Waikura/

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                    Monday 1 February 2021

Time:                                   3.30pm

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Members

Alexandra Davids

Sunita Gautam

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Michelle Lomax

Jake McLellan

Jackie Simons

Sara Templeton

 

 

26 January 2021

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Karakia Timatanga................................................................................................... 4 

C          1.        Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha........................................................................ 4

B         2.        Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga......................................... 4

C          3.        Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua........................ 4

B         4.        Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui................................................................ 4

B         5.        Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga............................... 4

B         6.        Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga.................................................. 4

Staff Reports

C          7.        Election of Community Board Deputy Chairperson....................................... 15

C          8.        Community Board Meeting Schedule 2021................................................... 19

CA       9.        Te Ara Ihutai Christchurch Coastal Pathway - Moncks Bay section.................. 23

C          10.      Te Pou Toetoe: Linwood Pool - Pedestrian kerb buildouts on Linwood Ave....... 33

B         11.      Otākāro Avon River Corridor Programme Update......................................... 39

C          12.      Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Youth Development Fund Application - Amy Brown............................................................................................ 41

C          13.      Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Sumner Community Residents' Association and Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre & Residents' Association................................................ 45

C          14.      Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Ōpāwaho (Lower Heathcote) River Working Party Project Costs.. 53

C          15.      Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Resource Consent Application – Confirmation of the submitted Board Comment........................................... 57

C          16.      Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - January 2021............................................................................................................. 59

 

B         17.      Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi............................................................................................................ 117 

Karakia Whakamutunga

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

Karakia Timatanga

1.   Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha  

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

That the minutes of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Monday, 30 November 2020  be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

5.   Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

Unconfirmed

 

 

Waikura/

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                    Monday 30 November 2020

Time:                                   3:30pm

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Members

Alexandra Davids

Sunita Gautam

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Michelle Lomax

Jake McLellan

Jackie Simons

Sara Templeton

 

 

 

30 November 2020

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

Karakia Timatanga: Sara Templeton.  

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

 

1.   Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

Yani Johanson declared an interest in Item 10 - Proposed Road Names - 356 Brougham Street and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00116

That the minutes of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 be confirmed.

Tim Lindley/Michelle Lomax                                                                                                                                 Carried

4.   Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

4.1      Signage/Traffic Calming in the Vicinity of Avonside Drive and Swanns Road

Andrew Hamlin, a local resident, presented to the Board regarding an area in the vicinity of Avonside Drive, Retreat and Swanns Roads on a proposal to install cautionary wildlife signage and traffic calming for the safety of the community and the wildlife that use this area. Wildlife is being attracted to the area owing to community members feeding the birds along the river. The wildlife species being attracted to the area in black and red billed gulls.

Mr Hamlin highlighted that speed was an additional issue in the area; he advised the Board that Linwood College was experiencing issues with speed around the school campus.

After questions from Board members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Hamlin for his presentation.

Item 19.2 of these minutes refers.

Attachments

a       Public Forum: Avonside Drive Swanns Road Slide One - 30 November 2020 

b      Public Forum: Avonside Drive Swanns Road Slide Two - 30 November 2020   

 

4.2      The Role of the Community Board

Wayne Hawker, a local resident, spoke to the Board outlining his opinion on the role of the Community Board within the community.

After questions from Board members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Hawker for his presentation.

5.   Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

5.1

Proposed Development – Main Road, Redcliffs

Peter Croft, and Kate Borett, Redcliffs residents, spoke to the Board regarding Item7 – Correspondence. Mr Croft was concerned by the information in the Project Information Memorandum (PIM) he requested from Council pertaining to the new medical centre facility to be built on Main Road in Redcliffs.

After questions from the Board Members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Croft for his presentation.

Item 7 of these minutes refers.

Attachments

a       Deputation: Representation of Peter Croft 30 November 2020 

b      Deputation: Resource Consent Notified or Non-notified 30 November 2020 

c      Deputation: Peter Croft Project Information Memorandum 30 November 2020   

 

5.2      Proposed Development - Main Road Redcliffs

Mike Callaghan, Architect and Ray Edwards, Project Traffic Engineer for the new medical centre facility to be built on Main Road in Redcliffs. spoke to the Board regarding Item 7 – Correspondence. Mr Callaghan and Mr Edwards confirmed that the non-compliant items identified by the Project Information Memorandum (PIM) have been addressed.  A resource consent application will be filed in the near future.

After questions from the Board Members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Callaghan and Mr Edwards for their presentation.

Item 7 of these minutes refers.

Attachments

a       Deputation: Development Main Road Redcliffs - 30 November 2020   

6.   Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.   Correspondence

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00117  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part B

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receives the information in the Correspondence Report dated 30 November 2020.

Jake McLellan/Sunita Gautam                                                                                                                             Carried

 

8.   North Hagley Park Proposed Changing Rooms

 

Community Board Decided LCHB/2020/00118  (Original staff recommendations accepted without change).

Part A

That the Waikura/Council recommends that the Council:

1.         Agrees that officers commence public consultation on:

a.         The proposed changing rooms building illustrated in Attachment A to the agenda report and located in North Hagley Park, as shown on the plan in Attachment B to the agenda report; and

b.         A variation to the existing ground lease to the North Hagley Community, Sports & Recreation Trust Board in accordance with clause 6.1 of the lease.

2.         Accepts the advice that the public consultation meets the requirements of section 78 of the Local Government Act 2002 and follows a process similar to, although not dictated by, that specified in section 54 of the Reserves Act 1977.

3.         Authorises the Property Consultancy Manager, should the proposed building and lease variation proceed to be consented to by both the Council and the Minister of Conservation, to implement the variation to the deed of lease.

Jake McLellan/Sunita Gautam                                                                                                                             Carried

 

9.   Risingholme Park Playground Renewal

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00119  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves the landscape plan for the renewal of the playground at Risingholme Park, Ōpāwa as per Attachment A Lp383203 of the agenda report.

Sara Templeton/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                Carried

 

 

10. 356 Brougham Street - Proposed Road Names 

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00120  (Original staff recommendations accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the following new lane names for 356 Brougham Street:

a.         Lane 1 - Hoiho Lane

b.         Lane 2 - Karoro Lane

c.         Lane 3 - Korimako Lane

Sara Templeton/Jackie Simons                                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

11. Opawaho (Lower Heathcote River Catchment Plan) Working Party - Terms of Reference Review

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00121  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Adopts the Terms of Reference for the Ōpāwaho (Lower Heathcote River) Working Party as per Attachment A of the agenda report. 

Yani Johanson/Jackie Simons                                                                                                                             Carried

 

 

12. Date for First 2021 Ordinary Meeting

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00122  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Confirms the first 2021 ordinary meeting of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board is to be held on Monday 1 February 2021, commencing at 3.30pm, at the Linwood Boardroom.

Jackie Simons/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

13. Establishment of the 2020/21 Recess Committee

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00123  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Appoints a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson and a minimum of two other member(s) available, to be authorised to exercise the delegated powers of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board for the period following its ordinary meeting on 30 November 2020 up until the Board resumes its normal business  on 1 February 2021.

2.         Notes that any such delegation exercised by the Board’s Recess Committee will be reported to the Board for record purposes.

3.         Notes that any meeting convened of the Recess Committee will be publically notified and the details forwarded to all Board members.

Jake McLellan/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

 

14. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Board's 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Board Project Greening the East

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00124  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $17,633 from its 20/2021 Discretionary Response Fund to CCC Capital Delivery – Community towards Greening the East project delivery

Sunita Gautam/Michelle Lomax                                                                                                                          Carried

 

15. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund - Roimata Food Commons Trust Toha Kai

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00125  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $12,000 from its 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund to Roimata Commons Trust towards the Toha Kai project.

Yani Johanson/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

16. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 202021 Discretionary Response Fund - Roimata Food Commons Trust - Communal Tunnel Houses

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00126  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $10,000 from its 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund to Roimata Commons Trust towards the Communal Tunnel Houses.

Jackie Simons/Sunita Gautam                                                                                                                            Carried

 

17. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020-21 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Te Whare Roimata Trust

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00127  (Original staff recommendation accepted without change).

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $20,000 from its 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund to Te Whare Roimata Trust towards the Smith Street Garden Project.

Darrell Latham/Jake McLellan                                                                                                                             Carried

 

18. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - December 2020

 

Officer Recommendation / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receives the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for November 2020.

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2020/00128

Part B

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receives the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for November 2020.

2.         Requests staff advice on the updated plan for Lancaster Park and recent engagement.

3.         Requests an update on the naming of Te Pou Toetoe: Linwood Pool meeting rooms naming process.

4.         Confirms Michelle Lomax as the Board’s representative on the Doris Lusk Reserve – Project Selection Team and to report to the Board on the progress of the project.

Michelle Lomax/Jackie Simons                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

19. Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

The Board exchanged information on the following:

·    The Board discussed the ability to have the reasoning noted why Board members are an apology for a meeting/briefing.

·    The Board were advised of a member’s  intention to have a small clinic set up in Linwood Village to enable community members to discuss issues.

·    The Board discussed various Board actions and the timeliness of receiving staff information back to the Board.

·    The Board were advised that a community event will be held at Culter Park in January 2021; information on the event will shortly be distributed to the community.

·    The Board discussed the opportunity of having the footpaths under the Richardson/Clarendon Terraces raised to enable access to Ōpāwa during flooding and high tide events.

·    The Friends of Edmonds Gardens recently held their 40 years celebrations where certificates from the Board were presented.

·    The Board were advised that a meeting regarding the New Zealand Statement on Coastal Hazards was held in New Brighton recently.  

 

19.1   Signage/Traffic Calming in the Vicinity of Avonside Drive and Swanns Road

The Board considered Mr Hamlin’s public forum presentation on the speed issues in the vicinity of Avonside Drive/Swanns and Retreat Roads.  The Board noted that Linwood College was experiencing issues with speed around the school campus.

 

The Board agreed to request staff to investigate speed issues in the vicinity of Avonside Drive/Swanns and Retreat Roads, and provide advice on the data collected. 

The Board agreed to request staff to contact New Zealand Police to carry out a speed “blitz” in the area and provide the police monitoring outcome to the Board on the speeds recorded in the area.

 

19.2   Board Priority - Improve Community Resilience and Preparedness for the impact of climate change

The Board discussed the desire to commence work on the sustainability plan/charter that the Board made as a priority in the Community Board Plan 2020-22.

 

The Board agreed to request that a workshop be held in early 2021 for the Board to formulate a sustainability plan/charter that outlines the Boards commitments and priorities for action and encourages citizen participation.

 

19.3   Summit Road Society - Board Representative

The Board were advised that the current Summit Road Society representative is finding it difficult to attend the Society’s meetings owing to the meeting’s timing. 

 

The Board agreed to request staff to investigate and report on a possible appointment of a new Board representative to the Summit Road Society at its first 2021 meeting.

 

 19.4  Council’s Draft Long Term Plan 2021-31

The Board agreed to request staff to forward the Chairperson’s 17 November 2020 presentation and the funding information to the Councillors giving the Board’s priorities for the Council’s Draft Long Term Plan.

 

19.5   20 Templar Street – Former Bill Sutton Residence

The Board agreed to request staff to provide advice on the Council’s role, intended uses and the future for the former Bill Sutton residence at 20 Templar Street, Richmond.

 

19.6   Edmunds Park - Drainage

The Board agreed to request staff advice on Edmonds Park not draining well resulting in the pooling of stagnant water meaning that the community is unable to use the park.

 

19.7   Election of Deputy Chairperson

The Board agreed to request staff provide a report for an election of a Community Board Deputy Chairperson for the Board’s 1 February 2021 meeting.

 

   

 

Karakia Whakamutunga: Sara Templeton.

 

Meeting concluded at 5.34pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 1st DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021.

 

Alexandra Davids

Chairperson

   


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

7.     Election of Community Board Deputy Chairperson

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1602848

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Liz Beaven, Community Board Advisor
liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Executive Summary / Te Whakarāpopoto Matua

1.1       The purpose of this report is to explain the process for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to elect a Deputy Chairperson.

1.2       This report has been written as a result of the Board requesting at its 30 November 2020 meeting:

“Agreed to request staff provide a report for an election of a Community Board Deputy Chairperson for the Board’s 1 February 2021 meeting.”

1.3       The decision in this report is low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. 

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

2.         Adopt by resolution, which system of voting it will use to elect a Deputy Chairperson, that is System A or System B.

3.         Proceeds to elect a Community Board Deputy Chairperson.

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1       At its 30 November 2020 meeting the Board:

“Agreed to request staff provide a report for an election of a Community Board Deputy Chairperson for the Board’s 1 February 2021 meeting.”

4.   Legal Considerations

Introduction

4.1       The provisions of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 apply to Community Boards (with a small number of exclusions), with necessary modifications as if the boards were local authorities. Clause 17 of Schedule & provides for the election of a Deputy Chairperson. 

4.2       The role of the Deputy Chairperson is to exercise all the powers, of the chairperson, -

a.  with the consent of the chairperson at any time during the temporary absence of the chair; and

b.  without that consent, at any time while the chair is prevented by illness or other cause from performing the responsibilities and duties or exercising the powers, of his or her office; and

c.   while there is a vacancy in the office of the Chairperson.

4.3       The manner in which a Community Board is to elect the position is prescribed in clause 25 of Schedule 7. It provides that the Community Board must determine by resolution that the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson be elected or appointed by using one of the following systems of voting:

System A

4.4       Requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives the votes of a majority of the members of the Community Board present and voting; and

4.5       Has the following characteristics:

4.5.1   There is a first round of voting for all candidates; and

4.5.2   If no candidate is successful in that round there is a second round of voting from which the candidate with the fewest votes in the first round is excluded; and

4.5.3   If no candidate is successful in the second round there is a third, and if necessary subsequent, round of voting from which, each time, the candidate with the fewest votes in the previous round is excluded; and

4.5.4   In any round of voting, if two or more candidates tie for the lowest number of votes, the person excluded from the next round is resolved by lot.

System B

4.6       Requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives more votes than any other candidate; and

4.7       Has the following characteristics:

4.7.1   There is only 1 round of voting; and

4.7.2   If 2 or more candidates tie for the most votes, the tie is resolved by lot.

Practical application of clause 25

4.8       The Community Board must first determine, by resolution, which system of voting it will use, that is System A or System B.

4.9       Nominations for the position of Deputy Chairperson are called for.

4.10    If there is only one candidate then the Community Board may resolve that that person be elected.

4.11    If there is more than one candidate the Community Board must then put the matter to a vote according to the system it has adopted. The Community Board members are then asked to vote on each candidate.

4.12    The following examples may be useful to illustrate two of the system:

System A

Example 1

Three nominations are received and upon the votes being counted the result is: A (5) B (2) C (2). In this case A is elected to the relevant position.

Example 2

Three nominations are received and upon the votes being counted the result is:

A (4) B (3) C (2). In this case no candidate is successful so a second round of voting is held for candidates A and B. The lowest polling candidate, C, is excluded.

System B

Example 1

Three nominations are received and upon the votes being counted the result is: A (5) B (2) C (2). In this case A is elected to the relevant position.

Example 2

Three nominations are received and upon the votes being counted the result is:

A (3) B (3) C (3). In this case a lot is held to determine who between A, B and C will be elected to the relevant position.

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments for this report.

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

 

 

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

8.     Community Board Meeting Schedule 2021

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1602117

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Liz Beaven – Community Board Adviser
liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve its meeting schedule from 1 February to 6 December 2021.

1.2       This report is staff generated to allow the Board to adopt a meeting schedule for 2021.

1.3       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Adopts the following meeting schedule from 1 February to 6 December 2021:

Date

Time

Date

Time

Wednesday 17 February

4.30pm

Wednesday 14 July

4.30pm

Wednesday 3 March

3.30pm

Wednesday 4 August

4.30pm

Wednesday 17 March

3.30pm

Wednesday 18 August

4.30pm

Wednesday 31 March

4.30pm

Wednesday 1 September

4.30pm

Wednesday 14 April

4.30pm

Wednesday 15 September

4.30pm

Wednesday 28 April

4.30pm

Wednesday 6 October

4.30pm

Wednesday 12 May

4.30pm

Wednesday 20 October

4.30pm

Wednesday 2 June

4.30pm

Wednesday 3 November

4.30pm

Wednesday 16 June

4.30pm

Wednesday 17 November

4.30pm

Wednesday 30 June

4.30pm

Thursday 2 December

4.30pm

2.         Agrees that every meeting will host a Public Forum.

3.         Notes that briefings will held on the Wednesdays on the alterative week of Board meetings, except where a month has five Wednesdays.

4.         Notes that the Community Governance Manager and the Community Board Chairperson have been delegated the ability to amend the ordinary meeting schedule, as required.

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1       In order that the business of the Board can be conducted in an orderly manner, and to allow for public notification of meetings to be given in compliance with the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA), it is recommended that the Board adopt a schedule of meetings as per the Officer Recommendation.

3.2       It is recognised that events may arise, or circumstances change that would mean the schedule may need to be revised or additional meetings added as required.  To cover this circumstance the Board has delegated to the Community Governance Manager and the Community Board Chairperson the ability to amend the ordinary meeting schedule, as required.

3.3       Any additional meetings will be appropriately publicly notified in compliance with the LGOIMA and Local Government Act 2002.

3.4       It is proposed that the Board meeting venue will be held at the Linwood Boardroom, 180 Smith Street, unless the Board request the meeting to be held at an alternative venue.

3.5       Briefings provide an opportunity for Board members and staff to have informal discussion on issues where no decisions are required at that time.  Briefings will only be held if there are agenda items scheduled.

 

4.   Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1       The only alternative option to adopting a meeting schedule is to hold meetings on an ad hoc basis, which would pose problems with LGOIMA requirements for advertising of meetings, the opportunity for members of the community to attend and could lead to clashes with other Council and Committee meetings.

5.   Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1       No community consultation has taken place on the recommendations in this report in line with the significance assessment.

5.2       The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.2.1   Linwood Ward.

5.2.2   Central Ward.

5.2.3   Heathcote Ward.

6.   Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

6.1.1   Activity: Governance & Decision Making

·     Level of Service: 4.1.22 Provide services that ensure all Council and Community Board Meetings are held with full statutory compliance - 100% compliance Strong sense of community

·     Active participation in civic life

6.2       The report supports objectives in the Community Board Plan, particularly:

-      The Board actively engages and communicates with its communities to resolve local issues.

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3       The decision is not relevant to any of Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4       The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5       The decisions in this report do not have a direct correlation to climate change.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6       This report does not impact on accessibility issues.

7.   Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1       Cost to Implement – not applicable

7.2       Maintenance/Ongoing costs – covered by existing operation budgets

7.3       Funding Source – Governance Budgets

Other / He mea anō

7.4       Not applicable.

8.   Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1       Clause 19.6 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 provides that community boards can adopt a meeting schedule.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.1       There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.2       This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9.   Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1       None identified.

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments for this report.

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

Not Applicable

 

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

9.     Te Ara Ihutai Christchurch Coastal Pathway - Moncks Bay section

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1556010

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Dave King – Transport Project Manager
dave.king@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

David Adamson – GM City Services
david.adamson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is advise elected members on the feedback from consultation on the Coastal Pathway project, and inform the Board of proposed changes to the recommended design as a result of that feedback.  The report seeks approval to proceed to detailed design and construction, and asks the Community Board to make recommendations to Council regarding matters outside the Board’s delegations.

1.2       The decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  The level of significance was determined by the level of community interest city-wide apparent in this project, and social benefits.  The level of impact on the people directly affected is expected to be medium-high during construction.  However, the Moncks Bay area affected by the works is small in relation to the size of the Christchurch District.

1.3       The decisions in this report allow the project to meet our funding partner’s ‘shovel ready’ milestones.

1.4       The decisions in this report will allow progress towards completing the last significant section of the Coastal Pathway, an iconic and scenic pathway from Ferrymead to Sumner, as well as supporting Council’s Strategic Priority Increasing active, public and shared transport opportunities.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receives the information within and attached to the report, and considers the submissions made as part of the public consultation process;

2.         Approves that staff proceed with detailed design and construction, of the works as shown (excluding speed limit change) in the scheme plan (Attachment A & B);

3.         That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board recommends to the Council:

a.         To approve the adoption of the speed limit changes as shown in Attachment A & B; and

b.         That the detailed traffic resolutions required for implementation of the project are referred to the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Urban Development and Transport Committee for approval at the end of the detailed design phase, prior to the beginning of construction.

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1       Consultation for the Moncks Bay section of the Coastal Pathway took place 11 November – 7 December, and has now incorporated the needs of the community.  This consultation addressed aspects of the pathway that were not dealt with in the 2014 consultation (consultation on the whole pathway).

3.2       Delegation to approve this project and changes following feedback (excluding speed limit decisions) sit with the Community Board.

3.3       A decision to implement the speed limit changes sits with Council.

3.4       Conditions of the ‘shovel ready’ funding mean that this project requires fast tracking to ensure construction starting within 12 months.

 

4.   Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1       A funding agreement has been put in place which commits us to the ‘shovel ready’ timeline, as well as delivering benefits to the local economy. Without the shovel ready funding, Council has no budget or mandate to deliver the pathway earlier than FY27. 

4.2       The alternative to receiving this funding and fast tracking the delivery, is to delay the works until FY27.

5.   Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1       A joint application between the Coastal Pathway Group and City Council was successful in its application for funding from the Government’s ‘shovel ready’ programme.  This allowed the delivery of this section of pathway to be brought forward from FY27, where it was programmed in Council’s Long Term Plan.  Conditions of the ‘shovel ready’ funding include physical works getting underway within 12 months. 

5.2       The off-road pathway itself has been consulted on and approved for delivery by the Council on the 27 March 2014 CNCL 27032014 item 8(1).  Design development and an impact on the adjacent road corridor has generated a need for further consultation and community engagement.  

5.3       A single scheme design was put forward for community consultation, with the main roading impacts including parking changes, speed limits and intersection changes.

5.4       Consultation was open between Friday 13 November and Monday 7 December 2020 and we received 121 submissions.  We hand delivered 306 consultation documents to surrounding properties, and sent them to 59 absentee owners and 104 key stakeholders.  A story regarding the project and the beginning of consultation was on Newsline on 16 November 2020.

5.5       The majority of submissions were received from local residents and we also received submissions from the following organisations:

·    New Zealand Automobile Association

·    Redcliffs Association

·    SPOKES

·    Christchurch Yacht Club

·    Blind Low Vision New Zealand

5.6       There was a strong level of support for the project in both written submissions, and through conversations at the drop-in session held at the Christchurch Yacht Club. 

5.7    The following themes and comments were received:

Speed limit change

Comment

Number of submissions

Support the speed limit change

62

Extend the 40kph through to the Sumner 30kph speed limit

15

The change will increase safety for everyone

9

Extend the 40kph to Redcliffs Village

9

Extend the 40kph to Redcliffs School

9

 

 

Do not support the speed limit change

33

Will cause driver frustration

8

The new pathway will make it safer therefore no need for a speed reduction

8

The reduction will impact on residents travelling to and from home

6

Weekend traffic already travels below 40kph

5

 

Parking changes

Comment

Number of submissions

Support the changes proposed

51

Do not support angle parking on Cliff Street – boats and trailers park here and the angle parking will not work

22

Do not support angle parking on Bay View Road

12

Do not support the removal of parking on Main Road

6

Pump Station carpark – overall design/consideration of access to garages/boat trailer parking/include bike parking here/no toilets here/lock at night

9

 

Bus stop relocations

Comment

Number of submissions

Support the changes

57

Do not support the changes

3

Move bus stop by Wakatu Ave closer to Barnett Park

2

Too many bus stops

2

 

New pedestrian islands

Comment

Number of submissions

Support the new islands, will make it a lot safer

56

Need another one by Bay View Rd and Cliff St

9

Need zebra crossings

6

Need to make sure they are safe/visible by either raised or painted zebra crossing lines and on straight parts of the road

6

Need to make sure they are big enough to accommodate a number of people and equipment (paddle boards etc)

3

 

Intersection upgrades

Comment

Number of submissions

Support proposed upgrades

36

Too narrowed at the intersections

10

No patterned surface at Cliff Street as this will cause noise and vibration for residents

9

Planting at intersections should be low (no trees)

4

Drainage/flooding issues at intersections needs to be addressed

4

Oppose bike stand at Cliff Street – should be on the other side of the road

4

 

Other comments

Comment

Number of submissions

Very excited about the project

17

Toilets needed in Moncks Bay

13

Protect Moncks Bay beach

9

Further detail about planting, seating etc needs to be shared with the community (keep existing seats)

9

Signage needed at the Tram stop directing people heading west back onto the footpath (and not along the waterfront) and people heading east as there is a sharp bend

5

Remove power poles as there are visibility issues/safety

4

Preserve existing sea wall

4

Ensure pathway surface and design is safe and caters to pedestrians and cyclists

3

More trees needed (with historic significance)

3

 

5.8    All feedback was considered and the following changes have been made:

·    Minor changes to no stopping lines at the request of home owners.

·    Minor changes to the location of crossing islands,

·    Minor change to the bus stop relocation beside Wakatu Avenue (affected residents have given their approval to the new location).

·    Removal of the proposed angle parking for Cliff Street and Bayview Road.

·    Modification to the layout in the pump station carpark, to allow car and trailer parking for users of the boatsheds.

·    During consultation there has been a range of feedback from public, police, staff and the AA on extending the speed limits changes beyond Moncks Bay. Further investigation will take place, but for this stage of the project, the proposed reduction to 40kph is restricted to the Moncks Bay area.  To provide a consistent and intuitive speed environment in the area, the speed limit will also be applied to the side streets coming off Main Road (Wakatu, Bayview and Cliff st).  Residents of these streets have been subsequently informed, as it was not expressly stated in the consultation material.

·    There was feedback both for and against locating toilets at the pump station carpark – further investigation to take place, but they are not proposed at this stage of the project.

5.9    A safety audit has been carried out based on the scheme design – no serious or significant issues have been identified with the proposed works.  Staff are working with the auditor to close out the remaining issues.

5.10 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

·      Heathcote Ward.

6.   Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1       This project supports Council’s Strategic Priority Increasing active, public and shared transport opportunities and use by providing a safe option for cyclists particularly those who would not normally feel comfortable biking among the main stream of traffic.

6.2       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

6.2.1   Activity: Active Travel

·     Level of Service: 10.5.2 Improve the perception that Christchurch is a cycling friendly city. - >=55%

6.2.2   Level of Service: 10.5.3 More people are choosing to travel by bike. - 5,100 average daily cyclists (>=3% increase)

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3       The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua 6.4        The estuary is identified as a site of Ngai Tahu Cultural Significance (Schedule of Nga Wai: 9.5.6.4 – ID 78) in the Christchurch District Plan (CDP).

6.5       Initial engagement with rūnanga via Mahaanui Kurataiao Ltd (MKT) commenced July 2020 with early consideration of the Coastal Pathway discussed at the Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga Kaitiaki Portfolio hui held on the 6 August 2020 based on an overview of the likely works.

6.6       At the hui it was recommended that this also be discussed with the Ihutai Trust. This occurred - though no initial feedback is available; a follow up discussion has been requested.

6.7       The rūnanga would also be interested in providing narratives with regard to design work on this project.

6.8       Due to works occurring along the edge of, and in places into the estuary, the decision does involve a decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.  This impact will be managed by engagement throughout the process (updates on changes and key milestones), and seeking feedback on how to incorporate cultural narrative in the design.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.9       The promotion of active transport will assist in reducing dependency on the private motor vehicle by providing a viable alternative, safe transport option. This option reduces vehicle emissions by encouraging more residents to cycle or walk for local trips and longer trips.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.10    Accessibility for all users has been prioritised in the design for the route through the inclusion of tactile pavers, new crossings with islands, and a wide and smooth primary pathway.

6.11    A transition over time towards a multi-modal transport system that gives people greater choice, supported by land use patterns will make transport more accessible and affordable.

7.   Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1       Cost to implement – nil to Council – cost of project is $15.8m (externally funded).

7.2       Maintenance/Ongoing costs - estimated at approximately $11,000 p.a.  This has been planned for as part of the Draft 2021/31 Long Term Plan process.

7.3       Funding Source – project expenditure budget has been set up for CPMS ID 61843 Coastal Pathway & Moncks Bay, with the expenditure being recovered from the Crown on a quarterly basis.

8.   Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1       The statutory powers to implement the proposals contained in this report is under the Local Government Acts 1974 and 2002, the Land Transport Act 1998 and Council’s Traffic & Parking Bylaw 2017.  The Resource Management Act 1991 is also relevant to likely consents required from Environment Canterbury.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2       The funding agreement is relevant context for this decision but does not raise any particular issues or implications, other than the timeframes that need to be met.

8.3       This report has been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9.   Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1       The most significant risk to the project is its delivery within a condensed timeframe, however all efforts are being made to fast track the delivery, and meet the funding requirements.

9.2       Most of the works take place within the transport zone and do not require consent. However: Consents from Environment Canterbury will be required for the intrusion into the coastal marine area.  This risk is being mitigated through pre-application meetings, and planning input into the design to minimise potential effects.

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Coastal Pathway Moncks Bay - scheme plan for board report - A

30

b

Coastal Pathway Moncks Bay - scheme plan for board report - B

31

 

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

 

 

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Dave King - Project Manager

Approved By

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

10.   Te Pou Toetoe: Linwood Pool - Pedestrian kerb buildouts on Linwood Ave

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1547480

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Peter Rodgers, Traffic Engineer

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

David Adamson, General Manager City Services

 

 

1.   Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve changes to the kerb on Linwood Avenue to assist with pedestrians and cyclists crossing to the new Te Pou Toetoe: Linwood Pool.  This report has been written as these changes were a requirement of the resource consent for the pool.

1.2       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve the kerb buildouts as detailed on Attachment A.

2.         Approve that any existing parking or stopping restrictions on the southwestern side of the northwest bound one-way section of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 62 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 16 metres be revoked.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southwestern side of northwest bound one-way section of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 62 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

4.         Approve that any existing parking or stopping restrictions on the northeastern side of the northwest bound one-way section of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 62 metres northwest of its intersection with the prolongation of the northwestern kerb line of Smith Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 16 metres be revoked.

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the northeastern side of the northwest bound one-way section of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 62 metres northwest of its intersection with the prolongation of the northwestern kerb line of Smith Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1       It is recommended to install kerb extensions and associated no stopping restrictions in order to facilitate safer access for pedestrians and cyclists crossing Linwood Avenue to reach the pool. The kerb extensions reduce the distance pedestrians and cyclists need to travel when crossing traffic lanes and the no stopping restrictions ensure that parked vehicles do not obstruct visibility of pedestrians and cyclists waiting to cross towards oncoming traffic.

 

4.   Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1       No other options were considered as the proposed kerb extensions are the type of crossing facility required by the conditions of the resource consent.

5.   Detail / Te Whakamahuki

5.1       When  Te Pou Toetoe: Linwood Pool was granted resource consent, a condition of the consent was that kerb extensions be constructed on Linwood Avenue, creating a more direct connection to the catchment immediately to the northwest, in the vicinity of Jollie Street.

5.2       This type of kerb extension is consistent with best practice and similar kerb extensions have been installed in several locations along Linwood Avenue, as part of the major cycle route construction. This includes a kerb extension on the southeast bound section of Linwood Avenue near Jollie Street.

5.3       In order to maintain sight lines for pedestrians waiting to cross it is necessary for parking to be restricted in the immediate vicinity of the kerb extensions.

5.4       No consultation has specifically been undertaken on this proposal as there are no adjacent affected properties, and the kerb extensions are required by a condition of the approved resource consent.

5.5       The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.5.1   Linwood Ward

6.   Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

6.1.1   Activity: Active Travel

·     Level of Service: 16.0.10 Improve the perception that Christchurch is a walking friendly city. - >=85%

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.2       The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.3       The decision does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.4       This proposal supports active travel but does not otherwise have any significant effect upon carbon emissions and Climate Change.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.5       This proposal is expected to improve accessibility by improving pedestrian and cyclist crossing facilities.

7.   Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1       Cost to Implement – This is expected to cost approximately $40,000

7.2       Maintenance/Ongoing costs - Maintenance costs for the road markings will be covered under the existing maintenance budget and will incur a cost of approximately $500 each year.

7.3       Funding Source – construction of kerb extensions is funded from the budget for Te Pou Toetoe Linwood Pool.

8.   Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1       Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.2       Section 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 provides Council with the authority to construct, remove or alter facilities including buildouts.

8.3       The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of buildouts, stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.4       The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.5       There is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

8.6       This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework outlined in sections 8.1 – 8.4.

9.   Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1       There are no expected risks associated with this decision.

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Linwood Avenue Buildouts Plan for approval

37

 

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

<enter document name>

<enter location/hyperlink>

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Peter Rodgers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Stephen Wright - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

11.   Otākāro Avon River Corridor Programme Update

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1530625

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Kent Summerfield, Senior Project Manager, kent.summerfield@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson

 

 

1.   Brief Summary

1.1       The purpose of this report is for staff to provide the Waikura/Linwood Central Heathcote Community Board with an update on progress on the various workstreams/projects within the Otākāro Avon River Corridor Programme.  The report follows an earlier update briefing provided to the Waikura/Linwood Central Heathcote Community Board in August 2020 and is part of an ongoing commitment to ensuring key stakeholders are regularly engaged with the Programme.

1.2       The basis of the update is found in the attached Powerpoint file, and staff will talk to each of the slides.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the Otākāro Avon River Corridor Programme Update report

 

 

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

OARC Programme Update (Under Separate Cover)

 

 

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

<enter document name>

<enter location/hyperlink>

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Kent Summerfield - Senior Project Manager

Simon Makker - Senior Communications Advisor

Brenden Winder - Manager Residential Red Zone

Approved By

Wolfgang Bopp - Director Botanic Gardens & Garden Parks

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

12.   Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Youth Development Fund Application - Amy Brown

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

21/38770

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Emily Toase, Emily.Toase@ccc.govt.nz, Community Recreation Advisor

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson, Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz, General Manager Citizens and Community

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application received for funding from its 2020-21 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       This report is to assist the Board to consider an application of funding from Amy Brown.

1.3       There is currently a balance of $3,900 remaining in this fund.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve a grant of $200 from its 2020-21 Youth Development Fund to Amy Brown towards competing in the NZ Juggling and Circus Festival in Nelson from the 19 to the 21 February.

3.   Key Points / Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment / Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1       The recommendations in this report align to the Council's Community Outcome of Resilient Communities including:

·   Celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport and recreation

·   Valuing the voices of all cultures and ages (including children)

Decision Making Authority / Te Mana Whakatau

1.1       Determine the allocation of the discretionary Response Fund for each community (including any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).

1.2       Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

1.3       The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement / Te Mana Whakatau

1.4       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.2       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.3       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4.   Applicant/ Te Kaitono 1 – Amy Brown

4.1       Age: 14             

4.2       School: Catholic Cathedral College

4.3       Suburb: Bromley

4.4       Event seeking support for: New Zealand Juggling and Circus Festival

4.5       The New Zealand Juggling and Circus Festival is an open forum where everyone can attend to learn and share circus skills from beginner level to advanced. It offers a series of workshops taught by experts in these performing arts as well as shows and a tournament.

4.6       Amy trains at Circotica Circus School, based in Waltham. Having tried lots of other sports and not finding one that she wanted to commit to, Amy went to a circus performance and found it both fascinating and exhilarating. This motivated her to sign up to her first class at Circotica and she has now been training with them for four years.

4.7       Amy started with contortion and trained to develop the new skills she needed to perform this performing art. In School Term 3 in 2019, Amy took on a new class in aerials and now continues to train in both. Having never thought it possible that she could perform either contortion or aerial, Amy has now developed her skills to the extent that she can perform solo.

4.8       The NZ Juggling and Circus Festival will be held on the South Island for the first time in 20 years. This provides an opportunity for young performers to expand their experience to learn from different teachers from around the country. So far Amy’s experience has been limited to the few teachers at Circotica so she hopes to participate in the festival to learn as much as possible at the workshops and shows so that she can escalate her development.

4.9       Amy will travel and attend the festival with her performance troupe which will also be an opportunity for them to bond as a team as well as grow the confidence and knowledge individually and as a troupe. 

4.10    In future Amy would like to become a professional circus performer and travel the country performing for people and sharing her art. 

4.11    The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Festival:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Festival entry

150

Travel costs

100

Accommodation

57

Total

$307

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

13.   Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund Applications - Sumner Community Residents' Association and Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre & Residents' Association

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

21/33257

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Emily Toase, Community Recreation Advisor
emily.toase@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

00061986

Sumner Community Residents Association

Sumner Skate Ramp

$22,160

$15,000

0061931

Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents Association Incorporated

Community Market Storage Space

$11,574

$4,000

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $124,809 remaining in the fund.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $15,000 from its 2021-21 Discretionary Response Fund to Sumner Community Residents Association towards the Sumner Skate Ramp project.

2.         Approves a grant of $4,000 from its 2020-21Discretionary Response Fund to Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents Association Incorporated towards the community market storage space.

3.   Key Points / Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment / Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1       The recommendations are strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of Strengthening Communities. It will provide support to community across the Heathcote and Linwood ward areas, enhancing their wellbeing, sense of place and community connectedness.

Decision Making Authority / Te Mana Whakatau

3.2       The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.2.1   Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.2.2   The Fund does not cover:

·     Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·     Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement / Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion / Kōrerorero

3.6       At the time of writing, the balance of the <enter year> Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2020/21

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$276,739

$151,930

$124,809

$105,809

 

3.7       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

3.8       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Waikura Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board - Discretionary Response Fund - Decision Matrix - Sumner Community Residents Association

48

b

Waikura Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board - Discretionary Response Fund - Decision Matrix  - Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents Association Incorporated

50

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

14.   Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Ōpāwaho (Lower Heathcote) River Working Party Project Costs

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1618474

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Sol Smith, Community Development Advisor Linwood-Central-Heathcote Team, Sol.Smith@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Arohanui Grace, Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote, Arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2020-21 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation(s) listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

00062278

Council Technical Services and Design

Ōpāwaho (Lower Heathcote) River Working Party Plan

$43,680

$30,000

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $124,809 remaining in the fund

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $30,000 from its 2020-21 Discretionary Response Fund to Council Technical Services and Design towards the Ōpāwaho (Lower Heathcote) River Working Party Plan.

3.   Key Points / Ngā Take Matua

Strategic Alignment / Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.1       The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of meeting the challenge of climate change through every means available. It will provide a Liveable City and Healthy Environment.

Decision Making Authority / Te Mana Whakatau

3.2       The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.2.1   Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.2.2   The Fund does not cover:

·     Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·     Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement / Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.3       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.4       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.5       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion / Kōrerorero

3.6       At the time of writing, the balance of the 2020-21 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2020/21

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$276,739.00

$151,930.00

$124,809.00

$94.809.00

 

3.7       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the applications listed above are eligible for funding.

3.8       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the applications.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Discretionary Response Fund Decision Matrix - Ōpāwaho (lower Heathcote) Working Party 1 February 2021

55

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Sol Smith - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

15.   Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Resource Consent Application – Confirmation of the submitted Board Comment

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1427920

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Liz Beaven, Community Board Adviser
liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson, Citizen and Community
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Brief Summary

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to confirm the Community Board Comment on the Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Resource Consent Application.

1.2       The Community Board was one of the specified parties/persons that was invited to make comments on the proposal during the 15 day consultation period.

1.3       Owing to the short timeframe for the Board to forward comment on the consent, the Board formulated a submission by email consensus.  The Board’s feedback was submitted on 16 November 2020.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Confirms the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board’s comment on the Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Order, submitted in November 2020.

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Comment on Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Resource Consent - 16 November 2020

58

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

16.   Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - January 2021

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1414523

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Arohanui Grace, Community Governance Manager
Arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson, Citizen and Community
mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for February 2021.

3.   Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1       Community Governance Projects

Activity

Detail

Timeline

Strategic Alignment

LYFE

The Christchurch Youth Council (CYC) are working on delivering a Mall Ball, a ball at Eastgate Mall.

 

The event will include a pop-up clothes shop, where rangatahi can pay whatever they can afford for items to ensure that finding a dress or suit is not a barrier to attending.

 

The ball is part of the wider engagement the Youth Council are conducting for LYFE. For this particular event, the registration ‘fee’ will take the form of a survey which will ask about what events or programs young people would like to engage in going forward. The results of the survey will help staff shape what form LYFE takes in future. Participants simply complete the survey to register for free to attend ball.

 

February

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Lancaster Park

The earthworks tender has now closed and the approved contractor has been appointed.

 

A group of stakeholders are meeting regularly to discuss how they can work together to plan a community facility which hosts the range of sports codes and potentially a local community development organisation.

 

These include Metro Cricket, Lancaster Park Cricket Club, Ōtautahi Sports Association, Canterbury Rugby and Phillipstown Community Hub.

 

Staff are working with stakeholders to review their requirements for the space and renew the initial spatial plan to ensure the best possible outcome for each of the sports and community.

 

On-going

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Inner City East (ICE) Revitalisation

The Inner City East Revitalisation Working group continued to meet fortnightly throughout 2020 (outside of COVID-19 level 3 and 4 restrictions).  A key focus for 2021 is to look at the ongoing model of the group moving forward, finalise a vision and action plan.

The group spent the later part of 2020 focusing on safety in Linwood Village.  A stakeholder forum was activated and a subsequent meeting held. The meetings have been well attended by key government agencies, community members and Christchurch City Council representatives. The safety working group is scheduled to meet again in early March 2021.

 

Linwood Village Streetscape Enhancements Christchurch City Council staff project team met twice in late 2020 and a site visit is planned to meet with elected members and community representative on Tuesday 2 February.

Proposed timeline: aiming to get some initial scheme design(s) through co-design process by May 2021, consultation with the wider community and stakeholders by August 2021, and seek approval from LCH Community Board by October 2021.  Aim to implement in early 2022.

 

On-going

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Community Asset Mapping

Linwood, Phillipstown and Inner City East Community Development organisations are working on a collaborative community asset mapping project.

Community asset mapping seeks to identify people assets, social networks, institutional assets, economics / business assets, the physical world, cultural assets, stories and heritage and exist within communities.

Asset mapping is an effective way to get a deeper understanding of communities and build community connection through the process.

 

On-going

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Community Events

Taylors Mistake Surf Lifesaving Club House Open Day

The opening of the new building will commence from 3pm

 

7 February

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Mt Pleasant Earthquake Memorial Exhibition will be held at Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association

To mark the 10th anniversary of the 2011 Earthquakes. Giving a specific perspective of the Mt Pleasant experience the exhibition will display the events of the day, the impact, the early days of getting through and the many positive aspects of the suburbs recovery since.

 

20-21 February

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

Estuary Festival 2021 will be held at McCormack Bay Reserve in Mt Pleasant from 1:00pm to 5:00pm.

 

27 February

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

 

South Island Novice Boxing Championships will be held at Woolston Boxing Club bring the boxing community together to provide an opportunity for developing athletes to compete.

 

13 – 14 March

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

 

Sea2Sky Challenge is a unique sports challenge which comprises of an ocean swim, bike ride climbing the highest roads in Ōtautahi and a run along the scenic coastal trail.

There categories for individuals, teams and tamariki.

 

14 March

Community Wellbeing is supported and improved

 

3.2       Community Funding Summary

3.2.1   Fresh 2020

Fresh was planned as a youth event to be held at Youth and Cultural Development’s (YCD) home base on Cashel Street for April 2020 and because of lockdown it wasn’t able to go ahead as planned. With renewed momentum and new organisations introduced to the partnership, YCD worked with the Christchurch Youth Council, VOYCE – Whakarongo Mai and Gap Filler to identify an alternative location which utilised the Youth Space on the Cr of Manchester and Litchfield Streets.

Staff heard from community, schools and youth groups, that since the earthquakes, Christchurch’s vibrant youth scene has not been the same and there is demand for more youth events, particularly in the Central City which used to host numerous popular youth parties. 

With funding the from the Waikura Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community, YCD were able to partner up with the other youth organisations in the area and deliver FRESH, their youth pop-up party attended by over 400 young people. With live acts from local artists Common Ground and SWARM dance crews, Nikki Montana, Harmony Twins and Big Sima, the event also hosted an open floor, dance off and a DJ set from the CLUBKINGZ. A free sausage sizzle provided and run by VOYCE, free snow cones from the Mai FM Street Team and free haircuts from the local barber shops were on offer for participants which together created a lively and exciting atmosphere with the space teaming with activity.

The event also introduced the inaugural Central Hoops, adding a fifth location to CCC’s series of Youth 3v3 Basketball Tournaments, Christchurch Hoops, and a first for the Central City which will now continue as an annual event.

 

FRESH is the starting point for a new wave of youth events for the city and it’s anticipated that we’ll be seeing more pop up youth parties under its brand in the months to come. The event was a fantastic way to end a challenging year, giving the youth scene in the central and east city and a re-FRESH and new momentum to carry forward into 2021.

3.2.2   Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2020-21

·     Discretionary Response Fund unallocated balance for 2020/21 is $124,809.00.

·     Youth Development Fund unallocated balance for 2020/21 is $3,900.

·     Light Bulb Moments Fund unallocated balance for 2020/21 is $5,400.

3.2.3   The 2020/21 Discretionary Response Funding Spreadsheet is attached. (Attachment A).

3.3       Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1   Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan

·     2021 Christchurch Street and Garden Awards – the Board were asked for a representative to accompany the Christchurch Beautifying Association’s Street and Garden Awards judges in December 2020.  The Board is asked to confirm Sunita Gautam to be the Board’s representative for the 2021 Street and Garden Awards judging panel.

·     Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Plan Bi-Annual Monitoring Report – The Community Board Plan bi-annual monitoring report (July 2020 – January 2021) is attached. (Attachment B)

3.3.2   Council Engagement and Consultation.

·     Council’s Draft 2021-31 Long Term Plan - Consultation for the Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP) is planned for 11 March to 19 April 2021.

·     Have your Say – at the time of writing the report the following consultations were open:

Topic

Closing Date

Link

Significant Indigenous Vegetation in the Coastal Environment

23 February 2021

https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/consultations-and-submissions/haveyoursay/show/374

Proposed new mountain bike track in Montgomery Spur Reserve

5 March 2021

https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/consultations-and-submissions/haveyoursay/show/361

4.   Advice Provided to the Community Board  

4.1       Edmonds Band Rotunda – Memorandum seeking the Board’s advice on the opening celebrations of the Edmunds Band rotunda in June 2021. (Attachment C)

4.2       Coastal Pathway Temporary Closures near Sumner Surf Club – Memorandum in reply to the Board’s 2 March 2020 request for staff to discuss with the Sumner Surf Club the blocking of the Coastal Pathway during functions being held at the Surf Club with the outcome of the discussion to be advised to the Board. (Attachment D)

4.3       Draft Central City Parking Policy – Memorandum providing information about the Draft Central City Parking Policy.  The report to consult publicly was made by the Council’s Urban Development and Transport Committee on 9 December 2020. (Attachment E)

4.4       Cave Rock Signal Mast Lights – Impacts on Bird Species – Memorandum in reply to the Board’s 4 November 2020 briefing request for staff advice on the impact of the Cave Road signal mast lights lighting design on wildlife.  (Attachment F)

4.5       Woolston Wellhead Security Upgrades – Memorandum providing information on the upcoming Woolston Wellhead updates. (Attachment G)

4.6       Ferry Road Master Plan Woolston Village Project Alignment – Memorandum providing information to the following question asked at the Council’s Sustainability and Community Resilience Committee meeting held on 26 November 2020.

Noting that the Council is currently consulting on the Woolston Village Masterplan WL1 project and that depending on the outcome of that consultation that consideration is given to aligning the Heathcote and Oak Street projects for cost efficiency and synergy by bringing forward the budget. (Attachment H)

4.7       Suburban Master Plans Unfunded Capital Projects – Memorandum providing information about unfunded Suburban Masterplan capital projects with the Community Board area. (Attachment I)

4.8       Community Board Long Term Plan Presentation to Council – Memorandum in reply to the Board’s 30 November 2020 request for staff to forward the Chairperson’s 17 November 2020 presentation and the funding information to the Councillors giving the Board’s priorities for the Council’s Draft Long Term Plan. (Attachment J)

4.9       Poulton Avenue Street Trees – Memorandum in reply to the Board’s 31 August 2021 request staff advice on how to protect the Poulton Avenue street trees which may include some parking compliance or parking education. (Attachment K)

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board 2020-21 Discretionary Fund

66

b

Board Plan Monitoring Report Linwood-Central-Heathcote July 2020 - January 2021

67

c

Memorandum: Edmonds Band Rotunda Opening 11 November 2020

73

d

Memorandum: Coastal Pathway Temporary Closues near Sumner Surf Club 2 November 2020

74

e

Memorandum: Draft Central City Parking Policy 4 December 2020

77

f

Memorandum: Cave Rock Signal Mast Lights 4 December 2020

89

g

Memorandum: Woolston Wellhead Security Upgrades 4 December 2020

91

h

Memorandum: Ferry Road Master Plan Woolston Village Project Alignment 11 January 2021

93

i

Memorandum: Suburban Masterplan Projects within Board Area unfunded in 2018-28 Long Term Plan 12 January 2021

96

j

Memorandum: Community Board Long Term Plan Presentations to Council 12 January 2021

102

k

Memorandum: Poulton Avenue Street Trees 18 January 2021

116

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Rochelle Faimalo - Community Development Advisor

Courtney Reid - Support Officer

Sol Smith - Community Development Advisor

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

01 February 2021

 

 

17.   Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.