Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 30 November 2016

Time:                                    4pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

23 November 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Main North Road Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions............................................... 13

C       7.       Harewood Road Proposed Relocation of Bus Stop.................................................... 19

C       8.       Factory Road Proposed Give Way Control.................................................................. 25

C       9.       Belfast Road Proposed P120 Parking........................................................................... 31

C       10.     Vagues Road Proposed P3 Parking.............................................................................. 37

C       11.     Fraser Street and Cranford Street Proposed No Stopping Restriction.................... 43

C       12.     Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction.................................................. 49

C       13.     Establishment of the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund........................................................................................................ 55

C       14.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club................................................................................................... 57

C       15.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Luisa Portia Dewar..................................................................... 61

C       16.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund - Belfast School............................................................................. 63

B       17.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update.......................................................... 67

B       18.     Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 72

B       19.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 72 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting both open and closed held on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

The Public Excluded minutes have been separately circulated.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Connor Hill

Connor Hill will attend to report back to the Board on his participation in the Spirit of Adventure Trophy Voyage from 30 October to 3 November 2016.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

 

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 15 November 2016

Time:                                    4pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

14 November 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00009

It was resolved on the motion of Member Davidson, seconded by Member Byrne that the apology for late arrival from John Stringer be accepted.

Member Davidson/Member Byrne                                                                                                                     Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00010

Community Board Decision

The Board resolved that the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 be confirmed subject to the amendment in Item 6 of 1016 to 2016.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Cotter                                                                                                 Carried

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Reilly Makea

             Reilly Makea attended to report back to the Board on his participation at the Junior World Men’s Softball Championships held in Michigan, USA in July 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Reilly Makea for his deputation.

 

4.2       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Jayda Stewart

             Jayda Stewart attended to report back to the Board on her participation in the Secondary Schools Girls’ Football U15 Development Tour held in Sydney in July 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Jayda Stewart for her deputation.

 

 

4.3       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Michael Tusani

             Michael Tusani attended to report back to the Board on his participation in the Junior Youth Development Tour of Argentina and Uruguay September/October 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Michael Tusani for his deputation.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.  

6.   Correspondence

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00011

(original Staff recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to receive the letter from the Shirley Community Trust thanking the Board for the funding grants as presented in the correspondence report dated 15 November 2016.

Member Cotter/Member Davidson                                                                                                                    Carried

 

7.   Papanui-Innes Community Board Status Report

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00012

(original Staff recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to receive the Papanui-Innes Community Board Status Report.

Member Byrne/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                                                  Carried

 

Member Stringer entered the meeting at 04:23 pm.

 

8.   Community Board Representation on Outside Organisations and Committees

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board

1.         Consider appointing representatives/community liaison to the following outside organisations and committees for the 2013/19 term:

·     Belfast Community Network (BCN) – all members

·     Christchurch Street and Garden Awards Committee (partnership between Christchurch City Council and Christchurch Beautifying Association) – one member

·     Delta Trust – one member

·     Garden Pride and Edible Garden Awards – all members

·     Graham Condon Sports and Recreation Centre – one member

·     Keep Christchurch Beautiful Committee – appointment of two members

·     Neighbourhood Support Canterbury – one member and one community appointee

·     Neighbourhood Trust – one member

·     Packe Street Park – one member

·     Papanui Heritage – one member

·     Papanui Network – all members

·     Police Liaison – two members

·     Shirley Community Trust – two members

·     Shirley Network – all members

·     Waimakariri Eyre – one member

Residents’ Associations – one liaison person to each

·        Belfast Area Residents’ Association

·        Ellington Residents’ Association

·        Kainga Residents’ Association

·        Northwest Richmond Residents’ Association

·        St Albans Residents’ Association

·        St James Avenue Residents’ Association

·        Spencerville Residents’ Association

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00013

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to appoint representatives/community liaisons to the following outside organisations and committees for the 2016/19 term:

·        Belfast Community Network (BCN) – all members

·        Christchurch Street and Garden Awards Committee (partnership between Christchurch City Council and Christchurch Beautifying Association) – Jo Byrne

·        Delta Trust – Jo Byrne

·        Garden Pride and Edible Garden Awards – all members

·        Graham Condon Sports and Recreation Centre – project completed

·        Keep Christchurch Beautiful Committee – Emma Norrish

·        Neighbourhood Support Canterbury – Mike Davidson and one community appointee

·        Neighbourhood Trust – Emma Norrish

·        Packe Street Park – Pauline Cotter

·        Papanui Heritage – Ali Jones

·        Papanui Network – all members

·        Papanui Youth Development Trust – John Stringer

·        Police Liaison –Mike Davidson and Ali Jones

·        Shirley Community Trust – Jo Byrne and Pauline Cotter

·        Shirley Network – all members

·        Te Ora Hou – Mike Davidson

·        Waimakariri Eyre – John Stringer

Residents’ Associations – one liaison person to each

·        Belfast Area Residents’ Association – Emma Norrish

·        Ellington Residents’ Association – Jo Byrne

·        Kainga Residents’ Association – John Stringer

·        Northwest Richmond Residents’ Association – Jo Byrne

·        St Albans Residents’ Association – Ali Jones

·        St James Avenue Residents’ Association – Mike Davidson

·        Spencerville Residents’ Association – now part of the Coastal ward

 

Member Davidson/Member Cotter                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

9.   Community Board Governance Arrangements - 2016/2019 Term

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to:

1.         Meeting Schedule

a.         Adopt the following Meeting Schedule to March 2017:

Friday 9 December                     9am             Papanui Boardroom
Friday 10 February                      9am             Papanui Boardroom
Wednesday 22 February          4pm             Papanui Boardroom
Friday 10 March                           9am             Papanui Boardroom
Wednesday 22 March               4pm             Papanui Boardroom

b.         Review its ordinary meeting arrangements in early 2017 for the remainder of the 2016/19 term.

2.         Committees, Subcommittees and Working Parties

a.         Consider the appointment of the following committees and working parties under the same Terms of Reference and with the same delegations that they previously held:

·        St Albans Community Centre Rebuild Working Party and appoint three members to this Working Party.

·        Consider the establishment of a Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee comprising three elected members with its Terms of Reference being ‘to respond on behalf of the Papanui-Innes Community Board to submission opportunities occurring during the Board’s 2016/19 term’. A Chairperson and deputy chairperson to be decided by the Submissions Committee.

·        That:

(i)        The Papanui-Innes Submissions Committee be delegated authority to lodge submissions on behalf of the Papanui-Innes Board.

(ii)       Any submission prepared by the Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee be reported to the Board for record purposes.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00014

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved that:

1.         Meeting Schedule

a.         The third ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board be held on Friday 9 December at 9am in the Papanui Board Room at the Papanui Library and Service Centre, corner Langdons Road and Restell Street.

b.         A report will be presented to the 9 December meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board to confirm the date for the first meeting of 2017.

b.         A review of the ordinary meeting arrangements for the remainder of the 2016/2019 electoral term be held in early 2017.

2.         Committees, Subcommittees and Working Parties be considered for appointment under the same Terms of Reference and with the same delegations that they previously held as follows:

·    Jo Byrne, Pauline Cotter and Mike Davidson be appointed as the Board representatives on the St Albans Community Centre Rebuild Working Party.

·     The Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions committee be comprised of all elected members with its Terms of Reference being ‘to respond on behalf of the Papanui-Innes Community Board to submission opportunities occurring during the Board’s 2016/19 term’.

·     That:

(i)           Any submission/s prepared by the Papanui-Innes Community Board Submissions Committee be reported to the Board for approval.

(ii)          The Papanui-Innes Submissions Committee be delegated authority to lodge approved submissions on behalf of the Papanui-Innes Board.

Member Cotter/Member Davidson                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00015

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to receive the report.

Member Cotter/Member Stringer                                                                                                                      Carried

 

10.1    St Albans Transitional Community Facility

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00016

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved that:

1.         Information be requested from staff on the options for the future use and location of the St Albans Transitional Community Facility and that the use of the White House as a transitional facility during the rebuild be discussed with the St Albans Residents’ Association (SARA)

Member Cotter/Member Stringer                                                                                                                      Carried

 

10.2    Edible Garden Awards

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00017

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request a meeting with the Canterbury Horticultural Society to discuss the format of the annual Edible Gardens Awards.

Member Cotter/Member Stringer                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

 

13. Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00018

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

Member Byrne, seconded by Member Cotter, moved that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely “Property at 130 Caledonian Road” under Section 7(2)(B)(ii) Prejudice Commercial Position and 7(2)(i) Conduct Negotiations.

Member Byrne/Member Cotter                                                                                                                          Carried

11. Elected Member Information Exchange

Part B

·        Graffiti

Members noted an increase in graffiti around the ward and were advised that this needs to be reported to the Council Call Centre for action.

·        Downstream Effects of the Northern Arterial Project

A number of questions were identified following the seminar presentation prior to the Board meeting. These will be forwarded to staff for their attention.

12. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under Standing Orders at this meeting.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 05:31pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 30th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016.

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

   


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

6.        Main North Road Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions

Reference:

16/973145

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the parking restrictions on Main North Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is being provided in response to a request from New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) to legalise the P10 parking restriction on Main North Road.  This road area has been reconfigured and the parking restriction has not been installed in the exact same place as the existing restriction.  Therefore this retrospective report is needed to formalise the current location of the P10 parking restriction.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the project and number of properties affected by the preferred option. 

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment. 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke any P10 parking restriction on the east side of Main North Road between the intersections of Richill Street and Third Street.

2.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Main North Road commencing at a point 45 metres south of its intersection with Richill Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 48 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday from 9am to 6pm and on Saturday and Sunday from 8am to 6pm.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install P10 Parking restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Formalises the existing P10 parking restriction

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       NZTA have reconfigured Main North Road at this location and have reinstalled the various line markings and signage.  The P10 parking restriction is within the part-time bus lane and has shifted slightly from its previous position.

5.2       The new location of the P10 parking maximises the parking in this area and ensures high vehicle turn over and no all-day parking.

5.3       The signs have already been installed as part of the NZTA-led project.

6.   Option 1 – Install P10 Parking (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install P10 Parking restriction on Main North Road as shown in Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       No specific consultation has been undertaken for this parking change.  This is a minor adjustment on an NZTA controlled road.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $0 to Christchurch City Council (NZTA have already installed these signs)

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.13    None identified

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community board approval to have legal effect.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – Already installed

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·     Formalises the existing P10 parking restriction:

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None

7.   Option 2 – Do nothing

Option Description

7.1       The existing parking restrictions on Main North Road are not resolved.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Parking restrictions would be unenforceable and may be subject to legal challenge.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    Potential legal challenge of parking restriction.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·     None

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     The parking restrictions are unenforceable and may be subject to legal challenge.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Main North Road P10 Parking Plan

17

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

7.        Harewood Road Proposed Relocation of Bus Stop

Reference:

16/1149846

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve that the existing bus stop located outside Mitre 10 Mega on Harewood Road be relocated in Accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following an assessment of the no stopping restrictions and parking outside Mitre 10 Mega.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres;

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 64 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 63 metres;

4.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 127 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres;

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 141 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 4 metres;

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 202 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Relocate the existing bus stop (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Maximises on-street parking

·     Continues to provide good bus infrastructure.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Decreased visibility from Mitre 10 mega driveway when a bus is stopped.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Harewood Road is serviced by the Orbiter bus service.  This is a 15 minute bus service during the weekdays and a 30 minute bus service in the weekends.

5.2       The existing bus stop is outside Mitre 10 Mega and would mainly service customers and staff to Mitre 10 Mega and residents in the area.  There is another stop on Main North Road which would service customers and staff working in the Papanui Road strip shopping area.

5.3       When Mitre 10 Mega was built a new entrance was installed north-west of the bus stop and the entrances around the bus stop were removed.  No stopping restrictions were approved around the new Mitre 10 Mega entrance but agreement could not be reached about the relocation of the bus stop and the shelter at this time.

5.4       Agreement has now been reached to relocate the bus stop and shelter to a position 14 metres north-west of the existing bus stop location.  This will allow 2 more car parking spaces along Harewood Road.

5.5       The shelter is owned and maintained by Adshel and they have already shifted it the short distance.  

5.6       Visibility from the Mitre 10 Mega access is maintained under the proposed bus stop location. 

5.7       There are high parking demands on this section of Harewood Road on weekdays.  In the weekends there is usually no parking on Harewood Road.

6.   Option 1 – Relocate Bus Stop (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Relocate the existing bus stop by 14 metres.  The dimensions of the proposed bus stop are compliant to the recommended bus stop dimensions as per the Christchurch City Bus Stop Guidelines (2009).

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       The adjacent land owner is Mitre 10 Mega who is specifically affected by this option.   The manager was emailed the proposed plans.  Mitre 10 Mega are concerned that the visibility for right turning drivers will be decreased when a bus is stopped at the bus stop.  They are therefore opposed to the proposal. 

6.6       This is correct but the entrance still meets the safe stopping distance requirement of 45 metres when a bus is stopped.  When a bus is not stopped the visibility is in excess of 80 metres.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $2,500 (line marking and berm works)

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

6.11    The Christchurch City Council, Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, provides Council with the authority to install stopping and parking restrictions by resolution.  The Council has delegated this authority for this part of the city to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board.

6.12    The installation of any traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.  These markings will comply.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.13    Not applicable

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board Approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe – Four weeks once the contractor receives the request

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Maximises on street car parking

·   Continues to provide good bus infrastructure

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Decreased visibility from Mitre 10 Mega intersection when a bus is stopped.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       The bus stop remains where it is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5 – 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    None identified.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   No civil costs

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not maximise the parking opportunities on Harewood Road.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Harewood Road Proposed Bus Stop Relocation Plan

24

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

8.        Factory Road Proposed Give Way Control

Reference:

16/1148818

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the Give Way control against Factory Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is in response to a request from a resident of Guthries Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Resolve that a Give Way control be placed against Factory Road at its intersection with Guthries Road.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.32 Assess risks on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install Give Way Control (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Highlights the intersection through line marking and signs

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       Factory Road links Main North Road and Guthries Road and is a mixture of an urban residential road and a rural road.  At the intersection with Guthries Road, Factory Road is a narrow, 80km/h rural road.

5.2       At the intersection with Guthries Road there is no traffic control on Factory Road.  The only line marking is a centre line and there is a chevron board at the top of the T-intersection.

5.3       Power poles run along the northern side of Factory Road and cross the intersection to run along the eastern side of Guthries Road.  This could give the appearance to drivers that Factory Road continues past the intersection.

5.4       There are good sightlines at this intersection with no large vegetation or fences.  It is a relatively busy intersection as Silver Fern Farms have a processing plant on Factory Road and Bioblend have a site on Factory Road as well.  It also provides a link between Main North Road and Marshland Road.

5.5       The proposed Give Way control will further highlight to drivers that they are approaching an intersection and need to give way to traffic travelling along Guthries Road.

6.   Option 1 – Install Give Way Control (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a Give Way control against Factory Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Consultation was not undertaken for this project.  Drivers are already required to give way at this intersection, therefore there is no change to how the road operates.  The change is proposed to try and highlight the intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $400

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.13    None identified

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by further highlighting that there is an intersection at Factory Road and Guthries Road.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing road layout.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations   

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   None

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the lack of awareness that there is an intersection at Factory Road and Guthries Road.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Factory Road Proposed Give Way - Plan

29

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

9.        Belfast Road Proposed P120 Parking

Reference:

16/1150347

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of a P120 parking restriction in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to request from a business in the area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by an assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 46 metres;

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres;

3.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of one hundred and twenty minutes on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at a point 27 metres east of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday only.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install P120 parking restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Creates a more usable mixture of time restricted parking on Belfast Road.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes all day parking which could spread long term parking into residential areas.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       Belfast Road is a collector road with a mixture of residential, industrial and commercial properties along it.  It links Main North Road with Belfast Road.  As a result of its location and the type of properties along it, it carries a reasonable amount of heavy traffic.

5.2       The Belfast Plunket Rooms are located at 7 Belfast Road.  They have no parking on site and their customers rely on the parking on-street.  Directly outside of the Plunket rooms there is space for 3 car parks.  There is also 3 parking spaces east of the Plunket Rooms.  All the other parking on Belfast Road would require you to cross either Belfast Road or a side road.

5.3       East of the Plunket rooms is a vacant lot and then 2 residential properties.  West of the Plunket rooms is commercial shops.

5.4       It is proposed to install a P120 parking restriction for the 3 parking spaces out in front of the Plunket rooms.  This gives parents and care givers attending Plunket appointments an opportunity to park in close proximity to the Plunket rooms.  Obviously the parking is not exclusively for Plunket room users and any customers to the shops in the area can use the parking.

6.   Option 1 – Install P120 Parking Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a P120 parking restriction on Belfast Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Affected businesses and residents were sent a letter on Friday 21 October 2016.  The consultation was for P60 parking instead of P120 parking. 

6.6       The owner of 9 Belfast Road rang and highlighted the existing problem of motorists parking over his lot.  His vacant lot is used by trucks making deliveries to a shop on Main North Road.  As part of the scheme, parking ticks will be installed to indicate to drivers the parking areas and hopefully minimise any parking over this driveway.

6.7       The main Canterbury office of Plunket replied to the consultation and requested a change from P60 parking to P120 parking.  Initially a Plunket nurse working at the Belfast Office requested the P60, which is fine for nurses visits, but Plunket also run programmes for new mums and trainings (such as First Aid) which run for longer than 60 minutes.  Hence the proposal was changed from 60 minutes to 120 minutes.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation - $400

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.11    Funding source – Traffic operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.15    None identified.

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board Approval

6.17    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Creates a more usable mixture of time restricted parking on Belfast Road.

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes all day parking which could spread long term parking into residential areas.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Belfast Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5-6.7.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on on-street parking

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the request for time restricted parking from a local business

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Belfast Road Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions Plan

35

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

10.    Vagues Road Proposed P3 Parking

Reference:

16/1151393

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the P3 (drop off/pick up) parking on Vagues Road outside St Joseph’s School in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to a request from St Joseph’s School and the Council parking wardens to change the parking limit to P3 and extend it in front of the school.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 159 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 20.5 metres;

3.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at a point 68 metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only;

4.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at a point 114 metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 45 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install P3 Parking Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·     Upgrades the existing five minute restriction to the current Council standard of three minutes.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Drivers unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on signs

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       St Joseph’s School frontage is along Vagues Road.  There is an existing P5 school drop off and pick up restriction in front of a section of the school.  The school has requested that Council look at extending this restriction and changing the time limit from five minutes to three minutes.

5.2       St Joseph’s School has seen a significant roll increase since the earthquakes which has obviously lead to more children being dropped off and picked up from the school.

5.3       It is proposed to create an area of three minute parking restrictions in front of the school on Vagues Road.  These restrictions are to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only.

5.4       The proposed restriction is to apply between the existing kea crossing and the driveway entrance into the school, which is an extension of approximately 20 metres.  There will still be an unrestricted parking on the school side between the driveway and Main North Road.

6.   Option 1 – Install P3 Parking Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       It is proposed to create an area of three minute time limited parking restrictions in front of St Joseph’s School on Vagues Road, as shown on Attachment A.  These restrictions are to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only.

6.2       The proposed three minute parking area will be extended by approximately 20 metres from the existing five minute parking area.

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.4       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       St Joseph’s School are specifically affected by this option due to the proposed parking changes along their frontage.  They requested the change and are supportive of this scheme.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $500

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.14    None identified

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·   Upgrades the existing five minute restriction to the current Council standard of three minutes.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Vehicles are unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on the signs.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing P5 parking restriction on Vagues Road.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations 

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on the existing on-street parking

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the issues that parents and caregivers require a larger area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parking.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Vagues Road Proposed P3 parking - St Jospeh's School - Plan

42

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

11.    Fraser Street and Cranford Street Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

16/1235429

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Fraser Street and Cranford Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report staff generated in response to requests from a resident and road users in the area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Cranford Street commencing at its intersection with Fraser Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

2.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Fraser Street commencing at its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Cranford Street commencing at its intersection with Fraser Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Fraser Street commencing at its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines;

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by removing a conflict point on Fraser Street;

·     Allows left turning vehicles an opportunity to move left earlier.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes two car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       At the intersection of Fraser Street and Cranford Street there is a heavy parking demand.  This is caused by local businesses in the area including Papanui Primary School which is on the opposite corner of this proposal.  Cars are parked right up to the corner which limits visibility and creates a pinch point for drivers entering Fraser Street.

5.2       This intersection is relatively busy with residents in this area only having the use of this intersection or the intersection of QEII and Winters Road to access the main roading network.

5.3       It is proposed to remove two car parking spaces.  This will increase the sightlines for drivers exiting Fraser Street and remove the conflict point for drivers entering Fraser Street.  It was also allow left turners to move left earlier so they do not impede the through traffic.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Fraser Street and Cranford Street as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Affected residents and Papanui Primary School were sent consultation letters on 21 October 2016.  There were no responses to these letters.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $100

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    None identified.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines;

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by removing a conflict point on Fraser Street;

·   Allows left turning vehicles an opportunity to move left earlier.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes two car parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Fraser Street and Cranford Street will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations 

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   No car parking is removed;

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the limited sightlines and therefore the crash risk;

·   It does not address the conflict point and therefore the crash risk

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Fraser Street and Cranford Street Proposed No Stopping Plan

47

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

12.    Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction

Reference:

16/1312639

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the ‘no stopping’ restrictions on Harewood Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is in response to a request from Wesley Care (retirement village).

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke any and all parking or stopping restrictions on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres;

2.         Resolve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the entrance to Wesley Care.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes one car park.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Wesley Care (retirement village) has been redeveloped and as part of the redevelopment the entrance has shifted on Harewood Road.  The new entrance point is east of the old entrance and is used by staff, visitors and all residents that drive.  Previously there was an entrance on Marblewood Drive but this has been closed.

5.2       The parking to the east of the new entrance was removed at the start of this year.  This has made a big improvement on visibility from the entrance.  Parking has now shifted to the west side of this entrance and this is limiting visibility for drivers turning right.

5.3       The new entrance accesses a car park which has more than 25 car parks on site.  It is also used by all residents that drive.  All the residents that drive would be considered elderly motorists.  Elderly motorists are more vulnerable in a crash than a younger motorists.  They also tend to have slower motor reflexes.  Increasing the sightlines at this entrance gives these elderly drivers more time to decide whether to exit.  Thereby increasing their safety.

5.4       Harewood Road is a minor arterial road with an average daily traffic volume of approximately 13,500 vehicles per day.

5.5       It is proposed to extend the existing no stopping restriction to 9 metres west of the entrance to Wesley Care.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Harewood Road at the new entrance to Wesley Care as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low, consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Wesley Care are specifically affected by this option as they are the land owners adjacent to the proposal.  They requested the no stopping restriction and are therefore in support of the proposal.  No other parties have been consulted as this is considered a safety issue.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $50

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.13    None identified.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board Approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the entrance to Wesley Care.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes one car park.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Harewood Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low, consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this low rating.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations 

7.11    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains one car park.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines at this commercial entrance and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction Plan

53

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

13.    Establishment of the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund

Reference:

16/1245710

Contact:

Helen Miles

helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

941 5409

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an allocation of $2,000 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund for the purpose of establishing the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $25,104.00 in the Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Review the current criteria and approves the establishment of the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

2.         Approves the transfer of $2,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

 

 

4.   Positive Youth Development Scheme

4.1       The purpose of the Positive Youth Development Scheme is to celebrate and support young people living in the Papanui-Innes ward by providing financial assistance for their development. The Community Board also seeks to acknowledge young peoples’ effort, achievement and potential excellence in the community.

4.2       The Positive Youth Development Scheme will consider applications for the following activities:

4.2.1   Personal Development and Growth - For example leadership training, career development, Outward Bound, Spirit of Adventure, extra-curricular educational opportunities.

4.2.2   Representation at Events - Applicants can apply for assistance if they have been selected to represent their school, team or community at a local, national or international event or competition.  This includes sporting, cultural and community events.

4.3       The following eligibility criteria must be met:

4.3.1   Age groups 12 to 21 years.

4.3.2   Projects must have obvious benefits for the young person and, if possible, the wider community.

4.3.3   Only one application per person permitted per year.

4.3.4   Applicants should be undertaking other fundraising activities and not relying solely on Community Board support.

4.4       Successful applicants will be required to report back to the Community Board on their experiences.

4.5       Each application will be assessed by the appropriate staff member and presented to the Board for its consideration.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

14.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club

Reference:

16/1271993

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

55675

QEII Swim Club Incorporated

Swim Coach and Facility Hire

$10,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from QEII Swim Club Incorporated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $2,000 to QEII Swim Club Incorporated towards pool hire.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$2,000

$0.00

$2,000

$0.00

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix (refer Attachment A) provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

4.4       This application is split between the Papanui-Innes and Coastal-Burwood Community Boards 35/65 respectively. Coastal-Burwood has approved their portion of the application for the amount of $5,000.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

QEII Swim Club Inc - Decision Matrix

59

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

15.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Luisa Portia Dewar

Reference:

16/1339842

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider one application received for the Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $2,000 in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Luisa Portia Dewar.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $250 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Luisa Portia Dewar towards New Zealand Scout Jamboree in Renwick, 29 December 2016 to 7 January 2017.

 

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Luisa Portia Dewar

4.1       The applicant, Luisa Dewar, is seeking financial support in assisting with the costs of attending the New Zealand Scout Jamboree being held in Renwick from 29 December 2016 to 7 January 2017.

4.2       Luisa Dewar is 13 years of age, lives in St Albans and currently attends Catholic Cathedral College in year nine.

4.3       Luisa joined scouts when she was eight years old.  She currently is a member of the St Mathews LLO Scout group.  She is currently finishing her Sliver award and her goal is to achieve her Gold award next year.   She is looking forward to developing her leadership skills at the Jamboree.

4.4       Luisa currently plays hockey summer and winter and received the sports scholarship from her school this year.

4.5       Luisa started fundraising for this Jamboree in October 2015 and has managed to raise $1,310.00.  Fundraising activities have included a quiz night, selling pies, firewood, BBQs, stock takes, busking and cake stalls.

4.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Luisa Portia Dewar:

 

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Event expense

1,600.00

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$1,600.00

 

4.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

16.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund - Belfast School

Reference:

16/1299323

Contact:

Trevor Cattermole

Trevor.Cattermole@ccc.govt.nz

941-5407

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider one application received for the Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $2,000 in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Belfast School.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $665 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Belfast School towards the cost of Belfast School Prefects and House Captains attending the Leadership Camp at the Positive Youth Development Trust (Te Koru) Youth facility on 4 and 5 April 2017.

 

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Belfast School

4.1       The applicant, the Belfast Primary School, wish to send 10 Prefects and four House Captains on a two day overnight Leadership training camp at the Positive Youth Development (Te Koru) Youth facility. Each pupil will be asked to contribute towards the costs.

4.2       Belfast School puts a strong emphasis on fostering and developing leadership skills amongst their students and has found in the past that the camp experience is invaluable. Skills learnt on camp include conflict resolution, mediation, problem solving, personality types, recognising personal strengths and identifying growth areas.

4.3       Historically, Belfast School helped to develop this program with Papanui Youth Development Trust (Te Koru Youth facility) and the benefits of this programme are evident in the development of future leaders. Papanui High school has previously contacted Belfast School with praise for the pupils who have attended this course and have presented at High School with the tools and skills this leadership program provides. Belfast School attendees have reported to teachers that this program was one of the most important components in the development of their leadership skills and learning.

4.4       Belfast School reports that this course is a major precursor for those who attend, not only to become mentors to the junior students, but also to participate further in all areas of school activities, thus creating leaders that their fellow students look up to, aspire to, emulate and follow.

4.5       Fund raising for this camp is difficult for the students at this time of year. Any assistance provided by the Board would be greatly appreciated. This is the tenth time the school has applied to the Youth Development Fund (each year different students attend the course). The school received in 2004/5 $720, 2006/07 $1,000, 2008/09 $350, 2010/11 $300, 2011/12 $840, 2012/13 $1050, 2013/14 $1050, 2014/15 $665 and 2015/16 $665.This year the school is again seeking $665 which is approximately $48 per student.

4.6       Each pupil will be asked to contribute towards the costs. The expected contribution is to be approximately $48 per student.

4.7       The application fits with the Board’s Youth Development Criteria of “Personal Development and Growth”

4.8       The Leadership Training course was originally devised jointly by the applicant Belfast Primary School and the deliverer, Papanui Youth Development Trust (Te Koru Youth facility), and provides a unique example of historical and ongoing successful collaboration between School and Community within the Papanui-Innes Ward.

4.9       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for <enter text>:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Cost per student ($95 per student x 14 students)

$1,330.00

(Includes Course, overnight accommodation, transport and meals).

 

Fundraising ($47.50 per student, including car-wash, sausage sizzle, parent and school contribution planned for February 2017.

$665.00

 

 

Total applied for

$665.00

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$665.00

 

4.10    This is the tenth time the applicant has applied for funding as each year different students attend the course.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

17.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update

Reference:

16/1340483

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Board Activities

1.1       A youth event organised through collaboration with a range of community organisations entitled a Pool Party will be held on Friday 9 December, commencing at 7pm at Jellie Park Outdoor Pool Area only. Admission $3 (exact change please – no Eftpos facilities).  Jointly supported by the Papanui-Innes and Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Boards.

1.2       Joint Board meeting re Northern Line Cycleway – 2pm to 3.30pm, Monday 5 December 2016, Fendalton Boardroom.

1.3       Additional Board Seminar – 4pm, Wednesday 7 December 2016, Papanui Boardroom.

1.4       Information recently sent to the Board included:

1.4.1      Link to engagement page for the Northern Line Cycleway

1.4.2      SCIRT Communication Snapshot October 2016

1.4.3      Glenfield Crescent – Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

1.4.4      Christchurch Northern Corridor – Work Notice

1.4.5      Main North Road – Proposed signal controlled pedestrian crossing

1.4.6      Stormwater Works – Papanui Parallel Cycleway

1.4.7      Proposed traffic improvement changes on Blighs Road

1.4.8      SCIRT update and performance dashboard – November 2016

1.4.9      Papanui Parallel Cycleway – work notice

2.   Community Activities

2.1       464 Papanui Road Bus Stop Relocation

             Attached to this report (refer Attachment A) is a memo from the Traffic Engineer and the Passenger Transport Engineer regarding the feasibility of moving the bus stop outside 464 Papanui Road.

2.2       Te Ora Hou annual break up

             This was held at Papanui Baptist the evening showcased Te Ora Hou’s work with the youth community by emphasising a holistic approach to supporting whanau.

 

2.3       Interagency meeting

             The end of year interagency meeting was held at Te Ora Hou in the heritage church.  Community organisations spoke about the issues they have faced in 2016 and what their aspirations are for 2017. This joint interagency meeting between the Shirley and Papanui organisation occurs only once per year which allows a wider range of groups to network around similar issues.

 

2.4       Redwood Plunket rooms update.

             Planning work is underway to repair the building with the aim of making it a permanent location for the Northcote Community worker who is currently working out of St Silas church.

 

 

2.5       St Christopher's door knockers

             St Christopher's door knockers are beginning a door knock of 1,500 households in the Casebrook area.  Staff are working closely with St Christopher's around this project and the outcomes will be reported to the Community Board.

 

2.6       Belfast Community Network

             Belfast Community Network is holding an event on 16 December in Sheldon Park to raise funds for Kaikoura residents. This event is a collaborative approach with a number of organisations helping.

 

2.7       Civil Defence Earthquake Emergency support

             Over the past two weeks many staff have been working with the Emergency Operations Centre supporting the response to the recent earthquakes. Our Unit is centrally involved in the provision of welfare support.

 

2.8       10 Shirley Road Community Facility rebuild

             Documents including the terms of reference and membership of the working party will be provided to the 9 December Community Board meeting.  

 

 

 

 

2    Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

464 Papanui Road Bus Stop and Pedestrian Refuge Island Memorandum

69

 

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

30 November 2016

 

 

18.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

19.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.