Agenda of Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

Unconfirmed

Waipapa

Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Friday 16 December 2022

Time: 9.01am

Venue: Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Emma Norrish

Simon Britten

Pauline Cotter

Sunita Gautam

Victoria Henstock

Jake McLellan via audio-visual link

John Miller

Emma Twaddell

Emma Pavey

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes-Central

941 5107

emma.pavey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

There were no apologies.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Emma Twaddell declared an interest in Item 11.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00010

That the minutes of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 10 November 2022 be confirmed.

Pauline Cotter/Simon Britten Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1 Citycare Property

Hana Saemon-Beck, Community Activator, spoke on behalf of Citycare Property to introduce her work in the role and after allowing members’ questions, the Chairperson thanked Ms Saemon-Beck for coming to speak to the Board.

4.2 Susan Peake

Susan Peake, local resident, spoke regarding issues with the two car parks in Mary Street nearest the approach to Main North Road. Ms Peake requested their removal to address traffic congestion and safety in relation to that northern exit from Mary Street into the turning and straight-through lanes, and also in relation to the exit from the Police Station.

After members’ questions had been answered by Ms Peake, the Board requested that staff report back in relation to Ms Peake’s request, and the Chairperson thanked Ms Peake.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1 Garry Neale - Briggs/Marshland/Lake Terrace Safety Improvements

Garry Neale, local resident, spoke regarding Item 8 - Briggs/Marshland/Lake Terrace Safety Improvements. Mr Neale delivered the attached presentation and suggestions as his deputation on this report, which was considered later in the meeting.

After members’ questions had been answered by Mr Neale, the Chairperson thanked him for his deputation.

Attachments

a Deputation Presentation from Garry Neale

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Correspondence
	Board Consideration The Board received the correspondence attached to the report, and in relation to the letter from Ms Hossack, requested a site meeting with Three Waters staff at Francis Ave. The Board also requested an update from staff on progress with information for the Board and residents relevant to the flooding mitigations requested, and on the process for pump activation, with an indication of the timeframe for information to be received to be communicated to Ms Hossack.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: 1. Receive the correspondence from Francis Ave resident, Jane Hossack, regarding the surface flooding experienced in the street when it rains persistently. 2. Receive the correspondence from Shirley Community Trust Chairman, Graeme Mitchell, thanking the Council’s Park Team for their assistance creating the Shirley Birdsong Trail.
	Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00011 Part B That the Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: 1. Receive the correspondence from Francis Ave resident, Jane Hossack, regarding the surface flooding experienced in the street when it rains persistently, and request a site meeting as soon as possible in the new year, and an update from staff on the progress of information, particularly around the pump station activation/process, being supplied in relation to the issues in this area. 2. Receive the correspondence from Shirley Community Trust Chairman, Graeme Mitchell, thanking the Council’s Park Team for their assistance creating the Shirley Birdsong Trail. Pauline Cotter/Victoria Henstock Carried

8. Briggs/Marshland/Lake Terrace Safety Improvements
	The Board received a deputation earlier in the meeting from Garry Neale on this item, informing its considerations, along with the answers staff could provide in relation to the points raised. To introduce the item itself, the Board received a PowerPoint presentation as attached from staff outlining the project and ‘Road to Zero’ more generally, which included as the second slide playing the video from the Transport Accident Commission Victoria that was available at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2tOye9DKdQ
	Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00012 (Officer Recommendations accepted without change) Part C That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: 1. Approves, pursuant to section 334 of the Local Government Act 1974, the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, islands and road surface changes at the intersection of Briggs Road, Marshland Road and Lake Terrace Road, on the Briggs Road and Marshland Road approaches, as detailed on plan TP360201 in Attachment A to the report. 2. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolution 1 above. 3. Notes that the above resolutions only have effect within the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board area, and the officer recommendations as relating to the other side of the scheme within the area of the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board have been accepted by that Board, including that they recommend to the Council to approve a new section of cycle lane on Lake Terrace Road. 4. Approves that the above resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in resolution 1 above are in place. Emma Twaddell/Emma Norrish Carried
	Attachments a Staff Presentation for Item 8

9. Bishop Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00013 (Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Approve, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on:

a. The north side of Purchas Street, commencing at its intersection with Bishop Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 7.5 metres.

b. The west side of Bishop Street, commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 8.5 metres.

c. The east side of Bishop Street, commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

d. The north side of Purchas Street, commencing at its intersection with Bishop Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 7.5 metres.

e. The south side of Purchas Street, commencing at its intersection with Bishop Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 7.5 metres.

f. The east side of Bishop Street, commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

g. The west side of Bishop Street, commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

h. The south side of Purchas Street, commencing at its intersection with Bishop Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 7.5 metres.

2. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1a -1h above.

3. Approve that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Pauline Cotter/Sunita Gautam Carried

10. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Board Projects

Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00014 (Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Approves a grant of $9,000 from its 22/23 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Youth Recreation Board project.

2. Approves a grant of $500 from its 22/23 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Community Pride Garden Awards Board project.

3. Approves a grant of $2,000 from its 22/23 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Edible and Sustainable Garden Awards Board project.

4. Approves a grant of $4,000 from its 22/23 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Community Liaison Board project.

5. Approves a grant of $3,500 from its 22/23 Discretionary Response Fund towards the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central School Civic Award Board project.

Simon Britten/Pauline Cotter Carried

Emma Twaddell requested that her vote against resolutions 2 and 3 be recorded.

11. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund Applications
	Board Consideration The Board accepted the officer recommendations in relation to resolutions 1-5, which were moved, seconded and put to a vote separately from resolution 6, so as to avoid a member’s declared interest in that final application from St Albans Residents Association. Exercising its discretion in respect of resolution 6, the Board departed from the officer recommendations only for this application, and approved a $150 grant toward the event.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: 1. Approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Christchurch Spikers Volleyball Club towards the cost of hall rental. 2. Approves a grant of $1,800 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Inner City West Neighbourhood Association (ICON) towards the cost of Web Site Design and management. 3. Approves a grant of $3,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Papanui Toy Library towards the cost of Wages for the Toy Library Supervisor. 4. Approves a grant of $2,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans School towards the cost of their Traffic Wardens. 5. Approves a grant of $575 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to New Direction Christchurch Charitable Trust 6. Decline the application to the 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund from St Albans Residents Association towards their Halloween Community Event.
	Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00015 Part C That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: 1. Approves a grant of $1,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Christchurch Spikers Volleyball Club towards the cost of hall rental. 2. Approves a grant of $1,800 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Inner City West Neighbourhood Association (ICON) towards the cost of Web Site Design and management. 3. Approves a grant of $3,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to Papanui Toy Library towards the cost of Wages for the Toy Library Supervisor. 4. Approves a grant of $2,500 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans School towards the cost of their Traffic Wardens. 5. Approves a grant of $575 from its 2022/23 Discretionary Response Fund to New Direction Christchurch Charitable Trust towards the boxing day community event. Sunita Gautam/Emma Twaddell Carried
	Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00016 6. Approves a grant of $150 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund from St Albans Residents Association towards their Halloween Community Event. Pauline Cotter/Simon Britten Carried Emma Twaddell declared an interest in the application relating to resolution 6 and took no part in the discussion or voting.

12. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board - Governance Arrangements for 2023-2025

Board Consideration

The Board broadly accepted the officer recommendations, and agreed that: the Chairperson is not to have a casting vote; the Ordinary Meeting Schedule set out as ‘Option A’ was adopted; it did not intend to appoint a representative to the Canterbury Horticultural Society, but named its appointments to Keep Christchurch Beautiful, the Christchurch Beautifying Association, and the North West Christchurch Community Sporting Trust; and any convening of its Recess Committee would be open to all members, though it would have a quorum of two members.

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

Consideration of a Casting Vote

1. Resolves whether or not the Chairperson of the Board is to have a casting vote.

Ordinary Meetings Schedule

2. Adopt one of the following schedules of ordinary meetings for the Board’s 2023-2025 term:

Option A: Thursdays commencing at 4pm in the Board Room at Papanui Service Centre, 5 Restell Street, Christchurch:

2023	2024	2025
9 February	15 February	13 February
9 March	14 March	13 March
13 April	11 April	10 April
11 May	9 May	15 May
15 June	13 June	12 June
13 July	11 July	10 July
10 August	15 August	14 August
14 September	12 September	11 September
12 October	10 October
9 November	14 November
14 December	12 December

Option B: Fridays commencing at 9am in the Board Room at Papanui Service Centre, 5 Restell Street, Christchurch:

2023	2024	2025
10 February	16 February	14 February
10 March	15 March	14 March
14 April	12 April	11 April
12 May	10 May	16 May
16 June	14 June	13 June
21 July	12 July	11 July
11 August	16 August	15 August
15 September	13 September	12 September
13 October	11 October
10 November	8 November
15 December	13 December

3. Approve that the Board Chairperson and Community Governance Manager are jointly authorised to amend the Ordinary Meeting Schedule as required, after consulting with the Board members, including adding or removing ordinary meetings.

4. Note the Board’s intent to be accessible to its communities by livestreaming meetings, and approving that staff work with communities interested in localising forums for the public to speak to the Board (and Community Network hui, subject to approval of that Broad Project), by offering, within capacity, to conduct select Board business accompanied by forum opportunities, or standalone forums/hui, near to relevant communities.

5. Note the holding of Board briefings will generally take place in the fourth week of the month on a day of the week and time that is the same as what the Board agrees above for when its ordinary meetings will occur in the second week of the month.

Appointments and Delegations

6. Consider the invitation to appoint two Board representatives to the Keep Christchurch Beautiful Committee.

7. Appoint a Board representative to the Canterbury Horticultural Society.

8. Appoint a Board representative to the Christchurch Beautifying Association.

9. Approve the Board Chairperson to appoint an alternate Board member to represent the Board on any occasion the Board’s appointed representative is unavailable.

10. Consider the invitation to appoint a Board representative to the North West Christchurch Community Sporting Trust to serve as a trustee.

11. Appoint the Board Chairperson, or an alternate Board member appointed by them, to represent the Board in ad hoc matters.

12. Endorse Sunita Gautam representing the Board as a continuing trustee of the Rose Historic Chapel Trust.

13. Appoint a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson and any one other member available, to be authorised to exercise the delegated powers of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board for the period, in each of the years 2022-24, following its last ordinary meeting of the calendar year up until the Board resumes its normal business the following year.

14. Approve that if the Board Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson are unavailable at the time needed the Community Governance Manager may substitute an alternate Board member for the Recess Committee, or to exercise any relevantly time-sensitive delegation they hold.

15. Note that any such delegation exercised by the Board’s Recess Committee will be reported to the Board for record purposes.

16. Note that any meeting convened of the Recess Committee will be publically notified and the details forwarded to all Board members.

17. Establish a Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Submissions Working Group for the 2022-25 term as follows:

a. Terms of Reference being to develop submissions on behalf of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board for relevant consultations as they arise.

b. All Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board members who are not also Councillors are appointed as members of the Submissions Working Group.

c. The quorum of the Submissions Working Group is two members, noting that it will operate on an informal basis for flexibility of timing in light of submission timeframes with the option to meet via audio-visual link.

d. The Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson will fill these roles for the Working Group, and are authorised to approve submissions on behalf of the Board that have been developed through the Submissions Working Group.

e. The Board Chairperson (or a member they delegate to for this purpose) is authorised to:

i. appear and be heard at any hearing of submissions;

ii. approve when and how submission opportunities will be workshopped in consultation with the Community Governance Manager; and

iii. amend or withdraw a submission (after consulting with the members).

f. Any submissions to be reported to the Board for record keeping purposes.

g. The Submissions Working Group need not process filings into quasi-judicial and similar proceedings, allowing that where the Board has decided to participate in such proceedings, filings (including submissions) to these may be approved by the Board Chairperson or the member(s) appointed to appear in the proceedings (who may also approve their withdrawal or amendment, and any settlement arrangements).

Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00017

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

Consideration of a Casting Vote

1. Resolves that the Chairperson of the Board will not have a casting vote.

Ordinary Meetings Schedule

2. Adopts the following schedule of ordinary meetings for the Board’s 2023-2025 term:

Thursdays commencing at 4pm in the Board Room at Papanui Service Centre, 5 Restell Street, Christchurch:

2023	2024	2025
9 February	15 February	13 February
9 March	14 March	13 March
13 April	11 April	10 April
11 May	9 May	15 May
15 June	13 June	12 June
13 July	11 July	10 July
10 August	15 August	14 August
14 September	12 September	11 September
12 October	10 October
9 November	14 November
14 December	12 December

3. Approves that the Board Chairperson and Community Governance Manager are jointly authorised to amend the Ordinary Meeting Schedule as required, after consulting with the Board members, including adding or removing ordinary meetings.

4. Notes the Board’s intent to be accessible to its communities by livestreaming meetings, and approving that staff work with communities interested in localising forums for the public to speak to the Board (and Community Network hui, subject to approval of that Broad Project), by offering, within capacity, to conduct select Board business accompanied by forum opportunities, or standalone forums/hui, near to relevant communities.

5. Notes the holding of Board briefings will generally take place in the fourth week of the month on a day of the week and time that is the same as what the Board agrees above for when its ordinary meetings will occur in the second week of the month.

Appointments and Delegations

6. Appoints Emma Norrish and Emma Twaddell as Board representatives to the Keep Christchurch Beautiful Committee.

7. Appoints Emma Twaddell as a Board representative to the Christchurch Beautifying Association.

8. Approves the Board Chairperson to appoint an alternate Board member to represent the Board on any occasion the Board’s appointed representative is unavailable.

9. Appoints Victoria Henstock as a Board representative to the North West Christchurch Community Sporting Trust to serve as a trustee.

10. Appoints the Board Chairperson, or an alternate Board member appointed by them, to represent the Board in ad hoc matters.

11. Endorses Sunita Gautam representing the Board as a continuing trustee of the Rose Historic Chapel Trust.

12. Appoints a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson and at least one other member available (noting there will be a quorum of two members), to be authorised to exercise the delegated powers of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board for the period, in each of the years 2022-24, following its last ordinary meeting of the calendar year up until the Board resumes its normal business the following year.

13. Approve that if the Board Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson are unavailable at the time needed the Community Governance Manager may substitute an alternate Board member for the Recess Committee, or to exercise any relevantly time-sensitive delegation they hold.

14. Note that any such delegation exercised by the Board’s Recess Committee will be reported to the Board for record purposes.

15. Note that any meeting convened of the Recess Committee will be publically notified and the details and invitation forwarded to all Board members.

16. Establish a Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Submissions Working Group for the 2022-25 term as follows:

a. Terms of Reference being to develop submissions on behalf of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board for relevant consultations as they arise.

b. All Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board members who are not also Councillors are appointed as members of the Submissions Working Group.

e. The Board Chairperson (or a member they delegate to for this purpose) is authorised to:

i. appear and be heard at any hearing of submissions;

ii. approve when and how submission opportunities will be workshopped in consultation with the Community Governance Manager; and

iii. amend or withdraw a submission (after consulting with the members).

f. Any submissions to be reported to the Board for record keeping purposes.

Emma Norrish/Emma Twaddell Carried

13. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Area Report - December 2022

Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2022/00018 (Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part B

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Area Report for December 2022.

Emma Norrish/Sunita Gautam Carried

14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Members exchanged information on matters of interest to the Board, including:

· Board delegation exclusions in respect of the Central City “Plan A” area, and the Council’s anticipated formation of its Central City Parking Restrictions Subcommittee were discussed.

· Opportunities for localised community networking hui were queried, noting a survey being undertaken to ascertain relevant preferences of the community groups involved in this.

· There was discussion around addressing the availability of voting boxes in the Innes Ward for the upcoming by-election.

14.1 Alcohol Law Reform

Members had an exchange, arising from mention of prospective alcohol bans, around the ongoing alcohol law reform, requesting information from staff on the current state of progress.

14.2 Dudley Street Scrubbing Maintenance Round

The Board requested staff to ensure that the previously arranged rotating Dudley Street maintenance schedule established to respond to the Dudley Street starlings (a two weekly scrubbing round for the footpaths during the roosting season to scrub off the droppings) has been initiated again further to resident indications that the starlings have returned to their roosts in the street again.

14.3 Staff Delegation for Discretionary Response Fund

There was interest from the Board in establishing a staff delegation to approve Discretionary Response Fund applications, similar to that for approving Youth Development Fund applications, over the period between electoral terms.

14.4 Briefing Session with Police

Noting the example of a number of thefts highlighted in Chester Street East, the Board sought to request a briefing session with the Police to explore and understand the challenges its community is facing with such criminality and other Police matters.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Meeting concluded at 10.30am.

CONFIRMED THIS 9^th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

Emma Norrish

Chairperson

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

9. Aberdeen Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1273548
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Sally-Ann Marshall, Traffic Engineer sallyann.marshall@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services (jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board to consider options to improve access along Aberdeen Street. This report has been written following requests from local residents to address access issues caused by vehicles being parked on both sides of the street

1.2 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.4 The recommended option is to install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in Resolution 2 below.

2. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on Aberdeen Street as detailed in Resolutions 2a-2f below:

a. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Aberdeen Street commencing at its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 133.8 metres.

b. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Aberdeen Street commencing 168.5 metres from its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16.8 metres.

c. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Aberdeen Street commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11.5 metres.

d. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Aberdeen Street commencing at its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

e. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Aberdeen Street commencing 106.5 metres from its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 72 metres.

f. That the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Aberdeen Street commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

3. Approves that these resolutions 1 to 2 take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Aberdeen Street is a narrow two-way street that has seen considerable residential development over the past four years.

3.2 We have received several safety related service requests from residents who are concerned that currently through access along Aberdeen Street can be compromised when there are vehicles parked on both sides of the road. This is particularly relevant to larger vehicles, such as emergency and refuse vehicles.

3.3 Implementing the No Parking restriction recommendations will allow better access along Aberdeen Street, improving safety by allowing unimpeded emergency access.

3.4 The preferred option is to install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety and Efficiency Service Plan in the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031).

4.2 The following feasible options have been considered:

· Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions, alternating sides (preferred option)

· Option 2 – Install No Stopping Restrictions; on one side of the road

· Option 3 – Do nothing

4.3 Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

4.3.1 Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restriction – alternating sides layout (preferred option), refer Attachment A

The advantages of this option include:

· Addresses resident concerns on the effect on through access along Aberdeen Street when there are vehicles parked on both sides.

· Addresses safety concerns that oversize emergency vehicle access is compromised when there are vehicles parked on both sides.

· Our preferred option is to provide No Stopping restrictions (broken yellow lines) to alternate sides of the street to assist in managing the speed environment in line with engineering best practice.

· Legalises the restriction of on-street parking along Aberdeen Street.

The disadvantages of this option include:

· Removes the 26 on-street parking spaces.

· Displaces parking to another location.

4.3.2 Option 2 – Install No Stopping Restrictions on one-side of the street, refer Attachment B

The advantages of this option include:

· Addresses resident concerns on the effect on through access along Aberdeen Street when there are vehicles parked on both sides.

· Addresses safety concerns that oversize emergency vehicle access is compromised when there are vehicles parked on both sides.

· Addresses residential concerns around loss of parking by reducing the number of parking spaces removed in the preferred Option 1 from 26 spaces to 19 spaces.

· Legalises the restriction of on-street parking along Aberdeen Street.

The disadvantages of this option include:

· Removes 19 on-street parking spaces.

· Displaces parking to another location.

4.3.3 Option 3 - Do nothing

The advantages of this option include:

· Retains 26 on-street parking spaces.

· Does not displace parking to other locations.

· Addresses resident requests to not remove any on-street parking spaces.

The disadvantages of this option include:

· Does not address the safety concerns relating to through access of oversize vehicles, including emergency vehicle access when vehicles are parked on both sides.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 Under the Christchurch City Council Central City Parking Policy (August 2021), Aberdeen Street is defined as a Residential Central City Street.

5.2 Under this policy, parking priority is set out in Policy 1 as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 – Central City Parking Policy Prioritisation Table

This table shows the general prioritisation order given to on-street parking space use for Residential Central City Streets, with safety being the number 1 priority.

5.3 Aberdeen Street is a narrow street at 6.5 metres wide.

5.4 Aberdeen Street has undergone significant residential redevelopment over the past four years. Our records show that there have been two residential developments on the south side of Aberdeen Street/corner of Madras Street.

· An initial development of 22 residential units which were approved in 2018 (RMA/2018/2407). This development was approved with each residential unit having at least one car parking space.

· A second development of 44 residential units (RMA/2021/236) to the north of the original 22 units and on the south side of Aberdeen Street. This development occurred when on site car parking was not required by the Christchurch City Council District Plan.

5.5 Any rule in the District Plan requiring on-site car parking to be provided by private developers was removed by Government legislation. Further, while the District Plan does not now require on-site car parking, the District Plan also does not have a rule that precludes the supply of on-site car parking. Any frontage road is a public space, and Council does not consider this public space to be an automatic extension of a private property (by way of dedicated car parking).

5.6 The issue with through access has been brought to Council’s attention by several residents of Aberdeen Street as well as Fire and Emergency New Zealand. The main concern is that emergency vehicles have been unable to get through the street in response to an emergency callout

5.7 There is an existing P5 time restriction on the south side of Aberdeen Street. Most of the signs were removed and not replaced during the construction of the residential units. Staff have been unable to locate the original report that resolved to have this restriction applied, however this time restriction is no longer considered appropriate due to the streets narrow width and significantly higher population density.

5.8 There are several businesses in the area, including the Salisbury Street Briscoes; their main yard for store deliveries is located off Aberdeen Street. Briscoes expressed their support for the proposals as currently vehicles parked near their yard access can have an impact on delivery vehicle turning movements,

5.9 While Aberdeen Street is within the central area, it is similar in function and form to narrow suburban streets. Under the Suburban Parking Policy (2019) Policy 10: review allocation of parking in circumstances where the street is less than 7 metres in width and there are recognised parking issues – If the carriageway of a street is less than 7 metres in width and there are known access problems (i.e. there are limited places for vehicles to pass and/or emergency access may be compromised), Council will propose to remove parking on one side of the street.

To remove the risk of emergency vehicles being unable to access property, Council has proposed removing parking on one side of this 6.5 metre wide street.

When removing parking on one side of a street, engineering best practice is to alternate the parking from one side to another. This has a traffic calming effect on speed which is especially desirable now Aberdeen Street has a much significantly higher number of people using the street than before. A similar situation exists at Cox Street, in Merivale, which is also 6.5 metres wide and had through access issues. This has been successfully mitigated by installing a No Stopping restriction to alternating sides of the street.

Our preferred option is therefore to provide No Stopping restrictions (broken yellow lines) to alternating sides of the street to assist in managing the speed environment (refer Attachment A).

5.10 Due to concerns about parking supply in Aberdeen Street from residents, the Traffic Operations Unit has reviewed the original proposal (Option 1). A second option is therefore also being presented to the Community Board for their consideration, to install parking restrictions (broken yellow lines) along the south side of the street only (refer Attachment B).

Removing parking on one side of Aberdeen Street only (Option 2), while not the technically preferred option, can be considered for the following reasons:

· Aberdeen Street is shorter than the Cox street example above, 230 metres compared to 365 metres.

· Speed limits are to be reviewed in the Central City in the next 10 years, noting that streets such as Aberdeen Street are likely to have a lowered speed limit of 40 km/h.

· Parking on one continuous side only (avoiding the need for transition between alternating side) results in 7 less car parks being removed.

5.11 The proposed No Stopping restriction (broken yellow line) layout for both Option 1 and 2 takes into account the apartment garage driveways accessed off the south side of Aberdeen Street and two fire hydrant locations where it is already illegal to park.

5.12 The length of No Stopping restriction on the south side of the street (Option 1) was extended in the westerly direction by 14 metres. This was following consultation with Briscoes who expressed concern about vehicles parked next to their access affecting access to their delivery yard.

5.13 We have received several enquiries from residents about residential parking permits, to give them priority use of the available on-street parking.

Council did run a residents parking permit scheme in 2019. This was discontinued in 2020 for several reasons, including investigation, administration, and enforcement issues. Currently Council has no process to issue residents parking permits. This is likely to be reviewed again next year, though there is no guarantee that a process will be put in place even then.

5.14 We have also received a number of enquiries to establish the street as one-way only and/or to install speed humps. Neither of these would make it easier for emergency vehicles to get through; the issue is still how narrow the street is and would still require removal of parking on one side.

5.15 There have been no reported crashes on Aberdeen Street in the last five years. This street has no risk classification under Council’s high risk intersection mapping system.

5.16 Approval is required by the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board.

5.17 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

Community Views and Preferences

5.18 Summary of feedback

We heard from six residents out of a possible 66 residential units on Aberdeen Street between 1 December and 16 December 2022. All feedback received with staff responses is in the attached document. (Attachment D).

All residents we heard from did not support the plan, stating that it didn’t consider residential parking. There has been development of units and townhouses in the area who depend on on-street parking for accessibility and safety reasons.

5.19 Key topics raised were

· New housing developments have increased parking demand (6)

· Introducing parking permits/time limited parking (3)

· Safety risks of reducing parking to residents (3)

· Emphasis has been given to Briscoes over residents’ needs. (3)

5.20 There was disappointment from residents that these restrictions were being implementing even though consent was given to build the units which lacked car parking. It was explained via email that in 2021 when 44 units were developed, the governmental legislation no longer required on-site car parking. Whereas the 22 units built in 2018 included at least one car parking space.

5.21 In response to the feedback, staff have investigated and decided to include a second option for the community board to consider which also gives residents more flexibility with their parking while also addressing the narrowness of the street.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - ≤ 105 crashes

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal improves accessibility for pedestrians/drivers/cyclists, by providing a safer means of transiting through Aberdeen Street.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $800 for the new road markings and $750 for producing the report,

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – approximately $200 a year.

7.3 Funding Source - Traffic Operations Signs and Markings budget (installation)/existing Transport maintenance budgets for ongoing maintenance.

Other

7.4 None identified.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no other legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

8.5 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.3.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 Not applicable.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Attachment A - Aberdeen Street, Proposed No Stopping Restriction - Option 1 (Preferred Option)	23/20494	35
b ⇩	Attachment B - Aberdeen Street Proposed No Stopping Restriction - Option 2	22/1791237	36
c ⇩	Attachment C - Officer Recommendations, Option 2	23/20495	37
d ⇩	Attachment D - Submitter Issues Raised Table	23/17515	38

Additional background information may be noted in the below table:

Document Name	Location / File Link
Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Sally-Ann Marshall - Traffic Engineer

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Assistant

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

10. Horner Street Proposed Parking Restrictions
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1762903
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Wayne Anisy, Traffic Engineer wayne.anisy@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services (jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board to consider approval of P120 and No Stopping Restrictions on Horner Street as shown on Attachment A. This report has been written following community feedback related to the lack of parking for residents and their visitors due to existing un-restricted on-street parking.

1.3 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment

1.4 The recommended option is to Install a P120 parking area on the south side of Horner Street and extend the existing south side No Stopping area just west of Loftus Street in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Horner Street commencing at its intersection with Loftus Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 17 Metres, as shown on Attachment A.

2. Approves, pursuant to Clause 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the south side of Horner Street commencing at a point 30 metres south west of its intersection with Loftus Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 56 metres, as shown on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply between the hours of 9.00am to 5.00pm, Monday to Friday.

3. Approves, pursuant to Clause 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the south side of Horner Street commencing at a point 94 metres south west of its intersection with Loftus Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 8 metres, as shown on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply at any time.

4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1-3 above.

5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the signage and/or road marking restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The Council has received requests from the community to review the parking issues being experienced on Horner Street between the Papanui/Main North intersection and Loftus Street. The issue is that apart from the existing P30 at the far west end, the section of Horner Street between Loftus Street and Main North Road currently has no time restrictions and this allows vehicles to park in this area for any amount of time. The proposal is to install a P120 restriction on the south side of the street and the proposed restriction is to apply on Monday to Friday and from 9am to 5pm (Refer to Attachment A for location). The proposed restriction days and times are in line with the existing restrictions currently applied to the immediate area, and by installing this restriction, it will eliminate the option of all day parking on both sides of the street and provides short term parking availability for residents, their visitors and nearby business customers.

3.2 Options within this report have been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance including the sight distance requirements of Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the current unrestricted parking availability on Horner Street.

4.2 The advantages of this option include:

4.2.1 Retaining unrestricted on-street parking spaces on both sides of the street.

4.3 The disadvantages of the option include:

4.3.1 Does not address resident requests for parking availability during working week days.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 This proposal removes approximately eight unrestricted car parking spaces on the south side of Horner Street and provides a short term parking area that can be utilised by residents and their visitors. Investigations have identified that there would be sufficient parking spaces available within the vicinity to accommodate for the removal of the un-restricted parking that currently occurs on the south side of Horner Street. This proposal is also in line with the existing restrictions currently applied to the immediate area.

5.2 Approval is required by the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-central Community Board.

5.3 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

Community Views and Preferences

5.4 Consultation was carried out from the 8th-24th November 2022. Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by way of letter drop and by way of post to the absentee owners. There were no objections to the proposal and one submission was received back which was in full support. Based on this there was no change to the consulted Attachment A diagram.

5.5 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

5.6 The alternative-do nothing option is inconsistent with community requests to improve parking demand on this street.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.3.3 Maintain customer perception of the ease of use of Council on- street parking facilities - >=50% resident satisfaction

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 This proposal does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this proposal does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal improves accessibility for residents, visitors and caregivers that currently struggle to find parking in close proximity to the address required.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement - The cost for the implementation of this proposal will be approx. $1,000.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Will be covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.3 Funding Source - Funding for the implementation of this proposal will be through the “Traffic Operations Road Marking and Signs” budget.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to revoke and approve traffic controls (including parking and stopping restrictions) by resolution.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no other legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 There are no known risks associated with this option.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	tg144323-Horner Street Proposed Parking Restrictions Diagram for Board Approval	22/1762352	47

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

11. Dedication of Local Purpose (Road) Reserve as road - 31 Leander Street Papanui
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1414719
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Stuart McLeod, Property Consultant, stuart.mcleod@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services (jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Nature of Decision or Issue and Report Origin

1.1 Under Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 a Council Resolution is required to vest Local Purpose (Road) Reserve as road.

1.2 This report is in response to a conditional resource consent RMA/2022/1230 that requires Local Purpose (Road) Reserve to be dedicated as road to give Lot 3 on the plan of subdivision legal road access.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by considering the positive benefits of dedicating this land as road to allow development to the north and to provide additional housing and rating income.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board recommends to Council that it:

1. Resolves pursuant to Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 to dedicate the Local Purpose (Road) Reserve containing 1473m² being Part Lot 3 DP 13330, Part Lot 4 DP 17321 and Lot 8 DP 13050 and now shown as Section 4 SO 586272 as road and

2. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to take all steps necessary to conclude the dedication of the land as road.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 This in an enabling decision that gives Lot 3 on the adjoining subdivision access to the road network. Resource consent has been granted conditional upon the Council to completing this road dedication prior to the issue of titles.

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Do nothing

4.1.1 Advantages

· There are no advantages with this option.

4.1.2 Disadvantages

· Creates reputational risk because Council has already issued a conditional resource consent.

· Would not allow access from the adjoining development and therefore

· Would effectively thwart the adjoining subdivision from progressing.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1 The Christchurch City Council acquired various parcels of land in the Leander Street area in the 1940’s and 1950’s as Local Purpose (Road) Reserve.

5.2 The reason to hold it as road reserve was to provide for future roads when subdivision of adjoining land was proposed. It also gave a degree of control over recovery of road formation costs when adjoining land was developed or subdivided.

5.3 The adjoining owner at 45 Vagues Road has now initiated a subdivision where they are creating 2 additional allotments. One of them (Lot 3) requires alternative legal road access and the only way to achieve this is to dedicate the parcels of land identified in this report as road.

5.4 Section 4 shown on the below plan (also shown on the attached Survey Office Plan) is the land parcel to be dedicated as road. Sections 5 and 6 are to remain Local Purpose (Road) Reserve until such time as the adjoining land on the southern boundary is subdivided or developed.

5.5 Because the land is a Local Purpose (Road) Reserve it is held and administered under the Reserves Act 1977. Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 authorises the Council to pass a resolution dedicating road reserves as road.

5.6 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.6.1 Papanui Electoral Ward – Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 This scheme aligns with the Councils Transport Strategy in the draft Christchurch Transport Plan by providing consistent and safe street design and connecting communities through the road network.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 16.0.2 Improve roadway condition, to an appropriate national standard, measured by smooth travel exposure (STE) - >=75% of the sealed local road network meets the appropriate national standard

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The decision is consistent with Council’s draft Christchurch Transport Plan and Policies by enabling safe streets and growth.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

6.5 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga

6.6 There is no impact on Mana Whenua. Any impact on Mana Whenua was considered in the resource consent application and addressed. This was accepted and the resource consent subsequently granted.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.7 The decisions in this report do not impact on climate change. Environmental effects were considered as part of the resource consent and where found to be less than minor. The development is not contrary to the relevant provisions set out in the District Plan or the purpose and principles of the Resource Management Act 1991.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.8 Accessibility will be considered as part of the design standards for road corridors and footpaths.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – None, the applicant is meeting all Councils costs including staff time, survey and formation of the road.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Minimal as the road will be newly formed

7.3 Funding Source – Transport – Growth

Other / He mea anō

7.4 There are no other considerations.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 authorises local authorities to dedicate Local Purpose (Road) Reserves as Road.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 There are no significant risks associated with the decisions in this report. There is reputational risk if a decision is not made in accordance with, and as anticipated by the resource consent granted by the Councils Resource Consent Unit.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	304/6592 Leander Street Location Map	22/1417781	54
b ⇩	304/6592 SO 586272 draft Title Plan	23/62130	55

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Stuart McLeod - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Andrew Milne - Team Leader of Asset Planning

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

12. Dedication of Local Purpose (Road) Reserve as road - 12 Ramore Place, Papanui
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1418094
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Stuart McLeod, Property Consultant, stuart.mcleod@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services (jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Nature of Decision or Issue and Report Origin

1.1 Under Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 a Council Resolution is required to vest Local Purpose (Road) Reserve as road.

1.2 This report is in response to resource consent RMA92030866 that anticipated a Local Purpose (Road) Reserve being dedicated as road.

1.3 This is a procedural matter and the decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by considering the benefits to road users and rate payers of dedicating this land as road to ensure the road corridor can remain open.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board recommends to Council that it:

1. Resolves pursuant to Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 to dedicate the Local Purpose (Road) Reserve containing 596m² described as Lot 22 DP 27176 as road and

2. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to take all steps necessary to conclude the dedication of the land as road.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 This in an enabling decision that gives nearby properties in the Sarabande Avenue area an alternative route to access Winters Road and Main North Road.

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Do nothing

4.1.1 Advantages

· There are no advantages with this option.

4.1.2 Disadvantages

· Creates reputational risk because it is contrary to the intended outcome of the resource consent.

· The road has been formed and is in use, to do nothing would create a nonsense.

· Does not resolve an outstanding road legalisation issue.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1 In 2015 Council received resource consent application RMA92030866 that created 9 new residential lots and anticipated that Council would form the road over the Local Purpose (Road) Reserve identified as Lot 22 DP 27176 (Lot 22) and dedicate it as road to provide continuity of the road corridor.

5.2 Under the Counties Amendment Act 1961 Lot 22 vested in Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown) in 1969 as a Local Purpose (Road) Reserve and in accordance with the practice at the time no title was issued.

5.3 Staff only became aware the land was owned by the Crown when the process to dedicate Lot 22 as road was considered. It has taken in excess of 3 years of discussions with Land Information New Zealand to resolve the ownership and agree to have the land vested in Council by using the provisions in the Counties Amendment Act 1972.

5.4 Title for Lot 22 has now issued in the name of the Christchurch City Council, the land is held as a Local Purpose (Road) Reserve and is administered under the Reserves Act 1977.

5.5 Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 authorises the Council to pass a resolution dedicating road reserves as road, the process to dedicate Lot 22 as road can now be completed.

5.6 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.6.1 Papanui Electoral Ward – Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Aligns with the Councils Transport Strategy in the draft Christchurch Transport Plan by providing consistent and safe street design and connecting communities through the road network.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The decision is consistent with Council’s draft Christchurch Transport Plan and Policies by enabling safe streets and growth.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.5 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga

6.6 There is no impact on Mana Whenua. Any impact on Mana Whenua would have been considered in the resource consent application and addressed. That application has been approved and the resource consent granted.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.7 The decisions in this report do not impact on climate change. Environmental effects were considered as part of the resource consent and where found to be less than minor. The development has already occurred and was not contrary to the relevant provisions set out in the District Plan or the purpose and principles of the Resource Management Act 1991.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.8 Accessibility was considered as part of the design standards for road corridors and footpaths.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – Minor, costs are limited to staff time.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Minimal as the road is newly formed

7.3 Funding Source – Transport – Growth

Other / He mea anō

7.4 There are no other considerations.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Section 111 of the Reserves Act 1977 authorises local authorities to dedicate Local Purpose (Road) Reserves as Road.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 There are no significant risks associated with the decisions in this report. On the contrary there is reputational risk if a decision is not made in accordance with and as anticipated by the resource consent granted by the Councils Resource Consent Unit.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	304/5825 Location map 12 Ramore Place	22/1423747	62

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Stuart McLeod - Property Consultant

Approved By

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Andrew Milne - Team Leader of Asset Planning

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Jane Davis - General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

16. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Area Report - February 2023
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1794390
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Emma Pavey, Community Governance Manager Papanui-Innes-Central (Emma.Pavey@ccc.govt.nz)
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:

1. Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Area Report for February 2023.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Downstream Effects Management Plan (DEMP)	Since the opening of the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC), the Council has monitored the impact of the works as part of the DEMP Stage 2. The new Board toured the area within the DEMP with relevant staff on 26 January 2023 as part of its familiarisation/induction activities. The St Albans, Edgeware and Mairehau transport projects site details traffic improvements made in these areas aimed at managing the traffic from the CNC and improving pedestrian and cycle connections.	Ongoing	Liveable city
Community Pride Garden Awards 2023	The awards are a Council initiative started in 1991, and have been a joint venture between the Community Boards and the Christchurch Beautifying Association since 1997. The awards encourage civic pride and acknowledge those who have contributed to maintaining the image of Christchurch as the Garden City by beautifying their streets and gardens.	Judging will be carried out from mid-January to early February with volunteer judges from the Christchurch Beautifying Association accompanied by a volunteer elected member.	Resilient Communities Strengthening Communities Together Strategy
Edible and Sustainable Garden Awards 2023	A partnership between the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board and the Canterbury Horticultural Society provides an opportunity to celebrate all types of food gardens. 14 applications have been received this round.	Entries closed on 10 January. Judging will occur in the next couple of months and certificates will then be posted to recipients.	Resilient Communities Strengthening Communities Together Strategy
Summer with Your Neighbours 2022-23	Summer with your neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood. The guidelines and application form for funding towards neighbourhood gatherings, and gathering suggestions, are all available at this link. There have been seven reimbursement claims to date of the 30 applications for this round. Evaluation feedback is once again very positive.	This year's events can be held from 22 October 2022 to 31 March 2023.	Resilient Communities Strengthening Communities Together Strategy

Summer with Your Neighbours events reported back by grantees

· Photo from Michael and Janita Patrick of the fun had at the event in Sarabande Avenue:

· Photo from the Community Fun Day, Nancy Ave (held at the St Albans Uniting Church and moved inside out of the rain):

3.2 Community Funding Summary

The balance of the Board’s funding pools at the time of writing is currently as follows subject to subtraction of the grants proposed through the reports to this meeting as shown:

2022/23 Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Discretionary Response Fund (DRF)
*Approved Board Projects:* · Summer with your neighbours · Youth Recreation · Community Pride Garden Awards · Edible and Sustainable Garden Awards · Community Liaison · School Civic Award	*Allocated:* $3,500 $9,000 $500 $2,000 $4,000 $3,500
BALANCE (at time of writing):	$59,139
*Proposed DRF Grants (subject to approval at this meeting):* · Marist Albion Rugby club Inc. – Roof Repair · Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust – Pizza Oven	*Recommended:* $5,000 $2,340
*Prospective remaining balance (if all recommendations accepted):*	*$51,799*

2022/23 Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Youth Development Fund (YDF)
BALANCE (at time of writing):	$2,725.00
There are no proposed recipients for approval at this meeting

3.3 Upcoming Community Events and Activities

· Children’s Day 2023

Children's Day is a free community event which is about celebrating children, and is being held on Sunday 5 March between 11am and 3pm at the Green Space, corner of 152 New Brighton Road and Locksley Ave.

· FRESH Events 2023

Youth & Cultural Development (YCD) are in the process of activating their events for events for 2023 beginning with:

11 February – Belfast FRESH Day Out (Sheldon Park)

24 or 25 February – FRESH Pool Party (Te Pou Toe Toe)

3 March – CHCH HHS Pop Up Show (Turanga Library)

· Walking Festival 2023

The Walking Festival will be back this year. Those wishing to host a walk during the Walking Festival 2023, can get in touch with the team on 03 941 5333 or at walkingfestival@ccc.govt.nz. For fans of local history or getting out into nature, socialising or pushing themselves to get awesome views, the Walking Festival offers something for all ages and abilities, with over 50 walks across Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri, and up-to-date information at the Facebook page.

Those interested in starting their own walking group can visit Active Canterbury for tips and free resources. The Council’s Walking track map is a great resource for identifying walks in the Board area and across wider Christchurch.

For accessibility information for tracks, Accessibel’s map provides detailed experiences that highlight challenges and amenities on walks. So far, Travis Wetland, Halswell Quarry, Victoria Park and Quail Island have been mapped in Christchurch.

· Libraries Events Calendar and CanterburyStories.nz

The Christchurch City Libraries site includes a calendar that can be filtered to view the events on at the libraries in or adjacent the Board area, including Papanui Library, Redwood Library, Shirley Library, Linwood Library and Tūranga.

Significant this month are events and library resources relevant to Waitangi Day and Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Noting also the Waitangi Day images in the collection at Canterbury Stories.

The Community Stories Liaisons connected to CanterburyStories.nz work across the community to collect stories and photographs which capture the history and culture of the City, past and present. They are seeking to establish new community connections and offer new opportunities for groups to tell their stories online, having worked with a number of groups based in the Board area including, for example, Richmond Community Garden, resulting in this collection Richmond Community Garden collection | canterburystories.nz

· Volunteer Events

Visit this link for the variety of volunteer events held around the city. Activities vary, but may involve general clean ups, planting, weeding and mulching. Some planting events are family-friendly and eligible for Children's University (CU) credits.

· Other upcoming community events and festivals in the city

Visit this link for the variety of community events and festivals held around the city. This also links to the What’s On site, where can found one-off and regular events like:

· Linwood Village Market – For new and pre-loved, crafts, artworks, and books, as well as fundraisers for local community projects. Held once a month at the Linwood Community Arts Centre car park.

· Electric Avenue Music Festival – To be held on 25 February and featuring close to 50 artists across 5 stages, this 12-hour marathon music and arts festival nestled in the heart of central Christchurch's Hagley Park.

3.4 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.4.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan

· St Albans Skate Jam

Another successful Skate Jam community event was held on Saturday, 21 January, at the St Albans Skate Park. Approximately 200 people attended throughout the afternoon. The Skate Jam offered the opportunity for children to get some instruction, and the skate competition was a highlight for many participants. Feedback from families was very positive.

· Stories in the Park at Redwood Library/ Park

With support from Community Recreation, the Library held a successful Stories in the Park community event on Saturday, 21 January, at Redwood Park. Approximately 100 people attended throughout the hour. The event allowed children and families to enjoy some stories, connect with the Library and community organisations and have some fun. Feedback from families was very positive.

· Waippapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Tiki Tour & Meet Up Day

On 26 January 2023, the Community Board members toured the Board Area with the community governance team and other staff to familiarise themselves with the highlights and work going on in their wards. Significantly woven into the day were opportunities to hear from community groups in their spaces (detailed below) as well as a collective session in one of the meeting spaces at 9 Shirley Road where community groups could ‘speed date’ the Community Board members.

The stop at Avebury House (above photo) transitioned into a tour of the Richmond Community Garden and Riverlution Eco Hub with Hayley Guglietta.

The session at 9 Shirley Road (below photo) transitioned to a walk across the road to Shirley Community Reserve (photo to right).

The tour started with meeting Dennis McMurtrie from Papanui Rotary at Papanui Bush (photo left), followed up by meeting Graeme and Jane Mitchell of Shirley Community Trust at MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre (photo below), before walking the Shirley Birdsong Trail with Steve Jones-Poole of the Shirley Village Project (third photo), and later meeting up with Viviana Zanetti at Phillipstown Hub (last photo).

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board

09 February 2023

· Boxing Day Whanau Day

Photos as below were supplied reporting back on this community event held in MacFarlane Park and supported by the Board’s discretionary funding, with the organiser noting that the day went really well and estimating that around 250 or more people attended over the four hours.

3.4.2 Council Engagement and Consultation

· Slow Speed Neighbourhoods Submission

Since the last Area Report, the Board’s Submissions Working Group has made a submission as found at Attachment A on this consultation.

· Consultation open on the Draft Waste Management and Minimisation Bylaw 2023 – closes 26 February 2023

The Council is proposing to replace it two current bylaws regarding waste management with a single Draft Waste Management and Minimisation Bylaw 2023. This bylaw will allow regulation of all waste collection services and operations, including landfills. The ‘Have your say’ site for the consultation is at the above link.

· Consultation open on the Ōtautahi Christchurch Urban Forest Plan– closes 6 March 2023

The Council is seeking feedback on an Urban Forest Plan. The ‘Have your say’ webpage for the consultation is at the above link. In a nutshell:

The Urban Forest Plan focuses on the growth and management of both public and private trees.

The Plan sets out how we can increase tree canopy cover across all of our urban area, over 50 years.

By meeting the goals within this plan we will make a significant contribution to mitigating the impacts of climate change, bring multiple benefits to the liveability of our neighbourhoods, our wellbeing and help to better sustain flora and fauna.

The Council is holding two online webinars on 13 February at 12pm and 6pm (which will be recorded and uploaded to the above webpage, which is also the place to register for these) to talk about the Plan and to answer any questions.

3.5 Governance Advice

3.5.1 Customer Service Request (CSR) Report for the Papanui-Innes-Central Wards

Refer to Attachment B for the 1 December – 31 December 2022 statistics, providing an overview of the number of CSRs that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.

3.5.2 Local Recipient of New Zealand Order of Merit in the New Year’s Honours List

A letter of congratulations as at Attachment C was sent to St Albans resident, Ms Margaret Teresa Tai Rākena, who was awarded the MNZM for her services to victims of sexual violence and the community in the New Year’s Honour List.

3.5.3 Public Participation

At its meeting on 16 December 2022 the Board received public forum presentations and deputations from:

· Hana Saemon-Beck, Community Activator for Citycare Property, introducing her work in the role.

· Susan Peake, a local resident, concerned about the two car parks in Mary Street nearest the approach to Main North Road contributing particularly to traffic congestion. The Board requested that staff report back in relation to the resident’s proposal the car parks be removed, and staff subsequently provide this advice:

The parking in this area is in high demand. If we are to remove parking and effectively improve the level of service to motorists in Mary Street, experience in the past has shown that we can have the unintended consequence of increasing traffic in a local road environment. We do not want to that, as Council has invested significantly in traffic calming Mary Street and adjoining local roads, to minimise excessive/unnecessary traffic from using these roads. Accordingly, we would not recommend removing these car parks.

· Garry Neale, a local resident, gave a deputation on Item 8 - Briggs/Marshland/Lake Terrace Safety Improvements, which helped inform the consideration of the item later in the meeting.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1 Start Work Notices (SWN)

SWN relating to the Board area are separately circulated to the Board. All Board area and city-wide start work notices can be found at this link. Recent SWN circulated relate to:

· Te Kaha (Canterbury's Multi Use Arena) - major concrete pours

· Murchison Park – pathway renewals

· The Court Theatre – construction

· Blighs Road – wastewater renewal 03

4.2 Graffiti Snapshot Summary for 2022

The Graffiti Snapshot Summary for 2022 can be found as Attachment D to this report.

4.3 Memoranda

Memoranda related to matters of relevance to the Board have been separately circulated for the Board’s information and are listed below.

· CCC: Cross Reserve Maintenance Schedule (Attachment E)

· CCC: High Street (Tuam to St Asaph) preferred option (Attachment F)

· CCC: Armagh Street - Traffic Calming (Attachment G)

· CCC: Alcohol Law Reform and Alcohol Bans (Attachment H)

· Orion: Orion Bromley to Milton new power cable project (Attachment I)

· CCC: Community Parks Rolling Renewal Programme (Attachment J)

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Safe Speed Neigbhourhoods Submission	23/53175	90
b ⇩	Customer Service Request Report - December 2022	23/53160	92
c ⇩	Correspondence to Ms Tai Rakena - Congratulations on MNZM Honour	23/75130	93
d ⇩	Graffiti Snapshot Summary for 2022	23/110897	94
e ⇩	Memo - Cross Reserve Maintenance Schedule - 14 December 2022	23/53181	96
f ⇩	Memo - High Street (Tuam to St Asaph) preferred option - 16 December 2022	23/53196	98
g ⇩	Memo - Armagh Street - Traffic Calming - 16 December 2022	23/53197	102
h ⇩	Memo - Alcohol Law Reform and Alcohol Bans - 21 December 2022	23/53198	110
i ⇩	Orion Memo - Orion Bromley to Milton new power cable project - 4 January 2023	23/53199	114
j ⇩	Community Parks Rolling Renewal Programme - 23 January 2023	23/98204	117

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Mark Saunders - Community Board Advisor

Emma Pavey - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes-Central

Lyssa Aves - Support Officer

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Stacey Holbrough - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Emma Pavey - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes-Central

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

[1] https://www.lgnz.co.nz/about/governance/community-board-executive-committee/

Name	Subject
Taylah Holdem	Report back on Youth Development Fund grant to attend the U19 World Beach Volleyball Championships in Turkey

Subject	Presenter(s)	Unit/Organisation
Introduction to Community Resilience Coordinator	Franzisca Doser	Civil Defence & Emergency Management

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
00064999	Marist Albion Rugby club Inc.	Repair the Roof of the South Hagley Shed	$17,393	$5,000

Total Budget 2022/23	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$88,164	$28,879	$59,289	$54,289

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
00065034	Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust	Phillipstown Pizza Oven	$2,340	$2,340

7. Correspondence
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/68025
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Mark Saunders, Kaitohutohu Hāpori - Community Board Advisor, (Mark.Saunders@ccc.govt.nz)
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

8. Briefings
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/89385
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Mark Saunders, Kaitohutohu Hāpori - Community Board Advisor, (Mark.Saunders@ccc.govt.nz)
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

13. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Marist Albion Rugby Club Inc.
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/71606
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Helen Miles, Community Recreation Advisor helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

14. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central 2022-23 Discretionary response Fund Application - Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/83820
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Stacey Holbrough, Community Development Advisor, Stacey.holbrough@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

15. New Zealand Community Boards' Executive Committee- Voting for Zone 5 Representative
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	23/62316
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Emma Pavey, Community Governance Manager Papanui-Innes-Central (Emma.Pavey@ccc.govt.nz)
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community (Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz)

Author	Sree Nair - Community Governance Advisor
Approved By	John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships