Waipapa

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 12 October 2018

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

9 October 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 


 

 

 

Mihi

 

 

Tēnā koutou

Kua hui mai nei

Ki tēnei whare ō tātou

Ki te kōrero, ki te whakarongo

i nga kaupapa ō to hapori

Nau mai, haere mai.

Nā reira tēnā koutou katoa

 

Greetings

to all who have gathered

within our (communal) house

to speak and to listen to the

topics/conversations of your community

Welcome, welcome

Therefore, again I greet all present

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 5

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 5

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 5

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 5

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 5

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 5

Staff Reports

C       7.       Papanui-Innes Wards - Proposed Road Names - Canon Street................................. 13

C       8.       Mahars Road Proposed P3 Restrictions....................................................................... 17

C       9.       Riselaw Street Proposed No Stopping Restrictions.................................................... 23

C       10.     Windermere Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions............................................. 29

C       11.     Westminster/Fergusson Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................................... 35

B       12.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - September/October 2018............ 41

 

B       13.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 45 

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

3.1.... That the minutes of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 28 September 2018  be confirmed (refer page 6).

3.2.... That the minutes of the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood and Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board’s joint meeting held on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 be confirmed (refer page 13).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

4.1

Positive Youth Development Fund Report – Hannah and Laura Warner

Hannah and Laura Warner will attend the meeting to report back to the Board on their participation in the NZ Choral Federation Big Sing Competition held in Wellington from 29 August to 2 September 2018.

 

4.2

Positive Youth Development Fund Report – Zavier Harema-Hughes

Zavier Harema-Hughes will attend the meeting to report back to the Board on competing at the National 3x3 Schools Basketball Tournament in Tauranga from 20–24 March 2018.

 

4.3

Positive Youth Development Fund Report – Matt Munro

Matt Munro will attend the meeting to report back to the Board on his participation in the Kiwi Caps India Development Tour from 16-28 April 2018.

 

4.4

Christchurch Youth Council – Kate Burgess

Kate Burgess will attend the meeting to inform the Board on the “Community Series” initiative, in particular the Papanui area.

 

4.5

Bus Stop Hills Road – John Whitford

John Whitford will attend the meeting to make a presentation to the Board on the bus stop on the northwest side of Hills Road close to the intersection with Acheson Avenue.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared.

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

 

Waipapa

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 28 September 2018

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

28 September 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Community Board Decision

There were no apologies.

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00089

That the minutes of the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 14 September 2018 be confirmed.

Jo Byrne/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                          Carried

 

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.3       Shirley Community Centre Update - Joanna Gould

Joanna Gould presented an update on her ideas for the future of the 10 Shirley Road site with an emphasis on identity, well-being and learning to create a new identity for the community through creative place-making.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Joanna Gould for her presentation.

 

4.1       Positive Youth Development Fund Report - Olivia Brett

Olivia Brett attended the meeting to report back to the Board on her attendance at the World Junior Canoe Championships as part of the U18 team.  The championships were held in Bulgaria from 6 July to 3 August 2018.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Olivia Brett for her presentation.

 

4.2       Positive Youth Development Fund Report - Matt Munro

Matt Munro was an apology and will attend at a later date.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

11. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - September 2018

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receives the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for September 2018

2          Approves its submission to the Council regarding the Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy Review 2018.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00090

Part B

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receives the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for September 2018.

2.         Requests that staff look at options around tree planting and walkways for the future in the Rutland Reserve and come back to the Board with designs and costings as soon as practicable.

Mike Davidson/Emma Norrish                                                                                                                               Carried

 

 

 

7.   Briefings

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Briefings.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00091

Part B

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Briefing and endorses it moving to the Working Party for their input and recommendation back to the Board.

Pauline Cotter/John Stringer                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

8.   Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund - Youth Recreation Project, Edible Garden Awards, Community Pride Garden Awards and Community Service Awards

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $1,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Edible Garden Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

2.         Approves a grant of $7,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/18 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Youth Recreation Project in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

3.         Approves a grant of $0 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Community Pride Garden Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

4.         Approves a grant of $3,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Community Service Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00092

Part C

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $3,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Edible Garden Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

2.         Approves a grant of $7,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Youth Recreation Project in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

3.         Approves a grant of $3,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Community Pride Garden Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

4.         Approves a grant of $3,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund for the delivery of Community Service Awards in the Papanui-Innes Ward.

Pauline Cotter/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

Jo Byrne left the meeting at 10:08 a.m.   Jo Byrne returned to the meeting at 10:10 a.m.

 

The meeting adjourned at 10.23 am and resumed at 10.28 am.

 

9.   Papanui-Innes 2018 Neighbourhood Week Applications

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00093 (Staff Recommendations adopted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Resolves to allocate its 2018 Neighbourhood Week funding as set out below:

 

Applicant

 

Activity

No. Attending

Staff Recommendation

1

Damian Ardell (Papanui Baptist Freedom Trust)

Community event for local neighbours, co-hosted by local Churches/Trusts.

200+

$200

2

Catherine Blummont

Coffee and cake open house event for neighbours.

15

$20

3

Rachel Crawford

BBQ gathering for neighbours.

60

$75

4

David Crean

Street BBQ and 'get to know/welcome' the new neighbours.

65

$120

5

Matt Cummins

Street BBQ.

30

$60

6

Jennifer Dalziel

To celebrate the finish of Dudley Creek remediation Project.

100

$150

7

Rachel Donaldson

Halloween parade and neighbourhood BBQ.

 

20

$50

8

Maureen and Ian Donovan

Christmas BBQ.

60-70

$100

9

Brendon Dowling

BBQ for all residents on the street.

30-40

$100

10

Murray Edlin

Street BBQ.

40

$80

11

Jeremy Elrick

Annual street BBQ.

50

Withdrawn

12

Craig Given

Neighbourhood BBQ / afternoon tea.

60

$100

13

Carolyn Jones

13th yearly BBQ get-together of residents.

65-70

$130

14

Lisa Jones (Paparoa Street School PTA)

End of year Christmas school funday gathering for the children and families of Paparoa Street School.

700 approx.

$0

15

Anneke Kamo

A get-together with our neighbours and their children.

30

$75

16

Alana Loader

Party in the Park – BBQ, activities and games for kids.

300

$150

17

Vicki McBratney

Street BBQ.

25

$60

18

Heather Mace (St Albans Uniting Parish)

Community Fun Day.

200-300

$200

19

Fiona Moloney

Pre-Christmas BBQ.

40-50

$50

 

Applicant

 

Activity

No. Attending

Staff Recommendation

20

Keith and Christine Moyes

Annual street BBQ and meeting.

45

$90

21

Becs Newcombe (Redwood Playcentre)

Family Fun Day for Playcentre families.

40

$0

22

Seepa Noa

 

100-150

$0

23

Denise Norriss

Pizza party.

50

$100

24

Colleen O'Hanlon

Neighbourhood get-together.

40

$100

25

Michael Patrick

Bring neighbours in and around our street and the surrounding area together for BBQ, games for the whole family, and network/connect together.

50-60

$80

26

Ann Powley (Shirley Community Trust)

A community lunch hosted by Shirley Community Trust and Te Puna Oraka.

70-80

$175

27

Ann Powley

Afternoon tea for all neighbours in cul-de-sac.

30

$40

28

Tony Ralfe

A BBQ for neighbours surrounding our Avenue, and inviting new residents from new area close by.

40

$80

29

Christine Rankin

BBQ in a back yard for neighbours or local neighbour will cook Paella.

 

40

$80

30

Philip Sapsford

Get-together of our neighbours over a BBQ.

30

$75

31

Anna-Marie Sloane (Edgeware Tennis Club)

Edgeware Tennis Amazing Race for Club members and their families.

70

$0

32

Paul Somerville (St Albans Swim Club Inc)

St Albans Swim Club social get-together BBQ and swim night to welcome new members and for all Club members and their families.

75

$0

33

Valerie Somerville (St Albans Pavilion and Pool Inc)

Neighbourhood BBQ and working bee on the future pool site venue.

50-75

$150

34

Latara Stevens

Games, food.

12 kids

$0

35

Denise Theyers (Christchurch North Presbyterian Church)

Christmas carols and BBQ in Redwood Park for all the local community. 

200

$150

36

Jane Walker

Annual neighbourhood BBQ.

50

$90

37

Joanna Wortley

Street BBQ.

35

$70

Total

$3,000

Emma Norrish/Ali Jones                                                                                                                                             Carried

John Stringer did not support Item 7.

 

10. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2018/19 Positive Youth Development Fund - Jennifer Kim Hong Trieu

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00094 (Staff Recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board resolves to:

1.         Approve a grant of $200 from its 2018/19 Positive Youth Development Fund to Jennifer Kim Hong Trieu towards representing Canterbury at the New Zealand Rhythmic Gymnastics Nationals in Tauranga from 1-6 October 2018.

Ali Jones/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

12. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on matters of interest.

 

 

 

Meeting concluded at 10.45am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 12th DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Waiti/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

and

Waipapa/ Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 3 October 2018

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Present

Coastal-Burwood Community Board

Chairperson                       Tim Sintes

Members                            Tim Baker

David East

Linda Stewart

Papanui-Innes

Community Board

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

2 October 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Jo Wells

Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

941 6451

jo.wells@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

 


 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Joint Community Boards’ Resolved JCPB/2018/00001

Committee Decision

Apologies were received for Glenn Livingstone, Kim Money and Pauline Cotter

Member Byrne/Member Davidson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

3.1

Trevor Lightfoot – Prestons subdivision speed limit

Mr Lightfoot spoke to the joint boards regarding the Prestons Subdivision Speed Limit Change from 50 kilometers per hour to 40 kilometers per hour. Mr Lightfoot expressed his concerns of dropping the speed limit in what he saw as such a low traffic density area, advising that the subdivision is full to capacity almost and there is no expectation for the traffic volume to rise. He asked the meeting to reconsider the recommendation to the Council.

 

 

 

4.   Prestons Subdivision 40 km/h Speed Limit

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board and Papanui-Innes Community Board recommend that Council:

1.         Approve, pursuant to Part 4 Section 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017, that speed limits within the Prestons subdivision be revoked and set as identified on Attachment A and listed below in Clauses 1a-1c including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps;

a.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Te Korari Street, Te Rito Street, Te Kereme Street, Te Aika Street, Whitau Place, Korowai Street, Raranga Street, Taiore Crescent, Karere Avenue, Kawharu Street, Ruapani Street, Te Aue Street, Metehau Street, David Palmer Street, Te Whenu Crescent, Urihia Street, Hineaari Street, Te Rau A Kaka Street, Polish Settlers Place, Weruweru Street, Makawe Roa Street, Te Whariki Street, Dunlops Road and Kohunga Crescent.

b.         Revoke the existing variable speed limit (school speed zone) of 40 kilometres per hour on Te Korari Street commencing at a point 85 metres north of its intersection with Prestons Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 310 metres.

c.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Te Korari Street, Te Rito Street, Te Kereme Street, Te Aika Street, Whitau Place, Korowai Street, Raranga Street, Taiore Crescent, Karere Avenue, Kawharu Street, Ruapani Street, Te Aue Street, Metehau Street, David Palmer Street, Te Whenu Crescent, Urihia Street, Hineaari Street, Te Rau A Kaka Street, Polish Settlers Place, Weruweru Street, Makawe Roa Street, Te Whariki Street, Dunlops Road and Kohunga Crescent be set to 40 kilometres per hour.

2.         Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in Clauses 1a-1c come into force following the date of Council approval and installation of all required infrastructure (signage and/or markings) and removal of obsolete infrastructure as indicated on Attachment A.

 

 

Joint Community Boards’ Comment

The joint boards noted advice from staff on the Land Transport Rule around the setting of speed limits in suburban residential areas.

Comments from members included that the two collector Roads (Te Korari and Te Rito Street) are often used as a bypass to the Marshland Road/Lower Styx Road intersection and the Prestons Road traffic lights

 

Joint Community Boards’ Decision

It was moved by Mike Davidson and seconded by Tim Baker:

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board and Papanui-Innes Community Board recommend that Council:

1.         Approve, pursuant to Part 4 Section 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017, that speed limits within the Prestons subdivision be revoked and set as identified on Attachment A and listed below in Clauses 1a-1c including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits and associated Speed Limit Maps;

a.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour on Te Korari Street, Te Rito Street, Te Kereme Street, Te Aika Street, Whitau Place, Korowai Street, Raranga Street, Taiore Crescent, Karere Avenue, Kawharu Street, Ruapani Street, Te Aue Street, Metehau Street, David Palmer Street, Te Whenu Crescent, Urihia Street, Hineaari Street, Te Rau A Kaka Street, Polish Settlers Place, Weruweru Street, Makawe Roa Street, Te Whariki Street, Dunlops Road and Kohunga Crescent.

b.         Revoke the existing variable speed limit (school speed zone) of 40 kilometres per hour on Te Korari Street commencing at a point 85 metres north of its intersection with Prestons Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 310 metres.

c.         Approve that the permanent speed limit on Te Korari Street, Te Rito Street, Te Kereme Street, Te Aika Street, Whitau Place, Korowai Street, Raranga Street, Taiore Crescent, Karere Avenue, Kawharu Street, Ruapani Street, Te Aue Street, Metehau Street, David Palmer Street, Te Whenu Crescent, Urihia Street, Hineaari Street, Te Rau A Kaka Street, Polish Settlers Place, Weruweru Street, Makawe Roa Street, Te Whariki Street, Dunlops Road and Kohunga Crescent be set to 40 kilometres per hour.

2.         Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in Clauses 1a-1c come into force following the date of Council approval and installation of all required infrastructure (signage and/or markings) and removal of obsolete infrastructure as indicated on Attachment A of the report.

The motion, when put to the meeting, was declared lost.

 

 

Joint Community boards’ Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

That the Council: Notes that the motion, when put to the meeting, was declared lost.

 

 

 

 

Meeting concluded at 5.28pm

 

CONFIRMED THIS 15th DAY OF OCTOBER

 

 

Tim sintes

deputy Chairperson

Coastal-Burwood

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED THIS 12th DAY OF OCTOBER

 

 

Ali Jones

chairperson

Papanui-inneS

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

7.        Papanui-Innes Wards - Proposed Road Names - Canon Street

Reference:

18/1000885

Presenter(s):

Paul Lowe, Principal Advisor Resource Consents

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider and approve the proposed road names for one local subdivision.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated resulting from naming request received from the subdivision developer.

1.3       This report relates to the subdivision Canon Street, 109 Canon Street.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to approve the following new right of way name:

1.         Canon Street (RMA/2018/1878), 109 Canon Street

·        Verlamio Lane

 

4.   Background

4.1       Introduction

4.1.1   Road naming requests have been submitted by the developer for Canon Street (RMA/2017/1878) subdivision. A preferred name and an alternative name(s) have been put forward by the developer for the right of way.

4.1.2   The recommended right-of-way names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spellings, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The recommended names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.

4.1.3   The recommended right-of-way names have been checked against the Council’s Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy dated 2 November 1993. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this policy.

4.1.4   The recommended right-of-way names and type have been checked against the Australian and New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4819:2011 Rural and urban addressing. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this Standard unless otherwise stated below.

4.1.5   Under the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is not an ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.

4.1.6   Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed names.

4.1.7   The requests have been accompanied by an explanation of the background to the names which are summarised below.

4.2       Canon Street (RMA/2018/1878)

4.2.1   Right of way names have been requested by Hesmac Properties Ltd for the right of way at the Canon Street subdivision. To view the right of way subject to this application refer to Attachment A.

4.2.2   The right of way names have been chosen in accordance with the theme of historic connections to the city of St Albans in England.

4.2.3   The names in order of preference are:

·    Verlamio Lane – St Albans’ namesake is the city of the St Albans in England. The city in England has got a long history of occupation dating back to about the year 20BC where it was a pre-roman settlement named Verlamio.

·    Ambit Lane – 109 Canon Street is located right on the boundary of Edgeware and St Albans. In fact, neighbouring properties are considered St Albans. The word Ambit is a synonym for boundary or edge.

·    Mellon Lane – The suburb of St Albans was names in memory of a British actress named Harriet Mellon who lived between 1777 and 1873. In 1827 Harriet married William Beauclerk who was the 9th duke of St Albans in England meaning that she became the Duchess of St Albans.

·    Beauclerk Lane – The Duke of St Albans was a position created in 1684 and given to Charles Beauclerk – son of King Charles II. There have been 14 Dukes of St Albans, all named Beauclerk.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Canon Street - Plan

16

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Laura Braddick - Senior Resource Consents Support Officer

Paul Lowe - Principal Advisor Resource Consents

Approved By

John Higgins - Head of Resource Consents

Leonie Rae - General Manager Consenting and Compliance

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

8.        Mahars Road Proposed P3 Restrictions

Reference:

18/974396

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of P3 Parking restrictions on Mahars Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from Mairehau Primary School representatives concerned with the congestion on Mahars Road around school drop off and pick up times.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

1.         Under clause 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the part of Mahars Road as indicated in the attached drawing TG133409 Issue 1, dated 23/8/2018, is reserved as a parking place for any vehicles, subject to the following restriction: the maximum time for parking of any vehicle is three minutes between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only.

2.         That any previous resolutions made pursuant to any bylaw that are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report are revoked.

3.         That these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install P3 Parking Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     It provides a pick up/drop off area for parents and caregivers close to the school entrance.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes approximately six unrestricted car parking spaces during the times stated on the proposal.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Representatives of Mairehau Primary School have approached Council with a request to look into the congestion issues being experienced on Mahars Road during school drop off and pick up times.  The school requires a safe area for parents/caregivers to park and pick up/drop off children.

5.2       Staff visited the site and discussed the issues with the school’s representatives.  It is proposed to install a P3 parking restriction area. 

5.3       The creation of a short term parking restriction will provide turnover of parking, maximising the ability for approximately six car park spaces in close proximity to the school during peak arrival/departure periods.  This type of parking management is common outside most school frontages.

6.   Option 1 - Install P3 Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install P3 Parking restrictions in accordance with Attachment A. These restrictions are to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       There has been no further consultation regarding this option as this was a direct request from the school and does not affect any other residential or business frontage.

6.5       The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports this option.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $500 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    There are no known risks associated with this option.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   It provides a pick up/drop off area for parents and caregivers close to the school entrance.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes approximately six unrestricted car parking spaces during the times stated on the proposal.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the school’s requests for improvement to the congestion at pick up and drop off times.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – Existing staff budgets.

Legal Implications

7.9       There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on unrestricted street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the congestion issues being experienced on Mahars Road during school drop off and pick up times.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Mahars Road P3 Diagram for Board Report

21

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

9.        Riselaw Street Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

18/975026

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions on Riselaw Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from local residents to improve safety and visibility around the 90-degree bend situated at the south end of Riselaw Street.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the part of Riselaw Street as indicated in the attached drawing TG133079 Issue 1, dated 31/8/2018.

2.         That any previous resolutions made pursuant to any bylaw that are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report are revoked.

3.         That these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions on Riselaw Street in accordance with Attachment A. (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines around the 90-degree bend situated at the south end of Riselaw Street.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes approximately nine car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by residents of Riselaw Street regarding the limited visibility around the 90-degree bend situated at the south end of Riselaw near properties #20 and #16.

5.2       Following site investigations, it was identified that due to a road width of approximately 7.6 metres around this bend, when vehicles were parked on both sides of the road at this location it created a blind, one-way pinch point when vehicles were travelling in both directions.

5.3       To address this concern it is proposed to install No Stopping lines on the inside curve of the bend (north side) while retaining parking on the south side of the road. There are approximately nine parking spaces to be displaced however following investigations it was identified that there is available parking space either side of the proposed No Stopping area which will accommodate this displacement.

5.4       While performing investigations of the area, all affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by way of face to face consultation which also included a visit with Shirley Primary School representatives. All consulted parties were happy with the proposal. Staff have also received a support email from the school which states they feel it would be a good safety strategy for their children who cross the road at that location to access the back entrance of the school.

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install 'No Stopping' restrictions on Riselaw Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance includes the consultation with the owner and occupier of any property likely to be injuriously affected by the option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       While performing investigations of the area, all affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by way of face to face consultation which also included a visit with Shirley Primary School representatives. All consulted parties were happy with the proposal. Staff have also received a support email from the school which states they feel it would be a good safety strategy for their children who cross the road at that location to access the back entrance of the school.

6.5       The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports this option.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $150 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    There are no risks associated with this option.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines around the 90-degree bend situated at the south end of Riselaw Street.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes approximately nine car park spaces.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for safety improvements at this location.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – Existing staff budgets.

Legal Implications

7.9       There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines and constraints at this location therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Riselaw Street No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

27

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

10.    Windermere Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

18/977547

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions at the intersections of Windermere, St James and Blighs Roads in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the Windermere Road Association and local residents to look into the safety issues being experienced at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the part of Windermere Road and St James Avenue as indicated in the attached drawing TG133059 Issue 1, dated 30/7/2018.

2.         That any previous resolutions made pursuant to any bylaw that are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report are revoked.

3.         That these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping restrictions and solid white intersection approach lines (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the intersection approaches.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes approximately eight car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The Council has received requests from local road users, which includes a letter from the Windermere Road Association, to review the safety issues being experienced on Windermere Road and St James Avenue. Currently the issue is that both Blighs Road and Tillman Avenue have limited parking and parents/caregivers of Waimairi School are parking on Windermere Road and St James Avenue.

5.2       Site investigations were carried out and it was noticed that during these school pick up and drop off times congestion is high and safety to all road users through these intersections was compromised. It was also noted that due to the approaches of the Windermere, St James and Blighs intersections being narrow, there is little space for motorists to take evasive action to avoid any vehicle that pulls out of the intersections unexpectedly.

5.3       It is proposed to install No Stopping restrictions on both the west and east sides of Windermere Road near to the Blighs Road intersection and both corners of the St James Avenue/Windermere Road intersection. Also proposed is to install solid white lines at all three approaches to the St James/Windermere junction.

5.4       Also during investigations, it was identified that there is sufficient available parking space either side of the intersections which will accommodate the displacement of vehicles that were parking on or near to the intersections. Consultation was carried out in July 2018, there were a total of 12 letters delivered to the affected properties and six letters posted to absentee owners.  One submission was received back which was in favour of the proposal.

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install 'No Stopping' restrictions and approach centre lines at the intersections of Windermere, St James and Blighs Roads in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance includes the consultation with the owner and occupier of any property likely to be injuriously affected by the option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Consultation was carried out in July 2018. There were a total of 12 letters delivered to the affected properties and six letters posted to absentee owners.  One submission was received back which was in favour of the proposal.

6.5       The Team Leader Parking Compliance supports this option.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $400 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    There are no risks associated with this option.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the intersection approaches.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes approximately eight car parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing intersection markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for improvement to the intersections.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – Existing staff budgets.

Legal Implications

7.9       There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact with on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines at the above named intersections and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Windermere Road No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

33

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

11.    Westminster/Fergusson Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

18/979918

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions at the Westminster Street/Fergusson Avenue intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the local residents to look into the safety issues being experienced at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve under clause 7 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the part of Westminster Street and Fergusson Avenue as indicated in the attached drawing TG133408 Issue 1, dated 18/9/2018.

2.         That any previous resolutions made pursuant to any bylaw that are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report are revoked.

3.         That these resolutions take effect when there is evidence that the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions and intersection approach markings. (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing.

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at this intersection.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes approximately six car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The Council has received recent requests from local residents, to review the safety issues being experienced at the Westminster Street/Fergusson Avenue intersection. This area can get heavily parked out due to various sporting events held at Christchurch Park. When events are being held parking demand is high and when vehicles are parked on or near the intersection this encourages drivers to nose out into the intersection for better visibility creating a safety issue that could be avoided. Also proposed for this intersection is the inclusion of a marked centreline with teardrop markings, this should aid in vehicles approaching the junction on the right angle and provide added visibility.

5.2       During investigations it was identified that although parking demand was high, there would be sufficient available parking space within the area which will accommodate the displacement of vehicles that were parking on or near to this intersection.

5.3       When investigations of the site were completed, consultation was carried out in August 2018 with affected property owners by way of door knock. There were no objections to installing the No Stopping and all affected owners indicated that due to the recent history of the area, the sooner the proposed restrictions were installed around the intersection the safer it would be.

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install 'No Stopping' restrictions at the Westminster Street /Fergusson Avenue intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance includes the consultation with the owner and occupier of any property likely to be injuriously affected by the option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Consultation was carried out in August 2018 with affected property owners by way of door knock. There were no objections and the proposal was well supported.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $300 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.7       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, clauses 7 and 8 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    There are no risks associated with this option.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the intersection.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes approximately six car parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing intersection markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for improvement to the intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – Existing staff budgets.

Legal Implications

7.9       There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted visibility issues at the intersection and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Attachment A-Westminster Fergusson No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

39

b

Attachment B-Westminster Fergusson Tracking Diagram for Board Report

40

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

12.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - September/October 2018

Reference:

18/1012820

Presenter(s):

Christine Lane, Community Governance Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This report provides information on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area, to provide the Board with a strategic overview and inform sound decision making.

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for September/ October 2018.

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Memos/Information/Advice to the Board

3.1.1   Information sent to the Board

·   Start work notice: Highfield waste water and water main – Project Update (circulated 27 Sep 2018)

·   Civic Education Programme Link (circulated 27 Sep 2018)

·   Richmond Community Meeting Flyer/Invitation (circulated 27 Sep 2018)

·   Picture of the letter in the bottle inside the Time Capsule (circulated 27 Sep 2018)

·   Start work notice: North West Suburbs Water Main Renewals – Momorangi Crescent (circulated 1 Oct 2018)

·   CNC Alliance: Project Update Belfast Road, Opening Guthries Road, QE II Barrier Move (circulated 1 Oct 2018)

·   Update of Community Facilities and Heritage Projects (circulated 4 Oct 2018)

3.2       Board area Consultations/Engagement/Submission opportunities

3.2.1   Nil to report.

3.3       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.3.1   Planning has begun for the 2019/20 Annual Plan. The Board received an update from the Chief Executive following their meeting on 28 September 2018.

A seminar discussion with governance staff will be scheduled for the Board to begin preparations for the Annual Plan 2019/20 process.

3.4       Board Reporting

The Board are asked to consider topics for inclusion in Newsline, the newsletter and report to the Council.


 

4.   Significant Council Projects in the Board Area

4.1       Strengthening Community Fund Projects

4.1.1   Edible Gardens

Papanui-Innes Edible Garden Awards will begin promotion next week. This will be a partnership with the Canterbury Horticultural Society and local staff are still looking to partner with a local business to support the wider project. The gardens will be judged early February and we hope to hold the event in March 2019.

4.2       Other partnerships with the community and organisations

4.2.1   Richmond Residents and Business Association

Staff have attended the Richmond Resident and Business Association monthly meetings and worked closely with Association members to plan the community meeting held on 2 October 2018.  Staff will continue to communicate, liaise and partner with the Richmond Resident and Business Association where appropriate.

4.3       Community Facilities (updates and future plans)

4.3.1   Redwood Plunket Rooms

The contractors have started back on site. This project is hoped to be completed prior to Christmas. Planning for an opening event will be started presently and a seminar will be scheduled with the Board round this event in the coming month.

4.3.2   10 Shirley Road

Awaiting a report from Parks team. Community Research has commenced which will have an element around this site.

4.3.3   St Albans Community Facility

Awaiting working party recommendations that the Board can adopt so the project can proceed.

4.3.4   St Albans Park

An update on progress will be provided in the Parks report at the 26 October Board meeting.

4.4       Infrastructure projects underway

4.4.1   Nil to report

5.   Significant Community Issues, Events and Projects in the Board Area

5.1       Richmond Community Meeting

35 residents attended the community meeting held on Tuesday 2 October in the Shirley Primary School hall. The information was well received and the community asked good questions. This project will now continue in partnership with the Richmond Business and Residents association.

5.2       Events Report Back

5.2.1   The Breeze Walking Festival (29 Sep to 14 Oct 2018)

With great weather and excellent numbers the Breeze Walking Festival has been well attended with lots of positive feedback.  Survey Monkey results will be compiled by the end of November.

The ‘Going on a Bear Hunt’ walk at Walter Park proved extremely popular with approximately eight hundred people attending.

 

 

      

          Splash Splosh!  (water)                                      Squelch spuerch! (mud)

 

6.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

6.1       The next bi-monthly report will be presented in the 26 October agenda.

7.   Community Board Funding Update

7.1       The 2018/19 financial year’s Positive Youth Development and Discretionary Response Funds Balance Sheet is attached (refer Attachment A of this report).

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes PYDF and DRF Balance Sheet as at 9 October 2018

44

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

Lyssa Aves - Governance Support Officer

Stacey Holbrough - Community Development Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Dane Moir - Community Development Advisor

Sharon Munro - Community Support Officer

Approved By

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 


Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board

12 October 2018

 

 

13.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.