Waipapa

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                    Friday 16 October 2020

Time:                                   9.15am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Emma Norrish

Simon Britten

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

Ali Jones

Emma Twaddell

 

 

13  October 2020

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 


 

 

 

Mihi

 

 

Tēnā koutou

Kua hui mai nei

Ki tēnei whare ō tātou

Ki te kōrero, ki te whakarongo

i nga kaupapa ō to hapori

Nau mai, haere mai.

Nā reira tēnā koutou katoa

 

Greetings

to all who have gathered

within our (communal) house

to speak and to listen to the

topics/conversations of your community

Welcome, welcome

Therefore, again I greet all present

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C          1.        Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha........................................................................ 5

B         2.        Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga......................................... 5

C          3.        Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua........................ 5

B         4.        Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui................................................................ 5

B         5.        Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga............................... 5

B         6.        Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga.................................................. 5

C          7.        Correspondence...................................................................................... 11

Staff Reports

C          8.        Cranford Street (Innes Road - Berwick Street) Improvements........................ 13

C          9.        Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2020/21 Positive Youth Development Fund - Burnside High School - Spirit of Adventure Trust............. 63

C          10.      Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Summer with your Neighbours 2020-21.................... 67

B         11.      Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - September 2020....... 77

 

B         12.      Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi............................................................................................................ 117 

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

1.   Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha  

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

That the minutes of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 2 October 2020  be confirmed (refer page 6).

4.   Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

Unconfirmed

 

 

Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                    Friday 2 October 2020

Time:                                   9.16am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Emma Norrish

Simon Britten

Mike Davidson

Ali Jones

 

 

 

2 October 2020

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00081

That the apology received for absence from Pauline Cotter be accepted.

 

Mike Davidson/Ali Jones                                                                                                                                        Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00082

That the minutes of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 18 September 2020 be confirmed with an amendment to the wording of Item 8  point 2 to read - The Board request a breakdown of the estimated costs.

Ali Jones/Simon Britten                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

4.   Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui

Part B

 

4.1      Leanne Ward – Erica Street Boarding house      

Leanne Ward, local resident, discussed the resource consent application currently being processed to change the use of a current rest home to a boarding house.  Concern has been raised at the application only being notified on a limited basis and that residents of the area are concerned about the changes that will occur in the area if this consent is granted.

The Board thanked Leanne for her public forum.

 

 

1.  

2.  

3.  

4.  

5.   Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6.   Presentation of Petitions / Ngā Pākikitanga

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.   Correspondence

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00083 (Officer Recommendations accepted without change)

Part B

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 02 October 2020.

Mike Davidson/Ali Jones                                                                                                                                        Carried

 

8.   Briefing on Private Plan Change - Homebase extension

 

Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Briefings.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00084

Part B

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Briefings.

2.         The Board will confirm a view in order to make a deputation to the UDT Committee in regards to the report being considered at the meeting on 12 October 2020.

 

Emma Norrish/Ali Jones                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

9.   Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Submissions Committee meeting dates

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00085 (Chairpersons Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Hold the following dates for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board’s Submissions Committee meetings:

·    10am Friday 9 October 2020 at the Papanui Boardroom, 5 Restell Street and;

·    9am Wednesday 18 November 2020 at the Papanui Boardroom, 5 Restell Street.

Emma Norrish/Simon Britten                                                                                                                              Carried

 

 

10. Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee Minutes - 25 September 2020

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2020/00086

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board receives the Minutes from the Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee meeting held on Friday 25 September 2020.

 

Simon Britten/Emma Norrish                                                                                                                              Carried

 

11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

Part B

·    Accidents around roadworks in the ward concerning.

·    Westminster/Cranford Streets update requested for completion date.

·    Communication issues with roadworks on Forfar Street and which streets to use during construction. The Board notes concerns around the suggested detours.

·    Liquor license issues and the Boards concerns around the social issues but are unable to submit on the license.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 10.07am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 16TH DAY OF October 2020

 

Emma Norrish

Chairperson

   


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

7.     Correspondence

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1235893

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Elizabeth Hovell – Community Board Advisor Papanui-Innes, elizabeth.hovell@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community, mary.richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Papanui Heritage Group

Purchase of land adjacent to St James Park

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report from Papanui Heritage Group, dated 16 October 2020

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui Heritage Group

12

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

8.     Cranford Street (Innes Road - Berwick Street) Improvements

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1107852

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Nilesh Redekar, Senior Transport Planner

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

David Adamson, General Manager, City Services

 

 

1.   Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is to update the Papanui-Innes Community Board on the outcome of the operational assessment and endorse the operational layout of Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street.

1.2       The decision in this report is of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  The level of significance was determined by relatively high number of people likely be affected and the community had shown a high interest on the outcomes of this work. 

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Endorse the current design of Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street as shown in attachment A.

2.         Carry out periodic monitoring of traffic levels in accordance with the designation conditions.

 

3.   Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau

3.1       The current design (attachment A) does not add any additional peak hour capacity and modelling indicates that it will sufficiently manage predicted traffic levels on Cranford Street immediately after the opening of the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC), especially at the southern of Innes Road.

3.2       The current design includes widening of Cranford Street and intersection improvement which will significantly improve safety for pedestrian, cyclists and all road users throughout the day when compared against all proposed options was previously approved by Council in 2019.

3.3       The current design does not require any additional capital and operational cost.

3.4       In addition, if traffic conditions on local areas exceeds more than 30% to satisfy the Designation Conditions the current design offers flexibility to quickly respond to accommodate an appropriate treatment.

 

4.   Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa

4.1       In addition to the existing layout (attachment A), three operational layout options were considered as part of the assessment and compared against the current design using effectiveness, operational performance, implementation challenges and impacts.

4.1.1   Option 1 Peak hour clearway between Innes Road and Berwick Street;

4.1.2   Option 2 Peak hour High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane between Innes Road and Berwick Street; and

4.1.3   Option 3 Peak Hour Bus only Lane between Innes Road and Berwick Street. 

5.   Detail / Te Whakamahuki (Include community views and preferences on the matter regardless of whether consultation has taken place or not)

5.1       At the Joint Community Board (Papanui-Innes and Linwood-Central-Heathcote) meeting on 13 September 2019, the layout of Cranford Street was approved as detailed in attachment A.  This did not include a resolution for the operation of the corridor.

5.2       The Joint Community Board decision was approved by Council at the meeting on 24 September, 2019.

5.3       This report provides the detail of the operational assessment undertaken by Jacobs and their detailed report is attached as attachment B. It provides a performance assessment of a number of possible options for the operation of Cranford Street between Innes Road and Berwick Street that seek to address the requirements of the Designation Conditions to keep increases of local road traffic below 30%.

5.4       Three operational layout options were considered as part of the assessment. They used effectiveness, operational performance, implementation challenges and impacts to assess the optimal performance of the network.

5.5       The current design includes intersection improvements along Cranford Street and it is considered these will sufficiently manage predicted traffic levels on Cranford Street after the opening of Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC), especially south of the Innes Road. This is based on the detailed traffic analysis that indicates the Cranford Street/Innes Road intersection will act as a bottleneck for the CNC and will likely discharge 1400 to 1600 straight through vehicles per hour which can be accommodated without negative impact along the study section of Cranford Street.

5.6       The current design includes widening of existing road corridor and intersection improvements that will significantly improve safety for pedestrians, cyclists and all other road users when compared against all remaining options.  The current design does not include any additional peak hour capacity which is only required if traffic levels on local roads in the area exceeds more than 30%. It is expected that the current design can easily and quickly accommodate appropriate changes to manage traffic levels on local streets. 

5.7       Option 1 Clearway considers a second general traffic lane for the full length between Innes Road and Berwick Street. These are operational in morning peak southbound and in the afternoon peak northbound directions, by not allowing parking to occupy on the side of the road. During non-peak conditions (i.e. non-operational Clearway times) on street parking is allowed and only one general traffic in either direction is operative.

5.7.1   Effectiveness – The peak hour clearway will provide the continuation of the tidal two traffic lanes up to Berwick Street and will cater for both local and arterial traffic. The peak hour clearway will ensure all traffic approaching Cranford Street and heading towards the CBD will likely stay on Cranford Street and will significantly reduce rat running probability through the surrounding local areas. However this option will have no added travel time incentives and will have no impact on mode shift.

5.7.2   Operational Performance – Overall, the clearway will likely have slightly worst operational safety performance to the current design. It likely offers some benefits to accessing different facilities assuming it will limit the local rat-running through the residential areas.

5.7.3   Implementation Challenges – The clearway will require additional signage and road markings to the current design indicating operational hours of clearway operations. It will also require some enforcement to ensure parked cars are removed prior to, and during the clearway hours of operation. Overall, the clearway design will require low level of capital and operational investment.

5.7.4   Impacts – This option will likely have a positive impact on reducing local rat running and keeping the traffic on arterial corridors however it does not provide any incentive for mode shift and any behavioural changes. Lastly, the COVID-19 exposure risk for this option is limited and is similar to the current design.

5.8       Option 2 Peak Hour High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane considers a managed traffic lane the full length between Innes Road and Berwick Street for vehicles with more than one occupant. These are operational in the morning peak southbound and in the afternoon peak northbound. During non-operational period, on-street parking is allowed and only one general traffic lane in either direction is operative.

(Note - An offside HOV lane is not feasible, as in reality it will not be possible for buses to stop on the inside lane and let passengers disembark. In addition, enforcement for managed lanes will be far easier if the managed lane is on kerbside.)

5.8.1   Effectiveness – The proposed HOV lane will provide a continuation of the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) HOV lane during morning peak and will provide additional benefits for the CNC users. Unlike the clearway option, this option will only benefit HOV users and buses, and will have relatively limited catchment when compared against the Clearway option. Whilst this option will likely incentives travel time benefits to HOV and PT users, it will likely have a limited impact on reducing rat-running through local areas.

5.8.2   Operational Performance – The option has safety concerns, such as -

·    potentially weaving in and out of the HOV lane for general traffic;

·    cyclists sharing the lane with traffic;

·    Bus stopping on the HOV lane could lead to rear-ending accidents;

·    Lane changes likely impact motorcycles greatly as they tend to use the area between two lanes.

The peak hour clearway will likely have a limited impact on reducing local rat-running and potentially limit access to HOV lanes during peak conditions that could marginally affect local accessibility. Overall, the analysis indicates that use of HOV lanes has been confusing for road users in urban settings especially when number of side roads (and driveways) connecting onto the HOV corridor that could create regular interruptions and reduce likely travel time savings.

5.8.3   Implementation Challenges - The HOV lane will require additional signage and road markings when compare to all options and is the most expensive option. It is expected that this option will require to install appropriate cameras and signs over a short distance that likely require additional 3 to 6 months of design as this needs to be consistent with the HOV designs along CNC. The HOV lane is the most difficult to monitor and needs more refined ITS systems, software and expensive camera. The analysis also indicates that the enforcement of the HOV lane is harder due to lack of approved technologies and the requirement for space to pull over offending vehicles for manual police enforcement.

5.8.4   Impacts – The additional capacity provided as part of HOV lane will likely have limited impact on reducing local rat-running especially during short term however longer term, mode shift is a possibility without negative impact of rat-running. HOV lanes can be used by family bubbles or for carpooling purposes however the COVID-19 risk is higher than for the Clearway option. Overall, the continuation of the HOV lane along Cranford Street will likely have the wider benefits and will contribute vastly towards mode shift.

5.9       Option 3 Peak Hour Bus Only Lane – is also a managed lane and is similar to Option 2. However, instead of HOV being able to use the additional lane, the lane would only be allowed for buses. The bus only lane would be located on the kerbside between Innes Road and Berwick Street.

5.9.1   Effectiveness – The bus only lane will have a catchment similar to Current Design and will likely have no impact on reducing local rat running. Whilst an express bus service is proposed along the CNC Corridor during morning peak, this Cranford Street Corridor have limited bus services in general and will likely have a limited catchment to that of the Clearway and HOV lane options. The analysis also suggests likely bus only lane will improve bus reliability however will have limited travel time incentives.

5.9.2   Operational Performance – The bus only lanes are very common around Christchurch, and in this particular case will only have occasional buses using this lane (i.e. Route 28 and Express Bus). The option is likely to feel more comfortable for cycle users, however the risk for cyclists is likely to attract cyclists of a lesser ability and in higher numbers away from safer areas on adjacent streets. The recent examples in Auckland suggests a high collisions risk with turning vehicles especially during peak when traffic is queuing. The bus only lane will have a similar to the current design accessibility which is slightly limited to the Clearway option. 

5.9.3   Implementation Challenges - The option is very well understood and will require a similar markings and signage as the other two option. When compared to the current design, the bus only lane will also require to deal with potential parking offences and needed additional technological support (i.e. camera and signage). Lastly, the enforcement for this option is common, and the technology and legislation exists to undertake this task. Overall, the additional costs (capital and operational) require to implement option 3 will be higher than the Clearway option and significantly lower than HOV lane option. 

5.9.4   Impacts – The option does not provide any additional capacity to vehicles and will likely have no impact on reducing local rat-running especially during short term. Also, Cranford Street Corridor is currently not a major bus route and offers limited incentive to use public transport going forward as the frequencies of the buses would be limited. Overall, the buses carries the highest risk for potentially contracting COVID-19.

5.10    Feedback was received from the community regarding the downstream effects projects in August 2019.  Included in this consultation was major road upgrade projects which included the Cranford Street/Sherborne Street corridor.

5.11    Feedback from the community in relation specifically to Cranford Street was:

5.11.1 26 submitters (253 submissions received) provided feedback that the plan is putting cars before community and making this corridor too car focussed for single occupancy vehicles.  There was disappointment that the Cranford Street/Sherborne Street corridor would not have at least an HOV lane in place before the opening of the Christchurch Northern Corridor.  An HOV would also provide a bus priority lane through this part of the network, supporting public transports for commuters from the north of the city.

5.12    The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas:

5.12.1 Innes Ward

6.   Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here

Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1       The propose recommendation is consistent with the Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan and is also consistent with the Council’s Strategic Priorities as it supports enabling active and connected communities to own their future.

6.2       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

6.2.1   Activity: Traffic Safety and Efficiency

·    Level of Service: 10.0.38 Maintain the number of motorised vehicle trips at 2019 levels. - 0.96 to 1.02 million vehicles per week

Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here

6.3       The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

6.4       The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions.

Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi

6.5       The preferred option does not increase additional capacity to single occupancy vehicles and will likely have limited impact on the vehicle emissions.

Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā

6.6       As part of technical analysis accessibility is evaluated for all options. It shows that the current design and all three proposed options will likely have limited impact on accessibility. 

6.7       Overall, as part of the current design many improvements (i.e. intersection upgrades and pedestrian crossing improvements) have been implemented to improve overall accessibility around Cranford Street.

7.   Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi

Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere

7.1       Cost to Implement – The recommendation does not require any additional capital cost.

7.2       Maintenance/Ongoing costs – The recommendation does not add any additional maintenance or ongoing costs.

7.3       Funding Source – The project is currently funded through the Council’s Long Term Plan.

Other / He mea anō

7.4       The Council is currently carrying out periodic monitoring of traffic level along the study area to understand likely traffic changes after opening of the Christchurch Northern Corridor. This work will be continued as part of the preferred option and appropriate funds are currently allocated within the draft 2021-31 Long Term Plan.

8.   Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture

Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa

8.1       The recommended option does not propose to make a change to the current design of the transport corridor in this area.

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture

8.2       The recommended option is consistent with the designation and its associated conditions.

8.3       There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision. Legal implication will only arise if the proposed works are inconsistent with the designation and its associated conditions.

8.4       This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9.   Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru

9.1       There is a risk that the current design will fail to accommodate all vehicular traffic within the arterial corridor and result in more than 30% traffic increases through local streets. If this happens and is confirmed through the periodic monitoring then a clearway or managed lane option along with traffic calming measures, will be explored to control the observed local street traffic increases. This will result in a further options report to Council.

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Cranford Street (Innes Road and Berwick Street) Road layout and typical cross section

20

b

Cranford Street (Innes Road and Berwick Street) Operational Layout Option Assessment

21

 

 

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available:

Document Name

Location / File Link

<enter document name>

<enter location/hyperlink>

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Nilesh Redekar - Senior Transport Network Planner

Ann Tomlinson - Senior Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Richard Holland - Team Leader Asset Planning

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

9.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2020/21 Positive Youth Development Fund - Burnside High School - Spirit of Adventure Trust

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1195142

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Helen Miles Community Recreation Advisor helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application received for funding from it’s 2020/21 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       This report is to assist the Board to consider an application of funding from Burnside High School.

1.3       There is currently a balance of $6750 remaining in this fund.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2020/21 Youth Development Fund to Burnside High School towards the costs of Amelie Cowell, Lleyton Crump, Kingsley Hanrahan, and Julie Uchiyama attending the Spirit of Adventure Trophy Voyage from 29 October – 3 November 2020.

 

3.   Key Points / Ngā Take Matua

Issue or Opportunity / Ngā take, Ngā Whaihua rānei

3.1       To consider applications received to support the development and achievements of young people living in the Waipapa Papanui-Innes area.

Strategic Alignment / Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.2       The recommendations in this report align to the Council's Community Outcome of Resilient Communities including:

·   Celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport and recreation

·   Valuing the voices of all cultures and ages (including children)

Decision Making Authority / Te Mana Whakatau

1.1       Determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community (including any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).

1.2       Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

1.3       The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement / Te Mana Whakatau

1.4       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.3       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.4       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4.   Applicant/ Te Kaitono 1 – Burnside High School

4.1       Burnside High School are seeking funding support to send ten young people on Spirit of Adventure Trophy Voyage in Auckland from  29 October to 3 November 2020

4.2       The following four students live in the Papanui Innes Board area:

·    Amelie Cowell

·    Lleyton Crump

·    Kingsley Hanrahan

·    Julie Uchiyama

4.3       The Spirit of Adventure Trophy Voyages are for Year 10 Students.  Teams of students from four schools, with one teacher per school, compete against each other over a period of five days.

4.4       All events include teamwork, problem solving, ship handling and aquatic sports in and on the water.  Teams will go ashore for a day and complete a task against others that will develop their ingenuity, leadership skills for a reward.  The ship environment will help build self-confidence and ability to work in a team.

4.5       Through the programme, students will learn the fundamentals of seamanship, water safety, sailing and marine sciences including navigation, meteorology and conservation.

4.6       Amelie Cowell is 15 years old, and resides in Bryndwr.  Amelie is hoping to build her leadership skills, and make new friends.  Amelie enjoys hockey, touch rugby and music.

4.7       Lleyton Crump is 14 years old and resides in Redwood.  Lleyton is hoping to develop new skills, meet new people and challenge himself.  Lleyton enjoys playing basketball and hanging out with his friends.

4.8       Kingsley Hanrahan is 15 years old and resides in St Albans. Kingsley is hoping to learn some life skills and gain some more independence. He wants to make some new friends, improve his teamwork and survival skills.  Kingsley enjoys surfing, kayaking and playing the guitar.

4.9       Julie Uchiyama is 15 years old and resides in Bryndwr.  Julie is hoping to learn new skills and increase her strategies for resiliency.  She enjoys swimming, volleyball and netball. 

4.10    The group of young people have been fundraising running bake sales, sausage sizzles and a quiz night.

4.11    The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Burnside High School for the Spirit Adventure Trophy Voyage:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Trip Fee

12,000

Airfares

1903

Transfers

108

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$14,011

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

10.   Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Summer with your Neighbours 2020-21

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1203598

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Trevor Cattermole – Community Development Advisor, trevor.cattermole@ccc.govt.nz
Sharon Munro – Community Support Officer,
Sharon.munro@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens and Community, Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider applications received for their 2020-21 Papanui-Innes Summer with your Neighbours and to allocate funding as appropriate.

1.2       There is a balance of $4,000 allocated to the 2020-21 Papanui-Innes Summer with your Neighbours.

 

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to:

1.         Allocate its 2020-21 Summer with your Neighbours as follows:

 

Applicant

Activity

No. Attending

Recommendation

1

Jonathan Allan

BBQ

42

$105.00

2

Amberlee Allison

BBQ

30

$75.00

3

Kathleen Anderson

Street Pizza Party

40

$100.00

4

Maureen Donovan

Christmas  BBQ

70

$100.00

5

Anna Dowling

Street BBQ

50

$100.00

6

Murray Edlin

Street BBQ

40

$100.00

7

Rosalee Ewington

Street BBQ

30

$75.00

8

Jeannette Gay

Street BBQ

40

$100.00

9

Mark Henshaw

Street BBQ

70

$175.00

10

Anneke Kamo

Street BBQ

50

$125.00

11

Shelley Knowles

Picnic/BBQ

30

$56.00

12

Jenni Krammer

Street Sausage Sizzle

As many as possible

$100.00

13

Vicki McBratney

Street BBQ

30

$75.00

14

Fi Moloney

Street BBQ

45

$60.00

15

Janita Patrick

Street BBQ

30

$75.00

16

Tony Ralfe

Street BBQ

30

$75.00

17

Christine Rankin

BBQ

40

$100.00

18

Philip Sapsford

Neighbourhood BBQ

40

$100

19

Prudence Thomson

Street BBQ

50

$125.00

20

Joanna Wortley

Street BBQ

30

$70.00

21

Mairehau Library

Mini Neighbourhood Gala and Book sale

50+

$200.00

22

Shirley Community Trust

Community BBQ

80

$150.00

23

Redwood Playcentre

Community BBQ

64

$150.00

24

Willowview Community Gardens

BBQ and Community gathering

150

$150.00

25

Aratupu Preschool and Nursery

Community Event

50

$125.00

26

St Pauls Papanui

Brass in the Grass/BBQ

150

$200.00

27

Carolyn Jones

BBQ

65

$130.00

 

 

 

Total

$2,996.00

 

2.         Transfer the unallocated funds of $1004.00 from the Papanui-Innes 2020-21 Summer with your Neighbours to the 2020-21 Papanui-Innes Discretionary Response Fund.

3.         Return any funding not required by the successful applicants from the Papanui-Innes 2020-21 Summer with your Neighbours back to the 2020-21 Papanui-Innes Discretionary Response Fund.

 

3.   Key Points / Ngā Take Matua

Issue or Opportunity / Ngā take, Ngā Whaihua rānei

3.1       At its meeting on 4 September 2020, the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to allocate $4,000 from its 2020-21 Discretionary Response Fund to its 2020-21 Summer with your Neighbours.

Strategic Alignment / Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

3.2       The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the strategic priority of Strengthening Communities. It will provide a strong sense of community, active participation in civic life, safe and healthy communities, celebration of our identity through arts, culture, heritage and sport, valuing the voices of children and young people.

Decision Making Authority / Te Mana Whakatau

3.3       The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of its Summer with your Neighbours funding.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement / Te Aromatawai Whakahirahira

3.4       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion / Kōrerorero

3.7       Summer with your Neighbours is about bringing people closer together and celebrating the unique and diverse mix of each neighbourhood.

3.8       Local community groups and previous applicants were sent information inviting them to apply for, Summer with your Neighbours funding as allocated by the Board.

3.9       Summer with your Neighbours will run from 23 October 2020 to 31 March 2021.  Applications for funding opened on 1 August 2020 and closed on 6 September 2020.

3.10    By the closing date, 26 applications had been received. One additional application was received after the closing date.  The applications were assessed to ensure that they meet the guidelines for Summer with your Neighbours events and the Board is considering 26 applications that meet the guidelines.

3.11    The officer recommendations were based on the following, in order to maintain consistency over the allocation of recommendations city-wide:

·    A formula of $2.50 per person has been applied city-wide as a consistent approach to applications.

·    A maximum of $200 per event was applied to all applicants.

·    Where two approximate attendee numbers have been noted, recommendations are based on the higher approximate figure.

·    When the requested amount is less than the $2.50 per head formula, the requested amount is what has been recommended.

3.12    A decision matrix (refer Attachment A) outlines the applications and staff recommendations. Also included are the Summer with your Neighbours Guidelines (refer Attachment B).

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes - Summer with your Neighbours 2020-21 - Applications to be considered.

71

b

Summer with your Neighbours 2020 - Guidelines

75

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Author

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

11.   Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - September 2020

Reference / Te Tohutoro:

20/1094242

Report of / Te Pou Matua:

Christine Lane – Community Governance Manager
Christine.Lane@ccc.govt.nz

General Manager / Pouwhakarae:

Mary Richardson – General Manager Citizens & Community
Mary.Richardson@ccc.govt.nz

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo

This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board area.

2.   Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for September 2020.

 

3.   Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity

3.1       Community Governance Projects

Activity

Detail

Timeline

Strategic Alignment

Project Title

As much detail as required or entered previously. Length will change depending on current status of the activity

Ongoing, Completed, or Date

Board Priority

Community Outcome

Interagency Meetings

Both wards held meetings on 13 and 15 October to allow community organisations to come together and support each other.

Ongoing

Ensure vulnerable communities are supported.

10 Shirley Road activation

Engagement on the possibilities for the site closed on 12 October. Feedback will come back to the board in November.

Ongoing

Improve and support community facilities and amenity in the Papanui-Innes Wards.

St Albans Community Centre rebuild

The build is well underway.  Opening preparations have began.

Ongoing

Improve and support community facilities and amenity in the Papanui-Innes Wards.

Langdons Road

Ongoing discussions

Ongoing

Endorse and encourage a functioning and safe traffic network that supports a connected community.

3.2       Community Funding Summary

3.2.1   The 2020-2021 financial year’s Positive Youth Development and Discretionary Response Funds Balance Sheet is attached (refer Attachment A).

3.3       Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making

3.3.1   Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]

·     Mairehau Volunteer Library

The new mural that the Board supported with funding to cover the uninspiring back wall of the much-loved Mairehau Volunteer Library has now been completed.  It is a vibrant celebration of local flora and fauna and has been greeted with enthusiasm by the library volunteers, patrons, surrounding neighbours and community.

·     Great Christchurch car rally

Ninety-seven people took part in the Great Christchurch Car Rally.  Nine vans travelled around Christchurch with youth from the Northwest area completing challenges to earn points using the Goose Chase app.

 Challenges undertaken by the youth were varied from the ridiculous to ones requiring knowledge and skills. The event was run in a way that would comply with the Covid-19 requirements, yet young people could connect and feel like they were part of a large event. Feedback to date has been very positive with a formal evaluation taking place in the next week.  Comments have included: “Can we have this event every year?” “This is best thing we’ve done in our lives!” “Can we run a year-long event?”

The PAC (Papanui Advisory Youth Committee) took the lead in running this event with the Papanui Youth Development Trust (PYD) and Council staff playing a lead supporting role.  Other agencies all worked in partnership in bringing this event to the young people in the Northwest.

·     Living wall for local recreation centre

A living wall has been installed on the outside of the Graham Condon Recreation and Sports Centre in Papanui.

These walls are proving tremendously popular and a growing body of research has accumulated evidence of the physical and mental health benefits resulting from access and interaction with living walls.

Where better to add nature to the built environment than a community sports and recreation centre which allows customers, employees and local residents to benefit from the attractive, organic alternative to the usual two-dimensional wall treatments.

 

3.3.2   Council Engagement and Consultation

The Board convened its Submissions Committee on Friday 25 September 2020 to formulate submissions on the following:

·     Draft Tree Policy

·     Community Facilities Network Plan

·     Metro Sports Facility – Aquatic Sensory Experience

The minutes of the Submissions Committee meeting are included in the Agenda of 2 October meeting.

3.4       Governance Advice

3.4.1   Northlink

The new Northlink retail precinct in Langdons Road, especially following the opening of Kmart, is rapidly becoming a popular destination and attracting a larger share of traffic. The Board are aware of the additional burden on the Papanui traffic network and have requested that staff keep an eye on this.

3.4.2   Bouquet

A local resident sent in the following positive comments regarding the result of Council staff’s work around traffic safety issues for residents of Aorangi Road:

Just reaching out to say thank you for everyone's effort in getting this work over the finish line.

The new safety solution has been in place for a month and I've already noticed phenomenal improvement in traffic behaviour, e.g.

·      with clear signage traffic now shows more responsibility during school hours

·      staff and wards of Allenvale appear to be more confident while crossing the street.

·      noticed pedestrians using the new island as their preferred spot for intersection traversal.

·      education in the number of burnout noises and screeching tire sounds.

·      great visibility for motorists during peak hours for right turn to Condell

Thank you once again for this great effort… really appreciate it.

 

3.4.3   End of Project Summaries for the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s Discretionary Response and Positive Youth Development Funds 2018-19

The End of Project Summaries for the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund (refer Attachment B) and the Positive Youth Development 2018-19 Fund  (refer Attachment C) are attached to this report.

4.   Advice Provided to the Community Board

4.1       Information sent to the Board:

·   SWN: Cranford/Westminster Streets Hydro (circulated 24 Aug 2020)

·   SWN: Barbadoes/Warrington Streets Evening Work  (circulated 24 Aug 2020)

·   CCC Update: St Albans, Edgeware and Mairehau transport projects (25 Aug 2020)

·   SWN: Realignment work on north side of Canon Street (circulated 1 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Road resurfacing Edgeware/Barbadoes (circulated 1 Sep 2020)

·   CCC Graffiti Team August update (circulated 1 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Road resurfacing Edgeware/Barbadoes (circulated 3 Sep 2020)

·   CNC Update: Radcliffe and Prestons, Waimakariri Bridge, QEII Drive and Philpotts Road (circulated 4 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Winston Ave/Sawyers Arms Road – priority bus lane improvements (circulated 7 Sep 2020)

·   CNC Update: Waimakariri Bridge, Grimseys/Prestons Intersection, Gantry Installation SH1 (circulated 14 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Cranford/Westminster Street intersection (circulated 16 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Barbadoes Street – two way (circulated 16 Sep 2020)

·   CNC Update: Resealing Waimakariri Bridge – northbound lanes, Grimseys/Prestons Intersection, Gantry Installation SH1 ongoing (circulated 17 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Warrington, Forfar, Barbadoes (circulated 18 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Winton Street (circulated 21 Sep 2020)

·   SWN: Rutland/Cranford Shared Pathway (circulated 22 Sep 2020)

·   St Albans, Edgeware and Mairehau transport projects Community Board update (circulated 25 Sep 2020)

 

 

 

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes DRF and PYDF Balance Sheet 2020-2012

82

b

End of Project Summary Papanui-Innes DRF 2018-19

83

c

End of Project Summary Papanui-Innes PYDF 2018-19

113

 

 

 

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu

Authors

Elizabeth Hovell - Community Board Advisor

Lyssa Aves - Governance Support Officer

Approved By

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 


 


 


 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

16 October 2020

 

 

12.   Elected Members’ Information Exchange / Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.