Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Monday 2 October 2017

Time:                                    3pm

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sally Buck

Jake McLellan

Alexandra Davids

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Brenda Lowe-Johnson

Deon Swiggs

Sara Templeton

 

 

27 September 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Shupayi Mpunga

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6605

shupayi.mpunga@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

 


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       7.       Silvester Street, Woolston - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions and Road Parking Improvement................................................................................................................. 35

C       8.       Ferry Road near Richmond Terrace, Woolston - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions 43

C       9.       Ribbonwood Place Hillsborough - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................... 51

C       10.     227 Ferry Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................................................ 59

C       11.     Alexandra Street, Richmond - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions.......................... 67

C       12.     Riccarton Ave: Proposed Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand............................. 75

C       13.     Application to 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Sumner Pool...................... 81

C       14.     Application to Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Sumner Community Residents Assocation - Sumner Neighbourhood Night ......... 85

C       15.     Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report................................... 89

B       16.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................. 131 

 

 


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 20 September 2017 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

It is intended that the public forum session will be held at <Approximate Time>

OR

There will be no public forum at this meeting

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

 

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 20 September 2017

Time:                                    10am

Venue:                                 The Board Room, 180 Smith Street,
Linwood

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sally Buck

Jake McLellan

Alexandra Davids

Yani Johanson

Darrell Latham

Tim Lindley

Brenda Lowe-Johnson

Deon Swiggs

Sara Templeton

 

 

19 September 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Shupayi Mpunga

Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

941 6605

shupayi.mpunga@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00138

Apologies were accepted from Jake McLellan and Brenda Lowe-Johnson for absence.

Deon Swiggs/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                             Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

Yani Johanson declared an interest in Item 8 (26 Angus Street, Sydenham – Proposed No Stopping Restrictions) and took no part in the discussion or voting on this matter.

 

Alexandra Davids declared an interest in Item 24 (Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Strengthening Communities Fund 2017-18  - Allocation of Grants Application from K2 Youth Development Trust) and took no part in the discussion or voting on this matter.

 

Sara Templeton declared an interest in Item 24 (Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Strengthening Communities Fund 2017-18  - Allocation of Grants Applications from Heathcote Valley School, Heathcote Valley Community Association and the Heathcote Valley Community Library) and took no part in the discussion or voting on those matters.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00139

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting held on Monday, 4 September 2017 be confirmed.

Darrell Latham/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.1       Waltham School Recycling Bins

             Ms Rebecca Baynton, teacher at Waltham School, spoke to the Board regarding the school’s initiative for sustainability and requested the Board’s support in obtaining additional recycling wheelie bins.

             The Chairperson thanked Ms Baynton for making her presentation to the Board.

             The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

·    Requested that staff work with Waltham School on a funding application to the Board for a grant for provision of additional recycling wheelie bins.

·    Requested that staff provide advice on the Board setting up a sustainability fund.

 

4.2       Sumner Temporary Skate Park

             Mr Roger Evans, motel owner in Sumner, expressed his concern to the Board regarding the Temporary Skate Park in Sumner and the effect on his business. Staffing attendance advised the Board on relevant considerations.

The Chairperson thanked Mr Evans for making his presentation to the Board.

The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

·    Requested staff advice on how to restrict skateboarding activity in the car park.

·    Noted its supports for signage to be placed at the car park to prohibit skateboarding.

·    Requested that staff ask the City to Sumner Community Patrol to monitor the carpark and report back to the Board.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

5.1       Rolleston Avenue Coach Parking

             Mr Robin McCarthy spoke to the Board regarding Rolleston Avenue Coach Parking, the increased volume of tourism vehicles using the area and the current stopping restrictions. Clause 12 of these minutes refers.

The Chairperson thanked Ms McCarthy for making her presentation to the Board.

 

12. Rolleston Avenue: Proposed Pick Up Drop Off and 30 Minute Tour Coach and Shuttle Parking

 

Board Comment:

The Board discussed the issues on Rolleston Avenue including:

·     additional accessibility parking spaces.

·     parking signage accuracy.

·     provision for private vehicle parking.

·     engagement with the local Residents Association for all Council projects.

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00140(Staff recommendations adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Rolleston Avenue, commencing at its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 232 metres be revoked.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 28 metres.

3.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes and designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the west side of Rolleston Avenue, commencing at a point 28 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 35 metres.

(Note: There is a 12 metre gap here for two vehicle entrances.)

 

4.         Approve that a marked bus, coach and shuttle stop, for the purposes of picking up and dropping off passengers only, be installed on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 75 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 28 metres.

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 103 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 45 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be reserved at any time for vehicles with an approved disabled person's parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4.1 of the Land Transport - Road User Rule 2004, restricted to a maximum time period of 120 minutes on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 148 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 169 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 4 metres.

 

8.         Approve that a marked bus, coach and shuttle stop, for the purposes of picking up and dropping off passengers only, be installed on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 173 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

9.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes and designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 195 metres south of its intersection with the prolongation of the southern kerb line of Gloucester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 37 metres.

Deon Swiggs/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                             Carried

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.    

7.   26 Angus Street, Sydenham - Proposed Weekday Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00141 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 8am and 5pm Monday to Friday on the north side of Angus Street commencing at a point 40m west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for 14 metres.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

8.   149 Clifton Terrace, Clifton - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00142 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south eastern side of Clifton Terrace commencing at a point 130m south west of its intersection with Panama Road (north east intersection) and extending in a south westerly direction for 13 metres.

Darrell Latham/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

9.   Elgin Street, Sydenham - Proposed P60 Parking Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00143 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve the restriction of parking to sixty minutes on the south side of Elgin Street commencing at a point 24 metres east of its intersection with Durham Street and extending in an easterly direction to a point 110 metres east of its intersection with Durham Street.

Sara Templeton/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

10. Worcester Street near Barbadoes Street - Removal of Bus Stops and Residents Parking Bay

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00144  (Staff recommendations adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Revoke the bus stop located on the north side of Worcester Street commencing at a point 14 metres east of its intersection with Barbadoes Street and extending in an easterly direction for 18 metres.

2.         Revoke the residents permit only parking restriction commencing at a point 32 metres east of its intersection with Barbadoes Street and extending in an easterly direction for 11 metres.

3.         Revoke the bus stop located on the south side of Worcester Street commencing at a point 14 metres west of its intersection with Barbadoes Street and extending in an easterly direction for 32 metres.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

11. Cannon Hill Crescent / Marama Crescent - Proposed Give Way Control

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00145 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.      Approve the installation of a Give Way Control against Marama Crescent at its intersection with Cannon Hill Crescent.

Sara Templeton/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

Meeting adjourned at 11.22

Meeting reconvened at 11.34

13. Linwood Village/Inner City East Community-led Planning Approach

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board request that the Council:

1.         Notes that staff have sought initial advice from Regenerate Christchurch, Te Whare Roimata and Te Puni Kokiri on an appropriate approach to address regeneration in the Linwood Village and Inner City East Area.

2.         Agree to rescind the Council Annual Plan decision CAPL/2017/00022.

3.         Endorse a community-led planning approach to address regeneration issues and opportunities in and surrounding Linwood Village, complementary to the agreed actions of the adopted Linwood Village Master Plan.

4.         Request Regenerate Christchurch to perform an interim facilitation role until such time as the project scope and governance structure for a community-led planning approach is fully established.

 

Community Board Decided LCHB/2017/00146

Part C

4.         Request that Inner City East Regeneration be a Standing Item within the Community Board Agenda.

Deon Swiggs/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

Community Board Decided LCHB/2017/00147

Part A

To recommend that the Council:

1.         Notes that staff have sought initial advice from Regenerate Christchurch, Te Whare Roimata and Te Puni Kokiri on an appropriate approach to address regeneration in the Linwood Village and Inner City East Area in fulfilment of the Council Annual Plan decision CAPL/2017/00022.

2.         Endorses a community-led planning approach to address regeneration issues and opportunities in and surrounding Linwood Village, complementary to the agreed actions of the adopted Linwood Village Master Plan.

3.         Requests Regenerate Christchurch to perform a facilitation role including as the project scope and governance structure for a community-led planning approach is fully established.

Deon Swiggs/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

23. Resolution to Include Supplementary Reports

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00148

Board Decision

That the reports be received and considered at the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board meeting on Wednesday, 20 September 2017.

Open Items

24.       Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Strengthening Communities Fund 2017-18 - Allocation of Grants

25.       Bells Creek Outfall Tree Removal

Sara Templeton/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                      Carried

 

24. Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Strengthening Communities Fund 2017-18 - Allocation of Grants

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund grant allocations totalling $548,285, as below:

No

Organisation Name

Project

Recommendation

56264

Avon Loop Planning Association

Administration of Community Cottage and Events

$2,000

56539

Avonside House Trust

Operating Costs for New Home for Disabled

$3,000

56440

Christchurch Estuary Association Inc.

Christchurch Estuary Association Meeting Room Rent

$110

56626

Community Patrol City to Sumner Incorporated

Two-way Radio Upgrade

$600

56375

Friends of Edmonds Factory Garden Inc.

Music at Edmonds

$750

56501

Heathcote Valley Community Library Inc.

Purchase of Library Books

$750

56822

Heathcote Valley School

Football Goals

$500

56615

Heathcote-Mt Pleasant Anglican Parish

Community Lunch Programme

$500

56513

Mt Pleasant Pottery Group Inc.

Children Holiday Pottery Class

$1,000

56362

Redcliffs Residents Association

Administration and Events for 2017/18

$500

56525

Sumner Senior Citizens Club

Bus Transport

$600

56759

Sydenham Community Preschool Inc.

Play and Development Programme

$1,500

56257

Woolston Boxing Club Inc.

Accounting and Equipment

$1,000

56870

Avebury House Community Trust

Community Development and Heritage Regeneration

$35,000

56869

Bromley Community Association Inc.

Bromley Community Centre

$40,000

56682

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

LYFE 2018

$17,000

56728

Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust

Community Development Worker

$35,000

56609

Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust

Community Hub Coordinator

$27,000

56542

Shoreline Youth Trust

Fuse Youth Cafe

$16,000

56660

Strengthening Linwood Youth Trust

Linwood Youth Development

$32,000

56845

Te Whare Roimata Trust

Inner City East / Linwood Neighbourhood Development Projects

2017/18: $111,500

2018/19: $115,000

2019/20: $117,500

56545

Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo - Waltham Community Cottage

The Cottage Project

2017/18: $47,500

2018/19: $48,500

2019/20: $49,500

56714

Te Whare Taonga O Nga Iwi Katoa Linwood Resource Centre

Operational and Project Costs

$9,000

56547

Woolston Development Project Inc.

Service Provision Assistance

$22,000

56463

Anglican Care Community Development

Community Development Workers in Linwood and Sydenham

$70,000

56544

Compassion Trust

Compassion Trust Financial Mentoring Service

$10,000

56296

Family Help Trust

Breaking the Cycle for Christchurch Children

$3,000

56590

Heathcote Valley Community Association

Community Support Worker, Community Centre Administrator and Centre Costs

$15,000

56261

K2 Youth Development Trust

Kiwi Can, STARS and Project K Programme Delivery

$9,000

56672

Linwood Avenue Community Corner Trust

Community Activities

$8,000

56655

Linwood Rugby League Football Club Inc.

Equipment and Administration Support

$2,000

56371

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Neighbourhood Week

$5,500

56369

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Light Bulb Moments Fund

$4,000

56367

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Community Recreation Events

$9,000

56368

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Award Ceremonies

$9,000

56735

Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association Inc.

Community Centre Administrator Wages & Estuary Fest Undo

$8,500

56598

Opawa Baptist Church

Strengthening Waltham Community

$12,000

56600

Opawaho Trust

24-7 YouthWork

$5,000

56853

Otautahi Creative Spaces Trust

Neighbourhood Creation Stations: Phillipstown Hub and Library

$10,000

56837

Parish of Linwood St Chads

Community Outreach Facilitator

$10,000

56373

Pioneer Basketball Club

Wages, Volunteer Recognition, Pacers Open Court for Youth

$3,000

56757

Redcliffs Public Library Inc.

Operational Costs

$1,000

56880

Richmond Community Garden Trust

Richmond Community Garden

$5,000

56732

Richmond Keas Softball Inc.

Equipment and Volunteer Support

$1,500

56258

Sumner Bays Union Trust

Sumner Bays Union Trust

$7,500

56815

Sumner Community Residents Association

SCRA Projects

$13,750

56764

Te Mapua Child and Youth Trust

Field Worker Wages

$10,000

56874

Te Puna Oranga Inc.

Nga Roopu Kaumatua Awhiora o te Ao - Elderly Days

$9,000

56877

Te Wero Gymnastics Inc.

Rent

$3,500

56730

Wainoni Avonside Community Services Trust

Wainoni Avonside Community Services Trust (WACST)

$6,000

56701

Waltham Out Of School Hours Inc.

Sponsorship of Children

 

$4,000

56894

Woolston Community Association Inc.

Woolston Community Centre

$7,750

2.         Decline to fund the 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund applications below:

No

Organisation Name

Project

Recommendation

56390

Emerge Aotearoa

Youth Mobile Community Support Group Activities

$0

 

56484

Avonside Early Childhood Centre

Volunteer Recognition

$0

56581

Linfield Cultural Recreational Sports Club Inc.

Facility Overheads

$0

56474

Redcliffs Mt Pleasant Bowling Club

Operational and Volunteer Costs

$0

56903

Be The Change NZ/Kia Tu Hurihanga Aotearoa

#Upstand Ignition Project

$0

56568

Kimihia Adventure Programme Trust

Youth Worker Wages

$0

56361

Kimihia Early Learning Trust

Teacher Aide Support

$0

56614

Sydenham Quarter Inc.

Promote Sydenham as an area to do Business

$0

56932

The Pharmacy @ Your Community Charitable Trust

The Pharmacy @ Your Community Charitable Trust

$0

56571

Woolston Preschool Inc.

Woolston Preschool Overhead Costs

$0

Do not delete this line

3.         That the remaining fund balance of $91,299 not allocated in the Strengthening Communities Fund applications above, be transferred to the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Discretionary Response Fund for allocation during the 2017-18 financial year.

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00149

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund grant allocations totalling $548,285, as below:

No

Organisation Name

Project

Decision

56264

Avon Loop Planning Association

Administration of Community Cottage and Events

$2,000

56539

Avonside House Trust

Operating Costs for New Home for Disabled

$3,000

56440

Christchurch Estuary Association Inc.

Christchurch Estuary Association Meeting Room Rent

$110

56626

Community Patrol City to Sumner Incorporated

Two-way Radio Upgrade

$600

56375

Friends of Edmonds Factory Garden Inc.

Music at Edmonds

$750

56501

Heathcote Valley Community Library Inc.

Purchase of Library Books

$1,000

56822

Heathcote Valley School

Football Goals

$500

56615

Heathcote-Mt Pleasant Anglican Parish

Community Lunch Programme

$500

56513

Mt Pleasant Pottery Group Inc.

Children Holiday Pottery Class

$1,000

56362

Redcliffs Residents Association

Administration and Events for 2017/18

$500

56525

Sumner Senior Citizens Club

Bus Transport

$600

56759

Sydenham Community Preschool Inc.

Play and Development Programme

$1,500

56257

Woolston Boxing Club Inc.

Accounting and Equipment

$1,000

56870

Avebury House Community Trust

Community Development and Heritage Regeneration

$0

Note: This project to be referred to the Community Resilience Partnership Fund.

56869

Bromley Community Association Inc.

Bromley Community Centre

$40,000

56682

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

LYFE 2018

$17,000

56728

Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust

Community Development Worker

$35,000

56609

Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust

Community Hub Coordinator

$0

Note: This project to be referred to the Community Resilience Partnership Fund.

56542

Shoreline Youth Trust

Fuse Youth Cafe

$16,000

56660

Strengthening Linwood Youth Trust

Linwood Youth Development

$32,000

56845

Te Whare Roimata Trust

Inner City East / Linwood Neighbourhood Development Projects

2017/18: $111,500

2018/19: $111,500

2019/20: $111,500

56545

Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo - Waltham Community Cottage

The Cottage Project

$0

Note: This project to be referred to the Community Resilience Partnership Fund.

56714

Te Whare Taonga O Nga Iwi Katoa Linwood Resource Centre

Operational and Project Costs

$9,000

56547

Woolston Development Project Inc.

Service Provision Assistance

$22,000

56463

Anglican Care Community Development

Community Development Workers in Linwood and Sydenham

$70,000

56544

Compassion Trust

Compassion Trust Financial Mentoring Service

$10,000

56296

Family Help Trust

Breaking the Cycle for Christchurch Children

$3,000

56590

Heathcote Valley Community Association

Community Support Worker, Community Centre Administrator and Centre Costs

$15,000

56261

K2 Youth Development Trust

Kiwi Can, STARS and Project K Programme Delivery

$11,000

56672

Linwood Avenue Community Corner Trust

Community Activities

$8,000

56655

Linwood Rugby League Football Club Inc.

Equipment and Administration Support

$3,225

56371

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Neighbourhood Week

$6,500

56369

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Light Bulb Moments Fund

$4,000

56367

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Community Recreation Events

$9,000

56368

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

2017/18 Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Project: Award Ceremonies

$9,000

56735

Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association Inc.

Community Centre Administrator Wages & Estuary Fest Undo

$8,500

56598

Opawa Baptist Church

Strengthening Waltham Community

$10,000

56600

Opawaho Trust

24-7 YouthWork

$5,000

56853

Otautahi Creative Spaces Trust

Neighbourhood Creation Stations: Phillipstown Hub and Library

$0

Note: This project to be referred to the Community Resilience Partnership Fund.

56837

Parish of Linwood St Chads

Community Outreach Facilitator

$10,000

56373

Pioneer Basketball Club

Wages, Volunteer Recognition, Pacers Open Court for Youth

$3,000

56757

Redcliffs Public Library Inc.

Operational Costs

$1,000

56880

Richmond Community Garden Trust

Richmond Community Garden

$5,000

56732

Richmond Keas Softball Inc.

Equipment and Volunteer Support

$1,500

56258

Sumner Bays Union Trust

Sumner Bays Union Trust

$7,500

56815

Sumner Community Residents Association

SCRA Projects

$13,750

56764

Te Mapua Child and Youth Trust

Field Worker Wages

$10,000

56874

Te Puna Oranga Inc.

Nga Roopu Kaumatua Awhiora o te Ao - Elderly Days

$9,000

56877

Te Wero Gymnastics Inc.

Rent

$2,000

56730

Wainoni Avonside Community Services Trust

Wainoni Avonside Community Services Trust (WACST)

$6,000

56701

Waltham Out Of School Hours Inc.

Sponsorship of Children

$4,000

56894

Woolston Community Association Inc.

Woolston Community Centre

$7,750

 

2.         Decline to fund the 2017-18 Strengthening Communities Fund applications below:

No

Organisation Name

Project

Recommendation

56390

Emerge Aotearoa

Youth Mobile Community Support Group Activities

$0

56484

Avonside Early Childhood Centre

Volunteer Recognition

$0

56581

Linfield Cultural Recreational Sports Club Inc.

Facility Overheads

$0

56474

Redcliffs Mt Pleasant Bowling Club

Operational and Volunteer Costs

$0

56903

Be The Change NZ/Kia Tu Hurihanga Aotearoa

#Upstand Ignition Project

$0

56568

Kimihia Adventure Programme Trust

Youth Worker Wages

$0

56361

Kimihia Early Learning Trust

Teacher Aide Support

$0

56614

Sydenham Quarter Inc.

Promote Sydenham as an area to do Business

$0

56932

The Pharmacy @ Your Community Charitable Trust

The Pharmacy @ Your Community Charitable Trust

$0

56571

Woolston Preschool Inc.

Woolston Preschool Overhead Costs

$0

 

3.         That the remaining fund balance of $209,824 not allocated in the Strengthening Communities Fund applications above, be transferred to the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Discretionary Response Fund for allocation during the 2017/18 financial year.

4.         Confirms the grant of $111,500 from its 2017/18 Strengthening Communities Fund, and the same amount in 2018/19 and 2019/20 to Te Whare Roimata Trust for Inner City East/ Linwood Neighbourhood Development Projects, and that this be reviewed in 2018/19 and 2019/20 to ensure that cost of living and other adjustments and organisational changes are taken into account.

5.         Note That the following applications for funding be referred to the Community Resilience Partnership Fund;

a.         Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust for the Phillipstown Community Hub;

b.         Otautahi Creative Spaces Trust for Neighbourhood Creation Stations: Phillipstown Hub and Library;

c.         Avebury House Trust for Community Development 2018 and Heritage regeneration;

d.         Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo - Waltham Community Cottage for The Cottage Project.

e.         Sydenham Quarter –Promote Sydenham.

6.         Should the applications referred to the Community Resilience and Partnership Fund be unsuccessful they will be transferred to be funded out of the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Discretionary Response Fund 2017/18.

7.         Request a meeting with the Sydenham Quarter.

8.         That the Board Report to the Council set out the challenges the Board has recognised with the Community Resilience Partnership Fund.

Deon Swiggs/Sally Buck                                                                                                                                            Carried

 

Deon Swiggs left the meeting at 12:07 pm.

25. Bells Creek Outfall Tree Removal

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00150 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve the removal of one street tree to allow the Bells Creek flood mitigation works to be implemented.

Sara Templeton/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                      Carried

Note: Yani Johanson requested that his vote against the resolution be recorded

 

Deon Swiggs returned to the meeting at 12:09 pm.

 

21  Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00151

Part C

That at 1.10pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on page 136 of the agenda be adopted.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 1.34pm.

Yani Johanson left the meeting at 01:40 pm.

 

19. Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Nominate two Board members for the opening of the Linwood Lower Fields (Urban Forest Project) on 16 October 2017; one to talk about the new urban forest and the second to cut the ribbon.

3.         Consider items for inclusion on Newsline.

4.         Consider items for inclusion in the Board report to Council.

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00152

Part B

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Nominate Alexandra Davids,  Brenda Lowe-Johnson and Yani Johanson to attend the Opening of the Linwood Lower Fields (Urban Forest Project) on 16 October 2017; to talk about the new urban forest and to cut the ribbon.

3.         Request items on the Linwood Lower Fields Opening, the Graffiti Statistics and maintenance challenges during the spring growth period be included on Newsline.

4.         Note staff advice on the revocation of resolutions and will not be reconsidering the report on Ruru Road Parking Restrictions.

6.         Request that staff provide advice regarding operating hours for Sumner Library including the current demand and options for increasing week end opening hours, before the Board considers its submission to the Long Term Plan.

7.         Request that the Linwood/Woolston Pool Update be a standing item in the Board agenda.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

14. Application to the Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Linwood College Community Partnership Group - Administrative and Volunteer Expenses

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00153  (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Makes a grant of $2,000 from it 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Linwood College Community Partnership Group towards Administrative and Volunteer Expenses.

Darrell Latham/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                     Carried

 

27  Extension of Meeting Duration

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00154

Part C

That Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Under Standing Orders, Clause 4.2 resolve to continue the meeting without a break to complete the meeting business.

Alexandra Davids/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                         Carried

 

15. Application to Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Te Mapua Child and Youth Trust - Health and Safety

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Makes a grant of $3,000 from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Te Mapua Child and Youth Trust towards Health and Safety.

 

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00155  (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.       Makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Te Mapua Child and Youth Trust towards Health and Safety.

Deon Swiggs/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

16. Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017 Neighbourhood Week Applications

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Transfers $217 from the Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to the Neighbourhood Week 2017 project.

2.         Resolves to allocate its 2017 Neighbourhood Week funding as set out below:

 

Applicant

Activity

No. Attending

Recommendation

1

Carolyn Aitken

Christmas barbeque

8-15

$60

2

Regan Allard

Christmas barbeque/afternoon get-together

12

$60

3

Geoffrey Allen - Centaurus Road Neighbourhood Watch Group

Neighbourhood barbeque

30

$90

4

Robin Arnold

Street barbeque

40

$100

5

Jacqui Benter-Lynch

Neighbourhood BBQ

30

$80

6

Jill Boanas

Barbeque, games for children, Neighbourhood Support

30

$100

7

Claire Burridge

Neighbourhood barbeque

20-30

$100

8

Gary Charmley

Neighbourhood barbeque

29

$120

9

Alison Cook

Barbeque, bouncy castle, kids games

20-100

$200

10

Jane Cowan-Harris - Clifton Hill Neighbourhood group

Neighbourhood barbeque

75-100

$200

11

Barbara Crooks

Street party

60

$100

12

Michael Dillon

Street party - barbeque, music, sharing garden produce

70

$150

13

Joseph (Jos) Galavazi

Grow a spud in a bucket competition followed by barbeque

24

$0

14

Andrew Grieve

Street barbeque

100

$200

15

Ann Griffiths - Wakatu Ave Neighbourhood Watch

Street barbeque

60-80

$100

16

Annette Hobby

Street barbeque

35

$175

17

Amanda Lawson

Street party

85

$200

18

Rebecca Marley

St Andrews Hill block gathering

50-60

$200

19

Fiona Miller - Beachville Road Neighbourhood Support

Morning tea

100

$200

20

Steven Muir - Chester Community (facebook group)

Neighbourhood bar and community garden planting

50

$200

21

Huong Nguyen

Vietnam Women's Day party for neighbours

10

$50

22

Helena Parsons

Annual street gathering

30-40

$150

23

Andrea Petschner - Belleview Terrace Neighbourhood

Barbeque

40

$200

24

Thi Tuyet Thanh Phan

Neighbourhood gathering with food

15

$75

25

Sandy Rodwell - Morgans Valley Neighbourhood Group

Barbeque gathering with family games

70-100

$200

26

Jennifer Steele - Flinders Road Neighbourhood Group

Barbeque

30-40

$150

27

Kimala Temple

Neighbourhood barbeque

40

$150

28

Caitlin Turner

Neighbourhood barbeque

30

$150

29

Alan and Maureen Warburton - Jura Place Neighbourhood Watch

Neighbourhood BBQ

17

$80

30

Phil Washbourn

Street barbeque

25

$100

31

Catherine White

Street party/sausage sizzle

20-30

Withdrawn

32

Lesley Willoughby

Neighbourhood gathering with food and drink

50

$200

33

Carrie Worthington - Dryden Street Sumner Neighbourhood Support Group

Family Street barbeque

60-90

$137

34

Richmond Community Garden Trust

Family day with planting, entertainment, food, drinks, treasure hunt, and games.

1000-2000

$0

35

Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo Waltham Community Cottage

Bric-a-brac stall and community lunch

45

$180

36

Wainoni/Avonside Community Services Trust

Lite Tea

30-35

$100

37

Kidsfirst Kindergarten Selwyn

Barbeque lunch

130

$140

38

Heathcote Valley Community Association

Community gathering with food and drink

40-60

$200

39

Hagley College

Fun afternoon with games and barbeque

70

$0

40

Sumner Community Residents Association

Sumner Neighbourhood Night

300

$0

41

Harman Motors Limited

Barbeque

50-60

$0

42

Opawa Community Church

Afternoon tea

40

$125

43

Opawa Community Church

Barbeque

30

$120

44

The Linwood Salvation Army

Barbeque, Community Day, Official opening of refurbished complex

150

$0

45

Linwood Resource Centre

Repair Café

40

$110

46

St Chads Linwood

Afternoon tea

30

$80

47

Avebury House Trust

Teddy Bears picnic

50

$0

48

Opawa Baptist Church

New Year's Eve gathering and BBQ after church service

100

$0

49

Taylors Mistake Association

Planting and barbeque

75

$175

50

Sydenham Quarter

Community Barbeque

100

$0

51

Opawa Baptist Church - Catch up Group

Afternoon tea for group of socially isolated women and neighbours

12

$60

52

ICON (Inner City West Neighbourhood Association)

Morning tea

30

$150

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00156 

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Resolves to allocate its 2017 Neighbourhood Week funding as set out below:

 

Applicant

Activity

No. Attending

Recommendation

1

Carolyn Aitken

Christmas barbeque

8-15

$60

2

Regan Allard

Christmas barbeque/afternoon get-together

12

$60

3

Geoffrey Allen - Centaurus Road Neighbourhood Watch Group

Neighbourhood barbeque

30

$90

4

Robin Arnold

Street barbeque

40

$100

5

Jacqui Benter-Lynch

Neighbourhood BBQ

30

$80

6

Jill Boanas

Barbeque, games for children, Neighbourhood Support

30

$100

7

Claire Burridge

Neighbourhood barbeque

20-30

$100

8

Gary Charmley

Neighbourhood barbeque

29

$120

9

Alison Cook

Barbeque, bouncy castle, kids games

20-100

$200

10

Jane Cowan-Harris - Clifton Hill Neighbourhood group

Neighbourhood barbeque

75-100

$200

 

11

Barbara Crooks

Street party

60

$100

12

Michael Dillon

Street party - barbeque, music, sharing garden produce

70

$150

13

Joseph (Jos) Galavazi

Grow a spud in a bucket competition followed by barbeque

24

$0

14

Andrew Grieve

Street barbeque

100

$200

15

Ann Griffiths - Wakatu Ave Neighbourhood Watch

Street barbeque

60-80

$100

16

Annette Hobby

Street barbeque

35

$175

17

Amanda Lawson

Street party

85

$200

18

Rebecca Marley

St Andrews Hill block gathering

50-60

$200

19

Fiona Miller - Beachville Road Neighbourhood Support

Morning tea

100

$200

 

20

Steven Muir - Chester Community (facebook group)

Neighbourhood bar and community garden planting

50

$200

21

Huong Nguyen

Vietnam Women's Day party for neighbours

10

$50

22

Helena Parsons

Annual street gathering

30-40

$150

23

Andrea Petschner - Belleview Terrace Neighbourhood

Barbeque

40

$200

24

Thi Tuyet Thanh Phan

Neighbourhood gathering with food

15

$75

25

Sandy Rodwell - Morgans Valley Neighbourhood Group

Barbeque gathering with family games

70-100

$200

26

Jennifer Steele - Flinders Road Neighbourhood Group

Barbeque

30-40

$150

27

Kimala Temple

Neighbourhood barbeque

40

$150

28

Caitlin Turner

Neighbourhood barbeque

30

$150

29

Alan and Maureen Warburton - Jura Place Neighbourhood Watch

Neighbourhood BBQ

17

$80

 

30

Phil Washbourn

Street barbeque

25

$100

31

Catherine White

Street party/sausage sizzle

20-30

Withdrawn

32

Lesley Willoughby

Neighbourhood gathering with food and drink

50

$200

33

Carrie Worthington - Dryden Street Sumner Neighbourhood Support Group

Family Street barbeque

60-90

$137

34

Richmond Community Garden Trust

Family day with planting, entertainment, food, drinks, treasure hunt, and games.

1000-2000

$0

35

Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo Waltham Community Cottage

Bric-a-brac stall and community lunch

45

$180

36

Wainoni/Avonside Community Services Trust

Lite Tea

30-35

$100

37

Kidsfirst Kindergarten Selwyn

Barbeque lunch

130

$140

38

Heathcote Valley Community Association

Community gathering with food and drink

40-60

$200

39

Hagley College

Fun afternoon with games and barbeque

70

$0

 

40

Sumner Community Residents Association

Sumner Neighbourhood Night

300

$0

41

Harman Motors Limited

Barbeque

50-60

$0

42

Opawa Community Church

Afternoon tea

40

$125

43

Opawa Community Church

Barbeque

30

$120

44

The Linwood Salvation Army

Barbeque, Community Day, Official opening of refurbished complex

150

$0

45

Linwood Resource Centre

Repair Café

40

$110

46

St Chads Linwood

Afternoon tea

30

$80

47

Avebury House Trust

Teddy Bears picnic

50

$0

48

Opawa Baptist Church

New Year's Eve gathering and BBQ after church service

100

$0

49

Taylors Mistake Association

Planting and barbeque

75

$175

 

50

Sydenham Quarter

Community Barbeque

100

$0

51

Opawa Baptist Church - Catch up Group

Afternoon tea for group of socially isolated women and neighbours

12

$60

52

ICON (Inner City West Neighbourhood Association)

Morning tea

30

$150

Sally Buck/Deon Swiggs                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

17. Application to Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Redcliffs Tennis Club

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00157 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $1500 from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Redcliffs Tennis Club towards Equipment and low cost coaching.

Sally Buck/Tim Lindley                                                                                                                                               Carried

 

18. Application to 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Ferrymead Bays U10s Torpedoes

 

Community Board Resolved LCHB/2017/00158 (Staff recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $900 from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Ferrymead Bays U10s Torpedoes towards Accommodation to compete at the Nelson Football Festival in October 2017.

Deon Swiggs/Darrell Latham                                                                                                                                  Carried

Sara Templeton left the meeting at 01:15 pm.

20. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Mention was made of the following matters:

·    Christchurch Hospital Car Parking challenges for the community to find appropriate parking around the hospital.

·    An enquiry was made on when the Scott Park Inaugural Working Group meeting will be held.

·    Maintenance of the landscape on the corner of Wakefield and Duncan Streets, Sumner.  Staff advice was that a Customer Service Request could be generated for this matter.

·    Alport Place Pump Station – as with the Sumner carpark skateboarders and youth are congregating at the newly completed Alport Place wastewater pump station.  The residents have voiced their concerns about the noise and the rubbish that these groups are leaving.

 

20.1    Major Cycleway Rapanui-Shag Road – Linwood Village

The Board noted that that business owners on the southwest side of Worcester Street in the Linwood Village have lost parking outside of their business with the placement of build outs for the cycleway.

The Board requested staff to discuss the issue of on street parking with the business at 403 Worcester Street since the installation of the Major Cycleway Route Rapanui-Shag Road cycleway and report back to the Board.  It was suggested that parking time restrictions be placed on the area where parking is not restricted.

 

20.2    Board Members’ Professional Development

The Board discussed the matter of Board Members training, in particular an upcoming retreat for young elected members.

The Board requested staff advice on the availability of funding for Board members professional development and how Board members arrange to attend suitable training.

 

20.3    Acknowledgment of Educationists during the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquakes

The Board requested staff advice on the progress of the Council, through the Mayor, of the acknowledgment of the outstanding work of Canterbury educationists during the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquakes.

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 2.43pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 2nd DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

 

Sally Buck

Chairperso n

   


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

7.        Silvester Street, Woolston - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions and Road Parking Improvement

Reference:

17/969081

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions along the east side of Silvester Street in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local resident located adjacent to the street.

1.4       These measures have been requested to improve safety at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Revoke any parking restrictions on the southeast side of Silvester Street commencing at a point 112 metres from its intersection with Wildberry Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Silvester Street commencing at a point 106 metres north east of its intersection with Wildberry Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 36 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install no stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides clear space for vehicles in both directions to turn at the bend without driving over the centre of the road

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None identified

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local resident raised concerns that parking activity near Woolston Park Bowling Club on Silvester Street was leading to safety risks to drivers using the road bend.

5.2       Consequently parking restrictions have been requested, to provide more road space for vehicles to turn at the bend location.

5.3       Upon investigation, council staff observed that right angled parking takes place on this section of Silvester Street and is especially intensive during major bowling fixtures and on Saturday mornings. There is some off-street parking available, though the level of demand is such that substantial parking takes place on-street at busy times.

5.4       The crash database has been checked and there have been no recorded crashes at location between 2011 and 2015. Nevertheless, staff consider that there is a substantial probability of a head on crash taking place at this location, unless the layout is improved.

5.5       Attachment C shows Silvester Street to and from the Wildberry Street end. At the time of the photo only the staff small vehicle was parked. However, it can be seen that the space length is coincident with the short vehicle parked and substandard.

5.6       On occasions when a larger family vehicle or SUV is parked the rear of the vehicle extends beyond the markings and approaching vehicles on Silvester Street must drive over the centre line, to drive around the parked vehicles. This, in turn leads to the risk of a vehicle colliding with another vehicle approaching from the east (or Richardson Terrace) end.

5.7       Staff consider it appropriate to relocate the centre line to reduce this risk, which would necessitate extending the no stopping restriction by one car length to enable drivers in both directions to use the bend without driving over the repositioned centre line.

5.8       Vehicle tracking has been carried out to ensure that the new layout will enable standard and medium size vehicles such as refuse trucks to approach the bend safely and take the turn without facing opposing traffic.

5.9       It is considered that there is sufficient on-street capacity elsewhere on Silvester Street to tolerate the loss of one space.

5.10    The installation of the no stopping restrictions will enable the road layout to be redesigned to improve safety for traffic approaching the bend in both directions.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Extend the existing no stopping restrictions on Silvester Street to enable the road alignment to be improved in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to the tenants and property owners at 9-29 Silvester Street, as well as Woolston Park Bowling Club.

6.5       No letters of objection or request for amendment were received. Responses were received in support of the proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $500 to revise the road markings at this location.

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Linwood-Central-Heathcote board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides clear space for vehicles in both directions to turn at the bend without driving over the centre of the road

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   One on-street parking space would be removed

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for No Stopping Restrictions to support the safe movement of commercial vehicles accessing the local business.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains one parking space

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The existing centre line would have to remain and the risks to opposing traffic would continue

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Silvester Street NSR site plan

40

b

Silvester Street NSR location plan

41

c

Silvester Street site photographs

42

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

8.        Ferry Road near Richmond Terrace, Woolston - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/976275

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions along the south side of Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local resident.

1.4       These measures have been requested to improve safety at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Ferry Road commencing at its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 105 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Ferry Road commencing at its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 105 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install no stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Improves the sight lines for vehicles turning out of Richardson Terrace

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Results in a loss of parking by the equivalent of four spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local resident who regularly drives on Richardson Terrace raised concerns that vehicles parked on Ferry Road caused difficulties in the visibility to the right, whilst turning safely onto Ferry Road.

5.2       Consequently parking restrictions have been requested, to improve safety at this intersection.

5.3       Council staff drove on Richardson Terrace and turned into Ferry Road.  Staff agree that the sight line to the east is very challenging, due to the occasional parked vehicle and the bend in the road towards the traffic lights at Radley Street.

5.4       The crash history for this location has been checked. This revealed that 2 crashes had been recorded, of which one in 2014 during fine weather involved a van turning out of Richardson Terrace and colliding with a vehicle on Ferry Road. This crash resulted in one minor injury.

5.5       The unrestricted section is of a length equivalent to 4 parking spaces.  The immediate frontage is a grass reserve which leads to a small jetty platform at the river, which may attract some recreational walking. However there are other nearby parking opportunities a short distance away on Richardson Terrace.

5.6       Upon investigation at different times of day, council staff observed that the parking demands at this location are rare and in recent times has been used by construction vehicles associated with nearby roadworks.  Attachment C shows the driver’s perspective from Richardson Terrace, with a vehicle parked on the section proposed to be restricted.

5.7       The installation of the no stopping restrictions will ensure that this section of Ferry Road will remain clear and improve the sight lines for drivers turning out of Richardson Terrace.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Provide no stopping restrictions on the south side of part of Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to the tenants and property owners at 546-605 Ferry Road.

6.5       No letters of objection or request for amendment were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

6.7       This proposal has been checked against the proposals for the Ferry Road Masterplan and proposals for Woolston Park. The proposed restrictions would not have any effect upon other schemes currently under consideration.

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $200 to install road markings.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.14    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies - Linwood-Central-Heathcote board approval.

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides improved sight lines for vehicles turning out of Richardson Terrace onto Ferry Road

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for No Stopping Restrictions to support the safe movement of commercial vehicles accessing the local business.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support the safety concerns of the local community.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Ferry Rd at Richardson Terrace site plan

48

b

Ferry Rd at Richardson Terrace location plan

49

c

Drivers perspective on Richardson Terrace

50

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

9.        Ribbonwood Place Hillsborough - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/976301

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions along the east side of Ribbonwood Place in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local resident located adjacent to the street.

1.4       These measures have been requested to improve safety at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south east side of Ribbonwood Place commencing at its intersection with Opawa Road and extending in a north westerly direction for 38 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between the hours of 8am and 5pm on the south east side of Ribbonwood Place commencing at a point 38 metres north west of its intersection with Opawa Road and extending in a north westerly direction for 64 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Deters parking on one side of the street for the duration of normal business hours

·     Retains the convenience of on-street parking for residents (especially visitors) during evenings and weekends

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None identified

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local resident raised concerns that their street is used intensively by workers at the nearby businesses at the light industrial area situated between Opawa Road and the railway.  Presently the street in unrestricted and for most of the working day leading to road narrowing and problems for resident turning in and out of driveways.

5.2       Consequently weekday parking restrictions have been requested, to facilitate two way traffic at all times, reduce the inconvenience upon local residents turning out of driveways yet maintaining on-street parking during evenings and weekends.

5.3       Upon investigation, council staff observed during 3 separate visits that parking consistently takes place on both sides of Ribbonwood Place for the majority of its length, during the working day.  Staff observations showed that drivers needed to take particular care as the street became only wide enough for one way operation. Some vehicles were parked close to driveways which presented particular difficulties for residents with skewed driveways. The crash database was checked which showed that no crashes had occurred between 2011 and 2015.

5.4       All of the properties have on-site parking with at least space for 2 vehicles. Consequently the restrictions are unlikely to have a negative effect on their convenience except perhaps for visitors or deliveries, who will need to use private driveways.

5.5       Staff consider that it is important to maintain two way operation along the street and provide restrictions that would be unnecessary during evenings and weekends when fewer workers are present.

5.6       The installation of the stopping restrictions will ensure that Ribbonwood Place maintains two way operation and that the street has increased space for turning movements for residents.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install no stopping restrictions on the approach to the Opawa Road intersection and weekday restrictions on the south east side, in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to all tenants and property owners in Ribbonwood Place. This consultation was based on the weekday restrictions only. 

6.5       No letters of objection were received. One request for amendment was received, which referred to the section of the street between the Opawa Road intersection and the first property on the south side (no.4). This requested additional no stopping at any time.

6.6       Site observations indicated that vehicles did not park along this section, though the basis of the request was that the weekday restriction could simply displace vehicles to park near the intersection at this location. Staff agree with this concern and have incorporated this amendment into the proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $300 to install road markings and install three signs on existing posts.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.14    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies - Linwood-Central-Heathcote board approval.

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Removes on-street parking to maintain space for two way traffic throughout the street

·   Reduces the inconvenience upon residents caused by inconsiderate parking

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for stopping restrictions to deter workers from blocking two way traffic and causing turning difficulties for some residents.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support the transport demands of the local business.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Ribbonwood NSR site plan

56

b

Ribbonwood NSR location plan

57

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

10.    227 Ferry Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/976318

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions adjacent to in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local resident located adjacent to the street.

1.4       These measures have been requested to improve safety at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited adjacent to the footpath between numbers 219 and 227 Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install no stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Assists local residents to turn safely in and out of their properties

·     Provides a clear path for cyclists using the route

·     Provides a clearer path for emergency and vehicles to reach the adjacent properties

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None identified

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local resident raised concerns that parked vehicles were causing difficulties at various times of the day for accessing nearby driveways and obstructing vehicle turns.

5.2       Consequently no stopping restrictions have been requested, to provide more road space for vehicles to turn in and out of driveways.

5.3       Upon investigation during the day and in the evening, council staff observed that parking takes place randomly near these properties. This was observed to constrain vehicle movements accessing properties, as well as obstructing eastbound cyclists using this section.

5.4       Staff consider that with the restriction in effect there are other parking opportunities on Leyden Street, around the corner which require a slightly longer walk to the properties.

5.5       It is apparent that some vehicles are choosing to park on the landscaped area nearby. Separate proposals are being prepared separately to modify the surface, for this to be accommodated formally, without blocking the movement of other vehicles.

5.6       The installation of the no stopping restrictions at this location will assist all the drivers accessing the adjacent properties, by clearing the path for vehicles to turn in and out of driveways. Cyclists will also benefit by this section becoming available as an eastbound cut through at the nearby intersection.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install no stopping restrictions adjacent to the footpath between numbers 219 and 227 Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to the tenants and property owners at 219-231 Ferry Road and 1 Leyden Street.

6.5       No letters of objection or request for amendment were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

6.7       The proposal has been checked against the Ferry Road masterplan and will not affect this proposal.

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $200 to install road markings.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.14    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies - Linwood-Central-Heathcote board approval.

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·     Assists local residents to turn safely in and out of their properties

·     Provides a clear path for cyclists using the route

·     Provides a clearer path for emergency and vehicles to reach the adjacent properties

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for No Stopping Restrictions to support the safe movement of commercial vehicles accessing the local business.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support the safety and access concerns of the local residents.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

227 Ferry Road NSR location plan

64

b

227 Ferry Road NSR site plan

65

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

11.    Alexandra Street, Richmond - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/976327

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions at the intersection of Alexandra Street and Pavitt Street in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local resident located close to the intersection.

1.4       These measures have been requested to improve safety at this location.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Alexandra Street commencing at a point 9 metres west of the prolongation of the western Pavitt Street kerb line and extending in an easterly direction for 21 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install no stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides clear space for turning vehicles at the intersection, particularly refuse trucks

·     Ensures that drivers on Alexandra Street heading west do not need to drive into the path of opposing vehicles, due to the presence of parked vehicles

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None identified

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Alexandra and Pavitt Street in Richmond are relatively narrow streets and parking on street often presents safety issues for passing traffic. Local residents have raised concerns that inconsiderate parking at the intersection of Pavitt Street and Alexandra Street present safety risks to vehicles.

5.2       Consequently parking restrictions have been requested, to improve sight lines and provide more road space for refuse trucks vehicles to turn.

5.3       Upon investigation, council staff observed that parking takes place during daytime and evenings at the intersection, forcing drivers to drive into the wrong side of the road and facing oncoming traffic from Pavitt Street and Alexandra Street. Parked vehicles also sometimes block the sight lines for vehicles leaving Pavitt Street.  This occurs at random locations with seemingly no consideration for the safety of other road users.  The crash statistics have been checked and no crashes were recorded between 2011 and 2015.

5.4       There are some missing no stopping restrictions on the north side of Alexandra Street at the intersection and on Pavitt St that are already approved, though have worn away or been surfaced over. Their absence contributes to the problems described, though will be replenished separately through the maintenance process.

5.5       Staff consider that with the restrictions in effect, there are other parking opportunities on Alexandra Street which will result in only a minor inconvenience to residents and require a slightly longer walk to the houses in the area.

5.6       The installation of the no stopping restrictions will ensure that this intersection will remain clear and assist vehicles turning in and out of Pavitt Street.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Provide no stopping restrictions at the Alexandra Street/Pavitt Street intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to the tenants and property owners at 70-80 Alexandra Street and 3 Pavitt Street.

6.5       No letters of objection or request for amendment were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $200 to install road markings.

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Linwood-Central-Heathcote board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides a clear route for all vehicles especially refuse trucks to turn at the intersection

·   Ensures that drivers on Alexandra Street heading west do not need to drive into the path of opposing vehicles, due to the presence of parked vehicles

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for No Stopping Restrictions to support the safe movement of all vehicles turning at the intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.5       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.6       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.7       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.8       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.9       Not applicable

Implementation

7.10    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.11    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.12    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.13    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the safety concerns of the local residents.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Alexandra Street NSR site plan

72

b

Alexandra Street NSR location plan

73

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

12.    Riccarton Ave: Proposed Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand

Reference:

17/1020171

Contact:

Steve Dejong

steve.dejong@ccc.govt.nz

941 6428

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to approve a ‘Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand’ on Riccarton Avenue.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report staff generated following a request from Otakaro limited and the Taxi Federation to provide an alternate location for Small Passenger Service Vehicles to stand before changes to the section of Oxford Terrace between Riccarton Avenue and Antigua Street are commenced.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing the factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north side of Riccarton Avenue commencing at a point 295 metres west of its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 51 metres be revoked

2.         Approve that a Bus Stop be installed on the north side of Riccarton Avenue commencing at a point 295 metres west of its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

3.         Approve that a ‘Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand’ be installed on the north side of Riccarton Avenue commencing at a point 317 metres west of its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Riccarton Avenue commencing at a point 342 metres west of its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 4 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install the Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     This will provide a location for Small Passenger Service Vehicles to wait for fares.

·     This location will also act as a staging location for the CBD, which the current Oxford Terrace stand is being used for.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Loss of revenue from metered parking of approximately $32,000 p/a.

 

5.   Context/Background

Riccarton Ave Proposed: Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand

5.1       As of the 1 October 2017 ‘Taxi Stand’ ceased to exist as a traffic control device within the Land Transport (Road User Rule) and (Traffic Control Devices Rule).  Following a directive from the Minister of Transport through The Ministry of Transport. This is to facilitate the international movement to include Uber vehicles as recognised ‘Small Passenger Service Vehicles’

5.2       Although there is no legislative obligation on Road Controlling Authorities (in this case the Christchurch City Council) to change existing Taxi Stands to ‘Small Passenger Service Stands’, as of the 1St of October 2017 taxi stands can no longer be installed.

5.3       With the post-quake redesign of the Health Precinct and the construction of the new Out- Patients facility on the triangular section of land between Oxford Terrace/Antigua Street and Tuam Street, Oxford Terrace is to be redesigned By Otakaro Limited. The design proposes a drop off pick up area on both sides of Oxford Terrace with enhanced pedestrian and cycling facilities which will require the relocation of the existing taxi stand.

5.4       Observations by hospital facilities staff and Council traffic operations staff have identified that the current Oxford Terrace taxi stand is mainly being used as a taxi staging post for the CBD and not primarily for folk leaving hospital. This has been confirmed by CDHB Senior Operations Manager, who has said the hospital has a contract with a particular taxi Company and that taxis drop patients at the main entrance and are called to the main entrance when a patient being discharged requires a taxi.

5.5       The ‘Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand’ is an existing Traffic Control Device, identified within The Traffic control devices manual Part 7, Parking Control 2011, Table 6.5 ‘Signs and markings for other stops and stands’.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The proposed location for the ‘Small Passenger Service Vehicle Stand’ (Small PSV) is approximately 50 metres west of the entrance to the new CDHB Emergency Department currently under construction.

6.2       From the proposed location on Riccarton Avenue, small passenger service vehicles will be able to service the new Emergency Department, the existing main entrance of the Hospital and the new Out Patients Department which is currently also under construction between Oxford Terrace and Antigua Street, these facilities are all located east of the proposed Small PSV Stand.

6.3       The Riccarton Avenue Proposed Small PSV stand will accommodate 4 to 5 small passenger services vehicles. A 4 meter section of No Stopping is proposed in between the metred parking space to the immediate west of the Small PSV stand to ease entry in to the stand.

6.4       The current Bus Stop located directly east of the Proposed Small PSV stand is under length, this proposal extends the bus stop by 2 metres to ease the entry of the bus and bring the stop up to the current design standard.

Significance

6.5       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.6       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consultation with adjacent property owners.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.7       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.8       On the 14 July 2017 a meeting was held with the Taxi Federation, Otakaro Staff, Council Staff and CDHB Staff, with regard to the relocation of current taxi stand from Oxford Terrace between Hagley Avenue and Antigua Street.  The Taxi Federation support the provision of the stand on Riccarton Ave but do not support that it will be signed for Small PSV and not a dedicated Taxi Stand.(see 5.1 & 5.2 above)

6.9       The CDHB and Otakaro Limited support this proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.10    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.  Bus stops and taxi parking are the highest priorities for kerb side parking under Councils Parking Strategy (2003).  Short stay private vehicle parking is the 5th priority, below bus stops, taxis, loading areas and mobility parking. 

Financial Implications

6.11    Cost of Implementation – Approximately $500 for installation of revised signage and markings. 

6.12    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Are covered under the area maintenance contract.  The option removes five existing metered parking spaces.  Revenue generated by the nearest parking meters indicates that each metered space in this location generates approximately $6,400 p/a, hence the option equates to a total parking revenue loss of approximately $32,000 p/a. 

6.13    Funding source - Traffic operations Operational Budget

Legal Implications

6.14    Part 1 clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council and Community Boards with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.15    The installation of signs and markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.16    Not applicable

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies - Community Board Approval.

6.18    Implementation timeframe - Approximately 4 weeks from Community Board approval.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·   A Small PSV Stand will be provided in the correct location to service the new ED Department, the main entrance and the new OP Department of the hospital.

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Loss of revenue from metered parking

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Do not install a Small PSV stand on Riccarton Avenue.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section two of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See 6.8 & 6.9 above.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is inconsistent with the Councils Parking Strategy 2003 for Commercial areas and the Central Business District.

7.5.1   Inconsistency – The Council Parking Strategy 2003, 6.3 identifies Taxi Stands (now Small PSV) as the second priority in the allocation of kerb side parking space within the CBD after busses.

7.5.2   Reason for inconsistency – not providing a stand for Small PSV near the hospital would not be consistent with the parking Strategy

Financial Implications

7.6       N/A

Legal Implications

7.7       See 6.14 & 6.15 above

Risks and Mitigations     

7.8       N/A

Implementation

7.9       Implementation dependencies  - N/A

7.10    Implementation timeframe – N/A

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.11    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retention of parking revenue

7.12    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Provision of Small PSV to wait to service the needs of visitors to the hospital and city would not be met

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Riccarton Ave Proposed Small PSV Stand

80

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Steve Dejong - Traffic Engineer

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

13.    Application to 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Sumner Pool

Reference:

17/1001503

Contact:

Carly Waddleton

Carly.waddleton@ccc.govt.nz

941 5120

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood Central Heathcote Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation(s) listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

57215

Sumner Community Pool

Fix the Leaks

$6688

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Sumner Community Pool.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Declines a grant from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Sumner Community Pool towards fixing the leaks in the pool.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2017/18

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$45,705

$17,385

$209,824

$209,824

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix DRF 17/18 2 Oct LCH Sumner Pool

83

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Carly Waddleton - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

14.    Application to Linwood-Central-Heathcote 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Sumner Community Residents Assocation - Sumner Neighbourhood Night

Reference:

17/1023863

Contact:

Vimbayi Chitaka

Vimbayi.Chitaka@ccc.govt.nz

941 6633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation(s) listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

00057218

Sumner Community Residents Association

Sumner Neighbourhood Night

$2,799.63

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This staff generated report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Sumner Community Residents Association.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Makes a grant of $500 from its 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund to Sumner Community Residents Association towards Sumner Neighbourhood Night.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2017/18

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$45,705

$15,385

$209,824

$209,324

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Linwood-Central-Heathcote - 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund - Sumner Community Residents Association - Sumner Neighbourhood Night - Decision Matrix

87

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Vimbayi Chitaka - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

15.    Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Area Report

Reference:

17/737539

Contact:

Shupayi Mpunga

Shupayi.mpunga@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 6605

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to resource the Community Board to promote a pro-active partnership approach to decision-making between the Council and Community Boards working together to achieve the best outcomes for the city with decisions being made with a good understanding of community views.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Decide how the Board will collect information on actions taken to progress issues in the 2017-19 Community Board Plan.

3.         Consider items for inclusion on Newsline.

4.         Consider items for inclusion in the Board report to Council.

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Community Board Plan update against outcomes

3.1.1   Over the next two years it is important that a plan is put in place that shows how the Board will put together data showing what has happened to progress the priorities set out in the plan.  Staff recommend that this be a standing item on the Board’s agenda to ensure that any activity that has taken place is recorded in a timely manner.

3.2       Memos/Information reporting back on Community Board matters

3.2.1   Te Oranga Waikura (Linwood Lower Fields) Landscape Plan Update – At the Board’s 15 March 2017 meeting the Board requested staff report back to the Board within three months on project detailed design, shading modelling, and feedback from residents.  Staff advice is provided to the Board by way of a memo.  (Attachment A).

3.2.2   Woolston Cut Dredging – At the Board’s 31 July 2017 meeting the Board requested detailed staff advice on the proposed Woolston Cut Dredging Project.  Staff advice is provided to the Board by way of a memo (Attachment B).

3.2.3   Keeping of Farm Animals – At the Board’s 16 August 2017 meeting the Board requested staff advice on the keeping of farm animals in urban environments.  Staff advice is provided to the Board by way of a memo. (Attachment C).

3.2.4   Street Tree Removal – At the Board’s 4 September 2017 meeting after hearing from a member of the public, requested a report for the removal of a street tree outside of 90 Bishop Street.  Upon the arborist inspection it was realised that the tree needed to be removed owing to public safety.  Staff advice by way of a memo and the Tree Report are attached.  (Attachment D).

3.3       Board area Consultations/Engagement

3.3.1   The following consultations are open to the community within the Community Board Area:

New Fees under the Resource Management Act

22 September 2017 - 27 October 2017

St Asaph Street Proposed Road Layout Options

14 September 2017 - 6 October 2017

Teen Leisure Programmes at the new Central Library

1 September 2017 - 30 October 2017

Bays Area skate project (upcoming)

13 November 2017 to 13 December 2017

3.4       Submission Opportunities

The Board submitted on the proposed Council’s General Bylaw and proposed Traffic and Parking Bylaw.  Attachment E.

3.5       Development of Civil Defence Emergency Plans

3.5.1   Community Response Shared Learning Day 24 September– Mt Pleasant Response Team ran an event for the wider Bays Area as part of the Community Preparedness Project covering Mt Pleasant, Redcliffs and Sumner. The day was well attended and facilitated shared learning for the development of community emergency hubs.

3.6       Requests for information from Board meeting on Newsline

3.6.1   The Board is asked to consider items for inclusion in Newsline.

3.7       Significant Board matters of interest to raise at Council

3.7.1   The Board is asked to consider items they would like to have included on the Board’s report to Council.

4.   Key Local Projects (KLPs) and Strengthening Communities Funded Projects

4.1       At the Board’s 20 September 2017 meeting the following Strengthening Communities Funding Applications were referred to the Community Reliance Partnership Fund: (Attachment H)

4.1.1   Avebury House Trust for Community Development 2018 and Heritage regeneration (staff recommendation of $35,000);

4.1.2   Phillipstown Community Centre Charitable Trust for the Phillipstown Community Hub (staff recommendation of $27,000);

4.1.3   Te Whare Roopu o Oterepo - Waltham Community Cottage for The Cottage Project (staff recommendation of $47,500);

4.1.4   Otautahi Creative Spaces Trust for Neighbourhood Creation Stations: Phillipstown Hub and Library; (staff recommendation of $10,000); and

4.1.5   Sydenham Quarter –Promote Sydenham Project (staff recommendation is a decline).

5.   Major Community and/or Infrastructure Projects

5.1       Community Facilities

5.1.1   Linwood/Woolston Aquatic Facility – At the time of writing this report there was no new information to report on the progress on the Linwood/Woolston Aquatic Facility Project.

5.1.2   Linwood Village/Inner City East Community-led Planning Approach – the Board considered a report to enable a broader application of tools and community leadership in relation to regeneration of the Linwood Village/Inner City East.  The report is to be considered by the Council 10 October 2017 meeting.

5.2       Infrastructure projects underway

5.2.1   Woolston Playground Upgrade – The Woolston Park playground consultation closed at the end of August 2017.  The project team are currently working through the received submissions and preparing a report to come to the Board in November 2017.

5.3       Events

5.3.1   Neighbourhood Week Additional Events – The Board has a remainder $583 left in their Neighbourhood Week Fund. It was decided by the Board that elected members would utilise this money to run Neighbourhood Week events in areas that do not have events organised for residents.  Attachment H shows the spread of applications, with a noticeable lack of events in Bromley, Inner City and parts of Woolston.  It is for the board to decide and arrange when and where they hold their events, along with how they engage local residents to attend.

6.   Community Board funding budget overview and clarification

6.1       Total of unallocated funding for 2017/18 is $255,744.  Funding table is Attachment F.

6.2       Discretionary Response Fund unallocated funding for 2017/18 is $246,144.

6.3       Youth Development Fund unallocated funding for 2016/17 is $5,600.

6.4       Light Bulb Moments Fund unallocated funding for 2016/17 is $4,000.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Te Oranga Waikura (Linwood Lower Fields) Landscape Plan Update

93

b

Woolston Cut Dredging Project - October 2017

99

c

Advice on Keeping of Farm Animals in the Urban Environment

101

d

Staff Advice on the Removal of Street Tree outside 90 Bishop Street

105

e

Board Submissions on the 2017 Proposed Council General Bylaw & Traffic and Parking Bylaw

121

f

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Funding 2017/18

123

g

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Neighbourhood Week 2017 applications comparison with 2015 and 2016 map

124

h

Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board Strengthening Communities 2017/18 Funding Applications Referred to the Community Resilence Partnership Fund

125

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Liz Beaven - Community Board Advisor

Vimbayi Chitaka - Community Development Advisor

Bruce Coleman - Community Development Advisor

Meg Logan - Governance Support Officer

Louise McLean - Community Support Officer

Diana Saxton - Community Recreation Advisor

Carly Waddleton - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga - Manager Community Governance, Linwood-Central-Heathcote

  


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board

02 October 2017

 

 

16.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.