Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 9 August 2017

Time:                                    1pm

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Mike Davidson

Councillor Vicki Buck

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Anne Galloway

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Sara Templeton

 

 

4 August 2017

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Carolyn Gallagher

Tel: 941 8879

 

Samantha Kelly

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee - Terms of Reference

 

 

Chair

Councillor Cotter

Membership

Councillor Davidson (Deputy Chair), Councillor Buck, Councillor Clearwater, Councillor Galloway, Councillor Keown, Councillor Templeton

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies) is odd.

Meeting Cycle

Monthly

Reports To

Council

 

 

Responsibilities

The focus of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee is the governance of roading and transport, three waters, waste management, and natural hazards protection.

 

The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

·         Encourages opportunities for citizenship, community participation and community partnerships

·         Works in partnerships with key agencies, groups and organisations

·         Encourages innovative approaches and sustainable solutions

 

The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committte considers and reports to Council on issues and activites relating to:

·         Water supply, conservation and quality

·         Stormwater drainage including the Land Drainage Recovery Programme

·         Natural environment, including the waterways, aquifers, ecology and conservation of resources

·         Natural hazards protection, including flood protection and river control

·         Solid waste minimisation and disposals

·         Sewage collection, treatment and disposal

·         Roads, footpaths and streetscapes

·         Transport including road operations, parking, public transport, cycle ways, harbours and marine structures consistent with Greater Christchurch Public Transport Joint Committee Terms of Reference.

 

Delegations

 

The Committee delegates to the following working group the responsibility to consider and report back to the Committee:

·         Land Drainage Working Group matters relating to the Land Drainage Recovery Programme, including opportunities for betterment.

 

Major Cycleway Route (MCR) Programme

 

At the Council meeting of 9 March 2017:

 

It was resolved that the Council:

 

1.         Delegates to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee the authority to make all decisions in connection with the Major Cycleway Routes (MCR) programme, including final route selections and anything precedent to the exercise by the Council of its power to acquire any property, subject to:

a.         The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee and affected Community Boards being briefed prior to any public consultation commencing on any Major Cycleway Route project.

b.         The relevant Community Board Chair(s) will be invited by the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to participate in the relevant Major Cycleway Route item discussion and give their Board’s feedback or recommendations.

2.         Notes and reconfirms Councils previous decision to designate the MCR programme a metropolitan project, as set out in the Council’s resolutions on 29 January 2015.

13.4    Agree to the Major Cycleway Route programme being declared a Metropolitan Programme and delegate to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee all decision making powers.

 

 

Christchurch Biodiversity Fund

 

 

At the Council meeting of 20 June 2017:

 

It was resolved that the Council:

 

5.         Delegate authority to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to consider and approve applications to the Christchurch Biodiversity Fund.

 

 

 

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 5

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 5

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 5

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 5

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 5

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       MCR Uni Cycle Section 3 - 30kph Speed Restrictions and Detailed Traffic Resolutions......................................................................................................................................... 11

C       7.       MCR Rapanui Shag Rock Section 1 - 30kph Speed Restrictions................................ 49

A       8.       Hereford Street Proposed Pedestrian Crossing (Zebra) and Parking Changes........ 65

B       9.       ITE Report 3 Waters and Waste - June 2017............................................................... 75

A       10.     Proposed Lower Styx, Marshland and Hawkins Road Intersection Improvement and widening of Marshland Road Bridge........................................................................... 97

C       11.     Resolution to Exclude the Public............................................................................... 282  

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 be confirmed (refer page 6).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Dirk De Lu will speak on behalf of Spokes Ltd regarding the staff report on the Uni Cycle Section 3 Major Cycleway Route 30kph speed restrictions and detailed traffic resolutions.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 26 July 2017

Time:                                    1.09pm

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

                                                                                                                                                                                       

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Mike Davidson

Councillor Vicki Buck

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Anne Galloway

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Sara Templeton

 

 

24 July 2017

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Carolyn Gallagher

Tel: 941 8873

 

Samantha Kelly

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

Meeting adjourned at 1.09pm and reconvened at 1.18pm.

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00033

Committee Decision

That the minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Thursday, 29 June 2017 be confirmed noting the following change to the Committee Comment for Item 7:

Committee Comment

3.  The Committee considered a further set of ideas (option five) submitted by Ray Edwards. The Committee resolved, by way of amendment, to request that staff investigate the merits of these ideas and report back to the Committee in August 2017.”

Councillor Templeton/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                   Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

6.   Flood Management and Multi-Hazard Assessment Progress

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Proceed with the preferred option (Option 1) which is to progress the multi-hazard analysis by completing further technical studies and developing floodplain management plans.

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2017/00034

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends:

1.         That the Council proceed with the preferred option (Option 1) which is to progress the multi-hazard analysis by completing further technical studies and developing floodplain management plans.

a.         Notes that the Land Drainage Recovery Programme (LDRP) will be returning to the Heathcote Community in October 2017.

b.         Notes that the LDRP will be reporting to Council on the options for short term measures for the Southshore Estuary Edge. 

c.         Notes that the Recovery Plan will be prepared following the recent flooding events and will include Community engagement.

2.         That the Council writes to the Minister for the Environment requesting that given recent serious flooding events in Christchurch and the South Island that the guidance to local government on sea level rise and the National Policy Statement on Natural Hazards be progressed with urgency.

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Templeton                                                                                                   Carried

Secretarial Note: The Council resolved recommendation two at its meeting on 27 July 2017.

 

Councillor Templeton left at 2.30pm and returned at 2.32pm.

 

7.   Canterbury Regional Transport Committee and Greater Christchurch Public Transport Committee Minutes (unconfirmed)

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00035

Part B

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Notes the minutes of the Canterbury Regional Transport Committee and the Greater Christchurch Public Transport Committee. 

Councillor Templeton/Councillor Galloway                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

8.   Transport Unit - Bi-Monthly Report

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Committee received the information in the report and requested that the Council write to the Minister(s) regarding the Kiwi Rail lease for the Northern Line Cycleway.

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the attached Transport Unit report.

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00036

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.       Receive the information in the attached Transport Unit report.

2.       Requests that the Council writes to the Minister(s) regarding the Kiwi Rail lease for the Northern line cycleway.

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Templeton                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

 

9.   Proposed Lower Styx, Marshland and Hawkins Road Intersection Improvement and widening of Marshland Road Bridge.

 

This item was withdrawn from the agenda.

 

 

 

10  Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00037

Part C

That at 2.59pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 394 to 395 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Keown                                                                                                                      Carried

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 4.02pm.

    Meeting concluded at 4.03pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Chairperson

   


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

6.        MCR Uni Cycle Section 3 - 30kph Speed Restrictions and Detailed Traffic Resolutions

Reference:

17/792775

Contact:

Jennifer Rankin

Jennifer.rankin@ccc.govt.nz

941 5177

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to approve the updated detailed traffic resolutions including approval for implementing a 30kph speed restriction for MCR Uni Cycle section 3.

1.2       The Committee approved the Uni Cycle Section 3 Major Cycleway Route and detailed traffic resolutions on 5 May 2016. This report outlines detailed traffic resolutions including proposed speed restrictions.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated.  This project is a specifically identified and funded within the 2015-2018 Long Term Plan.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by using the engagement significance matrix.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.

2.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2) The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 Applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Committee meeting of 7 August 2017; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 Applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Committee resolutions on the Uni-Cycle Major Cycleway report at the Committee meeting of 7 August 2017.

3.         Ngahere Street – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Ngahere Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in an easterly direction to the head of the cul-de-sac be revoked.

4.         Ngahere Street – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Ngahere Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in an easterly direction to the head of the cul-de-sac be revoked.

5.         Ngahere Street – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve all road marking changes and road surface changes on Ngahere Street from its intersection with Totara Street to the head of the cul-de-sac as detailed on Attachment B.

6.         Ngahere Street – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ngahere Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in an easterly direction following the northern, eastern then southern kerb lines (around the cul-de-sac) for a distance of 173 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Ngahere Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 Applies.

7.         Ngahere Street/Totara Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Ngahere Street and Totara Street be revoked.

8.         Ngahere Street/Totara Street Intersection - New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and traffic islands at the Ngahere Street and Totara Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

9.         Totara Street – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Totara Street, commencing at a point 38 metres north of its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a south westerly direction to a point 20 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

10.       Totara Street – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Totara Street, commencing at a point 38 metres north of its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a south westerly direction to a point 20 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

11.       Totara Street – New Traffic controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, raised platforms, road surface changes and traffic islands on Totara Street from a point 38 metres north of its intersection with Ngahere Street to a point 20 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

12.       Totara Street – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Totara Street, commencing at its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a northerly direction following the eastern kerb line for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Totara Street, commencing at its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Totara Street, commencing at a point 59 metres southwest of its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 50 metres. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north west side of Totara Street, commencing at its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 Applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north west side of Totara Street, commencing at its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 Applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Totara Street, commencing at a point 55 metres north east of its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a north easterly direction then northerly direction for a distance of 39 metres. Note 2 Applies.

13.       Miro Street/Totara Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Miro Street and Totara Street be revoked.

14.       Miro Street/Totara Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and traffic islands at the Miro Street and Totara Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Totara Street northbound approach to its intersection with Miro Street as detailed on Attachment B.

15.       Miro Street – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Miro Street from its intersection with Totara Street to its intersection with Hinau Street be revoked.

16.       Miro Street – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Miro Street from its intersection with Totara Street to its intersection with Hinau Street be revoked.

17.       Miro Street – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve all road marking changes on Miro Street from its intersection with Totara Street to its intersection with Hinau Street as detailed on Attachment B.

18.       Miro Street – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Miro Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a north westerly direction for 19 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Miro Street, commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a north westerly direction for 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Miro Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a south easterly direction for 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Miro Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a south easterly direction for 20 metres. Note 2 Applies.

19.       Hinau Street/Miro Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Hinau Street and Miro Street be revoked.

20.       Hinau Street/Miro Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and traffic islands at the Totara Street and Miro Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Hinau Street southbound approach to its intersection with Miro Street as detailed on Attachment B.

21.       Hinau Street – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Hinau Street from a point 15 metres north of its intersection with Miro Street to its intersection with Clyde Road be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

22.       Hinau Street – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Hinau Street from a point 15 metres north of its intersection with Miro Street to its intersection with Clyde Road be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

23.       Hinau Street – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, raised platforms, road surface changes and traffic islands on Hinau Street from a point 15 metres north of its intersection with Miro Street to its intersection with Clyde Road as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the westbound Hinau Street traffic, located at a point 57 metres east of its intersection with Clyde Road as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cyclists on the shared path to cross Hinau Street. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the eastbound Hinau Street traffic, located at a point 47 metres east of its intersection with Clyde Road as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cyclists on the shared path to cross Hinau Street. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the north side of Hinau Street commencing at its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance 55 metres as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

24.       Hinau Street – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a northerly direction following the eastern kerb line for a distance of 12 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 15 metres north of its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a southerly then south westerly direction following the western kerb line for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of Hinau Street, commencing its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the southeast side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 22 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres. This restriction is to apply on Monday to Friday, 9:00am to 5:00pm between March and November only. Note 2 Applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 68 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

f.          Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the east side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 85 metres southwest of its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a south westerly then westerly direction following the southern kerb line for a distance of 70 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday, 9:00am to 5:00pm between March and November only. Note 2 Applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 40 metres east of its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in an easterly then north easterly direction following the kerb line for a distance of 62 metres. Note 2 Applies.           

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 Applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

j.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 Applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8.00am-6.00pm, Monday to Friday, on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 17 metres west of its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 60 metres. Note 2 Applies.

m.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 77 metres west of its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

n.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 79 metres west of its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Note 2 Applies.

o.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8.00am-6.00pm, Monday to Friday, on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 97 metres west of its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 41 metres. Note 2 Applies.

p.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 31 metres. Note 2 Applies.

q.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 Applies.

r.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 14 metres west of its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 39 metres. Note 2 Applies.

s.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited between 8.00am-6.00pm, Monday to Friday, on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 16 metres west of its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 58 metres. Note 2 Applies.

t.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction following the northern kerb line for a distance of 72 metres. Note 2 Applies.

u.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction following the southern kerb line for a distance of 73 metres. Note 2 Applies.

25.       Hinau Street/Puriri Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Hinau Street and Puriri Street be revoked.

26.       Hinau Street/Puriri Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the Hinau Street and Puriri Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the Puriri Street northbound approach at its intersection with Hinau Street as detailed on Attachment B.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the Puriri Street southbound approach at its intersection with Hinau Street as detailed on Attachment B.

27.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

28.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

29.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, road surface changes, kerb alignment changes and traffic islands on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

30.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Puriri Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Puriri Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

31.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

32.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

33.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, road surface changes, kerb alignment changes and traffic islands on Puriri Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

34.       Puriri Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Puriri Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Puriri Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 Applies.

35.       Hinau Street/Konini Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Hinau Street and Konini Street be revoked.

36.       Hinau Street/Konini Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes at the Hinau Street and Konini Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Konini Street northbound approach to its intersection with Hinau Street as detailed on Attachment B.

37.       Konini Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Konini Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

38.       Konini Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Konini Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

39.       Konini Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes on Konini Street from its intersection with Hinau Street to a point 20 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

40.       Konini Street (Hinau Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Konini Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Konini Street, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 Applies.

41.       Clyde Road/Hinau Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Clyde Road and Hinau Street be revoked.

42.       Clyde Road/Hinau Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and road surface changes at the Clyde Road and Hinau Street intersection as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Hinau Street westbound approach to its intersection with Hinau Street as detailed on Attachment B.

43.       Clyde Road – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Clyde Road from its intersection with Hinau Street to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive be revoked.

44.       Clyde Road – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Clyde Road from its intersection with Hinau Street to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

45.       Clyde Road – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Clyde Road from its intersection Hinau Street to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only, be established on the east side of Clyde Road, commencing its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Clyde Road as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Clyde Road, commencing its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the east side of Clyde Road commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance 34 metres as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the west side of Clyde Road commencing at a point 10 metres north of its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance 102 metres as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

f.          Approve that a signalised cycle and pedestrian crossing be installed on Clyde Road at a point 20 metres north of its intersection with Hinau Street in accordance with Section 11.5 (5) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

46.       Clyde Road – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Clyde Road, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Clyde Road, commencing at its intersection with Hinau Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive.

47.       Clyde Road/University Drive Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Clyde Road and the access named and formed as University Drive be revoked.

48.       Clyde Road/University Drive Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Clyde Road and the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the University Drive eastbound approach to its intersection with Clyde Road as detailed on Attachment B.

49.       Ilam Road/University Drive Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Ilam Road and the access named and formed as University Drive be revoked.

50.       Ilam Road/University Drive Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Ilam Road and the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the University Drive westbound approach to its intersection with Ilam Road as detailed on Attachment B.

51.       Ilam Road – Existing Traffic Control

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Ilam Road from its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive to a point 218 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

52.       Ilam Road – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Ilam Road commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive to a point 218 metres north of this intersection be revoked . Note 1 Applies.

53.       Ilam Road – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, road surface changes, kerb alignment changes and traffic islands (including separation islands between cycles and motor vehicles) on Ilam Road from its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive to a point 218 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that a bi directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the east side of Ilam Road commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only, be established on the east side of Ilam Road against the kerb, commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in northerly direction for a distance of 218 metres as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Ilam Road against the kerb, commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in northerly direction for a distance of 218 metres as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

e.         Approve that a pedestrian crossing be established on Ilam Road located at a point 8 metres north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Dive as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with Section 8.2 of the Land Transport Rule Traffic Control Devices: 2004.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northbound Ilam Road traffic, located at a point 1 metre north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cycle traffic crossing Ilam Road. Note 2 Applies.

g.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southbound Ilam Road traffic, located at a point 18 metres north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cycle traffic crossing Ilam Road. Note 2 Applies.

h.         Approve that a pedestrian crossing be established on Ilam Road located at a point 184 metres north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Dive as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with Section 8.2 of the Land Transport Rule Traffic Control Devices: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

i.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northbound Ilam Road traffic, located at a point 173 metres north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cycle traffic crossing Ilam Road. Note 2 Applies.

j.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southbound Ilam Road traffic, located at a point 191 metres north of its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive as detailed on Attachment B. The purpose of this Give Way control is to create priority for cycle traffic crossing Ilam Road. Note 2 Applies.

k.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the west side of Ilam Road from its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in a northerly direction for a distance 184 metres as detailed in Attachment B, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

54.       Ilam Road– New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Ilam Road, commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in northerly direction for a distance of 218 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Ilam Road, commencing at its intersection with the access named and formed as University Drive and extending in northerly direction for a distance of 218 metres. Note 2 Applies.

55.       Dovedale Avenue – Existing Traffic Control

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Dovedale Avenue from its intersection with Waimairi Road to its intersection with Solway Avenue be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

56.       Dovedale Avenue – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Dovedale Avenue from a point 35 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road to its intersection with Solway Avenue be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

57.       Dovedale Avenue – New Traffic Control

a.         Approve the road marking changes, road surface changes, kerb alignment changes and traffic islands on Dovedale Avenue Road from its intersection with Waimairi Road to its intersection with Solway Avenue as detailed on Attachment B. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the south side of Dovedale Avenue from its intersection with Waimairi Road to its intersection with Solway Avenue as detailed on Attachment B, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

58.       Dovedale Avenue– New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 35 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the south side of Dovedale Avenue commencing at a point 53 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an westerly direction for a distance of 90 metres. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 143 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 Applies.

d.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the south side of Dovedale Avenue commencing at a point 162 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an westerly direction for a distance of 60 metres. Note 2 Applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 222 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 7 metres. Note 2 Applies.

f.          Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 3 minutes on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 229 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday (other than public holidays), 8:00am to 6:00pm only. Note 2 Applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 249 metres west of its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 38 metres. Note 2 Applies.

h.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the south side of Dovedale Avenue commencing at a point 114 metres east of its intersection with Solway avenue and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 Applies.     

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at a point 94 metres east of its intersection with Solway Avenue and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Note 2 Applies.

j.          Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the south side of Dovedale Avenue commencing at a point 7 metres east of its intersection with Solway avenue and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 140 metres following the southern kerb line. Note 2 Applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Dovedale Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Solway Avenue and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 7 metres. Note 2 Applies.

59.       Dovedale Avenue/Solway Avenue Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing controls at the intersection of Dovedale Avenue and Solway Avenue be revoked.

60.       Dovedale Avenue/Solway Avenue Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the intersection of Dovedale Avenue and Solway Avenue as detailed on Attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Dovedale Avenue westbound approach to its intersection with Solway Avenue as detailed on Attachment B.

61.       Solway Avenue – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic control restrictions on Solway Avenue from a point 37 metres south of its intersection with Dovedale Avenue to a point 23 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

62.       Solway Avenue – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on Solway Avenue from a point 37 metres south of its intersection with Dovedale Avenue to a point 23 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

63.       Solway Avenue – New Traffic Control

a.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only, be established on the east side of Solway Avenue against the kerb, commencing at a point 14 metres north of its intersection with Dovedale Avenue and extending in southerly direction for a distance of 46 metres as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Solway Avenue against the kerb, commencing at a point 25 metres south of its intersection with Dovedale Avenue and extending in northerly direction for a distance of 46 metres as detailed on Attachment B. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

64.       Solway Avenue – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Solway Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Dovedale Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 Applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Solway Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Dovedale Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. Note 2 Applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Solway Avenue, commencing at a point 21 metres north of its intersection with Dovedale Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 61 metres. Note 2 Applies.

65.       Approve that pursuant to Section 5 of the Christchurch City Council Speed Limits Bylaw 2010, speed limits be set as below in clauses 65.a to 65.d and include the resulting changes in the Christchurch City Register of Speed Limits and Speed Limit Maps:

a.         Approve that the speed limit on Ngahere Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in an easterly direction to the head of the cul-de sac.

b.         Approve that the speed limit on Totara Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Ngahere Street and extending in a south westerly direction to its intersection with Miro Street.

c.         Approve that the speed limit on Miro Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Totara Street and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Hinau Street.

d.         Approve that the speed limit on Hinau Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Miro Street and extending in a southerly westerly then westerly direction to its intersection with Clyde Road.

66.       Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in clauses 65a to 65d come into force with immediate effect.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Major Cycleways

·     Level of Service: 10.5.1 Reduce the number of fatal and serious crashes on the network involving cyclists

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·   Option 1 – Detailed Traffic Resolutions and 30kph Speed Restrictions (preferred option)

·   Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·    To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·    There are no disadvantages to this proposal

 

 

5.   Context/Background

MCR Programme

5.1       The Uni Cycle Route is one of 13 projects in the Major Cycleways Route (MCR) Programme.  The MCR programme has Urban Cycleway Programme (UCP), CCC and National Land Transport Fund (NLTF) funding attached to it and Uni Cycle is in the Long Term Plan as one of the identified MCR Projects.

5.2       The Uni Cycle route is 5.5Km long and starts at Central City and finishes at Solway Avenue.

5.3       Section 3 of the Uni Cycle Route was approved by the ITE Committee on 5 May 2016, this included detailed traffic resolutions but did not include a speed restriction and this has subsequently been consulted on separately. This report seeks to update the detailed traffic resolutions and seek approval to incorporate speed restrictions to the greenway areas.

5.4       During detailed design there were minor modifications to a number of street layouts.  This has resulted in changes to the measurements relating to the detailed traffic resolutions. Hence they are being updated in this report.  This has not resulted in any changes to parking or facilities provided and the resolutions are now formatted in a consistent manner.


 

6.   Option 1 – Detailed Traffic Resolutions and 30kph Speed Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       As part of the installation of Major Cycle Routes, some sections are proposed to be constructed as neighbourhood greenways, where cyclists share the road space with vehicles.  These greenways are provided on low volume roads with a slow speed environment.  To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are to consult with the stakeholders on the project needs, alternatives, opportunities and solutions so that any concerns, alternatives and aspirations are understood and considered.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Adjacent residents and businesses are specifically affected by this option. Their views are contained in attachment A.

6.6       Consultation was undertaken from 30 May 2017 to 20 June 2017.  Leaflets were delivered to directly affected properties along the route.  Properties were identified on their proximity to the route.

6.7       A total of 47 submissions were received from residents, businesses and organisations.  31 (66%) supported the proposal, 10 (21%) did not support the proposal and 10 (13%) generally supported but had some concerns.

6.8       The key issues raised were impact on parking, cost implications and existing speed concerns.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation – There are no increased financial implications over and above those originally reported in the option report on 16 February 2016.

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs will increase slightly to maintain a small number of new signs but these additional costs have been allowed for in the maintenance budgets.

6.12    Funding source –This project is funded through the Council’s Capital Programme of the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan and had funding from National Land Transport Fund and the Urban Cycleways Programme.

Legal Implications

6.13    All decisions associated with the projects associated with the Major Cycleways Programme have been delegated to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee by Council.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.14    Risk management was applied by the project team throughout project development. 

6.15    The key risks identified were impacts on residents and businesses.

6.16    Mitigation strategies have been developed for risks and periodic reviews will continue to be held until the end of the project.

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies - Staff are working closely with other Major Cycleway Projects to manage timing and consistency of design.

6.18    Implementation timeframe – the timeframe for implementation would be with immediate effect from the day of decision.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·    To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    There are considered to be no disadvantages


 

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Keep the speed limits of the proposed streets as existing.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is nil.

7.3       There are no engagement requirements for this option as the status quo is retained.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       No engagement or community consultation required.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - nil

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - nil

7.9       Funding source - nil

Legal Implications

7.10    nil

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    There are no risks associated with maintain the existing environment

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - nil

7.13    Implementation timeframe - nil

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   There are no advantages to this option

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   This area would not be consistent in treatment with other greenway areas around Christchurch.

·   Without a legal ability to enforce the speed limits, there is an increased risk to cyclists that vehicles may not travel at the desired speed.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

MCR Uni Cycle 30kph Consultation Responses-redacted

29

b

MCR Uni Cycle Detailed Traffic Resolutions Plans

36

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Jennifer Rankin - Project Manager

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Clarrie Pearce - Senior Project Manager

Approved By

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

7.        MCR Rapanui Shag Rock Section 1 - 30kph Speed Restrictions

Reference:

17/789798

Contact:

Jennifer Rankin

Jennifer.rankin@ccc.govt.nz

941 5177

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to approve the detailed traffic resolutions for implementing a 30kph speed restriction for MCR Rapanui Shag Rock section 1.

1.2       The Committee approved the Rapanui Shag Rock Section 1 Major Cycleway on 16 February 2016 and the detailed traffic resolutions on 10 May 2017. This report outlines detailed traffic resolutions not originally included, pertaining solely to the proposed speed restrictions.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated.  This project is a specifically identified and funded within the 2015-2018 Long Term Plan.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

3.1.1.        The level of significance was determined by using the engagement significance matrix.

3.1.2.        The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Approve that pursuant to Section 5 of the Christchurch City Council Sped Limits Bylaw 2010, speed limits be set as below in clauses 1a to 1i and include the resulting changes in the Christchurch City Register of Speed Limits and Speed Limit Maps:

a.         Approve that the speed limit on Worcester Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Fitzgerald Avenue and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Stanmore Road.

b.         Approve that the speed limit on Worcester Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Stanmore Road and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with England Street.

c.         Approve that the speed limit on England Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Worcester Street and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Hereford Street.

d.         Approve that the speed limit on England Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Hereford Street and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Cashel Street.

e.         Approve that the speed limit on Buccleugh Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Cashel Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Olliviers Road.

f.          Approve that the speed limit on Olliviers Road be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Buccleugh Street and extending in a north easterly direction to its intersection with Wellington Street.

g.         Approve that the speed limit on Wellington Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Olliviers Road and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Clive Street.

h.         Approve that the speed limit on Clive Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Wellington Street and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Marlborough Street.

i.          Approve that the speed limit on Marlborough Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Clive Street and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Aldwins Road.

2.         Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in clauses 1a to 1i come into force with immediate effect.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Major Cycleways

·     Level of Service: 10.5.1 Reduce the number of fatal and serious crashes on the network involving cyclists

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

3.1.2.1.1.                Option 1 – 30KPH Speed Restrictions (preferred option)

3.1.2.1.2.                Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

3.1.3.        The advantages of this option include:

·    To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

·    Although speed calming measures are installed, adding a 30kph speed restriction allows it to be legally enforceable.

3.1.4.          The disadvantages of this option include:

·    There are no disadvantages to this proposal

 

 

5.   Context/Background

MCR Programme

5.1       The Rapanui Shag Rock Route is one of 13 projects in the Major Cycleways Route (MCR) Programme.  The MCR programme has Urban Cycleway Programme (UCP), CCC and National Land Transport Fund (NLTF) funding attached to it and Rapanui Shag Rock is in the Long Term Plan as one of the identified MCR Projects.

5.2       The Rapanui Shag Rock route is 6.2Km long and starts at Fitzgerald Avenue and finishes at Ferrymead Bridge.

5.3       Section 1 of the Rapanui Shag Rock Route was approved by the ITE Committee on 16 February 2016 and the Detailed Traffic Resolutions on 10 May 2017. These reports did not include a speed restriction and this has subsequently been consulted on separately.

6.   Option 1 – 30kph Speed Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       As part of the installation of Major Cycle Routes, some sections are proposed to be constructed as neighbourhood greenways, where cyclists share the road space with vehicles.  These greenways are provided on low volume roads with a slow speed environment.  To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are to consult with the stakeholders on the project needs, alternatives, opportunities and solutions so that any concerns, alternatives and aspirations are understood and considered.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Adjacent residents and businesses are specifically affected by this option. Their views are contained in attachment A.

6.6       Consultation was undertaken from 26 May 2017 to 20 June 2017.  Leaflets were delivered to directly affected properties along the route.  Properties were identified on their proximity to the route.

6.7       A total of 65 submissions were received from residents, businesses and organisations.  34 (52%) supported the proposal, 24 (37%) did not support the proposal and 7 (11%) generally supported but had some concerns.

6.8       The key issues raised were impact on parking, cost implications and existing speed concerns.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation – There are no increased financial implications over and above those originally reported in the option report on 16 February 2016.

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs will increase slightly to maintain a small number of new signs but these additional costs have been allowed for in the maintenance budgets.

6.12    Funding source –This project is funded through the Council’s Capital Programme of the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan and had funding from National Land Transport Fund and the Urban Cycleways Programme.

Legal Implications

6.13    All decisions associated with the projects associated with the Major Cycleways Programme have been delegated to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee by Council.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.14    Risk management was applied by the project team throughout project development. 

6.15    The key risks identified were limited impacts on residents and businesses.

6.16    Mitigation strategies have been developed for risks and periodic reviews will continue to be held until the end of the project.

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies - Staff are working closely with other Major Cycleway Projects to manage timing and consistency of design.

6.18    Implementation timeframe – the timeframe for implementation would be with immediate effect from the day of decision.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·    To allow for safe shared space for people on bikes and vehicles, a reduced speed limit of 30kph is recommended. This lower speed limit is also supported by the design which includes various traffic calming measures to further encourage slower speeds.

·    Although speed calming measures are installed, adding a 30kph speed restriction allows it to be legally enforceable.

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    There are considered to be no disadvantages


 

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Keep the speed limits of the proposed streets as existing.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is nil.

7.3       There are no engagement requirements for this option as the status quo is retained.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       No engagement or community consultation required.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - nil

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - nil

7.9       Funding source - nil

Legal Implications

7.10    nil

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    There are no risks associated with maintain the existing environment

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - nil

7.13    Implementation timeframe - nil

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·    There are no advantages to this option

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    This area would not be consistent in treatment with other greenway areas around Christchurch.

·    Without a legal ability to enforce the speed limits, there is an increased risk to cyclists that vehicles may not travel at the desired speed.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

MCR Rapanui 30kph consultation responses redacted

55

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Jennifer Rankin - Project Manager

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Clarrie Pearce - Senior Project Manager

Approved By

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

8.        Hereford Street Proposed Pedestrian Crossing (Zebra) and Parking Changes

Reference:

17/407849

Contact:

Steve Dejong

steve.dejong@ccc.govt.nz

941 6428

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to recommend to Council that it approve the Pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing and parking changes on the south side of Hereford Street between Cambridge Terrace and Montreal Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a planning application from Ngai Tahu Property limited.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing the factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations :

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council approve:

1.         That all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the south side of Hereford Street between Cambridge Terrace and Montreal Street  be revoked.

2.         That the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

3.         That the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes Monday to Friday  9.00am to 5.00pm and designated to pay and display parking only on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 12 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 33 metres.

4.         That the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 45 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

5.         That a loading Zone (Goods Vehicles only) be installed on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 70 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 7 metres

6.         That the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 77 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 6 metres.

7.         That the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 83 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 33 metres.

8.         That a Pedestrian Crossing (Zebra) be installed across Hereford Street commencing at a point 97 metres west of its intersection with Hereford Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 5 metres

9.         That a bus stop be installed on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 116 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

10.       That the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Hereford Street commencing at a point 130 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32metres to its intersection with Montreal Street.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.35 Promote modal shift: Increase the percentage share of walking trips

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install Pedestrian Crossing and parking changes (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     A pedestrian Crossing (Zebra) will give priority to pedestrians crossing Hereford Street between the Civic offices and the Ngai Tahu development and Carpark on the south side of Hereford Street

·     The Pedestrian Crossing in this location will link the pedestrian desire line between Worcester Street, Art Gallery and the Bridge of Remembrance

·     The parking changes will facilitate the installation of the Zebra and the requirements of the Ngai Tahu development on the south side of Hereford Street

·     Installing a Loading Zone on the south side of Hereford Street will remove the need for delivery vehicles to U-turn thus improving road safety.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Installing the pedestrian Crossing Zebra and approving the parking changes on the south side of Hereford Street will reduce the current number of 16 on Street parking spaces to 7 on the south side of the Street.

 

5.   Context/Background

Hereford Street Pedestrian Crossing Zebra and Parking Changes

5.1       It has always been the intention to provide a pedestrian priority crossing from the Hereford Street Civic offices building to the Ngai Tahu development on the southern side of Hereford Street. This will facilitate a pedestrian link from the Worcester Street up the ramp feature through Civic offices across Hereford Street to the Ngai Tahu Development thus connecting the two sites.

5.2       The key to the success of a Pedestrian Crossing facility is locating it on an identified pedestrian desire line, which has a fairly consistent number of pedestrians crossing in the location all day. The number of council staff alone crossing between the civic offices and the Hereford Street ‘West End’ carpark on an average working day will ensure the consistency of crossing pedestrians is maintained.

5.3       Future Proposed AAC works will renew the kerb on the south side of Hereford Street and correct the post-quake road level differentials, therefore this proposal will provide ‘Stick-On’ kerb build outs for the proposed Zebra Crossing until the future AAC works realign the kerbs to match the north side of the road.


 

6.   Option 1 – Hereford Street Pedestrian Crossing and parking changes (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The proposed Hereford Street parking changes and pedestrian crossing will facilitate the safe operation of the Ngai Tahu development under construction on the south side of Hereford Street and provide prioritised pedestrian connectivity between the Council offices and the new development.

6.2       To provide sight lines for the ‘West End’ car park exit onto Hereford Street, four on street parking spaces are proposed to be removed. A further five on street parking spaced are proposed to be removed to facilitate the installation of the Zebra Crossing and its required 30km/hr SSSD /sight lines equating to the loss of nine on street parking spaces.

6.3       The remaining on street parking will consist of five 60 minute pay and display spaces between Cambridge Terrace and the ‘West End’ carpark exit. Between the carpark exit and the Zebra Crossing are the 2 remaining on street parking spaces, it is proposed to designate 1,  7 meter space as a Loading Zone and the remaining Space as a 10 minute short  term parking space

6.4       The proposed Loading Zone (Goods Vehicles Only) will facilitate west bound on street goods loading to the Ngai Tahu Development, as there is no entry permitted from Hereford Street, it will also provide west bound goods loading to the Council building.

6.5       The proposed 10 minute short term parking space will provide drop of pick up to all vehicles to both the Council and Ngai Tahu sites

6.6       As previously mentioned the proposed Zebra Crossing will provide prioritised pedestrian connectivity between the two sites and effectively link the art gallery to the ‘bridge of remembrance’ through the Council and Ngai Tahu sites.

6.7       The Number 17 bus stop which is a half hourly service has been adjusted slightly to fit in with the proposed Ngai Tahu housing development at the Montreal end of the site. The committee has previously approved a shelter for this stop.

Significance

6.8       The level of significance of this option is low and is consent with section 2 of this report

6.9       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consultation with adjacent property owners.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.10    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

6.11    Ngai Tahu Property limited are specifically affected by this option being the developers of the adjacent site. Ngai Tahu property limited have been involved in production of this proposal and support its implementation.  The decision in this report do not involve a decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value to Ngai Tahu.

6.12    Ngai Tahu property limited in developing the site have incorporated design elements which take into account the intrinsic value to Ngai Tahu. This report supports these design elements in facilitating the successful operation of the Ngai Tahu development on the KEB site. (See attachment B)

Community Views and Preferences

6.13    As mentioned above Ngai Tahu property limited, the developers of the KEB site support this proposal. The only other effected party is the City Council located on the north side of the street, however this proposal will not change the north side of Hereford Street other than the Zebra linking the two sites.

6.14    The Wynn William building owners were sent a copy of the proposal and all three businesses within the building were personally hand delivered a plan of the proposal which was explained to them. Aranz medical located on level one of the Wynn Williams building responded with questions about loading and indicated their support for the proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.15    This option is Consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.16    Cost of Implementation – Ngai Tahu Property Limited will meet the cost of this proposal

6.17    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Are covered under the area maintenance contract.

6.18    Funding source – Ngai Tahu property Limited

Legal Implications

6.19    Part 1 clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.20    The installation of signs and markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: traffic Control Devices 2004

Risks and Mitigations    

6.21    Not applicable

Implementation

6.22    Implementation dependencies  -Council approval

6.23    Implementation timeframe – If the proposal is approved by the ITE Committee Ngai Tahu will program the works.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.24    The advantages of this option include:

·   Improving safety and priority to pedestrians

·   Providing on street loading and short stay parking on the south side of Hereford Street

·   Providing site lines to vehicles exiting the ‘West End Car park’

6.25    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The loss of on street parking space


 

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Maintain the status quo, do not make changes proposed in Option 1. 

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section two of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       N/A This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See section 6.13 & 6.14 above. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       N/A

Financial Implications

7.6       N/A

Legal Implications

7.7       See 6.19 & 6.20 above

Risks and Mitigations    

7.8       Not Applicable

Implementation

7.9       Implementation dependencies  - N/A

7.10    Implementation timeframe – N/A

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.11    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains parking

7.12    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Poor level of service for pedestrians

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Report Plan: Hereford St Parking Changes and Zebra

72

b

NgaiTahu KEB Site History

73

c

Construction Plan:Hereford St Parking Changes and Zebra

74

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Steve Dejong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

9.        ITE Report 3 Waters and Waste - June 2017

Reference:

17/731267

Contact:

John Mackie

John.mackie@ccc.govt.nz

6548

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to inform the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee of the activities undertaken by the 3 Waters and Waste Unit, who are responsible for the planning, asset management, operations, maintenance and capital project delivery for all 3 waters and waste infrastructure. This includes drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, land drainage and solid waste services within the city.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated at the request of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to keep them up to date with the current status of the Three Water activities in Christchurch.

2.   Significance

2.1       There are no decision(s) sought in this report and therefore the significance is low in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the 3 waters and waste June 2017 report attached.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       Overview of 3 Waters and Waste Operations.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

3 Waters and Waste Bi-Monthly Report - June 2017

77

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

Approved By

Peter Ryan - Head of Performance Management

Michael Day - Head of Business Partnerships

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

10.    Proposed Lower Styx, Marshland and Hawkins Road Intersection Improvement and widening of Marshland Road Bridge.

Reference:

17/523651

Contact:

Adrian Thein

Adrian.thein@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 6549

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to outline key changes to the previously approved design and the rationale for those changes.

1.2       Request Infrastructure, Transport and Environment (ITE) Committee recommend to Council acceptance of the altered orientation of the intersection with an understanding of the resultant impacts.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as a result changes made to the previously approved scheme design of the Marshland Road, Lower Styx Road, Hawkins Road intersection and the Marshland Road Bridge. 

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance is assessed as low as staff are asking Council to endorse a previous agreed design option with a different positioning.

2.1.2   The community engagement is consistent with this assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Approve the staff proposal for the revised design and position for Marshlands Road, Lower Styx Road, Hawkins Road intersection improvement and widening of Marshland Road Bridge design (refer Appendix C & D).

2.         Approve that the intersection of Marshland Road, Lower Styx Road, Hawkins Road be controlled by traffic signals (lights); Marshland Road Bridge be widened; and the project proceed to final design, tender and construction as detailed in Appendix C & D.

3.         Request Staff to investigate and if feasible to proceed with the construction of the bridge widening works ahead of the intersection upgrade.

4.         Notes that the change request process is in place to adjust budgets in line with internal financial delegations.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Roads and Footpaths

·     Level of Service: 16.0.3 Maintain resident satisfaction with roadway condition

4.1.2   Capital Programme ID 1347 Lower Styx / Marshland Intersection Improvements and ID 913 Marshland Road Bridge upgrade.

4.2       Council approved (15 October 2015) changes to the Lower Styx, Hawkins and Marshland Roads intersection and Marshland Road Bridge improvements.

4.3       An ecological survey during detailed design highlighted the discovery of a species of lamprey that use the Reserve Canal Drain as both a spawning and nesting sites has resulted in changes to the positioning of the intersection.

4.4       A revised design was developed that shifts the intersection orientation and the bridge widening approximately 10 metres in the south west direction.  The revised design was completed in conjunction with Environment Canterbury (ECan), Department of Conservation (DoC), Mahaanui Kurataiao Ltd (MKT) and National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), to avoid the spawning and nesting site of the lamprey.

4.5       The revised design has resulted in an increased requirement to acquire private land (3235 square meters from five properties) and the demolition of a dwelling on the corner of Marshland Road and Lower Styx Road.

4.6       The following feasible options have been considered:

4.6.1   Option 1 – Signalise intersection, allow all movements and widen bridge, in the revised orientation (preferred option).

4.6.2   Option 2 - Signalise intersection, allow all movements and widen bridge, in the originally approved orientation as approved at 15 October 2015 Council meeting (Appendix B).

4.6.3   Option 3 – Do nothing

4.7       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.7.1   The advantages of the preferred option include:

·    Minimise the ecological impacts of the project and preserve the lamprey spawning and nesting sites along the Reserve Canal Drain.

·    Likely MKT, Doc, NIWA and ECan support of any land use and riverbed consent applications, which would mean increased certainty of project delivery.

·    Minimisation of project footprint and treatment of storm water in Janet Stewart Reserve.

4.7.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·    Increased private land requirements and potential additional property costs, including demolition of dwelling at corner of Marshland Road and Lower Styx Road.

·    Removal or relocation of the protected cabbage tree.

 

5.   Context/Background

Lower Styx and Marshland Road Intersection and Bridge Upgrade, Safety Improvements Project

5.1       Introduction:

5.1.1   The existing intersection has restricted turning movements and inadequacies are compounded by the ongoing development in the north of Christchurch and Waimakariri District, including the nearby Prestons Development.

·    Marshlands Road Bridge over the Styx River is 50m south of the intersection and requires an upgrade to facilitate the improvements.

Following public consultation:

5.1.2   The previous Scheme Design approvals were received from Burwood / Pegasus and Shirley / Papanui Community Boards on 22 September 2015 and full Council on 15 October 2015 (Attachment A for full report, Attachment B,  Council Resolution)

5.1.3   Since receiving approval, the design team, has progressed the intersection and bridge design details to 80% complete.

5.1.4   An ecological survey during detail design phase identified the Reserve Canal Drain that runs parallel to Marshland Road supports a species of lamprey. Further investigation and consultation with with ECan, DoC, MKT and NIWA, identified that the Reserve Canal Drain is spawning and rearing site for the lamprey. DoC noted that lamprey have a conservation status of “Threatened – Nationally Vulnerable” and comes under the protection of Section 26ZJ of the Conservation Act 1987 (offences relating to spawning fish). 

5.1.5   Land use resource consents and consents it undertake work within the waterway are required.  It is likely that DoC and MKT will oppose any consent application that impacts the Reserve Canal Drain and the spawning site of the lamprey.  This would elongate the consent processes and could result one or more consents necessary for the works being refused.

5.1.6   As a result further designs were developed in conjunction with DoC, NIWA, ECan and MKT. This resulted in five different options (including realignment of the existing channel) being explored using a multi criteria analysis. The Revised Options Report (Attachment C), in particular pages 25-28 and embedded Appendix G within that report, outlines the design and consultation process with DoC, NIWA and ECan. The current preferred design which minimises the impacts to the lamprey’s habitat has been endorsed by MKT, DoC, NIWA and ECan.

5.1.7   An updated independent road safety audit has been completed and endorsed the revised design with no serious concerns noted.

5.1.8   The following table illustrates the technical differences between Option 1 and Option 2.   This is summarised as:

·     Increased private land requirements for Option 1.

·     Increased impact on the waterways and ecological fauna in Option 2.

·     There is minimal difference demonstrated between the two options from a road safety perspective.

 

5.1.9   Significant attempts were made to minimise the project footprint and minimise the amount of private land required to be acquired to manage the stormwater runoff from the upgraded intersection.  The Revised Options Report details the considerations on pages 28 to 30.  The resulting design manages stormwater through the installation of kerb and channel with treatment within the Janet Stewart Reserve.

 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Signalise intersection, allow all movements and widen bridge, in the revised orientation (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       To proceed with finalising detail design of the revised preferred design (Attachment D) and associated property acquisition process.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are low.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

6.5       Liaison with MKT on both the waterway works and lamprey protections is complete and they are in support of this option. Key focus for the local iwi is the protection of the lamprey nesting and spawning site.

6.6       Relocation or removal of the cabbage tree located on 548 Marshland Road, requires further investigation and consultation to agree a solution.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7       This scheme has been publically consulted on in June / July 2015 and endorsed by the Burwood / Pegasus and Shirley / Papanui Community Boards on 22 September 2015 and full Council on 15 October 2015. This consultation did not factor in the proposed alteration to the position of the intersection.

6.8       However, the directly affected parties as a result of the position change for the intersection have been consulted with.  These are the land owners of 550, 548 Marshland Road, 9a Lower Styx Road, 794, 784 Hawkins Road.

6.9       This options requires the relocation / removal of the “scheduled significant tree” listed cabbage tree (under the District Plan) located at 548 Marshland Road. Preliminary investigations are underway on the logistics and relocation costs.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.10    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.11    Cost of Implementation is $10,600,000.  This includes the widening of the existing bridge (upstream side), additional approach works, and signalisation of the intersection, private property acquisition, increased service relocation costs and stormwater treatment in Janet Stewart Reserve.

6.12    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – allowance has been made for future maintenance.

6.13    Funding source - as per project funding allowances in CPMS 913 and 1347, $1,689,240 and $5,053,080 with a combined total of $6,742,320, outlined in the current LTP.

6.14    Change request processes, in line with financial delegations, are in place to increase the funding from underspends within other approved programmes and projects.  It is not expected there will be an issue with this approval process.

6.15    NZTA funding support will be applied for the final design and construction phase of this project.

Legal Implications

6.16    Land use consents, building consents and various authorisation requirements have been identified and will be confirmed in the final design phase.  No issues have been identified with obtaining these consents (DoC, NIWA, ECan and MKT are in support of this option).

6.17    Private property acquisition is required.

6.18    Upgrading this intersection is effectively required as part of the Plan Change 30 included within the City Plan.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.19    Private property acquisition is required including requirement to demolish dwelling on the corner of Lower Styx Road and Marshland Road. The mitigation strategy has been to minimise the foot print of the project and work closely with affected parties. If this is not successful then this could lead to initiating the formal acquisition process under the Public Works Act 1981.

6.20    Further investigation and consultation with local iwi is required for the removal and / or relocation of the “scheduled significant tree” (cabbage tree) located on 548 Marshland Road.

Implementation

6.21    Implementation dependencies it is expected that both the intersection and bridge project will be tendered and constructed as a single package. If property purchases is delayed there is an option with proceeding the construction of the bridge widening ahead of the intersection upgrade.

6.22    Implementation timeframe it is expected start to construction targeted for January 2018, for a period of 18 months.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.23    The advantages of this option include:

·    Minimise the ecological impacts of the project and preserve the lamprey spawning and nesting sites along the Reserve Canal Drain.

·    Likely MKT, Doc, NIWA and ECan support of any land use and riverbed consent applications, which would mean increased certainty of project delivery.

·    Minimisation of project footprint and treatment of storm water in Janet Stewart Reserve.

6.24    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    Increased private land requirements and potential additional property costs, including demolition of dwelling at corner of Marshland Road and Lower Styx Road.

·    Removal or relocation of the protected cabbage tree.

 


 

7.   Option 2 - Signalise intersection, allow all movements and widen bridge, in the originally approved orientation as at 15 October 2015 Council meeting

Option Description

7.1       To proceed with the construction of the original proposed design, as outlined in the 22 September 2015 community board meeting.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low  consistent with section 2 of this report

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are low.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option involves a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

7.5       Liaison with MKT on both the waterway works and lamprey protections is complete and they are not in support of this option. Key focus for the local iwi is the protection of the lamprey nesting and spawning site.

7.6       Relocation or removal of the cabbage tree located on 548 Marshland Road is not required.

      Community Views and Preferences

7.7       This scheme has been publically consulted on in June / July 2015 and endorsed by the Burwood / Pegasus and Shirley / Papanui Community Boards on 22 September 2015 and full Council on 15 October 2015.

7.8       DoC, MKT, NIWA are specifically affected by this option due to the loss of the spawning and nesting sites of the rare species of Lamprey.  This option is not supported by MKT, NIWA, ECan and DoC.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.10    Cost of Implementation is $7,480,000.  This includes the widening of the existing bridge (both sides), signalisation of the intersection and the realignment of Reserve Canal Drain.

7.11    Maintenance / ongoing costs – allowance has been made for future maintenance.

7.12    Funding source - as per project funding allowances in CPMS 913 and 1347, $1,689,240 and $5,053,080 with a combined total of $6,742,320 outlined in the current LTP.

7.13    Change request processes, in line with financial delegations, are in place to increase the funding from underspends within other approved programmes and projects.  It is not expected there will be an issue with this approval process.

7.14    NZTA funding will be applied for the final design and construction phase of this project.

Legal Implications

7.15    Land use consents, building consents and various authorisation requirements have been identified and will be confirmed in the final design phase.  Issues have been identified with obtaining these consents (DoC, NIWA, ECan and MKT are not in support of this option).

7.16    Private property acquisition is not required.

7.17    Upgrading this intersection is also as part of Plan Change 30, included within the City Plan.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.18    Land use resource consents and consents to undertake work within the waterway are required.  It is likely that DoC and MKT will oppose any consent application that impacts the Reserve Canal Drain and the spawning site of the lamprey.  This would elongate the consent processes and could result one or more consents necessary for the works being refused.

Implementation

7.19    Implementation dependencies - not applicable.

7.20    Implementation timeframe – not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.21    The advantages of this option include:

·    Reduced private land requirements and potential additional property costs, including the retention of the dwelling at corner of Marshland Road and Lower Styx Road.

·    Do not have to relocate the protected cabbage tree.

7.22    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    Ecological impact of the project is high, resulting in probable loss of lamprey spawning and nesting site along the Reserve Canal Drain.

·    Lack of support from MKT, DoC, NIWA and ECan of any land use and riverbed consent applications, which would mean increased uncertainty of project delivery.

 

 

 


 

8.   Option 3 – Do nothing

Option Description

8.1       This option is to do nothing and leave the existing intersection and bridge in its current state.

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report

8.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are low.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.5       This option is inconsistent with the prior public consultation process that occurred in June / July 2015. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.6       This option is inconsistent  with Council’s Plans and Policies

8.6.1   Inconsistency – unable to complete the intersection and bridge safety improvements.

8.6.2   Reason for inconsistency – this option does not meet this requirement.

8.6.3   Amendment necessary – not applicable.

Financial Implications

8.7       No additional cost of implementation, with the exception of the costs incurred to date.

8.8       Maintenance / ongoing costs changes and will increase over time due to incremental asset degradation.

Legal Implications

8.9       Upgrading this intersection is effectively required as part of Plan Change 30.

Risks and Mitigations    

8.10    Negative public perception by not delivering on approved scheme.

8.11    Safety issues of the intersection and bridge are not addressed.

Implementation

8.12    Implementation dependencies - not applicable.

8.13    Implementation timeframe – not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.14    The advantages of this option include:

·    No work required

·    No private land acquisition required

·    No ecological impact

8.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·    Safety implications of the current intersection not addressed.

·    Not meeting consent conditions of Plan Change 30

·    Reputational impact of not delivering on consulted scheme.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Hawkins / Lower Styx / Marshland Intersection and Bridge Upgrade, Originally Approved 22 Sep 15 Oct 2015

107

b

Council Resolution, 15 October 2015

123

c

Hawkins / Lower Styx / Marshland Intersection & Bridge Upgrade, Revised Options Report

126

d

Revised Preferred Design

280

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Adrian Thein - Project Manager

Janis Peterson - Business Administrator

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Approved By

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

PDF Creator

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

11.  Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

             (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

             (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

09 August 2017

 

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

12

Public Excluded Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee Minutes - 26 July 2017

 

 

Refer to the previous public excluded reason in the agendas for these meetings.

 

13

Lower Styx, Marshland and Hawkins Road Intersection Improvement and Widening of Marshland Road Bridge - Property Acquisitions

s7(2)(b)(ii), s7(2)(g), s7(2)(i)

Prejudice Commercial Position, Maintain Legal Professional Privilege, Conduct Negotiations

To conduct commercial negotiations and maintain legal privilege

Following the completion of the acquisition of the properties