase usage of Wainoni Park.

Linwood Drain Working Bee – Play Preservation Trust pop up play

Play Box Poster

Aranui Library carpark/ Wainoni Park posts

Planter Boxes Bring Life to the Mall

Naming the River project

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 For the Board’s Information, a summary is provided (refer Attachment A) on the status of the Board’s 2025-26 funding as at 25 August 2025.

3.2.2 Youth Development Fund

Board members with the delegation for the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Youth Development Fund (Jo Zervos, Greg Mitchell and Paul McMahon) made six decisions under delegation:

· A grant of $200 to Johnathan Tamepo to travel to the New Zealand Māori Rugby league tournament in Rotorua.

· A grant of $350 to Dylan Lowe to attend the 2025 Hip Hop World Championships in Prague.

· A grant of $400 to Mina and Pūmau Tana to travel with their team to Bali to perform at the Nusantara Folklore Festival.

· A grant of $200 to Lewis Monk to represent the junior New Zealand Black Fins at the Internation Surf Lifesaving competition at Mount Maunganui.

· A grant of $250 to Amaleila to represent New Zealand at the upcoming Tauila International Tag Series in Sāmoa.

· A grant of $250 to Amasio to represent New Zealand at the upcoming Tauila International Tag Series in Sāmoa.

3.2.3 Smith Street Community Farm Strategic Planning Workshop

Having worked through some significant challenges and transition at Smith Street Community Farm, the Trust, now strengthened with three new Board members, have turned their focus to strategic planning.

On Saturday 16 August the Trust Board and Manger came together for a strategic planning workshop facilitated by Community Governance staff at the Linwood Board room. With full view of the gardens out the windows, it was an opportunity for the Board to do a deep dive into their why, their values, opportunities and priorities for the next few years. Very quickly two key themes emerged; address food insecurity (feed people) and community (grow people). With open and honest kōrero, robust debate and no shortage of enthusiasm, the Trust Board worked through the series of exercises culminating in a first draft of a strategic plan.

The next steps for this process are honing and finalising the strategic plan along with their vision and mission statement for the community farm. The Board continue to meet fortnightly to progress this mahi as well as updating, consolidating and preparing their policies, procedures and plans.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· Community Board Plan

The last monitoring report of the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Plan 2023-25 is attached (refer Attachment B).

A book cover with a bridge and a body of water

Description automatically generated

· New Brighton Community Garden Sensory Garden Upgrade

Volunteers at the New Brighton Community Garden have been busy enhancing the Sensory Garden little house. The roof has been repaired and vibrant new artwork installed, creating a brighter, more welcoming space for the community to enjoy.

· Cook Island Language Week

Te Kura Katorika o Hato Ani St Annes School in Woolston celebrated Cook Island Language Week with a visit from Kuki Learning, a digital platform for Cook Island language, culture and connection. Epetoma o te reo Māori Kūki 'Airani - Cook Islands Māori Language Week ran the first week in August. Students at St Anne’s had the opportunity to learn some Cook Island Māori and were taught traditional songs and dance.

· SuperGrans SuperSkills Ōtautahi Launch

SuperGrans SuperSkills Ōtautahi celebrated their launch at The Loft in Eastgate Mall on Friday 8 August 2025.

SuperGrans the organisation was operating in Ōtautahi until 2016. After almost nine years, the organisation is back and has relaunched under their new name Supergrans SuperSkills.

The organisation works alongside individuals, whānau and communities, mobilising volunteers to share practical life skills and knowledge to enhance the well-being and confidence of the tangata they engage with. The types of services they offer include financial mentoring and budgeting, cooking healthy meals on a budget, growing kai at home, developing household routines, making your own cleaning products, basic repairs around the home, clothes mending, sewing and knitting and job seeking skills among others.

Now located at The Loft, SuperGrans SuperSkills is ideally located to collaborate with the other agencies and services on offer upstairs in Eastgate Mall.

· Emergency Response Planning with St Lukes’s Samoan Assembly of God Church

Recognising the importance of Pacific communities being well-prepared for emergencies, a Civil Defence Emergency Response Planning session was held in June at Christ City Church. The initiative focused on building local capability and resilience. Over 40 members of the St Lukes Samoan AOG attended including youth, young adults, elders and families. Participants learnt about setting up a community emergency hub, the key functions of a response during a disaster and what resources are needed to support the neighbourhood in times of crisis. The session was facilitated by the CDEM team and the Pacific Community Liaison Advisor. The church community is now working to gather the necessary resources to set up a well-equipped emergency hub and plans to participate in future CIMS training with CDEM, building a stronger, safer and more connected Pacific community in Ōtautahi.

· Radley Reserve

A trial of new tree swings has begun across Christchurch with the installation of swings in local parks to encourage more ‘risky’ play. One of these swings has been installed at Radley Park in Woolston. Council staff have been working with Youth Town and have heard how much the young people in their after school programme are enjoying it and have plans to visit every week as part of their programme. It has inspired them to ask about other ways they could activate Radley Park.

This is part of a trial initiated by Council’s Play Advocate to see how the swings hold up and how the public responds to low cost play elements that don’t have the same playground safety standards but do have a rigorous process for checking they are as safe as reasonable and the benefit of them outweighs any small risk.

This is the first location within the Waitai ward area, however if the pilot is successful more could be installed, particularly in areas the community identifies.

Rosalind Potter Programme lead from Youthtown said “The young people are excited to go and visit the swing - they wanted to walk down in the hail! And are excited to be part of developing the park with more cool things for teenagers”.

· Legit Art Wall event

Alma Place in Shirley was transformed into a vibrant bustling street party on Friday 15 August. Organised by Shirley Village Project in partnership with Youth and Cultural Development Trust and Christchurch City Council the event was centred around the Legit Art Wall, a long stretch of corrugated steel fencing which lines the north side of the street leading up to the residential area.

The Legit Art Wall project aims to spruce up the fence, giving the street a lift of colour and vibrancy. Whilst local artists from Shirley began painting the mural, the FRESH events crew from YCD were on hand with free drinks, kai, fades and braids and live DJ. Rangatahi who came along to the event were also invited to add to mural with their own designs and inspiration, transforming the fence line into a living piece of artwork and activating and otherwise quiet street.

· Village Green Update

The Greater New Brighton Charitable Trust recently delivered two public presentation sessions in August on the Village Green, which is now starting construction and on track to be completed by the end of the year.

More than five years in the making, the project reflects extensive community input and features upgraded designs to better serve local needs. Planned facilities include huts for start-ups, pop-up presentations, workshops, wellbeing services, community meetings, artistic displays, and performances. The lawn will provide space for socialising, games, and relaxation.

· Renew Brighton’s Community Emergency Preparedness Exercise

Renew Brighton in partnership the Civil Defence team delivered a community preparedness exercise for its three emergency hubs. The three hubs include The Bridge, Grace Vineyard and Union Street Church. Members of each organisation participated, along with other key community organisations to discuss what to do in an emergency.

· Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Bridges

Brooker Bridge

A new bridge was installed in the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor (OARC) replacing a structure badly damaged in the Canterbury earthquakes.

The new Brooker Bridge, located in Belair Close Reserve, will provide walking access across Corsers Stream between Brooker Avenue and Belair Close.

The previous bridge had been fenced off for several years. The new structure is expected to be open for public use in September.

It will then form part of the Christchurch 360 Trail, a walking path linking up the city’s existing tracks and urban routes.

The 135km trail features flora and fauna, and historical, architectural and cultural aspects of Christchurch.

Dallington Bridge

The opening of the new Dallington Bridge is scheduled for the middle of September. Its taking shape and looking amazing.

· Whītau Faleo’o Opening Ceremony

Whītau School held the opening ceremony of their new Faleo’o on Friday 8 August, which saw the whole community come together to celebrate the occasion.

The ceremony included performances from the school’s Pasifika group, speeches from the community and Principal, shared kai and lots of connection.

The Faleo’o is the culmination of the school’s ongoing participation in and commitment to Pasifika educational initiatives.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.

Topic

Date

Link

Notified Resource Consent

Coastal Protection Works

Open for feedback until Thursday 4 September 2025

https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/southshore-and-south-new-brighton-coastal-protection-works

3.4 Governance Advice

3.4.1 Waitakiri School – Burwood Road School Crossing

At its meeting on 11 August 2025, the Board received a public forum presentation from students of Waitakiri School in relation to safety concerns outside Waitakiri School when crossing Burwood Road. The Board decided to refer the issues raised to staff for investigation and response back to the Board.

Staff have advised that a proposal to raise the existing zebra crossing for Waitakiri Primary on Burwood Road is in the Minor Road Safety Programme and is currently planned for financial year 2027/2028. However, this is subject to the budget being available. The scheme would also need to be consulted on and approved by the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board.

A copy of this response has been shared with Waitakiri School.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori

4.1 Customer Service Request/Hybris Report

For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the July 2025 Hybris Reports (refer Attachment C).

4.2 Graffiti Snapshot

For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the July Graffiti Snapshot (refer Attachment D).

4.3 Parklands Reserve Helicopter Renewal

For the Board’s information, attached is a staff memorandum providing an update on the Parklands Reserve helicopter renewal (refer Attachment E).

4.4 QEII Park Development

For the Board’s information, attached is a staff memorandum providing an update on the QEII Park Development (refer Attachment F).

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Funding Update August 2025	25/1708567	259
b ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Plan Monitoring Report - September 2025	25/1698192	261
c ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board - Hybris Report - July 2025	25/1612549	295
d ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board - Graffiti Snapshot - July 2025	25/1612550	296
e ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board - Staff Memorandum - Parklands Reserve Helicopter Renewal	25/1612551	298
f ⇩	Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board - Staff Memorandum - QEII Park Development	25/1612553	301

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Cindy Sheppard - Community Board Advisor

Emily Toase - Community Development Advisor

Sam Savage - Community Development Advisor

Rory Crawford - Community Development Advisor

Jacqui Miller - Community Development Advisor

Tim Samson – Support Officer

Christopher Turner-Bullock - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood-Linwood

Approved By

Christopher Turner-Bullock - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood-Linwood

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

[1] The Freedom Camping Act explicitly limits freedom camping regulation (bylaws must not absolutely prohibit freedom camping – section 12). Freedom camping is limited in North Beach carpark under the Council's Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021. It is prohibited at weekends over the warmer months (7pm Fridays to 7pm Sundays, between 1 October and 1 May each year), when demand for the car park is highest. At other times, freedom camping is allowed, with certain conditions (vehicles must be self-contained, camping activities must not spread into nearby parking spaces, and duration of stay is limited). These same conditions apply to the surrounding area, including the roadside and in the parking bays along Marine Parade. Legal challenges to bylaws have been based on councils regulating too broadly using bylaw-making powers, or considering irrelevant matters (Article: Queenstown told its freedom camping rules are invalid | RNZ News (24 September 2024).

[3] Wattle Drive, south of Willryan Avenue and Willryan Avenue, west of the last house)

[4] CCC Delegations Register (25 March 2025), Part D – Sub Part 1 - Community Boards (pg. 96)

Name	Subject
Jack Reece and Max Hagger	Avon Stormwater Management

Subject	Presenter(s)	Unit/Organisation
Wastewater Treatment Plant	Adam Twose	Three Waters

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
CBL_00001_BOF	New Brighton Community Gardens Trust	New Brighton Community Garden Kitchen Upgrade	$14,000	$14,000
CBL_00002_BOF	Sustain South New Brighton	The Common Ground Consent Project	$11,500	$11,500

Total Budget 2023/25	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$500,000	$440,507	$59,493	$33,993

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	ACTION DUE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
New Brighton Community Gardens - proposed new lease	10 March 2025	15 October 2025	Facilities & Property Unit	Property Consultancy
Grant an Easement over Birkdale Reserve	6 November 2023	25 October 2025	Facilities & Property Unit	Property Consultancy
67989 Improving Bromley's Roads - Scheme Design for Approval and Approval to Proceed with Detail Design and Construction	9 December 2024	31 October 2025	Transport & Waste	Project Management
Bus layover for bus routes 5 and 135 - New Brighton	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Bus stop upgrades on Estuary Road near Bridge Street	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Chelsea Street Renewal - Linwood Woolston CRAF	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Transport & Waste	Project Management
Grant of Electricity Easement over Linwood Park	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Facilities & Property Unit	Property Consultancy
North Beach Surf Life Saving Club- approval for new build and lease	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Facilities & Property Unit	Property Consultancy
Proposed Time Restrictions: Broadpark Road	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Public Forum - Winter Fireworks - Danette Wereta	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	Recreation, Sports & Events	Events & Arts
Public Forum - James Ridpath - Rawhiti Domain Play Equipment	10 June 2024	31 January 2026	Parks	Parks & Recreation Planning

7. Correspondence
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1638981
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Cindy Sheppard, Community Board Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

8. Briefings
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2271183
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Cindy Sheppard, Community Board Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

11. Canterbury Billiards and Snooker Association - Amendment to Lease Recommendation
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1507993
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Felix Dawson, Leasing Consultant
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

19. Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood - Better-Off Fund Applications for Consideration - New Brighton Community Garden and Sustain South New Brighton
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1698308
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Sam Savage, Community Development Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

21. Valedictory
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1751545
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Cindy Sheppard, Community Board Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	DUE DATE	ACTION CLOSURE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
Broadpark Road - endorsement for overnight parking restrictions trial	12 May 2025	11 August 2025	4 August 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
New Brighton CRAF - Marine Parade (Hawke to Bowhill) Street Renewal - Scheme Adjustments and Detailed Traffic Resolutions	9 June 2025	30 April 2026	28 August 2025	Transport & Waste	Project Management
Board Projects Fund 2025-26	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	1 September 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Coa-Bur-Lin)
Public Forum - Waitakiri School	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	2 September 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Strengthening Communities Fund 2025-26	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	1 September 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Coa-Bur-Lin)
Urban Forest Planting Plan for the Ōpawaho Heathcote River	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	27 August 2025	Parks	Botanic and Garden Parks
Urban Forest Tree Planting Plan for Woolston Park	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	27 August 2025	Parks	Botanic and Garden Parks
Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Kawai Rangatahi	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	1 September 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Coa-Bur-Lin)
Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood 2025-26 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Youth and Cultural Development	11 August 2025	10 November 2025	1 September 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Coa-Bur-Lin)