Waipapa

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                    Friday 29 April 2022

Time:                                    9.30am

Venue:                                 Held by Audio/Visual Link

Under the current provisions of the Covid-19 Protection Framework (the Traffic Alert system) meeting attendance is only possible via an Audio/Visual link or by viewing a live stream (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRzshsY8rjDJYUymoYeQtA) of the meeting. 

Please request access details from Mark.Saunders@ccc.govt.nz for the Audio/Visual link

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Emma Norrish

Simon Britten

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

Ali Jones

Emma Twaddell

 

 

21 April 2022

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew Pratt

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5428

matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 


 

 

 

Mihi

 

 

Tēnā koutou

Kua hui mai nei

Ki tēnei whare ō tātou

Ki te kōrero, ki te whakarongo

i nga kaupapa ō to hapori

Nau mai, haere mai.

Nā reira tēnā koutou katoa

 

Greetings

to all who have gathered

within our (communal) house

to speak and to listen to the

topics/conversations of your community

Welcome, welcome

Therefore, again I greet all present

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B          Reports for Information

Part C          Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Karakia Tīmatanga........................................................................................ 5 

C         1.        Apologies Ngā Whakapāha............................................................. 5

B         2.        Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga............................. 5

C         3.        Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua........... 5

B         4.        Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui..................................................... 5

B         5.        Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga.................. 5

B         6.        Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga...................................... 5

Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee

C         7.        Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee Minutes - 4 April 2022........................................................... 29

Staff Reports

C         8.        Marshland Turners Safety Improvements.............................. 37

C         9.        Proposed Road Names - 20 Mills Road................................... 45

C         10.     Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - April 2022................................................................................... 49

 

B         11.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi...................................................................... 73

 

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

Karakia Tīmatanga

1.   Apologies Ngā Whakapāha  

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

That the minutes of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 18 March 2022  be confirmed (refer page 6).

4.   Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

4.1

Delta Community Support Trust

Mike Stanley will speak on behalf of the Delta Community Support Trust regarding their services, what pressures they have faced and changes they have made in the present climate, and what they envisage going forward.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared.

6.   Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

Unconfirmed

 

 

Waipapa

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                    Friday 18 March 2022

Time:                                    9.35am

Venue:                                 Held by Audio/Visual Link

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Emma Norrish

Simon Britten

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

Ali Jones

Emma Twaddell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew Pratt

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5428

matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B          Reports for Information

Part C          Decisions Under Delegation

 

Secretarial Note: This meeting was held via audio/visual link on the Zoom platform due to New Zealand being at the red setting of the Covid-19 Protection Framework (the Traffic Alert system) on the date the meeting was scheduled. These minutes provide a written summary of the meeting proceedings.

 

The Chairperson opened the meeting and advised that the meeting was being publicly livestreamed.

 

Karakia Tīmatanga: Emma Norrish  

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Pauline Cotter moved that an apology for lateness received from Simon Britten be accepted. The motion was seconded by Mike Davidson and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00012

That the apology for lateness received from Simon Britten be accepted.

Pauline Cotter/Mike Davidson                                                                                               Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

The Chairperson asked members to confirm that the minutes of the previous Board meeting held on 18 February 2022 were a true and accurate record of the meeting with amendment only to the first paragraph of the summary under Item 13.1, Elected Members’ Information Exchange – Dudley Creek Plantings Maintenance Schedule, to clarify that it was not meant that the onus is on residents to do the weeding, but rather that the reality is that residents are contributing and sought direct liaison with the Council to have the weeds removed when they do contribute.

 

Mike Davidson moved that the minutes be confirmed. The motion was seconded by Pauline Cotter and when put to the vote was carried unanimously.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00013

That the minutes of the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 18 February 2022 be confirmed subject to the following amendment to Item 13.1, Elected Members’ Information Exchange – Dudley Creek Plantings Maintenance Schedule:

 

The Chairperson requested information on the maintenance schedule for the plantings along Dudley Creek on Stapletons Road, indicating issues with it not being maintained, and the residents needing to contribute to the maintenance. The residents are willing to contribute to the maintenance and want a direct liaison with the Council to have the weeds taken away.

 

Mike Davidson/Pauline Cotter                                                                                               Carried

 

Emma Twaddell and Simon Britten joined the meeting at 9.38am.

Ali Jones joined the meeting at 9.42am.

4.   Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1

Jennifer Dalziel – Dudley Creek Plant Maintenance and other matters

Ms Dalziel spoke regarding:

·    Ongoing issue with need for weeding of the roadside plantings on Julius Terrace and Stapletons Road in Richmond – indicated that the weeds are now as tall as a person and seeding, and required attention now.

·    Suggestion of using discretionary fund to pay a local gardener to address the weeds.

·    Speed restrictions in North Richmond and Shirley (referencing page 72 of the agenda relating to Item 10, Confirmation of Richmond CRAF Programme) – Ms Dalziel suggesting Shirley Road should not be left out, and between Petrie Street and Woodville Street needs speed restrictions/traffic calming.

·    Concern that residents were not consulted on various aspects relating to Item 10, Richmond CRAF Programme, and that a previous petition on related matters has not been considered – Ms Dalziel suggested a speed hump on Julius Terrace is unnecessary, but is needed for Chancellor Street.

The Chairperson thanked Ms Dalziel for her presentation, noting the weeding is being addressed.

 

 

4.2         Shirley Road Central – 10 Shirley Road and other matters

Joanne Byrne spoke on behalf of Shirley Road Central regarding:

·    A successful car boot sale the community group for 10 Shirley Road has held on the site – noting the community enjoyed the event and would be keen for it to be a regular event.

·    Desire to have a sign put up for 10 Shirley Road to show the history of the site, and to contribute to the community having some input on the future of the site – Ms Byrne wanted to know if there would be any consenting requirements for signage. In response to a member’s question, Ms Bryne also indicated any artistic assistance with the sign would be welcome.

·    Following up about the feasibility study for combined community centre and library on the site – Ms Byrne sought some follow up on this as it has been lacking to date.

·    Seeking public facilities for the site, as there are no public toilets there – temporary facilities would be appropriate until community centre is provided.

·    Traffic calming on Shirley Road – need to ensure the road is community friendly and not car-centric.

·    Seeking a site visit to 10 Shirley Road with the Board, to talk about how to maximise use of the site with a community centre and library and other ideas for the site, such as an accessible playground, and bathroom facilities for adults with disabilities.

The Chairperson thanked Ms Byrne for her presentation and indicated the Board would be in touch with her about the issues raised.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1

Dave Gardner – Correspondence regarding Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed

Dave Gardner spoke to his correspondence regarding Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed presented in Item 7, Correspondence Report.

Mr Gardner ran through the points raised in his correspondence as a cyclist and motorist on Cranford Street and the CNC extension cycleway/shared pathway, highlighting:

·    Merging on the Cranford Street roundabout is difficult with the speed of the cars coming off the CNC.

·    Believes electronic speed sign is in the wrong place – suggesting it should be before the 50km/h zone.

·    Lack of design to slow people down naturally.

·    A lot of cars are going 100km/h in the 80km/h section causing problems in Cranford Street.

·    Difficult for cars to turn out of businesses in Cranford Street.

·    Believes Rutland Street should be a 40 kilometre per hour zone.

·    Does not get a feeling of safety using various sections to enter CNC.

·    CNC has an issue with the T2, having a speed limit of 100km/h where towing vehicles have a 90km/h limit, causing driver frustration.

·    Three crashes on the CNC in just over a year with one person dying.

A Board member queried whether lack of enforcement was an issue, which Mr Gardner agreed with, but reiterated his belief the issue is actually poor design. The Board member then asked Mr Gardner whether the electronic speed sign should be further into the 50km/h zone. Mr Gardner again suggested the poor design is causing the speed issue.

Mike Davidson at this point noted the attached staff response he had now received regarding Mr Gardner’s concerns, which he had shared with Mr Gardner and the Board during the meeting.

The Chairperson thanked Mr Gardner for his deputation.

Attachments

a      Staff Information provided to Mike Davidson regarding concerns raised with him by Dave Gardner related to the Northern Corridor extension  

6.   Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.   Correspondence

 

Board Consideration

 

The Chairperson noted the correspondence from Dave Gardner in relation to Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed to be received through this report, having heard Mr Gardner’s deputation on it.

The Board considered its ongoing concerns relating to the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) and Cranford Street, discussing concern to address issues ahead of handover of sections of the CNC to the Council with transport staff, and considered that it would:

·    Undertake to urgently address safety issues repeatedly raised by residents and observed by members in regard to speed, driver behaviour, design, lack of enforcement and speed limits along the CNC particularly the merging points on the Northern Arterial Extension – the Board noted is extremely concerned about these safety issues, and urgently addressing these issues may include, but is not limited to, meeting with staff, and requesting additional information (related to the response from staff given to Councillor Davidson).

·    Request this to progress within the next week.

·    Request information on contractual arrangements still to be finalised before handover of the sections of the CNC to the Council, including timelines related to that handover.

The Board discussed need for the Council to consider which issues are best addressed before or after handover with Waka Kotahi, and need to understand which contractual arrangement have not been met yet. The Board acknowledged that matters might need to go to the Council’s Urban Development and Transport Committee of the Whole, but suggested this highlighted need for urgent  conversation with staff.

Ali Jones moved that the correspondence be received, to urgently address issues as described above, and to request information as described above. The motion was seconded by Emma Norrish and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

 

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the correspondence from Dave Gardner in relation to Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00014

Part B

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receives the correspondence from Dave Gardner in relation to Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed.

2.         Undertakes to urgently address safety issues repeatedly raised by residents and observed by members in regard to speed, driver behaviour, design, lack of enforcement and speed limits along the CNC and in particular the merging points on the Northern Arterial Extension. The Board is extremely concerned about these safety issues.  Urgently addressing these issues may include, but is not limited to, meeting with staff, and requesting additional information – related to the response from staff given to Councillor Davidson. The Board requests this to progress within the next week.

3.         Requests information on contractual arrangements still to be finalised before handover of the sections of the CNC to the Council, including timelines related to that handover.

Ali Jones/Emma Norrish                                                                                                           Carried

 

8.   Change of classification of reserve and grant of easements 10R Blakes Road, Spring Grove, Belfast

 

Board Consideration

The Board took the report as read. The Staff Property Consultant was present to receive questions, though these were confined to querying the usefulness of the delegation to the Board in these matters, and whether a change of delegation to staff should be investigated, which was considered appropriate and helpful for broader matters.

Ali Jones moved that the officer recommendations be adopted with an additional resolution to request that staff investigate a change in delegation from the Board to staff (with reference to section 5.10 of the report) to address the efficiency of similar processes. The motion was seconded by Mike Davidson and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

 

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes all public notification requirements have been met under Section 24A(1) of the Reserves Act 1977 and that no objections have been received.

2.         Approve the change of classification of ‘local purpose (esplanade) reserve’ to local purpose (utility) reserve for that part of the reserve shown as Sec 1 RPS4262 (subject to survey). 

3.         Approve all easements over reserves that are required as part of the staged Spring Grove residential subdivision providing that the granting of easements are:

a.        In accordance with Section 48(3)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977 do not materially alter or damage the reserve; and

b.        In accordance with Section 48 (3) (b) of the Reserves Act 1977 the rights of the public in respect of the reserves are not permanently affected by the establishment and lawful exercise of the easement.

4.         Recommend that the Chief Executive, using the Council’s delegated authority from the Minister of Conservation, consent to the granting easement that are required as part of the subdivision consents for the Spring Grove staged subdivision.

5.         Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to manage and conclude all matters pertaining to the granting of easements over reserves that are required as part of a subdivision consent for the Spring Grove staged development.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00015

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes all public notification requirements have been met under Section 24A(1) of the Reserves Act 1977 and that no objections have been received.

2.         Approve the change of classification of ‘local purpose (esplanade) reserve’ to local purpose (utility) reserve for that part of the reserve shown as Sec 1 RPS4262 (subject to survey). 

3.         Approve all easements over reserves that are required as part of the staged Spring Grove residential subdivision providing that the granting of easements are:

a.        In accordance with Section 48(3)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977 do not materially alter or damage the reserve; and

b.        In accordance with Section 48 (3) (b) of the Reserves Act 1977 the rights of the public in respect of the reserves are not permanently affected by the establishment and lawful exercise of the easement.

4.         Recommend that the Chief Executive, using the Council’s delegated authority from the Minister of Conservation, consent to the granting easement that are required as part of the subdivision consents for the Spring Grove staged subdivision.

5.         Authorises the Manager Property Consultancy to manage and conclude all matters pertaining to the granting of easements over reserves that are required as part of a subdivision consent for the Spring Grove staged development.

6.         Requests that staff investigate a change in delegation from the Board to staff (with reference to section 5.10 of the report) to address the efficiency of similar processes.

Ali Jones/Mike Davidson                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

9.   Slow Speed Neighbourhoods Shirley

 

Board Consideration

Charlotte French of GHD lead the presentation of the report to the Board, with the support of the Engagement Advisor speaking to the consultation undertaken. The summary of submissions at Attachment A was circulated to the Board prior to the meeting, and the slides in Attachment B were presented to the Board at the meeting.

The Board’s discussion considered advice from staff that:

·    Shirley Road was not included in the slow speed neighbourhood zone as it was not in scope for funding, but if funded it is not excluded from future consideration.

·    Using CRAF funding was investigated by staff but did not align appropriately in timeframes.

·    There are presently legislative limitations to further reducing speed limits from the standard 40 km/h outside schools.

·    In light of the wider streets in the area, speeds will be monitored to enable further traffic calming measures to be considered if necessary to reduce speeds to the new limits.

·    Request in the consultation feedback for traffic lights at Emmett Street, Akaroa Street and Briggs Road was out of scope, but such feedback is passed on to transport staff, and will be responded to.

Emma Norrish moved that the officer recommendations be adopted with an additional resolution to notes that speeds will be monitored and that traffic calming will be considered if required. The motion was seconded by Pauline Cotter and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

 

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board recommends that the Council:

1.         Approve, pursuant to Part 4 Clause 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017, that the speed limits on the following roads be revoked and set generally as identified in Attachment A to the staff report and listed below in clauses 1a-1ddd (including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps):

a.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Acheson Avenue (entire length).

b.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Acheson Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

c.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Ailsa Street (entire length).

d.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Ailsa Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

e.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Allison Place (entire length).

f.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Allison Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

g.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Amos Place (entire length).

h.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Amos Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

i.          Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Arawa Street (entire length).

j.          Approve that the permanent speed limit on Arawa Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

k.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Bellbrook Crescent (entire length).

l.          Approve that the permanent speed limit on Bellbrook Crescent (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

m.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Boys Place (entire length).

n.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Boys Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

o.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Cherryburton Place (entire length).

p.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Cherryburton Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

q.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dawe Street (entire length).

r.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Dawe Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

s.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Emmett Street (entire length).

t.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Emmett Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

u.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hammersley Avenue (entire length).

v.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hammersley Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

w.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hercules Street (entire length).

x.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hercules Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

y.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hewlings Street (entire length).

z.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hewlings Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

aa.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hope Street (entire length).

bb.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hope Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

cc.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Jebson Street (entire length).

dd.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Jebson Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ee.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lusk Place (entire length).

ff.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Lusk Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

gg.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lynn Place (entire length).

hh.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Lynn Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ii.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on McIntyre Street (entire length).

jj.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on McIntyre Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

kk.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Olivine Street (entire length).

ll.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Olivine Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

mm.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orcades Street (entire length).

nn.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orcades Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

oo.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orion Street (entire length).

pp.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orion Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

qq.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orontes Street (entire length).

rr.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orontes Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ss.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Praem Place (entire length).

tt.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Praem (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

uu.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Quinns Road (entire length).

vv.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Quinns Road (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ww.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Riselaw Street (entire length).

xx.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Riselaw Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

yy.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Sabina Street (entire length).

zz.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Sabina Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

aaa.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Skipton Street (entire length).

bbb.    Approve that the permanent speed limit on Skipton Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ccc.     Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Voss Street (entire length).

ddd.    Approve that the permanent speed limit on Voss Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

2.         Approve that these resolutions take effect when the signage that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3.         Authorise staff to make any typographical changes or to correct minor errors or omissions in the above descriptions of the roads to which the speed limits apply (being changes that do not affect the materiality of the resolutions).

 

Community Board Decided PICB/2022/00016

Part A

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board recommends that the Council:

1.         Approve, pursuant to Part 4 Clause 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017, that the speed limits on the following roads be revoked and set generally as identified in Attachment A to the staff report and listed below in clauses 1a-1ddd (including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps):

a.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Acheson Avenue (entire length).

b.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Acheson Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

c.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Ailsa Street (entire length).

d.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Ailsa Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

e.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Allison Place (entire length).

f.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Allison Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

g.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Amos Place (entire length).

h.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Amos Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

i.          Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Arawa Street (entire length).

j.          Approve that the permanent speed limit on Arawa Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

k.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Bellbrook Crescent (entire length).

l.          Approve that the permanent speed limit on Bellbrook Crescent (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

m.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Boys Place (entire length).

n.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Boys Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

o.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Cherryburton Place (entire length).

p.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Cherryburton Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

q.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Dawe Street (entire length).

r.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Dawe Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

s.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Emmett Street (entire length).

t.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Emmett Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

u.        Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hammersley Avenue (entire length).

v.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hammersley Avenue (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

w.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hercules Street (entire length).

x.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hercules Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

y.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hewlings Street (entire length).

z.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hewlings Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

aa.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Hope Street (entire length).

bb.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Hope Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

cc.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Jebson Street (entire length).

dd.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Jebson Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ee.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lusk Place (entire length).

ff.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Lusk Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

gg.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Lynn Place (entire length).

hh.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Lynn Place (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ii.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on McIntyre Street (entire length).

jj.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on McIntyre Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

kk.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Olivine Street (entire length).

ll.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Olivine Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

mm.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orcades Street (entire length).

nn.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orcades Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

oo.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orion Street (entire length).

pp.      Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orion Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

qq.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Orontes Street (entire length).

rr.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Orontes Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ss.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Praem Place (entire length).

tt.        Approve that the permanent speed limit on Praem (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

uu.      Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Quinns Road (entire length).

vv.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Quinns Road (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ww.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Riselaw Street (entire length).

xx.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Riselaw Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

yy.       Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Sabina Street (entire length).

zz.       Approve that the permanent speed limit on Sabina Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

aaa.    Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Skipton Street (entire length).

bbb.    Approve that the permanent speed limit on Skipton Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

ccc.     Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Voss Street (entire length).

ddd.    Approve that the permanent speed limit on Voss Street (entire length) be set at 40 kilometres per hour.

2.         Approve that these resolutions take effect when the signage that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

3.         Authorise staff to make any typographical changes or to correct minor errors or omissions in the above descriptions of the roads to which the speed limits apply (being changes that do not affect the materiality of the resolutions).

4.         Notes that speeds will be monitored and that traffic calming will be considered if required.

Emma Norrish/Pauline Cotter                                                                                               Carried

Attachments

a      Submissions Summary - Slow Speed Neighbourhood Shirley 

b      PowerPoint Presentation - Slow Neighbourhood Speed Zones Shirley  

 

10. Confirmation of Richmond CRAF programme

 

Board Consideration

The Board took the report as read. The Project Manager was present to receive questions, and addressed the comments of Ms Dalziel in her public forum presentation as they related to the report, clarifying that consultation has to date not been undertaken on specific projects, but there was consultation to seek suggestions to present to the Board in regard to the programme of projects for investigation and delivery. Further consultation will be undertaken for individual projects.

The Project Manager undertook to contact Ms Dalziel to provide further information on her concerns, noting that Julius Terrace is not included in the list of projects for approval for such reasons as Ms Dalziel indicated. She also noted a speed hump included on Chancellor Street at the Warden Street intersection.

The Board’s discussion returned to Shirley Road as initiated in the preceding item on the slow speed neighbourhood zone for Shirley, and received advice that further investigation/ reprogramming could be brought back to the Board around including traffic calming for Shirley Road in the programme if the Board preferred laying the report on the table to allow for this, rather than adopting the officer recommendations at this meeting. Staff noted, however, the limited pool of money for the programme, and limited feedback to date on Shirley Road to prompt this.

The Board considered approving the programme without delay, versus laying the report on the table to explore including Shirley Road in the programme. The latter course of action was not supported, although it was decided to request information on traffic safety and liveability for the section between Hills Road and North Parade for future consideration as the majority of Board members did not wish to cause a  delay in achieving the benefits of the programme as presented.

The Board had questions for staff about the cycleway and varying speeds along it, which staff indicated they would follow up with more information to be provided to the Board.

Pauline Cotter moved and Simon Britten seconded that the officer recommendations be adopted, and agreed to add to the officer recommendations a resolution to request information on traffic safety and liveability on Shirley Road between Hills Road and North Parade.

The Board debated the matter, and when the motion was put to the meeting it was carried. Ali Jones recorded her vote against.

 

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves the following Christchurch Regeneration Acceleration Facility (CRAF) projects for the Richmond CRAF programme, for investigation and delivery by staff:

a.    An intersection upgrade at Averill Street and Petrie Street.

b.    An intersection upgrade at Averill Street and Stapletons Road.

c.    An intersection upgrade at Chancellor Street and Guild Street.

d.    An intersection upgrade at Guild Street and Hills Road.

e.    An intersection upgrade at Guild Street and Slater Street.

f.     New kerb and channel on Slater Street from Guild Street to 75/80 Slater Street
(currently no delineation between road and footpath).

g.    A new speed hump on Slater Street at the Warden Street intersection.

h.    A new speed hump on Chancellor Street at the Warden Street intersection.

i.     A new speed hump on Dudley Street at the Slater Street intersection.

j.     A neighbourhood greenway cycleway through North Parade, Averill Street, Stapletons Road and Nicholls Street.

k.    An area-wide speed restriction between North Avon Road, Hills Road, Shirley Road and North Parade.

l.     The rebuild of Slater Street from Warden Street to Shirley Road.

Note: Detailed plans for the above projects have not yet been completed. A decision report with plans will be brought back to the Board for approval, before detailed design and construction.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00017

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves the following Christchurch Regeneration Acceleration Facility (CRAF) projects for the Richmond CRAF programme, for investigation and delivery by staff:

a.    An intersection upgrade at Averill Street and Petrie Street.

b.    An intersection upgrade at Averill Street and Stapletons Road.

c.    An intersection upgrade at Chancellor Street and Guild Street.

d.    An intersection upgrade at Guild Street and Hills Road.

e.    An intersection upgrade at Guild Street and Slater Street.

f.     New kerb and channel on Slater Street from Guild Street to 75/80 Slater Street
(currently no delineation between road and footpath).

g.    A new speed hump on Slater Street at the Warden Street intersection.

h.    A new speed hump on Chancellor Street at the Warden Street intersection.

i.     A new speed hump on Dudley Street at the Slater Street intersection.

j.     A neighbourhood greenway cycleway through North Parade, Averill Street, Stapletons Road and Nicholls Street.

k.    An area-wide speed restriction between North Avon Road, Hills Road, Shirley Road and North Parade.

l.     The rebuild of Slater Street from Warden Street to Shirley Road.

2.         Notes that detailed plans for the above projects have not yet been completed. A decision report with plans will be brought back to the Board for approval, before detailed design and construction.

3.         Requests information on traffic safety and liveability on Shirley Road between Hills Road and North Parade.

Pauline Cotter/Simon Britten                                                                                                  Carried

Ali Jones requested that her vote against the resolutions be recorded.

 

 

11. Richmond Road Renewals - Dudley Street, Nicholls Street and Stapletons Road Board Report

 

Secretarial Note: Staff recommendations 1-5 relating to Dudley Street – Slater Street to Stapletons Road were accepted by the Board without change at its meeting of 18 February 2022, where the Board also resolved to: Lay the report on the table in respect of Nicholls Street – North Avon Road to Dudley Street, and Stapletons Road – Shirley Road to Warden Street (staff recommendations 6-15), pending a site visit with urgency with staff (arborists and designers) to be undertaken for those streets.

The site visit was undertaken on 22 February 2022 with all Board members present, resulting in a request to staff for further information (a Memorandum) to be appended to the report when it came back to this meeting (as it was as Attachment D to the report)  to inform the Board’s decision on the remaining staff recommendations considered this date.

Board Consideration

The Project Manager was in attendance with other staff involved in the project to assist the Board.

Emma Norrish moved that the officer recommendations be adopted. The motion was seconded by Pauline Cotter.

The Board encouraged  good communication around the works, particularly in regard to understanding the decisions around those trees proposed for removal; thanking staff for engaging with the Board in the site visit to view the trees, and for reassessing the trees to confirm those in a condition to be retained.

When the motion to adopt the officer recommendations was put to the meeting it was carried unanimously.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00018 (Original Officer recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

Nicholls Street – North Avon Road to Dudley Street

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Approves the scheme design for the section of Nicholls Street between North Avon Road and Dudley Street Road as shown on Attachment B including all road markings, signage, kerb alignment and road surface treatments.

2.        Approves that under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the parts of Nicholls Street as indicated in the drawing TP357601 Issue 1, 07/12/2021, and attached to this report as Attachment B.

3.        Approves that under Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Give Way control be placed against Nicholls Street at its intersection with North Avon Road, as indicated in the drawing TP357601 Issue 1, 07/12/2021, and attached to this report as Attachment B.

4.        Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report.

5.        Approves that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

Stapletons Road – Shirley Road to Warden Street

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

6.        Approves the scheme design for the section of Stapletons Road between Shirley Road and the Warden Street as shown on Attachment C including all road markings, signage, kerb alignment and road surface treatments.

7.        Approves that under Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the parts of Stapletons Road, as indicated in the drawing TP357501 Issue 1, 07/12/2021, and attached to this report as Attachment C.

8.        Approves that under Clause 6 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that a Give Way control be placed against Stapleton Road at its intersection with Shirley Road, as indicated in the drawing TP357501 Issue 1, 07/12/2021, and attached to this report as Attachment C.

9.        Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report.

10.      Approves that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

Emma Norrish/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                 Carried

 

 

12. Grampian-Jocelyn Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Board Consideration

The Board took the report as read. The Traffic Engineer was present to receive questions, though there were none.

Ali Jones moved that the officer recommendations be adopted. The motion was seconded by Simon Britten and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00019 (Original Officer recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the parts of the Grampian-Jocelyn Street slip-lane, as indicated in the drawing TG140727 Issue 1, dated 28/02/2022 and attached to the report as Attachment A.

2.         Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolution 1 above.

3.         Approves that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the road marking restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Ali Jones/Simon Britten                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

13. Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - March 2022

 

Board Consideration

 

The Board took as read its Area Report and considered that:

 

·    The Dudley Street Starling Issues be followed up through the Office of Chief Executive.

·    The Surface Flooding on Edgeware Road briefing be preceded by any interim information for the Board’s review of the issue.

·    A Board member asked that the documentation relating to the outcome for the road arising from the installation of the Dudley Pumping Station, be included in the briefing information on Surface Flooding on Edgeware Road, recalling it included indication of the situation for the road.

·    A report will come through about Shirley Community Trust’s interest in being gifted the MacFarlane Park Centre for the Board to make a recommendation to the Council.

·    Community mental health issues noted with the Board by Belfast Community Network may be raised with the local MP, Matt Doocey, further to the Chairperson circulating to the Board any relevant points already raised with Matt Doocey, as a possible basis for communicating with him again. Staff noted work with MHERC about considering opportunities for workshops supporting groups and volunteers around mental health and resilience, and an internal grant made to Belfast Community Network to assist.

·    Relevance of including consideration of afterschool care in discussing resilience matters.

·    That the Westminster Street location where the demolition works are taking place become a community space, but the Board as yet do not have an indication from the community what it would like to see included there.

 

Ali Jones moved that the Area Report be received and that the requests discussed as detailed below be resolved. The motion was seconded by Pauline Cotter and when put to the meeting was carried unanimously.

 

 

Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for March 2022.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00020

Part B

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for March 2022.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

13.1  Roadworks - Jacobs and Gosset Streets

Board Consideration cont.

A Board member considered that it would be helpful to have an update on the chip sealing, acknowledging advice that the roadworks had been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, but wanting to be sure the residents are being informed, because there are still “no parking” cones on the streets. The Board member wanted to ensure changes in work plans and schedules are communicated to residents.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00021

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

2.         Request staff review that communications are being delivered to residents around roadworks on Jacobs and Gosset Streets.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

 

13.2  Langdons Road Corridor

Board Consideration cont.

A Board member noted their understanding that there was a standing item around Langdons Road as part of trying to highlight ongoing key issues in the Board area, and queried where matters are up to with the whole corridor. The Board member noted the time being taken to find a solution for the traffic being created in the corridor. Staff indicated an update will be sought, and the item added to the next Area Report.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00022

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

3.         Request staff review delivery of regular information to the Board on the Langdons Roads corridor.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

 

13.3  Courtenay Street Briefing

Board Consideration cont.

A Board member noted continual issues raised in the community about Courtenay Street and suggesting it also be a regular update. The Chairperson requested that staff  provide an information update  in a briefing.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00023

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

4.         Request information on progress with Courtney Street briefing.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

 

13.4  Shirley Community Trust Birdsong Trail Project

Board Consideration cont.

The Chairperson sought to add a resolution about staff making contact with Shirley Community Trust about their Birdsong Trail project, noting that the Board supports it.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00024

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

5.         Request staff make contact with the Shirley Community Trust regarding their Birdsong Trail project. The Board notes its support for this project.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

 

13.5  Toilet Facilities for 10 Shirley Road

Board Consideration cont.

A Board member sought follow up on the cost of toilets for 10 Shirley Road, and another member sought follow up on investigating portacom toilet facilities for the site.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00025

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

6.         Request staff investigate portacom toilet facilities that could potentially be sited at 10 Shirley Road.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

 

13.6  Signage for 10 Shirley Road

Board Consideration cont.

A Board member sought to add to the resolutions a request that staff work with the Shirley Road Central group to progress their idea for signage (referenced in their public forum presentation, Item 4.2, at the start of the meeting).

Community Board Resolved PICB/2022/00026

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

7.         Request staff work with Shirley Road Central to progress their idea for signage.

Ali Jones/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                         Carried

14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

Board members exchanged information on the following matters of interest:

 

14.1   Factory Road Traffic Issues

A Board member discussed issues with trucks going through Factory Road and Tyrone Street, noting residents suffering through these large traffic movements, causing stress, and questioning if there is anything that can be done to progress the issue. The Board member requested that contact be made with the resident about an opportunity to raise the matter through a presentation to the Board.

 

14.2   Northwood Residents Request for Radcliffe Road Cycleway

A Board member noted a resident had sent correspondence to her needing a response about interest in a cycleway link, suggesting it could be an item for the future.

 

14.3   Environment Canterbury Annual Plan

A Board member noted the opportunity to feed into the Council’s submission on Environment Canterbury’s Annual Plan.

 

14.4   Ōtautahi Community Housing Trust (OCHT)

A Board member queried whether the Board had received an expected invitation to the opening of the OCHT housing complex on Coles Place, which other members were not aware of to date.

 

14.5   Springfield Road  

A Board member noted that concern for the safety of pedestrians on Springfield Road (Abberley Crescent to St Albans Street) had been highlighted for her, with no crossing on that road, suggesting that it would be good to look at this issue.

 

14.6   Cycling Education Programme  

A Board member noted discussions residents had been having with her about etiquette for bike and e-bike riding and parking, expressing interest in the Council doing education around those etiquettes.

 

14.7   Cranford Street Cycleway signage

A Board member queried whether there should be signage on the Cranford Street cycleway at the entrances to Placemakers and Waitomo for cyclists as well as vehicles. The Chairperson noted a briefing already arranged to come to the Board on related matters.

 

14.8   Snap, Send, Solve Unresolved Ticket relating to Water Pumping Station Garden Maintenance

A Board member expressed disappointment in snap, send, solve tickets being unresolved for overgrowing vines going onto a residents property from a Water Pumping Station. The Chairperson requested that staff to follow up on this.

 

Meeting concluded at 12.05pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 29th DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

Emma Norrish

Chairperson


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

7.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee Minutes - 4 April 2022

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

22/436476

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Matt Pratt – Community Governance Manager Papanui-Innes
Matthew.Pratt@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

The Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee held a meeting on 4 April 2022 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board for confirmation.

2.   Recommendation to Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board receives and confirms the Minutes from the Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee meeting held 4 April 2022.

 

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

A

Minutes Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee - 4 April 2022

30

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Lyssa Aves - Governance Support Officer

  


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 







Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

8.     Marshland Turners Safety Improvements

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

22/392439

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Wayne Anisy, Traffic Engineer, wayne.anisy@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services, jane.davis@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider approval of the proposed Right Turn Bay and No Stopping areas on Marshland Road and Turners Road as shown on Attachment A.

1.2      The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

1.3      The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

1.4      The recommended option is to Install a Right Turn Bay and No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A. The length of No Stopping in this option is the minimum length needed to provide Minimum Gap Sight Distance, allowing a driver entering the intersection sufficient visibility of approaching traffic to make the desired turn safely.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves the Right Turn Bay scheme design for the section of Marshland Road and Turners Road as shown on Attachment A including all road markings, signage, kerb alignment and road surface treatments.

2.         Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Marshland Road commencing at its intersection with Turners and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 48 metres.

3.         Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Marshland Road commencing at its intersection with Turners Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres.

4.         Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Turners Road commencing at its intersection with Marshland Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 36 metres.

5.         Approves, pursuant to Clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Turners Road commencing at its intersection with Marshland Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

6.         Revokes any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in resolutions 1-5 above.

7.         Approves that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the road marking restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1      The Council has received recent requests from the community and the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to look into the safety issues at the Marshland/Turners intersection. The main issues being experienced are in conjunction with the right turning movements from Marshland Road into Turners Road, mainly the lack of a right turn bay/little space for people travelling north to pass a vehicle waiting to turn.

3.2      The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

3.3      Install Right Turn Bay and No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.  The length of No Stopping in this option is the minimum length needed to provide Minimum Gap Sight Distance, allowing a driver entering the intersection sufficient visibility of approaching traffic to make the desired turn safety. 

3.4      The recommended option within this report has been assessed against relevant industry-standard design guidance including the sight distance requirements of the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard. 

 

4.   Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1      Maintain the current intersection layout.

4.2      There are no advantages to not installing the preferred option.

5.   Detail Te Whakamahuki

5.1      Marshland Road has a minor arterial classification and carries high traffic volumes. A stop control was introduced at the Turners intersection in 2019, and a 60km/h posted speed limit was introduced on Marshland and Turners Roads in 2020. Although CAS has no recorded accident history at this location in the past five years, Mega Maps shows a high collective risk rating for this intersection, and this scheme also focuses on improvements to the Marshland Road corridor which has been identified in the top 10 percent of the DSI road network.

5.2      The Scheme has had Transport Steering Group approval, and been through a Scheme Safety Audit and no major issues were identified. Further to the scheme detailed in Attachment A, there is a lighting upgrade required due to the existing lighting not complying with the lighting standards AS/NZS 1158.1, refer to Attachment B for the proposed solution and the work to be carried out to bring the intersection up to standards.

5.3      On several occasions, site investigations confirmed that there were no vehicles parking within the proposed areas of No Stopping. However consultation was carried out, in particular with Ouruhia Nursery as they were most affected by the proposal, and Nursery staff had no issues with the No Stopping areas as detailed in Attachment A. Nursery staff also stated that the Right Turn Bay was a wonderful idea and they will feel much safer when waiting to turn right into Turners Road so fully supported the scheme.

5.4      If approved, the scheme, including all markings will be implemented within the current financial year.

5.5      The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.5.1   Innes Ward.

5.5.2   Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board.

6.   Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1      Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

6.2      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1   Activity: Transport

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6.1 Reduce the number of death and serious injury crashes on the local road network  - ≤ 105 crashes

Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3      The recommendations in this report are consistent with the Christchurch Suburban Parking Policy.

Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4      This proposal does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this proposal does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5      This proposal does not have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6      This proposal improves accessibility for all road users, by providing a safer means of accessing the identified intersection.

7.   Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1      Cost to Implement – Approx. $80,000.

7.2      Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Will be covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.3      Funding Source - “Traffic Operations Minor Safety Intervention” budget.

8.   Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1      Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.2      The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.3      The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.4      There is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.5      This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.3.

9.   Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1      None identified.

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

tg139145 Marshland Turners Plan for Board Report

41

b

Marshland Turners Lighting Proposal

42

c

Marshland Turners Construction Issue Plan

43

 

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

 

 

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Katie Smith - Team Leader Road Amenity and Asset Protection

Stephen Wright - Acting Manager Operations (Transport)

Lynette Ellis - Head of Transport & Waste Management

  


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

9.     Proposed Road Names - 20 Mills Road

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

22/441017

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Paul Lowe, Manager Resource Consents,
Paul.Lowe@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Jane Davis, General Manager Infrastructure Planning & Regulatory Services, Jane.Davis@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the proposed road names at 20 Mills Road, Marshland.

1.2      The report is staff generated resulting from a naming request received from the subdivision developer.

2.   Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves the following new road and lane names for 20 Mills Road, (RMA/2022/330 - Oakbridge Stage 2):

a.        Road 1 - Cartvale Drive

b.        Lane 1 - Gingko Lane

3.   Detail Te Whakamahuki

Introduction Te Whakatkinga

3.1      Road naming requests have been submitted by the developer, for the subdivision of 20 Mills Road (RMA/2022/330 - Oakbridge Stage 2).  A preferred name and alternative names, have been put forward by the developer for each road/lane.

3.2      The recommended road names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spelling, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The proposed names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.

3.3      The recommended road names have been checked against the Council’s Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy dated 2 November 1993 and are considered to be consistent with this policy except as outlined below.

3.4      The recommended road names have also been checked against the Australia and New Zealand Standard AS/NZA 4819:2011 Rural and Urban Addressing. The names are considered to be consistent with the Standard unless otherwise stated below.

3.5      Under the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy, the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is not an ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.

3.6      Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed road names.

3.7      The names requested have been accompanied by an explanation of the background to the names, which is summarised below, along with correspondence with the applicant.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.8      The decisions in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.9      The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.10    Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Proposed Names

3.11    The proposed roads are shown in Attachment A

3.12    The proposed road names continue the existing theme of the development: the local environment and the Polish settler history of the area.

3.13    Road 1 - Preferred name: Cartvale Drive

3.14    The Cartvale was a ship which transported four Polish families (the Borkowski, Roda, Rogal, and Suchomski families) among others from London to Wellington Harbour in 1874. These families all settled in Marshland in the same year.

3.15    Lane 1 - Preferred name: Gingko Lane

3.16    Ginkgo biloba, commonly known as ginkgo or gingko also known as the maidenhair tree, is a species of tree native to China. There are three mature Gingko trees on the adjacent site which can be seen from the new lane. The owners of this adjacent site planted many of the mature trees that are present on the development site. This name is more relevant to the existing environment rather than Polish settlers.

Alternative Names

3.17    Rogal Drive/Lane - The Rogal family were one of four prominent Polish families to settle in Marshlands in 1874.

3.18    Kopper Drive/Lane - Captain E. Kopper commanded the Friedeberg which sailed from Hamburg to Lyttelton in 1872. The Polish immigrants from this ship settled in Marshland.

3.19    Note: If any alternative name is chosen the appropriate road type will be used.

 

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

RMA/2022/330 - Proposed Names Plan - 20 Mills Road

48

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Leashelle Miller - Planning Technician

Paul Lowe - Manager Resource Consents

Approved By

John Higgins - Head of Planning & Consents

Jane Davis - General Manager Infrastructure, Planning & Regulatory Services

  


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

10.  Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - April 2022

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

22/356673

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Matthew Pratt – Community Governance Manager Papanui-Innes
Matthew.Pratt@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2.   Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for April 2022.

3.   Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1      Community Governance Projects

Activity

Detail

Timeline

Strategic Alignment

Edible and Sustainable Garden Awards 2022

 

 

 

The Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board held the Edible and Sustainable Garden Awards for 2022 in partnership with the Canterbury Horticultural Society, to recognise and celebrate those growing their own food.

 

Award recipients detailed in section 3.5 below.

 

Concluded for 2022

 

·  Resilient Communities

·  Healthy environment

Downstream Effects Management Plan (DEMP)

The Board shared the briefing it received summarising transport modelling for the DEMP Stage Two through its YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNZAaBVM588

Ongoing

· Endorse and encourage a functioning and safe traffic network that supports a connected community

Summer with Your Neighbours 2021-22

 

Summer with Your Neighbours events were due to take place between November 2021 and March 2022.

In light of the Government decision to move the country into the Red traffic light setting, recipients of the subsidy have been advised that the timeframe to hold events has been extended. We will accept requests for reimbursements up until 1 June 2022.

1 June 2022

·  Resilient Communities

·  Strengthening Communities Strategy

Community Service Awards 2022

Council's Community Service Awards are a way of giving well-deserved recognition to people who make our communities better places to live.

 

Waipapa Papanui-Innes is participating in 2022. People will be eligible for Awards in the area in which they work, however, if the work is in a metropolitan organisation covering more than two board areas, then the nomination shall be considered in the board area that the nominee does the majority of their voluntary work.

Boards will consider these in May 2022, with decisions advised in May/June and awards given in June/July.

 

 

·  Resilient Communities

·  Strengthening Communities Strategy

Langdons Road Corridor

Network study requested. Work has progressed, but ultimately staff are waiting to see when the Northlink Retail Park Stage 3 will proceed, what this will look like, what roading works might result, and the scale of additional network demands generated.

Ongoing

Endorse and encourage a functioning and safe traffic network that supports a connected community

10 Shirley Road Activation

Staff are investigating options for the activation of the site further to the Board’s site visit and follow up discussion of the at Youth Audit Workshop. There will subsequently be an updated feasibility study for the site which includes options for community space. An independent service provider will be engaged to carry out the feasibility study.

Ongoing

Improve and support community facilities and amenity in the Papanui-Innes Wards.

 

3.2      Shirley Community Trust – Birdsong Trail

As noted in the last Area Report, Shirley Community Trust and local Shirley residents have a new project idea to enhance the MacFarlane Park walkway especially through Acheson Avenue to Jebson Street and Jebson Street to Riselaw Street. The community would like to see more native planting added to these areas with the hope to attract native bird life and to activate the space and community through the development of the project.

Staff have undertaken an initial walk-through with community representatives to visualise and discuss assistance with the project, observing the present relatively blank canvas for a significant community planting project.

3.3      Community Events

3.3.1   Walk Waitaha 2022

Walk Waitaha aims to offer an alternative to the traditional Walking Festival which was unable to run in its usual form this year due to the Covid-19 red light setting. It offers a range of self-guided walks and walking activities to cater for every kind of walker.

https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Events/Brand/Banner/CUS5088-Walk-A4-Whats-On-800x450-WEB__FillWzExNDAsNjQxXQ.jpg

Meet in the Middle is an example of a self-guided walk – this one through the Red Zone that will showing projects that are happening and planned.

3.3.2   Christchurch Heritage Festival 2022

Information on the festival will start to appear at this link from April/May 2022.

3.3.3   Other upcoming community events and festivals in the wider city

Visit this link for the variety of community events and festivals to held around the city.

3.4      Community Pride Garden Awards

3.4.1   The awards are a Council initiative started in 1991, which have been a joint venture between the Community Boards and the Christchurch Beautifying Association since 1997. 

3.4.2   The awards encourage civic pride and acknowledge those who have contributed to maintaining the image of Christchurch as the Garden City by beautifying their streets and gardens.

3.4.3   There were 95 recipients of a 2022 Papanui-Innes Community Pride Garden Award. Each of these recipients has had a certificate printed and posted out to them, to acknowledge and congratulate them on being selected for a Community Pride Garden Award and thank them for their contribution to enhancing the beauty of the city's environment through maintaining the attractiveness of their gardens.

3.4.4   Recipients were contacted by staff to ask if they would like to share a photo of their garden. 13 recipients sent in photos. 

3.4.5   Staff will be liaising with the Papanui-Innes Community Board to ask if they would be happy to share these photos on the Board's Facebook page.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.5      Waipapa Papanui-Innes Edible and Sustainable Garden Award Recipients 2022

Award Category

Plus Special Award Winner

Name

Suburb

Residential House Category

 

Claire Duncan

Papanui

Residential House Category

Award: Organic garden

Kelly Pope and Daniel Ready

Mairehau

Residential House Category

 

Sylvie Nikitine

Mairehau

Residential House Category

Award: Fruit and berries

Bernie Lynskey

Northcote

Residential House Category

Yvonne Palmer

Papanui

Residential House Category

Award: Yield

Margaret Howley

Papanui

Residential House Category

Award: Fruit and berries

Sarah Morel

St Albans

Residential House Category

Tracey Siepkes

Papanui

Residential House Category

Award: Beginner gardener

David Gardner

Redwood

Residential House Category

Award: Tomatoes

Evans Family

Redwood

Residential House Category

Ivan Hibberd

Belfast

Community or Business Category

 

MacFarlane Park Community Garden

Shirley

School or Early Learning Centre Category

Award: Organic garden

Casebrook Intermediate Edible Garden

Casebrook

Community or Business Category

 

Marralomeda Charitable Trust

Redwood

Community or Business Category

 

Packe Street Park and Community Garden

Edgeware

Community or Business Category

Award: Fruit and berries

Unity Church

Mairehau

 

Recipients have been contacted by staff to ask if they would like to have their certificate posted to them or have Community Board members present certificates in person:

·    11 recipients would like their certificates posted (or will pick up from the Papanui Service Centre).

·    5 recipients would like to have the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board members, who are available, come and deliver/meet with them in person to present the certificate to them.  Staff are co-ordinating with these recipients to confirm dates/times and will continue to keep Community Board members updated and to check with them as to their availability on those date/times.

The Canterbury Horticultural Society is putting together a PowerPoint presentation of photos of all of the edible gardens (as they were undertaking the judging/assessments).  Once staff have received this, it will be shared with the Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board members.

3.6      Community Funding Summary

3.6.1   The current balance of the 2021-2022 financial year’s Discretionary Response Fund is $6,830. There is $5,041 remaining in the Positive Youth Development Fund.

3.6.2   Applications for the 2022/23 Strengthening Communities Fund opened on 21 March 2022 and will close on 26 April 2022.

3.7      Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.7.1   Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

·     Sheldon Park Netball Courts

The upgrade of the Sheldon Park Netball courts is now complete.

The works involved repairing existing drainage and installing additional drainage to reduce ponding issues on the courts. The courts were then rebuilt to ensure surface water was directed off the courts, trip hazards were removed and the courts line marked with four netball courts and one tennis court. Adjustments to the fencing and entrance points were completed at the same time.

The courts are now open and available for community and club use.  The Toilet facilities are in the process of being repaired.

·     Langdons Sisson Roundabout Improvements

On 1 April 2022 the Traffic Operations Team briefed the Board on pedestrian and cycle safety improvements at the Langdons-Sisson-Restell Roundabout.

The changes being implemented are:

·      Removal of redundant cycle lane markings and symbols and installation of painted cycleway sharrows (where cycles share the road with cars) on all approaches to the roundabout

·      Cycle lane greening on both Langdons Road Roundabout departures

·      Installation of green surfacing to the shared path ramp on the west side of Sisson Drive and removal of existing incorrectly marked shared path symbols

·      Installation of tactile pavers and pedestrian hold rails at all crossing points.

The Board were supportive of staff proceeding, noting that Board approval was not required. The Board requested this note to provide awareness of the process and the background as follows:

·      The scheme has been through safety audits and had Transport Steering Group (TSG) approval to proceed.

·      Consultation with all major stakeholders has since been carried out from 23 February to 11 March including NZTA, Police and AA. Consultation also included a direct meeting with a Spokes representative. One submission was received back from Kiwi Properties who were in full support of the proposal. The submission from Kiwi Properties also highlighted some other issues that are being worked through via the Traffic Operations and Maintenance teams.

·      As part of this roundabout safety project, there are three sections of cycle lanes leading up to the roundabout limit lines that need removing, and generally this would require Community Board recommendation, then Council to approve or revoke. However in this case, following staff investigations, there are no records indicating that the cycle lanes through this section of Langdons Road were resolved so as to require revocation.

Moving forward, the scheme will proceed to the construction stage, with staff to include this section of Langdons Road within the up-coming Langdons Road cycle lane project following the next reseal of the carriageway.

3.7.2   Council Engagement and Consultation

·     New Port to Port Bus Stop Improvements

Environment Canterbury (ECan) has proposed a new Metro bus route between Lyttelton (and Rapaki) and the Christchurch International Airport. Christchurch City Council looks after bus stops and wants them to be safer and easier to use by providing more seats and shelters, improved line markings for buses pulling in and out, and overnight bike storage lockers near the Gondola building for those who want to bus through the tunnel and cycle to and from the city.

Six new pedestrian island crossings are proposed, including three on Wairakei Road. An interactive map is available at this link

Consultation on the bus stop improvements was open for feedback 22 March to 12 April 2022. A report relating to those improvements in the part of the ward along Wairakei Road is expected to proceed to the Board around mid-year on the current trajectory.

·     Slow speeds neighbourhood – Papanui

This proposed speed reduction is part of the Slow Speeds Neighbourhood programme focused on identifying areas in Christchurch where the community has expressed support for slower speeds.

It is proposed to reduce the speed from 50 km/h to 40 km/h and 30km/h on the road network shown in this map. The consultation is open to feedback 8 April 2022 to 3 May 2022.

·     Opawa neighbourhood safety improvements (closes 3 May 2022)

·     Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change (closes 13 May 2022)

Being that these changes are to bring the District Plan in line with government direction that has been given via the National Policy Statement-Urban Development (NPS-UD) and the Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) Amendment Act to enable more development in the city’s existing urban footprint, some of the changes are legal requirements of the new national direction and cannot be influenced by the Council, or community feedback. However, there are some changes that can be adapted based on residents’ views such as building heights above the new baselines. (More detailed information can be found at this link.)

·     Draft Coastal Hazards Plan Change (closes 13 May 2022)

·     Draft Heritage Plan Change (closes 13 May 2022)

11 Residential Heritage Areas (RHAs) are proposed across the city. These are areas with buildings and features which collectively rather than individually are of significance to the city’s heritage and identity. RHAs are matters of national importance under s6(f) of the Resource Management Act (RMA) and are therefore qualifying matters under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development (NPSUD). This means Council does not have to make as much provision for intensification in these areas as in standard residential areas. (More detailed information can be found at this link.)

The District Plan already includes Character Area overlays. These are also proposed to become Qualifying Matters as part of the Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change. Seven are proposed to be reduced in size and six to remain the same. The interactive map is useful for exploring these layers:

·     Draft Radio Communication Pathways Plan Change (closes 13 May 2022)

·     Draft Annual Plan 2022/23 and Opting out of kerbside collection & target rate

The minutes of the Board’s Submissions Committee that agreed submissions to the Council on these consultations are within the agenda for receipt. The Board has signalled that it wishes to be heard in support of its submissions.

·     Start Work Notices (SWN)

SWN relating to the Board area have been sent to the Board throughout the month.  All Board area and city-wide start work notices can be found at this link.

 

3.8      Governance Advice

3.8.1   Site Visit to 10 Shirley Road (Shirley Community Reserve)

The Community Board held a site visit to the Shirley Community Reserve on 23 March 2022 further to previously receiving briefings on a youth audit of the site and prospective landscape plan. Notes from this site visit are appended as Attachment A.

 

 

3.8.2   Public Participation in Board Meetings and Correspondence

The Board received the following at its 18 March 2022 meeting:

·     Public Forum Presentations

-      Dudley Creek Plant Maintenance – Jennifer Dalziel spoke in regard various matters including the need for weeding of the roadside plantings on Julius Terrace and Stapletons Road, which staff indicate has been attended to.

-      10 Shirley Road – Joanne Byrne spoke on behalf of Shirley Road Central regarding matters principally relating to the Shirley Community Reserve at 10 Shirley Road that have informed the Board’s ongoing discussions concerning the site.

·     Deputations / Correspondence   

-      Cranford Street and Northern Corridor Speed Correspondence and a deputation were received by Dave Gardner as detailed in last meeting’s minutes relating principally to motorist speed on the CNC through to Cranford Street, which informed the Board’s briefing in regard these matters generated.

-      Northwood Residents Request for Radcliffe Road Cycleway – In last meeting’s elected member information exchange, a member noted correspondence sent to her by the Northwood Residents Association advocating for a cycle connection between Northwood Boulevard and Main North Road and the Northern Corridor cycleway.

Following up on this request, it was relayed that there is an existing project ‘60115 Radcliffe Road Corridor Improvement’ that is expected to deliver a cycle connection from the Northern Corridor to Main North Road.  Construction funding is currently allocated in the 2026 Financial Year.  It is in the very early planning stages and will come to the Community Boards in due course, the Project Manager indicating he will keep the Boards informed as they progress with the project.

-      Dudley Street Starling Issues – The Board received an update on the consideration of these issues presented by Dudley Street residents, Mr and Mrs Hughes at the meeting prior. 

The questions presented by Mr and Mrs Hughes and the Board’s requests are with the Office of the Chief Executive for answer. The issue will remain live, though it encompasses a need to align a number of considerations; it will accordingly take time to settle on the organisation’s response to the difficulty the starlings pose. 

 

3.8.3   Community Open Forum

Though there were no requests to present to the Community Board at its open forum on 1 April 2022, since the last meeting, staff were able to report to the Board and community organisers on the follow up to the open forum of 4 March 2022.

The Community Development Activator for the Shirley Village Project in response noted that: the residents who made presentations to the Board have spoken positively about the experience and appreciated that they were able to talk directly to the Board about concerns they have as well as expressing the positive things that they see happening in their community.

He also noted: the value of residents connecting with the Community Board is the positive effect it has not their sense of ownership and self-belief that they can contribute to making their neighbourhood a better place. An example is Julie Gray's excitement at being contacted by the Council staff to inform her that the replacement of the Robert MacFarlane plaque was being progressed.

The Roading Amenity and Asset Protection Team conducted a night site visit to Acheson Ave to investigate the street lighting further the forum presentation on this, giving considered conclusions that though generally adequate they could look at trimming vegetation, and further investigate additional lighting to connecting streets such as Skipton Street.

3.8.4   Briefings

The Board received briefings since its last meeting about the following projects/issues:

·     Update on DEMP and CNC

·     Environment Canterbury Annual Plan korero with ECan Chair and Cr Southworth

·     Issues regarding Christchurch Northern Corridor

·     Flooding Edgeware Road

·     Youth Audit Workshop

·     Langdons Sisson Roundabout Improvements

3.8.5   Resources relevant to Board queries

·     The 3-Waters Network Asset Map was referred to in the Edgeware Road Flooding briefing.

·     The Traffic Link Counts Dashboard relates to the database arising from the Council’s intersection count programme, which includes a three-yearly monitoring regime over a number of selected intersections. (It does not cover every intersection of the city and the list of selected intersections can change over time.)

·     The Police’s policedata.nz resource was referred to as a tool providing more detailed crime data in follow up to the Police Snapshot at section 4.4 below.

·     The CCC Draft Plan Change 14 Zoning Map was referred to as resource relevant to the Plan Change consultations to help residents find out what the proposed changes mean for them and their property. It is an interactive map that is address searchable, and there is also functionality to provide feedback on zone types and locations through the Drop a Pin map.

·     The Road and Footpath Resurfacing Map was referenced for resurfacing queries.

4.   Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1      Graffiti Snapshots:

·   Graffiti Snapshot February 2022 (refer Attachment B)

·   Graffiti Snapshot March 2022 (refer Attachment C)

4.2      Memoranda sent to the Board:

·   CCC: Flood Prevention Trial to control nuisance aquatic weed 17 March 2022 (circulated 17 Mar 2022)

·   CCC: Vacuum sewer constraints in Shirley, Aranui and Prestons (circulated 21 Mar 2022)

·   CCC: Approval to consult on draft plan changes (circulated 22 Mar 2022)

·   CCC: Plan Change 4 - Short term accommodation - District Plan Change (circulated 25 Mar 2022)

·   CCC: Safety Improvements - Briggs/Lake Terrace/Marshland (circulated 28 Mar 2022)

·   Ecan: New Port to Port bus route improvements (circulated 28 March 2022)

·   CCC: Implications of the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 for Christchurch water supplies (circulated 30 Mar 2022)

·   CCC: Plan Change 4 - Short term accommodation District Plan Change (circulated 31 Mar 2022)

·   CCC:  Covid-19 Facilities Update (circulated 4 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: St Albans Skate Park and Skate Jam Update (circulated 8 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: Christchurch City Council submission on Environment Canterbury’s Annual Plan 2022/23 (circulated 8 Apr 2022) – incorporating the Board’s feedback

·   CCC: Alcohol Licence Application – 456 Papanui Road (circulated 11 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: Alcohol Licence Application – 60 Warrington Street (circulated 11 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: Alcohol Licence Application – 1B Morrison Avenue (circulated 11 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: Alcohol Licence Application – 2/23E Langdons Road (circulated 11 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: Recovery Progress at the Christchurch Wastewater Treatment Plant (circulated 12 Apr 2022)

·   CCC: MCR Northern Line – Existing Path Widening Feasibility Investigation (circulated 13 Apr 2022)

·   SWN: Emmet Street – Stormwater Renewal (circulated 13 Apr 2022)

·   SWN: Chrystal Street – road, kerb, footpath and stormwater renewal (circulated 14 Apr 2022)

4.3      Alcohol Licence Application Notifications in the Board area

Closing date

Applicant name

Trading name

Address

Application and licence type

Type of business

4 May 2022

Sam & Som Limited

Khmer Cambodian Cuisine

2/23E Langdons Road
Papanui
Christchurch

On-licence renewal

On- restaurant class 3

3 May 2022

The Elms Hotel Limited

Quality Hotel Elms

456 Papanui Road
Papanui
Christchurch

On-licence renewal

On- hotel

3 May 2022

Acheron Heights Limited

Schroeders Tavern

60 Warrington Street
St Albans
Christchurch

On-licence renewal

On- tavern

6 Apr 2022

Bowls Papanui Incorporated

Bowls Papanui

205 Condell Avenue
Bryndwr
Christchurch

Club licence renewal

Club class 3

 

4.4      Customer Service Request Report – Hybris Report for the Papanui-Innes Wards

Refer below for the 1 March to – 31 March 2022 statistics providing an overview of the number of Customer Service Requests that have been received, including the types of requests being received and a breakdown of how they are being reported.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.5      Police Snapshot - provided by Senior Sergeant Roy Appley to Community Boards for sharing:

Community Services Teams: Community Constables i.e. five teams of a Sergeant and five Constables work in all the Christchurch Metropolitan areas across the city. These teams investigate community related offences, such as thefts, assaults, neighbourly disputes, and wilful property damage, just to name a few. The teams also proactively patrol their communities and are bolstered in this effort by a myriad of Canterbury Police teams such as Road Policing units, Response staff and CIB investigators. More specialised teams are also called upon depending on the specific events that unfold, or the prevention activities that we undertake, with a view to reducing the risk of harm from occurring. Our purpose is to ensure everyone can Be Safe and Feel Safe.

The following are a couple of specific issues that have arisen lately and require some extra vigilance by our communities. The goal with these messages is to ensure that people are safe wherever they live, work or visit.

Police are aware of a slight increase in thefts from vehicles occurring in the Christchurch area recently.  Police are working hard to monitor areas that have been affected by this offending by increasing Police presence and working with Community Patrols. However, Police cannot be everywhere at once and it is important that people put prevention measures in place to deter opportunistic thieves.

Senior Sergeant Ian Appley says: “We see the same mistakes time and time again. People leave valuables in their car or leave their vehicle unlocked, which gives offenders ample opportunity to take their belongings. Prevention is key in this space. A helpful motto to use is ‘Lock or lose it, conceal it or remove it’.” 

Anyone that sees suspicious activity around vehicles can call Police on 111 if it happening, or 105 after the fact. It is important that every incident of theft from cars is reported to Police so that Police can appropriate resources effectively and aim to prevent more in the future. Supplying video footage of the incident is also helpful to Police after the offence has taken place. If Police can identify the person in that footage, Police will investigate and work to hold that offender to account. In some cases, identification of the individual responsible is not always possible. This is where prevention becomes key in such situations.   

Top tips for preventing theft from your vehicle include:

1.       Invest in a steering wheel lock to show thieves that you have security in place and make them less likely to target your vehicle.

2.       Put a prevention sticker on your windows or flashing LEDs on the dashboard.

3.       Always lock your car, even when you are parked in your own driveway.

4.       Avoid leaving valuables like CDs, laptops, mobile phones, GPS devices and iPods in your car. If you have to leave them there, make sure they are out of sight.

5.       Try to park in well-lit areas if you park your car on the street overnight.

6.       Joining a neighbourhood support group can be beneficial to deterring theft as more people in your neighbourhood can keep an eye out for suspicious activity. 

I also want to remind people to keep themselves, their friends and their community safe when they are out drinking and socialising. Police have been aware of large gatherings in Riccarton and Ilam during weekend nights in March. Police have been monitoring these events and attending where necessary to disperse gatherings and move people on. During these incidents approximately 40 individuals have been issued with alcohol infringement notices and 6 arrests have been made for offences relating to the gatherings. Noise control officers have seized 16 stereos.

Christchurch Police continue to have high visibility policing happening around known party locations and entertainment areas in Christchurch. Police Community Teams, Road Policing and Public Safety Units are working with other organisations including Christchurch City Council and University of Canterbury with the aim of keeping people safe. Police work closely with University of Canterbury management and security team to ensure the safety of the large student population on campus, and of all residents in the surrounding residential streets.

Overall, Police have found the behaviour of people at parties in this area to be good. Police have also been working with University of Canterbury Student Association to promote safety messages on student forums and to reinforce the University of Canterbury, Student Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct outlines values and expectations to ensure the health and wellbeing of students and a safe and secure campus for the benefit of every person using it. Police encourage people planning parties to register on the “Good One” party register, https://goodone.org.nz/ Police can assist party organisers to ensure everyone has a good time, with advice on safety measures and how to get assistance when needed.  

Here are some tips for partying safely: 

1.     Look out for your friends – if you arrive together at an event, make a plan to leave together

2.     Have a glass of water or other beverage between alcoholic drinks – don’t overdo it

3.     Make sure you eat some food if you are drinking

4.     Keep an eye on those drinks and your bag or wallet, or have your friends mind your gear if you need to go the toilet

5.     Have a designated driver, or put aside money for a taxi or bus

6.     If you plan to walk late at night, walk in pairs or group - either way, have a plan for getting home safely

7.     Make sure your phone is fully charged and keep it safe, so you can use it to get home.

Anti-Social Road Users: 

These groups continue to be a challenge in our communities. These are the groups who often are seen in large numbers “cruising” along known routes around the City. They are more obvious when they are racing each other or using the streets as a “burnout” zone. As much as we are able, we are very firm with these groups and ticket and seize vehicles wherever possible. 

Recently, search warrants have been executed and cars seized even after the offending has happened. This is down to excellent policing by our specialist Road Policing units. Speed, Distractions, Impairments and Restraints remain a focus for all Police and the members of the public can expect to be held to account for offences that fall within these categories. There will be an increased push over the next couple of months on unsafe driving behaviours, so members of the public can expect to be issued infringement notices for their unsafe driving behaviour.

This is all designed to make our roadways safer, preventing deaths and injuries. 

It is common to apprehend many local people speeding and failing to stop at intersections when we become active in communities that might not normally see as much road policing. Local people often complain to me about the driving in their areas from visitors but, as I say, it is common for Police to have to hold local residents to account for their poor driving - so please pay attention when driving, and let’s all get to where we are going and home again safely.

There are many good things about living in Christchurch, and most of us can live safely free from harm due to the work of many community agencies who help their own communities prosper. As we come into the winter season, it becomes darker earlier and roads can offer a different challenge. Good strong safe communities occur when the people that live in them care about what is going on in their communities. Please keep an eye on each other and look out for those who might need a hand or can no longer do things quite as well as they might once have. Lend a hand if you can or alert a community agency that might be able to assist.

Community Boards and Police work closely together to make improvements that have been highlighted by the community and to help ensure that your voice is heard. You may wish to consider becoming a member of a Neighbourhood Support Group or a Community Patrol. Both organisations are voluntary and may not involve too much of your time, but can empower you to feel you belong to your community, or offer an opportunity to give back with your presence, and help prevent crime and crashes. Information on Neighbourhood Support and on Community Patrols is here https://www.neighbourhoodsupport.co.nz/ https://cpnz.org.nz/

Safer Homes, Safer Roads and Safer Communities everyone.

 

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

10 Shirley Road Site Visit Notes

64

b

Graffiti Snapshot February 2022

68

c

Graffiti Snapshot March 2022

70

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Mark Saunders - Community Board Advisor

Lyssa Aves - Governance Support Officer

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Stacey Holbrough - Community Development Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Sharon Munro - Community Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support and Partnerships

  


Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 





Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 



Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 




Waipapa Papanui-Innes Community Board

29 April 2022

 

 

11.   Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

Karakia Whakamutunga