Agenda of Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

A black text on a white background

Description automatically generated

Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Thursday 12 December 2024

Time: 4.32 pm

Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Marie Pollisco

Helen Broughton

Sarah Brunton

Henk Buunk

Tyla Harrison-Hunt (via audio/visual link)

Andrei Moore

Debbie Mora (via audio/visual link)

Mark Peters

Principal Advisor

Bailey Peterson

Manager Community Governance

Tel: 941 8999

Bailey.Peterson@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Faye Collins

Community Board Advisor

Tel: 941 5108

faye.collins@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

No apologies were received.

Debbie Mora and Tyla Harrison-Hunt attended via audio/visual link.

Gamal Fouda was absent from the meeting and no apology was received.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Mark Peters declared an interest in Item 12 - Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Applications: Hornby Day Care Trust, Hornby Presbyterian Community Church, Jox Blue Blades Society Inc, BetterMan Charitable Trust and Youth Development Fund Transfer, recommendation 4 regarding Hornby Presbyterian Community Church.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00109

That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 14 November 2024 be confirmed.

Marie Pollisco/Andrei Moore Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1

Southern Institute of Technology's Canterbury operations

The scheduled public forum did not go ahead.

4.2

Cholmondeley Children’s Centre

Darel Hall, General Manager, updated the Board on the services and programmes of the Cholmondeley Children’s Centre.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Darel Hall for his presentation.

Tyla Harrison-Hunt joined the meeting at 4.35 pm during consideration of Item 4.2.

4.3

Halswell Play Spaces

David Hawke, Halswell Residents' Association Secretary, and Lucy Love, local resident, addressed the Board regarding Halswell play spaces.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked David Hawke and Lucy Love for their presentation.

4.4 Cycles on footpaths

Barry Harcourt raised safety concerns regarding cycles on footpaths on Ilam Road, specifically inquiring why there is a stretch that has both a shared path and a cycleway.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Barry Harcourt for his presentation.

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Requests staff investigate the removal of the shared cycleway provision on Ilam Road footpath between Rountree Street and Maidstone Road, Riccarton.

4.5 Dunbars Road pedestrian safety improvements

Matt Stewart, local resident, spoke regarding pedestrian safety improvements on Dunbars Road and around Oaklands School and suggested no parking around school entrances.

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Requests an update regarding Dunbars Road pedestrian safety improvements.

2. Requests staff investigate pedestrian safety improvements on Cobra Street outside Oaklands School.

Attachments

a Public forum Item 4.5 - Oaklands School Safe Crossing Presentation

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1 Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park Development

Aynslie Walter addressed the Board regarding the Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park Development Report (Item 9 of these minutes refers).

Ms Walter noted that Upper Riccarton War Memorial Library volunteers suggested that Sakura trees be planted in the new park, and that a small plaque be installed on a bench to commemorate volunteers.

After questions from the Board, the Chairperson thanked Aynslie Walter for her deputation.

Item 9 of these minutes records the Board’s decision on this item.

5.2 Quarry View Urban Forest Planting Plan

Lindsay Welch, local resident, addressed the Board regarding the Quarry View urban forest planting plan (Item 8 of these minutes refers) as a resident who is affected by the debris from the Poplar trees.

After questions from the Board, the Chairperson thanked Lindsay Welch for his deputation.

Item 8 of these minutes records the Board’s decision on this item.

Attachments

a Deputation 5.2 - Quarry View Urban Forest Planting Plan - Supporting Document

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Lease of Road 44 Canada Cresent

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00110 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the New Deed of Lease of Road 44 Canada Cresent Report.

2. Grants a ground lease to Hynds Pipe Systems Limited pursuant to s61(2) of the Reserves Act using the Public Bodies Leasing Act for a maximum period of 5 years less one day including renewals for 44 Canada Crescent held in Record of Title CB43B/636 and described as Lot 71 DP 75184.

3. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to manage and conclude all transactions required to finalise the lease terms and conditions.

Mark Peters/Sarah Brunton Carried

8. Quarry View Urban forest planting plan
	Community Board Comment Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board took into consideration the deputation from Lindsay Welch (Item 5.2 of these minutes refers).
	Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00111 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Quarry View Urban forest planting plan Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approve the planting of new trees within Quarry View Drainage Reserve as per Attachment B to the report on the meeting agenda. 4. Approve the removal of the Poplar trees located along the Southern edge of the park as outlined within Attachment B to the report on the meeting agenda. Andrei Moore/Helen Broughton Carried
	Attachments a Urban Forest Planting Plan Board Presentation - 12 December 2024

9. Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park Development

Community Board Comment

The Board took into consideration the deputation from Aynslie Walter (Item 5.1 of these minutes refers) specifically the suggestion of using Sakura trees and the inclusion of a small memorial plaque.

The Board requested the officers in attendance to incorporate these suggestions where possible, in the implementation of the project.

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00112 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board (the Board):

1. Receives the information in the Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park Development Report.

2. Note that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approve the recommended design (refer Attachment C to the report on the meeting agenda).

4. Approve the name ‘Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park’.

5. Endorse applying to ‘Watch this Space’ for funding for the mural

Helen Broughton/Henk Buunk Carried

10. Milns Road Speed Humps
	Community Board Comment Andrei Moore moved officer recommendations with an amendment to include the resolutions 5,6 and 7 below.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Milns Road Speed Humps Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves pursuant to Section 331 and 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 all traffic calming devices on Milns Road as detailed in Attachment A of this report. 4. Approves that these resolutions take effect when road markings that evidence the speed humps described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
	Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00113 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Milns Road Speed Humps Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves pursuant to Section 331 and 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 all traffic calming devices on Milns Road as detailed in Attachment A of this report. 4. Approves that these resolutions take effect when road markings that evidence the speed humps described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). 5. Seek advice from network planning staff regarding the notification and approval process it followed for the Milns Road and William Brittan Avenue intersection changes. 6. Seek advice from staff to clarify the process of when transport projects are moved from network planning to operations. 7. Seek staff advice on development contributions to fund this project. Andrei Moore/Helen Broughton Carried

Debbie Mora left the meeting the meeting at 5.50 pm during consideration of Item 11.

11. Traffic islands on Riccarton Road

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00114 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Traffic islands on Riccarton Road Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as medium significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the removal of three traffic islands on the south side of Riccarton Road to the west of Hansons Lane outside Woolworths Church Corner (as shown on the approved Attachment A to this report on the meeting agenda).

Mark Peters/Henk Buunk Carried

Debbie Mora returned to the meeting at 5.53 pm during consideration of Item 11.

12. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Applications: Hornby Day Care Trust, Hornby Presbyterian Community Church, Jox Blue Blades Society Inc, BetterMan Charitable Trust and Youth Development Fund Transfer

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00115 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Applications: Hornby Day Care Trust, Hornby Presbyterian Community Church, Jox Blue Blades Society Inc, BetterMan Charitable Trust and Youth Development Fund Transfer Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $4,250 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Hornby Day Care Trust towards the flooring component of the laundry and kitchen upgrade.

4. Approves a grant of $2,310 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Hornby Presbyterian Community Church towards venue hire costs for the Templeton Tots programme.

5. Approves a grant of $2,590 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Jox Blue Blades Rowing Society Incorporated towards the costs of purchasing two Coxboxes for the St Thomas Rowing squad.

6. Approves a grant of $4,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to BetterMan Charitable Trust towards administration and the development and action of their social media plan.

7. Approves the transfer of $5,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024-25 Youth Development Fund.

Andrei Moore/Sarah Brunton Carried

Mark Peters declared an interest in resolution 4 of this item and took no part in any discussion or voting.

13. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application: Awatea Athletics Incorporated

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00116 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application: Awatea Athletics Incorporated Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $7,000 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Awatea Athletics Incorporated towards the Awatea Athletics - Community Development & Administration project.

Mark Peters/Andrei Moore Carried

14. Waipuna Halswell Hornby Riccarton Community Board Recess Committee 2024/25

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00117 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell Hornby Riccarton Community Board Recess Committee 2024/25 Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Appoints a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson (or their nominees from amongst the remaining Board members) plus a minimum of any other two Board members and authorises the Committee to exercise the delegated powers of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board for the period following its ordinary meeting on 12 December 2024 up until the Board resumes its normal business from 13 February 2025.

4. Notes that any such delegation exercised by the Board’s Recess Committee will be reported to the Board for record purposes

Andrei Moore/Mark Peters Carried

Debbie Mora left the meeting at 6.09 pm during consideration of Item 14 and did not return.

15. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - December 2024

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2024/00118 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - December 2024.

Sarah Brunton/Mark Peters Carried

16. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

· A member raised the issue of buses parking and leaving engines running on Nelson Street.

· A member talked to decisions made during PC14, specifically regarding zoning densities in Riccarton.

· A member talked about the Community Service and Youth Service Awards concluding.

· A member talked to the PC14 recommendations that went to the Minister around the Hornby ward.

· A member talked about the trees in Denton Park being removed.

· A member talked to complaints from residents regarding trees in Templeton Domain, including damages to property.

· A member raised questions around trees in Leslie Park.

· A member talked to the carol service happening at 126 on the Corner and invited the Board to attend.

Attachments

a Elected Members' Exchange - Parking on Nelson Street

Tyla Harrison-Hunt left the meeting at 6.26 pm during Item 16 and did not return.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Meeting concluded at 6.32 pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025

Marie Pollisco

Chairperson

7. 148 Racecourse Road - Chokebore Lodge - Change from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic Reserve
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2242284
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Elizabeth Hoskins, Property Consultant
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Lynn McClelland, General Manager Corporate Services

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to change the classification of Chokebore Reserve from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic Reserve.

1.2 This change will allow the building to be occupied by a residential tenancy or other tenancy sympathetic to the heritage status of the Chokebore Lodge. This is not permitted under the current classification.

1.3 This report was requested by the Parks Unit to permit residential occupation of the building, once the extensive renovations to the property have been completed. The building was previously occupied for residential use however this is outside what is permitted under the current Local Purpose (Community) Reserve classification.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the 148 Racecourse Road - Chokebore Lodge - Change from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic Reserve Report and notes that Chokebore Lodge is registered as a Category 1 Historic Place and is sited on Local Purpose (Community) Reserve. The current classification restricts the use of the reserve and reclassification of the reserve to an Historic Reserve would allow the property to be used for activities that respect and are sympathetic to its heritage nature.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Pursuant to Section 24 (1)(b) of the Reserves Act 1977, under delegated authority from the Christchurch City Council, as administering body determines that the classification of that area of reserve described in Schedule A below be changed from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic Reserve.

Schedule A

· Area - 1314m2 approximately

· Description - Lot 30 Deposited Plan 49665 in Title CB28F/1281, known as Chokebore Reserve

4. Recommends that the Chief Executive exercise the discretion of the Minister of Conservation under Section 24 Reserves Act 1977 (power delegated to the Chief Executive) to change the classification of Lot 30 Deposited Plan 49665 in Title CB28F/1281 (Chokebore Reserve) from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic by notice in the Gazette.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Chokebore Lodge is registered as a Category 1 Historic Place built in the mid 1850’s with cob wall (earth) construction in part and various extensions over the following 60 years. The building was damaged in the 2010/2011 earthquakes and had further dampness/maintenance issues making the building uninhabitable and compromising the original cob wall construction.

3.2 In 2019, work commenced to upgrade and strengthen the building and conserve the original cob wall construction and other heritage features. Works were delayed due to weather and Covid and subsequent supply issues but are expected to be finished by the end of 2024.

3.3 The building will be available for occupation, with the preference for a residential tenancy, to continue the original purpose of the property as a residential home. Under the current classification of Local Purpose (Community) Reserve, a residential tenancy is not permitted.

3.4 The historic reserve classification will allow a residential tenancy subject to section 58 and 58(a) of the Reserves Act 1977. This classification will also broaden potential use of the building to commercial activities that respect and are sympathetic to the heritage nature of the property, should a suitable residential use not be successful.

3.5 The current classification is too restrictive on what the property can be used for which is a community building, kindergarten, playcentre, plunket, or other similar purposes. Most of these uses would not be appropriate for this property.

3.6 Decisions for approval are sought from the Community Board to proceed and complete the necessary process to achieve this reclassification under the Reserves Act 1977 subject to Minister of Conservation approval which has been delegated to the Christchurch City Council and sub delegated to the Chief Executive.

3.7 Plans are in attachment A showing the internal layout of the property for residential purposes.

Photos taken November 2019 - Boarded windows and disrepair.

Photos taken December 2024 - renovations almost completed.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Chokebore Lodge is registered as a Category 1 Historic Place and was built in the 1850’s with extensions over the following 60 years.

4.2 The building was damaged during the 2010/2011 earthquakes and suffered other dampness issues compromising part of the cob wall construction and other historical features. The property remained empty and boarded up for many years until a decision to strengthen and renovate the property was approved.

4.3 The building has now had extensive renovations to allow the building to be occupied again as a possible residential tenancy but keeping original heritage features. The current reserve classification being Local Purpose (Community) Reserve does not allow a residential tenancy.

4.4 The proposal is to change the reserve classification to Historic Reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.This will allow the building to be leased for a residential tenancy or other possible commercial use sympathetic to the historical nature of the property.

4.5 The process to change the classification requires approval of the Council (delegated to Community Boards) and Minister of Conservation (delegated to the Council Chief Executive) under the Reserves Act 1977.

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.6 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.6.1 Option 1 Change the classification of the land from Local Purpose (Community) Reserve to Historic Reserve therefore allowing the opportunity to lease for residential use.

4.6.2 Option 2. Maintain the existing classification which would not allow residential use for the property.

4.7 The following options were considered but ruled out:

4.7.1 N/A.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.8 Preferred Option: Option 1

4.8.1 Option Description: Change the land classification under the Reserves Act 1977 to Historic Reserve

4.8.2 Option Advantages

· Allows residential use of the property which reflects original use - a residential home - and ensures the heritage value of this property is preserved.

· Widens the potential use of the property to a commercial use by a party that would be sympathetic to the heritage status of the property.

4.8.3 Option Disadvantages

· There are no disadvantages.

4.9 Option 2

4.10 Option Description: Maintain the existing Local Purpose (Community)Reserve classification.

4.10.1 Option Advantages

· There are no advantages in maintaining the status quo

4.10.2 Option Disadvantages

· Restricts the use the property to community building, playcentre, kindergarten, plunket, or other similar purpose.

· Does not allow residential tenancy or other use that would respect the historic status outside the ones listed in above point.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.11 The heritage value of the property and appropriate use were considered and the most suitable reserve classification was selected.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option Change classification to heritage reserve	Option 2 – Maintain existing classification	Option 3 – N/A
Cost to Implement	Internal staff and LINZ costs	Nil
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Not affected	Not affected
Funding Source	Parks Unit operational budget	Parks Unit
Funding Availability	Operational funds are available	Nil as no action
Impact on Rates	Nil	Nil

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 There are no significant risks identified with this process and implementation.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 The Council has delegated its powers to undertake the Reserves Act reclassification approval to proceed to the Community Boards.

6.2.2 If a decision is made to proceed, an application to Minister of Conservation (decision delegated to the Council Chief Executive) will be sought for their approval of the proposed new classification.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

6.3.1 The proposed reserve classification change are legal processes under Section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decision:

6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework. The decision allows a wider use for the property including residential use and will ensure the heritage value of the building is preserved.

6.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by comparison of the current reserve status and the proposed change to parties having no negative impact. The building use will be less restrictive and more in keeping with the heritage reserve status.

6.4.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.6.1 Activity: Parks Heritage Management

· Level of Service: 6.9.1.2 Maintain Parks scheduled heritage buildings - 90% of scheduled maintenance completed according to planned programme - 65% of scheduled heritage buildings that are open or occupied are maintained at condition level 1 or 2.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 A public notice was issued identifying the land and reason for reclassification on 23 November 2024. This provided one month for submissions, and none were received.

6.8 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.8.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.9 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.10 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

The use of the property has not changed however the reclassification within a reserve status to Heritage Reserve legitimises the future use as a residential tenancy and maintains part of Christchurch heritage.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.15 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

6.16 The property was a residential home, and it is proposed to continue as a residential

property.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 The Property Consultancy team will obtain Minister of Conservation approval (delegated to the Council Chief Executive) and then complete the process for reclassification through LINZ.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Internal Layout plans Chokebore Lodge	24/2255105	22
b ⇩	Reserve delegations to Council	24/2255107	27
c ⇩	Excerpt Community Board delegations Reserves Act 1977	24/2255109	37

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Elizabeth Hoskins - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Kelly Hansen - Manager Parks Planning & Asset Management

Rupert Bool - Acting Head of Parks

8. Moffett Reserve play space renewal - design approval
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/80049
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Holly Whitaker, Project Manager- Community Parks
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, Acting General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to request that the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Board approve:

1.1.1 The concept plan for the renewal of Moffett Reserve play space, as per the attached concept plan. See attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Moffett Reserve play space renewal - design approval report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves the Moffett Reserve play space renewal plan attached to the report on the meeting as Attachment A.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 The renewal at Moffett Reserve forms part of the Community Parks Planned Play Space renewal programme. This play space is scheduled to be renewed based on its age and condition.

3.2 The play space is being renewed ‘like-for-like’, meaning a similar number of play elements will be maintained, whilst also taking into account feedback from community consultation. The design will ensure that today’s NZ Play Safety Standards are being met as well as taking into consideration any basic updates to the level of services:

· An accessible picnic table is being included as a standard in playground renewals and developments, providing families with a safe space to gather and share kai

· An increased number of play elements have been added for younger users, as these were identified as some of the primary users

· The play space incorporates an inclusive basket swing, which is an all-age all ability swing. It is suitable for children with mental and physical restrictions as it supports their whole-body weight. It provides a good option for preschoolers and creates a ‘hang out space’ for teenagers

· The play space upgrade has also included some additional planting to add textural points of difference and form a barrier from the road. Specimen trees will be included in the northern garden bed and next to the picnic bench to create shade in future years.

3.3 The concept design does not show its inclusion, but a post and chain fence will be added in the front of the Reserve to form an additional barrier from the road and improve safety.

3.4 The play space includes a play tower with climbing and sliding elements. This style of tower is not present anywhere else in the city, providing some variety across our play network. The tower incorporates imaginative play elements at ground level for very young children, a solid platform and slide at the lower level, suitable for pre-schoolers and a challenge element for older children in the upper level.

3.5 Currently, each play item is standalone in terms of its location. To maximise play benefits while the managing costs of safety surfacing, play items are now grouped together.

3.6 The Christchurch District Plan requires play equipment and structures to be placed a minimum of 10m from a residential boundary fence and 5m from a road boundary, however, this is not achievable in this Reserve. The front half of the Reserve is classified as a ‘paper road’ and Parks have been granted permission by the Transport unit to proceed with a renewal in that area, removing the setback requirements as a result. Therefore, the play space is proposed to be installed at the front of the Reserve, leaving a passive recreation space at the back. To enhance safety and increase the barriers between the Reserve and the road a chain fence, bollards and planting, have been added.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Consultation was undertaken in October 2024 via email, letter box drops and signage. The stakeholder groups included local primary schools, pre-schools and neighbours.

4.2 Only five responses were received, please see results in Attachment B. The primary user group identified were pre-schoolers and primary aged children.

4.3 A picnic table was the most mentioned feature, other play features that received positive feedback were sliding, swinging and climbing. Hence the inclusion of a play tower with climbing and sliding elements and a separate swing set.

4.4 The engagement letter suggested the inclusion of a scooter track and soccer posts. No comments were made regarding the soccer posts, so this was not included. A scooter track was considered but due to the very limited space available, and the desire to include a sizeable play tower, the scooter track could not be accommodated.

4.5 A rubbish bin was requested by one respondent; however, due to the reserves small size and lower frequency, the inclusion of a new litter bin is not included in the design.

4.6 A 1.9-meter gap has been left to accommodate access for mowers into the Reserve.

4.7 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
16/10/24	Memo- Moffett play space renewal

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.8 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.8.1 The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plans for the play space renewal at Moffett Reserve, allowing construction to begin in April 2025.

4.8.2 The Community Board does not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider alternative designs and re-consult with the community.

4.8.3 Remove play equipment from the Reserve and do not replace.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.9 Preferred Option: The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plan for the play space renewal at Moffett Reserve, allowing construction to begin in April 2025.

4.9.1 Option Advantages

· The community will receive a safe play space that offers increased play value, more age-appropriate equipment, and improved accessibility, delivered within this financial year.

4.9.2 Option Disadvantages

· No additional changes to the concept plan can be made.

4.10 Option 2: The Community Board does not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider alternative designs and re-consults with the community.

4.10.1 Option Advantages

· The Community Board has the opportunity to offer alternative suggestion to the proposed concept plan.

4.10.2 Option Disadvantages

· This option would impact the allocated budget as the new playground design and engagement costs would be funded from within the current budget. It is likely that this would impact the type of equipment we would be able to include in a revised plan.

· Dissatisfaction of the local community due to the delay.

4.11 Option 3: Remove play equipment from the Reserve and do not replace.

4.11.1 Option Advantages

· This would provide Council with a saving in capital and operating expenditure.

4.11.2 Option Disadvantages

· The play equipment would be removed from Moffett Reserve at the end of its life span resulting in no Council play provision in this area.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 - <enter text>	Option 3 - <enter text>
Cost to Implement	Allocated CAPEX budget $110,000	Allocated CAPEX budget $110,000	Decommissioning of old assets, approximately $10,000
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Covered by existing maintenance budget	Covered by existing maintenance budget	N/A
Funding Source	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget	Community Parks Fixed Renewal Budget
Funding Availability	Yes	Yes	Yes
Impact on Rates	N/A	N/A	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 If the decision is made to revise the concept plan and complete an amended design, another round of consultation will be required. This may pose a reputational risk if Council staff are unable to meet the proposed deadlines.

6.2 The risk of reduced privacy to immediate neighbours has been considered. The neighbours on both sides of the proposed play space have been contacted and informed of the concept plan via email. No response has been received from the neighbour on the eastern side, the neighbour on the western side, closest to the tower doesn’t object to the concept plan.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, 9 August 2024, the Community Board has the delegation to;

6.3.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96)

6.4 Other Legal Implications: There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to these decisions.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.5 The required decision:

6.5.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework that our residents have the opportunity to actively participate in community and city life, have a strong sense of belonging and identity, and feel safe.

6.4.1 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the level of decision impacting on a low number of residents and a small change to the Reserve.

6.5.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies: Physical Recreation and Sports Strategy 2002

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.6.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.3.5 Customer satisfaction with the recreational opportunities and ecological experiences provided by the City’s Regional Parks - >=80%

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 FY 25 play space renewal projects in the Waipuna Board area were discussed with a member of the Treaty Relations Team, it was felt no involvement with Mana Whenua was required.

6.8 Additional measures have been taken to discuss the play space renewal with immediate neighbours as neither provided feedback through the consultation process.

6.9 All respondents will be informed of the concept plan once Board approval has been received. Those who requested the scooter track and rubbish bin will be informed why this request cannot be met.

6.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.10.1 The Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Board

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.11 This decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.12 This decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.13 The decision in this report is likely to contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that local residents will have access to a play facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other playgrounds.

6.14 Where possible existing unsuitable soft fall (bark) will be reused as mulch in the garden beds.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Board approves the proposed concept plans for Moffett Reserve, the contracts for delivery can be awarded and construction can begin in April 2025.

7.2 Based on these decisions, the Parks Unit hope to complete construction and re-open the new play spaces by mid-May 2025, avoiding winter construction.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Final concept design Moffett Reserve play space renewal	25/160315	45
b ⇩	Moffett Reserve play space renewal engagement feedback summary	25/192502	51

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Holly Whitaker - Project Manager - Community Parks

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

9. The Runway, Wigram - Proposed No Stopping and Parking Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/887958
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Edwin Tiong, Transport Engineer, Traffic Operations
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 For the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve no stopping and parking restrictions on The Runway in Wigram.

1.2 This report has been written in response to request from the nearby businesses owners for timed parking restrictions to be installed outside their premises.

1.3 The recommended option is to introduce 30 minute restrictions (P30) in five spaces, 10 minute (P10) restrictions in five spaces as well as no stopping restrictions on The Runway in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the The Runway, Wigram - Proposed No Stopping and Parking Restrictions Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolutions 4 – 21 below.

North east side of The Runway

4. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 22 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

4. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 22 metres north east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 7 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

5. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 29 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 7 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

6. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 36 metres north east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

7. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 49 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 6 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

8. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 55 metres north east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

9. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 68 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

10. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 104 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 5 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

11. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north east side of The Runway commencing at a point 129 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

South east side of The Runway

12. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

13. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 24 metres south east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 7 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

14. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 31 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 7 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

15. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 38 metres south east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

16. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 51 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 5 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

17. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that parking on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 56 metres south east of its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes between the hours of 8am and 6pm on any day of the week except public holidays.

18. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 70 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

19. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 105 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 5 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

20. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of The Runway commencing at a point 129 metres its intersection with Corsair Drive and extending to the north east for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

21. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Currently, the parking spaces on the south western section of The Runway are partially unrestricted. Business owners have raised concerns relating to drivers parking their vehicles for long periods of time along The Runway adjacent to the main shops, which is affecting access to their business.

3.2 The recommended No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A is to ensure parking does not occur at the pedestrian crossing points and narrow locations on The Runway.

3.3 The recommendations for short stay parking restrictions in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through providing short stay parking to improve opportunities for customers to access local businesses and support economic activitiy.

3.4 These measures have been requested to:

3.4.1 Increase opportunities for short stay parking for customers and couriers.

3.4.2 Increase turnover of parking spaces throughout the day.

3.4.3 Provide time restrictions that are relevant for the local businesses.

3.4.4 Ensure parking does not occur at the pedestrian crossing points and narrow locations on The Runway.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 The Runway is a two way local street, with a posted speed limit of 30km/h.

4.2 There are five existing P60 parking restrictions on the north-eastern side of The Runway, and three P10 and two P10 Loading Zone Goods Vehicles Only parking restrictions on the south-eastern side of The Runway.

4.3 A request to investigate the possibility of introducing time restricted parking on the south-western section of The Runway to increase parking turnover and deter all day parking was received.

4.4 The central section of The Runway includes cafes, restaurants, takeaway shops, a bar clothing stores and a hairdressers. Staff visited the site and spoke with most of the business owners directly. All agreed with the problem of all-day parking and considered that introducing time restrictions would be beneficial.

4.5 Consequently, staff drafted a proposal that included P10 and P30 restrictions on each sides (equivalent of five spaces each) respectively, which was used for consultation purposes.

4.6 There are high parking demands in the area due to businesses and shops.

4.7 Staff proposed no stopping restrictions along the pedestrian crossing locations as complaints were received that courier drivers park in this area restricting pedestrian to cross the road.

4.8 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.9 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

· Install P10 and P30 as well as no stopping restrictions as shown on Attachment A.

· Do nothing.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.10 Preferred Option: Install P10 and P30 parking as well as no stopping restrictions as shown on Attachment A.

4.10.1 Option Advantages

· Addresses the request to provide time restricted parking to enable a higher turnover of available on-street parking.

· Provides a consistent approach to parking management and complies with the recommendations in the Councils Suburban Parking Policy.

· Improves visibility and accessibility at the pedestrian crossing points.

4.10.2 Option Disadvantages

· Replaces ten unrestricted parking spaces.

· Cost to implement.

4.11 Alternative Option: Do nothing, ten parking spaces remain unrestricted.

4.11.1 Option Advantages

· Retains ten unrestricted parking spaces.

· No cost to implement.

4.11.2 Option Disadvantages

· Does not address the request to provide time restricted parking to enable a higher turnover of available on-street parking.

· Inconsistent with Councils Suburban Parking Policy.

· Does not improve visibility and accessibility at the pedestrian crossing points.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – Do nothing
Cost to Implement	$1,500 for signs and markings	$0
Operational	$1,500 for staff time (reporting and investigation)	$1,500 for staff time (reporting and investigation)
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	$200 per annum	$0
Funding Source	Traffic Operations Signs and Markings budget	N/A
Funding Availability	Immediate	N/A
Impact on Rates	Negligible	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 None identified.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.

6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.

6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

6.3 Other Legal Implications:

6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The required decision:

6.4.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.4.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

6.4.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

6.5 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.7 Transport

6.7.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.3.3 Maintain customer perception of the ease of use of Council on- street parking facilities - >=50% resident satisfaction

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.8 Forty two affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by letter and were invited to make a submission. There were four submissions received all in favour of the proposal.

6.9 One submission requested to have regular enforcement in the area, while the other requested an additional loading zone for couriers and Uber drivers.

6.10 Staff have informed the parking enforcement team to monitor the area frequently. The courier and Uber drivers can utilise the existing P10 loading zone goods service vehicles only space, or the new P10 parking on the north-western side of The Runway.

6.11 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

6.12 The do nothing option is inconsistent with requests to improve parking situation on The Runway.

6.13 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.13.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.14 The decision does not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.15 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.16 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.16 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

6.17 The proposal is principally about accessibility. Due to the minor nature of the works, it is not expected to have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If approved, staff will implement the parking changes this financial year.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	The Runway Proposed No Stopping and Parking Restrictions drawing tg144371 For Board Approval	24/2358925	60

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations/Principal Advisor

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

10. Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street Intersection - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2294253
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Edwin Tiong, Transport Engineer, Traffic Operations
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 For the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve No Stopping Restrictions at the Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street intersection.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request by a resident who has raised safety concerns regarding on-street parking, especially with the University of Canterbury and College of English nearby, obstructing visibility and accessibility at the intersection of Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street. The proposed No Stopping Restrictions at the intersection of Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street would alleviate the issue above.

1.3 The recommended option is to install No Stopping restrictions and parking markings in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street Intersection - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Lynfield Avenue, commencing at the northern side of Maydell Street intersection, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14.0 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

5. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Lynfield Avenue, commencing at the southern side of Maydell Street intersection, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 9.5 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

6. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Maydell Street, commencing at the eastern side of Lynfield Avenue intersection, and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 10.5 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

7. Approves in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Maydell Street, commencing at the eastern side of Lynfield Avenue intersection, and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 10.0 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda.

8. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking road markings that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Safety concerns have been raised around the level of on-street parking, resulting in limited street accessibility and visibility on exiting the street. Implementing the recommended changes will improve access and lead to a reduction in the risk of a crash by increasing road width for manoeuvrability, particularly for emergency vehicles, as well as improving visibility at the intersection.

3.2 The recommended option is to install No Stopping restrictions and parking lines in accordance with Attachment A. The length of No Stopping in this option is the minimum length needed to provide drivers with sufficient road width to access the street safely and improve visibility at the intersection. The proposed parking lines are consistent with the nearby parking marking and would improve the parking arrangement, especially outside No.6 Maydell Street.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 There are high parking demands in the area due to with the University of Canterbury and College of English nearby. Visibility and accessibility can be limited by vehicles parking close to the intersection of Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street.

4.2 Both Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street have a road width of approximately nine metres. When vehicles are parked on both sides close to the intersection, there is only a narrow space for cars to move through, and this would likely restrict access for larger vehicles.

4.3 Both Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street are local streets providing access to residential properties. The majority of properties have the option of off-street parking, however it is likely there is an overflow of residential and/or visitor parking onto these streets.

4.4 There have been no crashes recorded at the Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street intersection within the last ten years. The intersection is classified as low risk for both personal and collective risks under Council’s risk mapping system. Although staff have not received any feedback from Emergency Services or Waste Management teams regarding accessibility concerns for this street, staff acknowledge that parking on both sides of the street could create an inconvenience and/or fully restrict larger vehicles or cars towing trailers due to the road width.

4.5 Currently, Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street form an uncontrolled T-intersection, with priority given to Lynfield Avenue.

4.6 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.7 Preferred Option: Recommended Option

4.7.1 Option Description: Install no stopping restrictions at the Lynfield Avenue and Maydell Street intersection.

4.7.2 Option Advantages

· Reduces the likelihood (risk) of vehicles, including emergency services, being unable to access properties at the intersection.

· Improves visibility at the intersection.

4.7.3 Option Disadvantages

· Removes four on-street parking spaces.

· Cost to implement.

4.8 Do Nothing

4.8.1 Option Description: Maintain the status quo.

4.8.2 Option Advantages

· Retains four on-street parking spaces.

· No cost to Council

4.8.3 Option Disadvantages

· Does not address safety concerns relating to through access of vehicles, including emergency vehicle access, when vehicles are parked in this location.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – Do Nothing
Cost to Implement	Approximately $750	N/A
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Approximately $350	N/A
Funding Source	Covered by existing maintenance contract.	N/A
Funding Availability	Traffic Operations signs and markings budget.	N/A
Impact on Rates	Minimal	N/A

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.1 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.1.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.

6.1.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Delegations Register. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.

6.1.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

6.2 Other Legal Implications:

6.2.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

6.2.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The required decision:

6.3.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.3.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

6.3.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

6.4 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.6 Transport

6.6.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.3.3 Maintain customer satisfaction with the ease of use of Council on-street parking facilities - >=50%

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.7 Consultation letters were sent to three affected property owners/residents. Staff received no negative responses and one response supporting the proposal.

6.8 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

6.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

6.9.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.10 The decision does not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.11 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.12 The proposal in this report is unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If approved, staff will arrange for new road markings to be installed in the current financial year.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Lynfield Ave Maydell St Proposed No Stopping Restrictions drawing TG148325 For Board Approval	25/29353	66

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations/Principal Advisor

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

11. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2024-25 Application - Hornby Community Patrols Inc
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/156637
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Marie Byrne, Community Development Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, Acting General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
00068526	Hornby Community Patrols Inc	Hornby Community Patrols 30^th Anniversary Celebration	$1,428	$1,428

1.2 There is currently a balance of $55,215 remaining in the fund.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2024-25 Application - Hornby Community Patrols Inc Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $1,428 from its 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund to Hornby Community Patrols Inc towards its anniversary commemorations.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority "Be an inclusive and equitable city". The project also aligns with Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy, the Multicultural Strategy and Our Heritage, Our Taonga Heritage Strategy.

3.2 The recommendations are consistent with the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.3 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.3.1 Allocations must be consistent with any Council-adopted policies, standards or criteria.

3.3.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal or environmental court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations, or Community Board decisions.

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.4 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5 The significance level was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.7 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund is:

Total Budget 2024/25	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$152,866	$97,651	$55,215	$53,787

3.8 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application above is eligible for funding.

3.9 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for this application. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information, and a staff assessment.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Decision Matrix - Hornby Community Patrols	25/156728	69

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor
Approved By	Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

12. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - February 2025
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2191305
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Bailey Peterson, Community Governance Manager
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, Acting General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - February 2025.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Community and Youth Service Awards 2024	On 3 December 2024 the Board recognised Skyler Alvarez and Hope De La Mare with Youth Service Awards for their service to the Hornby High School community, presenting their awards at the Graeme Dingle Foundation Canterbury Excellence Awards Ceremony. This was the last of twelve Community Service and Youth Service Award presentations the Board has made in the community, presenting awards to sixteen recipients. Community Service Awards are given to individuals and groups in recognition of significant voluntary service. Nominations for the Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 will be open from 7 March and close on 6 April 2025. More information is available at www.ccc.govt.nz/csa	Ongoing	Strengthening Communities Together Strategy
Summer with your neighbours	Summer with your neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood.	Ongoing	Strengthening Communities Strategy
Community Pride Garden Awards 2025	Judging for the Community Pride Garden Awards 2025 is currently underway, starting on 25 January through to 16 February 2025. The awards encourage civic pride, acknowledging those who have contributed to maintaining the image of Christchurch as the Garden City by beautifying their streets and gardens.	Ongoing	Strengthening Communities Strategy
Matatiki Pop-Up Play Sessions	The activation of the Matatiki lawn space through a series of Pop-up Play sessions was a great success, attracting strong attendance across five sessions run in partnership with Libraries. These sessions featured storytimes, giant games, and crafts, providing engaging activities for young tamariki and creating a vibrant, family-friendly community space.	January 2025	Strengthening Communities Strategy
Culture Galore	Culture Galore is an annual multicultural festival that celebrates our city’s diversity with food, music and dance performances, and arts and crafts from around the world. Each year stage performances range from Dekaworor, the West African Drumming Group to colourful traditional dances and songs from Indonesia, Korea, Ukraine, Poland, China, Fiji, Mexico, Thailand, Mexico, Bangladesh and many more. As well as these amazing performances there is a huge range of have-a-go activities, such as flax weaving, face painting, soft archery and bouncy castles, and appetising ethnic cuisines from the many food stalls. Entry is free with the event being held from 12pm to 4pm, on Saturday 8 March at Ray Blank Park on Maidstone Road. The location of Culture Galore will move to the Multicultural Recreation and Community Centre, South Hagley Park in 2026.	8 March 2025	Resilient Communities Strengthening Communities Strategy

· Skyler Alvarez and Hope De La Mare Youth Service Awards Presentation

Mark Peters and Marie Pollisco at person standing at a podium with a person holding a plaque

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 For information, a summary is provided on the status of the Board's 2024-25 funding as at January 2024 (refer Attachment A).

3.2.2 Youth Development Fund recipient

An image of 3 students reviewing soil samples, and an image of 4 people smiling for the camera outside with measuring equipment.

Hazel Topp was one of three University of Canterbury students to attend the Moana Oceania Soil Judging Competition in Rotorua in early December 2024.

Participants spent three days in the field learning how to describe and classify soils and interpret their appropriate land uses. The first two days were aimed at teaching and familiarising participants with the procedure and the third day was a competition day, where participants can put their skills to the test.

Hazel was appreciative of the Board's support, and gained practical field experience in soil description that can be applied towards a future career in natural science.

3.2.3 Summer with your neighbours

Under authority delegated to the Community Governance Manager, the following allocations were made in December 2024 and January 2025:

· $200 to Helena Dinnissen for the Awatea Athletics Incorporated Family Picnic and Fun Night.

· $200 to Sylvia Lukey for a Kennedys Bush Road Christmas Party.

· $75 to Richard Meekin for an Antonia Place Street BBQ.

· $200 to Gina Bolton – Hornby Anglican Parish for a Community Garden BBQ at St Columba’s Church.

· $75 to Kevin Bennett for an Okuku Place BBQ.

· $75 to Brad Flavall for a community BBQ at Shamrock Reserve.

There is currently $850 remaining in the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Summer with your neighbours 2024/25 fund.

Summer with your neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood.

Applications for a small funding subsidy are open until 31 March 2025 and can be made by completing an application form, available at: www.ccc.govt.nz/GetTogether

An image of group of people outside on a grassed area, seated at tables and children on a waterslide and an image of people around a table of food

Quarry Paddocks subdivision residents appreciated the Board’s support for their Christmas BBQ gathering, held on a warm afternoon in early December.

A group of people sitting in an open grassed area seated and standing and person dressed as Santa Claus shaking hands with a resident.

Throughout the Kennedys Bush Road Christmas gathering, over 65 residents from the area attended, enjoying each other’s company and a range of games and activities.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· Riccarton Sports Festival

Local clubs came together to run a successful sports programme on 21-22 January.

Over 70 children participated in the festival which ran from 9am – 3pm each day. This festival gave tamariki a wonderful opportunity to experience a range of sports, including football, basketball, tennis, cricket and ultimate frisbee whilst promoting active lifestyles and community connections.

· House of Hoopz Hornby/Riccarton

The House of Hoopz programme has provided an exciting opportunity for rangatahi to engage in basketball, build confidence, and form positive social connections in a supportive environment.

Hornby House of Hoopz event had lower numbers but still offered participants a valuable chance to play, stay active, and enjoy constructive activities rather than being at risk of getting into trouble.

The Riccarton House of Hoopz was a great success, bringing young players together to test their skills in a fun tournament setting, many experiencing competitive play for the first time.

The series continues to highlight the power of sport in creating meaningful opportunities for our youth to thrive and the winning teams have a chance to compete at the final tournament to be held March.

A group of people playing basketball with two children jumping, one shooting a basketball and one defending

· Christmas events

A number of Christmas events took place throughout the Community Board area in the lead up to Christmas Day. The volunteer hours in putting all of these together for the community would have been numerous. These included (but not limited to);

- The Oaklands School Gala by Oaklands School Parent Teacher Association at Oaklands School

- Carols in the Quarry by Halswell Lions at Halswell Quarry

- Carol Service by Hei Hei Bromfield Community Development Trust at 126 on the Corner

- Christmas Carols at Canterbury University by combined churches

- Hornby Community Christmas Event at Gilberthorpe School by Gilberthorpe School and Greater Hornby Residents Association

A large group of people seated on the grass in an open space at Halswell Quarry.

A crowd of people outside surrounding Santa Clause and a car

· Halswell Community Church Family Fun Day

Halswell Community Church held a Family Fun Day on Sunday 15 December at Seven Oaks School. Despite a rainy start to the day, many people enjoyed the entertainment and stalls.

An image of a man with a guitar on stage and another image of a man on a unicycle on stage

· Hornby Community Centre – Health and Wellbeing Hub

The Hornby Community Care Centre have officially opened their Health and Wellbeing Hub with a blessing. The centre has been working hard over the summer break to complete the refurbishment to part of the old Hornby Library.

The new Health and Wellbeing Hub will be the base for many community organisations that have a health and wellbeing focus, including Pegasus Health- Health Coaches and Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa. This is the first time Pegasus Health will have Health Coaches based outside of a General Practice office, and it is already proving to be a successful partnership, with the Health Coaches connecting with community members that they otherwise wouldn’t.

An image of a group of people standing chatting and an image of the a group of people standing and listening to a speaker

· Summer fun at Te Hāpua

To kick off the summer break a Summer Pool Party was held on Sunday 15 December 2024. The community could enjoy playing on massive inflatables, bounce their way through an obstacle slide and bouncy castle and compete in a manu competition.

A dive-in movie party was held on 18 January 2025 and was packed with fun activities for everyone to enjoy and then settle in to watch Inside Out 2 on the big screen.

Two children jumping on a inflatable slide

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.

· Quarry View Park Tree Planting Plan and Play Space

Consultation on the Quarry View Park Tree Planting Plan and Play Space was open from 17 December 2024 to 14 January 2025.

A tree in a wide open green green space.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori

4.1 Quarry View Reserve Trees

At its 15 August 2024 meeting the Board requested staff provide advice as a group of residents expressed a desire for the removal of poplar trees located along the Southern border of Quarry View Reserve.

The Board approved the Quarry View Urban Forest Planting Plan at its 12 December 2024 meeting which includes the removal of the trees, addressing the residents’ concerns.

4.2 Cycles on footpaths

At its 12 December 2024 meeting the Board requested staff investigate the removal of the shared cycleway provision on Ilam Road footpath between Rountree Street and Maidstone Road, Riccarton.

Staff have advised a decision on whether to continue with the current layout or to make amendments is part of the broader pedestrian project which is being led by the University of Canterbury, and subject to funding. Retaining or removing the current shared path layout - either in part or in full- is one of the options staff anticipate to be considered as part of the layout review. There has been no decision or agreement that the shared path designations need to be removed.

Staff also noted there are other locations in the city where there is a shared path and a cycle lane both in operation next to each other, and typically serve different types of users. Ilam Road is an example of this. Staff are unaware of any safety concerns raised about the share paths from the community since staff were last in contact.

4.3 Westlake Reserve, Halswell - Advisory signage

At its 13 July 2023 meeting, the Board requested that staff investigate and provide advice to the Board on the possible provision of signage warning the depth of the lake on Westlake Reserve, Halswell.

Advisory signage has now been installed at Westlake Reserve.

An image of Westlake Reserve warning signage noting, deep water, supervise children at all times, no lifeguard patrol at anytime, and no powered watercraft and an image of signage at Westlake.

4.4 Community Patrols

Community Patrols of New Zealand is dedicated to helping build safer communities in partnership with NZ Police and other organisations. Patrols in the Board area include the Halswell, Hornby and Riccarton Community Patrols. Their Monthly Patrol Statistics can be found on the Community Patrols of New Zealand website:

Halswell Community Patrol Inc statistical information

Hornby Community Patrol Inc statistical information

Riccarton Community Patrol Inc statistical information

4.5 Customer Service Requests/Hybris Report

For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the November 2024 and December 2024 Hybris Reports (refer Attachments B and C).

The report provides an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Funding Update - January 2025	25/149908	82
b ⇩	Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Hybris Report - November 2024	25/32282	85
c ⇩	Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Hybris Report - December 2024	25/32283	86

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Noela Letufuga - Support Officer

Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor

Faye Collins - Community Board Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Approved By

Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Christopher Turner-Bullock - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood-Linwood

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships