|
Greater Christchurch Partnership
Committee
16 February 2024
|
|
|
 Committee Members
|
|
|
|
Greater
Christchurch Partnership Independent Chair
Jim
Palmer
Mana
Whenua
Dr
Te Maire Tau, Jane Huria and Gail Gordon
Christchurch
City Council
Mayor
Phil Mauger, Councillors Victoria Henstock and Sara Templeton
Environment
Canterbury
Chair
Peter Scott, Councillors Grant Edge and Vicky Southworth
Selwyn
District Council
Mayor
Sam Broughton, Councillors Nicole Reid and Lydia Gliddon
Waimakariri
District Council
Mayor
Dan Gordon, Deputy Mayor Neville Atkinson and Councillor Niki Mealings
Health
Member
to be confirmed
Waka
Kotahi (New Zealand Transport Agency - Non-Voting Member)
James
Caygill
|
1.
TERMS OF REFERENCE Ngā Ārahina Mahinga
1.1.
The role of the Committee is to:
i.
Foster and facilitate a collaborative approach
between the Partners to address strategic challenges and opportunities for
Greater Christchurch.
ii.
Show clear, decisive and visible collaborative
strategic leadership amongst the Partners, to wider stakeholders, agencies and
central government and to communities across Greater Christchurch.
iii.
Enable Partners to better understand individual
perspectives and identify shared objectives and areas of alignment.
iv.
Assist information sharing, efficient and
effective working, and provide a stronger voice when advocating to others.
v.
Establish, and periodically review, an agreed
strategic framework to support a collective approach to improving intergenerational
wellbeing in Greater Christchurch through addressing strategic challenges and
opportunities.
vi.
Oversee implementation of strategies and plans
endorsed by the Committee and ratified at individual Partner governance
meetings, including through the adoption and delivery of an annual joint work
programme.
vii.
Ensure the Partnership proactively engages with
other related partnerships, agencies and organisations critical to the
achievement of its strategic functions.
1.2.
The functions of the Committee are to:
i.
Establish, and periodically review, an agreed
strategic framework to support a collective approach to improving intergenerational
wellbeing in Greater Christchurch.
ii.
As required, develop new and review existing
strategies and plans to enable Partners to work more collaboratively with each
other and to provide greater clarity and certainty to stakeholders and the
community. Existing strategies and plans endorsed by the Greater Christchurch
Partnership Committee or endorsed by the UDSIC and inherited by this Committee
are published on the Partnership’s website.
iii.
Recommend to Partners for ratification at
individual partner governance meetings any new or revised strategies and plans.
iv.
Adopt and monitor the delivery of an annual
joint work programme to deliver on strategic goals and actions outlined in
adopted strategies and plans.
v.
Undertake reporting on the delivery of adopted
strategies and plans, including in relation to an agreed strategic outcomes
framework.
vi.
Identify and manage risks associated with
implementing adopted strategies and plans.
vii.
Establish and maintain effective dialogue and
relationships (through meetings, forums and other communications) with other
related partnerships, agencies and organisations to the support the role of the
Committee, including but not limited to:
a.
Waka Toa Ora (Healthy Greater Christchurch)
b.
Canterbury Mayoral Forum
c.
Tertiary institutions and educational
partnerships
d.
Strategic infrastructure providers
e.
Government departments
viii.
Undertake wider engagement and consultation as
necessary, including where appropriate seeking submissions and holding
hearings, to assist the development of any strategies and plans.
ix.
Advocate to central government or their agencies
or other bodies on issues of concern to the Partnership, including through the
preparation of submissions (in liaison with the Canterbury Mayoral Forum as
necessary).
x.
For the avoidance of doubt, the
Committee’s strategic transport functions include:
a.
Consider key strategic transport issues,
national policies and public transport associated collaborative business cases.
b.
Develop the Greater Christchurch component of
the Regional Public Transport Plan and recommend to the Canterbury Regional
Council for approval, when required.
c.
Monitor the delivery of the strategic public
transport work programme in Greater Christchurch.
1.3.
In undertaking its role and performing its
functions the Committee will consider seeking the advice of the Chief
Executives Advisory Group.
2.
QUORUM AND
Conduct of meetings
1.1.
The quorum at a meeting of the Committee
consists of the majority of the voting members.
1.2.
Other than as noted in this Agreement, the
standing orders of the administering Council at the time, shall apply.
1.3.
Voting shall be on the basis of the majority
present at the meeting, with no alternates or proxies.
1.4.
For the purpose of clause 6.2, the Independent
Chairperson:
i.
has a deliberative vote; and
ii.
in the case of equality of votes, does not have
a casting vote (and therefore the act or question is defeated and the status
quo is preserved).
3.
MEETING FREQUENCY
3.1. Notification of meetings and the publication of agendas and reports
shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Part 7 of the Local
Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
3.2. The Committee shall meet monthly, or as necessary and determined by
the Independent Chair in liaison with the Committee.
3.3. The Committee welcomes external speakers by deputation however the
right to speak at meetings must be in accordance with the adopted public
deputation guidelines of the Committee.
4.
DELEGATIONS
4.1. Establishing, and where necessary, amending, protocols and processes
to support the effective functioning of the Committee, including but not
limited to those relating to the resolution of conflicting views,
communications and public deputations.
4.2. Preparing communication and engagement material and publishing
reports relevant to the functions of the Committee.
4.3. Commissioning and publishing reports relevant to the functions of
the Committee.
4.4. Undertaking engagement and consultation exercises in support of the
terms of reference and functions of the Committee.
4.5. Selecting an Independent Chair and Deputy Chair in accordance with
any process agreed by the Committee and the requirements of the LGA 2002.
4.6. Making submissions, as appropriate, on Government proposals and
other initiatives relevant to the role of the Committee.
4.7. Appointing, where necessary, up to two additional non-voting
observers to the Committee.
5.
FINANCIAL DELEGATIONS
5.1.
The Committee can make financial decisions
within an agreed budget envelope and as long as the decision does not trigger
any change to the statutory plans prepared under the LGA 2002, the RMA 1991, or
the LTMA 2003.
|
Greater Christchurch Partnership
Committee
16 February 2024
|
|
|
5. Greater
Christchurch Spatial Plan
|
|
Reference / Te Tohutoro:
|
24/161689
|
|
Report of / Te Pou Matua:
|
The
Chief Executive Advisory Group
|
|
Senior Manager / Pouwhakarae:
|
Tracy
Tierney, Director Greater Christchurch Partnership
(Tracy.Tierney@GreaterChristchurch.org.nz)
|
1. Purpose of Report Te
Pūtake Pūrongo
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee
(GCPC) to consider the Recommendations Report from the Hearings Panel for the
Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan (also being a Future Development Strategy
under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020).
2. Staff Recommendations / Ngā
Tūtohu
That the Greater
Christchurch Partnership Committee:
1. Receive the
Hearings Panel Recommendations Report for the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan
dated 17 January 2024, included as Attachment A.
2. Endorse the final
version of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan, as recommended by the
Hearings Panel in Attachment B, as the Spatial Plan for Greater
Christchurch.
3. Recommends that
the Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch City Council, Selwyn District
Council and Waimakariri District Council adopt:
a. the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan as recommended by
the Hearings Panel in Attachment B as the Spatial Plan for Greater
Christchurch.
b. the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan as recommended by
the Hearings Panel in Attachment B as the joint Future Development
Strategy for Greater Christchurch for the purposes of meeting the obligation to
produce a Future Development Strategy under 3.12 (1) of the National Policy
Statement on Urban Development 2020.
4. Notes that Mana Whenua, Te Whatu Ora – Health New
Zealand and NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi will convey the recommendations of the Hearings Panel in Attachment
A and the details of the endorsed Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan as recommended by the
Hearings Panel in Attachment B as the Spatial Plan for Greater
Christchurch to their governance, in a
manner that is appropriate within the context of their respective governance
arrangements.
5. Approves the
addition of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan Foreword in Attachment C to
be included in the final version of Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan.
6. Delegates
authority to the Independent Chair of the Greater Christchurch Partnership to
authorise any amendments of minor effect, or to correct minor errors, and make
design edits to the final version of Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan.
7. Notes that partner
Council governance adoption of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan will occur
over February – March 2024.
8. Acknowledge and
thank the Hearings Panel members for the considerable time and effort they have
contributed as part of undertaking their role as Hearings Panel members.
3. Context/Background Te Horopaki
Process Timeframe
3.1 At
its meeting on the 12 May 2023 the Whakawhanake Kāinga Komiti (the Komiti)
approved commencing consultation on the draft Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan
(the Spatial Plan) under section 83 of the Local Government Act 2022 (Special
Consultative Procedure).
3.2 The
general timing of the steps in the Special Consultative Procedure (consultation
phase) are provided in Table 1 below:
|
Table 1:
Consultation Phase
|
|
Monday June
19 to Sunday 23 July 2023
|
Consultation
|
|
Mid July to
early August 2023
|
Submission
Summary
|
|
Late July
– late September 2023
|
Officer
Report Prepared
|
|
Late October
– late December 2023
|
Hearings,
Deliberations, and Hearings Panel Recommendations Report
|
|
February 2024
|
Greater
Christchurch Partnership meeting endorse the recommendations of the Hearings
Panel and recommend to partner governance to adopt the Spatial Plan.
|
|
February 2024
– March 2024
|
Partner
governance meetings
Adopt the
Spatial Plan
|
Huihui Mai Engagement
3.3 Pre-consultation
with the public took place to obtain community input and test the work to date
to inform the development of the draft Spatial Plan and the Mass Rapid Transit
(MRT) Indicative Business Case work by means of the Huihui Mai engagement. The Huihui
Mai – let’s come together to plan our future engagement process was
held from 23 February – 26 March 2023. The engagement included an online
survey, public workshops, drop-ins, activations, and a dedicated youth
engagement programme which included workshops in schools and a youth summit.
3.4 During
the engagement over 7,000 people completed the online survey and over 500
people were engaged face-to-face through public and youth workshops, an online
webinar, drop-ins across Greater Christchurch, and presentations to groups. Of
these, over 1,300 people who completed the online survey and participated in
workshops were under the age of 25.
3.5 Findings
from the engagement include:
· 86% of respondents
agree with the proposed direction of the draft Spatial Plan to focus growth
around key urban and town centres and along public transport routes.
· 53% agree with the
proposed MRT route (24% disagree). Agreement is much higher in suburbs along
the MRT route (72%). For those who did not agree, a desire for improved public
transport to where they live – Rolleston, Rangiora, Eastern Christchurch (i.e.
not on the proposed route) is the main reason for disagreeing with the proposed
route.
· 56% are open to
higher density living, but it needs to be planned and designed to meet their
different needs and provide quality of life for people.
· To use their cars
less, people want more frequent, more reliable and more direct public
transport.
3.6 The
feedback on what would encourage people to consider higher density living and
using their cars less, and what people value and believe is missing in their
neighbourhoods provides an important input into the implementation of the
Spatial Plan.
3.7 With
the Huihui Mai consultation exploring what Greater Christchurch could look like
in 2050, there was a large emphasis on capturing the youth voice. 1,300 youth
under 25 took part in our survey, and 386 rangatahi from schools, tertiary
institutions, youth councils/rōpū and participation groups
participated in tailored workshops.
3.8 Key
themes identified by youth included:
· There needs to be an
affordable and accessible range of housing options for different groups of
people, including options for intergenerational living and large
whānau/aiga, when planning for future growth.
· First home buyers
and flatmates would be very open to high density housing - this would need to
be affordable and have good design that maintains privacy, space and energy
efficiency and promotes access to green spaces.
· The ‘Turn up
and go service’ could be extended to Kaiapoi and Rolleston, and out East,
to make the central city and Greater Christchurch areas more accessible.
Considerations for transport options are: affordability, accessibility,
frequency, consistency, safety for drivers and passengers and Wi-Fi-friendly.
· Climate change, a
clean and green environment, and drinking water quality are top priorities.
· Safety across all
aspects of living, working, transport and recreation in Greater Christchurch
and on online platforms is important.
· Māoritanga is
embraced, visible and valued. Greater Christchurch is diverse, multi-cultural
and welcoming and this is reflected in the city and in decision-making.
Draft Spatial Plan
3.9 The
Spatial Plan builds on and replaces the previous plans and strategies developed
for Greater Christchurch but has not fundamentally changed from their strategic
direction. It provides a blueprint for how future population and business
growth will be accommodated in the city region into the future, through
targeted intensification in centres and along public transport corridors.
3.10 The
development of the Spatial Plan was contributed to by all Whakawhanake
Kāinga Komiti partners, including Ministry of Housing and Urban
Development - Te Tūāpapa Kura Kāinga, Kāinga Ora and
Department of Internal Affairs - Te Tari Taiwhenua. The successful process and
development of the Spatial Plan is testament to the effectiveness of the
Partnerships cross-agency collaboration and leadership to effectively plan for
and manage urban development across the Greater Christchurch area.
3.11 The
Spatial Plan has been:
3.11.1 Built on the
clear direction set by the Greater Christchurch Partnership through the Greater
Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (UDS) which provided a strong framework
for the response following the Canterbury Earthquakes.
3.11.2 Informed by a
number of background reports to develop the evidence base, our strategic
framework, and to analyse different scenarios. These include:
· The Foundation Report
which summarises the work undertaken to identify urban opportunities and
challenges, and to develop the strategic framework to guide the Spatial Plan.
· The Ngā Kaupapa
Report which was prepared by Mahaanui Kurataiao on behalf of mana whenua and
identifies and describes the cultural values within the boundary of Greater
Christchurch and relevant cultural principles, as well as an assessment of
relevant Iwi Management Plan policies and other strategy documents to inform
and guide the development of the Spatial Plan.
· Housing and Business
Capacity Assessments, which were provided for endorsement alongside the final
draft Spatial Plan in May 2023.
· A
Housing Capacity Assessment was completed in June 2021 to meet the requirements
of the NPS-UD which provides an assessment of Greater Christchurch’s
capacity to meet the projected demand for housing over the next 30 years. This
HCA was updated in 2023 to inform the draft Spatial Plan.
· A draft
Business Capacity Assessment was also developed to inform the draft Spatial
Plan. This is a new assessment, rather than an update, as a previous version
was developed under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity
2016 (NPS-UDC)
· The Urban Form Scenarios
Evaluation Report that provides information on how different land-use scenarios
and transport packages contribute to the realisations of the outcomes and
priorities as set out in the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan Strategic Framework,
to inform the development of urban form direction and development of the draft
Plan. This was complemented by
a report prepared on behalf of Mana Whenua by Mahaanui Kurataiao “Greater
Christchurch Spatial Plan Evaluation” in June 2022. This evaluation
considered scenarios for a future settlement pattern having regard to the
priorities of mana whenua and the obligations of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
· An Areas to Avoid and
Protect report to detail the methodology and reasoning for identifying land
development constraints, and areas to protect, to inform the development of the
Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan.
· The Greater Christchurch
Public Transport Futures Mass Rapid Transit Indicative Business Case (IBC) that
sets out the case for investment in rapid transit to enable sustainable growth
for Greater Christchurch. The IBC assesses a range of route options, including
sub assessments on urban realm and land use, station stops and mode technology
to recommend a preferred rapid transit solution, its costs, and benefits.
3.12 The
Spatial Plan is structured around six opportunities, which together describe
the key ways in which the Spatial Plan can help shape the future of Greater
Christchurch to provide for the intergenerational wellbeing of its people and
place. Each of the six opportunities link to a set of clear directions to guide
the growth of Greater Christchurch, with the two overarching directions:
i. Focus
growth through targeted intensification in urban and town centres, and along
public transport corridors.
ii. Enable
the prosperous development of kāinga nohoanga on Māori land and
within urban areas.
3.13 In
addition to the directions, five key moves are identified, which are critical
to the implementation of the spatial strategy and achievement of the
transformational shifts required:
· The
prosperous development of kāinga nohoanga
· A
strengthened network of urban and town centres
· A
mass rapid transit system
· A
collective focus on unlocking the potential of Priority Areas
· An
enhanced and expanded blue-green network.
Mana whenua priorities and expectations
3.14 The
Spatial Plan reflects the values and priorities of mana whenua through identification of the blue/green network, the preference for
a compact urban form and recognition of Māori Land as part of the mapped settlement pattern. Of those
priorities which concern spatial planning, the Spatial Plan:
· Supports
kāinga nohoanga on Māori Land, supported by infrastructure and
improved accessibility;
· Supports
kāinga nohoanga within urban areas;
· Protects
Wāhi Tapu, Wāhi Taonga and Ngā Wai.
3.15 The
Spatial plan seeks to reflect these throughout the document including the
acknowledgement that enabling prosperous kāinga nohoanga is a “key
move’ of the Spatial Plan. Other specific directions include:
· Protect
urban development over Wāhi Tapu
· Protect,
restore and enhance Wāhi Taonga and Ngā Wai
· Improve
accessibility to Māori Reserve Land to support kāinga nohoanga.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
(NPS-UD)
3.16 The
draft Spatial Plan also acts as the Future Development Strategy (FDS) required
under the NPS-UD. For the purpose of the NPS-UD, the draft Spatial Plan
satisfies the requirements of Subpart 4 Part 3 to prepare and make publicly
available an FDS.
3.17 The
purpose of an FDS is to promote long-term strategic planning by setting out how
a local authority intends to achieve well-functioning urban environments in its
existing and future urban areas, provide at least sufficient development
capacity over the next 30 years to meet expected demand and assist the
integration of planning decisions with infrastructure planning and funding
decisions.
3.18 Although
the draft Spatial Plan represents the FDS for the tier 1 urban environment of
Greater Christchurch, the draft Spatial Plan has a much broader scope than the
requirements of the NPS-UD for an FDS. However, the mandatory requirements for
an FDS under the NPS-UD have been met.
Consultation Phase
3.19 Consultation
on the draft Spatial Plan has been undertaken in accordance with Part 6 of the
Local Government Act 2002. Consultation occurred from 10 June to 23 July 2023.
3.20 358
submissions were received. Approximately 80% of these were based around the
‘Have Your Say’ questions provided on the submission form. The
remaining submissions provided separate documentation to support their
position, in more ‘bespoke’ manner. Those tended to be through
lawyers or planning consultancies on behalf of larger groups, stakeholders, and
developers.
3.21 A
Reporting Officers group developed an Officers Report responding to submissions
on the draft Spatial Plan. This provided an assessment of the submission points
received and made recommended changes to the draft Spatial Plan for
consideration by a Hearings Panel. This Officers Report was peer reviewed by
the wider Spatial Plan Project Team consisting of representatives from the GCP
partners and was signed off by the Senior Officials Group (SOG) before
circulation.
3.22 The
Officers Report identified a number of themes arising from submissions. These
were grouped under key headings relating to the format of the draft Spatial
Plan. Each theme had a high-level summary of submissions and response to
submissions from the Reporting Officers, including recommendations.
Amended Terms of
Reference
3.23 At
its meeting on the 8 December 2023 the GCPC agreed to amend the Terms of
Reference (ToR) to have the Greater Christchurch
Spatial Plan Hearings Panel (Hearing Panel)
recommendations reported to the GCPC rather than the Komiti.
3.24 This
amendment was made to reflect the uncertainty as to when the Komiti would next
sit to consider the Hearing Panel recommendation report and endorse a final
Spatial Plan.
3.25 The
Spatial Plan is an important document for the Greater Christchurch Partnership
(GCP) in that it sets long term direction for the development of Greater
Christchurch. It also acts as the FDS under the National Policy Statement on
Urban Development and there is a legislative requirement to produce an FDS.
3.26 It
was considered important that the Spatial Plan continues along its development
process and that the consultation phase be completed in a timely manner.
3.27 In
the absence of certainty around the when the Komiti may next come together the
GCPC amended the ToR to enable the GCPC to consider and endorse the Hearing
Panel recommendations.
4. Hearings and Hearings Panel Recommendations Report
4.1 At
its meeting on the 12 May 2023 the Komiti delegated authority to the Chief
Executives Advisory Group to appoint an Independent Chair of the Hearings
Panel. The Komiti further delegated authority to the Independent Chair to
appoint the members of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan Hearings Panel
(excluding the Independent Chair), in accordance with partner recommendations.
4.2 A
Hearing Panel consisting of an Independent Chair and representatives from mana
whenua, Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch City Council, Selwyn District
Council, Waimakariri District Council and Central Government was established to
hear from submitters over the course of six days across the three Districts.
4.3 86
submitters presented to the Hearings Panel across these hearing days. The
hearings ran very well particularly for a consultation of this scale, being
heard across varying locations and with a significant breadth and depth of
issues.
4.4 One
of the hearing days was particularly focused on hearing youth submissions,
noting that this was still a public hearing. This was a great success, enabling
and providing an environment for youth to feel more comfortable to share their
views and allow their voices to be clearly heard. It is recommended that this
approach be considered for future consultation processes.
4.5 Throughout
the hearings the Hearing Panel heard from a range of submitters on varying
issues. The Panel collated questions for the Reporting Officers to consider.
These were provided in writing and the Reporting Officers responded back in
writing once all submitters had been heard.
4.6 The
Hearing Panel requested that the Reporting Officers present their responses
back to them to enable clarity questions to be asked, a type of ‘right of
reply’ for the Reporting Officers. This occurred on the Thursday 16
November and formed part of the open hearing time. Through this ‘right of
reply’ some supplementary issues and questions arose which Reporting
Officers responded to.
4.7 Following
the consideration of submissions, hearing from submitters and receiving the
Officers’ Reports, the Hearings Panel’s role was to hold
deliberations and make recommendations to the GCPC on any changes considered
necessary to the draft document.
4.8 The
Hearing Panel Recommendations Report produced by the Hearings Panel, dated 17
January 2024 is included as Attachment A to this
report.
4.9 A
final recommended version of the Spatial Plan is provided at Attachment B
to this report.
4.10 The
Hearings Panel Recommendations Report also includes considerations that relate
to matters raised through the hearings process that the Hearing Panel wanted to
share but did not necessitate specific changes to the draft Spatial Plan or
were out of scope. These are included in the Hearings Panel Recommendation
Report as Appendix 2. These matters will be considered as the Spatial
Plan progresses through implementation.
4.11 The
GCPC is being asked to endorse the final version of the Spatial Plan and
recommend the Spatial Plan to the Partner Councils for adoption at individual
governance meetings and the non-Council partners to convey their support in a
manner that is appropriate in the context of their individual governance
arrangements. This also includes a recommendation that each Partner Council
adopt the final version of the Spatial Plan as its joint future development
strategy for the purpose of meeting each council’s obligations under the
NPS-UD to produce a future development strategy.
4.12 The
GCPC can either accept or reject the recommendations of the Hearings Panel,
noting that section 82(1)(e) of the Local Government Act 2002 requires that
“the views presented to the local authority should be received by the
local authority with an open mind and should be given by the local authority,
in making a decision, due consideration.”
4.13 If
the GCPC rejects the Hearings Panel's Recommendations Report it is recommended
that the matter be referred to the Hearings Panel for further consideration.
5. Next Steps for the draft Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan
consultation process
5.1 Partner
Governance will need to consider adoption of the Spatial Plan at their
respective Council meetings as soon as possible following the 16 February 2024.
5.2 The
NPS-UD requirement to produce a future development strategy is a responsibility
of partner local authorities (Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch City
Council, Selwyn District Council and Waimakariri District Council).
5.3 If
the Hearings Panel Recommendations Report is accepted by the GCPC, the
Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch City Council, Selwyn District Council
and Waimakariri District Council will be asked to adopt the Hearings Panel
Recommendations Report on the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan included as Attachment
A and the final version of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan included
as Attachment B as recommended by the Hearings Panel as both the:
· Spatial Plan for
Greater Christchurch; and
· as the joint Future
Development Strategy for Greater Christchurch for the purposes of meeting each
local authorities’ obligations under the NPS-UD to produce a future
development strategy.
5.4 This
item would be expected to be included within the open agenda and publicly
accessible part of respective partner council meetings.
5.5 For
the final design version of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan, the Chief
Executive Advisory Group recommend the inclusion of a foreword, included as Attachment
C. This has been developed to introduce the Greater Christchurch Spatial
Plan and acknowledge the role that partners, and the community have played in
contributing towards its development.
Attachments
Ngā
Tāpirihanga
|
No.
|
Title
|
Reference
|
Page
|
|
a ⇩
|
Hearing Panel
Recommendation Report and Appendices 2024
|
24/161690
|
23
|
|
b ⇩
|
Final version
of the Greater Christchurch Spatial Plan
|
24/161694
|
276
|
|
c ⇩
|
Greater
Christchurch Spatial Plan Foreword
|
24/161696
|
354
|
