Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
Agenda
Notice of Meeting:
An ordinary meeting of the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:
Date: Friday 15 July 2022
Time: 9.30am
Venue: Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui
Membership
|
Chairperson
Deputy Chairperson
Members
|
Emma Norrish
Simon Britten
Pauline Cotter
Mike Davidson
Ali Jones
Emma Twaddell
|
12 July 2022
Emma Pavey
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
941 5107
emma.pavey@ccc.govt.nz
www.ccc.govt.nz
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
Mihi
|
Tēnā
koutou
Kua
hui mai nei
Ki
tēnei whare ō tātou
Ki
te kōrero, ki te whakarongo
i
nga kaupapa ō to hapori
Nau
mai, haere mai.
Nā
reira tēnā koutou katoa
|
Greetings
to all who
have gathered
within our
(communal) house
to speak
and to listen to the
topics/conversations
of your community
Welcome,
welcome
Therefore, again I greet all present
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
Part A Matters
Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports
for Information
Part C Decisions
Under Delegation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Karakia Tīmatanga................................................................................................... 5
C 1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha.......................................................................... 5
B 2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga........................................... 5
C 3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te
hui o mua.......................... 5
B 4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui.................................................................. 5
B 5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga
Whakaritenga................................. 5
B 6. Presentation
of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga.................................................... 5
Staff Reports
CA 7. MacFarlane
Park Centre - Gift of Building and Granting of Ground Lease to Shirley
Community Trust..................................................................................... 29
C 8. Sherborne
Street near Canon Street - Proposed Parking and U-Turn restrictions 83
C 9. Mairehau
Drain Timber Lining Renewal Tree Removals................................. 89
C 10. Waipapa/
Papanui-Innes Community Board - Establishment of the 2022-23 Youth Development
Fund and Summer with Neighbours Discretionary Response Fund application............................................................................................ 105
C 11. Waipapa/Papanui-Innes
2021-22 Positive Youth Development Fund Application - Ava Madeline White...................................................................................... 111
C 12. Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board - Meeting Schedule 2022............. 115
C 13. Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - July 2022............... 117
B 14. Elected Members’
Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti
Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi............................................................................................................ 136
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
Karakia Tīmatanga
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
2. Declarations of Interest Ngā
Whakapuaki Aronga
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making
when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any
private or other external interest they might have.
3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te
Whakaāe o te hui o mua
That the
minutes of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 17 June 2022 be confirmed (refer
page 6).
4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
A period of up
to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on
any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.
There were no public forum requests
received at the time the agenda was prepared
5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga
Whakaritenga
Deputations may
be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved
by the Chairperson.
There were no deputations by appointment
at the time the agenda was prepared.
6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā
Pākikitanga
There were no petitions
received at the time the agenda was prepared.
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
Open Minutes
Date: Friday 17 June 2022
Time: 9.35am
Venue: Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui
Present
|
Chairperson
Deputy Chairperson
Members
|
Emma Norrish
Simon Britten
Pauline Cotter
Mike Davidson
Ali Jones
Emma Twaddell
|
Emma Pavey
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
941 5107
emma.pavey@ccc.govt.nz
www.ccc.govt.nz
Part A Matters
Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports
for Information
Part C Decisions
Under Delegation
Karakia Tīmatanga: Given by Emma Norrish
The agenda was dealt with in the following
order.
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
Part C
|
Pauline Cotter noted an apology for her
possible early departure.
|
2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga
Part B
Emma Norrish declared an interest
in Item 8, Styx Living
Laboratory Field Centre - Lease to Styx Living Laboratory Trust.
Emma Twaddell
declared an interest in Item 11, Waipapa Papanui-Innes 2021-2022 Discretionary Response Fund
Application - Activation of Shirley Community Reserve and St Albans Residents
Association.
3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua
Part C
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00046
That the
minutes of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on
Wednesday, 18 May 2022 be confirmed.
Pauline
Cotter/Ali Jones Carried
Following on from the confirmation of its
previous minutes, the Board noted in relation to the first paragraph of Item
10.3 of those minutes, regarding the previous discussion of Springfield Road,
that it intended to reference the corner with St Albans Street, rather than
Rutland Street.
|
4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
Part B
There were no public forum presentations.
5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga
Part B
|
5.1
|
David Gardner – Slow Speed
Neighbourhood – Papanui, and Cranford Street Parking Restrictions
|
|
David Gardner
spoke to the Board regarding Item 7, Slow Speed Neighbourhood - Papanui. He
also spoke to Item 9, Cranford Street near McFaddens Road - Proposed P10 and
No Stopping Restrictions.
Mr Gardner thanked
the organisation for progressing the slow speed neighbourhood, describing it
as helpful for cyclists with children, and approving of the extension of the
slow speed zone further to the consultation. However, he considered that
there was still an issue on Rutland Street with the placement of the speed
transition from 30km/h to 40km/h right before the kindergarten and cycleway
crossing, and near the corner with Tomes Road and its entrance to the school.
Mr Gardner suggested
that the speed transition should instead be close to Mays Road. Mr Gardner
referred to his slides (attached), the second of which, taken from the
transition point, indicated with a green circle the kindergarten where
parents are likely to cross the road with their children. Mr Gardner
expressed concern that motorists would be starting to accelerate from the
point of the kindergarten, to support his belief that the 30 km/h zone should
start close to Mays Road.
Mr Gardner suggested
that the squeeze point close to Mays Road with the cycleway crossing, shown
on his third slide, would be a more natural and appropriate point for the
speed transition.
Mr Gardner also
considered it would be good to reduce the speed on Papanui Road and Main
North Road, given the number of pedestrians who cross those roads. Mr Gardner
further discussed issues around Main North Road near St Joseph’s School
and continuing on Main North Road outside Northlands Mall in relation to
vehicle interactions with cyclists.
Mr Gardner finally
spoke approvingly of the parking restrictions proposed in Item 9, suggesting
similar restrictions would be of benefit outside Placemakers on Cranford
Street in regard to sight lines for motorist-cyclist interactions, as would
removing further vegetation in this vicinity to avoid it becoming overgrown
and hindering those sight lines.
Mr Gardner also noted
the pub in this vicinity placing their portable sign on the shared path
taking up some of its width from its proper purpose.
After questions from
members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Gardner for his presentation.
|
|
Attachments
a David
Gardner's Presentation
|
|
5.2
|
Susan Peake – Slow Speed
Neighbourhood - Papanui
|
|
Susan Peake
spoke to the Board regarding Item 7, Slow Speed Neighbourhood - Papanui.
Ms Peake was
supportive of the slow speed proposal and began her presentation by observing
that there had been an increase in rat running in the area.
Ms Peake’s
presentation then focused on difficulties with the intersection of Grants
Road, Gambia Street and Rayburn Avenue, and also her concern over signalled
development in the area, particularly in Cranford Basin, and the resulting
traffic impacts.
After questions from
members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Peake for her presentation.
|
|
5.3 Fiona Bennetts - Slow Speed
Neighbourhood - Papanui
|
|
|
|
Fiona Bennetts spoke
to the Board regarding Item 7, Slow Speed Neighbourhood - Papanui.
Ms Bennetts was
supportive of the slow speeds proposal, though favoured speed reductions also
being applied to the main roads / arterial routes, such as Main North Road,
Papanui Road and Harewood Road.
Ms Bennetts also
clarified, upon being questioned on the point, that she favoured adding a
speed reduction for Sawyers Arms Road, at least to the rail crossing, noting
her observations of how busy the Domain there gets, and the traffic going to
Northlands Mall and the Graham Condon Centre.
After questions from
members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Bennetts for her presentation.
|
|
5.4 Joanna Gould - Shirley Community
Reserve
|
|
|
|
Joanna Gould spoke to
the Board regarding the Shirley Community Reserve as a matter discussed in
Item 13, the Community Board Area Report, with a related memo attached to
that Report.
Ms Gould spoke to her
attached supporting links, focusing on her case that Shirley Library should
be relocated and upgraded to the Shirley Community Reserve (10 Shirley Road)
site, among other needs and benefits for the community that could be
fulfilled through the site.
After questions from
members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Gould for her presentation.
|
|
Attachments
a Joanna
Gould's Supporting Links
|
6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga
Part B
There was no presentation of petitions.
|
7. Slow Speed Neighbourhood - Papanui
|
|
|
Charlotte
French of GHD lead the presentation of the report to the Board, with the support
of the Council’s Engagement Advisor speaking to the consultation
undertaken, and the Council’s Senior Transportation Engineer assisting.
The Board
received the deputations at the meeting on this item from submitters, David
Gardner, Susan Peake and Fiona Bennetts.
Board Comment
The Board broadly accepted the Officer
Recommendations as noted in the Report, except that further to its
consideration of the submissions and deputations on the proposal, and staff
reconsideration at the meeting further to hearing those deputations, where
staff clarified that a variable 30 km/h school speed zone on Main North Road
for St Joseph’s School, and further speed reductions on viable parts of
Sawyers Arms Road and Rutland Street, could be accommodated, the Board decided
to recommend that:
· A variable 30 km/h speed
limit be installed on Main North Road (School Zone) commencing at a point 38
metres south of its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in
a southerly direction for a distance of 200 metres, with times of operation
evidenced on the sign detail (Board recommendation 2 is accordingly
additional to the Officer Recommendations).
· A greater length of
Rutland Street, from Tomes Road to nearer Mays Road, be set at 30 km/h,
instead of 40 km/h (clauses 1zzzz and 1aaaaa of the Officer Recommendations
in the Report are accordingly different as to the distances noted there
compared to what the Board decided to recommend);
· A length of Sawyers
Arms Road, slightly more extensive than between the rail crossing and Sisson
Drive, be set at 30 km/h, instead of the existing 50 km/h (Board
recommendations 3-6 are accordingly additional to the Officer
Recommendations).
The Board
received advice from staff at the meeting that extending a 30km/h zone on
Sawyers Arms Road to Main North Road could not be accommodated under the
relevant Rule, and that the extension of the 30km/h zone on Rutland Street
could not (as a legality) be justified under the Rule by the location of the
pre-school there, but could be justified by the clear change point in the
nature of the street at the reconsidered speed transition point close to Mays
Road.
The
Board’s Minutes Attachments for this item are: the Proposed Speed Limit
Map (Attachment A to the Report) as updated to reflect the Board's recommendations
to the Council; and staff’s earlier advice in response to a Board
request, which was shared at the meeting to explain the exclusion of Main
North Road from the slow speed neighbourhood.
The Board
also agreed (in Board recommendations 9 and 10) to make and highlight note to
the Council of:
· The Board’s
request to staff to progress toward the business area of Papanui, Harewood
and Main North Roads being reduced to 30 km/h when funding becomes available.
· The submissions from the
Northcote suburb and from the opposite side of Harewood and Papanui Roads,
and the Board’s will to see these areas become a slow speed
neighbourhood.
|
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board recommends that the Council:
1. Approves,
pursuant to Part 4 Clause 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and
Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2022,
that the speed limits on the following roads be revoked and set generally as
identified in Attachment A to the staff report and listed below in clauses
1a-1aaaaa (including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council
Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps).
a. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Vagues Road
(entire length).
b. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Vagues Road (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
c. Approves
the installation of a 30 kilometres per hour variable speed limit on Vagues
Road (School Zone) commencing at a point 61 metres north-west of its
intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction
for a distance of 228 metres. Times of operation are as evidenced on
the sign detail.
d. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lydia Street
(entire length).
e. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Lydia Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
f. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on La Perouse
Place (entire length).
g. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on La Perouse Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
h. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Nyoli Street
(entire length).
i. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Nyoli Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
j. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Satwell Place
(entire length).
k. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Satwell Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
l. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Leander
Street (entire length).
m. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Leander Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
n. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Primrose
Street (entire length).
o. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Primrose Street (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
p. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Oakland
Street (entire length).
q. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Oakland Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
r. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Morrison
Avenue (entire length).
s. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Morrison Avenue (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
t. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Honey Suckle
Lane (entire length).
u. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Honey Suckle Lane (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
v. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Virgil Place
(entire length).
w. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Virgil Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
x. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Boyne Avenue
(entire length).
y. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Boyne Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
z. Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per
hour on Langdons Road from its intersection with Greers Road to its
intersection with Chapel Street.
aa. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Langdons Road from its
intersection with Greers Road and extending in an easterly direction for a
distance of 482 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
bb. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Langdons Road from its intersection with
Chapel Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 267
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
cc. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hoani Street
(entire length).
dd. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Hoani Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ee. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Cone Street
(entire length).
ff. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Cone Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
gg. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Ellery Street
(entire length).
hh. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Ellery Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ii. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Wilmot Street
(entire length).
jj. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Wilmot Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
kk. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Sails Street
(entire length).
ll. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Sails Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
mm. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Chapel Street
(entire length).
nn. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Chapel Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
oo. "Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Meadow Street
(entire length).
pp. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Meadow Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
qq. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Apollo Place
(entire length).
rr. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Apollo Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Shearer
Avenue (entire length).
tt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Shearer Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uu. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Grassmere
Street (entire length).
vv. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Grassmere Street (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
ww. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tulloch Place
(entire length).
xx. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Tulloch Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
yy. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Halliwell
Avenue (entire length).
zz. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Halliwell Avenue (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
aaa. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Proctor
Street (entire length).
bbb. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Proctor Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ccc. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Mary Street
(entire length).
ddd. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Mary Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
eee. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Loftus Street
(entire length).
fff. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Loftus Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ggg. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Horner Street
(entire length).
hhh. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Horner Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
iii. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Wyndham
Street (entire length).
jjj. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Wyndham Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
kkk. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Gambia Street
(entire length).
lll. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Gambia Street (entire length) be set at 30
kilometres per hour.
mmm. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Frank Street (entire
length).
nnn. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Frank Street from its intersection with
Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 272
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
ooo. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Frank Street from its intersection with
Proctor Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 169
metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
ppp. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Grants Road (entire
length).
qqq. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Grants Road from its intersection with
Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 325
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
rrr. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Grants Road from its
intersection with Grassmere Street and extending in a westerly direction for
a distance of 488 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
sss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Taunton Green
(entire length).
ttt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Taunton Green (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uuu. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dulles Place (entire
length).
vvv. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Dulles Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
www. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Erica Street (entire length).
xxx. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Erica Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
yyy. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dormer Street
(entire length).
zzz. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Dormer Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
aaaa. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Rayburn Avenue (entire length).
bbbb. Approve that the permanent speed
limit on Rayburn Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
cccc. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Perry Street (entire length).
dddd. Approve that the permanent speed
limit on Perry Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
eeee. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Paparoa Street (entire
length).
ffff. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Paparoa Street from its
intersection with Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a
distance of 399 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
gggg. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Paparoa Street from a point 63 metres west of
its intersection with Claremont Avenue and extending in an easterly direction
for a distance of 297 metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
hhhh. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Claremont Avenue (entire length).
iiii. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Claremont Avenue (entire length) be set at
30 kilometres per hour.
jjjj. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Bennett
Street (entire length).
kkkk. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Bennett Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
llll. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Nightingale
Place (entire length).
mmmm. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Nightingale Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
nnnn. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tomes Road
(entire length).
oooo. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Tomes Road from its intersection with Papanui
Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 399 metres be
set at 40 kilometres per hour.
pppp. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Tomes Road from a point 63 metres west of its
intersection with Claremont Avenue and extending in an easterly direction to
the intersection of Rutland Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
qqqq. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Norfolk Street
(entire length).
rrrr. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Norfolk Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ssss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Scotson
Avenue (entire length).
tttt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Scotson Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uuuu. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tavendale Place
(entire length).
vvvv. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Tavendale Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
wwww. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Mays Road (entire
length).
xxxx. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Mays Road (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour."
yyyy. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Rutland
Street from its intersection with Tomes Road to its intersection with Mays
Road.
zzzz. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Rutland Street from its intersection with
Tomes Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 58 metres
be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
aaaaa. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Rutland Street from its intersection with Mays
Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 127 metres be
set at 40 kilometres per hour.
2. Approve
that these resolutions take effect when the signage that evidence the
restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the
case of revocations).
3. Authorise
staff to make any typographical changes or to correct minor errors or
omissions in the above descriptions of the roads to which the speed limits
apply (being changes that do not affect the materiality of the resolutions).
|
|
Community Board Decided PICB/2022/00047
Part A
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board recommends that the Council:
1. Approves, pursuant to Part 4 Clause 27 of the Christchurch City
Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed
Limits 2022, that the speed limits on the following roads be revoked and set
generally as identified in Attachment A to the staff report and listed below
in clauses 1a-1aaaaa (including resultant changes made to the Christchurch
City Council Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps).
a. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Vagues Road
(entire length).
b. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Vagues Road (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
c. Approves
the installation of a 30 kilometres per hour variable speed limit on Vagues
Road (School Zone) commencing at a point 61 metres north-west of its
intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction
for a distance of 228 metres. Times of operation are as evidenced on
the sign detail.
d. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lydia Street
(entire length).
e. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Lydia Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
f. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on La Perouse
Place (entire length).
g. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on La Perouse Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
h. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Nyoli Street
(entire length).
i. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Nyoli Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
j. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Satwell Place
(entire length).
k. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Satwell Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
l. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Leander
Street (entire length).
m. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Leander Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
n. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Primrose Street
(entire length).
o. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Primrose Street (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
p. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Oakland
Street (entire length).
q. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Oakland Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
r. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Morrison
Avenue (entire length).
s. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Morrison Avenue (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
t. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Honey Suckle
Lane (entire length).
u. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Honey Suckle Lane (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
v. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Virgil Place
(entire length).
w. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Virgil Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
x. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Boyne Avenue
(entire length).
y. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Boyne Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
z. Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour
on Langdons Road from its intersection with Greers Road to its
intersection with Chapel Street.
aa. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Langdons Road from its
intersection with Greers Road and extending in an easterly direction for a
distance of 482 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
bb. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Langdons Road from its intersection with
Chapel Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 267
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
cc. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hoani Street
(entire length).
dd. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Hoani Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ee. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Cone Street
(entire length).
ff. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Cone Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
gg. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Ellery Street
(entire length).
hh. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Ellery Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ii. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Wilmot Street
(entire length).
jj. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Wilmot Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
kk. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Sails Street
(entire length).
ll. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Sails Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
mm. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Chapel Street
(entire length).
nn. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Chapel Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
oo. "Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Meadow Street
(entire length).
pp. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Meadow Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
qq. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Apollo Place
(entire length).
rr. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Apollo Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Shearer
Avenue (entire length).
tt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Shearer Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uu. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Grassmere
Street (entire length).
vv. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Grassmere Street (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
ww. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tulloch Place
(entire length).
xx. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Tulloch Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
yy. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Halliwell
Avenue (entire length).
zz. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Halliwell Avenue (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
aaa. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Proctor
Street (entire length).
bbb. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Proctor Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ccc. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Mary Street
(entire length).
ddd. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Mary Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
eee. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Loftus Street
(entire length).
fff. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Loftus Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ggg. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Horner Street
(entire length).
hhh. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Horner Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
iii. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Wyndham
Street (entire length).
jjj. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Wyndham Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
kkk. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Gambia Street
(entire length).
lll. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Gambia Street (entire length) be set at 30
kilometres per hour.
mmm. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Frank Street (entire
length).
nnn. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Frank Street from its intersection with
Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 272
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
ooo. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Frank Street from its intersection with
Proctor Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 169
metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
ppp. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Grants Road (entire
length).
qqq. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Grants Road from its intersection with
Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 325
metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
rrr. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Grants Road from its
intersection with Grassmere Street and extending in a westerly direction for
a distance of 488 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
sss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Taunton Green
(entire length).
ttt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Taunton Green (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uuu. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dulles Place (entire
length).
vvv. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Dulles Place (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
www. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Erica Street (entire length).
xxx. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Erica Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
yyy. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dormer Street
(entire length).
zzz. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Dormer Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
aaaa. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Rayburn Avenue (entire length).
bbbb. Approve that the permanent speed
limit on Rayburn Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
cccc. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Perry Street (entire length).
dddd. Approve that the permanent speed
limit on Perry Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
eeee. Revoke the existing
permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Paparoa Street (entire
length).
ffff. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Paparoa Street from its
intersection with Papanui Road and extending in an easterly direction for a
distance of 399 metres be set at 40 kilometres per hour.
gggg. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Paparoa Street from a point 63 metres west of
its intersection with Claremont Avenue and extending in an easterly direction
for a distance of 297 metres be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
hhhh. Revoke the existing permanent
speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Claremont Avenue (entire length).
iiii. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Claremont Avenue (entire length) be set at
30 kilometres per hour.
jjjj. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Bennett
Street (entire length).
kkkk. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Bennett Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
llll. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Nightingale
Place (entire length).
mmmm. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Nightingale Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
nnnn. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tomes Road
(entire length).
oooo. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Tomes Road from its intersection with Papanui
Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 399 metres be
set at 40 kilometres per hour.
pppp. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Tomes Road from a point 63 metres west of its
intersection with Claremont Avenue and extending in an easterly direction to
the intersection of Rutland Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour.
qqqq. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Norfolk Street
(entire length).
rrrr. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Norfolk Street (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
ssss. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Scotson
Avenue (entire length).
tttt. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Scotson Avenue (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour.
uuuu. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Tavendale Place
(entire length).
vvvv. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Tavendale Place (entire length) be set at
40 kilometres per hour.
wwww. Revoke the
existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Mays Road (entire
length).
xxxx. Approve
that the permanent speed limit on Mays Road (entire length) be set at 40
kilometres per hour."
yyyy. Revoke
the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Rutland
Street from its intersection with Tomes Road to its intersection with Mays
Road.
zzzz. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Rutland Street from its intersection with Tomes
Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 172 metres be
set at 30 kilometres per hour.
aaaaa. Approve that
the permanent speed limit on Rutland Street from its intersection with Mays
Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres be
set at 40 kilometres per hour.
2. Approve the installation of a 30 kilometres per hour variable
speed limit on Main North Road (School Zone) commencing at a point 38 metres
south of its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in a southerly
direction for a distance of 200 metres. Times of operation are as
evidenced on the sign detail.
3. Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per
hour on Sawyers Arms Road (from Main North Road to Northcote Road).
4. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Sawyers Arms Road from
its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a westerly direction
for a distance of 175 metres be set at 50 kilometres per hour.
5. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Sawyers Arms Road from a
point 175 metres west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending
in a westerly direction for a distance of 530 metres be set at 30 kilometres
per hour.
6. Approve that the permanent speed limit on Sawyers Arms Road from
its intersection with Northcote Road and extending in an easterly direction
for a distance of 554 metres be set at 50 kilometres per hour.
7. Approve that these resolutions take effect when the signage that
evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or
removed in the case of revocations).
8. Authorise staff to make any typographical changes or to correct
minor errors or omissions in the above descriptions of the roads to which the
speed limits apply (being changes that do not affect the materiality of the
resolutions).
9. Notes the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board requests staff to
progress toward the business area of Papanui, Harewood and Main North Roads
being reduced to 30 kilometres per hour when funding becomes available.
10. Notes the submissions from the Northcote suburb and from the
opposite side of Harewood and Papanui Roads, and the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board’s will to see these areas become a slow speed
neighbourhood.
Emma
Norrish/Simon Britten Carried
|
|
Attachments
a Updated
Proposed Speed Limit Map (Attachment A to the Report) reflecting the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board's Recommendations
b Earlier
staff advice on exclusion of Main North Road from Slow Speed
Neighbourhood
|
Pauline Cotter left the meeting at 10.44am
and re-joined at 10.46am during the consideration of Item 7.
The meeting adjourned at 10.58am during the
consideration of Item 7 to take a break and reconvened at 11.10am.
Simon Britten assumed the Chair for
consideration of Item 8.
|
8. Styx Living Laboratory Field Centre -
Lease to Styx Living Laboratory Trust
|
|
|
The Chairperson, having declared an
interest in this item, stood down for this item, and Deputy Chairperson
Britten assumed the Chair temporarily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00048
(Original Officer
recommendations accepted without change)
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Approve
the granting of a lease to the Styx Living Laboratory Trust for a period up
to twenty years including renewals over that part of land described as Lot 5
Deposited Plan 305008 being 6100 square metres more or less held for the
purpose of a Local Purpose Reserve (Community Buildings) subject to the
Reserves Act 1977 at an annual rental of $20,000 per annum including GST for
the purpose of establishing and managing a Living Laboratory.
2. Approve
the proposed use of the property to include the Styx Living Laboratory Trust
entering into occupancy agreements for the purpose of complementary
activities fitting the purpose of the Styx Vision; such uses to be approved
by the Head of Parks and Manager Property Consultancy.
3. Request
the Manager Property Consultancy to conclude and administer the terms and
conditions of the lease and any supporting occupancy arrangements such as hire
agreements and licences to occupy.
Ali Jones/Simon
Britten Carried
Emma Norrish declared an interest in this
item and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item.
|
Pauline Cotter left the meeting at 11.20am
during the consideration of Item 8.
Emma Norrish returned to the Chair
|
9. Cranford Street near McFaddens Road -
Proposed P10 and No Stopping Restrictions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00049 (Original Officer recommendations
accepted without change)
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Approves
that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic
& Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a
maximum period of 10 minutes, on the north east side of Cranford Street, commencing at a point 103 metres north west of its intersection
with McFaddens Road and extending in a north west direction for a distance of
7 metres.
2. Approves
that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic
& Parking Bylaw 2017, that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a
maximum period of 10 minutes, on the north east side of Cranford Street, commencing at a point 110 metres north west of its intersection
with McFaddens Road and extending in a north west direction for a distance of
8 metres.
3. Approves
that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic
& Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at any
time, on the south west side of Cranford Street commencing at a point 143
metres north of its intersection with McFaddens Road and extending in a
northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres.
4. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls
made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the
traffic controls described in resolutions 1-3 above.
5. Approve
that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings
that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or
removed in the case of revocations).
Simon
Britten/Mike Davidson Carried
|
|
10. Langdons Road - Transport Update
|
|
|
Board Comment
The Board received the information in
the Report, and requested that the Board be kept informed and briefed on the
details to be confirmed in relation to associated consent matters. The Board
also considered an aspect of the signalisation of the Greers Road / Langdons
Road intersection is subject to the Council’s consideration of its
final Annual Plan at the relevant Council meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00050 (Original Officer recommendations
accepted without change)
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Receive
the information, including the timing and scope of the network study.
Ali Jones/Simon
Britten Carried
|
|
11. Waipapa Papanui-Innes 2021-2022 Discretionary
Response Fund Application - Activation of Shirley Community Reserve and St
Albans Residents Association
|
|
|
Board Comment
The Board accepted the Officer
Recommendations, except it resolved to increase the
grant to St Albans Residents Association towards Volunteer Morning Teas at
Kohinga, from $450 to $540.
|
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Approves a grant of $10,000 from its 2021-22 Discretionary
Response Fund towards the Activation of Shirley Community Reserve project,
with any unspent funds to be returned to the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community
Board’s Discretionary Response Fund.
2. Approves a grant of $450 from its 2021-22 Discretionary Response
Fund to St Albans Residents Association towards Volunteer Morning Teas at
Kohinga.
3. Approves the move of any unspent funds from the Community Board
Projects; Summer with your Neighbours, Community Service Awards, Community
Garden Pride, Community Liaison and Events, Positive Youth Development Fund,
and Edible Gardens projects to be transferred back to the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Discretionary Response Fund.
4. Approves the carry forward of the remaining balance of the 2021-22
Strengthening Communities Fund to the 2021-22 Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Discretionary Response Fund.
5. Approves that any remaining 2021-22 Discretionary Response Funds
at the end of the financial year, be carried forward to the 2022-23
Discretionary Response Fund and 2022-23 Strengthening Communities Fund with a
30% /70% split, respectively.
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00051
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Approves a grant of $10,000 from its 2021-22 Discretionary
Response Fund towards the Activation of Shirley Community Reserve project,
with any unspent funds to be returned to the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community
Board’s Discretionary Response Fund.
2. Approves a grant of $540 from its 2021-22 Discretionary Response
Fund to St Albans Residents Association towards Volunteer Morning Teas at
Kohinga.
3. Approves the move of any unspent funds from the Community Board
Projects; Summer with your Neighbours, Community Service Awards, Community
Garden Pride, Community Liaison and Events, Positive Youth Development Fund,
and Edible Gardens projects to be transferred back to the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Discretionary Response Fund.
4. Approves the carry forward of the remaining balance of the 2021-22
Strengthening Communities Fund to the 2021-22 Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Discretionary Response Fund.
5. Approves that any remaining 2021-22 Discretionary Response Funds
at the end of the financial year, be carried forward to the 2022-23
Discretionary Response Fund and 2022-23 Strengthening Communities Fund with a
30% /70% split, respectively.
Ali Jones/Simon
Britten Carried
Emma Twaddell declared an interest in
this item and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this
item.
|
|
12. Waipapa Papanui-Innes 2021-2022 Positive Youth
Development Fund Application - Villa Maria College
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00052
(Original Officer
recommendations accepted without change)
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board resolve to:
1. Approve a grant of $600 from its 2021-22 Positive Youth
Development Fund to Villa Maria College towards the costs of Gemma and Lilly
Lysaght, Keeley Hughes and Beth O'Donovan attending the Hockey Federation Cup
in Napier from 29 August to 3 September 2022.
Emma
Norrish/Mike Davidson Carried
|
|
13. Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report
- June 2022
|
|
|
Board Comment
A Board member recorded the staff advice,
provided subsequent to the memo regarding Shirley Community Reserve (attached
to the Area Report) that, dependent on the outcomes of community
engagement/feedback for the Reserve, the following is at this stage set aside
for these financial years, FY26 $50k, FY27 $50k, FY28 $500k, FY29 $500k,
within 61782 Programme – Community Parks New Development (the advice
further noting that: however, this will be reviewed in the next Long Term
Plan as it was initially proposed for a major park facility such as a
skate-park, but this will depend on decisions regarding the community
centre).
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00053
(Original Officer
recommendations accepted without change)
Part B
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board:
1. Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for
June 2022.
Mike
Davidson/Emma Norrish Carried
|
14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi
Part B
|
The Board
exchanged the following information:
|
|
14.1 Police Data
|
|
|
|
The Board discussed concern at the
level of petty crime in the Board area apparent from social media reports,
including sourced from video surveillance footage, and expressed interest in
information from Police about the level of petty crime in the area, particularly
in St Albans, and particularly car break-ins. The Board requested to receive
a link
indicated in the discussion to review the Police data, and to invite a local
Police update on the issues.
|
|
14.2 Area Wide Traffic Management Report
|
|
|
|
In response to the
deputation from Susan Peake, the Board requested staff to advise on
commencing an area-wide traffic movement report for the living streets around
Grants Road, noting the impacts of the housing intensification in the
area, the impacts of the future housing development in the Cranford Basin,
and the increased rat-running and speeding in the area.
|
|
14.3 Shirley Library Engineering Report
|
|
|
|
The Board requested a
copy of the most recent engineering report for Shirley Library,
and that staff include a summary of information relating to any
potential repairs/rebuild requirements.
|
|
14.4 Transport issues raised through Slow Speed
Neighbourhood - Papanui consultation
|
|
|
|
The Board requested
that staff forward a list of the issues they identified through the Slow
Speed Neighbourhood – Papanui consultation to the Transport Unit, so
those issues can be picked up. The Board noted that doing these sorts of
consultation can helpfully identify a range of issues in a community.
The Board also
requested information come back to it from Transport staff about the
additional issues arising from the Slow Speed Neighbourhood - Papanui
consultation.
|
|
14.5 Cycle Counter - Rutland Reserve
|
|
|
|
It was shared that it
had been reported that the Cycle Counter in the Rutland Reserve area may not
be working, and the Board requested that staff check whether it is
functional. The Board queried that no counter appeared to be on the map in
this area.
|
|
14.6 Edgeware Road Drainage / Kerb Assessment
|
|
|
|
It was noted in
relation to advancing the information relevant to assessing Edgeware Road
drainage and kerbing outside Edgeware Village, which is being sought further
to a flooding issue occurring in weather events affecting the butchery, that
this has been delayed by a staff resourcing issue.
The Board asked for
clarification on the nature and purpose of the investigations being
undertaken, that staff ensure existing questions from Board members are
answered, and that clarity be provided on what the planned whiteboard session
with the Board will achieve.
|
|
14.7 Community Service Awards
|
|
|
|
The Board shared information on the
start of its schedule for presenting the Community Service Awards recently
agreed by the Board to recipients at a series of personal visits by Board
members held in the community in front of recipients’ peers.
|
|
14.8 Pavement Condition - Rutland Reserve
|
|
|
|
It was raised that
there is an issue coming out of Rutland Reserve, onto Rutland Street, with
the bad state of the transition down for cyclists, that the Board requested
staff improve when working in the area.
|
|
14.9 Overgrown Foliage
|
|
|
|
It was requested that
staff follow up the work completed to address overgrown foliage around the
Trafalgar Pump Station; it being indicated that the resident who raised the
issue still has an issue with foliage on their fence-line. The Board
requested this work be revisited.
|
Karakia
Whakamutunga: Given by Emma Norrish
Meeting
concluded at11.57am.
CONFIRMED THIS 15th DAY
OF JULY 2022
Emma Norrish
Chairperson
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
7. MacFarlane
Park Centre - Gift of Building and Granting of Ground Lease to Shirley
Community Trust
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/436230
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Paul
McKeefry, Community Facilities Specialist, paul.mckeefry@ccc.govt.nz; Barry
Woodland, Property Consultant, barry.woodland@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Mary
Richardson, General Manager Citizens & Community,
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake
Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is to seek the Board’s recommendation to Council
to deal unilaterally with the Shirley Community Trust (SCT) and to approve the
‘gift’ of the MacFarlane Park Centre building at 19A Acheson Avenue
on MacFarlane Park to SCT together with the grant of a lease of the land (ground
lease).
1.2 The
building, which was originally gifted to Council by the Lions Clubs
International Foundation (LCIF), was relocated to MacFarlane Park in 2018. SCT
has occupied and operated the building since then. There is currently no formal
ground lease between the Council and SCT.
1.3 Officers
received a formal request and supporting proposal from SCT to consider the
transfer of building ownership from Council to SCT which is supported by the
LCIF and Council staff.
1.4 The
decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the
Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The
level of significance was determined by an assessment determining that the
matter is of a local nature and supports an incumbent tenant contributing
significantly to the continued empowerment and strengthening of the local
Shirley Community. The property is not categorised as a strategic asset.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā
Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Recommends that Council:
a. Agrees to depart from policy and deal
unilaterally with Shirley Community Trust (SCT);
b. Agrees to gift the MacFarlane Park Centre at
19A Acheson Avenue to SCT for the sum of $1 (the gift being conditional on
Council having a first right of refusal option to take back the building from
SCT Trust at the sum of $1) and;
2. Conditional on recommendation 1a and 1b,
grants a ground lease over that part of the land parcel described as Pt Lot 2
DP 17482 (herein referred to as 19A Acheson Avenue) shown as Areas A and B on
the lease plan below in paragraph 5.9 for a period of 33 years, including
rights of renewal, at a rental to be determined in accordance with the
Council’s policy for setting rentals to community and sports organisations
occupying parks or reserves.
3. Authorise the Manager Property Consultancy to
negotiate, conclude and administer all the agreements necessary to facilitate
recommendations 1 and 2 above on terms and conditions acceptable to him, and in
doing so make any decisions necessary to give effect to this.
3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te
Whakatau
3.1 In
gifting the building and granting a ground lease to SCT it assumes full
responsibility and cost liability for all building and ground maintenance,
rates and other outgoings. Council retain a first right of refusal to take back
the building from SCT for $1 should SCT no longer require, or is unable to
operate from, the building.
3.2 The
recommendations support the Council’s Community Facilities Network Plan
2020, specifically:
That Council and Community Boards will
make decisions on the future support of the city-wide provision of community
facilities on a facility by facility basis but based on an informed
understanding of the wider network and decision making considerations presented
in the Plan.
To optimise the Council’s
community facilities portfolio there is a need to ensure that all facilities
fulfil a role within the network. To date the Council’s processes when
adding, changing or removing facilities have been ad hoc or focused on
individual circumstances rather than looking at the overall network.
The Community Facilities Network
Plan is intended to ensure that the best decisions are made on a sustainable
future network optimising community resources including people, time and money.
3.3 Advantages
for Council:
· Transfers
ownership of a depreciating asset to SCT where it will be valued.
· Existing
maintenance, repair and renewal budgets will be used on other community
facilities in the portfolio.
· The
land (park) remains in Council ownership.
· The
Council supports the community by providing a built asset that can become a
self-sustaining community facility which compliments the objectives of
SCT’s adjacent MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre and its wider
community and the Community Facilities Network Plan.
· The
transfer preserves the LCIF’s desire that the building continues its
function as a valuable community hub.
· The
transfer to SCT is supported by the LCIF who acknowledge SCT as a financially
robust and sustainable community organisation.
3.4 Advantages
for SCT:
· It provides them
with certainty and autonomy.
· Ownership of the
building provides improved access for programme delivery and external funding
sources.
· A low risk of being
left with a building they can’t use/sell, as it reverts to Council.
· Continued ability to
support and provide established services and activities which empower and
strengthen the local and wider Shirley community.
3.5 Disadvantages:
· The Council gift an
asset to SCT and lose control of the building asset with a book value of
$305,000
4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa
4.1 Retain
the Status Quo – the outreach services provided by SCT to the
community would continue but the opportunity for Council to activate its
preference to have a greater number of facilities community operated through
partnership agreements (in this case enabling SCT to own the building) would be
lost. The ongoing building maintenance and future works costs would continue to
require currently unspecified and unbudgeted Council funding.
4.2 Council
declares the building surplus and sells it in the open market – aside
from undermining SCT’s ability to provide its current level of outreach
services to the community the LCIF would not support this option given its
longstanding commitment to providing the building specifically for the purposes
of supporting community resilience, engagement and participation.
4.3 Carry
out a Request for Proposals procurement process seeking proposals to manage and
activate the building as a community centre – this option has been
discounted as there is a bona fida community organisation (SCT) who have
actively provided, developed and enhanced outreach services and activities to
the community from the site for over 20 years, and are proactively seeking
ownership and use of the facility.
4.4 Remove
SCT, retain the building and include it in the community facility portfolio
available for members of the public to hire with Council officers administering
the bookings, invoicing, weekly inspections and maintenance follow-up –
not considered a tenable option from a political, community or Council funding
perspective.
5. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Context
5.1 There
are three separate community based buildings located on that part of MacFarlane
Park referred to in this report as 17, 19 and 19A Acheson Avenue and shown
below as A, B and C on the diagram below.
· Building A (17 Acheson Avenue) – Play Centre Building - KidsFirst
Kindergarten own the building; a ground lease from Council is pending formal
approval.
· Building B (19 Acheson Avenue) – MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre
– SCT own the building; no ground lease currently in place.
· Building C (19A Acheson Ave) – MacFarlane Park Centre –
currently owned by Council; tenanted by the SCT; no ground lease currently in
place.
5.2 The
future ownership of the MacFarlane Park Centre (Building C), and lease of the
land it sits on, is the subject of this report.
5.3 The
grant of a ground lease to SCT over the land occupied by the MacFarlane Park
Neighbourhood Centre will be the subject of a separate report to the Community
Board.
The Lions Club International
Foundation’s Transitional Building
5.4 The
MacFarlane Park Centre building was originally owned by the Lions Club
International District 202E Charitable Trust (LCIF). Following the
post-earthquake demolition of several community buildings in the Shirley / St
Albans area the LCIF offered the building to Council in 2012 as a transitional
community facility for the area pending construction of the new St Albans
Community Centre.
5.5 Subsequently,
funding to enable the transitional facility to be relocated to MacFarlane Park
in support of the Shirley community was approved by Council in 2017
(CNCL/2017/00292) with the building being formerly gifted by the LCIF to
Council by way of a Deed of Gift in March 2018 (Refer Attachment A).
5.6 With
the support of the LCIF, Council and the local community the transitional
building was activated by the SCT to continue and expand the community
development work it had been undertaking from the Neighbourhood Centre at
MacFarlane Park since 2000.
5.7 With
the confirmed support of the LCIF the SCT now wish to assume ownership of the
building.
The Land and Building
5.8 The
land parcel containing the MacFarlane Park Centre, which extends to around
2797m2, is fee simple, described as Pt Lot 2 DP 17482 and gazetted as Local
Purpose (Community Buildings) Reserve. It is treated as a park in accordance
with the definition in Section 138 of the Local Government Act 2002.
5.9 Within
that land parcel the ground lease area occupied by the MacFarlane Park Centre
is shown as Areas A and B on the plan below.
5.10 The
building (A), which extends to some 133m2, includes a main community hall,
meeting room, kitchen, store room and unisex/accessible toilet facilities.
5.11 Opening
out onto MacFarlane Park the land (B) incorporates an accessible ramp,
ancillary shed, bike stand, general landscaping and three sealed car park
spaces (including one accessible space) accessed from Acheson Avenue.
5.12 The
Parks unit administer the land while the Community Support & Partnership
Unit (CSP) are currently responsible for the building.
Zoning
5.13 The
property is zoned Open Space Community Parks under the Christchurch District
Plan.
5.14 The
zoning allows for formal and informal recreation activities and the current use
as a community centre is considered a permitted activity under the zoning.
Asset – Current Value
5.15 The
current book value of the building is $305,000.
Asset – Current Cost to Council
5.16 A
detailed condition assessment of the building has been undertaken by Citycare.
Annual scheduled maintenance and operating costs are currently estimated at
$6,506.28 excluding depreciation.
5.17 These
annual costs, together with estimated planned work for the 2022 – 2032
period, are estimated at $87,203.70. Beyond that, planned work costs increase
incrementally over the 50 year cycle to 2071. Refer Attachment B.
5.18 There
is no budget in the 2021-2031 Long Term Plan to address the lack of operating
expenditure (including maintenance, capital replacements and renewals) for this
building.
5.19 The
expectation is that any revenue generated by a community organisation will
cover agreed operating expenses.
SCT Background and Proposal
5.20 A
formal request to purchase the MacFarlane Park Centre from Council was received
from SCT on 23 July 2021. A copy of this request together with supporting
business case information provided by SCT subsequently is appended as Attachment
C.
5.21 SCT’s
mission statement is “responding in Christian love to the local needs
holistically by empowering people through a range of community development
initiatives in the Shirley community”.
5.22 They
have owned and operated the adjacent MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre
building since 2000, providing an increasing range of grass roots community
based projects, services and activities, many in collaboration with other
Christchurch community organisations.
5.23 In
addition to managing (and maintaining / refurbishing) the MacFarlane Park
Centre since 2018 they also own and operate four shops in the Briggs Road
shopping complex.
5.24 Following
receipt and review of the Council’s annual and planned work cost
estimates for the building (referenced above in paragraphs 5.16 to 5.17) SCT
are confident in their ability to fund these works from operating revenues and
understand that they will be taking over the building on an as is / where is
basis.
5.25 SCT’s
financial information has been reviewed by the CSP’s Finance Business
Partner who is comfortable with approving this proposal (to gift the building
to SCT and to grant them a ground lease over the land) from a financial
perspective.
5.26 The
proposal supports the goals and objectives of the Council’s Community
Facilities Network Plan in terms of engaging with the community with the aim of
building resilience and connectivity within the community.
5.27 SCT’s
extensive provision of services, training and events include a community
café, barista training, pop-in Neighbourhood Centre, community garden
and basketball, playground and other sports activities in the Park. The
Macfarlane Park Centre building specifically offers a range of child, youth and
‘not quite so young’ educational and fitness programmes. A growing
number of external groups operating from the Centre include two Filipino
Churches, Tongan homework club, Etu Pasifika Ltd Matua Group, pre-schools,
Narcotics Anonymous, Man Up, Restorative Justice and others.
5.28 SCT’s
proposal demonstrates that they, and the MacFarlane Park Centre, are well
governed and managed and well supported by the LCIF, Council (Community Board
advisors, Parks (as asset owner of reserve), CSP (as asset owner of building)
and CSP’s Finance Business Partner), the community and external funders.
Asset Transfer
5.29 The
Community Facilities Network Plan reflects the Council’s preference to
have a greater number of facilities community operated, ideally through
partnership agreements.
5.30 While
there is no current LTP funding specifically available to operate the
MacFarlane Park Centre it is recognised that SCT are providing an important
role in empowering and strengthening the local community and are doing so from
a sustainable financial, management and governance perspective.
5.31 Technically
the transfer of ownership of the building to SCT constitutes a disposal of a
Council asset. However this is conditioned somewhat by the fact that Council
retains a first right of refusal to re-acquire the building.
5.32 The
Parks Unit, as asset owner of the land, will effectively become the notional
steward for the building albeit with no management, maintenance or financial
obligations.
5.33 The
criteria for ‘retaining’ the building (and transfer of ownership to
SCT) has been satisfied as: there is a clearly identified need; it is supported
by a sound and robust business case; it supports Council strategies, and; it
has an identified notional asset owner / steward.
Dealing Unilaterally
5.34 Where
there is only one logical lessee for a lease (in this case a ground lease) or
purchaser of a property (in this case the building) the Council may deal
unilaterally with the lessee/purchaser. This includes facilities linked to
not-for-profit organisations and community buildings.
5.35 There
are a number of matters that need to be considered when contemplating a
unilateral dealing. Refer to Attachment D.
5.36 The
granting of a ground lease and gift of the building to SCT is effectively a
continuation of community services that have been offered by SCT since 2018
(and since 2000 from the adjacent MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre) and
supports the purpose for which the land is used.
5.37 The
proposal does not depart from the considerations as outlined in Attachment D
and officers consider that it would be appropriate for the Community Board to
approve the ground lease to SCT and to recommend that Council approve the gift
of the building to SCT (conditional on Council having a first option to take the
building back if it can find an alternative use).
Lease Details
5.38 It
is proposed to grant SCT a ground lease for a term of 35 years including
renewals in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act. An
annual rental will be determined in accordance with the Council’s policy
for setting rents for community and sports organisations occupying parks and/or
reserves.
5.39 Provision
will be made that Council has first right of refusal if the building is no
longer required by SCT.
Community Views and Preferences
5.40 SCT
has operated from the MacFarlane Park Building since 2018 offering a wide
variety of services and activities to a wide range of local community groups
and individuals. The building operates at essentially full capacity and provides
a base from which SCT offer a wide range of other community outreach projects.
5.41 The
views and preferences of the local community were indirectly received when the
Council engaged with the community on the Community Facilities Network Plan.
5.42 While
this specific proposal has not been widely consulted, the local community and
groups and individuals seeking further educational and recreational
opportunities recognise SCT’s valuable contribution to the empowerment
and strengthening of the Shirley community since 2000 which, as such,
underscores their support for the general intent of the recommended option.
5.43 For
these reasons, and noting the specific support of the LCIF, staff do not
consider that the transfer of building ownership to SCT requires further
consultation.
5.44 However,
the grant of a ground lease to SCT (over land held pursuant to the Reserves
Act) will require public notification.
5.45 The
decision affects the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board area.
6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here
Strategic
Alignment Te Rautaki
Tīaroaro
6.1 The decision aligns with the Council’s vision:
6.1.1 The Council adopted
the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy 8 April 2022 (to be launched in
July 2022) based around 4 pillars: People, Place, Participation and
Preparedness. Relevant excerpts include:
· Place:
we support and help build connections between communities and their places and
spaces to foster a sense of local identity, shared experience and stewardship.
· Objective
2.3 of the implementation plan is to support the community activation and
kaitiakitanga of public places and spaces.
· Mahinga
Actions – support community-led activation and management of facilities
and public spaces through a partnership model eg Community Facilities Network
Plan implementation, number of community groups managing local Council
facilities.
6.1.2 The Council’s
goal for its role in supporting a city-wide network of community facilities is
“enabling active, connected and resilient communities to own their own
future”.
6.2 This report supports the Council's
Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):
6.2.1 Activity: Community Development and Facilities
· Level of Service: 2.0.7 Support community
management and activation of facilities through a Council and Community
partnership model. - At least 82% of community facilities are activated /
managed in partnership with the community
Policy
Consistency Te Whai
Kaupapa here
6.3 The
decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and
Policies, specifically the Council’s Community Outcomes and its Community
Facilities Network Plan 2020:
6.3.1 Community facilities
contribute to community outcomes in many ways, but not limited to:
· Providing
local venues, hosting community events, activities, classes, educational
opportunities, networking and community connection aimed at reducing social
isolation.
· Supporting
active citizenship and connected communities, by providing venues to support
community engagement with the Council, community boards and community
organisations in order to grow community participation in civic life.
· Building
community resilience, social capital and community capital to support a
response to major stressors such as climate change, terror attacks and the
effects of Covid-19.
· Supporting
a network of volunteers and opportunities for community partnerships regarding
provision, activation and operation of facilities.
· Enabling
the celebration of local identity and diversity by providing venues for
education, arts, culture, heritage, sport and recreation.
Impact
on Mana Whenua Ngā
Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.4 The
Senior Advisor Treaty Relationships has confirmed that the decision (to gift
the building and grant a ground lease to SCT) does not involve a significant
decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of
intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana
Whenua, their culture and traditions.
6.5 The granting of a ground lease is a continuation of the current
occupation of the land. The gifting of the building does not constitute the
sale of a land asset and is further conditioned by virtue of the Council
retaining a first right of refusal to reclaim ownership of the building.
Climate
Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.6 The gifting of the building and granting of a ground lease will not
require additional resources. The continued activation of the building by SCT
and the outreach services they provide may reduce the need for travel by
community users of the facility and contribute to the further enhancement of
services and activities available in the local community.
Accessibility
Considerations Ngā
Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā
6.7 The property is currently compliant for its existing use. Moving
forward the incumbent occupier (SCT) will be responsible for ensuring it meets
all regulatory resource and building consent requirements and regulations for
its continued use.
7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere
7.1 Cost
to Implement – legal costs in preparation of the Deed of Gift and Deed of
Ground Lease, covered in existing operational budgets.
7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing
costs – no building maintenance costs for the MacFarlane Park Centre
building (as these will be transferred to the SCT as new owner) or the
MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre (which SCT own). SCT will also be
responsible for any costs associated with the ground lease. Existing CSP
maintenance, repair and renewal budgets will be used on other community
facilities in the portfolio.
7.3 Funding
Source – current operational budgets for legal and property expenses.
Other / He mea anō
7.4 Transfer
of an asset with a current book value of $305,000 is not contemplated in the
current Long Term Plan.
8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report /
Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa
8.1 The
general powers of competence set out in section 12(2) “Status and
Powers” of the Local Government Act.
Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu
Hīraunga-ā-Ture
8.2 There
is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.
8.3 The
legal consideration is the Local Government Act 2002 and the Council’s
Leasing Council Property and Disposal of Property policies, as referred to in
paragraphs 5.38 above.
8.4 This
report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Team.
9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru
9.1 In
the event that SCT cease to operate from this neighbourhood or no longer has a
need for the building, the Council would have the first option to resume
ownership of the building asset. As a function of a request to surrender their
ground lease SCT would technically be required to remove the building from the
leased site (subject to consultation with the LCIF).
9.2 There
may be some residual community feedback regarding Council’s decisions to
deal unilaterally with SCT.
9.3 Conversely,
if a Council decision not to gift the building resulted in SCT deciding to quit
the building there is potentially some significant reputational risk and
community disengagement for Council given the valuable educational, community
and outreach activities and services SCT provide to the local
community.
Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
Deed of Gift
CCC & LCIF
|
39
|
|
b ⇩
|
OPEX and
Maintenance Costs
|
45
|
|
c ⇩
|
SCT
Unsolicited Proposal & Business Case Info
|
55
|
|
d ⇩
|
Factors to
Consider when Dealing Unilaterally
|
81
|
In addition to the attached documents, the following background
information is available:
|
Document
Name
|
Location
/ File Link
|
|
Not
applicable
|
Not
applicable
|
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga
ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors
|
Barry Woodland
- Property Consultant
Paul McKeefry
- Community Facilities Specialist
|
|
Approved By
|
Angus Smith -
Manager Property Consultancy
Peter Langbein
- Finance Business Partner
Claire
Appleby-Phillips - Principal Community Partnerships & Planning Advisor
Andrew
Rutledge - Head of Parks
Mary
Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
8. Sherborne
Street near Canon Street - Proposed Parking and U-Turn restrictions
|
|
Reference Te Tohutoro:
|
22/742712
|
|
Report of Te Pou Matua:
|
Barry
Hayes, Senior Traffic Engineer, barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager Pouwhakarae:
|
Jane
Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services,
jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake
Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to
consider options to improve safety and visibility for drivers turning out of
the Cranford Pharmacy car park and to facilitate more efficient use of
on-street parking space. This report has been written in response to a
request from the manager at the Cranford Pharmacy.
1.2 The
decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the
Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level
of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of
people affected by the recommended decision.
1.3 The
community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the
assessment.
1.4 The recommended option is to Install P10 and No Stopping
restrictions together with No U-turn restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of
the Christchurch City Council Traffic & Parking Bylaw 2017, that the
parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes, on the
north west side of Sherborne Street,
commencing at a point 25 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street and
extending in a northern direction for a distance of 16 metres.
2. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of
the Christchurch City Council Traffic & Parking Bylaw 2017, that the
stopping of vehicles is prohibited at any time, on the south west side of
Sherborne Street commencing at a point 41 metres north west of its intersection
with Canon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 8
metres.
3. Approves that in accordance with Clause 17 of
the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the U-turn
movement from Sherborne Street north approach at the intersection of Canon
Street be prohibited, as shown on Attachment A.
4. Approves that in accordance with Clause 17 of
the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the U-turn
movement from Sherborne Street south approach at the intersection of Canon
Street be prohibited, as shown on Attachment A.
5. Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to
traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in
conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1-4 above.
6. Approve that these resolutions take effect
when the signage and road markings that evidence the restrictions described in
the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te
Whakatau
3.1 Safety
concerns have been identified/raised for vehicles turning out of the car park
near 115 Sherborne Street (occupied by Cranford Pharmacy) due to parked
vehicles obstructing visibility. By implementing the noted recommendations will
lead to a reduction in the risk of a crash by improving sightlines for drivers
turning onto Sherborne Street.
3.2 Concern
had also been raised that parking spaces near the Pharmacy were being used for
all-day parking whereas there is a high demand for short stay parking at the
pharmacy. The recommendations would enable three spaces to be more efficiently
utilised by increasing parking turnover.
3.3 The
U-turn restrictions support the physical measures already in place to enable
the unsafe turning manoeuvres to be enforced and improve road safety.
3.4 The
recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community
outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.
4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa
Do Nothing
- Maintain the status quo
4.1 The
advantages of this option include:
4.1.1 Retains
four unrestricted on-street parking spaces on the west side of Sherborne
Street.
4.2 The
disadvantages of the option include:
4.2.1 Does
not address the identified safety issue of parked vehicles obstructing
visibility, inappropriate use of parking spaces and U-turning driving activity.
5. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Background
5.1 As
part of the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) project, further work has been
undertaken to monitor and respond to the downstream effects of the traffic
using the road network within the St. Albans and Edgeware areas, which include
the Sherborne and Cranford Street route.
5.2 A
major package of road safety improvements has already been implemented over the
last 2 years along this route and local streets. This proposal is a response to
feedback received on the effects of parked vehicles upon driver safety. This
section of Sherborne Street is classified as a minor arterial within the road
hierarchy in the District Plan.
Description of issues
a) Parking
related
5.3 At
present, there is a section of unrestricted parking on the west side of
Sherborne Street between the car park access and the southern side of Cranford
Pharmacy. The available parking spaces are usually occupied by vehicles parking
all of the working day.
5.4 Drivers
turning out of the Pharmacy car park experience difficulties in their sightline
towards the south. Since the access is classified (in RTS9 Table 1) as a high
volume activity (over 200 movements a day) and that the main road functions as
an arterial road the visibility play requires a sight line that exceeds that
which is currently available.
5.5 Consequently
it is considered appropriate to introduce no stopping restrictions for a short
distance (equivalent to one parking space) at this location to maintain a clear
visibility splay. Since Cranford Pharmacy operates for part of the weekend it
would be advantageous to maintain clear sight lines consistently throughout the
week.
5.6 Furthermore,
the on-site car park is intensively used and there is consistent pressure for
customers to find parking spaces, especially for short stay reasons, such as to
collect prescriptions.
5.7 Consequently
it is considered that it would be more appropriate to increase turnover at this
location (equivalent to three parking spaces), to improve short stay parking
opportunities for this Community facility. It also increases the probability of
empty parking spaces which improves the sight line for drivers leaving the car
park towards approaching out-bound traffic on Sherborne Street.
b) U-turning
activity
5.8 As
part of the CNC downstream effects project this intersection was modified to
improve traffic safety and road network efficiency. After extensive
consultation for the wider project, a median island was constructed in
approximately 2020 on Sherborne Street at this location. This was intended to
deter cross-movements on Canon Street, block right turns on Sherborne Street
(which is already signed).
5.9 The
island also deters U-turns, which are probably undertaken by drivers blocked by
the banned right turn. A U-turn manoeuvre requires a vehicle to effectively
grind to a halt and complete the turn very slowly. Since Sherborne Street is
extremely busy through the day, this manoeuvre would create a hazard for
drivers following behind, resulting in a rear-end type collision. The turning
drivers would be expected to take alternative routes to access Canon Street.
5.10 Approval
is required by the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board.
5.11 If
approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the next financial
year.
Community Views and Preferences
5.12 The
project manager for the CNC downstream effects project met the manager at the
Cranford Pharmacy and the business owner at Town and Country Motors, which both
have direct frontage. Both have confirmed their support for the proposal.
5.13 In
terms of the U-turn restriction, staff consulted NZ police, who had previously
been involved in the consultation for the introduction of the median island, to
deter cross movement and right turns on Canon Street. They were aware that some
drivers were ignoring the physical constraint of the island and undertaking the
U-turn.
5.14 NZ
police have confirmed their support for the no-U-turn signage, to enable them
to enforce this driving activity.
5.15 The
Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.
5.16 The
do nothing option is inconsistent with community requests to improve visibility
for drivers turning onto Sherborne Street and enabling short stay parking
opportunities.
6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here
Strategic
Alignment Te Rautaki
Tīaroaro
6.1 Council’s
strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in
this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an
identified priority.
6.2 This
report supports the Council's
Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):
6.2.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and
serious injury crashes on the local road network - ≤ 105 crashes
Policy
Consistency Te Whai
Kaupapa here
6.3 The
recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch
Suburban Parking Policy.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.4 The
effects of this proposal upon Mana Whenua are expected to be insignificant.
Climate Change Impact
Considerations Ngā
Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.5 This
proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate
Change.
Accessibility
Considerations Ngā
Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā
6.6 This
proposal improves accessibility for pedestrians/drivers/cyclists, by improving
visibility between drivers leaving the pharmacy car park and those travelling
on Sherborne Street.
7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
7.1 Cost
to Implement – approximately $1,000 for the 4 signs, posts and road
markings as well as $750 for investigation and preparation of this report.
7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing
costs – Approximately $100 per annum for line marking renewal.
7.3 Funding
Source – The CNC (Christchurch Northern Corridor) Downstream Effects
Delivery Package budget.
Other
7.4 Not
applicable.
8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report
Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa
8.1 Part
1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017
provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by
resolution.
8.2 The
Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the
delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations
for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and
traffic control devices.
8.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with
traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control
Devices 2004.
Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu
Hīraunga-ā-Ture
8.4 There
is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.
8.5 This
specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit
however the report has been written using a general approach previously
approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent
with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.3.
9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru
9.1 None
Identified.
Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
Site layout
plan Sherborne at Canon P10 and NUT restriction
|
88
|
In addition to the attached documents, the following background
information is available:
|
Document
Name
|
Location
/ File Link
|
|
Not
applicable
|
Not
applicable
|
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te
Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Author
|
Barry Hayes -
Senior Traffic Engineer
|
|
Approved By
|
Oscar Larson -
Team Leader Project Management
Jacob Bradbury
- Manager Planning & Delivery Transport
Lynette Ellis
- Head of Transport & Waste Management
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
9. Mairehau Drain Timber Lining
Renewal Tree Removals
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/813281
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Florian
Risse, Project Manager, Florian.Risse@ccc.govt.nz
Laurie Gordon, Arboricultural Advisor, Laurie.Gordon@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Jane
Davis, GM Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services,
Jane.Davis@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake
Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Waipapa Papanui-Innes
Community Board for the removal of trees within Aylesford Street for the
ongoing Mairehau Drain Timber Lining Renewal works to proceed which started
construction early May, 2022.
· Delegated authority approval for the removal of 21 healthy and
structurally sound trees is required from the Community Board under Section 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 (delegated to the
Board under Part D – Sub-Part 1 of the Delegations Register).
· Due to the trees being within the road corridor, the Head of
Transport has delegated authority to approve the removal of 11 unhealthy and
structurally unsound trees and five (5) healthy and structurally sound trees
causing infrastructure damage under Part B – Sub-Part 3, section 21 of
the Delegations Register, and the purpose of the report is to also advise the
Community Board regarding this.
1.2 The
decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch
City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. This is due to
the localised area where the trees are located and the relatively low number of
people affected by the tree removals.
1.3 A
landscape plan is yet to be finalised for the project, and will be presented to
the Community Board once completed. The landscaping is planned to occur
during the 2023 winter planting season.
· Due to inadequate space and the presence of utility services,
replacement tree planting within the vicinity of the drain will be
limited. As a result alternative locations for tree planting are
required.
· The Tree Policy (1.9 and 1.10) will be complied with regarding the
planting of a minimum of two (2) new trees for every tree removed, within
suitable alternative locations.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā
Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Approve the removal of 21 healthy and structurally sound trees for the
Mairehau Drain Timber Lining Renewal works to proceed.
2. Be advised regarding the removal of 16 trees under staff delegations.
3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te
Whakatau
3.1 The existing timber lining within Mairehau Drain on the eastern side
of Aylesford Street is being replaced between Westminster Street and Crosby
Street.
3.2 The works will involve excavation on both sides of the existing
timber lining. There are trees located on both sides in various locations
along the length of the drain section to be renewed that will be impacted by
the works.
3.3 The
trees will require removal to enable the works. Some of the trees have
caused damage to the existing timber lining, and other
trees in close proximity to the drain have the potential to cause damage in the
future.
4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa
4.1 Option
1 – Approve Tree removal
4.1.1 Proceed
with:
· Approval to
remove the identified trees to enable the project to proceed while the
landscape plan is being prepared in the meantime and presented to the Board in
the near future.
· The advantage
of this approach is that no delays will impact the contractor’s programme
which minimises the risk of additional costs from design changes and
variations.
4.2 Option
2 – Decline the tree removal and/or landscape plan
4.2.1 Proceed
with:
· This option
involves declining the removal of the trees and/or the supply of the landscape
plan at a later date. This would impact the ongoing construction works and
prevent their timely and on budget completion. This is because some of the
trees are too close to the drain for work to occur.
5. Detail Te Whakamahuki
5.1 The
trees to be removed include resident planted trees between property boundaries
and the drain, and trees between the drain and the road edge. Some of the
trees located between the drain and the road edge have tree asset identification
numbers; which comprise cabbage trees (Cordyline australis) and kohuhu (Pittosporum tenuifolium).
5.2 Below
are a few examples of the trees proposed for removal because they have been
planted too close to the asset. In some of these images, it can bee seen that
the root work is pressing hard up against the drain, deforming the asset.
5.3 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
5.3.1 Aylesford
Street, Innes Ward
6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here
Strategic
Alignment Te Rautaki
Tīaroaro
6.1 This report supports the Council's
Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):
6.1.1 Activity: Flood Protection and Control Works
· Level of Service: 14.1.6.1 Manage the risk of
flooding to property and dwellings during extreme rain events: Annual reduction
in the modelled number of properties predicted to be at risk of habitable floor
level flooding of the primary dwelling in a 2% AEP Design Rainfall Event of
duration 2 hours or greater excluding flooding that arises solely from private
drainage - ≥0 properties per annum on a rolling three-year average
Policy
Consistency Te Whai
Kaupapa here
6.2 The
decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and
Policies.
Impact
on Mana Whenua Ngā
Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.3 There
are no significant impacts on Mana Whenua. Mahaanui Kurataiao
Ltd has been consulted with at
the start of the project and notified of the start of the construction. No
issues were raised. A set of recommendations regarding the landscaping were
provided, which are being considered as part of the landscape plan.
Climate
Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.4 The landscape plan for this project will include mostly low planting
along the drain edge, as there will be inadequate space for tree planting
within the vicinity of the drain. However, a minimum of two (2)
replacement trees will be planted for each tree removed as specified in clauses
1.9 and 1.10 of the Tree Policy.
Accessibility
Considerations Ngā
Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā
6.5 Not applicable.
7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere
7.1 Cost
to Implement - the cost of removing existing trees and establishing replacement
trees will be included in the Mairehau Drain Timber Lining Renewal project.
7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing
costs - there will not be a significant increase in ongoing maintenance costs
relating the removal and replacement of the trees that will affect the
operations budget.
7.3 Funding
Source - Capex
Other / He mea anō
7.4 Not
applicable.
8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report /
Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa
8.1 Council
has the statutory powers required to undertake the work covered in this report.
Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu
Hīraunga-ā-Ture
8.2 There
is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.
9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru
9.1 If
approval is not given for the removal of the tress, remediation of the drain
cannot proceed and would prevent the Council from meeting its statutory
obligations.
9.2 Any
delays may also impact the contractor’s programme and potentially incur
the Council additional costs.
Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
CPMS49716 -
Mairehau Drain Tree Assessment - 11 December 2020
|
94
|
In addition to the attached documents, the following background
information is available:
|
Document
Name
|
Location
/ File Link
|
|
Not
applicable
|
Not
applicable
|
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te
Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors
|
Florian Risse
- Junior Project Manager
Laurie Gordon
- Arboricultural Advisor
|
|
Approved By
|
Grant Stowell
- Team Leader Asset Management
Lynette Ellis
- Head of Transport & Waste Management
Jane Davis -
General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
10. Waipapa/ Papanui-Innes Community Board -
Establishment of the 2022-23 Youth Development Fund and Summer with
Neighbours Discretionary Response Fund application.
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/767633
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Helen
Miles – Community Recreation Adviser Papanui-Innes,
Helen.Miles@ccc.govt.nz
Stacey Holbrough – Community Development Adviser Papanui-Innes,
Stacey.Holbrough@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Mary
Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to
consider applications for funding from its 2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund
from the organisation(s) listed below.
|
Funding Request Number
|
Organisation
|
Project Name
|
Amount Requested
|
Amount Recommended
|
|
00064634
|
Papanui-Innes Community Board
|
Youth Development Fund
|
$3,000
|
$3,000
|
|
00064633
|
Papanui-Innes Community Board
|
Summer with your Neighbours
|
$3,500
|
$3,500
|
1.2 There
is currently a nil balance at the time of writing this report, with
Discretionary Response Fund and carry forward budgets due to be confirmed.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Approves the transfer of $3,000 from its
2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund to establish the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes
Positive Youth Development Fund.
2. Apply the following criteria and decision
making process for its 2022-23 Youth Development Fund:
a. Agree to transfer the delegation from the
Community Board to the Community Governance Manager to approve grants from the
Youth Development Fund of up to $350.
b. Review and approve the current standardised
fund criteria in the matrix.
3. Approves an allocation of $3,500 from its
2022-23 Discretionary Response Fund towards ‘Summer with your Neighbours
2022-23’.
3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua
Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro
3.1 The
recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular
the strategic priority of 'enabling active and connected communities to own
their future'. It will support the community outcome of ‘resilient
communities’. The reports supports the Council Long Term Plan
(2021-2031).
· Activity:
Community Development and Facilities
(1) Level of Service: 2.3.1.1 Provide funding for projects and
initiatives that build partnerships; resilient, engaged and stronger
communities, empowered at a local or community of interest level. 95% of
reports demonstrate benefits that align to Council outcomes and priorities and
Community Board plans.
Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau
3.2 The
Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the
Discretionary Response Fund for each community.
3.2.1 Allocations
must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the
Council.
3.2.2 The
Fund does not cover:
· Legal
challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council
Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions
· Projects or
initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to
ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend
to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te
Aromatawai Whakahirahira
3.3 The
decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the
Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.4 The
level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or
with an interest.
3.5 Due
to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and
consultation is required.
Discussion Kōrerorero
3.6 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2022-23 Discretionary
Response Fund is as below.
|
Total Budget 2022/23
|
Granted To Date
|
Available for allocation
|
Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted
|
|
$0.00 – awaiting carry forward budget
|
$0.00
|
To be advised
|
To be advised
|
3.7 Based
on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed
above are eligible for funding.
3.8 The
attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the
applications. This includes organisational details, project details,
financial information and a staff assessment.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
2022-23
Papanui Innes Decision Matrix - Youth Development Fund
|
108
|
|
b ⇩
|
2022 - 23
Papanui Innes Decision Matrix Summer with your Neighbours
|
109
|
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā
Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors
|
Helen Miles -
Community Recreation Advisor
Stacey
Holbrough - Community Development Advisor
|
|
Approved By
|
Emma Pavey -
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
11. Waipapa/Papanui-Innes 2021-22 Positive Youth
Development Fund Application - Ava Madeline White
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/826505
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Helen
Miles, Community Recreation Advisor
Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Mary
Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of Report Te Pūtake
Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application received for funding
from its 2021-22 Youth Development Fund.
1.2 This
report is to assist the Board to consider an application of funding from Ava
Madeline White.
1.3 There is currently a balance of $3,000
remaining in this fund.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to:
1. Approve a grant of $500 from its 2021-22 Youth
Development Fund to Ava Madeline White towards representing New Zealand as part
of the U21 Women’s team at the ICF Canoe Polo World Championships in
Saint – Omer France and the Junior International Championships in
Belfast, Northern Ireland from 16 July – 24 August 2022.
3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua
Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro
3.1 The
recommendations in this report align to the Council's Community Outcome of
Resilient Communities including:
· Celebration of our
identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport and recreation.
· Valuing the voices of all
cultures and ages (including children).
Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau
3.2 Determine
the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community (including
any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).
3.3 Allocations
must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the
Council.
3.4 The
Fund does not cover:
· Legal challenges or
Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled
organisations or Community Board decisions.
· Projects or initiatives
that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing
operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the
Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Mana Whakatau
3.5 The
decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the
Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.6 The
level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with
an interest.
3.7 Due
to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and
consultation is required.
4. Applicant/ Te Kaitono 1 - Ava Madeline White
4.1 Age:
20
4.2 School:
Canterbury University
4.3 Suburb:
St Albans
4.4 Event
seeking support for: ICF Canoe Polo World Championships in Saint – Omer,
France and the Junior International Championships in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
4.5 Ava
began canoe polo seven years ago when she started high school. She
currently plays for Nemesis; they are the National Champions after an
eleven-year hiatus. Ava has represented New Zealand twice at the Oceania
Championships (in 2017 as part of the U18A team and in 2019 as part of the U21A
team), where the team won gold. She has also represented New Zealand in a
European development tour (in 2019) and was selected for the New Zealand U21
women's team for the World Championships in 2020. However due to COVID, the
competition did not go ahead.
4.6 Ava's
ultimate goal is to be selected for the National Senior Women's team and win a
gold medal at the World Games. This competition is not open to U21 grades and
is considered the pinnacle of achievement for canoe polo, higher even than the
World Championships.
4.7 When
not competing or training in canoe polo, Ava can be found working or studying
towards her Bachelor of Science in Physics at the University of Canterbury.
4.8 Ava
has been raising funds for the trip by working a couple of part-time jobs.
4.9 This
is the second time Ava has applied to the Youth Development Fund.
4.10 The
following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Ava Madeline White:
|
EXPENSES
|
Cost ($)
|
|
Competition tour costs
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$10,500
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no
attachments to this report.
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te
Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Author
|
Helen Miles -
Community Recreation Advisor
|
|
Approved By
|
Emma Pavey -
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
12. Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board -
Meeting Schedule 2022
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/819530
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Mark
Saunders, Kaitohutohu Hāpori - Community Board Advisor
mark.saunders@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Mary
Richardson, General Manager, Citizens and Community
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to
consider amending or retaining its ordinary meetings arrangements for the
period 19 August 2022 to 2 September 2022.
1.2 This
report has been prepared at the request of the Chairperson to enable the Board
to consider amending or retaining the start times of their formal
meetings.
1.3 The
Board can review these arrangements during 2022 should it wish to do so.
1.4 The
decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch
City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā
Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Consider amending the start time of their
remaining formal meetings to one of the following options:
a. Option A:
|
Date
|
Time
|
Location
|
|
Friday 19
August 2022
|
9am
|
Board
Room, Papanui Service Centre, Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street,
Papanui
|
|
Friday 2
September 2022
|
9am
|
Board
Room, Papanui Service Centre, Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street,
Papanui
|
b. Option B:
|
Date
|
Time
|
Location
|
|
Friday 19
August 2022
|
9.30am
|
Board
Room, Papanui Service Centre, Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street,
Papanui
|
|
Friday 2
September 2022
|
9.30am
|
Board
Room, Papanui Service Centre, Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street,
Papanui
|
…………….
3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te
Whakatau
3.1 This report has been prepared at the request of the Chairperson to
enable the Board to consider amending or retaining the start times of their
formal meetings.
4. Context/Background Te Horopaki
4.1 In order that the business of the Board can be conducted in an
orderly manner, and to allow for public notification of meetings to be given in
compliance with the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
(LGOIMA), it is recommended that the Board adopt a schedule of meetings as per
the Officer Recommendation.
4.2 It is recognised that events may arise, or circumstances change that
would mean the schedule may need to be revised or additional meetings
added. Any additional meetings will be appropriately publicly notified in
compliance with the LGOIMA and Local Government Act 2002.
4.3 It
is noted that holding an ordinary meeting each calendar month allows for all
items of business to be progressed on a regular basis. The minutes of the
Board meeting will be confirmed at the following Board meeting with any matters
requiring a Council decision then referred on to the next appropriate Council
meeting.
4.4 It
is proposed that Board meetings be held on the currently scheduled Fridays at either 9am or 9.30am. In addition to the
decision-making Board meetings, briefings or workshops will be scheduled as
required to provide an opportunity for Board members and staff to receive
information and have an informal discussion on issues where no decision is
required at the time.
Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no
attachments for this report.
In addition to the attached documents, the following background
information is available:
|
Document
Name
|
Location
/ File Link
|
|
Not
applicable
|
Not
applicable
|
Confirmation of Statutory
Compliance / Te
Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture
|
Compliance with Statutory Decision-making
Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).
(a) This report contains:
(i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable
options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and
disadvantages; and
(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of
affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous
community engagement.
(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the
matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's
significance and engagement policy.
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Author
|
Mark Saunders
- Community Board Advisor
|
|
Approved By
|
Emma Pavey -
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
13. Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area
Report - July 2022
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
22/755143
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
Emma
Pavey – Community Governance Manager Papanui-Innes
Emma.Pavey@ccc.govt.nz
|
|
General Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Mary
Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz
|
1. Purpose of Report Te
Pūtake Pūrongo
This report provides the Board with an overview on
initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā
Tūtohu
That the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board:
1. Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community
Board Area Report for July 2022.
3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity
3.1 Community Governance Projects
|
Activity
|
Detail
|
Timeline
|
Strategic Alignment
|
|
Downstream
Effects Management Plan (DEMP)
|
A briefing
update was provided to the Board on 1 July 2022.
|
Ongoing
|
Endorse and
encourage a functioning and safe traffic network that supports a connected
community
|
|
Summer with Your Neighbours 2022-23
|
Summer with
your neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the
unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood.
Report to
this meeting to approve funding provision for applications to be made for
funding assistance to hold Summer with your Neighbours events in the Board
area.
|
Subject to
approval of funding, applications open from 15 July 2022 to 12 August 2022.
|
Resilient Communities
Strengthening
Communities Strategy
|
|
Langdons
Road Corridor
|
Network
study requested. Work has progressed, but staff are currently awaiting
further details around the implementation of the Northlink Retail Park -
Stage 3, including when this will proceed, what this will look like, what
roading works might result, and the scale of additional network demands
generated.
|
Network
study aiming to be complete in 2022
|
Endorse and
encourage a functioning and safe traffic network that supports a connected
community
|
|
Shirley
Community Reserve Activation
|
On 10 June
2022, Council staff met with community members who are advocating for
replacing a community centre on the Shirley Community Reserve. The
meeting was to advise on the nature of the feasibility study, and the
potential options for the site, including the option to replace the community
centre.
|
Ongoing
|
Improve and
support community facilities and amenity in the Papanui-Innes Wards.
|
|
MacFarlane
Park Centre
|
Report to
this meeting to seek the Board’s recommendation to the Council to deal
unilaterally with the Shirley Community Trust (SCT) and to approve
‘gift’ of the MacFarlane Park Centre building to SCT together
with the grant of a lease of the land.
|
Ongoing
|
Community
Facilities Network Plan 2020
|
|
Psychological
Wellbeing Support advocated for Community Organisations
|
Members met
with local MPs, Duncan Webb and Sarah Pallett, to advance discussion of this
topic that the Board had written to the MPs about.
An EAP
Funding Pilot emerging from staff work on this topic is detailed below
(3.4.1).
|
Ongoing
|
Support and
encourage volunteering within the community.
|
|
Community Service Awards 2022
|
Council's
Community Service Awards are a way of giving well-deserved recognition to
people who make our communities better places to live.
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board conferred Awards on all nominees this year.
Board members are in the middle of going out into the community to deliver
the Awards.
|
Awards will
be delivered throughout July till September.
|
Resilient
Communities
Strengthening
Communities Strategy
|
3.2 Community
Funding Summary
3.2.1 The
current balance of the 2021-2022 financial year’s Discretionary Response
Fund at time of writing is $12,307. There is $3,450 remaining in the Positive
Youth Development Fund. Further detail is to be found in Attachment A.
3.2.2 Applications
for the 2022/23 Strengthening
Communities Fund opened on 21 March 2022 and closed on 26 April
2022. The Board is scheduled to consider the applications at its August
meeting.
3.2.3 There
was one 2021/22 Waipapa Papanui-Innes Youth Development Fund application
approved under delegation of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Governance
Manager in the month of June:
· Rosa Vesty was
granted $300 as a contribution towards the cost of attending New Zealand U19
Indoor Volleyball Team's test series against Australia held in the North Island
in July of 2022. The decision under delegation for this application was
made on Monday 20 June 2022.
3.3 Community
Events
· "Tūrangawaewae"
Exhibition - Artwork from several local schools in local
libraries from 22 June to 25 July
This project, co-ordinated by Chris Potts,
Papanui High comes from Tōtaranui Kāhui Ako which is a community of
learning in Northwest Christchurch. Their vision is Hono, Mahi Tahi, E tipu -
Connect, Collaborate, Grow. Students across all schools have been focused this
year on Tūrangawaewae.
Tūrangawaewae is one of the most
well-known and powerful Māori concepts. Literally tūranga (standing
place), waewae (feet), it is often translated as 'a place to stand.
Tūrangawaewae represents the places
where we feel especially empowered and connected. These places are our foundation,
our place in the world, our home.
All schools that belong to the
Tōtaranui Kāhui Ako understand the connection this has for the area
we live in. Each student has a place of belonging and this can be a physical,
emotional and spiritual place.
The work on display represents what
Tūrangwaewae means for our akonga (learners).
Location of student work:
· Redwood
Library - Te Kura o te Rakau Whero/Redwood Primary School, Te Kura o
Matarangi/Northcote School, Te Kura Mareko/Casebrook Intermediate
· Bishopdale
Library - Te Kura o Mātāhae/Cotswold School, Te Kura o
Papakōhatu/Bishopdale School, Te Kura Mareko/Casebrook Intermediate
· Papanui
Library - Papanui Primary School, Papanui High School, Te Kura Mareko/Casebrook
Intermediate
· KidsFest
KidsFest is Christchurch's festival
for kids that takes place in the winter school holidays. KidsFest 2022 is on
from 9 to 24 July 2022. KidsFest events at Libraries are found here.
· Keep
Christchurch Beautiful Community Awards 2022
Nominations for the Keep Christchurch
Beautiful Community Awards opened on Monday 13 June and close on Friday 18
July. The awards consist of Individuals, Community Groups and Businesses
categories. All nominees must be active within Christchurch or its surrounding
areas.
· Christchurch
Civic Awards 2022
The Council recognises the service of
volunteers and others who go above and beyond the call of duty for Christchurch
and its people with its annual Civic Awards. Nominations
for 2022 are open until Monday 1 August 2022.
· Volunteer
Events
Visit this
link for the variety of volunteer events held around the city. Activities
vary, but may involve general clean ups, planting, weeding and mulching.
Some planting events are family-friendly and eligible
for Children's University (CU) credits.
Upcoming weekend planting days include the
Cranford
Basin volunteer days. Conservation Volunteers New Zealand will be planting
7, 000 kahikatea in Cranford Basin this winter (2022), which these days
contribute to.
· Other
upcoming community events and festivals in the wider city
Visit this
link for the variety of community events and festivals held around the
city. This also links to the What’s On site,
where events like the Vegan
night mākete (market), Laughter
Yoga at the Scottish Society Hall in St Albans, and the Northern
Community Market are detailed.
Events are also regularly available
through Libraries, such as Reading
to Dogs, CSO
Music Trails through the Library, and Wā
Kōrero: Storytimes.
3.4 Participation
in and Contribution to Decision Making
3.4.1 Report
back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items
not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]
· Employee
Assistance Programme Funding Pilot
Staff have secured funding to support NGO
staff and volunteers who work directly with the most vulnerable in the Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Wards.
Following feedback from community
organisations, liaison meetings, and organisational health checks carried out
by staff during and post-Pandemic lockdown, it was highlighted the
organisational emotional toll in delivering services, while concurrently supporting
staff, volunteers, and the most vulnerable clients namely children, the elderly
and the socially isolated. The Manager of the Belfast Community Network
further highlighted the issue via an open forum opportunity with the Waipapa
Community Board.
The funding has been allocated to the
Belfast Community Network as the fund holder for the North West Collective
(nine organisations located in the suburbs of Belfast, Shirley, Papanui, and
Bishopdale namely: Belfast Community Network, Bishopdale Community Network
(F-W-H), Community Focus Trust, Neighbourhood Trust, Northgate Community
Services Trust, Papanui Baptist Freedom Trust, Papanui Youth Development Trust,
Shirley Community Trust, and Te Ora Hou.
The funding will be allocated to the nine
organisations by the fund holder.
This direct funding complements staff
initiated delivery via the Mental Health Education and Resource Centre of two
modules of education (Wellbeing on 7 July 2022 and Thrive and Revive on 19 July
2022) aimed at and delivered to community organisations within the Waipapa
Community Board area in July.
The funding signals an organisational,
(Community and Board highlighted) response to an issue that is now raised at a
National level by current and ongoing discussions at the Board level with local
Members of Parliament.
Staff have also liaised with Rata around
possible investment in this initiative.
· Northwest
Youth Events
The Papanui Youth Development Trust
(PYDT) and Te Ora Hou hosted the Northwest Car Rally which was held on Friday 1
July 2022 for high school youth. This event was organised by a group of
young people form the PAC team with support from Youth workers from PYDT,
Council and Te Ora Hou. The event saw 80 young people compete in fun and
competitive challenges similar to the amazing race around the city to win
points. This was done thru the app Goosechase. Feedback from the
event was very positive.
3.4.2 Council
Engagement and Consultation.
· Smart
Christchurch Strategy (closes 14 July 2022)
The Council set
up Smart Christchurch in 2016 with the goal of promoting
Ōtautahi-Christchurch as an open and connected city. The programme focuses
on using new technology and innovative trials to make Christchurch a smarter,
safer place to live, work and play.
The programme has delivered:
o Smart
bins that include solar-powered trash compactors
o Fruit
and Nut trees – Food Foragers - story
o Fruit
trees map
o Seismic
sensors that can help boost a city’s earthquake resilience
o High-tech
graffiti map and track programme
o Smart View
The strategy for
the Smart Christchurch programme reflects the lessons learned over the past six
years and the need for the programme to keep evolving. The Council is seeking
feedback on the strategy and whether the direction is the right one for our
city.
· South
Library Te Kete Wānanga o wai Mōkihi - User survey (closes
19 July 2022)
The Council is
exploring plans for rebuilding South Library and Service Centre Te Kete
Wānanga o wai Mōkihi, and is seeking user feedback to help shape its
design, feel and functionality.
· Expansion
of the sculptural gardens tourist activity (closes
19 July 2022)
This publicly
notified resource consent application is for the Construction of a café,
an entrance building and expansion of the sculptural gardens at the Giants
House in Akaroa
3.5 Governance
Advice
3.5.1 Customer
Service Request Report – Hybris Report for the Papanui-Innes Wards
Refer to Attachment B for the 1
June – 30 June 2022 statistics, providing an overview of the number of
Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of
requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.
It is noted that there are a high number
of dog administration tickets when compared to registration tickets. Dog
administration tickets are for changes to dog/owner records – change of
address, contact details, desexing status, microchip numbers, death of a dog,
etc. Registration tickets showing on the report are understood to be new
registrations only – approximately 36,000 annual registration tickets
have been created since 4 June 2022. These tickets do not show on the report.
3.5.2 Meeting
with Duncan Webb MP and Sarah Pallett MP
The Board met with Duncan Webb MP and Sarah Pallett on 27
June 2022 to kōrero regarding psychological wellbeing support for
community organisation and volunteers. Some notes from the meeting can be found
in Attachment C.
3.5.3 Kohinga St Albans Community Centre
On Friday 8 July 2022 this year’s Canterbury Architecture
Awards were held, where it was announced that Kohinga St Albans
was a winner in the public architecture category. This is a prestigious prize
within the peer-reviewed Te Kāhui Whaihanga New Zealand Institute of
Architects Local Architecture Awards.
3.5.4 Public
Participation
The Board received the following at its 17
June 2022 meeting:
· Deputations
on Slow Speed Neighbourhood – Papanui
The deputations received by the Board at
its 17 June 2022 in regard to the Slow Speed Neighbourhood (Papanui) were
summarised for the Council’s consideration at its meeting of 7 July 2022
alongside the Board’s recommendations on matter. The deputations helped
shape the decision to extend the 30km/h zone on Rutland Street, introduce one
on Sawyers Arms Road, and include a variable 30km/h school zone on Main North
Road across from St Joseph’s School.
· Deputation
on Shirley Community Reserve
The Board received a deputation
advocating for relocating and upgrading Shirley Library to be part of a
community centre suggested to be sited on Shirley Community Reserve.
3.5.5 Briefings
The Board received briefings since its last meeting about
the following projects/issues:
· Update on DEMP
and CNC
· Strengthening
Communities Fund Workshop
Briefings are upcoming to address previous Board requests:
· Courtenay Street Transport
Improvement case
· Edgeware Road
outside Edgeware Village – Drainage and Kerb Assessment
3.5.6 Board
Requests
· 276
& 278 Westminster Street Demolitions
The Board were updated on the
commencement of demolition works at 276 and 278 Westminster Street. Start Work
Notices were circulated.
· Severn
Street Trees
The Chairperson received inquiry from the resident who generated the
Board to visit Severn Street with the arborist to view the street trees on 2
May 2022. Staff provided interim update that there are discussions ongoing with
Orion regarding provisions for the electricity infrastructure that could relate
to the treatment of the trees, though staff are exploring communication with
the residents to understand the wider view of the significant trees lining the
relevant section of the street to also consider in respect of the review of the
long term management of the trees.
· Graham
Condon Changing Room Cleaning
Board follow up from a resident’s
concern about the cleanliness of the changing room floors at Graham Condon Pool
received assurance from staff that the floors have been cleaned, and even the
Centres Operations Leader has been in there scrubbing the floors with a rust
cleaner. A stubborn stain was noted in the accessible change room that could
not be removed with ordinary scrubbing. Staff advised they would use a steam
cleaner in endeavour to remove the stain, however assured that the floors are
cleaned throughout the day and at night so, whilst the stain is unsightly, the
floors are hygienic.
· Street
Works
The Board sought and had follow up and
clarification on a number of works in the Board area:
o Edgeware wastewater renewals – the Board gained assurance of
minimisation of the impacts of the works on the parking for St Albans Park,
appreciating there needed to be some temporary impact on the parking as part of
the works. The Board also had exchange with staff to improve the legibility of
the temporary traffic management.
o Aylesford Street – the Board sought and gained clarity on the
communications around the works for the Mairehau Drain timber lining renewal,
as covering the section of Aylesford Street affected.
o Chrystal, Warden and Petrie Streets Renewals – the Board
gained further detail around the Project Delivery Completion Date moving to 14
October 2022, noting the COVID impact on the contractor, archaeological
notification due to an ‘historic rubbish pit’, and coal tar
investigations, which have had minimal detection at sites within Richmond.
· Shirley
Library
Further to receiving the deputation
advocating for relocating and upgrading Shirley Library to the Shirley
Community Reserve site, the Board requested to see the engineering report for
Shirley Library, receiving advice after its last meeting that:
As the building strength is greater than
67%, it is not considered at risk of being earthquake prone.
From an asset, sustainability and
lifecycle approach, Shirley Library is currently in good physical condition,
having undergone capital works in 2020 and also received works to HVAC systems
in 2014. The building is currently in the first third of its useful life.
Council would not anticipate significant
capital works to occur in the next five years based on current condition and
data modelling. There is a programme of funds in the LTP for the portfolio
which is allocated to the remainder of the Libraries network.
The primary services delivered from the
facility include:
o Library services
o Service Centre
o NZ Post
o Governance
The recent refurbishment works ensure
that the facility continues to provide value to the community and remains fit
for purpose. Continued data collection and condition monitoring will be used to
help inform future decision making for this site. Physically, the asset is well
positioned to respond to how these services are delivered.
The Board inquired about a re-assessment
of the building given the passage of time, and related points, and received
advice that the engineering assessment (completed by
Aurecon) for Shirley Library (which also accommodates the Community Governance
Team for the neighbouring Coastal-Burwood Board area, as being located within
that area) occurred on 27 May 2013 and was determined to be 68% of the New
Building Standard. Two Chartered Engineers undertook a quantitative review of
the report from CERA on 6 March 2014, with further Capital works occurring in
2020.
Council’s Senior Manager Facilities
and its Technical Advisor, who oversees the Council's Earthquake-prone
buildings, have reviewed the 2013 report and advise there is no need to
commission another assessment of the Shirley Library. The Technical Advisor has
advised that the Library is of a Low Risk and not classified as
earthquake-prone or at earthquake risk.
4. Advice Provided to the Community Board
4.1 Information
sent to the Board:
· Exposure
Draft of National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity
Submissions on the Exposure Draft of
National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity are due Thursday 21 July
2022.
· Christchurch
District Plan Proposed Private Plan Change 6: Homebase extension
The Council has adopted the Hearings
Panel’s recommendation that the plan change be approved with some
modification.
4.2 Start
Work Notices (SWN)
· SWN relating to the Board
area have been sent to the Board throughout the month. All Board area and
city-wide start work notices can be found at this link.
4.3 Graffiti
Snapshot:
· Graffiti Snapshot June
2022 (refer Attachment D).
4.4 Memoranda
sent to the Board:
· CCC: Update on Urban
Forest Plan (circulated 9 June 2022)
· CCC: Submissions open - Water
Services Entities Bill (circulated 23 June 2022)
· CCC: Chrystal, Warden and
Petrie Streets Renewals - Project Delivery Completion Date moved to 14 October
2022 (circulated 23 June 2022)
· SWN - 276 Westminster
Street – demolition (circulated 23 June 2022)
· SWN: 278 Westminster
Street – demolition (circulated 28 June 2022)
· CCC: Time and Explanation
of Investigation of Options for Kerb on Edgeware Road Outside Edgeware Village (circulated
28 June 2022)
· CCC: Stormwater Drain
Rehabiliation Update - Canal Reserve Drain and Mairehau Drain (circulated 8
July 2022)
·
CCC: Weather Event (circulated 11 July 2022)
4.5 Alcohol
Licence Applications Notifications in the Board area
|
Date of notification
|
Closing date
|
Applicant name
|
Trading name
|
Address
|
Application and licence type
|
Type of business
|
|
17 Jun
2022
|
11 Jul
2022
|
ATU Limited
|
Saket
Indian Restaurant
|
74
Edgeware Road
St Albans
Christchurch
|
On-licence
renewal
|
On-
restaurant class 3
|
|
27 Jun
2022
|
18 Jul
2022
|
Elmwood Park Bowling Club Incorporated
|
Elmwood
Park Bowling Club
|
5 Donald
Place
St Albans
Christchurch
|
Club
licence renewal
|
Club
class 3
|
|
5 Jul 2022
|
26 Jul 2022
|
Cinco 2016
Limited
|
Papanui Pak 'N Save
|
171 Main
North Road
Papanui
Christchurch
|
Off-licence
new
|
Off-
supermarket
|
4.5.1 Every application for an alcohol licence requires a formal public
notification to be made. These public notices can be found on the Alcohol Licensing website.
4.5.2 Anyone
with a greater interest than the public generally, may lodge an objection
against an application by writing to: The Secretary, Christchurch District
Licensing Committee, Alcohol Licensing, Christchurch City Council, PO Box
73013, Christchurch 8154 or by emailing: alcohollicensing@ccc.govt.nz.
4.5.3 Any
such community objections must be lodged in writing within 15 working days of
the first publication of the notice on the website. These objections may only
be made against the specific criteria contained within the Sale and Supply of
Alcohol Act 2012. General guidance on objecting is available through this website run by Te Hiringa
Hauora/Health Promotion Agency. Request to view, or query, a specific
application may be directed to the Alcohol Licensing Team at alcohollicensing@ccc.govt.nz or 03 941 8999.
4.5.4 Community
Boards in this district have been authorised by the Council to appear and be
heard (upon seeking, and if granted, permission from the chairperson of the
District Licensing Committee) at any hearing of an application for an alcohol
licence. This is distinct and different from being an objector. Community
objectors should thus make their objections direct
to the Council’s Alcohol Licensing Team; they cannot be made via the
Community Board.
4.5.5 However, anyone may ask to speak to the Community Board about
whether the Community Board will seek permission to appear if an application
for an alcohol licence is proceeding to a hearing. Again, the Community Board
do not object on behalf of, or represent, individual objectors, but can (if
they seek and are granted permission to appear) deliver a submission at the
hearing, principally to provide the Community Board’s overview and
insight into the community in the locality of the premises.
4.6 Alcohol
Licence Application in the Board area with objections to be Heard
|
Hearing date
|
Applicant name
|
Trading name
|
Address
|
Application and licence type
|
Type of business
|
|
Aug 2022
|
Liquorsea Limited
|
Northwood Liquor
Store
|
Shop F.03a,
Northwood Supa Centa, 1 Radcliffe Road
|
Off-licence new
|
Off- bottle store
|
|
TBC
|
Pari
International Limited
|
Liquor Spot
Edgeware
|
565 Barbadoes Street
|
Off-licence new
|
Off- bottle store
|
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
Papanui-Innes
Community Board – Fund Balances as at 30 June 2022
|
128
|
|
b ⇩
|
Papanui-Innes
Hybris Report June 2022
|
130
|
|
c ⇩
|
Notes from Kōrero
with Duncan Webb MP and Sarah Pallett MP on 27 June 2022 re Psychological
Wellbeing Support for Community Organisations
|
131
|
|
d ⇩
|
Graffiti
Snapshot June 2022
|
134
|
Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors
|
Mark Saunders
- Community Board Advisor
Lyssa Aves -
Support Officer
Trevor
Cattermole - Community Development Advisor
Stacey
Holbrough - Community Development Advisor
Helen Miles -
Community Recreation Advisor
Emma Pavey -
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
|
|
Approved By
|
Emma Pavey -
Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes
Matthew
McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team
Claire
Appleby-Phillips - Principal Community Partnerships & Planning Advisor
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa
Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board
15 July 2022
|
|
|
14. Elected
Members’ Information Exchange Te
Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi
|
This item
provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events
and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.
Karakia Whakamutunga
