Coastal-Burwood Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Coastal-Burwood Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 6 June 2017

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Kim Money

Tim Sintes

Tim Baker

David East

Glenn Livingstone

Linda Stewart

 

 

29 May 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Jo Wells

Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

941 6451

Jo.Wells@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Muka Park: Consultation on Future of the Flying Fox............................................... 11

C       7.       Standing Orders............................................................................................................. 21

C       8.       Code of Conduct............................................................................................................ 89

C       9.       Coastal-Burwood  Discretionary Response Fund Application - Senior Maori haerenga ki Rarotonga Cultural Youth Trip - June 2017............................................................... 121

C       10.     Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 Burwood/Pegasus Community Watch Radio Upgrade Project.................................................................................... 125

C       11.     Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 Kidsfirst Kindergartens South Brighton ....................................................................................................................... 129

C       12.     Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report................................................... 133

B       13.     Elected Members Information Exchange................................................................... 145

B       14.     Question Under Standing Orders............................................................................... 145 

 

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Coastal-Burwood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 15 May 2017 be confirmed(refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Boat Safety – Coastal-Burwood Ward Residents

James Ensor will speak on boat safety applicable to Coastal-Burwood ward residents.

 

4.2

Eastern Community Sport and Recreation

Thea Mickell of Eastern Community Sport and Recreation will speak to the Board regarding their lease application to Council.

 

4.3

Professional Disc Golf Association

Paul Deacon will speak on behalf of the Professional Disc Golf Association regarding their proposal to install a disc golf course in Rawhiti Domain.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

 

Coastal-Burwood Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Monday 15 May 2017

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Kim Money

Tim Sintes

Tim Baker

David East

Glenn Livingstone

Linda Stewart

 

 

11 May 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Jo Wells

Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

941 6451

Jo.Wells@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

Apologies

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00086

That the apology for lateness be received and accepted from Tim Sintes, who arrived at 4.38pm.

Kim Money/Tim Baker                                                                                                                                              Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

·    Glenn Livingstone declared an interest in item 7 - Application to Coastal-Burwood Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 - Parenting Week 2017 and also in a part of item 12 (public excluded) of the agenda

·    Kim Money declared an interest in a part of item 12 (public excluded) of the agenda.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00087

1.    That the minutes of the Coastal-Burwood Community Board meeting held on Monday, 1 May 2017 be confirmed, with the correction noted for the name of the organisation mention in item 4.2 – Deputations by Appointment to the correct name of PEEEP (People Empowerment and Environmental Enhancement Programme).

2.    That the minutes of the Board's Submissions Committee meeting of 23 April 2017 be received for information.

Tim Baker/Linda Stewart                                                                                                                                          Carried

            

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Dahlia Xander of Pregnancy Help Incorporated provided an update to the Board on the services and programmes offered by the organisation.

             Ms Xander noted that her organisation are currently looking for a more affordable facility to operate from and have a strong desire to remain based in the Coastal-Burwood area.

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00088

Part B

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.    Request staff to advise Pregnancy Help Incorporated on possible locations and funding possibilities.

Glenn Livingstone/Linda Stewart                                                                                                                         Carried

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.    

6.   South Brighton Domain Boardwalk and Carpark

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve the option to repair the existing damaged boardwalk and shore protection.

2.         Approve concept design for the Car Park Renewal

3.         Is informed that surplus budget from the Jetty and Boardwalk budgets will allow shoreline protection between the car park and the jetty and in front of the board walk to be enhanced.

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00089

Part C

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve the option to repair the existing damaged boardwalk, bridge and shore protection in accordance with the technical specifications in the OCEL Report.

2.         Approve concept design for the Car Park Renewal

3.         Is informed that surplus budget from the Jetty and Boardwalk budgets will allow shoreline protection between the car park and the jetty and in front of the board walk to be enhanced.

4.         Note that any surplus money will be applied to the South New Brighton Reserves Development Plan.

David East/Tim Sintes                                                                                                                                                Carried

 

Note: Tim Baker requested that his abstention be noted.

 

 



7.   Application to Coastal-Burwood Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 - Parenting Week 2017

 

 

Board Comment

The Board believed the application may have qualified for metropolitan funding, but noted that two other Community Boards had already approved their contributions towards the event.

 

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve a grant of $4,000 to the Neighbourhood Trust towards 2017 Parenting Week for  activities to be held in the Coastal and Burwood ward areas.

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00090

Part C

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approve a grant of $4,000 to the Neighbourhood Trust towards 2017 Parenting Week for activities to be held in the Coastal and Burwood ward areas.

2.         Note that staff will investigate the requirements around funding metropolitan projects and report back to the Board.

Tim Baker/Kim Money                                                                                                                                              Carried

 

8.   Application to the Coastal-Burwood Community Board Youth Development Scheme 2016-17 - Mikayla Cooper

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00091 Staff Recommendation accepted without change

Part C

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $300 from its 2016/17 Youth Development Fund to Mikayla Cooper towards attending the New Zealand National Hip Hop Dance Championships from 26-29 April in Auckland.

David East/Tim Baker                                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

9.   Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report

1.1      

9.1       Bridge Street Bridge Landscaping

The Board requested staff to investigate and report back on a timeline for the Bridge Street Bridge Landscaping.

9.2       The Old School New Brighton

The Board requested staff to arrange an update from the Old School New Brighton group to update the Board on plans for the operation of the former Central New Brighton School site.

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00092 Staff Recommendation accepted without change

Part B

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.             Receive the Area Update.

Tim Sintes/Linda Stewart                                                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

10. Elected Member Information Exchange

Part B

 

10.1    Tim Sintes spoke to a request he had received from the Pleasant Point Yacht Club for a letter of support from the Board to assist with their funding applications.

The Board agreed to write a letter of support to the Pleasant Point Yacht Club.

10.2    Location of Board Meetings

             The Board requested staff to investigate having a Board meeting every three months located in different parts of the Board area. Staff will report back to the Board with a proposal containing location options and dates.

10.3    New Zealand Community Boards Conference

             Kim Money and Tim Baker who attended the recent New Zealand Community Boards Conference in Methven reported back to the Board.

10.4    Natural Heritage

             The Board noted the lack of consultation planned for natural heritage items.  Staff were requested to investigate why natural heritage is not being consulted on and how consultation can occur.

10.5    Strengthfinders Workshop

             The Board noted the success of the recently held Strengthfinders workshop and requested staff to write a letter of thanks to Emma Chivers who ran the workshop.

10.6    Otautahi Community Housing Trust

             The Board requested staff to arrange a deputation from Otautahi Community Housing Trust to update the Board on the Trust’s activities.

10.7    Aquatic Facilities Plan

             The Board requested staff to provide an update on the Aquatic Facilities Plan.

11. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under Standing Orders at this meeting.

 

The meeting adjourned at 6.30pm. 

The meeting reconvened at 6.47pm.


 

 

12  Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Community Board Resolved CBCB/2017/00094

Part C

That at 6.47pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 62 to 63 of the agenda be adopted.

Kim Money/Tim Baker                                                                                                                                                Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 7.27pm

   

Meeting concluded at 7.29pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2017

 

Kim Money

Chairperson

   


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

6.        Muka Park: Consultation on Future of the Flying Fox

Reference:

17/421861

Contact:

Russel Wedge

Russel.wedge@ccc.govt.nz

941-8270

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board to approve Staff to consult with the residents in Prestons North subdivision on whether they would like the flying fox reinstated in Muka Park or for it to be permanently removed from the Park. The flying fox must comply with the District Plan noise standards.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board after the flying fox was dismantled due to breaches of the City Plan noise standards. Council staff have informally received numerous complaints from residents to reinstate the flying fox. A report in 2016 to the Community Board to consult with the residents on the future of the flying fox was withdrawn while other compliance issues were investigated by the Council. Those investigations have been completed and there are no other non-compliances.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined on the suggested thresholds for assessing criteria, which had a high level of community interest, associated cost, and risk involved with either option.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.    Following the completion of successful trials of alternative flying fox mechanisms, approve Staff to consult with residents in Prestons North subdivision on whether:

a.    the flying fox should be reinstated in Muka Park

or

b.    the flying fox is permanently removed from Muka Park and the height of the southern mound supporting the flying fox pole reduced to 1 metre above ground.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Neighbourhood Parks

·     Level of Service: 6.0.2 Customer satisfaction with the range of recreation facilities

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 –Approve Staff to consult with residents in Prestons North subdivision

·     Option 2 – Not to undertake public consultation with the residents in Prestons North

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Option 1)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     This option will provide information on whether the residents would like to retain the flying fox in Muka Park or have it permanently removed.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     There is a $15,000 cost associated with this option to trial a flying fox to ascertain if it complies with the District Plan noise standards.

4.4       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Option 2)

4.4.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Capital budget funding is not utilised.

4.4.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     This option may be in breach of the consultation clauses in the Local Government Act.

·     Local residents may feel aggrieved if they believe they have not had the opportunity to give their opinion on whether they would like the flying fox in their local park retained or removed.

 

5.   Background

Muka Park

5.1       The Muka Park and playground were planned as part of a green corridor concept in a subdivision Outline Development Plan (ODP) proposed by Ngai Tahu Property Limited, pre-2010 Christchurch earthquakes.

5.2       The playground in Muka Park was designed as the centre piece or showcase, for the Prestons North subdivision. It is centrally located in the subdivision with a smaller playground to the north and another smaller one to the south. The Muka Park playground has a range of activities including the flying fox, half-court, skate path, slide, supernova, tyre swing, spica and balancing poles.

5.3       Muka Park, within Prestons subdivision has its own zoning within the District Plan, Living G (Prestons) Zone. The parks in the Prestons development do not contravene rules in the District Plan.

5.4       The flying fox in Muka Park was opened to the public on the 6th January 2016, under the control of Ngai Tahu Property Limited. The playground was handed over to Council as a Council asset in June 2016.

Noise Complaints – Flying Fox

5.5       On 15 February 2016 the Council’s Environmental Health Officer received a complaint from a person about the noise generated by the flying fox. The Environmental Health officer went out to Muka Park and measured the noise from the flying fox at 7.10 pm – 8.10 pm. The flying fox was in breach of the acceptable noise limits (refer Attachment A). Ngai Tahu Property Limited were notified of the breach of the City Plan.

5.6       On 22 February 2016 a second noise complaint was received by the Council’s Environmental Health Officer about the noise generated by the flying fox. The Environmental Health officer measured the noise levels at 2.30 pm – 3.00 pm. The flying fox was in breach of the acceptable noise limits (refer Attachment B). Ngai Tahu Property Limited were notified of the breach of the City Plan.

5.7       There are no rules in the District Plan that relate to regulating noise levels from children playing in a playground or park.

5.8       The cable and pulley mechanism from the flying fox were removed as a result of the noise complaints, which disabled the flying fox. A different type of pulley mechanism on the flying fox was trialled at Muka Park, but the noise generated by the mechanism exceeded the noise limits from the previous model. The pulley and cable were removed. After further investigations into types of cable and pulley mechanisms it was decided in conjunction with Ngai Tahu Properties Limited, who were still managing the playground as part of the subdivision development to remove the flying fox.

5.9       Council staff were contacted by the people who had complained about the noise generated by the flying fox. A site meeting was held with these people at the beginning of May 2016 where staff agreed after consulting with Ngai Tahu Property Limited to put out an information flyer. The flyer advised residents that the flying fox had breached the City Plan noise standards, a different pulley system had been trialled but still failed the noise standards. Therefore the flying fox would be removed and the eastern mound supporting the flying fox pole would be reduced in height.

5.10    On 24 May 2016 an Information leaflet produced by the Council was delivered to residents of Prestons North. The leaflet advised the flying fox had breached the City Plan noise limits and attempts to reduce the noise had been unsuccessful. The flying fox was therefore going to be removed and the area re-landscaped.

5.11    Upon residents receiving notification the flying fox was to be removed the Council received over a dozen phone calls and emails complaining about the removal of the flying fox. Numerous comments were made on the Preston residents Facebook and a petition was circulated by some of the residents to keep the flying fox. All of the comments, messages and signatures on the petition wanted the flying fox to be retained. All of the comments and messages received by the Council were not part of any formal Council Staff consultation with the community.

Ownership of Muka Park Playground

5.12    The Muka Park playground was designed and constructed under the Resource Consent process for the subdivision by Ngai Tahu Property Limited with the approval of Council. Muka Park is located within a sub-stage of Stage 2 of the subdivision development. The timing of construction within the Stages and sub-stages of this subdivision was managed by the developer, Ngai Tahu Property Limited. The development of Muka Park including the playground was not started until the last sub-stage in Stage 2, although the planning and approval process for the park and playground had commenced during the early stages of the development.

5.13    A consequence of the late playground construction start and being located next to other sub-stages where residential properties had already sold, resulted in the construction of houses commencing before the playground. In subdivisions the playground is usually completed before any titles are issued or building commences of residential properties within the vicinity of a park.

5.14    Muka Park was handed over to the Council in June 2016 and is within the Council Delegations of the Community Board for any landscape changes to a Council park.

Alternative Locations for Flying Fox within Prestons Subdivision

5.15    If the noise levels generated by the flying fox in Muka Park cannot be reduced by using a different cable and pulley mechanism, staff will relocate the flying fox to another park where there is a greater distance between the residential properties and the flying fox. The noise levels generated by the flying fox mechanism usually diminish for the adjoining residential properties as the distance increases and other surrounding noises such as traffic noises can dilute the noise levels of the flying fox mechanism. There are no other suitable locations within Prestons North that can provide a greater distance between the boundary of residential properties and the flying fox at Muka Park.

5.16    One of the new parks under development in Prestons Park (south of Prestons Road) is being considered as a possible location for a flying fox where there is a significant distance between the residential properties and playground. If the Muka Park flying fox was to be removed it would be put in storage until the park that is being developed could accommodate the flying fox.

5.17    The report in 2016 scheduled for the Community Board seeking approval to commence public consultation on whether to retain or remove the flying fox in Muka Park was put on hold until other compliance issues had been investigated by the Council. As a result of those investigations the Council’s compliance unit is satisfied there are no other non-compliances.


 

6.   Option 1 – To approve Staff to consult with residents in Prestons North subdivision.

Option Description

6.1       To approve Staff to consult with residents in Prestons North subdivision on whether they would like the flying fox in Muka Park reinstated, or to have the flying fox removed permanently and the height of the southern mound supporting the flying fox pole reduced to 1 metre above the ground.

6.2       The operation of the flying fox must comply with the District Plan noise standards for both day time and evening use. If the day-time use is compliant but the operation in the evenings is non-compliant (the noise standards levels are lower during the evenings than during the day-time) the flying fox would need to be disabled during the evenings. For example the flying fox could be disabled by locking up the pulley each evening. This would need further investigation as to how this could be achieved and the costs associated with this action.

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.4       Engagement requirements for this level of significance will include a letterbox drop, on-site signage and social media.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

6.6       Ngai Tahu Property Limited have been consulted throughout this process.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7       This report is requesting the Community Board to agree to Staff undertaking consultation with the community. Council staff will provide an information leaflet with a feedback form, information on the Council website and ‘Have Your Say’. The community’s comments will be collated and presented to the Community Board at a future meeting.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation – there is an estimated cost of $15,000 to trial a different flying fox cable and pulley mechanism from funds within the Parks Unit Capital Budget for playgrounds. This trial cost will be required to determine a different flying fox mechanism and pulley would be compliant with the District Plan’s noise standards.

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – the maintenance of the playground has already been included in the Council’s maintenance contracts. There will be no significant increases in the maintenance contract from any alterations to the existing playground.

6.11    Funding source – is through the Parks Unit Capital Budget for playgrounds to trial a new flying fox cable and mechanism, or the Operational Budget if any alterations to the maintenance of the playground are required.

Legal Implications

6.12    It is illegal to operate a flying fox if it breaches the District Plan noise standards. The flying fox in the Muka Park playground can only be reinstated if it is compliant with the District Plan rules.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.13    After public consultation has been completed and presented to the Community Board there is a risk some residents in the Prestons North subdivision will not agree with the Board’s decision.

6.14    There are two groups of residents in the Prestons North subdivision who have opposing views on whether the flying fox should be retained or removed. One group will not be pleased with the Community Board’s decision on whether the flying fox remains or is removed permanently.

6.15    A robust community consultation process will be undertaken that will provide residents with the opportunity to vote on whether they would like the flying fox to be retained or removed, providing it complies with the District Plan noise standards.

6.16    Residents will also have the opportunity to make a deputation to the Community Board if they would like to voice their concerns on the future of the flying fox in Muka Park. All of these measures will reduce the risks of the community not having an opportunity to provide their opinions to the Council on the future of the flying fox in their local park.

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies – a flying fox cable and mechanism will need to be obtained and trialled, which will cost approximately $15,000. The results of the trail will be reported to a future Community Board meeting.  If the cable and pulley mechanism are compliant there are no further implementation dependencies.

6.18    Implementation timeframe – the trial of the replacement cable and pulley mechanism at Muka Park will be completed and the results included in a report to a future Community Board meeting.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·   This option will provide information on whether the residents want to retain the flying fox or not.

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   There is a $15,000 cost associated with this option to trial a flying fox to ascertain if it complies with the District Plan noise standard.

7.   Option 2 – Not to undertake public consultation with the residents in Prestons North

Option Description

7.1       To not consult with the residents in Prestons North subdivision on whether they would like the flying fox in Muka Park reinstated or permanently removed and the height of the southern mound supporting the flying fox pole reduced to 1 metre above ground.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       There are no engagement requirement.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

7.5       Ngai Tahu Property Limited have been consulted throughout this process.

Community Views and Preferences

7.6       This option is not to consult with the residents in Prestons North subdivision on the future of the flying fox at Muka Park.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.7       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies to consult with the community.

Financial Implications

7.8       Cost of Implementation – there is no further cost implementation if the Community Board determines not to consult with the local community and leave the Park as it is.

7.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – The maintenance of the playground has already been included in the Council’s maintenance contracts. There will be no significant increases in the maintenance contract from any alterations to the existing playground.

7.10    Funding source – there are no future Capital Budget costs associated with this option.

Legal Implications

7.11    If the Community Board determines not to consult with the local community there may be compliance concerns raised as to whether the Board’s decision is compliant with the consultation rules in the Local Government Act.

7.12    It is illegal to operate the flying fox if it breaches the District Plan noise standards. If the flying fox in the Muka Park playground is non-compliant with the District Plan rules it cannot be re-instated.

Risks and Mitigations  

7.13    There is a high risk the Community Board may be in breach of some of the consultation rules within the Local Government Act if it determines not to consult with the local residents on the issue of whether the flying fox in Muka Park should be reinstated or not.

7.14    There are two groups of residents in the Prestons North subdivision who have opposing views on whether the flying fox should be retained or removed.

7.15    Residents would not have an opportunity to make a deputation to the Community Board if they would like to voice their concerns on the future of the flying fox in Muka Park.

Implementation

7.16    Implementation dependencies – there are no implementation dependencies if the Community Board determines not to consult.

7.17    Implementation timeframe – there are no implementation timeframes if the Community Board determines not to consult.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Capital budget funding is not utilised.

7.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   This option may be in breach of the consultation clauses in the Local Government Act.

·   Local residents may be aggrieved if they believe they have not had the opportunity to give their opinion on the future of the flying fox in their local park.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Noise Assessment Flying Fox for Muka Park Dated 15 February 2016

19

b

Noise Assessment Flying Fox Muka Park Dated 22 February 2016

20

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Russel Wedge - Senior Network Planner Parks

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

7.        Standing Orders

Reference:

17/521371

Contact:

Ian Thomson

Ian.thomson@ccc.govt.nz

941 6469

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       To recommend to the Board that it replaces its current set of Standing Orders with the new set attached to the report.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Receives the information in the report.

2.         Adopts the set of Standing Orders attached to the report, replacing the Board’s current Standing Orders.

3.         Resolves whether or not the Chairperson of the Board is to have a casting vote.

4.         Authorises the Chief Executive to approve any non-material changes that may be required before the new Standing Orders are published.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       All local authorities must adopt a set of Standing Orders for the conduct of its meetings and those of its committees (cl. 27(1), schedule 7 LGA 2002).

3.2       This requirement also applies to Community Boards (s. 54(2).

3.3       The Council’s current Standing Orders are based on a New Zealand standards model, last revised in 2003.

3.4       In 2015 Local Government NZ set up a working party to review the model and to develop its own template.  This was made available to local authorities in September 2016.

3.5       Council staff reviewed the template and made a number of changes they believed would best suit the Council’s needs.  Their draft, and an explanatory note, were distributed to all elected members (the governing body and Community Boards) in November 2016.

3.6       Since then a number of comments have been received and, where appropriate, reflected in the draft.  The Council adopted new Standing Orders on 6 April 2016.

3.7       The Council also requested that each Community Board replaces its current set of Standing Orders with the Standing Orders adopted by the Council.  These are attached to this report.

3.8       Each Board has the opportunity to decide whether or not a Chairperson is to have a casting vote (cl. 24, schedule 7 LGA 2002).  Unless Standing Orders provide otherwise matters are decided by majority vote and, in the case of a tie, there is no casting vote for the Chairperson.

3.9       The Standing Orders adopted by the Council on 6 April provide that a Council and Committee Chairperson does not have a casting vote but that this is a matter for each Community Board to decide on.

3.10    It is recommended that the Board adopts the Standing Orders attached to this report, and resolves whether or not the Chairperson is to have a casting vote.

3.11    The adoption of a new set of Standing Orders requires a vote of not less than 75% of members present.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Standing Orders 6 April 2017

23

 

 

Signatories

Author

Ian  Thomson - Senior Legal Advisor, Governance

Approved By

Rob Goldsbury - Head of Legal Services

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

8.        Code of Conduct

Reference:

17/520881

Contact:

Ian Thomson

Ian.thomson@ccc.govt.nz

941 6469

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       To recommend to the Board that it adopts the Code of Conduct attached to the report, replacing its current Code of Conduct.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Receives the information in the report.

2.         Adopts the Code of Conduct attached to the report, replacing the Board’s current Code of Conduct.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       Clause 15, schedule 7 of the Local Government Act (LGA) 2002 requires the Council to adopt a Code of Conduct.

3.2       This must set out:

3.2.1   understandings and expectations about the manner in which members may conduct themselves while acting in their capacity as members, including:

·     their behaviour towards one another, staff, and the public; and

·     the disclosure of information, including documents provided to elected members in their capacity as elected members, and which relate to how the Council gives effect to any provision of the LGA 2002.

3.3       The Code must also contain a general explanation of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and any other enactment or rule of law applicable to members.

3.4       The Mayor and Councillors must comply with the Council’s Code of Conduct, although a breach of the Code does not constitute an offence under the Act (cl. 15, schedule 7 LGA 2002).

3.5       The Council adopted a new Code of Conduct on 4 May 2017.

3.6       At the same time the Council requested that each Community Board replaces its current Code of Conduct with the Code of Conduct adopted by the Council.

3.7       The previous Code had been due for an overhaul, particularly with regard to the process for dealing with an alleged breach. In October 2016, LGNZ distributed to all local authorities a template for a new Code.  Staff reviewed the template and made a number of changes they believed best suited the Council’s needs.  Their draft, and an explanatory note, were provided to all elected members (the governing body and Community Boards) in November 2016.

3.8       As a result of that, a number of comments were received (including from Community Boards) and, where appropriate, reflected in the document adopted by the Council.

3.9       The LGA requirement to adopt a Code of Conduct does not apply to Community Boards (s. 54(2).  However the Community Boards in the Christchurch City Council district all adopted the Council’s previous Code of Conduct.

3.10    This is important for consistency across the organisation.  For example some Council staff, as part of their employment by the Council, have regular contact with Community Board members.  Comments made about staff by those members may create the same issues as comments made by Council members, and should be treated the same.

3.11    Also, the positive aspects of having a Code of Conduct apply as much to a Community Board as they do to the Council, particularly with regard to the community’s interest in the Boards’ governance practices.

3.12    It is recommended therefore that the Coastal-Burwood Community Board adopts the Code of Conduct attached to this report, replacing the Board’s current Code of Conduct.

3.13    Adopting a new Code of Conduct for the Council requires a vote of at least 75% of members present (cl. 15(7), schedule 7 LGA 2002).  It is recommended this should apply to the Board’s vote as well.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Code of Conduct - Community Board Draft - May 2017

91

 

 

Signatories

Author

Ian  Thomson - Senior Legal Advisor, Governance

Approved By

Rob Goldsbury - Head of Legal Services

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

9.        Coastal-Burwood  Discretionary Response Fund Application - Senior Maori haerenga ki Rarotonga Cultural Youth Trip - June 2017

Reference:

17/482442

Contact:

Natalie Dally

Natalie.dally@ccc.govt.nz

941 5236

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund.

 

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

00056243

T L Hay & S J Rangihuna - Account opened on behalf of Fundraising group - Senior Maori haerenga ki Rarotonga

Senior Maori Haerenga ki Rarotonga.

$2,450

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board in considering an application for funding from T L Hay & S J Rangihuna for the Shirley Boys High School Senior Youth Maori haerenga (trip)  ki Rarotonga, for seven of the youth particpants who live in the Coastal-Burwood ward.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $2,450 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to T L Hay & S J Rangihuna towards the Senior Maori haerenga ki Rarotonga, for youth participants living in the Coastal and Burwood wards.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$72,524

$36,756

$36,756

$34,306

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Coastal-Burwood DRF Decision Matrix June 2017 - T.L Hay  and S.J Ragihuna - Maori haerenga ki Rarotonga - Shirley Boys High School

123

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Natalie Dally - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

10.    Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 Burwood/Pegasus Community Watch Radio Upgrade Project

Reference:

17/426892

Contact:

Heather Davies

Heather.davies@ccc.govt.nz

941 5314

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

56220

Burwood/Pegasus Community Watch

Radio Upgrade

$5,261

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Burwood/Pegasus Community Watch

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund of $5,261 to Burwood/Pegasus Community Watch towards the radio upgrade project.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$72,524

$30,768

$41,756

$36,495

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

DRF 2016/17 Decision Matrix Burwood /Pegasus Community Watch Radio Upgrade

127

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

11.    Coastal-Burwood Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 Kidsfirst Kindergartens South Brighton

Reference:

17/510633

Contact:

Heather Davies

heather.davies@ccc.govt.nz

941 5314

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Coastal-Burwood Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

56279

Kidsfirst Kindergarten South Brighton

Rejuvenation of Kindergarten

$4,277

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Kidsfirst Kindergartens South Brighton.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $3,500 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Kidsfirst Kindergarten South Brighton towards the rejuvenation of the kindergarten project.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$72,524

$35,768.30

$36,755.70

$33,255.70

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Kidsfirst Kindergarten South Brighton Deciion Matrix

131

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

12.    Coastal-Burwood Community Board Area Report

Reference:

17/485900

Contact:

Jo Wells

jo.wells@ccc.govt.nz

941 6451

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to resource the Community Board to promote a pro-active partnership approach to decision-making between the Council and Community Boards working together to achieve the best outcomes for the city with decisions being made with a good understanding of community views.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Coastal-Burwood Community Board:

1.             Receive the Area Update.

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Community Board Plan update against outcomes

It is anticipated that the Community Board Plan will be reviewed and updated and come into effect from 1 July 2017.   

The Community Board Plan sets the framework that will guide the Boards decision making and actions for the next two years.  It informs the Board’s decisions on local activities and enables the Board to make decisions on funding and Long Term Plan priorities. 

 

Our communities have told us their views on many issues over the past years as part of the development of a wide range of council plans. This information, as well as information received through specific engagements will be used in developing this Plan.    

 

3.2       Memos/Information reporting back on Community Board matters

3.2.1     Bryan and Colleen Fairbairn

On 18 April 2017, the Board requested staff to consider providing Bryan and Colleen Fairbairn with one Red and four Green waste bins to be placed on site to assist them in their voluntary work in maintaining a portion of red zoned land in Avonside.

 

In discussion with Mr Fairbairn, the bins are now not needed at this time of the year and also because Land Information New Zealand has organised a rubbish pick-up service from the land being maintained.  Mr Fairbairn will advise if circumstances change.

3.2.2     Tern Street

On 3 April 2017, the Board requested a review of the Tern Street western barrier to enable better access for people to the Estuary, and that minimum roading and footpath repairs be carried out to enable safe access to the Estuary.

 

Staff have commenced installing a sealed pathway on the south side of the western portion of Tern Street from Rocking Horse Road through to the estuary.  See photo below.


 

 

 

 

 

Work has begun to install a path on Tern Street

 

3.2.3      New Brighton Pier

 

             Repairs are complete on column one, with repairs currently underway on columns two-four. Preparation is underway for starting work on column five. Crack repairs are also taking place on the access ramp

 

Fulton Hogan are fine tuning their temporary works and how best to sink the caissons (large temporary structures which will allow dry access for the actual repairs to the columns).

 

Works are still proceeding within budget and still forecasting to complete in Feb 2018. A selection of photos detailing work on the Pier are below:

Completed repair on column one

Typical damage found

 

Repair work underway, showing arrangements for jetting the caissons down

 

 


 

3.2.4     Community Board Conference 12-13 May 2017

The attendance of two Board members and staff at the recent Community Board Conference in Methven is noted. Presentations from the conference are available online (refer link below)

http://www.lgnz.co.nz/nzs-local-government/community-boards/community-board-conference/2017-cbec-conference/

 

3.2.5      Tour of the Styx River

A tour of the Styx River from the Source to the Sea took place on Friday 19 May. Participants included Papanui-Innes, Coastal-Burwood and Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board members, members of the Board of the Styx Living Laboratory Trust and relevant staff.

3.2.6      Outwards Correspondence

·     Emma Chivers – Thank you for recent Strengthfinders Workshop (Attachment A).

·     Pleasant Point Yacht Club – Letter of Support (Attachment B).

3.3       The provision of strategic technical and procedural advice to the Community Board

Nil to report.

3.4       Board area Consultations/Engagement

Current Consultations in the Coastal-Burwood Board Area:

·     Additional Information: Horseshoe Lake Reserve Earthquake rebuild – path relocation, car park and bridge removal. Open for feedback from 22 May 2017 – 9 June 2017.

·     Knights Drain – Proposed wetland and landscape plan. Open for feedback from 17 May 2017 – 7 June 2017.

 

3.5       Submission Opportunities

Nil to report.


 

3.6       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

Draft Annual Plan 2017/18 submitted by the Board.

3.7       Development of Civil Defence Emergency Plans

A workshop will be arranged for the Community Board to discuss how the Board can support the community in disasters including the possibility of developing a Board-wide Community Response Plan and increasing community education and awareness. The level of the project and what role the Board wish to have in leading these will be the focus of the first workshop. Local staff met with three of the Councils Civil Defence Emergency Management Team to let the team know that the Community Board would be considering the development of a plan for the Coastal and Burwood ward areas around preparedness and response in disasters. This initial staff meeting was to assist in gathering background information, to co-ordinate approaches to the community and to consider shared resourcing. The CDEM team will come along to Board meetings around the project as requested and share in community consultations as the project develops.

3.8       Requests for information from Board meeting on Newsline

Members are invited to consider items for inclusion in Newsline.

3.9       Significant Board matters of interest to raise at Council

Board members are requested to highlight significant matters from the meeting to be raised by the Chair at the next Council Meeting (Community Board reports) on Thursday 15 June.

4.   Key Local Projects (KLPs) and Strengthening Communities Funded Projects

 

4.1       Strengthening Communities Fund

 

The Strengthening Communities Fund opens on Monday 8 May and closes midnight Tuesday 6 June, all groups are encouraged to apply.

 

4.2       Summer with your Neighbours – Neighbourhood Week

 

Summer with your Neighbours - Neighbourhood Week will be held from Friday 27 October to the end of March coinciding with Neighbours Day Aotearoa. This change has come about from feedback from a number of applicants who are unable to hold events during the week previously dedicated to Neighbourhood Week, due to the weather or neighbours being busy in the lead up to Christmas. Funding will be available for the whole summer. Applications will still be called for in July, with a closing date of late August/early September and then final applications being presented to Community Boards for decision in late September/early October.

 

5.   Significant Community Issues

5.1       Styx Information Sharing

Status: The Papanui-Innes Community Board and council staff have held a number of facilitated meetings with the community concerning issues pertaining to the Styx under the umbrella of the Styx Catchment Information Sharing Group.

 

Action: Council is planning to hold a meeting on Wednesday the 14th of June at 4.30 pm at the Spencerville Community Centre to consult with the local Styx Community with the aim of establishing a Styx Working Party to continue and build on the ongoing dialogue between the local community and the Council on issues pertaining to the Styx.

 

Timeframe: Ongoing. It is hoped that representatives from the local community will find the time to commit to working together with elected members from Papanui-Innes and Coastal-Burwood Wards within the proposed "Styx Working party" framework.

6.   Major Community and/or Infrastructure Projects

6.1       Community Facilities

No updates to report.

6.2       Partnerships with the community and organisations

No updates to report.

6.3       Infrastructure projects underway

No updates to report.

6.4       Events Report Back

Coastal-Burwood Community Board Ward Tour

On 22 May the Coastal-Burwood Community Board hosted the Mayor, several Councillors and members of other Community Boards on a Ward tour. The trip encompassed from Southshore to Brooklands and points in between. The photos show site visits to the South Brighton Boardwalk on the estuary edge, the QEII Recreation and Sport Centre which is under construction and the Spencer Park Surf Life Saving Club which is also under construction.


A selection of photos from the tour are included below:

Image may contain: sky, ocean, outdoor, nature and water

QEII Rebuild beginning

 

 

Image may contain: ocean, sky, bridge, outdoor, nature and water

New Brighton Pier, currently being earthquake repaired but will remain open to the public

 

Image may contain: tree, grass, sky, outdoor and nature

Styx River weeding

Image may contain: sky, cloud and outdoor

Spencer Park Surf Lifesaving Club rebuild

 

Image may contain: sky, ocean, outdoor and nature

The South Brighton Boardwalk repair is soon to begin

 

Horseshoe Lake Reserve – path relocation, car park and bridge removal open for feedback

 

Image may contain: sky, outdoor and water

Development Christchurch Limited (DCL) CEO Rob Hall updated the group about the upgrade to the whale pool play area which is about to begin

7.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

7.1       Local Parks Update

The next report will be received in June.

8.   Community Board funding budget overview and clarification

8.1       The budget information for the Board’s Discretionary Response and Positive Youth Development funds is attached, refer Attachment C.

8.2       Strengthening Communities funding opened on 8 May and closes 6 June. Community Governance staff are available to assist community groups with applications.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Outwards Correspondence - Emma Chivers

142

b

Outwards Correpsondence - Pleasant Point Yacht Club - Letter of Support

143

c

2016-19 Coastal-Burwood Board Funding Update

144

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Katie MacDonald - Community Support Officer

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

Natalie Dally - Community Development Advisor

Heather Davies - Community Development Advisor

Jacqui Miller - Community Recreation Advisor

Peter Croucher - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jo Wells - Manager Community Governance, Coastal-Burwood

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

PDF Creator

 


Coastal-Burwood Community Board

06 June 2017

 

 

13.  Elected Members Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

14.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.