Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 10 February 2017

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                  Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

3 February 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

Part A         Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies....................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................ 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes.............................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment...................................................................... 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions.............................................................................. 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Tuckers Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction............................ 15

C       7.       Hills Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction.................................. 21

C       8.       Sturrocks Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction......................... 27

C       9.       Shannon Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions........................ 33

C       10.     Cranford Street Proposed Traffic Island........................................... 39

C       11.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Shirley Toy Library Inc................... 45

C       12.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Papanui Youth Development ....... 49

C       13.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Meeting Arrangements - 2016/2019 Term................................................................................. 53

C       14.     2017 Community Board Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons Workshop........................................................................................... 57

C       15.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report............................... 59

B       16.     Elected Member Information Exchange.................................................... 72

B       17.     Question Under Standing Orders............................................................... 72 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

1.    Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.    Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.    Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting, both open and closed, held on Friday, 9 December 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.    Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Kathleen Crisley will speak to the Board regarding problems with exiting traffic from Northlands Shopping Centre at the traffic light intersection with Halliwell Avenue.

 

4.2

Caroline Shone, Chief Executive Officer will speak on behalf of Community Energy Action regarding the services provided to residents within the constituencies. 

 

5.    Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

 

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 9 December 2016

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                  Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

8 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A         Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.    Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.    Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.    Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00033

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 be confirmed.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                   Carried

 

4.    Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1      Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Eloise Clark

            Eloise Clark attended to report back to the Board on her participation in the Papanui High School Cultural Tour of Japan in September 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Eloise Clark for her report.

 

4.2      Sigjaws Charitable Trust – Gary Watts

            Mr Watts sent an apology.

 

5.    Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

6.    Stapletons Road Proposed No Stopping

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Dudley Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Warden Street;

2.        Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction to for a distance of 110 metres;

3.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 440 metres;

4.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres;

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00034

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Dudley Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Warden Street;

2.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction to for a distance of 110 metres;

3.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 440 metres;

4.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres;

5.      Request that staff arrange for individual flyer communication with affected residents to be distributed as soon as possible and include the background details and reasons for this change.

 

Member Byrne/Member Davidson                                                                                            Carried

 


 

 

7.    Main North Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00035

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Main North Road commencing at a point 266 metres north of its intersection with Barnes Road and extending in a northerly direction, along the exit lane, for a distance of 104 metres.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                    Carried

 

 

 

 

8.    Glenfield Crescent Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00036

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on south-western side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at its intersection with Roslyn Avenue and extending in a north-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a north-easterly direction for a distance of 92.5 metres;

2.        Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the south-eastern side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at its intersection with Bronwyn Street and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a distance of 132 metres;

3.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-western side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at a point 62.5 metres north-west of its intersection with Roslyn Avenue and extending in a north-westerly, then following the kerbline to a north-easterly direction for a distance of 30 metres;

4.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-eastern side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at a point 100 metres south-west of its intersection with Bronwyn Street and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Byrne                                                                           Carried

 

 


 

 

 

9.    Blighs Road Proposed Lane Alterations

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Approve the road marking changes on Blighs Road as shown on Attachment G.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00037

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve the road marking changes on Blighs Road as shown on Option 8, Attachment G.

2.      Request that staff carry out a video audit of the relevant part of Blighs Road approaching Papanui Road before Christmas to be repeated in February 2017 when schools return and report back to the Board in March 2017.

Member Stringer/Member Cotter                                                                                             Carried

 

 

 

10. St Albans New Community Centre - Cladding

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Receive the information in the Proposed New St Albans Community Centre – Cladding Options report.

2.        Approve the cladding option presented by staff for the new St Albans Community centre.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00038

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Receive the information in the Proposed New St Albans Community Centre – Cladding Options report.

2.        Request that staff proceed with timber and steel claddings to the St Albans Community Centre as proposed on sheets p02-04/05/06 of the concept drawings and the final finishings to be presented to the Papanui-Innes Community Board Working Party.

3.        Request that the updated concept drawings be shared in the first instance with the community working party with an explanation of how the design was reached and then communicated more widely to the community.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                    Carried

 

 

11. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Papanui Leagues Club

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Approves a grant of $15,000 to Papanui Leagues Club Inc. towards the maintenance of their existing lights.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00039

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve a grant to the Papanui Leagues Club Inc. of $15,000, with $10,000 to be paid immediately and the balance of $5,000 to be paid to them in late March 2017.

Member Cotter/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                         Carried

 

Member Byrne left the meeting at 10:09 am.   Member Byrne returned to the meeting at 10:11 am.

 

12. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00040

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve a grant of $2,000 to QEII Swim Club Incorporated towards pool hire.

 

Member Byrne/Member Cotter                                                                                                 Carried

Note: Member Davidson voted against the motion.

 

13. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Community Pride Garden Awards

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00041

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve a grant of up to $3,500 to Papanui-Innes Community Board towards the costs of holding the Papanui‑Innes Community Garden Pride Awards.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Cotter                                                                         Carried

 

14. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Claudia Jane Rogers

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00042

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve a grant of $500 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Claudia Jane Rogers towards costs of attending the Christchurch School of Gymnastics development tour of United States of America in February 2017.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                    Carried

 

15. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00043

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to receive the report.

Member Davidson/Member Byrne                                                                                            Carried

 

15.1    10 Shirley Road Community Facility Rebuild

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00044

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Approve the recommendation that the site of the new permanent Shirley Community Centre be confirmed as the existing site (10 Shirley Road).

Member Byrne/Member Davidson                                                                                           Carried

 

15.2    Papanui-Innes Community Board Meeting Arrangements

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00045

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved:

1.        To hold their first meeting of 2017 on Friday 10 February at 9am in the Papanui Boardroom.

Member Byrne/Member Cotter                                                                                                Carried

 


 

 

15.3    Redwood Plunket Rooms

            The Board considered a Memorandum from Community Governance staff tabled at the meeting regarding the community need for the use of the Redwood Plunket Rooms.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00046

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

         1.        Receive the memorandum regarding the community need for the use of the Redwood Plunket Rooms.

         2.        Request that staff arrange for the Redwood Plunket rooms located in Redwood Park to be repaired for community use and that further information on this project be provided to a March 2017 meeting of the Community Board.

Note:          This resolution is in recognition that the Community Board funded community worker through the Belfast Community Network needs to be based in the local area in a suitable building.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                   Carried

 

15.4    St Albans Transitional Community Facility

The Board considered a memorandum from Community Governance staff tabled at the meeting regarding the future use of the Lions International Foundation Transitional Community Facility currently located at 1049 Colombo Street.

The Lions Club International Foundation have expressed their preference for gifting the Transitional Facility to the community, through the Council, on the condition that the Council redeploy the building for a similar community in an area where the earthquake damaged community buildings. 

The Papanui-Innes Community Board notes that the Shirley community is in need of a new community centre in the MacFarlane Park area.

The memorandum recommended that this matter be dealt with in two stages as follows:

a)         Removal of the St Albans Transitional Community Facility from its location in Colombo Street to MacFarlane Park for use as a community facility to fulfil needs. This will include the finalisation of arrangements with the Lions International Foundation to gift the building to the Council to hold the building in a guardianship role on behalf of the community.

b)         Placement of the facility with the proviso that the building contains an activation element which will be negotiated by staff with the relevant local community organisations.

 

Community Board Decided PICB/2016/00047

Part A

            The Papanui-Innes Community Board recommends that the Council:

1.         Accepts the gift of the Lions International Foundation St Albans Transitional Community Facility currently located at 1049 Colombo Street, St Albans for the use of the community.

2.         Agrees to the Lions International Foundation St Albans Transitional Community Facility being relocated to MacFarlane Park for use of the local Shirley community prior to June 2017.

3.         Delegates to the Papanui-Innes Community Board the authority to collaborate with the relevant Shirley community stakeholders to ensure the building is activated for ongoing site‑specific public participation.

Member Cotter/Member Byrne                                                                                                Carried

 

 

16. Papanui-Innes Community Board Recess Committee 2016/17

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00048

(Staff Recommendations accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.        Appoint a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson (or their nominees from the Board), to be authorised to exercise the delegated powers of the Papanui-Innes Community Board for the period following its ordinary meeting on 9 December 2016 up until the Board resumes normal business on 10 February 2016.

2.        Agree that the application of any such delegation be reported back to the Board for record purposes.

3.        Note that any meeting of the Recess Committee will be publicised and details forwarded to all Board members.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Stringer                                                                       Carried

 

 

 

19. Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00049

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely “St Albans Community Centre – Related Issues” under Section 7(2)(B)(ii) Prejudice Commercial Position and 7(2)(i) Conduct Negotiations.

Member Davidson/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                    Carried

 

 

The public were readmitted to the meeting at 10:37am.

 

17. Elected Member Information Exchange

Part B

There was no information exchanged at this meeting.

18. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under Standing Orders at this meeting.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 10:55am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017.

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

   


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

6.       Tuckers Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

16/1148626

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Tuckers Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report staff generated in response to requests from a resident in the area.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Tuckers Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres;

2.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Tuckers Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·      Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·      Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Improve capacity on Tuckers Road

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by separating turning traffic

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Removes 1 car parking space

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1      Tuckers Road is a collector road off Main North Road.  It has a combined traffic calming speed table and narrowing approximately 35 metres west of the Main North Road intersection.  The road is 9 metres wide at this location.  After this, Tuckers Road is 13.5 metres wide.

5.2      At the intersection of Tuckers Road and Main North Road the centreline marking is 6.5m from the kerb on the northern side.  This width allows both a left and right turner to wait beside each other at the intersection.  Main North Road is a busy major arterial road and right turners can be waiting at this intersection for a considerable amount of time.

5.3      Presently there is room for one car to park between the speed table and the Main North Road intersection.  This blocks left turning traffic from accessing the intersection if two or more right turning cars are waiting.  It is proposed to remove this car parking space to free up the access to the Main North Road intersection.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1      Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Tuckers Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5      Affected residents on Tuckers Road and Main North Road were sent consultation letters on Thursday 1 December and were asked to respond by Friday 16 December 2016.

6.6      No residents responded to the letter.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8      Cost of Implementation - $100

6.9      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.14    None identified.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Improves capacity on Tuckers Road;

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by separating turning traffic.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes one car park.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1      Tuckers Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5      See section 6.5 and 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7      Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9      Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations   

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains one car park.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the limited access for left turners on Tuckers Road.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Tuckers Road Proposed No Stopping Plan - Attachment A

20

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

7.       Hills Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

16/1372467

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Hills Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report staff generated in response to request from a resident in the area.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with East Ellington Drive and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12.5 metres.

2.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with East Ellington Drive and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12.5 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·      Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·      Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Removes one car parking space

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1      The intersection of Hills Road and East Ellington Drive is a T-intersection and is controlled by a Give Way sign on East Ellington Drive.  Therefore, Hills Road has priority over East Ellington Drive.  The main movement is actually the turning movement out of East Ellington Drive rather than the straight through movement.  The subdivision accessed by East Ellington Drive is now substantially full and the Diana Isaac Retirement Village is accessed off East Ellington Drive as well. 

5.2      This area is not heavily parked except when there are sports on at Walter Park or events on at Mairehau High School.  During these events drivers are parking right up to the intersection, restricting sightlines. 

5.3      The existing no stopping allows drivers to park 6m from the intersection.  The proposed no stopping will remove one car park and the parking will start 12.5 metres from the intersection.  This will give sightlines of approximately 40 metres.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1      Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Hills Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5      Affected residents were sent consultation letters on Thursday 24 November and asked to reply by 9 December.

6.6      No responses have been received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8      Cost of Implementation - $75

6.9      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.14    None identified.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes one car parking space

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1      Hills Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5      See section 6.5-6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7      Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9      Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains one car park

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines and therefore the crash risk.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Hills Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction Plan

26

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

8.       Sturrocks Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

16/1500180

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of a ‘No Stopping’ restriction on Sturrocks Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report staff generated in response to requests from a resident in the area.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Sturrocks Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres;

2.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sturrocks Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·      Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·      Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by removing a conflict point on Sturrocks Road.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Removes 1 car parking space

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1      Sturrocks Road is a collector road off Main North Road.  It has a traffic lane, cycle lane and parking area on both sides of the road.  The road is 13 metres wide.

5.2      At the intersection of Sturrocks Road and Main North Road there is a splitter island separating the traffic.  On the south side there is one car park between the splitter island and the first residential driveway.  This car park creates a conflict point between cyclists, a parked car and cars moving along Sturrocks Road. 

5.3      It is proposed to remove this car park space to allow cyclists and motorists to safely manoeuvre together around the corner.  Cyclists can then join the cycle lane which starts approximately in the middle of this car park space.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1      Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Sturrocks Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5      Affected residents on Sturrocks Road and Main North Road were sent consultation letters on Wednesday 7 December and were asked to respond by Thursday 22 December 2016.

6.6      No residents responded to the letter.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8      Cost of Implementation - $100

6.9      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.14    None identified.

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by removing a conflict point on Sturrocks Road.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes one car park.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1      Sturrocks Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5      See section 6.5 and 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7      Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9      Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations   

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains one car park.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the conflict point on Sturrocks Road.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Sturrocks Road Proposed No Stopping Plan

32

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

9.       Shannon Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/20923

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418666

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve no-stopping restrictions on Shannon Place in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is staff generated after a request from a resident of Shannon Place.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by an assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south-east side of Shannon Place commencing at a point 91 metres south-west of its intersection with Tahi Place and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a total distance of 29 metres;

2.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-east side of Shannon Place commencing at a point 91 metres south-west of its intersection with Tahi Place and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a total distance of 29 metres;

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·      Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·      Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines on a corner

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Removes car parking

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1      Shannon Place has a ninety degree corner in it.  The road is 9 metres wide north of the corner but through the corner the road narrows to 8 metres.  Cars are parking around the corner which is restricting visibility and creates a pinch point for drivers on this road. 

5.2      It is proposed to install no-stopping restrictions around the corner to prevent this parking.  This will remove any conflict around this corner and ensure appropriate sightlines.

5.3      Legally “a driver or person in charge of a vehicle must not stop, stand, or park the vehicle on any part of a roadway so close to any corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island, or intersection as to obstruct or be likely to obstruct other traffic or any view of the roadway to the driver of a vehicle approaching that corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island, or intersection”.  This is open to interpretation and as far as enforcement is concerned it is more easily enforceable through the installation of no-stopping restrictions.  No-stopping restrictions also make it obvious to drivers that they must not park on this bend.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1      Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Shannon Place as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5      Affected residents were sent consultation letters on 7 December 2016.  They were asked to respond by 22 December 2016.

6.6      No residents responded to this letter.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8      Cost of Implementation - $150

6.9      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal

6.10    Funding source – traffic operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.14    None identified

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by increasing sightlines on the corner.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes two car parking spaces

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1      Shannon Place will remain as is.

Significance

7.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5      See sections 6.5 and 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7      Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9      Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.11    None identified

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Does not remove car parking spaces 

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the visibility issue and therefore the risk of a crash

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Shannon Place Proposed No Stopping Plan

37

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

10.    Cranford Street Proposed Traffic Island

Reference:

17/79970

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of a traffic island on Cranford Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is staff generated in response to the closure of Winters Road as part of the Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) works.  The line marking changes have already been installed by CNC in advance of the closure of Winters Road.  This report is just for the approval of the traffic island.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendation

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board approve that a traffic island be installed on Cranford Street west of its intersection with Fraser Street in general accordance with Attachment A.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·      Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·      Option 1 – Approve traffic island (preferred option)

·      Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3      Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by channelizing motorists;

·      Reduces risk of a crash by improving sightlines;

·      Reduces the risk of a crash by making driving patterns and right of way rules transparent;

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Limited physical works, motorists will need to obey line marking;

·      Heavy flows of traffic using Cranford Street so delays will still occur on Fraser Street.

 

5.   Context/Background

General

5.1      The Christchurch Northern Corridor (CNC) combines the NZTA’s Northern Arterial motorway and two Christchurch City Council projects that link QEII Drive to Cranford Street and four lane Cranford Street to Innes Road.  Construction of the CNC started in November 2016 and will be ramping up in early 2017.  The project will take around four years to complete.

5.2      From Tuesday 7 February Winters Road will be closed to all traffic between house numbers 137 and 143.  For motor vehicles this road closure is permanent.  For pedestrians and cyclists the closure is temporary to allow the construction of the pedestrian/cycle subway.

5.3      Motor vehicle access from Winters Road to QEII Drive will be re-established in 2020 via the new QEII Drive off ramp on the western side of the new motorway.

5.4      Residents and businesses from 137 Winters Road to Fraser Street will need to enter and exit Winters Road from Cranford Street/Fraser Street intersection or enter from Main North Road.  Pedestrians and cyclists can use the existing QEII Drive shared path to enter Winters Road via Grimseys Road.

Cranford/Fraser Street Intersection

5.5      The Cranford/Fraser Street intersection will see an increase in traffic due to these CNC works.  Due to the road network in the area, motorists seeking to travel north and west will generally turn right out of Fraser Street.

5.6      The existing layout of the intersection has an urban seagull treatment.  Seagull intersections usually work well where right-turning traffic from the minor road would be delayed for extended periods due to the small number of gaps on the major road.  This intersection differs from the standard seagull treatment because Cranford Street expands to two lanes at this intersection.  So right turners from Fraser Street effectively have their own lane to turn into.

5.7      The existing layout relies on motorists staying in their lanes until they are past the intersection and then manoeuvring into the lane they require.  On site observations have shown that traffic northbound on Cranford Street merges into the right turning lane at the intersection which causes a conflict point.

5.8      The existing layout of Fraser Street is only one lane and there is no dedicated left turning lane from Cranford Street into Fraser Street.

5.9      The proposed layout aims to optimise the intersections performance, through minor alterations, to attempt to allow for the increase in traffic.  The clearer channelization aims to improve safety by separating traffic flows, improving sight lines and making driving patterns and right of way rules transparent.

5.10    The proposed changes at the intersection do not change the fundamental way motorists are using the intersection at present.  There are no changes to access for private properties and no additional parking restrictions.  The changes are solely aimed to increasing safety at the intersection through lane delineation.

5.11    The key features of the intersection changes include:

·      Providing a narrow 1 metre wide median for approximately 80 metres for right turning traffic exiting Fraser Street;

·      Installing flexi posts inside this median to reinforce the lane separation;

·      Installing a traffic island on Cranford Street west of Fraser Street to channel the right turners onto the correct side of the road and physically separate them from the opposing traffic;

·      Installing a left turning lane from Cranford Street into Fraser Street to separate the left turning traffic from the through traffic and increase visibility for traffic turning out of Fraser Street;

·      Installing two lanes on Fraser Street, one for right turners and one for left turners.

5.12    There is existing no stopping around this intersection which the Shirley/Papanui community board approved last year.  This no stopping may need to be extended on Fraser Street to allow for the queue of traffic.  Staff will monitor the queues once the changes are installed.

5.13    Staff will also monitor the existing right turning bay on Cranford Street.  This bay is approximately 41 metres long which would hold five to six cars before the cars would start to queue back into the through traffic on Cranford Street.

6.   Option 1 – Approve traffic island (preferred)

Option Description

6.1      Approve traffic island as shown on Attachment A.  There is no change to access for private properties and no additional parking restrictions.

Significance

6.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5      There has been no direct consultation to residents of this change.  CNC issued a Work Notice to residents in the Winters Road area about the approaching closure of Winters Road.  A number of residents responded back to this consultation about changes to Fraser Street, including creating two exit lanes on Fraser Street.

6.6      CNC will issue a further notice on Tuesday 31 January informing residents in the Winters Road area and within a 100 metre radius of the Fraser Street/Cranford Street intersection of the line marking changes.

6.7      There is no change to access for private properties and no additional parking restrictions.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.9      Cost of Implementation - $0 (covered under the CNC contract)

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.11    Funding source – CNC contract

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.15    None identified.

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval

6.17    Implementation timeframe – as soon as approval is achieved

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by channelizing motorists;

·   Reduces risk of a crash by improving sightlines;

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by making driving patterns and right of way rules transparent;

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Limited physical works, motorists will need to obey line marking;

·   Heavy flows of traffic using Cranford Street so delays will still occur on Fraser Street.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1      Cranford/Fraser Street intersection will remain as is (with additional line marking changes).

Significance

7.2      The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3      Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4      This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5      See section 6.5-6.7.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6      This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7      Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8      Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9      Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   None.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not channelize traffic through the intersection as effectively and intuitively as Option 1;

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Fraser Street and Cranford Street Proposed Changes Plan

44

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

11.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Shirley Toy Library Inc

Reference:

16/1450667

Contact:

Trevor Cattermole

Trevor.Cattermole@ccc.govt.nz

9415407

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

55938

Shirley Toy Library Inc.

Librarians Wages

$3,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Shirley Toy Library Inc. 

2.   Significance

2.1      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board approves a grant of $3,000 to Shirley Toy Library Inc towards funding librarian wages.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$25,104

$17,500

$7,605

$4,605

 

4.2      Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3      The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix - Shirley Toy Library Inc

47

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

12.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Papanui Youth Development

Reference:

17/76631

Contact:

Christine Lane

Christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

941 5213

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

00055251

Papanui Youth Development

Flip Tables

$2,397

 

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Papanui Youth Development Trust.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board declines a grant of $2,397 to Papanui Youth Development Trust towards Flip Tables.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$25,104

$23,165

$3,939

$1,542

 

4.2      Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3      The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix - Papanui Youth Development - Flip Tables

51

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Christine Lane - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

13.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Meeting Arrangements - 2016/2019 Term

Reference:

16/1383489

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve a Meeting Schedule for the period from 11 February 2017 to 31 December 2017.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is staff generated to allow the Board to set in place its meeting arrangements by adopting a meeting schedule until 31 December 2017.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment against the Significance and Engagement Policy criteria.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendation

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to adopt the following Meeting Schedule to December 2017:

Friday 24 February                      9.30am

Friday 10 March                           9am

Friday 24 March                           9am

Friday 21 April                              9am (One meeting only as 14 April is Good Friday)

Friday 12 May                              9am

Friday 26 May                              9am

Friday 9 June                                9am

Friday 23 June                              9am

Friday 14 July                                9am (Council Recess Week)

Friday 28 July                                9am

Friday 11 August                          9am

Friday 25 August                          9am

Friday 15 September                   9.30am

Friday 29 September                   9am

Friday 13 October                       9am

Friday 27 October                       9am (Council Recess Week)

Friday 10 November                   9am

Friday 24 November                   9am

Friday 8 December                      9am

 

 

 

 

4.   Key Points

 

Meeting Schedule

4.1      The staff recommendation in this report, for the Board to adopt a meeting schedule through to December 2017, has been developed based on a number of factors:

Ÿ Informal feedback from Board members

Ÿ The holding of two Board meetings per month where possible

Ÿ Consideration of other commitments on the Council calendar, e.g. Council meetings and its Committees

Ÿ A desire to avoid day/time clashes with other Community Board meetings

4.2      It is proposed that the venue for Board meetings be the Papanui Boardroom, corner of Langdons Road and Restell Street and that the meeting time be 9am except for the 24 February and 15 September meeting where, due to a the timing of another Community Board meeting, the meeting time is recommended to be 9.30am.

4.3      It is intended that each meeting of the month be a full business meeting.  Where possible each meeting will be followed by a short seminar/workshop.  Seminars provide an opportunity for Board members and staff to have informal discussion on issues where no decisions are required at that time.

4.4      It is proposed that a separate seminar/workshop be held on the third Wednesday of each month, February through to November (Community Week), at 3.30pm or at a time to be agreed by the Board.

4.5      The Boards meeting schedule for 2018/19 will be assessed later in 2017 and will reflect any necessary changes that may come about as a result of the review of delegations to community boards.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

14.    2017 Community Board Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons Workshop

Reference:

17/31079

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1      The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider approving attendance of the Board Chairperson and Deputy at the Community Boards Executive Committee (CBEC) workshop for Chairpersons and their Deputies in Christchurch on 25 February 2017.

Origin of Report

1.2      This report is staff generated following an offer from CBEC to Christchurch Community Board Chairpersons and Deputies.

2.   Significance

2.1      The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the low number of people affected and/or with an interest.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Approves the attendance of either Ali Jones or Emma Norrish, or both, at the Community Board Executive Committee workshop for Chairpersons and their Deputies to be held in Christchurch on 25 February 2017.

2.        Notes that the cost of $100 per attendee will be met from the Board’s operational funds.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1      The workshop will run from 9.30am until 4.00pm at a cost of $100 per attendee with morning tea on arrival, lunch and afternoon tea provided.

4.2      The purpose of this workshop will be to provide guidance and advice on such topics as Codes of Conduct, chairing meetings, the new Community Board Guide, what makes a good board operate to its maximum effectiveness, how to resolve disputes within a board, understanding standing orders, relationships between boards and councils, legislative update, conflicts of interest and an update on policy issues impacting on the performance of boards.

4.3      Central to these workshops is the opportunity for participants to learn from each other and to have an open forum style which allows round-table discussion. CBEC has indicated its intention to expand networking between boards and see the workshop as the ideal opportunity for participants to make contacts and set up these networks to help in their job as a Chairperson or Deputy.

4.4      The cost of $200 in total for attendance will be met from the Board’s training operational funding which has a current balance of $2,445.00

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a)  This report contains:

(i)   sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)  adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b)  The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

15.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report

Reference:

17/80938

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to resource the Community Board to promote a pro-active partnership approach to decision-making between the Council and Community Boards working together to achieve the best outcomes for the city with decisions being made with a good understanding of community views.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.        Receive the Area Update.

2.        Agree to open each Board meeting with an appropriate prayer or Waiata in Te Reo Maori.

 

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1      Community Board Plan update against outcomes

3.1.1   Community Board Monthly Plan update attached.

3.2      Memos/Information reporting back on Community Board matters

3.2.1   Information

Information sent recently to the Board included:

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway –  Work on Rutland Street

·    Marshland Road - Proposed no stopping restrictions

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Undergrounding of power cables on Rutland Street

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Stormwater works

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Sawyers Arms kerb and channel

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Traffic light upgrade Main North Rd/Sawyers Arms Rd

·    Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Paving and Kerbing Knowles/Rutland St intersection

·    Grampian Street - Proposed pedestrian refuge

·    Christchurch Southern Motorway - Stage 2 project update

·    Main North Road Bus Lane – Start work notice

3.2.2   Redwood Plunket Rooms

At its 9 December 2016 meeting the Board approved the repair of the Plunket Rooms for Community use. Further information on this project will be provided to the Board in March 2017.


 

3.2.3   Norm Withers Family Park

A proof of the proposed sign will be available shortly and circulated to Board members.

3.2.4   Guild Street Contracting Depot

            After a collaborative conversation between affected parties late in 2016 to discuss issues information has been received that the company concerned has vacated the site.

3.2.5   St Albans Bowling Club

Information relating to the St Alban Park upgrade will be presented at this meeting.

3.3.6 St Albans Sports Pavilion (storage shed and toilets)

            After community discussions further changes may evolve in this project. A seminar will be given to the Board in March.

3.3      The provision of strategic, technical and procedural advice to the Community Board

3.3.1   Prayer or Waiata to Open Meeting

A request has been received from a Board member for the Board to consider opening each Board meeting with a prayer or a Waiata in Te Reo Maori.

Recommendation: That the Papanui-Innes Community Board agrees to open each Board meeting with an appropriate prayer or Waiata in Te Reo Maori.

3.3.2   National Community Board Conference 2017

The 2017 Community Boards Conference will take place from 12-13 May 2017 in Methven. The New Zealand Community Boards Conference takes place every two years. The biennial conference was introduced in 1997 to bring together the community boards of New Zealand to share practice and to help improve the understanding and work of community boards.

The theme for the 2017 Conference is ‘Making 1+1=3” or how Boards can achieve more for their communities with the resources they are given.

Please indicate if you wish to attend this conference. Please also note that 12 May is a scheduled Board meeting day. If necessary this meeting will be transferred to another suitable date. Tuesday 9 May at 4.30pm is suggested.

3.3.3   National Community Board Best Practice Awards 2017

Entries close on Friday 17 March 2017 for the National Community Board Awards with the awards being announced and presented at the Community Boards Conference on Friday 12 May 2017.  Further information on the awards is attached.

 

3.4      Board area Consultations/Engagement

3.4.1   There are currently no consultations out for public submission.

3.5      Submission Opportunities

3.5.1   There are currently no publicly notified submission/consultations that relate to the Papanui-Innes Community Board area.

 


 

3.6      Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.6.1   Time frame for 2017 Annual Plan process

Tuesday 7 February               Annual Plan workshop including Board Chairs

Late February 2017               Council adopts draft Annual Plan

March/April 2017                  Ward based engagement and consultation

June 2017                                Council adopts the Annual Plan

Sept/Oct 2017                        Preparation of draft Long Term Plan

3.6.2   Papanui-Innes Annual Plan engagement and consultation

Consultation is planned with Residents Associations and Groups. Information advising residents of submission opportunities on the Annual Plan will be available at a range of community meetings in March and April 2017.

3.7      Development of Civil Defence Emergency Plans

3.7.1   Staff continue to work alongside communities in the development of community-led Civil Defence Emergency Plans in particular with the Belfast Community in the further development of their Civil Defence Plan.

3.8      Requests for information from Board meeting on Newsline

3.8.1   Members are invited to consider the following item, the Belfast Skate Jam, and any others for inclusion in Newsline.

3.9      Significant Board matters of interest to raise at Council

3.9.1   Board members are requested to highlight significant matters from the meeting to be raised by the Chair at the next Council Meeting (Community Board Reports) on Thursday 9 March.

4.    Key Local Projects (KLPs) and Strengthening Communities Funded Projects

         4.1      Neighbourhood Trust (NHT) - Community Development Programmes and Services

 

4.1.1      Current Oscar programmes and Holiday programmes

Status: A session of holiday programmes has concluded. The Oscar programmes continues to provide after school programmes throughout the year. These programmes continue to provide the opportunity for the NHT to engage with families and access opportunities.

Action: Staff continue to be updated on developments and to support the Trust’s initiatives to engage at a deeper level with their communities wherever practical through funding.

Timeline: This is a year- long programme.

 

4.1.2     Neighbourhood Trust collaboration with Mairehau Primary

Status: The NHT continues its impact in Mairehau by working closely with the Mairehau Primary school parents in various programs and initiatives which are fully supported by the school.  These initiatives include a Friday morning Snack Box meeting where parents meet with NHT staff in the staff room to discuss issues, share information and to build relationships. Student counselling is arranged by the Neighbourhood Trust in rooms provided by the school. Developments for 2017 with this group aim to extend the groups horizons from the school environs out into the community.

Action: Staff met with the NHT in January 2017. This program is an excellent example of the school and the community organisation working together within a space that is known to the local community to support parents and children. Staff support the organisation to continue this work, support and monitor.

Timeline: This a school year program that has been developed over a number of years and now provides for divergent opportunities for parent to parent development of relationships external of the school environment.

 

4.1.3     Neighbourhood Trust- Pay it Forward shop

Status: This social enterprise has 52 artists on its books and continues to be run by the artists themselves. The facility has established itself as an important local example of a member run social enterprise which provides peer support, innovation and the sharing of responsibilities and training and upskilling. This year, Pay it Forward aims to promote children’s art classes, and liaise with young designers at Mairehau High School to give them a start and experience working with the group.

Action: Staff have met with the NHT in January 2017.This enterprise was originally funded from the Capital Endowment Fund. Staff will continue to support.

Timeline: This enterprise is ongoing and developing new ways to engage not only with local artisans but also the wider community.

 

4.2   Delta Community Support Trust Community Development Programmes and Services

 

4.2.1     Delta Community Support Trust rebuild project

Status: Planning is ongoing between Delta and North Avon Baptist Church around the rebuild of the site. A close relationship with Crossways Church is being further developed towards a Joint venture in respect of the rebuild.

Action: Staff have met with the Trust in January 2017.  Development of a final agreement between all parties for the rebuild is progressing. Staff continue to be updated on progress of this exciting development.

Timeline: It envisaged that the commencement of the rebuild will start later this year.

 

4.3   Te Puna Oraka (Early Start) – Early Years Services, Parent Support, Community Programmes and Services

 

4.3.1     Maori Community Worker position

Status: Although Early Start is still under District Health Board Funding (DHB), it attracts Ministry of Social Development (MSD) funding. This year Te Puna Oraka will come under Te Putahitanga, delivering Whanau Tautoko Services. MSD Funding has moved to Te Putahitanga under Whanau Ora.

The Board funded Maori Community Worker position is going well, developing a deeper relationship with clients. Examples of this is the Oranga Kai initiative which involves food budgeting and cooking lessons by the Maori Community Worker in people’s homes. A recent Cross Agency Initiative involving Te Puna Oraka, Te Ora Hou and Neighbourhood Trust, delivered a Wananga-Moemoea with four families working to develop life plans with family individuals and the groups themselves. The families are joint clients of the agencies.

Action: Staff have met with the Trust in January 2017. Staff continue to provide employment support and career development advice.

Timeline: Staff continue to support the organisation and the incumbent in development of opportunities to engage at a deeper level within the community.

 


 

4.4   Shirley Community Trust – Community Development, Youth Work, Programmes and Services

 

4.4.1      MSD Funding for a further Youth Worker and a Community Nurse

Status: The Trust has contracted to MSD to provide a Community Nurse and another youth worker to the area. These positions are not full time but provide the Trust with the opportunity to deliver services to the area with funding sourced from the Central Government.

Action: Staff have met with the Trust and are working with them around planning and reporting requirements in respect of MSD funding. Staff have also met with ACTIS around their experience in having a Community Nurse attached to their organisation.

Timeline: This is an initial one off, 9 month program, which ends in December this year.

 

5.    Significant Community Issues

       5.1      Youth

Status: Youth and young people are a key focus of the Community Governance teams work across the Community Board area. One example is The Space run by the Board funded youth worker at Shirley Community Trust. Children of Intermediate and High School ages use the afterschool programme. The programme is highly successful. This has resulted in attendance at The Space being at full capacity throughout the year.

Action: Staff analysis indicated the need is primarily for additional mentors for boys at the service. Staff are being proactive in sourcing volunteers.

Timeframe: It is envisaged that volunteers will be sourced by March 2017.

6    Major Community and/or Infrastructure Projects

6.1      Community Facilities

6.1.1      Build of the Shirley Community Centre

Status: The Community Board has recommended that the site of the new permanent Shirley Community Centre be confirmed as the existing site (10 Shirley Road). On-going community engagement dating back 4 years commencing with the Crossways Church proposal has reiterated and underlined the community’s commitment to a facility rebuild on the site.

Action: Recently, an initial community meeting was held on 17th November which followed on from earlier soft engagement for the project which took place with the community which included informing schools and community organisations around the rebuild. In addition January 2017 a letter box drop around the residences nearby to the site was undertaken reminding residents of the planned rebuild. A number of residents responded indicating their enthusiasm and wish to be further informed of developments as the rebuild ensues.

Timeline: The timeframe to be confirmed.

 

6.1.2      St Albans Community Centre Rebuild

Status: The Board, working party and staff have worked together to facilitate this joint community and governance partnership in respect of the rebuild

Action: Staff are now providing further information to the Board in respect of the process to involve the community in the rebuild.

Timeline: The build and management of the facility is scheduled for 2017/2018.


 

 

6.1.3     The Council and Housing New Zealand (HNZ) Redevelopment of Shirley Project

Status: The project purpose is the practical collaboration between the Council and HNZ to redevelop the Shirley area. Arising out of the Land Use Recovery Plan following the earthquake, work is progressing around master planning and investigation into the complexity of renewal, development viability and rehousing priorities for the Shirley area.

A working party has met and early engagement for the project has taken place with the community which included informing schools and community organisations around the idea.

Action: Staff are involved in the working party. A community engagement meeting was held 29 November 2016 to introduce the plan officially to the community. An Information stall was also held at the “SHINE” community event on 5 November in MacFarlane Park, seeking community input and the providing of information. Currently the main issue is the complexity and scale of the Shirley Redevelopment plan which involves potential reconfiguration of open space, land swaps, redevelopment of community facilities and amenity improvement.

Timeline: The working party will update the Board in a seminar on 10 February.

 

6.2      Partnerships with the community and organisations

6.2.1      The Northwest Youth cluster continues to meet bimonthly at Belfast Community Network. This cluster is made up of Belfast Community Network, Northgate, Papanui Baptist Freedom Trust, Te Ora Hou, Papanui Youth Development, Bishopdale Community Trust, Neighbourhood Trust, and Shirley Community Trust.

6.2.2      The localised Shirley Network meeting is held monthly at Te Puna Oraka. The local network is focused on families with young children. The network is made up of organisations that have a particular focus in that area.

6.3      Infrastructure projects underway

6.3.1      Main North Road Bus Lane

6.3.2      Papanui Parallel Cycleways

6.3.3      Northern Arterial Motorway

6.3.4      St Albans Community Centre Rebuild

6.4      Events Report Back

6.4.1      Belfast and St Albans skate jams where held in January.  Numbers where very good for both skate jams and the feedback from the evaluations reported that 94% of respondents would come to another skate and would like to see them happen more often.  The evaluations highlighted the need for more scooter, and beginner options. 

6.4.2      The following events will be happening in the Papanui – Innes wards over the next two weeks.  The Faerie Picnic 11 February at Malvern Park, and Sumner in the Styx 19 February.  For more information on events check out the Be There website.

A young woman teaches a student how to skate board at the recent Belfast Skate Jam

7     Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

7.1      This report will be provided in March 2017.

 

8     Community Board funding budget overview and clarification 

8.1      The Discretionary Response Fund (DRF), the Positive Youth Development (PYD) and the Christchurch Creative Communities Scheme are open for applications. They can be accessed on the Council website. 

8.2      The budget information for the DRF Discretionary Response Fund (DRF) and the Positive Youth Development (PYD) is attached.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Community Boards Best Practice Awards

67

b

Papanui-Innes Community Board monthly report plan table

68

c

Papanui-Innes Community Board 2016/17 Funding Update as at 9 December 2016

71

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Christine Lane - Community Development Advisor

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

PDF Creator

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

10 February 2017

 

 

16.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

17.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.