Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Thursday 1 September 2016

Time:                                    8.30am

Venue:                                 Council Chamber, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor David East

Councillor Tim Scandrett

 

 

26 August 2016

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

David Adamson

General Manager City Services

Tel: 941 8235

 

Samantha Kelly

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee - Terms of Reference

 

Chair

Cr Clearwater

Membership

Cr Cotter (Deputy Chair), Deputy Mayor Buck, Cr East, Cr Scandrett

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including  vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies) is odd.

Meeting Cycle

The first Thursday of each calendar month except for January

Reports to:

Council

Long Term Plan Activities

·         water supply and water conservation

·         sewerage collection treatment and disposal

·         land and storm water drainage

·         flood protection and control works

·         natural hazards protection

­          natural hazards policy and planning

­          land instability management

­          other natural hazards management

·         roads and footpaths (inc. pedestrian malls and cycle lanes)

·         transport (including regional public transport and NZTA)

­          transport policy and planning

­          major cycle ways

­          parking (on and off street)

­          road operations

­          public transport infrastructure (including bus stops, shelters, seats and transport hubs)

­          transport education

­          harbours and marine structures

·         parks and open spaces

­          regional parks

­          garden and heritage parks

­          cemeteries

­          neighbourhood parks

·         waste management minimisation and disposal

­          residual waste collection and disposal

­          recyclable material collection and processing

­          organic material collection and composing

­          commercial and industrial minimisation

·         natural environment

­          natural environment policy and planning

­          environmental education

­          sustainability and energy initiatives and conservation of resources (including investigating electric buses)

·         all other transport issues such as regional public transport and NZTA

 

Responsibilities

·         Developing policy and strategy in relation to long term plan activities as listed above

·         Monitoring earthquake recovery related to the committees specified activities (i.e. Infrastructure rebuild, major facilities rebuild and facilities rebuild)

·         Considering recommendations from Council’s Subcommittees, Community Boards, the public, stakeholders and providers in relation to infrastructure, transport and environmental planning, delivery and operation

·         Making decisions with regard for the requirements of Sections 76 – 81 of the Local Government Act 2002 where it has the delegated authority from Council to do so, or recommendations to Council where a Council decision is required.

 

Delegations

 

Riccarton Road Corridor Public Transport Priority And Hub Decision Making Delegation

 

At the Council meeting of 13 November 2014:

It was resolved that the Council:

             33.1     Confirm that the Riccarton Public Transport Hub waiting lounge, super stop and associated street works, and the Riccarton Public Transport Priority project are both issues of metropolitan significance within the meaning of the Council’s delegations register.

             33.2     Will make the final decision on the design version for the Riccarton Public Transport Hub waiting lounge, the super stop and associated street works.

             33.3     Delegate the decision on the final design version for the Riccarton Public Transport Priority project and associated street works to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee because of tight time-lines.

             33.4     Instruct staff to ensure that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board is kept informed on the proposals arising from both project streams and arrange appropriate briefing session(s) accordingly.

             33.5     Confirm that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board will continue to make recommendations to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee on issues such as on-street works through Part A reports for the Riccarton Public Transport Priority and the Riccarton Public Transport Hub projects.

 

 

Major Cycleway Routes (MCR) Programme – Delivery Programme and Design Guides

 

At the Council meeting of 29 January 2015:

It was resolved that the Council:

             7.1       Note the progress update on the Major Cycleway Route programme.

             7.2       Adopt Revision A of the Major Cycleway Design Principles Best Practice Design Guide and the draft Way Finding and Signage Guide in principle for the four selected routes as detailed in 7.7.1, 7.7.2, 7.7.3 and 7.7.4.

             7.3       Agree to the route prioritisation.

             7.4       Agree to the Major Cycleway Route programme being declared a Metropolitan Programme and delegate to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee all decision making powers.

             7.5       Note that the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee and affected Community Boards will be advised prior to any public consultation commencing on any Major Cycleway Route project.

             7.6       Note that appropriate Community Board Members will be invited by the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to participate in the relevant Major Cycleway Route item discussion.

             7.7       Adopt in principle the route selection recommendations and refer the final decision to the Infrastructure Transport Environment Committee, noting the route selections as detailed below will be subject to receiving recommendations from the affected Community Board and to full consultation then approval by the Infrastructure Transport and Environment Committee:

                         7.7.1   Quarryman’s Trail;

                         7.7.2   Rapanui – Shag Rock;

                         7.7.3   Uni-Cycle;

                         7.7.4   Papanui Parallel.


 

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 6

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 6

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 6

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 6

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 6

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Papanui Parallel Major Cycleway Route Traffic Resolutions and Little River Major Cycleway Route Traffic Resolution amendments....................................................... 15

A       7.       Proposed Bus Shelter Manchester Street................................................................... 91

A       8.       Proposed CBD 30kph Speed Limit Threshold Enhancements.................................... 99

A       9.       Infrastructure Design Standard 2016......................................................................... 119

A       10.     Notice of Motion......................................................................................................... 137

A       11.     Mona Vale Gate House & Halswell Quarry - Commercial Premises Options.......... 145

A       12.     Medway Street renewal and adjustments to the Street Renewal programme. ... 183

B       13.     Botanic Gardens former visitor centre re-use .......................................................... 191

B       14.     September 2016 Zone Committees' update.............................................................. 201

B       15.     3 Waters and Waste Monthly Report........................................................................ 205

B       16.     Drinking Water E. coli Testing and Risk Mitigation Processes................................. 219

C       17.     Resolution to Exclude the Public............................................................................... 227  

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Thursday, 4 August 2016 be confirmed (refer page 7).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Helene Mautner representing the Opawaho/Heathcote River Network, Sylvia Smith representing the Avon-Otakaro River Network, and Tanya Jenkins representing the Avon-Heathcote Estuary/Ihutai Trust will address the Committee regarding the placement of litter booms in Christchurch rivers.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 4 August 2016

Time:                                    8.36am

Venue:                                 Council Chamber, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor David East

Councillor Tim Scandrett

 

 

4 August 2016

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

David Adamson

General Manager City Services

Tel: 941 8235

 

Aidan Kimberley

Committee Advisor

941 6566

Aidan.kimberley@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00051

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Clearwater, seconded by Deputy Mayor Buck that the apology for lateness from Councillor Scandrett be accepted.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Deputy Mayor                                                                                                                 Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00052

Committee Decision

That the minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 be confirmed.

Deputy Mayor/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                          Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.


 

 

6.   Major Cycleway - Uni cycle section 3 - Hinau Parking and Miro intersections

Mike Mora, Chairperson – Riccarton/Wigram Community Board, joined the table for this item.

 

Committee Recommendation

Part C

Councillor Clearwater moved, seconded by Councillor Cotter, that the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Approve that the scheme designs for Hinau Street/Miro Street and Miro Street/Totara Street intersections proceed to detailed design and construction, as detailed in Attachment A.

2.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southwest Totara Street approach to its the intersection with Miro Street.

3.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northern Hinau Street approach to its intersection with Miro Street.

4.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hinau Street from its intersection with Clyde Road to its intersection with Konini Street. 

5.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hinau Street from its intersection with Konini Street to its intersection with Puriri Street. 

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 80 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 80 metres east of its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 54 metres.  This restriction is to apply from Monday to Friday inclusive 8am to 7pm.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 18 metres east of its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 140 metres.  This restriction is to apply from Monday to Friday inclusive 8am to 7pm. 

11.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

12.       Approve that Resolutions 2 to 11 above take effect on completion of the physical works associated with the implementation of the layout on Attachment A.

13.       Endorse that parking restriction on the southern side of Hinau Street from Puriri Street to Miro Street be reviewed a year after opening and further consultation be undertaken at that time on any further changes required.

 

Amendment ITEC/2016/00053

Deputy Mayor Buck moved by way of amendment that:

The hours of operation for the parking restrictions in clauses 7 and 10 above be changed from 8am to 7pm, to 8am to 6pm.

The amendment was seconded by Councillor East and on being put to the meeting was declared carried.

 

Deputy Mayor/Councillor East                                                                                                                               Carried

 

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00054

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Buck, seconded by Councillor Cotter that the motion as amended (see below) was put to the meeting as the substantive motion and declared carried.

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Approve that the scheme designs for Hinau Street/Miro Street and Miro Street/Totara Street intersections proceed to detailed design and construction, as detailed in Attachment A.

2.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southwest Totara Street approach to its the intersection with Miro Street.

3.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northern Hinau Street approach to its intersection with Miro Street.

4.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hinau Street from its intersection with Clyde Road to its intersection with Konini Street. 

5.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hinau Street from its intersection with Konini Street to its intersection with Puriri Street. 

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 80 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 80 metres east of its intersection with Clyde Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 54 metres.  This restriction is to apply from Monday to Friday inclusive 8am to 6pm.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at a point 18 metres east of its intersection with Konini Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 140 metres.  This restriction is to apply from Monday to Friday inclusive 8am to 6pm. 

11.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hinau Street, commencing at its intersection with Puriri Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

12.       Approve that Resolutions 2 to 11 above take effect on completion of the physical works associated with the implementation of the layout on Attachment A.

13.       Endorse that parking restriction on the southern side of Hinau Street from Puriri Street to Miro Street be reviewed a year after opening and further consultation be undertaken at that time on any further changes required.

 

Deputy Mayor/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                          Carried

 

Councillor Scandrett joined the meeting at 9:11 am.

7.   Update of Major Cycleways Best Practice Design Guide

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00055

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Adopt the updated revision of Revision B of the Major Cycleway Routes Best Practice Design Guide. This is Part B of Christchurch City Council’s Christchurch Cycle Design Guidelines July 2016.

2.         Request that staff provide a further update of the Guide when the Urban Design / Landscape chapter and the review of best practice design for Greenways is available.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

8.   St Asaph Street and Hagley Avenue Speed Limits

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2016/00056

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Retain the existing 50km/hr speed limit of Hagley Avenue and St Asaph Street (the Do Nothing option)

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor East                                                                                                                 Carried

 

The meeting adjourned at 10:02am and resumed at 10:14am


 

 

9.   Bells Creek stormwater treatment option

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2016/00057

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Approve construction of a pilot stormwater treatment device at #12 Richardson Terrace (to be constructed concurrently with the Bells Creek stormwater pump station planned for this site).

2.         Fund construction from the 2016-17 Annual Plan item, SW (stormwater) Bells Creek Ferry Road Storm Filter Vault (CPMS ID 34337).

3.         Identify operational and maintenance funding for this pilot as a candidate in the next Annual Plan when operation will be ready to begin, with full operational funding for an improved level of service subject to approval in the 2018 LTP.

4.         In order to ensure that the funding of this device does not set a precedent, request a report to be delivered in early 2017 in accord with the preparation of the Long Term Plan on the city wide financial implications of stormwater quality improvement options (including capital and operational costs and benefits). This is to provide recommendations to enable decision by the Council on stormwater quality improvement measures to be implemented in existing urban areas.

5.         Instigate an appropriate monitoring regime that quantifies the water quality benefits delivered by this installation.

 

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                               Carried

 

10. August 2016 Zone Committees' Updates

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00058

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the Zone Committees' report.

 

Councillor Cotter/Councillor East                                                                                                                          Carried

 

11. Transport Unit - Bi-Monthly Report

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00059

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the August 2016 Transport Unit Bi-Monthly Report.

 

Councillor Cotter/Deputy Mayor                                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

12  Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2016/00060

Part C

That at 11:34 the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 180 to 181 of the agenda be adopted.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                              Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 11:50am.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 11:50am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016.

 

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Chairperson

   


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

6.        Papanui Parallel Major Cycleway Route Traffic Resolutions and Little River Major Cycleway Route Traffic Resolution amendments

Reference:

16/895272

Contact:

Brendan Bisley

brendan.bisley@ccc.govt.nz

941 8385

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       This report is for the Infrastructure Transport and Environment Committee (the Committee) to receive and to resolve the traffic resolutions, tree removal and replacement required to implement the Papanui Parallel Major Cycleway Route (MCR). In addition it is to amend a small number of the Little River MCR traffic resolutions previously resolved by the Committee when it approved the scheme plan in February 2016, due to minor changes in the detailed design of the route.

1.2       The Committee approved the Papanui Parallel MCR on the 16th February 2016. At the time, due to the large number of submissions received and the high community interest in the scheme, staff did not include the detailed traffic resolutions needed to implement the scheme as part of the report. This was to avoid giving the appearance that the outcome was pre-determined. The resolutions attached are the traffic resolutions required to implement the scheme approved by the Committee on the 16th February 2016. Attachment A contains the drawings that reflect the resolutions and highlight the trees that require removal due to movement of the kerb lines to accommodate the separated cycle lanes. New trees will be planted to replace the removed trees.

1.3       The Committee approved the MCR Little River City End scheme on the 4th February 2016. That decision included the amended traffic resolutions for the scheme. As the detailed design has progressed the design team have needed to make some minor changes to the signage on the cycleway as well as changes to the cycle crossing on Brougham Street following discussions with the New Zealand Transport Authority, which is the Road Controlling Authority for Brougham Street. The new recommendations included in this report are for the areas that have changed. Appendix B is the drawings with the proposed markings and signage.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the attachments to this report.

2.         Resolve the detailed traffic resolutions for the Papanui Parallel Major Cycleway Route as detailed in the attachment A and approve the removal of the trees identified in Attachment A.

             Papanui Parallel Resolutions

a.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.

b.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2)  The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Committee meeting of 15 September 2016; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Committee resolutions on the Papanui Parallel Major Cycleway at the Committee meeting of 15 September 2016.

 

3.         Existing Sawyers Arms Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Sawyers Arms Road from its intersection with Main North Road to a point 204metres north-west of its intersection with Nyoli Street.

 

4.         New Sawyers Arms Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Sawyers Arms Road from its intersection with Main North Road to a point 204metres north-west of its intersection with Nyoli Street, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound and southbound cycles only be established on the south-west side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing 5metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction to a point 407metres north-west of its intersection with Sisson Drive, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (south-eastbound cycles) on the Sawyers Arms Road approach to a point 10metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (south-eastbound cycles) on the Sawyers Arms Road approach at a point 73metres north-west of its intersection with Sisson Drive, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (north-westbound cycles) on the Sawyers Arms Road approach to a point 59metres north-west of its intersection with Sisson Drive, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (north-westbound cycles) on the Sawyers Arms Road approach to a point 407metres north-west of its intersection with Sisson Drive, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

 

5.         Existing Intersection – Sawyers Arms Road / Sisson Drive – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Sisson Drive.

 

6.         New Intersection – Sawyers Arms Road / Sisson Drive – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Sisson Drive, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Sisson Drive be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

7.         Existing Sisson Drive - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Sisson Drive from its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road to a point 14 metres southwest of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Sisson Drive from its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road to a point 6 metres southwest of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road. Note 1 applies.

 

8.         New Sisson Drive - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Sisson Drive commencing at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Sisson Drive commencing at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 6 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

9.         Existing Intersection – Sawyers Arms Road / Main North Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Main North Road.

 

10.       New Intersection – Sawyers Arms Road / Main North Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Main North Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Main North Road be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

11.       Existing Sawyers Arms Road - Main North Road to rail corridor - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Sawyers Arms Road from its intersection with Main North Road to its intersection with the rail corridor.

 

12.       New Sawyers Arms Road - Main North to Rail Corridor - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 16 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 15 minutes on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 16 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. This parking restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 26 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 37 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a loading zone for goods vehicles only be created and restricted to a maximum period of 15 minutes. The restriction is to be on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 63 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. This parking restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 74 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 60 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. This parking restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 134 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 140 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a Bus Stop be created on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 274 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 288 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 25 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 328 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 9 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 347 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 18 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 393 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 30 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 461 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 18 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

m.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 616 metres northwest of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction to its intersection with the rail corridor. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

n.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 276 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

o.         Approve that a Bus Stop be installed on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 276 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

p.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 290 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 9 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

q.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 299 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 69 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. Note 2 applies.

r.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 368 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 147 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

s.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 515 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 137 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. Note 2 applies.

t.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Sawyers Arms Road commencing at a distance 652 metres northwest its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a northwesterly direction to its intersection with the rail corridor. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

13.       Existing Main North Road – Sawyers Arms Road to South-West of Grassmere Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Main North Road from its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road to a point 30metres south-west of its intersection with Grassmere Street. Note 2 applies.

 

14.       New Main North Road –Sawyers Arms Road to South-West of Grassmere Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Main North Road from its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road to a point 30metres south-west of its intersection with Grassmere Street, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a bi-directional cycle path be established on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing at a point 5metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 35metres, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway be established on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing 5metres north-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a south-easterly then south-westerly direction to a point 5metres south-west of its intersection with Main North Road, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway be established on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing 45metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 42metres, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional cycle path be established on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing at a point 87metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a south-westerly direction for a distance of 34m, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the bi-directional cycle path (north-eastbound cycles) on the Main North Road approach at a point 10metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the bi-directional cycle path (south-westbound cycles) on the Main North Road approach at a point 121metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

h.         Approve that the all south-westbound cycles on the Main North Road special vehicle lane be restricted from continuing south-westbound, and must turn northwest  at a point 112metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

i.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south-west cycles only, be established on the south-east side of Main North Road against the kerb, commencing at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a south-westerly direction to a point 30metres south-west of its intersection with Grassmere Street. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 as detailed in Appendix A.

j.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north-eastbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Main North Road against the west side of the through lane, commencing at a point 65metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road and extending in a north-easterly direction to a point 10metres south-west of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 as detailed in Appendix A.

 

15.       Existing Intersection – Main North Road / Grassmere Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Main North Road and Grassmere Street.

 

16.       New Intersection – Main North Road / Grassmere Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Main North Road and Grassmere Street, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Grassmere Street at its intersection with the southeast side of Main North Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

17.       New Main North Road Crossing – Traffic Control

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Main North Road at the pedestrian and cycle crossing as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a pedestrian and cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals in accordance with sections 6 and 8.5(3) of the Land Transport Action - Traffic Control Devices Rule 2004, be installed on Main North Road at a point 5 metres north east of its intersection with Grassmere Street.

 

18.       Existing Main North Road - Grassmere Street to Sawyers Arms Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Main North Road from its intersection with Grassmere Street to a point 18 metres northeast of its intersection with Grassmere Street. Note 1 applies.

 

19.       New Main North Road - Grassmere Street to Saywers Arms Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast of Main North Road commencing at its intersection with Grassmere Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 15 minutes on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing at a distance 12 metres southwest of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. This parking restriction is located on the south eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Main North Road commencing at a distance 46 metres southwest of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 90 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the south eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

 

20.       Existing Grassmere Street – Main North Road to Grants Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Grassmere Street from its intersection with Main North Road to a point 12metres north-west of its intersection with Grants Road.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Main North Road from its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road to a point 135 metres southwest of its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road. Note 1 applies.

 

21.       New Grassmere Street – Main North Road to Grants Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Grassmere Street from its intersection with Main North Road to a point 12metres north-west of its intersection with Grants Road, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a bi-directional cycle path be established on the north-east side of Grassmere Street commencing 6metres south-east of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 247m, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway be established on the north-east side of Grassmere Street commencing 253metres south-east of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a south-easterly direction to a point 12metres north-west of its intersection with Grants Road, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004.  Note 2 applies.

 

22.       Existing Grassmere Street - Main North Road to Grants Road - Parking and Stopping Resolutions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast and southwest sides of Grassmere Street from its intersection with Main North Road to its intersection with Grants Road.

 

23.       New Grassmere Street - Main North Road to Grants Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Grassmere Street commencing at its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the southwest side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 129 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 91 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 220 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 75 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 494 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 60 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 60 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 6 metres. This parking restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 66 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 54 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 120 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 7 metres. This parking restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 179 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Grassmere Street commencing at a distance 244 metres southeast of its intersection with Main North Road, and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Grants Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

 

24.       Existing Rutland Street – Tomes Road to St Albans Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Rutland Street from its intersection with Tomes Road to its intersection with St Albans Street.

 

25.       New Rutland Street – Tomes Road to St Albans Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Rutland Street from its intersection with Tomes Road to its intersection with St Albans Street. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway be established on the east side of Rutland Street commencing 14m north-west of its intersection with Tomes Road and extending in a south-easterly direction to a point 15metres south east of its intersection with Tomes Road, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound and southbound cycles only be established on the east side of Rutland Street commencing 15metres south-east of its intersection with Tomes Road and extending in a south-easterly direction to a point 22metres north-west of its intersection with Mays (east), as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies

d.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south-eastbound cycles only be established on the east side of Rutland Street commencing 22metres north of its intersection with Mays Road (east) and extending in a south-easterly direction to its intersection with St Albans Street, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

e.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north-westbound cycles only be established on the west side of Rutland Street commencing 27metres north of its intersection with Mays Road (west) and extending in a south-easterly direction to its intersection with St Albans Street, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (north-westbound cycles) on the Rutland Street approach at a point 27metres north of its intersection with Mays Road (west), as detailed in Attachment A.

g.         Approve that a Give Way control for southeast bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

h.         Approve that a Give Way control for northwest bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

i.          Approve that a Give Way control for straight through vehicles on Mays Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

j.          Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Mays Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

k.         Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

l.          Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

m.       Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Mays Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

n.         Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Mays Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Mays Road as detailed in Attachment A.

o.         Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of McFaddens Road as detailed in Attachment A.

p.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against north-westbound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, against the south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of McFaddens Road as detailed in Attachment A.

q.         Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Chapter Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of McFaddens Road as detailed in Attachment A.

r.          Approve that a Give Way control for south-westbound vehicles on McFaddens Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of McFaddens Road as detailed in Attachment A.

s.         Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Chapter Street as detailed in Attachment A.

t.          Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Chapter Street as detailed in Attachment A.

u.         Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Chapter Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Chapter Street as detailed in Attachment A.

v.         Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on McFaddens Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Chapter Street as detailed in Attachment A.

w.        Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

x.         Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

y.         Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Weston Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

z.         Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Weston Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

aa.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against north-westbound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, against the north-westbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

bb.      Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound right turning vehicles on Weston Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

cc.       Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Weston Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

dd.      Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Weston Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Weston Road as detailed in Attachment A.

ee.      Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A.

ff.        Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A.

gg.       Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Knowles Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A.

hh.      Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Knowles Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A

ii.         Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A

jj.         Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound right turning vehicles on Knowles Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A

kk.       Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound straight through vehicles on Knowles Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A

ll.         Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Knowles Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Knowles Street as detailed in Attachment A

mm.   Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Malvern Street as detailed in Attachment A

nn.      Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Malvern Street as detailed in Attachment A

oo.      Approve that a Give Way control for south west bound vehicles on Malvern Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Malvern Street as detailed in Attachment A

pp.      Approve that a Give Way control for north west bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Hawkesbury Avenue as detailed in Attachment A

qq.      Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound right turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Hawkesbury Avenue as detailed in Attachment A

rr.        Approve that a Give Way control for north east bound vehicles on Hawkesbury Avenue, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north west bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Hawkesbury Avenue as detailed in Attachment A

ss.       Approve that a Give Way control for south east bound left turning vehicles on Rutland Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Westminster Street  as detailed in Attachment A

tt.        Approve that a Give Way control or south west bound vehicles on Westminster Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the south east bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Westminster Street as detailed in Attachment A

 

26.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Mays Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Mays Road.

 

27.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Mays Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Rutland Street and Mays Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Mays Road (west) at its intersection with the west side of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Mays Road (east) at its intersection with the east side of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

28.       Existing Mays Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Mays Road from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 16 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Mays Road from a point 14 metres southwest of its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 17 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

29.       New Mays Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Mays Road commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Mays Road commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a south westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 16 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Mays Road commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

 

30.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / McFaddens Road / Chapter Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street, McFaddens Road and Chapter Street.

 

31.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / McFaddens Road / Chapter Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Rutland Street, McFaddens Road and Chapter Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the west approach of Chapter Street at its intersection with Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the east approach of McFaddens Road at its intersection with Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

32.       Existing McFaddens Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of McFaddens Road from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 11 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of McFaddens Road from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 17 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

33.       New McFaddens Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of McFaddens Road commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of McFaddens Road commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

34.       Existing Chapter Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Chapter Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 17 metres southwest of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Chapter Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 16 metres southwest of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

35.       New Chapter Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Chapter Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a south westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 19 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Chapter Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a south westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 19 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

36.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Weston Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Weston Road.

 

37.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Weston Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Weston Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the east side of Weston Road at its intersection with Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the west side of Weston Road at its intersection with Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

38.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Knowles Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Knowles Street.

 

39.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Knowles Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Knowles Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the east side of Knowles Street at its intersection with of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the west side of Knowles Street at its intersection with Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

40.       Existing Knowles Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Knowles Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 9 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Knowles Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 9 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

41.       New Knowles Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Knowles Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 7 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Knowles Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 7 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

42.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Innes Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Innes Road.

 

43.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Innes Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Innes Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Rutland Street and Innes Road be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

44.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Hawkesbury Avenue – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Hawkesbury Avenue.

 

45.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Hawkesbury Avenue – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Hawkesbury Avenue, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Hawkesbury Avenue at its intersection with the west side of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

46.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Malvern Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Malvern Street.

 

47.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Malvern Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Malvern Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Malvern Street at its intersection with the east side of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

48.       Existing Malvern Street- Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Malvern Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 12 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Malvern Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 12 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

 

49.       New Malvern Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Malvern Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Malvern Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

50.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / Westminster Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and Westminster Street.

 

51.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / Westminster Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Rutland Street and Westminster Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Westminster Street at its intersection with the east side of Rutland Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that the right turn movement from Westminster Street into Rutland Street is prohibited, as detailed in Attachment A.

d.         Approve that the right turn movement from Rutland Street into Westminster Street is prohibited, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

52.       Existing Westminster Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Westminster Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 15 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street following the kerbline. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Westminster Street from its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 12 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

53.       New Westminster Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Westminster Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 15 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Westminster Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

54.       Existing Intersection – Rutland Street / St Albans Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Rutland Street and St Albans Street.

 

55.       New Intersection – Rutland Street / St Albans Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Rutland Street and St Albans Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Rutland Street and St Albans Street be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

56.       Existing Rutland Street -  St Albans Street to Tomes Street  - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Rutland Street from its intersection with St Albans Street to its intersection with Tomes Road.

 

57.       New Rutland Street - St Albans Street to Innes Street - Parking and Stopping Resolutions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 90 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 105 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 175 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 216 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 15 minutes on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 303 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 37 metres. This parking restriction is located on the northeast side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 340 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Innes Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 108 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 208 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 50 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 280 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 103 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 15 minutes on the northwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 383 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This parking restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 423 metres northwest of its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Innes Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with Innes Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 135 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the north eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

m.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 177 metres northwest of its intersection with Innes Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 72 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the north eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

n.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 358 metres northwest of its intersection with Innes Road, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Chapter Street. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the north eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

o.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with Innes Road, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with McFaddens Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 1 applies.

p.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with Chapter Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the north eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

q.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 55 metres northwest of its intersection with Chapter Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 60 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

r.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 115 metres northwest of its intersection with Chapter Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 5 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

s.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 238 metres northwest of its intersection with Chapter Street, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Tomes Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

t.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at its intersection with McFaddens Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 130 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

u.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 141 metres northwest of its intersection with McFaddens Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

v.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 203 metres northwest of its intersection with McFaddens Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 17 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

w.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 226 metres northwest of its intersection with McFaddens Road, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 27 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

x.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Rutland Street commencing at a distance 253 m northwest of its intersection with McFaddens Road, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Tomes Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the southwestern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

 

58.       Existing St Albans Street – West of Rutland Street to North-East of Trafalgar Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on St Albans Street from a point 36m south-west of its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 53m north-east of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

 

59.       New St Albans Street – West of Rutland Street to North-East of Trafalgar Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on St Albans Street from a point 36metres south-west of its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 53metres north-east of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound cycles only, be established on the south side of St Albans Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 21metres west of its intersection with Rutland Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a bi directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at a point 11metres northwest of its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a south-easterly then south-westerly direction for a distance 22metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a bi directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the south side of St Albans Street commencing at a point 7metres west of its intersection with Massey Crescent, and extending in a south-westerly direction to a point 75metres west of its intersection with Massey Crescent in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve a Give Way control for eastbound right turning vehicles on St Albans Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the eastbound and westbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent as detailed in Attachment A.

f.          Approve a Give Way control for westbound left turning vehicles on St Albans Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against eastbound and westbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent as detailed in Appendix A.

g.         Approve a Give Way control for northbound vehicles on Massey Crescent, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against eastbound and westbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent as detailed in Appendix A.

h.         Approve that special vehicle lanes for the use of eastbound and westbound cycles only be established on the south side of St Albans Street commencing 7metres west of its intersection with Massey Crescent and extending in a easterly direction to its intersection with Trafalgar Street, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

 

60.       Existing Intersection –St Albans Street / Massey Crescent – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of St Albans Street and Massey Crescent.

 

61.       New Intersection – St Albans Street / Massey Crescent – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of St Albans Street and Massey Crescent, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Massey Crescent at its intersection with the south side of St Albans Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Massey Crescent at its intersection with the special vehicle lanes on the south side of St Albans Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

62.       Existing northern intersection of Massey Crescent at St Albans Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Massey Crescent North from its intersection with  St Albans Street to a point 18 metres south of its intersection with  St Albans Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Massey Crescent North from its intersection with  St Albans Street to a point 19 metres south of its intersection with  St Albans Street. Note 1 applies.

 

63.       New northern intersection of Massey Crescent at St Albans Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Massey Crescent commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Massey Crescent commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

64.       Existing Intersection –St Albans Street / Trafalgar Street / Courtenay Street– Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of St Albans Street, Trafalgar Street and Courtenay Street.

 

65.       New Intersection – St Albans Street / Trafalgar Street / Courtenay Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands changes at the intersection of St Albans Street and Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Trafalgar Street at its intersection with St Albans Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

66.       Existing  St Albans Street - Trafalgar Street to Rutland Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of  St Albans Street from a point 82 metres southwest of its intersection with Massey Crescent to a point 50 metres northeast of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping resolutions on the north side of  St Albans Street from a point 211 metres northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street to a point 27 metres southwest of its intersection with Rutland Street. Note 1 applies.

 

67.       New  St Albans Street - Trafalgar Street to Rutland Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of  St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Massey Crescent, and extending in a westerly and then south westerly direction for a distance of 82 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Massey Crescent, and extending in a easterly direction to its intersection with Trafalgar Street. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the northern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 50 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 27 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 17 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of St Albans Street commencing at a distance 115 m northeast of its intersection with Rutland Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 96 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

68.       Existing Trafalgar Street – St Albans Street to Edgeware Road– Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Trafalgar Street from its intersection with St Albans Street to its intersection with Edgeware Road. Note 1 applies.

 

69.       New Trafalgar Street – St Albans Street to Edgeware Road– Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands changes on Trafalgar Street from its intersection with St Albans Street to its intersection with Edgeware Road as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that special vehicle lanes for the use of eastbound and westbound cycles only be established on the south-west side of Trafalgar Street commencing at its intersection with St Albans Street and extending in a south easterly direction to a point 29metres southeast of its intersection with Massey Crescent, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north-westbound cycles only, be established on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a point 29metres south-east of its intersection with Massey Crescent and extending in a south easterly direction to a point 51metres south-east of its intersection with Massey Crescent, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

d.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south-eastbound cycles only, be established on the north-east side of Trafalgar Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 26metres south-east of its intersection with Sheppard Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 17metres as detailed in Attachment A . This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

e.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (south eastbound cycles) on the Trafalgar Street approach at a point 51metres south-east of its intersection with Massey Crescent, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northwest bound cycles only, be established on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 55metres southeast of its intersection with Coles Place and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 6m as detailed in Attachment A etres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southeast bound cycles only, be established on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 37metres north-west of its intersection with Dover Street (east) and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 6metre as detailed in Attachment A s. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only, be established on the east side of Trafalgar Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 79metres north of its intersection with Edgeware Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 7 as detailed in Attachment A metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Trafalgar Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 72metres north of its intersection with Edgeware Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 7metres as detailed in Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway be established on the east side of Trafalgar Street commencing 79metres north of its intersection with Edgeware Road and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Edgeware Road, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway (northbound cycles) on the Trafalgar Street approach at a point 68metres north of its intersection with Edgeware Road, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve a Give Way control for south-eastbound right turning vehicles on Trafalgar Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against the north-westbound and southeast bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent . as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

m.       Approve a Give Way control for north-westbound left turning vehicles on Trafalgar Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against eastbound and westbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent as detailed in Attachment A . Note 2 applies

n.         Approve a Give Way control for north-eastbound vehicles on Massey Crescent, including cyclists using the traffic lane, be placed against north-westbound and south-eastbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Massey Crescent as detailed in Attachment A . Note 2 applies

 

70.       Existing Intersection – Trafalgar Street /  southern Massey Crescent intersection – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and the southern intersection of Massey Crescent.

 

71.       New Intersection – Trafalgar Street / southern Massey Crescent intersection– Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands changes at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Massey Crescent, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Massey Crescent at its intersection with the south-west side of Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

72.       Existing Massey Crescent Street southern intersection - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Massey Crescent from its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 12 metres southwest of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast side of Massey Crescent from its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 13 metres southwest of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

 

73.       New Massey Crescent (East) Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Massey Crescent commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 10 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Massey Crescent commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 10 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

74.       Existing Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Sheppard Place – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Sheppard Place.

 

75.       New Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Sheppard Place – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Sheppard Place, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Sheppard Place at its intersection with the north-east side of Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

76.       Existing Sheppard Place - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southeast side of Sheppard Place from its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 8 metres northeast of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northwest side of Sheppard Place from its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 21 metres northeast of its intersection with Trafalgar Street. Note 1 applies.

 

77.       New Sheppard Place - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southeast side of Sheppard Place commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 6 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northwest side of Sheppard Place commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 21 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

78.       Existing Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Coles Place – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Coles Place.

 

79.       New Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Coles Place – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and island changes at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Coles Place, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Coles Place at its intersection with the southwest side of Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

80.       Existing Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Dover Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Dover Street.

 

81.       New Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Dover Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands changes at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Dover Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against eastern approach of of Dover Street at its intersection with the east side of Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against western approach of Dover Street at its intersection with the west side of Trafalgar Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

82.       Existing Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Edgeware Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Edgeware Road.

 

83.       New Intersection – Trafalgar Street / Edgeware Road – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes changes at the intersection of Trafalgar Street and Edgeware Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Trafalgar Street at its intersection with Edgeware Road, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

84.       Existing Trafalgar Street - Edgeware Road to  St Albans Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Trafalgar Street from its intersection with Edgeware Road to its intersection with St Albans Street.

 

85.       New Trafalgar Street - Edgeware Road to the western intersection of Dover Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Trafalgar Street commencing at its intersection with Edgeware Road, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 63 metres north of its intersection with Edgeware Road, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 46 m northeast of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 170 metres northwest of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 10 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 180 metres northwest of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with St Albans Street. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the north eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Trafalgar Street commencing at its intersection with Edgeware Road, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 82 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 38 metres north of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of five minutes on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 143 metres northwest of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Friday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 153 m northwest of its intersection with Dover Street, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Shepard Place. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 1 applies.

j.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at its intersection with Shepard Place, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 28 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 28 metres northwest of its intersection with Shepard Place, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply during school days only between the hours of 8am and 6pm. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 38 metres northwest of its intersection with Shepard Place, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

m.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the northeast side of Trafalgar Street commencing at a distance 81 metres northwest of its intersection with Shepard Place, and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with St Albans Street. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

86.       Existing Edgeware Road – West of Trafalgar Street to East of Colombo Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Edgeware Road from a point 11m west of its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 24m east of its intersection with Colombo Street. Note 2 applies.

 

87.       New Edgeware Road – West of Trafalgar Street to East of Colombo Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Edgeware Road from a point 11metres west of its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 24metres east of its intersection with Colombo Street. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of east bound cycles only, be established on the north side of Edgeware Road against the kerb, commencing at a point 11metres west of its intersection with Trafalgar Street and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 30metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of west bound cycles only, be established on the south side of Edgeware Road against the kerb, commencing at a point 24metres east of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle path be established on the north side of Edgeware Road commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street and extending in a easterly direction to a point 22metres east of its intersection with Trafalgar Street, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

 

88.       Existing Intersection – Edgeware Road / Colombo Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Edgeware Road and Colombo Street.

 

89.       New Intersection – Edgeware Road / Colombo Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands changes at the intersection of Edgeware Road and Colombo Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Edgeware Road and Colombo Street be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

90.       Existing Edgeware Road – Colombo Street to Caledonian Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Edgeware Road from its intersection with Colombo Street to its intersection with Caledonian Road.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Edgeware Road from a point 18 metres west of its intersection with Trafalgar Street to a point 41 metres east of its intersection with Trafalgar. Note 1 applies.

 

91.       New Edgeware Road - Colombo Street to Caledonian Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Edgeware Road commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction and follows the kerbline for a distance of 14 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the south side of Edgeware Road commencing at a distance 14 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Friday between the hours of 9am to 5pm. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Bus Stop be created on the south side of Edgeware Road commencing at a distance 34 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Edgeware Road commencing at a distance 48 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Caledonian Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of Edgeware Road commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in a westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of Edgeware Road commencing at its intersection with Trafalgar Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 43 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

92.       Existing Colombo Street – Edgeware Road to South of Bealey Avenue– Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Colombo Street from its intersection with Edgeware Road to a point 36metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue. Note 2 applies.

 

93.       New Colombo Street – Edgeware Road to South of Bealey Avenue– Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Colombo Street from its intersection with Edgeware Road to a point 36metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that special vehicle lanes for the use of northbound and southbound cycles only be established on the west side of Colombo Street commencing 7metres south of its intersection with Edgeware Road and extending in a southerly direction to a point 58m south of its intersection with Canon Street, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only be established on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a point 58metres south of its intersection with Canon Street and extending in a southerly direction to a point 4metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

d.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only be established on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a point 45metres south of its intersection with Canon Street and extending in a southerly direction to a point 4metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

e.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound cycles only, be established on the east side of Colombo Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 4metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 70metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

f.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound cycles only, be established on the west side of Colombo Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 4metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 70metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 applies. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008.

g.         Approve that southbound left turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to south-bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

h.         Approve that northbound right turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to south-bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

i.          Approve that eastbound vehicles on Canon Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

j.          Approve that westbound vehicles on Canon Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to southbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

k.         Approve that northbound left turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

l.          Approve that southbound right turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

m.       Approve that eastbound straight through vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to southbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

n.         Approve that westbound vehicles on Canon Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Canon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

o.         Approve that southbound left turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to south-bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

p.         Approve that northbound right turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to south-bound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

q.         Approve that eastbound vehicles on Purchas Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

r.          Approve that westbound vehicles on Purchas Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to southbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

s.         Approve that northbound left turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

t.          Approve that southbound right turning vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

u.         Approve that eastbound straight through vehicles on Colombo Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to southbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

v.         Approve that westbound vehicles on Purchas Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound cycles using the special vehicle lane that are travelling across the intersection of Purchas Street as detailed on Attachment A.

w.        Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (southbound cycles) on the Colombo Street approach at a point 17m north of its intersection with Purchas Street, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

x.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (northbound cycles) on the Colombo Street approach at a point 25m south of its intersection with Purchas Street, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

y.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (southbound cycles) on the Colombo Street approach at a point 69m north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

z.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (northbound cycles) on the Colombo Street approach at a point 74m north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

 

94.       Colombo Street Crossing – Traffic Control

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Colombo Street at the pedestrian and cycle crossing as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals in accordance with sections 6 and 8.5(3) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule 2004, be installed on Colombo Street at a point 60 metres south of its intersection with Canon Street. Note 2 applies.

 

95.       Existing Intersection – Colombo Street / Canon Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Colombo Street and Canon Street.

 

96.       New Intersection – Colombo Street / Canon Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Colombo Street and Canon Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the east approach on Canon Street at its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the west approach on Canon Street at its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

97.       Existing Intersection – Colombo Street / Purchas Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Colombo Street and Purchas Street.

 

98.       New Intersection – Colombo Street / Purchas Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Colombo Street and Purchas Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the east approach of Purchas Street at its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the west approach of Purchas Street at its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed in Attachment A.

 

99.       Existing Purchas Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Purchas Street from a point 17 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street to a point 20 metres east of its intersection with Colombo Street. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Purchas Street from a point 14 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street to a point 17 metres east of its intersection with Colombo Street. Note 1 applies.

 

100.    New Purchas Street - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Purchas Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 20 m. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the south side of Purchas Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in an easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 m. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of Purchas Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 16 m. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the north side of Purchas Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a easterly direction and follows the kerb line for a distance of 18 m. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

101.    Existing Intersection – Colombo Street / Bealey Avenue – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Colombo Street and Bealey Avenue.

 

102.    New Intersection – Colombo Street / Bealey Avenue  – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands at the intersection of Colombo Street and Bealey Avenue, as detailed in Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Colombo Street and Bealey Avenue be controlled with traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A.

 

103.    Existing Colombo Street – Bealey Avenue  to Edgeware Road and Bealey Avenue to 72m south - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Colombo Street from its intersection with Bealey Avenue to its intersection with Edgeware Road.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Colombo Street from its intersection with Bealey Avenue to a point 72 metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue. Note 1 applies.

 

104.    New Colombo Street - South of Bealey Avenue to Bealey Avenue - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 12 metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 22 metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 4 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 26 metres south of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 46 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. Note 2 applies.

 

105.    New Colombo Street - Bealey Avenue to Edgeware Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 74 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a bus stop be installed on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 74 m north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 98 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 24 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 132 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 24 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 178 m north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 m. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 1 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 195 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 8 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a bus stop be installed on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 203 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 217 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Purchas Street. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 59 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that a bus stop be installed on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 59 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 73 metres north of its intersection with Bealey Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Purchas Street. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 25 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

m.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 5 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 25 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday between the hours of 8am to 6pm. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

n.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 35 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 8 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

o.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 48 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

p.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be reserved for vehicles with an approved residents parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4.1 of the Land Transport Act - Road users rule: 2004. The restriction will apply on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 63 metres north of its intersection with Purchase Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

q.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 73 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

r.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 110 m north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

s.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 128 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

t.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 146 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

u.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 166 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

v.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 204 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 34 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

w.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 247 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Canon Street. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

x.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 8 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

y.         Approve that a bus stop be installed on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 8 m north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

z.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 22 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 243 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the western side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

aa.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of five minutes on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 274 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

bb.      Approve that a bus stop be installed on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 288 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

cc.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 305 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Canon Street. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

dd.      Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

ee.      Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 5 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 11 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

ff.        Approve that a bus stop be installed on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 21 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

gg.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 35 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

hh.      Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 71 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

ii.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 91 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

jj.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 111 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

kk.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 125 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

ll.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 133 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 5 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

mm.   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 138 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

nn.      Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 152 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 5 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

oo.      Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 157 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

pp.      Approve that a bus stop be installed on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 166 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

qq.      Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person's parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4.1 of the Land Transport Act - Road users rule: 2004. The restriction will apply on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 182 m north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This restriction is to apply at any time. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

rr.        Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 192 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 31 metres. The restriction is to apply Monday to Friday between the hours of 9am to 5pm. This parking restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

ss.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 223 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Edgeware Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. This stopping restriction is located on the eastern side of the cycle lane separation kerb, inclusive of gaps for access points. Note 2 applies.

tt.        Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

uu.      Approve that a bus stop be installed on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 149 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 applies.

vv.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 182 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 applies.

ww.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a distance 215 metres north of its intersection with Canon Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Edgeware Road. The restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 applies.

 

106.    Trees

a.         Approve that three trees be removed on the southwest side of Sawyers Arms Road, outside number 71C Main North Road, as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that five trees be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 96 Main North Road, as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that one tree be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 3, as detailed on Attachment A.

d.         Approve that one tree be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 5, as detailed on Attachment A.

e.         Approve that one tree be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 11, as detailed on Attachment A.

f.          Approve that one tree be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 13, as detailed on Attachment A.

g.         Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Grassmere Street, outside number 18, as detailed on Attachment A.

h.         Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Grassmere Street, outside number 20, as detailed on Attachment A.

i.          Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Grassmere Street, outside number 22, as detailed on Attachment A.

j.          Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Grassmere Street, outside number 24, as detailed on Attachment A.

k.         Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Grassmere Street, outside number 28, as detailed on Attachment A.

l.          Approve that two trees be removed on Grassmere Street, opposite number 29, as detailed on Attachment A.

m.       Approve that 18 trees be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 41, as detailed on Attachment A.

n.         Approve that 13 trees be removed on the northeast side of Grassmere Street, outside number 45, as detailed on Attachment A.

o.         Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 206, as detailed on Attachment A.

p.         Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 166, as detailed on Attachment A.

q.         Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 164, as detailed on Attachment A.

r.          Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 162, as detailed on Attachment A.

s.         Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 154, as detailed on Attachment A.

t.          Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 152, as detailed on Attachment A.

u.         Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Rutland Street, outside number 150, as detailed on Attachment A.

v.         Approve that three trees be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 148 Western Road, as detailed on Attachment A.

w.        Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 151 Knowles Street, as detailed on Attachment A.

x.         Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 136, as detailed on Attachment A.

y.         Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 87, as detailed on Attachment A.

z.         Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 55, as detailed on Attachment A.

aa.       Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 45, as detailed on Attachment A.

bb.      Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 43, as detailed on Attachment A.

cc.       Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 39, as detailed on Attachment A.

dd.      Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 35, as detailed on Attachment A.

ee.      Approve that one tree be removed on the west side of Rutland Street, outside number 33, as detailed on Attachment A.

ff.        Approve that one tree be removed on the south side of Rutland Street, outside number 29, as detailed on Attachment A.

gg.       Approve that one tree be removed on the south side of Rutland Street, outside number 25, as detailed on Attachment A.

hh.      Approve that two trees be removed on the south side of St Albans Street, outside number 150, as detailed on Attachment A.

ii.         Approve that one tree be removed on the south side of St Albans Street, outside number 156, as detailed on Attachment A.

jj.         Approve that two trees be removed on the south side of St Albans Street, outside number 160, as detailed on Attachment A.

kk.       Approve that one tree be removed on the south side of St Albans Street, outside number 166, as detailed on Attachment A.

ll.         Approve that one tree be removed on the south side of St Albans Street, outside number 170, as detailed on Attachment A.

mm.   Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street, outside number 109, as detailed on Attachment A.

nn.      Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street, outside number 107, as detailed on Attachment A.

oo.      Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street, outside number 105, as detailed on Attachment A.

pp.      Approve that one tree be removed on the southwest side of Trafalgar Street, outside number 6 Massy Crescent, as detailed on Attachment A.

qq.      Approve that one tree be removed on the east side of Trafalgar Street, outside number 18, as detailed on Attachment A.

rr.        Approve that two trees be removed on the east side of Colombo Street, outside Alexandra Court Motel, as detailed on Attachment A.

107.    Resolve the amended traffic resolutions for the Little River MCR as detailed in the attachment B.

108.    Little River Resolutions

a.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.

b.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2)  The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Committee meeting of 15 September 2016; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Committee resolutions on the Little River Major Cycleway report at the Committee meeting of 15 September 2016.

 

109.    Existing Grove Road South of Moorhouse Avenue to Harman Street Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Grove Road from its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue to its intersection with Harman Road.

 

110.    New Grove Road Layout– South of Moorhouse Avenue to Harman Street – Traffic Control

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and islands on Grove Road from its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue to its intersection with Harman Street as detailed in attachment B.

 

b.         Approve that Grove Road be one way north to south from its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and Lincoln Road to a point 16 metres south of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and Lincoln Road.  This one way section was added to the Register of One Way Streets in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 following approval of the changes through An Accessible City by Council in November 2014.

c.         Approve that northbound traffic is prohibited on Grove Road from a point 16 metres south of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and Lincoln Road, extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and Lincoln Road as detailed in attachment B.  This one way section was added to the Register of One Way Streets in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 following approval of the changes through An Accessible City by Council in November 2014 as detailed in attachment B. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the path on the west side of Grove Road commencing at its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 32 metres be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle path in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in attachment B. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional cycle path be created on the west side of Grove Road commencing at a point 32 metres south of its intersection with Moorhouse Avenue and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Harman Street, as detailed on attachment B, in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 and Clause 1.6 of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve a Give-Way control be placed against the bi-directional cycle path (north bound cycles) on the Grove Road south approach to the Railway Level Crossing, as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve a Give-Way control be placed against the bi-directional cycle path (south bound cycles) on the Grove Road north approach to the Railway Level Crossing, as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve a Stop control be placed against the west approach of Hazeldean Road at its intersection with Grove Road, as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that southbound right turning vehicles on Grove Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Hazeldean Road as detailed in attachment B. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that northbound left turning vehicles on Grove Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Hazeldean Road as detailed in attachment B. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that eastbound vehicles on Hazeldean Road, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle that are travelling across the intersection of Hazeldean Road as detailed in attachment B. Note 2 applies.

 

111.    Existing Hazeldean Road – Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Hazeldean Road from its intersection with Grove Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hazeldean Road from its intersection with Grove Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres. Note 1 applies.

c.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Hazeldean Road from its intersection with Grove Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres. Note 1 applies.

d.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Hazeldean Road from its intersection with Grove Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 1 applies.

 

112.    New Hazeldean Road - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hazeldean Road commencing at its intersection with Grove Road, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hazeldean Road commencing at its intersection with Grove Road, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hazeldean Road commencing at its intersection with Grove Road, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hazeldean Road commencing at its intersection with Grove Road, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

 

113.    Existing Church Square/Collins Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Collins Street and Church Square intersection.

 

114.    New Church Square/Collins Street – Traffic Controls

 

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Church Square and Collins Street as detailed on attachment B.

b.         Approve a Give-Way control be placed against north approach of Church Square at its intersection with Collins Street and the east approach of Church Square as detailed on attachment B.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against north approach of Church Square at its intersection with the bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle path, as detailed on attachment B.

d.         Approve that south-westbound right turning vehicles on Church Square, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to north-eastbound and south-westbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Church Square (west) as detailed on attachment B.

e.         Approve that north-eastbound left turning vehicles on Collins Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to north-eastbound and south-westbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Church Square (west) as detailed on attachment B.

f.          Approve that southbound vehicles on Church Square (west), including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to north-eastbound and south-westbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle that are travelling across the intersection of Church Square (west) as detailed on attachment B.

 

115.    Existing Collins Street/Emerson Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Collins Street and Emerson Street.

 

116.    New Collins Street/Emerson Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Emerson Street at its intersection with Collins Street.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Emerson Street at its intersection with the bi-directional cycle path on the west side of Collins Street, as detailed on attachment B.

c.         Approve that southbound right turning vehicles on Collins Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Emerson Street.

d.         Approve that northbound left turning vehicles on Collins Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Emerson Street.

e.         Approve that eastbound vehicles on Emerson Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle that are travelling across the intersection of Emerson Street.

 

117.    Existing Collins Street/Macauley Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls at the intersection of Collins Street and Macauley Street intersection.

 

118.    New Collins Street/Emerson Street – Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Macauley Street at its intersection with Collins Street as detailed on attachment B.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Macauley Street at its intersection with the bi-directional cycle path on the west side of Collins Street, as detailed on attachment B.

c.         Approve that southbound right turning vehicles on Collins Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Macauley Street as detailed on attachment B.

d.         Approve that northbound left turning vehicles on Collins Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle path that are travelling across the intersection of Macauley Street as detailed on attachment B.

e.         Approve that eastbound vehicles on Macauley Street Street, including cyclists using the traffic lane, give way to northbound and southbound cycles using the bi-directional cycle that are travelling across the intersection of Macauley Street Street as detailed on attachment B.

 

119.    Existing Wrights Road – Wrights Road Traffic Controls

a.         Revoke all traffic controls on Wrights Road commencing at a point 138 metres northwest of Hillmorton Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 198 metres. Note 1 applies.

 

120.    New Wrights Road – Wrights Road/Hillmorton Street Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against Hillmorton Street at its intersection with Wrights Road as detailed on attachment B. Note 1 applies.

b.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, and median islands on Wrights Road starting at a point 118 metres north if its intersection with Cardigan Bay Place and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 192 metres as detailed on attachment B. Note 1 applies.

c.         Approve that a pedestrian and cycle road crossing, controlled by traffic signals in accordance with sections 6 and 8.5(3) of the Land Transport Act- Traffic Control Devices Rule 2004, be installed on Wrights Road located at a point 17 metres north of its intersection with Hillmorton Street as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the path on the northeast side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 123 metres northeast of its intersection with Cardigan Bay Place, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 70 metres be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle path in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the pathway on the southwest side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 14 metres northwest of its intersection with Hillmorton Street, and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance 97 metres be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian/cycle pathway in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south-eastbound cycles only, be established on the northeast side of Wrights Road against the kerb, commencing at a point 49 metres northwest of its intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 172 metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north-westbound cycles only, be established on the southwest side of Wrights Road against the kerb, commencing at a point 52 metres southeast of its intersection with Hillmorton Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 180 metres. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008 as detailed on attachment B. Note 2 applies.

 

121.    Existing Wrights Road - Parking Restrictions

a.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast side of Wrights Road from its intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 69 metres. Note 1 applies.

b.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast side of Wrights Road from its intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 109 metres. Note 1 applies.

c.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southwest side of Wrights Road from its intersection with the Hillmorton Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 120 metres. Note 1 applies.

d.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the southwest side of Wrights Road from its intersection Hillmorton Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51 metres. Note 1 applies.

 

122.    New Wrights Road - Parking restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Wrights Road commencing at the intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 109 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Wrights Road commencing at the intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 49 metres.  Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a bus stop be installed on the northeast side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 49 metres northwest of its intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres.  Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 62 metres northwest of its intersection with the access named and formed as Jack Hinton Drive and extending in a north- westerly direction for a distance of seven metres.  Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Wrights Road commencing at the intersection with Hillmorton Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 120 metres.  Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a bus stop be installed on the southwest side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 120 metres northwest of its intersection with Hillmorton Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.  Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Wrights Road commencing at a point 134 metres northwest of its intersection with Hillmorton Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of four metres.  Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Wrights Road commencing at its intersection with Hillmorton Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 52 metres.  Note 2 applies.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui Parallel Resolutions Plans

63

b

Little River Resolution Plans

74

c

Tree Removal and Planting Plans

81

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Brendan Bisley - Project Manager

Sharon O'Neill - Team Leader Project management Transport

Clarrie Pearce - Programme Manager Major Cycleway Routes

Approved By

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport, Acting General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

7.        Proposed Bus Shelter Manchester Street

Reference:

16/740199

Contact:

Ryan Rolston

ryan.rolston@ccc.govt.nz

941 8516

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to seek the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee’s recommendation that the Council approves the installation of a bus shelter to service the approved Manchester Street “Super Stop” at 207 to 215 Manchester Street, in accordance with the design layout plan provided as Attachment A of this report. 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following the notification of a proposal to install a bus shelter under s339 of the Local Government ACT (1974).  As no objections to the bus shelter were received, a Council resolution is required for the shelter to be installed. 

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Councils Significance an Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Approves the installation of a bus Super Stop shelter at 207 to 215 Manchester Street, to be constructed in accordance with Attachment A of this report. 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.37 Promote modal shift: Contribute to increasing the percentage share of public transport trips. Level of Service: 10.4.4 Ensure user satisfaction with the number and quality of bus shelters

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - The preferred option, install a bus passenger shelter at 207 to 215 Manchester Street, as described in Section 6 of this report.

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing.

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Seating and shelter provided.

·     Increase the visibility and legibility of public transport.

·     Is consistent with the Council’s approval of the Super Stop in this location.

·     Complimentary to the Super Stop shelter previously approved on the opposite side of Manchester Street.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     An increase in the number of bus passenger shelters to be maintained by the Council.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Manchester Street is an Otakaro led first phase An Accessible City (AAC) transport project that was approved by the Council on 10 September 2015.  Under AAC, Manchester Street is prioritised for public transport, and the approved design includes a pair of Super Stops centred around Worcester Street.  Prior to the Council’s decision on the project, a separate process was conducted to approve the shelter component of the Super Stops in accordance with s339.  Adjacent property owners objected to the shelter on the west side of Manchester Street.  The objections where upheld by the Hearings Panel. 

5.2       The Council’s decision on the Manchester Street AAC project confirmed the location of the Super Stop but did not approve the shelter, because this is subject to the requirements of s339.  On approving the Manchester Street AAC project, the Council resolved that:

 

3.0 Notes the scheme designs and resolutions of TP4 Manchester Street - from Kilmore Street to Lichfield Street (mindful of the Hearings Panel decision of the LGA s339 Hearing of 11 August into the Manchester Street super-stop proposals)

 

3.1. That the transport shelters for the super stop on Manchester Street be redesigned in consultation with the current submitters in respect of the findings of the Local Government Act 1974 section 339 Hearing - and that those shelters (a) be based upon a suitable "pod' type design; and (b) allow sufficient space to allow clear access on the footpath and to the properties behind; and (c ) not have a canopy structure over the pods; and (d) Have no bus shelter in front of the Shands Emporium or the Trinity Church; and (e) be subject to a further hearing of any outstanding objections under section 339 of the Local Government Act 1974.

 

3.2 That the new technology being utilised at the bus interchange be also used for the Manchester Street superstops in order to minimise three busses arriving at one time to the Manchester Street stop.

5.3       Subsequently Otakaro has undertaken a process that has allowed the adjacent property owners to take ownership of the Super Stop shelter design through the engagement of their own designer, and being assisted by an independent facilitator. 

5.4       In accordance with s339, property owners were notified of the redesigned Super Stop shelter on 27 June 2016.  No objections have been received. 

5.5       In situations where a bus shelter is not opposed, Community Boards have delegated authority to approve the shelter.  In this instance, the bus shelter is within the Plan A area of the delegations register, where the Hagley Ferrymead Community Board does not have delegated authority of transport matters.  Therefore, a Council decision is required to approve the Super Stop shelter for installation. 

6.   Option 1 – Install Bus Shelter at 207 to 215 Manchester Street (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a bus shelter at 207 to 215 Manchester Street in accordance with Attachment A

6.2       Attachment B shows a photorealistic perspective view of the shelter. 

6.3       The shelter design consists of two canopy structures that provide cover to seating.   

Significance

6.4       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       A letter advising of the proposed bus passenger shelter was posted and emailed to all affected property and business owners on 27 June 2016.  As per the consultation requirements set out in Section 339, the letter only requested responses from affected parties if they objected to the proposal. No objections or responses were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation – Nil to the Council

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Costs will be met from the Passenger Transport Maintenance budget.

6.10    Funding source – Otakaro funds the installation of the shelter through the delivery of the Manchester Street AAC project (funded from their share of the Cost Sharing Agreement).

Legal Implications

6.11    Section 339 of the Local Government Act (1974) enables Councils to install shelters for use by passenger transport passengers, provided that the shelter does not unreasonably prevent access to land fronting the road. 

6.12    s339 requires that Councils give notice to any owner or occupier of land that is likely to be injuriously affected by the erection of the shelter. 

6.13    Owners and occupiers have an opportunity to object to the erection of a shelter.  Where an objection is received, the Council must appoint a Hearings panel to make a decision on the erection of the shelter. 

6.14    The Council has delegated authority to Community Boards to resolve the installation of bus shelters for instances where there has been no objection. 

6.15    Plan A of the Delegations Register shows the area of the CBD where the Hagley Ferrymead Community Board does not have delegated authority to determine traffic matters, including the installation of bus shelters.  Reports on traffic matters within the Plan A area require a Council decision. 

Risks and Mitigations

6.16    See paragraphs 6.17 and 6.18 regarding construction access to buildings behind the proposed Super Stop shelter. The Council has not entered any agreement with adjacent property owners over the potential cost associated with removing, modifying or storing the super stop shelter associated with any construction activity on adjacent sites. 

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies - To be installed by Otakaro as part of its Manchester Street AAC project.  Completion of the shelters is dependent on the timing of construction of buildings behind the shelter.  Otakaro is working through delivery phasing options with property owners to ensure the shelters are built in timely fashion whilst enabling construction access to the properties fronting the Super Stop.  The favoured option presently is to construct the southern shelter to enable the northern property to be constructed.  Subsequently, the second shelter can be constructed in the northern positon, or the southern shelter can be relocated to the northern position to enable construction access to the southern site. 

6.18    Implementation timeframe - indicatively 12 to 24 months, subject to construction timeframes for adjacent buildings 

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·   Seating and shelter provided

·   Increase the visibility and legibility of public transport

·   Is consistent with the Council’s approval of the Super Stop in this location

·   Complimentary to the Super Stop previously approved on the opposite side of Manchester Street

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Increase in the number of bus passenger shelters to be maintained by the Council


 

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       To not install a bus shelter at the Manchester Street Super Stop. 

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       A letter advising of the proposed bus passenger shelter was posted and emailed to all affected property and business owners on 27 June 2016.  As per the consultation requirements set out in Section 339, the letter only requested responses from affected parties if they objected to the proposal. No objections or responses were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is inconsistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies

7.5.1   Inconsistency – Super Stop is identified in the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan and the location was subsequently approved by the Council

7.5.2   Reason for inconsistency – Having a quality shelter is an essential Super Stop element

7.5.3   Amendment necessary - No amendment needed to the Council's Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Nil

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Nil

7.8       Funding source – Not Applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Section 339 of the Local Government Act (1974) enables Councils to install shelters for use by passenger transport passengers, provided that the shelter does not unreasonably prevent access to land fronting the road. 

7.10    s339 requires that Councils give notice to any owner or occupier of land that is likely to be injuriously affected by the erection of the shelter. 

7.11    Owners and occupiers have an opportunity to object to the erection of a shelter.  Where an objection is received, the Council must appoint a Hearings panel to make a decision on the erection of the shelter. 

7.12    The Council has delegated authority to Community Boards to resolve the installation of bus shelters for instances where there has been no objection. 

7.13    Plan A of the Delegations Register shows the area of the CBD where the Hagley Ferrymead Community Board does not have delegated authority to determine traffic matters, including the installation of bus shelters.  Reports on traffic matters within the Plan A area require a Council decision. 

Risks and Mitigations

7.14    None identified

Implementation

7.15    Not Applicable

7.16    Not Applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduced cost to Otakaro

7.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Undermines the Council’s previous decision to install a bus Super Stop in this location. 

·   Compromises the AAC vision for Manchester Street and is inconsistent with the Central Christchurch Recovery Plan.

·   Does not facilitate adequate bus passenger shelter facilities at a key location.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Super Stop Layout Plan

97

b

Super Stop Perspective View

98

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

Steve Parry - Manager Traffic Operations

Approved By

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

8.        Proposed CBD 30kph Speed Limit Threshold Enhancements

Reference:

16/930214

Contact:

Ryan Rolston

ryan.rolston@ccc.govt.nz

941 8516

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to seek the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee’s recommendation that the Council approve a package of 30kph threshold enhancements, refer Attachments A to K.  

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and follows the implementation of the 30kph Central Business District (CBD) speed limit area earlier this year. 

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by consideration of the level of impact of the decisions and the number of people affected.  

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Colombo Street at a point 33 metres north of its intersection with Oxford Terrace, in accordance with Attachment B. 

2.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Gloucester Street at a point 9 metres east of its intersection with Latimer Square, in accordance with Attachment C. 

3.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Hereford Street at a point 5 metres east of its intersection with Latimer Square, in accordance with Attachment D. 

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the southern side of Hereford Street commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres. 

5.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Colombo Street at a point 29 metres south of its intersection with Bath Street, in accordance with Attachment E.

6.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Manchester Street at a point 49 metres south of its intersection with Kilmore Street, in accordance with Attachment F. 

7.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Armagh Street at a point 22 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, in accordance with Attachment G. 

8.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Cashel Street at a point 15 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, in accordance with Attachment H.

9.         Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Bedford Row at a point 10 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, in accordance with Attachment I. 

10.       Approve the implementation of a 30 kilometres per hour speed limit threshold on Lichfield Street at a point 23 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, in accordance with Attachment J. 

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations:

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network.

·     Level of Service: 10.0.31 Protect vulnerable users – minimise the number of fatal crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists.

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install 30kph Speed Limit Threshold Enhancements. (Preferred Option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing.

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Enhances legibility and credibility of the 30kph CBD speed limit area.

·     Contributes to the creation of CBD ‘gateways’ and the identity of the inner CBD 30kph area.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes a small number of car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The speed limit of roads within the central CBD was reduced to 30kph by the Minister of Earthquake Recovery by public notice of a change to the Council’s Speed Limits Bylaw under the CERA Act at the end of 2014. 

5.2       In March 2016 the Council implemented the change to 30kph.  At the time of implementation a basic package of signage was implemented, consisting of some 130 basic speed limit signs.  Keeping the signage system basic enabled staff to coordinate the erection of the signs and unveiling on a particular date that was coordinated with a media campaign to ensure the public were aware of the impending change. 

5.3       The nature of the 30kph area is highly suited to a suite of threshold treatments around the cordon to emphasise the speed limit change to motorists.  It is proposed to enhance the legibility of the 30kph area by the installation of enhanced threshold treatments at the entry points to the 30kph area. 

5.4       In July 2016 staff consulted on a proposal to extend the 30kph area into St Asaph Street and Hagley Avenue.  At the time of preparation of this report, the Council had not made a decision on this proposal.  The decision affects the location of threshold treatments at the southern edge of the 30kph cordon.  A second package of thresholds will be consulted on once the Council has confirmed the speed limit of St Asaph Street and Hagley Avenue. 

5.5       It is noted that this report applies to the thresholds where there is no delegated authority for traffic matters to the Hagley / Ferrymead Community Board for the area of the CBD identified on Plan A of the Delegations Register, which includes the majority of the 30kph area, but not Park Terrace.  A separate report to the Hagley / Ferrymead Committee recommends approval of the Park Terrace threshold treatment (Attachment L). 

 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install 30kph Speed Limit Threshold Enhancements (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       This option involves constructing enhanced threshold treatments at the entry points to the CBD 30kph speed limit area at the locations shown on Attachments A.

6.2       In principle there are two threshold types.  Major gateways are proposed on the main traffic routes into the CBD.  These consist of coloured pavement markings and large “30kph Central City” signs on a blue backing board (Refer Attachment K).  Minor gateways consist of standard speed limit signage and coloured pavement markings. 

6.3       Due to the specific constraints at each site, a customised design has been prepared for each site.  Where practical the traffic lane width has been narrowed by traffic islands on major gateways, which also serve the purpose of housing the larger signs.  It is not practical to install the larger signs in all major gateway locations because of insufficient clearance to traffic lanes. 

6.4       It is noted that there has been some debate over the wording at the base of the signs.  Staff consider “Central City” to be the most appropriate wording, but are open to other suggestions.  This wording, however, would need to be consistent on all signage.

Significance

6.5       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7       Following installation of the 30kph speed limit in March 2016, the Council received a lot of feedback about the legibility of the lower speed limit area, highlighting the importance of enhancing the change points.   

6.8       Consultation on the proposed thresholds was undertaken with all adjacent businesses, residents and property owners between 16 June and 4 July 2016. 

6.9       Two submissions were received on the Colombo Street south threshold.  The original design included a central island and a build-out on the western side of Colombo Street, which removed three car parking spaces.  One submission supported the reinforcement of the 30kph speed limit through the enhancement of the thresholds.  The submission raised a concern that the threshold would be used as a de facto pedestrian crossing point, and sought that pedestrian safety be maintained.  The other submission opposed the loss of three car parking spaces (two P5, and one 1 hour), which service the New City Hotel and nearby businesses.

6.10    Consideration was given to modifying the Colombo Street south threshold to include safe and formalised pedestrian facilities.  However, it was found that this could not be achieved without removing all parking outside the New City Hotel, which would then create an unusually wide single traffic lane that was contrary to the desired effect of drivers feeling constrained whilst travelling through the threshold treatment.  In consideration of all matters, it was determined that the best option is the layout proposed on Attachment D.  This option does not encourage pedestrians to cross at the threshold and retains parking.  It is noted that there is an alternative pedestrian crossing facility 100m to the north that is aligned with access to South City. 

6.11    Two submissions were received on the proposed Manchester Street threshold.  The first noting the inclusion of the threshold being within the Manchester Street AAC project area, which is led by Otakaro Limited.  The project team will facilitate the delivery of this particular threshold as part of the Manchester Street project.  The second submission sought the retention of car parking on the eastern side of Manchester Street south of Kilmore Street.  The Council approved plans for the Manchester Street AAC project in August 2015. Three parking spaces are retained on the east side of Manchester Street close to the Kilmore Street intersection, and six parking spaces on the west side of the street.  The threshold does not affect parking on Manchester Street.

6.12    Otakaro made a submission identifying a number of conflicts with Otakaro-led projects (including Manchester Street above).  Staff are working closely with Otakaro to ensure that the delivery of thresholds is streamlined with other projects. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.13    This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.14    Cost of Implementation - approximately $230,000 for the installation of the threshold package

6.15    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.16    Funding source - TP30k AAC Slow Core budget.

Legal Implications

6.17    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.18    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices. 

6.19    The Park Terrace site is not within the Plan A area as identified within the Register of Delegations, within which all traffic matters require a Council decision. 

6.20    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.21    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.22    Implementation dependencies - Council approval.

6.23    Implementation timeframe - Approximately eight weeks following Council approval.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.24    The advantages of this option include:

·   Enhances legibility and credibility of the 30kph CBD speed limit

·   Contributes to the creation of CBD  ‘gateways’ and the identity of the inner CBD 30kph area

6.25    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes three P120 car parking spaces.


 

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       To rely on the current 30kph speed limit signage

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community feedback, suggesting that signage identifying the 30kph is presently insufficient.   

7.5       See paragraphs 6.7 and 6.12. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.9       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.13    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not enhance the legibility and credibility of the 30kph CBD speed limit area

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

30kph Threshold Treatment Location Plan

106

b

30kph Threshold Treatment Colombo Street North

107

c

30kph Threshold Treatment Gloucester Street

108

d

30kph Threshold Treatment Hereford Street

109

e

30kph Threshold Treatment Colombo Street South

110

f

30kph Threshold Treatment Manchester Street

111

g

30kph Threshold Treatment Armagh Street

112

h

30kph Threshold Treatment Cashel Street

113

i

30kph Threshold Treatment Bedford Row

114

j

30kph Threshold Treatment Lichfield Street

115

k

30kph Threshold Treatment Major Gateway Generic Cross Section

116

l

30kph Threshold Treatment Park Terrace

117

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Jennie Hamilton - Engagement Advisor

Steve Parry - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

Approved By

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

9.        Infrastructure Design Standard 2016

Reference:

16/864226

Contact:

Yvonne McDonald

Yvonne.mcDonald@ccc.govt.nz

941 8361

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to recommend that the Council adopt the 2016 revision of the Infrastructure Design Standard and establish the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group with authority to adopt future revisions of the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated to ensure that the horizontal infrastructure being designed by internal and external designers reflects best engineering practice, fulfils the requirements of the District Plan and aligns with Council’s policies and design standard.

1.3       The decision(s) in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

1.3.1   The level of significance was determined as low, due to the small audience and the role of the Infrastructure Design Standard as a guidance document.

1.3.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment. The proposed engagement is intended to inform the intended users, not consult with them.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

1.         That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

a.         Adopt the Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 as Council’s design standard for both Council funded assets and assets that will be vested with Council, effective from the date of this resolution.

b.         Establish the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group comprising 5 members as a subordinate decision-making body of the Council with authority to adopt future revisions (in whole or in part) of the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard.

c.         Delegate to the Chief Executive the power to appoint and remove, as the case may be, the members of the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group.

d.         Note that the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group will otherwise regulate its own procedure. 

e.         Resolves under Clause 30(7) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 that the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group will not be discharged on the coming into office of the members of the Council following triennial general elections.

f.          Requires that the Design Standard Steering Group report to the Council on at least an annual basis or when a significant revision to the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard has been adopted by the Steering Group.

 


 

3.   Key Points

3.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

3.1.1   Activity: Water Supply (combining water conservation)

·     Level of Service: 12.0.2 (non-LTP) Ensure potable water is supplied in accordance with the Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand (microbiology)

·     Aligning the design and construction of horizontal infrastructure to the requirements of the Replacement District Plan.

3.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Adopt the 2016 revision of the Infrastructure Design Standard and establish the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group with authority to adopt future revisions of the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard. (Preferred Option)

·     Option 2 – adopt the Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 and retain the current revision adoption process. (Status Quo)

3.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

3.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Aligning the design and construction of horizontal infrastructure to the requirements of the Replacement District Plan.

·     Aligning the design and construction of stormwater related infrastructure to the new Council held discharge consents.

·     Applying best engineering practice to the design and construction of horizontal infrastructure.

·     Removing inconsistencies in evolving engineering practice between Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team and Council.

·     Enhancing protection of the environment through increased emphasis on environmental management in design.

·     Improving capture of vested as-built infrastructure.

·     Clearly stating within this organisation, through the delegation of adoption of the revisions, who owns and so should be determining standard for the design and acceptance of infrastructure.

·     Providing a clearer separation between policy and District Plan rules and the guidance for achieving or complying with those policies and rules.

·     Allowing faster and more frequent amendment of the Infrastructure Design Standard to reflect current Council policy and promote best engineering practice. 

 


 

4.   Context/Background

4.1       The Infrastructure Design Standard details Christchurch City Council’s minimum standard for the design of horizontal infrastructure or expands on requirements laid out in the District Plan. It is applied by internal designers through the capital works programme and by developers and their advisers when undertaking land subdivision. It also sets out processes for designing assets to aid the designer in achieving and demonstrating compliance with those requirements.

4.2       The Infrastructure Design Standard is a guidance document that facilitates the acceptance of horizontal infrastructure by Council, either through vesting under a subdivision consent or delivering on a Capital Works project brief. Alternative designs or processes can be used but these require the provision of further information to allow additional auditing by Council officers. This auditing must be undertaken to provide certainty that the infrastructure will deliver the required level of service and operational life.

4.3       The Infrastructure Design Standard 2010 was originally adopted through a Council resolution on 24 June 2010, for immediate application to both Council funded assets and assets that will be vested on subdivision. The Infrastructure Design Standard 2010 was reviewed by an external provider and the review confirmed that the standard is not a document identified under the Local Government Act 2002 as requiring consultation, and accordingly at that time there was no need to adopt the special consultative procedure under the Act. However, the legal advice did identify that consultation is desirable to reduce the risk of subsequent formal challenge and/or produce a more robust document.

4.4       Internal consultation with Council staff was undertaken for the 2010 version of the Infrastructure Design Standard, which created an internal draft. This internal draft was then presented to external users for their comment, which was collected through workshops, email and written submission. These submissions were assessed over the preparation of the external draft before the presentation for adoption by Council of the final version in 2010.

4.5       The 4 September 2010, 22 February 2011 and subsequent earthquake series prompted a reassessment of the design of infrastructure in liquefaction prone areas – the Infrastructure Design Standard 2013. Further developments in the design of Three Water’s infrastructure were reflected in amendments captured in the 2015 Infrastructure Design Standard.

4.6       The Infrastructure Design Standard is referred to within the Replacement District Plan as a guidance document:

Decision 13 – Subdivision development and earthworks decision (Part) – Stage 1 Schedule to decision 8.2.1:

There are a number of guidance documents that assist developers when preparing applications for subdivision consent and understanding the required level of service for matters relating to their development and whether these are acceptable to the Council. Where conditions are placed on subdivision consents within the matters of control or discretion specified in this chapter, such conditions may reference documents, including the following, as a means of achieving the matter of control or discretion:

i. Infrastructure Design Standard;

ii. Construction Standard Specifications;

iii. Stormwater Management Plans; and/or

iv. Waterways, Wetlands and Drainage Guide.

Note: These documents are not incorporated by reference into the District Plan.

4.7       The Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 incorporates extensive changes arising from the review of the current operative City Plan and Banks Peninsula District Plan and the resulting Replacement District Plan. It also includes best practice developed in tandem with the Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team. Submissions for change from Council staff on the current content have been considered, along with comment from external users although comment was not actively sought from external users under this review.

4.8       The review process is recorded in the Infrastructure Design Standard Update Procedure Manual attached, which also sets out roles and responsibilities for the Steering Group, the assessment team members and the Infrastructure Design Standard manager. The Update Methodology attached provides additional information including about seeking submissions and notifying of new versions.

4.9       Submissions on each chapter are reviewed by a cross-council team of asset managers and designers. The team determines any amendments needed, including to figures. The decisions, with reasons for accepting or rejecting the submissions, are recorded in a summary document. The finalised text, once accepted by the team for each chapter, is presented for acceptance to the Infrastructure Design Standard Steering Group, comprising the heads of Transport, Three Waters, Parks, Asset Management, and the manager of Technical Services and Design, as the principal internal user. Once accepted by the Steering Group, the revised Infrastructure Design Standard is presented to the infrastructure Transport and Environment Committee in preparation for full Council consideration.

4.10    The Infrastructure Design Standard is now ready for publication subject to Council resolving to adopt the document. Upon adoption, it will be published immediately on the Council website. Presentations to internal and external user groups will be undertaken, to convey the major changes and to highlight the application of the 2016 revision.

4.11    The delegation of the adoption of future revisions to a steering group will support the role of the Infrastructure Design Standard as a guideline, administered by management to achieve the policies set by Council in their governance role. This separation will help clarify what is not negotiable (policy and the requirements within the District Plan) versus what is recommended as best practice to achieve that (the guidelines in the Infrastructure Design Standard).


 

5.   Option 1 – Adopt the Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 and establish the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group with authority to adopt future revisions of the Infrastructure Design Standard (preferred)

Option Description

5.1       The Infrastructure Design Standard includes amendments due to the District Plan and references the supporting design documents created by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority. It includes expanded guidance on the design criteria for infrastructure, particularly wastewater reticulation systems. It expands on environmental protection and stormwater treatment and references as-built record standard adopted from the Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team.

5.2       The current process for a comprehensive review of the Infrastructure Design Standard requires adoption by Council. However, this option proposes the formal creation of the Infrastructure Design Standards Steering Group as a subordinate decision-making body of the Council comprising 5 members.  The Chief Executive will have the power to appoint and remove the members of the Steering Group.  (It is noted that the Steering Group currently comprises the Head of Transport, the Head of Asset Management, the Head of Three Waters & Waste, the Head of Parks and the manager of Technical Services and Design (as the principal internal user). The Steering Group will have the delegated authority to adopt future revisions (in whole or in part) of the Council’s Infrastructure Design Standard.

Significance

5.3       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements are to provide information about the new standard. Targeted promotion and notification will be undertaken with industry groups and interested parties to inform potential users of the major amendments incorporated in this revision. External submissions on the content of the Infrastructure Design Standard were received and considered as part of the revision process. Any further comment on the Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 once users are applying it will be considered in the next review.

Impact on Mana Whenua

5.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

5.5       As above. With respect to future revisions and amendments, the Steering Group will follow the process outlined in the Methodology and Process documents, which allow for engagement with stakeholders (both internal and external).

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

5.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

5.7       Cost of Implementation – There is no new expenditure required. All staff time is included in planned operational overhead budgets. The publishing of the Infrastructure Design Standard onto the Council webpage is part of Council’s standard operating procedures.

5.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – there are no ongoing costs in this revision. There would be a slight reduction in ongoing costs from removing the adoption of revisions from Council.

5.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

5.10    The Infrastructure Design Standard was reviewed by an external provider and the review confirmed that the standard is not a document identified under the Local Government Act 2002 as requiring consultation, and accordingly at that time there was no need to adopt the special consultative procedure under that Act.  However, the legal advice did identify that consultation was desirable to reduce the risk of subsequent formal challenge and/or produce a more robust document.

Risks and Mitigations

5.11    The Methodology and Process documents allow for engagement with stakeholders so the Steering Group will be able to assess the views and preferences of interested and affected persons.

Implementation

5.12    In terms of the future process, the Council is able to appoint the Steering Group as a subordinate decision-making body and delegate to it the power to sign-off on any future revisions and amendments to the Standard.  For efficiency and effectiveness, it is desirable to delegate the power to the Chief Executive to appoint and remove the members of the Steering Group.  This will allow for flexibility should job titles or designations change in the future. The Steering Group will be able to regulate its own procedure (e.g. deciding on a quorum etc.), and will not be automatically discharged at the triennial general elections.

5.13    When a resource consent references the Infrastructure Design Standard, it will be necessary for the resource consent to refer to the date of the Standard so that subsequent amendments to the Standard do not prejudice the resource consent holder.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

5.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Aligning the design and construction of horizontal infrastructure to the requirements of the Replacement District Plan.

·   Aligning the design and construction of stormwater related infrastructure to the new Council held discharge consents.

·   Applying best engineering practice to the design and construction of horizontal infrastructure.

·   Removing inconsistencies in evolving engineering practice between Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team and Council.

·   Enhancing protection of the environment through increased emphasis on environmental management in design.

·   Improving capture of vested as-built infrastructure.

·   Clearly stating within this organisation, through the delegation of adoption of the revisions, who owns and so should be determining standards for the design and acceptance of infrastructure.

·   Providing a clearer separation between policy and District Plan rules and the guidance for achieving or complying with those policies and rules.

·   Allowing faster and more frequent amendment of the Infrastructure Design Standard to reflect current Council policy and promote best engineering practice.

6.   Option 2 – Retain Infrastructure Design Standard and the current revision adoption process

Option Description

6.1       Adopt Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 and retain the current process for updating the Infrastructure Design Standard through a comprehensive review, which looks at all content on a five yearly cycle.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report. Engagement requirements are to provide information about the new standard. Targeted promotion and notification will be undertaken with industry groups and interested parties to inform potential users of the major amendments incorporated in this revision. External submissions on the content of the Infrastructure Design Standard were received and considered as part of the revision process. Any further comment on the Infrastructure Design Standard 2016 once users are applying it will be considered in the next review. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       As above. With respect to future revisions and amendments, the Steering Group will follow the process outlined in the Methodology and Process documents, which allow for engagement with stakeholders (both internal and external).

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation – There is no new expenditure required. All staff time is included in planned operational overhead budgets. The publishing of the Infrastructure Design Standard onto the Council webpage is part of Council’s standard operating procedures.

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – there are no ongoing costs in this revision. There will be additional staff costs in this option due to the time needed to present reports to Council for adoption.

6.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

6.9       The Infrastructure Design Standard was reviewed by an external provider and the review confirmed that the standard is not a document identified under the Local Government Act 2002 as requiring consultation, and accordingly at that time there was no need to adopt the special consultative procedure under that Act.  However, the legal advice did identify that consultation was desirable to reduce the risk of subsequent formal challenge and/or produce a more robust document.

Risks and Mitigations

6.10    The Methodology and Process documents allow for engagement with stakeholders so the Steering Group will be able to access views and preferences of interested and affected persons.

Implementation

6.11    When a resource consent references the Infrastructure Design Standard, it will be necessary for the resource consent to refer to the date of the Standard so that subsequent amendments to the Standard do not prejudice the resource consent holder.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.12    The advantages of this option include:

·   The Infrastructure Design Standard gains ‘weight’ through its adoption by Council.

6.13    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Potential for misunderstanding the role of the Infrastructure Design Standard as a guideline compared to policies determined by Council.

·   Delays in implementing best practice and updating guidance to reflect policy and legislation due to longer adoption process.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

IDS Update Procedure Manual V3

127

b

IDS Update Methodology V3

133

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Lelanie Crous - Personal Assistant / Business Administrator

Approved By

Vivienne Wilson - Senior Solicitor

Piers Lehmann - Head of Asset Management

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

10.    Notice of Motion

Reference:

16/649975

Contact:

Aidan Kimberley

Aidan.kimberley@ccc.govt.nz

941 6566

 

 

 

 

1.   Secretarial Note

 

At its meeting on 1 June 2016, the Shirley/Papanui Community Board considered a Notice of Motion from Board Chairperson Mike Davidson, and resolved the following:

                      That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board requests that the Council investigate:

a.         Installing a pedestrian refuge island on the Main North Road between Harewood and Langdons Roads in the vicinity of Age Concern which is situated at 24 Main North Road

b.         Restricting traffic movements out of Loftus Road on to the Main North Road to left turn only in order to create a more pedestrian friendly environment to allow people, many of whom are elderly, to cross the Main North Road safely without having to walk to the signalised crossing points.

The Board’s recommendation was considered by the Council at its meeting on 14 July 2016. At that meeting, the Council resolved to refer the matter to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee.

Council staff have prepared a memorandum with further advice and recommendations. This memorandum is set out in Attachment A.

 

2.   Shirley/Papanui Community Board Recommendation to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

 

Part A

That the Committee requests that staff investigate:

a.         Installing a pedestrian refuge island on the Main North Road between Harewood and Langdons Roads in the vicinity of Age Concern which is situated at 24 Main North Road

b.         Restricting traffic movements out of Loftus Road on to the Main North Road to left turn only in order to create a more pedestrian friendly environment to allow people, many of whom are elderly, to cross the Main North Road safely without having to walk to the signalised crossing points.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Report Title

Page

1

Notice of Motion

 

 

No.

Title

Page

a

Shirley Papnui Community Board - Main North Road Pedestrian Refuge Island Memo - Age Concern

139

 

Signatories

Authors

Aidan Kimberley – Committee and Hearings Advisor

Penny Gray – Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Chris Gregory – Head of Transport, Acting General Manager City Services

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

11.    Mona Vale Gate House & Halswell Quarry - Commercial Premises Options

Reference:

16/895321

Contact:

Luke Rees-Thomas

Luke.reesthomas@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8504

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for staff to provide advice, regarding a potential change of use for the Mona Vale Gate House and a building located within Halswell Quarry Park for commercial application, in order for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to recommend to Council their preferential option.

1.2       There are two options included for the Mona Vale Gate House and four options included for Halswell Quarry Park.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is being provided to fulfil the Council resolution dated 21 June 2016, which “set aside $500,000 (in the annual plan), subject to further staff advice being brought to Council, to do the additional work required for the Mona Vale Gate House and a building within the Halswell Quarry Park to be used for commercial activities.”

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by completing the Significance and Engagement Policy Worksheet.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Recommend to Council:

a.         That the Mona Vale Gate House building retain the existing operational use, being residential occupation.

b.         That staff be instructed to lease the Mona Vale Gate House building in accordance with Council policies and practices, upon completion of the building repair programme.

2.         Recommend to Council:

a.         That staff be instructed to commence an Expressions of Interest process in order to establish food and beverage operator interest for potential licence(s) on vacant land in proximity to the Singlemans House building and visitor car park on Halswell Quarry Park.

b.         That staff be instructed to investigate costs and implications for suitable landscaping and seating in order to accommodate the proposed licence(s) in item 2 (a) and report back to Council in due course.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the :

4.1.1   Activity: Regional Parks

·     Level of Service: 6.3.5 Provide, develop and maintain facilities to the satisfaction of park users.

4.2       Options - Mona Vale Gate House

4.2.1   The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Elect to retain the existing use of the Mona Vale Gate House being residential occupation and instruct staff to lease the building upon repair programme completion (Preferred Option).

 

·     Option 2 - Elect to halt the repair programme on the Mona Vale Gate House and instruct staff to further investigate all associated costs, implications and operator interest for a change of use to commercial application.

 

4.2.2   Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

The advantages of this option include:

·     By retaining the current use, the traditional use of the Mona Vale Gate House will be preserved as envisioned by the Park Management Plan.

·     The Council will eliminate the substantial cost and viability risk involved with a conversion of the Gate House building to accommodate a commercial use.

·     The allocated budget of $500,000 can be applied to the Halswell Quarry option and any savings directed to other projects.

·     The option to convert for commercial use will still be available in the future.

 

The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Reinstating the previous use of the building will not provide an additional attraction for the community or enhance the park entrance.

·     Vacancy required for a future change of use may be complicated if a residential tenant is in situ.

 

4.3       Options - Halswell Quarry Park

4.3.1   The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Instruct staff to investigate and implement temporary (portable) food and beverage operator licence(s) over vacant land in close proximity to the Singlemans House building and adjacent car park. Instruct staff to investigate costs and implications for suitable landscaping and seating to accommodate the vendor(s) (Preferred Option).

 

·     Option 2 – Instruct staff to investigate cost and implications for a Council new build on land adjacent to the Singlemans House.

 

·     Option 3 – Instruct staff to halt the repair programme on the Singlemans House building and to investigate associated costs, implications and operator interest for a change of use to allow commercial application.

 

·     Option 4 – Take no action.

 

4.3.2   Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

The advantages of this option include:

·     Park users will receive the same service as Options 2 & 3 at a lesser sum, whilst complimenting and retaining the full heritage appearance of the Singlemans House attraction.

·     The Council will eliminate the substantial cost and viability risk involved with a conversion of the Singlemans House building.

·     The Council and vendor(s) will be able to test the viability of the site with a reasonable amount of flexibility.

·     Should the temporary Vendor arrangement prove successful a permanent new build on the same site could then be priced and considered by Council.

·     The option to convert the Singlemans House for commercial use will still be available in the future.

 

The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Turnover of the vendor(s) could be higher than a building lease.

·     Rental income for the Council will be less than a building lease.

 

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Council Annual Plan Allocation

5.1.1   During the meeting of 21 June 2016, the Council resolved to “set aside up to $500,000, subject to further staff advice being brought to Council, to do the additional work required for the Mona Vale Gate House and a building within the Halswell Quarry Park to be used for commercial activities.”

This report responds to this annual plan resolution by providing advice on options for elected member’s consideration and resolution.

5.2       Mona Vale Gate House

5.2.1   History, Land & Relevant Planning considerations

·   The Mona Vale Gate House was built in 1905 and is located at the northern end of the Mona Vale Grounds (refer Attachment A). The Gate House holds significant heritage values and has traditionally been utilised as residential accommodation and leased out under the Residential Tenancies Act. The building was severely damaged as a result of the Canterbury Earthquakes and the Council has resolved to complete a full repair and restoration programme, which is now underway.

·   The land on which the building sits is not reserve land, rather land held by the Council for the purpose of ‘Pleasure Ground’ and administered under the Local Government Act 2002.

·   The land is zoned ‘Conservation 2’ and ‘Living 1’ in the Operative City Plan, however ‘OCP (Open Space Community Parks)’ in the Proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan. The latter includes “promoting compatible mixed or multi-functional use of land, buildings and facilities through adaptable designs.”

·   The building has a floor area of approximately 135m2 including porches.

·   The operative Management Plan for Mona Vale was adopted in 1988. The plan considers several commercial opportunities including; a licenced restaurant, conference facilities, a sound shell for concerts, a coffee house and a boat house. Apart from the development of the Homestead as a function centre the additional proposals were not accepted as it was considered at the time the original character of the property should be preserved.

·   These commercial opportunities still exist as potential development options. They could however potentially create uncertainty and risk regarding the commercial viability for either a new venture or the existing Homestead tenant.

·   The Mona Vale Gate House Conservation Plan is dated December 2001, specific comment is included regarding intended use:

“The Gate house is currently used as a rental property. The original purpose of the building was for residential use and it is currently being used for that purpose. It is recommended that it remain a residential property. Other uses may be possible for the house but they would need to be uses that require the least modification so as not to unduly compromise the significance of the place.”

·   In summary, the land, zoning, management and conservation plans, do not constrict the possibility of changing the use of the Mona Vale Gate House for commercial applications. However several factors are present which combine to recommend the existing use be retained.

 

5.2.2   Building repair and timeframes

The Mona Vale Gate House repair programme has commenced and provides an approximate programme completion date of December 2016. The repair programme propose to yield an appearance as per prior to the earthquake events.

5.2.3   Commercial Viability

Independent advice received has concluded that a café in this location is unlikely to be viable. The premises are constricted by several impediments, including; parking, foot traffic and the existing Homestead restaurant.

 

Please refer to Attachment B for full detail.

5.3       Halswell Quarry Park

5.3.1   History, Land & Relevant Planning considerations

·    Halswell Quarry Park has metropolitan significance and serves a recreation function within Christchurch’s regional parks network. Located in the rural south-west, the Halswell Quarry Park is somewhat isolated from other open space areas. While a relatively small community currently live near it, the park is used by the greater Christchurch community for walking and running, walking dogs, cycling, horse riding, and picnics in the summer.

·    The Singlemans House (Workman’s Quarters) building is an original stone single level building located on the main driveway entrance from Kennedys Bush Rd and sits opposite a visitor car park (refer Attachment C).

·    This building holds significant heritage values and was originally used as worker accommodation. In recent years the building has been maintained as a visitor information icon.

·    The building was severely damaged as a result of the Canterbury Earthquakes and the Council has resolved to complete a full repair and restoration programme, which is now underway.

·    The land on which the building sits is not reserve land, rather land held by the Council and administered under the Local Government Act 2002. The park Management Plan, has recommended a future change of classification to Recreation Reserve, however this process is yet to be completed.

·    The land is zoned ‘Conservation 2’ in the Operative City Plan, however ‘ON (Open Space Natural)’ in the Proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan.

·    The building has a floor area of approximately 140m2 including porch.

·    The operative Management Plan for Halswell Quarry was adopted in 2009. The plan considers commercial opportunity solely for the former Manager’s House on the rise, however noting that a preferable use in the medium term is to retain that building as a Ranger’s residence.

·    Further commercial opportunities exist on the park, however the business viability and market response are yet to be tested.

·    In summary, the land, zoning and Management Plan do not constrict the possibility of changing the use of the Singlemans House building for commercial applications. However several factors are present which combine to recommend the existing use be retained.

 

5.3.2   Building repair and timeframes

The Halswell Quarry Singlemans House repair programme has commenced and has an approximate programme completion date of December 2016. The repair programme will yield an appearance as per prior to the earthquake events.

5.3.3   Commercial Viability

Independent advice received has concluded that a café in this location could be viable. However, the Singlemans House building is heavily constricted by the lack of services, heritage limitations and fit-out cost, all of which have not been fully detailed within the report.

 

Please refer to Attachment D for full detail.

 

5.4       Change of use requirements

·    In order for the buildings to be converted for commercial application, several aspects need to be considered and consented: design, fire systems, modification of access ways & doorways, provision and upgrade services throughout, external improvements, upgrade finishes and kitchen etc.

·    Initial estimated costs for this project have been provided at $300,000 for the Mona Vale Gate House and $200,000 for the Halswell Quarry Singlemans building, however further investigation is required to establish the actual cost.

5.5       Heritage aspects and limitations

·    The Council’s Heritage Team provide full commentary regarding the Mona Vale and Halswell options in Attachment E, with summary as follows:

 

“These buildings are significant to the Christchurch District, and are accordingly protected in the District Plan.  Consents would be required for altering the buildings to convert them to café use.  A change of use would trigger building code requirements. As a general principle, continuation of the original use of heritage buildings is desirable if this can be achieved, otherwise, new uses can enable heritage buildings to be retained. However any new use needs to be appropriate to the buildings, and not significantly impact on their heritage values and fabric. Given the requirements of café use and the resultant building code requirements, the extent of change and loss of heritage fabric to these buildings would significantly compromise their heritage significance.  Café conversions could result in detracting from these very features which people go to experience at the visitor destinations of Mona Vale and Halswell Quarry.”

 

5.6       Consultation requirements

Should the Council elect to proceed with building conversion works, public consultation would be required on two occasions:

i)       Resource Consent - In order for the Council to change the use of the building.

ii)      Lease of building – The land on which this building sits is deemed ‘Park’ under the Local Government Act 2002 and the Council is required to notify the public under section 138 when any ‘disposal’ of land takes place over 6 months in duration.

It is probable the Council will receive a reasonable response to any public consultation over proposed changes to these sites. This may be in the form of the local residents or the current operator of the Mona Vale Homestead voicing their opinions either for or against.

The Council will incur staff time and cost to facilitate necessary consultation and potential hearing processes.                   


 

6.   Option 1 – Mona Vale Gate House – Retain existing use (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       This option will determine the building shall be reinstated to its original purpose for which it is currently zoned, being residential occupation. No further time will be invested by staff towards the change of use investigations and the building will be leased in due course.

6.2       The building will be re-let under standard Council practices and the occupation of a suitable individual(s) will assist to provide a security presence at this entry point to the park.

6.3       This option is considered low risk to the Council.

Significance

6.4       The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are not required as no change of use is taking place.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       The local community, users of the Mona Vale grounds and the Homestead restaurant operator are specifically affected by this option due to the residential occupation of the building.  Their views are not required as the park Management Plan contemplates the Gate House be used for this purpose.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation – Nil, proceed as budgeted

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Standard property maintenance

6.10    Funding source – Existing budgets

Legal Implications

6.11    Nil

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    Nil

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies  - Nil

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Nil

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·     By retaining the current use, the traditional use of the Mona Vale Gate House will be retained as included within the Management Plan.

·     The Council will eliminate the substantial cost and viability risk involved with a conversion of the Gate House building to accommodate a commercial use.

·     The allocated budget of $500,000 can be applied to the Halswell Quarry option and any savings directed to other projects.

·     The option to convert for commercial use will still be available in the future.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Turnover of the residential tenant could be higher than a commercial lease.


 

7.   Option 2 – Mona Vale Gate House – Change of use for commercial applications

Option Description

7.1       This option will instruct staff to further investigate the necessary actions to change the permitted business use of the building, in order to allow a commercial operator to lease the space, e.g. a small café or souvenir shop.

7.2       This option is considered a high risk for the Council and prospective tenants.

Significance

7.3       The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance will be actioned as required by the Local Government Act.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       The local community, users of the Mona Vale grounds and the Homestead restaurant operator are specifically affected by this option due to the potential change of use for the building. The group’s views will be sought and considered as required.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – High Cost (building works, repair halt, staff time, consultation)

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Property Maintenance, lease administration, staff time

7.9       Funding source – Existing budgets, allocated annual plan funds.

Legal Implications

7.10    Potential challenge through the public consultation process & lease documentation.

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    High risk associated with the high outlay in cost vs the commercial viability concerns.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies - Subject to further staff investigation, cost establishment, Council reporting, building works, tenant sourcing.

7.13    Implementation timeframe – 6 months for further information and report. Additional time for site works.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·     The grounds, users of the park and local residents would benefit from an additional commercial option in the area, e.g. a small coffee house / tea room.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     The building repair programme will be required to halt and incur a subsequent cost.

·     Independent viability advice advises against a café use.

·     The market has not been tested for operator interest.

·     The building layout does not support a cafe application.

·     Heritage designation limits much fabric alteration and will not be reversible.

·     The cost for Council to convert the building is prohibitive – approximately $300,000. This price is likely to increase based on the nature of the building.

·     Any tenant’s rental will be meagre in order to reflect the uncertainty of trade and small premises footprint, therefore the Council’s outlay cost is difficult to justify.

·     A primary food and beverage offering is already present within the Mona Vale Homestead, due to re-open in October 2016. A new café in the Gate House would be in direct competition with the Homestead.

 


 

8.   Option 1 – Halswell Quarry Park - Temporary tenant occupation (preferred)

Option Description

8.1       Under this option staff will investigate and implement the provision of a space within the park for temporary food and beverage operator(s). This will allow the Council to test the viability of the location without substantial investment and risk.

8.2       This option is considered low risk to the Council.

Significance

8.3       The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance will be actioned as required by the Local Government Act.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.5       Users of the park are specifically affected by this option due to the proposed new commercial use. Their views will be sought as required by the Local Government Act.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

8.7       Cost of Implementation – Minimal cost.

8.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Staff time, some site works.

8.9       Funding source – Annual plan allocation.

Legal Implications

8.10    Licence documentation.

Risks and Mitigations

8.11    The operator interest in this opportunity is unclear.

Implementation

8.12    Implementation dependencies - Staff assessment of the site and required services.

8.13    Implementation timeframe – 3 months.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   The park will receive the same service as Options 2 & 3 at a lesser sum, whilst complimenting and retaining the full heritage appearance of the Singlemans House attraction.

·   The Council will eliminate the substantial cost and viability risk involved with a conversion of the Singlemans House building.

·   The Council and vendor(s) will be able to test the viability of the site with a reasonable amount of flexibility.

·   Should the temporary Vendor arrangement prove successful a permanent new build on the same site could then be priced and considered by Council.

·   The option to convert the Singlemans House for commercial use will still be available in the future.

8.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   There is uncertainty around the market response for a potential food and beverage vendor(s).

·   Turnover of the vendor(s) could be higher than a building lease.

·   Rental income for the Council will be less than a building lease.


 

9.   Option 2 – Halswell Quarry Park - New build by Council on adjacent land

Option Description

9.1       Under this option staff will proceed to investigate location and costs for a new build on vacant park land in close proximity to the Singlemans House building and visitor car park. The repair programme for the Singlemans building will proceed as current.

9.2       This option is considered medium-high risk for the Council and prospective tenants.

Significance

9.3       The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance will be actioned as required by the Local Government Act.

Impact on Mana Whenua

9.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

9.5       Users of the park are specifically affected by this option due to the proposed new building and commercial use within. Their views will be sought as required by the Local Government Act and during consenting processes.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

9.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

9.7       Cost of Implementation – High cost (staff time, investigation, new build, new services installed).

9.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Building maintenance, lease management.

9.9       Funding source – Allocated Annual Plan funds, further budgets TBA.

Legal Implications

9.10    Potential challenge through the public consultation process, lease documentation.

Risks and Mitigations

9.11    High risk associated with the high outlay in cost vs the commercial viability unknowns of the site.

Implementation

9.12    Implementation dependencies - Subject to further staff investigation, cost establishment and Council reporting.

9.13    Implementation timeframe - 6 months for further information and report. Additional time for site works.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

9.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   The grounds, users of the park and local residents will benefit from an additional commercial option in the area, e.g. a small coffee house / tea room.

9.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   A high cost to risk ratio for both Council and prospective tenants.

·   The market has not been tested for operator interest.

10. Option 3 – Halswell Quarry Park - Change of use for ‘Singlemans House’ building

Option Description

10.1    This option will instruct staff to further investigate the necessary cost and actions to change the permitted business use of the building, in order to allow a commercial operator to lease the space, e.g. a small café.

10.2    This option is considered medium-high risk for the Council and prospective tenants.

Significance

10.3    The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance will be actioned as required by the Local Government Act.

Impact on Mana Whenua

10.4    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

10.5    Users of the park are specifically affected by this option due to the proposed change of use for the Singlemans House building for commercial application. Their views will be sought as required by the Local Government Act and during consenting processes.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

10.6    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

10.7    Cost of Implementation - High cost (staff time, investigation, building works, new services installed)

10.8    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Building maintenance, lease management.

10.9    Funding source - Allocated Annual Plan funds, further budgets TBA.

Legal Implications

10.10  Potential challenge through the public consultation process, lease documentation.

Risks and Mitigations

10.11  High risk associated with the high outlay in cost vs the commercial viability unknowns of the site.

Implementation

10.12  Implementation dependencies - Subject to further staff investigation, cost establishment and Council reporting.

10.13  Implementation timeframe - 6 months for further information and report. Additional time for site works.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

10.14  The advantages of this option include:

·   The grounds, users of the park and local residents will benefit from an additional commercial option in the area, e.g. a small coffee house / tea room.

 

10.15  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The building repair programme will be required to halt and incur a subsequent cost.

·   A high cost to risk ratio for both Council and prospective tenants.

·   The market has not been tested for operator interest.

·   Alterations to the building are difficult given the heritage fabric and will not be reversible.

·   The building layout does not support a commercial application.

·   The building does not currently have water / waste / drainage / grease trap connections.

·   The building fabric complicates fit-out works, i.e. stone walls do not have cavities for services.

·   Fire separation and safety egress will be a consenting issue.

·   Resource consent approval will be difficult.

·   The cost for Council to convert the building is prohibitive – approximately $200,000*. This price will likely increase based on the nature of the building fabric.

 

*This price is based on a kiosk style operation with only the front portion of the building being converted. Heritage Contractor advice has recommended this method as a more achievable consenting avenue as opposed altering the entire building which will require significant change to the building structure.

 


 

11. Option 4 – Halswell Quarry Park – Take no action

Option Description

11.1    No action will be taken, the Singlemans House building will be repaired as planned and the Halswell Quarry Park will continue to function as status quo.

Significance

11.2    The level of significance of this option is medium and consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are not required.

Impact on Mana Whenua

11.3    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

11.4    Users of the park are not affected as no action is being taken.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

11.5    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

11.6    Cost of Implementation – Nil

11.7    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Nil

11.8    Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

11.9    Nil

Risks and Mitigations

11.10  Nil

Implementation

11.11  Implementation dependencies – Nil

11.12  Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

11.13  The advantages of this option include:

·    Visitors to the park will be unaffected and the park will continue to be utilised in the current manner.

 

11.14  The disadvantages of this option include:

·    No new food and beverage option will be provided for users of the Park.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Attachment A-Mona Vale Gate House Images

162

b

Attachment B-Mona Vale Gatehouse Viability Report

165

c

Attachment C-Halswell Quarry Park Images

171

d

Attachment D-Halswell Quarry Park Viability Report

173

e

Attachment E-Heritage Team Advice

180

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Luke Rees-Thomas - Leasing Consultant

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

12.    Medway Street renewal and adjustments to the Street Renewal programme.

Reference:

16/969691

Contact:

Steve McNeill

Steve.McNeill@ccc.govt.nz

941 8766

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to consider and to recommend that the Council endorse the amendment of the street renewal programme to include Medway Street.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by Chris Gregory.

 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Endorse the inclusion of Medway Street kerb replacement (North Parade to Woodchester Street) in the 2016/17 Street Renewals Programme as a high priority due to the land drainage recovery project occurring in the street.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Roads and Footpaths

·     Level of Service: 16.0.19 Maintain Road infrastructure

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – the preferred option is to delay the delivery of several existing projects within the Street Renewal programme in order to fund and allow the timely delivery of the Medway Street project in conjunction with the current land drainage project in the street. The Medway Street carriageway width will be reduced from 13 metres to 9 metres as a consequence of these works.

·     Option 2 – do nothing

 

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     An opportunity to provide timely and efficient delivery of the street renewal portion of this project as the land drainage project will affect a 9 metre width of the existing carriageway. Coordination of the two projects will achieve an optimal road profile to residential street standards and remove the existing deep-dish channel.

·     Coordination of projects across Council.

·     Whole of life cost savings for storm water and transport assets.

·     Will deliver a complete rather than incomplete project for Medway Street.

·     Community benefits because rework and further construction disruption to local residents is not required in future years.

 

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Slight delay (1-2 years) to North Avon Drive and projects beyond 2019 that are yet to be programmed.

·     Short consultation opportunity.

·     Some budget uncertainty regarding apportioning budget to either land drainage or street renewal budgets.

 

 

5.   Context/Background

Street renewal prioritisation

5.1       The installation of the pipework for the land drainage recovery programme in Medway Street will require extensive excavation and a likely trench width of 9 m at road level. The land drainage project will be required to re-instate the road pavement for this full trench width.

5.2       The current deep-dish channels in Medway Street are set 13m apart. There is the opportunity as a street upgrade project to install new flat dish channel to a 9m road width with wider berms as part of the land drainage project but funded from the Street Renewals category.

5.3       The preliminary estimate for this project requires a budget amendment of $1M.

5.4       Medway Street was not included within the 2015-20 street renewal programme because of uncertainty regarding the extent and timing of utility works. It was tentatively scheduled for works in the next 5 to 10 year period.

Opportunity

5.5       The opportunity to combine works provides the community with the optimum current and whole of life solution.

6.   Option 1 – Provide Street Renewal Budget for Medway Street

Option Description

6.1       The preferred option is to delay the delivery of several projects within the existing Street Renewal programme in order to provide budget for, and allow the timely delivery of the Medway Street project, in conjunction with the land drainage project in the street.

6.2       Reallocation of funding for Griffiths, Nicholls, Warden and Chancellor are the changes made to first two years when compared with the previously agreed programme. The additional design funding provided has been distributed across projects as part of the changes made to accommodate the Medway Street construction in FY2017.

 


 

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.4       The engagement requirements for this level of significance are to consult/inform adjacent property owners.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       Local residents are affected by this option - due to the major land drainage project in their street.  Their views indicate they favour a full street renewal in conjunction with the land drainage works.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $1,000,000.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs. Following the completion of the works there will be a reduction in maintenance and surfacing renewal costs due to less sealed area and reduced channel cleaning costs.

6.10    Funding source. It is proposed that the project be funded from within the existing Street Renewal programme by deferral of several existing projects by 1-2 years.

Legal Implications

6.11    Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.12    There is a risk that the preliminary budget estimate is inadequate.

6.13    Risk is caused by procurement uncertainty. The options for procurement include pricing and delivery by the land drainage contractor, or open tender. This will result in the need to review scope at all stages.

6.13.1       Treatment: budget management during the design and procurement phases.

6.13.2       Residual risk rating: the rating of the risk is Medium.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - implementation should be in conjunction with, or immediately following the land drainage (culvert) installation.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – to be determined during the land drainage construction period.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·     An opportunity to provide timely delivery of the street renewal portion of this project as the land drainage project will affect at least a 9 metre width of the existing carriageway.

·     Coordination of projects across Council.

·     The project will result in whole of life cost savings for storm water and Transport assets.

·     The project will deliver a complete rather than incomplete project for Medway Street.

·     The community benefits because rework and further construction disruption to local residents is not required in future years.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Slight delay (1-2 years) to other listed projects.

·     Short consultation opportunity.

·     Some budget uncertainty regarding apportioning budget to either land drainage or street renewal budgets and procurement methodologies.


 

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Do nothing

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are not necessary.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       This option does not change the 2016/17 Annual Plan and existing projects are not specifically affected by this option.  Community views have already been sought through LTP and Annual Plan processes.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation. There is no change from current programme of works.

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – are not applicable to this option.

7.9       Funding source – is as per the existing 2016/17 Annual Plan.

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    There are no risks with the Do Nothing option.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - are as per the existing 2016/17 Annual Plan dependencies.

7.13    Implementation timeframe – is as per the existing 2016/17 Annual Plan timeframe.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   No change from the existing work stream.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The opportunities highlighted for the preferred Option will not be realised.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Steve McNeill - Senior Capital Programme Advisor Transport

Approved By

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

13.    Botanic Gardens former visitor centre re-use

Reference:

16/947343

Contact:

John Clemens

john.clemens@ccc.govt.nz

941 7589

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to be informed about the re-purposing of the former visitor information centre building in the Christchurch Botanic Gardens.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   No decision is required.

2.1.2   Extensive engagement and consultation have already been undertaken during the preparation of the Hagley Park & Botanic Gardens Master Plan and the Christchurch Botanic Gardens Management Plan already adopted by Council in 2007.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report is about the intention to repurpose the former Botanic Gardens visitor information centre in order to fulfil the objectives of Project 47 of the Hagley Park & Botanic Gardens Master Plan, which is to have a Science and Research Facility/Programme in the Botanic Gardens for the benefit of the public (refer Attachment A).

4.2       As noted under Project 47, over the average number of submitters responded to this project during the Master Plan consultation process, and nearly three-quarters of submitters were in support of this development (refer Attachment A).

4.3       The intended repurposing of the building also supports the goals of the Christchurch Botanic Gardens Management Plan and attendant policy objectives for conservation, the environmental importance of plants, and contributing to a greater understanding of plants through scientific research (Attachment B).

4.4       As detailed in the two above plans, the repurposing will entail the installation of (i) a seed bank for endangered Canterbury plants, and support facilities (a seed lab), (ii) a plant prep room/lab (conservation lab), (iii) desk space for visiting experts assisting the Botanic Gardens and a base for the Friends of the Botanic Gardens (workstations), and (iv) a space for engagement with the public and meetings/presentations (a multifunction learning space) (Refer draft floor plan Attachment C).

4.5       Initial cost estimates ($250 K) indicate that the repurposing of the former visitor information centre may be able to be funded from within existing LTP Capex budget. In addition, Council staff will be exploring opportunities for external funding sources from entities with an interest in science communication and the development of the Botanic Gardens.

4.6       It is intended to repurpose the former visitor information centre to achieve this rather than the new Botanic Gardens Visitor Centre for three reasons:

4.6.1   The new Visitor Centre does not include the important facilities outlined above that the Master and Management Plans identified as required to fulfil staff and visitor needs.

4.6.2   The new Visitor Centre provides visitors good visibility of operations in the nursery greenhouse, but visitors are separated from active engagement with staff and the plant world within.

4.6.3   The former visitor information centre can be readily adapted to provide both the needed facilities not already supplied in the new Visitor Centre (described above) and the means to connect directly with visitors.

4.7       The former visitor information centre in its existing state has been underutilised since the opening of the new Visitor Centre in 2014.

4.8       The intended repurposing will not duplicate facilities in the new Visitor Centre and will enhance both the visitor experience as well as improving the reputation of the Christchurch Botanic Gardens as a high performing botanic garden.

 

 

5.   Context/Background

Achieving Community Outcomes

5.1       The proposed improvements to the former visitor information centre will contribute to achieving Community Outcomes described in the Garden & Heritage Parks Activity Management Plan, notably:

·   The city’s heritage and taonga are conserved for future generations.

·   People have equitable access to parks, open spaces, recreation facilities and libraries.

·   The public has access to places of scenic, natural, heritage, cultural and educational interest.

·   City assets, financial resources and infrastructure are well-managed, now and in the future.

Which will be reflected in:

·   Educational programmes, displays and promotions are provided that enhance public access to parks and gardens and encourage learning about our natural heritage, culture and history.

·   Access to garden and heritage parks as part of the district’s network of parks and open spaces, provides places for relaxation, recreation, and provide opportunities for protecting ecosystems, vegetation and habitats.

·   The Christchurch Botanic Gardens remains as one of the most visited and appreciated sites within the city and the residents are satisfied with the standard delivered.

·   The City’s biodiversity is protected and enhanced through the activities of Garden and Heritage parks, and the Christchurch Botanic garden contributes to global plant conservation through its collections.

·   Appropriate use of built facilities and are under constant review to protect and enhance, and provide appropriate business use.

·   A range of events and displays to inform, and provide enjoyment to residents and visitors is undertaken.

Contributions to Levels of service

5.2       The proposed re purposing of the old visitor centre will contribute to the following Levels of Service, as defined within the Activity Management Plan for Garden and Heritage Parks in connection with goals set out for the Botanic Gardens:

·   6.2.3             Provision of a Botanic Garden that is open to the public

·   6.2.4             Provision of Botanic Gardens Services that:

·   6.2.4.1         Facilitate environmental and community education…

·   6.2.4.2         Invest in science and research partnerships…

·   6.2.4.4         Displays can contribute to the ongoing learning of residents and visitors.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Extract from Christchurch Botanic Gardens Management Plan adopted by Council in 2007

194

b

Extract from Hagley Park & Botanic Gardens Master Plan adopted by Council in 2007

195

c

Provisional Concept

196

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

John Clemens - Manager Conservation and Sustainable Development

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

14.    September 2016 Zone Committees' update

Reference:

16/884394

Contact:

Clive Appleton

clive.appleton@ccc.govt.nz

941 8352

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       This report is to provide the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee with the September 2016 update report from the Christchurch-West Melton, Banks Peninsula and Selwyn-Waihora water management zone committees (Attachment A).

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the Zone Committees' report.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The ITE Committee has asked for a monthly update from the zone committees.  The attached report (Attachment A) is the latest update from the zone committees.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Zone Committee Chairs report

202

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Diane Shelander - Senior Policy Analyst

Clive Appleton - Team Leader Natural Environment

Approved By

Helen Beaumont - Head of Strategic Policy

Emma Davis - Acting General Manager Strategy and Transformation

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

15.    3 Waters and Waste Monthly Report

Reference:

16/984205

Contact:

John Mackie

John.mackie@ccc.govt.nz

6548

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to inform the Committee of the activities undertaken by the 3 Waters and Waste Unit, who are responsible for the planning, asset management, operations, maintenance and capital project delivery for all 3 waters and waste infrastructure. This includes drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, land drainage and solid waste services within the city.

1.2       The unit also has responsibility for the delivery of the remaining SCIRT rebuild works relating 3 Waters.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the bi-monthly report.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The 3 Waters and Waste unit is responsible for the delivery of all water services including rebuild projects that are eligible for funding under the CCC-Crown cost share agreement and includes the land drainage recovery programme as well as all routine operations and maintenance.  The attached report provides an update on both SCIRT and non-SCIRT water infrastructure works based largely on the previous month end progress results and highlighting recent activities to date.

3.2       The attached report (Attachment 1) is a summary of key activities carried out through the period July / August 2016.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

ITE Report 3 Waters and Waste July 2016

206

 

 

Signatories

Author

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

Approved By

Peter Ryan - Head of Performance Management

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

16.    Drinking Water E. coli Testing and Risk Mitigation Processes

Reference:

16/993999

Contact:

John Mackie

John.mackie@ccc.govt.nz

941 6548

 

 

1.   Introduction

1.1       The purpose of this report is to provide Council executive and Elected Members background information about the city’s drinking water compliance monitoring programme to understand the risk to the Community given that Christchurch operates an untreated water supply that is fed from groundwater aquifers.

1.2       The topic of drinking water security has received a great deal of media attention in recent weeks and it is important that the Council and the community are fully informed of the steps that are taken by Council staff, contractors and partner agencies to maintain a safe and healthy drinking water supply.

 

2.   Executive Summary

2.1       Council’s water supply situation and risk management processes can be summarised as follows:

·   With the exception of the Northwest Christchurch zone, all of Council’s groundwater supplies have the highest grading possible for a secure groundwater supply which is ‘B’ for the groundwater source (satisfactory, very low level of risk). The Northwest Christchurch groundwater supply is currently graded ‘D’ as this zone is served from shallow aquifers. Capital works to develop deeper wells into the deeper confined aquifers are in progress to improve the water quality and the future grading. Refer to section 5.

·   Council’s comprehensive water quality monitoring programme is carried out in accordance with best practice and is fully compliant with the Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand. Additional monitoring and sampling is also undertaken well in excess of the minimum DWSNZ requirements. Refer to section 6.

·   The Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand (DWSNZ) use E. coli as an indicator organism for the potential presence of faecal material (which could include a range of organisms including Campylobacter and Cryptosporidium) due to the fact that E. coli water samples don’t require specialist filtering procedures, the laboratory turnaround time is short (24 hours) compared to other microbiological analyses that take longer and are more expensive.

·   Response is programmed to proactively and quickly deal with any emerging issue through isolation and/or chlorination. If the contamination was caused by a microorganism other than E. coli then Council has the ability to expedite investigatory work required in liaison with the local District Health Board to identify the offending bug. Refer to section 8.

·   Council has effective risk management and mitigation processes in place to manage risks to the water supply. Refer to section 10.

·   Various water treatment based risk mitigation options exist but have very high capital and ongoing operational costs. Refer to section 11.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in this report

 

4.   CCC Drinking Water Supplies

4.1       CCC owns and operates 11 water supply schemes in the urban Christchurch and Banks Peninsula areas.

Supplies & Zones

Supply Population

WINZ Community Code

Supply Type

Risk Grading

Urban Christchurch

Christchurch Central

255,500

CHR001

Groundwater

(DWSNZ secure groundwater status)

Ba

Central

185,000

Ba

Rocky Point

2,500

Ba

Parklands

16,000

Ba

Riccarton

10,000

Ba

West

42,000

Ba

Northwest Christchurch

80,000

NOR012

Groundwater

Da

Brooklands / Kainga

1,600

BRO012

Groundwater

(DWSNZ secure groundwater status)

Ba

Banks Peninsula

Lyttelton

4,450

LYT001

Groundwater

(DWSNZ secure groundwater status)

Bb

Lyttelton

2,500

Bb

Diamond Harbour

1,200

Bb

Governors Bay

750

Ba

Akaroa

1,350

AKA001

Surface Water

Uu

Birdlings Flat

150

BIR001

Groundwater

Uu

Duvauchelle

250

DUV001

Surface Water

Uu

Little River

240

LIT001

Surface Water

Uu

Takamatua

150

TAK002

Surface Water

Uu

Wainui

200

WAI138

Groundwater

(DWSNZ secure groundwater status)

Uu

Pigeon Bay

26

PIG001

Surface Water

Uu

 

5.   Water Supply Public Health Risk Grading

5.1       The purpose of the public health grading of community drinking-water supplies is ‘to provide a public statement of the extent to which a community drinking-water supply achieves and can ensure a consistently safe and wholesome product’.

5.2       This is determined by the extent to which a community drinking-water supply conforms to the DWSNZ and whether adequate barriers to potential contamination are in place to minimise risk to public health.

5.3       The grading has two letters. The first letter (capital) represents the source and treatment grading, while the second letter (lower case) grades the water in the distribution zone (reticulation system).

Source and treatment grading:

Assessment based on source and treatment factors will result in a grade:

·   A1       Completely satisfactory, negligible level of risk, demonstrably high quality

·   A          Completely satisfactory, extremely low level of risk

·   B          Satisfactory, very low level of risk when the water leaves the treatment plant.                                             (‘B’ is the highest possible grading for an untreated secure groundwater supply)

·   C          Marginally satisfactory, low level of microbiological risk when the water leaves
                   the treatment plant, but may not be satisfactory chemically.

·   D          Unsatisfactory level of risk

·   E          Unacceptable level of risk

·   U         This means that the supply has not been graded by the Drinking Water  Assessor

 

Distribution zone grading:  

Assessment based on reticulation condition, management and water quality will result in a grade:

·   a1        Completely satisfactory, negligible level of risk, demonstrably high quality.
                   (only supplies with a disinfection residual can achieve an ‘a1’ distribution zone grading)

·   a          Completely satisfactory, extremely low level of risk

·   b          Satisfactory, very low level of risk

·   c           Marginally satisfactory, moderate level of risk

·   d          Unsatisfactory level of risk

·   e          Unacceptable level of risk

·   u          This means that the reticulation has not been graded by the Drinking Water  Assessor

 

Minimum acceptable gradings are:

·   Ba for water supplies serving community of greater than 10,000 residents

·   Bb for water supplies serving a community between 5,001 and 10,000 residents

·   Cc for water supplies serving a community of less up to 5,000 residents

 

5.4       Public health grading is currently a voluntary process which is the reason why most of CCC’s Banks Peninsula water supplies are currently ungraded and expressed as Uu on the register of New Zealand community drinking water supplies on www.drinkingwater.org.nz .

5.5       CCC will get all water supplies graded when all capital works have been completed in a particular water supply.

5.6       Wainui was graded in July 2016 as having a Bb grade, however, the official grading report has not yet been released.

 


 

6.   Drinking Water Compliance Monitoring Regime

6.1       Drinking water quality compliance monitoring is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand 2005 (rev 2008) (DWSNZ).

6.2       E. coli is the indicator organism for microbiological compliance as it is easy to detect, does not require labour-intensive sample collection processes and has a relatively short laboratory turnaround time (24 hours incubation period).

6.3       The drinking water sampling schedules are approved by a Drinking Water Assessor from CDHB Community & Public Health and all water sampling and analysis is carried out by Council’s laboratory which is IANZ accredited and Ministry of Health approved.

6.4       The water sampling regime for the water source / treatment plant is dependent on the type of water source which in general terms means that more samples are required for surface water and non-secure groundwater sources and less samples (3 samples per quarter) are required for secure groundwater sources as those are deemed to have a very low risk of contamination.

6.5       The sampling regime for the distribution zones is population dependent with daily sampling in the large distribution zones.

6.6       In addition to the sampling requirements outlined in the DWSNZ CCC has additional monitoring requirements:

·   All secure groundwater sources / well sites are tested monthly.

·   All reservoirs are tested monthly.

·   The target sample numbers for the distribution zones are 150% of the DWSNZ minimum sample requirements, and on average Council takes 200% of the number of samples required by DWSNZ

·   Approx. 15-20% of all water supply wells – approx. 20-25 wells - are tested for a comprehensive range of chemical parameters each year.

 

7.   Sampling Results in FY 2015/16

7.1       In the FY 2015/16 a total of 5,487 samples had been analysed for E.coli in Christchurch City and Banks Peninsula of which 14 returned a positive result for E.coli. This equates to 0.26% of samples analysed showing presence of E.coli. No E. coli was found in secure groundwater well sites. The 14 positive results were related to 9 transgression events as outlined in the following table. 5 transgression events were related to water reservoir tank issues that occurred after rainfall and 1 transgression event was caused by a treatment plant equipment failure. 2 positive samples were from a pump station which sources water from shallow non-secure wells in the Northwest zone.

 

Date

Supply

(Source, Distribution)

Location

No. of positive E. coli samples per event

Details and Possible Cause

03/08/2015

Little River (Distribution)

Western Valley Rd

3

Airlock in liquid chlorine dosing unit, caused by subcontractor construction work upstream.  Pipework has been altered to reduce potential for air locking.

04/01/2016

Central (Distribution)

Major Aitken 2 reservoir

1

Rainfall event resulted in water ingress via defects in roof. Defects identified, on repair programme

18/01/2016

Central (Distribution)

Mt Pleasant 1 reservoir

1

Rainfall event resulted in water ingress via defects in roof.  Defects identified, on repair programme.

19/02/2016

Northwest (Source)

Burnside pump station

1

Presence detected at pump station outlet.  No further presence nor count detected. Shallow wells on replacement programme (Northwest DWSNZ Upgrade).

17/03/2016

West (Distribution)

Burkes Track 2 reservoir

1

Rainfall related – defects in roof to be rectified (reservoir roof lining).

18/03/2016

West (Distribution)

Halswell 1 reservoir

1

Rainfall related – defects in roof to be rectified (reservoir roof lining).

26/03/2016

Northwest (Source)

Burnside pump station

1

Presence detected at pump station outlet.  No further presence nor count detected. Shallow wells on replacement programme (Northwest DWSNZ Upgrade).

 

06/04/2016

Lyttelton (Distribution)

Buxton 2 reservoir

2

Possible contamination pathway through reservoir lid.  Included on chlorine spraying round.  Reservoir replacement scheduled.

01/06/2016

Northwest (Distribution)

151 Greers Rd

3

Probable source shallow wells at Burnside pump station.  CCC shut down pump station. Shallow wells on replacement programme (Northwest DWSNZ Upgrade).

 

8.   Corrective Actions Taken When Transgressions Occurred

8.1       All procedures were undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the DWSNZ. As soon as a water sample returned a positive test for E. coli a CCC Laboratory staff member notified all 32 members of the ‘Transgression Response’ email distribution list.

8.2       A group of representatives from CCC Network Operations, Asset Management, CCC Laboratory and the maintenance contractor City Care then used the City Services Procedures Manual procedure WS-003 Water Contamination to develop an appropriate response plan to address the issues.

8.3       In all 9 transgression events the immediate response plans included steps to isolate the suspected source, undertake a comprehensive sanitary survey (sampling in the nearby distribution zone and from the source), carry out an investigation of the possible causes for these transgressions and corrective action to rectify the issues such as chlorination of the reservoir, mains flushing in the distribution zone, equipment maintenance, implementation of a reservoir roof repair programme etc.

8.4       The local Drinking Water Assessor was notified on every occasion, consulted and kept informed of the actions taken and the progress made. The Drinking Water Assessor was also notified when 3 consecutive clear days had been achieved at the original transgression site.

 

9.   Transgression Events in Previous 4 Financial Years and Determination of Root Cause

 

FY 2015/16

FY 2014/15

FY 2013/14

FY 2012/13

Total number of samples taken

5,487

6,163

6,827

6,395

No. samples with E. coli present

14

29

39

43

Transgression events:

9

11

23

15

Reservoir

5

5

16

5

Distribution

2

3

5

7

Water Treatment Plant

0

2

1

2

Groundwater / Well

2

1

1

1

 

·   Sampling data from the previous 4 financial years suggest that water supply reservoir tanks are the main contributors to the Council’s transgression count. Corrective actions always proved successful and over the last years Council has made significant improvements to its reservoir maintenance programme to reduce the risk.

·   Equipment failure at water treatment plants has in the past resulted in E. coli being present, however, all Banks Peninsula treatment plants have had significant upgrades over the past years which reduced the risk of future transgressions greatly.

·   Positive E. coli results from groundwater wells or pump stations with wells on site are rare and were related to shallow non-secure wells on site (which are currently being replaced under the Northwest DWSNZ Upgrade project) or related to the water storage / suction tanks on site.

10. Programmes and Initiatives to Reduce Public Health Risk

10.1    Council has several operational and capital works programmes in place to reduce public health risks.

10.2    Northwest DWSNZ upgrade: this $16m project started in FY 2012/13 and includes the drilling of deep wells and the decommissioning of all remaining 22 unconfined aquifer 1 wells in the Northwest zone. The programme will be completed by 30 June 2018.

10.3    Reservoir condition assessments: maintenance contractor City Care has purchased an underwater camera which allows them to check the entire reservoir for structural issues even when the reservoir is filled. They have also implemented a ‘roof spraying programme’ where the roofs of reservoirs that are known to have structural defects are being sprayed with a chlorine solution to prevent ingress of contamination until the repairs have been completed.

10.4    Increased water quality sampling: as outlined in section 5 Council takes more than the minimum number of water samples in all water supplies, usually at least 200% of the minimum number of samples. In response to recent events in the North Island, we propose to increase this sampling even further to provide additional assurance to the community.

10.5    Water Safety Plans: CCC has Ministry of Health approved water safety plans for all water supplies. The plans contain supply specific risk assessment tables and improvement schedules that aim to reduce the most significant risks. The water safety plans are reviewed on an annual basis and the Drinking Water Assessors carry out implementation audits onsite together with Council staff and specify improvement items as required.

10.6    Liaison with Environment Canterbury: Council maintains a close working relationship with Environment Canterbury groundwater scientists and shares water quality data which enables the preparation of long-term groundwater quality trends. Council also regularly provides comments on resource consents that have the potential to affect Council’s water supplies.

10.7    Backflow Prevention: Council has a backflow policy in place that requires high risk properties to install testable double backflow devices on the point of water supply in order to reduce the risk of contaminated water entering the public water supply.

10.8    Authorised Water Supply Installer Scheme: Council operates an authorised water supply installer scheme which ensures that only suitably experienced and qualified individuals are permitted to work on Council owned water supply reticulation assets. All water supply installers are aware of the hygiene procedures they need to follow in order to reduce the risk of water supply contamination.

10.9    Permit to Work System: CCC has put the Permit to Work (PtW) system in place for works on the water supply and wastewater networks in order to ensure that Council has visibility of what is happening in the networks, can notify its principal maintenance contractor of work carried out by others, in case an after-hours response is required and can notify the applicant of any special conditions and precautions they should take in doing the work and any contingencies and remedial actions required.

 

11. Future Risk Management Options

11.1    If a decision was made at a local or national level that the public health risk of supplying untreated water to communities such as Christchurch was no longer acceptable, then Council has several options to address and mitigate those risks.

11.2    Risk management based approach; by means of more stringent water quality monitoring and proactive measures to monitor and assess risks, e.g. land use controls, inspection programmes, asset assessments, better monitoring of network activities, closer relationships with ECan, connecting with our commercial and industrial ratepayers, looking further afield  (Canterbury Plains etc.)

11.3    Disinfection at all Christchurch pump stations: by installing chlorination and ultraviolet equipment at 55 sites. ROC $100m plus ongoing operational costs.

11.4    (After the February 2011 earthquake Council installed portable chlorination units at 26 sites across the most vulnerable and earthquake affected parts of Christchurch. The units chlorinated the supply between March and December 2011 until key water infrastructure repairs had taken place. A comprehensive water quality monitoring programme was in place during those months and no outbreak of disease was recorded which was a very good public health outcome.)

11.5    Alternative (non-groundwater) source: In 2005 Council commissioned a report that looked at water supply options if the aquifer system became contaminated. A number of options were discussed and considered. The option of using the Waimakariri River as an alternative surface water supply and treating the water at a centralised membrane water treatment plant had a ROC of $67m plus ongoing operational costs at 2005 construction prices.

11.6    Accelerated Bore Renewal Programme: Council staff are assessing a proposal to accelerate the shallow bore renewal programme in the Northwest zone of the city in order to reduce the contamination risk even further. This may require a re-prioritisation of our capital programme and securing additional resources to expedite the construction and commissioning.

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Signatories

Author

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

Approved By

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

   

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

17.  Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

             (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

             (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

01 September 2016

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

18

Public Excluded Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee Minutes - 4 August 2016

 

 

Refer to the previous public excluded reason in the agendas for these meetings.