Agenda of Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

A black text on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Waimāero

Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Monday 7 July 2025

Time: 4.34 pm

Venue: Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Jason Middlemiss

Bridget Williams (via audio/visual link)

James Gough

Aaron Keown

Sam MacDonald

Principal Advisor

Maryanne Lomax

Manager Community Governance

Tel: 941 6730

maryanne.lomax@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Aidan Kimberley

Community Board Advisor

Tel: 941 6566

aidan.kimberley@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00025

That the apologies from Linda Chen, Nicola McCormick and David Cartwright for absence be accepted.

Jason Middlemiss/Bridget Williams Carried

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00026

That the minutes of the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 9 June 2025 be confirmed.

Jason Middlemiss/James Gough Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1 Spokes Canterbury

Anne Scott and Fox Bennetts spoke on behalf of Spokes Canterbury regarding cycling priorities in the Community Board area.

The Board thanked the Spokes representatives for their presentation and requested advice from staff on the suggested raised, including:

· A kerb buildout at the Greers Road entrance to Jellie Park to improve pedestrian visibility.

· Reviewing the vehicle lanes at the Ilam Road/Memorial Avenue intersection to remove the option for cars to carry on straight from the left lanes.

· Improving wayfinding signage to help cyclists find their way to Major Cycleway Routes.

· Improving the integration into Google Maps and SmartView of cycling routes, particularly local routes through parks and other off-street pathways.

Attachments

a Spokes Canterbury Presentation - Waimāero Priorities

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Road Stopping at 40 Garden Road, Merivale

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00027

Officer recommendations accepted without change.

Part C

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Road Stopping at 40 Garden Road, Merivale Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Notes that the proposed road stopping has been assessed and approved by staff.

4. Resolve pursuant to Sections 116(1), of the Public Works Act 1981 to stop and sell to the adjoining owner that parcel of land shown as Section 3 SO 466494 in Attachment A to this report containing 35m2, and to amalgamate that parcel of land with the adjoining land contained in Record of Title CB8K/740.

5. Approves the Manager Property Consultancy under delegated authority to undertake all actions, negotiations and conclude the agreements necessary to facilitate the above on terms and conditions acceptable to him at his sole discretion, and in doing so make any decisions necessary to give effect to this.

Sam MacDonald/James Gough Carried

8. Proposed Road Names - 275 Highsted Road

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00028

Officer recommendations accepted without change.

Part C

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Proposed Road Names - 275 Highsted Road Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the following new road names for 275 Highsted Road (RMA/2021/3245)

a. Road 1 - Kōmanawa Place

b. Lane 1 - Mikimiki Lane

Aaron Keown/Sam MacDonald Carried

9. Notice of Extraordinary Vacancy

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Notice of Extraordinary Vacancy Report.

2. Notes that an extraordinary vacancy has been created by the resignation of Shirish Paranjape as a member of the Community Board.

3. Resolves either:

a. That the vacancy is not to be filled.

b. That the vacancy will be filled by the appointment of a person who is qualified to be elected as a Community Board member.

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00029

Part C

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Notice of Extraordinary Vacancy Report.

2. Notes that an extraordinary vacancy has been created by the resignation of Shirish Paranjape as a member of the Community Board.

3. Resolves that the vacancy is not to be filled.

James Gough/Sam MacDonald Carried

10. Appointment to Riccarton Bush Trust

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Appointment to Riccarton Bush Trust Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Appoints a Board member as its representative on the Riccarton Bush Trust for the remainder of the 2022-25 term

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00030

Part C

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Appointment to Riccarton Bush Trust Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Defers the appointment of a Board member to Riccarton Bush Trust until the new electoral term.

Jason Middlemiss/Aaron Keown Carried

11. Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board Area Report - July 2025

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2025/00031

Officer recommendations accepted without change.

Part B

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board Area Report - July 2025.

James Gough/Jason Middlemiss Carried

12. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Members exchanged information on matters of interest to the Board.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Meeting concluded at 5pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 11^TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025

Jason Middlemiss

Chairperson

7. Bishopdale Tennis Club Padel Court Application
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1140729
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Jason Tickner – Parks and Recreation Planner Felix Dawson – Leasing Consultant
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider an application for the install of a Padel Court within the Bishopdale Tennis Club Lease area at Bishopdale Park.

1.2 The report is staff initiated to address the request to construct a padel court on a reserve and the need to vary the permitted use in the lease to include padel.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Bishopdale Tennis Club Padel Court Application Report.

2. Approve the construction of a new padel Court, including the relocation of an existing coaching shed and storage shed to accommodate the new court as shown in the plan in Attachment A, Drawing A1.03.

3. Approve the removal and replacement of four trees as shown in the plan in Attachment A, Drawing A1.02 and A1.03.

4. Approve variation to the permitted use in the existing lease to include padel.

5. Notes that approval is subject to the Bishopdale Tennis Club meeting all regulatory requirements including the Building Act 1991 and the Resource Management Act 1991.

6. Notes that the decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the small number of neighbouring properties affected and the minimal cost to the Council.

7. Requests that the Manager Property Consultancy do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above including completing negotiations for, and administer, the terms and conditions of the variation.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 This report recommends landlord approval for Bishopdale Tennis Club to develop a new Padel court within their existing lease area at Bishopdale Park (Lot 3 DP28874, Record of Title CB10K/1264) and variation of the lease to include the additional use.

3.2 The Bishopdale Tennis Club is a long-term tenant at Bishopdale Park and continues to function well as a growing club with 383 members.

3.3 The Club currently maintains six tennis courts and wishes to develop a padel court at the eastern end of their lease. To accommodate the new court, a storage shed and coaching shed will need to be relocated.

3.4 The Parks Unit supports the proposal on the basis that this is a well-functioning club and the new facility will accommodate the club and the sport’s growth. It is also considered that the sport of padel aligns well with the existing lease and use.

3.5 The Parks Unit note the loss of the four trees and advises, and the Club have proposed to, replace these trees with a more suitable setback from the boundary of the lease and the new Court.

3.6 To enable the proposal the ‘Permitted Use’ clause in the lease requires variation to include Padel. Together with the recommendation to approve court construction this report recommends approval of the appropriate variation.

3.7 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the small number of neighbouring properties affected and the minimal cost to the Council.

3.8 Resource Consent has already been granted for the proposed padel court development and use.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The Bishopdale Tennis Club is a long-established sports club located in the southwestern corner of Bishopdale Park. The club currently has 383 members, and membership has been steadily increasing. It has a current lease with a final expiry of 31 December 2043.

4.2 The club has requested approval to develop a padel court at the eastern end of their lease. To facilitate the development of the new court, an existing 6m² storage shed and 13m² coaches shed will be repositioned onsite. The proposed court is shown below and in Attachment A.

A map of a building

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

A tennis court with net and net

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

What is Padel

4.3 Padel is a racket sport that combines elements of tennis and squash. It is played on an enclosed court, that is smaller than a tennis court, typically 10 meters wide and 20 meters long, surrounded by walls.

4.4 It’s a great sport for players of all ages and skills, as it is both quick and easy to pick up. Padel is usually played in doubles and is known for its social and strategic nature.

4.5 Padel is widely considered to be one of the fastest-growing sports globally.

Tree Removals and Replacements

4.6 The construction of the proposed padel court will damage the roots of four trees. Three trees are on the eastern boundary of the Bishopdale Tennis Club Lease, and one is within the lease area.

4.7 These trees are proposed to be removed and replaced under this proposal. The affected trees are identified in the plan below and in Attachment A (Plan A1.02)

A blueprint of tennis courts

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4.8 The three trees along the boundary of the tennis club lease consist of one Ake Ake and two Pittosporum (Lemonwood). These native trees are typically selected for screen planting due to their hardy nature and fast-growing attributes. These trees are shown in the image below:

A grassy area with trees and a body of water

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4.9 The Council Parks Arborists provided the following comment regarding the proposal:

The 3 trees with the trunks located right on the boundary have structural roots near the surface protruding into the tennis court. Construction of the additional court adjacent to these trees can’t be achieved without compromising the trees structural integrity. I would recommend the 2 x lemonwoods and 1 x akeake for removal as part of the tennis clubs proposed development plans with replacement planting going in the garden. There is room in the park for additional planting space if required.

4.10 It is proposed that this garden is renewed due it its condition and age and this would include the replacement of the trees removed by the club. As per the tree policy, two new trees of the same or similar species would be replanted in the same planting bed however at a more suitable setback from the boundary of the courts (approximately 3 metres).

4.11 The fourth tree requested for removal by the Club is a walnut tree within the Bishopdale Tennis Club premises. It is damaging existing tennis courts with its roots, and would likely be damaged by the installation of the padel court. The tree is shown below:

A tree with a blue sky and clouds

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4.12 The Council Arborist considered the tree to be healthy, however noted that it will negatively impact the proposed court, and there are several significant roots visible that would need to be removed for the court construction.

4.13 The Council Arborist also indicated that due to the way the tree has been maintained it offers low amenity value, and the best long-term solution is to remove the tree and plant suitable replacements in the park.

4.14 The club have proposed to plant two trees of a more suitable grown scale within its lease site.

4.15 To mitigate any future impact of the replanted trees on the new court the club are to install root barrier along the boundary of the new courts (if approved).

Approved Resource Consent

4.16 Bishopdale Tennis Club have also applied for, and been granted, resource consent for the proposed padel court facility. The resource consent considered environmental effects and impacts on neighbours, including noise, light spill, and visual effects.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.17 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.17.1 Approve the proposal.

4.17.2 Approve the proposal and retain the trees.

4.17.3 Decline the proposal.

4.18 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.18.1 Build the club facility on an alternative location or site - there is no other plausible location within their lease site, nor is it suitable for the club to have their new court facility on a separate site.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.19 Preferred Option: Approve the proposal

4.19.1 Option Description: – Allow the construction of the Padel Court within the club’s lease area and allow the removal and replacement of the four trees.

4.19.2 Option Advantages

· The court will provide a new recreational facility to the community that complements the tennis club.

· Supports the growth of the club and increases access to court space for members.

· Removal and replanting of the trees at a suitable setback will ensure the existing and new court facilities are not damaged by tree roots.

4.19.3 Option Disadvantages

· Four trees will be removed, and new trees will take some time to re-establish.

· Additional light and noise are possible from the site.

4.20 Alternative Option 1 - Approve the proposal and retain the trees.

4.20.1 Option Description: Approve the proposal and retain the trees bordering the new padel court facility.

4.20.2 Option Advantages

· The court will provide a new recreational facility to the community that complements the tennis club.

· Supports the growth of the club and increases access to court space for members.

· There will be no trees removed around the new court, retaining existing screening and shade.

4.20.3 Option Disadvantages

· Tree roots are likely to be damaged during construction of the new padel court having a negative impact on tree condition and stability.

· The trees are likely to cause damage to the new courts from tree roots making the surface unsafe and un-usable.

· Future court repair or replacement costs imposed on the Tennis Club.

4.21 Alternative Option 2 – Decline the proposal.

4.21.1 Option Description: Decline the proposal for the construction of a padel court.

4.21.2 Option Advantages

· There will be no trees removed.

· There will be no change in light spill or noise being emitted from the site.

4.21.3 Option Disadvantages

· The club will not be able to provide for this new recreational activity for its users and community.

· This option does not support the growth of the club or the community that it provides for.

· Existing investment in the court infrastructure and resource consent will be wasted.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

5.1 This proposal is Club initiated and funded, including replacement of any trees. There is no direct financial impact on the Council.

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option Approve the proposal	Alternative Option 1 Approve but retain trees	Alternative Option 2 Decline the proposal
Cost to Implement	Nil (Club funded)	Nil (Club funded)	Nil
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Nil (Club funded)	Nil (Club funded)	Nil
Funding Source	N/A (Club funded)	N/A (Club funded)	N/A
Funding Availability	N/A (Club funded)	N/A (Club funded)	N/A
Impact on Rates	Nil	Nil	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

Light Spill

6.1 There is risk that the light spill from the proposal may have an adverse effect on the neighbouring properties beyond that permitted by the District Plan rules and this may impact park neighbours.

6.2 This risk has been mitigated by way of the club ensuring the light design and mitigations (i.e. shields) have been designed and reviewed by two sperate lighting engineers as well as being reviewed by Council Environmental Health Officer to ensure they meet the standards of the District Plan.

6.3 Additional mitigations are in place under the resource consent by way of conditions of consent stipulating that:

6.3.1 Prior to opening the Padel Ball court to the public, the approved lighting must have a backboard or shield 1600mm long x 800mm deep installed behind the floodlights positioned on the south east boundary facing 7 Palliser Place to prevent light spill to this property. The backboards must be maintained in a good condition on an ongoing basis and be repaired or replaced if damaged.

6.3.2 Prior to opening the Padel Ball court to the public, a post-installation report must be provided to the Council via email rcmon@ccc.govt.nz demonstrating that the lighting, including the backboard/shields have been installed in accordance with the Lighting Design Report provided by Eleccom Report dated 07-03-2025.

6.3.3 The Padel Ball Court, including lighting, must not be used during nighttime hours. For the purposes of this condition, this is between 2200 hours and 0700 hours (next day).

Noise

6.4 The increase in recreation activity in this location will see an increase in noise, and this may have a negative impact on adjoining residents.

6.5 To mitigate this risk the club commissioned Acoustic Engineers, Marshall Day to undertake a noise assessment to determine if the proposed noise would meet the District Plan Standards. The report confirms that:

6.5.1 Considering the cumulative effects of the padel noise combined with the tennis noise, there will be a small increase in noise of 5 to 7 dB for the three locations adjacent to the padel court.

6.5.2 The other houses along the south boundary of the courts will experience no noticeable change in noise level.

6.5.3 Predicted noise levels (adjusted in accordance with the Standard) comply with the District Plan noise limits except for a 3 dB exceedance at the vacant rugby club and an up to 8 dB exceedance at the façade of the garage at 34 Raleigh Street. The owner of this property has provided written approval.

6.5.4 Considering the noise levels and the subjective character of padel being similar to tennis, it is our opinion the noise effects are reasonable and there would be no significant adverse noise effects from the installation of a padel court in either of the three court locations.

6.6 It is also noted that no noise is proposed during nighttime hours (10pm-7am) and that the residents of 43A Leacroft Street and 37, 40 Raleigh Street have provided letters of support and Affected Persons Consent to the proposal.

Trees

6.7 It is recognised that there will be a temporary impact while the trees are re-established. This is typical of all Council plantings/trees that need to be replaced. As per the tree policy 2 for 1.

6.8 To mitigate this impact, any suitable shrubs along the boundary will be maintained rather than removed, and the replacement trees will be of a suitable grade and size to ensure fast and effective establishment to reduce the period in which the tennis courts are ineffectively screened.

6.9 Overall it is considered that the impact will be temporary in nature and the new plantings are intended to improve the amenity of the area.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.10 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.10.1 Delegations Parks (Part D-sub Part 1- Community Boards) Authority delegates from Council to Community Boards to:

“Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within policy and budget set by the Council.”

“To agree to variations of leases and licences in accordance with this section and to authorise staff to sign all required documentation” section 114 Reserves Act 1977

6.11 Other Legal Implications:

6.11.1 Local Government Act 2002-Decision Making including consideration of community views.

6.11.2 Reserves Act 1977, use consistent with recreation use classification

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.12 The required decisions:

6.12.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.12.2 Are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by Engagement Advisor, Amy Rice.

6.12.3 Are consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies:

· Open Space Strategy

· Physical Recreation and Sports Strategy

· Tree Policy, in particular:

4.3 Tree removal will be considered where the tree is causing, or likely to cause, significant damage to buildings, services or property (both public or privately owned) and the damage cannot be reasonably rectified or mitigated except by removing the tree.

6.13 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.14 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.14.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.8.10.1 Appropriate use and occupation of parks is facilitated - Processing of the application is started within ten working days of receiving application – 95%

· Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City’s parks and foreshore network - >= 70%

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.15 Consultation started on 28 May 2025 and ran until 15 June 2025.

6.16 Consultation details, including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage, were advertised via:

6.16.1 An email sent to four key stakeholders, including Bishopdale Community Trust and Padel New Zealand.

6.16.2 Posts were made in two local community group Facebook pages.

6.16.3 Consultation documents were delivered to 54 residents closest to the Bishopdale Tennis Club on Leacroft Street, Raleigh Street, and Pallier Place.

6.17 The Kōrero mai | Let’s talk page had 356 views throughout the consultation period. The technical plans were downloaded 34 times.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.18 Submissions were made by one recognised organisation and 55 individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage.

6.19 Padel New Zealand is supportive of the proposed court, noting they have received more requests from Christchurch residents about padel and padel clubs than from any other region.

6.20 Fourteen of the submitters live in Bishopdale, including one on the same street as the Bishopdale Tennis Club.

6.21 Of the submissions received:

· 54 were supportive of the proposed plans

· One was not supportive of the proposed plans

· One did not specify.

6.22 Submitters supported the plan for the following reasons:

· A padel court would be an asset to the community (28)

· It provides an additional recreational/fitness activity (11)

· Padel is a novel sport for Christchurch (13)

· Padel is well suited to different level of fitness (5).

6.23 The submitter who was not supportive is concerned about the impact on neighbouring properties of the light and noise generated by court use. This submitter is not a neighbour of the club.

6.24 Only one submitter raised concerns about the removal of trees, due to the possible loss of privacy to neighbouring residents. The majority of submitters are not concerned about the removal and replacement of trees (40).

6.25 Residents from three properties neighbouring the back of the Bishopdale Tennis Club (where the padel court would be) provided written approval through the resource consent process.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.26 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.27 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.15 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If approved, the Bishopdale Tennis Club can commence construction of the new court facility subject to meeting the conditions of their resource consent and undertaking a building consent check.

7.2 Tree removal can proceed subject to Council Arborist supervision and replanting is to be completed in the same planting season.

7.3 The Council’s Property team to update lease documentation and update the lease plan.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Bishopdale Tennis Club - Proposed Padel Court Plans	25/1367958	22
b ⇩	Bishopdale Tennis Club Padel Court - Submissions Table	25/1368084	35

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Jason Tickner - Parks & Recreation Planner

Felix Dawson - Leasing Consultant

Amy Rice - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Kelly Hansen - Manager Parks Planning & Asset Management

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

Rupert Bool - Head of Parks

8. 23 Holmwood Rd - Road Stopping Application
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1238491
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Luke Rees-Thomas, Property Consultant
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek a decision by the Community Board under delegated authority from the Council to a Road Stopping application under the Road Stopping Policy 2020 and pursuant to the Public Works Act 1981.

1.2 The Council’s Transport team has accepted the Road Stopping application, subject to Community Board approval.

1.3 This report has originated from an application lodged by the owner of 23 Holmwood Rd, Merivale, to stop and purchase an area of road (being approx. 49m2) located adjacent to their property.

1.4 The decisions proposed in this report will enable staff to process a stopping of the road and transfer of this land to the applicant. These actions will allow the applicant to develop a new dwelling and yard area on their land.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the 23 Holmwood Rd - Road Stopping Application Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Notes that the proposed Road Stopping details have been assessed and approved by Transport staff.

4. Resolve pursuant to Sections 116(1), of the Public Works Act 1981 to stop and sell to the adjoining owners, Annabel and Glen Crozier, that parcel of land shown as Section 1 in Attachment A to this report containing 49m2, at market value, and to amalgamate that parcel of land with the owner’s adjoining land contained in Record of Title 1078200.

5. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy under delegated authority to undertake all actions, negotiations and to conclude the agreements necessary to facilitate the above on terms and conditions acceptable to him at his sole discretion, and in doing so make any decisions necessary to give effect to this.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The owners of 23 Holmwood Rd have lodged an application for the Council to stop a 49m2 section of legal road, adjacent to their land, located on the corner of Holmwood Rd and Garden Rd, Merivale. The applicant wishes to purchase this land and amalgamate with their existing title, so to enable redevelopment with a new dwelling and yard area.

3.2 The legal road area in question is located behind the applicant’s boundary fence and currently forms a part of their garden space. The land has historically been maintained by the private owner and is not held by the Council for any current or future planned public work.

3.3 The stopping of this land is consistent with a previous Council-led process in 2013, where multiple sections of road frontages along Garden Road were stopped and sold to adjacent private owners. Further, the stopping and sale of the land requested by the applicant, will enable a revised road boundary line which is consistent with the opposing corner of Garden Rd.

3.4 The existing footpath and public street accessibility will not be altered, and staff view the application as non-controversial. In consideration of the factors involved, staff are hereby recommending for the Public Works Act Road Stopping process to be utilised.

3.5 Once the road area is stopped, the land will be transferred to the applicant at market value and all costs involved in this process are being met by the applicant.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The current owners of 23 Holmwood Road, Merivale (Annabel and Glen Crozier) have applied for Council to ‘stop’ a portion of legal road located adjacent to their property on the corner of Holmwood Rd and Garden Rd. The owners intend to purchase this area of land and amalgamate with their existing title, enabling them to redevelop and landscape their property.

4.2 The road land requested to be stopped totals an area of 49m2 and aligns with the applicant’s existing boundary fence. Please refer to Attachment A, showing the area of road proposed to be stopped, noting the incorporation of a chamfered layout design, so to match the opposing corner of Garden Rd.

4.3 The applicant’s existing fence appears to have been in place for at least 20 years and judging by the materials used in the fence’s construction, the structure may date back to when the homes were originally developed. Regardless, the historical presence of this fence has provided a common local assumption that this land has always formed part of the adjoining private property. Until this time, the land has been managed by the property owner. Please refer to Attachment B for additional street view and aerial imagery.

4.4 In 2013, the Council completed a proactive process to survey road areas along Garden Rd which were not held for any planned road widening public work. At that time, the owners of each residence had opportunity to purchase these road frontages, though not all owners took up this offering. This has left the Garden Rd road boundary in a saw-tooth pattern, with a number owner occupied frontages technically held by Council as legal road.

4.5 This current road stopping application is in keeping with the 2013 process and seeks to transfer an unused area of legal road to an existing occupier. The road stopping will not affect the public sealed roading or pedestrian footpath. Nor will this road stopping cause any accessibility or safety issues for users of the road or footpath.

4.6 There is no Council or external party infrastructure located under the area of road proposed to be stopped. It is noted there are 2 medium sized trees located on the land. Historically these trees have been maintained by the occupier/owner of 23 Holmwood Rd. In processing the road stopping application, the Transport Team has consulted Council’s arborists who have confirmed that the trees are not recorded as specimens of note to Council and are of no heritage protection importance under the District Plan. It is noted; in the applicant’s resource consent application (to develop the new dwelling) the existing trees are marked as being retained.

4.7 Once the road area has been stopped, the land shall be transferred to the applicant at full market value and amalgamated with their existing land title. Staff have sourced a property valuation report which has been agreed with the applicant and supports the proposed transfer value.

4.8 The applicant’s land is zoned ‘Residential Suburban Zone’, and the addition of the stopped road area will not result in any additional potential for subdivision. The minimum lot size permitted under the RS zone is 450m2. Including the 49m2 addition of the stopped road, the applicant’s landholdings of both 21 & 23 Holmwood Rd (933m2) will total 982m2. A gross site area of 1,350m2 would be required to enable 3 sites and that will not be the case in this instance.

4.9 Views of the community have not been sought on this occasion as there will be no effect on pedestrian or vehicular access. Nor will there be any impact on adjoining neighbours. As mentioned above, many of the surrounding properties in Garden Rd completed a similar Road Stopping process in 2013/2014 and this ad-hoc application is in keeping with those prior transactions.

4.10 As required by the Council’s Road Stopping Policy, the adjoining neighbour of the road area to be stopped, has provided their written consent and support of the applicant’s Road Stopping submission. This is held on file by Council staff.

4.11 All costs in relation to this application, including staff time, legal review, survey and LINZ processing fees are being met by the applicant. A conditional agreement has been signed by the Council and applicant to record this obligation.

4.12 In summary, specifics of this Road Stopping application have been considered by Transport staff with reference to the Council’s Road Stopping Policy 2020, and a recommendation is hereby presented for the process to proceed, subject to Community Board approval, pursuant to the Public Works Act 1981.

4.13 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
March 2025	High level details of the proposed road stopping application were circulated around board members.

4.14 The following related information session/workshops have taken place for the members of the meeting:

Date	Subject
Nil

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.15 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.15.1 Approve the road stopping process and transfer of land to the applicant.

4.15.2 Decline the road stopping process and transfer of land to the applicant.

4.16 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.16.1 Nil

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.17 Preferred Option: Approve the road stopping process and transfer of land to the applicant.

4.17.1 Option Description: Approve the road stopping pursuant to Section 116(1) of the Public Works Act 1981, as outlined in the Council’s Road Stopping Policy 2020 and the transfer of the stopped land to the applicant at a market value sum.

4.17.2 Option Advantages

· Is consistent with Council’s Strategic framework as it transfers rights to enable further development.

· Is consistent with the previous 2013 Council-led process to transfer areas of unrequired road in Garden Rd to the private owners.

· Will tidy up the ownership of this section of land, which has long been located behind the applicant’s boundary fence, with little involvement from Council.

· Will remove the Council from any future maintenance of this section of land.

· Will enable the applicant to complete their intended property development.

· The Council will be remunerated appropriately for the transfer of land to the private owner.

4.17.3 Option Disadvantages

· There are no disadvantages as the land is not required for a current or future public work.

4.18 Alternative Option: Decline the road stopping process and transfer of land to the applicant.

4.18.1 Option Description: Do not approve the road stopping.

4.18.2 Option Advantages

· The Council would retain this section of road, albeit for no likely public purpose.

4.18.3 Option Disadvantages

· This alternative would be inconsistent with previous decisions made by Community Boards and previous applications for road stopping under the Council’s Road Stopping Policy 2020.

· The applicant will need to fund the Road Stopping application fee and staff costs incurred to date, with no positive outcome being achieved.

· The Council will need to contribute to maintenance costs of the land, when there is no projected need for the land.

· No transfer remuneration will be received by Council.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.19 In making its decision, the Community Board needs to consider the impact of stopping and selling this land to the applicant. As outlined in the report, the impacts are low, given the location and historical use of the land. There are no impacts on the public’s ability to access the footpath or street and the addition of this land to the owner’s title will not enable further subdivision of their site.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option – Approve Road Stopping and transfer	Option 2 – Decline Road Stopping and transfer
Cost to Implement	Survey, staff, legal, LINZ processing fees	Staff time
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Borne by the Applicant	Borne by the Applicant
Funding Source	Borne by the Applicant	Borne by the Applicant
Funding Availability	Borne by the Applicant	Borne by the Applicant
Impact on Rates	Nil	Nil

5.1 All costs are recoverable from the applicant, including but not limited to, valuation, staff time, legal costs and LINZ processing costs.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 There are no significant risks identified with this process and implementation. The Transport unit have considered any risks and concluded there is no operational reason not to stop and transfer this portion of road.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 The Council’s decision-making is in accordance with the general powers of competence set out in Section 12(2) “Status and Powers” of the Local Government Act.

6.2.2 This proposed Road Stopping has been determined by staff to meet the Public Works Act 1981 criteria, alongside Council’s Road Stopping Policy 2020, and the reasons and decision-making process is set out below.

6.2.3 The Community Board holds delegation to authorise the Road Stopping process, along with a transfer of the subsequent fee simple land to the adjoining property owner.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

There are two statutory processes under which Road Stoppings can be enacted. The authority to determine which statutory procedure should be employed to undertake a particular road stopping (either under the Local Government Act 1974 or under the Public Works Act 1981) is delegated to staff. The Policy establishes:

4.5 The following criteria have been established to ensure that the appropriate statutory procedure is consistently adopted by the Council, and to avoid, as much as is practicable, such decisions being successfully contested by any party.

Local Government Act 1974 process

4.6 The Local Government Act 1974 road-stopping procedure will be adopted if one or more of the following circumstances apply:

a. Where any public right of access to any public space could be removed or materially limited or extinguished as a result of the road being stopped; or

b. If it is found through the review process that the road stopping could injuriously affect or have a negative or adverse impact on any other property; or

c. The road stopping is, in the judgment of the Council, likely to be controversial; or

d. If there is any doubt or uncertainty as to which procedure should be used to stop the road; or

e. The Public Works Act 1981 process is not able to be used or is not used.

Public Works Act 1981 process

4.7 The Public Works Act 1981 road stopping procedure may be adopted only if all of the following circumstances apply:

a. Where there are no more than two properties, other than the applicant’s property, adjoining the road proposed to be stopped.

b. Where the written consent to the proposed road stopping of all adjoining landowners (other than the applicant) to the proposed road-stopping is obtained.

c. Where no other persons, including the public generally, are considered by the Council in its judgment to be adversely affected by the proposed road stopping.

d. Where the road proposed to be stopped is to be amalgamated with the adjoining property or properties (as appropriate); and

e. Where other reasonable access exists or will be provided to replace the access previously provided by the road proposed to be stopped (i.e. by the construction of a new road); and

f. Where the use of the Public Works Act 1981 road stopping procedure is approved by the relevant Government department or Minister.

4.8 If any one of the circumstances referred to in clause 4.7 does not apply, then the Local Government Act 1974 process must be used.

6.3.1 The appropriate process is this instance is the Public Works Act 1981.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decision:

6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The low level of significance was determined due to there being no change in use or appearance of the land which already appears to form part of the adjoining site. There is no change to access or use of the road or footpath for the public.

6.4.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Strategic Planning and Policy

6.6.1 Activity: City Growth and Property

· Level of Service: 13.4.10 Acquisition of property right projects, (e.g., easements, leases, and purchases) is delivered to agreed timeframes - At least 90% projects delivered to agreed timeframes per annum

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 There is no impact on the public use of the sealed road and footpath, should the road stopping proceed. The area of land to be stopped has long been incorporated into the adjoining site by fencing and landscaping, therefore the appearance from the street will not change. Many of the neighbouring sites have completed Road Stopping processes and amalgamated non-required road frontages into their sites in 2013/2014.

6.8 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.8.1 Waimaero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

6.9 The Community Board view has not been formally established prior to this report been completed. Brief details of the Road Stopping application were circulated by the Board advisor in March 2025 for comment.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.10 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.12 The decision does not alter the appearance or use of the land as it has always been incorporated by fencing with the adjoining land.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.15 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

6.16 The use of the land will not change as it has long been used as part of the adjoining site and can only be used in the future by the adjoining site for landscaping.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 Complete the process of application to Minister of Lands to approve the Road Stopping and amalgamation of the land with the adjoining site.

7.2 The Manager Property Consultancy will complete all documentation to implement this process.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	23 Holmwood Rd - Road Stopping Area Plan	25/1303703	49
b ⇩	23 Holmwood Rd - Street and Aerial Views	25/1377199	50

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Luke Rees-Thomas - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Andy Milne - Team Leader Asset Planning

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

9. Halifax Reserve play space renewal and Urban Forest plan
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/881304
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Holly Whitaker (Project Manager Community Parks) and Toby Chapman (Urban Forest Manager)
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to request the Waimāero Fendalton- Waimari-Harewood Community Board approve:

1.1.1 The concept plan for the renewal of the play space at Halifax Reserve

1.1.2 The tree planting plan for Halifax Reserve using the attached tree planting plan.

1.2 The report is in response to the adoption of the Urban Forest Plan which seeks to increase canopy cover across the city by 40%.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Halifax Reserve play space renewal and Urban Forest plan Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the low number of people affected and the low level of impact on Council’s functions.

3. Approves the Halifax Reserve play space renewal plan set out in attachment A to the report in the agenda.

4. Approves the planting of trees in Halifax Reserve in alignment with the planting plan described in section 4 of the report in the agenda.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The renewal of the play space forms part of the Community Parks Planned Play Space Renewal Programme. This play space is being renewed based on its age and condition.

3.2 The play space is being renewed ‘like-for-like’, meaning a similar number of play elements will be maintained, whilst also taking into account feedback from community consultation. The design will ensure that today’s NZ Play Safety Standards are being met as well as taking into consideration any basic updates to levels of service.

3.3 Photo of current play space at Halifax Reserve: A grass field with trees and a road

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.4 Halifax Reserve is located in Bishopdale, surrounded by Mooray Avenue, Halifax Lane and Midhurst Street that form the boundaries. An aerial view of a neighborhood

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.5 Community consultation was considered, and the renewed play space includes the following:

3.5.1 A play space that provides enjoyable recreational features for general park users. Minimal feedback was received regarding the play space renewal through the two consultation periods and therefore Parks staff have attempted to create a space for users who may not actively ‘play’ to also enjoy. The new walkway from the corner of Halifax Lane and Midhust street will provide an accessible pathway, via a bridge to the ‘low fort platform’ and if budget allows will connect to an accessible picnic table.

3.5.2 Two forts that are designed to resemble tree houses, connecting the play space to the existing established cypress tree. In the initial consultation, two of the respondents requested a play space that is suitable for younger children, one requested a play fort and another requested nature play. The forts have been chosen as staff feel they will appeal to younger children who generally enjoy imaginative play and ‘hiding places’. CPTED was also considered, and due to the excellent sight lines into the Reserve, forts were deemed appropriate.

3.5.3 Climbing elements in the form of balance ropes, climbing posts, ladder and natural stepping logs. These are suitable for a range of ages as hand holds are included so younger children can participate.

3.5.4 A double slide from the accessible platform, creating play opportunities for multiple children.

3.5.5 A basket swing, which provides play options for multiple children at once and is suitable for infants to adults, due to the support it provides.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Consultation was first undertaken through the Korero Mai process in late October 2024. Halifax Reserve play space renewal | Kōrero mai | Let’s talk. Four responses were received, please see attachment B.

4.2 The integration of nature play, forts and equipment suitable for younger children was considered in the design stage. Space and noise limitations meant the requested basketball court was not an option.

4.3 Budget restraints and lack of space prohibited our ability to include a scooter track.

4.4 The Parks Unit then consulted on the tree planting plan in Halifax Reserve and therefore the community were then given a second opportunity to give feedback on the play space, this time with the inclusion of the concept plan.

4.5 The planting plan proposes to plant 5 new trees which will increase the canopy cover in Halifax Reserve from 17% to 56% once they reach maturity, in approximately 30 years.

4.6 The images below show the proposal for the planting and what modelling estimates it to look like once the trees have reached maturity:

An aerial view of a neighborhood

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Image one: Aerial view of the existing reserve. Image two: Aerial view of the reserve with the proposed new trees included at maturity.

Image three: Areial view of the new trees placement

4.7 Feedback received on the tree planting plan was mixed. Of the six that provided feedback three supported the plan, two somewhat supported the plan and one was unsure/did not know. Comments shared by those who somewhat supported the plan and were unsure stated concern that the trees would provide too much shade on nearby properties and make pathways slippery, could impede properties view into the park, could impede drivers view at the intersection of Midhurst Street and Mooray Avenue and requested use of low allergen plant species.

4.8 The plan has been developed using a recession plane to help reduce shading impact. While we cannot avoid shading all together, this model does assist in ensuring it is managed to the same extent as would occur if a resident’s neighbour was constructing a new building.

4.9 Staff will be selecting a mix of deciduous and light canopy evergreen trees to assist in managing the amount of shade on neighbouring properties in winter. Trees will be lifted and widely spaced to retain views into the park area and ensure sight lines are maintained, and species will be low allergen.

4.10 Staff will be maintaining all trees once planted for the first seven years using our own in-house team. Maintenance will include watering, pruning and mulching. After seven years the trees will be inputted to our contracted maintenance program.

4.11 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
31/10/2024	Halifax Reserve play space renewal 24/1857002 25/881304

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.12 The following reasonably practicable options were considered in this report:

4.12.1 The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the play space renewal at Halifax Reserve and the tree planting plan.

4.12.2 The Community Board do not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consult with the community.

4.12.3 Remove play equipment from the Park and do not replace. Do not plant any more trees.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.13 Preferred Option: The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plans for the play space renewal and tree planting plan at Halifax Reserve.

4.13.1 Option Advantages

· The community will receive a safe play space that offers increased play value, more age-appropriate equipment, and improved accessibility.

· Supports the Urban Forest Plan objectives and targets by increasing canopy cover in Halifax Reserve to 56% once trees reach maturity.

· Local community gain some of the many benefits trees provide.

4.13.2 Option Disadvantages

· No additional changes to the concept plan can be made.

· Some may see the planting of trees presents a loss of open space.

4.14 Option 2:

4.14.1 Option Description: The Community Board does not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consults with the community.

4.14.2 Option Advantages

· The Community have the option to offer alternative suggestions to the proposed concept plans.

4.14.3 Option Disadvantages

· This option would impact the allocated budget as the new playground design and engagement costs would be funded from within the current budget. It is likely that this would impact the type of equipment we would be able to include in a revised plan.

· Dissatisfaction among the local community due to the delay.

4.15 Option 3: Remove play equipment from the Park and do not replace. Do not plant any more trees.

4.15.1 Option Advantages

· This would provide Council with a saving in capital and operating expenditure.

· Open space within the park would be retained.

4.15.2 Option Disadvantages

· The play equipment would be removed from the Park at the end of its life span resulting in no Council play provision in this area.

· The local area will be deprived of the benefits that trees provide.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – reject and redevelop plan	Option 3 – do not approve
Cost to Implement	Allocated CAPEX budget $125,000 for play space renewal Tree planting $2800	Allocated CAPEX budget $125,000 for play space renewal Tree planting $0	Decommissioning of old assets, approximately $15,000 Tree planting $0
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Covered by existing maintenance budget Tree planting Nil	Covered by existing maintenance budget Tree planting NA	N/A Tree planting NA
Funding Source	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget Tree planting Better off funding budget	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget Tree planting’ NA	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget Tree planting NA
Funding Availability	Yes Tree planting Existing	Yes Tree planting Existing	Yes Tree planting NA
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Planting will be funded through the Urban Forest Tree Planting program which is currently funded through the Better Off Fund.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Implementation costs of the play space renewal are based on anticipated product supply, installation, and wider construction costs. There is a risk that these costs could change due to product availability and supply. The final cost of construction will be confirmed during the tender phase. If costs escalate beyond the approved budget, staff will manage small shortfalls through minor design amendments. In this instance, the amount of nature play will be reduced if required. If there are major implications to the level of service, staff will discuss these with the Community Board before proceeding further with the project.

6.2 The availability of trees can be challenging. If not all trees and plants are available, staff will push planting out to 2026.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, 9 August 2024, the Community Board has the delegation to;

6.3.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96)

6.3.2 Under the Reserves Act, Community Boards have the delegation to “determine to plant, maintain and remove trees on reserves within the policy set by the Council”.

6.4 Other Legal Implications:

6.4.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.5 The required decisions

6.5.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework with a particular focus on a green, liveable city.

6.5.2 Are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact the decision will have on the city which is low.

6.5.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies. The planting plan forms a key component of the implementation of the Councils Urban Forest Plan.

6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.7 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.7.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City’s parks and foreshore network - >= 70%

· Level of Service: 6.8.2.1 Increasing tree canopy in Parks - A net increase in total number of trees is achieved (1:2 replacement policy), with a minimum of 50% of the trees being medium to very large species

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.8 Early engagement with park users on the play space renewal started in October 2024. A Kōrero mai | Let’s talk webpage included a survey that asked for high level feedback on a play space renewal. Park visitors were asked for play opportunities and concerns / barriers they experienced coming to the park. Users were also asked whether they preferred renewing the play equipment or replacing the play equipment with a simple tree fort.

6.9 Consultation on the concept design and tree planting plan started on 17 June and ran until 7 July 2025.

6.10 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

6.10.1 Flyer delivery to neighbouring properties

6.10.2 Local community Facebook pages.

6.10.3 Signage at the park

6.11 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk page had 186 views throughout the consultation period.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga – play space renewal

6.12 A submission was made by Spokes Canterbury and six individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.13 Spokes Canterbury supported the play space renewal and requested secure bike parking to encourage families to actively travel to and from the play space.

6.14 Submitters were asked whether they thought we had the play space renewal plan right.

6.15 Most submitters thought we had the plan right (5, 71%) because the improved equipment provides more play opportunity for all ages.

6.16 Some submitters thought we had the plan somewhat right (2, 29%) for the following reasons:

· Feeling there is not enough space between the proposed play equipment.

· Requesting more seating in the reserve.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga – tree planting plan

6.17 Submissions were made by six individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.18 Submitters were asked how important certain aspects were in the park, what aspects were concerning going forward with the park and whether they felt we got this tree planting plan right.

6.19 Three submitters felt we had the tree planting plan right, two submitters felt we had the plan somewhat right and one submitter didn’t know / wasn’t sure.

6.20 Submitters were asked to rate the importance of various aspects when increasing the tree cover in this park. The top aspects were: native trees (5), providing enough shade (5), climbable trees (5) and attracting birds and insects (5).

6.21 Submitters were asked whether they were concerned about various aspects when increasing the tree cover in this park. Submitters were able to select more than one concern. While most submitters had no concerns, two selected potential debris, one selected potential hazards and one selected loss of view.

6.22 Submitters were also invited to provide additional feedback. Comments shared by those who somewhat supported the plan and were unsure stated concern that the trees would provide too much shade on nearby properties and make pathways slippery, could impede properties view into the park, could impede drivers view at the intersection of Midhurst Street and Mooray Avenue and requested use of low allergen plant species.

Supplementary information

6.23 A quick poll was conducted on the Let’s Talk webpage to reduce barriers to participate and the concept design received nine 5-star responses.

6.24 The tree planting plan received eight 5-star responses and one 4-star response.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.25 The decisions do not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.26 The tree planting is in alignment with the Councils Urban Forest Plan which sought feedback from Mana Whenua and is in alignment with the Iwi Management Plan.

6.27 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.28 The decision in this report is likely to contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that local residents will have access to a play facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other playgrounds.

6.29 If possible, existing unsuitable safe fall (bark) will be reused as mulch in the garden beds.

6.30 The decision on tree planting in this report is likely to:

6.30.1 Contribute positively to adaptation to the impacts of climate change.

6.30.2 Contribute positively to emissions reductions.

6.31 Tree planting will assist Council in offsetting its emissions and coping with the impacts of climate change.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Board approves the play space renewal plan then equipment can be ordered and construction can begin in spring 2025.

7.2 Urban Forest staff will also proceed with sourcing trees and schedule the Reserve for planting.

7.3 If the Community Board decline the plan no further action will be taken.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Final Concept plan for Halifax Reserve play space renewal	25/1248003	63
b ⇩	Halifax Reserve play space renewal- anonymised feedback from October 2024 consultation	25/1248007	67

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Holly Whitaker - Project Manager - Community Parks

Toby Chapman - Manager Urban Forest

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Claire Fletcher - Project Manager - Community Parks

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

10. Hyde Park play space renewal- design approval
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/947101
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Holly Whitaker- Project Manager- Community Parks Kiran Skelton- Engagement Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to request the Waimāero Fendalton- Waimari-Harewood Community Board approve:

1.1.1 The concept plan for the renewal of the play space at Hyde Park.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Hyde Park play space renewal- design approval Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact on local residents and the like-for-like nature of the project.

3. Approves the Hyde Park play space renewal plan set out in attachment A to the report in the agenda.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The renewal of the play space forms part of the Community Parks Planned Play Space Renewal Programme. This play space is being renewed based on its age and condition.

3.3 Current play space at Hyde Park:

A playground with a swing set

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.4 Hyde Park is located in Avonhead, in close proximity to Avonhead Park and is connected via walking paths to four residential streets.

Aerial view of a city

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.5 Community consultation was considered, and the renewed play space includes the following:

3.5.1 A diverse range of swinging options. Of the 23 submitters, 21 people mentioned swinging as a type of play they enjoyed. Three respondents specifically requested a ‘you and me swing’ which combines a strap seat and a toddler seat into one swing, meaning adults or older tamariki can swing simultaneously with toddlers. In addition, we will include a standard strap swing seat and two swings in nearby trees.

3.5.2 A variety of climbing items. 18 respondents referenced climbing as a preference. Staff have incorporated this in the play module, which includes rope/ web, ladders and monkey bars. Sliding has also been integrated as 17 respondents favoured this.

3.5.3 A play hut. This simple teepee feature, integrated into the garden bed, will allow for imaginative play for younger tamariki.

3.5.4 A rocker in-keeping with the natural theme is included as it was requested by five submitters and this style of play offers motion play for under 3’s, who were identified as a significantly high user group.

3.5.5 Nature play has been woven into the design, with stepping logs and planks, providing more climbing options and natural seating. Planned tree removals from other Parks will provide natural wood for the nature play elements. Additionally, wood has been selected as the primary material for the ‘formal’ play items, to make the play space feel integrated into the tree filled setting.

3.5.6 The natural shade of the trees has been utilised by placing items as close to established trees as possible.

3.5.7 New accessible seating has been added, to provide spots for whanau to congregated. The existing bench and picnic table will also be re-stained to increase their life span.

3.6 Using funds from the Community Parks Hard Surface Renewal Programme, the most damaged pathways in the park will be upgraded, significantly improving accessibility throughout.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Consultation was undertaken through the Korero Mai process in late November 2024. https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/hydeplay. 23 responses were received.

4.2 The majority of feedback has been taken on board; however, feedback was received from three submitters that requested a fully fenced play space, unfortunately with a very tight budget this is cost prohibitive.

4.3 Scootering, biking and skating in the park were identified as activities that a high number of users enjoyed. Unfortunately, the need to maintain pathways that are suitable for wheelchairs and prams, and in the context of tight budgets, we were unable to integrate ‘wheel sports’ tracks within the pathways.

4.4 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
30/11/2024	Hyde Park Play Space Renewal Memo- 24/2059208

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.5 The following reasonably practicable options were considered in this report:

4.5.1 The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the play space renewal at Hyde Park.

4.5.2 The Community Board does not approve the concept plan and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consult with the community.

4.5.3 Remove play equipment from the park and do not replace.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.6 Preferred Option: The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the play space renewal at Hyde Park.

4.6.1 Option Advantages

· The community will receive a safe play space that offers increased play value, more age-appropriate equipment, and improved accessibility.

4.6.2 Option Disadvantages

· No additional changes to the concept plan can be made.

4.7 Option 2:

4.7.1 Option Description: The Community Board does not approve the concept plan and requests that staff consider an alternative design and re-consults with the community.

4.7.2 Option Advantages

· The Community have the option to offer alternative suggestions to the proposed concept plan.

4.7.3 Option Disadvantages

· Dissatisfaction among the local community due to the delay.

4.8 Option 3: Remove play equipment from the Park and do not replace.

4.8.1 Option Advantages

· This would provide Council with a saving in capital and operating expenditure.

4.8.2 Option Disadvantages

· The play equipment would be removed from the park at the end of its life span resulting in no Council play provision in this area.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2	Option 3
Cost to Implement	Allocated CAPEX budget $125,000	Allocated CAPEX budget $125,000	Decommissioning of old assets, approximately $15,000
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Covered by existing maintenance budget	Covered by existing maintenance budget	N/A
Funding Source	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget
Funding Availability	Yes	Yes	N/A
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Implementation costs are based on anticipated product supply, installation, and wider construction costs. There is a risk that these costs could change due to product availability and supply. The final cost of construction will be confirmed during the tender phase. If costs escalate beyond the approved budget, staff will manage small shortfalls through minor design amendments. In this instance, the amount of nature play will be reduced if required. If there are major implications to the level of service, staff will discuss these with the Community Board before proceeding further with the project.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, 9 August 2024, the Community Board has the delegation to;

6.2.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96).

6.2.2 Other Legal Implications: There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to these decisions.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The required decision:

6.3.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.3.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

6.4 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.5 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment:

6.5.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City’s parks and foreshore network - >= 70% .

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.6 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.6.1 Waimāero Community Board, specifically the Waimairi ward area.

6.7 Consultation started on 26 November and ran until 16 December 2024.

6.8 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

· Local community group Facebook pages.

· Signs installed on-site.

6.9 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk page had 193 views throughout the consultation period.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.10 Submissions were made by 23 individuals. All submissions are available on our Kōrero mai webpage.

6.11 Submitters were asked for their most common use of the reserve. Their responses were as follows:

· Playground use – 20

· Walking / biking / scootering / skating – 12

· Using the open space – 6

· Picnics - 4

6.12 Submitters were asked what kind of play feature was the most interesting for the play space, their responses were as follows:

· Swinging – 21

· Climbing – 18

· Sliding – 17

· Rocking – 5

· Spinning – 3

6.13 Submitters made the following requests for the project to consider incorporating into the play space design:

· More nature play – 6

· A play hut – 6

· Adding two standard swings – 5

6.14 Stakeholders from surrounding schools, preschools, sports clubs, church groups and community trusts were contacted about the engagement process, however no submissions from organisations were received.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.15 This decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.16 This decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.17 The decision in this report is likely to contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that local residents will have access to a play facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other playgrounds.

6.18 If possible, existing unsuitable safe fall (bark) will be reused as mulch in the garden beds.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Board approves the proposed concept plan, the equipment can be ordered and tenders documents created, for a planned construction period in Spring 2025.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Hyde Park play space renewal- concept plan	25/1142774	76

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Holly Whitaker - Project Manager - Community Parks

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

11. Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund Applications for Consideration
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1187564
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Maryanne Lomax, Community Governance Manager maryanne.lomax@ccc.govt.nz
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider applications for funding from their 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund Applications for Consideration Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed at low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund grants outlined in the following schedule:

4. Approves the transfer of $112,854 to the 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendations above are aligned to the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priorities of a Collaborative and Confident City and A Cultural Powerhouse City. The projects also align with the Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 Approve the allocation of the local Strengthening Communities Fund for each Community Board area.

3.3 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.4 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.7 The 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund opened on 1 May 2025 and closed on 30 May 2025.

3.8 A total of 59 applications were received, requesting a total of $936,682. Of the 59 applications, 17 are multi-year funded projects and eight were withdrawn. This leaves 34 applications for the Board to consider for the 2025/26 round.

3.9 The Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board has a total funding pool of $515,834.

3.10 Staff have recommended a total of $402,980 for the 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund (this includes $209,500 of pre-committed multi-year funding), which would result in $112,854 remaining for the 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund (plus any carry-forward from the 2024/25 year which is currently being finalised).

3.11 In the 2023/24 funding round, the Board approved three-year funding to the following organisations:

· Belfast Community Network Inc - $34,000

· St Barnabas Anglican Church, Parish of Fendalton - $21,000

· Anglican Diocese of Christchurch - Parish of Merivale St Albans - $20,000

· Te Ora Hou Ōtautahi - $15,000

· Papanui Baptist Church Community Services Freedom Trust - $13,000

· Northgate Community Services Trust - $9,000

· The Kind Foundation (formerly YMCA) - $9,000

· Papanui Youth Development Trust (Te Koru Pou Iho) - $8,000

· Papanui Youth Development Trust (Te Koru Pou Iho) - $5,000

· Christchurch High School Old Boys Rugby Football Club - $3,500

· Canterbury Cricket Association - $3,000

· Christchurch North Community Patrol - $3,000

· Burnside Rugby Football Club Incorporated - $7,500

3.12 In the 2024/25 funding round, the Board approved two-year funding to the following organisations:

· Bishopdale Community Trust - $24,000

· Burnside Community Transformation Trust - $18,000

· Rangitahi Bryndwr Trust - $13,500 (for 2024/25) and $15,000 (for 2025/26)

· Papanui Returned and Services Association - $1,500

3.13 Staff are not recommending any additional applications this year for multi-year funding.

3.14 Staff have assessed all applications received and made recommendations. Attached is a decision matrix, which includes organisational details, project details, financial information, a staff assessment, and a priority ranking (refer Attachment A).

3.15 The Funding Outcomes and Priorities and Criteria for this fund are also attached (refer Attachment B).

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund Decision Matrix	25/1418079	86
b ⇩	Funding Outcomes and Priorities	25/1418080	120

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Maryanne Lomax - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

Approved By

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

Matt Boult - Acting Head of Community Support & Partnerships

12. 2025/26 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1187342
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Maryanne Lomax, Community Governance Manager maryanne.lomax@ccc.govt.nz
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider allocations for funding from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Board Projects listed below.

Funding Request Number	Project Name	Amount Recommended
00001_FWH	2025/26 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Youth Development Fund	$12,000
00002_FWH	Celebrate Bishopdale 2025	$8,000
00003_FWH	Summer with your Neighbours 2025/26	$3,500
00004_FWH	Youth Activities and Events	$6,000
00005_FWH	Community Liaison and Events	$2,000
00006_FWH	Youth Achievement Event	$2,500
00007_FWH	Garden Pride Awards 2026	$3,750

1.2 The balance of the fund will be dependent on the allocations approved for the 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to be considered at this meeting.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the 2025/26 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Allocates $12,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund to establish the 2025/26 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Youth Development Fund.

4. Allocates $8,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards the delivery of Celebrate Bishopdale 2025.

5. Allocates $3,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Summer with your Neighbours 2025/26.

6. Allocates $6,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Youth Activities and Events.

7. Allocates $2,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards Community Liaison and Events.

8. Allocates $2,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards hosting a Youth Achievement Event.

9. Allocates $3,750 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Garden Pride Awards 2026.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of being an inclusive and equitable city.

3.2 The recommendations are consistent with the goals of the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.3 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.3.1 Allocations must be consistent with any Council-adopted policies, standards or criteria.

3.3.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal or environmental court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations, or Community Board decisions.

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.4 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5 The significance level was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.7 If the staff recommendations for the 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund are approved, there will be a balance of $112,854 in the 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund (plus any carried forward from 2024/25 which is still being finalised).

Total Budget Current Year	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$112,854 (TBC)	$0	$112,854	$75,104

3.8 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the projects above are eligible for funding.

3.9 The attached document provides detailed information for the project. This includes project details, financial information, and a staff recommendation.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	2025/26 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Board Projects Matrix	25/1187351	126

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Maryanne Lomax - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

Approved By

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

Matt Boult - Acting Head of Community Support & Partnerships

13. Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - St Mark's Presbyterian Church and St Christopher's Anglican Church
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1456591
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Karen Boag, Community Development Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2025-26 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
DRF 25/26_00011	St Mark’s Presbyterian Church	Chairs and handrail	$4,978	$4,000
DRF 25/26_00009	St Christopher’s Anglican Church	Security Cameras	$2,500	$1,500

1.2 The balance of the fund will be dependent on the allocations approved for the 2025-26 Strengthening Communities Fund to be considered at this meeting.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - St Mark's Presbyterian Church and St Christopher's Anglican Church Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $4,000 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund to St Mark's Presbyterian Church towards new chairs and a handrail.

4. Approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Discretionary Response Fund to St Christopher's Anglican Church towards security cameras.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of being an inclusive and equitable city. The project also aligns with the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.

3.2 The recommendations are consistent with the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.3 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.3.1 Allocations must be consistent with any Council-adopted policies, standards or criteria.

3.3.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal or environmental court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations, or Community Board decisions.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.4 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5 The significance level was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

Total Budget Current Year

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$112,854

(TBC)

$112,854

$107,354

3.8 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications above are eligible for funding.

3.9 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information, and a staff assessment.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 DRF - St Mark's Presbyterian Church Decision Matrix	25/1465778	136
b ⇩	Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2025/26 DRF - St Christopher's Anglican Church Decision Matrix	25/1465784	137

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Karen Boag - Community Development Advisor
Approved By	Maryanne Lomax - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

14. Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board Area Report - August 2025
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/1450690
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Maryanne Lomax, Community Governance Manager, maryanne.lomax@ccc.govt.nz
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board Area Report - August 2025.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

3.1.1 Northwood Roundabout

Council staff, in discussions with the Northwood Residents Association have been working on tidying up the Northwood Boulevard roundabout sculpture and landscaping. The next phase of removing unwanted self-seeding plants and the out-of-control hebe has been started.

Feedback is that the roundabout landscaping is looking tidier and feeling safer now that the removal of plantings allows you to see more of the traffic on the roundabout. The idea is to plant some Nadina as well to give it a splash of colour. The Resident’s Association have asked for the other roundabouts to be treated in the same way to increase visibility and have a tidy community theme.

3.1.2 Juniper Place Reserve Planting Project: Final Milestone Completed

We’re pleased to share that the final stage of the Juniper Place Reserve planting project has now been completed, wrapping up a 12 month journey of collaboration, learning, and community engagement.

This project began in 2024 as part of the Council’s Urban Forest Plan, which aims to increase tree canopy cover across the city. Juniper Place Reserve, situated directly behind Roydvale School, was selected for a 54% increase in tree cover. Recognising a unique opportunity to involve local students, staff contacted the school’s principal, and the Student Reporters Club enthusiastically came on board to take part in the consultation process.

As the project evolved, Fire and Emergency NZ joined the conversation to discuss fire-smart planting. Students were introduced to low-flammability species and safe planting practices, particularly valuable learning in light of the recent Port Hills fires. Wayne Hamilton from FENZ attended the final engagement in June 2025, where he spoke about planting zones, fire risks in gardens, and how to identify fire-resistant plants.

Final Planting Day – Tuesday, 22 July 2025 - The planting day was a great success, thanks to a strong team effort.

· 110 native revegetation plants and 17 trees were planted

· Around 30 students from Roydvale’s Reporters Club took part

· Students completed the revegetation planting in just under an hour

Two students who had taken part in the original 2024 discussions returned from their new school (Cobham Intermediate) with special permission to help, a lovely full-circle moment for the project.

3.1.3 Englefield Nature Play Space

There have been a few minor delays in the project due to end of financial year movements and school holidays, but the project is moving again. The Community Advisory Group concept design is currently being turned into a document to go to households in the Englefield Reserve and surrounding area. The flyer will let the wider community know what the possibilities could be and get their feedback on it. There will be an on-site engagement activity for those who are keen as part of this.

Belfast School, in conjunction with the Councils Play Advocate, are looking at getting activity happening in the area prior to the consultation, as part of looking into Kaitiakitanga and including the area as a school enquiry project.

The Community Advisory Group will be finalising the details around the wider community engagement shortly and once the feedback has been collated a final design will be agreed upon and then work will begin. The idea being that the play space will be revitalised in time for summer play and family picnics.

3.1.4 Computers to the Community Scheme – Yearly Round up

Through its Computers to the Community Scheme, the Council is committed to supporting the Christchurch community and recognising the value of community organisations.

Requests for computers are assessed by our local Community Development Adviser, Natalie Dally, and supported by Katie MacDonald as part of the work of the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Governance Team.

This year has seen an increase in demand on the scheme with 630 pre-loved Council devices (PCs and laptops) being gifted to 80 organisations and clubs ranging from cultural groups, sports clubs, early learning centres and disability support groups. Donations were also made to the three strategic partner community groups, Recycle a Device (RAD), Housing First and Ōtautahi Community Housing Trust.

3.1.5 Listening and Connecting: A Community-Led Project in Burnside and Bryndwr

The Burnside Bryndwr Community Network (BBCN) is leading a community-led research project to better understand how people in Burnside and Bryndwr connect, communicate, and participate. With a strong focus on inclusion and wellbeing, the project will support future planning by identifying participation barriers, recognising what’s working well, and exploring ways to strengthen local identity, connection, and safety.

It’s a collaborative effort, with local groups leading engagement across the community, including young people, older adults, families, social housing tenants, and Mandarin speakers. Community Governance staff from the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood team are also supporting the project through coordination and resourcing.

A range of tools is being used, including online and paper surveys, interviews, focus groups, and pop-up sessions. Both quick and extended surveys are available in Mandarin. To support accessibility, 7,000 homes will receive a paper version of the quick survey and translated flyers.

The short survey provides a snapshot of connection and participation, while the extended version invites deeper feedback around inclusion, safety, and community life. Groups like Burnside Community Transformation Trust, Rangatahi Bryndwr Trust, City Mission, ACTT, Kāinga Ora, and local schools are also running targeted engagement with the people they support.

Engagement runs through July and August 2025, with a community hui at Burnside Primary School on Tuesday, 4 November to share early insights and help guide next steps. Final findings will be presented in mid-November to the wider network and community partners.

This locally driven initiative is already attracting strong participation and will offer valuable insights to inform future community planning. With trusted local leadership and support from Community Governance staff, the project is designed to amplify the voices of those often under-represented, helping to build a safer, stronger, and more connected Burnside and Bryndwr.

A qr code on a paper

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 The monthly reporting on the Board’s Discretionary Response Fund and Youth Development Fund will resume in September 2025.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan

· The final monitoring report for the Board’s 2022-25 Board Plan was included in the July 2025 Area Report. The Board will begin working on their new Board Plan following the elections in October.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation

· Bryndwr Road Renewal

Following Community Board feedback, the Council is planning a street renewal for Bryndwr Road. The proposed changes include:

· Replacing the deep-dish gutters with flat kerb and channel to address ponding and flooding

· Resurfacing and flattening of the road camber

· Additional street tree planting.

· Road narrowing with tactile paving at appropriate locations to make crossing the road easier for people who are blind or low vision.

· Timed parking outside the Bryndwr Road Shops.

You can view more information and make your submission on the Council’s website here: Bryndwr Road renewal | Kōrero mai | Let’s talk Consultation closes on Sunday 17 August.

· Waimakariri Road and Whitchurch Place speed limit changes

The Council is proposing to lower the speed on Whitchurch Place and Waimakariri Road to make it safer for children and families getting to and from Harewood School and support the proposed installation of a safer crossing on Waimakariri Road.

Proposed changes to speed limits:

· 60kmph to 50kmph

· Whitchurch Place

· Part of Waimakariri Road from 188 Waimakariri Road to where the speed limit currently changes to 50kph near the Harewood Road intersection.

You can view more information and make your submission on the Council’s website here: https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/waimakariri-whitchurch-speeds Consultation closes on 17 August 2025.

· A full list of open consultations city-wide is available at https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori

4.1 Customer Service Request Report - Hybris monthly report for June 2025 attached, providing an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported (refer to Attachment A).

4.2 Graffiti Snapshot (citywide) - June 2025 (refer to Attachment B)

4.3 SWN - Ilam Wastewater Upgrade – one-way traffic system (circulated 3 July 2025)

4.4 SWN - Smacks Creek riparian planting (circulated 4 July 2025)

4.5 SWN - Kahu Road Wastewater Mains Renewal - investigations (circulated 18 July 2025)

4.6 Road maintenance notifications: Culahill Street; Maple Street; Greers Road; Waimairi Road; Memorial Avenue

4.7 Memo - Targeted consultation for the Harewood Road/Gardiners Road/Breens Road intersection upgrade and Harewood School signalised crossing (circulated 4 July 2025 - refer to Attachment C)

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Hybris Ticket Report - June 2025	25/1451303	145
b ⇩	Graffiti Snapshot (citywide) - June 2025	25/1451304	146
c ⇩	MEMO - Targeted consultation for the Harewood Road/Gardiners Road/Breens Road intersection upgrade and Harewood School signalised crossing	25/1451389	148

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Maryanne Lomax - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood
Approved By	Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

Actions Register Ngā Mahinga

When decisions are made at meetings, these are assigned to staff as actions to implement. The following lists detail any actions from this meeting that were:

· Open at the time the agenda was generated.

· Closed since the last ordinary meeting agenda was generated.

Open Actions Ngā Mahinga Tuwhera

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	ACTION DUE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
Jamell Place - Proposed parking restrictions	10 February 2025	15 August 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Public Forum - Mark Smith	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Public Forum - Nicholas Tyler	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Road Stopping at 40 Garden Road, Merivale	7 July 2025	6 October 2025	Facilities & Property Unit	Property Consultancy
Spokes Canterbury	7 July 2025	6 October 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Spokes Canterbury	7 July 2025	6 October 2025	Transport & Waste	Travel Demand Management
Waimakariri Stopbanks	6 March 2023	28 November 2025	Three Waters	Asset Planning Stormwater & Waterways
Otara Street Proposed No Stopping - Fendalton Mall entrance	10 March 2025	30 November 2025	Transport & Waste	Asset Planning

Actions Closed Since the Last Meeting Ngā Mahinga kua Tutuki nō Tērā Hui

REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION	MEETING DATE	DUE DATE	ACTION CLOSURE DATE	UNIT	TEAM
Sunningvale Lane - Proposed time restricted parking and no stopping restrictions	7 October 2024	15 August 2025	19 June 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Belfast Residents' Association	10 February 2025	14 June 2025	10 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)
Tralee Reserve and Crofton Reserve Play Space Renewals- Design Approval	7 April 2025	7 July 2025	10 June 2025	Parks	Community Parks
Fendalton Waimairi Harewood 2024-2025 Discretionary Response Fund Application, Bishopdale Preschool	12 May 2025	11 August 2025	23 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)
Jeffrey's Reserve Bike Jumps	12 May 2025	11 August 2025	10 June 2025	Parks	Community Parks
Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood - Better-Off Fund - Revocation of Previous Decision and Applications for Consideration - Gordon Scout Group and Outdoor Table Tennis Table.	12 May 2025	11 August 2025	4 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)
Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Service Awards 2025	12 May 2025	11 August 2025	23 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)
Fendalton Waimairi Harewood 2024-2025 Discretionary Response Fund Application, St Aidans Anglican Church Bryndwr, Burnside West Christchurch University Cricket Club Inc, Nomads United Association Football Club Incorporated, Belfast Community Network, Circability Trust	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	23 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)
Johnswood Avenue - Kea Crossing	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	12 June 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
No Stopping Restrictions - Glasnevin Drive	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	12 June 2025	Transport & Waste	Traffic Operations
Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood - Better-Off Fund Applications for Consideration	9 June 2025	8 September 2025	23 June 2025	Community Support & Partnerships	Governance (Fen-Wai-Har)

No	Organisation Name	Project	Recommendation
SCF25/26_046_FWH	Asian Community Transformation Trust (ACTT)	ACTT Operating Costs and Salaries	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $15,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Asian Community Transformation Trust towards the salaries of the Trust Manager and Family Support Worker.
SCF25/26_006_FWH	Social Service Council of the Diocese of Christchurch	Burnside/Bryndwr Community Development Kaimahi	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Social Service Council of the Diocese of Christchurch towards the Burnside/Bryndwr Community Development worker.
SCF25/26_036_FWH	Anglican Parish of Burnside Harewood	Community Services/programmes	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $8,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Anglican Parish of Burnside Harewood towards their community services and programmes operating costs excluding food and prizes.
SCF25/26_009_FWH	Avonhead Community Trust	Whole Village	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $11,750 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Avonhead Community Trust towards the costs of their Community Connect initiative.
SCF25/26_031_FWH	Avonhead Tennis Club Inc	Encouraging Tennis Participation by Youngsters	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $3,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Avonhead Tennis Club Inc towards their Junior Tennis Programme Expenses.
SCF25/26_005_FWH	Burnside Bowling Club Incorporated	Greenkeeper Wage Assistance	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burnside Bowling Club Incorporated towards their Greenkeeper's wages.
SCF25/26_050_FWH	Burnside Elim Church Trust	Burnside Elim Church - Community Programs	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $7,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burnside Elim Church Trust towards delivering their community projects excluding refreshments.
SCF25/26_063_FWH	Burnside Park Tennis Club Inc	Club and Administrator Wages	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $4,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burnside Park Tennis Club Inc towards wages for their Head Coach and Club Administrator.
SCF25/26_032_FWH	Burnside Squash Rackets Club Incorporated	Annual Operational Expenses	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burnside Squash Rackets Club Incorporated towards their annual operational expenses.
SCF25/26_034_FWH	Burnside West Christchurch University Cricket Club Incorporated	Junior and Youth Coaching	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Burnside West Christchurch University Cricket Club Incorporated towards wages for their Junior and Youth Programme coaches.
SCF25/26_038_FWH	Christchurch Chinese Church Trust	Christchurch Chinese Projects	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Christchurch Chinese Church Trust towards operational costs, including salaries and wages, for their community programmes excluding refreshments.
SCF25/26_048_FWH	Christchurch Girls High School Netball Club Incorporated	CGHS Netball Club	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Christchurch Girls High School Netball Club Incorporated towards playing bibs and uniforms.
SCF25/26_002_FWH	Community Toy Library Waimairi Incorporated	Operating costs for the toy library	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $3,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Community Toy Library Waimairi Incorporated towards the wages of the Toy Librarian.
SCF25/26_045_FWH	Cotswold Preschool & Nursery Assoc. Inc.	Art and Play equipment for our Tamariki	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Cotswold Preschool & Nursery Assoc. Inc. towards art and play equipment.
SCF25/26_029_FWH	Crockfords Bridge Club Incorporated	Bridge Learner Lessons	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $4,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Crockfords Bridge Club Incorporated towards tutor training fees.
SCF25/26_007_FWH	Delta Rhythmic Gymnastics Club Incorporated	Operational Costs	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Delta Rhythmic Gymnastics Club Incorporated towards their operational costs.
SCF25/26_062_FWH	FC Twenty 11 Incorporated	Football Development Officer	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to FC Twenty 11 Incorporated towards the salary expenses for their Football Development Officer.
SCF25/26_057_FWH	Fendalton Bowling Club Inc	Support for Greenkeeper Contract	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $5,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Fendalton Bowling Club Inc towards their Greenkeepers wages.
SCF25/26_003_FWH	Fendalton Park Croquet Club Incorporated	Croquet Lawn Maintenance	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $3,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Fendalton Park Croquet Club Incorporated towards lawn maintenance costs.
SCF25/26_054_FWH	Harewood Hockey Club Inc	Youth and Junior Development Program	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $9,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Harewood Hockey Club Inc towards turf training hire expenses at Nunweek Park and wages for Coach Developer.
SCF25/26_064_FWH	Marist Albion Netball Club Incorporated	Club Administration	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $2,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Marist Albion Netball Club Incorporated towards Club Administrators wages.
SCF25/26_049_FWH	Marist Albion Rugby Club Inc	Marist Albion Rugby Club - Supporting Costs for Members and Volunteers	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $8,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Marist Albion Rugby Club Inc towards their Club administration and operation expenses.
SCF25/26_053_FWH	Merivale Papanui Rugby Football Club Incorporated	Rugby development for our Tamariki	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $3,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Merivale Papanui Rugby Football Club Incorporated towards the Club’s operating expenses and safety equipment.
SCF25/26_060_FWH	Miyazato Karate Club Christchurch Incorporated	Karate Club Growth Project 2025	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Miyazato Karate Club Christchurch Incorporated towards essential training equipment, venue hire, volunteer recognition and promotion.
SCF25/26_041_FWH	New Generation Church	Strengthening Bryndwr community engagement and well-being	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $2,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to New Generation Church towards Community events and programmes excluding food.
SCF25/26_042_FWH	Nomads United Association Football Club Incorporated	Support for Football Development Officer and Junior Programmes	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Nomads United Association Football Club Incorporated towards their Football Development Officer wages and Junior Programmes.
SCF25/26_055_FWH	Nor'west Brass Incorporated	General Running Costs	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $7,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Nor'west Brass Incorporated towards rent and insurance.
SCF25/26_028_FWH	Papanui Community Toy Library Inc	Papanui Toy Library Supervisor Wages	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Papanui Community Toy Library Inc towards toy library supervisor wages.
SCF25/26_047_FWH	St Christopher's Anglican Church - Avonhead	24-7 Youth Workers Programme and Holiday Programme	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $15,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to St Christopher's Anglican Church - Avonhead towards the operational costs of their 24-7 Youth Work initiatives and Holiday Programme Young Leaders’ Programme.
SCF25/26_056_FWH	St Marks Presbyterian Church	Foot Clinic	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,130 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to St Marks Presbyterian Church towards the community foot clinic.
SCF25/26_001_FWH	St Marks Retired Peoples Fellowship	Monthly Outings Project	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to St Marks Retired Peoples Fellowship towards the monthly coach outings.
SCF25/26_061_FWH	The Old Boys' Te Kura Tennis Club Incorporated	Hagley Grass Courts	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $1,600 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Old Boys' Te Kura Tennis Club Incorporated towards the purchase tennis balls and pickleball supplies and volunteer recognition function (excluding court maintenance).
SCF25/26_030_FWH	The Village Presbyterian Church	Community Centre Operations & Programmes	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $10,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to The Village Presbyterian Church towards the Village Community Centre operations and their community programmes.
SCF25/26_059_FWH	Waimairi Tennis Club Inc	Waimairi Tennis Club Junior Tennis Programme	That the Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board makes a grant of $6,000 from its 2025/26 Strengthening Communities Fund to Waimairi Tennis Club Inc towards its junior tennis programme expenses.