Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Monday 26 June 2017

Time:                                    4pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

David Cartwright

Sam MacDonald

Aaron Campbell

Linda Chen

Jamie Gough

Aaron Keown

Raf Manji

Shirish Paranjape

Bridget Williams

 

 

20 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew McLintock

Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

941 6231

matthew.mcLintock@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4 

B       7.       Correspondence............................................................................................................. 13

C       8.       Staff Briefings................................................................................................................. 15

STAFF REPORTS

C       9.       St Albans Street/Browns Road - Proposed No Stopping Restriction....................... 19

C       10.     Normans Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................................................... 25

C       11.     Apsley/Kedleston Drives - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................................ 33

AB     12.     Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Wards - Property Review Process.......................... 39

C       13.     Application to the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board's 2016/17 Youth Development Fund - Zachery Abraas........................................................................... 57

C       14.     Applications to the 2016/17 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board's Discretionary Response Fund - Fendalton Bowling Club  and Riccarton Leagues Club 61

B       15.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 67 

 

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 12 June 2017 be confirmed (refer page 5).

 

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

It is intended that the public forum session will be held at 4pm.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

 

Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Monday 12 June 2017

Time:                                    4pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Members

Sam MacDonald

Aaron Campbell

Linda Chen

Aaron Keown

Raf Manji

Shirish Paranjape

Bridget Williams

 

 

12 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew McLintock

Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

941 6231

matthew.mclintock@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

 

Apologies

Part C

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00080

That the apologies for absence received from David Cartwright and Jamie Gough, be accepted.

Sam MacDonald/Linda Chen                                                                                                                                  Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00081

That the minutes of the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 22 May 2017, be confirmed.

Shirish Paranjape/Linda Chen                                                                                                                                Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Lyndon Rodgers - Bryndwr Youth Workers

 

             Lyndon Rogers and Steffi Brightwell, Youth Workers in Bryndwr were in attendance along with youth leaders Shannon Woodford Clifford, Luca Mahon Harding and Sandra Turner and gave the Board an update on their activities in the Bryndwr community.

Part B

         The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board thanked Rodger, Steffie and the Youth Leaders for their deputation and for the work they are doing in the Bryndwr community.

 

 

 

 

 

4.2       New Zealand Police Update

 

             Jason Keeys and Nathan Wilson, Community Liaison Officers, introduced themselves to the Board and gave a brief overview of what is happening in the wards.

Part B

         The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board  thanked  Officers Keeys and Wilson for their deputation and for the work they do in the local community.

 

4.3       Professor Roy Bickerstaffe and Andrew Simmons – Proposed Holmwood Road Pedestrian              Island

 

             Professor Bickerstaffe and Andrew Simcock were in attendance and spoke in opposition to the proposed parking restrictions in Holmwood Road.

             Item 6 of these minutes records the Board decision on this matter.

Part B

         The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board thanked Professor Bickerstaff and
Mr Simcock for their deputation.

 

4.4       Dr Stuart Gowland – Proposed Holmwood Road Pedestrian Island

 

             Dr Gowland was in attendance and spoke in opposition to the proposed parking restrictions in Holmwood Road.  

             Item 6 of these minutes records the Board decision on this matter.

Part B

             The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board thanked Dr Gowland for his deputation.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.   

 

6.   Holmwood Road - Pedestrian Refuge Island

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

 

1.    Approves all line marking changes and the construction of a central pedestrian refuge island on Holmwood Road, as shown on Attachment A of the report.

 

2.    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north-west side of Holmwood Road, commencing at its intersection with Rossall Street and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 64 metres.

 

3.    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south-east side of Holmwood Road, commencing at its intersection with Rossall Street and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 52.5 metres.

 

4.    Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south-west side of Rossall Street, commencing at its intersection with Holmwood Road and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

 

5.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-west side of Holmwood Road, commencing at its intersection with Rossall Street and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 38.5 metres.

 

6.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the north-west side of Holmwood Road, commencing at point 38.5 metres north of its intersection with Rossall Street , and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.  This restriction is to apply at any time.

 

7.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-east side of Holmwood Road, commencing at its intersection with Rossall Street and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 21.5 metres.

 

8.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the south-west side of Holmwood Road, commencing at point 21.5 metres south-west of its intersection with Rossall Street, and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres.  This restriction is to apply at any time.

 

9.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-west side of Rossall Street, commencing at its intersection with Holmwood Road and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

 

 

Board Consideration

 

The Board considered the information from the two deputations referred to in Items 4.3 and 4.4 of these minutes. and also the results from the community engagement survey. 

 

While noting that the intersection was a busy one, members raised questions around the placement of the proposed pedestrian refuge.

 

It was considered the refuge would impact on the traffic flow through the intersection by narrowing the road at that point and, coupled with the heavy use of the P10 parking outside the local businesses, make pedestrian crossings the road?? more hazardous.

 

Accordingly, it was generally agreed not to proceed with the pedestrian refuge at this time.

 

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00082

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board resolved to:

1.    Adopt Option 3, do nothing and maintain the status quo.

Aaron Campbell requested that his vote against the above decision, be recorded.

Sam MacDonald/Raf Manji                                                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

7.   Easement Over Harewood Park

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00083 (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board, acting in the capacity of the administering body, resolved to:

1.         Recommend that the Chief Executive acting as the Minister of Conservation’s delegate, consents to the granting of the easement to Orion for the right to convey electricity and to Christchurch City Council for the right to convey water as outlined in this report.

2.         Approve the grant of the easements pursuant to Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 subject to the consent of the Minister of Conservation to:

a.         Orion - for the right to convey electricity over part of 239 Gardiners Rd (Certificate of Title reference 743891 and 743893) shown E, F and G on the plan at attachment A, and;

b.         Christchurch City Council - for the right to convey water over part of 239 Gardiners Road (Certificate of Title reference 743891 and 743893) shown A, B, C and D on the plan attachment A referred to in the report.

3.         Authorise the Property Consultancy Manager, should the easement be granted with the consent of the Minister of Conservation, to finalise documentation to implement the easement.

Raf Manji/Linda Chen                                                                                                                                                Carried

 

 

8.   Mustang Park Stage 2 - Proposed Road Names

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00084 (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board resolved to approve the following road names in relation to the application for the private roads (RMA/2017/1142) at Mustang Park Stage 2, as shown in the submitted plan:

1.         Pathfinder Place

2.         Sir Keith Park Place

Aaron Campbell/Aaron Keown                                                                                                                             Carried

 

 

9.   Application to the 2016/17 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Discretionary Response Fund - Bikes in Schools Programme at Cotswold School

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00085 (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $15,000 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Cotswold School towards track construction costs for the Bikes in Schools Project.

Raf Manji/Bridget Williams                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

10. Code of Conduct

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00086 (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board resolved to:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

2.         Adopt the Code of Conduct attached to the staff report, replacing the Board’s current Code of Conduct.

Shirish Paranjape/Aaron Keown                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

11. Standing Orders

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Receives the information in the report.

2.         Adopts the set of Standing Orders attached to the report, replacing the Board’s current Standing Orders.

3.         Resolves whether or not the Chairperson of the Board is to have a casting vote.

4.         Authorises the Chief Executive to approve any non-material changes that may be required before the new Standing Orders are published.

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00087

Part C

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board resolved:

1.         To receive the information in the report.

2.         To adopt the set of Standing Orders attached to the staff report, replacing the Board’s current Standing Orders.

3.         That the Chairperson of the Board does not have a casting vote.

4.         To authorise the Chief Executive to approve any non-material changes that may be required before the new Standing Orders are published.

Sam MacDonald/Shirish Paranjape                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

12. Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board Area Report

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Report.

 

Community Board Resolved FWHB/2017/00088

Part B

The Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board decided:

1.    To receive the Area Report.

2.    Not to proceed with the installation of an interpretation panel to highlight the history of Little Hagley Park and the redesign of the Carlton Mill bridge, due to the projected cost of the project.

Sam MacDonald/Linda Chen                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

Aaron Keown left the meeting at 5.22pm.

13. Elected Members Information Exchange

Part B

·    Riccarton Bush meeting update and the impact of the cycleway which runs through the grounds.

·    Update on Earthquake Disabilities Leadership Group meeting.

 

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 5.25pm

 

CONFIRMED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2017

 

 sam macdonald

deputy Chairperson

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

7.        Correspondence

Reference:

17/590211

Contact:

Margaret Henderson

margaret.henderson@ccc.govt.nz

03 941-6728

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

At the time the agenda went to print no correspondence had been received.

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence tabled at the 26 June 2017 meeting.

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

8.        Staff Briefings

Reference:

17/581256

Contact:

Matt McLintock

Matt.mclintock@ccc.govt.nz

941 6231

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

Jellie Park – Bike Incentive Programme

Martin McGregor

Recreation and Sports Unit

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Staff Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Bike Incentive Programme Memorandum

16

 

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

9.        St Albans Street/Browns Road - Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

17/548008

Contact:

Wayne Anisy

wayne.anisy@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from local residents and Community Board members.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Revoke all stopping and parking restrictions on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Browns Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of
17 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Browns Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

3.         Revoke all stopping and parking restrictions on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Browns Road and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Browns Road and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of
Browns Road commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of
Browns Road commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public and Board members regarding the operations of the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection.  The intersection is an uncontrolled T-intersection with priority given to St Albans Street.

5.2       Just recently there were various intersections along St Albans Street that were consulted on and approved to have No Stopping restrictions installed. At the time of meeting it was highlighted that the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection also had similar sightline and safety issues and staff were asked to look into this.

5.3       After site investigations and sightline calculations were carried out, the proposal is to install No Stopping restrictions around this intersection which will align with the recent safety measures carried out along St Albans Street. Also installing the No Stopping lines on the east side of Browns Road will enable any sump grate maintenance to be carried out when necessary.

 


 

6.   Option 1 -  Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions at the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Property owners and residents were advised of the proposal by letter drop. A total of six consultation letters and plans were delivered. Three submissions were received back with one objection and two in support. In regards to the one objection, the yellow lines are not proposed to be installed directly outside this property frontage and the objection was more referring to similar issues at intersections throughout Christchurch that do not have this proposed level of service.

6.5       Based on the submissions received back the original proposal will remain without change and all submitters will be notified of the meeting time and date where they can obtain speaking rights if they wish.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $180

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.13    Not Applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Browns Road/St Albans Street intersection.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes car parking.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the residents request for improvement to visibility when exiting Browns Road onto St Albans Street.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation Not applicable.

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   On street parking is retained.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Browns Road Proposed No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

24

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

10.    Normans Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/548053

Contact:

Wayne Anisy

wayne.anisy@ccc.govt.nz

941 8346

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at the Normans/Searells Roads and Normans Road /St Andrews Square intersections in accordance with Attachments A to C.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from local residents.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

Searells Road:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of
Searells Road commencing at its intersection with Normans Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of
Searells Road commencing at its intersection with Normans Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
Normans Road commencing at its intersection with Searells Road and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
Normans Road commencing at its intersection with Searells Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

St Andrews Square:

5.         Revoke all stopping and parking restrictions on the south side of Normans Road commencing at its intersection with St Andrews Square and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Normans Road commencing at its intersection with St Andrews Square and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres.

7.         Revoke all stopping and parking restrictions on the south side of Normans Road commencing at its intersection with St Andrews Square and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of
Normans Road commencing at its intersection with St Andrews Square and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Normans/Searells Roads and Normans Road/St Andrews Square intersections.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the operations of the Normans/Searells Roads and Normans Road/St Andrews Square intersections.  The intersections are uncontrolled T-intersections with priority given to Normans Road.

5.2       The visibility of vehicles exiting from Searells Road and St Andrews Square can be limited by parked vehicles on Normans Road. This encourages drivers to nose out into the intersection for better visibility.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions at the Normans/Searells Roads and Normans Road/St Andrews Square intersections in accordance with Attachments A to C.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Affected property owners and residents were advised of the proposal by letter drop.  A total of nine consultation letters and plans were delivered, five to the properties surrounding the Normans/Searells intersection and four to the properties at the Normans/St Andrews Square intersection. In total, four submissions were received back (three from Searells and one from
St Andrews Square), all were in support.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $400

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.12    Not Applicable.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Normans/Searells and Normans/St Andrews Square intersections.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes car parking.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the residents request for improvement to visibility when exiting Searells Road and St Andrews Square onto Normans Road.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   On street parking is retained.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Normans Road (A) No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

30

b

Normans Searells (B) No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

31

c

Normans St Andrews (C) No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

32

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

11.    Apsley/Kedleston Drives - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/548074

Contact:

Wayne Anisy

wayne.anisy@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at the Apsley/Kedleston Drive and Apsley/Berkshire Drive intersections in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from local residents and Community Board members.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
Kedleston Drive commencing at its intersection with Apsley Drive and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 33 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of
Kedleston Drive commencing at its intersection with Apsley Drive and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 24 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of
Apsley Drive commencing at its intersection with Kedleston Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of
Apsley Drive commencing at its intersection with Kedleston Drive and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of
Apsley Drive commencing at its intersection with Berkshire Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of
Berkshire Drive commencing at its intersection with Apsley Drive and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Kedleston Drive/Apsley Drive intersection.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       At the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board meeting of 10 April 2017, correspondence was presented regarding safety concerns at the Apsley Drive / Kedleston Drive intersection, following this correspondence the Board decided to request that staff provide a report back to the Board.

5.2       The correspondence highlighted that this intersection is part of the #130 bus route which operates between Avonhead and Hei Hei using Kedleston Drive and Apsley Drive.

5.3       Following staff on site observations, it was concluded that when vehicles are parked at or near to this intersection it makes it difficult for buses to manoeuvre within their lanes and on several occasions buses had to cross the centre lines and/or vehicles had to pull over and wait for the bus to proceed. By installing No Stopping restrictions around this intersection this will aid in the safety of all road users.


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions at the Apsley/Kedleston Drive and Apsley/Berkshire Drive intersections in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Consultation has been carried out with the affected property owners and residents. A total of nine consultation letters and plans were delivered. Two submissions were received back and both were in support. It should be noted that the submission from the resident at number 2/36 Apsley Drive stated that the number 1/36 Apsley Drive property was in the process of being sold and it would be unlikely that we receive a submission back from that address.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $400

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.12    Not Applicable.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the Apsley Drive/Kedleston Drive intersection.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes car parking

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the community request for improvement to visibility at the Apsley Drive/Kedleston Drive intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Implementation

7.10    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.11    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.12    The advantages of this option include:

·   On street parking is retained.

7.13    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines and road width constraints therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Apsley Drive No Stopping Diagram for Board Report

38

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

12.    Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Wards - Property Review Process

Reference:

17/386163

Contact:

Angus Smith

angus.smith@ccc.govt.nz

9418502

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to formally receive the list of properties in their area that are no longer required, or being utilised, for the purpose that they were originally purchased.

1.2       To initiate the process to review those properties for the purpose of making future use decisions.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated to follow up on a Council resolution of 12 May 2016 Council Resolved CNCL/2016/00242 and related workshops held with Community Boards.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined utilising the significance and engagement assessment worksheet.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect this assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

2.         Commence the Board’s review process to identify if the properties in Attachments B, C and D should be retained for alternative public uses, retained for strategic purposes/future decisions or considered for disposal.

3.         Being of the view that the sites listed below are unlikely to have alternative public uses or strategic purposes, and that the Board has sufficient information to form this preliminary view, recommends that Council directs officers to commence investigation processes regarding the potential to dispose of the sites.

a.            ____________________

4.         To allow for the inclusion of advice in a report to Council, conclude this review and provide comment to staff, within six months of resolving to commence the process.

5.         Note that the final report containing the outcome of the process will come back to the Board for recommendation to Council.

 

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The Council has adopted a process for determining the future use of properties that are no longer being utilised for a public work i.e. delivering a service or activity.

4.2       That process has been socialised with Community Board’s on a couple of occasions and this report serves to formally commence that process.

4.3       A list of the properties in the Community Board’s area is attached.

4.4       The next steps following this report are for the Community Board to either make some early decisions in respect of the specific properties, or develop and work through a process to develop alternative public uses to inform an options report in six months’ time.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       The Council purchases properties for the delivery of a service / activity / public work. They are held and funded by the business unit (titular asset owner) delivering that service / activity or project.

5.2       When a property is no longer required for the purpose for which it was originally purchased it is incumbent on the Council to make a decision to determine the future use of that property.

5.3       The Council adopted a process in May 2016 that is designed to facilitate and make decisions that support the active and prudent management of the Council’s property.

5.4       In general terms the Council should only hold land that is:

5.4.1   Required for a public work, either; currently utilised to deliver an activity or service; or held for future delivery of the same; and

5.4.2   Held for strategic purposes; and

5.4.3   Held pending a future use decision i.e. under review in terms of future use. 

5.5       Holding land with an indeterminate purpose or reason is not prudent and may put the Council at operational risk. It also comes at a cost in terms of operating / holding, foregone capital, potential social, poor community outcomes and therefore imprudent custodianship of public assets / money.

Process

5.6       A flow chart of the process is attached, but in summary is as follows.

5.6.1   When a property ceases to be held for the purpose of delivering the activity or service for which it was originally purchased then it is circularised around business units, Community Boards and possible stakeholders to assess and identify community needs and develop options to for alternative public uses.

5.6.2   This is done on a portfolio basis annually or as required.

5.6.3   A period of six months is provided to establish the alternative public uses and options.

5.6.4   The results are collated into an options report which would usually incorporate as one of the options sale.

5.6.5   The Council then resolve future use based on staff and Community Board recommendations.

5.7       Retaining the property for an alternative public use needs:

5.7.1   To be rationalised,

5.7.2   A clearly identified need,

5.7.3   To be supported by a sound and robust business case,

5.7.4   Supporting Council strategies,

5.7.5   Established funding in the Councils annual and long term plans

5.7.6   To have an identified sponsor i.e. end asset owner (titular internal owner) / sponsor and budget provision within the Long Term Plan.

Process initiation

5.8       Attached are the following:

5.8.1   A list of properties in the ward that is no longer being utilised for the original intended purpose for which they were purchased.

5.8.2   A plan of the ward showing the property locations.

5.8.3   A brief status report, street view and aerial photo of each property.

5.8.4   A list of all the properties across the city grouped in terms of Board/Ward areas.

5.9       Next step is for the Board to consider how it approaches the process of considering alternative future public uses. This may involve:

5.9.1   Whether the properties can/should be prioritised.

5.9.2   Whether early decisions can be made e.g. retention for a particular use or purpose or to declare some surplus for disposal because it is obvious there are no practical alternative options

5.9.3   Develop a programme and process with the Community Governance Team to canvass the community’s needs and develop options over the next six months.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Process flow chart

43

b

Property list Harewood

44

c

City List

50

d

Property list Waimari

53

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Approved By

Bruce Rendall - Head of Facilities, Property and Planning

Anne Columbus - General Manager Corporate Services

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

13.    Application to the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board's 2016/17 Youth Development Fund - Zachery Abraas

Reference:

17/549419

Contact:

Lisa Gregory

lisa.gregory@ccc.govt.nz

941-6729

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider an application received for the Board's 2016/17 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $350 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as the result of applications being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $350 from its 2016/17 Youth Development Fund to Zachery Abraas towards participating New Zealand Under 17 Waterpolo European Tour from 1 July to 4 August 2017.

 

4.   Applicant - Zachery Abraas

4.1       Zachery is a 17 year old Christchurch Boys' High School student from Fendalton.

4.2       Zachery has been selected in the 'Born 2000' Waterpolo squad to compete for New Zealand in the Under 17 Waterpolo European tour, from 1 July to 4 August 2017. 

4.3       The purpose of this tour is to provide players with competition games in Montenegro, Dubrovnik and Kotor as a build up to the 2018 FINA Youth World Waterpolo tournament.  This is the second time Zachery has been selected in the New Zealand 'Born 2000' Waterpolo squad and he is the only player from the South Island again to be chosen for this tour.

4.4       Zachery has been playing waterloo since the age of 11 and predominantly plays in goal.  He is following his father's footsteps of representing New Zealand and his preparation involves a large commitment to his sport.  Zachery has achieved extremely well in waterpolo despite coming from a region where the sport struggles for pool space for training.

4.5       Zachery not only plays for his school and has travelled to National events with this team, he will also compete for Canterbury Waterpolo this July in Auckland at the New Zealand Nationals before flying out to Montenegro to play for New Zealand.

4.6       Zachery will organise a quiz night and run raffles through June to raise funds for his trip and he also works on the weekend when he is not in Auckland at training camps.

4.7       The cost for the trip is $5,500, but these costs were not broken down for the players.

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

International flights, taxes, accommodation, food, uniform

$5,500

 

4.8    This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

  

        

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Lisa Gregory - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

14.    Applications to the 2016/17 Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board's Discretionary Response Fund - Fendalton Bowling Club  and Riccarton Leagues Club

Reference:

17/532463

Contact:

Lisa Gregory

lisa.gregory@ccc.govt.nz

9416729

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board to consider four applications for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation(s) listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

00056319

Fendalton Bowling Club

Upgrade of Building Gutters and Sealing of Access Asphalt Path

$3,140

00056348

Riccarton Leagues Club

Upgrade of Riccarton Leagues Club Changing Rooms at Crosbie Park

$30,000

00056664

Fendalton Bowling Club

Replacement of North Facing Sunscreen Blinds in Community Lounge

$4,741

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated as the result of applications being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board:

1.         Approves the making of a grant of $3,000 from the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to the Fendalton Bowling Club towards the costs involved with the gutter upgrade and sealing of the asphalt access path.

2.         Approves the making of a grant of $20,000 from the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to the Riccarton Leagues Club towards the costs of the engineering reports, foundation design, concept plans and building consent for their change room upgrade.

 

3.         Approves the making of a grant of $3,500 from the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to the Fendalton Bowling Club towards the costs involved with the replacement of the north facing sunscreen blinds in the community lounge.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$104,363

$30,219

$74,144

$35,644

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2016-17 DRF - Fendalton Bowling Club Clubrooms Upgrade Decision Matrix

63

b

Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood 2016-17 DRF - Riccarton Leagues Club Change Room Upgrade Decision Matrix

65

c

Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Funding Matrix for Fendalton Bowling Club

66

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Lisa Gregory - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Matthew McLintock - Manager Community Governance, Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood

  


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

PDF Creator

 


Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board

26 June 2017

 

 

15.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.