Agenda of Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board

A black text on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū

Banks Peninsula Community Board

Open Minutes

Date: Monday 7 April 2025

Time: 10.04 am

Venue: Akaroa Boardroom, 78 Rue Lavaud Akaroa

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Lyn Leslie

Nigel Harrison

Tyrone Fields

Jillian Frater

Asif Hussain

Cathy Lum-Webb

Luana Swindells

Principal Advisor

Penelope Goldstone

Manager Community Governance

Tel: 941 5689

penelope.goldstone@ccc.govt.nz

Meeting Advisor

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

Tel: 941 6601

liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

Website: www.ccc.govt.nz

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Tīmatanga

Whakataka te hau ki te uru

Whakataka te hau ki te tonga

Kia mākinakina ki uta

Kia mātaratara ki tai

E hī ake ana te atakura

He tio, he huka, he hauhūnga

Tīhei mauri ora

Cease the winds from the west
Cease the winds from the south
Let the breeze blow over the land
Let the breeze blow over the ocean
Let the red-tipped dawn come with a sharpened air.
A touch of frost, a promise of a glorious day.

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Howard Needham was absent from the meeting and no apology was received.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Asif Hussain declared an interest in Item 11 - 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00020

That the minutes of Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board meeting held on Monday, 10 March 2025 be confirmed.

Luana Swindells/Cathy Lum-Webb Carried

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

There were no public forum presentations.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan

The following presenters spoke to the Board in relation to Item 10 - - 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked each presenter for their deputation.

Item 11 of these minutes records the Board’s decision on this item.

Item number	Name	Organisation
5.1	Marie Harley	Akaroa Civic Trust
5.2	Harry Stronach	Akaroa Ratepayers Association

Attachments

a Item 5.1 - Deputation Akaroa Civic Trust BP Meats - Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board - 7 April 2025

9. Correspondence
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receive the tabled correspondence from the Akaroa Butchery and Deli regarding 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan report dated 07 April 2025.
	Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00021 Part B That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receive the tabled correspondence regarding 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan report dated 07 April 2025. from: a. Akaroa Butchery and Deli. b. Keith Harris. Nigel Harrison/Tyrone Fields Carried
	Attachments a Item 17 – Correspondence - Akaroa Butchery and Deli 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan - 7 April 2025 b Item 17 - Correspondence - Keith Harris 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan - 7 April 2025

The meeting adjourned at 10.59am and reconvened at 11.10am.

Secretarial Note: During the staff presentation of Item 11 - 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan the Board were advised that a deputation request had been forwarded to an incorrect email and the error was discovered during the meeting. The Chairperson decided to hear the deputation.

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga continued

Part B

67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan

Item number	Name	Organisation
5.3	Ave Parthonnaud	Regenerate Akaroa

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Parthonnaud for her deputation.

Item 11 of these minutes records the Board’s decision on this item.

Attachments

a Item 5.3 - Deputation Regenerate Akaroa - Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board - 7 April 2025

11. 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan
	Community Board Comment 1. The Board took into consideration the deputations received on this item. (Item 5 of these minutes refers). 2. The Board decided that further community feedback be gathered through a community meeting.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receive the information in the 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan Report. 2. Note that the decision in this report is assessed as medium significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Agree that the best potential future land uses of the site would be commercial and/or residential activity as set out in Indicative Concept Plans 1 – 3 (Attachment A) in this report. 4. Instruct staff to undertake Phase 2 of community engagement, which will seek to further refine those into the preferred future land use/s through continued stakeholder input and public engagement, and report back to the Community Board with the findings and implementation recommendations for final sign off and adoption of. 5. Delegate authority to the Manager Property Consultancy do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above.
	Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00022 Part C That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receives the information in the 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan Report. 2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as medium significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 3. Agrees that the potential future land uses of the site would be mixed use and include a community hub. 4. Requests staff to undertake Phase 2 of community engagement, which will seek to further refine those into the preferred future land use/s through continued stakeholder input and public engagement, and report back to the Community Board with the findings and implementation recommendations for final sign off and adoption of. This engagement will include, but not be limited to, a community meeting where the qualitative data gathered from the initial consultation is presented and reviewed in a public setting. 5. Delegates authority to the Manager Property Consultancy do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above. Nigel Harrison/Tyrone Fields Carried Asif Hussain declared an interest in the item and took not part in the vote.

The meeting adjourned at 11.43am and reconvened at 11.55am during the consideration of Item 11 - 67 and 67A Rue Lavaud (BP Meats site) - Phase 1 Community Feedback & Confirming Phase 2 Engagement Plan

10. Okains Bay Reserve Committee Triennial Plan and Reserve Schedule 2023 - 26

Community Board Comment

Graeme Page, representing the Okains Bay Reserve Committee, Aparini Deer – representing Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, Whitney Cocking – Environmental Advisor Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, and Kelly Governor – Programme Leader, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu presented with staff on the Okains Bay Reserve Committee Triennial Plan and Reserve Schedule and highlighted some issues to be addressed in the future.

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/ Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Okains Bay Reserve Committee Triennial Plan and Reserve Schedule 2023 - 26 Report.

2. Accepts and support the Okains Bay Reserve Committee Triennial Plan through the Long-Term Plan (LTP) and Annual Plan (AP) processes.

3. Endorses the Okains Bay Reserve Schedules for Ōkeina and Sefton Park Reserves.

4. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Asif Hussain/Nigel Harrison Carried

12. Akaroa Recreation Ground - Akaroa Playcentre New Lease

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00023 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the information in the Akaroa Recreation Ground - Akaroa Playcentre New Lease Report.

2. Grant a lease to Te Whānau Tupu Ngātahi O Aotearoa - Playcentre Aotearoa Akaroa branch pursuant to section 61(2A) of the Reserves Act 1977, for a lease period of thirty-three years less a day, including renewals for an area approximately 532 square meters of land and approximately 75 square meters of the Akaroa Sports Pavilion being part of Akaroa Recreation Ground described as Lot 1 Deposited Plan 79110.

3. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4. Delegates authority to the Manager Property Consultancy to do all things necessary and make any decisions at his sole discretion that are consistent with the intent of this report to implement the resolutions above including but not limited to finalising the lease negotiations including the setting of the annual rental.

Nigel Harrison/Asif Hussain Carried

13. Te Oka Reserve - Pine plantation conversion to native forest

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00024 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the information regarding the rationale for transitioning a pine plantation on Te Oka Reserve to native forest in the form of a proposal.

2. Approve the recommendation to adopt Option One of the report to use passive restoration to transition the plantation to native forest.

Lyn Leslie/Nigel Harrison Carried

14. Leading Light Lane - Transition of Pine Block to Native Forest

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00025

Part C

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Leading Light Lane - Transition of Pine Block to Native Forest Report.

2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approve the removal of the block of pine trees and replacement with appropriate native species.

Tyrone Fields/Lyn Leslie Carried

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

The meeting adjourned at 12.45pm and reconvened at 1.15pm.

7. Reserve Committee Meeting Minutes

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00026 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part B

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the unconfirmed minutes of the following Reserve Committees:

a. Awaiti Reserve Committee 26 February 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes

b. Lyttelton Reserves Committee 3 March 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes

c. Pigeon Bay Reserve Committee 3 March 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes

d. Garden of Tane Reserve Committee 4 March 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes

Lyn Leslie/Nigel Harrison Carried

8. Head to Head Walkway Working Party Notes
	Board Comment 1. The Board noted that submissions to the Council’s Draft Annual Plan had closed and agreed to investigate another way of integrating various walking and mountain biking tracks brochures into a comprehensive repository.
	Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receive the notes and respective attachments of the Head to Head Walkway Working Party: a. 10 March 2025 Meeting Notes. b. 10 March 2025 Notes Attachments. 2. Note the recommendation to Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board in respect to the memorandum from staff (Attachment A) to approve Option 3: Localised widening of the informal track on the seaward side of Purau Avenue. 3. Note the recommendation to Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board to request Annual Plan funding to enable staff resource to look into the integration of various walking and mountain biking track brochures so that comprehensive Information is readily available in one place and to make improvements on the information where appropriate.
	Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00027 Part B That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receives the notes and respective attachments of the Head to Head Walkway Working Party: a. 10 March 2025 Meeting Notes b. 10 March 2025 Notes Attachments 2. Notes the recommendation to Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board in respect to the memorandum from staff (Attachment A to the report in the meeting agenda to approve Option 3: Localised widening of the informal track on the seaward side of Purau Avenue. 3. Requests staff investigate the integration of various walking and mountain biking tracks brochures into a comprehensive repository that is readily available in one place and to make improvements on the information where appropriate and report the findings to the Head to Head Working Party. Tyrone Fields/Cathy Lum-Webb Carried

15. 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Akaroa Resource Collective Trust, Te Whare Tapere O Te Mata Hapuku Society Incorporated

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00028 Officer recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Akaroa Resource Collective Trust, Te Whare Tapere O Te Mata Hapuku Society Incorporated Report.

2. Notes that the decisions in this report are assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3. Approves a grant of $1,000 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to Akaroa Resource Collective Trust towards the Coordinator wages for Akaroa Information Centre Trial.

4. Approves a grant of $1,940 from its 2024/25 Discretionary Response Fund to Te Whare Tapere O Te Mata Hapuku Society Incorporated towards Recovering chairs and repair Heatpump at Birdlings Flat Community Hall.

Luana Swindells/Cathy Lum-Webb Carried

16. Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - April 2025

Community Board Resolved BKCB/2025/00029

Part B

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - April 2025.

Lyn Leslie/Asif Hussain Carried

17. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Board members exchanged information on matters of mutual interest:

· The Board were advised that anti-social road users behaviour was continuing around Whakaraupō Lyttelton Harbour.

· The inaugural Matariki award ceremony is in the planning stages.

· The Council are currently holding the Draft Annual Plan 2025-26 hearings.

· The Pumpkin Festival recently held in Wairewa Little River was successful.

· The Diamond Harbour Residents’ Association Annual General Meeting will be held shortly.

· The Board was encouraged to identify areas on the State Highway and local roads that would be suitable “pull over areas or new passing lanes.

· Some Board members attended the launch of Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula seafloor mapping — Iongairo project in Akaroa recently.

· Board members shared the various activities of local community groups.

Karakia Whakamutunga

Unuhia, unuhia

Unuhia ki te uru tapu nui

Kia wātea, kia māmā, te ngākau,

Te tinana te wairua i te ara takatā

Koia rā e Rongo, whakairia ake ki runga

Kia tina! TINA! Hui e! TĀIKI E!

Draw on, draw on,

Draw on the supreme sacredness

To clear, to free the heart, the body and the

spirit of mankind

Rongo, suspended high above us (i.e. in ‘heaven’) Draw together! Affirm!

Meeting concluded at 1.44pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 12^th DAY OF MAY

Lyn Leslie

Chairperson

9. Misty Peaks - Pine Plantation Conversion to Native Forest
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/729929
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Alison Evans, Team Leader Regional Parks
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the Community Board’s approval for the transition of a pine plantation on Misty Peaks Reserve to native forest.

1.2 The report follows an assessment of the pine forests by Regional Parks rangers and researchers from Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research into the merits of developing a restoration plan and research project to transition the pine plantation to native forest.

1.3 The block of pines is approximately 26ha in size and has not been maintained for production purposes.

1.4 The proposal is to undertake sample plots for controlled poisoning to inform research as to the future management and control of the complete pine stand.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the information regarding the rationale for transitioning a pine plantation on Misty Peaks Reserve to native forest in the form of a proposal.

2. Approve the recommendation to adopt Option One of the report to use passive restoration to transition the plantation to native forest.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 This report seeks approval from Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board to convert the exotic pine forest at Misty Peaks Reserve to native forest enhancing the native biodiversity values of the reserve and improving landscape resilience to climate change.

3.2 Risks considered in this proposal include proximity to wāhi tapu sites situated at Ōteauheke and public perception associated with pine tree removal.

3.3 Ōnuku Rūnanga have been consulted and have approved.

3.4 Existing operational funding is available to complete this project.

3.5 The proposal is for the controlled poisoning of small groups of pines within the larger stand. These groups will be monitored to determine the optimal size of plots for poisoning to naturally transition from exotic pine plantation to native vegetation with minimal disturbance. Appendix 2 provides more details and supporting information on this methodology.

3.6 The proposed methodology to remove the trees (option one- Passive tree establishment) is considered the most suitable option for reducing disturbance to soil, erosion and run off into waterways during the transition process.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Christchurch City Council (the Council) manages Misty Peaks Reserve on the Banks Peninsula. The reserve supports a (26 ha) stand of Pinus radiata which were present when the land was purchased by the Council.

4.2 This legacy forest is unmanaged (the trees haven’t been pruned or thinned) and have minimal commercial value. The forest is not part of the Emissions Trading Scheme and is not being used to offset the Council’s carbon footprint.

4.3 The trees are now reaching an age where their future management will become challenging. As they continue to age, they will become more susceptible to windthrow events and also pose an increased fire risk to the area.

4.4 The forest is also a seed source for wilding pines which given their proximity to the nearby naturally regenerating native forest is a particular concern.

4.5 It is Council’s view that these exotic trees would provide more benefits to the reserve as a whole if they were gradually transitioned to native forest that support biodiversity and contribute to the resilience of the wider landscape.

4.6 Options that consider the ecological, social and a te ao Māori values are outlined below (Section 4.7 to 4.9).

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.7 Option One: Passive tree establishment (preferred option).

This technique involves gradual removal of the pine forest canopy allowing passive regeneration of native trees. Small groups of pine trees are gradually treated with herbicide using a proven ‘drilling and filling’ technique which kills the pine trees in situ.

Advantages:

· cost-effective as no requirement to remediate land or replant

· reduced weed invasion

· rapid rates of native tree regeneration

· natural succession patterns which improve long-term ecological benefits

· low visual impact

· allows research opportunities to study the benefits of this technique for other plantations around Aotearoa New Zealand.

· reflects the management of pine plantations being undertaken by other councils

· no disturbance to soil, so less erosion and run off into waterways

· gradual decay of trees providing habitat for native birds, insects and fungi

· minimal added fire risk as understory is replaced by native trees

· likely to meet the aspirations of mana whenua and the community

Disadvantages:

· it is a gradual process meaning some residual pine trees will remain for 10 years and continue to provide seed source for wilding pines

· residual trees can become vulnerable to windthrow

4.8 Option Two: Clear-felling

Advantages:

· tree extraction is completed quickly

· potential for some financial return

Disadvantages:

· site remediation will be required following timber extraction

· compaction of soil and damage to the adjacent native biodiversity

· requires development of tracks and a skid site to process timber

· may require consents as it is adjacent to a Site of Ecological Significance.

· risk of sediment run-off into catchment and neighbouring Rūnanga land

· costly replanting required following tree removal

· intensive weed control will be required following tree removal for 10 years

· visually high impact

· social considerations regarding negative connotations with pine tree harvesting

· potential for economic loss

4.9 Option Three: Do nothing

Advantages:

· cost-effective as no requirement to remediate land or input from CCC staff

Disadvantages:

· ongoing fire risk

· risk of damage to perimeter fencing as trees get older and fall over uncontrolled

· ongoing visual considerations in the landscape

· the pine plantation will continue to act as a seed source for wilding pines

· the pine plantation does not contribute to the native ecology

· the pine plantation will continue to deteriorate causing structural damage and make it dangerous to access for weed and animal pest control

4.10 After consulting with the Ōnuku Rūnanga and considering the advice of the scientists from Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, internal expertise (Dr Alison Evans and Nicholas Head) and the advice of an independent consultant Dr Adam Forbes, the preference of CCC is to implement Option One – passive tree establishment.

Analysis Criteria Ngā Paearu Wetekina

4.11 Ability to transition pine forest to Native with minimal negative impact to the land and surrounding environment.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Costs
Cost to Implement	Option One*	(Years 1-3)
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Botanical Survey Drill and filling of pine trees Insect survey and identification Bird survey Animal and plant pest control	$12,000 $8000 $3000 (to be done in house by Council staff) (to be done in house by Council rangers)
Funding Source	OPEX	Covered by existing Operational maintenance budget
Funding Availability	Existing	100%

*Costing is for the first stage of poisoning which will include selected groups of varying sizes. Costing do not cover the full removal of the pine stand.

Costings for Clear- Felling have not been sought. Staff can request quotes for this work upon request from the board.

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 There are no significant risks associated with this decision.

6.2 Ōnuku Rūnanga have been consulted due to the proximity to wāhi tapu sites at Ōteauheke.

6.3 There are minor risks such as public opposition to using herbicide to ‘drill and fill’ trees but these are likely to be outweighed by the negative implications of alternative control techniques.

6.4 The successful outcome is complimentary to the aspirations of Ōnuku Rūnanga to revegetate the whenua and reduce sedimentation into the Akaroa Habour.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.5 Statutory and/or delegated authority to undertake proposals in the report:

6.5.1 Regional Parks.

6.6 Other Legal Implications:

6.6.1 There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to this decision.

6.6.2 Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa are included in Appendix One relating to the pine trees under the ETS and demonstrating that there is sufficient regeneration of native forest after 4 years.

6.7 The required decision:

6.7.1 Align with the Christchurch City Council’s Strategic Framework.

6.7.2 Is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by assessing the project proposal against recommended criteria outlined on Council’s significance and engagement policy worksheet.

6.7.3 Is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies including the Christchurch City Biodiversity Strategy 2008-2035.

6.8 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2024 - 2034):

6.9 Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

6.9.1 Activity: Parks and Foreshore

· Level of Service: 6.2.12 Active collaboration on plant and biodiversity project, including conservation of rare and threatened species - actively collaborate with a partner on a conservation project specifically the Ōnuku Rūnanga.

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.11 The options do not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, however it does need to be considered in relation to wāhi tapu sites at Ōteauheke. The successful outcome is complimentary to the aspirations of Ōnuku Rūnanga who are currently working on a catchment wide project (Te kori a te kō) to reduce the impacts of climate change and sedimentation into Akaroa Harbour through slips and erosion. The proposed transitioning of the pine forest at Misty Peaks complements the impact considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi.

6.12 The decisions in this report are likely to:

6.12.1 Contribute positively to adaptation to the impacts of climate change.

6.12.2 Contribute positively to emissions reductions.

6.13 Emissions reductions will be sustained long term as the replacement with native forest will be permanent (whereas pine forests are temporary).

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the recommendations are accepted, a research program will be initiated to take baseline measurements (as detailed in Appendix Two), followed by a progressive series of ‘drill and fill’ areas within the pine forest over a three year period. The forest will be studied to determine the rate of regeneration with native trees, increases in bird and insect life and other biometric data associated with the soil. Once these measurements have been completed and the outcomes of the research have been assessed to inform optimal gap size, further ‘drill and fill’ will take place to transition the pine forest to native forest. This is expected to take a minimum of 10 years and ongoing minor funding will be required to undertake the progression of this work.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Transitional management Misty Peaks pine forest plantation on Banks Peninsula	25/771925	43

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Transitioning Exotic Forest to Native • Tāne’s Tree Trust

FOREST CONVERSION | Forest Lifeforce Restoration Trust

Key Issue: Council’s forestry approach | Long Term Plan 2024-2034 | Shape Nelson

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Alison Evans - Team Leader Regional Parks

Approved By

Toby Chapman - Manager Urban Forest

Robbie Hewson - Head Ranger Coastal & Plains

Rupert Bool - Acting Head of Parks

10. Stoddart Point Reserve and Kirk Park play space renewal- design approval
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/371012
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Holly Whitaker- Project Manager Community Parks
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose and Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 The purpose of this report is to request the Te Pātaka o Rakaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board approve:

1.1.1 The concept plan for the renewal of the play space at Stoddart Point Reserve

1.1.2 The concept plan for the renewal of the play space at Kirk Park

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the information in the Stoddart Point Reserve and Kirk Park play space renewal- design approval Report.

2. Note that the decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy 2019. The level of significance was determined by the nature of the project being a like-for-like renewal.

3. Approve the Stoddart Point Reserve play space renewal plan, as per attachment A as attached to the report.

4. Approves the Kirk Park play space renewal plan, as per attachment B as attached to the report.

3. Executive Summary Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

3.1 Stoddart Point Reserve play space is located to the south of the Diamond Harbour Community Centre. Kirk Park is located on Waipapa Avenue, in close proximity to the Diamond Harbour Tennis Club.

3.2 The renewal at both play spaces form part of the Community Parks Planned Play Space Renewal Programme. These play spaces are being renewed based on their age and condition.

3.3 To reduce construction costs, and direct funds to increasing play value, the planning and construction works for both play spaces are planned to be packaged together and delivered at simultaneously. The allocated budget for the two projects is $240,000.

3.4 The play spaces at both Reserves are being renewed ‘like-for-like’, meaning a similar number of play elements will be maintained, whilst also taking into account feedback from community consultation. The design will ensure that today’s New Zealand Play Safety Standards are being met as well as taking into consideration any basic updates to the level of services.

Current play space Stoddart Point Reserve:

A playground with a swing and a bench

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.5 Community consultation was considered and the design for Stoddart Point Reserve incorporates:

3.5.1 A play space that is aimed at younger tamariki

3.5.2 A play module that includes climbing features, a slide, a wobbly bridge and a monorail glider

3.5.3 A rocker shaped like a hectors dolphin

3.5.4 An accessible pathway

Current play space at Kirk Park A playground in a park

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

3.6 Community consultation was considered and the design for Kirk Park incorporates:

3.6.1 A play space designed for upper primary aged tamariki and rangatahi

3.6.2 A swing set including an inclusive basket swing, which is an all-age all ability swing. It is suitable for tamariki with mental and physical restrictions as it supports their whole-body weight. It provides a good option for preschoolers and creates a ‘hang out space’ for rangatahi

3.6.3 A roundabout, the model selected provides a safe option for younger tamariki as they can hold on to the netting and provides a challenge option for older tamariki to climb.

3.6.4 A tall climbing feature, with a tunnel slide

3.6.5 Nature play, in the form of balance beams and stepping posts

3.6.6 A hammock, providing a play and seating feature

3.6.7 An accessible pathway from the street frontage.

4. Background/Context Te Horopaki

4.1 Staff prepared a briefing memo to the board on 30 November 2024 explaining the engagement approach and consultation timeframes. Public consultation was undertaken between December 2024 and February 2025, targeting the Diamond Harbour community. https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/stoddartkirkplay. An in-person workshop was carried out with the Diamond Harbour Primary School to collect feedback from school students. This information has been included as supplementary information, in attachment C.

4.2 In response to feedback from consultation at Stoddart Point Reserve:

4.2.1 the fish rocker was substituted for a hectors dolphin rocker

4.2.2 the play module was adapted to add a monorail glider

4.3 In response to feedback from consultation at Kirk Park:

4.3.1 the play module was changed to better challenge older tamariki and include a tunnel slide

4.3.2 the spinning feature was substituted for a roundabout that allowed for a higher number of users and was more challenging for older tamariki

4.3.3 additional swing/ seating features were added in the form of a hammock, suitable for adults and tamariki to enjoy

4.3.4 Diamond Harbour school pupils will be contributing to the play space by putting some stencilled artwork on the pathways.

4.4 The following related memos/information were circulated to the meeting members:

Date	Subject
30 November 2024	Stoddart Point Reserve and Kirk Park play space renewals memo

Options Considered Ngā Kōwhiringa Whaiwhakaaro

4.5 The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

4.5.1 The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plans for the play space renewals at Stoddart Point Reserve and Kirk Park.

4.5.2 The Community Board does not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider alternative designs and re-consult with the community.

4.5.3 Remove play equipment from one or both of the Reserves and do not replace.

Options Descriptions Ngā Kōwhiringa

4.6 Preferred Option: The Community Board adopt the proposed concept plans for the play space renewals at Stoddart Point Reserve and Kirk Park.

4.6.1 Option Advantages

· The community will receive two safe play spaces that offer increased play value, more age-appropriate equipment, and improved accessibility.

4.6.2 Option Disadvantages

· No additional changes to the concept plan can be made.

4.7 Option 2:

4.7.1 Option Description: The Community Board does not approve the concept plans and requests that staff consider alternative designs and re-consults with the community.

4.7.2 Option Advantages

· The Community Board can offer an alternative suggestion to the proposed concept plan.

4.7.3 Option Disadvantages

· This option would impact the allocated budget as the new playground design and engagement costs would be funded from within the current budget. It is likely that this would impact the type of equipment we would be able to include in a revised plan.

· Dissatisfaction of the local community due to the delay.

4.8 Option 3: Remove play equipment from one or both of the Reserves and do not replace.

4.8.1 Option Advantages

· This would provide Council with a saving in capital and operating expenditure.

4.8.2 Option Disadvantages

· The play equipment would be removed from one or both Reserves at the end of its life span resulting in no Council play provision in these areas. Removing one of the play spaces would mean residents close to that respective areas would have a significant, hilly distance to cover to reach a play area.

5. Financial Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere

	Recommended Option	Option 2 – re-design	Option 3 – remove equipment
Cost to Implement	Allocated CAPEX budget $240,000	Allocated CAPEX budget $240,000	Approximately $10,000 per play space to remove existing assets and remediate land.
Maintenance/Ongoing Costs	Covered by existing maintenance budget	Covered by existing maintenance budget	N/A
Funding Source	Community Parks fixed renewal budget	Community Parks fixed renewal budget	Community Parks fixed renewal budget
Funding Availability	Yes	Yes	Yes
Impact on Rates	None	None	None

6. Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro

Risks and Mitigations Ngā Mōrearea me ngā Whakamātautau

6.1 Implementation costs are based on anticipated product supply, installation and wider construction costs. There is a risk these costs could change due to product availability and supply. Final construction costs will be confirmed during the tender stage. If costs escalate, staff will manage small shortfalls through minor amendments to design. Should there be major implications to levels of service, staff will discuss this with the Community Board before proceeding with the project.

6.2 Construction is not anticipated to affect local facilities however staff have spoken to members of the Diamond Harbour Community Association and Diamond Harbour Tennis Club and no conflict is anticipated.

Legal Considerations Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

6.3 As per the Christchurch City Council’s Delegation Register, 9 August 2024, the Community Board has the delegation to;

6.3.1 Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. (Part D – Sub Part 1 – Community Boards – Pg 96)

6.4 Other Legal Implications: There is no legal context, issue, or implication relevant to these decisions.

Strategy and Policy Considerations Te Whai Kaupapa here :

Parks, Heritage and Coastal Environment

Activity: Parks and Foreshore

Level of Service: 6.8.5 Resident satisfaction with the overall availability of recreation facilities within the City’s parks and foreshore network - >= 70%

Community Impacts and Views Ngā Mariu ā-Hāpori

6.5 Consultation started on 18 December 2024 and ran until 17 February 2025.

6.6 Consultation details including links to the project information shared on the Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk webpage were advertised via:

6.6.1 An email sent to five key stakeholders, including local education providers and residents’ association,

6.6.2 The Diamond Harbour local community Facebook group,

6.6.3 The Diamond Harbour Herald,

6.6.4 Consultation documents delivered to Diamond Harbour library.

6.7 The Kōrero mai | Let’s Talk page had 257 views throughout the consultation period.

6.8 Staff attended Diamond Harbour Primary School on 11 February 2025 to discuss the plans with students and understand their priorities for the Reserves. Their feedback is included below as ‘supplementary information’.

Summary of Submissions Ngā Tāpaetanga

6.9 Submissions were made by two recognised organisations and 15 individuals. All submissions are available on the Kōrero Mai | Let’s talk page.

6.10 Submissions were made by Diamond Harbour Community Association (DHCA) and Spokes Canterbury. Both supported the proposed plans. DHCA suggested that drinking fountains be installed at each playground. Spokes suggested that secure bike parking be provided.

Stoddard Point Reserve play space

6.11 The majority of submitters (14, 82%) supported the proposal and did not provide further feedback on the plan. Three submitters (18%) didn’t know/ were not sure if they supported the plan.

Kirk Park play space

6.12 The majority of submitters (12, 70%) supported the proposal and did not provide further feedback on the plan. Three submitters (18%) didn’t know/were not sure if they supported the plan.

6.13 Two submitters (12%) did not support the proposal. Their concerns have been addressed via email.

6.14 Common submitters requests for both play spaces included:

· Providing equipment suitable for 2 – 6-year-old users (8)

· Imaginative play (4)

· Swinging equipment (4)

· Climbing equipment (3)

· Retention of hanging glider in Stoddart Point Reserve play space (3)

Supplementary information

6.15 Diamond Harbour Primary School students (aged 7 to 12) gave their feedback on play space proposals by annotating the consultation plans. A group of children working on a project

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

6.16 Their feedback about the current play spaces included:

· Majority of equipment is too small for them to use,

· Equipment collects too much water, making it awkward to play,

· Equipment isn’t challenging or exciting enough for their age group,

· Slides are uncomfortable – either too bumpy or heats up and causes irritation on hot days.

6.17 Their feedback about the proposed play spaces included:

· More fun and interesting non-play aspects should be included – like more nature play and places for adults to rest.

· Play features should be prioritised higher than additional seating

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.18 The decisions does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land, a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture, and traditions.

6.19 The decision involves a matter of interest to Mana Whenua, as Te Waipapa is within the takiwā of Te Hapū Ngāti Wheke. Staff have spoken with members of the Hapū, who were happy to support the like for like renewal, and they were keen to see representation of the local whenua in the design. The decision will not impact on our agreed partnership priorities with Ngā Papatipu Rūnanga.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.20 The decision in this report is likely to contribute positively to emissions reductions, in that local residents will have access to a play facility within walking distance and therefore may choose not to drive to other playgrounds.

6.21 Where possible existing unsuitable soft fall (bark) will be reused as mulch in the garden beds.

6.22 Trees that are due for removal in the wider Parks network will be used for nature play elements.

7. Next Steps Ngā Mahinga ā-muri

7.1 If the Board approves the proposed concept plans, final drawings can be prepared, equipment can be ordered and the tender for construction can be prepared.

7.2 Based on the lead time for equipment manufacturing, construction is planned for spring 2025.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Stoddart Point Reserve play space renewal concept design	25/767751	65
b ⇩	Kirk Park play space renewal concept design	25/767752	66
c ⇩	Diamond Harbour School tamariki engagement feedback	25/767753	67

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name – Location / File Link

Not applicable

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Holly Whitaker - Project Manager - Community Parks

Kiran Skelton - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Bridie Gibbings - Manager Operations - Parks Development

12. Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - May 2025
Reference Te Tohutoro:	24/2207275
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Penelope Goldstone, Community Governance Manager
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

1. Purpose of Origin of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1 This report provides the Board with an overview of initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

1.2 This report is staff-generated monthly.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receives the information in the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - May 2025.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1 Community Governance Projects

Activity	Detail	Timeline	Strategic Alignment
Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke Education Day(s)	Staff have been working with Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke to organise Education Day(s) for members of the Whakaraupō community to learn the history of the area and enhance their understanding of mana whenua priorities, plans and programmes of work. This will be held at Rāpaki marae later this year.	Ongoing	Good social and physical connections for our communities
Allandale Reserve Committee	Parks and Community Governance staff have been working with Allandale Reserve Committee to develop their Triennial Plan.	Ongoing	Good social and physical connections for our communities
Whakaraupō Emergency Hubs Collective	Staff are supporting members of the collective to understand how potable water and wastewater may be affected in their communities in a disaster. By being informed they can help educate their communities.	Ongoing	Proactive Planning for Climate Change
Te Ūaka Lyttelton Museum	During the 2024-2034 Long Term Plan, the Council resolved “That the Council requests staff to work with the Lyttelton Museum to develop a funding proposal for a future Annual Plan process”. Staff have worked with Lyttelton Historical Museum Society who have developed a Business Case for Te Ūaka Lyttelton Museum. This has been provided to the Board.	Completed	Good social and physical connections for our communities
Lyttelton Farmers’ Market	Staff are supporting Project Lyttelton who manage the Lyttelton Farmers Market to identify ways to reduce the current high costs of traffic management. In April, a funding application to the Council was approved which will provide interim support to the Market while a more financially sustainable approach to traffic management is developed.	Ongoing	Good social and physical connections for our communities
Whakaraupō Lyttelton Harbour Community Groups Network Meeting	The theme of the next Whakaraupō Lyttelton Harbour Community Groups Network Meeting is Emergency Preparedness. This will be held on Tuesday 20th May, 10am – 11.30am in the Lyttelton Community Board Room.	Ongoing	Good social and physical connections for our communities
Little River informal car park	The area adjacent to the Little River main car park has been used as an informal car park for some time. Local business owners have tried to maintain the area, but recurring potholes and issues with dumping have persisted. Parks staff have met with local residents to discuss a more permanent solution which includes reshaping the area so that water can run off, removal of grass that becomes waterlogged and the addition of a seating area at the end of the Little River Rail Trail. Costings are currently being sought for this work.	Ongoing	Improve infrastructure to support community resilience
Birdlings Flat Toilets	The Birdlings Flat public toilets were recently closed due to an infestation of lake flies. New self-closing doors and sensor lights have been installed, and a bug control system introduced. Two portaloos have been in place since the closure. Parks staff expect the toilets to be reopened by the end of April.	Completed end of April	Improve infrastructure to support community resilience
Okuti Valley Emergency Preparedness	The Okuti Valley Hall Committee have established a WhatsApp group for residents to use during an emergency. They have provided community training for this. A community Preparedness Day will be held on May 10.	May 10	Proactive Planning for Climate Change
Little River Emergency Preparedness	A draft Community Response Plan has been completed by members of the Little River Wairewa Community Trust and will be circulated in the community before being finalised.	Ongoing	Proactive Planning for Climate Change
Little River Pumpkin Festival	Another successful Little River Pumpkin Festival was held on April 6, attracting crowds from far and wide.	April 6	Good social and physical connections for our communities

3.2 Community Funding Summary

3.2.1 As at 14 April 2025 the Discretionary Response Fund unallocated balance for 2024/25 is $13,617. The Discretionary Response Fund summary as at 14 April 2025 is attached. (Attachment A).

3.2.2 A Youth Development Fund grant of $150.00 was approved on 8 April 2025 for a participant to compete in the National School Cross Country Championships in Whangārei.

3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

· Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 2023-25 Community Board Plan was adopted by the Board at their meeting in 8 May 2023 and can be found online here.

· Progress on the Community Board Plan can be found online here.

3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.

· Have your say – at the time of writing the report the following consultations were open for feedback:

	Submission Closing	Link
Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Stormwater Management Plan	17 June 2025	Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Stormwater Management Plan \| Kōrero mai \| Let’s talk
Pūrau Recreation Ground and Foreshore Redevelopment Plan	18 May 2025	Pūrau recreation ground and foreshore development plan \| Kōrero mai \| Let’s talk

· A full list of open consultations can be found on the Council's Lets Talk website at https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/.

· Board Submissions – The Board submitted to the following consultation:

· Local Water Done Well – the Board agreed with the Council’s preferred option. (Attachment B)

3.3.3 Start Work Notices - Various Start Work Notices have been sent to the Board throughout the month. All Board area and city-wide start work notices can be found at: https://ccc.govt.nz/transport/works.

3.3.4 Planned road works and closures - Planned road works and closures are indicated on the map at the Traffic Updates . Additionally, a Smartview of nearby road works and closures is available at the following link: https://smartview.ccc.govt.nz/travel/roads.

3.4 Governance Advice

3.4.1 Board Information Sessions – the Board received the following briefings in April 2025:

· Akaroa Reclaimed Water Treatment and Reuse Scheme Update.

· Community Funding Information Session.

· Purau Foreshore and Reserves Development.

· Lyttleton Port Masterplan.

3.4.2 Steadfast Reserve Site Visit–The Board attended a site visit to Steadfast Reserve, to enable the Cass Bay Residents’ Association to update the Community Board on their Building Project at Steadfast.

A grey building with a white roof

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board Ngā Kupu Tohutohu ka hoatu ki te Poari Hapori

4.1 Customer Services Request Report - providing an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received during March 2025 is attached. (Attachment C)

4.2 Snap Send Solve is the smartphone app the Council offers to help make reporting issues easy, and it is still possible to report issues online, by calling Council on 03 941 8999 or visiting one of the Council’s Service Centres.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Banks Peninsula Discretionary Response Fund Summary - April 2025	25/794700	80
b ⇩	Local Water Done Well - Submission Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 1 April 2025	25/744945	81
c ⇩	Customer Services Request Report - March 2025	25/654101	82

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Steffi Brightwell - Community Development Advisor

Linda Burkes - Banks Peninsula Governance Advisor

Jane Harrison - Community Development Advisor

Dane Moir - Community Development Advisor

Heather Spreckley - Support Officer

Jo Wells - Community Development Advisor

Andrea Wild - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Community Development Advisor

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

Minutes Received	Date
Duvauchelle Reserve Committee Confirmed Minutes	17 March 2025
Allandale Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	25 March 2025
Cass Bay Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	2 April 2025
Robinsons Bay Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	13 April 2025
Okains Bay Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	16 April 2025
Pigeon Bay Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	15 April 2025
Duvauchelle Reserve Committee Unconfirmed Minutes	21 April 2025

No.	Title	Reference	Page
a ⇩	Duvauchelle Reserve Committee 17 March 2025 Confirmed Minutes	25/888342	17
b ⇩	Allandale Reserve Committee 25 March 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes	25/729553	19
c ⇩	Cass Bay Reserve Committee 2 April 2025 - Unconfirmed Minutes	25/756160	21
d ⇩	Robinsons Bay Reserve Committee 13 April 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes	25/815843	24
e ⇩	Okains Bay Reserve Committee 16 April 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes	25/845533	26
f ⇩	Pigeon Bay Reserve Committee 15 April 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes	25/845537	29
g ⇩	Duvauchelle Reserve Committee 21 April 2025 Unconfirmed Minutes	25/845539	32

Subject	Presenter(s)	Unit/Organisation
Adverse Weather Event – May 2025	Brent Smith	General Manager City Infrastructure
	Tim Drennan	Manager Service Excellence
	Brendon Winder	Manager Civil Defence & Emergency Management

7. Reserve Committee Meeting Minutes
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/631920
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Linda Burkes, Banks Peninsula Governance Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

8. Briefing - Adverse Weather Event May 2025
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/887305
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Liz Beaven, Community Board Adviser
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community

11. 2025 SuperLocal Conference and Ethnic Women in Politics Summit - Elected Members' Attendance
Reference Te Tohutoro:	25/607648
Responsible Officer(s) Te Pou Matua:	Liz Beaven, Community Board Advisor
Accountable ELT Member Pouwhakarae:	Andrew Rutledge, General Manager Citizens and Community