Agenda of Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

Unconfirmed

A black text on a white background

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Waihoro

Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Thursday 15 June 2023

Time: 4.01 pm

Venue: Boardroom, Beckenham Service Centre,
66 Colombo Street, Beckenham

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Callum Ward

Keir Leslie

Melanie Coker

Will Hall (via audio visual link)

Roy Kenneally

Tim Lindley

Lee Sampson

Tim Scandrett

Sara Templeton (via audio visual link)

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote

941 6663

Arohanui.Grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga: All together

Waiata: The Board sang a waiata to open the meeting.

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Community Board Decision

There were no apologies.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Tim Lindley declared an interest in Item 5.1 Deputation by the Coastal Pathway Group

regarding a proposed Len Lye sculpture "Grass" to be located in Scott Park and Item 7 correspondence from the Coastal Pathway Group and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on these items.

Lee Sampson declared an interest in Item 8 Cashmere Tennis Club- Request for New Court Surfacing and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item.

Keir Leslie declared an interest in Item 7 correspondence from the Sumner Community Orchard and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00045

That the minutes of the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 11 May 2023 be confirmed.

Callum Ward/Tim Lindley Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1

Transport Issues in Hoon Hay Area

Jenny Goodman and Kaitlyn White spoke on behalf of Hoon Hay Community Association regarding transport safety issues in the Hoon Hay Area.

After receiving a lot of feedback from local residents on road safety issues at events, the Association undertook a way of collating this; via a six-week online petition and collected hand written signatures at events, with 100% support for better road safety in Hoon Hay, and 99% support for a pedestrian island on Hoon Hay Road between Mathers Road and Sparks Road.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Goodman and Ms White for their presentation.

Part B

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Requests staff review the tabled Better Road Safety Report presented by the Hoon Hay Community Association and provide advice on the issues raised in the report.

Attachments

a Item 4.1 Public Forum - Hoon Hay Community Association - Better Road Safety Report

4.2

Coastal Pathway - Art Sculpture

Miranda Hill spoke on behalf of Pacific Fleet Windsurfing Incorporated and as a member of Canterbury Windsports Association regarding the proposed Len Lye art sculpture placement along the Christchurch Coastal Pathway at Scott Park.

Ms Hill advised the Board that windsurfing and wing foiling are becoming quite popular with more people taking up these fast growing sports. Ms Hill spoke of the concerns for health and safety, and noted that Scott Park has limited space.

Questions raised by the windsurfing club:

· Will the installation mean a change to the number of available carparks?

· Will there be any changes to our ability to access the area with trailers re transport of boards and equipment?

· Will there be any changes with regard to our ability to access the water?

· Anything else that you can think of that we will need to do differently in terms of our operation at Scott Park as a result of the proposed changes to the area?

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Hill for her presentation.

Part B

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Requests staff address the questions raised by Pacific Fleet Windsurfing club and report back to the Board.

2. Requests staff advise what consultation has been done on the approved landscape plan, and what consultation and engagement will be done for any changes to the approved landscape plan for Scott Park.

3. Requests staff advice on any health and safety issues relating to the proposed Len Lye sculpture –"Grass".

4. Requests clarification regarding the delegation for the proposed change to the landscape plan at Scott Park.

Attachments

a Item 4.2 Public Forum - Pacific Fleet Windsurfing presentation

Tim Lindley left the table at 4:30 pm after consideration of item 4.2.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1

Len Lye sculpture in Scott Park alongside the Coastal Pathway

Hanno Sander and Tim Lindley spoke on behalf of the Coastal Pathway Group regarding a proposed Len Lye sculpture "Grass" to be located in Scott Park alongside the Coastal Pathway. (Item 7, correspondence from Coastal Pathway Group, of these minutes refers).

Mr Lindley provided history on the Group and the work that has been accomplished to date. Mr Sander advised that the Group is now at the stage of making the pathway a special place; including supporting the placement of three sculptures along the Coastal Pathway.

Mr Sander acknowledges that this sculpture is not the one that was suggested for the 2019 approved landscape plan, and given the difference in size, would need to be relocated to where the temporary toilet facility is currently located.

The Group is collaborating with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Canterbury University and four students in their final year are building the sculpture.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Sander and Mr Lindley for their presentation.

Attachments

a Item 5.1 Deputation - Coastal Pathway Group presentation

Tim Lindley returned to the table at 4:46 pm after consideration of item 5.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

8. Cashmere Tennis Club- Request for New Court Surfacing

Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00046 (Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Approves the re-surfacing of the Cashmere Tennis Club tennis courts in a synthetic surface as shown in Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda subject to the work meeting all compliance requirements.

Tim Scandrett/Roy Kenneally Carried

Lee Sampson abstained from discussion and voting on item 8.

7. Correspondence
	(Item 4.1 of these minutes refers).
	Staff Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board: 1. Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding Edgar Taylor Walk in Beckenham Park. 2. Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding temporary roading measures. 3. Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding the land use approval in the red zone by the Sumner Community Orchard – Hua Whenua. 4. Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding the placement of a Len Lye sculpture in Scott Park alongside the Coastal Pathway.
	Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00047 Part B That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding Edgar Taylor Walk in Beckenham Park and refers to staff to follow up. 2. Receives the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding temporary roading measures, and refers to staff for advice. 3. Receives the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding the land use approval in the red zone by the Sumner Community Orchard – Hua Whenua, and requests staff progress a lease to this group. Keir Leslie declared an interest in this item of correspondence and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item. 4. Receives the information in the correspondence report dated 15 June 2023 regarding the placement of a Len Lye sculpture in Scott Park alongside the Coastal Pathway, and requests a briefing from staff on the proposed changes to the Scott Park landscape plan. Tim Lindley declared an interest in this item of correspondence and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item. Callum Ward/Tim Scandrett Carried

9. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2022/23 Application: St Peters Indoor Bowls

Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00048 (Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

Approves a grant of $500 from the 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to St Peters Indoor Bowling Club towards hall hire.

Tim Scandrett/Keir Leslie Carried

10. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2022/23 Application: Redcliffs Public Library, Power, Printer and Volunteer's Recognition Project

Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00049 (Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

Approves a grant of $1,313.66 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to Redcliffs Public Library Incorporated towards volunteer recognition, power and purchase of printer.

Sara Templeton/Tim Lindley Carried

The meeting adjourned at 4.56pm and reconvened at 5.43pm.

11. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - June 2023

Community Board Resolved SCBCC/2023/00050 (Original Officer Recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Receives the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for June 2023.

Tim Scandrett/Callum Ward Carried

12. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Board members exchanged information on the following:

· A member advised there is a stormwater disconnect between a developer and those purchasing.

· All members have received correspondence on South Library consultation.

· A member asked if there was an update with Westmorland footbridge.

· A member attended the Estuary Trust meeting.

· A member received correspondence from the local Member of Parliament regarding Rossmore Terrace safety concerns.

· A member received correspondence regarding community facilities in the Lindon Grove area.

· A member will attend a meeting regarding Leith Reserve and the number of neglected trees in the reserve.

· A member received an invitation to the opening of the John Jamieson Lookout, Bellbird carpark.

· A member attended a safety meeting regarding Warren Crescent.

· A member attended Spreydon Neighbourhood Network meeting.

· A member attended Addington Neighbourhood Association meeting.

· A member was contacted by a resident about possible widening of the footpath opposite West Spreydon School.

· A member met with Kainga Ora, local Member of Parliament, and Te Kōmanawa Rowley School regarding communicating on Kainga Ora houses.

· A member advised that road safety consultation is happening in the Hoon Hay Road area and asked members to consider what groups should be approached for engagement.

· A member met with business owners' in Sydenham.

· A member attended planting on Fifield Terrace riverbank.

· A member was contacted by a resident regarding a declined Customer Service Request – vandalism at Opawa Childrens Library.

· A member was contact by Chatswood Retirement Village regarding excessive speeds and advised that speeds and parking issues on Hawford Road will be assessed by staff.

· A member attended a safety hui in Heathcote.

· A member was contacted about the lack of carparking spaces by the Heathcote Valley shops.

· A member attended the 75^th anniversary celebrations of the Christchurch Irish Society.

12.1 Port Hills Management Plan

A member met with staff regarding a proposed Port Hill management plan.

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board requests staff facilitate a workshop to identify the Boards' aspirations on what a Port Hills management plan would look like, including the process, engagement, consultation, where it would sit.

12.2 Council Projects

A member shared that there are a lot of projects in the board area, and the need to know what they are in order to share with the local community.

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board requests staff investigate a tool that shows current works and planned projects.

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.3

Proposed basketball half-court at Cornelius O'Connor Reserve

The Manuka Rangatahi rōpū spoke about a basketball half-court proposal for Cornelius O’Connor Reserve.

Five young men – Tane, Donte, Finn, Jerimiah, and Tyrone informed the Board of the desire for a basketball half-court at Cornelius O'Connor Reserve that include the following points:

· Proximity of nearest basketball court.

· Safety issues in getting to closest basketball court, across State Highway.

· The high costs to stay active.

· The benefits it will bring now and in the future.

· A place to make connections and friends.

· Letters of support from seven local organisations.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Tane, Donte, Finn, Jerimiah, and Tyrone for their presentation.

Part B

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Refers the request for consideration of the installation of a basketball half-court at Cornelius O'Connor Reserve to staff for investigation and report back to the Board.

Attachments

a Item 4.3 Public Forum - Manuka Rangatahi Rōpū presentation

b Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Addington Farm

c Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Addington Neighbourhood Association Incorporated

d Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Addington Te kura Taumatua

e Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Cross Over Trust

f Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Hillmorton High School - Tigers Sport

g Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from Manuka Cottage

h Item 4.3 Public Forum - Letter of Support from St Mary the Virgin Parish, Addington

Karakia Whakamutunga: All together.

Meeting concluded at 6.28 pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 13^TH DAY OF JULY 2023

Callum Ward

Chairperson

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

8. Duncan Street - Proposed Bus Stop Markings
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1104268
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Toni Dakers, Traffic Engineer, toni.dakers@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board to approve the improvements to the existing bus stops on Duncan Street. The two bus stops are number 42755 beside 3 and 5 Duncan Street, and 42622 beside 10 Duncan Street. Please refer to Attachment A for details.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request from a member of the public for Council to consider marking these bus stops to improve accessibility for passengers using this service. Access to the bus stop is often impeded by parked vehicles which means passengers need to board or disembark on the road. The increased height between the bus and the road surface is a particular safety concern for wheelchairs users and those with restricted mobility.

1.3 The bus stops will be marked to the Council’s Construction Standard Specifications to allow sufficient space for the buses to straighten and stop parallel and close to the kerb.

1.4 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by consideration of the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

1.5 The recommended option is to mark the two bus stops in their current location in accordance with Attachment A. Staff also consulted on an alternative option to relocate the westbound bus stop further west. This option (Option 2) is included as Attachment B.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board approves:

1. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and as shown on Attachment A (Plan TG142046, Issue 1, 31/05/2022):

Bus Stop 42775 beside 3 and 5 Duncan Street

a. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 26 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street, measured from a prolongation of the eastern kerbline, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres;

b. That a bus box be installed on the north side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 38 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street, measured from a prolongation of the eastern kerbline, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres;

c. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 53 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street, measured from a prolongation of the eastern kerbline, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of five metres;

Bus Stop 42622 beside 10 Duncan Street

d. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 79 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of five metres;

e. That a bus box be installed on the south side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 84 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres; and

f. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Duncan Street commencing at a point 99 metres east of its intersection with Truro Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of seven metres.

2. That any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 1a to 1f are revoked.

3. That these resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in 1a to 1f. are in place (or removed, in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The existing bus stops have signage in place but they do not have any painted markings on the road to indicate where vehicles should or should not park. According to the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, drivers are permitted to park up to six metres away from either side of a bus stop sign. However, this provision of 12 metres is often insufficient to allow buses to safely manoeuvre in and out of the bus stop and align appropriately with the kerb. As a result, there is a need to provide additional space for buses to pick up and drop off passengers safely and efficiently.

3.2 The planned upgrades to the bus stops will have several benefits, including improved pedestrian accessibility and enhanced safety and operational performance for the buses that service the stops. Currently, there is a high demand for residential parking on Duncan Street which often results in parked vehicles blocking access to the bus stops. These upgrades will help to mitigate this issue by providing designated parking areas for buses and creating clearer signage and road markings to indicate where parking is permitted.

3.3 The location of the bus stops relative to the surrounding area, is indicated in Figure 1.

A map of a city with a route

Description automatically generated

Figure 1: Existing Duncan Street bus stops 42622 and 42755

3.4 The bus stops are on Route 3 – the Airport and Sheffield Crescent to Sumner route, operated by Red Bus (Ritchies).

3.5 The advantages of the recommended option to mark the bus stops in the existing locations include:

3.5.1 Marking the bus box and the associated No Stopping restrictions will ensure buses are able to pull in safely and stop parallel to the kerb.

3.5.2 Enhanced safety and operational performance of the buses accessing these stops. Twelve metres of No Stopping restrictions (formed by no stopping lines and existing vehicle access on the south side of Duncan Street) are proposed in advance of the bus box and five metres of No Stopping restrictions on the lead-out. This will allow buses to access the existing bus stops more easily and ensure appropriate clearance is provided for manoeuvring.

3.5.3 The proposed markings are consistent with Council’s Construction Standard Specification for the marking of bus stops.

3.6 The disadvantages of this option include:

3.6.1 The removal of four to five existing unrestricted on-street parking spaces which is strongly opposed by adjacent residents.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Option 2: - Relocate the westbound bus stop further west to outside 2 Duncan Street (as per Attachment B)

4.1.1 The advantages of this option include:

· This option has the same operational benefits to Option 1. Compared to the recommended option there are no additional benefits identified.

· Staff proposed this location because there is no direct vehicle access to this property from Duncan Street. However the same concerns about the loss of parking were still raised. This is further discussed in the consultation summary included in Section 5 of this report.

4.1.2 The disadvantages of this options include:

· Results in the same loss of parking as the recommended Option (overall loss of up to 3 parking spaces on the south side of Duncan Street).

· Additional cost to construct the hard stand area and rebuild new kerb (estimated up to $13,500 which includes the installation of a bus stop 150mm Kerb) compared to recommended option;

· Not as centrally located as the recommended Option.

4.2 Option 3 – Do nothing and the existing bus stop infrastructure will remain as is and these Bus Stops will be reviewed again in the future as part of a wider programme to upgrade bus stops to make them more accessible.

4.2.1 The advantages of this option include:

· Retains approximately four to five on-street parking spaces;

4.2.2 The disadvantages of this options include:

· Does not address the existing issue with parked vehicles obstructing access for the buses servicing these stops;

· Inconsistent with Councils Suburban Parking Policy which prioritises public road space for the provision of bus stops ahead of residential parking on suburban roads;

· Inconsistent with Council’s Construction Standard Specifications for bus stops;

· Does not improve bus infrastructure to encourage the use of public transport and support mode shift; and

· Additional staff resources and consultation processes will be required when Council staff assess this bus stop in the future.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 There is a high demand for parking on Duncan Street associated with the adjacent residential properties.

5.2 The proposal in this report aligns with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy (2019), which provides a framework to address parking related issues and the management of competing demands for public space within the city’s suburban areas. As indicated in Table 1, Policy one of the Suburban Parking Policy prioritises the provision of bus stops ahead of residents’, short stay and commuter parking.

Priority	Commercial Areas	Residential Areas	Other Areas
1^st	Safety	Safety	Safety
2^nd	Movement and amenity	Movement and amenity	Movement and amenity
3^rd	Mobility parking	Mobility parking	Mobility parking
4^th	Bus stops/ cycle parks/ bike corrals/ shared parking (bike share or car share)/ micromobility (e.g. scooters)	Bus stops	Bus stops / cycle parks/ bike corrals/ shared parking (bike share or car share)/ micromobility (e.g. scooters)
5^th	Taxi ranks (special passenger vehicle stands)	Residents parking	Short stay parking
6^th	Loading zones	Cycle parks/ bike corrals/ shared parking (bike share or car share)/ micromobility (e.g. scooters)	Residents parking
7^th	Short stay parking	Short stay parking	Commuter parking
8^th	Residents parking	Commuter parking
9^th	Commuter parking

Table 1: Suburban Parking Policy, prioritisation of road space

Community Views and Preferences / Ngā mariu ā-Hāpori

Initial Consultation - August 2022

5.3 Consultation has been carried out with the affected property owners and residents of Duncan Street properties, ECan and Ritchies (the bus operator for bus Route 3).

5.4 Staff initially consulted on the plan included as Attachment A during the period 1 August 2022 to 18 August 2022. A total of 16 letters were issued to affected property owners and tenants.

5.5 A total of ten submissions were received. Eight were from the community and two were from stakeholder organisations – Environment Canterbury (ECan) and Ritchies. Four submissions were in support, one did not specify and five were opposed to the proposed bus stop marking.

5.6 Of those opposed, three were specifically opposed to the changes to the bus stop on the south side of the road (outside 10 Duncan Street) and two opposed to the changes on the north side of the road outside 5 Duncan Street.

5.7 Those in support included ECan and the bus service operator, Ritchies.

5.8 ECans submission stating: “Fully marking these stops on road to the City Council’s Construction Standard will allow buses to pull in parallel and close to the kerb which improve passenger boarding / de-boarding, upgrades the stops accessibility and allow for better operational performance of the buses.”

5.9 Feedback received from the community through this initial round of consultation included many comments suggesting alternative locations for the bus stops. The proposal was consequently put on hold while these options could be considered. Investigation of alternative locations was undertaken in early 2023.

5.10 Locations put forward by the community and investigated by staff at this time are summarised in Attachment C.

Further Consultation - March 2023

5.11 Following investigation an alternative location was proposed along the frontage of 2 Duncan Street. This is included as Attachment B.

5.12 Staff undertook further consultation in March 2023 on the alternative option to relocate the westbound bus stop further west along the frontage to 2 Duncan Street. Comments received through the original consultation process undertaken in August 2022 were still relevant so residents were advised they were not required to resubmit previous comments.

5.13 A further ten submissions were received from the community through this round of consultation (three were associated with one property). A summary of key points is below.

5.13.1 Three submitters from the adjacent property were strongly opposed to the revised Option 2, largely raising the same concerns about loss of parking outside their property as the residents adjacent to the existing bus stop did.

5.13.2 Two submitters who were opposed to Option 1 through the original consultation indicated their support for Option 2, the revised option.

5.13.3 One submitter who was supportive of the original proposal preferred the existing location due to its more central location and access to Campbell Street.

5.13.4 One resident remained opposed to both options.

5.13.5 One resident remained neutral with no preference for either option. Their main comment was that money should be spent on improving the condition of the road not upgrading the bus stops.

5.13.6 Two submissions related to the bus stop outside 5 Duncan Street, these residents were opposed to the changes largely on the basis of parking being removed. They wanted this bus stop to be relocated.

5.14 A table summarising the key issues raised throughout the consultation process and staff responses to these comments is included as Attachment D.

5.15 After considering various factors staff recommend Option 1, the initial proposal as the preferred bus stop location. This decision is grounded in the fact that Option 1 involves an existing stop in a central location. Although there was opposition to this location, there was also similar opposition and concerns raised when staff consulted on relocating this bus stop.

5.16 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.16.1 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

5.16.2 Heathcote Ward

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s Strategic Framework is a key consideration in guiding the recommendations in this report. The recommendations in this report help achieve the:

· community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city promoting active and public transport, and

· strategic priorities of meeting the challenge of climate change through every means available.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.3 Transport

6.3.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.4.4 Improve user satisfaction of public transport facilities (number and quality of shelters and quality of bus stop) - >=72% resident satisfaction

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies including the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.5 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.6 Public transport is a key provision to support mode shift, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, traffic congestion and traffic crashes. Measures that promote the use of public transport make it a more attractive travel option, thereby supporting mode shift and the associated benefits to the environment.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.7 Accessibility by access to opportunities:

· Improvements to bus stops have a positive impact to the well-being and accessibility of our community through freedom to access opportunities by other means than the private vehicle.

6.8 Accessibility by inclusive design:

· Improvements to the bus stop marking improves the operational performance of the buses that use the bus stop.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $1,975 for the bus stop line marking, new sign / pole and tactile pavers, plus $2,000 for the planning, consultation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Transport Unit Operational Expenditure budgets, include maintenance of bus stop infrastructure, an additional $850 per year of works will be added to and covered by the area maintenance contract.

7.3 Funding Source – Traffic Operations, Capital Expenditure budget for bus stop, seating and shelter installations.

7.4 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented during this financial year.

Other / He mea anō

7.5 None identified.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 The relevant Community Board or Committee have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolutions of:

· Stopping, standing and parking restrictions (including bus stops) under Clause 7 of the Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 The legal consideration is that the installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

8.3 This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Should the Community Board proceed with the ‘do nothing’ option access to the bus stop will continue to be obstructed and drivers will still be required to drop passengers off away from the kerb which has safety and accessibility implications for bus users.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Site Plan - Recommended Option 1	23/870935	25
b ⇩	Site Plan - Alternative Option 2	23/870937	26
c ⇩	Summary of investigation into alternative locations	23/871003	27
d ⇩	Summary of consultation feedback and staff responses	23/871084	30

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link
<enter document name>	<enter location/hyperlink>
<enter document name>	<enter location/hyperlink>

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Toni Dakers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

9. Sydenham Park- Proposed Lease- Sydenham Rugby Club
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/634933
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Felix Dawson Leasing Consultant, felix.r.dawson@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Nature of Decision or Issue and Report Origin

1.1 The purpose of this report is to consider an application for a new ground lease by Sydenham Rugby Club for part of Sydenham Park for the purpose of rugby changing rooms.

1.2 The Club have been operating from the site since around 1882. The current lease has expired and a new lease is required. A new lease is proposed on the basis that the Club is a sound organisation with a long standing track record of providing opportunities of a sporting nature.

1.3 The decision in this report is considered low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by considering the number of people affected, the level of impact on those affected and the low cost to Council associated with entering into the lease.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Grant a ground lease to Sydenham Rugby Club pursuant to s54 of the Reserves Act 1977, for a lease period of 33 years including renewals for an area of approximately 230sqm being part of RS 41338-CB125/181 as shown on the plan described as Attachment A in this report.

2. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to conclude negotiation and administer the terms and conditions of the lease.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The Sydenham Rugby Club lease has expired. It is an active club and requires security of tenure to plan on-going activities with certainty.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 The option of not granting a lease has been considered and discounted as the request for a new lease complies with current Council practice and policy in regard to existing sports clubs and community groups. The club is viable and functioning and has invested in the facilities on site.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

The Property

5.1 Sydenham Park is located at 220 Brougham Street. It is held as Reserve pursuant to the Reserves Act 1977

5.2 The Sydenham Rugby Club changing rooms are located on the reserve as shown as A below. The Club is part of the Sydenham Park Complex which has a lease over the pavilion marked on marked B below. The pavilion is subject to a separate lease.

Aerial view of a sports field

Description automatically generated

Sydenham Rugby Club Inc

5.3 The Sydenham Rugby Club (SRC) was established in 1882 and with a total of 490 members is one of the largest clubs in the South Island. The building associated with this proposed lease is used as a changing room for club members and teams playing on Sydenham Park. It contains changing rooms, showers and storage space for equipment.

5.4 SRC meets the Council’s requirements as a suitable lessee

· Incorporated society

· Strong membership

· Historical use and investment on the site

· Financially sound

5.5 Key lease terms are:

· Ground lease, 230sqm

· Initial lease term 11 years with two rights of renewal

· Rent and outgoings calculated in accordance with policy for ground lease to sports clubs and community groups-$207.00 plus GST

Consideration of Community Views

5.6 Community engagement involved direct contact with the neighbouring lessees on the park, public notice in the Press on 20 October 2022, delivery of flier to residents nearby and notification in the public notices of the Council website. No responses were received. Staff consider that this is sufficient consideration of community views taking into account the significance of the decision proposed.

5.7 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.7.1 Waihoro –Spreydon -Cashmere –Heathcote Community Board.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic AlignmentTe Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.1.1 Activity: Recreation, Sports, Community Arts and Events

· Level of Service: 7.0.3.2 Support citizen and partner organisations to develop, promote and deliver recreation and sport in Christchurch - 80% satisfaction with the quality of Council recreation and sport support

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.2 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

6.2.1 Sports Leases Charging Policy

6.2.2 Leasing Council- dealing unilaterally with incumbent tenant where there is only one logical tenant including non for profit organisations particularly sports clubs on reserves

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.3 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.4 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities

6.5 The proposal was forwarded to Mahaanui Kurataio Ltd for comment on 21 October 2022 and they responded that there were no issues.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.6 The proposal to enter into a new lease does not have an impact on climate change as there is limited carbon footprint associated with leasing itself. In terms of the activities associated with the lease, the club encourages local community involvement and in that sense the carbon footprint associated with travel is low. There are no development plans associated with the activities that involve use of significant resources.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.7 The building meets code requirements.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – Preparation of lease and public advertising costs to be recovered from the tenant

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – tenant responsibility

7.3 Funding Source – tenant responsibility

Other He mea anō

7.4 No other matters are applicable

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Delegations Parks (Part D-sub Part 1- Community Boards) Authority delegated from Council to Community Boards

“To grant leases of recreation reserves in accordance with this section”- s54 Reserves Act 1977

8.2 Reserves Act 1977-Lease entered into pursuant to s54.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.3 Other legal implications are:

8.3.1 Local Government Act 2002-Decision Making including consideration of community views.

8.3.2 Reserves Act 1977, public notice pursuant to s54

8.3.3 Department of Conservation approval pursuant to delegation to CEO.

8.4 This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 There is a risk of the lessee failing to pay rent or maintain the premises.

9.2 The risk is assessed as low. Financial consequences would be relatively small and operational issues could be rectified. The likelihood of these consequences occurring is considered low based on the clubs previous track record.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Sydenham Rugby Club Lease Area	23/709691	38

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Felix Dawson - Leasing Consultant

Approved By

Kathy Jarden - Team Leader Leasing Consultancy

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Al Hardy - Manager Community Parks

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

10. Former Opawa Children's Library Building - Expression of Interest, Results and Recommendation
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/380606
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Barry Woodland, Property Consultant (barry.woodland@ccc.govt.nz); Matthew Pratt, Head of Community Support & Partnerships (matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz)
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Nature of Decision or Issue and Report Origin

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek a Council decision to approve the demolition of the vacant Opawa Children's Library building and associated site remediation, following the outome of an Expression of Interest (EOI) process (refer Attachment A).

1.2 The subject of this report was previously reported to Council via the then Waikura-Linwood Central-Heathcote Community Board. Following the 2022 election the building now resides in the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board area. At its 11 August 2022 meeting Council resolved to approve an EOI process designed to determine whether there was any interest in purchase / relocation / temporary use options for the building from private operators or community organisations (CNCL/2022/00076). This current report is staff generated with the intent of providing the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board with some background to the original report and a summary of the outcomes from the EOI process.

1.3 The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the limited number of people affected by the decision given that no substantive or sustainable proposals to purchase and relocate the building were received during the EOI process.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Receive the report and acknowledge the staff summary and outcomes from the EOI process.

Recommend to Council to:

2. Approve the immediate demolition of the building and subsequent remediation of the site to its natural state.

3. Delegate to the Manager Property Consultancy the authority to enter into such contracts and documents as deemed necessary to implement the demolition of the building and remediation of the site.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 There were no substantive proposals to relocate the building arising from the EOI process. There is no allocated LTP funding specifically assigned to the maintenance and repair of the building which will continue to deteriorate if left insitu (having been vacant since 2020). Demolition and removal of the vacant building from the site will remove the ongoing risk (and cost) of vandalism and arson and the increasing risk from flooding and inundation. It will also enable Council to remove itself from land which has no title and over which it has no occupation agreement. Remediating the land will help to enhance the natural river-bank ecology of the site.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Status quo – leave the building insitu and vacant. From a reputational perspective it is not ideal to hold on to a building in a high hazard flood zone where Council rules say we should not have any structures at all. The building will continue to deteriorate, be subject to potential inundation if a significant flood event occurs and prone to vandalism / arson. There are no advantages with this option.

Not a practical or sustainable option.

4.2 Short to medium term hire / occupation – leave the building insitu and subject to short term hire pending demolition. Although the costs required to re-occupy the building would be minimal there is no allocated budget to fund ongoing insurance, maintenance and repair costs and / or potential costs arising from inundation. The building is also in a vulnerable flood-prone location which technically should not be occupied.

Continuing procrastination / inertia regarding the building is not recommended.

4.3 Revisit Ferrymead Trust’s interest – relocating the building to the Ferrymead Heritage Village would represent a good ‘fit’ from a heritage perspective. However, given the Ferrymead Trust’s current financial position, this option could only be achieved at a significant cost to Council.

Not recommended from a financial perspective.

4.4 Revisit Riverlution Tiny House Village’s (RTHV) interest – use of the building associated with a proposed RTHV eco-village on residential red zone edge housing land would potentially represent a good fit. However, the processes and timeframe required to create some certainty around this option (referred to in paragraphs 5.15 to 5.17 ) is largely unknown at this stage.

Not recommended. No certainty of outcome; building remains prone to vandalism / arson for an indeterminate timeframe.

4.5 Re-issue the EOI – the current EOI was well distributed across various mediums without any tangible, sustainable, interest from private operators or community groups. Re-issuing the EOI would incur further staff time and costs without any certainty of a positive outcome.

Not recommended.

4.6 Relocate and store the building on a CCC site – in addition to the costs to remove the building, remediate the existing site and relocate the building to an alternative CCC owned site (if one could be identified) the building would remain vacant and subject to deterioration, vandalism and arson for an indeterminate period of time. If the building were then to be relocated to another site for a future (currently unspecified) use Council would incur additional relocation, holding, commissioning and set up costs.

Not recommended.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

Future Use

5.1 The single storey Opawa Children’s Library building was originally the social hall on the upper storey of the New Brighton Fire Station from c1930 to 1965 and was relocated to the banks of the Heathcote River in 1965.

5.2 The building has been closed since 2020 and is no longer required for operational purposes by the asset owner, Community Support and Partnerships.

5.3 The building is situated in a ‘hydro parcel’ between legal road and the Heathcote River. As such the land has no title and no occupation agreement exists. It is located in a High Flood Hazard Management Area, susceptible to coastal inundation and within the orange tsunami evacuation zone.

5.4 With a view to determining its future use the Council resolved at its meeting on 11 August 2022 as follows:

A white text on a black background

Description automatically generated

5.5 In context the Community Board’s preference was, where possible, to identify a community group prepared, and financially able, to relocate, recommission and operate the building.

5.6 Short to medium use of the building (pending relocation or demolition) is an option but would involve further administrative, management and maintenance costs for Council on a building which needs to be removed from its high flood zone location.

Expression of Interest

5.7 An Expression of Interest (EOI) process was open for applications from 15 September 2022 until 29 November 2022. The EOI was advertised on GETS, in the local press and on Council’s website and circulated to the Council’s governance, funding and heritage teams.

5.8 In broad terms Private Operators and Community Organisations were required to:

· decommission and remove the building from the site;

· remediate the site;

· establish the building on a new site (leased or owned by the applicant);

· provide evidence of the financial capability and resources, and;

· in the case of Community Organisations, provide details of the proposed community use for the building – all at no cost to Council.

5.9 A Council contribution of $40,000 was available to prospective respondents, being the estimated equivalent cost to Council of demolishing the building and remediating the site.

Expression of Interest - Outcomes

Applications from Private Operators or Community Groups

5.10 Only one completed, formal, EOI application was received by the closing date for submissions. Three other informal enquiries were received and followed up by staff.

Formal EOI Application

5.11 Private individual (name not to be disclosed): the respondent proposed to relocate the building for private residential use. However, after undertaking due diligence the proposal was withdrawn on 29 March 2022. The reasoning cited the significant costs required to decommission, relocate and re-establish the building and services on a new site together with the associated consenting and compliance costs and the cost to remediate the existing site.

Informal EOI Enquiries

5.12 Immediately prior to the closing date for applications staff received two other informal enquiries from two community- based organisations.

5.13 Ferrymead Trust: contemplated the use of the building within the Ferrymead Heritage Park. The Trust were granted an extension until 31 January 2023 to submit a completed EOI. This was not forthcoming.

5.14 Based on the discussions with, and general feedback provided by, the Trust before and after 31 January, staff advised the Trust on 1 March that it would be recommending to the Board not to proceed with the Trust’s informal interest for the following reasons:

· Ferrymead Trust has insufficient existing funds to facilitate this opportunity in this current economic climate.

· Staff are of the opinion that the minimum requirements under Option 1 of the EOI cannot be met by Ferrymead Trust given their current financial position.

· The Trust are not in a position to consider the proposal further without significant Council investment and undertakings regarding consenting and engineering requirements and costs associated with the relocation of the building.

· Ferrymead Trust has confirmed that it does not have spare funds and have indicated that it is not prepared to divert funds in a hasty speculative course of action which could come to nothing.

5.15 Riverlution Tiny House Village (RTHV): contemplated the use of the building as a community building associated with the proposed Riverlution eco-village on residential red zoned land in Richmond.

5.16 Following further correspondence and consideration RTHV withdrew their interest on 7 March 2023 confirming that “our RTHV team have considered the opportunity to apply, but decided that we don’t have enough certainty of a future lease to go forward with an application and the risk of taking on a building. We’re still in the situation that RTHV have a licence for investigative works for a Richmond RRZ edge housing site, and we can’t apply for a lease for this site (which will be a significant process) until we’ve completed more due diligence and until LINZ complete handover for this RRZ tranche and CCC have co-governance lease application model in place. It’s unlikely all these factors will come together for at least another 6+ months”.

5.17 It is noted that the edge housing superlot has now been transferred to Council and a co-governance is in place. However, a framework for agreeing how third-party proposals (including housing) will be assessed is still being worked through together with the terms and conditions associated with that process. A decision to deal unilaterally with RTHV would then be required which would likely be associated with a lengthy LGA consultation and Council approvals process. Aligned to this RTHV would need to undertake its own due diligence and demonstrate a financially sustainable business case. This process could take in excess of 6 months to complete.

Post EOI Proposal

5.18 Staff worked extensively with a private individual who, after expressing interest during the EOI timeframe, then presented a formal proposal on 14 June 2023 to relocate the building.

5.19 Private individual (name not to be disclosed): proposed to adapt the building for residential purposes as a Tiny Home subject to securing a suitable residential section. Unfortunately, following an extensive search, their proposal was subsequently withdrawn due to new sections generally having covenants against relocatable buildings and the paucity of older sections (with no covenants) and their tendency to be snapped up by developers.

EOI Enquiries for Short Term Use

5.20 Although we received a number of general enquiries regarding temporary short to medium use of the building no detailed EOI applications were received.

5.21 The enquiries included use for the display of artworks, storage hire and art classes/workshops.

5.22 These were not pursued in any detail pending the outcome of the EOI and potential building relocation options from private or community-based operators.

Proposed Next Steps

5.23 In the absence of any substantive proposals to purchase and relocate the building staff propose to initiate a process to demolish the building and remediate the site in line with the general intent of the prior Council resolution referred to in paragraph 5.4.

Community Views and Preferences

5.24 As outlined in the initial report to the previous Board the building has been vacant for several years, is situated in an undefined land parcel and occupies a high hazard prone riverside location which is likely to become increasingly subject to climate change vulnerability at greater cost to Council and the ratepayer.

5.25 In this context, and given that we have received no substantive or sustainable interest in relocating the building, the demolition of the building is arguably the only financially prudent and practical option.

5.26 Although the views and preferences of the community have not been directly considered the response (or lack of it) to the EOI process has been informative. Prior to the EOI being released details of the building were circulated to all Heads of Service (and disseminated to their respective teams) and also to the Community Governance Managers representing the various community boards city-wide.

5.27 The decision affects the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board area.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic AlignmentTe Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Demolition of the building is in keeping with the Council’s financial strategy of maintaining a policy of financial prudence through managing assets.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.3 Communities and Citizens

6.3.1 Activity: Community Development and Facilities

· Level of Service: 2.0.1.2 Review and identify community facilities surplus to requirement and recommend a course of action - All agreed actions implemented for 2021/22 .

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.4 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies regarding the disposal / demolition of the building following public tender in the open market.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.5 Previous advice from the Senior Advisor Treaty Relationships confirmed that the decision (to remove the building) does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.6 However, the library setting is of archaeological significance for its location on the banks of the Heathcote River, a place of early Ngai Tahu activity, an important food gathering place and part of the interconnected network of travel routes that crossed the widespread wetland system of greater Christchurch.

6.7 As such the removal of the building and restoration of the river-bank will return the land to its original natural state.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.8 The removal of the building and concrete access path and footings will help to replenish and preserve the natural ecology of the site and reduce the Council’s carbon footprint.

6.9 In terms of responding positively to climate change vulnerability its removal will take away a potential impediment in the event of flooding and therefore improve the rivers capacity and ability to deal with future flood events.

6.10 The vacant building has recently been the subject of several break-in attempts. Its removal will remove the potential risk of further unsocial behaviours, vandalism and / or arson.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.11 N/A.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement:

7.1.1 Demolition and site remediation: estimated cost to Council $35,000 to $40,000 plus GST.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs:

7.2.1 Interim costs prior to demolition: insurance, staff costs, repair and maintenance (if required).

7.3 Funding Source:

7.3.1 Demolition Costs: covered by the Community Facilities Tranche 2 Programme.

7.3.2 Interim costs prior to demolition: covered by existing Community Support and Partnerships operational budgets.

Other He mea anō

7.4 N/A.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 The general powers of competence set out in section 12(2) “Status and Powers” of the Local Government Act.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 The legal consideration is that the Council does not own, or have an occupation agreement over, the land on which the building is situated.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 The Crown, as likely administrator of the land, could seek for the building to be removed at some future date if the Council does not do so in accordance with this report.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	EOI Document	22/1246824	47

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Barry Woodland - Property Consultant

Matthew Pratt - Acting Head of Community Support and Partnerships

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Matthew Pratt - Acting Head of Community Support and Partnerships

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

11. Revocation of Local Purpose (Road) Reserve 106 Hazeldean Road
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/132804
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Stuart McLeod, Property Consultancy, stuart.mcleod@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Nature of Decision or Issue and Report Origin

1.1 A Council resolution to revoke the reserve status of part of the land in Record of Title CB10K/630 is required to forward to the Minister of Conservation for publication in the New Zealand Gazette.

1.2 Registrar General of Land has advised that the privately owned land in Record of Title CB10K/630 mistakenly includes a parcel of land (Lot 4 DP 28940) which is legally vested in Council. The owner of the adjoining fee simple land is under the impression they own it, have been maintaining it and paying rates on it.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by considering if Lot 4 DP 28940 is required for the road network and the impact on the road network if it was transferred to the adjoining owner.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

Noting that:

a. On the basis that Lot 4 DP 28940 is no longer required for road reserve purposes and Hazeldean Road is fully formed and

b. the site is occupied by the adjoining owner and

c. the adjoining owner has been paying rates on the site

1. Approves:

a. The commencement of the revocation of reserve process under Section 24.1(b) of the Reserves Act 1977 to revoke the reserve classification over Lot 4 DP 28940 subject to:

i. Public Notification as described by Section 119 of the Reserves Act 1977 (and no sustainable objections being received) and;

ii. The consent of the Minister of Conservation pursuant to Section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977 being obtained,

b. Following notification of the revocation that the road reserve classification over Lot 4 DP 28940 will be revoked:

i. if there are no sustainable objections and;

ii. The Department of Conservation ratification is obtained.

2. Delegates to the Property Consultancy Manager the authority to manage and conclude all of the negotiations and transactions required to finalise the revocation process, the subsequent issue of a new fee simple title and transfer of the property to the adjoining owner or

3. On the basis that there are objections or submissions on the reserve revocation proposal, then in accordance with Section 120 of the Reserves Act 1977 the matter will be brought back to the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board for full consideration and for it to send to the Minister of Conservation its recommendation and a summary of all objections and comments received and a statement as to the extent to which they have been allowed or accepted or disallowed or not accepted.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Lot 4 DP 28940 is not required for road and there is no foreseeable requirement for it to be retained for future road.

3.2 The land has been occupied by successive adjoining owners who have paid rates on it. This along with the other circumstances outlined in this report give rise to this correcting transaction occurring with no costs or transaction value for either party.

3.3 It is necessary to revoke the reserve status before it can be transferred to the adjoining owner.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Do nothing

4.1.1 Advantages

· Council retain ownership.

4.1.2 Disadvantages

· Does not resolve the ownerships issues.

· The adjoining owner may request a refund of rates paid on land they do not own.

· The land would remain as road reserve with Council being responsible of its ongoing maintenance.

· Is inconsistent with how similar properties have been dealt with in Hazeldean Road.

4.2 Form the land as road

4.2.1 Advantages

· As the land is not required for road there are no known advantages.

4.2.2 Disadvantages

· The land is not required for road.

· There are costs to physically form the road.

· The adjoining owner will need to be advised they can no longer occupy the land.

· The adjoining owner will object to this happening.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 In 1970 a larger parcel of land on Hazeldean Road comprising 2066m² was subdivided into four new parcels. Two of these parcels (now) Lots 3 and 4 DP 28940 vested in the Christchurch City Council as Local Purpose (Road) Reserve.

5.2 These parcels would have been created for future widening of Hazeldean Road. However Hazeldean road was never widened and by the mid 1990’s it became apparent widening was no longer required.

5.3 This is evidenced by the revoking of the reserve status for the adjoining Lot 3 DP 28940 in 1997 and its subsequent transfer to its adjoining owner.

5.4 For unknown reasons Lot 4 was not included in this reserve revocation process, it remains vested in the Council.

5.5 When Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) converted the Record of Title (Attached) for 106 Hazeldean Road from paper format to a digital format in 2002, they omitted to show Lot 4 had vested in the Christchurch City Council as Local Purpose (Road) Reserve.

5.6 This resulted in the appearance that the owner of 106 Hazeldean Road owned the land in its entirety, right out to the edge of the formed road. It is therefore understandable that this owner is of the belief they own and could occupy of Lot 4 DP 28940.

5.7 This ownership belief is further supported by the fact that Council were unaware Lot 4 DP 28940 is a local purpose (road) reserve.

5.8 Council data bases do not show the separation of Lot 4 from the original land parcel. It is zoned Industrial General and it has been included within 106 Hazeldean Road as a rateable area as illustrated below.

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated A map of a neighborhood

Description automatically generated

5.9 In December 2022 Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) approached Council advising that they consider the Record of Title for 106 Hazeldean Road should be amended to exclude Lot 4, the solicitor for the owner of 106 Hazeldean Road on behalf of their client has strenuously opposed this proposal.

5.10 Council were unaware it had ownership of Lot 4 until approached by LINZ. Council have no plans to form Lot 4 as road and are now seeking to complete a reserve revocation process and transfer the land to the adjoining owner.

5.11 It is used by the occupiers of 106 Hazeldean Road for client parking and signage A parking lot with cars parked in front of it

Description automatically generated

5.12 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.12.1 Waihoro Spreydon Cashmere Heathcote – Spreydon Ward

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic AlignmentTe Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Consideration was given to the Council’s Strategic Priorities in formulating these recommendations, however the nature of this work is to rectify an unwanted situation rather than actively contributing to these strategies.

6.2 This report does not support the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031).

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The decision has no impact on the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The decision is not a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.5 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

6.6 The decisions in this report do not impact on Mana Whenua. The City plan does not identify the land as having any Natural or Cultural Heritage overlays.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.7 There are no climate change considerations, the current use of the land will continue.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.8 The minimum width for footpaths in an Industrial area is 1.5m, the footpath width in this area is in excess of 2.0m and will remain so.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – Nil. This situation has arisen from an error made by Land Information NZ, the Registrar General of Land has agreed to meet all of Councils costs in relation to this matter

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Nil

7.3 Funding Source – N/A

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 The legal consideration is how to address the ownership issues surrounding Lot 4 DP 28940 as detailed earlier in this report.

8.3 In discussion with the Councils Legal Services Unit and the Registrar General of Land an agreement for sale and purchase has been prepared and signed that if the recommendations in this report and adopted and completed will result in the ownership of the land reflecting its day to day occupation.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Risk Management Implications for the decisions being asked are insignificant. There is no measurable disruption to services and the process to reach the desired outcome does not require management involvement.

9.2 However because there is a statutory Reserves Act 1977 process to follow, there is a small risk public consultation will result in objections. If that is the case the recommendations in this report require the Community Board to consider any such objections and forward their decision to the Minister of Conservation.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	304/6664 DP 28940	23/414854	81
b ⇩	304/6664 Record of Title CB10K/630 Historic View	23/104094	83

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Stuart McLeod - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Andrew Milne - Team Leader Asset Planning

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

12. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund - Board Projects
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/996897
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Arohanui Grace, Community Governance Manager Menime Ah Kam-Sherlock, Community Recreation Advisor Heather Davies, Community Development Advisor Shanelle Temaru-llalio, Community Recreation Advisor
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board to set up its 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund (DRF) and consider allocations for Board Projects from the Fund.

Funding Request Number	Project Name	Amount Recommended $
66212	Hoon Hay Hoops and Hoon Hay Fiesta	4 500
66222	2023-24 Off the Ground Fund	3 000
66213	2023-24 Youth Development Fund	7 000
	Total	14 500

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Set up a 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund of $30,000.

2. Allocate $4,500 from its 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund towards the costs of the Hoon Hay Fiesta and the Hoon Hay Hoops.

3. Allocate $3,000 from its 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund towards the 2023-24 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Heathcote Community Board Off the Ground Fund.

4. Allocate $7,000 from its 2023-24 Discretionary Response Fund towards the 2023-24 Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere Heathcote Community Board Youth Development Fund.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of Resilient Communities. The projects recommended above also align with the four pillars of the Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy - People, Place, Participation and Preparedness.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.

3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4. Discussion Kōrerorero

4.1 Staff advice is that the Community Board set up a DRF with a portion of the funds available from its 2023-24 financial year, to allow for the establishment of the Off the Ground and Youth Development Funds, for which there is a current demand.

4.2 Funding for the Hoon Hay Hoops and Fiesta will provide surety for the community to begin planning for events that occur in November 2023.

4.3 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

4.4 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

4.5 Further Community Board Projects will be presented at future Community Board meetings. The balance of the DRF will be determined by the allocations to the Strengthening Communities Fund considered at the 10 August 2023 meeting.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Decision Matrix - 2023-24 DRF - Hoon Hay Fiesta and Hoon Hay Hoops	23/1032033	90
b ⇩	Decision Matrix - 2023-24 DRF - Off the Ground Fund	23/1031947	91
c ⇩	Decision Matrix - 2023-24 DRF - Youth Development Fund	23/1032003	92

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Shanelle Temaru-Ilalio - Community Recreation Advisor

Menime Ah Kam-Sherlock - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote

Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board

13 July 2023

13. Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - July 2023
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/845097
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Arohanui Grace, Community Governance Manager – Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote, arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board:

1. Receive the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for July 2023.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity

Detail

Timeline

Strategic Alignment

Community & Youth Service Awards

Nominations for the Community & Youth Service Awards 2023 have been received.

Ongoing

Resilient communities – strong sense of community.

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2022/23 – as at 26 June 2023:

· Discretionary Response Fund balance for 2022/23 is $0.00

· Youth Achievement and Development Fund balance is $0.00

· The Off the Ground Fund balance is $494.18

· The Shape Your Place Toolkit Fund balance is $1,161.00

3.2.2 The 2022/23 Discretionary Response Funding Spreadsheet is attached for record purposes.

3.2.3 Discretionary Response Fund Applications – Closed for the remainder of 2022-23 financial year.

3.2.4 Youth Development Fund Applications – Closed for the remainder of 2022-23 financial year.

3.2.5 Off the Ground Fund Applications

Name	Event	Amount
Addington Neighbourhood Community	Church Square tidy up project	$300
Avon Sequence Dance Club	Costs associated with accommodation and rent	$200

The Off the Ground Fund Decision Matrices are attached for record purposes.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report Back on Other Activities Contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· The Board adopted its Community Board Plan on 11 May 2023 and can be found online here.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation

· Consultation – The Council is consulting on various proposals. You can view more details on the Have Your Say website here.

· Start Work Notices – Various Start Work Notices have been sent to the Board throughout the month. All city-wide start work notices can be found at: https://ccc.govt.nz/transport/works.

3.4 Governance Advice

3.4.1 Public Forum – The Board received the following public forum presentations at its Community Open Forum on 27 May 2023, 15 June and its 22 June 2023 meeting:

· A local businessman spoke regarding Coleridge Street parking.

· A local resident spoke regarding the microwave tower in Cashmere.

· A member of Canterbury Windsports Association spoke regarding the proposed Len Lye art sculpture placement along the Christchurch Coastal Pathway at Scott Park.

· Members of Hoon Hay Community Association spoke regarding transport safety issues in the Hoon Hay Area.

· The Manuka Rangatahi rōpū spoke about a basketball half-court proposal for Cornelius O’Connor Reserve.

· Local residents requested no stopping lines on 406-412 Barrington Street.

3.4.2 Deputations – The Board received the following deputations at the Board’s 15 June 2023 meeting:

· Members of the Coastal Pathway Group spoke regarding a proposed Len Lye sculpture "Grass" to be located in Scott Park alongside the Coastal Pathway.

3.4.3 Correspondence – The Board received the following correspondence at its 15 June 2023 meeting:

· The state of Edgar Taylor Walk in Beckenham Park.

· Temporary roading measures.

· Land use approval in the red zone.

· Placement of a Len Lye sculpture in Scott Park, alongside the Coastal Pathway.

3.4.4 Briefings – The Board received the following briefings/workshops in June 2023:

· Pest Management Plan and Sycamore Trees at Ernle Clark and Purau Reserves

· Living Wage Aotearoa

· Pavements – Q&A session

· Sumner Esplanade – proposed surf school licences

· Transport Choices 2022 – Little River Link Cycle Connections

· Westmorland Cycle Connection – Transport Choices 2022 (CERF)

· Strengthening Communities Funding workshop

3.4.5 Board Requests – The Board made the following requests during Elected Members’ Information Exchange at its 15 June 2023 meeting:

· That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board requests staff facilitate a workshop to identify the Boards' aspirations on what a Port Hills management plan would look like, including the process, engagement, consultation, where it would sit.

· That the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board requests staff investigate a tool that shows current works and planned projects.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1 Ticket Report – A report on open and completed tickets (requests for service) in May 2023 is attached.

4.2 Graffiti Snapshot Report – A report on Graffiti for May 2023 is attached.

4.3 Community Parks Bimonthly Community Board Update – June 2023 is attached.

4.4 Memo – Transport Choices (CERF) 2022 - Westmorland Cycle Connection – A memo informing the Board on the proposed project and engagement is attached.

4.5 Memo – Community Partnerships Better Off Funding – Community Board Update – A memo providing an update around the process is attached.

4.6 Memo – Smart Christchurch Innovation Expo – A memo informing the Board about the Smart Christchurch Innovation Expo at Te Pae is attached.

4.7 Memo – Coastal Pathway Moncks Bay Construction Update – Night Works – A memo advising the upcoming night works is attached.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	2022-23 Waihoro Discretionary Response Fund Spreadsheet as at 26 June 2923	23/996643	97
b ⇩	Decision Matrix 00066190 - Off The Ground Fund - Addington Neighbourhood Community	23/996644	98
c ⇩	Decision Matrix 00066031 - Off The Ground Fund - Avon Sequence Dance Club	23/996646	99
d ⇩	Ticket Report - May 2023	23/1003402	100
e ⇩	Graffiti Snapshot - May 2023	23/1003184	101
f ⇩	Community Parks Bimonthly Community Board Update – June 2023	23/1005902	103
g ⇩	Memo - Transport Choices (CERF) 2022 - Westmorland Cycle Connection	23/846864	108
h ⇩	Memo - Community Partnerships Better Off Funding - Community Board Update	23/1003553	110
i ⇩	Memo - Smart Christchurch Innovation Expo	23/1003554	112
j ⇩	Memo - Coastal Pathway Moncks Bay Construction Update - Night Works	23/1003556	114

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote

Jane Walders - Community Board Advisor

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Shanelle Temaru-Ilalio - Community Recreation Advisor

Menime Ah Kam-Sherlock - Community Recreation Advisor

Bec Carr - Support Officer

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

Matthew Pratt - Acting Head of Community Support and Partnerships

Name	Subject
Julie Steffens	Footpaths – request repairs to Fusilier Street, Hussar Place and Martell Place footpaths

7. Correspondence
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/1068272
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
Senior Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)