Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An Ordinary Meeting of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                    Tuesday 12 March 2019

Time:                                   4.30pm

Venue:                                 Hao Room, Te Hāpua: Halswell Centre
341 Halswell Road, Halswell

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Vicki Buck

Jimmy Chen

Catherine Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie Mora

 

 

6 March 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew Pratt

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 5428

matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board – Community Board Plan 2017-2019

 

Community Outcomes and Priorities

 

1.        Strong Communities

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

1.1          A range of social and recreational initiatives which build and develop community wellbeing.

1.2          Culturally inclusive and celebrates diversity.

   

Our Board Priorities are to:

Community

1.3          Support and encourage the involvement of children and young people in all aspects of community life including decision making.

1.4          Support and advocate for initiatives that address poverty issues and improve the well-being of families and individuals.  

1.5          Support and advocate for activities for older adults in the ward to reduce social isolation.

1.6          Advocate for culturally inclusive practices, where diversity is supported. 

1.7          Consider disability access across all projects.

1.8          Ensure partnerships are created and strengthened with community organisations, schools and the University of Canterbury.

1.9          Foster the development of leadership and celebrate this across the wards.  

Community Board Engagement

1.10       Advocate for the promotion and accessibility of the Community Board and its members so as to enhance more active participation and transparency in the Board’s decision-making.

1.11       Supporting and enabling consultation to gain clear views from the community.

Social Wellbeing

1.12       Advocate for safe, well-run and attractive social housing and strategies that reduce homelessness in the city. 

1.13       Support the creation of safe, accessible and connected places for people to meet in the community.

1.14       Support local events and activities that bring communities together.  

1.15       Support innovative projects that enhance social wellbeing.

 

2.        Liveable City

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

2.1       Residents feel safe in their communities and neighbourhoods.

2.2       Residents have ready access to parks and greenspace for recreational facilities and activities.

2.3       The cultural, natural and built heritage is acknowledged, valued and enhanced.

2.4       Children are provided with fun and safe environments.

2.5       Community facilities are provided that meet the needs of communities. 

2.6       A safe, efficient and sustainable transport and local roading network.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

Roading and Transport

2.7       Work with schools and community groups to ensure safe crossings and road networks near schools and along key transit routes. 

2.8       Support public transport and cycling initiatives that promote increased usage.

Planning

2.9       Advocate for improvements to parks, greenspace and recreational facilities. 

2.10    Advocate for the protection of the quality of residential living. 

2.11    Monitor the issues of green field subdivisions and increasing intensification across the ward. 

2.12    Advocate for the community facing the challenges of growth. 

2.13    Advocate and make decisions on effective traffic management measures that contribute to meeting the needs and connectivity of local communities.

2.14    Monitor planning issues and support community concerns through appropriate channels.

Community Facilities and Playgrounds 

2.15    Ensure the new Riccarton Community Centre and the Hornby Library and Customer Services and South West Leisure Centre meet the needs of the community.

2.16    Advocate for the timely provision of local facilities to meet the needs of growing local communities.

2.17    Ensure that usage of Council facilities is being optimised.

2.18    Advocate for the provision of quality playgrounds throughout the wards. 

Heritage

2.19    Support and advocate for the enhancement and protection of local heritage assets.

  

3.        Healthy Environment

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

3.1       A commitment to protect and improve the local environment.

3.2       Climate change and environmental sustainability is considered by the Community Board in its decision making, including for all new facilities.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

3.3       Support and advocate to maintain clean drinking water and high standards of air quality.

3.4       Monitor pollution issues, quarrying effects and compliance of consents. 

3.5       Support local communities on land use, and air and water quality issues and where appropriate, advocate for and represent any community concerns arising.

3.6       Monitor and respond on parks and tree issues raised by the community.

3.7       Encourage and support the implementation of local sustainable greenspace use initiatives, for example, food forests and community gardens.

3.8       Support and advocate for initiatives aimed at addressing climate change. 

 

4.        Prosperous Economy

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

4.1       Strong local business communities.

4.2       An environment where innovative projects are trialled and supported.

4.3       Has a strong social enterprise sector.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

4.4       Continue to liaise with local business networks.

4.5       Support initiatives that promote a wide range of innovative practices. 

4.6       Foster social enterprise initiatives. 

4.7       Advocate for Council rate increases to be kept as low as possible.   

4.8       Support the provision of more affordable and social housing. 

 

 

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C          1.        Apologies................................................................................................. 6

B         2.        Declarations of Interest.............................................................................. 6

C          3.        Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................. 6

B         4.        Public Forum............................................................................................ 6

B         5.        Deputations by Appointment....................................................................... 6

B         6.        Presentation of Petitions............................................................................ 6

Staff Reports

C          7.        West Broken Run Reserve - Landscape Plan.................................................. 15

C          8.        Kennedys Landing Subdivision, Halswell Ward - Proposed Road Names............ 33

C          9.        Yaldhurst Park Subdivision, Hornby Ward - Proposed Road Names................... 55

C          10.      Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Application - Anna Taylor................................................................. 61

C          11.      Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund - Application - SHARP Trust.................................................. 65

 

B         12.      Elected Members’ Information Exchange..................................................... 68 

 

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

1.   Apologies

An apology for absence from Catherine Chu.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday 26 February 2019,  be confirmed (refer page 7).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes is available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

The public forum will be held at 4.30pm.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

 

Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                    Tuesday 26 February 2019

Time:                                   4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Jimmy Chen

Catherine Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie Mora

 

 

26 February 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew Pratt

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 5428

matthew.pratt@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Part A           Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B           Reports for Information

Part C           Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00018

That the apologies from Vicki Buck for absence, and for early departure from Debbie Mora, Catherine Chu and Jimmy Chen, be received.

 

Mike Mora/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                               Carried

 

Vicki Buck joined the meeting by arranged audio link for the Board’s consideration of  Item 7, Hornby Library, Customer Services and South West Leisure Centre – Reserves  Act Process..

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00019

That the minutes of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Wednesday 13 February 2019, be confirmed.

Ross McFarlane/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                    Carried

4.   Public Forum

Part B

There were no public forum presentations.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

Vicki Buck joined the meeting via audio link at 4.32pm.

 

7.   Hornby Library, Customer Services, and South West Leisure Centre - Reserve Act Processes

 

Staff and a representative from Tonkin and Taylor in attendance, spoke to the accompanying report and responded to questions from members.

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board, acting under the delegated authority of the Christchurch City Council, resolves as follows:

1.         To commence the process under section 24(1)(b) of the Reserves Act 1977 to change the classification of part of Kyle Park, being part of Lot 1 DP78681 as shown outlined in yellow and marked "A" on Attachment A to the staff report from which this resolution emanates, from 'Recreation Reserve' to 'Local Purpose (Community Buildings) Reserve', and to publicly notify the proposed change in accordance with section 24(2) of the Reserves Act 1977.

2.         To approve the draft non-comprehensive review of the Kyle Park Management Plan in the form attached to the staff report from which this resolution comes, and; 

3.         To not follow the procedures in s41(5) and s41(6) of the Reserves Act 1977; and

4.         To approve the release of the draft changes to the Kyle Park Management Plan for public consultation for a period of not less than one month.

 

Community Board Recommendation

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board, acting under the delegated authority of the Christchurch City Council, resolves as follows:

1.         To commence the process under section 24(1)(b) of the Reserves Act 1977 to change the classification of part of Kyle Park, being part of Lot 1 DP78681 as shown outlined in yellow and marked "A" on Attachment A to the staff report from which this resolution emanates, from 'Recreation Reserve' to 'Local Purpose (Community Buildings) Reserve', and to publicly notify the proposed change in accordance with section 24(2) of the Reserves Act 1977.

2.         To approve the draft non-comprehensive review of the Kyle Park Management Plan in the form attached to the staff report from which this resolution comes, and; 

3.         To not follow the procedures in s41(5) and s41(6) of the Reserves Act 1977; and

4.         To approve the release of the draft changes to the Kyle Park Management Plan for public consultation for a period of not less than one month.

Jimmy Chen/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                                               

 

 

 

 

 

Community Board Recommendation

Ross McFarlane moved an amendment, seconded by Debbie Mora:

 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board incorporate into the Draft Kyle Park Management Plan a process to identify known public health risks of surface proximity Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) within Kyle Park and that this item lie on the table until remediation or mitigation options are alluded to in the draft document prior to release in the public consultation document.

 

On being put to the meeting by the Chairperson, the amendment was declared lost.

Ross McFarlane/Debbie Mora                                                                                                                                     Lost

 

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00020

Helen Broughton moved an amendment by way of addition, seconded by Ross McFarlane:

 

5.         That full details of contamination and potential mitigation in both sections of Kyle Park to the extent known, will be included in the public consultation document.

 

On being put to the meeting by the Chairperson, the amendment was declared carried.

A division was requested and declared carried by five votes to four votes, the voting being as follows:

For:                          Mike Mora, Helen Broughton, Catherine Chu, Ross McFarlane and Debbie Mora

Against:                Natalie Bryden, Vicki Buck, Jimmy Chen and Anne Galloway

Helen Broughton/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00021

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board, acting under the delegated authority of the Christchurch City Council, resolved as follows:

1.         To commence the process under section 24(1)(b) of the Reserves Act 1977 to change the classification of part of Kyle Park, being part of Lot 1 DP78681 as shown outlined in yellow and marked "A" on Attachment A to the staff report from which this resolution emanates, from 'Recreation Reserve' to 'Local Purpose (Community Buildings) Reserve', and to publicly notify the proposed change in accordance with section 24(2) of the Reserves Act 1977.

2.         To approve the draft non-comprehensive review of the Kyle Park Management Plan in the form attached to the staff report from which this resolution comes, and; 

3.         To not follow the procedures in s41(5) and s41(6) of the Reserves Act 1977; and

4.         To approve the release of the draft changes to the Kyle Park Management Plan for public consultation for a period of not less than one month.

5.         That full details of contamination and potential mitigation in both sections of Kyle Park to the extent known, will be included in the public consultation document.

 

On being put to the meeting by the Chairperson as the substantive motion, the above was declared carried.

Helen Broughton/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

Vicki Buck left the meeting at 5.42pm.

 

8.   Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund - Application - Acorn Trust

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00022 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $1,000 from its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund to the Acorn Trust towards the installation of a defibrillator for the Halswell MenzShed. 

Debbie Mora/Natalie Bryden                                                                                                                               Carried

 

9.   Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Application - Tim Marshall

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2019/00023 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Tim Marshall towards attending the Global China Connection Summit in Washington DC, U.S.A, from 20 to 21 April 2019.

Natalie Bryden/Debbie Mora                                                                                                                               Carried

 

 

The meeting adjourned between 5.43pm and 5.49pm.

 

 

Debbie Mora and Catherine Chu left the meeting at 5.43pm.


 

 

10. Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - February 2019

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board decide:

1.         To receive the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report for February 2019.

2.         To appoint up to two Board members to attend the Community Boards’ Conference in New Plymouth from 11 to 13 April 2019.

 

Community Board Decided HHRB/2019/00024

Part B

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board decided:

1.         To receive the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report for February 2019.

2.         To appoint Natalie Bryden and Catherine Chu subject to availability (with Mike Mora and Helen Broughton as alternates), to attend the New Zealand Community Boards’ Conference in New Plymouth from 11 to 13 April 2019.

Jimmy Chen/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                               Carried

 

 

11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on the following:

·    Templeton Residents’ Association – recent meeting – Roydon Quarry submission, railway corridor  maintenance issues

·    Selwyn Water Race Subcommittee – recent meeting

·    Yaldhurst Park subdivision – recent meeting of some elected members and local residents

·    Greater Hornby Residents’ Association – recent meeting – South Express MCR, Draft Annual Plan submission and railway corridor maintenance issues

·    Christchurch City BMX Club at Kyle Park – site rental - update

·    Roading projects - operational programme – Board input into prioritising

·    Halswell Common Subdivision – invitation for the Board to visit

·    2019-20 Draft Annual Plan – community engagement

·    Parkstone Avenue – noise disturbance re District Plan query

  

Meeting concluded at 6.21pm

 

CONFIRMED THIS 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2019

Mike Mora

Chairperson

   


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

7.        West Broken Run Reserve - Landscape Plan

Reference:

18/770221

Presenter(s):

Sarah Mankelow, Interpretation and Exhibition Designer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board for the West Broken Run Reserve Landscape Plan following the engagement conducted between July and December 2018.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated for the Board having the delegated authority by the Christchurch City Council, to approve landscape plans in the Board’s area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined using the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy worksheet.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report, reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the Landscape Plan for the West Broken Run Reserve

a.         Note that this is a community-led initiative and acknowledge accordingly.

2.         Support the community’s desire to have an ongoing kaitiaki role within the West Broken Run Reserve, with volunteer planting and maintenance days, informed by the plan in this 2019 season.

3.         Request that the Council’s Land Drainage Team investigate the drainage issues at the culvert end of the reserve, to resolve the issues raised by the community about the levels within the culvert and flooding issues.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028):

4.1.1   Activity: Parks  and Foreshore

·           Level of Service: 6.3.7.3 Provide community participation opportunities across the parks network - Community Parks and Cemeteries: 5 volunteer hours/1000 people.

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·           Option 1 – Accept the landscape plan as delivered (preferred option)

·           Option 2 – Decline the landscape plan

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·           Improvement to the habitat, biodiversity and amenity values of West Broken Run Reserve.

·           Reduce the need for mowing maintenance, particularly on the steep slopes where mowing has been an ongoing issue and subject to complaint.

·           Timely response to community desire for planting, building on the individual initiatives already underway.

·           Identify an area for immediate planting to respond to and build on the growing community interest.

·           Address some of the flooding issues with appropriate wetland plants.

·           Engage the community from the outset to create a connection and ongoing commitment to maintenance of plantings.

Connecting with city-wide initiatives e.g. Food Resilience Network, and the development of urban edible parks.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·           The cost of remediating the pathway has not got any allocated budget at this time.

·           Some of the community desires may not be consistent with Council policy or conflicting feedback.

 

5.   Context/Background

West Broken Run Reserve

5.1       West Broken Run Reserve is located in Halswell, and runs between Wigram Road and the Christchurch Southern Motorway (269R Wigram Road).

·      This reserve is a recreation reserve.

·      There were no landscape plans produced for this reserve through the subdivision development process. The reserve remains largely undeveloped, apart from a large, shared pathway running its length. The Council does not hold any landscape bond for this reserve.

·      The reserve does connect with two other large parks with landscaping and playgrounds.

·      The reserve has been the subject of a number of complaints around maintenance and mowing, and flooding issues with a previously unidentified member of the community taking on mowing sections themselves.

·      A number of neighbours have already done their own planting within the reserve directly adjoining their properties.

Community engagement

5.2       In May of 2018, Council staff received a request from Chris and Bill Thorne, neighbours to the reserve, to get Council permission to plant in the reserve.

·      This request was passed onto the urban ranger team who then asked for support to action this request.

·      Mr Thorne identified himself as the mystery mower. Mr and Mrs Thorne canvased their neighbours and formed a group of 20 keen to do sanctioned planting.

·      An informal community feedback session and BBQ was held on Saturday 21 July 2018 to give the community a chance to have some input into the development of a landscape plan. Invitations were via letterbox drop to neighbouring streets.

·      40 to 50 people came to speak to the team and each other and express their views. These views were incorporated into the first draft of the landscape plan.

·      Engagement was high and positive around the planting, but there was a recurring mention of the issues around flooding of the path and drainage of the waterway leaving the reserve.

6.   Option 1 – Approve the West Broken Run Reserve planting plan (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Approve the landscape plan (refer Attachment A).

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance have been carried out.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to a significant ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value.

The approval of this landscape plan does however connect with the Owaka-Awatea Corridor linking the upper reaches of the Halswell and Heathcote Rivers, below Wigram Road, documented in the South West Area Plan.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Residents of the area ‘Broken Run’ are specifically affected by this option due to the local community interest in seeing this reserve developed. A number of properties have undertaken planting and spraying in the reserve. 

6.6       Formal engagement was undertaken from Monday 19 November to Wednesday 12 December 2018.

6.7       A total of 515 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and properties on Amelia Place, Asheridge Place, Broken Run, Colt Place, Cromdale Place, Deerwood Lane, Dow Square, Edwin Ebbett Place, Four Peaks Drive, Grassington Lane, Highpeak Place, James Caird Lane, Longspur Avenue, Platinum Drive, Ryton Way, Sharman Place and sections of Awatea Road, Rich Terrace, Valiant Street, Wigram Road and Winfield Drive.

6.8       The consultation leaflets were also sent to 87 key stakeholders and 148 absentee owners. 

6.9       Additional leaflets were made available at the Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre, Riccarton Service Centre, Te Hapua: Halswell Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

6.10    During the course of the engagement, the Council received feedback from 43 submitters. Of the 43 submissions, 22 were in support of the proposal, 20 had concerns and one did not support the proposal.

6.11    The following outlines the main themes of the feedback.

6.12    Changes to the tree species

·         15 submitters requested changes/additions to the tree species.

6.13    Maintenance

·         Eight submitters had concerns about maintenance/pest control/rubbish in the reserve.

6.14    Concerns over how the produce will be shared/harvested

·         Three submitters had concerns about the sharing/harvesting of produce.

6.15    Outside the scope of the project

·         Four submitters requested changes/additional boardwalks

·         One submitter requested a more comprehensive nature play area be installed

·         Three submitters requested maintenance on areas outside the reserve

·         Two submitters requested changes to the path

·         Two submitters requested a community plot

·         One submitter requested a bike park be installed

·         One submitter requested horse trails be included

6.16    Additional requests

·         Four submitters requested that park furniture be installed such as seats and picnic tables

The one submitter who did not support the proposal commented that they …” would rather see long grass which does get cut from time to time and looks very nice rather than plantings which are not maintained as has happened in the reserve between the old Broken Run and the motorway”.

6.17    As a result of consultation, the following changes have been made to the final plan for approval:

·         We have replaced the quince with an apple tree and included a mixture of fruit trees including, peach, plum, pear and feijoa, in addition to the apple tree.

·         We have some seating available to be recycled from other parks and will install this in the reserve.

6.18    A letter has been sent to all submitters advising the outcome of the consultation, including details of the Board meeting and how they can request speaking rights. Also included in this letter was a link to the feedback summary with project team responses.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.19    This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.20    Cost of Implementation – total cost of implementation stands at $121,890, including site preparation and weed control; based on contracting out the entire works. With community involvement, the implementation will be significantly reduced.

6.21    Funding source – Community Partnerships Initiative Fund will support the community-led planting aspect of this project. This includes site preparation $5,000, mulch and plant protectors $13,000, and native plant supply $21,000 – implemented and spread over two planting seasons.

6.22    Maintenance/Ongoing Costs – the community group is willing to take on maintenance of the plantings but as it is a large area, consideration must be given to some additional operational support. The main concerns raised were around ongoing maintenance. Garden amenity maintenance costs for 4,300 m2 estimated at $1,016 annually and will be covered by the Community Partnerships Initiative Fund for the first two years. Going forward, this cost will need to be factored into operational budgets via the Annual Plan process.

6.23    Semi-mature trees and fruit trees supply and planting $15,000 are coming from the community parks tree budget, managed by the arborist team.

6.24    Ongoing maintenance and care of the fruit trees is being supported and managed by the Food Resilience Network.

6.25    Three boardwalks across the stream are costed at $48,000 and there is currently no budget allocated for these.

Legal Implications

6.26    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision. This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

Risks and Mitigations

Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk is low.

Implementation

6.27    Implementation dependencies - with Board approval this project can start straight away in identified areas.

6.28    Plants will need to be ordered well in advance for the 2019 planting season. 

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.29    The advantages of this option include:

·         Improvement to the habitat, biodiversity and amenity values of West Broken Run Reserve.

·         Reduce the areas for mowing maintenance, particularly on the steep slopes where mowing has been an ongoing issue and subject to complaint.

·         Timely response to community desire for planting, building on the individual initiatives already underway.

·         Identify an area for immediate planting to respond to and build on the growing community interest.

·         Engage the community from the outset to create a connection and ongoing commitment to maintenance of plantings.

·         Address some of the flooding issues with appropriate wetland plants.

6.30    The disadvantages of this option include:

·         Some of the issues raised around flooding and drainage may not be easily resolved or financed. Some of this may be resolved around drainage clearance and appropriate plantings by heavily vegetating with wetland plants in the puddle areas. Large rain events may cause residents expectations which will need to be managed accordingly.

·         The plantings will require at least two years ongoing maintenance.

7.   Option 2 – Decline the landscape plan

Option Description

7.1       Do not approve the West Broken Run Reserve Landscape Plan.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are medium as there is an expectation that Council will deliver a plan to support community planting in the reserve.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions. This option differs to clause 6.4 because this option is not consistent with the previous Council decision to create a linkage between the upper reaches of the Halswell and Heathcote Rivers.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       Neighbouring community are specifically affected by this option due to a strong desire to take action in this reserve. Without council guidance they may continue to carry on with their own planting.

7.6       Formal engagement was undertaken from Monday 19 November to Wednesday 12 December 2018.

7.7       A total of 515 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and properties on Amelia Place, Asheridge Place, Broken Run, Colt Place, Cromdale Place, Deerwood Lane, Dow Square, Edwin Ebbett Place, Four Peaks Drive, Grassington Lane, Highpeak Place, James Caird Lane, Longspur Avenue, Platinum Drive, Ryton Way, Sharman Place and sections of Awatea Road, Rich Terrace, Valiant Street, Wigram Road and Winfield Drive.

7.8       The consultation leaflets were also sent to 87 key stakeholders and 148 absentee owners. 

7.9       Additional leaflets were made available at the Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre, Riccarton Service Centre, Te Hapua: Halswell Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

7.10    During the course of the engagement, the Council received feedback from 43 submitters. Of the 43 submissions, 22 were in support of the proposal, 20 had concerns and one did not support the proposal.

7.11    The one submitter who did not support the proposal commented that they …” would rather see long grass which does get cut from time to time and looks very nice rather than plantings which are not maintained as has happened in the reserve between the old Broken Run and the motorway”.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.12    This option is inconsistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies

7.12.1 Inconsistency – work cannot progress

Financial Implications

7.13    Maintenance/Ongoing Costs – no change, current maintenance and mowing contracts ongoing

7.14    Funding source – operational budgets (no change)

Legal Implications

7.15    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

7.16    This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

Risks and Mitigations

7.17    There is a reputational risk to the Council if this project does not proceed. This may result in a negative response from the community and a lack of credibility for the Council when working with the community in future.

This option will not involve any changes to the status quo.

Implementation

7.18    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.19    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.20    The advantages of this option include:

·         No additional costs

7.21    The disadvantages of this option include:

·         No added amenity value, or community connection.

·         Loss of engagement with community who are already in a cycle of complaints.

The community group will continue with their own activities leading to an ad hoc development of the reserve.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Broken Run Reserve Landscape Plan 375801 Revision 3 - For Board Approval

23

b

West Broken Run Reserve - Submission Feedback Table

25

c

West Broken Run Reserve - Project Cost Estimate

30

d

Letter to Submitters

31

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Sarah Mankelow - Interpretation and Exhibition Designer

Lori Rankin - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizen and Community

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

8.        Kennedys Landing Subdivision, Halswell Ward - Proposed Road Names

Reference:

19/155549

Presenter:

Paul Lowe, Principal Advisor Resource Consents

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider and approve the proposed road names arising from the Kennedys Landing subdivision in Halswell.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated resulting from naming requests received from the subdivision developer.

1.3       This report relates to Kennedys Landing subdivision at 25 Kennedys Bush Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to approve the following new road names:

1.         Kennedys Landing (RMA/2018/1627), 25 Kennedys Bush Road:

·                Light Mood Road

 

·                Irvines Track

 

·                Tussle Grove

 

·                Winning Post Place

 

4.   Background

4.1       Introduction

4.1.1   Road naming requests have been submitted by the developer for Kennedys Landing (RMA/2018/1627) subdivision. A preferred name and alternative names, have been put forward by the developer for each road.

4.1.2   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spelling, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The recommended names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.

4.1.3   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against the Council’s Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy dated 2 November 1993. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this policy.

4.1.4   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names and types have been checked against the Australian and New Zealand Standard AS/NZA 4819:2011 Rural and urban addressing. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this Standard unless otherwise stated below.

4.1.5   Under the Roads and Right-of-Way naming Policy the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is not an ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.

4.1.6   Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed road names.

4.1.7   The requests have been accompanied by an explanation of the background to the names which are summarised below.

4.2       Kennedys Landing (RMA/2018/1627)

4.2.1   Road names have been requested by 25 KBR Ltd for roads at the Kennedys Landing subdivision which is bounded by Kennedys Bush Road, Sutherlands Road, Sparks Road and Provincial Road. To view the roads subject to this application refer to Attachment A.

4.2.2   The road names have been chosen in recognising the work and horses of the late Professor Emeritus Clifford Irvine who owned the land subject of this subdivision. Professor Irvine was a world renowned veterinarian specialising in horses, and he also owned and bred several successful horses.

4.2.3   The names for each road are below, and a list of alternative names follows:

Road 1

·         Light Mood Road – Light Mood was a very successful racehorse trained at the property. Light Mood won nine races and placed a further 10 times, in a total of 75 starts. Light Mood was the Dam Sire of Tussle, one of Professor Irvine’s most successful horses.

Road 2

·         Irvines Track – This road is named after Professor Irvine. The use of Track is suggested as this road roughly follows the location of the old training track around the property. Please refer to Attachment B for information relating to Professor Irvine.

Road 3

·         Tussle Grove – Tussle was a horse bred and trained by Professor Irvine. Tussle became one of the best mares produced in New Zealand and was the first horse to win the Rowe Cup, Dominion Handicap and the Inter Dominion Trotting Final, the three biggest trotting races in Australasia – a feat subsequently equalled only by Lyell Creek. Tussle won 38 races and retired as the country’s best stakes-winning trotter.

 

 

Road 4

·         Winning Post Place – A fence post that was used as the finish line for the training track on the property where this road is located.

Alternative names

·         Gusto Lane – a horse that was bred and/or trained by Professor Irvine. Gusto had 39 starts, seven wins, five seconds and one third.

 

·         Zeal Lane – a horse that was bred and/or trained by Professor Irvine. Zeal had 44 starts, five wins, nine seconds and nine thirds.

 

·         Curling Lane – a horse that was bred and/or trained by Professor Irvine. Curling had 32 starts, two wins, two seconds and four thirds.

 

·         Kimmer Lane – a horse that was bred and/or trained by Professor Irvine. Kimmer had two starts with zero wins/places. Kimmer is the Dam of Tussle, Curling, Tattle and Great Dam of Gusto and Zeal.

 

·         Equine Lane – Latin for Horse - Equine Endocrinology (particularly in relation to reproduction, growth and stress in mares) was the specialist area of Professor Irvine.

 

·         Home Straight Lane – the straight piece of the track prior to the finish line.

 

·         Juno Lane – Name of an animal that lived at the property.

4.2.4   Notes

·         In respect of the alternatives, the use of ‘Lane’ in the name is nominal only. If the preferred options are not adopted, the alternative road name selected would need to be matched with a road type that is appropriate for the situation.

 

·         Technically ‘Irvines Track’ does not meet the rural and urban addressing standard because the subject road type (i.e. track) is intended to be used for a walkway in a natural setting as opposed to an urban road. Notwithstanding, it is considered acceptable in this instance because Land Information New Zealand has not raised any concerns with it, it ties in well with the overall theme, and is consistent with the Road Naming Policy.   

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Kennedys Landing Subdivision - Attachment A - Site Plan

37

b

Kennedys Landing Subdivision - Attachment B - Background

38

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Laura Braddick - Senior Resource Consents Support Officer

Paul Lowe - Principal Advisor Resource Consents

Approved By

John Higgins - Head of Resource Consents

Leonie Rae - General Manager Consenting and Compliance

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

9.        Yaldhurst Park Subdivision, Hornby Ward - Proposed Road Names

Reference:

19/133491

Presenter:

Paul Lowe, Principal Advisor Resource Consents

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider and approve the proposed road names arising from the Yaldhurst Park Subdivision, Yaldhurst.

1.2       A report came to the Board in November 2018 to name a new short road in the same subdivision.  That report has been left to lie on the table awaiting certain actions.   This report is to name other roads in the subdivision, none of which are connecting to the neighbouring properties.  As the subdivision is progressing, it is necessary to name the roads.  

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated resulting from naming requests received from the subdivision developer.

1.4       This report relates to Yaldhurst Park subdivision at 473 Yaldhurst Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to approve the following new road names:

1.         Yaldhurst Park (RMA/2007/1846), 473 Yaldhurst Road.

·    Filly Place

·    Broodmare Place

·    Martingale Street

·    Wrigley Place

·    Saddlers Lane

·    Drivers Lane

·    Trainers Lane

·    Reins Lane

·    Horseman Lane

·    Pacers Lane

 

 

4.   Background

4.1       Introduction

4.1.1   Road naming requests have been submitted by the developer of the Yaldhurst Park subdivision (RMA/2007/1846). A preferred name, and alternative names, have been put forward by the developer for each road.

4.1.2   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spelling, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The recommended names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.

4.1.3   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against the Council’s Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy dated 2 November 1993. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this policy.

4.1.4   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names and types have been checked against the Australian and New Zealand Standard AS/NZA 4819:2011 Rural and Urban addressing. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this Standard, unless otherwise stated below.

4.1.5   Under the Roads and Right-of-Way naming Policy, the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is not an ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.

4.1.6   Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed road names.

4.1.7   The requests have been accompanied by an explanation of the background to the names which are summarised below.

4.2       Yaldhurst Park Subdivision (RMA/2007/1846)

4.2.1   Road names have been requested by Infinity Yaldhurst Limited for roads at the Yaldhurst Park Subdivision which is bounded by Yaldhurst Road and Sir John McKenzie Avenue. To view the roads the subject of this application, Attachment A refers.

4.2.2   The road names have been chosen in accordance with the theme of horse racing, horse tack and Roydon Lodge, which reflect the recent historical use of the subject land. Other existing street names in the subdivision mostly refer to these themes such as Sir John McKenzie Avenue, George Noble Road, Founders Lane, Rannoch Drive, Stirrup Lane, Stud Road, Apple Orchard Lane, Gallop Lane and Loch Tanna Way.

4.2.3   The names in order of preference are:

Road 1

·         Filly Place – a filly is a female horse that is too young to be called a mare.

 

·         Gaits Place – harness racing is a form of horse racing in which the horses race at a specific gait (a trot or pace).

Road 2

·         Broodmare Place – a fine tribute to Sir John’s work for trotting was paid by a writer for ‘The Times’, London , who stated that “by importing first class stallions and broodmares Sir John McKenzie probably did more for trotting than any other man in NZ, and his example of honesty and impartiality, kept the pastime clean and above board”.

 

·         Birdcage Place – the birdcage is the area where horses are paraded before entering the racetrack.

Road 3

·         Not subject to this application.

Road 4

·         Martingale Street – Martingale is horse tack.

 

·         Furlong Street – Furlong is an imperial scale formerly used in Australia racing and still used in some parts of the world. It is a distance of approximately 200 metres. A 1,200 metre race is six furlongs; the reason the 1,200 start at Flemington is often referred to as the straight six.

Road 5

·         Wrigley Place – Sir John McKenzie’s wife (Lady McKenzie) was nee Ann May Wrigley.

 

·         Jockey Place – referring to a person who rides horses.

Road 6

·         Saddlers Lane – referring to a person who saddles up horses.

 

·         Farriers Lane – referring to a person who shoes horses.

Road 7

·         Drivers Crescent – referring to drivers in harness racing.

 

·         Sulky Crescent – a sulky is a lightweight cart used in harness racing.

Road 8

·         Trainers Lane – referring to horse trainers in harness racing.

 

·         Jodphurs Lane – Jodphurs are the pants a jockey wears.

Road 9

·         Reins Lane – refers to the reins used in horse racing.

Road 10

·         Horseman Lane – referring to a person who works with horses.

Road 11

·         Pacers Lane – referring to pacing horses bred at Roydon Lodge.

 

·         Withers Lane – the withers is the ridge between the shoulder blades of a horse and is the standard place to measure the animal’s height.

4.2.4   All of the above names have been assessed as appropriate under the above mentioned standard and policy with one exception. Both names for Road 7 utilise the road type ‘Crescent’. However being a private access, this should instead be named a ‘Lane’ under the Road Naming Policy. Therefore, the recommendation in this report is to change the road type to ‘Lane’ for Road 7. 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Yaldhurst Park Subdivision - Master Plan - October 2018

59

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Laura Braddick - Senior Resource Consents Support Officer

Paul Lowe - Principal Advisor Resource Consents

Approved By

John Higgins - Head of Resource Consents

Leonie Rae - General Manager Consenting and Compliance

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

10.   Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Application - Anna Taylor

Reference:

19/197639

Presenter:

Emily Toase, Community Recreation Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider an application received for funding from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       This report is to assist the Board to consider an application for funding from Anna Taylor.

1.3       There is currently a balance of $8,846 remaining in this fund.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Anna Taylor towards competing in an International Gymnastics Tour from March to May 2019.

 

3.   Key Points

Opportunity

3.1       Offer funding support to Anna Taylor who is competing in an International Gymnastics Tour, travelling to Japan, Poland, Estonia, Serbia and Australia from March to May 2019.

Strategic Alignment

3.2       Investing in our youth to develop leadership, cultural competence and success in their chosen field builds the capacity of our city’s youth, our future adults. In doing so, we increase the likelihood of these youths contributing to developing a vibrant, prosperous and sustainable 21st century city; one of the Council’s six Strategic Priorities. The recommendation contained in this report is based on this principle.

Decision Making Authority

3.3       Determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community (including any allocation towards a Youth Development Fund).

3.4       Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.

3.5       The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions.

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

3.6       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.7       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.8       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

4.   Applicant 1 – Anna Taylor

4.1       Age – 16 years

4.2       School - Riccarton High School

4.3       Activity - International Gymnastics Tour

4.4       Event seeking support for - Anna is competing in an International Gymnastics Tour, travelling to Japan, Poland, Estonia, Serbia and Australia from March to May 2019.

4.5       The tour will provide Anna with an opportunity to gain exposure to other international gymnasts and also a chance to compete to achieve qualifying marks to gain entry into the World Gymnastics Championships.

4.6       Anna has been doing Rhythmic Gymnastics since she was six years old. She has competed in the New Zealand Championships three times and represented New Zealand numerous times including the Junior Commonwealth Championships in Namibia.

4.7       Anna hopes to qualify to compete in the New Zealand University Games, the Commonwealth Games and the World Championships and is working towards achieving these goals. She trains 28 hour a week over six days.

4.8       Anna attends Riccarton High School and has just been selected to be the Year 13 Prefect. As a member of both the Junior and Senior School Council’s and the Wellbeing Committee, Anna has shown sound leadership skills which she continues to use in mentoring younger members of her gymnastics club as well as at school.

4.9       Anna received the Academic Excellence Awards in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Excellence in Girls Junior Sports Award in 2015, the Prebble Trophy for Sportswoman of the Year in 2018 and the Riccarton Challenge Gold and Speech Awards. 

4.10    The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for the International Gymnastics Tour:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Flights

5,000

Accommodation

4,000

Competition Entry Fees

400

                                                                                                 Total

$9,400

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

11.   Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund - Application - SHARP Trust

Reference:

19/199400

Presenter:

Emily Toase, Community Recreation Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

00058779

SHARP Trust

Halswell After-School Programme

$5,000

$5,000

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $65,199 remaining in the fund.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve a grant of $5,000 from its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund to the SHARP Trust towards the Halswell After-School Programme.

 

3.   Key Points

Opportunity

3.1       To support funding for a second After-School care programme to be established in Halswell.

Strategic Alignment

3.2       The recommendation is strongly aligned to the Strategic Framework and in particular the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board’s strategic priorities 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 1.14 and 1.15.

Decision Making Authority

3.3       Determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund for each community.

3.4       Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.

3.5       The Fund does not cover:

·   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled organisations or Community Board decisions.

·   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project or that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council (though Community Boards can recommend to the Council that it consider a grant for this purpose).

Assessment of Significance and Engagement

3.6       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.7       The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

3.8       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

Discussion

3.9       At the time of writing, the balance of the 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2018-19

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$179,411

$114,212

$65,199

$60,199

 

3.10    Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application is eligible for funding.

3.11    A Decision Matrix (refer Attachment A) provides information about the application including organisational and project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund - Decision Matrix - SHARP Trust

67

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

PDF Creator 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

12 March 2019

 

 

12.   Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.