
Waipuna
Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
Agenda
Notice of Meeting Te Pānui o te Hui:
An ordinary meeting of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will be held on:
Date: Thursday 12 June 2025
Time: 4.30 pm
Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch
Membership Ngā Mema
|
Chairperson Deputy Chairperson Members |
Marie Pollisco Helen Broughton Sarah Brunton Henk Buunk Luke Chandler Tyla Harrison-Hunt Andrei Moore Debbie Mora Mark Peters
|
9 June 2025
|
|
Principal Advisor Bailey Peterson Manager Community Governance Tel: 941 6743 |
Meeting Advisor Faye Collins Community Board Advisor Tel: 941 5108 |
Website: www.ccc.govt.nz


Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports for Information
Part C Decisions Under Delegation
TABLE OF CONTENTS NGĀ IHIRANGI
Karakia Tīmatanga................................................................................................... 5
C 1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha.......................................................................... 5
B 2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga........................................... 5
C 3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua.......................... 5
B 4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui.................................................................. 5
B 5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga................................. 5
B 6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga.................................................... 5
C 7. Notice of Motion - Revocation of Community Service Award.......................... 25
Staff Reports
C 8. Proposed Lane Names - 70 McTeigue Road................................................... 31
C 9. Tree Planting Plans for Ridder and Waterloo Reserve.................................... 37
C 10. Pedestrian crossing near Yaldhurst Road / Brake Street................................ 85
C 11. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Canterbury Horticultural Society Incorporated and Christchurch Envirohub Trust.................................................................... 93
C 12. Standing Orders Amendment - Notices of Motion......................................... 99
B 13. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - June 2025 105
B 14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi............................................................................................................ 130
C 15. Resolution to Exclude the Public.............................................................. 131
Karakia Whakamutunga
Actions Register Ngā Mahinga Tuwhera
|
Whakataka te hau ki te uru Whakataka te hau ki te tonga Kia mākinakina ki uta Kia mātaratara ki tai E hī ake ana te atakura He tio, he huka, he hauhūnga Tīhei Mauri Ora |
Cease the winds from the west |
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
Apologies will be recorded at the meeting.
2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua
That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 15 May 2025 be confirmed (refer page 7).
4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.
|
Bryan Gilchrist, Chief Executive Officer, will provide an update on the work of Step Ahead Trust.
|
5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga
Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.
Deputations will be recorded in the meeting minutes.
6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga
There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.
To present to the Community Board, refer to the Participating in decision-making webpage or contact the meeting advisor listed on the front of this agenda.
Waipuna
Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
Open Minutes
Date: Thursday 15 May 2025
Time: 4.30 pm
Venue: Rārākau: Riccarton Centre,
199 Clarence Street, Christchurch
Present
|
Deputy Chairperson Members |
Helen Broughton Sarah Brunton Henk Buunk Luke Chandler Tyla Harrison-Hunt Andrei Moore (via audio/visual link) Debbie Mora (via audio/visual link) Mark Peters
|
|
|
Principal Advisor Bailey Peterson Manager Community Governance Tel: 941 6743 |
Meeting Advisor Faye Collins Community Board Advisor Tel: 941 5108 |
Website: www.ccc.govt.nz
Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision
Part B Reports for Information
Part C Decisions Under Delegation
Karakia Tīmatanga
The agenda was dealt with in the following order.
1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha
Part C
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00027 That the apologies from Marie Pollisco for absence and Tyla Harrison-Hunt for early departure, be accepted. Mark Peters/Sarah Brunton Carried |
2. Declarations by Member Te Ki Taurangi
Part B
Luke Alex Chandler completed his oral and written declaration in the presence of Helen Broughton, Deputy Chairperson and Matthew McLintock, Manager Community Governance Team.
|
Attachments a Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Declaration - Luke Alex Chandler |
3. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga
Part B
Andrei Moore declared an interest in Item 19 - Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 and took no part in the discussion or voting on this item.
4. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua
Part C
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00028 That the minutes of the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Thursday, 10 April 2025 and the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board extraordinary meeting held on Thursday, 1 May 2025 be confirmed. Mark Peters/Henk Buunk Carried |
5. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui
Part B
|
5.1 |
Step Ahead Trust The scheduled presentation did not go ahead. |
|
5.2 |
Hornby Toy Library location Tessa Taylor, Chairperson Hornby Toy Library addressed the Board regarding the Library’s location on Springs Road. The site is Ministry of Education land and the Library asked for the Board’s support for it to obtain a more secure tenure on the site. After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Taylor for her presentation. |
|
Part B That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Agrees to provide a letter from the Board supporting the Hornby Toy Library’s request for a more secure tenure of its current site on Springs Road. |
|
|
5.3 |
Halswell ANZAC Day Service 2025 Adele Geradts, Secretary, Halswell Residents’ Association updated the Board on the well-attended Halswell ANZAC Day Service 2025 and thanked the Board for its support for the event. After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Geradts for her presentation. |
|
5.4 Springs Road footpath construction |
|
Cody Cooper, local resident, addressed the Board regarding the need for construction of a section of footpath from approximately 199 Springs Road to the Wigram Fire Station and Wilmers Road intersection, connecting to the Little River Link shared path, noting that this is included in the Council’s new footpath programme. After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Cooper for his presentation. |
|
Attachments a Presentation - Springs Road footpath construction |
6. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga
Part B
|
6.1 Quaifes Road Corridor |
|
Ross McFarlane, local resident, spoke in support of the staff recommendation in relation to the Quaifes Road Corridor Report (Item 16 of these minutes refers). After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Mr McFarlane for his presentation. |
|
Attachments a Presentation - Quaifes Road, Sabys Road and Candys Road Area Plan |
7. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga
Part B
There was no presentation of petitions.
|
8. Correspondence |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00029 Officer recommendation accepted without change Part B That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the correspondence from G Wilson and J Silcock in relation to the appointment of a replacement Riccarton Ward Board member to the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board. Tyla Harrison-Hunt/Sarah Brunton Carried |
|
11. Proposed Safety Improvements on Suva St, Owens Tce and Hillary Cres (north) |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00030 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Proposed Safety Improvements on Suva St, Owens Tce and Hillary Cres (north) Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolution 4 below. 4. Approves pursuant to Section 331 and 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 all kerb alignments, traffic calming devices, traffic islands and road markings, and one speed hump on each of the three local streets as detailed in Attachment A. 5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on Owen Terrace, Suva Street and Hillary Cresent (North) as detailed in below and in Attachment A: a. North side of Owens Terrace, commencing at the intersection with Curletts Road and extending in an easterly direction for 28 meters. b. South side of Owens Terrace, commencing at the intersection of Curletts Road and extending in an easternly direction for 32 meters. c. North side of Suva Street, commencing at the intersection with Curletts Road and extending in an easterly direction for 28 meters. d. South Side of Suva Street, commencing at the intersection with Curletts Road and extending in an easterly direction for 34 meters. e. North side of Hillary Cresent (North), commencing at the intersection with Curletts Road and extending in an easterly direction for 28 meters. f. South side of Hillary Cresent (North), commencing at the intersection with Curletts Road and extending in an easterly direction for 36 meters. 6. Approves that these resolutions take effect when road markings and speed humps that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Tyla Harrison-Hunt/Helen Broughton Carried |
|
|
Andrei Moore, Mark Peters and Debbie Mora requested that their abstentions from the vote be recorded. |
Tyla Harrison-Hunt left the meeting at 5.18pm following consideration of Item 11.
|
9. Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions |
|
|
|
Community Board Consideration The Board noted that the red poppy is the symbol of remembrance of ANZAC day and fits the theme of the development, being fallen soldiers from World War I. |
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves the following new road name for 160 Awatea Road (RMA/2023/1733) a. Pearl Road 4. Approves the following new road name for 440 Wigram Road (RMA/2021/3823) a. Logos Place 5. Approves the following new road name for 304 Halswell Junction Road (RMA/2024/1899) a. Nurse Rogers Lane |
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00031 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves the following new road name for 160 Awatea Road (RMA/2023/1733) a. Pearl Place 4. Approves the following new road name for 440 Wigram Road (RMA/2021/3823) a. Logos Place 5. Approves the following new road name for 304 Halswell Junction Road (RMA/2024/1899) a. Red Poppy Lane Mark Peters/Henk Buunk Carried |
|
10. Matatiki Play Space |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00032 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Matatiki Play Space Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves the Matatiki Play Space Plan being attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda. Sarah Brunton/Mark Peters Carried |
|
12. Bus stop upgrades on Murphys Road (Updated Report) |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00033 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Bus stop upgrades on Murphys Road (Updated Report) Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. New bus stops at Murphys-Skibbereen-Caulfield intersection (Attachment A) 3. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017: Outbound – outside 33 Murphys Road a. Approves that a bus stop be installed on the southern side of Murphys Road commencing at a point 62 metres north of its intersection with Skibbereen Drive and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Inbound – outside 32 Murphys Road a. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the north side of Murphys Road commencing at a point 35 metres north of its intersection with Caulfield Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 2 metres. b. Approves that a bus stop be installed on the north side of Murphys Road commencing at a point 33 metres north of its intersection with Caulfield Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. c. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the north side of Murphys Road commencing at a point 19 metres north of its intersection with Caulfield Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. 4. Approves that directional and warning tactile pavers, a seat, hardstand areas, and bus stop signs are installed at the bus stops, as shown on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda. 5. Approves the removal of one street tree (Tree ID 143928) outside 2 Caulfield Avenue on Murphys Road, as shown on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Approves the replacement planting of trees on Caulfield Avenue outside Murphys Drainage Reserve, as shown on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda. 7. Pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017: a. Approves that the stopping of all vehicles be prohibited at any time, on the south side of Murphys Road commencing at a point 16 metres north of its intersection with Skibbereen Drive and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. 8. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to parking or stopping restrictions and traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions and traffic controls described in resolutions 3-7 above. Debbie Mora/Luke Chandler Carried |
|
13. 100 Hayton Road - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00034 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the 100 Hayton Road - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolutions 4 – 5 below. 4. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwestern side of Hayton Road, commencing at its intersection with Pilkington Way and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres, as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, plan TG150138, Issue 1, dated 12/03/2025. 5. Approves that, in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the northwestern side of Hayton Road, commencing at a point 19 metres north west of its intersection with Pilkington Way and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres as detailed on Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda, plan TG150138, Issue 1, dated 12/03/2025. 6. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in 3-5 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Luke Chandler/Mark Peters Carried |
|
14. William Brittan / Milns / Kearns intersection |
|
|
|
Community Board Consideration Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report. The Board discussed the possibility of a small roundabout being installed at the William Brittan Drive / Milns Road / Kearns Drive intersection. The Board noted concerns that the agapanthus plants on William Brittan Avenue affect visibility at the William Brittan Drive / Milns Road / Kearns Drive intersection. |
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the William Brittan / Milns / Kearns intersection Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Approve existing kerb alignments of Milns Road 3. Approves the paths, kerb alignments, road widening and road surface within the road corridor of Milns Road, at the intersection of Milns Road, William Brittan Drive and Kearns Drive as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. Approve Stop control 4. Approves, pursuant to Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Stop control be placed against the northern approach of Milns Road at its intersection with William Brittan Drive and Kearns Road, as shown in Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 5. Approves, pursuant to Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Stop control be placed against the southern approach of Milns Road at its intersection with William Brittan Drive and Kearns Road, as shown in Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 4 & 5. 7. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 4 & 5 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Formalise existing no stopping restrictions on Milns Road and Kearns Road 8. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Milns Road, commencing at its intersection with Kearns Drive and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 9 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 9. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Milns Road, commencing at its intersection with Kearns Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 9 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 10. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kearns Drive, commencing at its intersection with Milns Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 35 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 11. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kearns Drive, commencing at its intersection with Milns Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 33 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 12. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 8 to 11. 13. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 8 to11 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Medium Term Intersection Changes 14. Provides guidance for staff to investigate and consult on options for the future layout (subject to further decision report) relating to: b. Four-way Stop control, consultation option 2b (Attachment C) Plan TG144362d to the report on the meeting agenda. c. Left-in-left-out arrangement, consultation option 2c (Attachment D) Plan TG144362e to the report on the meeting agenda. d. Temporary Closure of Kearns Drive approach, and revert to Milns road as the priority road consultation option 2d e. Revert to Milns Road priority over William Brittan Avenue, consultation option 2e
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00035 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the William Brittan / Milns / Kearns intersection Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Approve existing kerb alignments of Milns Road 3. Approves the paths, kerb alignments, road widening and road surface within the road corridor of Milns Road, at the intersection of Milns Road, William Brittan Drive and Kearns Drive as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. Approve Stop control 4. Approves, pursuant to Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Stop control be placed against the northern approach of Milns Road at its intersection with William Brittan Drive and Kearns Road, as shown in Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 5. Approves, pursuant to Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Stop control be placed against the southern approach of Milns Road at its intersection with William Brittan Drive and Kearns Road, as shown in Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 4 & 5. 7. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 4 & 5 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Formalise existing no stopping restrictions on Milns Road and Kearns Road 8. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Milns Road, commencing at its intersection with Kearns Drive and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 9 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 9. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Milns Road, commencing at its intersection with Kearns Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 9 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 10. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kearns Drive, commencing at its intersection with Milns Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 35 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 11. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kearns Drive, commencing at its intersection with Milns Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 33 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG144362b to the report on the meeting agenda. 12. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 8 to 11. 13. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 8 to11 are in place (or removed in the case of revocations). Medium Term Intersection Changes 14. The Board requests that staff investigate and consult on options for the future layout (subject to further decision report) relating to: a. Minor road marking improvements, consultation option 2a (Attachment B) Plan TG144362c to the report on the meeting agenda. b. Four-way Stop control, consultation option 2b (Attachment C) Plan TG144362d to the report on the meeting agenda. c. Left-in-left-out arrangement, consultation option 2c (Attachment D) Plan TG144362e to the report on the meeting agenda. d. Temporary Closure of Kearns Drive approach, and revert to Milns road as the priority road consultation option 2d. e. Revert to Milns Road priority over William Brittan Avenue, consultation option 2e. f. A permanent or temporary roundabout at the intersection of William Brittan Avenue and Milns Road. 15. The Board requests the urgent removal of agapanthus plants on William Brittan Avenue. Andrei Moore/Luke Chandler Carried |
|
15. Kennedys Bush Road upgrade |
|
|
|
Community Board Consideration Staff in attendance spoke to accompanying report. The Board discussed the need for traffic calming measures on Kennedys Bush Road. |
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Kennedys Bush Road upgrade Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Existing Kennedys Bush Road works 3. Approves retaining the existing paths, parking bays, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface on Kennedys Bush Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. Note: The existing infrastructure is highlighted green on Attachment A. Future Kennedys Bush Road works associated with subdivision 4. Approves the new paths, kerb alignments, road widening, speed humps, islands, raised platform at the new subdivision intersection and road surface on Kennedys Bush Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. Note: The new infrastructure is highlighted yellow on Attachment A, and the proposed additional path on the Quarry side is highlighted purple. No Stopping Restrictions 5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at its intersection with Comer Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 316 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 391 metres south of its intersection with Comer Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 49 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 7. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 44 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 8. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 124 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 9. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 286 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 16 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 10. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 341 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 41 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. |
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00036 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Kennedys Bush Road upgrade Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Existing Kennedys Bush Road works 3. Approves retaining the existing paths, parking bays, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface on Kennedys Bush Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. Note: The existing infrastructure is highlighted green on Attachment A. Future Kennedys Bush Road works associated with subdivision 4. Approves the new paths, kerb alignments, road widening, islands, and road surface on Kennedys Bush Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. Note: The new infrastructure is highlighted yellow on Attachment A, and the proposed additional path on the Quarry side is highlighted purple. No Stopping Restrictions 5. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at its intersection with Comer Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 316 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 391 metres south of its intersection with Comer Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 49 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 7. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 44 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 8. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 124 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 9. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 286 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 16 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. 10. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kennedys Bush Road, commencing at a point 341 metres south of its intersection with Cashmere Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 41 metres as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG140003S3 to the report on the meeting agenda. Andrei Moore/Debbie Mora Carried |
|
|
Henk Buunk requested that his vote against the resolutions be recorded. Helen Broughton requested that her abstention from the vote be recorded. |
Debbie Mora left the meeting at 7pm following the consideration of Item 15.
|
16. Quaifes Road Corridor |
|
|
|
Community Board Consideration Staff in attendance spoke to accompanying report. The Board took into consideration the deputation from Ross McFarlane (6.1 of these minutes refers). |
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Quaifes Road Corridor Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Existing Quaifes / Murphys Road intersection 3. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface at the intersection of Quaifes Road and Murphys Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. 4. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface on Murphys Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. Existing Quaifes / Matai Springs Drive intersection 5. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface within the road corridor of Quaifes Road, at the intersection of Quaifes Road and Matai Springs Drive as detailed on Attachment B, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. |
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00037 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Quaifes Road Corridor Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Existing Quaifes / Murphys Road intersection 3. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface at the intersection of Quaifes Road and Murphys Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. 4. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface on Murphys Road as detailed on Attachment A, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. Existing Quaifes / Matai Springs Drive intersection 5. Approves retaining the existing paths, kerb alignments, road widening, raised platform and road surface within the road corridor of Quaifes Road, at the intersection of Quaifes Road and Matai Springs Drive as detailed on Attachment B, Plan TG1361S9 to the report on the meeting agenda. 6. Requests staff advice on options to fill in missing footpath connections on Quaifes Road to consider as part of future Quaifes Road decisions to be presented to the Board. Andrei Moore/Luke Chandler Carried |
|
17. 2025 Ethnic Women in Politics Summit - Elected Members' Attendance |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00038 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the 2025 Ethnic Women in Politics Summit - Elected Members' Attendance Report. 2. Approves Marie Pollisco to attend the Ethnic Women in Politics Summit in Auckland on 5 September 2025. Helen Broughton/Luke Chandler Carried |
|
18. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Oak Development Trust, Hornby Hockey Club Incorporated, Korean Painting Group and Youth Development Fund Transfer |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00039 Officer recommendations accepted without change Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Oak Development Trust, Hornby Hockey Club Incorporated, Korean Painting Group and Youth Development Fund Transfer Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to Oak Development Trust towards Riccarton Tool Shed equipment costs and co-ordinator wages. 4. Approves a grant of $5,000 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to Hornby Hockey Club Incorporated towards floodlight pole replacement, installation, associated wiring work and inspection sign off. 5. Approves a grant of $1,140 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to the Korean Painting Group towards venue hire costs. 6. Approves the transfer of $4,000 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton 2024/25 Youth Development Fund. Mark Peters/Luke Chandler Carried |
|
22. Resolution to Exclude the Public Te whakataunga kaupare hunga tūmatanui |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00040 Part C That at 7.15pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 141 to 142 of the agenda be adopted. Mark Peters/Luke Chandler Carried |
The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 7.27pm.
|
19. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 |
|
|
|
Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Confers Community Service and Youth Service Awards on the nominees listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part A - separately circulated). 4. Confers a Certificate of Appreciation on the nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part B - separately circulated). 5. Declines the Community Service Award nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part C - separately circulated). 6. Delegates authority to the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson to decide any late nominations referred from other Community Boards. 7. Agrees that the names of successful nominees be released after the Board's Community Service Awards have been presented. Names of unsuccessful nominees will be kept confidential. |
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00041 Part C That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 Report. 2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Confers Community Service and Youth Service Awards on the nominees listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part A - separately circulated). 4. Confers a Certificate of Appreciation on the nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part B - separately circulated). 5. Confers a Community Service Award on the nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations 2025 (Part C - separately circulated). 6. Delegates authority to the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson to decide any late nominations referred from other Community Boards. 7. Agrees that the names of successful nominees be released after the Board's Community Service Awards have been presented. Names of unsuccessful nominees will be kept confidential. Mark Peters/Luke Chandler Carried |
Luke Chandler left the meeting at 7.30pm.
|
20. Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - May 2025 |
|
|
|
Community Board Resolved HHRB/2025/00042 Officer recommendation accepted without change Part B That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - May 2025. Mark Peters/Sarah Brunton Carried |
21. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi
Part B
|
The following information was exchanged: · The grant of an alcohol off licence to a premises on Blenheim Road is subject to an appeal. |
Karakia Whakamutunga
Meeting concluded at 7.33pm.
CONFIRMED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2025
Marie Pollisco
Chairperson
|
7. Notice of Motion - Revocation of Community Service Award |
|
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
25/1099985 |
|
Elected Member Te Mema Pōti: |
Luke Chandler – Community Board Member |
|
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Mary Richardson – Chief Executive |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide the Waipuna Halswell Hornby Riccarton Community Board with a Notice of Motion submitted by Luke Chandler and the associated Council Officer advice.
Notice of Motion Recommendations
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Revokes Resolution 5 of its decision on Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 - HHRB/2025/00041 made at its meeting on 15 May 2025 (as detailed below):
5.Confers a Community Service Award on the nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations2025 (Part C - separately circulated).
2. Declines to confer a Community Service Award on the nominee listed on Part C Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Community Service Awards 2025 - Summary of Nominations Matrix (separately circulated).
3. Requests staff investigate and provide advice on suitable ways to recognise the nominee listed on Part C Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Community Service Awards 2025 - Summary of Nominations Matrix (separately circulated).
Officer Recommendations
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Revokes Resolution 5 of its decision on Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 -HHRB/2025/00041 made at its meeting on 15 May 2025 (as detailed below):
5. Confer a Community Service Award on the nominee listed on the Summary of Nominations2025 (Part C - separately circulated).
2. Declines to confer a Community Service Award on the nominee listed on Part C Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Community Service Awards 2025 - Summary of Nominations Matrix (separately circulated).
3. Requests staff investigate and provide advice on suitable ways to recognise the nominee listed on Part C Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Community Service Awards 2025 - Summary of Nominations Matrix (separately circulated).
3. Resource Impact of the Notice of Motion
3.1 The request for staff to investigate and provide advice on suitable ways to recognise the nominee is not required as this was addressed and considered as part of the original staff advice on the Award decisions at the meeting.
3.2 The revocation aligns with the original staff recommendation to decline the award as not meeting the criteria and guidelines for an award. The nominee is a cat.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 At its meeting on 15 May 2025 the Board considered a report and recommendations on the Board’s Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025, which recognise service of a voluntary nature. The Board decided to exclude the public for its consideration of the summary of nominations matrix attachment that had been separately circulated.
4.2 One nomination was recommended by staff to be declined as not meeting the criteria and guidelines for an award. The Community Service Awards are designed to recognise voluntary efforts of individuals and groups in areas such as youth, older adults, education, culture, church, recreation, sport, and community service fields. The service undertaken should be voluntary and performed by individuals who consciously engage in these activities with the intent to serve the community. The nominee is a cat.
4.3 The Board decided to confer a Community Service Award on the nominee.
5. Officer Advice
Any Current Related Work Underway / Achievability of the Notice of Motion
5.1 The Christchurch City Council created Community Service and Youth Service Awards as a way to thank and honour those who, by their demonstrated commitment and example, inspire others to engage in volunteer service. Recognising and honouring community-focused initiatives sets a standard for service, encourages a sustained commitment to civic participation, and inspires others to make service a central part of their lives.
5.2 Nominations were open from Friday, 7 March 2025, to Sunday, 6 April 2025. The nominations were considered by the Board at its meeting on 15 May 2025. The list of nominations was separately circulated to members.
5.3 Staff recommended that an award to the nominee listed on Part C of the Summary of Nominations matrix be declined as it was not considered the nominee met the criteria and guidelines for this award that are designed to recognise voluntary efforts of individuals and groups undertaken voluntarily nature and performed by individuals who consciously engage in these activities with an intent to serve the community.
5.4 The Board decided to confer an award. The Nominators have been advised of the Board’s decision to confer a Community Service Award. No action has been taken to advise the nominee, and no preparations have yet been made for the presentation of the award.
5.5 Alternative forms of informal recognition including a certificate of appreciation and letter of recognition were considered as part of the original staff advice on the Award decisions and were discussed by staff at the meeting. Staff can provide further advice on this
Financial Implications / Capex and Opex Funding Sources
5.6 There are no negative financial impacts, there will likely be a small cost saving, refer 5.5
6. Legal Advice
6.1 No legal advice was sought as it was considered that the proposal does not raise any legal issues.
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Officer Advice Provided by |
Noela Letufuga – Support Officer Faye Collins – Community Board Advisor Bailey Peterson – Community Governance Manager |
|
Approved By |
Mary Richardson – Chief Executive |
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 - 15 May 2025 Report |
25/1115618 |
28 |
|
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 15 May 2025 Public Excluded Agenda Attachments (Under Separate Cover) - Confidential |
25/1115621 |
|
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
25/837494 |
|
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Sean Ward, Team Leader Planning |
|
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
John Higgins, General Manager Strategy, Planning & Regulatory Services |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the proposed lane names at 70 McTeigue Road, Halswell.
1.2 The report is staff-generated resulting from a naming request received from the developer.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Proposed Lane Names - 70 McTeigue Road Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves the following new road names for 70 McTeigue Road (RMA/2023/3319)
a. Lane 1 - Tūrutu Lane
b. Lane 2 - Rautini Lane
3. Detail Te Whakamahuki
Introduction Te Whakatkinga
3.1 A road naming request has been submitted by Inovo Projects Ltd on behalf of the developer. A preferred name and alternative names have been put forward for the lanes.
3.2 The recommended road names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spelling, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The proposed names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.
3.3 The recommended road names have been checked against the Council’s Naming Policy dated 15 November 2023 and are considered to be consistent with this policy. The specific criteria for assessing a name from clause 2 is set out below.
3.3.1 A traditional or Māori name which is acceptable to the Rūnanga or Iwi; this may be a name reflecting the physical characteristics of an area, an activity or event associated with the area or of a notable ancestor.
3.3.2 A feature of historical, social, cultural, environmental or physical importance in the area (e.g., Carlton Mill Road or Carlton Mill Reserve*).
3.3.3 The name of a notable family, person or event associated with the locality or with the wider Christchurch area.
3.3.4 A name in recognition of a person’s service. This can be for community service, conservation, sport, the arts, science and research or other sphere of activity.
3.3.5 Consistency with a common or established theme for naming in a subdivision or locality.
3.3.6 A name that reflects the diverse cultures and communities of the locality or of Christchurch generally.
3.3.7 The name of an event or activity strongly associated with the immediate location including an informal name for the area that is (or was historically) in common usage.
3.3.8 A name associated with a person, event or activity of significance to Christchurch including names associated with people, events, or places of national and international significance.
3.4 The criteria for names that are not suitable for approval from clause 6 are set out below.
3.4.1 Names of people, flora, fauna or geographical features not associated with the area, e.g., names of native trees which are not present in the area or views that cannot be identified, except where the name continues a current naming theme in the locality.
3.4.2 Currently trading commercial organisations except for sponsorship names for facilities and leased parks.
3.4.3 Anagrams, amalgamations or derivatives of people's names.
3.4.4 Names of living persons.
3.4.5 Names related to the developer of a subdivision.
3.4.6 Name of a person, club or organisation associated with a privately owned building on Council land, where the club or organisation does not hold the ground lease for the building.
3.4.7 Names for roads which may cause confusion because they are associated with another geographical location or feature e.g., Parklands Drive which is not located in the Parklands suburb.
3.5 The recommended road names have also been checked against the Australia and New Zealand Standard AS/NZA 4819:2011 Rural and Urban Addressing. The names are considered to be consistent with the Standard.
3.6 Under the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy, the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is no ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.
3.7 Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed names.
3.8 Consultation under the policy with rūnanga is not required because the roads to be named are not collector roads and/or site(s) of significance under the District Plan (clause 3 of the Naming Policy).
3.9 No addresses of neighbouring properties are affected by the proposed road naming (clause 12.2 of the Naming Policy).
3.10 The names requested have been accompanied by an explanation of the background of the names, which is summarised below.
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira
3.11 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.12 The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.
3.13 Council’s Paeārahi | Senior Treaty Relationships Advisor has been consulted and has raised no concerns with the suitability of the proposed Te Reo Māori names as set out below.
3.14 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.
Proposed Names
3.15 The proposed roads are shown in Attachment A.
3.16 The proposed names are themed for native flora, continuing the theme of the neighbouring developments.
3.17 Lane 1 - Tūrutu Lane
3.18 Dianella nigra, also known as the New Zealand blueberry, ink berry, or tūrutu, is a perennial herb of the family Asphodelaceae, subfamily Hemerocallidoideae, found in New Zealand. It is a loose tussock forming evergreen perennial herb, forming dense to open, diffuse clumps. It has green or white flowers in November – December, and berries from grey-white and dull to strongly violet-blue and glossy.
3.19 Lane 2 - Rautini Lane
3.20 Brachyglottis huntii, also known as Rautini or Chatham Island Christmas tree, is a species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae. It is a tall, showy shrub from the Chatham Islands. The lance-shaped pale green leaves roll back slightly at the edges. In summer, golden-yellow daisies crown the tree.
Alternative Names
3.21 Ramarama Lane - Lophomyrtus bullata, also known as ramarama, is a species of evergreen myrtle shrub in the genus Lophomyrtus, family Myrtaceae. It is endemic to New Zealand. It is a native shrub found along the edges of native forest. It has blistered, shiny leaves; white, fluffy flowers; and dark red to black fruit on long stalks.
3.22 Akeake Lane - Dodonaea viscosa, also known as the broadleaf hopbush or akeake, is a species of flowering plant in the Dodonaea genus. It is a small tree with long, sometimes reddish leaves. It’s flowers are greenish to reddish. Akeake wood is black, variegated with streaks of white and is very hard.
3.23 Astelia Lane - Astelia is a genus of flowering plants in the family Asteliaceae. They are rhizomatous tufted perennials native to various islands in the Pacific, Indian, and South Atlantic Oceans, as well as to Australia and to the southernmost tip of South America. A significant number of the known species are endemic to New Zealand.
3.24 Iris Lane - Iris is a genus of flowering plants with showy flowers. As well as being the scientific name, iris is also widely used as a common name for all Iris species, as well as some belonging to other closely related genera. It is a popular garden flower.
Assessment of Names
3.25 The proposed name is considered to be consistent with the policy.
3.26 Notwithstanding, the discretion lies with the Community Board to approve any of the above name options, including the alternative names.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
RMA/2023/3319 - Proposed Names Plan - 70 McTeigue Road |
25/706135 |
35 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors |
Leashelle Miller - Planner Level 2 Sean Ward - Team Leader Planning |
|
Approved By |
Mark Stevenson - Head of Planning & Consents |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
25/969825 |
|
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Toby Chapman (Urban Forest Manager) |
|
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek approval for the planting of new trees within Ridder and Waterloo Reserve in alignment with the attached tree planting plan.
1.2 The report is in response to the adoption of the Urban Forest Plan which seeks to increase canopy cover across the city.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Tree Planting Plans for Ridder and Waterloo Reserves Report.
2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves the planting of trees within Waterloo Reserve in alignment with the planting plan attached to the report on the meeting agenda as Attachment A.
4. Approves the planting of trees within Ridder Reserve in alignment with the planting plan attached to the report on the meeting agenda as Attachment B.
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 The Urban Forest Plan was adopted in 2023 and includes an objective of increasing canopy cover within our parks from 23% to 40% by 2040. To meet this objective, Council has implemented an Urban Forest Tree Planting program.
3.2 As part of the Urban Forest Tree Planting program, staff have developed a plan to plant new trees in Ridder and Waterloo Reserve.
3.3 All plantings will follow our general guidelines for planting including the use of recession planes to assist in determining the size and location of trees.
3.4 Two other parks went out for consultation at the same time as Waterloo and Ridder reserve. Lomax and Burmuda reserve have been put on hold while we engage further with the local community to address some feedback.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
Ridder Reserve:
4.1 A planting plan was developed for Ridder Reserve as part of the Urban Forest Tree Planting program with an emphasis on increasing canopy cover both within the reserve and within the wider area.
4.2 Ridder Reserve in located in a low canopy area making planting in these areas a priority for Council and the Urban Forest Plan.
4.3 Staff have provided a planting plan that will increase the number of trees within Ridder Reserve by 89 and the canopy cover from the existing 19.5% to 39% once the trees have reached maturity.
4.4 The image below provides an aerial view of the park from aerial imagery captured in 2019 and what the park may look like once the proposed trees reach maturity.
4.5 It should be noted that work has been undertaken in the park including changes to the playground and pathway alignment. All planning for planting within the park is based on its current layout and not that which is shown in the image below.
4.6 Some feedback highlighted a desire to increase the size of the open space, this can be accommodated during planting through closing the spaces between trees. It should also be noted that the trees will be lifted and therefore the open space will essentially be expanded to the base of the tree trunks.


Waterloo Reserve:
4.7 A planting plan was also developed for Waterloo Reserve as part of the Urban Forest Tree Planting program with an emphasis on increasing canopy cover both within the reserve and within the wider area.
4.8 The planting plan proposes 158 new trees which will increase the canopy cover from 15% to 78% once the trees have reached maturity.
4.9 This is a park that is surrounded by industrial zone and the proposed planting will provide a densely treed area that will weave between the buildings and carparking areas while retaining walk ways and a park like atmosphere.
4.10 Only one submission was received during consultation which felt we got the plan right. More details on consultation can be found in the later section of this report.
4.11
![]()
4.12 As the feedback on the planting was positive, staff are not proposing any changes to the proposed planting.
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.13 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
4.13.1 Approve the planting as per the proposed plans
4.13.2 Decline the planting plans
4.14 The following options were considered but ruled out:
4.14.1 Alter the plans and reconsult – Based on the largely positive feedback for these two plans, staff do not feel this is necessary.
4.14.2 Present Bermuda and Lomax reserve to the board for approval – Staff do not feel that this has the necessary public support and would like to undertake further work before presenting these to the Board.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.15 Preferred Option: Approve the proposed plans
4.15.1 Option Description: Approve the plans in their current form.
4.15.2 Option Advantages
· More trees are planted within a low canopy area of the city.
4.15.3 Option Disadvantages
· Some may see the planting of trees presents a loss of open space.
4.16 Option 2:-Decline planting plans.
4.16.1 Option Description: Decline the plans and require no trees to be planted.
4.16.2 Option Advantages
· Open space would be retained.
4.16.3 Option Disadvantages
· No new trees will be planted within the park.
Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina
4.17 Increase in canopy area.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
|
Recommended Option |
Option 2 – Decline planting |
|
Cost to Implement |
$160k (including 7 years maintenance) |
$0 |
|
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
$0 |
N/A |
|
Funding Source |
Better off funding |
N/A |
|
Funding Availability |
yes |
N/A |
|
Impact on Rates |
nil |
N/A |
5.1 This planting will be funded through the Urban Forest Tree Planting program which is currently funded through the Better Off Fund.
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 The availability of trees can be challenging. If not all trees and plants are available, staff will push planting out to 2026.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Under the Reserves Act, Community Boards have the delegation to “determine to plant, maintain and remove trees on reserves within the policy set by the Council”
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decision:
6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework with a particular focus on a green, liveable city.
6.4.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact the decision will have on the city which is low.
6.4.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies. The planting plan forms a key component of the implementation of the Councils Urban Forest Plan.
6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.6 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment
6.6.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore
· Level of Service: 6.8.2.1 Increasing tree canopy in Parks - A net increase in total number of trees is achieved (1:2 replacement policy), with a minimum of 50% of the trees being medium to very large species
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
Ridder Reserve-
6.7 Consultation started on 6 March and ran until 24 March 2025. An email was sent to one key stakeholder.
6.8 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage was advertised via:
· A post in the Halswell/Westlake/Wigram/Aidanfield/Kennedys Bush Community and Halswell Community Facebook groups.
· A letter drop to neighbouring properties.
· A sign at the reserve’s entrance
6.9 The Kōrero mai | Let’s talk Ridder Reserve page had 97 views throughout the consultation period.
6.10 Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga
6.11 Submissions were made by one recognised organisation and four individuals. A full table of submission feedback is available on Kōrero mai | Let’s talk.
6.12 Submitters were asked how important certain aspects were in the park, what aspects were concerning going forward with the park and whether they felt we got this tree planting plan right.
6.13 Three submitters felt we had got the tree planting plan right, as shown in the graph below. Two submitters felt we had somewhat got the plan right.

6.14 Submitters were asked to rate the importance of various aspects when increasing the tree cover in this park. As shown below, the top aspects were: native trees, trees attracting birds and insects.
6.15 Submitters were asked whether they were concerned about various aspects when increasing the tree cover in this park. Submitters were able to select more than one concern. The majority of submitters had no concerns. Some concerns were raised about debris and hazards.
6.16 Submitters gave additional feedback on the tree planting plans which can be viewed in the submission tables available on Kōrero mai | Let’s talk.
6.17 Supplementary information
6.18 A quick poll was conducted on the Kōrero Mai | Let’s talk page to reduce barriers to participate. Three 5-star ratings were received for the plan.
Waterloo Reserve-
6.19 Consultation started on 6 March and ran until 24 March 2025. An email was sent to 12 key stakeholders.
6.20 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage was advertised via:
· A post in the Hornby Community and Hornby Neighbourhood Watch Facebook groups.
· A sign at the reserve’s entrance
6.21 The Kōrero mai | Let’s talk Waterloo Reserve page had 78 views throughout the consultation period.
Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga
6.22 One submission was made by a business who felt we had got the tree planting plan right. They felt that trees with autumn colours and attracting birds and insects were important aspects. They had no concerns about the plan.
6.23 Additional feedback was received:
6.24 “As a business owner in this area where you are wanting to plant more trees, I have no objection to the tree's being planted. I do hope that with the planting of the trees, the pruning and upkeep of them will also become the council responsibility and this will be done on a regular basis or as needed. The council (apparently) do not prune the trees that are on the front berm of the area in Waterloo Road that our business is sighted. These trees need pruning each year and nothing is ever done with them in the 15-20 years that we have been at this sight. My husband is the only one each year that does something about pruning them to keep them at a height the is good so the business signs can been seen. I would like to see the Council take some ownership of pruning these trees in their annual pruning route.”
Supplementary information
6.25 A quick poll was conducted on the Kōrero Mai | Let’s talk page to reduce barriers to participate. One 5-star rating and one 3-star rating was received for the plan.
6.26 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.26.1 Wapuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.1 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.
6.2 The planting is in alignment with the Councils Urban Forest Plan which sought feedback from Mana Whenua and is in alignment with the Iwi Management Plan.
6.3 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.4 The decisions in this report are likely to:
6.4.1 Contribute positively to adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
6.4.2 Contribute positively to emissions reductions.
6.5 Tree planting will assist Council in offsetting its emissions and coping with the impacts of climate change.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 Once the plans have been approved, staff will proceed with sourcing trees and schedule the reserves for planting..
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
Planting Plan for Waterloo Reserve |
25/1054071 |
46 |
|
b ⇩ |
Planting Plan for Ridder Reserve |
25/1054074 |
64 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
|
Document Name – Location / File Link |
|
Not applicable
|
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors |
Toby Chapman - Manager Urban Forest Jonathan Hansen - Arborist |
|
Approved By |
Rupert Bool - Head of Parks |
|
10. Pedestrian crossing near Yaldhurst Road / Brake Street |
|
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
24/2361338 |
|
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Nick Reid, Traffic Engineer |
|
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Brent Smith, Acting General Manager City Infrastructure |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 For the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve no stopping restrictions on Yaldhurst Road near the intersection with Brake Street.
1.2 This report has been written in response to a safety issue raised through the independent post-construction safety audit undertaken for the safety improvements at Riccarton Road / Waimairi Road / Hansons Lane and surrounding areas. The issue relates to pedestrian sightlines for people looking westward before crossing from the north to the south side of Yaldhurst Road near Brake Street.
1.3 The recommended option is to extend the no stopping restrictions at this location to improve the pedestrian sightlines at this new median island crossing.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Pedestrian crossing near Yaldhurst Road / Brake Street Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the parking or stopping restrictions described in resolution 4 below.
4. Approves that in accordance with Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Yaldhurst Road, commencing at a point 23 metres west of its intersection with Brake Street and extending in a westward direction for a distance of 13 metres. This is detailed in Attachment A to the report on the meeting agenda (Plan TG150183, dated 21/03/2025).
5. Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road markings that evidence the restrictions described in this staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 Safety improvements were recently completed near the intersection of Brake Street and Yaldhurst Road to improve the safety of all users travelling through the site. As part of the independent post construction safety audit, a minor issue was raised about the pedestrian crossing visibility on Yaldhurst Road at the new median refuge crossing near Brake Street.
3.2 Recommendations in this report will address the concern raised in the post-construction safety audit and provide improved visibility for people crossing Yaldhurst Road near the intersection with Brake Street. This will be achieved by extending the existing no stopping line restrictions.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 As part of the transport project processes at the Council, independent safety audits are completed at various stages, from the design of a scheme through to completion and including the post-construction stage. The post-construction safety audit identified the following issue:
4.1.1 The safety issue is the intervisibility at the newly installed crossing at Brake Street is not adequate between motorists and pedestrians crossing from the northside to the middle of the road. The kerbside parking has not been relocated further from the crossing, and the crossing waiting area has not been extended into the carriageway. The crash type expected is pedestrians to be hit by on coming motorists. The risk factors include: high volume of pedestrians, high volume of motorists (16,930 - MegaMaps), high speeds of motorists (Free flow speed: 44 km/h – MegaMaps).

Figure 1: Photo from the safety audit: visibility from the new crossing location
4.2 The safety audit team recommended:
4.2.1 Primary treatment recommendation: provide a raised safety platform for this crossing. Secondary treatment recommendation: increase car parking distance from the crossing to increase intervisibility between pedestrians and motorists.
4.3 Visibility can be limited by parked vehicles on Yaldhurst Road. The parking is unrestricted and therefore vehicles can occupy the space with no time restriction. There are high parking demands in the area due to large number of businesses in the adjacent Brake Street and Church Corner malls area.
4.4 There has been one crash in the last five years (2022) involving a motorist turning right onto Brake Street and another u-turning on Yaldhurst Road. In the preceding five-year period, there were three crashes between motorists turning right out of Brake Street colliding with another road user (motorist serious injury in 2015; cyclist minor injury in 2016; motorist minor injury in 2016).
4.5 If approved, the recommendations will be implemented within the current financial year (generally around four weeks after the contractor receives the request, but this is subject to other factors such as resourcing and prioritisation beyond Council’s control).
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.6 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
4.6.1 No stopping line restrictions.
4.6.2 Kerb build outs.
4.7 The following options were considered but ruled out:
4.7.1 Do nothing. This option was ruled out as it does not resolve the safety issue.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.8 Preferred Option: No stopping line restrictions.
4.8.1 Option Description: Extend the no stopping restrictions by 13 metres on the north side of Yaldhurst Road.
4.8.2 Option Advantages
· Improves the safety of the crossing by improving the pedestrian crossing sight distance, resolving the concern raised in the post construction safety audit.
· Improves the sightlines for motorists turning right from Brake Street to Yaldhurst Road.
· Low cost.
4.8.3 Option Disadvantages
· Removes two carparks.
4.9 Alternative option: Kerb build outs
4.9.1 Option Description: A small kerb build out on the north side of the street.
4.9.2 Option Advantages
· Retains two carparks as the length of new kerbing would be within the existing extents of no stopping restrictions.
· Achieves sufficient sight distance for people crossing and reduces the width of the live traffic lane they have to cross.
· Co-benefits of slowing the operating speeds of motorists turning left onto Brake Street.
· Improves the safety of the crossing by improving the pedestrian crossing sight distance, resolving the concern raised in the post construction safety audit.
4.9.3 Option Disadvantages
· Cost of ~$30,000, which is a relatively substantial cost when there is an alternative that could achieve the same effect but at a significantly lower cost.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere
|
|
Recommended Option |
Option 2 – Kerb build outs |
|
Cost to Implement |
$1,000 |
$25,000 – $35,000 |
|
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs |
Minimal cost to overall maintenance contract. |
Minimal cost to overall maintenance contract. |
|
Funding Source |
Traffic Operations Signs and Markings budget 2024/25. |
Unknown. |
|
Funding Availability |
Available. |
Unknown. |
|
Impact on Rates |
Negligible. |
Unknown. |
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 There is a risk that if this report is not approved then Council remains liable for the safety issue identified by the independent safety audit.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Part 1, Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking or stopping restrictions by resolution.
6.2.2 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Delegations Register. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping and traffic control devices.
6.2.3 The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 There is no other legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.
6.3.2 This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in this report.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decision:
6.4.1 Aligns with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.
6.4.3 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.
6.5 The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.
6.6 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.7 Transport
6.7.1 Activity: Transport
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network (DIA 1) - 4 less than previous FY
· Level of Service: 10.0.6.2 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network - Five year rolling average <100 crashes per year
· Level of Service: 16.0.10 Maintain the perception (resident satisfaction) that Christchurch is a walking friendly city - >=85% resident satisfaction
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.8 The adjacent Upper Riccarton Methodist Church are the only adjacent and affected property owners. The church was advised of the recommended option by letter, delivered in person. There was no formal response from the church, however the church representative supported the proposal in person, noting the improvements for pedestrians crossing at this location. They stated they would circulate the letter to the wider congregation and noted that members of the congregation had trouble turning right from Brake Street to Yaldhurst Road, and this proposal would greatly improve sightlines for motorists.
6.9 The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.
6.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:
6.10.1 Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.11 The decision does not involve a significant decision concerning ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.
6.12 The decision includes minor work which is contained within the roadway.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.13 This is a minor proposal that is principally intended to address safety concerns at this location. Due to the minor nature of the works, it is not expected to have any impact towards adaption to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 If approved, no stopping restrictions will be installed by the contractor in the current financial year.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
Yaldhurst Road near Brake Street Pedestrian Crossing No Stopping Restrictions |
25/781460 |
91 |
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
|
Document Name – Location / File Link |
|
Not applicable |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Author |
Nick Reid - Traffic Engineer |
|
Approved By |
Gemma Dioni - Acting Team Leader Traffic Operations/Principal Advisor Stephen Wright - Manager Operations (Transport) |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider applications for funding from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.
|
Funding Request Number |
Organisation |
Project Name |
Amount Requested |
Amount Recommended |
|
DRF 2024/25045_ HHR |
Canterbury Horticultural Society Incorporated (Umbrella for Halswell Run Group) |
Event Equipment |
$2,705 |
$2,000 |
|
DRF 2024/25040 _ HHR |
Christchurch Envirohub Trust |
Stormwater Superhero Trailer |
$16,415 |
$0 |
1.2 There is currently a balance of $37,447 remaining in the fund.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2024-25 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Canterbury Horticultural Society Incorporated and Christchurch Envirohub Trust Report.
2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves a grant of $2,000 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to Canterbury Horticultural Society Incorporated towards gazebos and tear drop banners for the Halswell Run Group.
4. Declines the application to its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund from the Christchurch Envirohub Trust towards the Stormwater Superhero Trailer project.
3. Key Points Ngā Take Matua
Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro
3.1 The recommendations above are aligned with the Council's Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority "Be an inclusive and equitable city". The project also aligns with Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy, Te Wai Ora o Tāne Integrated Water Strategy and the Ōtautahi Christchurch Climate Resilience Strategy.
3.2 The recommendations are consistent with the Strengthening Communities Together Strategy.
Decision Making Authority Te Mana Whakatau
3.3 The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.
3.3.1 Allocations must be consistent with any Council-adopted policies, standards or criteria.
3.3.2 The Fund does not cover:
· Legal or environmental court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations, or Community Board decisions.
· Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).
Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira
3.4 The decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3.5 The significance level was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.
3.6 Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.
Discussion Kōrerorero
3.7 At the time of writing, the balance of the 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund is:
|
Total Budget Current Year |
Granted To Date |
Available for allocation |
Balance If Staff Recommendations adopted |
|
$152,866 |
$115,419 |
$37,447 |
$35,447 |
3.8 The applications have been assessed on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria.
3.9 The attached Decision Matrices provide detailed information for these applications. This includes organisational details, project details, financial information, and a staff assessment.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund - Decision Matrix - Canterbury Horticultural Society |
25/1118403 |
96 |
|
b ⇩ |
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund - Christchurch Envirohub Decision Matrix |
25/1046825 |
97 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors |
Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor |
|
Approved By |
Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton |
|
Reference Te Tohutoro: |
25/1051691 |
|
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua: |
Faye
Collins, Community Board Advisor |
|
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae: |
Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community |
1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek a decision from the Waipuna Halswell Hornby Riccarton Community Board to amend the Community Board’s Standing Orders 22.1 and 19.3 relating to notices of motion and the timeframe required for a notice of motion to be submitted to the Chief Executive.
1.2 The report is staff generated to ensure that the decision-making requirements of Part 6 of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act) are met and that there is the opportunity to provide timely information and advice to support good decision making by Community Boards.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Standing Orders Amendment - Notices of Motion Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Revokes Standing Order 22.1 and 19.3, and replaces it with the following wording, in order to amend the timeframe for a notice of motion to be delivered to the Chief Executive:
a. 22.1 Notice of intended motion to be in writing
Notice of intended motions must be in writing signed by the mover, stating the meeting at which it is proposed that the intended motion be considered, and must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least 10 clear working days before such meeting, or a shorter time at the discretion of the Chief Executive. [Notice of an intended motion can be sent via email and include the scanned electronic signature of the mover.]
Once the motion is received and accepted by the Chief Executive, he or she must give members notice in writing of the intended notice of motion at least 2 clear working days before the date of the meeting at which it will be considered.
b. 19.3 Requirement to give notice
A member must give notice to the Chief Executive at least 10 clear working days before the meeting, or a shorter time at the discretion of the Chief Executive, at which it is proposed to consider the motion. The notice is to be signed by not less than one third of the members including vacancies. Notice can be sent via email and include the scanned electronic signatures of members. If the notice of motion is lost, no similar notice of motion which is substantially the same in purpose and effect may be accepted within the next six months.
3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua
3.1 Under the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act) all local authorities are required to adopt a set of Standing Orders (schedule 7, clause 27(1)). The Act sets out in Schedule 6 the requirements for local authority planning, decision-making and accountability.
3.2 A notice of motion is a motion given in writing by a member in advance of a meeting in accordance with the Council’s Standing Orders.
3.3 There are two provisions within Standing Orders relating to timeframes that a notice of motion is required to be delivered to the Chief Executive:
3.3.1 Provision 22.1 states that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least five clear working days before the meeting they are to be considered at.
3.3.2 Provision 19.3, relating to a notice of motion where an elected member wishes to propose a revocation, states that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least five working days before the meeting it is to be considered at.
3.4 The Chief Executive has identified that more notices of motion are being submitted and anticipates the volume could increase during an already busy period.
3.5 The current timeframe with five days’ notice does not align with the agenda report deadlines and does not usually allow sufficient time for the matter to be reviewed or for council officer advice to be provided to ensure that it meets the requirements of the Act.
3.6 To address this, it is recommended that Standing Orders 22.1 and 19.3 are amended to require that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least 10 clear working days before the meeting at which it is proposed to be considered.
3.7 The recommended amendment includes that the Chief Executive has discretion to consider and accept notices of motion submitted in a shorter timeframe where there is a statutory or legislative timing issue relative to the motion, or the matter can be dealt with sooner if sufficient information is readily available from council officers.
4. Background/Context Te Horopaki
4.1 Under the Act all local authorities are required to adopt a set of Standing Orders (schedule 7, clause 27(1)).
4.2 The Act provides that an amendment to the Council’s Standing Orders requires a vote of not less than 75% of the members present at the meeting (schedule 7, clause 27(3)).
4.3 Council officers are reviewing the Council’s current Standing Orders, to consider matters that have been raised and compiled since Standing Orders were last amended, 2025 governance guidance and model Standing Orders provided by Local Government New Zealand and good practice. Information and opportunities for input regarding this will be provided to the Council and Community Boards in coming months.
4.4 The Act also sets out the obligations of local authorities with regard to the making of decisions (schedule 6).
4.5 The timeframe relating to the submission of notices of motion is a matter that has been raised since Standing Orders were last adopted, with regard to the provision of council officer advice and compliance with the decision-making requirements of the Act.
4.6 The current Standing Orders for Community Boards require that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least five clear working days before such meeting.
4.7 At its meeting on 16 April 2025, the Council amended its Standing Orders (which apply to Council and committee meetings) to require that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least ten clear working days before such meeting, or a shorter time at the discretion of the Chief Executive. To ensure consistency across Council, it is preferred that Community Boards align their practice with regard to the 10 clear working day timeframe.
4.8 This Council term, the number of notices of motion has increased and those submitted often require detailed and complex information to be compiled at short notice to try to ensure that the decision is compliant with the Act, Council policy and requirements for decision-making.
4.9 It is currently a busy time for the organisation with work programmes and financial commitments set or under consideration and notices of motion can have an impact on these matters. The current five-day timeframe can cause challenges as they require staff to divert resources away from current work, in order to provide advice to ensure that decision-making requirements are met.
4.10 The five day working period for notices of motion to be submitted can impact on the timeframe elected members have to consider the motion, the information and advice received or for the matter and proposed motion to be visible to the public.
4.11 The number of notices of motion that have been submitted have increased this term. In the 2019 – 2022 term, there were a total of 15 notices of motion submitted and accepted. This term there have been 28 notices of motion submitted so far, with four submitted in the first few months of 2025. To note, these numbers do not include notices of motions that have been submitted but declined by the Chief Executive under the provisions allowed for in Standing Orders.
4.12 In comparison, Auckland Council advised they have a timeframe of 5 clear working days, and have received a total of five notices of motions this term. Wellington City Council’s timeframe is not less than four weeks, and they have received two notices of motions this year.
Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro
4.13 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:
4.13.1 Amend Standing Orders, clauses 22.1 and 19.3 as proposed.
4.13.2 Make no changes to Standing Orders.
Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa
4.14 Preferred Option: Amend Standing Orders, clause 22.1 and 19.3.
4.14.1 Option Description: Amend Standing Orders, section 22.1 and 19.3 so that a notice of motion must be delivered to the Chief Executive at least 10 clear working days before the meeting, or a shorter time at the discretion of the Chief Executive.
4.14.2 Option Advantages
· To ensure that any notice of motion considered by the Community Board is received with adequate time to ensure that the requirements for decision-making in the Act are met and that sufficient council officer advice can be provided.
· Manages the impact on existing workloads and work programmes for the organisation.
· Allows for advice to be provided to elected members in a timely manner and if accepted, for the proposed motion to be visible to the public on the Agenda, as opposed to requiring a Supplementary Agenda.
· Provides consistency across Council by aligning the Community Boards practise with the Council’s Standing Orders (which apply to Council and committee meetings).
4.14.3 Option Disadvantages
· No disadvantages have been identified. Elected members will still have an opportunity to submit a notice of motion. The Chief Executive, will also have discretion to consider and accept notices of motion submitted outside of the 10 clear working day timeframe where there is a statutory or legislative timing issue relative to the motion, or the matter can be dealt with sooner if sufficient information is readily available from council officers.
4.15 Make no changes to Standing Orders.
4.15.1 Option Description: Make no changes to Standing Orders.
4.15.2 Option Advantages
· There is no change to the current procedure.
4.15.3 Option Disadvantages
· The Chief Executive may decline a notice of motion where the Community Board may not meet the decision-making requirements of the Act, due to having insufficient time to receive and consider officer advice regarding the matter.
· Can impact existing workloads and work programmes as staff prepare advice for the notice of motion.
· Can impact the timeframe elected members have to consider the motion, the information and council officer advice received or for the matter and proposed motion to be visible to the public.
· Is inconsistent with the Council’s Standing Orders (which apply to Council and committee meetings).
Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina
4.16 To enable elected members to consider a motion it is necessary that they receive sufficient comment, information and advice to ensure that consideration and decision making meet the decision-making requirements of the Act.
5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi
5.1 There are no costs associated with the recommended amendment to Standing Orders.
6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro
Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau
6.1 The recommended decision addresses the risk of the Council not complying with the decision-making requirements of the Act. It also reduces the risk that the council officers do not have sufficient time to provide information and advice to enable elected members to consider a matter fully or the public to be aware of the matter and information or advice provided.
Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture
6.2 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:
6.2.1 Community Boards are able to amend Standing Orders, the Act provides that an amendment to Standing Orders requires a vote of not less than 75% of the members present at the meeting (schedule 7, clause 27(3)).
6.3 Other Legal Implications:
6.3.1 Standing Orders must meet the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here
6.4 The required decision:
6.4.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.
6.4.2 Are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by nature of the amendment recommended.
6.4.3 Are consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.
6.5 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):
6.6 Governance
6.6.1 Activity: Governance and Decision Making
· Level of Service: 4.1.22 Provide services that ensure all Council, and Committee meetings are held with full statutory compliance - 98% compliance
Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori
6.7 The decision affects all Community Board areas.
6.8 Prior to the Council meeting of 16 April 2025, Community Board Chairs provided feedback that they preferred a ten clear working day timeframe to submit a Notice of Motion. The Council approved this timeframe for Council and committee meetings, instead of the original Officer Recommendation of 15 clear working days.
Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua
6.9 The amendment to Standing Orders does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.
6.10 The decision does not involve a matter of interest to Mana Whenua and will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.
Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi
6.11 The proposals in this report are unlikely to contribute significantly to adaptation to the impacts of climate change or emissions reductions.
7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri
7.1 A decision amending the Community Board’s Standing Orders will take immediate affect for its meetings.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
There are no attachments for this report.
In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:
|
Document Name – Location / File Link |
|
Standing-Orders adopted 6 April 2017.pdf
|
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Author |
Faye Collins - Community Board Advisor |
|
Approved By |
Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships |
1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.
1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.
2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - June 2025.
3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity
3.1 Community Governance Projects
|
Activity |
Detail |
Timeline |
Strategic Alignment |
|
2025 Community Profiles
|
Each year, the Council's Community Support and Partnerships Unit produces community profiles of each of the 16 wards across the city. These profiles are a snapshot of the ward regarding the community infrastructure and includes the updated Census statistics and Deprivation Index information. The profiles for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Wards are available online, through the following links: · Halswell · Hornby
|
Completed |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
|
Local Election Awareness Campaign |
Staff accompanied the Electoral Commission’s Engagement team at the Riccarton Rotary Market on 4 May 2025 to promote awareness of upcoming local elections. The level of engagement was steady throughout the entire day and 24 enrolment forms were completed. Staff will continue to work alongside the Commission in the lead up to the local election.
|
Ongoing |
Strengthening Communities Together Strategy |
3.2 Christchurch’s award-winning Te Kuru to the rescue
Te Kuru, the 109-hectare stormwater facility features expansive wetland areas, stormwater storage, and filtration basins, won two top awards at last week’s Aotearoa New Zealand Public Works Engineering Excellence Awards.
Te Kuru was named Best Public Works Project Over $5 million and received the award for Excellence in Environment & Sustainability, highlighting the city’s commitment to building resilient and environmentally sustainable infrastructure.
![]()
3.3 Halswell Junction Road extension
A new link road is now open, to provide a safer and more direct route for traffic travelling along Halswell Junction Road.
Completed in May, the new road link, level crossing and signalised intersection provides safer and easier access onto Waterloo Road for all road users, including heavy haulage vehicles, buses, cars, cyclists and pedestrians.

3.4 Community Funding Summary
3.4.1 For information, a summary is provided on the status of the Board's 2024-25 funding as at May 2025 (refer to Attachment A).
3.4.2 Youth Development Fund
Under authority delegated by the Community Board the following allocation was made in May 2025:
· $500 to Finley Smith towards representing New Zealand at the Australian Gymnastic Championships on the Gold Coast, Australia.
Under authority delegated by the Community Governance Manager the following allocation was made in May 2025:
· $300 to Cooper Stewart towards representing Te Toka Tū o Waitaha Under 15’s Tama Māori Rugby League team in Rotorua.
3.4.3 Off the Ground Fund
Under authority delegated by the Community Governance Manager the following allocation was made in May 2025:
· $400 to Oak Development Trust towards the advertising costs for the Share Kai and Korero events (see 3.3.1).
3.4.4 Better Off Fund Updates
- Pūtaringamotu Riccarton Bush is closed from Kings Birthday Weekend until September while the Boardwalk replacement work is undertaken. All the existing concrete paths and boardwalk will be replaced with wider, safer tracks that will be more accessible. Closing the Bush completely enables the work to be completed more efficiently and safely.

- Work has started on the new Upper Riccarton Memorial Park on the site of the former Upper Riccarton War Memorial Library. Completion is expected in late June/early July.
3.5 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making
3.5.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]
· Share Kai Riccarton
![]()
Oak Development hosted the Share Kai initiative in Riccarton on
Friday nights in May. Share Kai is a series of four pop-up community food
events that encourage connection. Food was prepared by refugee women from
four different countries. It celebrates the diversity of cultures that
call Aotearoa and Ōtautahi home through the sharing of food and
conversations. Each event proved to be very popular, with tickets selling out.
· Deans Avenue pedestrian improvements
The pedestrian crossing points on Deans Avenue have been installed.
![]()
![]()
· Community Development Network (CDN) Trust Luncheon
CDN Trust held their annual luncheon thanking supporters and volunteers and celebrating their achievements. During the past year, the Trust made an impressive 21,118 connections involving 1,256 young people and families. This is through a number of initiatives such as 24/7 workers, the Hornby Youth Hangout, Teen and Kids Camps, Big Night Outs and counselling.
![]()
3.5.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.
· Wycola Park Consultation – Hornby Schools Engagement
Two productive engagement sessions took place at Hornby High School and Hornby Primary School on 8–9 May, complementing the Kōrero mai. Let’s talk website engagement. Young people shared their views by placing tokens to indicate their level of support—ranging from "do not support" to "support"—while staff also gathered suggestions for potential improvements to strengthen the initiative.
This activity supported the wider consultation on the Wycola Skate Park, which was open from 29 April to 12 May 2025. Feedback from this process is now being reviewed, with a staff report and recommendations expected to be presented to the Community Board in mid-2025.

· Draft Local Alcohol Policy 2025
Early feedback on a Draft Local Alcohol Policy was invited in early March. A Community Workshop was held on 3 March 2025 attended by community and Board members. The discussion at this workshop was used by the Board to inform its responses to the early consultation.
All the early feedback provided as part of this consultation was used to help prepare the Draft Local Alcohol Policy 2025 that went out for consultation in May (closed 18 May). The Board submission is attached (see Attachment D).
· Amyes Road street renewal
The Council is planning a full street renewal for Amyes Road and are asking for feedback to find out if there is anything residents would like improved on the street while the renewal work is being done.
Consultation opened on 22 May and closes on 15 June 2025.
3.6 Governance Advice
3.6.1 Appointment of Board member
Community Board member Gamal Fouda resigned from the Board 31 March 2025. This created an extraordinary vacancy on the Board. Where a vacancy occurs within 12 months of the next triennial local government election, a by-election is not required, and the Board had the option to either leave the vacancy unfilled or appoint a person to fill the vacancy for the remainder of the triennial term.
At its meeting on 10 April 2025 the Board resolved to fill the vacancy on the Board created by the resignation of Gamal Fouda by the appointment of Luke Chandler who was the highest polling unsuccessful candidate for the Riccarton Ward at the 2022 local body elections. The appointment was confirmed at an extraordinary meeting of the Board on 1 May 2025 and Luke Chandler completed his oral and written declaration as a member at the start of the Board meeting on 15 May 2025.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori
4.1 Seat in Railway Reserve
At its 10 April Meeting during the Public Forum the Board heard from Bryan Henare, local resident regarding Railway Reserve, Templeton. Bryan Henare, local resident addressed the Board regarding Railway Reserve, Templeton. Mr Henare advised that the area is regularly used by locals for walking and picnicking, including the elderly. He suggested that a bench be installed for people to sit on.
Following the presentation the Board requested staff advice on the possible placement of a park bench on the Reserve. Staff have now responded and advised that there are some park seats available and they will contact Mr Henare to discuss a suitable location and aim to install a seat within the next few weeks (see Attachment B).
4.2 Installation of speed limit signage in four Halswell Subdivisions
Staff have advised that speed limit signage was not installed at the time of completion of the following four Halswell subdivisions – Meadowlands of Halswell, Benrogan, Quarry View and Quarry Paddocks (see Attachment C).
Signage is therefore to be installed shortly on the following minor roads (listed first) at the
following intersections:
• Larissa Road / Sparks Road intersection
• Collier Drive / Sparks Road intersection
• Benrogan Drive / Sparks Road intersection
• Muirhill Road / Sutherlands Road intersection
• Spalling Road / Sutherlands Road intersection
to support the existing 50 kilometre per hour default speed limits.
4.3 Community Patrols
Community Patrols of New Zealand is dedicated to helping build safer communities in partnership with NZ Police and other organisations. Patrols in the Board area include the Halswell, Hornby and Riccarton Community Patrols. Their Monthly Patrol Statistics can be found on the Community Patrols of New Zealand website:
Halswell Community Patrol Inc statistical information
Hornby Community Patrol Inc statistical information
Riccarton Community Patrol Inc statistical information
4.4 Graffiti Snapshot
For the Board’s information, attached is a Graffiti Snapshot update for March and April 2025 (refer Attachment E).
4.5 Customer Service Requests/Hybris Report
For the Board’s information, attached is a copy of the April 2025 Hybris Report (refer Attachment F).
The report provides an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.
Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga
|
No. |
Title |
Reference |
Page |
|
a ⇩ |
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Funding Update - May 2025 |
25/1041852 |
114 |
|
b ⇩ |
Staff Memorandum - Seat in Railway Reserve |
25/907218 |
118 |
|
c ⇩ |
Memo - Installation of speed limit signage in four Halswell Subdivisions |
25/936833 |
120 |
|
d ⇩ |
Draft Local Alcohol Policy 2025 - Waipuna Halswell Hornby Riccarton Community Board Submission |
25/984702 |
122 |
|
e ⇩ |
Graffiti Snapshot - March and April 2025 |
25/1012312 |
125 |
|
f ⇩ |
Community Board Hybris Ticket Report - Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton - April 2025 |
25/924505 |
129 |
Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu
|
Authors |
Noela Letufuga - Support Officer Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor Eileen Yee - Community Development Advisor Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor Faye Collins - Community Board Advisor |
|
Approved By |
Bailey Peterson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships |
|
14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi |
This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.
Karakia Whakamutunga
|
Unuhia, unuhia Unuhia ki te uru tapu nui Kia wātea, kia māmā, te ngākau, Te tinana te wairua i te ara takatā Koia rā e Rongo, whakairia ake ki runga Kia tina! TINA! Hui e! TĀIKI E! |
Draw on, draw on, |
Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Note: The grounds for exclusion are summarised in the following table. The full wording from the Act can be found in section 6 or section 7, depending on the context.
I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely the items listed overleaf.
Reason for passing this resolution: a good reason to withhold exists under section 7.
Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)
Note
Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:
“(4) Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):
(a) Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and
(b) Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:
|
GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED |
SECTION |
SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT |
PUBLIC INTEREST CONSIDERATION |
Potential Release Review Date and Conditions |
|
|
7. |
Notice of Motion - Revocation of Community Service Award |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment b - Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 15 May 2025 Public Excluded Agenda Attachments |
s7(2)(a) |
Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons |
To protect the privacy of the nominees and the confidence of the nomination process. Names of unsuccessful nominees will be kept confidential. |
22 September 2025 Names of successful nominees will be released following recipients receiving their awards. |
|
16. |
Public Excluded Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Minutes - 15 May 2025 |
|
|
Refer to the previous public excluded reason in the agendas for these meetings. |
|
Actions Register Ngā Mahinga
When decisions are made at meetings, these are assigned to staff as actions to implement. The following lists detail any actions from this meeting that were:
Open Actions Ngā Mahinga Tuwhera
|
REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION |
MEETING DATE |
ACTION DUE DATE |
UNIT |
TEAM |
|
Travel around the Riccarton Ward |
14 November 2024 |
20 June 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Real Time Services |
|
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton - Better-Off Fund Applications for Consideration |
9 May 2024 |
7 July 2025 |
Community Support & Partnerships |
Governance (Hal-Hor-Ric) |
|
Public Forum - Hornby Menzshed |
10 April 2025 |
10 July 2025 |
Strategic Policy & Resilience |
Management |
|
Trees on Gilberthorpes Reserve |
10 April 2025 |
10 July 2025 |
Parks |
Botanic and Garden Parks |
|
Dunbars Road pedestrian safety improvements |
12 December 2024 |
1 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Traffic Operations |
|
Public Forum - Harvard Avenue Traffic Plan and Branston Street traffic movements |
13 March 2025 |
1 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Traffic Operations |
|
100 Hayton Road - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Traffic Operations |
|
Kennedys Bush Road upgrade |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Asset Planning |
|
Matatiki Play Space |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Recreation, Sports & Events |
Operations |
|
Proposed Safety Improvements on Suva St, Owens Tce and Hillary Cres (north) |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Traffic Operations |
|
Quaifes Road Corridor |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Asset Planning |
|
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - Community Service and Youth Service Awards 2025 |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Community Support & Partnerships |
Governance (Hal-Hor-Ric) |
|
William Brittan / Milns / Kearns intersection |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Asset Planning |
|
William Brittan / Milns / Kearns intersection |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
City Streets Maintenance |
|
Public Forum - Halswell Quarry Park Management Plan and Board processes |
13 March 2025 |
30 August 2025 |
Parks |
Parks & Recreation Planning |
|
Trees on Gilberthorpes Reserve |
10 April 2025 |
30 August 2025 |
Parks |
Botanic and Garden Parks |
|
Visibility of traffic island - Sparks Road, Halswell |
10 August 2023 |
30 August 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Asset Planning |
|
Public Forum - Matipo and Maxwell Streets - Safety concerns |
10 April 2025 |
5 September 2025 |
Transport & Waste |
Traffic Operations |
|
Wigram Road artificial turf sports field consultation and development |
13 March 2025 |
3 October 2025 |
Parks |
Metropolitan Parks |
Actions Closed Since the Last Meeting Ngā Mahinga kua Tutuki nō Tērā Hui
|
REPORT TITLE/AGENDA SECTION |
MEETING DATE |
DUE DATE |
ACTION CLOSURE DATE |
UNIT |
TEAM |
|
Orion Easement over Upper Riccarton War Memorial Park - 372 Riccarton Road |
13 March 2025 |
12 June 2025 |
21 May 2025 |
Facilities & Property Unit |
Property Consultancy |
|
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton - Better-Off Fund Application for Consideration - Community Development Network Trust |
13 March 2025 |
12 June 2025 |
19 May 2025 |
Community Support & Partnerships |
Governance (Hal-Hor-Ric) |
|
Confirmation of Appointment to Extraordinary Vacancy on the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board |
1 May 2025 |
31 July 2025 |
15 May 2025 |
Community Support & Partnerships |
Governance (Hal-Hor-Ric) |
|
Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
22 May 2025 |
Planning & Consents |
Resource Consents |
|
Public Forum - Hornby Toy Library location |
15 May 2025 |
14 August 2025 |
20 May 2025 |
Community Support & Partnerships |
Governance (Hal-Hor-Ric) |