Agenda of Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

Unconfirmed

Waihoro

Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Tuesday 30 August 2022

Time: 5pm

Venue: Boardroom, Beckenham Service Centre,
66 Colombo Street, Beckenham

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Karolin Potter

Lee Sampson

Melanie Coker

Keir Leslie

Tim Scandrett

Callum Ward

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance Spreydon Cashmere

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga: Keir Leslie.

Waiata: The Board sang a waiata to open the meeting.

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

There were no apologies.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2022/00051

That the minutes of the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 17 August 2022 be confirmed with the following amendment to Item 12 - Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi:

A Board member attended the ~~Opawa~~ South Christchurch Farmers’ Market.

Lee Sampson/Tim Scandrett Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

There were no public forum presentations.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Joint Meeting - Linwood-Central-Heathcote and Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Minutes - 12 August 2022

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2022/00052

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board receives the Minutes from the Joint Meeting - Linwood-Central-Heathcote and Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board meeting held 12 August 2022.

Tim Scandrett/Keir Leslie Carried

8. 470-472 Barrington Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2022/00053 (Original officer recommendations accepted without change.)

Part C

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north-east side of Barrington Street commencing at its intersection with Lincoln Road and extending in a south-east direction for a distance of 99 metres.

2. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolution 1 above.

3. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 1 and 2 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Lee Sampson/Keir Leslie Carried

9. 167-175 Ashgrove Terrace - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2022/00054 (Original officer recommendations accepted without change.)

Part C

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, and as indicated in Attachment A of this report (‘TG142035’, Plan 167-175 Ashgrove Terrace Proposed No Stopping Restrictions, dated 29/07/2022), that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Ashgrove Terrace commencing at a point 300 metres east of its intersection with Fairview Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 33 metres.

2. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolution 1 above.

3. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in1. and 2 report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Tim Scandrett/Callum Ward Carried

10. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Board members shared the following information:

· A Board member noted that the Park Lane Retirement Village is meeting with staff about the Village entranceway.

· A Board member noted that the Park Lane Retirement Village may write to the Board about pedestrian access across Whiteleigh Avenue.

· A Board member heard from some residents that thefts in the area are becoming more blatant.

· A Board member was contacted by a resident asking when the raised platform at the Lincoln Road /Barrington Street / Whiteleigh Avenue intersection was introduced to the Lincoln Road Bus Lanes project. Staff advice is pending.

· A Board member noted that the Council’s Smart City programme includes an app that shows the nearest available disability car park.

· A Board member attended the planting of kahikatea trees at Spreydon Domain.

· A Board member noted that a new sign at Spreydon Domain has the following subheading: “Canterbury Gaelic Athletics Association.” But it does not note the other sports clubs that regularly use the Domain.

· A Board member spoke to a St John youth group about local government.

· A Board member attended a fruit tree planting event at Gainsborough Reserve.

· A Board member was advised by a school principal that they regularly confiscate vapes from students.

· The Chairperson thanked staff for their acknowledgement of her upcoming retirement from the Board.

10.1 Rates

A Board member heard from residents on fixed incomes who are struggling to pay their rates.

Part B

The Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board agreed to ask staff whether there is an option for residents to pay their rates with a form of equity release where payments are deferred until the sale of their home.

10.2 Process for Murals

A Board member noted that a local muralist is interested in painting murals on Council assets to brighten the areas.

Part B

The Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board agreed to request staff advice on the process for developing murals on Council assets, including the process for selecting a muralist.

10.3 Ōpāwaho Heathcote Guidance Plan

A Board member noted that the Board was recently briefed on the Ōpāwaho Lower Heathcote Guidance Plan.

Part B

The Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board agreed to request that staff brief the incoming Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board on the Ōpāwaho Lower Heathcote Guidance Plan, and consider whether a similar plan could be developed for the upper Ōpāwaho Heathcote.

Karakia Whakamutunga: Keir Leslie.

Meeting concluded at 5.35pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 14^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022.

Karolin Potter

Chairperson

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

7. Huntsbury Avenue - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1113595
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Toni Dakers, Traffic Engineer, toni.dakers@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services, jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to approve a proposal for the installation of No Stopping Lines on Huntsbury Avenue, within the turning head adjacent to the Tussock Hill Vineyard and Port Hills recreational area. This report has been written in response to requests from members of the public for Council to address concerns about parked vehicles impeding access for vehicles manoeuvring in this location, and the associated safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists.

1.2 These issues were raised both through the resource consent process for the Tussock Hill Vineyard development located at 210 Huntsbury Avenue, as well as through the Council customer service system ‘Hybris’.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

1.4 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.5 The recommended option is to install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A (note: the property at 210 Huntsbury Avenue has been developed further since this aerial photo was taken).

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time in accordance with that shown on the plan provided as Attachment A to this report (Huntsbury Avenue, Proposed no stopping restriction, TG139120, dated 25 August 2022).

2. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolution 1 above.

3. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 A turning head is located at the end of the sealed section of Huntsbury Avenue at the access to the Port Hills recreational area. Due to the popularity of the tracks and recreational activities in this location, this area is often occupied by parked vehicles. During busy periods some drivers are undertaking multiple turning manoeuvres within the Tussock Hill Vineyard access.

3.2 The main safety concern associated with this is that drivers are reversing/manoeuvring in a congested location with a relatively high volume of pedestrians and cyclists.

3.3 The recommended option is to Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo – Do Nothing

4.2 The advantages of this option include:

4.2.1 Retains space for around five to six vehicles to park on-street.

4.2.2 Retains parking ‘at grade’ – this is the only location in this general area where drivers can park on a relatively flat section of road.

4.3 The disadvantages of the option include:

4.3.1 Does not address the issue with drivers parking in a manner that obstructs access for larger vehicles and increases the risk to pedestrians and cyclists in this location.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 Huntsbury Avenue is sealed to a point immediately south (uphill) of the access to 210 Huntsbury Avenue (Tussock Hill Vineyard). The legal road continues south into the reserve, however this section is unsealed with limited access for most vehicles.

5.2 There is a high demand for parking in this area particularly during the summer months. This demand is largely associated with recreational vehicles and pedestrians / cyclists accessing the tracks in the Port Hills. The Vineyard has off street parking available. However there may be some demand for overflow parking on street which will compound the existing issues within the turning head.

5.3 The newly formed access to Tussock Hill Vineyard provides further manoeuvring space compared to the original layout however this is still insufficient for most drivers to turn around if vehicles are parked around the perimeter of the turning head.

5.4 A search of the Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency Crash Analysis System did not identify any reported crashes in this location over the last five years.

5.5 Approval is required by the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board.

5.6 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

Background

5.7 The recently opened Tussock Hill Vineyard located at 210 Huntsbury Avenue has access off this turning head, consent was granted for this activity in 2019.

5.8 A submission was received through the resource consent process, one of the concerns raised was around the increased parking demand around the turning head on Huntsbury Avenue which was already congested during busy summer periods.

5.9 Further to this, safety concerns associated with vehicles manoeuvring, particularly reversing or undertaking multiple turning manoeuvres was identified as a safety issue in the Transportation Assessment for the consent application due to the high volume of pedestrians and cyclists in this area.

5.10 In response to the above, Traffic Operations staff confirmed at the time that a proposal would be developed for No Stopping Lines within the turning head to maintain access and allow vehicles to manoeuvre at the top of the hill.

5.11 Due to staff changes this wasn’t progressed at the time. The proposal was further delayed until the access to Tussock Hill Vineyard was completed and behaviour could be observed. While the new access does formalise this area and provide more space for manoeuvring, there continues to be issues, particularly for larger vehicles and those with trailers.

Community Views and Preferences

5.12 Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by letter.

5.13 Five responses were received. Three were supportive of the proposal the other two raised some concerns. These included:

5.13.1 Removing parking at the turning head will force drivers to park further down the hill.

The extent of No Stopping Restrictions has been minimised as much as possible however we are aware this will lead to drivers parking further down the road on the verge in busy times. This is a balance, currently during busy times there are drivers parked along the road with no safe place to manoeuvre at the top of the hill. The proposal intends to allow drivers to manoeuvre safely and improve sight lines to pedestrians and cyclists. Parked vehicles can assist with managing speeds however the effects will continue to be monitored.

5.13.2 Pedestrians having to walk on the road as the vegetation is overgrown on the verge.

This has been passed on to our Landscape Maintenance team to action.

5.13.3 Lack of infrastructure for pedestrians and poor connectivity to the #17 bus service further down the hill.

We agree this needs to be considered however this is outside of the scope of this proposal. As above, trimming back the vegetation will improve the level of service for pedestrians on this verge as a short term measure.

5.14 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=100 crashes

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal is principally intended to improve accessibility for vehicles however providing more clearance in this area will also improve visibility and access for pedestrians and cyclists in this immediate area.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $90 for line marking and $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Cost will be covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.3 Funding Source – Traffic Operations Team Traffic Signs and Markings budget.

Other

7.4 None identified.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no other legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

8.5 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.3.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Not applicable.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Site Plan - Huntsbury Avenue Proposed No Stopping Restrictions	16

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable	Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Toni Dakers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

8. Hackthorne Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1073176
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Toni Dakers, Traffic Engineer, toni.dakers@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services, jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider a proposal for the installation of No Stopping Lines at three locations on Hackthorne Road. This report has been written in response to requests from members of the school community for Council to consider options to improve safety for pedestrians around Cashmere Primary Te Pae Kererū. Specifically visibility between pedestrians and drivers manoeuvring during peak school travel periods.

1.2 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.4 The recommended option is to Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachments A and B.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on:

a. the north side of Hackthorne Road, commencing from a point 210 metres east of its intersection with Dyers Pass Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres, as indicated on Attachment A of this report (139 Hackthorne Road, Proposed No Stopping Restriction, TG142017, dated 25/8/2022).

b. the north side of Hackthorne Road, commencing from a point 130.5 metres east of its intersection with Dyers Pass Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 7.5 metres, as indicated on Attachment B of this report (Hackthorne Road – Cashmere Primary School, Proposed No Stopping Restriction, TG142020, dated 15/08/2022); and

c. the south side of Hackthorne Road, commencing from a point 33.5 metres east of its intersection with Dyers Pass Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

2. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking and stopping restrictions described in resolutions 1a – 1c above.

3. Approve that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The main focus of the proposal is to improve safety for pedestrians crossing the wide access between 139 and 141 Hackthorne Road. Drivers regularly use this space to manoeuvre (U-turn) during peak school pick up / drop of times. It is also a busy location for pedestrians walking to/from Cashmere Primary Te Pae Kererū School immediately to the west.

3.2 While pedestrians have the right of way in this location, near misses have been reported between drivers and young pedestrians on this section of footpath. The proposed No Stopping restrictions remove one parking space in advance of the driveway to ensure pedestrians on the footpath are visible to turning drivers.

3.3 No Stopping Lines are also proposed outside the school vehicle entrance to deter drivers parking in this location and better define the P3 areas. The school access is closed off to traffic during school pick up / drop off times.

3.4 In conjunction with this, a short section of No Stopping lines is proposed to address operational issues outside 130 Hackthorne Road. The available kerbside parking space is insufficient for two vehicles but too large for one. Drivers are therefore regularly obstructing this driveway during peak periods. The existing No Stopping lines have been extended by two metres to remove this ambiguity and provide clear space for one vehicle only.

3.5 The recommended option is install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachments A and B.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo – Do Nothing

4.2 The advantages of this option include:

4.2.1 Retains one on-street parking space immediately to the south of 139 Hackthorne Road.

4.3 The disadvantages of the option include:

4.3.1 Does not address any of the concerns regarding safety for pedestrians walking on this section of footpath.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 Cashmere Primary Te Pae Kererū is located at 135 Hackthorne Road. The school has access from both Hackthorne Road and Dyer Pass Road. A pedestrian gate is situated immediately south of the driveway to 139 Hackthorne Road so there are often groups of pedestrians waiting and walking in this immediate area.

5.2 Council’s School Travel Planning Team have been working with Cashmere Primary Te Pae Kererū to develop a school travel plan. One of the issues that was raised during initial discussions with the School was concerns about drivers U-turning on Hackthorne Road during school pick up / drop off times, particularly the wide area accessing 139-141 Hackthorne Road.

5.3 The proposed No Stopping restrictions do not restrict drivers from U turning but do improve safety by improving visibility so pedestrians walking on the footpath are not obstructed by parked vehicles. Staff will continue to work with the School to address any ongoing issues through the school travel plan process.

5.4 There have been no crashes reported on this section of Hackthorne Road (between Dyers Pass Road and Westernra Terrace) in the last five years however near misses have been reported by the School and members of the school community.

5.5 Approval is required by the Waihoro Spreydon Cashmere Community Board.

Community Views and Preferences

5.7 139-141 Hackthorne Road

5.7.1 Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by letter.

5.7.2 Two submissions were received, both supportive of the proposal.

5.7.3 Both submitters specifically requested for the No Stopping restrictions to extend over the full length of the access. The recommended option shown in Attachment A has been updated to reflect this.

5.8 The Principal of Cashmere Primary Te Pae Kererū School confirmed that they are supportive of the proposed No Stopping restrictions.

5.9 The owner of 130 Hackthorne Road was supportive of the short section of No Stopping outside this address.

5.10 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred options.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=100 crashes

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal is principally intended to improve safety for young pedestrians on the footpath and accessibility for the residents entering/exiting properties during this time.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $90 for line marking and $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Will be covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.3 Funding Source – Traffic Operations Team Traffic Signs and Markings budget.

Other

7.4 None identified.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no other legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 None identified.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Site Plan - 139-141 Hackthrone Road No Stopping Restriction	22
b ⇩	Site Plan - 130 Hackthorne Road No Stopping Restrictions	23

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable	Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Toni Dakers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

9. Faraday Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1113554
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Toni Dakers, Traffic Engineer, toni.dakers@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services, jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to approve the installation of No Stopping restrictions on Faraday Street. The No Stopping restrictions are required to ensure 24 hour access is maintained for critical service vehicles accessing the Council’s Water Pump Station via the new entrance at the western end of Faraday Street.

1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.4 The recommended option is to Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A. The length of No Stopping in this option is the minimum length needed to ensure clearance is maintained for trucks turning from Colombo Street and through traffic on Faraday Street.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017:

a. that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Faraday Street, commencing at a point 3 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres;

b. that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Faraday Street, commencing at a point 33 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres; and

c. that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Faraday Street, commencing at a point 3 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 44.7 metres.

2. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1a – 1c above.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Faraday Street is approximately seven metres wide which is insufficient for vehicles to park on both sides and still maintain through access for larger vehicles. The new entrance to the Council’s Water Pump Station is located at the end of Faraday Street. The No Stopping lines proposed will ensure clearance is available for critical vehicles accessing this facility.

3.2 For the continuation of water services to the central zone of the City it is imperative that vehicles servicing the pump station are able to access this facility when needed. This includes maintenance vehicles and delivery trucks.

3.3 No Stopping lines are also proposed at the intersection to improve visibility for vehicles entering/exiting Faraday Street and provide clearance for larger vehicles to turn in safely. Trucks accessing the pump station can be up to approximately 11 metres long.

3.4 The recommended option is to install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo – Do nothing

4.2 The advantages of this option include:

4.2.1 Retaining approximately eight on-street parking spaces.

4.3 The disadvantages of the option include:

4.3.1 Critical service vehicles may not be able to access the water pump station when needed.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 Faraday Street is a No-Exit local road intersecting with Colombo Street. It is located immediately south of a small commercial development which has access off both Faraday Street and Colombo Street.

5.2 Access to the pump station was previously provided via Milton Street. The access has been moved to Faraday Street due to pending development of the adjacent sites.

5.3 Parking demand is observed to be relatively low during the day however it is understood it can be high at times with overflow parking from the adjacent businesses.

5.4 There have been no crashes reported on Faraday Street or at its intersection with Colombo Street over the last five years.

5.5 Approval is required by the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board.

5.6 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year.

Community Views and Preferences

5.7 Affected property owners and businesses within the adjacent development were advised of the recommended option by post and letter drop respectively. A total of seven consultation letters were distributed.

5.8 No public submissions were received on this proposal.

5.9 The Team Leader of Water and Wastewater Operations supports the proposal for the reasons given below:

‘It is imperative that our operational teams and our maintenance contractor are able to access this water station pump station to conduct our routine scheduled maintenance and resolve any reactive issues that arise. We hold responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure water supply to residents and being unable to fulfil our maintenance duties could compromise this.’

5.10 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - <=100 crashes

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal is principally intended to improve accessibility for drivers on Faraday Street however improving sight lines and clearance at the intersection will improve safety and accessibility for all road users.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $120 for line marking and $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Will be covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.3 Funding Source – Traffic Operations Team Traffic Signs and Markings budget.

Other

7.4 Not applicable.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no other legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Should the Community Board proceed with the ‘do nothing’ option there is a risk that access will be obstructed to the water pump station, and that delays particularly during emergency call out situations may impact this service.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Site Plan - Faraday Street No Stopping Restrictions	29

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable	Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Toni Dakers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

10. Innov 808 -Lease variations and Bond release to facilitate re-Investment
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1026133
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Grant McIver, Leasing Consultant, grant.mciver@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is seek the approval of the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to:

1.1.1 Consider a request from Innov 808 Limited, the Tenant of The Sign of the Takahe Restaurant /Café for the release of the rental bond requirement so funds may be reinvested in the business by the Tenant;

1.1.2 Consider a request from the Tenant for lease variations setting new minimum trading hours;

1.1.3 Consider a request from the Tenant for lease variations to approve the continued use of a total occupancy cost percentage rent mechanism for assessing rent.

1.2 The above supports a business recovery plan to mitigate the ongoing effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and the re-establishment of the business after the building closed for repair in February 2011.

1.3 This report has been written on the request of the Tenant who is seeking the above variations and permissions.

1.4 The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by balancing the expectations of public access to the building on balance with the operating of a commercial business in a heritage setting and the uncertainty of future trade patterns due to the effects of Covid-19 settings.

1.5 There is no material change to the land or surroundings. The number of days that the public can access the building will change, however the number of people affected by the decision is low.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves the release of the bond requirement for Innov 808 Limited.

2. Agrees to vary the existing lease to Innov 808 Limited allowing new minimum seasonally adjusted trading hours with changeover at day light saving:

a. Summer hours-6 months, 5 days per week Wednesday to Sunday inclusive, 9am-9pm

and

b. Winter hours-6 months, 3 days per week Friday - Sunday inclusive, 9am-3pm

3. Approves the continuation of a Total Occupancy Cost percentage rental model to assess rental, based on affordability and in line with industry recommendations set at 8% + GST of annual sales to be reviewed at the next rent review in 2025.

4. Authorises the Property Consultancy Manager to manage and conclude all issues, including future rent reviews, processes and documentation associated with the request for landlord approval to lease variations and the Rent Bond release application.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The matter of approving Tenant requests for lease variations and the waiving of the Rental Bond is a lease condition that requires Community Board approval, as landlord, under the lease.

3.2 Approval of the proposed lease variations allows the Tenant to put in place a business recovery plan and give advertised certainty to customers and the public on minimum trading and building access hours.

3.3 Releasing the bond back to the Tenant will enable the use of these funds to facilitate reinvestment back in to the business including but not limited to the reconfiguring of the upstairs and downstairs kitchens to provide better economies of scale and to right-size the menu offer operations to achieve industry ratio expense recommendations in order to facilitate new service levels proposed.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Do not provide landlord approval to the bond release

· Advantage - The current setting will remain unchanged

· Disadvantage - Alternative Funds may not be available to carry out the business investment requested and the business may fail if undercapitalised.

4.2 Do not provide landlord approve to lease variations

· Advantage - The current setting will remain unchanged

· Disadvantage - The business may fail if it is not allowed to adjust to industry recommended cost ratios and service levels.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

Land and Buildings

5.1 The land and buildings are located at the corner of Dyers Pass and Hackthorne Roads on part of Cracroft Reserve, described in Computer Freehold Register Certificates of Title CB293/34 and CB374/164 and is classified as a park under section 138 of the Local Government Act 1977.

5.2 The current lease commenced 1 October 2019 and established a new customer base following the building being shut for earthquake repairs and strengthening following the events of 2010/2011.

Proposed Variations in Service Delivery

5.3 The existing lease requires the following opening hours and days “Every day throughout the year between the hours of 10am-4pm keep the premises and its conveniences and appurtenances open to the public.”

The current Lease prescribed opening hours are not financially sustainable.

5.4 Proposed variations to minimum levels of service with changeover in conjunction with Day Light Saving period:

Summer hours (minimum) restaurant/cafe (6 months of the year)

5 days - Wednesday - Sunday inclusive; 9am-9pm

Winter hours (minimum) restaurant / café (6 Months of the year)

3 days - Friday - Sunday inclusive, 9am-3pm

Functions

There is no impact on private functions as these are booked separate to the restaurant/cafe operations.

Market Conditions Necessitating Service Review

5.5 It is not commercially viable for the Tenant to remain open and operate the restaurant/café on the originally prescribed days and hours.

The first two years of trade data coupled with unforeseen Covid-19 settings have led to the Tenant to revisit their business plan.

5.6 There are higher tenant operational costs incurred than would normally be associated with a modern non-heritage building that the tenant is wanting to mitigate, these are ( but not limited to):

· High winter energy costs to maintain optimum dining temperature due to inefficiencies from a single glazed, uninsulated stone building

· Staffing costs are above the industry guidelines of 33% of sales

· There are two kitchens for service; upstairs and downstairs:

· The upstairs works well in the warmer months as it is more economical to keep comfortable for patrons than in winter months.

· The downstairs is an ideal winter service point as it is effective to heat and provides a better link to the outdoor seating area.

Agreed minimum trading hours will provide certainty to the public; as these are minimum hours of trade the Tenant may elect to exceed these once trade conditions permit and the Tenant would advertise the change in trading hours as appropriate.

Annual rent - changes to calculation to Total Occupancy Cost model

5.7 Removing the base rent provisions of the lease allows the Tenant to pay rent based on sales at an industry acceptable Total Occupancy rent Cost (TOC) of 8% + GST based on commercial affordability. They are not financially penalised by having to pay rent on the days that they don’t trade or at a ratio higher than industry standards in fluctuating market conditions.

This mechanism would be reviewed as to continuation at each market rent review if reasonable and warranted.

Bond release detail

5.8 As the business was newly established without a trading history in 2019, a rent bond equivalent to nine (9) months gross rental was required as a condition of Council agreeing to the lease; this money is held for the benefit of the Council, as landlord, by the Tenant's bank in case the Tenant defaults on rental payments.

Under the percentage rental model proposed, rent is assessed on sales (paid 2 monthly in arrears). The risk to council of the Tenant defaulting is less than equal monthly fixed rental payments and if the business ceases to trade no rent is paid and future base rental is not guaranteed until a new Tenant is contracted.

The Tenant has been prudent to date, in a continuously changing market, through prompt rent payment and are a responsible tenant.

Staff are satisfied that the rent bond is no longer required and that it would be better put to use by the Tenant to reinvest in the business as capital expenditure needed at this time.

5.9 When making decisions the Council is required to consider the views and preferences of those affected by this decision:

· Familiarity and community confidence - the building and operators are a symbol of the stability and continuity from Christchurch past, connection for people to the heritage of the community and tourism links.

· Service levels - In this case the proposal is a continuation of service of a commercial business allowing public access to a Council owned heritage building during seasonally adjusted optimum service hours

5.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.10.1 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Reinvestment by the Tenant ensures that the Tenant's operations are fit for purpose and provides additional service improvements to the public and customer base.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Parks Heritage Management

· Level of Service: 6.9.1.6 To manage and maintain Parks scheduled heritage buildings - Resident satisfaction with presentation of Parks scheduled heritage buildings:>= 55%

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies on managing leases.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.5 Mana Whenua have not been contacted as the variations to the lease are an existing commercial lease management matter.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.6 Allowing seasonally adjusted trading hours will reduce unnecessary energy usage in winter allowing any building heating or cooking inefficiencies to be mitigated.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.7 Disabled Access: The building is a heritage grade one listed building and has special dispensation from the government to not have wheelchair or disabled access.

6.8 The tenant is working with Council and the CCS Disability Action group to improve accessibility.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – Preparation of documents which is within Operational Budgets

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - existing operational budgets for Parks Heritage buildings

7.3 Funding Source - not applicable

Other / He mea anō

7.4 Ensures ongoing viability of business and ability to right size the business model to ensure continuity.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 The decision to approve Tenant requests for lease variations on land held as a Park is delegated to the Community Board.

8.2 The Community Board has the authority to enter into variations of leases or licences of parks to other parties, and to authorise staff to sign all required documentation.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.3 The legal consideration is the approval to written variations to the lease to allow the rent bond removal, vary the rental assessment mechanism and approve the change of opening hours for access by the public (section 53 of the lease)

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Officers have no concerns in the Tenant's past performance of the lease terms and conditions and support the bond release to facilitate investment, the proposed seasonal changes to opening days/hours and a percentage rental structure for assessing rent in the medium term.

9.2 The risk in declining the request may cause some minor reputational damage to the Council (as landlord) in not meeting the current market and working with the tenant to enable there proposed business plan.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments for this report.

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Grant McIver - Leasing Consultant

Approved By

Kathy Jarden - Team Leader Leasing Consultancy

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Wolfgang Bopp - Director Botanic Gardens & Garden Parks

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

11. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Summer With Your Neighbours 2022- 2023
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/962959
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Heather Davies Community Development Adviser heather.davies@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider applications received for the 2022/2023 Summer With Your Neighbours fund and to allocate funding as appropriate.

1.2 There is currently a balance of $3,500 in the fund.

1.4 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Allocate its 2022/2023 Summer With Your Neighbours funding as follows:

	Family Name	First name	Activity	Attending #	Recommend $
1	Niles	Wendy	Street Get together	80	200.00
2	Peddie	Michelle	Mobile Tepenyaki	42	105.00
3	Early	Corrine	Pizza Halloween Party	50	125.00
4	Loveday	Karen	Barbeque	30	75.00
5	Perry	Tim	Picnic in the Alleyway	50	125.00
6	McDermott	Louise	Barbeque	30	75.00
7	Creagh	Alva	Street Gathering	30	75.00
8	Wheeler	Camilla	Halloween Barbeque	35	87.50
9	Drayton	David	Afternoon Tea	30	75.00
10	Coey	Deborah	Pot Luck Dinner	25	62.50
11	Watts	Ellen	Neighbourhood Whanau Picnic	150	118.00
12	Suckling	Sarah	Barbeque	60	100.00
13	Crowe	Natalie	Street Barbeque	30	75.00
14	Reid	Lisi	Street Party Barbeque	40	100.00
15	Kingham	Sue	Street Barbeque	70	150.00
16	Reiner	Belinda	Neighbours Gathering at Reserve	50	125.00
17	Cooke	Myriam	Neighbours Gathering Street Lunch	50	125.00
18	Wallace	Rosa	Pot Luck Barbeque	70	147.00
19	Dale	Catherine	Barbeque	35	87.50
Residents' Associations and wider community events 2021- 2022
Groups
20	Beckenham Neighbourhood Association	Christmas Get Together		100	80.00
21	Cracroft Residents Association	Christmas Barbeque		100	100.00
21	Hoon Hay Community Association	Community Picnic Sausage Sizzle		100	65.00
22	Lower Cashmere Residents Association	Community Barbeque		100	100.00
24	Rowley Resource Centre	Annual Open Day		100	100.00
25	Somerfield Play Centre	Christmas Party		100	100.00
26	St Marys Anglican Church	Community Carols & Supper		80	60.00
27	Cashmere Club	Spring Gala		300	0.00

2. Note that the granted funds are to be used towards food and non-alcoholic drinks.

3. Return any funding not required by the successful applicants to the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere 2022-2023 Summer With Your Neighbours fund back to the 2022-2023 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Discretionary Response Fund.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Summer With Your Neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood. It invites residents to consider organising a neighbourhood gathering to get to know the people who live close to them. This popular event has grown from year to year and is promoted by the Council.

3.2 Local community groups, including residents' associations and neighbourhood support groups, have been sent information inviting them to apply for the Summer With Your Neighbours funding that has been allocated by the Board.

3.3 The number of applications received and the allocated budget have been taken into consideration when assessing the applications and making recommendations. Subsidies are not available for alcohol, fireworks, paid entertainment or hire costs.

A matrix outlining the applications and staff recommendations is included (Attachment A) along with the Summer With Your Neighbours guidelines (Attachment B) that accompany the application details.

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 To not approve the staff recommended allocations

4.2 To approve recommended funding grants with adjustments.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1 At its meeting on 17 August 2022 the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board resolved to allocate $3,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to its 2022/23 Summer With Your Neighbours.

5.2 Summer With Your neighbours will run from 22 October 2022 to 31 march 2023. Applications for funding opened on 15 July 2022 and closed 5pm on Friday 12 August 2022.

5.3 A total of 27 applications were received, this includes four late applications which were accepted. The applications were sorted and assessed to ensure that they met the guidelines for the Summer With Your Neighbours events, and staff recommended an amount to be allocated to each application.

5.4 In making the recommendations staff have endeavoured to maintain consistency over the allocation recommendations according to the amounts applied for and the number of people estimated to be attending the events.

5.5 19 applications are for neighbourhood gatherings and 8 for wider community events.

5.6 Staff recommendations were based on the following, in order to maintain consistency over the allocation of recommendations:

· A city-wide formula of $2.50 per person has been applied as a consistent approach to applications, with a cap of $200 per gathering.

· If an applicant has requested a lower amount than the calculated formula, the requested amount has been recommended.

5.7 The attached matrix provides detailed information on the 27 eligible applications for consideration. This includes applicants’ details, suburbs, activities, event location, items required, funds requested and recommended.

5.8 The total amount recommended for funding is $2,637.50

5.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.9.1 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere

6. Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

6.1.1 Activity: Community Development and Facilities

· Level of Service: 4.1.27.2 Community development projects are provided, supported and promoted. - Community Board plans are developed and implemented.

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.2 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies. The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of Strengthening Communities. It will provide a strong sense of community, active participation in civic life, safe and healthy communities, celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport, valuing the voices of children and young people.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.3 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.4 Not applicable.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.5 The Community Board would expect Summer With Your Neighbours events to be accessible to people of all abilities.

7. Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – at its meeting on 17 August 2022 the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board resolved to allocate $3,500 from its 2022/2023 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2022/2023 Summer With Your Neighbours Fund.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Not applicable.

7.3 Funding Source – Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Discretionary Response Fund.

8. Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 The decision making authority is the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.3 This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 The applications for funding are made by local residents / neighbourhood groups, or by residents’ associations and Spreydon-Cashmere community organisations.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Matrix for Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Summer With Your Neighbours 2022	42
b ⇩	Summer with your neighbours 2022-23 Guidelines	45

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable	Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor
Approved By	Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

12. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2022/23 - Avon Sequence Dancing
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1131017
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Watene Hema, Community Recreation Advisor, Watene.hema@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider an application for funding from it's 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation(s) listed below.

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
64745	Avon Sequence Dancers	Avon Sequence Dancers Hall Hire	$3000	$200

1.2 There is currently a provisional balance* of $16,473 remaining in the fund

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves a grant of $200 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Avon Sequence Dancers towards Hall Hire.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of enabling active and connected communities. It will provide resilient communities.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.6 At the time of writing, the provisional balance* of the 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund is as below, subject to confirmation of funding carry forward from the 2021/22 Discretionary Response Fund.

Total Budget 2022/23*	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$37,473	$21,000	$16,473	$16,273

3.7 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

3.8 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	64745 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Avon Sequence Dancers DRF 2022-23 Decision Matrix	49

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Watene Hema - Community Recreation Advisor
Approved By	Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

13. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Discretionary Response Fund - Shape Your Place Toolkit 2022/23 - Suburbs Rugby Football Club
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1169672
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Watene Hema, Community Recreation Advisor, Watene.hema@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
64820	Suburbs Rugby Football Club	Shape Your Place Toolkit - Consultancy Fee's for Operational Assessment	$5,000	$4,300

1.2 There is currently a provisional balance* of $16,473 remaining in the fund

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Approves a grant of $4,300 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Suburbs Rugby Football Club towards the consultancy fees for an operational assessment.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of enabling active and connected communities. It will provide resilient communities.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.6 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2020/21	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$37,473	$21,000	$16,473	$12,173

3.7 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

3.8 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	64820 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Discretionary Response Fund 2022-23 - Shape Your Place Toolkit - Suburbs Rugby Football Club Decision Matrix.pdf	53

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Watene Hema - Community Recreation Advisor
Approved By	Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

14. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Plan - Final Monitoring Report
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1136045
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Arohanui Grace Community Governance Manager, Spreydon-Cashmere Arohanui.Grace@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, Citizen and Community Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Brief Summary

1.1 The purpose of this report is to make a final report on progress toward achieving the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board's 2020-22 Board Plan Priorities.

1.2 The Board Plan Monitoring Report is presented to the Board annually.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board's 2020-22 Board Plan Monitoring Report as of September 2022.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Plan 2020-22 - Monitoring Report - September 2022	57

Additional background information may be noted in the below table:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not Applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Amy Hart - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

15. Alteration to Resolution of Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board - 17 August 2022
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1217872
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Amy Hart, Community Board Advisor, amy.hart@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Customer and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Brief Summary

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider an alteration to two resolutions in the minutes of its meeting held on 17 August 2022. The report has been written following staff advice that part of the officer recommendations in two reports in the agenda of the 17 August 2022 meeting was incorrect.

1.2 At its 17 August 2022 meeting under Item 7 – Maryhill Avenue – Kea Crossing, as part of Resolution SCCB/2022/00001, the Board resolved:

1.2.1 That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approve, pursuant to the powers vested in it by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, the Christchurch City Council hereby authorises the head teachers of the Hoon Hay School and Our Lady of the Assumption School to appoint appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Maryhill Avenue school crossing point as indicated in drawing TG142006 Issue 1, dated 30/06/2022 in Attachment A of the agenda report.

1.2.2 Note: Text was bolded for clarity in this report. The resolution did not contain bold text.

1.3 At its 17 August 2022 meeting under Item 8 – Rowley Avenue – Kea Crossing, as part of Resolution SCCB/2022/00002, the Board resolved:

1.3.1 That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approve pursuant to the powers vested in it by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, the Christchurch City Council hereby authorises the head teacher of Te Kōmanawa Rowley School to appoint the appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Rowley Avenue school crossing point as indicated in drawing TG142014 Issue 1, dated 18/07/2022 in Attachment A of the agenda report.

1.3.2 Note: Text was bolded for clarity in this report. The resolution did not contain bold text.

1.4 After the meeting, staff advised that section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002) actually authorises the Board of Trustees of a school to appoint persons as members of school patrols, rather than the head teacher as stated in the original officer recommendation.

1.5 To ensure the resolutions comply with section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), the Board needs to alter the above resolutions (refer Items 1.2.1 and 1.3.1).

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Alter Resolution SCCB/2022/00003, passed at its 17 August 2022 meeting, as follows:

a. That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approve, pursuant to the powers vested in it by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, the Christchurch City Council hereby authorises the Board of Trustees ~~head teachers~~ of the Hoon Hay School and Our Lady of the Assumption School to appoint appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Maryhill Avenue school crossing point as indicated in drawing TG142006 Issue 1, dated 30/06/2022 in Attachment A of the agenda report.

2. Alter Resolution SCCB/2022/7, passed at its 17 August 2022 meeting, as follows:

a. That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approve pursuant to the powers vested in it by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, the Christchurch City Council hereby authorises the Board of Trustees ~~head teacher~~ of Te Kōmanawa Rowley School to appoint the appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Rowley Avenue school crossing point as indicated in drawing TG142014 Issue 1, dated 18/07/2022 in Attachment A of the agenda report.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments to this report.

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable	Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Amy Hart - Community Board Advisor
Approved By	Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

14 September 2022

16. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Area Report - September 2022
Reference Te Tohutoro:	21/1756837
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Arohanui Grace, Community Governance Manager – Spreydon-Cashmere, arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Customer and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1. Receive the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Area Report for September 2022.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Pump Track Youth Audit	Staff supported a youth audit for the development of the pump track near the South City Library and Service Centre beside Hunter Terrace. The audit was run on site in partnership with the Revision Team of Youth Voice Canterbury. Several local young people ranging from ages 11 to 23 were taken through the process, and feedback has been provided in a report. This feedback will be considered through the design phase of the pump track and surrounding area, and staff will reconnect with the youth auditors when formal engagement is undertaken.	Complete	Resilient Communities – Valuing the voices of all cultures and ages
Age Friendly Spreydon-Cashmere	The Age Friendly Spreydon-Cashmere Committee has recently advocated for the provision of a temporary venue that older adults can use while the South Library gets rebuilt. Two members were interviewed and photographed by the Southern View newspaper. Star media photo. The Committee is interested in extending their work beyond the current 2019-22 Action Plan developed with the Community Board.	Ongoing	Resilient Communities – Valuing the voices of all cultures and ages
Community Service & Youth Service Awards	The presentation of the 2022 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Service Awards took place on 17 August, when eight individual recipients and one group joined the Community Board for morning tea followed by the presentation of certificates.	Complete	Resilient Communitie s – Strong sense of community

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 At the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board meeting on 2 August 2022, the Board granted $68,800 to 12 community groups from its 2022/23 Strengthening Communities Fund.

3.2.2 The Board’s Discretionary Response Fund unallocated balance for 2022/23 is $1,121 (refer to Attachment A for details).

3.2.3 The Board’s Youth Development Fund unallocated balance for 2022/23 is $3,000 (refer to Attachment A for details).

3.2.4 The Board’s Off the Ground Fund unallocated balance for 2022/23 is $3,000 (refer to Attachment A for details).

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· One of the Board’s priorities in its Community Board Plan is to upgrade the toilets, changing rooms facilities and sports storage at Hoon Hay Park. In the Long Term Plan 2021-31, the Council approved the programme budget in financial year 2025. Staff advised in August 2021 that they have begun investigating potential options for the Hoon Hay Park pavilion to meet user needs with the aim of being in a position to progress the preferred option when funding becomes available in financial year 2025. The Board will receive a more detailed briefing on the options in the coming months.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.

· Start Work Notices – Various Start Work Notices have been sent to the Board throughout the month. All city-wide start work notices can be found at: https://ccc.govt.nz/transport/works.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1 Customer Service Requests Report – Reports on customer service requests in the Board area from 1-31 July 2022 is attached as Attachment B.

4.2 St Martins Library Internet Connection – At its 16 March 2022 meeting, the Board received a public forum presentation from St Martins Library about its internet connection. The Board asked for staff advice on whether public wi-fi could be installed at the library. Staff provided the following advice: Staff have provided the following advice:

· Internet connectivity was not included in the scope for the rebuild of the St Martins Community Centre and Voluntary Library.

· Staff recognise the benefits of internet connectivity being available in the Council’s community facilities where appropriate.

· The Council’s portfolio of community facilities includes halls, community centres, volunteer libraries, toy libraries and play centres owned by the Council.

· Staff’s intention is for all new community facilities in the portfolio to have included in their scope, where practically possible, internet connectivity.

· The retrospective addition of internet connectivity into the portfolio of community facilities is not currently funded by the Council for specific community facilities.

· Staff will arrange for the installation of internet into the St Martins Community Centre and Voluntary Library during the 2023 Financial Year.

· Internet access will be limited to users of the hall and the current hours of operation from 8am to 10pm seven days a week.

· Staff will work with the current tenant to ensure their internet needs are also met.

4.3 Seat in Ernle Clark Reserve – At its 16 March 2022 meeting, the Board asked staff to trim vegetation to improve access to a seat in Ernle Clark Reserve near the Colombo Street entrance. Staff advised that the vegetation was removed around four benches in the reserve.

4.4 Ōpāwaho Heathcote River Stopbanks – At its 3 May 2022 meeting, the Board asked for a staff briefing on technical aspects of floodplain management along the Ōpāwaho Heathcote River catchment. A briefing was held in June 2022.

4.5 Addington Te Kura Taumatua – At its 31 May 2022 meeting, the Board received correspondence from Addington Te Kura Taumatua about school safety. The Board asked staff to work with the school to develop a School Travel Plan. Staff advised that they have engaged with the school and are awaiting the School Board’s approval to undertake a travel survey and prepare a School Travel Plan.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Board Funding Balances - 2022/23	69
b ⇩	Customer Service Requests Report	70

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Amy Hart - Community Board Advisor

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Watene Hema - Community Recreation Advisor

Jay Sepie - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships