Waipuna
Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
Agenda
Notice of Meeting:
An ordinary meeting of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will be held on:
Date: Thursday 15 August 2024
Time: 4.30 pm
Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch
Membership
Chairperson Deputy Chairperson Members |
Marie Pollisco Helen Broughton Sarah Brunton Henk Buunk Gamal Fouda Tyla Harrison-Hunt Andrei Moore Debbie Mora Mark Peters |
9 August 2024
|
|
Bailey Peterson Acting Manager Community Governance, Halswell, Hornby, Riccarton Tel: 941 6743 |
Faye Collins
Community Board Advisor
941 5108
Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports for Information
Part C Decisions Under Delegation
TABLE OF CONTENTS NGĀ IHIRANGI
Karakia Tīmatanga................................................................................................... 5
C 1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha.......................................................................... 5
B 2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga........................................... 5
C 3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua.......................... 5
B 4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui.................................................................. 5
B 5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga................................. 5
B 6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga.................................................... 6
B 7. Correspondence...................................................................................... 39
Staff Reports
C 8. Arthur Street - Proposed Traffic and Parking Improvements.......................... 41
C 9. Proposed Road Name - 678 Cashmere Road................................................. 79
C 10. Lillian Street Proposed Stop Control........................................................... 85
C 11. Darvel Street- Proposed No Stopping Restrictions........................................ 91
C 12. Wigram Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions......................................... 97
C 13. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund 2024-25 - Bangaliana Christchurch, Awatea Athletics Incorporated and Hornby Good Companions Club................................................................................... 103
B 14. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - August 2024............................................................................................................ 109
B 15. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi............................................................................................................ 126
Karakia Whakamutunga
Whakataka te hau ki te uru Whakataka te hau ki te tonga Kia mākinakina ki uta Kia mātaratara ki tai E hī ake ana te atakura He tio, he huka, he hauhūnga Tīhei Mauri Ora |
Cease the winds from
the west |
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua
That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 25 July 2024 be confirmed (refer page 7).
4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.
Pavement resurfacing on Lancewood Drive, Halswell Iain Begg, local resident, will address the Board regarding pavement resurfacing on Lancewood Drive, Halswell.
|
5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga
Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.
6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga
There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.
Waipuna
Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
Open Minutes
Date: Thursday 25 July 2024
Time: 4.30pm
Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch
Present
Chairperson Deputy Chairperson Members |
Marie Pollisco Helen Broughton Sarah Brunton Henk Buunk Tyla Harrison-Hunt Debbie Mora Mark Peters |
|
|
Bailey Peterson Acting Manager Community Governance, Halswell, Hornby, Riccarton Tel: 941 6743 |
Faye Collins
Community Board Advisor
941 5108
Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports for Information
Part C Decisions Under Delegation
Karakia Tīmatanga
The agenda was dealt with in the following order.
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
Part C
There were no apologies received. |
2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga
Part B
Marie Pollisco declared an interest in part of Item 7- application by Hornby Community Patrol Incorporated (3.22) and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter.
Sarah Brunton declared an interest in part of Item 7- application by Hornby Community Care Trust (3.2) and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter.
Henk Buunk declared an interest in part of Item 7- application by Social Service Council of the Diocese of Christchurch (3.5) and Hei Hei Broomfield Community Development Trust (3.21) took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on these matters.
Tyla Harrison-Hunt declared an interest in part of Item 7- application by Pioneer Basketball Club Incorporated (3.27) and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter.
Debbie Mora declared an interest in part of Item 7- application by Hornby Community Patrol Incorporated (3.22) and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter.
3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua
Part C
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00069 That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 11 July 2024 be confirmed. Mark Peters/Helen Broughton Carried |
4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
Part B
There were no public forum presentations.
5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga
Part B
There were no deputations by appointment.
6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga
Part B
There was no presentation of petitions.
7. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund Report |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Consideration Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board discussed the applications and staff recommendations, agreeing that the following applications be increased from those recommended: Hornby Presbyterian Community (3.3) La Vida Youth Trust (3.4) Papuni Boxing Ōtautahi Trust (3.26) Halswell Residents Association Incorporated (3.44)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed at low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grants outlined in the following schedule:
4. Declines the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund applications outlined in the following schedule:
5. Approves the transfer of $139,055 from the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00070 Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed at low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Mark Peters/Debbie Mora Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00071 Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Tyla Harrison-Hunt/Debbie Mora Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00072 Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Tyla Harrison-Hunt/Sarah Brunton Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00073 Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Helen Broughton/Henk Buunk Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00074 Original officer recommendation accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Approves the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grants outlined in the following schedule:
Mark Peters/Debbie Mora Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00075 Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Mark Peters/Helen Broughton Carried
Sarah Brunton declared an interest and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00076 Original officer recommendation accepted without change Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grants outlined below:
Mark Peters/Debbie Mora Carried Henk Buunk declared an interest and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00077 Original officer recommendation accepted without change Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Helen Broughton/Mark Peters Carried |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debbie Mora declared an interest and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter. Marie Pollisco declared an interest, vacated the Chair and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter. The Chair was assumed by Deputy Chairperson Helen Broughton at 5.27 pm. Marie Pollisco returned to the Chair at 5.28pm following consideration of this matter.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00078 Original officer recommendation accepted without change Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Approves the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund grant outlined below:
Debbie Mora/Helen Broughton Carried Tyla Harrison-Hunt declared an interest and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this matter. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00079 Original officer recommendation accepted without change
Part C
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
4. Declines the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund applications outlined in the following schedule:
5. Approves the transfer of $123,555 from the 2024-25 Strengthening Communities Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund.
Tyla Harrison-Hunt/Henk Buunk Carried |
8. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects |
|
|
Community Board Consideration
Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board discussed the proposed Board Projects and agreed to a delegation to staff to consider and approve Youth Development Fund applications of up to and including $400. The Board also discussed delivery of the Community Service and Youth Service Awards Board Project and agreed to allocate funding for the project in the 2024/25 financial year.
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Creates the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 4. Approves an allocation of $3,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 5. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $400 from the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 6. Adopts the eligibility and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund as follows: a. Funding may be granted up to a maximum of $400 for any application. b. The project must benefit people living in the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton wards. c. Applications must be made by one resident, group or organisation, providing contact details, location of the project and a short description of what the project will involve. Funding will not be considered for projects already undertaken. d. All applications will have to meet the criteria requirements of the Discretionary Response Fund. 7. Approves an allocation of $4,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Summer With Your Neighbours grants. 8. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $200 for Summer With Your Neighbours events. 9. Adopts the following application process and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Summer With Your Neighbours Fund grant applications: a. Applications for Summer With Your Neighbours funding for events proposed to be held within the Halswell, Hornby and Riccarton wards can be made between July 2024 and 31 March 2025. Events to be held between 1 October 2024 and 30 April 2025. b. Grants can made of up to $200 as a contribution towards food items, non-alcoholic drinks and/or invitation costs for events in accordance with any city wide formula. c. Funding is provided post-event on the production of appropriate receipts. 10. Creates the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 11. Approves an allocation of $10,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 12. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $350 from the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 13. Adopts the following decision-making process on the allocation of 2024-25 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund grant applications of over $350: a. Application details and staff recommendations to be sent to all Board members via email with a request for a response within two business days. b. The response of at least five members with the same decision (approval, decline or amendment) will constitute the Board decision. c. In the event that less than five members respond within two business days, the Board decision will be taken to be decline. 14. Adopts the eligibility and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund as follows: a. An application from, or on behalf of a young person(s) aged between 12 and 25 years of age living in the Halswell, Hornby or Riccarton wards. b. The projects applied for will be for the development of personal growth or sporting or cultural representation. c. Individual applicants can receive a maximum of three youth development grants with a limit of one grant in any financial year (July to June). Further applications may be accepted on exceptional circumstances. d. Applicants will be required to provide a report back on their project. 15. Requests that all decisions on grants be reported to the Board in Community Board Area Reports. 16. Approves an allocation of $1,500 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards 2025 ANZAC Day expenses. 17. Approves an allocation of $3,500 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards the hosting of the 2025 Garden Pride Awards ceremony. 18. Decides not to confer Community and Youth Service Awards in 2025. 19. Approves an allocation of $2,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Community Leadership Opportunities. 20. Approves an allocation of $12,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Culture Galore 2025. 21. Approves an allocation of $3,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Engaging with the Community. |
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00080 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Creates the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 4. Approves an allocation of $3,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 5. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $400 from the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund. 6. Adopts the eligibility and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund as follows: a. Funding may be granted up to a maximum of $400 for any application. b. The project must benefit people living in the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton wards. c. Applications must be made by one resident, group or organisation, providing contact details, location of the project and a short description of what the project will involve. Funding will not be considered for projects already undertaken. d. All applications will have to meet the criteria requirements of the Discretionary Response Fund. 7. Approves an allocation of $4,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Summer With Your Neighbours grants. 8. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $200 for Summer With Your Neighbours events. 9. Adopts the following application process and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Summer With Your Neighbours Fund grant applications: a. Applications for Summer With Your Neighbours funding for events proposed to be held within the Halswell, Hornby and Riccarton wards can be made between July 2024 and 31 March 2025. Events to be held between 1 October 2024 and 30 April 2025. b. Grants can made of up to $200 as a contribution towards food items, non-alcoholic drinks and/or invitation costs for events in accordance with any city wide formula. c. Funding is provided post-event on the production of appropriate receipts. 10. Creates the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 11. Approves an allocation of $10,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 12. Delegates to the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Governance Manager to decide grants up to and including $400 from the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund. 13. Adopts the following decision-making process on the allocation of 2024-25 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund grant applications of over $400: a. Application details and staff recommendations to be sent to all Board members via email with a request for a response within two business days. b. The response of at least five members with the same decision (approval, decline or amendment) will constitute the Board decision. c. In the event that less than five members respond within two business days, the Board decision will be taken to be decline. 14. Adopts the eligibility and criteria for the 2024-25 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Youth Development Fund as follows: a. An application from, or on behalf of a young person(s) aged between 12 and 25 years of age living in the Halswell, Hornby or Riccarton wards. b. The projects applied for will be for the development of personal growth or sporting or cultural representation. c. Individual applicants can receive a maximum of three youth development grants with a limit of one grant in any financial year (July to June). Further applications may be accepted on exceptional circumstances. d. Applicants will be required to provide a report back on their project. 15. Requests that all decisions on grants be reported to the Board in Community Board Area Reports. 16. Approves an allocation of $1,500 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards 2025 ANZAC Day expenses. 17. Approves an allocation of $3,500 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards the hosting of the 2025 Garden Pride Awards ceremony. 19. Approves an allocation of $2,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Community Leadership Opportunities. 20. Approves an allocation of $12,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Culture Galore 2025. 21. Approves an allocation of $3,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards Engaging with the Community. Mark Peters/Tyla Harrison-Hunt Carried |
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00081 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
18. Approves an allocation of $4,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Community and Youth Service Awards in 2025. Helen Broughton/Henk Buunk Carried |
|
Sarah Brunton and Tyla Harrison-Hunt requested that their vote against the resolution be recorded. |
9. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi
Part B
The following information was discussed: · It was noted that the Independent Hearings Panel findings on Plan Change 14 are expected to be available on the 30 July 2024 and that there will be a Council information session and the recommendations will go to Council for a decision on 4 September 2024. A member plans to meet with affected residents’ groups on 1 August 2024 to discuss the recommendations. · The Councillor for Riccarton is holding a public meeting on 2 August 2024 to update the community on the Long Term Plan. · There has been concern expressed recently about youth activity and traffic safety in the Riccarton area. · The Yaldhurst Residents’ Association held their general meeting and will look at the process for the transfer of the Yaldhurst Memorial Hall to the association. · A proposal to hold a street sprint event at the Waterloo Business Park is currently being investigated. · There is concern about recent earthworks in the stormwater basin in Templeton. |
Debbie Mora left the meeting at 6.16pm.
Karakia Whakamutunga
Meeting concluded at 6.19pm.
CONFIRMED THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024
Marie Pollisco
Chairperson
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/1342812 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Faye Collins, Community Board Advisor |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Andrew Rutledge, Acting General Manager Citizens and Community |
1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
Correspondence has been received from:
Name |
Subject |
Megan Woods, Member of Parliament for Wigram |
Yaldhurst and Russley Roads intersection |
2. Staff Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the report correspondence from Megan Woods, Member of Parliament for Wigram, regarding the Yaldhurst and Russley Roads intersection.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Correspondence - Megan Woods, Member of Parliament for Wigram |
24/1342813 |
40 |
8. Arthur Street - Proposed Traffic and Parking Improvements |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/900065 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Andrew Hensley, Traffic Engineer |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Community Board to change parking restrictions in Arthur Street.
1.2 This report has been written in response to access, safety and parking issues raised by the community.
1.3 The recommended option is to amend and install parking restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Arthur Street - Proposed Traffic and Parking Improvements Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolutions 4 – 14 below.
4. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Arthur Street, commencing at its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 31 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8am-9am and 2.30pm- 3.30pm on School Days, on the northern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 37 metres east of its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 104 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
6. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 146 metres east of its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 165 metres, as detailed on Attachment A the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
7. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Arthur Street, commencing at its intersection with Middleton Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
8. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at its intersection with Middleton Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
9. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8am-9am and 2.30pm- 3.30pm on School Days, on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 36 metres west of its intersection with Middleton Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 121 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
10. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 157 metres west of its intersection with Middleton Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 48 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
11. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8am-9am and 2.30pm- 3.30pm on School Days, on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 209 metres west of its intersection with Middleton Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 56 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
12. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 142 metres east of its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 89 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
13. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes, on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at a point 33 metres east of its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres.
14. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Arthur Street, commencing at its intersection with Hansons Lane and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG146808 dated 24/7/24).
15. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 3.-14. are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 Access, safety and parking concerns on Arthur Street have been raised by the community due to activity related to Middleton Grange School. Implementing the recommendations will ease congestion and lead to a reduction in the risk of a crash by improving sightlines for pedestrians and vehicles.
3.2 The recommended option is to install new parking restrictions and revise the existing parking restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
3.3 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.
3.4 Options within this report have been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 Arthur Street is a local road in Riccarton with approximately 1500 vehicle movements per day.
4.2 Middleton Grange School is a large, combined primary and high school with a roll of around 1500 students. It is a school that serves a wide catchment area, and as a result has a relatively high number of students travelling by private vehicle. It has vehicle and pedestrian accesses on Arthur Street, including a pick up / drop off area.
4.3 Arthur Street has a long history of parking and traffic issues associated with Middleton Grange School activity, in particular at school drop off and pick up times. This has resulted in a number of complaints and infringement notices issued by Council Parking Compliance.
4.4 While there is some frustration from road users related to congestion at peak school times, this does however keep operating speeds relatively low and supports some aspects of safety in Arthur Street.
4.5 Various parking restrictions and parking configurations have previously been implemented in an attempt to improve the situation, with varying degrees of success. The current configuration of parking restrictions is no longer considered to be working effectively, resulting in the current access, parking and safety concerns. The time restricted no stopping restrictions in particular have a poor level of compliance.
4.6 There have been six recorded crashes in the last five years - four crashes at the Arthur Street / Middleton Road intersection, and two at the Arthur Street / Hansons Lane intersection. Arthur Street is classified as having low personal risk and low collective risk at each end, and in the middle section medium personal risk and low medium collective risk under Council’s risk mapping system.
4.7 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).
4.8 The following related briefings/workshops have taken place for the members of the meeting:
Date |
Subject |
1/2/2024 |
Arthur Street Traffic & Parking Issues |
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.9 The following options were identified as being reasonably practicable and are assessed in this report:
· Revised Parking Plan
· Consultation Parking Plan
· Do nothing
4.10 The following options were also considered but were not assessed as being reasonably practicable for the reasons outlined below:
· Remove parking permanently on the entire northern side of Arthur Street - this is likely to increase vehicle operating speeds due to reduced side friction, unnecessarily removes parking permanently, and does not provide an option to park on street for eastbound vehicles.
· Remove parking permanently on the entire southern side of Arthur Street - this is likely to increase vehicle operating speeds due to reduced side friction, unnecessarily removes parking permanently, and does not provide an option to park on street for westbound vehicles.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.11 Preferred Option: Revised Parking Plan (Attachment A).
4.11.1 Option Description: Implement parking restriction changes as shown in Attachment A.
4.11.2 Option Advantages
· Improves access and visibility for vehicles at the intersections, and for those travelling along Arthur Street.
· Improves visibility for pedestrians at the intersections and outside Middleton Grange.
· Improves vehicle access for those waiting to enter and exit the School pick up / drop off area.
· Time restricted no stopping restrictions are to only apply on school days instead of the current year-round application, which enables greater on-street parking availability where these restrictions apply.
· Increased signage provision for the time restricted no stopping areas.
· Incorporates community feedback into the revised design.
· Provides an opportunity for short term parking close to the Chinese Consulate on Hansons Lane.
· Permanent no stopping restrictions are more prominent and therefore likely to have a greater level of compliance when compared to the existing time restricted no stopping restrictions.
· Permanent no stopping restrictions can be useful when events in Arthur Street occur outside of peak school activity times.
· Maintains the need for vehicles to yield to each other at some points along Arthur Street at peak school times, which supports lower vehicle operating speeds.
4.11.3 Option Disadvantages
· Cost to implement.
· Permanently reduces on street parking outside some additional properties, however all have off-street parking and parking demand outside of peak school times is low to moderate.
· Reduces on street parking provision overall at peak school times when compared to both the Consultation Plan and the Do Nothing option.
· Retains some of the existing time limited no stopping restrictions which have poor compliance. These may need to be revisited in the future if they continue to have issues.
4.12 Option 2: Consultation Parking Plan (Attachment B).
4.12.1 Option Description: Implement parking restriction changes as shown in Attachment B.
4.12.2 Option Advantages
· Removes all the existing time limited no stopping restrictions which have poor compliance.
· Increases on street parking provision overall at peak school times when compared to both the recommended and do-nothing options. Improves access and visibility for vehicles at the intersections, and for those travelling along Arthur Street.
· Improves visibility for pedestrians at the intersections and outside Middleton Grange.
· Improves vehicle access for those waiting to enter and exit the school pick up / drop off area.
· Provides an opportunity for short term parking close to the Chinese Consulate in Hansons Lane.
· Permanent no stopping restrictions are more prominent and therefore likely to have a greater level of compliance when compared to the existing time restricted no stopping restrictions.
· Permanent no stopping restrictions can be useful when events at the school occur outside of peak school activity times.
· Maintains the need for vehicles to yield to each other at some points along Arthur Street at peak school times, which supports lower vehicle operating speeds.
4.12.3 Option Disadvantages
· Permanently reduces on street parking outside some additional properties, however all have off street parking and parking demand outside of peak school times is low to moderate.
· Does not align with some community views to retain the time limited no stopping restrictions.
4.13 Do Nothing: Status quo remains.
4.13.1 Option Description: No changes to parking restrictions are made.
4.13.2 Option Advantages
· Does not remove additional parking spaces.
· No additional cost beyond this report and Parking Compliance.
4.13.3 Option Disadvantages
· Does not address access, safety and parking issues.
· Likelihood of ongoing parking compliance issues.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
Recommended Option |
Option 2 – Consultation Parking Plan |
Option 3 – Do Nothing |
Cost to investigate, consult, write report. |
$4000 approximately |
$4000 approximately |
$4000 approximately |
Cost to Implement |
$3300 approximately |
$1700 approximately |
$0 |
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
Covered by existing maintenance contract. |
Covered by existing maintenance contract. |
$0 |
Funding Source |
Traffic Operations Team traffic signs and markings budget. |
Traffic Operations Team traffic signs and markings budget. |
n/a |
Funding Availability |
Yes |
Yes |
n/a |
Impact on Rates |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 Not applicable.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.
6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.
6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decisions:
6.4.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.
6.4.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.
6.5 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.
6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.7 Transport
6.7.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.3.3 Maintain customer perception of the ease of use of Council on- street parking facilities - >=50% resident satisfaction
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=96 crashes
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.8 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.8.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton.
6.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.
6.10 Early engagement with Middleton Grange School and Consulate-General of the People's Republic of China started in February 2024.
6.11 At early meetings, staff shared plans and met on site to discuss how the current street layout was functioning. Middleton Grange School and the Consulate-General of the People's Republic of China were supportive of the consultation plan.
6.12 Middleton Grange School discussed the current functioning of its drop off/pick up area and how this adds to congestion on the street. The school mentioned that it would be open to making further changes to how this area functions, depending on the outcomes of this project.
6.13 Feedback from the Consulate-General of the People's Republic of China influenced the proposed addition of three P60 time restricted parking spaces to assist Consulate visitors.
6.14 Public consultation started on 25 March 2024 and ran until 7 April 2024. An email was sent to 39 key stakeholders, including emergency services, Kainga Ora, Spokes, Central Riccarton Residents Association, and the Ministry of Education. The consultation was shared via the Middleton Grange School newsletter, inviting submissions on the Council’Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage. This page had 397 views throughout the consultation period.
6.15 Consultation documents were delivered to residents on the street on 25 March 2024. Documents were also available in Upper Riccarton Library.
6.16 Late consultation was received from two residents. This included a request for Parking Compliance to issue infringement notices for illegal parking. This site is already visited by Parking Compliance, and Parking Compliance staff are aware of the issues. The other suggestion was to consider implementing a time of day prohibited ‘no right turn’ from Arthur Street into Hansons Lane. This has been considered but it is not recommended. This is due to the cost of an electronic sign, likelihood of poor compliance based on a similar existing situation at the Larsens Road / School Road intersection, the likelihood that vehicles would look to other turning alternatives such as by ‘u turning’ in Arthur St and contributing to further congestion or attempting to turn right at the more difficult Blenheim Road / Middleton Road intersection.
6.17 Following the consultation period, staff had a follow up meeting with Middleton Grange School to discuss updates to the plans based on consultation feedback. The school indicated they would be supportive of the revised plan, but to alter temporary parking signage to display 2.30pm-3.30pm on school days, to increase the presence of the signage, and to investigate whether additional no stopping lines could be implemented outside 33 and 35 Arthur Street.
6.19 The school also had questions about directing people to park at Middleton Park, removing trees for driver visibility on school property, how to best advocate for changes to Acacia Street parking, a Suva Street pedestrian crossing, and whether a public path through the school could become school property. These have been investigated as part of separate processes.
Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga
6.20 Submissions were made by five recognised organisations and 49 individuals. Of the 54 total submissions, 43 submissions were made online in Let’s Talk, and 11 were via email or phone call. All submissions are available in Attachment C.
6.21 Of the 43 online submissions received, only 18.6% currently feel somewhat safe on Arthur Street.
6.22 Only 19% fully supported the plan, with another 40.5% partially supporting and 40.5% not supporting the plan.
6.23 Submitter support for the plan differed by reason for travel. Those who lived on the street were more likely to support the plan (33.3%) than parents who drop their children at the school (10.3%). 25% of submitters who selected other reasons for travel supported the plan (other reasons included work travel or visiting the area sometimes).
6.24 The charts below show that 71.4% of submitters supported the addition of yellow no stopping lines, and 55% of submitters supported the addition of three P60 car parks to service the Chinese Consulate.
6.25 Submitters liked the following elements of the plan:
· Yellow line extensions (27)
· Parking availability / removal of restrictions (6)
· Nothing (5)
· Generally like the plan with no further comments (5)
· P60 parking (4)
6.26 Submitters disliked the following elements of the plan:
· Permanent parking on both sides of the street hindering traffic flow/safety (32)
· Removal of time restrictions generally (27)
· That compliance will still be an issue (10)
· P60 parking (5)
· Yellow line extensions (3)
· Worry about impact of nearby businesses on Blenheim Road (3)
6.27 Submitters made the following requests for the project:
· Permanent no stopping lines on one side of the street (21)
· Make signage clearer and increase it (6)
· Install a school crossing (6)
· Implement a short term drop off/pick up zone for the school (4)
· Install speed bumps (4)
· Extend yellow lines further (3)
· Make Arthur Street one way (3)
· Install reduced speed signage (3)
6.28 In addition, two out of scope requests were made from submitters. Eight submitters asked whether the school could make their onsite drop off/pick up zone left turn out only. Four submitters asked whether the Council could install traffic lights at the Middleton Road/Blenheim Road intersection.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.29 The decisions do not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.
6.30 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.16 The proposal in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.
6.17 This is a minor proposal that is principally intended to address access and safety concerns at this location. Due to the minor nature of the works, it is not intended to have any impact on climate change.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 If approved, staff will arrange for signage and road marking changes to be made.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Arthur Street Proposed No Stopping & Parking Restriction Changes For Board Approval TG146808 |
24/1301246 |
52 |
b ⇩ |
Arthur Street Proposed No Stopping & Parking Restriction Changes Consultation Plan TG146808 |
24/1304696 |
53 |
c ⇩ |
Arthur Street Consultation Submissions April 2024 |
24/932010 |
54 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
Document Name – Location / File Link |
Not applicable
|
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Authors |
Andrew Hensley - Traffic Engineer Samantha Smith - Engagement Advisor |
Approved By |
Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport) |
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/1221670 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Marilyn Regnault, Principal Advisor Resource Consents |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
John Higgins, General Manager Strategy, Planning & Regulatory Services |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the proposed road name at 678 Cashmere Road, Halswell.
1.2 The report is staff-generated resulting from a naming request received from the developer.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Proposed Road Name - 678 Cashmere Road Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves the following new road names for 678 Cashmere Road (RMA/2024/16)
a. Road 1 - Blue Dusk Close
b. Lane 1 - Kōawa Lane
c. Lane 2 - Jane Marie Lane
3. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Introduction Te Whakatkinga
3.1 A road naming request has been submitted by the developer. A preferred name and alternative names have been put forward for the road and lanes.
3.2 The recommended road name has been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spelling, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The proposed name is considered sufficiently different to existing road names.
3.3 The recommended road name has been checked against the Council’s Naming Policy dated 15 November 2023 and is considered to be consistent with this policy. The specific criteria for assessing a name from clause 2 is set out below.
3.3.1 A traditional or Māori name which is acceptable to the Rūnanga or Iwi; this may be a name reflecting the physical characteristics of an area, an activity or event associated with the area or of a notable ancestor.
3.3.2 A feature of historical, social, cultural, environmental or physical importance in the area (e.g., Carlton Mill Road or Carlton Mill Reserve*).
3.3.3 The name of a notable family, person or event associated with the locality or with the wider Christchurch area.
3.3.4 A name in recognition of a person’s service. This can be for community service, conservation, sport, the arts, science and research or other sphere of activity.
3.3.5 Consistency with a common or established theme for naming in a subdivision or locality.
3.3.6 A name that reflects the diverse cultures and communities of the locality or of Christchurch generally.
3.3.7 The name of an event or activity strongly associated with the immediate location including an informal name for the area that is (or was historically) in common usage.
3.3.8 A name associated with a person, event or activity of significance to Christchurch including names associated with people, events, or places of national and international significance.
3.4 The criteria for names that are not suitable for approval from clause 6 is set out below.
3.4.1 Names of people, flora, fauna or geographical features not associated with the area, e.g., names of native trees which are not present in the area or views that cannot be identified, except where the name continues a current naming theme in the locality.
3.4.2 Currently trading commercial organisations except for sponsorship names for facilities and leased parks.
3.4.3 Anagrams, amalgamations or derivatives of people's names.
3.4.4 Names of living persons.
3.4.5 Names related to the developer of a subdivision.
3.4.6 Name of a person, club or organisation associated with a privately owned building on Council land, where the club or organisation does not hold the ground lease for the building.
3.4.7 Names for roads which may cause confusion because they are associated with another geographical location or feature e.g., Parklands Drive which is not located in the Parklands suburb.
3.5 The recommended road name has also been checked against the Australia and New Zealand Standard AS/NZA 4819:2011 Rural and Urban Addressing. The name is considered to be consistent with the Standard.
3.6 Under the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy, the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is no ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.
3.7 Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed road names.
3.8 Consultation under the policy with rūnanga is not required because the road to be named is not a collector road and/or sites of significance under the District Plan (clause 3 of the Naming Policy).
3.9 No addresses of neighbouring properties are affected by the proposed road naming (clause 12.2 of the Naming Policy).
3.10 The names requested have been accompanied by an explanation of the background of the names, which is summarised below.
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira
3.11 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.12 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.
3.13 Council’s Paeārahi has been consulted and has raised no concerns with the suitability of the proposed Te Reo Māori names set out below.
3.14 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.
Proposed Names
3.15 The proposed roads are shown in Attachment A.
3.16 The below names are themed for the local environment.
3.17 Road 1 - Blue Dusk Close
3.18 Reflects the beautiful blue dusk seen from the site over the water in the stormwater ponds of Hoon Hay Basin, part of Te Kuru Wetlands, immediately adjacent to the site.
3.19 Lane 1 - Kōawa Lane
3.20 Kōawa is te reo Māori for stream, watercourse. This is reflecting the nearby stormwater facility and adjacent swales.
3.21 Lane 2 - Jane Marie Lane
3.22 Jane-Marie Alberts was a lovely, vibrant lady who was killed in the Christchurch Earthquake, 22 February 2011, leaving behind two young sons.
3.23 Officers Note: Jane-Marie is a relative of the developers. Consultation for this proposed naming has been provided from her immediate family.
3.24 Officers Note: While Jane-Marie’s name is spelt with a hyphen, LINZ Street Naming Standard prohibits hyphens.
Alternative Names
3.25 Blue Dawn Close - Similar to Blue Dusk as above.
3.26 Blue Creek Close - Further to Blue Dusk, and also to reflect the swales of the adjacent stormwater facility.
3.27 Daffodil Lane - Daffodils are present in the area and will be planted on site.
3.28 Blackwood Lane - Blackwood is a hardwood tree that is present in the area and will be planted on site.
Assessment of Names
3.29 The above names are considered to be consistent with the policy. Except for “Jane Marie” which is related to the developer.
3.30 Notwithstanding, the discretion lies with the Community Board to approve any of the above name options, including the alternative names.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
RMA/2024/16 - Proposed Road Names Plan - 678 Cashmere Road |
24/996698 |
83 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Authors |
Leashelle Miller - Planning Technician Marilyn Regnault - Principal Advisor Resource Consents |
Approved By |
Mark Stevenson - Acting Head of Planning & Consents |
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/1221438 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Nick Reid, Traffic Engineer |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Community Board to install a Stop Control on Lillian Street at its intersection with Ensign Street and Wales Street. This report has been written following a safety concern raised by a member of the community and staff observations.
1.2 The recommended option is to install a stop control in accordance with Attachment A.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Lillian Street Proposed Stop Control Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves, pursuant to Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Stop control be placed against Lillian Street at its intersection with Ensign Street and Wales Street, as shown in Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Plan TG148377 dated 24/07/2024.
4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 3.
5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 3 or 4 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 The intersection of Lillian Street and Ensign Street-Wales Street is currently controlled by a Give Way control but there is reduced visibility for vehicles turning out of Lillian Street.
3.2 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.
3.3 The recommended option is to install a Stop Control in accordance with Attachment A.
3.4 Options within this report have been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 Lillian Street is classified in the Christchurch District Plan as a collector road. Lillian Street is wide, with a carriageway width of 14 m. Streets with wide traffic lanes generally result in higher vehicle operating speeds than streets with narrow traffic lanes.
4.2 Ensign Street becomes Wales Street at the intersection with Lillian Street.
4.3 Lillian Street and Ensign Street-Wales Street form a Give Way controlled T intersection with priority given to Ensign Street-Wales Street.
4.4 Residents are concerned with the speed of vehicles turning left from Lillian Street to Wales Street (existing Give Way control) when exiting a private property.
4.5 Visibility is limited at this intersection due to physical obstructions on private property, and as a result warrants a Stop Control.
4.6 A search of NZ Transport Agency’s Crash Analysis System indicates there has been one recorded crash in the vicinity of the intersection in the last 5 years.
4.7 Approval is required by the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.
4.8 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year.
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.9 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
4.9.1 Install a Stop Control in accordance with Attachment A.
4.9.2 Maintain the status quo - retain the Give Way Control.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.10 Preferred Option: Install a Stop Control.
4.10.1 Option Description: Install a Stop Control in accordance with Attachment A.
4.10.2 Option Advantages
· Reduces the vehicle operating speeds of motorists on the Lillian Street approach to the intersection with Ensign Street-Wales Street.
· Reduces the likelihood (risk) of crashes at the intersection.
4.10.3 Option Disadvantages
· Cost to implement
4.11 Retain Give Way controls.
4.11.1 Option Description: Maintain the status quo - retain the Give Way Control.
4.11.2 Option Advantages
· No cost
4.11.3 Option Disadvantages
· Does not align with visibility guidelines at an intersection.
· Does not slow vehicle operating speeds.
· Does not reduce the likelihood (risk) of crashes at the intersection.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
Recommended Option – Proposed Stop Control |
Option 2 – Retain Give Way Control |
Cost to Implement |
Approximately $1,000 |
$0 |
Cost to prepare report – Opex from Traffic Operations Staff Budget |
Approximately $500 for investigations and report writing |
$0 |
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
Comparable with existing signage and markings in place |
Comparable with existing signage and markings in place |
Funding Source |
Traffic Operations Signs & Markings |
Traffic Operations Signs & Markings |
Funding Availability |
Available |
Available |
Impact on Rates |
No impact on rates |
No impact on rates |
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 N/A
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install traffic controls by resolution.
6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.
6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.3.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decision:
6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.
6.4.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.
6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.6 Transport
6.6.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network (DIA 1) - 4 less than previous FY.
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.7 Consultation was undertaken with the member of the community who raised the safety issue.
6.8 No wider community consultation was undertaken due to the safety nature of the proposal, and lack of anyone considered to be directly affected. The change of intersection control does not remove any carparking or affect the level of service for people who drive.
6.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.9.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.10 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.
6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
6.12 The decision includes minor work which is contained within the roadway.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.13 The proposal in this report is unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 If approved, staff will arrange for new road marking and signage to be installed in the current financial year.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Lillian Street Proposed Stop Control TG148377 |
24/1275602 |
89 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
Document Name – Location / File Link |
Not applicable |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Nick Reid - Traffic Engineer |
Approved By |
Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport) |
11. Darvel Street- Proposed No Stopping Restrictions |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/914364 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Andrew Hensley, Traffic Engineer |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūta Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to install no stopping restrictions in Darvel Street.
1.2 This report has been written following a parking concern raised by a local resident, and further staff investigations.
1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.
1.4 The recommended option is to install no stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Darvel Street- Proposed No Stopping Restrictions Report.
2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolutions 4 – 5 below.
4. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Darvel Street, commencing at a point 84 metres north of its intersection with Kilmarnock Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Plan TG148350 Issue 1 dated 30/7/24.
5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Darvel Street, commencing at a point 87 metres north of its intersection with Kilmarnock Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Plan TG148350 Issue 1 dated 30/7/24.
6. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 3.-5 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 Access concerns have been raised on Davel Street due to vehicles parking inconsiderately at the speed hump and road narrowing. Implementing the noted recommendations will lead to a reduction in the risk of a crash by improving usable road width.
3.2 The recommended option is to Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
3.3 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.
3.4 Options within this report have been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 Darvel Street is a local road in Riccarton.
4.2 Parking demands in the area can be high due to the proximity of Christchurch Girls High School and housing density.
4.3 Some vehicles park within the existing road narrowing that is a traffic calming feature. No stopping restrictions are not currently marked, unlike other narrowing situations in the area. Any parking in this location further narrows the usable road space and reduces through traffic access.
4.4 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.5 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
· Install no stopping restrictions.
· Do nothing.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.6 Preferred Option: Install no stopping restrictions.
4.6.1 Option Description: Install no stopping restrictions to cover the road narrowing part of the traffic calming feature.
4.6.2 Option Advantages
· Improves access for through traffic.
4.6.3 Option Disadvantages
4.7 Do nothing.
4.7.1 Option Description: Do not install no stopping restrictions.
4.7.2 Option Advantages
· No cost.
4.7.3 Option Disadvantages
· Without no stopping restrictions in place some are likely to continue to park at this location.
· Inconsistent with other traffic calming features in the local area.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
Recommended Option |
Option 2 – Do nothing |
Cost to investigate and write report |
$750 |
$750 |
Cost to Implement |
$150 approximately |
$0 |
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
Covered by the existing maintenance contract |
$0 |
Funding Source |
Traffic Operations Team traffic signs and markings budget |
$0 |
Funding Availability |
Yes |
$0 |
Impact on Rates |
n/a |
n/a |
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 Not applicable.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.
6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.
6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decisions:
6.4.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.
6.4.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.
6.5 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.
6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.7 Transport
6.7.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=96 crashes
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.8 This issue has been raised by a local resident. No further engagement has been undertaken.
6.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.
6.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.10.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.11 The decisions do not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.
6.12 The decisions do not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.13 The decisions in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaption to the impacts of climate change or emissions reduction.
6.14 This is a minor proposal that is principally intended to address access issues at this location. Due to the minor nature of the works, it is not expected to have any impact on climate change.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 If approved, staff will arrange for the new road markings to be installed.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Darvel Street Proposed No Stopping Restrictions Plan TG148350 |
24/1312768 |
95 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
Document Name – Location / File Link |
Not applicable
|
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Andrew Hensley - Traffic Engineer |
Approved By |
Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport) |
12. Wigram Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/1109251 |
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Andrew Hensley, Traffic Engineer |
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to install no stopping restrictions on Wigram Road outside Oaklands Chapel.
1.2 This report has been written following a request from Lamb and Hayward Funeral Directors, who operate Oaklands Chapel.
1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.
1.4 The recommended option is to install no stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Wigram Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolutions 4 below.
4. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwestern side of Wigram Road, commencing at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 146 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG148360 dated 25/7/2024).
5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 3. and 4. are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 A request has been made by Lamb and Hayward Funeral Directors to install permanent no stopping restrictions on Wigram Road, outside Oaklands Chapel. This is intended to improve safety, access and visibility, and negate the need to install temporary no stopping restrictions to manage parking related issues when large funerals are being held.
3.2 The recommended option is to Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.
3.3 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.
3.4 Options within this report have been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance including the sight distance requirements.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 Wigram Road is a collector road in the suburb of Halswell.
4.2 Lamb and Hayward Funeral Directors began operating the Oaklands Chapel as a funeral venue in April 2023.
4.3 To fulfil resource consent conditions to mitigate concerns about the operation of the site, a range of possible traffic management measures have been developed and implemented. This has included Lamb and Hayward engaging a temporary traffic management contractor to install temporary no stopping restrictions in advance of funerals expected to be attended by more than 250 people.
4.4 Estimates of attendee numbers are made in advance of the funeral day and can prove to be inaccurate. This increases the risk that temporary no stopping restrictions are not in place when required, or temporary no stopping restrictions are installed when not required.
4.5 Following their first 12 months of operation at the site, Lamb and Hayward have asked that the option of permanent no stopping restrictions be considered. This would negate the need to engage a temporary traffic management provider, and to provide certainty that no stopping restrictions are in place when needed. All other consent conditions regarding traffic and parking would remain unchanged.
4.6 The extent of the proposed permanent no stopping restrictions covers what is required for funerals expected to be attended by more than 250 people.
4.7 There has been one crash in the last five years on Wigram Road within the area covered in this report, but this was prior to the Oaklands Chapel being operational. Wigram Road is classified as having low collective risk and low-medium personal risk under Council’s risk mapping system.
4.8 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.9 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
4.9.1 Install no stopping restrictions as shown in Attachment A.
4.9.2 Do nothing- status quo of temporary traffic management no stopping restrictions.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.10 Preferred Option: Install no stopping restrictions
4.10.1 Option Description: Install no stopping restrictions
4.10.2 Option Advantages
· Reduces the likelihood of congestion on Wigram Road in the vicinity of Oaklands Chapel.
· Improves visibility for drivers exiting Oaklands Chapel onto Wigram Road.
· Improves visibility for pedestrians crossing Wigram Road.
4.10.3 Option Disadvantages
· Permanently removes the ability to park on the northwestern side of Wigram Road. However, it is noted that there appears to be little demand to park in this location outside of funerals being held.
4.11 Do Nothing.
4.11.1 Option Description: Do Nothing- status quo of temporary traffic management provision.
4.11.2 Option Advantages
· Does not permanently remove the ability to park on the northwestern side of Wigram Road. However, it is noted that there appears to be little demand to park in this location outside of funerals being held.
4.11.3 Option Disadvantages
· Ongoing requirement to provide temporary no stopping restrictions under a temporary traffic management plan.
· Relies on an estimate of the projected funeral attendee numbers, made three days before the event. This introduces the risk that temporary no stopping restrictions may not be in place when needed if an estimate of numbers is incorrect, or that temporary no stopping restrictions are in place when not needed, both with little option to rectify this at short notice.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
Recommended Option |
Option 2 – Do Nothing |
Cost to investigate, consult and write report |
$750 |
$750 |
Cost to Implement |
$800 approximately |
$0 |
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
Covered by existing maintenance contract. |
$0 |
Funding Source |
Traffic Operations Team traffic signs and markings budget. |
n/a |
Funding Availability |
Yes |
n/a |
Impact on Rates |
n/a |
n/a |
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 Not applicable.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.
6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.
6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decisions:
6.4.1 Alings with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.
6.4.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.
6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.6 Transport
6.6.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=96 crashes
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.7 The request to implement permanent no stopping restrictions has come from Lamb and Hayward Funeral Directors.
6.8 There are no other property owners or residents considered to be directly affected by the proposal.
6.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.
6.10 The Planning Team supports the preferred option.
6.11 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.11.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.12 The decision does not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.
6.13 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.14 The decisions in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reduction.
6.15 This is a minor proposal that is principally intended to address access and safety issues at this location. Due to the minor nature of the works, it is not expected to have any impact on climate change.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 If approved, staff will arrange for the new road marking to be installed.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Wigram Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions TG148360 |
24/1287727 |
102 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
Document Name – Location / File Link |
Not applicable
|
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Andrew Hensley - Traffic Engineer |
Approved By |
Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport) |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider applications for funding from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.
Funding Request Number |
Organisation |
Project Name |
Amount Requested |
Amount Recommended |
00068093 |
Awatea Athletics Incorporated |
Volunteer and Coach Support |
$2,000 |
$2,000 |
00067959 |
Bangaliana Christchurch |
Durga Festival – Easten Indian Cultural Community Day |
$2,000 |
$800 |
00062649 |
Hornby Good Companions Club |
Bus Trips |
$1,500 |
$1,500 |
1.2 There is currently a balance of $80,555 remaining in the fund.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund 2024-25 - Bangaliana Christchurch, Awatea Athletics Incorporated and Hornby Good Companions Club Report.
2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Awatea Athletics Incorporated towards its Volunteer and Coach Support project.
4. Approves a grant of $800 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Bangaliana Christchurch towards venue hire and entertainment costs for the Durga Festival, Eastern Indian Cultural Community Day in October 2024.
5. Approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fun to Hornby Good Companions Club towards the Bus Trips project.
3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua
Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro
3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority “Enabling active and connected communities to own their future”. The projects also align with the Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.
Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau
3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.
3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.
3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:
· Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations, or Community Board decisions.
· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira
3.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.4 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.
3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.
Discussion Kōrerorero
3.6 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.
Total Budget 2024-25 |
Granted To Date |
Available for allocation |
Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted |
$123,555 |
$43,000 |
$80,555 |
$76,255 |
3.7 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.
3.8 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information, and a staff assessment.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Discretionary Response Fund 2024/25 Decision Matrix - Awatea Athletics Incorporated, Bangaliana Christchurch and Hornby Good Companions Club |
24/1320120 |
106 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Sam Savage - Community Recreation Advisor |
Approved By |
Bailey Peterson - Acting Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton |
1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.
1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - August 2024.
3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity
3.1 Community Governance Projects
Activity |
Detail |
Timeline |
Strategic Alignment |
Summer with your neighbours |
Summer with your neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood. At its 25 July 2024 meeting, the Board decided to extend the application and event timeframe. Applications for events proposed to be held within the Halswell, Hornby and Riccarton wards can now be made until 31 March 2025. Events are to be held between 1 October 2024 and 30 April 2025. Applications for a small funding subsidy can be made online at: ccc.govt.nz/GetTogether |
Ongoing |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
Riccarton Collective |
The Way Forward was the topic of the latest Riccarton Collective hui held in early July attended by 18 community members. This is the third gathering for the Collective which was initiated by Cr Harrison-Hunt. The opportunity to connect more regularly and how to do this, was a recurring theme that emerged from discussions |
Ongoing |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
Certificate of Appreciation |
Anne Holwell was recognised for her service with the Christchurch City Council Graffiti Programme by receiving a Certificate of Appreciation which has been delivered. |
Completed |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
Halswell Community Garden |
The Halswell Community Garden, located at St Mary’s Anglican Church, is wanting to connect with the wider community. The Community Governance Team is supporting them in hosting an event in October and building the committee’s capacity. |
Ongoing |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
Riccarton Youth Audit |
Ongoing |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
Riccarton Youth Audit
Summer with your neighbours
Riccarton Collective
3.2 Community Funding Summary
3.2.1 For information, a summary is provided on the status of the Board's 2024-25 funding as at July 2024 (refer Attachment A).
3.2.2 Youth Development Fund
Under authority delegated by the Community Board the following allocations were made in July 2024:
· $550 to St Thomas of Canterbury College towards Micha Sula, Xavier Reweti, Zeke Faga-leti, Luke Waikawau, Isshin Nakao, Jackson Stewart, Xavier Lynch, Meihana Pauling, Ashton Clark, Caleb Foleni and Ramsay Sula to participate in the New Zealand Secondary Schools Rugby League Tournament 2024 in Auckland.
· $1,000 to Halswell United Association Football Club Incorporated towards Charlize Forde, Lio Gunther, Malia Forde and Jade O’Connor to participate in the Premier Football Invitational Tournament to be held on the Gold Coast, Australia.
Under authority delegated by the Community Governance Manager the following allocations were made in July 2024:
· $200 to Zion-Tūkaha Journey-Reign Roberts towards participating in the the Aotearoa National Māori Rugby League Tamariki Tournament in Rotorua.
· $200 to Adele Dunning towards participating in the New Zealand Irish Dancing National Championships 2024 in Wellington
· $200 to Micah Pomare towards participating in the Hillary Challenge National Final to be held at the Hillary Outdoors Tongariro Centre.
3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making
3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]
· Hornby Community Care Trust Events
Before renovations start at the new Hornby Community Care Centre, an open afternoon was held to share "The Great Reveal" of the new space.
That night, a whānau movie night was hosted in partnership with Youth and Cultural Development.
· Matatiki a hit with the community
Matatiki Hornby Centre has had a bumper first three months of operation.
Since opening its doors in April, Christchurch’s newest pool, library and customer service hub has welcomed over 80,000 visitors.
Matatiki offers the Hornby community refreshing pools, learn to swim classes, aqua group fitness classes, library, service centre and more.
Information about Matatiki Hornby Centre can be found at: https://recandsport.ccc.govt.nz/matatiki-hornby-centre/
· Halswell Youth Connections
Halswell Community Church hosted its first youth group for Years 6-8 on the first Friday of the school term.
4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori
4.1 Our Play Spaces Network Plan for Ōtautahi Christchurch
A plan for the future of play spaces in the city, ‘Our Play Spaces Network Plan for Ōtautahi Christchurch’, is being developed (see Attachment B). This network plan follows other similar parks planning documents including our Urban Forest Plan and our Sports Field Network Plan. The plan will set out a framework for the distribution of play spaces and prioritising the provision or acquisition, renewal, improvement, management, and in some limited cases decommissioning of the city’s play space assets.
There will be early engagement to seek feedback on distribution, location, and hierarchy of play spaces, and the location of inclusive and accessible play spaces. This will occur through workshops facilitated in each Community Board area and with key target audience/s and populations including tamariki, rangatahi, access and inclusion, multi-cultural, mana whenua, pasifika and older adults which will inform the development of the draft plan. It is planned to hold a Community Workshop on 22 August 2024. Board members have been invited to attend the workshop to provide feedback and hear from local groups who advocate for play.
The workshops coincide with a play spaces survey on Kōrero mai/Let’s talk in August 2024. The gathered information will inform the Draft Play Spaces Network Plan which will be shared with the Council in November/December 2024.
If approved the draft plan will be released for formal consultation during February/March 2025 to check ‘have we got it right?’. After the formal engagement the Draft Plan will be considered by a hearings panel in July 2025 followed by Council consideration of approval of the plan in August 2025.
4.2 Upper Riccarton - Road safety improvements
A start work notice has been distributed for installation of safety improvements at intersections and crossing points in Upper Riccarton (see Attachment C). The work will be on intersections and crossing points, including Waimairi Road, near the Bush Inn entrance. Work commences on Wednesday 7 August 2024 and continues until mid-October 2024 and will be undertaken at night (Sunday to Friday between 9pm and 6am, weather/site condition dependent).
The following changes will be made:
· Installation of safe speed platforms on the approaches to the Riccarton Road/Hansons Lane/Waimairi Road intersection.
· Removal of the slip lane from Riccarton Road onto Waimairi Road.
· Addition of a new signalised crossing on Waimairi Road, outside the Bush Inn Centre.
· Addition of cycle lanes on Waimairi Road (between Riccarton Road and Bowen Street) and making changes to the bus stop and parking markings.
· Installation of speed humps on Angela Street, Brake Street, Leslie Street and Bowen Street.
· Installation of a pedestrian refuge island on Yaldhurst Road close to the intersection with Brake Street.
Removal of the left turn slip lane from Main South Road into Curletts Road and provision of a left turn lane at the signals.
A number of traffic management layouts will be implemented during the work. There will be a variation of road closures, shoulder closures, lane drops and temporary on-street parking removal. Pedestrian access will be maintained at all times.
Options for improving the safety of the Main South and Yaldhurst/Riccarton Intersection were presented to the Council at an Information Session/Workshop on 6 August 2024. A report with recommendations is currently scheduled to go the Council meeting on 21 August 2024 for a decision.
4.3 Community Patrols
Community Patrols of New Zealand is dedicated to helping build safer communities in partnership with NZ Police and other organisations. Patrols in the Board area include the Hornby and Riccarton community patrols. Their Monthly Patrol Statistics can be found on the Community Patrols of New Zealand website:
Hornby Community Patrol Inc statistical information
Riccarton Community Patrol Inc statistical information
4.4 Graffiti Snapshot
For the Board’s information, attached is a Graffiti Snapshot, an update on graffiti as of June 2024 (refer Attachment D).
4.5 Customer Service Requests/Hybris Report
For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the June 2024 Hybris Report (refer Attachment E).
The report provides an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
a ⇩ |
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Funding Update - July 2024 |
24/1320237 |
117 |
b ⇩ |
Internal or External Memos Our Play Spaces Network Plan for Ōtautahi Christchurch 31 July 2024 Report |
24/1065812 |
118 |
c ⇩ |
Upper Riccarton - Road safety improvements |
24/1320242 |
121 |
d ⇩ |
Graffiti Snapshot - June 2024 |
24/1315998 |
123 |
e ⇩ |
Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Hybris Report - June 2024 |
24/1316055 |
125 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Authors |
Noela Letufuga - Support Officer Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor Faye Collins - Community Board Advisor Hannah Martin - Community Support & Events Coordinator Sam Savage - Community Recreation Advisor Bailey Peterson - Acting Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton |
Approved By |
Bailey Peterson - Acting Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Emma Pavey - Acting Manager Community Governance Team Matthew McLintock - Acting Head of Community Support and Partnerships |
15. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi |
This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.
Karakia Whakamutunga
Unuhia, unuhia Unuhia ki te uru tapu nui Kia wātea, kia māmā, te ngākau, Te tinana te wairua i te ara takatā Koia rā e Rongo, whakairia ake ki runga Kia tina! TINA! Hui e! TĀIKI E! |
Draw on, draw on, |