Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 30 October 2018

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Vicki Buck

Jimmy Chen

Catherine Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie Mora

 

 

24 October 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 8258

gary.watson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board – Community Board Plan 2017-2019

 

Community Outcomes and Priorities

 

1.       Strong Communities

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

1.1          A range of social and recreational initiatives which build and develop community wellbeing.

1.2          Culturally inclusive and celebrates diversity.

   

Our Board Priorities are to:

Community

1.3          Support and encourage the involvement of children and young people in all aspects of community life including decision making.

1.4          Support and advocate for initiatives that address poverty issues and improve the well-being of families and individuals.  

1.5          Support and advocate for activities for older adults in the ward to reduce social isolation.

1.6          Advocate for culturally inclusive practices, where diversity is supported. 

1.7          Consider disability access across all projects.

1.8          Ensure partnerships are created and strengthened with community organisations, schools and the University of Canterbury.

1.9          Foster the development of leadership and celebrate this across the wards.  

Community Board Engagement

1.10       Advocate for the promotion and accessibility of the Community Board and its members so as to enhance more active participation and transparency in the Board’s decision-making.

1.11       Supporting and enabling consultation to gain clear views from the community.

Social Wellbeing

1.12       Advocate for safe, well-run and attractive social housing and strategies that reduce homelessness in the city. 

1.13       Support the creation of safe, accessible and connected places for people to meet in the community.

1.14       Support local events and activities that bring communities together.  

1.15       Support innovative projects that enhance social wellbeing.

 

2.       Liveable City

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

2.1       Residents feel safe in their communities and neighbourhoods.

2.2       Residents have ready access to parks and greenspace for recreational facilities and activities.

2.3       The cultural, natural and built heritage is acknowledged, valued and enhanced.

2.4       Children are provided with fun and safe environments.

2.5       Community facilities are provided that meet the needs of communities. 

2.6       A safe, efficient and sustainable transport and local roading network.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

Roading and Transport

2.7       Work with schools and community groups to ensure safe crossings and road networks near schools and along key transit routes. 

2.8       Support public transport and cycling initiatives that promote increased usage.

Planning

2.9       Advocate for improvements to parks, greenspace and recreational facilities. 

2.10    Advocate for the protection of the quality of residential living. 

2.11    Monitor the issues of green field subdivisions and increasing intensification across the ward. 

2.12    Advocate for the community facing the challenges of growth. 

2.13    Advocate and make decisions on effective traffic management measures that contribute to meeting the needs and connectivity of local communities.

2.14    Monitor planning issues and support community concerns through appropriate channels.

 

Community Facilities and Playgrounds 

2.15    Ensure the new Riccarton Community Centre and the Hornby Library and Customer Services and South West Leisure Centre meet the needs of the community.

2.16    Advocate for the timely provision of local facilities to meet the needs of growing local communities.

2.17    Ensure that usage of Council facilities is being optimised.

2.18    Advocate for the provision of quality playgrounds throughout the wards.  

Heritage

2.19    Support and advocate for the enhancement and protection of local heritage assets.

  

3.       Healthy Environment

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

3.1       A commitment to protect and improve the local environment.

3.2       Climate change and environmental sustainability is considered by the Community Board in its decision making, including for all new facilities.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

3.3       Support and advocate to maintain clean drinking water and high standards of air quality.

3.4       Monitor pollution issues, quarrying effects and compliance of consents. 

3.5       Support local communities on land use, and air and water quality issues and where appropriate, advocate for and represent any community concerns arising.

3.6       Monitor and respond on parks and tree issues raised by the community.

3.7       Encourage and support the implementation of local sustainable greenspace use initiatives, for example, food forests and community gardens.

3.8       Support and advocate for initiatives aimed at addressing climate change. 

 

4.       Prosperous Economy

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

4.1       Strong local business communities.

4.2       An environment where innovative projects are trialled and supported.

4.3       Has a strong social enterprise sector.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

4.4       Continue to liaise with local business networks.

4.5       Support initiatives that promote a wide range of innovative practices. 

4.6       Foster social enterprise initiatives. 

4.7       Advocate for Council rate increases to be kept as low as possible.   

4.8       Support the provision of more affordable and social housing. 

 

 

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 6

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 6

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 6

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 6

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 6

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 6

Staff Reports

A       7.       Templeton Area - Proposed Speed Limit Changes..................................................... 21

C       8.       Blenheim Road/Annex Road Intersection - Proposed No U-Turn Restrictions........ 31

C       9.       Main South Road - Proposed No Right Turn and No U-turn Restrictions................ 39

C       10.     Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2018-19 - Applications - Hornby Rugby Football Club and Yaldhurst Environment Association 49

C       11.     Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Applications - Catherine Boyle and Anna Lee School of Dance................................ 53

C       12.     Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - October 2018........... 57

 

B       13.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 82 

 

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday 16 October 2018,  be confirmed (refer page 7).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

The public forum will be held at 4.30pm.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

 

Waipuna

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 16 October 2018

Time:                                    4.31pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Vicki Buck

Jimmy Chen

Catherine Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie Mora

 

 

16 October 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 8258

gary.watson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00127

That the apology received for early departure from Debbie Mora, be accepted.

Natalie Bryden/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                         Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00128

That the minutes of the Joint Waimāero/Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board and Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Monday 10 September 2018,  be confirmed.

 

Ross McFarlane/Mike Mora                                                                                                                                   Carried

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00129

That the minutes of the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday 25 September 2018, be confirmed.

Natalie Bryden/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                         Carried

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.1       Templeton Residents' Association

Garry Kilday, Chairperson of the Templeton Residents’ Association, addressed the Board in relation to the Proposed Templeton Quarry and sought an indication of the Board’s progress to date in preparing a submission in support of the Templeton Residents’ Association opposition to the anticipated application from Fulton Hogan Limited.

He indicated that the Board should focus on water and transport aspects as the basis of its support to the Association’s submission.

 

Mr Kilday was advised that the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson had sought a meeting with the Mayor to further discuss the matter.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Garry Kilday for his presentation. 

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

5.1

Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops

Caroline Hutchinson, local property owner, addressed the Board regarding the Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops associated with the 45 Route Change report in support of the proposed A1 Bus Stop location.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Caroline Hutchinson for her presentation.

 

Item 8 of these minutes detail the Board’s decision on this matter.

 

5.2

Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops

Michael Corner, local resident, addressed the Board regarding the Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops associated with the 45 Route Change report and spoke against the proposed B1 and B2 Bus Stops locations due to safety concerns over poor sight lines and the loss of on street parking.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Michael Corner for his presentation.

 

Item 8 of these minutes detail the Board’s decision on this matter.

 

Debbie Mora left the meeting at 5.00pm.

 

5.3          Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops

                Nino Kozlevcar, local resident, addressed the Board regarding the Westmorland Proposed Bus Stops associated with the 45 Route Change report and spoke against the proposed D1 Bus Stop location.

After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Nino Kozlevcar for his presentation.

 

Item 8 of these minutes detail the Board’s decision on this matter. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.


 

 

 

7.   Correspondence

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00130 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board decided to:

1.         Receive the correspondence from Elizabeth Dublin in relation to public toilets.

Mike Mora/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

 

8.   Westmorland - Proposed Bus Stops Associated With 145 Route Change

 

Staff in attendance spoke to the accompanying report and answered questions from members.

 

In its consideration of the staff report, the Board also took account of the deputations made to it from Caroline Hutchinson, Michael Corner and Nino Kozlevcar (Items 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 of these minutes refer).

 

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board approve Option 1:

Option 1: Revoke redundant bus stops on Woodside Common

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop adjacent to 1 Woodside Common, on the southeast side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 34 metres west of its intersection with Ravensdale Rise and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

2.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop between 21 and 23 Woodside Common, on the southern and eastern side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 274 metres west of its intersection with Ravensdale Rise (measured along the kerb line) and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

Option 1: Location A1, adjacent to 71 Ravensdale Rise

3.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 27 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres be revoked.

4.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 27 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

5.         Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 35 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 49 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 1: Location B1, adjacent to 111 Ravensdale Rise

7.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

8.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

9.         Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 139 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 153 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 1: Location C, adjacent to Ravensdale Park

11.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

12.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of four metres.

13.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 70 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

14.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 84 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Option 1: Location D2, adjacent to 126 Penruddock Rise

15.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12 metres, be revoked.

16.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30 metres, be revoked.

17.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the north and south sides of Francis Mill Grove, commencing at its intersection with Penruddock Rise and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres, be revoked.

18.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north and south sides of Francis Mill Grove, commencing at its intersection with Penruddock Rise and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

19.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

20.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

21.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the west side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 12 metres north of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

22.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 26 metres north of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 1: Location E, adjacent to 112 Penruddock Rise

23.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 40 metres, be revoked.

24.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

25.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the south side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 18 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

26.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 32 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

That should the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board decline to approve Option 1, that the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board approve Option 2:

Option 2: Revoke redundant Bus Stops on Woodside Common

27.       Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop adjacent to 2 Woodside Common, on the southeastern side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 34 metres west of its easternmost intersection with Penruddock Rise and extending in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

28.       Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop between 21 and 23 Woodside Common, on the south side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 274 metres west of its intersection with Penruddock Rise (measured along the kerb line) and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

Option 2: Location A2, adjacent to 63 Ravensdale Rise

29.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 13 metres north of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

30.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 13 metres north of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of four metres.

31.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 17 metres north of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

32.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 31 metres north of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Option 2: Location B2, adjacent to 109 Ravensdale Rise

33.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 105 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

34.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 105 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

35.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 113 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

36.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 127 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 2: Location C, adjacent to Ravensdale Park

37.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

38.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of four metres.

39.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 70 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

40.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 84 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Option 2: Location D1, adjacent to 132 and 143 Penruddock Rise

41.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 71 metres south of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

42.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 71 metres south of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

43.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the west side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 75 metres south of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

44.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 89 metres south of its intersection with Francis Mill Grove and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Option 2: Location E, adjacent to 112 Penruddock Rise

45.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 40 metres, be revoked.

46.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

47.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the south side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 18 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

48.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 32 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00131

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to approve Option 1:

Option 1: Revoke redundant bus stops on Woodside Common

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop adjacent to 1 Woodside Common, on the southeast side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 34 metres west of its intersection with Ravensdale Rise and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

2.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions, including the Bus Stop between 21 and 23 Woodside Common, on the southern and eastern side of Woodside Common commencing at a point 274 metres west of its intersection with Ravensdale Rise (measured along the kerb line) and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

Option 1: Location A1, adjacent to 71 Ravensdale Rise

3.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 27 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

4.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 27 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

5.         Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 35 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 49 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the northern kerb line of Woodside Common and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 1: Location B1, adjacent to 111 Ravensdale Rise

7.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

8.         Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 131 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

9.         Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 139 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 153 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Petworth Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres.

Option 1: Location C, adjacent to Ravensdale Park

11.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres, be revoked.

12.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 66 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of four metres.

13.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 70 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

14.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the southeast side of Ravensdale Rise commencing at a point 84 metres northeast of its intersection with Penruddock Rise, measured along the kerb line, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Option 1: Location D2, adjacent to 126 Penruddock Rise

15.          Install an interim (unmarked) bus stop at location D2 and that staff be requested to further investigate and respond back to the Board on options for either the Bus Stop Location D2 to be moved away from 126 Penruddock Rise, or for the kerb build out to be modified to accommodate the bus stop on a section of Penruddock Rise located immediately below the existing stormwater grate.

Option 1: Location E, adjacent to 112 Penruddock Rise

16.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 40 metres, be revoked.

17.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

18.       Approve that a marked Bus Stop be installed on the south side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 18 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

19.       Approve that the stopping and standing of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south western side of Penruddock Rise, commencing at a point 32 metres southeast of its intersection with Sedbergh Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of eight metres.

Ross McFarlane/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

9.   Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board - 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Applications - Cashmere Croquet Club, Lucinda Pearse and Elle-Roze Ilkiw

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00132 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $600 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Cashmere Croquet Club on behalf of Myles Duggan and James Duggan, towards them competing in the New Zealand Under 21 Golf Croquet Championship in Matamata from 19 to 22 October 2018. 

2.         Approve a grant of $300 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Lucinda Pearse towards attending to compete at the 2018 National Gymnastics Championships in Tauranga from 3 to 7 October 2018.

3.         Approve a grant of $300 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Elle-Roze Ilkiw towards attending to compete at  the National Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships in Tauranga from 3 to 7 October 2018.

Vicki Buck/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

10. Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Neighbourhood Week 2018 - Funding Applications

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00133 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Transfer $2,900 into the 2018 Neighbourhood Week Fund from its 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund.

2.         Approve the allocation of its Neighbourhood Week/Let's Get Together this Summer 2018 funding of $4,400, as follows:

 

Applicant

Activity

No. Attending

Recommendation

1.

Arthur Phillips,

Steadman Road Area Residents’ Group

BBQ

45

$150

2.

Kathy Cowan

Pre-Christmas BBQ

30

$130

3.

Kevin Bennett

Street BBQ

40

$100

4.

Debbie Reeves,

Delamain Residents' Association

Community Sausage Sizzle

50

$115

5.

Aneta Matagi

Family Reunion/birthday celebration

400

$0

6.

Tim Gunther

BBQ and outdoor cinema

35

$140

7.

Wendy McLintock

Community afternoon tea

30

$115

8.

Pleayo Tovaranonte

Neighbourhood Family Potluck BBQ

70-80

$200

9.

Malcolm Lilley,

Halswell Road/Candys Road Neighbourhood Support Group

Bi annual get together

25-30

$130

10.

Margaret Bennie,

Kintyre Drive Mull Place Neighbourhood

BBQ

25-30

$130

11.

Barbara Tie

Shared lunch

30

$85

12.

David Chamberlain

BBQ

64

$80

13.

Belinda Carter,

Rewi Alley Chinese School Trust

Open day BBQ with activities

450+

$100

14.

Felicity Rea

BBQ

50

$160

15.

Julia Caldwell

Christmas Dinner

20-30

$0

16.

Erin White

BBQ

20-40

$120

17.

Rachel McErlain

Street BBQ

40

$100

18.

Margaret Murray

BBQ

30

$130

19.

Una Raleqe,

Canterbury Fiji Social Services Trust

Shared community meal

60

$175

20.

Jo Wall,

Corsair Drive Neighbourhood Support Group

Pizza and games

20-30

$80

21.

Sonja Carpenter

Street BBQ

50-60

$160

22.

Karen Martin

BBQ

50

$160

23.

Jacinta Stopforth

Sausage sizzle

50

$150

24.

Geoff Wallis

Cul-de-sac BBQ

70

$190

25.

Sharon Read

Street BBQ

75

$200

26.

Patrice Crawford

BBQ lunch

90

$210

27.

Hazim Al Umari

Dinner

17

$0

28.

Lyn Hucklebridge,

Greater Hornby Residents' Association Inc

BBQ

700

$500

29.

Wendy Weusten,

Avonhead Baptist Church

Family event, alternative to Halloween

250

$250

30.

Richard Meekin,

Antonia Place Neighbourhood Group

Street BBQ and get together

27

$90

31.

Judith Penney,

Halswell Hall Incorporated

BBQ

300

$250

o nottext

Vicki Buck/Natalie Bryden                                                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on the following matters:

·    Halswell Junior Youth Council – prize awarded for the Westlake Park Clean Up

·    Te Reo 101 class - three elected members attending

·    Goulding Avenue/Shands Road – local flooding

·    Wigram Air Crash Memorial unveiling – congratulations to those involved

·    Multicultural Festivals – Tamil Society and Iranian Society

·    Prestons - proposed 40 kilometres per hour speed limit and Joint Coastal-Burwood and Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting

·    Board Requests and My Council – clarification of process

·    District Licensing Committee - Hearing re The Common Room application, 119 Riccarton Road

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 6.04pm

 

CONFIRMED THIS 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

 

Mike Mora

Chairperson

   


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

7.        Templeton Area - Proposed Speed Limit Changes

Reference:

18/844636

Presenter(s):

Edwin Tiong, Traffic Engineer and Lori Rankin, Engagement Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to seek the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board’s recommendation to the Council that it approve the proposed speed limit changes on the streets in Templeton area as described within this report in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the community to reduce speed limits in the Templeton area, in alignment with the new speed limits on Selwyn District Council’s road network.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board recommends that the Council:

1.         Approve that pursuant to Part 4 Section 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017, that speed limits in the Templeton area be revoked and set as identified on the agenda attached drawing TG132770 Issue 3, dated 10-10-2018, and as listed below in Clauses 1a. to 1b. including resultant changes made to the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits and Associated Speed Limit Maps:

a.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 100 kilometres per hour on Hasketts Road, Leggett Road, Maddisons Road, Kirk Road, Newton Road, Dawsons Road and Jones Road.

b.         Revoke the existing permanent speed limit of 80 kilometres per hour on Waterloo Road.

2.         Approve that the speed limit on Hasketts Road be set at 80 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Buchanans Road and extending to its intersection with Barters Road.

3.         Approve that the speed limit on Leggett Road be set at 80 kilometres per hour.

4.         Approve that the speed limit on Maddisons Road be set at 80 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Barters Road and extending in a westerly direction to a point measured 300 metres east of Kirk Road, and commencing from a point measured 360 metres west of Kirk Road and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Dawsons Road.

5.         Approve that the speed limit on Kirk Road be set at 80 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with West Coast Road and extending in a southerly direction to a point measured 400 metres north of Maddisons Road.

6.         Approve that the speed limit on Newtons Road be set at 80 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Kirk Road and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Dawsons Road.

7.         Approve that the speed limit on Dawsons Road (boundary road with Selwyn District Council) be set at 80 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with West Coast Road and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Jones Road.

8.         Approve that the speed limit on Jones Road be set at 60 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Dawsons Road and extending in an easterly direction to a point measured 130 metres west of Globe Bay Drive.

9.         Approve that the speed limit on Waterloo Road be set at 60 kilometres per hour commencing at a point measured 80 metres west of Pound Road and extending in a westerly direction to a point measured 50 metres east of Bicknor Street.

10.       Approve that the speed limit on Maddisons Road be set at 60 kilometres per hour commencing at a point measured 300 metres east of Kirk Road and extending in a westerly direction to a point measured 360 metres west of Kirk Road.

11.       Approve that the speed limit on Kirk Road be set at 60 kilometres per hour commencing at a point measured 400 metres north of Maddisons Road and extending in a southerly direction to a point measured 330 metres south of Maddisons Road.

12.       Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in Clauses 1 to 11 come into force following the date of Council approval and installation of all required infrastructure (signage and/or markings) and removal of obsolete infrastructure as indicated in the attached drawing TG132770 Issue 3, dated 10/10/2018.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety & Efficiency Service Plan in the Councils Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Set Speed Limits in accordance with the Attachment A (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Speed limits are set at a level that is appropriate for the nature of the road use and consistent with the speed limits in Selwyn District Council.

·     Reduce potential for crashes with high severity injuries.

·     Proposed speed limits supported by community.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Longer travel times (minimal).

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the speed limits in the Templeton area.

5.2       Recently, Selwyn District Council (SDC) reduced the speed limit on its sections of Newtons Road and Maddisons Road from 100 kilometres per hour to 80 kilometres per hour. Members of the public have requested that the Christchurch City Council (CCC) consider making the same changes on the remaining sections of these roads.

5.3       The speed limit changes made by SDC results in a variation of speed limits in the Templeton area. These speed limit variations over short distances of road, are confusing for motorists.

5.4       From a safety perspective, the rural roads, for example Newtons Road, are very narrow with no hard shoulders and no road markings at all.

5.5       In addition, it has been identified that vehicle operating speeds travelling into the Templeton area from Kirk Road, Jones Road and Waterloo Road are  higher than the posted speed limit.

5.6       These speed limit changes are proposed primarily for safety and consistency.

5.7       An earlier engagement with SDC, NZTA, Police and the AA resulted in unanimous support of the proposal. SDC are also in agreement with CCC with regards to the speed limit reduction on Dawsons Road (boundary road with SDC).

 


 

6.   Option 1 – Set Speed Limits in accordance with Attachment A (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The preferred option involves the changing of speed limits in accordance with the Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance includes the consultation with the businesses, owner and occupier of any property likely to be affected by the option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by receipt of the consultation leaflet. The consultation was also emailed to key stakeholders and was posted on the Council Have Your Say webpage.

6.5       Engagement was undertaken from Wednesday 13 June 2018 to  Friday 6 July 2018.

6.6       A total of 1,000 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and properties on Barters Road, Dawsons Road, Hasketts Road, Ivey Road, Jones Road, Kirk Road, Leggett Road, Maddisons Road, Miners Road, Newtons Road, Pound Road and West Coast Road.

6.7       The consultation leaflets were also sent to 20 key stakeholders and 198 absentee owners. 

6.8       Additional leaflets were made available at Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

6.9       During the course of the engagement, the Council received feedback from 96 submitters. Of these, 83 submitters were in support of the proposal and 13 did not support the proposal.

6.10    The following outlines the main themes of the feedback:

6.10.1 Further speed reductions

·   20 submitters requested further speed reductions.

Kirk Road

·   Seven submitters (in support) requested Kirk Road from Templeton to Maddisons Road be reduced to 50 kilometres per hour.

·   Two submitters (one in support and one against) requested Kirk Road from Templeton to Newtons Road be reduced to 60 kilometres per hour.

·   One submitter (in support) requested Kirk Road from Templeton to Maddisons Road or Newtons Road be reduced to 60 kilometres per hour or 70  kilometres per hour.

Barters Road

·   One submitter (in support) requested Barters Road be reduced to 60 kilometres per hour.

Hasketts Road

·   One submitter (in support) requested Hasketts Road near the  Ruapuna Motorsport Park be reduced to 70  kilometres per hour.

 

 

Maddisons Road

·   One submitter (in support) requested Maddisons Road between Dawsons Road and Kirk Road be reduced to 50  kilometres per hour.

Waterloo Road

·   One submitter (in support) requested Waterloo Road between Pound Road and Bicknor Street be reduced to 70  kilometres per hour.

·   One submitter (in support) requested Waterloo Road to the intersection with Wakamuri Road be reduced to 50  kilometres per hour.

·   One submitter (in support) requested Waterloo Road between Kirk Road and Pound Road be reduced to 50 kilometres per hour.  

West Coast Road

·   Two submitters (in support) requested that the intersection of West Coast Road and Kirk Road be reduced to 70 kilometres per hour  (NZTA are the RCA).

·   Two submitters (in support) requested that West Coast Road west of the Hasketts Road intersection be reduced to 70 kilometres per hour   (NZTA are the RCA).

All proposed roads

·   One submitter (in support) requested all roads be reduced to 60 or 70 kilometres per hour.

6.10.2 Exclusions

·   Six submitters requested some roads be excluded, three submitters did not support any speed reductions and one submitter requested an increase in the speed limit on Hasketts Road.

Jones Road:

·   Three submitters in support and one submitter against the proposal did not agree with the speed limit being reduced to 60 kilometres per hour.  

·   One submitter in support did not agree with the speed limit being reduced to 60 kilometres per hour and suggested it be reduced to 80 kilometres per hour instead.

Kirk Road (Maddisons Road to West Coast Road)

·   One submitter who did not support the proposal, suggested Kirk Road (between Maddisons Road and West Coast Road) remain 100  kilometres per hour.

Maddisons Road and Hasketts Road to the intersections with Kirk Road

·   One submitter who was in support of the proposal suggested that Maddisons Road and Hasketts Road to the intersection with Kirk Road remain at 100  kilometres per hour.

Hasketts Road

·   One submitter who did not support the proposal suggested the current 70 kilometres per hour section on Hasketts Road be increased to 80  kilometres per hour to make it consistent with the other proposed 80  kilometres per hour sections.

All roads with proposed speed reductions

·   Three submitters that did not support the proposal, and did not agree to any of the speed reductions.

6.10.3 Heavy vehicle route

·   Nine submitters (seven in support and two against) requested a heavy vehicle route is implemented to direct truck drivers not to use Kirk Road.

6.10.4 Outside the scope of the project

·   14 submitters made requests which were outside the scope of this project.

6.10.5 Additional threshold signage

·   Two submitters in support of the proposal requested extra threshold signage be installed.

6.11    As a result of consultation, the following change(s) has/have been made to the final plan for approval:

·   Proposed 60  kilometres per hour speed limit on section of Waterloo Road between Pound Road and Bicknor Street instead of 80 kilometres per hour.  

·   Proposed 60  kilometres per hour speed limit on the section of Kirk Road approaching Maddisons Road intersection instead of 80 kilometres per hour.  

·   Proposed 60  kilometres per hour speed limit on the section of Maddisons Road approaching Kirk Road intersection instead of 80  kilometres per hour.

·   The above changes would improve the safety at the Kirk Road/Maddisons Road intersection.

·   The access roads such as Kirk Road, Waterloo Road and Jones Road would be reduced to 60  kilometres per hour prior to entering into the 50 kilometres per hour area of Templeton for consistency purposes.

6.12    Overall, it is noted that the majority of the proposed 80  kilometres per hour speed limits are appropriate due to the rural nature of the road, and is consistent throughout the area.

6.13    A heavy vehicle ban on Kirk Road into Templeton, will be reviewed in the near future.

6.14    A letter has been sent to all submitters advising of the outcome of the consultation, including details of the Board meeting and how they can request speaking rights. Also included in this letter was a link to the feedback summary with project team responses.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.15    This option is consistent with the Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan 2012-2042.

Financial Implications

6.16    Cost of Implementation - $30,000 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $3,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.17    Funding source - Traffic Operations Signs and Road Marking Budget.

6.18    Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.19    Speed limits must be set in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017.

6.20    Part 4 Section 27 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides the Council with the authority to set speed limits by resolution.

6.21    The Council has not delegated its authority to set speed limits to the Community Boards. 

6.22    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

             6.23        None identified

Implementation

6.24    Implementation dependencies - Community Board recommendation to the Council for Council approval.

6.25    Implementation timeframe - Approximately six weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.26    The advantages of this option include:

·   Speed limits are set at a level that are appropriate for the nature of the road use.

·   Reduced potential for crashes and high severity injuries

·   Proposed speed limits supported by community

6.27    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Longer travel times (minimal)

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing speed limit.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by receipt of the consultation leaflet. The consultation was also emailed to key stakeholders and was posted on the Council Have Your Say webpage.

7.4.1   Engagement was undertaken from Wednesday 13 June 2018 – to Friday 6 July 2018.

7.4.2   A total of 1,000 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and properties on Barters Road, Dawsons Road, Hasketts Road, Ivey Road, Jones Road, Kirk Road, Leggett Road, Maddisons Road, Miners Road, Newtons Road, Pound Road and West Coast Road.

7.4.3   The consultation leaflets were also sent to 20 key stakeholders and 198 absentee owners. 

7.4.4   Additional leaflets were made available at Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

7.5       During the course of the engagement, Council received feedback from 96 submitters. Of the 96 submissions, 83 submitters were in support of the proposal and 13 did not support the proposal.

7.6       All roads with proposed speed reductions

·   Three submitters that did not support the proposal, and did not agree to any of the speed reductions.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.7       This option is inconsistent with the Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan 2012-2042.

7.7.1   Inconsistency – Not creating a culture of safety.

7.7.2   Reason for inconsistency – Not ensuring safe and appropriate speed limits which support the design, function and expected level of safety of the road network.

7.7.3   Amendment necessary – Recommend speed limit changes as per Attachment A (Option 1).

Financial Implications

7.8       Cost of Implementation - $3,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.9       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - $0

7.10    Funding source – Existing staff budgets

Legal Implications

7.11    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.12    Road use and misalignment of safe and appropriate speeds in the area not addressed. This option is inconsistent with the speed limits on adjacent roads in the Selwyn District Council area.

Implementation

7.13    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable

7.14    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retain existing travel times and not incur installation costs.

7.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not have the potential to improve road safety in accordance with changes of speed limits in the Selwyn District Council area.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Templeton Area - Proposed Speed Limit Changes - Drawing TG132770 - For Council Approval

30

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Lori Rankin - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Stephen Wright - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

8.        Blenheim Road/Annex Road Intersection - Proposed No U-Turn Restrictions

Reference:

18/933972

Presenter(s):

Edwin Tiong, Traffic Engineer and Lori Rankin, Engagement Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the installation of a 'No U-turn' restriction at the Blenheim Road/Annex Road intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to complaints from road users of conflicting movements at the Blenheim Road/Annex Road signalised intersection.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to approve that:

1.         Under Part 2, Clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that from the right turn bay of Blenheim Road as indicated in the agenda attached drawing TG132793 Issue 1, dated 7-9-2018, vehicles are prohibited from performing a U-turn from Blenheim Road eastbound to Blenheim Road westbound.

2.         That any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report are revoked.

3.         That these resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restriction described in the report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety and Efficiency Service Plan in the Council’s Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No U-turn restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the crash risk by prohibiting conflicting movements caused by vehicles undertaking a U-turn at this signalised intersection.

·     Right turning motorists are not held up by U-turning motorists.

·     The conflict between left turning traffic from Annex Road and U-turning traffic will be removed.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Restricts the opportunity for east bound traffic to perform a U-turn.

·     Some motorists will have to travel further to change direction.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the operation of the Blenheim Road/Annex Road signalised intersection.

5.2       When motorists travelling on Blenheim Road towards Annex Road perform a U-turn, it causes confusion for left turning motorists from Annex Road. Even though the left turning traffic has right of way the conflict and confusion often causes delays.

5.3       There have been 12 crashes at this signalised intersection in the last five years.  These crashes generally involved rear end crashes and right turn traffic colliding with oncoming traffic on Blenheim Road. There is no crash history involving U-turn traffic. However, delays result in frustration.  This can lead to poor decision making resulting in right turn movements colliding with opposing traffic. 

5.4       Motorists can still perform a U-turn further east at the intersection of Blenheim Road and Penn Place.


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No U-turn Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Prohibiting Blenheim Road eastbound traffic from performing a U-turn at the Annex Road intersection.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance included, a letterbox drop to the local community and businesses.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Engagement was undertaken from Thursday 14 June 2018 to  Friday 6 July 2018.

6.5       A total of 170 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and residential properties around the intersection on Annex Road, Blenheim Road, Hansen Lane and Penn Place.

6.6       The consultation leaflets were also sent to 20 key stakeholders and 98 absentee owners.

6.7       Additional leaflets were made available at Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

6.8       During the course of the engagement, the Council received feedback from 25 submitters. Of the 25 submissions, 24 submitters were in support of the proposal and one did not support the proposal.

6.9       The following outlines the main themes of the feedback:

·    Seven submitters commented that the current set-up is dangerous and had safety concerns about the U-turn, which relate to conflicting movement between the U-turning traffic and left turning traffic from Annex Road.

·    Three submitters commented that the U-turn causes congestion/delays.

·    The one submitter against the proposal did not believe there was an issue with the U-turn.

6.10    A letter has been sent to all submitters advising the outcome of the consultation, including details of the Board meeting and how they can request speaking rights. Also included in this letter was a link to the feedback summary with project team responses.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.11    This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.12    Cost of Implementation - $200 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $2,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

6.13    Funding source - Traffic Operations Signs and Road Marking Budget

6.14    MaintenanceOngoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.15    Part 2, Clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides Council with the authority to prohibit or restrict U-turn movement by resolution.

6.16    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.17    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

             6.18        Motorists who currently use this intersection to perform a U-turn will no longer be able to, however a U-turn can be performed further east at the intersection of Blenheim Road and Penn Place.

Implementation

6.19    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval

6.20    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.21    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the crash risk by prohibiting conflicting movements caused by vehicles undertaking a U-turn at this signalised intersection.

·   Right turning motorists are not held up by U-turning motorists.

·   The conflict between left turning traffic from Annex Road and U-turning traffic will be removed.

6.22    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Restricts the opportunity for east bound traffic to perform a U-turn.

·   Some motorists will have to travel further to change direction.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing status quo, allowing U-turn movements at this signalised intersection.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       Only one submitter supported this option however this option would not deliver the desired safety benefits.

7.5       This option is inconsistent with community requests for improvement to the intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is inconsistent with the Council’s Safer Christchurch Strategy 2016-2021.

7.6.1   Inconsistency – Not enhancing safety on our roads

7.6.2   Reason for inconsistency – Does not address the U-turn effect on traffic at this intersection.

7.6.3   Amendment necessary – Recommend Option1 to ban the U-turn from Blenheim Road eastbound to remove the conflicting movement with left turn traffic on Annex Road.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $2,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report

7.8       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - $0

7.9       Funding source – Existing staff budgets

Legal Implications

7.10    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option other than the Council not being proactive in reducing crashes.

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    There is a risk of conflicting movements at this signalised intersection. If a crash was to occur at this intersection, it is highly likely that U-turn movement could be a factor.

7.12    Residual risk rating: There are no mitigation measures within this option that remove the risk.  When assessed against the Council’s Risk and Mitigation Guide, this intersection resulting in a rating of medium risk

7.13    This risk can be reduced by installing a no U-turn restriction at this intersection (Option 1).

Implementation

7.14    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable

7.15    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Vehicles would still be able to perform U-turn at the intersection.

7.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the risk associated with conflicting movement at the signalised intersection and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Blenheim Road Annex Road Intersection - Proposed No U-turn Restriction - Drawing TG132793 - For Board Approval

37

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Lori Rankin - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Stephen Wright - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

9.        Main South Road - Proposed No Right Turn and No U-turn Restrictions

Reference:

18/1049646

Presenter(s):

Edwin Tiong, Traffic Engineer and Lori Rankin, Engagement Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Right Turn' and ‘No U-turn’ restrictions at Main South Road, by Green Lane and Harvard Avenue, in accordance with Attachments A, B and C.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the community regarding safety on Main South Road by Green Lane and Harvard Avenue.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve that:

1.         Under Part 2, clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that from Main South Road, southbound, as indicated in the agenda attached drawing TG132792 Issue 1, Attachment 1, dated 5-10-2018, vehicles are prohibited from performing a right turn into properties No.214 and No.218 Main South Road opposite Harvard Avenue.

2.         Under Part 2, clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that from Main South Road, southbound, as indicated in the agenda attached drawing TG132792 Issue 1, Attachment 2, dated 5-10-2018, vehicles are prohibited from performing a right turn into Green Lane.

3.         Under Part 2, clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that from Main South Road, southbound, as indicated in the agenda attached drawing TG132792 Issue 1, Attachment 1, dated 5-10-2018, vehicles are prohibited from performing a U-turn opposite Harvard Avenue to Main South Road northbound.

4.         Under Part 2, clause 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017, that from Main South Road, southbound, as indicated in the agenda attached drawing TG132792 Issue 1, Attachment 2, dated 5-10-2018, vehicles are prohibited from performing a U-turn by Green Lane to Main South Road northbound.

5.         That any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this report, are revoked.

6.         That these resolutions take effect when the traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in the staff report are in place.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The recommendations in this report are consistent with the anticipated outcomes of the Traffic Safety and Efficiency Service Plan in the Council’s Long Term Plan (2018 - 2028)

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Right Turn and No U-turn Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a rear-end crash by improving safety on Main South Road.

·     Straight through motorists are not held up by the right turning or U-turning motorists.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Restricting right turn and U-turn movement causing longer travel distance and time for southbound motorists wishing to go to Green Lane or entering businesses opposite Harvard Avenue.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the operation of Main South Road by Green Lane and Harvard Avenue. 

5.2       Main South Road is classified as a Major Arterial under the Christchurch City Council Road Classification System. The Average Daily Traffic Count obtained in 2017 was 19,576 for northbound and 18,955 for southbound traffic. The 85th percentile speed is 63  kilometres per hour. This section of road has a posted speed limit of 60  kilometres per hour.

5.3       In between Springs Road and the Sockburn Roundabout, Main South Road has two lanes in each direction with a median island configuration, and an overbridge in between Sockburn Roundabout and Green Lane.

5.4       Vehicles travelling in a southbound direction on the Main South Road have been performing right turns and U-turns where a no turning bay is provided. The right turn gaps are specifically for northbound right turns into Harvard Avenue and Symes Road. These southbound right turners and U-turners cause unexpected delays, slowing and stopping traffic in the offside lane, southbound on Main South Road. 

5.5       The speed of vehicles travelling down from the overbridge is fast and this could potentially create serious rear-end and lane changing crashes.

5.6       There have been 12 crashes in the last five years, with one serious injury and three minor injury crashes. The serious injury crash involved a truck changing lane hitting a cyclist. 5 involved rear-end crashes, and 3 crashes involved changing lanes / overtaking. Main South Road is classified as low medium risk under the Council’s risk mapping system.

5.7       It is proposed that the No Right Turn and No U-turn movements on Main South Road be restricted to reduce the likelihood of the related rear-end crashes and changing lane/ overtaking crashes.


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Right Turn and No U-turn Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Restricting right turn and U-turn movements on Main South Road.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance includes the consultation with the owner and occupier of any property and businesses likely to be injuriously affected by the option, by way of a letterbox drop.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Engagement was undertaken from Thursday 14 June 2018 to  Friday 6 July 2018.

6.5       A total of 200 leaflets were hand delivered to businesses and properties in sections of Green Lane, Harvard Avenue, Hayton Road, Main South Road, Symes Road and Vickerys Road.

6.6       The consultation leaflets were also sent to 20 key stakeholders and 97 absentee owners.

6.7       Additional leaflets were made available at Civic Offices, Hornby Service Centre and Upper Riccarton Community Library.

6.8       During the course of the engagement, the Council received feedback from 46 submitters (14.5 per cent). Of the 46 submissions, 26 submitters (56.5 per cent) were in support of the proposal, 16 (34.8 per cent) did not support the proposal and four (8.7 per cent) did not indicate their preference.

6.9       The following outlines the main themes of the feedback:

Green Lane

·    Eight submitters commented that they supported bans at Green Lane. Of the eight submitters, five supported the bans, two supported the right turn ban and one submitter supported a left turn only in and out of Green Lane.

·    One submitter commented that they did not support the right-turn ban at Green Lane.

Harvard Avenue

·    Ten submitters requested the installation of a slip lane on the Main South Road near Harvard Avenue.

·    Three submitters commented that they supported bans at Harvard Avenue. Of the three submitters, one supported the bans, one supported the U-turn ban and one supported the right-turn ban.

·    Three submitters commented that they did not support the right-turn and U-turn bans near Harvard Avenue.

6.10    No change has been made to the final plan for approval as a result of consultation, as the request for the slip lane is not feasible as we do not construct a slip lane into private business areas.

6.11    A letter has been sent to all submitters advising the outcome of the consultation, including details of the Board meeting and how they can request speaking rights. Also included in this letter was a link to the feedback summary with project team responses.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.12    This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.13    Cost of Implementation - $800 for the installation of traffic controls, plus $2,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report.

6.14    Funding source - Traffic Operations Signs and Road Marking Budget

6.15    Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

Legal Implications

6.16    Part 2, Clauses 17 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 provides the Council with the authority to install right turn and U-turn restrictions by resolution.

6.17    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.18    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.19    Motorists would need to use alternative routes to access Green Lane and the properties at 214 and 218 Main South Road. This may lead them to perform U-turns further down Main South Road after Springs Road, or alternatively use an alternative route such as Harvard Avenue, Henry Wigram Drive, Springs Road and back down Main South Road.

6.20    There is a risk that traffic would still disobey the law and perform right turn and/or U-turn on the Main South Road.

Implementation

6.21    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval

6.22    Implementation timeframe - Approximately six weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.23    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of rear-end and lane changing crashes by improving safety on Main South Road.

·   Straight through motorists are not held up by right turning and U-turning motorists.

6.24    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Restricting right turn movement causing longer travel distance and time.

   Restricts the opportunity for east bound traffic to perform a U-turn.

·   Some motorists will have to travel further to change direction.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing status quo to allow right turn and U-turn movements on the Main South Road.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       There were  16 submitters (34.8 per cent ) who supported this option, however, this option would not deliver the desired safety benefits.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is option is consistent with the Council’s Safer Christchurch Strategy 2016-2021.

7.5.1   Inconsistency – Not enhancing safety on our roads

7.5.2   Reason for inconsistency – Does not address the right turn and U-turn effect on traffic on Main South Road.

7.5.3   Amendment necessary – Recommend Option 1 to ban right turn and U-turn on the Main South Road.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $2,750 for consultation and the preparation of this report.

7.7       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – Existing staff budgets

Legal Implications

7.9       There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this option other than the Council not being proactive in making the road safer.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    There is a risk of right turning traffic blocking through traffic on the Main South Road, it is highly likely that the lack of control of the right turn and U-turn movements would be a factor relating to a crash likelihood.

7.10.1 Residual risk rating: No mitigation measures within this option will remove the risk, which has a residual risk rating of low medium, as assessed against the Council’s Risk and Mitigation Guide.

7.10.2 This risk can be reduced by installing a No Right Turn and No U-turn restrictions on Main South Road (Option 1).

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Vehicles would still be able to perform right turn and U-turn on the Main South Road.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the right turn and U-turn safety concerns on the Main South Road and therefore the safety risk has not been addressed.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Main South Road Proposed No Right Turn No U-turn Restrictions Drawing TG132792 Attachment 1 - For Board Approval

45

b

Main South Road Proposed No Right Turn No U-turn Restrictions Drawing TG132792 Attachment 2 - For Board Approval

46

c

Main South Road Proposed No Right Turn No U-turn Restrictions Drawing TG132792 Attachment 3 - For Board Approval

47

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Lori Rankin - Engagement Advisor

Approved By

Stephen Wright - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

10.    Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2018-19 - Applications - Hornby Rugby Football Club and Yaldhurst Environment Association

Reference:

18/1003968

Presenter(s):

Marie Byrne and Karla Gunby, Community Development Advisors

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider applications for funding from its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

58565

Hornby Rugby Football Club

Save Denton Park Campaign

$1,380

$0

58459

Yaldhurst Environment Association

Environment Court Appeal

$37,000

$0

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $75,800 remaining in the fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as a result of applications being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Decline the application to its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund from the Hornby Rugby Football Club for legal expenses.

2.         Decline the application to its 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund from the Yaldhurst Environment Association Hau Ora Inc for legal expenses.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2018-19

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$179,411

$75,800

$103,611

$103,611

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, both of the applications listed above are not eligible for funding.

4.3       The Council’s Delegations Register states in Part D sub part 1 (1.2 pages 139-140)  that Community Boards have the authority as delegated under the Local Government Act (2002) Clause 32, Schedule 7 to “determine the allocation of the Discretionary Response Fund (being an amount determined by the Council) for each community” with a limit on the delegation being:

1.         Allocations must be consistent with any policies, standards or criteria adopted by the Council.

2.         The Discretionary Response Fund does not cover:

a.     Legal Challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations or Community Boards decisions.

b.     Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project.

c.      Projects or initiatives that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council.

4.4       Both applications fall under clause 2(a) above as areas that the Discretionary Response Fund does not cover.

4.5       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information on the applications.  This includes organisational and project details, financial information and staff assessments.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Discretionary Response Fund Decision Matrix - Hornby Rugby Football Club and Yaldhurst Environment Association

51

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor

Karla Gunby - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

11.    Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board 2018-19 Youth Development Fund - Applications - Catherine Boyle and Anna Lee School of Dance

Reference:

18/1062097

Presenter(s):

Marie Byrne, Community Development Advisor and Emily Toase, Community Recreation Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider applications received for funding from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently a balance of $6,540 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Board in  considering  applications for funding from Catherine Boyle and the Anna Lee School of Dance, on behalf of Keisha Jones, Shinlan Wang and Bridget Egan.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are  of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Catherine Boyle towards the research trip to Beijing, China, from 16 November to 23 December 2018.

2.         Approve a grant of $1,500 from its 2018-19 Youth Development Fund to Anna Lee School of Dance on behalf of Keisha Jones, Shinlan Wang and Bridget Egan towards performing in the She Shines On Dance Tour in New York City and Orlando, USA, in April 2019.

4.   Applicant 1 – Catherine Boyle

4.1       Catherine Boyle is a 20 year old University of Canterbury student who is seeking funding assistance towards a trip to China to undertake research into the Chinese perceptions of Christchurch and Canterbury as a safe destination for visitors and students.

4.2       Catherine is one of 14 students who have been selected into a programme representing the University of Canterbury on an internship programme working on a research project for the Canterbury Mayoral Forum, based at Peking University in Beijing, China.  The trip will take place from 16 November 2018  to 23 December 2018.

4.3       The students will be conducting research in Beijing for six weeks and presenting to the regional Mayors and Christchurch City Council on their return.  Catherine has the pivotal role in co-ordinating the research before the presentations. 

4.4       The programme is recognised, and supported by the Prime Minister's Scholarship for Asia and the selection procedure was highly competitive and demanding.  It will provide Catherine with excellent international and high level experience and she will be exposed to a wide range of people from different levels and cultures.

4.5       This particular research project will directly impact our local communities as it is centred on improving the economic wellbeing of Christchurch through strengthening international connections and relationships.

4.6       Catherine has lived in the ward for three years and is in her final year of study.  She has a particular interest in health and wellbeing and her special areas of focus have been in developing healthy public policy and reducing health inequalities.  Two years ago she founded, along with two other students, Health Soc which is the University of Canterbury's first Health Sciences faculty club.

4.7       Catherine works part time in retail to cover her rent.  However, once the university term finishes she is hoping to obtain as many extra shifts as possible as well as additional employment before she flies out to save for the trip. Funding was also applied for by University of Canterbury on behalf of the 14 students.  The result of this is unknown at this stage.

4.8       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Catherine:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Flights, accommodation

$1,500

Course Fee

$1,493

Food

$100

Transport

$50

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$3,143

 

 

Amount sought from Community Board

$500

 

4.9       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

5.   Applicant 2 – Anna Lee School of Dance

5.1       Anna Lee School of Dance are applying for funding to take thirteen of their dancers to attend the She Shines On Dance Tour in New York and Disneyland Orlando in April 2019. Three of the dancers in the crew are from the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton  area.

5.2       To gain a place on the She Shines On 2019 Tour, the crew submitted a video of their performance which the tour organisers judged against the other applicants. The dancers will be performing a thirty minute high-energy showcase at Disney World which encompasses a variety of dance styles including jazz, hip hop, contemporary, musical theatre and some solo dances.

5.3       The tour also includes a series of seminars and a workshop taken by the Disney Show choreographer as well as other classes at some of the most prestigious dance studios in the  world. At these classes the girls will be mixing and dancing with professional dancers who take the class regularly and will experience what it is like to be a professional dancer learning unique choreography and gaining an understanding of the energy levels and commitment required to become professional. They will also get the opportunity to meet and talk to agents to gain insight into the industry and learn what it takes to be successful in performing arts.

5.4       Keisha Jones, Shinlan Wang and Bridget Egan are among the thirteen dancers selected to attend the tour.

5.5       Keisha Jones is a thirteen year old from Halswell. Keisha has been dancing for eleven years and studies Hip Hop, Jazz, Ballet, Tap and Contemporary dance styles. She loves performing and choreographing, and coaches her own junior Hip Hop crew on Wednesdays after school. Keisha dreams of becoming a professional dancer and teacher.

5.6       Shinlan Wang is twelve years old and from Sockburn. Shinlan started dancing when she was five years old and practises Hip Hop, Ballet and Contemporary dance in total for five hours a week. She also plays the piano and violin. Shinlan is looking forward to the opportunity of participating in professional performances on stage on the tour.

5.7       Bridget Egan is thirteen years old and lives in Yaldhurst. Bridget does four classes a week including Hip Hop, Jazz, Contemporary and Ballet and also trains in Gymnastics a few times a week. Her dream is to be a professional choreographer and to dance at Walt Disney World, a goal which will be realised on the She Shine On Tour.

5.8       The tour is not only a dream come true for the dancers, but will help them to enhance their dance skills, and gain personal development and growth in confidence. 

5.9       To fundraise for the trip the girls have been undertaking their own activities including selling bacon, pasta, fudge and cookies. The Dance School and the girl's parents are also organising several fundraising events; a Quiz Night, Movie Night, Dance Performances, a disco, car washes, Lego fundraisers and Bake Sales.  The group have also applied to Foodstuffs South Island Limited for some funding.

5.10    The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for attending the She Shines On 2019 Tour.

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

International flights

2,189

Tour package includes accommodation, internal flights and transfers, dance classes and organised trips 

5,376

USA Visitors Visa

22

Food

360

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$7,947

Amount sought from Community Board

$1,500

 

5.11    This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor

Karla Gunby - Community Development Advisor

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

12.    Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - October 2018

Reference:

18/986444

Presenter(s):

Gary Watson, Community Governance Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This report provides information on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area, to provide the Board with a strategic overview and inform sound decision making.

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report for October 2018.

2.         Receive the minutes of the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board’s Submissions Committee meetings held on 17 and 22 August 201 to complete Board submissions on the Brothels (Local and Commercial Sexual Services Signage) Bylaw 2013, Cemeteries Bylaw 2013, Public Places Bylaw 2008, Alcohol Restrictions in Public Places Bylaw 2009 and Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015 – Akaroa.

3.         Resolve to allocate $1,500 from its 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Discretionary Response Fund to its 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund.

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Memos/Information/Advice to the Board

3.1.1   Provision of strategic, technical and procedural advice to the Board

The Board continues to receive strategic, technical and procedural advice mainly through an ongoing programme of Board seminars and/or workshops generally held at the conclusion of the Board’s twice monthly ordinary meetings.

3.2       Board area Consultations/Engagement/Submission opportunities

3.2.1   Submissions Committee – Meeting Minutes – 17 and 22 August 2018

Presented for record purposes (refer Attachments A and B) are the minutes of the Board’s Submissions Committee meetings held on 17 and 22 August 2018 to prepare the Board’s submissions to the Council on the Brothels (Local and Commercial Sexual Services Signage) Bylaw 2013, Cemeteries Bylaw 2013, Public Places Bylaw 2008, Alcohol Restrictions in Public Places Bylaw 2009 and Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015 – Akaroa.

3.2.2   Submission Opportunities

The Board’s Submissions Committee will be meeting on Wednesday 31 October 2018 to consider the preparation of Board submissions on the following: 

·    Draft Heritage Strategy 2019-2029

·    Draft Suburban Parking Policy

·    Earthquake Prone Buildings

3.2.3   Longhurst and Knights Stream  - Proposed Speed Limit Change

A proposal for a 40 kilometre per hour speed limit to apply across Knights Stream, Longhurst and John Paterson Drive was consulted on until 24 October 2018.

A report, including details of the feedback received, will be presented to the Board for consideration in the near future.

3.2.4   Harrington Park - Playground Upgrade

For information, some of the play equipment in Harrington Park is planned for renewal.  Engagement is underway within the local community, collecting information about how the park is currently being used and what type of activities the community would like in the park. 

3.2.5   Draft Greater Christchurch Regional Public Transport Plan

At its meeting on 11 October 2018, the Council, inter alia, resolved:

3.      That Community Board submissions provided be attached to the Council submission and that the Community Boards appear at the hearings in support of their submissions, if they wish to.

4.      Request that staff present to Community Boards to update them on this process and what now occurs.

             Accordingly, the Board is invited to consider its involvement or otherwise in respect of 3. above. 

Should the Board indicate its interest in this next phase, advice will be provided to the Board to fulfil 4. above.

3.3       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan

3.3.1   The development of the Christchurch City Council’s Draft Annual Plan for 2019-20 is underway.

3.3.2   The Board will shortly be receiving ward-based capital projects for year two of the Long Term Plan, and the Draft Annual Plan Community Engagement Plan.

3.3.3   The Board will also have the opportunity to provide feedback on what they wish to do in their wards. There will be forum in November 2018 with all Community Boards, Councillors and the Mayor to discuss how communities should be engaged, how year two of the Long Term Plan contributes to each respective Community Board Plan and any recommended organisational savings and/or project swaps.

3.4       Board Reporting

3.4.1   Board members are invited through the issued weekly meetings schedule, to forward to local staff, any items they would like highlighted for inclusion in the Board’s monthly Newsletter, Newsline releases and the monthly report to the Council.

4.   Community Board Plan – Update against Outcomes

4.1       The next quarterly update will be included in the Area Report to the Board’s meeting on
11 December 2018.


 

 

5.   Significant Council Projects in the Board Area

5.1       Strengthening Community Fund Projects

5.1.1   The Christchurch Tamil School will be moving its school operation from the Waimairi Community Centre to Riccarton Baptist Church.  The school will be using rooms that had been used by PEETO and the additional space will allow the Tamil School to expand.  A welcome ceremony is planned for late October 2018.

5.1.2   The Hornby Community Care Trust has been granted $111,540 from the Community Resilience Partnership Fund over two years for a Hornby Community Activator position.  The funding will be split over two years with $57,020 in Year One with the remaining $54,520 in Year Two subject to a satisfactory monitoring report.

5.2       Other partnerships with the community and organisations

5.2.1   University Student Projects

University of Canterbury students in the CHCH101, Rebuilding Christchurch course have organised a number of projects in the local community over September and October 2018.  Local staff have collaborated with two groups and local communities on the following projects:

·     The removal of graffiti from the underpass between Kyle Park and Denton Park and the painting of a brightly covered mural design on the wall.  Students were joined by the Greater Hornby Residents’ Association chairperson and a teacher from Hornby High School. 

·     Another group of students are working on installing a community library box at Clarence Street Reserve where people can take books to read and leave for others to read.  A favourable response was received from the Chairperson of the Central Riccarton Residents’ Association to the proposal with university students set to work with local youth to install the box.

·     Working with Kauri Rest Home to supply board games to residents and join in with residents in a games afternoon.

 

 


 

 

5.2.2   Ruapuna Community Liaison Committee

The Ruapuna Community Liaison Committee continues to meet quarterly. 

The Committee is provided for in the Christchurch City District Plan to allow residents and the motorsport organisations to monitor noise from the venue, ensure compliance with District Plan provisions and proactively minimise its effects. 

The Committee comprises three community representatives, three motorsport representatives, Councillor Chen as the Christchurch City Council appointee and Laurie McCallum, Independent Chairperson.

The Car Club report indicated that they used more of the lower noise days provided for and less high noise days.  The Speedway Club's report showed they were operating in accord with the District Plan.  There had been no noise complaints recorded in the period from May to August 2018.

5.3       Infrastructure projects underway

5.3.1   Harrington Park

The public toilet in Harrington Park has been installed with its painting having taken place during the Riccarton Community Event at Labour Weekend.   Design options were put to the local community and following that feedback, a team from the Riccarton Community Church Youth Groups managed the painting project.  This involved the community placing their handprints onto the back wall and a geometric design on one of the side walls.  Words of welcome and hello are still to be painted on the remaining side wall.

Funday20181-1200px

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3.2   Halswell Skate Park

Work is progressing on the construction of the skate park at Halswell Domain with an expected completion of late December 2018.  A Skate Jam event to celebrate the opening of both the Halswell Domain and Opouria/Knights Stream Skate Parks is being planned for mid-January 2019.


 

 

5.3.3   Riccarton Road Bus Priority and Interchanges

The Riccarton Road pavement works to Harakeke Street are complete. The traffic signals at the rail crossing were commissioned on 24 October 2018.  This was a joint commissioning between the Council and KiwiRail and the pedestrian and cycle crossing is now operational. The temporary zebra crossing outside Wilsons Sports Bar has been removed and the bus lanes are now fully operational.

The tender evaluation for the next stage of work from Harakeke Street to Matipo Street is well underway, but the team do need slightly longer than anticipated due to the complexity of the submissions received.

The project team will be coming soon to the Board to introduce the appointed contractor and to provide information on the upcoming programme of works. The project team will also be undertaking further engagement with the community once the contractor is appointed.

The project team is also in the process of arranging a meeting with some of the local businesses about how they would like to receive communications during the period of the works. Finding a time that has suited everyone has been challenging but the plan is to hold smaller meetings working with people’s availability. The Board will be kept updated on these meetings.

6.   Significant Community Issues, Events and Projects in the Board Area

6.1       Upcoming events

6.1.1   The Riccarton Street Party will take place on Sunday 4 November 2018 in Elizabeth Street.  The event is organised by the Riccarton Community Church.

6.1.2   After the success of the inaugural tournament last year, Hornby Hoops will be held again on Friday 8 December 2018 from 4pm to 9pm. Hornby High School will be joining the partnership with Christchurch Development Network and Christchurch City Council to deliver the event in conjunction with the opening of the School's new sport hall.

6.1.3   Templeton Community Day will take place on Sunday 2 December 2018 from 11am to 2pm at the Mike Pero Motorsport Park, Ruapuna.  This is a change in venue and time of year from previous years and is reflective of the community partnerships between the Templeton Residents' Association and Ruapuna.  A highlight of the day will be sports car rides around the park.

6.1.4   Fun on the Park 2018 is a new event being organized by the Greater Hornby Residents’ Association to be held on Sunday 25 October 2018 from 1pm to 5pm at Denton Park. The event is aiming to bring together up to 2,000 people from the local suburbs of greater Hornby to celebrate the summer holidays with community stalls, music, entertainments and food.


 

 

6.2       Events Report Back

6.2.1   Pūkeko Stomp Scavenger Hunt

The Pūkeko Stomp Scavenger Hunt took place on Tuesday 9 October 2018 as part of The Breeze Walking Festival at the Halswell Quarry Park. Delivered in partnership with PlayCentre and PAPO, around 900 people attended the event to enjoy the beautiful surroundings of the park, whilst completing the permanent orienteering course and searching for the hidden Pūkeko along the way. Participants also enjoyed the free Hellers BBQ and fruit on offer, storytelling from the Council’s Libraries staff at Te Hāpua:Halswell Centre, and had fun modelling their own Pūkeko out of playdoh.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

6.2.2   Halswell Quarry Heritage Walk

As part of Beca Heritage Week 2018, the Halswell Quarry Heritage Walk was held on 16 October 2018.

Meeting at the Singleman's Quarters, two groups set out on a walk around each of the three newly restored heritage buildings with a talk from Ranger and Project Manager Nigel Morritt and John Moore from the Halswell Lions, with a free Hellers BBQ to finish. The walk was a great opportunity to showcase the work that has been done to restore the heritage buildings which gave an insight into their previous use and particularly for Paterson House, its current use. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

6.2.3   Wigram Crash Memorial - Unveiling

The unveiling of the memorial plaque and seat for the Wigram Air Crash took place successfully on Tuesday 16 October 2018.   A short ceremony and blessing was led by Padre Chris Purdie with speeches coming from the Halswell Residents’ Association's Ron Fensom, who has been instrumental in advocating for a memorial site and for leading the process, and from Councillor Anne Galloway and Air Commodore Mark Brunton. The speakers acknowledged the family representatives present of the servicemen who lost their lives and thanked all those involved in delivering the project. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.2.4   The Skate Jam at Opouria/Knights Stream Park was postponed in mid-October 2018 due to inclement weather.  It is hoped to reschedule this event for early 2019 in conjunction with the opening of the new Halswell Domain Skate Park.

6.2.5   Youth Development Fund Report Back

The Board’s Youth Development Fund Report Back event was successfully held on Monday 8 October 2018 at Te Hāpua: Halswell Centre. Recipients updated the Board regarding their various recreational and cultural projects, and expressed gratitude for receiving funding support from the Board.

 

 

 

 

 

6.2.6   Riccarton Community Day

The Riccarton Community Day took place at Harrington Park on Saturday 20 October 2018 over Labour Weekend.  Alongside the usual offerings of stage entertainment, tug of war, giant games, petting zoo, face painting, bouncy castle and ethnic food, the newly installed public toilet was painted and attendees provided excellent feedback on how they saw the park being used into the future.


 

7.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

7.1       Local Parks Update

Spring sports turf renovations are now complete.

 

The Metrological Office has predicted warm temperatures ranging from mid to late teens, with less rainfall through to November 2018. This prediction will influence weed and turf growth rates.

Contract key performance: Delta

September 2018

Quality: 88 per cent

 

Breakdown of KPI scores by activity


 

Current Maintenance Programme:

Scheduled Parks Maintenance Programme for October 2018:

Activity

Frequency per month

Ornamental Mowing

4

Amenity Mowing

4

Informal Mowing

1

Summer Sport Mowing

4

Cricket Block Maintenance

4

Summer Sport Line Marking

2

Chemical Weed Control

1

Ornamental Garden Maintenance

2

BBQ Clean

2

Drinking Fountain Clean

4

 

Scheduled Parks Maintenance Programme for November 2018:

Activity

Frequency per month

Ornamental Mowing

4

Amenity Mowing

4

Informal Mowing

1

Summer Sport Mowing

4

Cricket Block Maintenance

4

Summer Sport Line Marking

2

Chemical Weed Control

1

Ornamental Garden Maintenance

2

BBQ Clean

4

Drinking Fountain Clean

4

8.   Community Board Funding Update

8.1       For the Board’s information, a summary is provided (refer Attachment C) on the status of the Board’s 2018-19 Funding as at October 2018.

8.2       Off the Ground Fund

8.2.1   The Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board established the 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund in June 2018.  Under the Board's delegated authority, allocations to date have been made to:

·    Oaklands School Board of Trustees for the Westlake Park Clean Up event

·    Nerida Britten for a Community Produce Stand

·    Brad Flavell for a Shamrock Place and Sunbeam Place Community Barbecue

8.2.2   There is currently $307 remaining in the 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund.  $1,200 was the start up allocation for the fund.  In order to respond to further requests in 2018-19, staff recommend that a further $1,500 be transferred from the Board’s 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund to the 2018-19 Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Off the Ground Fund.

             A staff recommendation to give effect to this transfer is set out in clause two of this report.

 

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Submissions Committee - 17 August 2018 Minutes

69

b

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Submissions Committee - 22 August 2018 Minutes

74

c

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Funding Update - October 2018

79

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Cindy Sheppard - Governance Support Officer

Emily Toase - Community Recreation Advisor

Noela Letufuga - Support Officer

Peter Dow - Community Board Advisor

Karla Gunby - Community Development Advisor

Marie Byrne - Community Development Advisor

Gary Watson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

Approved By

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Waipuna/Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

30 October 2018

 

 

13.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.