Agenda of Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

Unconfirmed

Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Tuesday 6 September 2022

Time: 5.03pm

Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton (via audio visual link)

Jimmy Chen (via audio visual link)

Catherine Chu (via audio visual link)

Gamal Fouda (via audio visual link)

Andrei Moore

Debbie Mora

Mark Peters

Matthew Pratt

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 5428

matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00083

That the apology for absence received from Anne Galloway be accepted.

Mark Peters/Andrei Moore Carried

2. Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00084

That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday, 16 August 2022 be confirmed.

Mike Mora/Mark Peters Carried

Gamal Fouda joined the meeting at 5:06 pm.

4. Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1 Safe pedestrian access, The Runway Wigram

Sarah Schaap, local business owner, addressed the Board regarding her concerns about pedestrian safety on The Runway, in the vicinity of The Landing, Wigram. She is particularly concerned that parked vehicles, including trucks, obscure visibility of pedestrians crossing the road and suggested the installation of a loading zone.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Sarah Schaap for her presentation.

Attachments

a Sarah Schaap - Public Forum photos

5. Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1 Correspondence Report

Marc Duff, Chairperson of the Greater Hornby Residents' Association addressed the Board regarding the letter in the Correspondence Report (Item 7 of these minutes refers) from local residents Kim Moss and Liz Gordon, regarding the benefits of a portable Wi-Fi camera unit for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area.

Mr Duff said that the Association supports the use of a portable camera as a crime prevention/detection tool.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Marc Duff for his presentation.

6. Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Correspondence

The Board took into consideration the deputation from the Greater Hornby Residents' Association (Item 5.1 of these minutes refers).

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00085(Original Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the correspondence from the Greater Hornby Residents' Association acknowledging the Board's support of the Hornby Youth Disco.

2. Receives the correspondence from Kim Moss and Liz Gordon, local residents, requesting the consideration of funding a portable camera unit.

Mark Peters/Debbie Mora Carried

8. Canterbury Agricultural Park-Halswell Pony Club - Proposed licence

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00086(Original Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Grants a licence to occupy to the Halswell Pony Club Inc over that area of land at the Canterbury Agricultural Park as shown in Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda as area A and B, being approximately 12.8735ha and being part of the land described as Section 2 SO556827 and held in record of title 1010268.

2. Approves the licence for a period of 20 years including renewals at an annual rental set in accordance with the Council’s Sports Lease Charges Policy.

3. Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to conclude negotiation and administer the terms and conditions of the lease.

Mark Peters/Debbie Mora Carried

9. School Patrol Crossings

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00087(Original Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Pursuant to the powers vested in the Christchurch City Council by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, authorises the Board of Trustees of St Bernadette’s Primary School, to appoint the appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the St Bernadette’s Primary School Kea school crossing point as indicated in drawing SK120 dated 25/07/2019 in Attachment A, page 1 of the agenda report.

2. Pursuant to the powers vested in the Christchurch City Council by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, authorises the Board of Trustees of Hornby Primary School, to appoint the appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Hornby Primary School Zebra school crossing point as indicated in drawing SK119 dated 25/07/2019 in Attachment A, page 2 of the agenda report.

3. Pursuant to the powers vested in the Christchurch City Council by section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, authorises the Board of Trustees of Riccarton Primary School, to appoint the appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the Riccarton Primary School Zebra school crossing point as indicated in drawing SK136 dated 25/07/2019 in Attachment A, page 3 of the agenda report.

4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls and parking or stopping restrictions made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls and parking or stopping restrictions described in 1, 2, and 3 above.

5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in1-4 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Mark Peters/Mike Mora Carried

10. Board representative to mediation on an appeal regarding Plan Change 4: Short-term accommodation

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Appoints persons as its representatives for mediation on an appeal regarding Plan Change 4: Short-term accommodation with authority to agree to a settlement or any subsequent negotiations. The appointment to apply for the duration of the mediation process and any subsequent negotiations.

2. Notes that the appointment is made to the persons named in 1. in their personal capacity not their capacity as a Board member and is not dependent on the persons being re-elected to the Board.

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00088

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Appoints persons Mike Mora, Helen Broughton, and Debbie Mora as its representatives for mediation on an appeal regarding Plan Change 4: Short-term accommodation with authority to agree to a settlement or any subsequent negotiations. The appointment to apply for the duration of the mediation process and any subsequent negotiations.

2. Notes that the appointment is made to the persons named in 1. in their personal capacity not their capacity as a Board member and is not dependent on the persons being re-elected to the Board.

Mark Peters/Andrei Moore Carried

11. Summer with your Neighbours 2022-23

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00089(Original Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Allocates its Summer with your Neighbours 2022-23 Fund as follows:

	Applicant	Activity	Board Decision
1	Barry White Fuchsia Place & Surrounds Neighbourhood Support Group	Summer BBQ	$100
2	Nigel South	Neighbourhood get-together	$200
3	Helen Johnstone	Neighbourhood BBQ	$125
4	Vicky Mills	Street BBQ	$75
5	Joan Markham	Neighbourhood BBQ	$75
6	Mike Bryce, Old Red Barn Residents Group	Community gathering	$200
7	Anna Alrutz	Neighbourhood get-together	$115
8	Preet Kour	Neighbourhood picnic	$75
9	Viviane Marques	Community gathering	$125
10	Kerry Miller	Neighbourhood BBQ	$75
11	Brad Flavall	Neighbourhood BBQ	$100
12	Tim & Trish Joyce	Street BBQ	$150
13	Arthur Phillips	Neighbourhood BBQ	$200
14	Isabel Ross	Summer BBQ	$75
15	Lauren & Joan Boyer	Pot luck afternoon tea	$75
16	Mike Sanford	Neighbourhood BBQ	$75
17	Kevin Bennett	Street BBQ	$75
18	Margaret Murray	Neighbourhood BBQ	$75
19	Barbara Tie	Street Gathering Lunch	$100
20	Kathy Cowan	BBQ get-together	$90
21	Richard Meekin, Antonia Place Neighbourhood Group	Street BBQ	$75
22	Shirley Poppelwell	Potato competition judging and BBQ	$50
23	Yvette Cleall	Street BBQ	$125
24	Jeremy Dickson	Community BBQ	$125
25	Una Raleqe, Canterbury Fiji Social Services Trust	Community shared meal	$125
26	Carmel Gulliver	Iona Place Christmas in the Park	$75
27	Michelle Grant	Neighbourhood get-together	$150
28	Alex McMillan	Neighbourhood sausage sizzle and get-together	$150
29	April Greaves, Bamber Crescent Neighbourhood Group	Pot luck BBQ lunch	$125
30	Marc Duff, Greater Hornby Residents' Association	Two park pop up BBQs	$200
31	Angelena Pedersen	Neighbourhood afternoon tea	$90

2. Notes that the granted funds are to be used towards food items, non-alcoholic drinks or invitation/advertising costs only.

3. Re-opens Summer with your Neighbours 2022-23 applications for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton area to allow for the remaining unallocated funding and any unspent funding by funding recipients noted in Resolution 1, to be applied towards events that meet the Summer with your Neighbours criteria.

4. Delegates authority to the Manager Community Governance (Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton) to consider and make decisions on late applications received for the Summer with your Neighbours 2022-23 Fund in accordance with the fund criteria, and to approve grants up to a maximum of $200 per application.

Helen Broughton/Debbie Mora Carried

12. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund 2022-23 - Halswell Bowling Club Incorporated, American Football Canterbury Incorporated, Avon Sequence Dancers

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2022/00090 (Original Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves a grant of $15,000 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to Halswell Bowling Club Incorporated towards the Green Development Project.

2. Approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to American Football Canterbury Incorporated towards the AFC Youth, Varsity and Senior Season.

3. Approves a grant of $900 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to Avon Sequence Dancers towards Another Year of Avon Sequence Dancing.

Debbie Mora/Andrei Moore Carried

13. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on the following:

· There is local concern regarding antisocial behaviour involving young people in Riccarton.

· It was noted that there is ongoing concern regarding intensification proposals with a number of Residents' Associations expressing opposition. The Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change will go to the Council for consideration at its meeting on 8 September 2022; Debbie Mora will speak on behalf of the Board at the meeting.

· There is concern that ambulances are having to undertake dangerous manoeuvres when exiting the Hendersons Road hub during peak traffic times.

· It was noted that staff advice is still awaited on parking in the vicinity of Arthur Street and Hansons Lane.

· It was noted that a very successful community safety hui was recently held.

· It was noted that staff advice on safety improvements on Waterloo/Gilberthorpes Road/Parker Street is still outstanding.

· It was noted that there are a number of streets in Hornby that have footpaths damaged by tree roots.

· It was noted that the traffic implications of an application for development of the University of Canterbury’s Dovedale Street campus is of concern to some local residents.

· It was noted that Sutherlands Road has re-opened.

· It was noted that fading of some street signs is causing visibility issues.

· It was noted that there is local interest in pedestrian crossing facilities on Sparks Road, including whether any additional facilities are planned.

Gamal Fouda left the meeting at 5:42pm.

13.1 Safety concerns - 306 Riccarton Road

A member has met with the owner of 306 Motel Apartments on Riccarton Road, who presented as part of the public forum at the last meeting, and witnessed motorists turning right from Riccarton Road into the motel premises, turning in the carpark and exiting left onto Riccarton Road.

Members discussed the safety concerns of such manoeuvres and agreed to seek an on-site meeting of traffic staff with the owner and members to explore options to deter this behaviour.

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Requests that staff meet the owner of 306 Motel Apartments on Riccarton Road and Board members at the apartments to explore options to deter vehicles from entering the carpark of 306 Riccarton Road for the purposes of turning around and exiting onto Riccarton Road.

13.2 Traffic congestion on Sparks and Hendersons Roads

It was noted that there is traffic congestion on Hendersons and Sparks Roads at peak times that seems to be impacted by vehicles exiting Westmorland via Hendersons Road.

The Board agreed to request that staff investigate and provide advice on measures that can be implemented to relieve the congestion.

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Requests that staff investigate traffic congestion on Hendersons and Sparks Roads at peak times and provide advice on measures that can be implemented to relieve the congestion.

13.3 Misspelt sign in Aidanfield

It was noted that there is a sign on the berm adjacent to Aidanfield Reserve is misspelt.

The Board agreed to seek staff advice on the possible replacement of the sign including consent for the replacement is required.

Part B

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Requests staff advice on the possible replacement of a misspelt sign on the berm adjacent to Aidanfield Reserve, including whether consent is required for the replacement.

Catherine Chu left the meeting at 5:56pm.

Meeting concluded at 6:07pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 20th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

Mike Mora

Chairperson

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

7. Waterloo Road Improvements
Reference Te Tohutoro:	22/1024134
Report of Te Pou Matua:	Gemma Dioni, Senior Transportation Engineer, Gemma.Dioni@ccc.govt.nz Kiran Skelton, Engagement Assistant, Kiran.Skelton@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services, jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve a proposal for safety improvements on Waterloo Road between Hei Hei Road and Carmen Road.

1.2 This report has been written in response to concerns raised by the students at Te Huruhuru Ao o Horomaka Hornby High School.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

1.4 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.5 The recommended option is to construct pedestrian islands, traffic calming, and new road markings in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves the scheme design as detailed on plan TG138201 in Attachment A to the agenda report.

2. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017:

a. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres.

b. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at a point 74 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres.

c. Approves under Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of motor vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes between the times of 8:15am and 9:15am, and between 2:30pm and 3:30pm, Monday to Friday on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing a point 102 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 37 metres.

d. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at a point 139 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 45 metres.

e. Approves that the parking of motor vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes between the times of 8:15am and 9:15am, and between 2:30pm and 3:30pm, Monday to Friday on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing a point 184 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 43 metres.

f. Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at a point 227 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 43 metres.

g. Approves that the parking of motor vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes between the times of 8:15am and 9:15am, and between 2:30pm and 3:30pm, Monday to Friday on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing a point 270 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 37 metres.

h. Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to buses only between the times of 10:00am and 2:00pm, Monday to Friday on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing a point 270 metres east of its intersection with Hei Hei Road and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 37 metres.

i. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at its intersection with Carmen Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 176 metres.

j. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Waterloo Road commencing at its intersection with Carmen Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 154 metres.

k. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Waterloo Road commencing at its intersection with Smarts Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

l. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Waterloo Road commencing at commencing at a point 40 metres west of its intersection with Smarts Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

m. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Waterloo Road commencing at commencing at a point 124 metres west of its intersection with Smarts Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

n. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Smarts Road commencing at its intersection with Waterloo Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

o. Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Smarts Road commencing at its intersection with Waterloo Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

p. Approves that the parking of vehicles on the western side of Smarts Road commencing at a point 15 metres south of Waterloo Road, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres be restricted to a maximum parking time of 120 minutes. This restriction is to apply during standard hours of 8am to 6pm Monday to Sunday.

3. Approves that a give-way control be placed against the Chestnut Avenue westbound approach to its intersection with Smarts Road as detailed in Attachment A to the agenda report.

4. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1-3 above.

5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 1 to 4 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Safety concerns have been identified on Waterloo Road by students attending schools in the area. The key concerns were lack of pedestrian crossing facilities, the existing pedestrian islands not being large enough to cater for groups of children and the high number of heavy vehicles using the road.

3.2 The recommendations in this report will help to improve safety along the school frontages by installing:

· New larger pedestrian islands and build outs at the two locations outside Te Huruhuru Ao o Horomaka Hornby High School.

· Retention of the existing island outside Te Māhuri Mānuka Hornby Primary School with additional build outs.

· Traffic calming in the form of road humps to slow vehicle speeds on the approaches to the crossing points.

· Revised road markings to support the crossings.

· Wider paths to accommodate demands.

· Additional gateway features to highlight the presence of the school further.

· Parking restrictions for school pick-up and drop-off on Waterloo Road and also on Smarts Road for Matatiki Hornby Community Centre.

3.3 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

3.4 This project supports the forthcoming School Speed Zone changes to be consulted on later this year.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo

4.2 The advantages of this option include:

4.2.1 Retains on-street parking spaces.

4.3 The disadvantages of the option include:

4.3.1 Does not address the concerns raised by the school children.

4.3.2 Is not consistent with the community views expressed through consultation.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 Waterloo Road between Carmen Road and Hei Hei Road provides access to Te Huruhuru Ao o Horomaka Hornby High School, Te Māhuri Mānuka Hornby Primary School, Matatiki Hornby Community Centre, Kyle Park, and the industrial area off Smarts Road. It is also an attractive route linking State Highway 1 Carmen Road to the Waterloo Industrial Park without travelling through the Hornby Hub area.

5.2 Under the Waka Kotahi One Network Framework Classification, Waterloo Road is an urban connector to the east of Smarts Road and an activity street to the west of Smarts Road. It has one lane in each direction and is separated by an approximately 2m wide flush median. There are no dedicated cycling facilities on Waterloo Road outside the schools, however the Puari ki Niho-toto South Express Major Cycleway is accessible to the west of the school on Hei Hei Road.

5.3 Christchurch City Council’s traffic count database shows that in 2019, Waterloo Road had approximately 7500 vehicles per day, with 8.2% classified as heavy vehicles. The 85^th percentile speed is 54.8 km/h and the mean speed is 46.8km/h.

5.4 There are two midblock pedestrian refuge islands on Waterloo Road. One is approximately 30m east of the main entrance to the High School. The other is approximately 25m east of the eastern entrance to the Primary School. The signalised intersection at Carmen Road and Waterloo Road also provides a formal pedestrian crossing point as does the new cycle/pedestrian signalised crossing at the intersection of Hei Hei Street and Waterloo Road.

5.5 The Waka Kotahi Crash Analysis System (CAS) was used to gain an understanding of any underlying safety issues on Waterloo Road between Hei Hei Road and Carmen Road. Twelve crashes were recorded in this corridor between 2017 and 2022 (inclusive). All these crashes occurred at the intersection of Waterloo Road and Carmen Road. Of these, one crash occurred during school pick up time on a weekday. This was a rear-end crash. There were no serious or fatal crashes recorded in the period.

5.6 The two schools along with the new community centre create a medium to high pedestrian activity on Waterloo Road depending on the time of day. So, although the crash history does not show any underlying safety concerns, the current road layout is not conducive to a safe pedestrian and cyclist environment.

5.7 Following consultation, a number of changes have been made to the proposal, these include:

5.7.1 Changing the location of the middle crossing point so that it aligns with the pedestrian exit from the High School.

5.7.2 Retention of the island outside the Primary School.

5.7.3 Build outs at the crossing points to reduce the exposure length of children crossing the road. This provides a consistent treatment along Waterloo Road where an island for the Major Cycleway to the west of Hei Hei Road has the same design.

5.7.4 Widening of the shared path to 4 metres on the south side between the main crossing point and the pedestrian entrance to Matatiki, Hornby Centre.

5.7.5 Coloured surfacing at the entrance to the safety zone to further highlight to drivers they are entering a school zone.

5.8 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).

6. Community Views and Preferences Ngā mariu ā-Hāpori

Public Consultation Te Tukanga Kōrerorero

6.1 Early engagement with Hornby High School and Hornby Residents Association started in 27/07/22. Marc Duff from the Greater Hornby Residents Association was contacted and given the consultation plan for the Waterloo Road Safety Improvements; he was happy with the plan and told to spread information about the consultation to his community. Hornby High School was engaged with on multiple occasions; on a high level, staff attended a Board of Trustees meeting where the consultation plan was debriefed and questions were received which staff were able to collect and respond to in an email back to board members. On a local level, staff engaged with Hornby High School students to get views from active users. There was a mix of formal and informal submissions received with feedback given being helpful to identify where pain points were on Waterloo Road in the context of student safety.

6.2 Consultation started on 25/07/22 and ran until 15/08/22. An email was sent to 48 key stakeholders, including SPOKES and other cycling advocacy groups, DPA, FENZ and NZ Police, Waka Kotahi, multiple heavy haulage organisations and Ecan. Community organisations were provided with an email outlining consultation information and a link to the Have Your Say page where all consultation documents were found. The consultation was posted on the council Facebook page as well as the Greater Hornby Residents Association Facebook page and on Newsline, inviting submissions on the Have Your Say webpage.

6.3 Consultation documents were available on demand to any stakeholder who requested a physical or virtual copy.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.4 Submissions were made by 4 recognised organisations and 41 individuals. Staff also collected 4 informal pieces of feedback from student groups. Of these individuals; 10 self-identified as caregivers, 13 individuals and 4 groups self-identified as students. All submissions are available on the HYS page.

6.5 The majority of submitters supported the proposed changes (41, 91%) for the following reasons:

· The safety of the students at Hornby High School and Hornby Primary School is the top priority for community members. Submitters also were in major support of Hornby High students raising the deputation to Council which helped their support for the project as a whole

· Submitters felt that the plans were a moderate to large improvement to the current state of the road. The common opinion is that attention has been sorely needed in this area.

· Safe active transport was a feature that was brought up by submitters. Being able to safely walk, cycle and scooter to and from school was important.

· The position of the new crossing point was supported by many submitters. The main sentiment was that it needs to be in line of sight and easy access to both students from Hornby High and Primary when coming to and from school.

6.6 A minority of submitters did not support the proposed changes (4, 9%) for the following reasons:

· Lights should be installed at the Smarts Road and Waterloo Road intersection. The plan should account for this and incorporate this in.

· The plan is not effective as members of the community and school won’t listen to the changes being proposed. Students will continue to cross wherever they want; the refuge island will not be used as much as is anticipated.

· Fears around the lack of parking.

· Truck use on Waterloo Road is very high; this issue needs to be addressed first.

6.7 Key themes that came through from submitters to be considered by Staff were:

· Student safety and wellbeing was prioritised. There was an attention to making sure students at Hornby High and Primary were safe around Waterloo Road and making sure they were crossing safely.

· Calls for futureproofing in regards to Matatiki | Hornby Centre being developed. There was speculation around what the increase of traffic would do to the area and more importantly, to the roads around Waterloo Road. There were calls for traffic lights to be installed at Smarts Road – Waterloo Road intersection to ease stress for motorists turning onto Waterloo.

· Prioritising safe active transport by making the shared path wider to account for all kinds of active transport or making a separated active transport path when taking into account the number of students biking, scootering, etc. compared to those who walk.

· Speed reductions should be done sooner to lower speeds to 30km/h.

· Traffic calming should be prioritised especially to stop speeding cars on Waterloo Road and to address heavy truck use.

6.8 A summary of submissions and responses to submissions is available in Attachment B.

7. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

7.1 Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

7.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

7.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 10.0.2 Increase the share of non-car modes in daily trips - ≥17% of trips undertaken by non-car modes

· Level of Service: 10.5.1 Limit deaths and serious injury crashes per capita for cyclists and pedestrians - ≤ 12 crashes per 100,000 residents

· Level of Service: 16.0.10 Maintain the perception that Christchurch is a walking friendly city - ≥85% resident satisfaction

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

7.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with Council’s Policies and Plans.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

7.4 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

7.5 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant as the proposal involves minor work within the existing carriageway.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

7.6 This proposal includes measures to encourage walking/cycling/public transport and therefore will result in positive changes to reduce carbon emissions and the effects of Climate Change.

7.7 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

7.8 This proposal improves accessibility for pedestrians/cyclists, by providing a safer means of crossing Waterloo Road.

8. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

8.1 Cost to Implement – $280,000 approx

8.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - To be covered under the area maintenance contract, the effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

8.3 Funding Source - Traffic Operations Road Safety budget.

Other / He mea anō

8.4 None identified.

9. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

9.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

9.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

9.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

9.4 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

9.5 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 7.1 – 7.3.

10. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

10.1 None identified.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Waterloo Road For Approval Plan	23
b ⇩	Waterloo Road Submitter Issues Raised	24

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Gemma Dioni - Senior Transportation Engineer

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Assistant

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

8. No Stopping Restrictions - Totara Street / Konini Street intersection
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1161543
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Gautham Praburam, Traffic Engineer gautham.praburam@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager – Infrastructure, Planning and Regulatory Services jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider approval of No Stopping restrictions at the Totara Street / Konini Street intersection.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request from a resident who expressed concerns regarding the low road width available for vehicles travelling through this intersection when vehicles are parked adjacent to the existing kerb extensions.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by applying the assessment criteria in the Significance and Engagement Policy Worksheet.

1.4 The recommended option is to install No Stopping lines at the Totara Street / Konini Street intersection, in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time (as shown in Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Drawing TG142059, issue 1 dated 06/09/2022):

a. Along the northern side of Totara Street commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

b. Along the northern side of Totara Street commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

c. Along the southern side of Totara Street commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

d. Along the southern side of Totara Street commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

e. Along the western side of Konini Street commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

f. Along the eastern side of Konini Street commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

g. Along the western side of Konini Street commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

h. Along the eastern side of Konini Street commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres.

2. Relocates the start point of the existing 120 minute (Monday to Friday, 9AM to 5PM, March to November) parking restrictions (as shown in Attachment A Drawing to the report on the meeting agenda,TG142059, issue 1 dated 06/09/2022):

a. On the southern side of Totara Street (west of its intersection with Konini Street), to a point 9 metres west of its current location.

b. On the western side of Konini Street (south of its intersection with Totara Street), to a point 10 metres south of its current location.

3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 0 and 2 above.

4. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Concerns have been raised regarding limited road width due to the presence of parked vehicles adjacent to the kerb extensions at the Totara Street / Konini Street intersection. Vehicles parked in this location restrict visibility and free flow of traffic thereby affecting all road users. Implementing the noted recommendations could provide better accessibility for road users at this intersection.

3.2 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

3.3 It is proposed to install No stopping restrictions adjacent to the kerb extensions at the Totara Street / Konini Street intersection. This is expected to reduce any inconsiderate parking activity at this location.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo.

4.1.1 The advantages of this option include:

· No cost to the Council.

4.1.2 The disadvantages of the option include:

· Does not address the customer’s request, and identified concerns, related to the accessibility and safety at this location.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 The Totara Street / Konini Street intersection has kerb extensions on all four legs. These kerb extensions help in slowing down vehicles as they approach the intersection thereby improving road safety at this location.

5.2 Presence of parked vehicles do encourage lower speeds along many residential streets as they tend to present a visually narrow road. But parked vehicles at this intersection, near the kerb extensions, heavily reduce the available road width thereby creating safety and accessibility concerns for turning vehicles and vehicles travelling straight through the intersection.

5.3 A search of the New Zealand Transport Agency Crash Analysis System identified no crashes within 50m of this intersection since 2017. While there is no history of reported crashes associated with parked vehicles, parked vehicles near the kerb extensions are expected to cause safety accessibility issues for all road users at this intersection.

5.4 After investigating the matter, staff acknowledge the resident’s concerns and agree that there is a potential safety and accessibility issue present that could be addressed by adopting the recommendations in this report.

5.5 Approval is required by the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

5.6 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year.

Community Views and Preferences

5.7 Owners and residents of the properties near the proposed No Stopping lines were advised of the recommended option by letter.

5.8 Responses were received from six residents.

· Two residents supported the proposal.

· One other resident supported the proposal but also requested parking ticks at this location which are currently being considered and separately investigated.

· Another resident also supported the proposal and indicated their preference to extend the restrictions further south on Konini Street.

· One of the residents opposed this proposal as they felt that parked vehicles would help in slowing down vehicles approaching the intersection. They also felt that this proposal would remove parking spaces for students and visitors.

· One resident did not indicate their support or opposition but provided feedback regarding driver behaviour around this location (driving at inappropriate speeds through the STOP controlled intersection without stopping).

5.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance has no concerns with the preferred option.

5.10 The extent of the proposed No Stopping restrictions along the southern side of Totara Street, east of the Konini Street intersection, has been reduced by 2m from the plan sent out for consultation. This has been done to tie in the proposed restrictions with the existing 120 minute (Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm, March to November) parking restrictions. This is not expected to cause any major change in the intended parking behaviour and the road safety scenario at this location. The respondents will be informed regarding this change.

5.11 The do nothing option is inconsistent with community requests to improve safety and accessibility at this location.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 The Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 The recommendations in this report are also consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety and Efficiency Service Plan in the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031)

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The decision is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal does not have any specific effect on accessibility for pedestrians. It is intended to improve accessibility and safety for road users travelling through this location.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $310 for the installation and approximately $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Included under existing maintenance contracts - approximately $100 per annum.

7.3 Funding Source –Traffic Operations, traffic signs and markings budget.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.2 Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.5 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 to 8.3.

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 None identified.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Totara Street / Konini Street intersection - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions	34

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Gautham Praburam - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

9. No Stopping Restrictions - Tara Street
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1071631
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Gautham Praburam, Traffic Engineer gautham.praburam@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager – Infrastructure, Planning and Regulatory Services jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider approval of No Stopping restrictions along the western side of Tara Street.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request from a road user who expressed concerns regarding the low road width available for vehicles travelling along Tara Street when vehicles are parked on both sides of the road.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by applying the assessment criteria in the Significance and Engagement Policy Worksheet.

1.4 The recommended option is to install No Stopping lines along the western side of Tara Street, in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time along the western side of Tara Street commencing at its intersection with Shand Crescent and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 48 metres. Refer to Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Drawing TG142031, issue 1 dated 19/08/2022.

2. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 0. above.

3. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Concerns have been raised regarding limited road width due to the presence of parked vehicles along both sides of Tara Street. Vehicles parked in this location restrict visibility and free flow of traffic. Implementing the noted recommendations could provide better accessibility for road users along Tara Street.

3.2 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

3.3 It is proposed to install No stopping restrictions along the western side of Tara Street for a length of 48 metres. This would result in the effective removal of available on street parking for up to five vehicles.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo.

4.1.1 The advantages of this option include:

· Retains existing on-street parking spaces.

4.1.2 The disadvantages of the option include:

· Does not address the customer’s request, and identified concerns, related to the accessibility and safety at this location.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 The Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy recommends No Stopping restrictions on one side of the road / alternate sides if the road width is less than 7m. Tara Street is approximately 6m wide (kerb to kerb).

5.2 According to the road user, accessibility / free flow of vehicles was difficult when vehicles were parked on both sides of the road. This was confirmed during site inspections as well.

5.3 A search of the New Zealand Transport Agency Crash Analysis System identified no crashes along Tara Street since 2017. While there is no history of reported crashes associated with parked vehicles, restricted lane width caused due to on street parking on both sides is expected to cause accessibility issues for all vehicles (especially emergency vehicles) travelling through Tara Street.

5.4 After investigating the matter, staff acknowledge the customer’s concerns and agree that there is a potential accessibility issue present that could be addressed by adopting the recommendations in this report.

5.5 Approval is required by the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

5.6 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year.

Community Views and Preferences

5.7 Owners and residents of the properties near the proposed No Stopping lines were advised of the recommended option by letter.

5.8 Responses were received from four residents. One of them supported the proposal. Two people supported the proposal but requested additional treatments like parking ticks and signs as this proposal could lead to additional vehicles being parked on street in the nearby Shand Crescent. One of them enquired about the possibility of having the restrictions along the eastern side of Tara Street. But, after further discussion, they agreed with the current proposal.

5.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance has no concerns with the preferred option.

5.10 The do nothing option is inconsistent with community requests to improve accessibility at this location.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 The Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 The recommendations in this report are also consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety and Efficiency Service Plan in the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031).

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal does not have any specific effect on accessibility for pedestrians. It is intended to improve accessibility for road users by improving safety for those travelling through this location.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – approximately $100 for the installation and approximately $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – Included under existing maintenance contracts - approximately $100 per annum.

7.3 Funding Source –Traffic Operations, traffic signs and markings budget.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 None identified.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Tara Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions	39

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Gautham Praburam - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

10. Heavy Vehicles Restrictions - Little Gem Road
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1071563
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Gautham Praburam, Traffic Engineer gautham.praburam@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Jane Davis, General Manager – Infrastructure, Planning and Regulatory Services jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to recommend that the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board approve Heavy Vehicle Restrictions along Little Gem Road under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request from the residents of Little Gem Road who were concerned about the high volume of heavy vehicles passing through their street.

1.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by applying the assessment criteria in the Significance and Engagement Policy Worksheet.

1.4 The recommended option is to prevent heavy vehicles from accessing Little Gem Road except for deliveries in that street, in accordance with Attachment A.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves, pursuant to Clause 19 of the Council’s Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that heavy vehicles be prohibited along Little Gem Road except where there is no other way reasonably available for the traffic concerned to proceed, and/or bone fide deliveries to or collections from properties on the road, and/or scheduled bus services. Refer to Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, Drawing TG142081, issue 1 dated 19/08/2022.

2. Approves that any other existing traffic control and/or restriction made under any Act, Rule or Bylaw that is contrary to or in conflict with1. be revoked.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 Concerns have been raised by residents regarding the high number of heavy vehicles travelling through Little Gem Road, which is a residential street. The residents felt that, after Little Gem Road was fully opened in 2020, heavy vehicles were using Little Gem Road as a shortcut between Wilmers Road and Owaka Road.

3.2 The residents were concerned regarding potential road safety risks and the noise and vibration issues which could occur due to the high frequency of heavy vehicles along Little Gem Road.

3.3 The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

3.4 It is proposed to prevent heavy vehicles from accessing Little Gem Road except for deliveries or collections in that street.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 Maintain the status quo.

4.1.1 The advantages of this option include:

· No cost to the Council.

4.1.2 The disadvantages of the option include:

· Does not address the residents’ requests and identified concerns related to noise and vibration issues and road safety at this location.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1 The residents of Little Gem Road have expressed their concerns regarding noise and vibration issues and road safety risks due to the high volume of heavy vehicles passing through their street. After Little Gem Road was fully open, the residents feel that many heavy vehicles were using Little Gem Road as a shortcut to access the nearby businesses.

5.2 A traffic survey was done in December 2021 to analyse the heavy vehicle volumes. The average weekday (5 days) proportion of heavy vehicles was found to be 17.2% which is very high for a residential street of this kind. The high number of heavy vehicles is understood to have not been caused by any temporary road works and is expected to continue if the proposed restrictions are not in place.

5.3 A search of the New Zealand Transport Agency Crash Analysis System identified no crashes along Little Gem Road since 2017. While there is no history of reported crashes, the high volume of heavy vehicles is expected to have a negative impact on people residing in this residential street

5.4 After investigating the matter, staff acknowledge the residents’ concerns and agree that they could be addressed by adopting the recommendations in this report.

5.5 Preventing heavy vehicles along Little Gem Road would require vehicles on Wilmers Road (Secondary Collector) to travel through Awatea Road (Secondary Arterial) to access Owaka Road and vice versa. Based on the traffic volumes and outlook of these roads, the displaced traffic along the new route is not expected to create a negative impact on them.

5.6 The new route is also not expected to significantly increase the travel time / distance for heavy vehicles. It also needs to be noted that all vehicles (including heavy vehicles) were following this route before Little Gem Road was recently fully open to traffic.

5.7 It is proposed to install gated signs indicating entry restrictions to heavy vehicles (except for deliveries) near both ends of Little Gem Road.

5.8 Approval is required by the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.

5.9 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year.

Community Views and Preferences

5.10 The following organisations were consulted regarding the proposed restrictions:

· NZ Heavy Haulage Association

· NZ Trucking Association

· Southern Demolition & Salvage Ltd

· Parks Towing

· Native Timber Solutions

· Transporting NZ

5.11 Though there were some minor concerns and questions, no one objected to the proposal and offered to cooperate with the restrictions.

5.12 NZ Police were also consulted regarding this proposal. They did not have any issues and mentioned that enforcement would be available if required.

5.13 The do nothing option is inconsistent with community’s requests and concerns.

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 The Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Transport

· Level of Service: 16.0.3 Improve resident satisfaction with road condition - >=25% resident satisfaction

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5 This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6 This proposal does not have any specific effect on accessibility for pedestrians. It is intended to improve safety for road users and the surrounding community by preventing heavy vehicles from accessing this residential street.

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement - approximately $800 for the installation of signage and approximately $1000 for investigation and preparation of this report.

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Included under existing maintenance contracts - approximately $100 per annum.

7.3 Funding Source - Traffic Operations, traffic signs and markings budget.

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 Part 2 Clause 19 of the Traffic and Parking Bylaw provides the Council with the authority to establish Heavy Vehicle Restrictions (subject to conditions as the Council sees fit) by resolution.

8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 None identified.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Little Gem Road - Proposed Heavy Vehicle Restrictions	46

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name	Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Gautham Praburam - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

11. Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents Association - Boundary Extension
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/986419
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Bailey Peterson, Community Development Advisor, bailey.peterson@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson @ccc.govt.nz

1. Executive Summary / Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Board to consider for approval, the extension of the Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents' Association’s existing boundary.

1.2 This report has been written in response to a request received from the Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents’ Association (RBKRA).

1.3 Application for a boundary extension is the consequence of increased membership of residents who are outside of the current boundary for the RBKRA. The membership growth has been prompted by the Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Changes.. The proposed changes to the Medium Density Residential Standards has potential to have impact on the area that the RBKRA represents.

1.4 The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by taking into account the localised area that the options involve.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves an extension of the boundaries for the Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents’ Association’s existing area, as follows:

a. To include the area bounded by, but not including Ilam Stream, Clyde Road and Riccarton Road. This includes Konini Street, Totara Street, Hinau Street, Puriri Street, Miro Street and Ngahere Street.

b. To extend the boundary down Straven Road and Harakeke Street from Matai Street West to Ilam Stream.

c. To include Kotare Street from Kahu Road to Roa Road

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1 The proposed boundary changes do not extend into any other active residents' group area.

3.2 The RBKRA will provide a voice for the residents of the expanded area to Council, the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board and to other agencies, on issues of significance and interest to the community.

3.3 Council and the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will have an avenue to communicate with the residents in the expanded area.

3.4 The RBKRA already has representatives from the additional area to enable local feedback and representation.

3.5 The RBKRA has plans in place to engage with further residents from the additional areas to increase the opportunities for advocacy.

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1 The alternative option is to decline the requested extension.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1 The RBKRA recorded their highest number of membership at the 2022 Annual General Meeting with 165 members. This includes new members from outside their current boundary. At this meeting, the motion was unanimously passed to extend their geographical boundary to ensure the wider community interest is adequately represented and able to be included in the representation of the association.

5.2 This decision impacts the Board’s Riccarton Ward.

6. Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 This report supports the:

6.1.1 Activity: Community Development and Facilities

· Level of Service: 4.1.27.2 Community development projects are provided, supported and promoted. - Community Board plans are developed and implemented.

· Support neighbourhood and city-wide initiatives aimed at increasing a sense of neighbourliness, safety and wellbeing.

6.1.2 Strategic Priority: Enabling active and connected communities to own their future.

6.1.3 Community Outcomes: Resilient communities

· Strong sense of community

· Active participation in civic life

6.1.4 Te Haumako Te Whitingia, Strengthening Communities Together Strategy: Te Pou Tuatoru: Te Mahi, Pillar 3: Participation.

· Residents and groups in the wider community are socially and actively engaged and able to initiate and influence decisions affecting their lives.

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.2 The decision is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies and aligns with the Council’s Residents’ Association Formation and Recognition Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.3 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.4 Not applicable

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.5 Not applicable

7. Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1 Cost to Implement – no associated costs

7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – no associated costs

7.3 Funding Source – not applicable

8. Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1 The Board can make a decision on this matter based on the delegated authority given to it by the Council.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.1 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.2 This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1 It is anticipated that there is no risk to the Council in the Board making its decision.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Current Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents Association Boundaries, 2022	51
b ⇩	Proposed Riccarton Bush Kilmarnock Residents Association Boundaries, 2022	52

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author	Bailey Peterson - Community Development Advisor
Approved By	Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

12. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2022-23 Applications - Canterbury Muslim Community Trust, Rewi Alley Chinese School and Riccarton Leagues Club Incorporated
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1128538
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Bailey Peterson, Community Development Adviser, bailey.peterson@ccc.govt.nz Marie Byrne, Community Development Adviser, marie.byrne@ccc.govt.nz Sam Savage, Community Recreation Adviser, sam.savage@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager - Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider applications for funding from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.

Funding Request Number	Organisation	Project Name	Amount Requested	Amount Recommended
00064423	Canterbury Muslim Community Trust	Kids Afterschool Programme	$83,200	$6,000
00064808	Rewi Alley Chinese School Trust	Rewi Alley Chinese School	$20,000	$12,000
00064823	Riccarton Leagues Club Incorporated	Repainting of Clubrooms	$22,000	$8,000

1.2 There is currently a balance of $172,193 remaining in the fund.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Approves a grant of $6,000 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to Canterbury Muslim Community Trust towards the Kids Afterschool Programme project.

2. Approves a grant of $12,000 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to the Rewi Alley Chinese School Trust towards wages in delivering the Chinese School Saturday programmes and parent support programmes.

3. Approves a grant of $8,000 from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to the Riccarton Leagues Club Incorporated towards the painting of its clubrooms.

3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1 The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of enabling active and connected communities to own their future. It will provide for a strong sense of community, safe and healthy communities and celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage, sport and recreation.

Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau

3.2 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.2.1 Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.2.2 The Fund does not cover:

· Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3 The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion Kōrerorero

3.6 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2022/23	Granted To Date	Available for allocation	Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
$241,193	$69,000	$172,193	$146,193

3.7 Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

3.8 The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund 2022-23 Application Matrix September 2022	56

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Bailey Peterson - Community Development Advisor

Marie Byrne - Community Board Advisor

Sam Savage - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

20 September 2022

13. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - September 2022
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1000960
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Matthew Pratt, Community Governance Manager, matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1. Receives the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report for September 2022.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Kia Rite Hoea Workshops	The Greater Hornby Residents' Association attended a tailored Kia Rite Hoea workshop. Over two sessions they up skilled on their events planning skills.	August 2022	Te Haumoko Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy
Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2022	The Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2022 were held on Tuesday 30 August at the Hornby Club. Fourteen Community Service Awards and two Youth Service Awards were presented at the ceremony with a further Community Service Award and a Youth Service award subsequently to be delivered to recipients who could not attend.	August 2022	Te Haumoko Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy

· Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2022

· Certificates of Appreciation

Two Certificates of Appreciation were presented prior to the Board's 16 August 2022 meeting. Geoa Geer was acknowledged for her service with the Naaasty Women’s Ultimate Frisbee Club and Hana Saemon-Beck for her service with Aotearoa Adaptive Archery and the Aotearoa Multicultural Women Association.

A certificate was also presented prior to the Board's 6 September 2022 meeting to the Ismail family in recognition of their valuable contribution to the Hornby community through the operation of the Springs Road Dairy for over 35 years.

A Certificate of Appreciation has been arranged to be delivered to Tony O'Connor, in recognition of his valuable contribution to the communities of Hornby, Islington, Hei Hei and Broomfield through operation of the Hei Hei Butchery for over 50 years.

· Riccarton Community Garden

The Riccarton Community Garden has started to make the big shift from Peverel Street to 18 Dilworth Street. A big working bee took place on Saturday 18^th August. Over 40 volunteers supported the garden to build the new garden beds and fill with soil.

· Huritini Council

The Huritini Council, which has student representation from Halswell Primary School, Oaklands School, Aidanfield Christian School, Oaklands School, Knights Stream School and Wigram Primary School continue to meet every 6 weeks. The students are currently working a School Travel Safety video that will promote safe travel around the community, with a specific focus around schools. The video is expected to be completed by Term 4.

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 For information, a summary is provided on the status of the Board's 2021-22 funding as at August 2022 (refer Attachment A).

3.2.2 Off the Ground Fund – Under the Board’s delegated authority, the following allocations were made in August 2022:

· $400 to the Greater Hornby Residents' Association towards the Youth Disco Project.

· $400 to Yao Tong (Tanya Tong) towards the Chinese Parenting Group, Parenting Courses.

3.2.3 Youth Development Fund – Under the Board’s delegated authority, the following allocations were made in August 2022:

· $175 to Burnside West University Cricket Club Incorporated on behalf of Ben Hooker towards the Cricket Development Tour of India.

· $500 to Mikayla Cooper towards participating in the Hip Hop International World Championships to be held in Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

· $500 to Zachary Hannen towards attending the International Sports Academy at Andrews Osborne to be held in Willoughby, Ohio, USA.

· $500 to Thomas MacGibbon towards participating in the Asia Pacific Canoe Sprint Cup to be held in Japan.

· $500 to Natasha MacGibbon towards participating in the Asia Pacific Canoe Sprint Cup to be held in Japan.

· $300 to Tamsyn Campbell towards participating in the Commonwealth Fencing Championships in England.

· $250 to Christchurch Girls High School towards Medha Baadkar to participate at the National Readers Cup in Auckland.

· $480 to Templeton Primary School board of Trustees towards two Kī o Rahi teams to participate at the Koru Games in Selwyn.

· $500 to Liliana Gunther towards competing in the FIG Trampoline World Age Group Competition in Sofia, Bulgaria.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· School Travel Plan

Staff are working with Villa Maria College to develop a School Travel Plan. A working group made up of students, school staff and a school board of trustee's representative lead this project. A travel survey was recently sent out to the school community, which received the highest response rate the Council has received on any School Travel Plan Survey. This included responses from 234 parents, 28 staff and 192 students. The survey results will inform any proposed safety changes that are drafted in the School Travel Plan. The next step is for council staff to do a site visit to observe some of the issues at hand and provide feedback for the working group to utilise in their travel plan.

· Matatiki: Hornby Centre

The Board voted at its 16 August 2022 meeting to accept Ngāi Tūāhuriri’s gifted name of Matatiki for the new community facility that the Council is building on land in Kyle Park, Hornby.

Matatiki means spring of water and represents the importance of water as a source of life and wellbeing.

The new centre will be called Matatiki: Hornby Centre, in line with the Council’s naming convention for other similar facilities.

Construction continues on site with the piling, landfill gas membrane and pipework now finished under the original pool hall and hydrotherapy pool areas. In addition, work is continuing on the library and hydrotherapy pool foundation beams and the pool hall lower floor balance.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.

· Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change

The Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change, Draft Coastal Hazards Plan Change, Draft Heritage Plan Change, Draft Radio Communications Pathway Plan Change were open for feedback from 11 April 2022 to 13 May 2022. Pursuant to the decision of the Board’s Submissions Committee on 4 May 2022, the attached feedback was lodged on behalf of the Board (see Attachments B, C, D and E).

Following consideration of the feedback received the Council considered the Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change, and Draft Heritage Plan Change, plan at is meeting on 8 and 13 September and decided to notify the Heritage Plan Change but not the Housing and Business Choice Plan Change.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1 Information regarding Chalmers Street Extension

At the staff briefing on Waterloo Road - Road Safety Improvements Project on the 26th October 2021 the Board requested that staff provide advice on a proposal for an extension of Chalmers Street to Hei Hei Road.

Staff have provided a memorandum in response (see Attachment F) outlining the history of a proposal for an extension of Chalmers Street through to Waterloo Road including a consultation in 2011 by Shopping Centre Investments Ltd, (SCIL), the owners of The Hub Hornby, with a number of key stakeholders for an extension as part of redevelopment and expansion of the mall. However, SCIL did not choose to pursue the extension in its application for resource consent for the redevelopment.

The memorandum sets out the limitations/restrictions on any extension proposal as well as the advantages/disadvantages. It is noted that Council funding the extension is likely to be prohibitively expensive, with significant disadvantages, limitations and barriers to implementation, little to no public benefit, and is counter to many of Council’s strategic priorities. Extension of Chalmers Street is not planned for future Long Term Plans.

4.2 Banks & Kissel Street Kerb Renewal

The attached memorandum (Attachment G) outlines the proposal for kerb renewal projects in Banks Street and Kissel Street, Templeton.

The key objective of the proposal is to replace the existing kerb and deep dish channel with a standard kerb and flat channel along the Western end of Banks Street, and Northern end of Kissel Street, and improve access and safety for pedestrians to public transport. This will incorporate issues with school access and accessibility to public bus stop locations. The Council will also provide a safer pedestrian crossing point on Banks Street in front of Templeton School.

A consultation flyer has been delivered to the residents and businesses in the area and to Templeton School, the pre-school and the RSA Community Club. Feedback may be provided from 13 September to 4 October 2022.

4.2 Halswell Quarry Security

At is meeting on 19 February 2022 the Board discussed local concerns regarding security in the vicinity of the Halswell Quarry and agreed to request a briefing by Council Park Rangers on the Halswell Quarry including security in and around the Park.

Staff have responded with the attached memorandum (Attachment H) advising that two live-stream security cameras have been installed, one on a pole in the central Head Quarters Park car park and another overlooking the exterior of the park office and vehicle storage compound and motion sensor lights have been installed around the exterior of the park office area. In addition security hardware has been improved with heavy duty chains and padlocks and alarms for the park offices are being monitored.

Staff also advised that security audit has been completed by security advisors that has highlighted a few more minor issues and that more fixed night lights and a loud internal and external office alarm siren are proposed.

4.3 Knights Stream School Area Improvements

Staff have advised that there is to be community engagement on a number of safety improvements proposed around Mingimingi Hautoa Knights Stream School and neighbourhood. See attached memorandum (Attachment I).

Improving safety on local roads in Christchurch is a priority for the Council and is also a national priority under the principles and guidance of the Road to Zero - New Zealand’s road safety strategy for 2020-2030. Speed limit changes around schools will be consulted on as part of the Interim Speed Management Plan in October 2022.

The proposed safety improvements are to support journeys to school that are taken on foot, by bicycle and scooter. Following community engagement a report to the Community Board is expected in early 2023.

4.4 Customer Service Requests/Hybris Report

For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the July 2022 Hybris Report (refer Attachment J).

4.5 Graffiti Snapshot

For the Board’s information, attached is a Graffiti Snapshot, an update on graffiti as of August 2022 (refer Attachment K).

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Funding Update - August 2022	67
b ⇩	Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan change - WHHR feedback	69
c ⇩	Draft Heritage Plan Change WHHR Feedback	75
d ⇩	Coastal Hazards Plan Change WHHR feedback	77
e ⇩	Draft Radio Communications Pathway Plan Change WHHR Feedback	78
f ⇩	Information regarding Chalmers Street extension.	79
g ⇩	Proposal for kerb renewal projects in Banks Street and Kissel Street, Templeton.	82
h ⇩	Security at Halswell Quarry Regional Park	84
i ⇩	Knights Stream School Area Improvements	85
j ⇩	Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Hybris Report July 2022	88
k ⇩	Graffiti Snapshot - August 2022	89

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Noela Letufuga - Support Officer

Faye Collins - Community Board Advisor

Sam Savage - Community Recreation Advisor

Bailey Peterson - Community Development Advisor

Marie Byrne - Community Board Advisor

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Approved By

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

14. Valedictory
Reference / Te Tohutoro:	22/1228685
Report of / Te Pou Matua:	Matthew Pratt, Community Governance Manager, matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:	Mary Richardson, General Manager, Citizens and Community mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz