Waitai

Coastal-Burwood Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Monday 1 October 2018

Time:                                    4:30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Kim Money

Tim Sintes

Tim Baker

David East

Glenn Livingstone

Linda Stewart

 

 

26 September 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Jo Wells

Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

941 6451

jo.wells@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4

C       7.       Correspondence............................................................................................................. 11

B       8.       Briefings.......................................................................................................................... 13

Staff Reports

C       9.       Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton) Renewal......................................................... 15

C       10.     Coastal-Burwood Neighbourhood Week 2018 - Consideration of Applications to the Fund................................................................................................................................ 53

C       11.     Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2018/19 Spencerville Play Centre Roof Repair, North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club Equipment..................................... 65

C       12.     Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Youth Development Fund Report - Thomas Robertson 71

C       13.     Coastal-Burwood Community Board 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund Southshore Residents Association Penguin Nesting Boxes............................................................ 73

C       14.     Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Youth Development Fund Report - Karamea Phoenix Te Whaiti............................................................................................................................. 77

C       15.     Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report - October 2018.............. 81

 

B       16.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 97 

 

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

An apology for leave of absence was received from Glenn Livingstone and Kim Money.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 17 September 2018  be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Public Forum

 A period of up to 30 minutes is available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

It is intended that the public forum session will be held at 4.35pm

 

At the time of publication, the following presentation has been confirmed.

 

4.1

Youth Development Fund Recipient

 

Forbes Hollobon will report back to the Board on his attendance to the 28th Shanghai Tourism Festival in Shanghai

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

5.1

Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton) renewal

 

Ted Woodward, resident of Palmers Road, will speak regarding the Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton) renewal report on the current agenda

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

 

Waitai

Coastal-Burwood Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                            Monday 17 September 2018

Time:                            4:30pm

Venue:                         Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Present

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Tim Sintes

Tim Baker

David East

Linda Stewart

 

 

17 September 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Jo Wells

Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

941 6451

jo.wells@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


  

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.     Apologies

Part C

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00075

Community Board Decision

That an apology from Glenn Livingstone and Kim Money for leave of absence, be received and the apology from Linda Stewart for early departure be accepted.

Tim Baker/Linda Stewart                                                                                                                                          Carried

 

2.    Declarations of Interest

Part B

Tim Baker declared an interest in item 12 in relation to Discretionary Response Fund 2018/19 New Brighton and Districts Historical Society and Museum Incorporated and took no part in the discussion and voting thereon.

 

3.    Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00076

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Coastal-Burwood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 3 September 2018 be confirmed.

Linda Stewart/David East                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

4.   Public Forum

Part B

There was no public forum held at this meeting.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6.    Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.    Correspondence

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.            Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 17 September 2018.

2.            Refers the issues raised by Isobelle Doig to staff for consideration.

 

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00077

Part B

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.            Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 17 September 2018.

2.            Refers the following issues raised by Isobelle Doig to staff for consideration:

                 2.1          Under the Memorial Trees policy a tree in memory of the Late Neville Pickering,                                                Mayor of Christchurch

                 2.2        Concerns about the health, hygiene, safety of the Shaw Avenue public toilets

                 2.3        The need for new toilets in the New Brighton shopping centre

                  2.4          The ANZAC poppy statues, corner Travis and QEII drive roundabout and walkway -                                               In the Poppy Statue area a colourful planting of Soldier Poppies and a seat for                                              walkers to remember

 

Tim Baker/David East           Carried

 

8.    Briefings

 

Part B

8.1  Community Guardians initiative

Wendy Fox, Community Engagement Co-ordinator from Citycare Group, spoke about a recently launched initiative “Community Guardians”.  This is a collaboration between Citycare and the Student Volunteer Army to drive meaningful, sustained community impact across the country.  As a volunteer or a Community Guardian, people can be involved in one-off community projects or play a lead role in ongoing community care.

8.2  Fireworks Spectacular 2018

Amanda Fiddes, Events Coordinator and Drew Urlichs, Team Leader Events Production, presented the Council’s plan for the upcoming Fireworks Spectacular 2018 to be held on New Brighton Beach on Friday 2 November 2018.  They spoke about the completed survey as well as information on traffic plans for the evening, available buses, exclusion zone, parking and facilities in the area.

The next Kite Day event will held on New Brighton beach on 26 January 2019.  Sponsorship has been obtained.  The Council events team are working closely with the New Brighton Surf Lifesaving club.

 

Linda Stewart left the meeting at 17:07 p.m.

 

9.    Knights Drain Pump Station - Orion Easement

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00078 (Original Staff Recommendations            accepted without change)

Part C

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board, acting in the capacity of the administering body, resolve to:

1.         Recommend that the Chief Executive, acting as the Minister of Conservation’s delegate, consents to the granting of the easement to Orion for the right to convey electricity as outlined in this report. 

2.         Approve the grant of the easement pursuant to Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 subject to the consent of the Minister of Conservation to:

a.         Orion, for the right to convey electricity over part Sections 6 and 7 SO 340208 (held in the same CT Identifier 711220) shown marked A on the plan at Attachment A.

b.         This grant subject to Orion first securing a right to convey electrical easement from the Crown over the segregation strip (Sections 5 and 6 SO 304208).

3.         Authorise the Property Consultancy Manager, should the easement be granted with the consent of the Minister of Conservation, to finalise documentation to implement the easement.

Tim Sintes/Tim Baker                                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

 

10. Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Youth Development Fund Report - Kaiyah Ratu

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00079 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $250 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Kaiyah Ratu towards her costs for attending the National Hockey Tournament in North Harbour from 8 to 13 October 2018.  Noting that the funds are not to be used for any supervisory staff, coaching, tuition or management costs.

Tim Sintes/David East                                                                                                                                                Carried

 

11. Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund Application - Shirley Boys High School - Rarotonga Trip, Retracing the Migration of our Tupuna

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00080 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $1,500 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to Shirley Boys’ High School towards the Shirley Boys’ High School – Rarotonga Trip, "Tracing the Migration of our Tūpuna," being $300 each for Tiwini Campbell, Tom Donaldson, Kahurangi Weerden-Sweet, Neihana Hay and Whetu Beattie.

David East/Tim Baker                                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

12. Discretionary Response Fund 2018/19 New Brighton and Districts Historical Society and Museum Incorporated Local People - Local Stories Project.

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2018/00081 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $1,500 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to New Brighton and Districts Historical Society and Museum Incorporated towards the Local People – Local Stories Project.

David East/Tim Sintes                                                                                                                                                Carried

 

Having declared an interest in this matter, Tim Baker did not participate in voting.

13. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on matters of interest including:

13.1    The Board noted the recent successful Notice of Motion that was submitted to the Council requesting urgency be accorded the High Flood Hazard Management area policy so that the District Plan can be amended to reflect the intention of the Independent Hearings Panel as soon as possible. The Board requested that an update on this be included in the next Board newsletter.

13.2    Staff will follow up on public concern regarding pedestrian safety at the Estuary Road/Bridge Street roundabout.

13.3    The Board noted Earthquake-prone building notices are being attached to 41 Christchurch City Council-owned buildings.

 

 

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 5.32pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

 

TIM SINTES

DEPUTY Chairperson

   


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

7.        Correspondence

Reference:

18/990764

Presenter(s):

Peter Croucher, Community Board Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Isobelle Doig

Anzac Bridge Fronds

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 01 October 2018

2.         Request staff to respond to Isobelle Doig about the Anzac Bridge Fronds with the information in the Coastal-Burwood community Board area report item 3.1.2

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Coastal-Burwood Community Board - Inwards Correspondence - 1 October 2018 - Isobelle Doig

12

 

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

8.        Briefings

Reference:

18/975010

Presenter(s):

Jane Harrison & Samantha Fay, Sustain South Brighton

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

Common Ground project

Jane Harrison & Samantha Fay

Sustain South Brighton

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

9.        Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton) renewal

Reference:

18/944703

Contact:

Sandra Novais

Sandra.novais@ccc.govt.nz

941 8018

 

 

Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to advise the Coastal-Burwood Community Board on the outcome of community consultation and discussions with the Board and to request the Board to approve the scheme design for the Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton).

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board following the consultation process. The Board was previously updated on the project via a memo sent on the 25 August 2017.

1.3       When the report came to the Board on 4 December 2017, noting that there would be no impact on construction start date, the Board decided to lay the report on the table to enable a seminar between the Board and the project team to take place.    The Community Board expressed concern at the road being narrowed from 14 metres in width to nine metres and asked staff to investigate a street width that allowed two vehicles to pass comfortably if there were parked vehicles on either side of the street.

Other discussions happened on the:

a)    8 December 17;

b)    23 April 18; when staff provided an updated letter to the community as per Attachment E of this report.

c)    7 May 18; and

d)    12 September 18; when a new option was discussed as per Attachment F of this report.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the significance matrix on the suggested thresholds for assessing criteria, which had a medium level of community interest.

2.1.2   Staff have considered the significance of the decision to be made by the Community Board.  Their assessment is that the matter is of medium significance for the following reasons:

a)  possible costs/risks to the Council, ratepayers and wider community of carrying out the decision;

b)  possible benefits/opportunities to the Council, ratepayers and wider community of carrying out the decision and;

c)   whether the impact of a decision can be easily reversed, a medium-low level of impact on those affected and level of impact on the capacity of the Council to carry out its role and functions and low for all of the other criteria

2.1.3   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve the general layout of Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton) renewal as detailed in Attachment D of this report, including new Kerb alignments, landscaping, surface treatments, parking restrictions and line markings.

2.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) an intersection is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway; and (2) The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) if the resolution states "Note 1 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Community Board meeting of the 4th December 2017; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 Applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the resolution as approved.

a)    Revoke all traffic controls on New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 1 applies.

b)    Revoke all traffic controls on New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 1 applies

c)    Revoke all traffic controls on Palmers Road, between its intersection with New Brighton Road and its intersection with Bowhill Road. Note 1 applies.

d)    Revoke all traffic controls on Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and continuing in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 1 applies.

e)    Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Palmers Road with Caithness Street. Note 1 applies.

f)     Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Palmers Road with Bowhill Road. Note 1 applies.

g)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 1 Applies

h)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 1 Applies

i)     Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Palmers Road, between its intersection with New Brighton Road and its intersection with Caithness Street. Note 1 applies.

j)     Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Caithness Street and continuing in a northerly direction for a distance of 600 metres. Note 1 applies.

k)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Palmers Road, between its intersection with New Brighton Road and its intersection with Bowhill Road. Note 1 applies.

l)     Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and continuing in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 1 applies.

m)  Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Caithness Street, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 1 Applies

n)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Caithness Street, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 1 Applies

o)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Bowhill Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in an easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 1 Applies

p)    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Bowhill Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and continuing in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 1 Applies

q)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 2 Applies.

r)     Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of New Brighton Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 Applies.

s)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 Applies.

t)     Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres. Note 2 Applies.

u)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 60 metre north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 Applies.

v)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 63 metres north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 Applies.

w)   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 Applies.

x)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 Applies.

y)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 243 metres north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres. Note 2 Applies.

z)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 134 metres north of its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 Applies.

aa)  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 401 metres north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 35 metres. Note 2 Applies.

bb) Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 285 metres north of its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30 metres. Note 2 Applies.

cc)  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 546 metres north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres. Note 2 Applies.

dd) Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 453 north of its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 Applies.

ee) Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 715 metres north of its intersection with New Brighton Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 32 metres. Note 2 Applies.

ff)   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palmers Road, commencing at a point 564 metres north of its intersection with Caithness Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 36 metres. Note 2 Applies.

gg)  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 Applies.

hh) Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palmers Road, commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

ii)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Caithness Street, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

jj)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Caithness Street, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

kk)  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Bowhill Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 2 Applies.

ll)    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Bowhill Road, commencing at its intersection with Palmers Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 Applies.

mm)      Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Palmers Road, between its intersection with New Brighton and a point 15 metres north of its intersection with Bowhill Road, as detailed in Attachment D. Note 2 Applies.

nn) Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on New Brighton Road, at its intersection with Palmers Road, as detailed in Attachment D. Note 2 Applies.

oo) Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Caithness Street, at its intersection with Palmers Road, as detailed in Attachment D. Note 2 Applies.

pp) Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Bowhill Road, at its intersection with Palmers Road, as detailed in Attachment D. Note 2 Applies.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Roads and Footpaths

·     Level of Service: 16.0.2 Maintain road condition

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Replacement of kerb and dish channel with kerb and flat channel and narrowing the carriageway to 9.0 metres with installation of horizontally offset traffic management devices (chicanes) which narrow the carriageway to 4.0m (one-lane flow) at approximately 100 - 150m spacing’s , with unmarked parking on both sides (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Street Renewal on 9m alignment with no traffic calming devices

·     Option 3 - Replacement of kerb and dish channel with kerb and flat channel and narrowing the carriageway to 9.0 metres with installation of horizontally offset traffic management devices (chicanes) which narrow the carriageway to 6.0m (two-way flow) at approximately 100 - 150m spacing’s , with unmarked parking on both sides

·     Option 4 - Replacement of kerb and dish channel with kerb and flat channel and narrowing the carriageway to 6.0 metres with regular indented parking bays, 2.0m wide, on both sides of the carriageway

·     Option 5 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·    Renews damaged assets

·    Enhances the streetscape by narrowing the road and providing more green areas with trees

·    Introduces traffic calming by narrowing the carriageway and installing chicanes, which will assist with speed management and discouragement of rat running

·    Addresses issues with stormwater ponding and treatment

·    It will be compatible with any future decision on the riverbank treatment by New Brighton Rd

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     some road users may see the traffic calming as an inconvenience however the benefits are considered significant enough to outweigh any disbenefits

·     Current cost estimate exceeds funding allocation, this will be managed during the detailed design phase

 

5.   Context/Background

Palmers Road

5.1       This report summarises the scheme design investigations undertaken for the Palmers Road urban street renewal. The project length is approximately 855 metres long with a north-south orientation, from New Brighton Road to the intersection of Palmers Road and Bowhill Road. The project features in the capital programme in the Kerb and Channel Renewal category.

5.2       Palmers Road is a low volume local road, with the primary purpose of providing access to residential properties.

5.3       Figure 1 shows the location of the scheme in the context of the surrounding area.

Figure 1 – Palmers Rd (Bowhill to New Brighton) location plan

5.4       The need for the project was identified due to:

5.4.1   existing damaged kerb and channel with obsolete sections;

5.4.2   poor pavement condition;

5.4.3   opportunity to improve safety;

5.4.4   poor condition of other assets, such as footpaths and street trees

5.4.5   opportunity to tie in with renewal of underground assets

5.5       Palmers Road is low volume (1,220vpd in 2008 – CCC traffic volume data) with a Give Way control at the intersection with New Brighton Road, all other intersections are uncontrolled. It is not on a bus route and has no greater strategic alignment, such as a freight or cycle route.

5.6       The adjacent land over the project length of Palmers Road is classified as urban residential housing apart from the southern end which has been classified as ‘Red Zone’ post the 2011 earthquakes.

5.7       Interrogation of the NZTA Crash Analysis System (CAS) for the period spanning from 2005 – 2016 was undertaken in September 2016, this revealed twelve crashes (2 minor injury, 10 non-injury). Of the total twelve crashes five occurred within 50m of the New Brighton Road / Palmers Road intersection (2 minor, 3 non-injury). Two crashes occurred within 50m of the Bowhill Road / Palmers Road intersection (2 non-injury) and three crashes had speed identified as a contributing factor (3 non-injury).

5.8       Initial pavement analysis by CCC confirmed the existing pavement is in poor condition and requires improvement. The CCC analysis recommended a 400mm full depth pavement reconstruction to be adopted based on a worst case scenario and for cost estimation purposes, however this will be confirmed during detailed design.

Project Objectives

5.9       Based on the ‘need for the project’ and consideration of the background information the aim and objectives of the project are to identify a preferred option that:

5.9.1   Achieve the lowest cost-effective solution that meets all objectives

5.9.2   Renew the kerb and channel to suit

5.9.3   Maintain or improve user safety along Palmers Road, and specifically at the intersections

5.9.4   Renew carriageway and footpaths as required

5.9.5   Tie-in with recently upgraded street lighting

5.9.6   Address stormwater ponding and serious consideration of stormwater quality treatment of road runoff as required

5.9.7   Install new landscaping as appropriate

5.9.8   Tie-in with renewals of underground services including tie-in with works on New Brighton Road

Community Consultation

5.10    Consultation on the Palmers Rd street renewal project was undertaken from 14 September 2017 to 17 October 2017.  The submission form asked submitters to indicate whether yes, they generally support the plan or no, they generally do not support the plan.  There was also an opportunity to add any additional comments or concerns on the plans.

5.11    A total of 380 leaflets (refer attachments B and C) were hand delivered to properties along Palmers Rd and the immediately surrounding streets (Caithness Street, Lindis Lane, Reg Stillwell Place and sections of Bower Avenue and Bowhill Road). The consultation leaflets were also sent to 20 key stakeholders and 113 absentee owners. 

5.12    Additional leaflets were made available at Civic Offices, New Brighton Community Library and Parklands Community Library. The project was also posted on the Council’s “Have Your Say” website.

5.13    During the course of the engagement, Council received feedback from 59 people. Of the 59 submissions, 25 submitters were in support of the proposal, 29 were in support but had some concerns, four did not support the proposal and one did not state their preference.

5.14    Of the 59 submitters, 18 were male, 25 were female, one was other (an organisation) and fifteen did not indicate.

5.15    Of the 59 submitters, 35 did not indicate their age, 16 were in the 25-49 years age group, four were in the 50-64 years age group and four were in the 65 years and over age group.

5.16    The following outlines the main themes of the feedback:

5.16.1 Enthusiasm and appreciation for the street upgrade

5.16.2 Requests for the powerlines to be installed underground

5.16.3 Road narrowing

·   Support for the road narrowing

·   Request for four more narrowed sections to slow traffic

·   Concerns about the road narrowing chicanes and the location of them

·   Request for the chicane outside 96 Palmers Road to relocate

·   Concerns about the loss of on-street carparks

5.16.4 Trees

·   Concerns about the locations of trees in the berm

·   Concerns about the tree species options

6.   Option 1 – Street Renewal on 9m alignment with one-lane flow chicanes (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The consulted option is presented in Figure  2 below (and also Attachment A to this report) and consists of the following physical works:

6.1.1   Replacement of kerb and dish channel with kerb and flat channel and narrowing the carriageway to 9.0 metres, with unmarked parking on both sides.

6.1.2   Bowhill Road, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 9.0m.

6.1.3   Narrowing and using appropriate treatment of each leg of the Palmers Road / Caithness Street intersection to 6.0m

6.1.4   Narrowing of Palmers Road at its intersection with New Brighton Road to implement a 7m threshold treatment

6.1.5   Installation of chicanes (type of TMD-Traffic Management Devices) which narrow the carriageway to 4.0m (one-lane flow) at approximately 100 - 150m spacing’s.

6.1.6   Full road reconstruction to a depth of 400mm (100mm M4, 300mm AP65)

6.1.7   Footpath reconstruction

6.1.8   Re-seal of footpath and driveways in current location – re-grade driveways where necessary to avoid possible tail scrape issues

6.1.9   The road cross section requires lowering of the existing crown by approximately 170-310 mm to maintain drainage paths. In some sections the carriageway is skewed towards the western side of the road corridor to allow for a wider berm on the eastern side of Palmers Road, whilst still minimising clashes with existing and proposed services. This allows for greater tree planting opportunities due to the presence of overhead power lines on the eastern side of the carriageway.

Figure 2 – Overall layout of the preferred option (Option 1)

 

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance included, a letterbox drop to the local community and meetings as requested.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       The residents who own property or reside in homes along Palmers Road are specifically affected by this option due to the implication of any physical construction works.  Their views are included in the “Community Consultation’ of this report (from section 5.10 to 5.16).

6.6       As a result of consultation, the following change(s) has/have been made to the final plan for approval. Amended plan is shown in attachment D.

6.6.1   The chicane previously outside 96 Palmers Road has been relocated slightly and is now outside number 98 Palmers Road.

6.6.2   The alleyway entrances will be hard surfaced instead of grassed.

6.6.3   The position of some trees will be reviewed during detailed design to ensure no clashes.

6.6.4   The Carpinus fastigata (Upright Hornbeam) has the low potential to affect some people with allergies and will be replaced with Fraxinus ornus (Manna Ash).

6.7       A letter has been sent to all submitters advising the outcome of the consultation, including details of the Board meeting and how they can request speaking rights. Also included in this letter was a link to the feedback summary with project team responses.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation – The preliminary estimate for this street renewal is $2.9 million. The actual budget for this project is $2.4 million. The shortfall for this project will be funded from the Street Renewal programme.

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – there will be additional maintenance cost related to extra landscaping incorporated in the street (e.g. new trees), this will be balanced by lower overall maintenance due to the new asset condition.

6.11    Funding source - This project is funded from the Street Renewals Program capital funds.

Legal Implications

6.12    There are no implications beyond Christchurch City Council’s rights as the Road Controlling Authority for this street.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    The project is funded in the LTP but budget does not match scheme cost estimate.
This will be managed during the detailed design phase and additional funds will be provided from the program if required.

6.14    There is some level of uncertainty in the drainage works proposed, caused by risks related to stop banks by New Brighton Road, and future of the Red Zone land interfacing the scheme.  This may result in small changes in the scheme which will be managed in a way to not cause big impacts in the residents of the street.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies - the street renewal project is dependent upon the completion of water works. These works are expected to be completed by February 2018.

6.16    Implementation timeframe - the construction of the street renewal is planned to commence in the second half of 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Renews damaged assets.

·   Enhances the streetscape by narrowing the road and providing more green areas with trees.

·   Introduces traffic calming by narrowing the carriageway and installing chicanes, which will assist with speed management and discouragement of rat running.

·   Addresses issues with stormwater ponding and treatment.

·   It will be compatible with any future decision on the riverbank treatment by New Brighton Road.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Some road users may see the traffic calming as an inconvenience however the benefits are considered significant enough to outweigh any disbenefits.

·   Current cost estimate exceeds funding allocation, this will be managed during the detailed design phase.

7.   Option 2 – Street Renewal on 9m alignment with no traffic calming devices

Option Description

7.1       This option is presented in Figure 3 below and includes of the following works:

7.1.1   Narrowing of the existing carriageway to 9.0m, with unmarked parking on both sides.

7.1.2   Replacement of the existing kerb and dish channel with new kerb and flat channel

7.1.3   Narrowing of each leg of the Palmers Road / Caithness Street intersection to 6.0m

7.1.4   Palmers Road, at its intersection with New Brighton Road is narrowed to 6.0m

7.1.5   Full road reconstruction to a depth of 400mm (100mm M4, 300mm AP65)

7.1.6   Minimum footpath reconstruction

7.1.7   Re-seal of footpath and driveways in current location, re-grade driveways where necessary and to avoid possible tail scrape issues

Figure 3 – Overall layout Option 2

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance included, a letterbox drop to the local community and meetings as requested.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       Community views were not obtained on this option. They were only obtained for the preferred option. There is general support from the community on the preferred option.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies, specifically the Long Term Plan 2015-20, which includes this road renewal.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – $2.6 Million

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - There are no additional maintenance costs.

7.9       Funding source - Street Renewals Program capital funds.

Legal Implications

7.10    There are no implications beyond Christchurch City Council’s rights as the Road Controlling Authority for this street.

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    There is some level of uncertainty in the drainage works proposed caused by Risks related to stop banks by New Brighton Road and future of the Red Zone land interfacing the scheme.  This may result in small changes in the scheme which will be managed in a way to not cause big impacts in the residents of the street.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies - the street renewal project is dependent upon the completion of water works. These works are expected to be completed by February 2018.

7.13    Implementation timeframe - the construction of the street renewal is planned to commence in the second half of 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Renews damaged assets

·   Enhances the streetscape by narrowing the road

·   Addresses issues with stormwater ponding and treatment

·   It will be compatible with any future decision on the riverbank treatment by New Brighton Rd

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The 9.0 metre carriageway with no chicanes is considered insufficient to create the desired low speed environment for a low volume local street with low parking demand.

·   Less opportunities to plant new trees

 

8.   Option 3 – Street Renewal on 9m alignment with two-way flow chicanes

Option Description

8.1       This option is presented in Figure 4 below and includes the following works:

8.1.1   Narrowing of the existing carriageway to 9.0m, with unmarked parking on both sides.

8.1.2   Replacement of the existing kerb and dish channel with new kerb and flat channel

8.1.3   Bowhill Road, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m.

8.1.4   Caithness Street, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m.

8.1.5   Palmers Road, at the intersection with New Brighton Road, remains at the existing width of 12.0m

8.1.6   Full road reconstruction to a depth of 400mm (100mm M4, 300mm AP65)

8.1.7   Installation of chicanes which narrow the carriageway to 6.0m (two-way flow) at approximately 100-150m spacing’s.

8.1.8   Footpath reconstruction

8.1.9   Re-seal of footpath and driveways in current location, re-grade driveways where necessary and to avoid possible tail scrape issues

Figure 4 – Overall layout Option 3

8.2       Option 3 proposes that Bowhill Road, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m. This would increase the cost of the project due to the modification required to existing sumps and underground services, when compared to the 9.0m narrowing.

 

Significance

8.3       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.5       Community views were not obtained on this option. They were only obtained for the preferred option. There is general support from the community on the preferred option

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

8.7       Cost of Implementation – $ 3.2 Million

8.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – there would be additional maintenance cost related to extra landscaping incorporated in the street (e.g. new trees) this will be balanced by lower overall maintenance due to the new asset condition.

8.9       Funding source - Street Renewals Program Capital funds.

Legal Implications

8.10    There are no implications beyond Christchurch City Council’s rights as the Road Controlling Authority for this street.

Risks and Mitigations

8.11    There is some level of uncertainty in the drainage works proposed caused by risks related to stop banks by New Brighton Road and future of the Red Zone land interfacing the scheme.  This may result in small changes in the scheme which will be managed in a way to not cause big impacts in the residents of the street

Implementation

8.12    Implementation dependencies - the street renewal project is dependent upon the completion of water works. These works are expected to be completed by February 2018.

8.13    Implementation timeframe - the construction of the street renewal is planned to commence in the second half of 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   The same of option 1 but with 6m wide width TMDs (chicanes).

·   Parking is available on both sides of the road.

8.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The 6.0m wide TMD’s will restrict vehicle speeds creating a sufficiently slow speed environment however will increase noise pollution.

·   The New Brighton Road intersection remains at 12.0m which is unrestrictive to vehicle tracking movements and encourage fast movements.

·   The narrowing of Bowhill Road to 6.0m would result in increased cost due to modifications required to the existing services. 

·   Current cost estimate exceeds funding allocation

·   The two-laned horizontal and vertical deflection Traffic Management Devices proposed in Option 3, are generally a minimum of 4.0m in length (to accommodate the wheelbase of the largest emergency vehicle) and are effective at reducing vehicle speeds, rat running and lowering crash risk. However they can create a negative environmental effect due to the noise associated with vehicles traversing them. In order to minimise this effect, the gradient of the ramps could be reduced (1 in 20) and the platforms lengthened (6.0m), however this reduces their effectiveness and is generally only appropriate where buses or heavy vehicles are common.

9.   Option 4 – Street Renewal on 6.0 metres alignment with regular indented parking bays

Option Description

9.1       This option is presented in Figure 5 below and includes following works:

9.1.1   Narrowing of the existing carriageway to 6.0m

9.1.2   Regular indented parking bays, 2.0m wide, on both sides of the carriageway

9.1.3   Bowhill Road, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m.

9.1.4   Caithness Street, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m.

9.1.5   Palmers Road, at the intersection with New Brighton Road is narrowed to 6.0m.

9.1.6   Replacement of the existing kerb and dish channel with new kerb and flat channel

9.1.7   Full road reconstruction to a depth of 400mm (100mm M4, 300mm AP65)

9.1.8   Footpath reconstruction

9.1.9   Re-seal of footpath and driveways in current location – re-grade driveways where necessary to avoid possible tail scrape issues

9.2       The proposed 6.0m carriageway width is sufficient to create a slow speed environment. The CCC IDS requires 6m minimum width for two way flow.

9.3       Option 4 also proposes that Bowhill Road, at the intersection with Palmers Road, is narrowed to 6.0m. This will increase the cost of the project due to modifications required to existing sumps and underground services. Additionally, the proposed indented parking bay layout creates the need for a more complex stormwater solution, which will likely result in an elevated project cost compared to other options and the 9.0m narrowing.

9.4       The proposed layout will result in a minor decrease of 30 on-street parking on Palmers Road. As the positioning of these parking bays is flexible and indicative only at this stage, it is recommended that this would be resolved at detailed design to ensure localised conflicts are minimised. 

Figure 5 – Overall layout Option 4

Significance

9.5       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

9.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

9.7       Community views were not obtained on this option. They were only obtained for the preferred option. There is general support from the community on the preferred option

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

9.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

9.9       Cost of Implementation – $3.2 Million

9.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – here would be additional maintenance cost related to extra landscaping incorporated in the street (e.g. new trees) this will be balanced by lower overall maintenance due to the new asset condition

9.11    Funding source - Street Renewals Program Capital funds.

Legal Implications

9.12    There are no implications beyond Christchurch City Council’s rights as the Road Controlling Authority for this street

Risks and Mitigations

9.13    There is some level of uncertainty in the drainage works proposed caused by Risks related to stop banks by New Brighton Road and future of the Red Zone land interfacing the scheme.  This may result in small changes in the scheme which will be managed in a way to not cause big impacts in the residents of the street.

Implementation

9.14    Implementation dependencies - the street renewal project is dependent upon the completion of water works. These works are expected to be completed by February 2018.

9.15    Implementation timeframe - the construction of the street renewal is planned to commence in the second half of 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

9.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   The narrowing of the carriageway to 6.0m increases the safety by restricting the available width for vehicles.

·   Narrowing of the intersections raises awareness of the intersections, further supports a slow speed environment and reduces the pedestrian crossing distance.

9.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The 6.0m carriageway is considered appropriate for achieving a slow speed environment; however the required modifications to existing services resulting from the narrowing of Bowhill Road to 6.0m, as well as the increased complexity of the stormwater solution and elevate the project cost.

·   Reduction in on street parking by 30 spaces.

 


 

10. Option 5 – Do nothing

Option Description

10.1    The road to remain as it is. No renewal.

Significance

10.2    The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

10.3    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

10.4    Community views were not obtained on this option because it does not meet the requirements of the Council Asset Management Plan.

10.5    No feedback supported this option and this option would not deliver the required roading upgrades.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

10.6    This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies, specifically the Long Term Plan 2015-20, which now includes this road renewal.

Financial Implications

10.7    Cost of Implementation – nil.

10.8    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – There will be ongoing increasing maintenance costs if the road stays the way is.

10.9    Funding source – n/a

Legal Implications

10.10  Does not meet requirements for CCC asset maintenance plan.

Risks and Mitigations    

10.11  There is some level of uncertainty in the drainage works proposed caused by Risks related to stop banks by New Brighton Road and future of the Red Zone land interfacing the scheme.  This may result in small changes in the scheme which will be managed in a way to not cause big impacts in the residents of the street.

10.12  There is a risk to council reputation, having consulted on a street renewal proposal with budget available, to not complete these works given the current street condition.

Implementation

10.13  Implementation timeframe – n/a

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

10.14  The advantages of this option include:

·   No change

10.15  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Option does not meet requirements for CCC asset maintenance plan.

·   This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies, specifically the Long Term Plan 2015-20, which now includes this road renewal.

·   Residents are unlikely to be satisfied with the condition of the road and a decision not to complete the street renewal

·   Ongoing, increasing maintenance costs due to the current road condition

·   No traffic calming measures would be installed reducing the safety and residential amenity of the street

·   This project follows the three Waters project which will have temporary reinstatement, if this works does not proceed that temporary works would have to be upgraded.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Consultation Plan Palmers Road (Bowhill-New Brighton Rd) renewal

35

b

Palmers Road Public Information Leaflet

36

c

Palmers Road Feedback form

40

d

Consultation Plan - Palmers Road renewal amended after public submissions

42

e

Palmers Road Letter of 27 April 2018 to residents

43

f

Memo discussed with the CB on the 12 September 2018

47

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Sandra Novais - Project Manager

Approved By

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

10.    Coastal-Burwood Neighbourhood Week 2018 - Consideration of Applications to the Fund.

Reference:

18/964157

Contact:

Natalie Dally

natalie.dally@ccc.govt.nz

941 5326

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider applications to the 2018 Coastal-Burwood Neighbourhood Week Fund.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.2       Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement or consultation is   required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board resolves to:

1.         Consider applications to the 2017 Neighbourhood Week fund as set out below:

 

Applicant

Activity

No. Attending

Recommendation

1

Betty Chapman – Bottle Lake Residents Association

BBQ

35

$100

2

Doug Boniface – Iti Place Neighbourhood Watch Group

BBQ

43

$100

3

Cheryl Nuthall

Street BBQ

40

$140

4

Fran Raine

Street BBQ

50

$170

5

Elissa Smith

Neighbourhood BBQ

40

$100

6

Briar Thompson

Street/Block Dinner Party

20

$70

7

Koral Fitzgerald – Beach Road Neighbourhood Support Group

Pop-Up Shop/ BBQ

25

$85

8

Sarah Vickers

Christmas Shindig

45

$150

9

Amy Ridpath

Block Neighbourhood Party

32

$120

10

Nicola Ellis

Pot Luck

30

$100

11

Gillian Kney – Sea Eagles/Manly Place Neighbourhood Support Group

Christmas Party/BBQ

50

$100

12

Kyrstyna Kavanagh

Street BBQ

60

$206

13

Alicia Fitzpatrick

Pre-Christmas Block Party

100

$300

14

Linda Burdekin – Southshore Residents Association

Afternoon Tea

80

$175

15

New Brighton and Districts Historical Society and Museum Incorporated

Armistice Day 100th Anniversary

30

$70

16

New Brighton Community Gardens

Annual Community Open Day

300

$355

17

Salvation Army Aranui

Carols on the park and BBQ

100

$160

18

Aranui Community Trust (ACTIS)

Community BBQ

250

$375

19

Te Wero Gymnastics Club

Annual Community Open Day

100

$150

20

New Brighton Union Parish

Summer Neighbourhood Lunch

40

$80

21

New Brighton Catholic School

Community Gathering

30

$70

22

Dallington Community Cottage Trust

"LOVE lock and LANDY" event

200

$54

23

North New Brighton Kindergarten

Late Lunch/Afternoon Tea

180

$270

 

Note: The staff recommendations total $3,500

2.         Return any funding that is no longer required by successful applicants, for the 2018 Neighbourhood Week fund, to the Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       Neighbourhood Week is a dedicated period in which individuals and groups are encouraged to get together and get to know one another locally.  This year Neighbourhood Week is to be held from 27 October 2018 to 31 March 2019.  Applications for funding closed on 7 September 2018.

4.2       Local community groups, including residents' associations and neighbourhood support groups, have been sent information inviting them to apply for the Neighbourhood Week funding that has been allocated by the Board. Applicants to the 2017 Neighbourhood Week funding were also notified via email.

4.3       A matrix outlining the applications and staff recommendations is attached (Attachment A), along with the Neighbourhood Week Guidelines (Attachment B) that accompany the application details.

4.4       By the closing date, 27 applications had been received.  Of these, four withdrew their applications from consideration. There are 23 applications to be considered by the Coastal-Burwood Community Board.

4.5       The applications were sorted and assessed to ensure that they met the guidelines for the Neighbourhood Week events, and staff recommended an amount to be allocated to each application.

4.6       The staff recommendations have been calculated based on the estimated number of people attending. For local neighbourhood gatherings the recommendations are based on $3.50 per person and for the applications from organisations the recommendations are based on $1.50 per person as a guideline. Where the "per person" calculation exceeds the amount requested by an applicant, the amount requested figure has been recommended by staff.

4.7       In making the recommendations staff have endeavoured to maintain consistency over the allocation recommendations according to the amounts applied for and the number of people estimated to be attending the events. Calculations have also been made in accordance with the guideline for Neighbourhood Week that states; "applications from individuals getting together and holding a local gathering will take priority over those held by organisations."

4.8       Organisers of events that are scheduled to take place in a public place situated within an alcohol ban area, will be notified of the ban requirements.

4.9       From time to time due to unforeseen circumstances events are not held or other funding is made available to the organisers and Community Board funding is no longer required for the events. In these cases it is recommended by staff that the unspent funding be returned to the 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Coastal-Burwood Neighbourhood Week 2018 MATRIX

56

b

Neighbourhood Week Guidelines 2018

62

 

 

Signatories

Author

Natalie Dally - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

11.    Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2018/19 Spencerville Play Centre Roof Repair, North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club Equipment

Reference:

18/957069

Presenter(s):

Heather Davies Community Development Advisor, Jacqui Miller Community Recreation Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an applications for funding from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisations listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

58566

Spencerville Play Centre

Roof Repair

$1,600

$1,600

58471

North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club

Indoor Bowls equipment replacement

$860

$800

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $46,560 remaining in the fund

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as a result of funding applications being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Resolve to approve the making of a grant of $1,600 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to Spencerville Playcentre towards the roof repair.

2.         Resolve to approve the making of a grant of $800 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club towards equipment (one set of coloured bowling balls).

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2017/18

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$88,060

$41,500

$46,560

$44,960

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Spencerville Playcentre Decision Matrix

67

b

North New Brighton Indoor Bowls Club DRF Decision Matrix

69

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Jacqui Miller - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

12.    Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Youth Development Fund Report - Thomas Robertson

Reference:

18/966910

Presenter(s):

Jacqui Miller, Community Recreation Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application received for funding from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently a balance of $3,750 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Board to consider an application of funding from Thomas Robertson.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $250 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Thomas Robertson towards his costs for attending the National Primary Schools Surfing Championships from 6 to 7 October 2018 in Gisborne. Noting that the funds are not to be used for any supervisory staff, coaching, tuition or management costs.

4.   Applicant 1 – Thomas Robertson

4.1       Thomas Robertson is a 12 year old year seven student who lives in the suburb of Waimairi Beach.

4.2       Thomas has been selected to attend the National Primary Schools Surfing Championships from 6 to 7 October 2018 in Gisborne.  Selection is based on performance in the previous year’s South Island Surfing Circuit where Thomas placed second in his age group.

4.3       Thomas has been surfing since he was 10 as a member of the North Wai Boardriders Club.  He is also an active member of the New Brighton Rugby Club and attends Rawhiti School.  He has been involved with competitive surfing for a short period yet has progressed quickly and achieved high placings.

4.4       Thomas and his family have been involved in supporting fundraising efforts by North Wai Boardriders to support a number of their club members to attend the 2017 and 2018 World Junior Surfing events in Japan and America.  These Clubs members and their fundraising efforts where prioritised by the Club therefore funding is not available from the Club.

4.5       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Thomas to attend the National Primary Schools Surfing Championships from 6 to 7 October 2018 in Gisborne.

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Flights

$440.96

Accommodation

$200.00

Transport – Rental car

$235.00

Tournament entry fee

$50.00

Food

$150

                                                                                                 Total

$1,075.96

FUNDRAISING

 

No fundraising activities

 

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$0

 

 

REMAINING

$1,075.96

 

4.6       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

4.7       The application from Thomas was not submitted 6 weeks prior to the activity occurring due to the criteria age group being 12-20 year olds. Thomas did not turn 12 until the 22 August 2018 therefore submitted his application in alignment with the criteria.   

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Jacqui Miller - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

13.    Coastal-Burwood Community Board 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund Southshore Residents Association Penguin Nesting Boxes 

Reference:

18/970859

Presenter(s):

Heather Davies Community Development Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

Amount Recommended

58597

Southshore Residents Association

Penguin Nesting Boxes

$1,000

$1,000

 

1.2       There is currently a balance of $46,560 remaining in the fund

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as a result of an application being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Resolve to approve the making of a grant of $1,000 from its 2018/19 Discretionary Response Fund to Southshore Residents Association towards the Penguin Nesting Boxes Project.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the <enter year> Discretionary Response Fund is as below.

Total Budget 2017/18

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$88,060

$41,500

$46,560

$43,960

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Southshore Residents Association Penguin Nesting Boxes Decision Matrix

75

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

14.    Coastal-Burwood 2018/19 Youth Development Fund Report - Karamea Phoenix Te Whaiti

Reference:

18/974825

Presenter(s):

Heather Davies Community Development Advisor

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application received for funding from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently a balance of $3,750 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Board to consider an application of funding from Karamea Te Whaiti.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $500 from its 2018/19 Youth Development Fund to Karamea Te Whaiti towards the cost of attending a Japanese language trip from 30 September to 13 October. Noting that the funds are not to be used for any supervisory staff, coaching, tuition or management costs.

4.   Applicant 1 – Karamea Te Whaiti

4.1       Karamea is a 16 year old student who lives in North New Brighton.

4.2       Karamea has been studying the Japanese language since she started high school.

4.3       The school have organised a trip to Japan, which will take place during the school holidays.

4.4       The trip is an opportunity for students to develop their understanding of Japanese culture and language.

4.5       It will provide valuable experience for Karamea to use and practice her language skills in Japan.

4.6       Karamea will experience a different country, culture and language, whilst also sharing impressions of herself, her school, her country and her Maori culture. 

4.7       Karamea states: "I would like to study engineering at university level and feel that my ability to speak another language enables me to better represent my learning ability, my academic success and my culture".

4.8       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Karamea to go on the trip to Japan from 30 September to 13 October 2018.

 

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Flights

$1853.00

Accommodation

$344.00

Transport – 7 day Japan Rail Pass

$420.00

2 days at Yokohama Jogakuin

$150.00

Disneyland

$87.00

Universal Studios

$107.00

Staff cost divided by 16

$632.00

                                                                                          Total

$3,593.00

Money to be taken by each student

 

Food

23,000 yen

Non rail pass travel

5500 yen

Admission to temples

2200 yen

                                                                                           Total

30,700 yen

                                                                                     

  (NZ$415.00)

FUNDRAISING

 

Private Request (pending)

$400

School Bake Sale $300 divided by 6 )

$50

Stocktake at Warehouse

$500

                                                                                                 Total

$950.00

 

4.9       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

4.10    The application from Karamea was not submitted 6 weeks prior to the activity occurring. The Youth Development Fund came up in a conversation between a staff member of the school and a friend who used to work for Council – it was as a result of this conversation that the application has been submitted.  

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

15.    Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report - October 2018

Reference:

18/924998

Presenter(s):

Jo Wells, Community Governance Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This report provides information on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area, to provide the Board with a strategic overview and inform sound decision making.

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Receive the Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report for October 2018.

2.         Inform the Burwood East Residents Association of the use of the pond swales located at the northern end of Donnell Park

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Memos/Information/Advice to the Board

3.1.1   Donnell Park

On 6 August 2018 the Board requested advice on whether the pond swales located at the northern end of Donnell Park (24 and 26 Kingsbridge Drive) are functioning/providing a land drainage function, and whether they are still required. The reason for the request for this information is that the Burwood East Residents’ Association has indicated it would like to consult with the community about what the community would like to see happen in this area (if anything can). Therefore this information will help to inform the consultation.

Advice from staff is that the swales provide for storm water treatment and retention ponds for the Travis Road Subdivision (circa 2007).  While most of the catchment area is red-zoned, they will still be providing a mitigation function for the roading and pockets of Residential Suburban residential land in that area.

3.1.2   Anzac Bridge Fronds

On 3 September 2018 the Board requested information on the storage location of the Anzac Bridge fronds and assurance that the fronds are in a suitable condition for reuse.

Staff have approached the New Zealand Transport Authority (NZTA) and they have agreed to reinstatement of the fronds at the Bridge on certain conditions. Currently no funding has been allocated to the reinstatement of the fronds and therefore no timeframe or accurate cost estimate is available. It is understood that they were installed for art/ beautification of the area and reflect the plant life of the area. The fronds were removed following the earthquakes so that their condition could be assessed. If reinstated, they will be on their own supports and not attached to the bridge structure. However, as advised by NZTA, they may have to be temporarily removed and stored when the bridge is eventually replaced. The fronds are currently stored at a Council contractor’s yard in McLeans Island.

 

 

3.1.3   Bottle Lake Forest Gates

At the Board meeting on 4 September 2018, staff undertook to follow up that the conditions of the contract for the gate closing regime for Bottle Lake Forest are being followed by the Council’s security contractor. It has been confirmed that the contractor is providing the required service.

There have not been any recent complaints related to closing times or about resulting activity. Staff are investigating areas of the overflow carpark that may not need to remain open at all times and potentially putting in some post and cable fencing so that there is more control over the use of this area.







 

 

 

3.1.4   Heritage Status – New Brighton War Memorial

On 3 September 2018 the Board requested clarification on why the New Brighton War Memorial (1925) was not listed as a heritage place in the District Plan, noting that the New Brighton Clock Tower (1935) had that status.

Heritage staff advise that age is not an indicator of significance or the criterion for listing within the District Plan. A candidate structure is considered on its Heritage values. This means the following tangible and intangible attributes which contribute to the significance of a heritage item and its heritage setting:

·    historical and social values;

·    cultural and spiritual values;

·    architectural and aesthetic values;

·    contextual values;

·    technological and craftsmanship values; and

·    archaeological and scientific values

With regards to the war memorial, it and other similar structures are recognised as having heritage values and significance that would meet the threshold for listing in the District Plan.  There is currently a moratorium on plan changes that is expected to be lifted in the short to medium term. With the implementation of the heritage strategy new listings are likely to become a focus of a work programme including researching and assessing the memorial.

In line with the new heritage strategy direction, staff would be working more collaboratively with the community to identify and research new listings such as this one.

As it is one of a number of suburban war memorials in the city, staff would likely look at these thematically as a group in terms of researching them. 

In the meantime it is in Council ownership and can be managed to safeguard its heritage values.    

3.1.5   Flying Fox Relocation

At its meeting on 5 October 2017, the Burwood-Coastal Community Board resolved to:

1.            Approve the removal of the flying fox from Muka Park and reduction of the height              of the southern mound supporting the flying fox pole to a level that is compatible                with supporting the skate path.

2.         Direct staff to investigate relocating the flying fox to a location in close proximity                to the current site.

The flying fox was removed late 2017 and the cable and trolley is in storage.

Staff have determined that the best location for the flying fox would be at Marshland Domain.

Funding is available to install the flying fox in year three (2020/2021) of the current 2018 – 2028 Long Term Plan. This funding is subject to Annual Plan reviews.

When the funding is confirmed, Council will check in with the community to see if they support the project and the proposed location for the flying fox.

3.1.6   New Brighton Pier

On 3 September 2018, the Board noted reported occasions of fish offal being left on the Pier.

The Coastal Rangers have advised that the Pier’s main fishing area at the very end gets cleaned daily at around 6am. The other sections are rotated to have at least one thorough clean a week.  On Sundays it is cleaned later at about 9am, so that it is cleaned just before the Sunday fishing ban.

There have not been any recent complaints and it has looked relatively clean on the occasions it has been inspected. 

3.1.7   New Brighton Toilets

On 17 September 2018, as the result of correspondence from a resident, the Board referred various requests to staff for consideration. These included the suggestion that there was a need for new toilets in the New Brighton shopping centre.

The requirement to provide modern public toilets was identified in the Council’s 2015 New Brighton Centre Master Plan, however this was not identified as being a priority during the Long Term Planning (LTP) funding process.


The Board could consider highlighting the need for modern public toilets in New Brighton in the next Annual and Long Term Plans.

 

3.1.8   Burwood Bowling Club Land

On 3 September 2018 the Board requested staff to advise the status of the land that previously was used by the Burwood Bowling Club, located in Burwood Park South.

The land has been cleared and is maintained as part of Burwood Park. The small car park remains.

A local cricket club are considering establishing an artificial wicket for juniors on the former Club site.


 

3.2       Board area Consultations/Engagement/Submission opportunities

 

3.2.1   Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy Review 2018

This policy is open for public consultation from 3 September 2018 – 5 October 2018

 

3.2.2   Thomson Park carpark enhancement and landscape plan project

Public consultation for this project was open during August, staff are analysing the feedback and a report including the public feedback is expected to come to the Board in mid-October.  The purpose of this project is to improve the functionality, flow and access of this area of Thomson Park for all park users.

 

3.3       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.3.1   Long Term Plan 2018-2028

The following link outlines the recommendations that were adopted in the Long Term Plan 2018-2028: http://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2018/06/CLTP_20180622_MIN_2843_AT.PDF.

 

4.   Community Board Plan – Update against Outcomes

The Board approved the Coastal-Burwood Community Board Plan for 2017-19 on 16 October 2017. This Plan, can be found at the following link: https://www.ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Community-Boards/Coastal-Burwood-Community-Board-Plan-2017-19.pdf

The Board’s ongoing decisions are being included as measures against the Outcomes and Priorities contained in the 2017 – 2019 Community Board Plan.

 

5.   Significant Council Projects in the Board Area

5.1       Other partnerships with the community and organisations

5.1.1   Regenerate Christchurch Engagement findings from the Red Zone futures exhibition

A report on the findings of Regenerate Christchurch’s public engagement on the shortlist of land use options for the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Regeneration Area is now available. The findings of the representative survey and feedback on the Red Zone Futures exhibition, which ran from 26 May to 30 June 2018, will inform development of the draft regeneration plan for the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor. The views of the Christchurch City Council, Environment Canterbury, Ōtākaro Ltd, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) and Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu will also inform development of the draft plan before it is publicly notified.

5.2       Community Facilities (updates and future plans)

5.2.1   Parklands Recreation Centre

With the opening of Taiora QEII Recreation and Sport Centre, the space at the Parklands Recreation Centre previously occupied by the fitness centre is now available for hire. The recreation hall is available for sporting, dance, educational, art and craft activities and social functions. There are two wall-mounted hoops and the floor is marked our for a half basketball court. Located at 75 Queenspark Drive, this hall has a maximum standing capacity of 250 people and has a variety of equipment available including chairs and tables for all function needs.

 

6.   Significant Community Issues, Events and Projects in the Board Area

6.1       Southshore New Brighton/Southshore Regeneration Strategy

The Coastal Futures Hub at 82 Estuary Road has been open for 12 weeks and has seen a steady stream of people through the doors, looking for more information about the Southshore South New Brighton regeneration strategy process. 

Flyers about the Regeneration Strategy process have been delivered to residents in Southshore and South New Brighton. An overview of the process over the coming months is provided below:

•    The Regeneration Strategy process is divided up into five phases. The first phase (current phase) is ‘introducing the regeneration strategy and what it means’.

•    The second phase is ‘what we know’. 

•    The next phase is collectively coming up with ‘options’ and ideas for responding to the changes in our environment.

•    Phase four is about ‘evaluating those options’ and collectively narrowing down the list to the best options.

•    And phase five is ‘writing the strategy’.

Throughout the process there are opportunities for the community get involved, give feedback, and help shape decisions.

6.2       Rockabilly Show & Shine

This event is to be held in New Brighton 10 November 2018. The organiser and representative from the New Brighton Business and Landowners Association presented to the Community Board regarding the 2018 Rockabilly Show & Shine event, specifically regarding support for the Friday night Cruise and music event held in New Brighton Mall.  Staff suggested the organisers consider applying to the Council’s Enliven Spaces Fund as the event meet the criteria.  The Friday night event has been granted $2,900 towards the traffic management and entertainment costs.Image may contain: text

 

6.3       Fireworks Spectacular event 2018

The Treetech Fireworks Spectacular this year will be held on Friday 2 November at New Brighton Pier rather than the traditional Guy Fawkes Night on 5 November. “Anthems of Rock” will set the scene for an explosion of colour across the night sky from 9pm.

Plans are under way to ease traffic pressures by prioritising bus access and reviewing options for a “park and ride” service.  Several roads will be closed from 6pm to allow for the thousands of people expected to crowd into the foreshore area. Parking restrictions will also be in force, with signage installed the day prior to the event.

 

6.4       Events Report Back

6.4.1   The Breeze Walking Festival 2018

The Festival kicked off on Saturday 29 September running through the school holidays until 14 October with over 50 walks to choose from in Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri districts.  The opening weekend sees the return of the popular Dogs Day Out event at Ferrymead Heritage Park as well as the Otakaro Avon River Walk.  Some walks require bookings with many of these walks booked out 3 weeks prior to the Festival opening.

Ferrymead Heritage Park with Dave and Hillary from the Breeze Canterbury, as well as the Festival favourites – Gruff, Perky and Angus the Dog along with all their mates.

 

7.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

7.1.1   Please find a parks update attached.

 

8.   Community Board Funding Update

8.1       The budget information for the Board's 2017/18 Discretionary Response and Youth development Funds is attached.

 

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Coastal-Burwood Parks update - Eastern Area  October 2018

89

b

Coastal Burwood Community Board's 2017/18 Discretionary Response and Youth

95

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Peter Croucher - Community Board Advisor

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

Natalie Dally - Community Development Advisor

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Jacqui Miller - Community Recreation Advisor

Ann Furlong - Support Officer

Katie MacDonald - Support Officer

Approved By

John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Waitai/Coastal-Burwood Community Board

01 October 2018

 

 

16.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.