Agenda of Finance and Performance Committee

Karakia Tīmatanga

Whakataka te hau ki te uru

Whakataka te hau ki te tonga

Kia mākinakina ki uta

Kia mātaratara ki tai

E hī ake ana te atakura

He tio, he huka, he hau hū

Tihei mauri ora

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Apologies will be recorded at the meeting.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

That the minutes of the Finance and Performance Committee meeting held on Tuesday, 26 May 2026 (refer page 8) and on Wednesday, 27 May 2026 be confirmed (refer page 31).

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearing process.

Public Forum presentations will be recorded in the meeting minutes

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

Deputations will be recorded in the meeting minutes.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.

To present to the Committee, refer to the Participating in decision-making webpage or contact the meeting advisor listed on the front of this agenda.

Finance and Performance Committee

Open Minutes

Date: Tuesday 26 May 2026

Time: 10.01 am

Venue: Camellia Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Sam MacDonald

Councillor Jake McLellan

Mayor Phil Mauger

Deputy Mayor Victoria Henstock

Councillor David Cartwright

Councillor Melanie Coker

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Kelly Barber

Councillor Celeste Donovan

Councillor Tyrone Fields

Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt

Councillor Nathaniel Herz Jardine

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Andrei Moore

Councillor Mark Peters

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Principal Advisor

Bruce Moher

Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / CFO

Tel: 941 8999

bruce.moher@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Samantha Kelly

Team Leader Democratic Services Support

Tel: 941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Cathy Harlow

Democratic Services Advisor

Tel: 941 5662

cathy.harlow@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order. Where no voting record is shown, the item was carried unanimously by those present.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Committee Decision

There were no apologies received.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Councillors Coker and Cartwright declared an interest in Resolutions 5a 5b and 5c in relation to the Canterbury Museum.

Councillor Cotter left the meeting at 10.01 am and returned at 10.05 am.

3. Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27

Committee Comment

Officer Presentation and Councillor questions

1. Council Officer Peter Ryan joined the table to present the report.

2. The Mayor and Councillors were provided an opportunity to ask questions of clarification of staff regarding the proposed content of the Annual Plan which will be tabled for adoption in June 2026.

Temporary Suspension of Standing Orders

3. The meeting resolved to temporarily suspend specified Standing Orders.

Motion Moved and Seconded

4. Councillor MacDonald Moved, and Councillor McLellan Seconded a Motion which included Officer Recommendations 1 to 4 and 6 to 12 and the Chair’s Recommendation 5 contained in the report. During the meeting and with the agreement of the meeting and Mover and Seconder, the following updates were made to Recommendations 5ai, 5ei, 5eiii and 5g:

5ai. The Crown providing the Canterbury Museum a minimum of $15.0 million grant, towards their capital programme; or the Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

5ei. The Crown providing Christ Church Reinstatement Limited a minimum of $15.0 million grant towards their capital programme, and

5eiii. The parties (CCC and CCRL) and the Anglican Diocese of Christchurch entering into a funding agreement confirming the Council’s contribution is full and final, with no further financial obligation for any further capital or operational expenditure for the Christ Church Cathedral.

5g. Requests that Council staff work with The Arts Centre Te Matatiki Toi Ora ~~to develop a formal expression of interest for the former Student Union site,~~ and report back on a range of options ahead of the Long Term Plan.

Proposed Amendments Raised

5. The Mayor and Councillors tabled proposed amendments for inclusion in the content of the Annual Plan (refer to Attachment A). With the agreement of the meeting and Mover and Seconder, the following amendments were incorporated into Motion 3:

· A11. Waihoro Community Board – cycle projects

· A28. Youth employment outcomes.

Public Excluded Session

6. The public were excluded from the meeting to allow discussion of legally privileged information.

7. Upon the public being readmitted, the meeting adjourned to enable Council Officers to provide advice regarding the proposed amendments.

Motion 5 – Iconic Buildings

8. Upon reconvening the meeting held one debate for Motion 5 in relation to the iconic buildings.

9. The meeting voted on Motions 5a to 5i in relation to the Canterbury Museum, the Christchurch School of Music, the Christ Church Cathedral, the Arts Centre and the balance of the 2025/2026 forecast operating surplus separately and when put to the vote, the Motions were declared carried (refer below to the individual voting records).

Proposed amendments

10. The meeting adjourned to enable Council Officers to provide further advice regarding the proposed amendments (refer to Attachment A).

11. Upon reconvening the following proposed amendments and Foreshadowed Motions were Moved and Seconded. The Mayor and Councillors were provided an opportunity to ask clarifying questions:

· A2. Awatea, Amyes, Springs Road intersections

· A4. Kiwi Rail budget reductions

· A5. North Beach Carpark

· A9. New and in-fill street lighting budgets

· A13. Cycle lane delivery – report

· A7. Weaving the East

· A18. Smith Street Service Centre

· A24. Skatepark enhancements

· A34. Rewi Alley Museum Charitable Trust

· A31. Lower Heathcote Guidance Plan.

· A40. 156 McCormacks Bay Road (Foreshadowed Motion to Motion 6).

12. The meeting held one debate for all proposed amendments and voted on each amendment individually (refer below to the individual voting records).

Motion 3 – Community Funds and Grants

13. The meeting voted on Motions 3a to 3c in relation to the Climate Resilience Fund, Contestable Community Grants, and Environmental Partnership Fund separately and when put to the vote, the Motions were declared carried (refer below to the individual voting records).

Motion 6 – 124A Main Road and 156 McCormacks Bay Road

14. With the agreement of the meeting and Mover and Seconder, Motion 6 in relation to properties 124A Main Road and 156 McCormacks Bay Road were amended to incorporate proposed Foreshadowed Motion A40.

15. Motion 6 was split into Motion 6A (124A Main Road) and 6B (156 McCormacks Bay Road). The meeting voted on Motions 6A and 6B separately and when put vote, the Motions were declared carried (refer below to the individual voting records).

Motion 10 – 13 Mundy’s Road

16. With the agreement of the meeting and Mover and Seconder, Motion 10 in relation to 13 Mundy’s Road, which had proposed the property be withdrawn from the current disposal process, was amended to recommend that the property be retained in the current disposal process. The Motion was put to the vote and declared carried (refer below to the individual voting record).

Motions 7 to 12 – Properties for disposal

17. Motion 7 in relation to 4 and 6 Balmoral Lane, Motions 11 and 12 in relation to 8 Martindales Road, Motion 8 in relation to 274A Main Road, and Motion 9 in relation to 59 Farnborough Street were put to the vote separately and declared carried (refer below to the individual voting records).

Motions 3d to 3e - Cycleway connections and youth employment

18. Motions 3d and 3e (cycleway connections) and 3f (youth employment) were put to the vote as a block and declared carried (refer below to the individual voting record).

Rate percentage update

19. The meeting adjourned to allow Council Officers to update the proposed average rates increase to existing ratepayers referred to in Motion 4.

20. Upon reconvening, Council Officer Mitch Shaw joined the table to note that, based on the carried amendments, the updated proposed average rates increase to existing ratepayers was 7.83% (down from the 7.96% proposed in the Draft Annual Plan). Motion 4 was updated to reflect this.

Motions 1, 2 and 4

21. Motions 1, 2 and 4 were then put to the vote and declared carried (refer below to the individual voting record).

Resumption of Standing Orders

22. The meeting resumed the suspended Standing Orders.

Next Steps

23. Council Officer Peter Ryan rejoined the table to confirm that the resolutions carried at the meeting would inform the content of the final Annual Plan to be voted on at the Council meeting on 23 June 2026.

Original Officer Recommendations and Chairs’ Recommendations – Moved/Seconded

Committee Comment

1. The Officer Recommendations, including the Chairs’ Recommendations in relation to the iconic buildings, were Moved and Seconded (the Motion).

2. Changes to the Motion were made at the meeting with the agreement of the meeting and the Mover and Seconder, and are reflected below.

Motion – Moved and Seconded

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the summary information and options in the Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27 Report.

2. Confirms the direction provided through the Annual Plan workshops in May 2026 to inform the Annual Plan adoption report development process.

3. Confirms that the development of the Annual Plan should include the following, subject to resolutions at the meeting:

a. continuing the planned 0.25% rates increase for the Climate Resilience Fund in 2026/27, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

b. continuing to provide the planned $7.12m in funding for contestable community grants, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

c. continuing to provide the planned $0.30m increase in funding for the Environmental Partnership Fund, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

4. Notes the direction provided through the Annual Plan workshops and the resolutions above will result in a:

a. proposed final Annual Plan average rates increase to existing ratepayers of 7.82%, further noting rate increases to individual rate payers could vary materially due to the impact of the General Revaluation taking effect on 1 July 2026; and

b. breach of the balanced budget financial prudence benchmark for 2026/27 as indicated in the LTP.

5. Confirms that the development of the Annual plan should include the following Chair’s Recommendations in relation to the Iconic Buildings: ~~Provides direction on the Chair’s Recommendations to inform the development of the Annual Plan in relation to the Iconic Buildings, set out as follows~~:

Canterbury Museum

a. Allocates $15 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to the Canterbury Museum, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. The Crown providing the Canterbury Museum a minimum of $15.0 million grant, towards their capital programme; or the Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

b. Provides the Canterbury Museum with an interest-bearing loan of $28.6 million, to be repaid by the Museum by way of an international visitor levy. Council will charge the Canterbury Museum interest at 4.90% p.a. on the balance of the loan.

c. Requests the Mayor write to the Canterbury Museum requiring them to source $15 million of funding from Government.

Christchurch School of Music

d. Allocates $4 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to the Christchurch School of Music, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. Confirmed matched funding from the Christchurch School of Music of $4 million.

ii. The Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

Christ Church Cathedral

e. Allocates $15 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to Christ Church Reinstatement Limited, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. The Crown providing Christ Church Reinstatement Limited a minimum of $15.0 million grant towards their capital programme, and

ii. The Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

iii. The parties (CCC and CCRL) and the Anglican Diocese of Christchurch entering into a funding agreement confirming the Council’s contribution is full and final, with no further financial obligation for any further capital or operational expenditure for the Christ Church Cathedral.

f. Requests that the Council’s remaining commitment to Christ Church Reinstatement Limited, being a grant of up to $10 million collected by way of a targeted rate, be released on 1 July 2026, with any balance of the grant not collected through the targeted rate and interest to be funded from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus.

Arts Centre

g. Requests that Council staff work with The Arts Centre Te Matatiki Toi Ora ~~to develop a formal expression of interest for the former Student Union site,~~ and report back on a range of options ahead of the Long Term Plan.

Balance of 2025/2026 forecast operating surplus

h. Requests any balance of the 2025/2026 forecast operating surplus be applied to Council debt repayment.

i. Notes that, should any conditions of the funding arrangements above not be met, any unspent funds will be applied towards Council debt reduction.

6. Recommends to Council that properties at 156 McCormacks Bay Road and 124A Main Road be withdrawn from the current disposal process, noting there are outstanding archaeological matters to be investigated and resolved before further decisions on the properties can be made.

7. Recommends to Council that properties at 4 and 6 Balmoral Lane be declared surplus, noting ecological assessments have confirmed that present and estimated values are not sufficient to justify retention.

8. Notes the submission to include 274A Main Road, Clifton in the disposal list, and that:

a. staff have considered the property for disposal

b. it has not been included due to identified risks

c. further advice, including options, will be formally reported separately to the Committee prior to 23 June.

9. Recommends to Council that, in progressing the potential disposal of 59 Farnborough Street (Aranui), consideration be given in the first instance to community housing providers, noting this is consistent with existing delegations.

10. Recommends to Council that 13 Mundy’s Road (Dallington) be withdrawn from the current disposal process, noting it is within the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor and is better considered through processes specific to that programme.

11. Notes the submission to remove 8 Martindales Road from the list of properties previously declared surplus.

12. Recommends to Council that 8 Martindales Road remains on the list of properties declared surplus, noting that:

a. no compelling reason to retain the property has been identified

b. alternative options are available for neighbouring parties to participate in community gardening initiatives

c. disposal will reduce ongoing costs to Council and may generate a modest capital return.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Moved/Seconded

Temporary Suspension of Standing Orders

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00081

That pursuant to Standing Order 3.5 (Temporary Suspension of Standing Orders), the following Standing Orders be suspended to enable a more informal discussion:

17.5 members may speak only once.

18.1 general procedure for speaking and moving motions.

18.8 foreshadowed amendments.

18.9 lost amendments

19.5 revocation or alteration by resolution at the same meeting.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

Resolution to Exclude the Public

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00082

That at 10.29 am the resolution to exclude the public set out below be adopted:

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

Note: The grounds for exclusion are summarised in the following table. The full wording from the Act can be found in section 6 or section 7, depending on the context.

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely the items listed below.

Reason for passing this resolution: a good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

Note

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

“(4) Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

(a) Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

(b) Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:

General subject matter to be considered:

3. Confirmation of content – Annual Plan 2026/27

Section:

Section 7

Subclause and reason under the Act:

(2)(g) Maintain legal professional privilege

Public interest consideration:

The public interest in ensuring the maintenance of legal professional privilege is such that any public interest consideration which may outweigh the interest would need to be very high. It is not considered that the public interest here is sufficiently high to outweigh ensuring the maintenance of the legal professional privilege.

Potential release review date and conditions:

1 December 2027 or sooner by approval of the Director of Legal and Democratic Services

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 11.01 am.

The meeting adjourned at 11.02 am and reconvened at 12.00 pm.

Motion 5 - Iconic Buildings

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00083

5. Confirms that the development of the Annual plan should include the following Chair’s Recommendations in relation to the Iconic Buildings:

Canterbury Museum

a. Allocates $15 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to the Canterbury Museum, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. The Crown providing the Canterbury Museum a minimum of $15.0 million grant, towards their capital programme; or the Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

c. Requests the Mayor write to the Canterbury Museum requiring them to source $15 million of funding from Government.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	14	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	1	Councillor Johanson
TOTAL	15

Conflict of interest	2	Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00084

Christchurch School of Music

d. Allocates $4 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to the Christchurch School of Music, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. Confirmed matched funding from the Christchurch School of Music of $4 million.

ii. The Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00085

Christ Church Cathedral

e. Allocates $15 million from the 2025/26 forecast operating surplus to Christ Church Reinstatement Limited, as a grant, towards their capital programme, conditional upon:

i. The Crown providing Christ Church Reinstatement Limited a minimum of $15.0 million grant towards their capital programme, and

ii. The Council being satisfied of a clear and deliverable pathway to completion.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	12	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	3	Councillor Donovan, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Moore
Abstain	2	Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00086

Arts Centre

g. Requests that Council staff work with The Arts Centre Te Matatiki Toi Ora and report back on a range of options ahead of the Long Term Plan.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00087

Balance of 2025/2026 forecast operating surplus

h. Requests any balance of the 2025/2026 forecast operating surplus be applied to Council debt repayment.

i. Notes that, should any conditions of the funding arrangements above not be met, any unspent funds will be applied towards Council debt reduction.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

The meeting adjourned at 12.47 pm and reconvened at 2.24 pm.

Councillor Proposed Amendments

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00088

A2: Awatea, Amyes, Springs Road intersections

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Requests that $2 million be added to project 79723 - Programme - Amyes, Awatea and Springs Intersection Improvements in FY28/29.

Councillor Peters/Councillor Moore Carried

For	16	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	1	Councillor Donovan
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00089

A4. Kiwirail budget reductions

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Requests a report to consider how it can reduce the quantum of Council funding towards KiwiRail projects and seek an update on what changes have been made by central government to reduce the compliance burden on local councils.

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Moore Carried

For	15	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	2	Councillor McLellan, Councillor Scandrett
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00090

A5. North Beach Carpark

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Requests advice in time for the draft Long Term Plan on the North Beach carpark upgrade, including capital cost, funding options (including Parks co-funding), delivery timing, and key dependencies.

Councillor Donovan/Councillor Barber Carried

For	12	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters
Against	5	Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00091

A9: New and in-fill street lighting budgets

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Allocates an additional $200,000 to the Road Lighting Safety Budget (#37449) to address lighting gaps on Grange Road, Grantley Street, Symes Rd and Inwoods Road.

Councillor Herz Jardine/Councillor Donovan Carried

For	14	Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	2	Councillor Barber, Councillor Keown
Abstain	1	Councillor Moore
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00092

A13. Cycle lane delivery – report

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

a. Agree to support investigation of an alternative delivery approach on sections of the Ōtākaro Avon Major Cycle Route to assess whether rapid rollout or staged delivery methods could provide a lower-cost, more flexible, and scalable model.

b. Request staff report back on:

i. Suitable locations or sections of the route where this approach may be appropriate;

ii. Potential delivery methods, including temporary or adaptable infrastructure and shorter-life materials where appropriate;

iii. Costs, timing, risks, benefits, and trade-offs compared with permanent infrastructure delivery;

iv. Lessons and evaluation criteria that could help inform future design and delivery approaches for Major Cycle Routes across the city.

c. Notes that this work is intended to help inform future Council direction on cycleway delivery and identify opportunities to deliver network outcomes more efficiently and at pace.

Councillor Harrison-Hunt/Councillor MacDonald Carried

For	16	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	1	Councillor Moore
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Recommendation

A17. Weaving the East

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Includes budget provision in FY 26/27 of $250,000 for implementing unfunded Weaving the East activities.

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Donovan Lost

For	7	Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Scandrett
Against	9	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	1	Councillor Coker
TOTAL	17

Committee Recommendation

A18. Smith Street Service Centre

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1Includes budget provision in FY 26/27 of up to $100,000 for a feasibility study on the future of 180 Smith Street.

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Cotter Lost

For	6	Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor McLellan
Against	9	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	2	Councillor Fields, Deputy Mayor Henstock
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00093

A24. Skatepark enhancements

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

Includes make budget provision of $500,000 to support Washington Way improvements to improve the ability to host events.

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Barber Carried

For	10	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock
Against	5	Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	2	Councillor Coker, Councillor McLellan
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00094

A34. Rewi Alley Museum Charitable Trust

That the Finance and Performance Committee

Provides the Rewi Alley Museum Charitable Trust a one-off operating grant of $40,000 funded by the Capital Endowment Fund, subject to a staff assessment of the grant against the eligibility criteria, in time for the final Annual Plan adoption meeting.

Councillor Harrison-Hunt/Mayor Carried

For	13	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Peters, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	3	Councillor Donovan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Scandrett
Abstain	1	Councillor Herz Jardine
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00095

A31. Lower Heathcote River Guidance Plan

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

a. That Council make changes to its draft annual plan to include $55,000 of opex to initiate a dedicated weed control in the riparian margins of the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River.

b. Requests staff to bring back advice to the Long-Term Plan to support a year on year riparian weed control programme.

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Coker Carried

For	9	Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Scandrett
Against	8	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Motions 3a – 3c Community Grants

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00096

3. Confirms that the development of the Annual Plan should include the following, subject to resolutions at the meeting:

a. continuing the planned 0.25% rates increase for the Climate Resilience Fund in 2026/27, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	11	Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock
Against	6	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Peters, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00097

3. Confirms that the development of the Annual Plan should include the following, subject to resolutions at the meeting:

b. continuing to provide the planned $7.12m in funding for contestable community grants, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	14	Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	3	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Keown
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00098

3. Confirms that the development of the Annual Plan should include the following, subject to resolutions at the meeting:

c. continuing to provide the planned $0.30m increase in funding for the Environmental Partnership Fund, as per the Draft 2026/27 Annual Plan.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	11	Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock
Against	6	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor Peters, Mayor Mauger
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Motions 6 to 12 – Properties

Committee comment

1. Updates to Motion 6 were made during the meeting with the agreement of the meeting, and of the Mover and Seconder, and are reflected below in Resolutions 6A and 6B.

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00099

6.A. Recommends to Council that properties at 124A Main Road be withdrawn from the current disposal process, noting there are outstanding archaeological matters to be investigated and resolved before further decisions on the properties can be made.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00100

6.B. Recommends to Council that properties at 156 McCormacks Bay Road be withdrawn from the disposal process, noting there are outstanding archaeological matters to be investigated and resolved before further decisions on the properties can be made, including staff advice on the process of designating the land as a Reserve.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee comment

1. Motion 10, which had proposed the property at 13 Mundy’s Road be withdrawn from the current disposal process, was amended with the agreement of the meeting, and of the Mover and Seconder, to recommend that the property be retained in the current disposal process.

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00101

10. Recommends to Council that 13 Mundy’s Road (Dallington) be retained in the current disposal process.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00102

7. Recommends to Council that properties at 4 and 6 Balmoral Lane be declared surplus, noting ecological assessments have confirmed that present and estimated values are not sufficient to justify retention.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	13	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	3	Councillor Coker, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Johanson
Abstain	1	Councillor Herz Jardine
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00103

11. Notes the submission to remove 8 Martindales Road from the list of properties previously declared surplus.

12. Recommends to Council that 8 Martindales Road remains on the list of properties declared surplus, noting that:

a. no compelling reason to retain the property has been identified

b. alternative options are available for neighbouring parties to participate in community gardening initiatives

c. disposal will reduce ongoing costs to Council and may generate a modest capital return.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00104

8. Notes the submission to include 274A Main Road, Clifton in the disposal list, and that:

a. staff have considered the property for disposal

b. it has not been included due to identified risks

c. further advice, including options, will be formally reported separately to the Committee prior to 23 June.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00105

9. Recommends to Council that, in progressing the potential disposal of 59 Farnborough Street (Aranui), consideration be given in the first instance to community housing providers, noting this is consistent with existing delegations.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

Motions 3d to 3f – Cycleway Connections and Youth Employment

Committee Comment

1. Motions 3d, 3e and 3f were proposed Councillor amendments which were incorporated into the Chair’s Motion by the Mover and Seconder.

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00106

3. Confirms that the development of the Annual Plan should include the following, subject to resolutions at the meeting:

Cycle connections

d. Requests staff undertake high-level feasibility work to assess options and give more accurate estimate of the costs of the Westmorland to Nor’West Arc cycle connection, at a cost of $50,000 opex for 2026/27.

e. Request staff undertake initial planning work on an Edinburgh Street cycle connection, aiming for construction in the first year of the Long Term Plan 2027/28.

Youth employment

f. That the Council prioritise strengthening and increasing Youth employment outcomes across Christchurch by co-ordinating with the Community Development Advisor with the Youth Portfolio, and a number of teams within Council and external agencies with whom the Council has existing relationships.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	17	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock, Mayor Mauger
Against	0
Abstain	0
TOTAL	17

The meeting adjourned at 3.14 pm and reconvened at 3.34 pm.

The Mayor left the meeting during the adjournment and did not return.

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00107

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the summary information and options in the Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27 Report.

2. Confirms the direction provided through the Annual Plan workshops in May 2026 to inform the Annual Plan adoption report development process.

4. Notes the direction provided through the Annual Plan workshops and the resolutions above will result in a:

a. proposed final Annual Plan average rates increase to existing ratepayers of 7.83%, further noting rate increases to individual rate payers could vary materially due to the impact of the General Revaluation taking effect on 1 July 2026; and

b. breach of the balanced budget financial prudence benchmark for 2026/27 as indicated in the LTP.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

For	14	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Cotter, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Fields, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor Johanson, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock
Against	2	Councillor Keown, Councillor Moore
Abstain	0
TOTAL	16

Absent	1	Mayor Mauger

Resumption of Standing Orders

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00108

That the Standing Orders set aside above, be resumed.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

Attachments

a Proposed Amendments

Karakia Whakamutunga

Meeting concluded at 3.38 pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 23^rd DAY OF JUNE 2026

Councillor Sam MacDonald

Chairperson

Finance and Performance Committee

Open Minutes

Date: Wednesday 27 May 2026

Time: 9.32 am

Venue: Camellia Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Sam MacDonald

Councillor Jake McLellan

Mayor Phil Mauger

Deputy Mayor Victoria Henstock

Councillor David Cartwright

Councillor Melanie Coker

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Kelly Barber

Councillor Celeste Donovan

Councillor Tyrone Fields

Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt – via audio/visual link

Councillor Nathaniel Herz Jardine

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Andrei Moore

Councillor Mark Peters

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Principal Advisor

Bruce Moher

Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / CFO

Tel: 941 8999

bruce.moher@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

David Corlett

Democratic Services Advisor

Tel: 941 5421

david.corlett@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order. Where no voting record is shown, the item was carried unanimously by those present.

Councillor McLellan was in the Chair for items 1 to 4.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Councillors Henstock and Coker declared an interest in Item 14 - Appointment of an Elected Member to the Board of Christchurch City Holdings Ltd.

The Mayor declared an interest in Item 16 - Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00081

That the minutes of the Finance and Performance Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 22 April 2026 be confirmed.

Mayor/Councillor Scandrett Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

There were no public forum presentations.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

Councillor MacDonald joined the meeting at 9.37 am during consideration of Item 5.1.

Deputy Mayor Henstock left the meeting at 9.34 am and returned at 9.38 am during consideration of Item 5.1.

Councillor Keown joined the meeting at 9.40 am during consideration of Item 5.1.

5.1 Friends of Banks Peninsula

Jan Cook and Suky Thompson spoke on behalf of Friends of Banks Peninsula regarding Item 16 - Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting.

Councillor MacDonald assumed the Chair during item 5.2.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00082

That the apology for lateness from Councillor MacDonald be accepted.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor McLellan Carried

5.2 Bruce McLean and Lee Robinson

Bruce McLean and Lee Robinson regarding Item 16 - Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting.

Attachments

a Bruce McLean and Lee Robinson - Presentation to Finance and Performance Committee

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Key Organisational Performance Results - April 2026

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00083

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Key Organisational Performance Results - April 2026 Report.

Councillor McLellan/Councillor Peters Carried

8. Financial Performance Report - April 2026

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00084

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Financial Performance Report - April 2026 Report.

Mayor/Deputy Mayor Carried

9. Capital Programme Performance Report April 2026

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00085

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Capital Programme Performance Report April 2026.

Councillor Cartwright/Councillor Barber Carried

10. Visibility of Capital Project Changes - April 2026

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00086

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Visibility of Capital Project Changes - April 2026 Report.

Councillor Coker/Councillor Scandrett Carried

Deputy Mayor Henstock left the meeting at 10.34 am and returned at 10.37 am during consideration of Item 11.

Councillor Barber left the meeting at 10.50 am and returned at 10.52 am during consideration of Item 11.

11. Digital Activity Update

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00087

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Digital Activity Update Report.

Mayor/Councillor Cotter Carried

Attachments

a Digital Activity Update - Presentation to Finance and Performance Committee

12. Audit Engagement Letter

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00088

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receive the information in the Audit Engagement Letter Report.

2. Note that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Recommend that the Engagement Letter is signed by the Mayor on behalf of Council.

Mayor/Councillor McLellan Carried

13. CCO Non-trading Shelf Companies - Appointment of Interim Chief Executive as Director

Committee Comment

1. Staff proposed a minor amendment to the staff recommendations in item 13. This change was to appoint the Interim Chief Executive as a director prior to formally removing the former Chief Executive as a director. The amended staff recommendation was approved.

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00089

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

1. Approves the appointment of the Interim Chief Executive, Mr Bede Carran as a director of the Council’s non-trading shelf companies – CCC One Ltd, CCC Five Ltd, CCC Seven Ltd and Ellerslie International Flower Show Ltd;

2. Notes that upon her retirement the former Chief Executive, Mary Richardson, verbally resigned as the sole director of the Council’s non-trading shelf companies – CCC One Ltd, CCC Five Ltd, CCC Seven Ltd and Ellerslie International Flower Show Ltd;

3. Notes that Ms Richardson’s resignation as a director of the above companies was not in writing and therefore, for completeness approves the removal of Mary Richarson as a Director of the Council’s non-trading shelf companies – CCC One Ltd, CCC Five Ltd, CCC Seven Ltd and Ellerslie International Flower Show Ltd; and

4. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor Cotter Carried

14. Appointment of an Elected Member to the Board of Christchurch City Holdings Ltd

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00090

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Notes that the Council’s Appointments Committee sought expressions of interest from elected members for the vacant Council director position on the Christchurch City Holdings Ltd board on 2 April 2026 with one expression of interest registered;

2. Notes that the appointments process required by the Council’s Policy for the Appointment and Remuneration of Directors to Council Organisations is not suited to the situation of having only one candidate for a director position and therefore Christchurch City Holdings Ltd has declined to convene the Appointments Committee;

3. Agrees to appoint Deputy Mayor Victoria Henstock to the Christchurch City Holdings Ltd board commencing 1 September 2026 and ending at the 2028 triennial election; and

4. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor Peters Carried

Deputy Mayor Henstock and Councillor Coker declared an interest in this Item and took no part in any discussion or voting.

15. Wind up of Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00091

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Agrees that Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd becomes a non-operational shelf company from 1 July 2026;

2. Approves a change in company name from Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd to CCC Six Ltd from 1 July 2026;

3. Approves the exemption of CCC Six Ltd (formerly Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd) as a Council-controlled organisation from 1 July 2026 pursuant to section 7(3) of the Local Government Act 2002;

4. Appoints the Council’s Interim Chief Executive Bede Carran as a director of CCC Six Ltd from 1 July 2026;

5. Agrees to pass an ordinary shareholder resolution to remove Richard Peebles and Steve Reindler as directors of Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd as at 30 June 2026 pursuant to section 156(1) of the Companies Act 1993 and clause 10.2 of the company’s constitution; and

6. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Mayor/Councillor Scandrett Carried

The meeting adjourned at 11.06 am and reconvened at 11.27 am.

Mayor Mauger left the meeting at 11.53 am during consideration of Item 16.

16. Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00092

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as medium significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Resolves to seek use of the Fast-track Approvals Act for approvals needed for the Akaroa and Duvauchelles wastewater irrigation scheme by lodging a referral application under section 13 of that Act.

4. Requests the Chief Executive to advance that application with urgency.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor Moore Carried

Mayor Mauger declared an interest in this Item and took no part in any discussion or voting.

For	12	Councillor Barber, Councillor Cartwright, Councillor Coker, Councillor Donovan, Councillor Harrison-Hunt, Councillor Herz Jardine, Councillor MacDonald, Councillor McLellan, Councillor Moore, Councillor Peters, Councillor Scandrett, Deputy Mayor Henstock
Against	4	Councillor Cotter, Councillor Fields, Councillor Johanson, Councillor Keown
Abstain	0
TOTAL	16

Conflict of Interest	1	Mayor Mauger

Mayor Mauger returned to the meeting at 12.01 pm during consideration of Item 17.

Councillor Moore left the meeting at 12.03 pm and returned at 12.06 pm during consideration of Item 17.

17. Christchurch Wastewater Treatment Plant: Monthly monitoring of temporary treatment plant

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00093

Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Christchurch Wastewater Treatment Plant: Monthly monitoring of temporary treatment plant report.

Councillor MacDonald/Councillor Johanson Carried

Attachments

a Christchurch Wastewater Treatment Plant: Monthly monitoring of temporary treatment plant - Presentation to Finance and Performance Committee

18. Resolution to Exclude the Public Te whakataunga kaupare hunga tūmatanui

Committee Resolved FPCO/2026/00094

Part C

That at 12.06 pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 170 to 171 of the agenda be adopted.

Deputy Mayor/Mayor Carried

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 12.58 pm.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Meeting concluded at 12.59 pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 24^TH DAY OF JUNE 2026

Councillor Sam MacDonald

Chairperson

11. Financial Performance Report - May 2026
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1132756
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Mitchell Shaw, Principal Advisor Finance
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the Committee on Council's financial performance to 31 May 2026, which includes providing an updated year-end forecast.

1.2 This is a standing report that is presented to the Committee.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Financial Performance Report - May 2026 Report.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 This report to the end of May 2026 provides a brief update to the April 2026 report presented on 27 May 2026. Year-to-date operational performance and the forecast have improved slightly since the last report with no material change to capital expenditure performance.

3.2 The year-to-date operational surplus of $70.9 million is $53.8 million more than budget (improved from $49.5 million last month). The positive improvement from last month is largely driven by: additional personnel and net interest savings, along with improvements in Transport revenue and Recreation & Sports participation revenue.

3.3 The forecast year end operating surplus has increased slightly to $46.3 million (from $46.2 million last month) driven by a $0.6 million improvement in costs less a $0.5 million reduction in revenue.

The overall positive forecast variance is largely driven by: insurance renewal savings ($8.7 million), lower personnel costs based on the forecast vacancies ($8.6 million), landfill and resource recovery operations due to lower landfill maintenance and lower recycling processing costs ($5.7 million), Three Waters higher labour capitalisation rates and lower operating costs ($3.0 million), Recreation & Sports higher participation rates ($2.7 million), Rates and rates penalty growth ($1.5 million), a buoyant property market increasing consenting operations including LIM and Property File revenue ($3.7 million), higher Subvention receipts ($7.2 million) and lower net interest costs due to lower borrowing ($3.4 million), reflecting lower capital spend.

3.4 The Weather Event in late February involved significant rain predominately impacting Banks Peninsula, causing major slips and damage to bridge buttresses. $3.4 million additional Opex costs have been incurred to date, mainly dumping fees for slash and debris. A total of $4.3 million has been incorporated into the current forecast, $0.8 million higher than last month’s forecast, with Transport staff assessing whether this will reduce slightly once the capital works aspects have been separated out of the costs.

3.5 Any direct operational increased fuel costs resulting from the Middle East conflict have now been factored into this forecast. This initial assessment has forecasted approximately a 25% increase for the remaining months of the 2026 financial year, mostly in Three Waters, Facilities, Parks and Transport. Operational contract impacts will become clearer when the next price indexes are available from Statistics NZ, as this is what drives any lagged contract escalations. As such, and due to the contract escalation contract clauses, these increases will begin to emerge in Q1 and beyond next financial year. In addition, there may be some supply disruption for products or raw materials for products.

3.6 The capital programme spend is below budget year-to-date by $34.9 million ($36.6 million last month), primarily in the areas of Three Waters ($11.1 million), Landfill and Transfer Station projects ($5.4 million), Parks, Heritage & Coastal Environment($ 5.8 million) and $16.6 million for One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha. The Project Management Office (PMO) forecasts the underspend to extend to $75.4 million by year end.

4. Operational Revenue and Expenditure

4.1 This covers day to day spend on staffing, operations and maintenance, and revenues to fund the operational spend.

4.2 Operational revenue exceeds expenditure as it includes rates revenue for capital renewals and debt repayment. This revenue is referred to below as ‘Funds not available for Opex’ and is removed to show the year to date and forecast cash operational surplus or deficit.

	Year to Date Results			Forecast Year End Results			After Carry Forward
$m	Actual	Budget	Var	Forecast	Budget	Var	C/ fwd	Var
Operational
Revenues	(1,097.9)	(1,085.4)	12.5	(1,158.3)	(1,144.7)	13.6	(0.8)	14.4
Expenditure	771.7	813.0	41.3	850.2	892.4	42.2	8.5	33.7
Funds not available for Opex	255.3	255.3	-	254.2	252.3	(1.9)	(0.1)	(1.8)
Operating (Surplus) / Deficit	(70.9)	(17.1)	53.8	(53.9)	-	53.9	7.6	46.3

4.3 After eleven months, the year-to-date operating variance to budget is positive $53.8 million, and forecasted to reduce to $46.3 million after carry forwards by financial year end. Summaries of the material revenue and expenditure variances and changes are highlighted below.

4.4 Revenue is $12.5 million higher than budget year-to-date, which includes $7.2 million in additional subvention receipts, $3.0 million in Recreation & Sports and $5.6 million in consenting. Revenue is forecast to be $14.4 million higher than budget at year end.

4.5 Key drivers of actual and forecast revenue variances to budget include (amounts in brackets are unfavourable variances, i.e. revenues below budget):

Revenue Variances ($ million)	Annual Budget	YTD Var	Forecast Var
Rates – additional late 24/25 valuation growth	825.7	0.8	0.4
Rates – penalties	5.5	1.5	1.1
Interest earnings	36.0	(2.9)	0.8
Subvention receipts	7.3	7.2	7.2
Transwaste dividend – SOI update	5.6	(0.4)	(0.4)
Resource Consenting – DC change and strong Christchurch property market	10.1	3.5	3.6
Building Regulation – prior period revenue correction and strong Christchurch property market	27.1	2.1	2.2
LIM & Property file volumes – strong Christchurch property market	3.3	0.8	0.9
Transport – mix of NZTA subsidy receipts and commercial and parking revenue	48.4	(1.0)	(1.2)
Recreation & Sports – additional community participation	26.4	3.0	1.7
Water Supply (Water Billing) and Wastewater (Trade Waste) both revenues trending to be lower by year end	13.0	0.1	(0.9)
Solid Waste – Burwood landfill revenue processed as internal charge from Council capital projects (offset below)	24.4	(2.2)	(2.3)
Community Housing -variation due to timing.	17.4	(1.6)	(0.1)
Other revenue variances	94.5	1.6	1.4
Total	1,144.7	12.5	14.4

4.6 Expenditure is $41.3 million under budget year to date and forecast to be $33.7 million (3.8%) under budget, after carry forwards, at year end.

4.7 Key drivers of actual and forecast expenditure variances to budget include (amounts in brackets are unfavourable variances, i.e. expenses are greater than budget):

Expenditure Variance ($ million)	Annual Budget	YTD Var	Forecast Var
Insurance - renewal savings	37.3	8.7	8.7
Waste Management – lower recycling processing fees and organic processing fees, and landfill costs	67.7	7.1	8.0
Personnel Costs –vacancies with 2025 salary increases applied.	296.9	9.7	8.6
Three Waters - timing of reactive maintenance & operating works and higher capitalisation rates	60.6	5.0	3.9
Rates on Council owned properties – late annual plan rates reductions after expense budget set	39.9	1.9	1.7
Digital – timing of software renewals and portfolio delivery.	33.0	0.7	(0.7)
Interest expense	139.1	5.7	2.6
Governance – savings in renegotiated MKT Treaty contract and election costs	6.2	0.7	0.5
Parks – minor timing of activity and no major fire events	20.4	(0.3)	(0.2)
Transport - timing of maintenance works and new tram contract impacting forecast	67.6	(1.0)	(1.2)
Recreation & Sports – maintenance cost savings due to delay in Parakiore opening	24.3	(0.6)	1.0
Riskpool insurance call	-	(0.4)	(0.4)
Resource Consenting and Building – additional outsourcing costs due to high volumes	9.0	(2.1)	(3.0)
Regulatory Compliance & Licencing – underspend in noise control security costs	2.5	0.5	0.5
Strategic Planning & Policy – underspend in professional advice and Port Hills redzone	3.2	1.0	0.6
Libraries – underspend in Turanga Bores project	7.3	0.4	0.4
Other expenditure variances	77.4	4.3	2.7
Total	892.4	41.3	33.7

5. Capital Expenditure and Revenue

5.1 This section covers the capital programme spend and funding relating to it (details on the delivery of capital projects is contained in the Capital Programme Performance Report).

	Year to Date Results			Forecast Year End Results			After Carry Forwards
$m	Actual	Budget	Var	Forecast	Budget	Var	Carry Fwd	Var
Core Programme	438.3	456.6	18.3	502.5	562.2	59.7	43.2	16.5
Less unidentified Carry Forwards	-	-	-	(2.5)	-	2.5	19.0	(16.5)
Core Programme	438.3	456.6	18.3	500.0	562.2	62.2	62.2	-
One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha	74.6	91.2	16.6	79.3	92.5	13.2	13.2	-
Total Capital Programme	512.9	547.8	34.9	579.3	654.7	75.4	75.4	-
Revenues and Funding	(296.8)	(303.8)	(7.0)	(310.9)	(311.5)	(0.6)	(2.4)	1.8
Borrowing required	216.1	244.0	27.9	268.4	343.2	74.8	73.0	1.8

Capital Expenditure

5.2 Capital expenditure is $34.9 million under budget year-to-date primarily due to Landfill and Transfer Station projects ($5.4 million), Three Waters ($11.1 million) and One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha ($16.6 million relating to timing of expenditure) offset by Parks, Heritage & Coastal Environment overspend ($5.8 million).

5.3 The PMO’s current core programme year end forecast remains at $500.0 million. This is $62.2 million (11%) lower than budget, most of which will likely be requested to be carried forward to future years. The project managers’ forecast is currently $2.5 million higher than PMO’s at $502.5 million. The primary reason for the variance is that the project managers forecast on a project-by-project basis. In contrast the PMO forecasts using a programme level analytical review and historic delivery trends of prior years.

5.4 The project managers core programme year end forecast is $59.7 million (11%) under budget before carry forwards due to underspends on three waters ($30.1 million, 12% of its total capex), mainly related to delays arising from dependencies on other project work proceeding, transport ($12.0 million, 8% of its total capex) and landfill and transfer station projects ($8.4 million, 70% of its total capex).

Capital Revenues and Funding

5.5 Capital revenues and funding are $7.0 million lower than budget year to date. Development Contributions ($10.5 million) and Asset Sales ($2.3 million) are higher than budget offset by lower NZTA Subsidies ($4.7 million), lower Parakiore and Court Theatre capital grant receipts ($4.5m) and lower crown revenues on Major Cycleway routes ($4.8 million). Reserve drawdowns are $5.8m under budget due to receiving DC revenue in advance of associated expenditure.

5.6 Capital revenues and funding are forecast to align with budget by year end.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments for this report.

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Kiran Hasan - Finance Systems & Reporting Accountant

Nick Dean - Finance Business Partner

Approved By

Mitchell Shaw - Principal Advisor - Finance

Bruce Moher - Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

13. Long Term Plan 2027 - Project & Risk Update
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1079624
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Peter Ryan, LTP Project Manager
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 To provide regular updates to the Committee on the development of the Long-term Plan 2027-2037 (LTP) as requested.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Committee:

1. Receives the information in the Long-Term Plan 2027 – Project & Risk Update.

2. Notes the status update for the overall LTP project and each workstream provided in section 4.1 and provides advice and guidance as required.

3. Notes that the Chief Financial Officer will provide a report to the July 2026 meeting of the Finance and Performance Committee setting out Executive Leaderships plan for the Council to achieve a rates trajectory of 6-5-4 %, as set out in the LoE and Financial Strategy. The plan must identify:

a. the level of savings required;

b. the recommendations, milestones and accountabilities necessary for ELT to arrive at a proposal by 1 October2026, that will allow Council to achieve a 6-5-4% position.

3. Background/Context Te Horopaki

3.1 On 27 August 2025 this Committee approved the key principles, governance and other structures to drive development of the LTP 2027 (Attachment A). This was followed on 7 October 2025 by the Audit and Risk Management Committee’s (ARMC) approval of specific workstream plans, milestones and accountabilities (Attachment B).

3.2 In February 2026 this Committee consolidated this guidance into Council’s formal Letter of Expectations (LOE) for the LTP (refer Attachment C). The LOE sets out clear and specific guidance on the trajectory of future rates increases, development of the capital programme and other key LTP components.

3.3 The LOE supports the decisions made by both Committees, but adds further context and specificity, as well as modifying slightly some timelines. This is reflected in an updated LTP project timeline (refer Attachment D).

3.4 Scheduling of LTP workshops is carried out in conjunction with Democracy Services team and must remain flexible due to competing demands for workshop time.

3.5 This report provides an update to the Committee on the implementation of the above guidance to date, including current status, key risks and mitigations to those risks. In particular, it provides assurance that a specific risk previously identified by the ARMC is being actively managed: a failure of Council internal processes, including where relationships between the LTP and other overlapping internal processes are not established early, or where accountabilities and milestones are not agreed in advance and adhered to throughout the LTP’s development.

3.6 Mitigations for this risk have also been informed by recent sector learning, including insights from the Taituarā LTP Roadshow – The Road to 2027 held on 26 March 2026, which was attended by several Council staff. These insights have been applied to strengthen internal coordination, sequencing, and risk visibility across the LTP programme. This approach is consistent with the Council’s LOE, which notes that both this Committee and the ARMC have requested regular project and risk updates throughout the development of the LTP, with all issues or barriers to be identified and escalated early.

3.7 Staff have also been reminded on a regular basis that the LTP should build from approved content within the 2024 LTP rather than commencing fundamental rebuilds. Restarting from ‘scratch’ when the LTP components are well known, well-understood (and have been successfully audited) is not considered an effective or efficient use of scarce resources. It also, critically, introduces a significant risk of misalignment between interdependent LTP components.

3.8 On 15 June, the Audit Office presented to the ARMC their summary of intended areas of focus and audit timings for the LTP (Attachment E).

4. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

4.1 The following is a status update for the overall LTP project and for each workstream. This update is as at 8 June 2026.

Overall Status	On track.
	Complexity around local government reforms is high, but almost all workstreams are on track. (One requires information on risk and may be reinstated to on track.) Feedback from councillors is positive. Early engagement underway with the Audit Office.
Community Outcomes	On track.
	Updated by Council 19 March 2026. Completed.
Environmental Scan	On track.
	Council briefed at workshop 19 March, circulated to LTP stakeholders. Completed.
Financial Strategy	On track.
	6-5-4% rates trajectory set by LOE, along with clear parameters on capital programme size and development. These two parameters also set many of the major components of an FS. FS workshops were held with councillors over April, May and June. Their purpose was to build consensus around additional issues such as headroom, debt, renewals and financial benchmarks. Scenarios were also canvassed, including savings required to achieve the 6-5-4% rates trajectory. A first draft (WIP) was presented to the Finance & Performance Committee on 10 June. The document can now be further updated prior to going to ELT in September and Council on 1 October 2026. From there the draft LTP goes through a 10 week quality assurance and alignment period with Council to ensure that the Letter of Expectation has been met, and that the various components of the LTP are balanced and integrated.
Infrastructure Strategy	On track.
	Specific work is being applied to keep alignment and accountabilities for the FS and IS clear, and to ensure that the IS is delivered to match the financial parameters set out in councillors Letter of Expectation. IS workshops were held with Council over April, May and June. Long-term risks, challenges and constraints around infrastructure were clearly framed. A first draft (WIP) was presented to the Finance & Performance Committee on 10 June. The document can now be further updated prior to going to ELT in September and Council on 1 October as a draft. From there the draft LTP goes through a 10 week quality assurance and alignment period with Council to ensure that the Letter of Expectation has been met, and that the various components of the LTP are balanced and integrated.
Opex budgeting and prioritisation	On track.
	Informed by draft FS. Personnel planning and opex budgeting have commenced, rolling through to early August. This is followed by ELT signoff prior to the draft LTP going to Council on 1 October. These budgets will need to include any savings required to achieve the 6-5-4% rates trajectory set out in the LOE. There are two tranches of potential savings. They are LOS review (via the activity planning workstream) and a non-LOS based savings initiative (through the Finance team and ELT.) Both are currently active.
Capital Programme development	On track.
	The LOE sets out clear guidance on capital programme parameters, including overall quantum. This workstream was asked to deliver a capital prioritisation model for approval prior to the capital programme being developed. The model must enable Council to meet the 6-5-4% rates trajectory, capital programme quantum and deliverability requirements. Council held several workshops with the capital development workstream over April and May. The result was agreement on a prioritisation model, which will now be used to develop a draft capital programme for Council by 1 October 2026. This work was completed ahead of schedule. The key risk to the capital programme lies in maintaining this prioritisation. Once it has been re-prioritised to an affordable and deliverable size, there will be pressure from competing demands to expand it again. This would put the FS and deliverability at risk and erode opex savings made to reach the 6-5-4% trajectory.
Activity plans (inc. LOS review)	On track.
	A simplified activity plan template is being used for the 2027 LTP. As part of the level of service review process, managers presented their current performance and budget information to council in a series of preliminary workshops between early May and 11 June. At the specific direction of the Finance and Performance Committee this covered review of both external and internal activities. There was a high level of engagement with these workshops and an extensive Q&A process has been developed to process enquiries. Council guidance affecting level of service measures will be confirmed with Council in late June, prior to feeding into the budgeting, activity and asset planning processes. Other general questions will be responded to as information becomes available. Activity plans, including updated LOS, will be reviewed again after 1 October 2026.
Asset planning alignment with LTP	Potentially on track, but risks to be clarified.
	There are three key risks to manage when aligning asset planning with the LTP. Risk 1: avoiding overlap or duplication between asset plans and activity plans. Mitigation: The LTP Project Team has agreed that Levels of Service (LOS) are the performance measures and targets that HOS agree with Council in activity plans. The term Level of Service will not be used for anything else. LOS are represented in asset management plans. To avoid duplication or misalignment they will simply be cross referenced in asset management plans by hyperlinks to the relevant activity plan. The standards that asset management plans recommend will be known as ‘Proposed Performance Standards’ throughout all LTP documents, including asset management plans. These standards may be recommended to Heads of Service as part of activity planning and budgeting, but the decision by Heads and Council – which often involves balancing priorities, affordability and deliverability at the organisational level - will drive the LOS and legislative content of the LTP. If a Proposed Performance Standard becomes a LOS it will be removed from the asset management plan, as it will be then covered by the link. The LTP Project Team is communicating these definitions and processes among workstreams. The Head of Strategy is doing the same within asset teams. This is assisting both workstreams. Risk 2 – The Recommendations of the recent AMMA (Asset Management Maturity Assessment) report state that the assessment should “inform Long Term Plan cycles and budgeting processes.” Implications of these results on the LTP are yet to be understood. This includes any asset data or asset management risks to renewals, asset plans, capital programme definition and deliverability, or the financial parameters set out in the FS. The Audit Office has advised that their audit of the LTP 2027 will include a specific focus on “asset condition, performance and renewal information, and whether prioritisation decisions are well supported for critical assets.” This will be carried out by a specialist asset management auditor within the Audit Office, commencing December 2026. The recent AMMA assessment shows a significant decline for a number of major asset classes since the last full maturity assessment in 2020. (The 2023 assessment had a focus on data and information.) This includes Water Supply, Wastewater and Land Drainage. Broadly speaking there are drops from approx. 80 to 60 (out of 100) across all three activities. The asset renewals and other projects generated by these activities have a major (and expanding) footprint within Council’s capital programme and are at the heart of the ‘bow wave’ problem raised by the LOE. Mitigation: feedback has been requested from the asset team setting out any risks/impacts on the LTP arising from AMMA findings. This will include any risks arising from confidence in asset data or processes. These risks are currently unknown. Risk 3: asset plans must align with the LTP. Asset planners have opted to build phase 1 asset plans in an unconstrained manner to reflect ideal practice. They then intend to moderate those plans to align with the parameters set out in Council’s Letter of Expectation, and Council guidance on the FS, IS and activity plans/LOS. The risk is that this alignment is not achieved, or that it is not achieved in time for critical LTP milestones (aligned asset plans to ELT for September and to Council 1 October 2026.) Mitigation: checklist signoff across asset plans to ensure clarity and that critical alignment milestones will be met.
Consultation document	On track.
	The CD will begin early, parallel development rather than being developed late in the process. Agreement in place that one writer will ensure consistent style and voice.
Local Water Done Well	On track.
	This is not an LTP workstream but there are relationships and issues to be monitored. The Water Services Strategy (WSS) is being written to cover WS, WW and Stormwater activities (not Flood Protection, which is LTP-only). Based on meetings with the GM Infrastructure and Head of Three Waters, the plan is to update existing LTP activity plans for WS, WW and Stormwater that will serve WSS requirements while still meeting LTP and reporting requirements. (This is similar to the approach the Transport activity takes for LTP and NZTA requirements.) This means a single source of truth and that existing organisational reporting platforms can continue to be used. Consultation of the WSS and underlying plans will be separate from but parallel with the LTP CD. Further updates will be provided as this approach matures.
LTP Audit	On track.
	Early engagement with the Audit Office has commenced. Council has been supplied with key audit milestones and timings, and at the time of writing the Audit Office plans to present a summary of LTP focus areas and audit timings to ARMC on 15 June (attachments to be provided under separate cover.) This will include an LTP self- assessment to be completed by early November 2026, with review of underlying LTP information (FS, IS and supporting documents) in December 2026. This will be followed by review of the CD in January 2027 and final audit report on draft LTP in February 2027. These are standard timings and the LTP process has been designed to meet them.

5. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

5.1 An LTP progress update was provided to the ARMC on 15 June.

5.2 A further update will be provided to the Committee at its subsequent meetings.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Long Term Plan 2027 - Project Update and Risk Assessment (Finance & Performance Committee) August 2025	26/753459	232
b ⇩	ARMC approval LTP 2027 Workstreams	26/552755	240
c ⇩	Long Term Plan 2027 Council Letter of Expectations	26/552250	244
d ⇩	LTP Project Timeline (updated post LOE)	26/650556	248
e ⇩	The Audit Office - Summary of intended areas of focus and audit timings for the LTP	26/1197199	249

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Boyd Kedzlie - Senior Corporate Planning & Performance Analyst

Meg Wedlock - Performance Analyst

Amber Tait - Performance Analyst

Peter Ryan - Head of Corporate Planning & Performance

Approved By

Peter Ryan - Head of Corporate Planning & Performance

Bruce Moher - Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

14. Guidance and Next Steps - Long Term Plan 2027-2037
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1082163
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Peter Ryan, Head of Corporate Planning & Performance
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to:

1.1.1 Summarise Long-term Plan (LTP) development to date; and

1.1.2 Seek confirmation of the guidance received to date for the Financial Strategy, Infrastructure Strategy and Capital Programme prioritisation framework, to enable staff to proceed with full build of a draft LTP by 1 October 2026, as required by the Council’s Letter of Expectation.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

1. Receives the summary information and options in the Guidance and Next Steps - Long Term Plan 2027-2037 Report.

2. Confirms the direction provided for the draft Financial Strategy (Attachment A) through the Long-term Plan workshops is in line with the Letter of Expectation and is suitable to inform development of all supporting LTP information and documents (activity plans, levels of service, asset management plans, capital projects, and budgets) to be considered by Council from 1 October 2026.

3. Confirms the direction provided for the draft Infrastructure Strategy (Attachment B) through the Long-term Plan workshops is in line with the Letter of Expectation and is suitable to inform development of supporting LTP information and documents (asset management plans, capital projects, and budgets) to be considered by Council from 1 October 2026.

4. Confirms the direction provided for the Capital Prioritisation framework (Attachment C) through the Long-term Plan workshops is in line with the Letter of Expectation and is suitable to inform reprioritisation and development of the draft Capital Programme, including budgets, to be considered by Council from 1 October 2026.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Phase 1 of the approved LTP project plan sought high level guidance from Council on LTP content by June 2026, which would enable staff to then proceed to developing detailed supporting documents for consideration by 1 October 2026.

3.2 Council, via the Finance & Performance Committee has now provided that guidance. The project is now essentially ready to proceed to Phase 2, development of detailed strategies, plans, programmes and budgets.

3.3 The purpose of this report is to take stock of the guidance provided by Council and confirm that staff proceed to Phase 2.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 On 27 August 2025 the Finance & Performance Committee approved the key principles, governance and other structures to drive development of the LTP 2027. This was followed on 7 October 2025 by the Audit and Risk Management Committee’s (ARMC) approval of specific workstream plans, milestones and accountabilities.

4.2 In February 2026 this Committee consolidated this guidance into Council’s formal Letter of Expectation (LOE.) The LOE sets out clear and specific guidance on the trajectory of future rates increases, development of the capital programme and other key LTP components.

4.3 The LOE supports the decisions made by both Committees but adds further context and specificity.

4.4 Workshops on the Financial Strategy (FS), Infrastructure Strategy (IS) and capital programme prioritisation were held with councillors over April, May and June 2026. Scenarios were also canvassed, including savings required to achieve the 6-5-4% rates trajectory.

4.5 First (work in progress) drafts were presented to the Finance & Performance Committee on 10 June. The draft work on all three components was accepted for further development.

4.6 In the case of the FS, structure and content is heavily prescribed by section 101a of the LGA 2002 as well as the LOE:

“The draft LTP should be developed with an indicative rates increase trajectory of no more than 6-5-4% over the first three years of the LTP (6% for 2027/28, 5% for 28/29 and 4% for 29/30). These figures are indicative and may be adjusted as the rating impact of the (separate) water supply and waste water activities become clearer. They remain subject to any reform, legislation or exclusions.”

4.7 The Committee considered a range of options around the trajectory or rates increases, with the proposed rates cap legislation as a key factor in development. The draft FS (Attachment A) has been built based on that guidance. Completion of the draft FS now relies upon more detailed development of budget and related financial data across the draft LTP.

4.8 The IS is heavily prescribed by section 101b of the LGA 2002, as well as the LOE:

“The existing LTP Financial and Infrastructure Strategies must now be updated together to reflect these rating parameters. It is essential that they stay in step at all times.

Councillors would like to see further financial context in the Financial Strategy on the impacts of debt, renewals and a balanced budget. The existing Infrastructure Strategy should be updated so that the assumptions underpinning it, the scenarios arising, and what Council plans to do in response, align with the updated Financial Strategy. This is especially the case with climate change and related issues.”

4.9 The draft (Attachment B) sets out a range of key challenges facing the city’s infrastructure in the long term, and strategic direction on response. Completion of the IS now relies upon more detail on the implementation of those responses across the draft LTP.

4.10 Capital programme development and prioritisation was clearly defined in the LOE:

“Staff will obtain expert advice or peer review to baseline core capital programme deliverability. Councillors will expect evidence-based advice on deliverability, including market capacity and risks, and if there is any proposal to fund beyond the total level set in the draft (2026/27) Annual Plan, which has already been adjusted for deliverability.

Council would also like to understand and approve the capital prioritisation model before the draft programme is prepared, and will be looking for clear evidence that risk of material carry-forwards from year to year has been minimised. There should be no short term ‘bow wave’ in the proposed capital programme profile.”

The capital prioritisation model (Attachment C) was developed with councillors in workshops during May, and the final model was supported to proceed to developing a revised capital programme for consideration by 1 October 2026.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

5.1 While guidance has been received and financial parameters are clear at high level, detailed financial implications will only become clear when supporting documents (draft activity and asset plans, capital programme and budgets) have been developed for consideration after 1 October 2026.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 At this stage the LTP process is on track against project milestones.

6.2 At the end of Phase 1 of development key strategic risks include:

· complexity, timing and uncertainty of numerous central government reforms impacting local government;

· lack of integration between LTP components and workstreams;

· key decisions not made in a timely manner.

There are many operational and tactical risks and mitigations. These are set out in detail in the LTP Project and Risk updates regularly supplied to both the Finance & Performance and Audit & Risk Management Committees.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.3.1 The Council must, at all times, have an LTP / Annual Plan in place (sections 93 and 95 of the LGA). The LTP is required to be adopted before the commencement of the first year to which it relates and continues in force until the close of the third consecutive year to which it relates (section 93(3) of the LGA).

6.4 Other Legal Implications:

6.4.1 Other legal implications, such as from the Local Government (Systems Improvement) Bill, may come into force during development for the LTP. These will be communicated with Council and staff and incorporated into the LTP development process as required.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.5 The required decision:

6.5.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework adopted with the 2024 Long Term Plan.

6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.7 Internal Services

6.7.1 Activity: Performance, Finance, and Procurement

· Level of Service: 13.1.1 Implement the Long-Term Plan and Annual Plan programme plan - Critical path milestone due dates in programme plans are met

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.8 This decision simply allows development of draft documents to proceed. The adopted draft and final LTP 2027 will affect all existing citizens and ratepayers of Christchurch, and has implications for future citizens, ratepayers, and Councils.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.9 The LTP 2024 – 2034 saw consultation and engagement with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga, which resulted in a wide range of initiatives being undertaken in the LTP. Those undertakings remained intact for Annual Plan 2026/27.

6.10 The project plan for LTP 2027 puts a high priority on working with Mana Whenua in the early development of the plan, and a dedicated workstream has been established for that purpose. This includes the development of a clear plan for partnership.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.11 This decision simply allows development of draft documents to proceed for consideration after 1 October 2026.

6.12 The draft and final LTP 2027 will affect climate change and resilience initiatives undertaken by Council, but the options and decisions underpinning them are yet to be considered.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 The overall LTP project will remain on schedule if the guidance is confirmed and staff may proceed to detailed development of activity and asset plans, budgets and a capital programme for consideration by ELT in September and then Council after 1 October 2026.

7.2 Workshops will be scheduled during October, November and early December to test content and options, ensure alignment and implement any adjustments required by Council.

7.3 This is followed by a formal confirmation of draft LTP content in mid-December.

7.4 Formal adoption of the draft LTP is scheduled for mid-February 2027, to be followed by consultation with the community.

7.5 Adoption of the final LTP 2027 is scheduled for June 2027.

7.6 Next steps for the FS include: completion of financial detail (which is often contingent upon completion of the personnel planning and operational budgeting process, as well as the reprioritised capital programme ); the development of options to meet the 6-5-4% rates trajectory (including a recommended option); as well as confirmation that the draft FS meets all statutory requirements.

7.7 The draft FS is to be fully completed in time for ELT consideration in September and Council from 1 October 2026. This must include confirmation of alignment with the IS.

7.8 Next steps for the IS include: completion of the remaining sections (Key Assumptions underpinning the IS, Most Likely Scenario and other legislative requirements); definition of options (including a recommended option); as well as confirmation that the IS meets all statutory requirements.

7.9 Key financial policy, decisions and budgets may be referenced in the IS but remain guided by and within the purview of the FS.

7.10 The draft IS is to be completed in time for ELT consideration in September and Council from 1 October 2026. This must include confirmation of alignment with the FS.

7.11 Next steps for capital prioritisation and development include: reprioritisation of the capital programme based on requirements of the LOE (see 4.10 above); as well as full transparency and clear information on projects or programmes of work that have been reprioritised to future years.

7.12 The Project Management Office (PMO) to advise the LTP project team by the end of June 2026 if there are proposals for any capital works to be considered separate or outside the capital programme parameters set in the LOE (and set out above in 4.10.)

7.13 Exemptions to the LOE will require ELT and Council approval.

7.14 The draft capital programme is to be completed in time for ELT consideration in September and Council from 1 October 2026. This must include confirmation that all provisions of the LOE have been met.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Draft (WIP) Financial Strategy	26/1244211	260
b ⇩	Draft (WIP) Infrastructure Strategy	26/1244213	275
c ⇩	Capital Prioritisation Framework	26/1244317	318

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Draft Annual Plan 2026/27
https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Plans-Strategies-Policies-Bylaws/Plans/annual-plan/2026-2027/WEB-FRP8390-Draft-Annual-Plan-2026-27_Full-Plan.pdf

Council Letter of Expectations for the Long Term Plans 2027-37

Long Term Plan 2027-37 Development Workshops

25 February 2026: LTP 2027-27 Development (px)

5 March 2026: Draft 2027-37 LTP Development (px)

19 March 2026: Long-term Plan 2027 – Setting the Scene

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 19 March 2026

30 April 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 – Workshop

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 30 April 2026

· Attachments of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 30 April 2026

7 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 Level of Service Review Process (px)

14 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 – Workshop

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 14 May 2026

· Minute Item Attachments of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 14 May 2026

20 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Wednesday, 20 May 2026

· Attachments of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Wednesday, 20 May 2026

20 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 Level of Service Review Process (px)

28 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 – Workshop - Infrastructure Strategy

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 28 May 2026

· Attachments of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Thursday, 28 May 2026

28 May 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 Level of Service Review Process (px)

4 June 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 Level of Service Review Process (px)

10 June 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 – Workshop

· Agenda of Annual Plan/Long-Term Plan Workshop - Wednesday, 10 June 2026

10 June 2026: Long Term Plan 2027 – 2037 Level of Service Review Process (px)

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Meg Wedlock - Performance Analyst

Peter Ryan - Head of Corporate Planning & Performance

Boyd Kedzlie - Senior Corporate Planning & Performance Analyst

Amber Tait - Performance Analyst

Saba Azeem - Senior Corporate Planning and Performance Analyst

Approved By

Peter Ryan - Head of Corporate Planning & Performance

Bruce Moher - Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

16. Consideration for sale of 274a Main Road Clifton
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/774272
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Nigel Collings, Property Consultant
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Anne Columbus, General Manager Corporate Services/Chief People Officer

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to present for the Committee’s consideration whether the Council- owned property at 274A Main Road, Clifton should be reassessed for surplus status and, if appropriate, declared surplus and approved for disposal.

1.2 This review has been undertaken in response to a deputation made by adjoining landowners during the Annual Plan, submission 1110, process and a subsequent request from Councillors that the matter be reconsidered.

1.3 Staff advice to date has been to retain this property due to the underlying geotechnical, access and risk factors associated with the site.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Finance and Performance Committee under delegation from the Council:

1. Receive the information in the Consideration for sale of 274a Main Road Clifton Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Notes that 274a Main Road was previously considered for recommendation to Christchurch City Council for disposal but did not meet the threshold for disposal.

4. Resolves to retain the land at 274a Main Road Clifton due to ongoing geotechnical risk, traffic management/health and safety and public development and access requirements amongst other factors.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Council staff considered 274a Main Road Clifton for disposal through previous Annual Plan (AP) Properties for Disposal processes and ultimately determined that the property was not suitable to be considered for disposal due to underlying geotechnical, access and risk factors associated with the site including Coucnil’s current criteria for disposal.

3.2 Following the submission to the Annual-Plan process and discussion with Elected Members, Councillors have requested that a report be presented to Council to consider this property being declared surplus and disposed of. This report serves that purpose.

3.3 This report provides background information on the specific characteristics and constraints of the property and recommends retaining it as there is no clear or defensible rationale to support disposal in light of:

3.3.1 The geotechnical risk and constraints,

3.3.2 Traffic management and safety issue,

3.3.3 The land contains a pathway that is relied upon by adjoining properties (264–276 Main Road) for access and bin storage, and while there are no formal easements in place, there are functional and equitable reasons to retain the land in public ownership, therefore meeting councils’ retention criteria

3.3.4 The land remains subject to significant and enduring natural hazard exposure irrespective of future ownership.Therefore sale exposes Council to reputational risk and undermining public confidence in its property management decisions.

3.4 Having regard to the site’s significant geotechnical constraints, traffic and safety issues, and the reliance of adjoining properties on informal access arrangements, together with the material risk that the land may be undevelopable due to hazards, staff consider that disposal would not represent a prudent or responsible outcome. This position is reinforced by the fact that no other comparable red zone disposal site exhibits this level of complexity, and that best-practice asset management requires Council to take a cautious, risk-aware approach that protects public confidence and upholds its reputational and governance responsibilities.

3.5 Staff have reconsidered the property in response to Annual Plan Submission 1110 and Councillor requests. The reassessment confirms that while community members identified a potential use for the site, the underlying geotechnical, access and risk considerations remain unchanged. The review demonstrates that community feedback has been carefully considered while applying a consistent risk-based framework.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Following the Canterbury Earthquakes, the property at 274a Main Road was “red zoned” and purchased by the Crown. The residential dwelling was demolished, along with the existing pathway to adjoining properties. The site was landscaped and a new pathway constructed by the Crown for access to the adjoining & nearby properties which include: 276 Main Road, 274 Main Road, 272 Main Road, 270 Main Road, 268 Main Road, 266 Main Road and 264 Main Road. The pathway is the primary source of access and location for wheelie bin storage for these properties, however no formal easements are registered.

4.2 In 2021, 274a Main Road was transferred to the Christchurch City Council as part of the Global Settlement with the Crown.

4.3 Following previous requests from the submitters to the Annual Plan (submission1110), Council staff considered the property for potential disposal. As part of this process, a Land Status Report was prepared incorporating advice from the Principal Geotechnical Advisor and the Transport Unit. The report is attached as Attachment A.

4.4 In assessing the property, staff considered the Council’s retention and disposal framework, including the additional considerations relevant to Port Hills Residential Red Zone (RRZ) properties. These considerations include the extent of natural hazard exposure, whether disposal could reintroduce private ownership into an area subject to ongoing risk, the long-term implications for public safety and risk management, and whether retention better aligns with Council’s broader stewardship responsibilities. The assessment also considered whether disposal could create future expectations, liabilities, or reputational issues for Council arising from the known characteristics of the land.

4.5 Geotechnical advice identifies that the site is affected by significant inherent land stability hazards associated with the cliff face located immediately behind the former building platform. The risk arises from the site’s natural landform, geological conditions, and the close proximity of the platform area to the base of the cliff. These hazards exist independently of any particular development proposal and represent an ongoing physical constraint affecting the land itself.

4.6 The cliff face presents an ongoing risk of rockfall and localised instability along an estimated 25–30 metre section of exposed cliff approximately 12 metres in height. The available platform area is limited in size and configuration, restricting opportunities for passive hazard separation or buffering. Geotechnical advice indicates that management of the identified hazards would likely require substantial active engineering intervention directly to the cliff face, including measures such as rock bolting, shotcreting and/or rockfall mesh systems. The scale of intervention reflects the magnitude and persistence of the underlying geotechnical risk environment affecting the property

4.7 The geotechnical constraints are compounded by the physical relationship with the adjoining property at 274 Main Road, which is located in close proximity to both the cliff top and the shared boundary. Due to the geometry and constrained nature of the site, any substantial stabilisation response may require works extending beneath or adjacent to neighbouring land, including potential rock anchors beneath the adjoining property. This demonstrates that the hazard environment is not readily self-contained within the site boundaries and that management of the risk may depend on third-party legal arrangements and ongoing cooperation with neighbouring landowners.

The property at 274A Main Road is located predominantly within the Cliff Collapse Management Area 2 (CCMA2) hazard overlay under the Christchurch District Plan. The overlay reflects the recognised susceptibility of the land to cliff collapse and associated geotechnical hazards and confirms that the identified risks are an inherent characteristic of the site. An image from the District Plan showing the extent of the hazard overlay is attached as Attachment C.

4.8 The geotechnical review concluded that the site is subject to substantial and enduring geotechnical constraints arising from its natural landform, hazard exposure, and physical limitations. The combination of cliff instability risk, constrained site geometry, limited separation from the hazard source, and reliance on significant engineering intervention indicates that the land carries a high level of inherent geotechnical risk that will continue to materially affect the site over the long term, irrespective of ownership or intended use.

4.9 The Transport Review considered the physical and operational constraints associated with the site, including the absence of existing vehicle access from Main Road and the implications of any future access arrangements onto an arterial route. The review identified that the formation of a compliant vehicle crossing in close proximity to existing structures could create pedestrian visibility and safety concerns. It also noted that reversing vehicle movements onto Main Road would generally not be supported and that the constrained site layout provides limited opportunity for vehicle manoeuvring on site.

4.10 The review also assessed the existing garages located on legal road adjacent to the property and noted that, under current standards and the operative District Plan, such arrangements would be unlikely to obtain approval if proposed today. Given the function of Main Road as an arterial route and the constrained nature of the site, the Transport Review concluded that additional vehicle access or garaging is unlikely to be supported. These constraints further limit the practical utility and future use options available for the property.

4.11 The property is affected by an informal pedestrian access arrangement servicing multiple adjoining properties. Following demolition of the former dwelling after the Canterbury Earthquakes, the Crown landscaped the site and constructed a replacement pedestrian pathway and wheelie bin storage area for the benefit of neighbouring properties at 264–276 Main Road. While this arrangement functions as an important shared access route, no formal easements are registered to protect these interests. The absence of legal formalisation presents an administrative and legal constraint. Should the property be disposed of, Council would likely need to negotiate and register easements with multiple parties to preserve existing access arrangements, a process that may be complex, time-consuming, and uncertain.

This constraint is compounded by the site's inherent geotechnical challenges, as the limited physical area and constrained topography would further restrict any future land use or stabilisation works while maintaining the existing access route. A Site Plan showing the terrain using LiDAR is attached as Attachment D. Retaining Council ownership represents the most prudent approach, ensuring continuity of access for neighbouring properties, avoiding potential disputes regarding informal rights established following the earthquakes, and supporting Council's broader stewardship and risk management responsibilities.

4.12 While the submitters identified potential non-habitable use for the site, such as a garage, staff note that any disposal process would occur through an open market sale and there is no certainty that a future purchaser would be limited to, or continue with, non-habitable uses. While this is not determinative in itself, it is a foreseeable outcome that is relevant when considering the long-term implications of transferring ownership of land known to be subject to significant natural hazard exposure.

4.13 Retaining such sites has been reinforced through Councillor commentary during previous discussions relating to Port Hills Residential Red Zone land. Collectively, this reflects a broader expectation that Council apply a cautious, consistent, and risk-based approach when considering the future ownership and management of land subject to recognised natural hazards. In this context, retaining ownership of sites with enduring geotechnical constraints aligns with Council’s broader stewardship and risk management responsibilities.

4.14 While the site is not currently required for a specific operational purpose, staff consider that the combination of significant inherent geotechnical risk, constrained site geometry, hazard overlay status, informal shared access arrangements, transport limitations, and the long-term implications associated with reintroducing private ownership into a known hazard environment means the property is not presently suitable for disposal. Retention enables Council to maintain oversight and management of the site while preserving flexibility for any future low-intensity or non-habitable use that may be considered appropriate over time. On balance, retention is considered the most prudent and consistent outcome when assessed against Council’s retention criteria and the broader risk management considerations applicable to Port Hills Residential Red Zone land Refer Attachment G for an analysis against the retention criteria.

4.15 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject

4.16 The following related information session/workshops have taken place for the members of the meeting:

Date	Subject

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.17 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.17.1 Option 1: Decline the proposal from the owners of 272 Main Road and Council continues to retain and manage 274a Main Road.

4.17.2 Option 2: Declare 274a Main Road surplus and sell it on the open market in accordance with the Council’s policy and normal practices.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.18 Preferred Option: Retain in Council ownership, land at 274a Main Road Clifton, held in Record of Title CB15F/847.

4.18.1 Option Description: Do not declare 274a Main Road Clifton surplus. Continue to retain and manage the land.

4.18.2 Option Advantages

· Maintains transparency and supports public confidence in Council decision-making.

· Avoids creating an expectation of development or private use where significant site constraints may limit or prevent future building potential.

· Ensures adjoining property owners retain continued access arrangements to their properties, including practical use of the area for bin placement and similar day-to-day access needs.

· Preserves Council control over future use of the site, including the ability to manage safety, environmental, and interface risks in a coordinated manner.

· Supports the “Crowns” work and intentions and therefore the adjoining property owners’ expectations.

4.18.3 Option Disadvantages

· Continues Council ownership obligations, including ongoing maintenance, inspection, and management costs for a site with no identified immediate operational need.

4.19 Declare 274a Main Road, Clifton Surplus to requirements and resolve to dispose of it in accordance with Council policy and normal practices. (not recommended).

4.19.1 Option Description: If the Council considered that the property did not meet the Retention Criteria and was suitable for sale. The council could declare the property surplus to be disposed of in accordance with its normal practices and policy.

4.19.2 Option Advantages

· Transfers management responsibility and associated risks to a private owner

· Reduces ongoing holding, maintenance, and administrative costs associated with continued ownership.

4.19.3 Option Disadvantages

· Conflict with broader strategic intent in certain areas (e.g., hazard-prone or legacy Crown-acquired land), where retention may be preferred to avoid reintroducing private occupation risk.

· Potential for future use expectations to exceed what is realistically achievable on the site, particularly where topography, access, or planning constraints may limit development.

· Risk of community concern or reputational sensitivity associated with disposal of land perceived as having public or semi-public value or use.

· There are multiple private unregistered interests in the land that would need to be resolved and formalised before sale. This would come at a cost to the council and the adjoining property owners who have an interest. Agreement from all parties to resolve the matter would be required, this could be difficult to achieve.

· Disposal would reintroduce private ownership into land known to be subject to significant natural hazard exposure and ongoing geotechnical uncertainty.

· Disposal would be inconsistent with Council's previous assessment against Port Hills Residential Red Zone criteria.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.20 The primary focus of this report is to consider the options of either disposing of or retaining the land. The risk to life, and the overall suitability of the site for future use, is the primary consideration.

4.21 While the request through the submission to the Annual Plan that council consider selling this property does not constitute a complete unsolicited proposal. The Council’s Guidelines for Submission and Assessment of Unsolicited Proposals, Disposal of Property Policy, the Local Government Act principles, and the Strategic Framework are relevant and have been considered as part of this assessment.

4.22 Section 2.3 of the Unsolicited Proposals guidelines stipulates that any proposal must be consistent with the Council’s community outcomes and strategic priorities, as well as its annual and long-term plans. In the context of a property where geotechnical, transport, and community concerns exist, this section acts as a high-level filter: the proposal to dispose of this land does not actively assist the Council in addressing these specific issues and therefore retention is recommended.

4.23 Stewardship and Risk: The Council’s principle of stewardship requires it to act cautiously when managing risk and avoiding "irreversible effects".

4.24 The property has geotechnical issues and there is no plan for the land to indicate its’ sale will lead to a more resilient outcome or provide better risk management than Council retention. Retention therefore better safeguards the community against these hazards and preserves the existing rights established through the Crowns’ post-earthquake undertakings, thereby creating alignment with the provisions set out in 2.3.

4.25 The land needs to maintain neighbourhood accessibility, any proposal that seeks to privatise or obstruct those rights would be considered misaligned with section 2.3.

4.26 It is not considered that sale of this property is a superior "social proposition" or "value for money over whole of life" compared to the Council retaining the property to manage those concerns directly.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option – Retain 274a Main Road	Option 2 – Sell 274a Main Road
Cost to Implement	N/A	Internal Staff costs and real estate fees. Foregone sale revenue – unknown.
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	N/A	N/A
Funding Source	N/A	N/A
Funding Availability	N/A	N/A
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A

5.1 The decision of this report does not have a direct financial implication but rather considers the risks associated with disposal of the land.

5.2 Due to the complexity of the site, as detailed in this report, it is not expected that the land would achieve a value significant enough to materially influence Council operational budgets.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 The property has previously been reviewed by staff against Council’s retention and disposal criteria, including the additional considerations applicable to Port Hills Residential Red Zone land. Those assessments concluded that the property does not presently meet the threshold for disposal and that retention remains the most appropriate course of action having regard to the following matters:

6.1.1 Inherent Geotechnical Risk
The property is subject to significant and enduring geotechnical constraints associated with cliff instability, rockfall exposure, constrained site geometry, and its location within the Cliff Collapse Management Area 2 (CCMA2) hazard overlay. These risks are intrinsic characteristics of the land and persist irrespective of ownership or any specific development proposal. The scale and nature of the hazard environment support a cautious and risk-based approach to the long-term management of the site.

6.1.2 Access Rights and Adjoining Property Interests
The property contains an informal pedestrian access route and associated bin storage area servicing multiple adjoining properties. While no formal easements are currently registered, the pathway performs an important functional role for neighbouring residents. Disposal of the property could create uncertainty regarding ongoing access rights and may require formalisation of legal arrangements, including easements or other encumbrances. The constrained physical environment and interaction between access arrangements and geotechnical hazards further complicate the long-term management of the site.

6.1.3 Transport, Access and Safety Constraints
The property does not currently have legal or practical drive-on access from Main Road and is subject to significant transport and safety constraints associated with its location on an arterial route. The constrained site layout, pedestrian visibility considerations, and inability to safely accommodate vehicle manoeuvring materially limit future access options and reduce the practical utility of the site.

6.1.4 Long-Term Risk and Expectation Management
While submitters have identified potential non-habitable uses for the site, any disposal process would occur through an open market mechanism and Council cannot control future ownership outcomes or guarantee that subsequent uses would remain limited in nature. Disposal of land known to be affected by significant natural hazard exposure may create unrealistic expectations regarding future use potential and could result in ongoing reputational or risk management implications for Council over time.

6.1.5 Consistency of Decision-Making and Precedent Considerations
Retaining a consistent and transparent approach to Port Hills Residential Red Zone land is important to maintaining confidence in Council’s decision-making framework and broader risk management approach. Community submissions and Councillor commentary have reinforced the expectation that Council apply a cautious and principled approach when considering disposal of land subject to recognised natural hazards. Including the property in the surplus portfolio without a clear change in circumstances or supporting justification may undermine the consistency of previous assessments and create expectations regarding the future treatment of similarly constrained sites.

6.2 At this time, retention represents the most prudent, defensible, and policy-aligned position. Retention enables Council to continue managing the inherent risks associated with the land, maintain oversight of informal access arrangements affecting neighbouring properties, and preserve flexibility for any future low-intensity or non-habitable use that may be considered appropriate, while remaining consistent with Council’s broader stewardship and risk management responsibilities for Port Hills Residential Red Zone properties.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.3.1 The delegation to divest land sits with the full elected Council. In this instance delegated to the Finance and Performance Committee.

6.4 Other Legal Implications:

6.4.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision Strategy and Policy Considerations.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.5 The required decision:

6.5.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.5.2 Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by assessing the value of the land against the overall value of the land resolved for disposal in the Long-Term Plan.

6.5.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies. Property Policy 2000.

6.6 This report does not support the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034).

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 Through the course of its decision-making processes, the Council is required to consider the views and preferences of persons likely to be affected by, or to have an interest in, the matter (Section 78 of the Local Government Act 2002). However, a local authority is not required by that section alone of the Act to undertake any consultation process or procedure.

6.8 As staff determined that the property did not satisfy the requisite threshold for suitability to be declared surplus through the Annual Plan process, no community consultation was undertaken.

6.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.9.1 Heathcote Ward.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.10 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.12 The land is not located in an area of significance, nor has the site historically been under Mana Whenua ownership.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.13 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

6.14 The sale of this property would have no significant impact on climate change adaption or emissions reductions.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 Maintain status quo approach ownership, management and control.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	274a Main Road Clifton Land Status Report	26/826008	339
b ⇩	274a Main Road drone image with boundaries	26/949871	345
c ⇩	274a Main Road District Plan Hazard overlay	26/950297	346
d ⇩	LiDAR site plan	26/949365	347
e ⇩	Christchurch-City-Council-Unsolicited-Proposals	26/1004934	350
f ⇩	2018-Strategic-Framework	26/1004947	367
g ⇩	Assessment agianst retention criteria	26/1172756	369

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Refer to Item 4 at Council Workshop on 16 June 2026. Minutes of Council Workshop - Tuesday, 16 June 2026

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Nigel Collings - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Bruce Rendall - Head of Facilities & Property

Anne Columbus - General Manager Corporate Services/Chief People Officer

Chair	Councillor MacDonald
Deputy Chair	Councillor McLellan
Membership	The Mayor and all councillors are members of this committee.
Quorum	Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies) is odd
Meeting Cycle	Monthly
Reports To	Council

7. One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha - Project Close-out Report
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1218418
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Barry Bragg – Chairperson, Te Kaha Project Delivery Limited
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

12. Capital Programme Performance Report May 2026
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/483403
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Paul Dadson, Manager Capital Programme
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

15. Christchurch Wastewater Treatment Plant: Monthly monitoring of temporary treatment plant
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/877851
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Gavin Hutchison, Head of Three Waters
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

	Actual YTD to Mar 2026 $000	SOI Budget $000	Variance $000	Last YTD to Mar 2025 $000	Variance $000
CCC core funding	12.3	12.3	-	11.9	+0.4
Other operating revenue	4.3	1.3	+3.0	2.3	+2.0
Operating expenditure	(14.6)	(12.8)	+1.8	(13.2)	+1.4
Surplus/(Deficit) before tax	2.0	0.8	+1.2	1.0	+1.0
Total assets	11.5	8.1	+3.4	8.4	+3.1

8. Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd - Quarter 3 2025/26 Performance Report
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1175251
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Linda Gibb, Performance Advisor, Finance.
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

Author	Linda Gibb - Performance Monitoring Advisor CCO
Approved By	Bruce Moher - Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

9. Venues Ōtautahi - Quarter 3 2025/26 Performance Report
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1075640
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Linda Gibb, Performance Advisor, Finance
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

10. Key Organisational Performance Results - May 2026
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1081931
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Peter Ryan, Head of Corporate Planning & Performance Peter.Ryan@ccc.govt.nz
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

17. ChristchurchNZ Holdings Ltd - Quarter 3 Performance Report for the period 1 July 2025 - 31 March 2026
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/1059548
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Linda Gibb, Performance Advisor, Finance
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

18. Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Quarter 3 2025/26 Performance (Traffic Lights) Report
Reference Te Tohutoro:	26/867496
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Linda Gibb, Performance Advisor, Finance
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Bruce Moher, Interim General Manager Finance, Risk & Performance / Chief Financial Officer

ITEM NO.	GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED	SECTION	SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT	PUBLIC INTEREST CONSIDERATION	Potential Release Review Date and Conditions
20.	Public Excluded Finance and Performance Committee Minutes - 27 May 2026			Refer to the previous public excluded reason in the agendas for these meetings.
21.	Public Excluded Finance and Performance Committee Minutes - 26 May 2026			Refer to the previous public excluded reason in the agendas for these meetings.
22.	Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Appointment of Directors to Council-Controlled Organisation Boards	s7(2)(a)	Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons	To protect the reputations of the candidates which is greater than the public interest.	30 June 2026 After decisions have been made and the candidates notified.
23.	Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Appointment of Directors to Orion New Zealand Ltd	s7(2)(a)	Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons	The public interest does not outweigh the obligation to protect the reputation of individuals seeking appointment as directors of council controlled organisations.	30 June 2026 Following decision by Council and notification to the applicants.
24.	Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Strategic Update as at 31 March 2026	s7(2)(b)(ii), s7(2)(h)	Prejudice Commercial Position, Commercial Activities	The protection of commercially sensitive information that could, if it became public be detrimental to the profitability of the CCHL subsidiary and the group and therefore outweighs the public interest.	30 September 2026 After the full performance results for 2025/26 for the CCHL group have been published.
25.	One New Zealand at Operating Agreement	s7(2)(b)(ii), s7(2)(h), s7(2)(i)	Prejudice Commercial Position, Commercial Activities, Conduct Negotiations	Commercial negotiations ongoing with operator	14 April 2028 Disclosure to be on the apporval of the Director of Legal and Democratic Services / General Counsel
26.	Visibility of Capital Project Changes - May 2026	s7(2)(h)	Commercial Activities	The report contains information on specific projects being tendered in the open market and the commercial sensitivity of the information means that it must remain confidential in order to protect the Council's commercial position, and withholding the information at this time is reasonable and outweighs the public interest.	29 May 2028 This report can be released to the public once all commercial negotiations and contracts have been concluded, and subject to the approval of the Head of Procurement and Contracts.
27.	Event Opportunity	s7(2)(b)(ii)	Prejudice Commercial Position	The major event information and levels of funding could impact the ability to negotiate for the benefit of the city	30 June 2028 Information may be released with the Chief Executive approval.
28.	Economic Development Deliery	s7(2)(a), s7(2)(i)	Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons, Conduct Negotiations	Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons and to conduct negotiations which outweighs the public interest.	30 June 2027 Adoption of the 2027-2037 Long-Term Plan

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	ACTION DUE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	8 June 2026	Finance	Management
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	20 July 2026	F&P Unit	Management
Akaroa Wastewater Cost Reduction Opportunities	22 April 2026	22 July 2026	Legal & Democratic Services	Legal Services
Council-controlled Organisations - Draft Statements of Intent	22 April 2026	22 July 2026	F&P Unit	Management
Akaroa Wastewater Cost Reduction Opportunities	22 April 2026	31 July 2026	TW	Management
Draft Annual Plan 2026/27	10 February 2026	31 July 2026	Transport & Waste	Asset Planning
Draft Annual Plan 2026/27	10 February 2026	17 August 2026	Corporate Planning & Performance	Corporate Planning & Performance
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	25 August 2026	Executive Office	Executive Office
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	25 August 2026	Parks	Management
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	25 August 2026	Transport & Waste	Management
Appointment of an Elected Member to the Board of Christchurch City Holdings Ltd	27 May 2026	26 August 2026	Finance	Management
Audit Engagement Letter	27 May 2026	26 August 2026	Finance	Management
CCO Non-trading Shelf Companies - Appointment of Interim Chief Executive as Director	27 May 2026	26 August 2026	Finance	Management
Options for quicker Akaroa wastewater consenting	27 May 2026	26 August 2026	TW	Asset Planning Water & Wastewater
Wind up of Te Kaha Project Delivery Ltd	27 May 2026	26 August 2026	Legal & Democratic Services	Legal Services
151/153 Gilberthorpes Road - Future Use Issues and Options	27 August 2025	30 September 2026	F&P Unit	Property Consultancy
Red Bus Site - Transfer from CCHL to Council	25 March 2026	24 June 2027	F&P Unit	Property Consultancy
Canterbury Provincial Council Buildings - proposed Expressions of Interest process	28 May 2025	30 June 2027	Citizens & Community Management	Citizens & Community Management

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	DUE DATE	ACTION CLOSURE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
Procurement Plan for Transport Technology Maintenance Contract	27 August 2025	11 May 2026	25 May 2026	P&C	Management
Transport Technology Maintenance Contract Extension	25 February 2026	27 May 2026	25 May 2026	P&C	Management
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	8 June 2026	8 June 2026	CS&P	Management Team
Confirmation of content - Annual Plan 2026/27	26 May 2026	25 August 2026	8 June 2026	CS&P	Management Team