Council Information Session/Workshop
Agenda
Notice of Information Session/Workshop:
A Council Information Session/Workshop will be held on:
Date: Tuesday 23 July 2024
Time: 9.30 am - 12.00 pm
Venue: Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch
Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6439418430?omn=86418455067
Meeting ID: 643 941 8430
Membership
Chairperson Deputy Chairperson Members |
Mayor Phil Mauger Deputy Mayor Pauline Cotter Councillor Kelly Barber Councillor Melanie Coker Councillor Celeste Donovan Councillor Tyrone Fields Councillor James Gough Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt Councillor Victoria Henstock Councillor Yani Johanson Councillor Aaron Keown Councillor Sam MacDonald Councillor Jake McLellan Councillor Andrei Moore Councillor Mark Peters Councillor Tim Scandrett Councillor Sara Templeton |
19 July 2024
|
|
Principal Advisor Mary Richardson Interim Chief Executive Tel: 941 8999 |
Please Note:
This forum has no decision-making powers and is purely for information sharing.
TABLE OF CONTENTS NGĀ IHIRANGI
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha................................................................................. 3
Information Session/Workshop Items
9.00am-9.30am
Councillors’ informal
9.30am-9.45am
Break
2. Coal Tar........................................................................................................... 5
9.45am-10.15am
Presenters: Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning & Delivery TransportMark Tipper - Senior Environmental Advisor, Jeanine Keller - Senior Environmental & Resource Planner and Dave Little - Manager Residential Red Zone
3. Public Consultation for Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street....... 7
10.15am-10.45am
Presenters: Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport and David Sun - Transport Project Manager
10.45am-11.00am
Break
4. Antigua Street - Design and Options to Proceed..................................................... 9
11.00am-11.30am
Presenters: Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport, and Ann Tomlinson - Project Manager Transport
5. Implementation of Greater Christchurch Partnership - Joint Housing Action Plan Action 7..................................................................................................................... 13
11.30am-12.00pm
Presenter: Bruce Rendall - Head of City Growth and Property
12.00pm-1.00pm
Lunch
1.00pm-2.00pm
Drop In session – Elected Members Lounge
This is to discuss Plan Change 14 and preparing for decision making on Panel recommendations. Brent Pizzey and City Planning staff will be available to interested councillors.
2. Coal Tar |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/970976 |
Presenter(s) Te Kaipāhō : |
Jacob
Bradbury, Manager Planning & Delivery Transport |
1. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Purpose and Origin |
· The purpose of this session is to give Elected Members an understanding of Coal Tar, and how it affects Council’s work · This Information Session is in response to an action from the Finance and Performance Committee on 18 April 2024: Staff to provide information to elected members on how coal tar is dealt with when encountered in projects, possibly through an information session |
Timing |
This information session is expected to last for 30 minutes. |
Confidentiality |
The session and any shared information are not confidential. |
Outcome Sought |
This session is to give Elected Members an understanding of Coal Tar, the implications of it on Council’s Capital programme, and ways that staff manage the risks.
This is for information only. |
ELT Consideration |
This is a result of a direct request from Elected Members and is for information only, so has not currently been considered by ELT. |
Next Steps |
This is for information only, so no further steps are planned. |
Key points / Background |
The aim of the session will be to cover the following points: · Coal Tar: what is it, where did it come from, why is it there, what are its defining features? · What are the risks to human health and the environment, and what are Council’s legal responsibilities? · Case studies: · 3 Waters example, to cover pre-construction testing · Transport example, to cover sampling technique and disposal management · OARC example, to cover other ways to manage the risk, and potential opportunities · Question and Answer session.
|
Useful Links |
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no attachments to this coversheet.
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning & Delivery Transport |
Approved By |
Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management Brent Smith - Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
3. Public Consultation for Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/834987 |
Presenter(s) Te Kaipāhō : |
Jacob
Bradbury, Manager Planning and Delivery Transport |
1. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Purpose and Origin |
This information session aims to provide information on the proposed options for Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street before the public consultation. The session will cover: · Background information · Options investigated · Options for public consultation · Consultation arrangements · Post-consultation decision-making process |
Timing |
This information session is expected to last for 30 minutes. |
Confidentiality |
The session and any shared information are not confidential. |
Outcome Sought |
For information only – the Community Board is the delegated decision-making body for DEMP-related issues.
However, the options for consultation include elements that require Council delegation to be installed (ie Special Vehicle Lanes). The intent of this session is therefore to ensure that Council are aware of the options and consultation strategy, so they are in a strong position to decide on these |
ELT Consideration |
Has not been formally discussed with ELT. However, the relevant General Manager is aware of the consultation strategy and decision-making process. |
Next Steps |
· Public consultation from 22 July to 19 August. · Post consultation briefing to the Community board on 26 September · Post consultation briefing to the Council on 1 October · Recommodation to Board in November · Board recommendation to the Council in December 2024 |
Key points / Background |
Background The Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) opened in late 2020. It has also resulted increased traffic on Cranford Street. Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street is a two-lane, two-way corridor. Over the past three years, peak-hour bus lanes have been trialed on this section of Cranford Street to address the challenging downstream impacts of increased traffic from the motorway. Five options have been investigated for the final solution, it is proposed that three options will be publicly consulted in July 2024. Key Issues · The consent requires that Council consider traffic effects along the Cranford Street corridor and identified local streets as a result of the opening of the Northern Motorway. · Attempts have been made to balance these obligations for traffic efficiency against local views on safety, travel choice, and other priorities. · This consultation aims to reach local residents, but also consider the views of commuters from further afield. Approval process and requirements. |
Useful Links |
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no attachments to this coversheet.
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
David Sun - Project Manager |
Approved By |
Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning & Delivery Transport Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management Brent Smith - Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
4. Antigua Street - Design and Options to Proceed |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/856401 |
Presenter(s) Te Kaipāhō : |
Jacob
Bradbury, Manager Planning and Delivery Transport |
1. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Purpose and Origin of the Workshop |
· Explain issues around current design for Antigua Street · Offer potential options for exploration |
Timing |
This workshop is expected to last for 30 minutes. |
Confidentiality |
The workshop and any shared information are not confidential. |
Outcome Sought |
Direction from Council about whether they believe there would be value in staff looking at alternatives to the approved design. If Council wishes the design to be re-evaluated, then direction over what elements are key to the design. |
ELT Consideration |
Held on 4th June 2024. ELT requested “that on-budget options be included in the presentation and reporting to Council”. |
Next Steps |
This information session is not currently timed to coincide with a paper to Council. However, the outcomes from the discussion will determine the type and timing of any future report to Council/F&P. The most likely outcomes are that staff will either: a) Produce a report to Council/Finance & Performance Committee to request additional funding, which will be approved as part of the FY26 Annual Plan b) Develop outline alternative designs, which will be presented to Council as part of a formal report. This will include key considerations relating to the designs (eg. high-level costs and timing, impacts on consultation, etc) |
Key points / Background |
Background: The approved design for Antigua Street between St Asaph and Moorhouse has not yet moved to construction, due to delays with the construction of Parakiore. · The current approved design is in line with Streets and Spaces, where it is tasked with “provid[ing] a fitting and attractive address for [Parakiore]” · The design, and likely outturn cost, generated a level of concern when approved. The costs are anticipated to have increased further. · Based on the draft GPS, staff believe it is unlikely that this project will attract subsidy through the NLTF in the current Triennium · This is a key link into the city for both vehicles and cyclists, and has high numbers of both. Cycle numbers here have grown around 10% in the past year, and vehicle numbers are expected to increase when Parakiore opens. Key discussion points: Based on learnings from other projects staff believe there could be alternative ways to construct this section of road and cycleway. However, these would require compromises, so staff would like to understand: · Do Council have any appetite to re-visit the design, given the likely cost and time impact? · If so, what elements of the design are able to be changed, and what are considered to be non-negotiables? Options include: · Road space · Separated cycleways · On-street parking · Drainage · Would Council be open to expanding the scope slightly to investigate known Public Transport delays at the St Asaph/Antigua intersection? · Is Council open to using different materials? · Permanent (similar to MCRs) · Semi-permanent (similar to Wellington transitional cycleways) · Temporary (similar to Park Terrace/Gloucester Street) Staff specimen design: Based on feedback from ELT, staff have developed a high-level concept and price, to demonstrate that it is possible to deliver an effective project within the budget. The key design elements of this are: · Priority to moving vehicles and cyclists along the corridor · Remain within original road boundaries by reducing parking and greenery within the corridor · Use of semi-permanent materials to separate cycleways · Maintain drainage level of service · No substation relocation · Any planting will be installed behind the footpath |
Useful Links |
· Consultation webpage: https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/community-consultation-archive/show/487 · Hearings Panel Agenda (11 April 2022): https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2022/04/BLHP_20220411_AGN_7840_AT.PDF · Recommendations from Hearings Panel (Council Agenda 12 May 2022): https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2022/05/CNCL_20220512_AGN_7424_AT.PDF#page=389 · Minutes of Council Decision (12 May 2022): https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2022/05/CNCL_20220512_MIN_7424_AT.PDF#page=11
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no attachments to this coversheet.
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Jacob Bradbury - Manager Planning & Delivery Transport |
Approved By |
Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management Brent Smith - Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
5. Implementation of Greater Christchurch Partnership - Joint Housing Action Plan Action 7 |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/1087904 |
Presenter(s) Te Kaipāhō : |
Bruce Rendall, Head of City Growth and Property |
1. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Purpose and Origin of the Workshop |
· The Greater Christchurch Partnership’s Joint Housing Action Plan (JHAP) includes an action to “investigate expanding the Ōtautahi Community Housing Trust model”. · In this workshop officers will present the preferred option for delivering this action and seek guidance from Councillors on the Council’s response to the consequences of expanding the model. · This workshop is staff originated in response to the ongoing implementation of the JHAP. |
Timing |
This workshop is expected to last for 30 minutes. |
Confidentiality |
The workshop and any shared information are not confidential.
|
Outcome Sought |
Officers are looking to inform Councillors about progress and the preferred option to implement the JHAP action. If successful there are consequential impacts that will require guidance from Councillors.
Following the workshop, staff prepare a formal report on this matter for Council’s consideration.
|
ELT Consideration |
The CE has approved this matter proceeding to a workshop. No ELT consideration of the matter is planned
|
Next Steps |
A report to Council on the 21 August 2024.
|
Key points / Background |
· There is interest from the Selwyn and Waimakariri District Council’s in having the Ōtautahi Community Housing Trust (OCHT) developing and operating community housing in the areas. · OCHT is interested in doing this, but its Trust agreement restricts it to only operating within Christchurch and Banks Peninsula. · Changing the relevant section of the Trust Deed is not straight forward. There are five options, three of which are not feasible. The not feasible options are: · Take the matter to the High Court – this is an expensive and time-consuming option and not guaranteed of success; · Ask a Member of Parliament to submit a Private Members Bill – this process is subject to luck, as bills are selected by ballot; or · Set up a sister trust that operates in the other areas – this is expensive due to the need to have duplicate rules, governors and reporting arrangements.
· There are two feasible options, which are variations of a similar approach. The feasible options are: · A Local Bill, which is submitted by the Council’s supporting the legislation; or · A Private Bill, which can be submitted by an individual or organisation supporting the legislation
· The initial view is that the Private Bill is preferred. · Any change will not impact on tenants, Council’s portfolio or OCHT’s financial viability because of other, non-affected, protections.
|
Useful Links |
· Joint Housing Action Plan : Greater Christchurch · Introducing Private and Local Bills - New Zealand Parliament (www.parliament.nz).
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no attachments to this coversheet.
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
Author |
Bruce Rendall - Head of City Growth & Property |
Approved By |
Brent Smith - Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |