Waikura

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                    Monday 6 May 2019

Time:                                    3pm

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sally Buck

Jake McLellan

Alexandra Davids

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Brenda Lowe-Johnson

Deon Swiggs

Sara Templeton

 

 

1 May 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B          Reports for Information

Part C          Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C         1.        Apologies..................................................................................... 4

B         2.        Declarations of Interest................................................................. 4

C         3.        Confirmation of Previous Minutes.................................................. 4

B         4.        Public Forum................................................................................ 4

B         5.        Deputations by Appointment.......................................................... 4

B         6.        Presentation of Petitions............................................................... 4

Staff Reports

C         7.        Scott Park Landscape Plan................................................... 15

A         8.        Delegation of sign off of Main Contract for Linwood Pool to Chief Executive.................................................................... 43

C         9.        Madras Purchas Proposed No Stopping Restrictions............... 47

C         10.     Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board's 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund - 2018/19 Youth Development Fund................................................................................... 55

C         11.     Application to Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Comunity Board 2018/19 Youth Development Fund - Various................. 59

C         12.     Application to 2018/19 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Youth Development Fund - Various................................................. 63

C         13.     Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - May 2019................................................................ 67

 

B         14.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange....................................... 80

C         15.     Resolution to Exclude the Public........................................... 81  

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Monday, 1 April 2019  be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

5.1

Scott Park Landscape Plan (Clause 7 of this agenda refers)

Amuri Cockerell, solicitor, will speak on behalf of R and L Thompson, local residents, regarding their submission on the Scott Park Draft Landscape Plan.

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

     

 

 

Waikura

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Open Minutes

 

        

Date:                                    Monday 1 April 2019

Time:                                    3pm

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sally Buck

Jake McLellan

Alexandra Davids

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Deon Swiggs

Sara Templeton

 

 

1 April 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Part A          Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B          Reports for Information

Part C          Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00039

Community Board Decision

That the apologies from Brenda Lowe-Johnson for absence and Yani Johanson and Deon Swiggs for lateness be accepted.

Sara Templeton/Tim Lindley                                                                                                 Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

Tim Lindley declared an interest in Item 11 of  Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report regarding the information on the Coastal Pathway and took no part in the Board’s discussion or voting on this item.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00040

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 20 March 2019 be confirmed.

Darrell Latham/Tim Lindley                                                                                                    Carried

 

Yani Johanson and Deon Swiggs arrived at the meeting at 3.06pm.


 

 

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.1      Ensors and Ōpāwa Road Crossing

Part B

Ms Norma Marriot and Mr Michael Elsworth, residents of Ōpāwa, raised safety concerns with the Board regarding the Ensors and Ōpāwa Road pedestrian crossing, and stated that in their opinion the crossing is not a pedestrian crossing but a gap in the road island. 

Following questions from the Board members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Marriot and Mr Elsworth for their presentation.

Part B

 

The Board agreed:

 

1.    To have a site visit, accompanied by members of the community, to look at the crossings at Ensors and Ōpāwa Roads intersection.

2.    To include in the Board’s submission to the Council’s 2019/20 Draft Annual Plan, a request that the funding for the Orbiter Passenger Transport Ensors Road project be retained and allocated towards pedestrian safety at the Ensors/Ōpāwa Roads intersection.

 

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

5.1

Nayland Street Bus Stop near Menzies Street

Part B

Mr Dave Hicks, resident of Nayland Street, spoke to the Board regarding the Nayland Street Bus Stop.  Mr Hicks reiterated that his request for moving the bus stop was to give privacy to his property. (Clause 8 of these minutes refer).

Following questions from the Board members, the Chairperson thanked Mr Hicks for his deputation.

 

5.2

Avebury House Trust 

Part B

Hayley Guglietta and Beth Rouse, representatives from Avebury House Trust, gave a presentation to the Board regarding the trust’s strategic and expansion plans as well as pointing out some barriers that prevent the Trust  from fully utilising Avebury House,  including issues around security and general maintenance.  (Clause 11 of these minutes refer).

Following questions from the Board members, the Chairperson thanked Ms Guglietta and Ms Rouse for their deputation.

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.   Woodchester Avenue - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00041 Original Staff Recommendations accepted without change

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approve under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the turning head of Woodchester Avenue as shown by broken yellow lines on the drawing TG133719 issue 1 dated 06/03/2019 attached to the meeting agenda.

2.        Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in 1.

3.        Approve that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in 1.are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Deon Swiggs/Jake McLellan                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

8.   Nayland Street Bus Stop near Menzies Street

 

Board Comment

Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report.

The Board took into consideration the deputation from Mr Dave Hicks (Item 5.1 of these minutes refers). 

 

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00042 (Original Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

1.        Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast side of Nayland Street, commencing at its intersection with Menzies Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 43 metres be revoked.

2.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Nayland Street, commencing at its intersection with Menzies Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

3.        Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the northeast side of Nayland Street, commencing at a point 21 metres northwest of its intersection with Menzies Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

4.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Nayland Street, commencing at a point 35 metres northwest of its intersection with Menzies Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

5.        That these resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

Darrell Latham/Jake McLellan                                                                                                Carried

 

 

9.   Hagley Park- Winter School Sports Bus Parking Requirements

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approves that any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 404 metres, be revoked.

2.           Approves that any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 417 metres, be revoked.

3.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 71 metres.

4.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day,  on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 71 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres. This restriction is to apply on any day.

5.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to buses only and be further restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 71 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres. This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August each year.

6.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 181 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

7.        Approves  that the parking of vehicles be restricted to buses only and be further restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August each year.

8.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 60 degree angle parking on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres. This restriction on angle parking applies at all times except at times when any parking is prohibited and except for between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August, every year.

9.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day, on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres. This restriction is to apply on any day.

10.      Approves that the parking of vehicles be reserved for vehicles with an approved mobility person’s parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4 of the Land Transport-Road User Rule: 2004, on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at a point 373 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of seven and half metres.  This restriction is to apply at any time, and be further restricted to 60 degree angle parking.

11.      Approves that a motorcycle stand be created on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at a point 380.5 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of six metres. This restriction is to apply at any time.

12.      Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 386.5 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17.5 metres.

13.      Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 58 metres.

14.      Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day, on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 58 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 340 metres. This restriction is to apply on any day.

15.      Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to Buses only on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 198 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 200 metres. This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August each year.

16.      Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 398 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

17.      Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00043

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approves that any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 404 metres, be revoked.

2.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 71 metres.

3.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day,  on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 71 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres. This restriction is to apply on any day.

4.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to buses only and be further restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 71 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres. This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August each year on school days only.

5.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 181 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

6.        Approves  that the parking of vehicles be restricted to buses only and be further restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August on school days only each year.

7.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 60 degree angle parking on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres.  This restriction on angle parking applies at all times except at times when any parking is prohibited and except for between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August, on school days only every year.

8.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day,  on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 182 metres.  This restriction is to apply on any day.

9.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be reserved for vehicles with an approved mobility person’s parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4 of the Land Transport-Road User Rule: 2004, on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at a point 373 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of seven and half metres. This restriction is to apply at any time, and be further restricted to 60 degree angle parking.

10.      Approves that a motorcycle stand be created on the east side of Deans Avenue, commencing at a point 380.5 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of six metres. This restriction is to apply at any time.

11.      Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Deans Avenue commencing at a point 386.5 metres north of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17.5 metres.

12.         Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Jake McLellan/Sara Templeton                                                                                              Carried

 

 

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00044

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.           Approves that any previous resolutions pertaining to parking and stopping restrictions made on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 417 metres, be revoked.

2.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 58 metres.

3.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 11:00pm and 5:00 am on the following day, on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 58 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 340 metres. This restriction is to apply on any day.

4.        Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to Buses only on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 198 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 200 metres. This restriction is to apply between the hours of 12:00pm and 3:00 pm, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, for the months of May, June, July and August each year on school days only.

5.        Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south eastern side of Harper Avenue commencing at a point 398 metres southwest of its intersection with Park Terrace and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

6.        Approves that these resolutions take effect when parking signage and/or road marking that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place (or removed in the case of revocations).

Sally Buck/Sara Templeton                                                                                                     Carried

 

The meeting adjourned at 4.07pm and reconvened at 4.17pm.

 

 

10. Application to 2018/19 Youth Development Fund - Various

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00045 (Original Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approves a grant of $600 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Christchurch Football Club Under12 towards Pollyana Palamao and Jack O’Rourke attending the Kids World Rugby Festival in Japan from 19 to 22 April 2019.

2.        Approves a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Marion College towards Mailena Fasi Fidow attending the Five Schools Educational and Cultural Exchange in Japan from 13 to 27 April 2019.

Alexandra Davids/Yani Johanson                                                                                           Carried

 

11. Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - April 2019

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Receive the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for April 2019.

2.        Request staff to work with Avebury House Community Trust to negotiate conditions of use that allow full use of the facilities for community and fundraising events while protecting the heritage values of the facility.

3.        Note the Board submission to the Council’s Draft Annual Plan 2019/20.

4.        Consider items for inclusion for the Board Report to the Council’s 11 April 2019 meeting.

5.        Consider items for inclusion in the Board April 2019 Newsletter.

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2019/00046

Part B

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Receive the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for April 2019.

2.        Request staff to work with Avebury House Community Trust to negotiate conditions of use that allow full use of the facilities for community and fundraising events while protecting the heritage values of the facility and report back to the Board on the progress before the end of the current Board term.

3.           Request staff to investigate security and maintenance arrangements for Avebury House and report back to the Board on the progress before the end of the current Board term.

4.        Include in the Board submission to the Council’s Draft Annual Plan 2019/20 the additional clause relating to the retention of funding for pedestrian safety at Ensors/Ōpāwa Roads intersection.

5.        Request a review six months from the completion of the development of Te Ara a Rongo – Gloucester/Worcester Park on the need for walkway lighting, water fountains, and rubbish bins.

6.        Request information on the leasing arrangements for Council owned facilities within the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board area.

7.        Request a seminar on Development Contributions and how to access the contributions for local/community developments.

8.        Request that information advising the community on how to complain about offensive odour is included in the Council’s Newsline and Board Newsletter.

9.        Request a seminar on the My Council Customer Service Request system.

10.        Formally acknowledge the efforts of the Council staff in responding to the impact of the terror attacks and maintaining the ongoing functioning of Council.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

12. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Elected Members shared the following information:

·    The Board noted that some residents had received information on a proposed cell tower to be erected near the Woolston Borough Memorial on Ferry Road.

·    The Board were advised that owing to the National Memorial Day Service to commemorate the lives lost in the Christchurch terrorist attack being held on Friday 29 March 2019 a small blessing took place for Sumner Road opening .  There will be another celebration arranged at a later date.

·    The Board noted that the recently held Woolston and Phillipstown galas were well attended.

   

Meeting concluded at 5.30pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 6th DAY OF MAY 2019

 

Sally Buck

Chairperson

   


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

7.     Scott Park Landscape Plan

Reference:

19/240729

Presenter(s):

Eric Banks – Senior Network Planner Parks,
Josh Neville – Urban Regeneration Planner,
Dennis Preston – Team Leader TSD Parks and Landscapes
Tara King – Senior Engagement Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the landscape plan (Option 1) for the future development of Scott Park (Attachment A) and for the Community Board to approve the recommended prioritisation of work as outlined in this report.

2.   Executive Summary

2.1      This report describes:

·    The landscape plan for the future development for Scott Park

·    The process to develop the landscape plan

·    The response from engagement with the community of this landscape plan

·    A recommendation to approve this plan with the amendments following consultation and the prioritisation of works.

2.2      Scott Park was badly damaged in the Earthquakes in 2010 and 2011. A small amount of works were carried out to bring the park to a usable state but this was below levels of service expectations. The park was identified and funded through the Main Road Masterplan for some improvements as a key node of activity along the Main Road corridor. To enable these works to occur and to resolve some complaints raised in relation to the park a working party was convened by the Linwood Central Heathcote Community Board in 2017. This working party included representatives from key organisations in relation to the park, and in-conjunction with Council staff a draft landscape plan was developed. This draft landscape plan was consulted on 11 February 2019 – 11 March 2019 and 27 submissions were received, the majority being in support of the draft landscape plan. Staff revised some elements of the plan following consultation.

2.3      A revised plan and a prioritisation of works have been presented in this report for approval from the community board. Two options are provided, option 1 (preferred) allocates more funding to completion of the eastern carpark, whereas option 2 prioritises completion of the more expensive central carpark, with an associated reduction in the levels of planting. There is insufficient budget to achieve all elements of the landscape plan and further funding will need to be allocated in future long term plans to fully implement the landscape plan.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Receive the information outlined in this report

2.        Approve the Scott Park Landscape plan (Attachment A) incorporating the amendments a to c below as a result of community feedback:

a.        Changes to the location of the trees adjacent to the Mt Pleasant Sea Scouts building

b.        Shortened beach area west of the ramp adjacent to the Mt Pleasant Sea Scouts building

c.         Incorporation of cycle stands near the toilet.

3.        Approve the priorities of work, a to f below, to implement the first stages of the Scott Park Landscape Plan:

a.        Seal and mark (eastern) carpark area including markings to improve access from the Christchurch Coastal pathway to the coast.

b.        Plantings adjacent to the Mt Pleasant Yacht Club boat storage building.

c.         Plantings in the picnic area.

d.        Sealed pathway from the Ferrymead Bridge to the public boat ramp.

e.        Other plantings or paths as budget allows.

f.         Seats, picnic tables, and cycle stands as budget allows.

4.        Request staff investigate future funding options to fully implement the landscape plan.

 

4.   Context/Background

Issue or Opportunity

4.1      Prior to the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes, Scott Park was a home for a number of diverse uses. These uses included the Mt Pleasant Yacht Club; on site since the 1930’s, the Mt Pleasant bowling club, pétanque clubs and the Mt Pleasant Sea Scouts.  The park was also well used by wind surfers, and casual water sports users. The earthquakes had substantial impacts on the park and the facilities located here, resulting in a number of demolitions.

4.2      The Parks Unit utilised earthquake related renewals and landscape budgets to redevelop Scott Park to a basic level, however further development was dependent on future project budget being made available.  The park is usable but does not meet the levels of service expectations as set out in the Council’s Long Term Plan.

4.3      In June 2016 the Mt Pleasant Yacht club was granted an 11 year lease to occupy a portion of Scott Park, with a 13-year option for renewal. The Yacht club with approval has constructed a new boat storage facility on their leased area of the park. The Yacht club lease continues to permit public access to and from the foreshore and the legal road directly adjacent to the park, and permits the Yacht club to carry out their activities on the leased area of the park. They are responsible for maintenance of their leased area of the park.

4.4      Following the earthquakes, the Main Road Master Plan was developed. In this document, Scott Park was identified as a key nodal point and a concept plan for the park was approved. 

4.5      The Christchurch Coastal Pathway was developed adjacent to the park. Access to and from the pathway and the park is limited.

4.6      As part of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan, a budget from the Main Road Master Plan of $145,296 was allocated for financial year 2019 for improvements to Scott Park.

4.7      In late 2017 requests for improvements to Scott Park were presented to the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board. The Community Board agreed that a working party consisting of key stakeholders be set up, with the intention being, to resolve issues regarding Scott Park and to contribute to the production of a draft landscape plan designed to implement the concept plan.

4.8      The Scott Park Working Party consisted of representatives from the Christchurch Coastal Pathway Group, Mt Pleasant Yacht Club, Mt Pleasant Sea Scouts, Mt Pleasant Residents Assn, Canterbury Windsports Assn, and the Linwood Coastal Community Board.  Staff also attended these meetings.

4.9      A set of design objectives were agreed by the Working Party based on the original concept, the Master Plan Actions and the issues raised by Working Party representatives.  (Attachment B).  The main issues identified for improvement by the group consisted of better and more obvious access to the water and marine facilities for the public, better connectivity with the Coastal Pathway, good facilities for casual users such as a defined picnic area,  sealed and more efficient parking, and maximising the area of green space and planting overall.  The main challenges were ensuring safe and efficient ingress/egress to the water by yacht and wind sports users, while providing better access to the coastal edge areas for the public.

4.10    The working party has convened seven times to develop a draft landscape plan.

4.11    Staff and the Avon-Heathcote Estuary Ihutai Trust had an onsite meeting in August 2018 to discuss the draft landscape plan and proposed works at Scott Park.

4.12    Following agreement by the Working Party a draft plan was made available for public consultation.  Consultation consisted of a letter box drop to local residents, Have Your Say was open for 4 weeks between 11 February and 11 March 2019, and Council staff were available to answer questions at the Estuary Fest, 23 February 2019.

Strategic Alignment

4.13    The draft plan and working party approach to producing it is compatible with Council’s Strategic Priority of Enabling active citizenship and connected communities and the Community Outcome of Strong Communities – Active participation in civic life.

4.14    This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

4.14.1 Activity: Parks & Foreshore

·      Level of Service: 6.8.5.0 Satisfaction with the range and quality of recreation opportunities within parks - Resident satisfaction with range and quality of recreation facilities within Parks: = 85%.

4.14.2 Funding provision has been made in the current LTP FY19 of $145,296 to support the Main Road Master Plan implementation of the Suburban Centres programme (Action NE3).  CPMS ID 39152.  Proposed expenditure on improvements shown in the Landscape Plan (refer to attachment A) support the Master Plan actions and principles of:

·      improved access to water (ramp from Ferrymead Bridge to waterway),

·      provision for expected growth in water sports (seal and mark carpark area, effective lawn area for set up and clear accessways to shore)

·      integration with SCIRT repairs and Coastal pathway (ramp from Ferrymead Bridge to waterway, easier and more obvious access to shore from pathway)

·      preservation and interpretation of heritage features (sufficient space provided around Penfolds cottage for subsequent restoration and appropriate landscaping)

·      amenity landscaping incorporating native species (native trees proposed for shade and screening)

·      quality gateway experience, including design of new buildings (tidy and enhanced amenity values, future ablutions proposed).

Decision Making Authority

4.15    Approval of landscape plans is delegated to Community Boards by the Council, specifically, the power to approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area, and the design of landscape plans for the same, on reserves, parks and roads, provided the design is within the policy and budget set by the Council.

Previous Decisions

4.16    The concept upon which the landscape plan is based was endorsed by the community board in September 2014 and approved by the Council in November 2014 as part of the Main Road Master Plan.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

4.17    The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4.18    The low level of significance reflects that the proposal is largely a tidy up of the park and there is no significant variation to the already approved concept plan.

4.19    Engagement with the community has involved distributing consultation material and feedback forms, having staff at the Estuary Festival and the distribution of a Newsline story on the park on the Council social media channels.

4.20    The draft landscape plan for Scott Park is very well supported by the local community with only one submitter who does not support the plan. The community would like to see improvements made at the park as they are unhappy with the current condition of the park.

 

5.   Options Analysis

Options Considered

5.1      The following reasonably practicable options were considered for the landscape plan and are assessed in this report:

·      Option 1 (preferred) Eastern carpark focus: Draft landscape plan as attached with priorities for expenditure outlined below in 5.3.2.

·      Option 2 Central carpark focus: Draft landscape plan as attached with priorities for expenditure outlined below in 5.4.2.

5.2      The following options were considered but ruled out

Do nothing –

·    Budget has already been provided for this project.

·    Approval of the landscape plan will provide certainty for future development regardless of when budget is available. 

·    Scott Park will deteriorate over time if no further development takes place, disproportionately increasing maintenance requirements.

·    Scott Park Working Party already ruled this option out.

Options Descriptions

5.3      Preferred Option: Option 1 – Implementation priorities listed in 5.3.2.

5.3.1   Option Description: The proposed landscape plan (Attachment 1), is an improvement to the existing park and proposes:

·    A public access path from the Ferrymead Bridge to the public ramp and pontoon

·    Improved access and visibility to other areas of the coast and the park itself for the public / coastal pathway users.

·    Sealed car and boat parking.

·    Picnic areas, amenity planting and shade trees.

·    Additional screen planting of the boat shed.

·    A site for a future sculpture, design of which is yet to be decided.

·    Combined toilets, changing, washdown and storage area.

·    An extension to the shingle beach.

·    Seating, cycle stands and picnic tables.

·    A site for a future security gate, to be confirmed.

·    A new park sign.

5.3.2   The following items are proposed to be installed as priorities utilising the existing budgets available:

·      A public access path from the Ferrymead Bridge to the public ramp and pontoon.

·      Improved access and visibility to other areas of the coast and the park itself for the public / coastal pathway users.

·      Sealing and reconfiguration of the eastern car parking area (closest to picnic area)

·      Planting of the picnic area.

·      Additional screen planting of the boat shed.

The other items listed in 5.3.1 are proposed to be installed/constructed when future budget allows.  There is a reasonable likelihood that alternative budgets will be available for seating, cycle stands, picnic tables, and a new park sign in financial year 2020.

5.3.3   Option Advantages

·      Sealing the eastern car park, rather than the western one, as a budget priority would provide more efficient and usable parking areas overall.  This is because the existing western car park is more robust in its current unsealed state than the eastern one, so sealing the eastern one first would provide a better overall outcome until further budget was available.

·      Sealing the eastern car park requires less budget than sealing the western car park and therefore greater budget would be available for planting and pathways compared with Option 2, as outlined in 5.3.2 and 5.4.2.

5.3.4   Option Disadvantages

·      Slight disadvantage for trailer parking having to continue to park on gravel rather than marked sealed car parks.

5.4      Option 2 - Implementation priorities listed in 5.4.2.

5.4.1   Option Description: The proposed landscape plan (Attachment 1), is an improvement to the existing park and proposes (same features as Option 1 but with an alternative set of priorities for implementation, listed in 5.4.2):

·    A public access path from the Ferrymead Bridge to the public ramp and pontoon.

·    Improved access and visibility to other areas of the coast and the park itself for the public / coastal pathway users.

·    Sealed car and boat parking.

·    Picnic areas, amenity planting and shade trees.

·    Additional screen planting of the boat shed.

·    A site for a future sculpture, design of which yet to be decided.

·    Combined toilets, changing, washdown and storage area.

·    An extension to the shingle beach.

·    Seating, cycle stands and picnic tables.

·    A site for a future security gate, to be confirmed.

·    A new park sign.

5.4.2   The following items are proposed to be installed as priorities utilising the existing budgets available:

·      A public access path from the Ferrymead Bridge to the public ramp and pontoon.

·      Improved access and visibility to other areas of the coast and the park itself for the public / coastal pathway users.

·      Sealing and reconfiguration of the western car parking area (centre of park).

·      Limited planting of the picnic area.

·      Limited additional screen planting of the boat shed.

·      Limited planting in other areas of the park.

The other items listed in 5.4.1 are proposed to be installed / constructed when future budget allows.  There is a reasonable likelihood that alternative budgets will be available for seating, cycle stands, picnic tables, and a new park sign in financial year 2020.

5.4.3   Option Advantages

·      Slight advantage for trailer parking to be able to park on a sealed surface rather than unmarked gravel car parks.

5.4.4   Option Disadvantages

·      Less of the remaining project budget available for planting trees and shrubs, reducing the overall amenity of the park for general users and locals.

·      Less of the remaining project budget available for sealed pathways as outlined above in 5.4.2, reducing accessibility to the coast and the temporary toilet by a small degree for those with limited mobility.

Analysis Criteria

5.5      Financial

5.5.1   In terms of an options comparison, capital expenditure is the same for both options (project budget is $140,000), and the difference in operational expenditure would be small ($2,000-3,000) in the first few years but tending to be negligible over time once further items are implemented. 

5.5.2   By implementing the landscape plan entirely over time, long term maintenance costs for the park would increase from approximately $18,000 p.a. to $33,000 p.a. (at today’s rates).  By implementing the portion of the landscape plan currently funded an increase of $4,300 per year in maintenance would result for the first year or two for Option 1; $790 for Option 2.

5.5.3   Both options will reduce the short term cost to maintain the car parking areas ($800 and $1,200 respectively p.a.) as the existing metal surface would not have to be regraded every few years.  Long term this would represent a saving of $2,000 p.a., assuming regraded once every five years.

5.5.4   When budget is available, it is proposed to replace the existing temporary toilet with a permanent facility.  Removing the temporary toilet will cost approximately $10,000.  The proposed new toilet block / changing rooms/washdown/storage facility would cost in the order of $350,000.

5.5.5   To extend the shingle beach as shown on the plan would cost approximately $65,000.  Maintenance would be in the order of $10,000 once every several years.

5.5.6   A security gate would cost approximately $3,000 to install.

5.5.7   Seating, cycle stands and picnic tables as depicted in the plan would cost approximately $35,000.  This cost is not covered by the project but there is a possibility other budgets may be available to allow their installation at the same time as the project work.

5.6      Accessibility

5.6.1   By sealing the eastern car park (Preferred option 1) $50,000 over the western car park (Option 2) $95,000, there would be a marginal improvement in accessibility for windsports users (closer to beach) and the general public (to the picnic area and toilet).  This would however result in a slight disadvantage for trailer parkers until further budget became available.

5.6.2   Sealing the western car park using the existing budget (option 2) $95,000, would result in less budget being available for paths to the coast and temporary toilet, potentially creating an inconvenience to less abled park visitors.

5.7      Social and Community impacts

5.7.1   General community benefit differences between the two options not already mentioned include the lesser area of the park able to be planted with the existing budget. This includes the picnic area (fewer shade trees) and a lesser amount of additional screen planting for the boat shed (less visual mitigation). 

Options Considerations

5.8      There is only one version of the landscape plan which is described within each option above.  Each option is differentiated by the preference for the priority of expenditure of the existing budget on the listed items.

5.9      There is a reasonable likelihood of additional budget for further planting in the near future so maintenance is likely to be roughly the same for both options over time.

5.10    Seats, signage, picnic tables, bicycle stands, and park signage are common to both options.  There is a possibility they may be able to be funded from other existing budgets and are not proposed to be funded from the existing project budget.

6.   Community Views and Preferences

6.1      Consultation on the draft landscape plan for Scott Park was undertaken from Monday 11 February 2019 to Monday 11 March 2019.

6.2      The submission form for the draft landscape plan for Scott Park asked submitters to indicate whether they support the landscape plan, generally support the landscape plan but have concerns or do not support the landscape plan.  Space was also available on the submission form for any additional comments.

6.3      Approximately 80 consultation leaflets and submission forms (Attachments C and D) were hand delivered to properties surrounding Scott Park, including 17 absentee owners.  This information was also emailed to 136 key stakeholders, which also included those who previously provided a submission on the Penfold’s historic sod and cob cottage project. 

6.4      The consultation material was also made available at Linwood Service Centre, Matuku Takotako: Sumner Centre, Lyttelton Service Centre and Civic Offices.

6.5      The project was also posted on the Council’s ‘Have Your Say’ website https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/consultations-and-submissions/haveyoursay/show/210 and a Newsline story was also produced on 11 February 2019 and posted on the Council social media channels https://ccc.govt.nz/news-and-events/newsline/show/3302

6.6      The project team were available to discuss this project and answer any questions at the Estuary Festival on Saturday 23 February 2019 from 1 pm to 5 pm.  The team spoke with approximately 25 people during this event and the main topic of conversation related to tree species.  Feedback was generally very supportive of the plan as it would be an improvement to the existing site.

6.7      At the close of consultation 27 submissions were received with 16 submitters supporting the draft plan, 10 who generally support but have concerns and one submitter who did not support the plan.

Support the plan

Generally support but with concerns

Do not support the plan

Total

16 (59%)

10 (37%)

1 (4%)

27 (100%)

 

 

6.8      In relation to the location of submissions (for those who provided a suburb), these can be summarised as:

Location submission came from

Submitter ID #

No. of submissions from this location

Avondale

21608

1

Burnside

21094

1

Christchurch Central

21935, 21255

2

Fendalton

21067

1

Ferrymead

21064

1

Heathcote Valley

21867

1

Mount Pleasant

21988, 21779, 21323, 21057, 21396, 21713, 21065, 21061, 21184, 21675, 21813

11

Redcliffs

21086

1

St Andrews Hill

21496, 21445, 22157

3

Sumner

21795, 21232

2

Woolston

21075, 21324, 21782

3

Total

 

27

 

6.9      The majority of submissions have been received from Mount Pleasant (40%), which is the suburb closest to Scott Park.  Of those submitters from Mount Pleasant there were none who did not support the draft landscape plan and five with concerns and four who support the draft plan.  A map has been included to show the location of submissions in the area (Attachments E and F).

6.10    There were also submissions received from six organisations or businesses:

Name of organisation

Submitter ID #

Feedback

Adderley Head (representing a property owner)

21935

Generally support, but have some concerns

Christchurch Coastal Pathway Group

21988

Generally support, but have some concerns

Mt Pleasant Sea Scouts

21396

Generally support but have some concerns

Canterbury Windsports

21067

Support the plan

Groundswell (windsurf, kiteboard and stand up paddle)

21064

Support the plan

 

6.11    Park users and those with properties overlooking Scott Park are affected by this option, due to the minor disruption the physical works would have when construction starts and the views into the park from some properties opposite the park.

Themes from those who support the landscape plan

6.12    For those who indicated that they supported the draft landscape plan for Scott Park, the most common comments were about:

Type of comment

Submitter ID #

No. of comments

Greenspace areas

21057, 21713, 21065, 21094, 21445, 21675

6

Accessibility

21065, 21094

2

Project priorities

21713, 21075

2

Requests for additional items

21094, 21782

2

 

6.13    The common themes around supporting the draft landscape plan at Scott Park related to the greenspace areas, accessibility, project priorities and requests for additional items.   The project team comments in relation to these are as follows (where relevant).

Greenspace areas

6.14    There were six submitters who specifically commented on the greenspace areas.  Five of these comments relating to supporting the planting of trees to provide shade and to screen the buildings in the park and one comment related to ensuring that the height of any trees did not impede views into the park for properties overlooking the park.

“Planting of trees and picnic area is also encouraging people to utilise this space.  Look forward to the plans going ahead”.  Submitter # 21675.

The project team will contact specific property owners as we get to the detailed design stage of the project.  We are open to having discussions around making slight tweaks to planting locations where we are able to, but we also need to balance this with the needs of the wider community.

Accessibility

6.15    There were two submitters who made comments about the accessibility of the park.  One submitter thought it provided good cycle access and water access.  The other submitter also supported the beach extension to provide better water access.

“I like the new access points from the cycleway as Scott Park is currently challenging to access from the bridge end via bike”.  Submitter # 21065.

Project priorities

6.16    There were two submitters who commented that they would like the project priorities to be amended.  One would prefer that the car park and greenspace aspects were fully completed first and the access and improved sight lines were completed later.  The second submitter would like to see works to install a new toilet and wash down area to happen quickly.

“I think a permanent toilet and wash down area should be expedited”.  Submitter # 21713.

The building of the permanent toilet and wash down area is currently unfunded and subject to any available funding through the Council Long Term Plan.

Requests for additional items

6.17    There were two submitters who each requested that a playground is included in the design and one submitter requested that park signage is installed in the park.

“The picnic area near the toilet needs a small playground.  Playgrounds are super necessary to let parents relax”.  Submitter #21094.

Scott Park does not have enough space for a playground with the current use of the park or enough budget for this.  The closest park with a playground from Scott Park is King Park (with a see-saw, roundabout, slide and swings) on Rangatira Terrace in Mt Pleasant which is only a 10 minute walk away.  There is already adequate provision of play equipment in this area.

Themes from those who generally support the landscape plan, but have some concerns

6.18    For those who indicated that they generally supported the draft landscape plan for Scott Park, but had concerns, the most common comments were about:

Type of comment

Submitter ID #

No. of comments

Greenspace areas

21988, 21396, 21061, 21813, 21496, 22157, 21935

7

Requests for additional items

21988, 21779, 21323, 21061, 21813, 22157, 21935

7

Accessibility

21988, 21396, 21232, 21061

4

Toilets

21988, 21779, 21232

3

Parking

21323, 21813

2

 

6.19    The common themes from submitters who generally support the landscape plan, but have some concerns relate to the greenspace areas, requests for additional items, accessibility, the toilets and parking.   The project team comments in relation to these are as follows (where relevant).

Greenspace areas

6.20    There were seven submitters who specifically commented on the greenspace areas.  These comments related to support for the planting to discourage vandalism, low maintenance of native plantings, support for planting to progress around Penfold’s Cottage, requests for Pohutakawa trees for shade and colour, support for planting around the toilet building and other buildings to blend them into the park. 

There were also concerns raised from the Mount Pleasant Sea Scouts that some of the trees on the estuary side could be an issue for their boat rigging and launching space.

Two submitters were also concerned about the height of any trees blocking views of the estuary from their properties.

“The use of native plantings is to be commended, they grow well here and need little maintenance unlike exotics”.  Submitter # 21988.

We have amended the plan and moved the trees further out, in order to widen the gap to the boat ramp so that it does not interfere with the boat rigging and launching space for the Sea Scouts.

Requests for additional items

6.21    There were seven submitters who requested additional items to be added to the plan which included more picnic tables (two comments), a gas BBQ, a shelter (two comments), playground, more rubbish bins, a drinking fountain, restricted entry (two comments) and reinstatement of the petanque court.

“Prior to 2011 the site was home to a number of recreational users; yacht, bowls and petanque, now only boaties.  Suggest reinstating petanque court on the NE of no. 2 grassed are”.  Submitter # 22157.

Further picnic tables, seating, gas BBQ and shelters could be considered for the future if the need arises in the community.  However, this would be subject to future available funding.

There is already adequate provision of play equipment in this area. 

The Council has a rubbish-free parks initiative which involves increasing people’s awareness of their impact on the environment and encouraging them to reduce, reuse and recycle. 

Rubbish bins were removed in a number of parks across the city encouraging people to take responsibility for their own rubbish by taking it home for recycling. 

There is already a drinking fountain located in the park beside the temporary toilet block. 

We are unaware of any demand for petanque in Scott Park and there is not enough room to reinstate the petanque court.  There are more suitable parks in the area that would be more appropriate for a petanque court.

Accessibility

6.22    There were four comments relating to accessibility in the park.  These comments related to being supportive of the improved water access and access in general (two comments), a request for more access to the area between the public boat ramp and the scout den for water users, foot access from the bridge to the ramp being most important.

There were also concerns raised by the Mount Pleasant Sea Scouts about not having enough access to deep water for launching.

One submitter also had concerns that the draft plan gave cars priority over pedestrians when crossing the coastal pathway and suggested the inclusion of a zebra crossing.

“Foot access from the bridge traffic lights to the ramp is our first priority; would like to see the design before it is built”.  Submitter # 21061.

We have amended the plan to shorten the beach so that the western side of the ramp is clear, to ensure the Sea Scouts have access to deep water.

There were Give Way signs placed on the Coastal Pathway on either side of the entrance to Scott Par.  For safety reasons cyclists do need to give way to motorists at this location, and be aware of vehicle movements in and out of Scott Park.

Toilets

6.23    There were three submitters who commented on the need to replace the toilets more urgently.

“Also you need to replace the toilet.  It isn’t pretty”.  Submitter # 21779.

The building of the permanent toilet and wash down area is currently unfunded and subject to any available funding through the Council Long Term Plan.

Parking

6.24    There were two submitters who commented on the parking within the draft plan.  One submitter was concerned that the trailer parking would reduce the parking for single cars and another submitter wanted to see the parking area by the sea scouts building reduced as it is too close to houses.

“The parking lot by the Sea Scouts should be minimised because it is extremely close to residential area and nocturnal use of this area has been disturbing residents”.  Submitter # 21813.

The trailer parking is shared parking but designed for trailers, as it is more difficult for trailers to park elsewhere.  We have amended the landscape plan to also include some cycle stands near the toilet block.

  The car park by the Sea Scouts is already well used, so there is a need to supply an appropriate number of parks.

Themes from those who do not support the landscape plan

6.25    For the one submitter who indicated that they do not support the draft landscape plan for Scott Park, their comments relate to greenspace elements within the plan.  The need for more large trees (avenue of trees adjacent to the Main Road boundary), the unsuitability of the kowhai tree and the suggestion of including a Manna Gum instead.

The plan in development with the number of groups involved with the park had specific discussion regarding tree species, tree heights, maintenance requirements and locations of planting. Considerations were given to a number of non-native trees but these were discounted. A concern has been the height of many trees impeding the views of adjacent residents over the park, who have expressed concern in submissions about adverse impacts on their enjoyment of being able to look out over the estuary and park. We have attempted with our planting scheme to balance a community desire for more planting and trees, the concerns of adjacent residents, and the needs of the variety of users in the park.  A suggestion of larger trees along Main road may prevent the natural surveillance that currently occurs over the park, and larger specimens could create issues for infrastructure.

6.26    All submissions with names and addresses have been provided to the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board members.  All submissions with names but without address and contact details are available publicly online at https://cccgovtnz.cwp.govt.nz/the-council/consultations-and-submissions/haveyoursay/show/210

6.27    All submitters from this consultation (who provided contact details) have been advised of the results of the community feedback, the staff recommendation, the Community Board meeting details and how they can request to speak at the meeting if they wish to do so.  They were also provided with the updated landscape plan for Scott Park.

Changes made following consultation

6.28    The following changes have been made to the landscape plan following consultation:

·      New park signage has been included on the plan.

·      Cycle stands have been added to the plan (near the toilets).

·      The trees near the boat ramp have been moved out further, to create a wider gap to help with the launching of boats.

·      The beach has been shortened, so the western ramp is clear to ensure there is enough deep water for boat launching.

·      Security gates have been added to plan, however these are currently unfunded.


7.   Legal Implications

7.1      There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

7.2      This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

8.   Risks

8.1      There are no significant risks associated with the decisions of this report.

8.2      There is some risk associated with Option 2 that by constructing the more expensive car park as a priority, none, or very little, of the existing project budget will be available for planting of the park.  This would result in not addressing some of the primary issues raised about the current park with respect to shade trees and minimising the visual impact of buildings.  This option is more likely to negatively impact on Council’s Level of Service: 6.8.5.0 Satisfaction with the range and quality of recreation opportunities within parks - Resident satisfaction with range and quality of recreation facilities within Parks: = 85%.

8.2.1   This risk could be mitigated by seeking funding from other existing Council budgets and resources or additional budget for the next LTP.  The residual risk remains largely unchanged because of the uncertainty over seeking additional budget.

9.   Next Steps

9.1      The Community Board will hear any submitters who have indicated they wish to be heard at this decision making meeting. 

9.2      Following the Community Board decision on this report:

9.2.1   Submitters will be notified of the decision.

9.2.2   The priorities for expenditure of the project budget will be implemented at the park over the next 6 months.

9.2.3   Staff will investigate alternative funding alternatives and make recommendations as part of the next LTP process to enable the remaining works indicated in the approved landscape plan to be actioned.

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

10. Options Matrix

Issue Specific Criteria

Criteria

Option 1 – Eastern Carpark focus

Option 2 – Central Carpark focus

 

Financial Implications

Cost to Implement

$140,000 (project budget)

$772,000 all items implemented as per plan.

$140,000 (project budget)

$772,000 all items implemented as per plan.

 

Maintenance/Ongoing

$22,300 p.a. following implementation of existing budget up until further items are implemented. This is an increase of $4,300 p.a. over the existing maintenance cost for the park. This is currently unfunded in the parks maintenance budget and consequently will be absorbed to offset budget exposure

 

No difference between options once all items implemented - $33,000, this represents an increase of $15,000 over current maintenance cost for the park.

$18,800 p.a. following implementation of existing budget up until further items are implemented.  This is an increase of $790 over the existing maintenance cost for the park. This is currently unfunded in the parks maintenance budget and consequently will be absorbed to offset budget exposure

 

 

No difference between options once all items implemented - $33,000, this represents an increase of $15,000 over current maintenance cost for the park.

 

Funding Source

Current budget $140,000 - CPMS ID 39152

Current budget $140,000 - CPMS ID 39152

 

Impact on Rates

Capex = $632,000, but this figure could be up to $50,000 less if other existing budgets are able to be utilised (as yet unknown).

Opex = $15,000 p.a.

Capex = $632,000, but this figure could be up to $50,000 less if other existing budgets are able to be utilised (as yet unknown).

Opex = $15,000 p.a.

 

Criteria 1: Accessibility Impacts

Advantage for disabled and other users to have sealed pathways constructed to the coast and to the toilet.

Slight advantage for trailer parkers to have sealed car park.

 

Criteria 2: Social and Community Impacts

Very slight impact on ability to trailer park compared with Option 2.

Lesser area of the park able to be planted with the existing budget. This includes the picnic area (fewer shade trees) and a lesser amount of additional screen planting for the boat shed (less visual mitigation).

 

 

 

Statutory Criteria

Criteria

Option 1

Option 2

Option 3

Impact on Mana Whenua

No impact

No impact

 

Alignment to Council Plans & Policies

1.        Very slightly more consistent with Council’s Parks and Waterways Access Policy 2002 and Equity and access for people with disabilities Policy 2001 by allowing budget for the sealed pathway from the eastern car park to the shore.

Slightly more consistent with Council’s Biodiversity Strategy 2008 (planting more native trees).

Option 1 is slightly more consistent with the Main Rd Master Plan with respect to the provision of shade trees (more likely with this option in this short term).

Compared with Option 1, this option more likely to negatively impact on Council’s Level of Service: 6.8.5.0 Satisfaction with the range and quality of recreation opportunities within parks - Resident satisfaction with range and quality of recreation facilities within Parks: = 85%.

 

 

·  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Scott Park landscape plan for approval

34

b

Scott Park Working party landscape plan objectives

35

c

Scott Park consultation leaflet

36

d

Scott Park submission form

38

e

Map of all submissions for Scott Park

40

f

Map of all submissions from Ferrymead area on Scott Park

41

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Tara King - Senior Engagement Advisor

Eric Banks - Senior Network Planner Parks

Josh Neville - Planner - Urban Regeneration

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizen and Community

Carolyn Ingles - Head of Urban Regeneration, Design and Heritage

Brendan Anstiss - General Manager Strategy and Transformation

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

8.     Delegation of sign off of Main Contract for Linwood Pool to Chief Executive

Reference:

19/319187

Presenter(s):

Kent Summerfield – Senior Project Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Council to approve delegation of execution of the main contract for the Linwood Pool to the Council’s Chief Executive.

2.   Executive Summary

2.1      The Council have included funding allowances for the development of a Linwood Pool within the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan as updated by the 2018-2019 Annual Plan.

2.2      At their meeting of 16 May 2018 the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board resolved (under resolution LCHB/2018/00065) to :

1.    Approve 141 Smith Street as the site for the Linwood Pool facility.

2.    Approve staff proceeding with procurement and development of a concept design for the Linwood Pool facility.

2.3      Staff have been proceeding in line with the resolutions in 2.2, and in response to consistent stakeholder feedback seeking earliest delivery of the facility possible, are exploring all options to accelerate the programme.

2.4      Execution of the Main Contract is a critical path activity i.e. any delay to this item will directly result in a delay to the end date of the project.  Currently delegation for executing the Main Contract sits with Council (as the value is anticipated to exceed $15m).

2.5      If Council were to delegate sign off of the Main Contract to the Chief Executive it would significantly expedite completion of this item and therefore assist in meeting stakeholder expectations around timeline.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Recommend to the Council that delegation for sign off of the Main Contract for the Linwood Pool be delegated to the Chief Executive, subject to that execution being consistent with capital and operational provision for the Linwood Pool within the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan as updated by the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan.

 

4.   Context/Background

Issue or Opportunity

4.1      Execution of the Main Contract is a critical path activity within the Linwood Pool project i.e. any delay to this item will directly result in a delay to the end date of the project.  Currently delegation for executing the Main Contract sits with the Council (as the value is anticipated to exceed $15m).

4.2      If Council were to delegate sign off of the Main Contract to the Chief Executive it would significantly expedite completion of this item and therefore assist in meeting stakeholder expectations around timeline.

Strategic Alignment

4.3      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

4.3.1   Activity: Recreation, Sport, Community Arts & Events

·      Level of Service: 7.0.1.1 Provide citizens access to fit-for-purpose recreation and sporting facilities - 8 outdoor pools and 8 paddling pools are open seasonally.

Decision Making Authority

4.4      With the value of the Main (Design & Build) Contract for Linwood Pool expected to exceed $15 million, delegation for its approval sits with the Council itself under Council’s policy.  Recommendation is sought from the Community Board that specific approval for this item be delegated from the Council to the Council Chief Executive.

Previous Decisions

4.5      No specific decisions relating to this delegation have been made previously, although in Resolution CNCL/2018/00049 which delegated decision making on site selection and final Concept to the Community Board it was noted that financial delegation relating to executing the main build contract remained with Council.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

4.6      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4.7      The low level of significance reflects that the decision relates only to the sign off of the Contract and does not otherwise impact Project Stakeholders.

 

5.   Options Analysis

Options Considered

5.1      The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

·   Option 1 (preferred) - Sign off of Main Contract delegated to Chief Executive.

·   Option 2 – Council retain delegation for sign off of Main Contract.

 

Options Descriptions

5.2      Preferred Option:  Sign off of Main Contract delegated to Chief Executive.

5.2.1   Option Description: Under this option Council would delegate sign off of the Main (Design & Build) Contract for Linwood Pool to the Council Chief Executive.

5.2.2   Option Advantages

·      If Council were to delegate sign off of the Main Contract to the Chief Executive it would significantly expedite completion of this item and therefore assist in meeting stakeholder expectations around timeline.

5.2.3   Option Disadvantages

·      Council would no longer see the Contract prior to its execution although the execution would still need to consistent with capital and operational provision for the Linwood Pool within the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan as updated by the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan.

5.3      Option 2: Council retain delegation for sign off of Main Contract.

5.3.1   Option Advantages

·      Council retain ownership of this item.

5.3.2   Option Disadvantages

·      Timeframes involved in the decision making process would significantly extend the overall project programme as sign off is a critical path item.

Analysis Criteria

5.4      The sole criteria used to assess preference in this instance is the respective timeline impact of the two options.  Depending on exact timing it is estimated that retaining delegation of this decision could add six to eight weeks to the project programme.

6.   Community Views and Preferences

6.1      While this matter has not been discussed with the community it is expected that they would support delegation of the Main Contract sign off to the Chief Executive as they have repeatedly expressed a desire to see the project programme accelerated wherever possible.

7.   Legal Implications

7.1      There not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision

7.2      This report has been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

8.   Risks

8.1      There are not significant risks associated with the decision in this report.  Regardless of which party holds delegation, sign off of the Main Contract will be subject to remaining consistent with capital and operational provision for the Linwood Pool within the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan as updated by the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan, and the same level of information would be provided to prove that consistency.

9.   Next Steps

9.1      Once a Concept Design is approved by the Waikura/Linwood Central Heathcote Community Board, the Request for Proposal package will be completed and released to the shortlist of candidates, and ultimately a preferred tenderer identified.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Kent Summerfield - Senior Project Manager

Approved By

Alistair Pearson - Manager Capital Delivery Major Facilities

Michael Down - Finance Business Partner

Nigel Cox - Head of Recreation, Sports & Events

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizen and Community

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

9.     Madras Purchas Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

19/327975

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy, Traffic Engineer – Traffic Operations Team
Peter Rodgers, Traffic Engineer – Traffic Operations Team
Stephen Wright, Senior Traffic Engineer – Traffic Operations Team

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider options to improve visibility at the intersection of Madras Street and Purchas Street.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approve that under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the parts of Madras Street and Purchas Street as indicated in the attached drawing TG133712 Issue 1, dated 18/2/2019.

2.        Revoke any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report.

3.        Approve that these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

3.   Key Points

3.1      This recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

3.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·      Option 2 - Do Nothing

3.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

3.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Madras/ Purchas Streets intersection.

3.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Removes up to eight car parking spaces.

 

4.   Context/Background

Issue

4.1      Safety concerns have been raised regarding the intersection of Madras Street and Purchas Street due to restricted visibility caused by on street parking close to the intersection. Madras Street and Purchas Street form a Stop Controlled cross-road, with priority given to Madras  Street.

4.2      There have been 17 reported crashes at the intersection over the last five years. 

4.3      Stop signs were recently upgraded to a larger size to highlight the presence of the intersection from the Purchas Street approaches. 

4.4      Visibility can be limited by parked vehicles on Madras Street.  There are high parking demands in the area due to multiple city living dwellings with limited off street parking.   During site investigations it was identified that there is sufficient parking in the general vicinity of the intersection to accommodate displacement of vehicles resulting from the installation of No Stopping restrictions. 

4.5      Consultation was carried out in February 2019 with affected owners and residents, there was one submission received back which was in full support of the proposal.

Strategic Alignment

4.6      Council’s strategic priorities have been considered in formulating the recommendations in this report, however this area of work is not specifically covered by an identified priority.

4.7      The recommendations in this report will help to achieve the desired community outcome of a well-connected and accessible city through improved road safety.

4.8      The recommendations in this report are also consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)  

Decision Making Authority

4.9      Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

4.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

4.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

4.12    The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

4.13    The level of significance was determined by the low level of impact and low number of people affected by the recommended decision

4.14    The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment

5.   Options Analysis

Options Considered

5.1      The following reasonably practicable options were considered and are assessed in this report:

·   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option).

·   Option 2 - Do Nothing.

5.2      More comprehensive options are outside the scope of this assessment.  Option 1 is an interim measure until long term investigations into this intersection have been completed. The CNC Downstream Effects Management project is at public consultation until 15 April 2019.  It is not been decided if improvements to this intersection are within the scope of this project at the present time.   

Options Descriptions

5.1      Option One: Preferred Option:  Install No Stopping Restrictions.

5.1.1   Option Description: Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with Attachment A.  The length of No Stopping in this option is the minimum length needed to provide Minimum Gap Sight Distance, allowing a driver entering the intersection sufficient visibility of approaching traffic to make the desired turn safely. 

5.1.2   Option Advantages

·      Meets appropriate sight distance standards. 

·      Addresses community concerns over the lack of visibility at the intersection.

·      Supports a reduction in crashes at the intersection. 

5.1.3   Option Disadvantages

·      Removes eight unrestricted car parking spaces.

5.2      Option Two: Do Nothing 

5.2.1   Option Description: Do not change traffic management at intersection.  This option will not meet Council’s adopted sight distance requirement. 

5.2.2   Option Advantages

·      There is no impact on unrestricted on-street parking.

5.2.3   Option Disadvantages

·      Does not meet Council’s adopted sight distance requirement.

·      Does not address community concerns over the lack of visibility at the intersection.

·      Does not support improved road safety at the intersection. 

Analysis Criteria

5.3      Options within this report have been assessed against:

·   Complying with the sight distance requirements of Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard. 

·   Improving safety at the intersection. 

Options Considerations

5.4      The “Do Nothing” option is inconsistent with the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard:

5.4.1   Inconsistency – Adequate sight distance at an intersection must be provided as sight distance is fundamental to safe intersection design. 

5.4.2   Reason for inconsistency – The intersection configuration allows vehicles to park within the sight line envelope which happens frequently due to high parking demands in the area. 

5.4.3   Amendment necessary – Install No Stopping restrictions in accordance with the preferred option.

6.   Community Views and Preferences

6.1      Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by way of letter drop and all absentee owners were informed post.

6.2      One response to the consultation was received, supporting the preferred option. 

6.3      The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports the preferred option.

7.   Legal Implications

7.1      There is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

7.2      This specific report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit however the report has been written using a general approach previously approved of by the Legal Services Unit, and the recommendations are consistent with the policy and legislative framework.

8.   Next Steps

8.1      Approval is required by the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board.

8.2      If approved, the recommendations will be implemented approximately four weeks after the contractor receives the request.


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

9.   Options Matrix

Issue Specific Criteria

Criteria

Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions

Option 2 – Do Nothing

Financial Implications

Cost to Implement

$300 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

$750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

Maintenance/Ongoing

Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

$0

Funding Source

Traffic Operations Budget.

Existing staff budgets

Impact on Rates

No impact

No impact

Road Safety

Supports improvement to road safety in a location with a high crash rate (17 reported crashes in the last five years)

No impact

Intersection sight distance

Minimum gap sight distance provided

Non-compliant sight distance

Community Preferences

Supports community aspirations for improved safety and sight lines

Does not support community aspirations

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

TG133712 Madras Purchas No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

54

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Peter Rodgers - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

10.  Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board's 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund - 2018/19 Youth Development Fund

Reference:

19/410095

Presenter(s):

Diana Saxton, Community Recreation Adviser

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

00059274

Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2018/19 Youth Development Fund

$3,000

$3,000

 

1.2      There is currently a balance of $67,355 remaining in the fund

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approves a grant of $3,000 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to the 2018/19 Youth Development Fund.

3.   Key Points

Issue or Opportunity

3.1      This report is staff generated as a result of the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board – Youth Development Fund having insufficient funds to meet requests for grants up until 30 June 2019.

Strategic Alignment

3.2      Investing in our youth to develop leadership, cultural competence and success in their chosen field builds the capacity of our city’s youth, our future adults. In doing so we increase the likelihood of these youths contributing to developing a vibrant, prosperous and sustainable 21st century city; one of the council’s six Strategic Priorities. The recommendations contained in this report are based on this principle.

Decision Making Authority

3.3      The Community Board has the delegated authority to determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community

3.3.1   Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.3.2   The Fund does not cover:

·      Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·      Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

3.4      The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.5      The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.6      Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion

3.7      At the time of writing, the balance of the 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2018/19

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$141,336

$73,981

$67,355

$64,355

 

3.8      Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

3.9      The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Youth Development Fund Decision Matrix

57

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Diana Saxton - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

11.  Application to Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Comunity Board 2018/19 Youth Development Fund - Various

Reference:

19/406144

Presenter(s):

Sol Smith, Community Development Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application(s) received for funding from its 2018/19Youth Development Fund.

1.2      This report is to assist the Board to consider an application(s) of funding from William Kao.

1.3      There is currently a balance of $1,100 remaining in this fund.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to William Kao towards Chisnallwood Intermediate Graduate Jazz Band Trip to Music in the Summer Air – Shanghai Youth Summer Music Camp 2019.

3.   Key Points

Issue or Opportunity

3.1      To support funding for a group of youth to attend a Summer Music Camp.

Strategic Alignment

3.2      Investing in our youth to develop leadership, cultural competence and success in their chosen field builds the capacity of our city’s youth, our future adults. In doing so we increase the likelihood of these youths contributing to developing a vibrant, prosperous and sustainable 21st century city; one of the council’s six Strategic Priorities. The recommendations contained in this report are based on this principle.

Decision Making Authority

3.3      Determine the allocation of the discretionary Response Fund for each community (including any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).

3.4      Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.5      The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

3.6      The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.7      The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.8      Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4.   Applicant – William Benjamin Kao

4.1      Age: 13

4.2      School: Chisnallwood Intermediate

4.3      Suburb: Wainoni

4.4      Event seeking support for: MISA (Music in the Summer Air) Shanghai Youth Summer Music Camp 2019 will take place from 5 to 14 July 2019.

4.5      William Kao is a Year 9 student at Burnside High School. William along with other former students of Chisnallwood  have been invited to take part in the Chisnallwood Intermediate Graduate Jazz Band Trip to MISA (Music in the Summer Air) Shanghai Youth Summer Music Camp 2019 will take place from 5 to 14 July 2019. Current and former students of Chisnallwood Intermediate were offered an opportunity to take part in a Jazz Band students to attend the Summer Music Camp. The Chisnallwood Graduate Band has been created for this trip. The students invited to take part perform at very high standard. Students will rehearse and perform at a number of concerts as both the Chisnallwood Graduate Band and as part of an international combined band. William will have the opportunity to attend workshops, collaborate with other International music groups and explore the food, language and culture of China. Current and graduate students were invited to attend by the schools musical director. Musicians were selected according to their proficiency of specific instruments required to make up the group. This trip will allow William to experience overseas travel unaided by parents, form lifelong friendships with groups and individuals of other countries, collaboration with other musicians around the globe, cultural experiences including food, customs and climates. William plays multiple instruments including trombone, piano, saxophone, cello and guitar. He has undertaken many fundraising opportunities for the trip. These events include Sausage Sizzles, Concerts, Car Wash, Musical Bingo and Raffles.

4.6      The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for William:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares, transfers, insurance, visa

$1,957.23

Accommodation - 9 nights (dinner, bed and breakfast)

$350.00

Tournament expenses (entry fee, accreditation, training hall etc)

$600.00

Miscellaneous

$100.00

Total

$3,007.23

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Sol Smith - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

12.  Application to 2018/19 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Youth Development Fund - Various

Reference:

19/409729

Presenter(s):

Diana Saxton, Community Recreation Adviser

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider applications received for funding from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund.

1.2      This report is to assist the Board to consider applications of funding from Caitlin Rosalie Rodgers Sadler, Zachary James Andrews and Katelyn Louise Huata-Chapman.

1.3      There is currently a balance of $1,100 remaining in this fund.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Caitlin Rosalie Rodgers Sadler towards competing in the International Korfball Federation U21 Asia Oceania Championship, May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

2.        Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Zachary James Andrews towards competing in the International Korfball Federation U21 Asia Oceania Championship, May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

3.        Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Katelyn Louise Huata-Chapman towards competing in the International Korfball Federation U21 Asia Oceania Championship, May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

3.   Key Points

Strategic Alignment

3.1      Investing in our youth to develop leadership, cultural competence and success in their chosen field builds the capacity of our city’s youth, our future adults. In doing so we increase the likelihood of these youths contributing to developing a vibrant, prosperous and sustainable 21st century city; one of the council’s six Strategic Priorities. The recommendations contained in this report are based on this principle.

Decision Making Authority

3.2      Determine the allocation of the discretionary Response Fund for each community (including any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).

3.3      Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council

3.4      The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

3.5      The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.6      The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.7      Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4.   Applicant 1 – Caitlin Rosalie Rodger Sadler

4.1      Age: 16

4.2      School: Year 13, Avonside Girls High School

4.3      Suburb: Woolston

4.4      Event seeking support for: International Korfball Federation (IKF) U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

4.5      Caitlin has been selected for the NZ U21 Korfball Squad to travel to compete in the IKF U21 Asia Oceania Championship in May 2019. She has been playing Korfball since 2016 and attends training on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday each week.  Caitlin was successful in making the NZ U17 travelling squad that went to the Netherlands last year and her passion for the sport continues to grow with training, competition and the opportunity to play overseas. In winter, Caitlin plays netball for her school in the Senior A netball team and she also coaches the Year 9 B team.  She also plays korfball for school, referees games and coaches teams.  In winter, Caitlin plays korfball in the winter league competition which is made up of five teams. Last year Caitlin was a finalist in the Zonta Sports Award for Outstanding individual achievement by a young sportswoman specialising in one sport and this year she is an ambassador for the Forward Foundation that promotes leadership in girls through sport. Next year, Caitlin plans to take a gap year and travel to the Netherlands to play lots of korfball and to travel around Europe.  She would then like to go onto university to study sport coaching. She is keen to encourage more people to play korfball and likes the way both men and women work together to score a goal and win the game. Travelling to China is going to be a valuable experience as it will give each player the opportunity to improve as players and as a team as the competition will be more challenging than what is available in NZ. This will also be useful for Caitlin in her coaching role of younger players when she returns to Christchurch. Caitlin has been raising funds for the trip by marshalling at City to Surf and Weetbix triathlon, selling bacon and doing odd jobs for family and friends. Caitlin received a grant from the 2017/18 Linwood-Central- Heathcote Community Fund to attend the U17 Korfball World Cup in the Netherlands in 2018.

4.6      The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Caitlin Rosalie Sadler to attend the IKF U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares, transfers, insurance, visa

2,075.00

Accommodation - 9 nights (dinner, bed and breakfast)

1,156.31

Tournament expenses (entry fee, accreditation, training hall etc)

156.25

Team costs (uniform, recovery protocols, incidentals, extra daily meal)

562.00

Total

$3,962.50

5.   Applicant 2 – Zachary James Andrews

5.1      Age: 17

5.2      School: Year 13, Shirley Boys High School

5.3      Suburb: Woolston

5.4      Event seeking support for: International Korfball Federation (IKF) U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

5.5      Zachary has been selected for the NZ U21 Korfball Squad to compete in the IKF U21 Asia Oceania Championship in May 2019. He has been playing korfball for over two years and trains four times a week. This will be the second time Zachary has represented NZ in Korfball. Zachary is looking forward to competing in the tournament as it is an opportunity to qualify for the 2020 U21 Korfball World Cup in Taiwan. He also feels it helps endorse the sport which is still in its early stage of development in NZ and hopes it will encourage more people to play and enjoy the sport of korfball.  Zachary also enjoys going to the gym and playing rugby for the first fifteen.  He has been fundraising for the trip by having a part time job at Countdown and selling pies. Zachary received a grant from the 2017/18 Linwood-Central- Heathcote Community Fund to attend the U17 Korfball World Cup in the Netherlands in 2018.

5.6      The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Zachary James Andrews to attend the IKF U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares, transfers, insurance, visa

2,075.00

Accommodation - 9 nights (dinner, bed and breakfast)

1,156.31

Tournament expenses (entry fee, accreditation, training hall etc)

156.25

Team costs (uniform, recovery protocols, incidentals, extra daily meal)

562.00

Total

$3,962.50

6.   Applicant 3 – Katelyn Louise Huata-Chapman

6.1      Age: 16

6.2      School: Year 12, Avonside Girls High School

6.3      Suburb: Linwood

6.4      Event seeking support for: International Korfball Federation (IKF) U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China.

6.5      Katelyn has been playing korfball for three years and trains four times a week. She is a dedicated and talented sportswoman playing multiple sports at a highly competitive level including korfball, softball and netball. Katelyn was selected to compete in the U17 Korfball World Cup in the Netherlands in 2018 but due to financial circumstances it was not possible for her to attend. This year her whanau have all rallied together to enable Katelyn to realise her dreams and Katelyn is also working intensely over the holidays to raise funds towards the cost of the trip. This will be a trip of a lifetime for Katelyn as she wants to continue to develop her skills, excel in her chosen sport, continue to represent NZ, and use her success in sport to open up further education and career opportunities.

6.6      The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Katelyn Louise Huata-Chapman to attend the IKF U21 Asia Oceania Championship, 20 to 25th May 2019 in Shaoxing, China:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares, transfers, insurance, visa

2,075.00

Accommodation - 9 nights (dinner, bed and breakfast)

1,156.31

Tournament expenses (entry fee, accreditation, training hall etc)

156.25

Team costs (uniform, recovery protocols, incidentals, extra daily meal)

562.00

Total

$3,962.50

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Diana Saxton - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

13.  Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report - May 2019

Reference:

19/261276

Presenter(s):

Arohanui Grace, Community Governance Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This report provides information on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area, to provide the Board with a strategic overview and inform sound decision making.

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.        Receive the Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report for May 2019.

2.        Consider items for inclusion for the Board Report to the Council’s 11 April 2019 meeting.

3.        Consider items for inclusion in the Board April 2019 Newsletter.

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1      Memos/Information/Advice to the Board

3.1.1   Proposed Changes to the District Plan Port Hills Slope Instability Overlays – Staff are working on proposed amendments to the Christchurch District Plan to amend the Port Hills slope instability overlays.  A joint seminar with Spreydon-Heathcote Community Board is to be held in May 2019.  A memorandum is attached.  (Attachment A)

3.1.2   Proposed Doris Lusk Park Children’s Interactive Play Art – at the Board’s 17 October 2018 meeting the Board request:

Request staff advice on the costings of the proposed Doris Lusk Park children’s interactive play art.

Staff advice is attached. (Attachment B)

3.2      Board area Consultations/Engagement/Submission opportunities

3.2.1   The following consultations are open to the community within the Community Board Area:

Central City Transport Project – Victoria Street Upgrade

18 April – 27 May 2019

Bays Area Skate and Scooter Park Design Ideas

18 April – 20 May 2019

 

3.3      Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.3.1   The following link outlines the recommendations that were adopted in the Long Term Plan 2018-2028: http://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2018/06/CLTP_20180622_MIN_2843_AT.PDF.

3.4      Board Reporting

3.4.1   Members are invited to suggest items for inclusion in the Board Newsletter.

3.4.2   Members are invited to suggest items for inclusion in the Board Report to the Council.

4.   Community Board Plan – Update against Outcomes

4.1      Ōpāwaho to Ihutai (Ōpāwa to Ferrymead Bridge) – A community workshop was held on Tuesday 30 April at the Ōpāwa Baptist Church.

5.   Significant Council Projects in the Board Area

5.1      Strengthening Community Fund Projects

5.1.1   The 2019-20 Strengthening Communities Fund opened for applications on 4 March 2019 and closed at midnight on Tuesday 9 April 2019.

Over 600 stakeholders in the Board’s area were sent notification about the funding round along with an invitation to attend a drop-in session held on Monday 18 March 2019.  This included every organisation that has received funding from the Community Board over the past six years. 

5.1.2   Staff have also been following up on offers to meet or speak with organisations individually and have met with over 40 organisations over the past few weeks.

5.1.3   Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund Grants Summary End of Project Report - An accountability report for the 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund has been compiled. 

End of project reports have been received for most of the 51 organisations funded.  The report has been made available to Board members, on the Hub.  Organisations that have not yet submitted their reports are being followed up. 

5.2      Community Facilities (updates and future plans)

5.2.1   Risingholme Opening – After earthquake and fire damage repairs Risingholme will be reopened by the Mayor on 5 June 2019 with a community open day to be held on Saturday 8 June 2019.

5.3      Infrastructure projects underway

5.3.1   The Infrastructure Projects within the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board March 2019 update is attached.  (Attachment C)

6.   Significant Community Issues, Events and Projects in the Board Area

6.1      The Christchurch Documentary Project: Woolston 2019 - Christchurch City Libraries in collaboration with the University of Canterbury are creating a photographic portrait of Woolston.

6.1.1   The Christchurch Documentary Project is a contemporary photographic archive produced in collaboration with Christchurch City Libraries and the University of Canterbury, School of Fine Arts.  Beginning with Halswell in 2015, The Christchurch Documentary Project set out to create a documentary photographic record of communities across our city.  Find out more about this project and past projects at https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/the-christchurch-documentary-project/

6.1.2   From March through to September, three photography students, Lucinda Webber, Annabelle Johnston and Victor Wu are photographing the Woolston community. The final collection of images will be available on the Christchurch City libraries website from mid-November and an accompanying exhibition will be displayed at a venue in Woolston from mid-November through December.

6.2      Events Report Back

6.2.1   Linwood Youth Festival Experience (LYFE) celebrating 21 years of LYFE was held on 9 March. The coordinator, youth crew and LYFE Advisory Group with support from Council staff have assessed how the event went according to the guidelines and objectives for this project. Representatives from the LYFE crew and the LYFE Advisory Group will present their findings to the Board to share these results and to foster links with the Board.  LYFE is also being reviewed by an external contractor with the aim of providing direction to the Community Board for future decision making.

6.2.2   Linwood College had a very successful ‘leaving Linwood High/College’ on the 5th and 6th of April.

6.2.3   Nature Play Workshops and Pop Up Nature Play - two workshops were held, one for staff at te Waka Unua and one for early childhood educators and OSCAR programme providers.  Approximately 20 teachers attended from Te Waka Unua and the second workshop had 30 attendees.  Feedback was very positive with increased confidence by attendees to facilitate child led nature play and learning through outdoor play.  Increased awareness and use of Te Waikura Oranga is also being encouraged with twelve days of pop up nature play with some supervision and additional loose parts. This inaugural initiative has been well received with particular interest from the early childhood sector, Te Waka Unua primary school and Woolston Development Project OSCAR programme.

7.   Updates from Other Units

7.1      Parks Update

7.1.1   Winter sports turf maintenance commences this month.

7.1.2   The Metrological Office has predicted cool to warm temperatures ranging from low to high teens, with increasing rainfall.  It is typical at this time of year that growth rates decrease region wide. As there has been differing weather patterns in the last 12 months, this cannot be entirely counted on.

7.1.3   Contract key performance: Recreational Services

April 2019 - Quality: 90%

7.1.4   Breakdown of KPI scores by activity

7.1.5   Current Maintenance Programme:

Scheduled Parks Maintenance Programme for April 2019:

Activity

Frequency per month

Ornamental Mowing

2

Amenity Mowing

2

Informal Mowing

1

Winter Sport Mowing

5

Winter Cricket Block Maintenance

2

Winter Sport Line Marking

3

Chemical Weed Control

1

Ornamental Garden Maintenance

2

BBQ Clean

4

Drinking Fountain Clean

4

 

Scheduled Parks Maintenance Programme for May 2019:

Activity

Frequency per month

Ornamental Mowing

2

Amenity Mowing

2

Informal Mowing

0

Summer Sport Mowing

4

Cricket Block Maintenance

2

Summer Sport Line Marking

3

Chemical Weed Control

1

Ornamental Garden Maintenance

2

BBQ Clean

2

Drinking Fountain Clean

4

 

ANZAC Day:

Focus is being given to the preparation of service sites across the city with ANZAC Day upcoming, including Ruru Lawn and Bromley Cemeteries. The bulk of work is expected to be completed NLT 18 Apr 19, with touch up works completed next week.

 

15 March 2019 Event:

This event saw a significant number of internments at Memorial Park Cemetery. Due to the nature of this incident, improvements have been made to the Muslim section of the cemetery. This includes garden clean ups, re planting, mulching and a change in classification from garden amenity to garden ornamental. This means a higher maintenance specification for the gardens.

8.   Community Board Funding Update

8.1      Discretionary Response Fund unallocated balance for 2018/19 is $67,355.

8.2      Youth Development Fund unallocated balance for 2018/19 is $1,100.

8.3      Light Bulb Moments Fund unallocated balance for 2018/19 is $1,320.

8.4      The 2018/19 Discretionary Response Funding Spreadsheet is attached. (Attachment D).

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Proposed changes to the District Plan – Port Hills Slope Instability Overlays - March 2019

72

b

Proposed Doris Lusk Park Children's Interactive Play Art - April 2019

74

c

Linwood -Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Infrastructure Council Projects Underway - March 2019

75

d

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Discretionary Response Fund 2018-2019

79

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Amanda Black - Support Officer

Bruce Coleman - Community Development Advisor

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

Diana Saxton - Community Recreation Advisor

Sol Smith - Community Development Advisor

Tracey Waho-Blayney - Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance Team

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

PDF Creator 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

14.   Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 


Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

15.   Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

            (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

            (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

06 May 2019

 

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

16

Waikura/Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board: Consideration of Community Servce Awards 2018/19

s7(2)(a)

Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons

Personal details of nominees and nominators are included in the report

Hosting of the Community Service Awards Function