Christchurch City Council

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Christchurch City Council will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Thursday 28 January 2016

Time:                                    9.30am

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor David East

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

Councillor Raf Manji

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Councillor Andrew Turner

 

 

21 January 2016

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Dr Karleen Edwards

Chief Executive

Tel: 941 8554

 

Megan Pearce

Council Secretary

941 8140

megan.pearce@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
Watch Council meetings live on the web:
http://councillive.ccc.govt.nz/live-stream

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Council - Terms of Reference

 

 

Chair

The Mayor

Membership

The Mayor and all Councillors are members of Council

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies) is odd.

Meeting Cycle

To be separately considered

 

 

The Council has the power to: (these powers cannot legally be delegated)

·         Make a rate

·         Make a bylaw

·         Borrow money, or purchase or dispose of assets, other than in accordance with the long-term plan

·         Adopt a long-term plan, annual plan or annual report

·         Appoint a Chief Executive

·         Adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Local Government Act 2002 in association with the long term plan or the preparation of the local governance statement

·         Adopt a remuneration and employment policy

 

The Council is also responsible for:

·         Reviewing and making decisions, when required, on the District Plan

·         Approving all Council strategy and policy, except that specifically delegated to a committee or subcommittee

·         Adoption of, and amendment to, Committee Terms of Reference, Standing Orders and Code of Conduct

·         Approving or amending the Triennial Agreement  and Local Governance Statement

·         Reviewing and making decisions on representation reviews

·         Appointing and discharging trustees, directors or office holders to Council’s Council-Controlled Organisations  and Council Organisations, except where specifically delegated to a committee or officer, and determining the remuneration for trustees, directors or office holders

·         Dealing with issues of significant community importance

·         Monitoring progress on earthquake recovery

Considering recommendations from Council committees, subcommittees, Community Boards, the public, stakeholders and others, and making Council decisions with regard for the requirements of Sections 76 – 81 of the Local Government Act 2002

 

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

1.       Apologies................................................................................................................................... 5

2.       Declarations of Interest............................................................................................................ 5

3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes.......................................................................................... 5

4.       Public Participation.................................................................................................................. 5

4.1     Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 5

4.2     Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 5

5.       Presentation of Petitions......................................................................................................... 5

6.       Avon River Precinct Road Stop Request............................................................................... 59

7.       Metro Sport Facility Road Stop - Balfour Terrace and Horatio Street............................... 65

8.       Minor change to Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015................................................................. 69

9.       Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee Extraordinary Meeting - 22 September 2015...................................................................................................................... 75

10.     The Notification Decision For Resource Consent Applications........................................... 79

11.     LINZ Smart City Programme funding.................................................................................... 93

12.     Canterbury Economic Development Company Limited - Annual Meeting Shareholders' Resolution.............................................................................................................................. 101

Burwood-Pegasus Community Board

13.     Options for the Treatment of Asbestos Containing Material at QEII Park...................... 125

Audit and Risk Management Committee

14.     Audit and Risk Management Committee Minutes - 24 November 2015......................... 151

Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee

15.     Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee Minutes - 3 December 2015................................................................................................................................................ 155

Regulation and Consents Committee

16.     Regulation and Consents Committee Minutes - 19 November 2015............................... 163

17.     Regulation and Consents Committee Minutes - 17 December 2015................................ 171

Strategy and Finance Committee

18.     Strategy and Finance Committee Minutes - 19 November 2015...................................... 177

19.     Strategy and Finance Committee Minutes - 17 December 2015....................................... 187

20.     Vbase Limited - Appointment of new director.................................................................. 193

21.     Report by the Chairperson of the Capital Endowment Fund Working Group................ 199

22.     Resolution to Exclude the Public......................................................................................... 205  

 

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Council meeting held on Thursday, 10 December 2015 be confirmed (refer page 6).

That the minutes of the Council meeting held on Thursday, 14 January 2016 be confirmed (refer page 56).

4.   Public Participation

4.1  Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes is available for people to speak for up five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

4.1.1         Rotary Club of Christchurch North presents "Paul Harris" award to Mayor Lianne Dalziel.

4.2  Deputations by Appointment

A period of up to 30 minutes for deputations that have made application and been approved by the Chairperson.

There were no Deputations by Appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no Presentation of Petitions at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Christchurch City Council

Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 10 December 2015

Time:                                    9.30am

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor David East

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

Councillor Raf Manji

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Councillor Andrew Turner

 

 

11 December 2015

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Dr Karleen Edwards

Chief Executive

Tel: 941 8554

 

Megan Pearce

Council Secretary

941 8140

megan.pearce@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Watch Council meetings live on the web:
http://councillive.ccc.govt.nz/live-stream

 

  

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00099

That the apology from Deputy Mayor Buck for absence, and apology for lateness from Councillors Jones and Manji be accepted.

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                              Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Councillor Turner declared an interest in Item 33.

Councillors Lonsdale and Gough declared an interest in Item 60.

Members of the Arts Centre Trust (Councillor Johanson) and Museum board (Councillors Cotter, East and Lonsdale) declared an interest in item 34.

 

3 and 6.    Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meetings of 15 October, 29 October, 12 November, 17 November and 26 November, and the Extraordinary Council meeting of 2 December 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00100

1.         That the minutes of the Council meetings held on 15 October 2015, 29 October, 12 November 2015, 17 November 2015, and 26 November 2015, and the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 2 December 2015 be confirmed.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor East                                                                                                                            Carried

 

59. Resolution to Include Supplementary Reports

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00101

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor East, seconded by Councillor Livingstone that supplementary item 71 be considered at the meeting directly following the deputation.

Councillor East/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                                  Carried

 

4.   Public Participation

4.1  Public Forum

There were no Public Forum presentations.

4.2  Deputations by Appointment

Mark Munro, Chairman - Christchurch Coastal Residents United (CCRU) - addressed the Council on item 71, Response to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment report on sea level rise. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There was no Presentation of Petitions.

Councillor Jones joined the meeting at 9.52am

Councillor Manji joined the meeting at 9.58am

 

71. Response to Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment report on sea level rise

 

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00102

That the Council:

1.         Receive the report on the Council’s response to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s report Preparing New Zealand for rising seas: certainty and uncertainty.

2.        a.            Direct staff to seek a further peer review of the Coastal Hazards Assessment (Tonkin                          and Taylor 2015)

b.           The peer review be conducted as soon as practicable by a panel of scientific experts, the details of which will be determined after consultation with affected communities.

c.            That LIM notations following receipt of the peer review report be reviewed acknowledging the findings of the report.       

3.         Direct staff to review the wording of the LIM notation for properties potentially affected by coastal inundation and coastal erosion to ensure that the information provided is fair, clear and accurate.

4.         Ensure the Council submission on the Resource Legislation Amendment Bill include a recommendation to the Select Committee that the Building Act 2004 and the Resource Management Act 1991 be amended so that there is better alignment and integration, reduced duplication and better consistency in the resource management system in relation to natural hazards to land.

 

Councillor East/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

59. Resolution to Include Supplementary Reports cont.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00103

That the following reports be received and considered at the Council meeting on Thursday, 10 December 2015:

60        Local Alcohol Policy

64        Eastern Rec & Sport Centre

72        Peterborough Quarter

73        Cashmere Forest Adventure Park

63        AAC Phase 2 - St Asaph Street

67        Santa Cruz Lane Social Housing

69        Major Cycleways

70        Upper Heathcote Storage

62        ITE Minutes 3 December

68        ITE Minutes 3 December

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                Carried

 

Councillors Scandrett and Livingstone left the meeting at 10.34am and returned at 10.38am.

7.   Report of a meeting of the Akaroa/Wairewa Community Board. Meeting of 14 October 2015

 

Pam Richardson, Chairperson, joined the table via audio conference for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00104

That the Council receive the report.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                              Carried

 

8.   Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board - 21 October 2015 - Notice of Motion

 

Paula Smith, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00105

That the Council request a staff report be provided to the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board meeting of March 2016 on the proposal to subdivide and reclassify Council owned land at 27 Hunters Road, Diamond Harbour as a reserve for the purpose of community-led re-vegetation.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                Carried

 

9 and 10. Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Minutes - 21 October 2015 and              28 October 2015

 

Paula Smith, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00106

That the Council receive the information in the reports.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                              Carried

 

 

11 and 12.        Fendalton/Waimairi Community Board Minutes - 2 November 2015                     and 16 November 2015

 

Val Carter, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00107

That the Council receive the reports.

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Manji                                                                                                                        Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

The meeting adjourned at 11am and reconvened at 11.14am.

Councillor Cotter left the meeting at 11am.

Councillor Jones left the meeting at 11am.

Councillor East left the meeting at 11am.

Councillor Manji left the meeting at 11am and returned at 1.30pm in public excluded.

64. Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre Council Report December 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00108

That the Council approve:

1.          The scope of the Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre is changed to that detailed in the Component Schedule attached to this report as Attachment B.

2.          The procurement of the Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre follow a Design & Build process reporting back to Council through the Council for approval to award the contract.

3.          It seeks the inclusion of a future expansion zone within the facility concept drawing to protect the future proofing aspirations of the community.

 

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

 Councillor Cotter returned to the meeting at 11.15am.

Councillor Jones returned to the meeting at 11.16am.

Councillor East left returned to the meeting at 11.21am.

 

 

 

34. Hearings Panel Report - Proposed Land Gift Rolleston Avenue

 

Councillors Cotter, East, Lonsdale and Johanson declared an interest in item 34 and did not participate in the debate or voting for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00109

That the Council:

1.         Having received a unique unsolicited proposal for the development of that part of the land at 52 Rolleston Avenue as is outlined in the plan at section 5.12 of this report ("Land") that:

a.         would provide significant benefit to the people of Christchurch by improving the cultural offering to the community that is not otherwise available; and

b.         aligns with the objectives of, and has the support of, the Canterbury Museum; and

c.         would endeavour, to retain a car park for use by the public that was as similar as practicable to the car park currently available on the site;

2.         Having considered the submissions received and heard by the Hearings Panel, and noting:

a.         the unique benefits offered by the unsolicited proposal the Council; and

b.         that the University of Canterbury has (subject to the Ravenscar Trust Building being built on the land) formally waived its 'offer-back' rights under section 40 of the Public Works Act, and

c.         that the Land (subject to the Ravenscar Trust Building being built on the land) is no longer required for a public work;

3.         Agrees to gift the Land to the Canterbury Museum to facilitate the building of the Ravenscar Trust Building; and

4.         Agrees to delegate to the Manager Property Consultancy authority to complete the subdivision of the Land and to negotiate and enter into such legal documentation with the Canterbury Museum and the Ravenscar Trust relating to the Land as is generally outlined in this report and otherwise as he shall consider appropriate or expedient to give effect to this resolution.

 

Mayor/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

25. Notice of Motion - Coastal Information Hub

 

Andrea Cummings, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00110

1.             That the Council request a staff report to investigate the feasibility of an Information Hub to be located in New Brighton.

 

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor East                                                                                                                  Carried

 

26. New Brighton Catholic School - School Patrol on Lonsdale Street

 

Andrea Cummings, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00111

That the Council:

1.         Resolve, in pursuance of the powers vested in it by Section 8.3 (1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 (Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, to authorise the Board of Trustees of New Brighton Catholic School to appoint appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the school crossing point on Lonsdale Street approximately 113 metres south west of its intersection with Shaw Avenue.

 

Councillor East/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                                  Carried

 

28. Report of a meeting of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board Meeting of 2 November 2015

 

Andrea Cummings, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00112

That the Council receive the report.

 

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor East                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

 

13. Mount Pleasant Community Centre and Ratepayers Association Incorporated - Deed of Surrender and Deed of Lease

 

Sara Templeton, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00113

That the Council:

1.         Surrender in order to grant a new lease the lease dated 6 April 2001 between the Mount Pleasant Community Centre and Ratepayers Association Incorporated ("Association") and the Christchurch City Council having a final expiry of 30 June 2019.

2.         Grant a new Deed of Lease to the Association over part of the land described as being approximately 6,184 square metres being Section 1 on SO 20183 and part of the land described in Certificate of Title 4B/1500 as local purpose (community buildings) reserve for a period of 33 years once the former lease is surrendered.  The annual rent to be waived for the first three years and then reviewed three-yearly having regard to the Lessors general policies in relation to the leasing of sporting and community facilities.  The lease to include a condition that the Lessor will share with the Lessee up to 50% of the costs of maintenance and repair of the building used as a community centre with such share of costs not to exceed $7000 per annum, plus GST reviewed at the time of the three yearly rent review.

3.         Delegate to the Property Consultancy Manager the authority on behalf of the Council to negotiate and conclude the terms and conditions of the Deed of Lease with the Association.

4.         Request that staff provide the Council with information on the most appropriate insurance cover for the building at the meeting when it considers the lease.

 

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Johanson                                                                                                            Carried

 

36. Mt Pleasant Community Centre - Insurance Coverage

 

Sara Templeton, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00114

That the Council receive the information in the report.

 

Councillor Jones/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

 

14 and 15.        Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Minutes - 21 October 2015                       and 4 November 2015

 

Sara Templeton, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00115

That the Council receive the reports.

 

Councillor Johanson/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 and 17.        Riccarton/Wigram Community Board Minutes - 17 November 2015                       and 3 November 2015

 

Mike Mora, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00116

That the Council receives the Minutes from the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board meetings held 17 November 2015 and 3 November 2015.

 

Councillor Chen/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                   Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18. St Albans Working Party - Terms of Reference

 

Mike Davidson, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00117

That the Council delegates the necessary authority to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board to receive and action recommendations from the St Albans Working Party regarding any rebuild of the St Albans Community Centre.

 

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                         Carried

 

20. Proposed Road Names

 

Mike Davidson, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00118

That the Council:

1.            Receive the information in the Proposed Road Names report.

2.            Approach the developer with a request to install a plaque in the subdivision explaining the history of the street names.

 

Councillor Jones/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                         Carried

 

21. Right to Convey Sewage Easement over Reserve - Tullet Park

 

Mike Davidson, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00119

That the Council:

1.             Receive the information in the Right to convey sewage easement over reserve - Tullet Park report.

2.            Exercise the powers of the Minister of Conservation referred to in the First Schedule of                              the Reserves Act 1977 and Instrument of Delegation for Territorial Authorities dated 12                                    June 2013 pursuant to Section 48(1) of the Reserves Act 1977.

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                         Carried

 

22 and 23.        Shirley/Papanui Community Board Report to Council - 14 October                       2015 and 4 November 2015

 

Mike Davidson, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00120

That the Council receive the reports.

 

Councillor Jones/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24. Spreydon Heathcote Community Board -  Unconfirmed Minutes - 3 November 2015

 

Paul McMahon, Chairperson and Karoline Potter, Deputy Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00121

That the Council receive the information in the report.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                        Carried

 

Election of a Chair and Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00122

It was resolved on the motion of Mayor Dalziel, seconded by Councillor Scandrett that Councillor Manji be appointed acting Chairperson of the Council meeting of 10 December 2015 until the return of the Mayor; And

 

That at 12.33 the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 497 to 499 of the agenda and pages 323 to 324 of the first supplementary agenda and pages 15 to 16 of the second supplementary agenda be adopted.

Mayor/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

The meeting adjourned at 12.35pm.

The Mayor left the meeting at 12.35pm and returned at 2.36pm during public excluded.

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 2.39pm.

Councillor Clearwater left the meeting at 2.44pm.

30. Council's Relationship with Nga Papatipu Runanga

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00123

That the Council:

1.         Agrees to establish a Committee of Council known as Te Hononga Council - Papatipu Rūnanga Committee (the Committee).

2.         Agrees that the following elected members be appointed to the Committee: The Mayor and Chairs (or alternate) of the Strategy and Finance, Regulatory and Consents, Community, Housing and Economic Development and Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committees and Multicultural Working Group.

3.         Agrees that a representative (or alternate) of each of the Papatipu Runanga  be appointed to the Committee: Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri,  Rūnanga Ōnuku  Rūnanga; Te Rūnanga o Koukourārata; Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke; Taumutu Rūnanga; and Wairewa Rūnanga.

4.         Agrees in principle to the development of Memorandum of Partnership.

5.         Asks the Committee to finalise a memorandum for the Council's and nga Runanga's  endorsement.

6.         Ask the Committee to develop actions to implement and give tangible effect to the relationship.

 

Mayor/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                                            Carried

Councillor East left the meeting at 2.46pm and returned to the meeting at 2.49pm.

29. Nga Puna Wai Sports Hub Council Status Report December 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00124

That the Council receive the report.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                   Carried

 

31. South New Brighton Motor Camp Request For Proposal

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00125

That the Council:

1.         Rescind its resolution of 14 May 2015 namely that the Council:

a.         Conduct an expression of interest process, once public notification of the remainder of the Natural Hazards chapter of the District Plan Review has occurred for the development and operation of a motor camp or similar on the site on the existing South New Brighton Motor Camp including the relevant information summarised in section 3.9 of this report.

b.         Instruct officers to report back to the Council before the end of November 2015 with the results of the expression of interest and any other relevant information to inform the Council's decision making on the South New Brighton Motor Camp.

c.         Authorise officers to conduct preliminary discussions with the existing lessees and report back to the Council prior to conducting the expression of interest with legal advice as to whether an arrangement can be entered into with them.

2.         Conduct a request for proposal process from the market for the development and operation of a motor camp or similar on the site of the existing South New Brighton Motor Camp noting that:

a.         The Council will be the decision maker on the development and operation of a motor camp and any processes necessary under the Reserves Act based on a recommendation from the Burwood Pegasus Community Board.

b.         The criteria informing the request for proposal will include:

·   The intended outcome will be the development and operation of a motor camp or similar.  Ideas for similar uses will be considered at the discretion of the Council.

·   Any future use of the site will not come at a cost to rates and demonstrate added value to the immediate area and local community.

·   Any RFP process and subsequent decisions will protect the Council's earthquake insurance claim.

·   The Council will:

·   Demolish and remove its buildings that are unable to be utilised.

·   Provide information it has in the public domain on the condition of the buildings, civic and park infrastructure, land the predicted vulnerability of the land to natural hazards.

·   Be prepared to grant a long term lease subject to the provisions of the Reserves Act.

·   The Council will not:

·   Fund any repair to its buildings, civic or park infrastructure.

·   Subsidise the development or operation of a motor camp or similar on the site.

·   Warrant the suitability of the land for any particular form of development.

·   Be responsible for any consenting processes on behalf of the operator.

 

Mayor/Councillor East                                                                                                                                                 Carried

 


 

 

32. Proposed New Delegations Register

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00126

That the Council:

1.         Relying on clause 32 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 and for the purposes of efficiency and effectiveness in the conduct of Council's business, and relying on any other applicable statutory authority:

a.         For the purpose of performing his or her duties, delegates to the Chief Executive all of its responsibilities, duties and powers to act on any matter, subject to the restrictions set out in the sub-parts and tables in Part A of Attachment 1.

b.         Notes that these delegations expressly exclude any power, responsibility or duty that has been delegated to a Community Board, Committee, Subcommittee (including an Officer Subcommittee), Council Hearings Panel or other subordinate decision-making body as referred to in Part D of Attachment 1.

c.         Notes that the Chief Executive may sub-delegate any of these responsibilities, duties, or powers unless this is expressly excluded as set out in the tables in Part A of Attachment 1.

2.         Delegates to the persons who hold the positions as set out in Part B of Attachment 1, the responsibilities, duties, and powers as set out in the sub-parts and tables in Part B.

a.         Notes that unless otherwise specified, these delegations exclude any power, responsibility or duty that has been delegated to a Community Board, Committee, Subcommittee (including an Officer Subcommittee), Council Hearings Panel or other sub-ordinate decision-making body.

b.         Notes that these powers may only be sub-delegated if it is expressly provided for in the sub-parts and tables in Part B of Attachment 1

c.         Notes that all delegations are made severally unless specified otherwise.

3.         Confirms the appointments to, and the appointments of, the other council committees and subcommittees, officer subcommittees and other bodies, and delegates the responsibilities, duties, and powers as set out in sub-parts 3 to 5 and the tables in Part D of Attachment 1, noting that the Committee and Community Board delegations will be amended at a later date as per paragraph 5.8.

a.         Notes that these powers may be sub-delegated unless this is expressly excluded as set out in the sub-parts and tables in Part D of Attachment 1

b.         Notes that all delegations are made severally unless specified otherwise.

4.         Relying on clause 32 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002, together with any other applicable statutory authority, adopts the following Parts of the Delegations Register as set out in Attachment 1:

a.         Contents

b.         How this delegation register works

c.         Delegations policy

d.         Part A – Statutory and Other Delegations to the Chief Executive

e.         Part B – Statutory and Other Delegations to Staff

f.          Part D – Council to Community Boards, Committees, Sub-Committees, and Other Subordinate Decision-making Bodies

5.         Notes that-

a.         Part C of the Delegations Register as set out in Attachment 1 contains sub-delegations made by the Chief Executive and is the responsibility of the Chief Executive; and

b.         It is the intention of the Chief Executive that any current financial sub-delegations to level 4 or level 5 staff continue to have effect as if they had been made in accordance with the new Delegations Register.

6.         Authorises the Legal Services Unit to maintain the Delegations Register as set out in Attachment 1, whose staff may

a.         Give effect to any Council resolution with respect to Parts A, B or D, and make the corresponding changes, deletions or additions to these Parts:

b.         Give effect to any written instruction to that effect given by the Chief Executive with respect to Part C, and make the corresponding changes, deletions or additions to this Part:

c.         Make any typographical or grammatical corrections.

7.         The Council revokes the delegations recorded in the Christchurch City Council "Register of Delegations" dated 12 May 2015 except for those delegations to Community Boards, Council Committees and Subcommittees as specifically indicated in Part D of Attachment 1.

8.         The Council confirms that any delegations not currently recorded in the "Register of Delegations" dated 12 May 2015 remain in force and may be exercised accordingly.

             9.         That resolutions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 come into force on 4 January 2016, and that                                             resolutions 5 and 6 come into force immediately.

 

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Manji                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

The meeting adjourned at 3pm and reconvened at 3.30pm.

Councillors Manji and Turner left the meeting at 3pm and returned to the meeting at 3.36pm.

The Mayor left the meeting at 3pm and returned to the meeting at 3.43pm.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00127

Election of a Chair

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Gough, seconded by Councillor Scandrett that Councillor East be appointed Chairperson of the Council meeting of 10 December 2015 until the return of the Mayor.

Councillor Gough/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                Carried

 

38. Review of the Dog Control Policy and Dog Control Bylaw

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00128

That the Council:

1.         Receives this report and its attachments; and

2.         Resolves to replace the Dog Control Bylaw 2008 and the Dog Control Policy 2008 with a proposed new dog control bylaw and policy as a result of the review, and through this consultation process; and

3.         Resolves that the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 meets the requirements of section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, in that:

a.         a bylaw is the most appropriate way of addressing the perceived problems; and

b.         the proposed bylaw (subject to the outcome of the consultation process), is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and that

c.         the proposed bylaw does not give rise to any implications under, and is not inconsistent with, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

4.         Resolves that the proposed Dog Control Policy 2016 meets the requirements of section 10 of the Dog Control Act; and

5.         Resolves to undertake the Special Consultative Procedure in relation to the proposed new bylaw and policy, as set out in sections 83 and 86 of the Local Government Act 2002, and in accordance with the requirements of section 10(1) and 20(1) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

6.         Resolves to adopt the Statement of Proposal, which includes the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 and the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Policy 2016; and

7.         Resolves to give notice of the draft policy to every person who is a registered dog owner, in accordance with section 10(2) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

8.         Resolves that the consultation period be from 1 February 2016 to 1 March 2016; and

9.         Resolves that a hearings panel be appointed to hear submissions in April 2016, deliberate on those submissions and to report back to the Council on the final form of the bylaw and policy in May 2016; and

10.       Note that there will be some as yet unknown signage costs associated with implementing the proposed new policy and bylaw, if adopted; and

11.       Note that the proposed new Dog Control Policy includes an updated version of the Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy (adopted by Council on 24 September 1997), which will require the revocation of the 1997 Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy if the new Dog Control Policy is adopted.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                Carried

 

43. Corporate Finance Report for the period ending 30 September 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00129

That the Council receive the report

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                            Carried

 

The Mayor returned to the meeting at 3.43pm and resumed the Chair.

44. Christchurch City Holdings Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00130

Recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Christchurch City Holdings Limited.

 

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                  Carried

 

33. Removal of Bach Port Levy-Further Advice

 

This item was deferred to a workshop (including the Community Board), to report back to Council in the new year.

 

35. Postal Services in Fendalton - Waimairi Community

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00131

It is recommended that the Council:

1.              Endorse the proposed New Zealand Post Centre integration into the Fendalton Service Centre in alignment with the Citizen Hub Strategy with as many of the services previously provided by New Zealand Post as possible, for example bill payments and car registration.

2.              Request that staff work with New Zealand Post on providing services through other Council facilities.

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Manji                                                                                                                        Carried

 

37. The Mayor's Welfare Fund Charitable Trust - Exemption as a CCO

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00132

That the Council grant an exemption to The Mayor's Welfare Fund Charitable Trust under section 7 of the Local Government Act from being a Council Controlled Organisation.

 

Mayor/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                                                       Carried

 

39. Regulatory Compliance Activity

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00133

That the Council:

1.        Receive the information in the Regulatory Compliance Activity report.

 

2.        Approach Government to review the Amusement Devices Regulations to assist the Council Regulatory Compliance Unit in dealing with issues surrounding amusement devices in the City.

 

Councillor East/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

 

27. Residential Red Zone Horizontal Infrastructure

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00134

That the Council:

1.              Acknowledges the situation of residents affected by the earthquakes still residing in the Residential Red Zone and their servicing  provision.

2.              Recommend that no horizontal infrastructure be permanently removed until decisions are made on the future use of the residential red zone flat lands.

3.              Recommend the proposed road status changes as indicated on the Attachment Plan A for in service full, out of service, and in service reviewed/reduced. The NEW attached Plan A has been amended following the meetings with the Community Boards to reflect the changes requested. These changes were for the following road sections to remain in service; Avonside Drive from Wainoni Road to Gloucester Street, Retreat Road to Swanns Road Bridge, Access to 20 Templar Street (Bill Sutton's House) via Harvey Terrace.

4.              Recommend that for the roads to be taken out of service and closed to vehicles that temporary barriers are replaced with semi-permanent barriers to prevent vehicle access and deter dumping that is occurring. There will still be access for pedestrians and service vehicles.

5.              Recommend that residents still residing at Brooklands be informed of future infrastructure and land issues, and with Proposed District Plan zoning  prior to final Crown offer closure on 10 December 2015 (completed).

6.              Recommend that Residents Associations be kept informed of access and infrastructure status prior to reporting back to the Community Boards.

7.              Approve for consultation with remaining red zone residents and affected residents the road status in service reviewed/reduced.

8.              Approve for consultation with remaining red zone residents and affected residents the proposed three waters status, as indicated on the Attached Plans B C and D for wastewater, storm water and water supply.

9.              Note that Council staff work with CERA horizontal infrastructure team on alternative servicing provisions for remaining occupied   privately owned properties in the residential red zone flat lands to meet Council's legal supply and collection obligations and those reviewed services will be communicated to the remaining residents and Community Boards as part of that consultation process.

10.          Note that following the consultation period staff report back to the Community Boards and Council.

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

72. Request for Peterborough Quarter

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00135

That the Council:

1.         Agree to DCL engaging with the market with respect to the Council-owned land in Peterborough Street (specifically 95 Kilmore Street and 82 and 84 Peterborough Street) and surrounding Council-owned sites in order to seek development partners aligned to Council objectives for the redevelopment of the Peterborough Quarter.

2.         Note that DCL will work with Elected Members and Council staff to determine the development objectives, outcomes and risk profile that they would like to see represented in a possible development agreement on the Peterborough Quarter land.

3.         Note that once a preferred developer has been identified and key commercial terms identified DCL will come back to Council for full approval to proceed.

 

Councillor Manji/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                  Carried

Councillor Johanson voted against this resolution.

 

 

 

19. Northern Transport Options

 

Mike Davidson, Chairperson, joined the table for this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00136

That the Council:

 

1.              Receive the information in the Northern Transport Options Report

2.              Initiates a business case process in conjunction with Community Boards for a future Public Transport study with strategic partners.

3.              Provide advice on the utilisation of the current rail infrastructure.

 

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                         Carried

Councillor Gough left the meeting at 4.36pm and returned to the meeting at 4.44pm.

41. Lease policy for the creation of new leases and extension requests prior to expiry

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00137

That the Council:

a.         Adopt the attached operational Lease Policy with the recommended wording changes made.

b.         Delegate authority to the Property Consultancy Manager to implement the policy and in doing so make any decisions he considers necessary at his sole discretion.

 

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                         Carried

Councillors Clearwater, Johanson and Turner voted against this resolution

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00138

             c.         Request that staff notify Community Boards of any requests for extension of lease, and                                       prepare advice for the Council on the appropriateness of delegating the decision to the                                      Community Board.

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                         Carried

Councillor Turner left the meeting at 5.09pm.

 

 

 

 

 

40. Performance Report for the three months to 30 September 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00139

That the Council receive the report.

 

Councillor Manji/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                        Carried

 

 

 

42. Debt Write Off Global Developments 511 Madras Street Limited

 

 

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00140

That the Council write off the debt of $19,946.09 plus GST, owed by Global Developments.

 

Councillor Manji/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                        Carried

 

60. Update for appeals to the Local Alcohol Policy

 

Councillors Gough and Lonsdale declared a conflict of interest and took no part in the debate or vote on this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00141

That the Council:

1.         Receives this report including an attached schedule [Attachment 1] of appeals on the PLAP.

2.         Approves the establishment of a working party to be set up and discharged on completion of the attached terms of reference[Attachment 2]

a.         To have oversight of, and to provide staff and legal counsel with guidance and strategic direction as to any pre-hearing discussions/negotiations with appellants and parties to the appeals on the PLAP appeals in accordance with the terms of reference.

b.         To make recommendations to the Council as to possible negotiated resolutions of any appeal in accordance with the terms of reference

3.         Appoints 5 councillors to the working party being Councillors East, Clearwater, Livingstone, Jones and Scandrett, with Councillor Livingstone to be the Chairperson of the working party.

 

Mayor/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                                            Carried

 

62. Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee Minutes - 3 December 2015

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00142

That the Council receives the Minutes from the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held 3 December 2015.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                        Carried

 

63. AAC Phase 2 Project - St Asaph Street

 

 

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00143

 

That the Council:

1.         Approve the scheme designs for St Asaph Street, as detailed in Attachment A

2.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974

3.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2)  The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 Applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Council meeting of 11 December 2015; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 Applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Council resolutions on the An Accessible City report at the Council meeting of 11 December 2015.

Existing St Asaph Street – Eastern extent of project to Madras Street– Traffic Control

4.         Approve all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. Note 1 Applies.

New St Asaph Street – Eastern extent of project to Madras Street– Traffic Control

5.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb build out changes, traffic islands and kerb alignment changes on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street, extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

6.         Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres, except for bicycles, which can travel eastbound on the dedicated bicycle path between Madras Street and Ferry Road. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets. Note 1 Applies.  

7.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

8.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound right turning bicycles only, be established on the southern side of St Asaph Street, against the median island which separates straight ahead and right turning bicycles, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

9.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of eastbound bicycles only, be established on the southern side of St Asaph Street, located on the southern side of the traffic islands, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending to its intersection with Ferry Road, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

10.       Approve that the pathway on the south side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point six metres east of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a shared pedestrian/bicycle pathway where bicycles can travel southwest bound only, in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.  Note 1 Applies.

11.       Approve the lane marking changes, traffic islands and kerb alignment changes at the St Asaph Street and Ferry Road intersection as detailed on Attachment A.

12.       Approve that the right turn movement from the southeast approach of Ferry Road at its intersection with St Asaph Street be prohibited.

13.       Approve that a give way control be placed on the Ferry Road special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) located on the south western side, at its intersection with St Asaph Street, as detailed on Attachment A.

14.       Approve that a give way control be placed on the St Asaph Street eastbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) located on the southern side of St Asaph Street, at its approach to its intersection with Ferry Road, as detailed on Attachment A.

15.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Ferry Road approach at its intersection with St Asaph Street.

16.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Ferry Road approach to the St Asaph Street westbound special vehicle lane at its intersection with St Asaph Street, as detailed on Attachment A.

17.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the special vehicle lane (northwest bound bicycle lane) on the Ferry Road approach to the St Asaph Street intersection, as detailed on Attachment A.

18.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the St Asaph Street left turn lane into Ferry Road as detailed on Attachment A.

             Existing St Asaph Street – Eastern extent of project to Madras Street – Parking and                                    Stopping Restrictions

19.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

             New St Asaph Street – Eastern extent of project to Madras Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

20.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 185 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

21.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 159 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

22.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Ferry Road.  This stopping restriction is to apply to the southern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A.

23.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Ferry Road.  This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points, as detailed on Attachment A

Existing Ferry Road – St Asaph Street to south eastern extent of project– Traffic Control

24.       Approve all traffic controls on Ferry Road from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres be revoked.  Note 1 Applies.

New Ferry Road – St Asaph Street to south eastern extent of project– Traffic Control

25.       Approve the lane marking changes, traffic islands and kerb alignment changes on Ferry Road from its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

26.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northwest bound bicycles only, be established on the southwest side of Ferry Road, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

27.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southwest bound, and then southeast bound bicycles only, be established on the east and then northeast side of Ferry Road, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly and then south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

28.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south eastbound bicycles only, be established on the south western side of Ferry Road, located between the north westbound bicycle lane and the central traffic island on Ferry Road, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

Existing Ferry Road – St Asaph Street to south eastern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

29.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Ferry Road from its intersection with St Asaph Street extending in a southerly and then south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

New Ferry Road – St Asaph Street to south eastern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

30.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on both sides of Ferry Road, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly, then south easterly direction for a distance of 42 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies

31.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south western side of Ferry Road, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This stopping restriction applies to the north eastern side of the traffic islands that separates the bicycle lane and vehicle lane. Note 1 Applies

Existing Intersection – Madras Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

32.       Approve that all traffic controls including traffic signals at the intersection of Madras Street and St Asaph Street be revoked.

New Intersection – Madras Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

33.       Approve that the intersection of Madras Street and St Asaph Street be controlled by                                traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

34.       Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of Madras Street and St Asaph Street as detailed on Attachment A.

35.       Approve that the left turn movement for all motorised vehicles be prohibited from the St Asaph Street approach into Madras Street.

36.       Approve that the right turn movement for all motorised vehicles and bicycles be prohibited from the Madras Street approach into St Asaph Street.

Existing High Street – Madras Street to North Western extent– Traffic Control

37.       Approve all traffic controls on High Street from its intersection with Madras Street and St Asaph Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 39 metres be revoked.  Note 1 Applies

New High Street – Madras Street to North Western extent– Traffic Control

38.       Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on High Street from its intersection with Madras Street and St Asaph Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 40 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

39.       Approve that a bi-directional bicycle path be created on High Street commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and St Asaph Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 Applies.

40.       Approve that a Stop Control be placed against the realigned High Street approach, at its intersection with Madras Street, as detailed on Attachment A.

41.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed on the High Street north westbound bicycle path located on the south western side of High Street, located at a point 17 metres northwest of its intersection with St Asaph Street and Madras Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

Existing High Street – Madras Street to North Western extent– Parking & Stopping Restrictions

42.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of High Street, from its intersection with Madras Street and St Asaph Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 39 metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

New High Street – Madras Street to North Western extent– Parking & Stopping Restrictions

 

 

43.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side and then the north eastern side of the realigned High Street, commencing at its new intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly and then north westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

44.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side, and then the south western side of the realigned High Street, commencing at its new intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly and then north westerly direction for a distance of 39 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Madras Street – St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Traffic Control

45.       Approve all traffic controls on Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked, and that this one way section of Madras Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New Madras Street – St Asaph Street to Tuam Street – Traffic Control

46.       Approve that Madras Street be one way south to north from its intersection with St Asaph Street, to its intersection with Tuam Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

47.       Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street as detailed on Attachment A.

48.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Madras Street, located against the kerb, commencing at a point nine metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 50 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

49.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Madras Street, located against the parking lane, commencing at a point 59 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

50.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Madras Street, located against the kerb, commencing at a point 76 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Madras Street- St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

51.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked.

 

New Madras Street – St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

52.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Madras Street, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street.  Note 1 Applies.

53.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Madras Street, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 59 metres. Note 2 Applies.

54.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the west side of Madras Street, commencing at point 59 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm.  Note 2 Applies.

55.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Madras Street, commencing at a point 76 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Madras Street – Southern extent of project to St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

56.       Approve all traffic controls on Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres be revoked, and that this one way section of Madras Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. Note 1 Applies.

New Madras Street – Southern extent of project to St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

57.       Approve that Madras Street be one way south to north from its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets. Note 1 Applies.

58.       Approve the lane marking changes on Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

59.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the western side of Madras Street, located between the straight ahead and left turning lanes, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

60.       Approve that the pathway on the east side of Madras Street commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /bicycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.  Note 1 Applies

 

 

 

Existing Madras Street – Southern extent of project to St Asaph Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

61.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Madras Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

New Madras Street – Southern extent of project to St Asaph Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

62.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on both sides of Madras Street, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres. Note 1 Applies.                                                                    

Existing St Asaph Street – Madras Street to Manchester Street– Traffic Control

63.       Approve that all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street to its intersection with Manchester Street be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.                                                        

New St Asaph Street – Madras Street to Manchester Street– Traffic Control

64.       Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes (including separation traffic islands between bicycles and motor vehicles) on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street to its intersection with Manchester Street as detailed on Attachment A.

65.       Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Madras Street, to its intersection with Manchester Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

66.       Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street against the kerb, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Manchester Street, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

Existing St Asaph Street – Madras Street to Manchester Street – Parking and Stopping Restrictions

67.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Madras Street to its intersection with Manchester Street be revoked.

New St Asaph Street – Madras Street to Manchester Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

68.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

69.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point six metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

 

 

70.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 17 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm.

71.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 36 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

72.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 58 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm.

73.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 64 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

74.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 76 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

75.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 87 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

76.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 103 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

77.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 116 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 29 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

78.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 145 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

79.       Approve that a Loading Zone (Goods Vehicles Only) be restricted to a maximum period of five minutes and be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 164 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply from 6:00 am to 10 pm on any day. Note 1 Applies.

80.       Approve that a Taxi Stand be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 145 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This Taxi Stand restriction to apply on any day, from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am on the following day. Note 1 Applies.

81.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 177 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 47 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

82.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 224 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Manchester Street.

83.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 35 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

84.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 35 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

85.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 65 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

86.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 83 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm.

 

87.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 95 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

88.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 101 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

89.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 114 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

90.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 132 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

91.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 145 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

92.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 150 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

93.       Approve that a motorcycle stand be created on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 163 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of four metres. Note 2 Applies.

94.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 167 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

95.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 176 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

96.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 188 metres west of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Manchester Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

 

Existing Intersection – Manchester Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

97.       Approve that all traffic controls including traffic signals at the intersection of Manchester Street and St Asaph Street be revoked.

New Intersection – Manchester Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

98.       Approve that the intersection of Manchester Street and St Asaph Street be controlled by                                traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

99.       Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of Manchester Street and St Asaph Street as detailed on Attachment A.

100.    Approve that the left turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from the Manchester Street north approach into St Asaph Street.

101.    Approve that the right turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from the Manchester Street south approach into St Asaph Street.

Existing St Asaph Street – Manchester Street to Colombo Street– Traffic Control

102.    Approve that all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Manchester Street to its intersection with Colombo Street be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New St Asaph Street – Manchester Street to Colombo Street– Traffic Control

103.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes (including separation traffic islands between bicycles and motor vehicles) on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Manchester Street to its intersection with Colombo Street as detailed on Attachment A.

104.    Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Manchester Street, to its intersection with Colombo Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

105.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending to its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

Existing St Asaph Street – Manchester Street to Colombo Street – Parking and Stopping Restrictions

106.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Manchester Street to its intersection with Colombo Street be revoked.

New St Asaph Street – Manchester Street to Colombo Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

107.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of three metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

 

 

108.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point three metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

109.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 11 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply at any time. Note 2 Applies.

110.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 23 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 54 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

111.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 77 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

112.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 109 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

113.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 135 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 39 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

114.    Approve that a Taxi Stand be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 135 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 39 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This Taxi Stand restriction to apply on any day, from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am on the following day. Note 2 Applies.

115.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 174 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 50 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

 

 

116.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 224 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

117.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

118.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 13 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

119.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 30 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

120.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 50 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

121.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 63 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

122.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 68 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

123.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 87 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

124.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 92 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm.  Note 1 Applies.

125.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 117 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

126.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 143 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

127.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 154 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

128.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 163 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

129.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 169 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

130.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 182 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

131.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 188 metres west of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

Existing Intersection – Colombo Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

132.    Approve that all traffic controls including traffic signals at the intersection of Colombo Street and St Asaph Street be revoked.

New Intersection – Colombo Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

133.    Approve that the intersection of Colombo Street and St Asaph Street be controlled by                                traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

134.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of Colombo Street and St Asaph Street as detailed on Attachment A.

135.    Approve that the left turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from the Colombo Street north approach into St Asaph Street.

136.    Approve that the right turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from the Colombo Street south approach into St Asaph Street.

Existing Colombo Street – St Asaph Street to southern extent - Traffic control

137.    Approve all traffic controls on Colombo Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres be revoked.

New Colombo Street – St Asaph Street to southern extent - Traffic control

138.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Colombo Street, from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

139.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the east side of Colombo Street, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

140.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Colombo Street between the straight ahead and left turn lanes, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Colombo Street – St Asaph Street to Southern Extent - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

141.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Colombo Street, from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Colombo Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Welles Street be revoked. Note 2 applies.

New Colombo Street – St Asaph Street to Southern Extent - Parking and Stopping Restrictions

142.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Colombo Street, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres. Note 2 applies.

a.         142a. Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Colombo Street, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 2 applies.

b.         142b. Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Colombo Street, commencing at a point 24 metres south of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         143c. Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Colombo Street, commencing at a point 30 metres south of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Welles Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

Existing St Asaph Street – Colombo Street to Durham Street South– Traffic Control

143.    Approve that all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Colombo Street to its intersection with Durham Street South be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New St Asaph Street – Colombo Street to Durham Street South– Traffic Control

144.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes (including separation traffic islands between bicycles and motor vehicles) on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Colombo Street to its intersection with Durham Street South as detailed on Attachment A.

145.    Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Colombo Street, to its intersection with Durham Street South. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

146.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending to its intersection with Durham Street South, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

147.    Approve that a Give Way control be placed on the St Asaph Street westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) located on the south side located at a point 128 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

148.    Approve that a pedestrian crossing be duly established and marked in accordance section 8.2 of Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, on the southern side of St Asaph Street located at a point 132 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, crossing the westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

149.    Approve that a pedestrian crossing be duly established and marked in accordance section 8.2 of Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, on the southern side of St Asaph Street located at a point 138 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, crossing the westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

Existing St Asaph Street – Colombo Street to Durham Street South – Parking and Stopping Restrictions

150.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Colombo Street to its intersection with Durham Street South be revoked.

New St Asaph Street – Colombo Street to Durham Street South– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

151.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of three metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

152.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point three metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

 

 

 

153.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 23 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

154.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 42 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

155.    Approve that a Loading Zone with a maximum period of five minutes for Goods Vehicles only, be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 57 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of seven metres.  This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 6am-10pm. Note 1 Applies.

156.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 64 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

157.    Approve that a Taxi Stand be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 23 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 54 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This Taxi Stand restriction to apply on any day, from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am on the following day. Note 1 Applies.

158.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 77 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

159.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 96 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

160.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 108 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island) inclusive of gaps for access points, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

161.    Approve that a bus stop be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 125 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

162.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 139 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 90 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

163.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 229 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Durham Street South, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

164.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

165.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 18 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

166.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 48 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

167.    Approve that a Taxi Stand be created on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 63 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This Taxi Stand restriction to apply at any time. Note 2 Applies.

168.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 82 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

169.    Approve that a motorcycle stand be created on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 113 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of three metres. Note 2 Applies.

170.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 116 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

171.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 125 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres, as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

172.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 138 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

173.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 161 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm.  Note 2 Applies.

174.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 179 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

175.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 191 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

176.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 197 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

177.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 206 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Sunday 9:00am to 6:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

178.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 217 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Durham Street South, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Intersection – Durham Street South / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

179.    Approve that all traffic controls including traffic signals at the intersection of Durham Street South and St Asaph Street be revoked.

New Intersection – Durham Street South / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

180.    Approve that the intersection of Durham Street South and St Asaph Street be controlled by traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

181.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of Durham Street South and St Asaph Street as detailed on Attachment A.

182.    Approve that the left turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from Durham Street South into St Asaph Street.

183.    Approve that the right turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from St Asaph Street into Durham Street South.

Existing Durham Street South – St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Traffic Control

184.    Approve all traffic controls on Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked, and that this one way section of Durham Street South be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New Durham Street South– St Asaph Street to Tuam Street – Traffic Control

185.    Approve that Durham Street South be one way north to south from its intersection with Tuam Street, to its intersection with St Asaph Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

186.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street as detailed in part on Attachment A, in part as previously approved by Council and in part as per existing traffic controls on street.

187.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the western side of Durham Street South, between the left turn lane and straight ahead lane commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 31 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

188.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the western side of Durham Street South, adjacent to the parking lane commencing at a point 31 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 60 metres, as detailed as per existing on street bicycle lane. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

189.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the eastern side of Durham Street South, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 20 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

190.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the eastern side of Durham Street South, adjacent to the parking lane commencing at a point 20 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 72 metres, as detailed as per existing on street bicycle lane. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

 

 

191.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the eastern side of Durham Street South, against the kerb commencing at a point 92 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as detailed in part as previously approved by Council. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

Existing Durham Street South - St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

192.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked.

New Durham Street South– St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

193.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Durham Street South, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 31 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

194.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes  on the west side of Durham Street South, commencing at point 31 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 60 metres, as detailed as per existing on street parking restrictions. Note 1 Applies.

195.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Durham Street South, commencing at a point 91 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as detailed in part as per existing on street parking restrictions and in part as per previously approved by Council. Note 1 Applies.

196.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 20 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

197.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes  on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at point 20 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 24 metres, as detailed as per existing on street parking restrictions. Note 1 Applies.

198.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at a point 44 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 25 metres, as detailed as per existing on street parking restrictions. Note 1 Applies.

199.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at point 69 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 23 metres,  as detailed as per existing on street parking restrictions. Note 1 Applies.

200.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at a point 92 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as detailed as previously approved by Council. Note 1 Applies.

 

Existing Durham Street South – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Traffic Control

201.    Approve all traffic controls on Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres be revoked, and that this one way section of Durham Street South be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. Note 1 Applies.

New Durham Street South – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Traffic Control

202.    Approve that Durham Street South be one way north to south from its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres.  This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets. Note 2 Applies.

203.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Durham Street South, from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

204.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the east side of Durham Street South against the kerb, commencing at  its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed in Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

205.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of southbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Durham Street South against the kerb, commencing at  its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed in Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Durham Street South – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

206.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

207.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Durham Street South from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 11 metres be revoked.  Note 1 Applies.

New Durham Street South – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

208.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Durham Street South, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

209.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Durham Street South, commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of nine metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

Existing St Asaph Street – Durham Street South to Montreal Street– Traffic Control

210.    Approve that all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Durham Street South to its intersection with Montreal Street be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New St Asaph Street – Durham Street South to Montreal Street– Traffic Control

211.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes (including separation traffic islands between bicycles and motor vehicles) on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Durham Street South to its intersection with Montreal Street as detailed on Attachment A.

212.    Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Durham Street South to its intersection with Montreal Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

213.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street, against the kerb commencing at its intersection with Durham Street South to its intersection with Montreal Street, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

Existing St Asaph Street – Durham Street South to Montreal Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

214.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Durham Street South to its intersection with Montreal Street be revoked.

New St Asaph Street – Durham Street South to Montreal Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

215.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

216.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point five metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of four metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

217.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point nine metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of seven metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

218.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 16 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 27 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

 

 

219.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 43 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of seven metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

220.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 50 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 36 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

221.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 86 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

222.    Approve that a motorcycle stand be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 99 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

223.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 105 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

224.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 121 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

225.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 131 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

226.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 177 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

227.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 189 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), inclusive of gaps for access points as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

 

 

228.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes  on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 204 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This parking restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

229.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 216 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.                                                  

230.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 230 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Montreal Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

231.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

232.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 11 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 75 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

233.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 86 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

234.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 100 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 38 metres, as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

235.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 138 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

236.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and be controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 156 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres, as detailed on Attachment A.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

237.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 162 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

238.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of five minutes on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 176 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres. This parking restriction is to apply at any time. Note 1 Applies.                            

239.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 182 metres west of its intersection with Durham Street South and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Montreal Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies. 

Existing Intersection – Montreal Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

240.    Approve that all traffic controls, including traffic signals at the intersection of Montreal Street and St Asaph Street be revoked.

New Intersection – Montreal Street / St Asaph Street– Traffic Control

241.    Approve that the intersection of Montreal Street and St Asaph Street be controlled by                                traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

242.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of St Asaph Street and Montreal Street as detailed on Attachment A.

243.    Approve that the left turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from St Asaph Street into Montreal Street.

244.    Approve that the right turn movement for all motorised vehicles, including bicycles be prohibited from Montreal Street into St Asaph Street.

Existing Montreal Street– St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Traffic Control

245.    Approve all traffic controls on Montreal Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked, and that this one way section of Montreal Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New Montreal Street – St Asaph Street to Tuam Street – Traffic Control

246.    Approve that Montreal Street be one way south to north from its intersection with St Asaph Street, to its intersection with Tuam Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

247.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Montreal Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street as detailed in part on Attachment A, and in part as detailed as per existing traffic controls and in part as previously approved by Council.

248.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northbound bicycles only, be established on the west side of Montreal Street against the kerb, commencing at a point 76 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly  direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as previously approved by Council. This special vehicle lane is to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles in the Traffic and Parking bylaw 2008. Note 2 Applies.

249.    Approve that the pathway on the west side of Montreal Street commencing at a point 106 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street as previously approved by Council, be resolved as a shared pedestrian /bicycle pathway, where bicycles can travel in a northbound direction only, in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.  Note 2 Applies.

Existing Montreal Street - St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

250.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Montreal Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street to its intersection with Tuam Street be revoked.

New Montreal Street– St Asaph Street to Tuam Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

251.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Montreal Street commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

252.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Montreal Street commencing at a point 67 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as previously approved by Council.  Note 2 Applies.

253.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Montreal Street commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

254.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Montreal Street, commencing at a point 65 metres north of its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Tuam Street, as previously approved by Council.  Note 2 Applies.

Existing Montreal Street – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Traffic Control

255.    Approve all traffic controls on Montreal Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres be revoked, and that this one way section of Montreal Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. Note 1 Applies.

New Montreal Street – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Traffic Control

256.    Approve that Montreal Street be one way south to north from its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.  This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets. Note 2 Applies.

257.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Montreal Street, from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 Applies.

Existing Montreal Street – St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

258.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Montreal Street from its intersection with St Asaph Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

 

New Montreal Street– St Asaph Street to southern extent of project– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

259.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Montreal Street commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. Note 1 Applies.

260.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Montreal Street commencing at its intersection with St Asaph Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. Note 2 Applies.

Existing St Asaph Street – Montreal Street to Antigua Street– Traffic Control

261.    Approve that all traffic controls on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Montreal Street to its intersection with Antigua Street be revoked, and that this one way section of St Asaph Street be revoked as authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008.

New St Asaph Street – Montreal Street to Antigua Street– Traffic Control

262.    Approve the lane marking changes and kerb alignment changes (including the separation islands between bicycles and motor vehicles) on St Asaph Street from its intersection with Montreal Street to its intersection with Antigua Street as detailed on Attachment A.

263.    Approve that St Asaph Street be one way east to west from its intersection with Montreal Street, to its intersection with Antigua Street. This one way section is authorised under clause 12 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of One Way Streets.

264.    Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound bicycles only, be established on the south side of St Asaph Street against the kerb, commencing at its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 259 metres, as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 1 Applies.

265.    Approve that the pathway on the south side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 259 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Antigua Street as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a shared pedestrian/bicycle pathway where bicycles can travel westbound only, in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.  Note 1 Applies.

266.    Approve that a Give Way control be placed on the St Asaph Street westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) located on the south side located at a point 35 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

267.    Approve that a pedestrian crossing be duly established and marked in accordance section 8.2 of Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, on the southern side of St Asaph Street located at a point 37 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, crossing the westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

268.    Approve that a pedestrian crossing be duly established and marked in accordance section 8.2 of Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004, on the southern side of St Asaph Street located at a point 43 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, crossing the westbound special vehicle lane (bicycle lane) as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

Existing St Asaph Street – Montreal Street to Antigua Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

269.    Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of St Asaph Street from its intersection with Montreal Street to its intersection with Antigua Street be revoked.

New St Asaph Street – Montreal Street to Antigua Street– Parking and Stopping Restrictions

270.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street commencing at its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.

271.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point five metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of four metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. Note 1 Applies.                                               

272.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at point nine metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A. This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 1 Applies.

273.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 21 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

274.    Approve that a Bus Stop be created on the southern side of St Asaph Street, commencing at a point 30 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island), as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

275.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 44 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction  for a distance of 183 metres. This stopping restriction is to apply to the northern side of the traffic island (bicycle lane separation island) inclusive of gaps at access points, as detailed on Attachment A.  Note 1 Applies.

276.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 227 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Antigua Street.  Note 1 Applies.

277.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 Applies.

278.    Approve that a Loading Zone with a maximum period of five minutes for Goods Vehicles only, be created on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 14 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. This restriction to apply at any time.  Note 2 Applies.

279.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 33 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 Applies.

280.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 44 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

281.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 62 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres. Note 2 Applies.

282.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 71 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

283.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 81 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of five metres. Note 2 Applies.

284.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 86 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres.   Note 2 Applies.

285.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 112 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. Note 2 Applies.

286.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 122 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.   This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

287.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at a point 134 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 2 Applies.

288.    Approve that a motorcycle stand be created on the north side of St Asaph Street, commencing at point 146 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of three metres. Note 2 Applies.

289.    Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes and controlled by Parking Meters, (including Pay and Display machines or any approved means of payment) on the north side of St Asaph Street commencing at point 149 metres west of its intersection with Montreal Street, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm. Note 2 Applies.

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Cotter                                                                                                              Carried

Councillors Johanson and Lonsdale requested their votes against be recorded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

45. 2015 Annual Reports for Council Controlled Organisations: Vbase Limited, Civic Building Limited, Tuam Limited, Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust, The World Buskers' Festival Trust, Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust, Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited and New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited

 

 

 

Councillors Chen, Gough, Manji, Scandrett and Turner declared a conflict of interest and took no part in the debate or vote on this item.

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00144

1.         Recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Reports of

a.         Vbase Limited (Attachment A)

b.         Civic Building Limited (Attachment B)

c.         Tuam Limited (Attachment C)

d.         Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust (Attachment D)

e.         The World buskers' Festival Trust (Attachment E)

f.          Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust and its Annual Review (Attachment F and G)

g.         Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited (Attachment H)

h.         New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited (Attachment I)

 

Mayor/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

Report from Strategy and Finance Committee - 19 November 2015

46. Residential Land Availability Report

 

 

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00145

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that Council:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

2.         Approve that the update reports be submitted half yearly rather than quarterly.

 

Mayor/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

61. Submission on the Shop Trading Hours Amendment Bill

 

This item was not included in the resolution to include supplementary reports.

 

 

 

 

 

 

47. Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2015/00146

At 5.27pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 497 to 499 of the agenda and pages 323 to 324 of the first supplementary agenda and pages 15 to 16 of the second supplementary agenda be adopted.

Mayor/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 10.19am on Tuesday 15 December 2015.

   

Meeting concluded at 10.20am on Tuesday 15 December 2015.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 28th DAY OF JANUARY 2016

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Chairperson


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Christchurch City Council Recess Committee

Extraordinary Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 14 January 2016

Time:                                    11.00 am

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor David East

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

Councillor Raf Manji

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Councillor Andrew Turner

 

 

14 January 2016

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Dr Karleen Edwards

Chief Executive

Tel: 941 8554

 

Megan Pearce

Council Secretary

941 8140

megan.pearce@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Watch Council meetings live on the web:
http://councillive.ccc.govt.nz/live-stream

 

  

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Council Resolved CNCL/2016/00032

That the apologies from Councillor Jones, Councillor Turner, Councillor East, Councillor Livingstone, Councillor Cotter and Councillor Clearwater be accepted.

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                     Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Public Participation

3.1  Public Forum

There were no Public Forum presentations.

 

3.2  Deputations by Appointment

There were no Deputations by Appointment.

4.   Presentation of Petitions

There was no Presentation of Petitions. 

 

5.   Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Council Resolved CNCL/2016/00033

That at 11:01 the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 5 to 6 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Johanson requested his voted against item 7 being considered in public excluded be recorded.

Mayor/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                                               Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 11:50am.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 11.50am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 28th DAY OF JANUARY 2016

 

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Chairperson

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

6         Avon River Precinct Road Stop Request

Reference:

15/1443324

Contact:

Philip Basher

philip.basher@ccc.govt.nz

8605

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Council to provide a formal response on the Christchurch Central Development Unit’s (CCDU) consultation with the Council in relation to the stopping of part of Oxford Terrace and Chester Street East for the Avon River Precinct site (Attachment A), and particularly the Margaret Mahy Playground site.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response CCDU's letter dated 26 November 2015 notifying the Council of the road stopping proposal.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impacts on the wider community which indicate that the issue in question has a moderate impact.

2.1.2   There has been no community engagement and consultation as the matter is excluded from the usual consultation processes because of the powers granted to CCDU under Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 section 46 (3).

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council:

1.         Supports the CCDU to proceed and stop a section of Oxford Terrace and part of Chester Street East (refer Attachment A) using their statutory powers.

2.         Authorise staff to effect the transfer of the road, once stopped and vested in the Council, to the Crown under section 53.3 of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 which preserves any offer back obligations the Council may have.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       In November 2015 the Director of CCDU Baden Ewart wrote to the Council CCDU letter advising that they are going to use their powers under the CER Act to stop the portions of road required for the Avon River Precinct anchor project (refer Attachment A).  The road is held, managed and controlled by the Council as legal road.  The CCDU has provided notice of this intention to satisfy their requirement under the Act to consult with the relevant road controlling authority.  Staff expect them to action the road stopping immediately.

4.2       This is a procedural matter with the likely only visible signs being some advertising by way of a gazette notice. The stopped road would initially vest in the Council, which would then transfer it to the Crown as provided for in the cost share Agreement.  Under the Cost Sharing Agreement there is no identified right for compensation.

4.3       This portion of the Avon River Precinct i.e. the Margaret Mahy Playground is currently being constructed is due to open on 22 December 2015 with the construction being completed in February 2016. The Avon River Precinct is an anchor project that is part of the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan and this portion also forms part of the eastern frame. CCDU has also provided a plan (Attachment B) showing the proposed road stopping area overlaying the new Margaret Mahy playground.

4.4       Chester Street East will become part of the playground's car park exit onto Madras Street (Attachment B) which is adjacent to a proposed residential development.

4.5       This request to road stop parts of Oxford Terrace and Chester Street East is similar to the applications to stop Struthers Lane for the New Bus Interchange in May 2014 and part of Gloucester Street in April 2015 for the proposed Convention Centre. 

4.6       CCC staff have been advised CCDU that pedestrians and cyclist will be able to use the path along the river (Attachment B)

4.7       CCDU and CCC staff are actively working together to resolve the issues associated with horizontal infrastructure and services.

 

5.   Context/Background

Legal Implications

5.1       The CCDU letter to the Council outlined the requirement to consult the Council in relation to the stopping of two areas of road (approximately 4,864 m²) which were designated for the Avon River Precinct anchor project through the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan (Attachment A).

5.2       The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 permits the Chief Executive (Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority) may by giving public notice or any other manner determined suitable stop any road or part of road in greater Christchurch (section 46(3)).  Also relevant to this issue are subsections 46 (3, 4, 5 and 6), which are quoted below:

“(3) The chief executive may, by giving public notice or in any other manner that he or she determines, stop any road or part of a road in greater Christchurch.

(4) The stopping of a road under subsection (3) has effect as if the road had been stopped in accordance with section 342 and Schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 1974 and as if the chief executive were a council within the meaning of that section.

(5) The chief executive must consult the relevant road controlling authority—

·           (a) before stopping a road or part of a road under this section:

·           (b) if practicable, before exercising any other power under this section in relation to a road.

(6) To avoid doubt,—

·           (a) there is no right of appeal or objection against a decision made under subsection (3):

·           (b) nothing in section 345 of the Local Government Act 1974 applies to the disposal of land resulting from a stopping of a road under this section.”

 

5.3       Although the road reserve adjoins the River Avon the CER Act section 46 (6) means that section 345 of the Local Government Act 1974 does not apply in respect of the disposal or ownership of the land in question. The Crown / CCC Cost Sharing Agreement requires that the land will vest in the Crown as it is required for an anchor project.

Financial Implications

5.4       At this stage there are no direct financial implications for the Council. The road stopping process will be undertaken by CCDU at their cost.

5.5       The Council will not be entitled to any compensation in accordance with the Cost Sharing Agreement.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Avon River Precinct Road Stopping area CERA plan

62

b  

Avon River Precinct Road Stopping Area overlay on Margaret Mahy Playground

63

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)    sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)   adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Philip Basher

Richard Holland

Transport Policy Engineer

Team Leader Planning Transport

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Unit Manager - Assets & Networks

Director Council Facilities & Infrastructure

  


Council

28 January 2016

 


Council

28 January 2016

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

7         Metro Sport Facility Road Stop - Balfour Terrace and Horatio Street

Reference:

15/1530605

Contact:

Philip Basher

philip.basher@ccc.govt.nz

8605

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Council to provide a formal response on the Christchurch Central Development Unit's (CCDU) consultation with Council in relation to the proposed road stopping of part of Balfour Terrace and Horatio Street. This is required for the Metro Sports Facility anchor project.

1.2       The proposal to road stop part of Balfour Terrace land locks the properties known as 1 and 3 Balfour Terrace, CCDU therefore propose to create new access to these properties from Stewart Street. This new road will be vested in the Council as a component of the Metro Sport Facility anchor project.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated in response to CCDU's letter dated 11 December 2015, notifying the Council of the road stopping and new road proposals.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impacts on the wider community which indicate that the issue in question has a moderate impact.

2.1.2   There has been no community engagement and consultation as the matter is excluded from the usual consultation processes because of the powers granted to CCDU under Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 section 46 (3).

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council:

1.         Supports the CCDU to proceed and stop a section of Balfour Terrace and Horatio Street (refer to the light brown sections in Attachment A) using their statutory powers.

2.         Consents to the CCDU's request to create and vest to the Council the new road to link 1 and 3 Balfour Terrace to Stewart Street (refer to the dark blue section in Attachment A). CCDU requires the Council's written consent on this matter.

3.         Authorise staff to effect the transfer of the road, once stopped and vested in the Council, to the Crown under section 53.3 of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 which preserves any offer back obligations the Council may have.

4.         Request staff arrange a briefing by CCDU to update the Council on the current status, and future requirements of the Central City Anchor projects to include the roading requirements (i.e. road stops and new road creation).

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       In December 2015 the Director of CCDU Baden Ewart wrote to the Council advising that they are going to use their powers under the CER Act to stop the portions of road required for the Metro Sports Facility anchor project (refer Attachment A).  The road is held, managed and controlled by the Council as legal road.  The CCDU has provided notice of this intention to satisfy their requirement under the CER Act to consult with the relevant road controlling authority.  Staff expect them to action the road stopping during 2016.

4.2       In addition CCDU have notified the Council of its intention to create a new road to link 1 and 3 Balfour Terrace to Stewart Street. This accessway will be legalised as road under section 114 of the Public Works Act 1981 and will be vested to the Council in due course (refer to dark blue section in Attachment A). The Council is required to provide its written consent on this matter by 10 February 2016.

4.3       This is a procedural matter with the likely only visible signs being some advertising by way of a gazette notice. The stopped road would initially vest in the Council, which would then transfer it to the Crown as provided for in the cost share Agreement.  Under the Cost Sharing Agreement there is no identified right for compensation.

4.4       This request to road stop part of Balfour Terrace and Horatio Street is similar to the applications to stop Struthers Lane for the New Bus Interchange in May 2014 and part of Gloucester Street in April 2015 for the proposed Convention Centre. In addition there is a report in respect of the Avon River Precinct and Margaret Mahy Playground road stopping proposal on this meeting's agenda.

4.5       CCDU and CCC staff are actively working together to resolve the issues associated with horizontal infrastructure and services.

 

5.   Context/Background

Legal Implications

5.1       The CCDU letter to the Council outlined the requirement to consult the Council in relation to the stopping of two areas of road (approximately 6,351 m²) which were designated for the Metro Sports Facility anchor project through the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan (Attachment A).

5.2       The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (CER) Act 2011 permits the Chief Executive (Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority) may by giving public notice or any other manner determined suitable stop any road or part of road in greater Christchurch (section 46(3)).  Also relevant to this issue are subsections 46 (3, 4, 5 and 6), which are quoted below:

“(3) The chief executive may, by giving public notice or in any other manner that he or she determines, stop any road or part of a road in greater Christchurch.

(4) The stopping of a road under subsection (3) has effect as if the road had been stopped in accordance with section 342 and Schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 1974 and as if the chief executive were a council within the meaning of that section.

(5) The chief executive must consult the relevant road controlling authority—

·           (a) before stopping a road or part of a road under this section:

·           (b) if practicable, before exercising any other power under this section in relation to a road.

(6) To avoid doubt,—

·           (a) there is no right of appeal or objection against a decision made under subsection (3):

·           (b) nothing in section 345 of the Local Government Act 1974 applies to the disposal of land resulting from a stopping of a road under this section.”

 

5.3       The Crown / CCC Cost Sharing Agreement requires that the road stopped land will vest in the Crown as it is required for an anchor project.

5.4       As the road stopping proposal would land lock 1 and 3 Balfour Terrace CCDU propose to create a new road (approximately 758 m²) to link to Stewart Street (see dark blue section in Attachment A). The Crown / CCC Cost Sharing Agreement requires that new road created for an anchor project will be vested in and maintained by CCC. CCDU intends to legalise the new road under Section 114 of the Public Works Act 1981. Furthermore under Section 114(2) requires that the body in which the road land is vested (CCC) provide written consent to CCDU, this case by 10 February 2016.

Financial Implications

5.5       At this stage there are no direct financial implications for the Council. Although the creation of the new road (758 m²) will need to be maintained by the ongoing operational budget this will be exceeded by the stopped road area of 6,351 m² that will no longer be vested to the Council. The road stopping process will be undertaken by CCDU at their cost.

5.6       The Council will not be entitled to any compensation in accordance with the Cost Sharing Agreement.

Proposed Briefing

5.7       Staff are conscious that the requests to Council advising on proposed road stopping in connection with the Central City's Anchor Projects have been passed to us on a piecemeal basis. It is felt that the process would be better served by providing the Council with a detailed briefing on the anchor projects and their roading requirements, including road stopping and new road creation.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Metro Sports Facility Road Stopping Plan

68

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)    sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)   adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Philip Basher

Transport Policy Engineer

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Unit Manager - Assets & Networks

Director Council Facilities & Infrastructure

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

PDF Creator


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

8         Minor change to Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015

Reference:

15/1572181

Contact:

 Enter contact

Enter email address

Enter phone.

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Council to approve a minor change/error correction to the wording of a clause in the Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the minor nature of the change/correction to be made.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council:

1.         Approve, in accordance with section 11(6) of the Freedom Camping Act 2011, the replacement of the wording in clause 11 of the Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015 to provide better clarity with camping and parking restrictions in other Council bylaws, with the following:

'11. Effect of this bylaw on other bylaws and enactments

(1)  If any other bylaw or enactment requires Council to give approval for camping on any Council land, then providing for freedom camping in the areas identified in clause 8 of this Bylaw provides the approval required by that other bylaw or enactment.

(2)  Providing for restricted freedom camping in clauses 7 and 8 of this Bylaw also provides for the parking of any vehicle being used for freedom camping in any area identified in clauses 7 and 8, but does not affect any time, vehicle class or other restrictions that apply to the parking of that vehicle, made under any other bylaw or enactment.

 

The following note is explanatory and is not part of the Bylaw: This clause is to make it clear that approval of freedom camping under this Bylaw also satisfies a requirement for approval under another bylaw or enactment.  For example:

·    under the Parks and Reserves Bylaw camping is not allowed in any park or reserve without Council approval, so allowing for freedom camping in a park or reserve in this Bylaw (eg at Wainui) also provides the required approval under the Parks & Reserves Bylaw; and

·    the Council designates parking areas under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw; approving the same area for restricted freedom camping under this bylaw also provides any Traffic and Parking Bylaw approval, if required (the freedom camping must still comply with any parking time limits etc applicable to the area)'.

 

2.         Note there will be public notification of the resolution.

 

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The Council adopted a new Freedom Camping Bylaw 2015 at its meeting on 26 November 2015.  The bylaw as adopted contained several changes from the consultation version of the bylaw. 

4.2       One of the changes was a new clause 11 headed 'Effect of this bylaw on other bylaws and enactments'.  This clause was included in the bylaw to deal with matters raised in submissions.

4.3       Since the Bylaw was adopted staff have realised the clause does not sufficiently and clearly address the two issues that were intended to be covered in the clause: camping restrictions and parking designations made under other bylaws or legislation, and the effect of any freedom camping areas approved in the bylaw on these other restrictions and designations. 

4.4       The clause as worded is too wide in respect of camping.  The wording in relation to parking could also be clearer.

4.5       Staff recommend the Council approve a replacement clause that separates the two issues.

4.6       The Council can make this change to the bylaw under section 11(6) of the Freedom Camping Act 2011 without any further consultation, provided it publicly notifies its resolution.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The Council consulted on a new Freedom Camping Bylaw using the special consultative procedure from Monday 20 August 2015 to Monday 21 September 2015.  One hundred and ninety two submissions were received in total, and fifty one submitters indicated they wanted to be heard.  The Hearings Panel heard verbal submissions on 13 and 16 October. 

5.2       The Council received the Hearings Panel report and made the new Bylaw at its meeting on 26 November 2015.  The bylaw came into effect on 1 December 2015.

5.3       Clause 11 of the Freedom Camping Bylaw did not appear in the consultation version of the Bylaw.  It was proposed by the Hearings Panel as a result of submissions.  The reasons for the new clause were discussed in the Hearings Panel report as follows:

"One submitter suggested that providing in the proposed bylaw that the North Ramp carpark would be a non self-contained freedom camping area would be contrary to the area having been designated as a parking area under the Councils Traffic and Parking Bylaw.  However, the Council can alter any parking designation by making a resolution. A similar issue also arises in relation to allowing Stanbury Park to be used for freedom camping when the Parks and Reserves Bylaw says Council approval is required to camp in a reserve. The Panel proposes new clause 11 (and an explanatory note) to make it clear what the effect of this bylaw is in relation to Council's other bylaws or any enactments."

 

5.4       The explanatory note to the clause in the published Bylaw states:

"This clause is to make it clear that approval of freedom camping under this Bylaw also satisfies any requirement for approval under another bylaw or enactment.  For example:

·          the Council designates parking areas under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw and Council approval is needed to make changes; approving the same area for freedom camping under this bylaw also provides any Traffic and Parking Bylaw approval required (the freedom camping must still comply with any parking time limits applicable to the area);

·          under the Parks and Reserves Bylaw camping is not allowed in any park or reserve without Council approval, so allowing for freedom camping in a park or reserve in this Bylaw (eg at Wainui) also provides the required approval under the Parks & Reserves Bylaw."

5.5       Clause 11 currently states:

"If any other bylaw or enactment requires Council to give approval for camping or parking on any Council land, or a change to any camping or parking restriction or designation previously imposed by the Council, then the designation of any area for freedom camping in clauses 7 or 8 of this Bylaw provides the approval required by any other bylaw or enactment."

 

5.6       Clause 11 deals with camping and parking designations/approvals together in the one clause.  Because clause 11 refers to both clause 7 (self-contained freedom camping only areas) and clause 8 (areas where non self-contained freedom camping can occur) that means that in respect of camping restrictions, all the reserves in the clause 7 areas would be covered by clause 11 as being approved for camping.  

5.7       It is appropriate in relation to parking designations on roads that any freedom camping areas in both clauses 7 and 8 are covered.  However, it was not the Council's intention that clause 11 be so wide that it applies to all Council reserves. 

5.8       The intention of the clause in respect of camping was to address the specific situations where reserves were identified as places in the Bylaw where freedom camping was allowed (the areas identified in clause 8 of the bylaw - eg the non self-contained freedom camping area at Stanbury Park in Wainui).

5.9       Staff propose a new clause that separates the two issues of camping and parking, and better aligns with the explanatory note and reasons the Council decided to include the clause in the bylaw:

"(1) If any other bylaw or enactment requires Council to give approval for camping on any Council land, then providing for freedom camping in the areas identified in clause 8 of this Bylaw provides the approval required by that other bylaw or enactment.

(2)    Providing for restricted freedom camping in clauses 7 and 8 of this Bylaw also provides for the parking of any vehicle being used for freedom camping in any area identified in clauses 7 and 8, but does not affect any time, vehicle class or other restrictions that apply to the parking of that vehicle, made under any other bylaw or enactment."

5.10    Section 11(6) of the Freedom Camping Act 2011 allows this correction to be made by the Council without any further consultation:

"….a local authority may, by resolution publicly notified, make minor changes to, or correct errors in, a bylaw made under this section, but only if the changes or corrections do not affect—

(a) an existing right, interest, title, immunity, or duty of any person to whom the bylaw applies; or

(b) an existing status or capacity of any person to whom the bylaw applies."

 

5.11    Clause 11 was only included in the bylaw following submissions made as part of the special consultation procedure.  The clause, and the proposed change, do not affect any existing rights duties, status or capacity of any person. 

5.12    It is a clause that identifies that different Council decisions in respect of the same land are to be applied together.  Freedom camping approvals/provisions over land made in the Freedom Camping Bylaw are effective even though other decisions have been made by the Council in respect of the same land for other purposes.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)    sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)   adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Cheyne

Senior Solicitor

Approved By

Rob Goldsbury

Anne Columbus

Unit Manager Legal Services

Director Corporate Services

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

9         Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee Extraordinary Meeting - 22 September 2015

Reference:

16/3516

Contact:

Liz Ryley

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

941 8153

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee held an Extraordinary meeting on 22 September 2015 and the minutes recorded from that meeting are attached for the information of the Council.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council receive the minutes of the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee Extraordinary meeting of 22 September 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Communities Housing and Economic Development Extraordinary Meeting Minutes 22 September 2015

76

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

Approved By

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

10     The Notification Decision For Resource Consent Applications

Reference:

16/3789

Contact:

Brent Pizzey

Brent.Pizzey@ccc.govt.nz

941 5550

 

 

1.   Secretarial Note

1.1       A report on the Council notification decisions for resource consent applications was considered at the Council meetings of 13 and 27 August 2015. The report was left to lie on the table, and the Council resolved that staff be directed to prepare a report to the Regulation and Consents Committee about whether, and if so how, the Council could adopt a policy guiding notification decisions under the Resource Management Act 1991 which would increase the likelihood of people who are affected by a proposal having an opportunity to lodge a submission and be heard.

1.2       That report went to the Regulation and Consents Committee meeting of 17 December 2015.

1.3       The original report which was left to lie on the table in August 2015 is attachment A, and the report which was considered by the Regulation and Consents Committee in December 2015 is attachment B.

1.4       Councillor David East, at the 13 August 2015 Council meeting, proposed an amendment to the Regulations and Consents Committee recommendation and this amendment was also left to lie on the table. Councillor East's amendment, yet to be seconded, is copied below at section 3.

 

2.   Staff and Committee Recommendations

That the Council approve that:

a.         Hearings Panels are not used for resource consent decision making at this time.

b.         A further report is brought to the Council in approximately 12 months' time and no later than 1 July 2016 to review the practice.

c.         A list of applications be sent weekly to the applicable Community Board.

d.         Applications considered of interest by staff to be circulated as soon as practicable following receipt of a complete application to the applicable Community Board for their information.

3.   Councillor East's Proposed Amendment

 

3.1          That Hearings Panels are not used for making the notification decision (Section 95) on resource consent applications.

3.2          That Hearings Panels continue to be used to make the substantive decision (section 104) on resource consent applications where a hearing is required.

3.3          That a further report which reviews resource consent decision making is brought to the Council in approximately two years' time and no later than 1 July 2017.

3.4          That an independent audit be carried out bi-annually that examines a representative sample of decisions made on 20 resource consent applications in the context of the requirements under the Resource Management Act. The results of the audit is to be reported to Council as soon as practicable following the report being received, with the first audit being reported back to Council no later than 1 July 2017.

 

3.5          That a list of applications be sent weekly to the applicable Community Board once the new Connect software has been deployed for Resource Consents and all applications be sent to the Regulation and Consents Committee.

3.6          That resource consents senior staff visit each Community Board at least annually to gain feedback on issues arising from the processing of resource consent applications.

3.7          That applications considered by staff to be of interest to elected members be circulated as soon as practicable following receipt of a complete application to the applicable Community Board for their information.

            

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Council 27 August 2015 - Clause 9 - REPORT - Making the Notification Decision for Resource Consent Applications

81

b  

Regulation and Consents Committee 17 December 2015 - Council Policy for Notification of Resource Consent Applications

89

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Brent Pizzey

John Gibson

Senior Solicitor

Planning Administration Manager

Approved By

Rob Goldsbury

Anne Columbus

Unit Manager Legal Services

Director Corporate Services

  


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

11     LINZ Smart City Programme funding

Reference:

16/4858

Contact:

Eric Assendelft

eric.assendelft@ccc.govt.nz

941 6271

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       This report outlines the Smart City programme of work to be funded by LINZ and the proposed match funding of this commitment.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council:

1.         Approve the match funding of $330,000 from the LTP Sensing City budget to support the LINZ programme of Christchurch proof of concept projects;

2.         Note the $330,000 in funding from LINZ and the $200,000 from NEC as contributions towards the Christchurch Smart City programme.

3.         Authorise the Mayor to sign the Smart City Collaboration Protocol with NEC

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       A Smart City can be thought of as a developed urban area that creates sustainable economic development and a high quality of life by excelling in multiple key areas: economy, mobility, people, living, environment and government. Excelling in these key can be done through strong human capital, social capital and information and communication technology (ICT) to create new and nimble ways of doing things. By using information and data collected from new smart systems and technologies, citizens, managers and decision makers collectively can enhance the quality, performance and delivery of city services, so that cities work more efficiently and usefully for us. This also reduces capital and operating costs and improves resource efficiency.   Historically the focus of a smart city (or sensing city as it was called) has been on developing and distributing open-data sets. More recently the focus has shifted towards using the data and information available to make better decisions around asset management and city design. This is driving progress towards meeting community outcomes for transport (congestion management), energy efficiency, water quality monitoring and citizen safety. Citizen participation through the development of visualisation tools of real time information is also on the rise through new smart city capabilities such as interactive real-time public facing dashboards on the health and workings of the city.  A Smart City therefore, is one that goes beyond the use of ICT technology in particular areas (and for narrow purposes) to one where the technology is used in a manner that positively impacts on the community.

3.2       Council has previously committed to a Christchurch Smart City initiative through what was termed Sensing Cities. This commitment was to support a project led by the Sensing City Trust, and was closely linked to a number of areas of Council business. Funding for the Sensing Cities project was secured from the Callaghan Innovation Fund and the project proposed a number of 'sensing - related' activities across Christchurch, including embedding sensing technologies in the rebuild of the city. CCC subsequently made approx. $1m budget provision for this activity through the Capital Endowment Fund. However, the lack of an internal CCC Smart City 'champion' as well as concerns about the narrow focus of the Trust's work meant no progress was made on this project.

3.3       After the Christchurch earthquake series, the relevance of robust, tested, open source data became apparent to the government as a means to transform the level of understanding of how cities operated so that in the future everyone can make informed and better decisions to improve lives and reduce costs. However, it was also apparent that it was difficult to describe a future investment/ business case for innovative, smart, new ways of approaching city management and design through improved collection and use of data. Therefore, in early-2015 Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) was successful in securing a Better Public Services (BPS) Grant of $1.5m for catalyst funding to invest in smart city projects to gain a better understanding of how cities operate and the progress towards outcome cities provide to their respective communities. The outcome of this grant was to collect evidence as to the viability and usefulness of embedding smart city principles across central and local governments in New Zealand.

3.4       LINZ have indicated that they would now like to work with Christchurch City Council, Wellington City Council and Auckland Council to develop a "Smart City coalition" to test the value of smart city concepts through proof of concept projects that will provide empirical and robust evidence as to the potential value of smart city principles, techniques and modes of operation. LINZ have chosen a programme approach to this work, involving a range of central government agencies but focussed on learnings from Christchurch, Wellington and Auckland cities. To that end, the majority of the BPS funding will be allocated equally across the three cities ($330,000 each) to develop proof of concept projects. The balance of the fund will be used to develop a Smart City business cases by end of 2016 that will determine the viability of a roll-out for a nation-wide Smart Nation programme.

3.5       In August 20156 The Mayor and the Chief Executive were briefed by LINZ and NEC on the opportunity to engage in this national programme of work with the Crown. As a result of this briefing the Mayor and the Chief Executive agreed to participate, anticipating that this would be the best way to catalyse the concept of Smart City Christchurch and to support the eventual development of city-wide Smart City strategy. The Mayor also proposed to match fund the potential $330,000 LINZ commitment from the LTP funding that had previously been set aside for Smart City (Sensing City) project.

3.6       On 25 November, the CCC received formal approval for the LINZ funding ($330k) for a Christchurch-based programme of projects to support the national Smart City programme. NEC, who LINZ have accepted as the technology "learning' partner for this national programme of work, have also committed to part funding ($200k) the infrastructure for the programme and have offered their international experience in other cities throughout the world to support the learnings for Christchurch.

3.7       NEC provides a prototype smart city backbone and flexible sensing array to study and learn from, to see if this is something that should be considered as part of a longer-term national Smart City strategy. A smart city backbone and flexible sensing platform are effectively the infrastructure that allows a wide range of sensors to be deployed throughout the city and for data to be translated into useful forms to improve decision making. NEC have deployed such a backbone and sensing platform to certain parts of Wellington under a Collaboration Agreement with the Mayor of Wellington. WCC have also provided matched funding to support this deployment. This collaboration and the project work now underway are being augmented by the LINZ funding to scale up the projects and to increase the learnings about the value of embedding smart city capabilities.

3.8       To leverage the learnings from Wellington and the LINZ funding opportunity, Panuku Auckland (Development Auckland) has also signed a collaboration agreement with NEC and have begun proof of concept projects in downtown Auckland. Other Auckland Council agencies such as Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and Digital Auckland, are now also part of this national programme.

3.9       The four Christchurch projects that have been agreed and will be funded by LINZ Smart City programme, NEC and the proposed matched funding by CCC are:

TABLE 1: Split of Smart City funding and Projects

Project #

Description

LINZ Funding

NEC Contribution

CCC (Matched Funding)

TOTAL Investment

1

Capacity building

$40,000

 

 

$40,000

2

Flexible sensing platform

$100,000

$100,000

$75,000

$275,000

3

Backbone

$50,000

$100,000

$50,000

$200,000

4

Proof of concept projects

$140,000

 

$205,000

$345,000

TOTAL

 

$330,000

$200,000

$330,000

$860,000

 

3.10    Project 1 provides for a LINZ funded contractor (Margot Christeller) to be engaged to lead the Christchurch programme of the LINZ programme. Margot is highly experienced in the area of Smart City work having developed the initial LINZ BPS proposal as well as sitting on the Board of Treasury's National Infrastructure Unit. Her role will be to coordinate the implementation of the LINZ programme with existing CCC projects (approved under the LTP) and work with CCC project managers. Her role will also be to pull together local stakeholders across local government, universities and the private sector that may identify further opportunities for economic development as well as cross-city partnerships.

3.11    Project's 2 and 3 are the critical elements of a Smart City infrastructure. NEC, as part of their global R & D capability, have committed $200,000 in funding to Christchurch to support the establishment of this sensing infrastructure so that we can collectively learn about the effectiveness and viability of new ways of operating. NEC are keen to extend their research support in Christchurch on the basis of the unique regeneration opportunities here and as a way to test technologies in a new and possibly environmentally challenging environment (sun, heat/cold, dust). Following Council's agreement, a Collaboration Protocol is expected to be signed between NEC and CCC (by the Mayor) to reinforce this collaborative arrangement. A formal signing of this relationship between NEC and local and central governments is expected to occur early this year at a planned Ministers / Mayors meeting at the Innovation Hub in Wellington (a joint NEC/WCC venture).

3.12    Projects 2 and 3 are a significant step forward in creating an infrastructure in which sensing opportunities for both the LINZ programme and Christchurch can be explored. Rather than spending considerable time and effort exploring issues around data, civil engineering etc., CCC and potential partners can now focus purely on the sensors that they would like to 'attach' to this backbone. This also means that the sensing projects will be at a marginal cost rather than having to factor in the data collection platform. NEC are expected to work with CCC staff through the first quarter of 2016 to implement the infrastructure ensuring that it serves the city's requirements as much as possible.

3.13    Project 4 is the area of considerable opportunity for CCC and Christchurch. The $140,000 of funding that is tied to LINZ will be used to explore common national issues such as water quality, traffic congestion and air quality. However, the remaining $205,000 from the matched funding allows the programme to focus purely on those opportunities that are specifically of interest to Christchurch. 

3.14    With both sources of funding available, there is up to $345,000 to identify sensing projects that would specifically serve the needs of CCC and the city, as well as inform the development of a CCC Smart City strategy. Following a 9 December 2015 workshop the following topics of interest were identified:

a)     Improving understanding to improve decision making:

o   Travel movement (multi-mode; cycles; pedestrian)

o   Air quality

o   Water quality of rivers, estuaries and sea

o   Resilience measures

b)     Improving analytics to improve decision making

o   Using data to solve problems

o   Multiple sensor/data inputs into decision making

c)      Improving engagement to create the right outcomes for everyone

o   Visualisation of the data to show city 'health'

o   Interactive opportunities/ participative democracy

d)     Catalysing economic development opportunities that leverage public investment

o   Public / private data collaboration/integration (open source data)

o   Use of the rebuild as a living lab

 

3.15    Once Council has agreed to the match-funding, specific projects and outcomes will be confirmed.

3.16    In addition to the selection of proof of concept projects, the LINZ programme also creates collaboration opportunities with other partners including the University of Canterbury (UC). UC are particularly keen on working with CCC to develop visualisation and analytical tools to create a real-time 'dashboard' that informs residents and officials of the real-time health of the city. In addition UC are also interested in working with CCC on cycle movements and impacts on congestion.

3.17    There are also significant opportunities to use Development Christchurch (DCL) and its relationship with the private sector to leverage potential R & D ('Living Lab' opportunities) through the rebuild. This includes testing building technologies, built form, vehicle/pedestrian interactions as well as streetscape impacts. ECan have also expressed an interest in using the infrastructure to pursue joint projects on water quality.

3.18    To date a number of private sector companies have also expressed a desire to work with CCC to support both the LINZ programme as well as a wider Smart City vision. These companies have also indicated a willingness to commit financial resources to access the infrastructure. The economic development opportunities that this could create as well as the symbolic demonstration of the Council's commitment to innovation and economic development align perfectly with the intent of this year's Annual Plan.

How does the LINZ work tie into the development of a CCC Smart City Strategy?

3.19    On 16 November 2015, ELT agreed on the need to proceed with the development of a Smart City strategy for Christchurch. This project is longer - term and looks beyond the immediate milestones of the LINZ programme. There are very compelling synergies between the two streams of work and they should be seen as complementary rather than competing. In particular, the LINZ programme allows CCC access to the outputs and lessons learned of the LINZ programme which will provide very useful inputs to the CCC Smart City programme.

3.20    The 9 December workshop identified a range of proof of concept projects that will help inform the CCC Smart City strategy and staff at a working level have been cooperating very closely to ensure that the two streams of work are closely aligned. It is expected that by mid-year the management of these two pieces of work will effectively merge into one as CCC articulates what their smart city strategy will look like. In the meantime, the LINZ programme offers Christchurch an immediate opportunity to be part of a national programme developing proof of concept projects and to demonstrate its commitment to developing Christchurch as a smart city.

NEC Collaboration

3.21    As part of the LINZ programme, NEC have already approved a contribution of $200,000 towards the Christchurch Smart City programme. This will be used to off-set the cost of the backbone and the flexible sensing platforms (the infrastructure) that the sensors will be attached to. NEC have also indicated that they will make available to CCC the global research capability to support aspects of the Smart City work of interest to Christchurch. In return, NEC will obtain R & D benefits through exposure to the particular physical environment available in Christchurch (i.e. hot/cold weather, dust, intense sunshine, etc.) that may subsequently be used for commercial purposes. This agreement is already in place with Wellington Council and allows for the use of a common technology partner across the LINZ programme.

3.22    It is important to note that at the end of the proof of concept period (end 2016) there is a decision point required for Council as to whether they wish to purchase the infrastructure (for a possible expansion consistent with a Smart City strategy) or have it removed by NEC at no cost to CCC. Collaboration with NEC during this proof of concept period in 2016 does not imply any ongoing obligation on either party, it does not prevent CCC working with alternative suppliers at a later stage and CCC will have no obligation to purchase the hardware or software that will be put in place as part of the proof of concept work. This is outlined in a separate agreement between CCC and NEC.

3.23    To formalise the relationship between NEC and CCC it is proposed that the Council give the Mayor the authority to sign the Collaboration Protocol on behalf of the CCC. This signing is likely to take place in early 2016 at a joint Ministers/Mayors Smart City forum in Wellington.

What are the benefits for the city in this programme?

3.24    Participation in the LINZ programme will provide significant benefits to the city. At a minimum, the city receives third party funding (through LINZ and NEC) for the support of a programme of work. More importantly however, in terms of demonstrating innovation, the programme represents an exemplar as to how we, as a city, are looking to deliver our community outcomes differently (rather than expecting the ratepayers to fully fund). In addition, there is strong interest by the private sector, academia and ECan to participate in this project through access to the platform and sensing capability. This sends a strong and visible signal that we are committed to fostering innovation in Christchurch and that we will be collaborating with our partners to achieve this vision.

3.25    Internally, this programme of work allows the results of the proof of concept projects to be used to test assumptions about asset management planning as well as inform the development of Christchurch's own smart city strategy.

3.26    Finally, application of smart city technology allows us as a city to move away from the 'lag intelligence' more towards a 'lead intelligence / real-time' decision making framework. For example, the CCC has a number of community outcomes that it aspires to and uses the LTP to fund the progress and priorities for. The current community outcomes reporting system is hampered by constraints on data availability and timing. It is challenging for elected members to make critical and time-sensitive decisions on the Annual Plan or LTP. A lead-intelligence / real-time reporting system creates a much better framework for decision making as well as being able to engage with residents on priorities and progress of the outcomes.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Attachment 1 - LINZ Smart City Investment Logic Map

99

 

 

Signatories

Author

Eric Assendelft

Senior Advisor

Approved By

Peter Sparrow

Director Building Control & City Rebuild

  


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

12     Canterbury Economic Development Company Limited - Annual Meeting Shareholders' Resolution

Reference:

16/38727

Contact:

Darryl Griffin

darryl.griffin@ccc.govt.nz

6436

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This purpose of this report is for the Council to pass resolutions in accordance with clause 12.4 (d) of constitution of the Canterbury Economic Development Co. Ltd. in lieu of holding an annual general meeting.

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Council  resolve that:

1.         That the Annual Report, including the Auditor's Report, of the Canterbury Economic Development Co. Ltd. for the year ended 30 June 2015 be adopted; and

2.         That the Auditor General be reappointed as auditor for the year ending 30 June 2016.

 

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The Canterbury Development Company Ltd was established in 2008 from ten Canterbury local authorities with shareholding as follows:

• Group A shares - 30 each held by Hurunui, Waimakariri and Kaikoura (10 shares each);

• Group B shares - 10 shares held by Christchurch;

• Group C shares - 20 shares held by Ashburton and Selwyn (10 shares each);

• Group D shares - 30 shares held by Waimate, McKenzie and Timaru (10 shares each);

• Group E shares - 10 shares held by Environment Canterbury.

3.2       The Canterbury Economic Development Co. Ltd. is a dormant company.

3.3       The Timaru District Council, as the administrating Council for the Canterbury Economic Development Co. Ltd. (the Company), advises that the Company has not traded during the year ended 30 June 2015 and to save shareholders' time and money, requests that, in accordance with clause 12.4 (d) of Company's constitution,  resolutions be passed by the 10 shareholding Councils adopting the Company's Annual Report for the year (including the Auditor's Report) and the appointment of auditors for the current year. A copy of the Company's constitution is available at: http://www.business.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/2175166/documents

3.4       The Timaru District Council requests that the resolution be passed and notified to them by 31 January 2016.

3.5       The Timaru District Council advises that a meeting of directors is to be called soon to enable the directors to discuss the future of the company.

3.6       The Christchurch City Council appointed Councillor David East and Canterbury Development Corporation Chief Executive Tom Hooper as Directors at its meeting on 10 September 2015.

3.7       The Company was established as a promoter of transformational economic development projects of benefit to Canterbury and to utilise the Canterbury Regional Economic Development Strategy (CREDS) to coordinate strategic economic development initiatives. Originally, CREDS was created as the result of a central government funding round for regional development. The strategy itself was developed for the Councils across the Canterbury region by the Agricultural Economic Research Unit (AERU) at Lincoln University. The entity, Canterbury Economic Development Company (CEDC), was established to make the funding application, and the money received was then distributed to the individual TLA's for a variety of projects which they proposed.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Timaru District Council - Annual Meeting Shareholders' Resolution

103

 

 

Signatories

Author

Darryl Griffin

Manager Council Secretariat

Approved By

Darryl Griffin

Mary Richardson

Manager Council Secretariat

Director Community & Democracy Services

  


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Report from Burwood/Pegasus Community Board  – 14 December 2015

 

13     Options for the Treatment of Asbestos Containing Material at QEII Park

Reference:

15/1543142

Contact:

Peter Croucher

peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

941.5305

 

 

Secretarial Note:

Due to urgency the Community Board Advisor requested that this report come to the 28 January 2016 Council meeting instead of waiting for the Community Board Council meeting in February 2016.

1.   Burwood/Pegasus Community Board Comment

 

The Burwood/Pegasus Community Board considered a report which recommended to Council a method of managing Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) found by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) on QEII Park during the course of the demolition of the recreation and sports centre.

The Board agreed that it was important to have clear communication with all affected stakeholders as the encapsulation work progressed at QEII Park.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

 

It is recommended that the Burwood / Pegasus Community Board recommend that the Council:

1.         Resolve that the asbestos containing material found at the QEII demolition site is safely encapsulated on the site and the QEII demolition site is returned to grass playing fields for community use at a maximum cost of $3,860,963.

2.         Allocate $1,966,277 from Council’s Building and Infrastructure Allowance to partially fund the encapsulation of asbestos containing material.

3.         Approve the balance of the funding needed to encapsulate the asbestos containing material to come from the funds set aside in the Capital Governance Pool, to a maximum value of $1,894,686.  This is subject to officers taking all reasonable steps to reduce the cost including focusing the detailed design to solely provide safe and secure ACM management and return the land to grassed sports fields.

4.         Delegate to the Recreation and Sports Manager the authority to make such arrangements as necessary to implement the decisions of the Council in respect to this report.

 

 

3.   Burwood/Pegasus Community Board Recommendation to Council

 

Part A

Member Baker moved by way of amendment that clause 1. of the staff recommendation be approved with the addition of the words "and fully" as noted in bold below. 

It is recommended that the Burwood / Pegasus Community Board recommend that the Council:

1.         Resolve that the asbestos containing material found at the QEII demolition site is safely and fully encapsulated on the site and the QEII demolition site is returned to grass playing fields for community use at a maximum cost of $3,860,963.

2.         Allocate $1,966,277 from Council’s Building and Infrastructure Allowance to partially fund the encapsulation of asbestos containing material.

3.         Approve the balance of the funding needed to encapsulate the asbestos containing material to come from the funds set aside in the Capital Governance Pool, to a maximum value of $1,894,686.  This is subject to officers taking all reasonable steps to reduce the cost including focusing the detailed design to solely provide safe and secure ACM management and return the land to grassed sports fields.

4.         Delegate to the Recreation and Sports Manager the authority to make such arrangements as necessary to implement the decisions of the Council in respect to this report.  That any new information arising from this decision be reported back to the Board and that any communication/media releases that go out on this topic are forwarded to the Community Board Chairperson before release.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Report Title

Page

1

Options for the Treatment of Asbestos Containing Material at QEII Park

127

 

No.

Title

Page

a  

Proposed Site Plan

136

b  

Letter to residents - QEII Asbestos update - 10 December 2013

137

c  

Safe Encapsulation Options BECA Report (Redacted)

138

d  

Safe Encapsulation Options

149

 

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

Options for the Treatment of Asbestos Containing Material at QEII Park

Reference:

15/1292676

Contact:

John Filsell

John.filsell@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8303

 

 

              Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1          The purpose of this report is for the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board to recommend to Council a method of managing Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) found by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) on QEII Park during the course of the demolition of the recreation and sports centre.

Origin of Report

1.2          This report is provided to fulfil Councils resolution (17a) passed at the Council Meeting on 23 August 2012.  That the Council accept the tender by Mainzeal to demolish the balance of the main QEII complex, not currently being demolished under the Section 38 CERA notice.

2.       Significance

2.1          The decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1     The level of significance was determined by recognising the level of identified public concern related to ACM under temporary and secure containment on QEII Park. Not treating the ACM material on site would significantly adversely impact the development of the Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre, two high schools and wider Community use of the QEII Park area. ACM currently under temporary and secure containment on QEII Park is unsightly and prevents the final facility demolition and the return of the land to community sports fields.

2.1.2     The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance have been discharged through informing the local community, preparing a number of options for the Community Board and subsequently the Council to make a decision. The management of asbestos containing material on QEII Park is a Level of Service in the 2015/25 Long Term Plan.

 

3.       Staff Recommendations

It is recommended that the Burwood / Pegasus Community Board recommend that the Council:

1.              Resolve that the asbestos containing material found at the QEII demolition site is safely encapsulated on the site and the QEII demolition site is returned to grass playing fields for community use at a maximum cost of $3,860,963.

2.              Allocate $1,966,277 from Council’s Building and Infrastructure Allowance to partially fund the encapsulation of asbestos containing material.

3.              Approve the balance of the funding needed to encapsulate the asbestos containing material to come from the funds set aside in the Capital Governance Pool, to a maximum value of $1,894,686.  This is subject to officers taking all reasonable steps to reduce the cost including focusing the detailed design to solely provide safe and secure ACM management and return the land to grassed sports fields.

4.              Delegate to the Recreation and Sports Manager the authority to make such arrangements as necessary to implement the decisions of the Council in respect to this report.

 

 

4.       Key Points

4.1          This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1     Activity: Facilities and Infrastructure Rebuild

·           Level of Service: 13.7.1 Delivery of the rebuild infrastructure and facilities capital programme.

4.1.2     Activity: Recreation and Sports Facilities

·           Level of Service: 7.0.1 Provide residents access to fit-for-purpose recreation and sporting facilities.

·           Note:  This also supports The Recreation and Sports Facilities Activity Management plan which recognises the North Eastern Recreation and Sports Centre located at QEII Park will be opened in 2018.

4.1.3     Activity: Sports Parks

·           Level of Service: 7.1.1 Provide access to fit-for-purpose sports parks. There is increasing participation in recreation and sporting activities.

4.2          The following feasible options have been considered:

·           Option 1 - Encapsulation On-Site (preferred option)

·           Option 2 - Haul to Kate Valley

4.3          Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1     The advantages of this option include:

·           Encapsulation is a proven and safe treatment widely used to reduce the risk of transporting asbestos containing material and the prohibitive cost of transport and disposal at Kate Valley.

·           The encapsulated ACM will form a raised spectator embankment surrounding an enclosed community sports field and will improve the spectator viewing, shelter and use of the field. See the proposed site plan attached to this report as Attachment A.

·           Encapsulation on-site has a shorter timeframe of approximately 12 weeks compared to 18 weeks to haul ACM to an approved disposal site.

·           The estimated cost to encapsulate material on site is approximately $3,860,963 and is significantly lower than the cost to haul to an approved disposal site $9,054,713.

4.3.2     The disadvantages of this option include:

·           Community perception that encapsulation on-site poses current or ongoing health concerns.

·           Encapsulation will postpone future costs of handling or removing the material if the area is to be redeveloped in the future.

 

 

5.       Context/Background

Summary of demolition and contaminated area

5.1          In May 2012 Council engaged CERA to commission the demolition of the QEII Sports Complex as required under a Section 38 CERA notice.  CERA engaged Mainzeal Property and Construction Ltd to carry out the demolition works which commenced in June 2012.

5.2          On 23 August 2012 Council resolved to demolish the balance of the QEII complex, not currently being demolished under the Section 38 CERA notice.

5.3          During demolition ACM was uncovered having been buried in the ground for many years. A number of temporary secure mitigation measures were put in place to prevent the airborne transfer of asbestos fibres. This included water irrigation to suppress dust, all loose stockpiled material covered with cloth and weighted down and additional fencing installed to prevent unauthorised access to the site.  The entire demolition site is currently fenced and closed to public access.  See the photograph in section 5.4 below.

5.4           100_3613

5.5          In December 2013, residents were updated by letter informing them about the buried asbestos and the actions CERA and Council were taking.  Details of the community information is attached to this report as Attachment B.

5.6          In February 2014 work on-site reached a point where all physical structures had been demolished and all non-contaminated waste material that could be removed from site had been removed. The main contractor (Smith Crane and Construction Ltd following the receivership / liquidation of Mainzeal) has since demobilised from site and all work has now stopped.

5.7          CERA have formally closed out the demolition contract and assisted Council by identifying two options to manage the ACM on-site. Both options have the same outcome in that asbestos containing material can be managed safely and effectively.

5.8          Asbestos containing material is presently contained within the QEII Sports Complex demolition site.  Demolition works have reached a point where treatment options need to be agreed in order to complete the work and reinstate the land as sports fields for community use.

5.9          Two options exist for managing ACM on-site.  Both options have the same outcome in that asbestos containing material can be managed effectively securely and safely.  Both options will complete the demolition process and return the area to basic grassed playing fields for community use.

5.10       This report has been prepared in consideration of QEII Site Study of 4 June 2015 and supports the establishment of future use of the site for the Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre and two Ministry of Education high schools.

5.11       A cost breakdown for both options was originally determined by CERA.  Financial budgets were set based on this information.  Options and budgets were subsequently reviewed by Council and peer reviewed by BECA. This provides an up to date cost estimate.  The estimates are based on current market conditions and experience in carrying out similar work within the CBD.  The BECA report is attached to this report as Attachment C, detailed cost estimates are redacted and subsequently detailed in a confidential document that will be separately circulated.  This is solely to ensure Council gets best value from any competitive tender procurement process.

5.12       The imperative for the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board and Council to make a timely decision on the asbestos remediation at QEII lies in three areas:

5.12.1      A remediated site is needed in order to progress the rebuild of the Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre and the co-location of two high schools and associated infrastructure on site.  Project stakeholders are looking to Council for a commitment on land remediation as both projects are scheduled to begin in 2016.

5.12.2      It is two years since the asbestos containing material was discovered and there is increasing community concern that a solution has not been agreed and actioned.

5.12.3      The temporary management of asbestos containing material whilst technically safe is unsightly, results in frequent dust issues and is preventing the reestablishment of sports fields, grass and appropriate planting on the site.  For example, the temporary covers blew off on Friday 28 November.  A decision is needed now in order to use the autumn growing season and remediate the site before winter.


 

6.       Option 1 - Encapsulation On-Site (preferred)

Option Description

6.1          This option allows for retaining the ACM on-site in a contained and controlled area where it is unlikely to cause future issues.  An area at the back of number two playing field is identified as being suitable for this to occur. Refer to the site plan in Attachment A.  This would isolate the asbestos containing material to one area and provide a raised spectator embankment for the enclosed number two sports field. This location is within the fenced and floodlit football field, and would improve the use of the ground.  More importantly this is an area of QEII Park that will not be redeveloped so the risk is very low that ACM will be disturbed in the future.

6.2          Asbestos containing material found at the QEII demolition site can be safely and securely encapsulated on the site.  This is the most common form of managing ACM under these circumstances.  Attachment D of this report illustrates methods of safely containing ACM in a controlled area.

6.3          Encapsulating asbestos containing material in this area involves burying the material in a specially contained and bounded area, covering with mesh and geotextile then further covering with layers of clean topsoil and stabilising with grass.

6.4          The cost to encapsulate ACM on site is significantly lower than the costs to haul ACM to Kate Valley landfill.  It also negates the risk of transporting the ACM.

Significance

6.5          The level of significance of this option is medium and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance have been discharged through informing the local community, preparing a number of options for the Community Board and subsequently the Council to make a decision. The management of asbestos containing material on QEII Park is a Level of Service in the 2015/25 Long Term Plan.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.6          This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7          Immediate residents and stakeholders of the QEII site are specifically affected by both options due to the nature of the earth works on site.  Dust management is an ongoing challenge for this site however will be mitigated using irrigation systems.

6.8          The community wish to see the demolition site cleaned up and returned to use as a public area.

6.9          Feedback from the community demonstrates an ongoing frustration at the ACM remaining under temporary secure management.  They are asking for a decision on a permanent solution.

6.10       All the stakeholder groups currently working with the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board on future planning for QEII Park are aware of the issue.  To date their expectations have centred on a safe and secure management option.  The encapsulation of ACM in the bounded area around sports fields (option 1) has been included as a feature in site planning exercises.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.11       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.12       Cost of Implementation -$3,860,963.  It should be noted that this includes a 25% contingency and may be delivered for as low as $3,204,713 if the contingency is not required.  The cost breakdown is circulated separately to this report.  This is solely to ensure Council gets best value from any competitive tender procurement process.  The cost breakdown includes provision to reinstate grass sports fields and other landscaping and associated infrastructure on site.

6.13       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Undisturbed buried material has no additional ongoing management or cost. Maintenance of sports fields is within the QEII site maintenance budget.

6.14       Funding source - Council has set aside $1,966,277 from the Building and Infrastructure Allowance.  The balance of the funds needed will come from the Capital Governance Pool.  This will be a maximum of $1,894,686.

6.15       Officers will take all steps to reduce the cost including focusing the detailed design to solely provide safe and secure ACM management and return the land to basic grassed sports fields.

6.16       The shortfall exists because Council set its budget forecast based on specific information from CERA on the cost of managing the ACM provided in April 2014.  CERA provided this information based on the market and industry capability at the time. Since this time Council commissioned BECA to provide a current detailed cost estimate and contingency. The cost is considerably more.

Legal Implications

6.17       No legal implications.

Risks and Mitigations

6.18       Undisturbed buried asbestos whether it is undiscovered or contained in a bounded area does not cause any harm. There are many such areas in Christchurch.  Dr Alistair Humphrey, Canterbury Medical Officer of Health states that:

“Undisturbed asbestos in the ground does not cause any harm.  An issue only arises when asbestos becomes airborne, and I am comfortable that the Council and CERA have ensured that the asbestos remaining at QEII will be covered, never be disturbed and therefore safe.  Moreover, the site has been clearly identified so that if, for any unlikely reason, the ground is disturbed at some time in the future appropriate mitigating action can be taken.”

Implementation

6.19       Implementation dependencies - All works carried out on site within a contained area, reducing extensive site truck movements required to remove ACM material from site.

Implementation timeframe - Estimated work programme is 12 weeks compared to option 2 (18 weeks).

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.20       The advantages of this option include:

·      Encapsulation is a proven and safe treatment widely used to reduce the risk of transporting asbestos containing material and the prohibitive cost of transport and disposal at Kate Valley.

·      The residual risk is very limited given; the containment area is fenced at all times; access is controlled and supervised and further disturbance of the bounded area is not envisaged under any forward planning process.

·      The encapsulated ACM will form a raised spectator embankment surrounding an enclosed community sports field which will improve the spectator viewing, shelter and use of the field. Refer Attachment A and Attachment C to this report.

·      The estimated cost to encapsulate material on site is approximately $3,860,963 and is significantly lower than the cost to haul to an approved disposal site $9,054,713.

·      Encapsulation On-Site has a shorter timeframe of approximately 12 weeks compared to 18 weeks to haul ACM to an approved disposal site.

6.21       The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Encapsulation will postpone future costs of handling or removing the material if the area is to be redeveloped in the future.

·      Ongoing environmental management plan needed to manage risk.  (This is the case for both Options provided in this report.)

·      Asbestos containing material being contained does not mean that the site is completely clean and clear. The site will remain classified on the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL).

7.       Option 2 - Haul to Kate Valley

Option Description

7.1          This option allows for the loading and transport of between 16,000 and 22,000 tonnes of asbestos containing material to an accredited facility (such as Kate Valley) for disposal.

7.2          This is approximately 750 truckloads (truck and trailer 15m3) using approved hazardous material handling methods.

Significance

7.3          The level of significance of this option is high which differs from section 2 of this report due to option 2 not being the recommend option. A significance assessment recognises a high level of ratepayer discomfort with Option 2 being a significantly higher cost to achieve essentially the same safe clean-up of the site. Engagement requirements for this level of significance are not greater than option one.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4          This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5          Residents and stakeholders of the QEII site are specifically affected by both options due to the nature of the earth works on site.  Dust management is an ongoing challenge for this site however will be mitigated using irrigation systems.

7.6          Extensive truck movements transporting contaminated material will add to existing congestion on roads.  If the effects of the truck movements and the high cost were not a factor in decision making it is anticipated that the community would prefer removal of the ACM from site.

7.7          The Community wish to see the demolition site be cleaned up and returned to use as a public area.

7.8          Feedback from the community demonstrates an ongoing frustration at the ACM remaining under temporary secure management.  They are asking for a decision on a permanent solution.

7.9          All the stakeholder groups currently working with the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board on future planning for QEII Park are aware of the issue.  To date their expectations have centred on a safe and secure management option.  The encapsulation of ACM in the bounded area around sports fields (option 1) has been included as a feature on site planning exercises.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.10       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

7.10.1 Inconsistency - The option of removing ACM from the QEII site does not represent best value to the community.

7.10.2 Reason for inconsistency - The option to encapsulate the material is significantly lower cost, effectively manages risk and provides the same level of service to the Community.

Financial Implications

7.11       Cost of Implementation - $9,054,713. It should be noted that this includes a 25% contingency and maybe delivered for as low as $7,349,713 if the contingency is not required.  The cost breakdown is circulated separately to this report as Attachment D and is public excluded.  This is solely to ensure Council gets best value from any competitive tender procurement process.  The cost breakdown in Attachment D includes provision to reinstate grass sports fields and other landscaping and associated infrastructure on site.

7.12       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - No additional ongoing management or cost. Maintenance of the site is within existing OPEX budgets for the QEII site.

7.13       Funding source - Council has set aside $1,966,277 from the Building and Infrastructure Allowance.  If Council were to apply the Building and Infrastructure Allowance to the project there would be a shortfall of $7,088,436.  Should this option be supported additional funds will have to be borrowed.

Legal Implications

7.14       No legal implications.

Risks and Mitigations

7.15       Removing ACM material from site involves extensive truck movements approximately 750 truckloads (truck and trailer 15m3), and minor risks of further contamination exist. Safe handling procedures would be implemented to lower the risk and impact transport routes and adjacent properties.

Implementation

7.16       Implementation dependencies - Works carried out on site are within a contained area and include transport of material by heavy truck and trailer units to remove ACM material from site.

7.17       Implementation timeframe - estimated work programme is 18 weeks compared to option 1 (12 weeks)

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.18       The advantages of this option include:

·      Removal of material is a proven and safe method, however is less widely used due to cost and risks associated with transporting asbestos containing material.

·      When complete the area will be left flat grassed and be available as community sports field

7.19       The disadvantages of this option include:

·      Major, extensive truck movements approximately 750 truckloads (truck and trailer 15m3) with asbestos containing material being hauled between QEII and Kate Valley. This will impact transport routes and adjacent properties.

·      Asbestos containing material being removed does not mean that the site is completely clean and clear. The site will remain classified on the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL). As a HAIL site a compliant environmental management plan and ongoing testing may be required to support future developments and manage risk.

·      The estimated cost to encapsulate material on site cost is approximately $3,860,963 and is significantly lower than the cost to haul to an approved disposal site $9,054,713 a difference of $5,193,750.

·      There is no identified funding source within existing budget sufficient to cover the cost of option 2 the funding shortfall will have to be borrowed.

·      Encapsulation On-Site has a shorter timeframe of approximately 12 weeks compared to 18 weeks to haul ACM to an approved disposal site.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a 

Proposed Site Plan

 

b 

Letter to residents - QEII Asbestos update - 10 December 2013

 

c 

Safe Encapsulation Options BECA Report (Redacted)

 

d 

Safe Encapsulation Options

 

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)      sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)    adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

John Filsell

Unit Manager - Recreation & Sports

Approved By

John Filsell

Jason Rivett

Darren Moses

Jane Parfitt

Unit Manager - Recreation & Sports

Finance Manager

Unit Manager - Community Facilities Rebuild

Director Chief Operations Officer

 


Council

28 January 2016

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

PDF Creator


Council

28 January 2016

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Attachment 5: Safe Encapsulation Options

 

untitled

 

Note: These sketches show the principles associated with encapsulating ACM, not exactly what the bund at QEII would look like. Encapsulation bunds would be designed using industry standard criteria and be constructed to be useable as raised spectator seating along side the number 2 playing field.

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

14     Audit and Risk Management Committee Minutes - 24 November 2015

Reference:

15/1488666

Contact:

Margaret Henderson

Margaret.henderson@ccc.govt.nz

941 8185

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Audit and Risk Management Committee held a meeting on 24 November 2015 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Council for adoption.

 

2.   Recommendation to Council

That the Council receive the Minutes from the Audit and Risk Management Committee meeting held 24 November 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Minutes Audit and Risk Management Committee - 24 November 2015

152

 

 

Signatories

Author

Margaret Henderson

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Audit and Risk Management Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 24 November 2015

Time:                                    1.00pm

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Civic Offices, Level 2,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sue Sheldon

Councillor Raf Manji

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor David East

Mr. Mark Russell

Mr. Michael Rondel

 

 

24 November 2015

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Peter  Gudsell

Chief Financial Officer

Tel: 941 8528

 

Margaret Henderson

Committee Advisor

941 8185

margaret.henderson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

1.                                      

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Apologies

 

Committee Resolved ARCM/2015/00001

It was resolved on the motion of Chairperson Sheldon, seconded by Councillor Chen that the apologies for absence from Councillor Buck and Mr Russell and that the apology from Councillor East for lateness be accepted.

Chairperson Sheldon/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                  Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

There were no minutes for confirmation.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no Deputations by Appointment. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no Presentation of Petitions.     

 

6.   Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Committee Resolved ARCM/2015/00002

Part C

The Committee resolved:

That Julian Tan of Audit New Zealand, remain after the public have been excluded for Items 7, 8 and 9 of the public excluded agenda as he has knowledge that is relevant and will assist the Committee.

That the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 7 and 8 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Manji/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                        Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 2.21pm.

The Committee expressed its thanks to Hugh Jory for his work as an auditor for Audit New Zealand on Christchurch Council work.

   

Meeting concluded at 2.21pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016

 

SUE SHELDON

CHAIRPERSON


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

15     Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee Minutes - 3 December 2015

Reference:

15/1560152

Contact:

Liz Ryley

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

941 8153

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee held a meeting on 3 December 2015 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Council for their information.

 

2.   Recommendation to Council

That the Council receives the Minutes from the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee meeting held 3 December 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Minutes Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee - 3 December 2015

156

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 3 December 2015

Time:                                    1.08pm

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Andrew Turner

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

 

 

2 December 2015

 

 

Principal Advisor

Mary Richardson

Director Community & Democracy Services

Tel: 941 8999

Principal Advisor

Jane Parfitt

Chief Operating Officer

Tel: 941 8607

 

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

941 8153

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

1)                                     

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

       Apologies

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00001

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Livingstone, seconded by Councillor Turner that an apology for absence from Councillor Scandrett be accepted.

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor Turner                                                                                                             Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Nil.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

 

New Brighton Sustainable Coastal Village Project - Pauline Wayman and Bev Shepherd

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00002

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Turner, seconded by Councillor Livingstone that the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee request staff to work with the New Brighton Sustainable Coastal Village Project with a view to progressing the project, including consideration of possibilities presented by Development Christchurch Limited or Regenerate Christchurch, and a report on ownership and the future use of the land identified, and report back to the Committee as soon as possible.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                             Carried

 

 

 

 

Redcliffs Library - Sara Templeton, Hagley-Ferrymead Community Board on support to rebuild the voluntary library only for the community, not a combined meeting facility.  No action resulted from this deputation.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no Presentation of Petitions.    

6.   Community Facilities Rebuild Update November 2015

 

Committee Comment

1)         Staff will circulate to Councillors six pages that were missing from the printed agenda.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00003

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

7.   Major Facilities Rebuild Monthly Update

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee requested a memorandum from staff confirming the content of the original Council resolution on the land purchased adjacent to the Art Gallery, proposed next steps and timeline.

2)         The Committee acknowledged the invaluable amount of work carried out by Alistair McGuffie.

 

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00004

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

 

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

8.   Anchor Projects CHED Report 3 December 2015

 

Committee Comment

1)         Staff will arrange for Councillors to view the progress of the Town Hall.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00005

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

9.   Housing Operations Monthly Report for October 2015

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee considered the report on the Housing Operations for October 2015.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information reported.

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00006

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee:

1.         Receive the information reported.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

10. Social Housing Rebuild and Repair Programme Update (October2015) Report for the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee 2015-12-03

 

Committee Comment

The Committee considered the report on the Social Housing Rebuild and Repair Programme for October 2015.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee

1.         Receive the information supplied.

 

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00007

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee

1.         Receive the information supplied.

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

 11.   Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Committee Resolved CHED/2015/00008

Part C

That at 3.08pm the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 182 to 183 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Turner/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                             Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 4.31pm.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 4.31pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016

 

Councillor Andrew Turner

Chairperson


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

16     Regulation and Consents Committee Minutes - 19 November 2015

Reference:

15/1515880

Contact:

Liz Ryley

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

941 8153

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Regulation and Consents Committee held a meeting on 19 November 2015 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Council for their information.

 

2.   Recommendation to Council

That the Council receives the Minutes from the Regulation and Consents Committee meeting held 19 November 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Minutes Regulation and Consents Committee - 19 November 2015

164

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Regulation and Consents Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 19 November 2015

Time:                                    9.00am

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor David East

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

 

 

19 November 2015

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Peter Sparrow

Director Building Control & City Rebuild

Tel: 941 8462

 

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

941 8153

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

1)                                     

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Apologies

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00001

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Scandrett, seconded by Councillor Livingstone that the apology from Councillors Lonsdale and Jones be accepted.

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                       Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Nil.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no Deputations by Appointment.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

             There were no petitions presented to the meeting.

 

6.   Review of the Dog Control Policy and Dog Control Bylaw

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Summary document of the Dog Control Policy and Dog Control Bylaw was noted by the Committee.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

1.         Receives this report and its attachments; and

That the Regulation and Consents Committee recommends that the Council:

2.         Resolves to replace the Dog Control Bylaw 2008 and the Dog Control Policy 2008 with a proposed new dog control bylaw and policy as a result of the review, and through this consultation process; and

3.         Resolves that the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 meets the requirements of section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, in that:

a.         a bylaw is the most appropriate way of addressing the perceived problems; and

b.         the proposed bylaw (subject to the outcome of the consultation process), is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and that

c.         the proposed bylaw does not give rise to any implications under, and is not inconsistent with, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

4.         Resolves that the proposed Dog Control Policy 2016 meets the requirements of section 10 of the Dog Control Act; and

5.         Resolves to undertake the Special Consultative Procedure in relation to the proposed new bylaw and policy, as set out in sections 83 and 86 of the Local Government Act 2002, and in accordance with the requirements of section 10(1) and 20(1) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

6.         Resolves to adopt the Statement of Proposal, which includes the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 and the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Policy 2016; and

7.         Resolves to give notice of the draft policy to every person who is a registered dog owner, in accordance with section 10(2) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

8.         Resolves that the consultation period be from 1 February 2016 to 1 March 2016; and

9.         Resolves that a hearings panel be appointed to hear submissions in April 2016, deliberate on those submissions and to report back to the Council on the final form of the bylaw and policy in May 2016; and

10.       Note that there will be some as yet unknown signage costs associated with implementing the proposed new policy and bylaw, if adopted; and

11.       Note that the proposed new Dog Control Policy includes an updated version of the Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy (adopted by Council on 24 September 1997), which will require the revocation of the 1997 Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy if the new Dog Control Policy is adopted.

 

 

 

Committee Decided RCCM/2015/00002

Part A

That the Council:

1.         Receives this report and its attachments; and

2.         Resolves to replace the Dog Control Bylaw 2008 and the Dog Control Policy 2008 with a proposed new dog control bylaw and policy as a result of the review, and through this consultation process; and

3.         Resolves that the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 meets the requirements of section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, in that:

a.         a bylaw is the most appropriate way of addressing the perceived problems; and

b.         the proposed bylaw (subject to the outcome of the consultation process), is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and that

c.         the proposed bylaw does not give rise to any implications under, and is not inconsistent with, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

4.         Resolves that the proposed Dog Control Policy 2016 meets the requirements of section 10 of the Dog Control Act; and

5.         Resolves to undertake the Special Consultative Procedure in relation to the proposed new bylaw and policy, as set out in sections 83 and 86 of the Local Government Act 2002, and in accordance with the requirements of section 10(1) and 20(1) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

6.         Resolves to adopt the Statement of Proposal, which includes the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016 and the proposed Christchurch City Council Dog Control Policy 2016; and

7.         Resolves to give notice of the draft policy to every person who is a registered dog owner, in accordance with section 10(2) of the Dog Control Act 1996; and

8.         Resolves that the consultation period be from 1 February 2016 to 1 March 2016; and

9.         Resolves that a hearings panel be appointed to hear submissions in April 2016, deliberate on those submissions and to report back to the Council on the final form of the bylaw and policy in May 2016; and

10.       Note that there will be some as yet unknown signage costs associated with implementing the proposed new policy and bylaw, if adopted; and

11.       Note that the proposed new Dog Control Policy includes an updated version of the Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy (adopted by Council on 24 September 1997), which will require the revocation of the 1997 Responsible Dog Owner Status Policy if the new Dog Control Policy is adopted.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                       Carried

 

Councillor Livingstone left the meeting at 9.55am and returned at 10.02am.  The meeting was adjourned during this time due to a lack of quorum.

 

7.   Update of the Building Control and City Rebuild Group

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee note the content of this report.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00003

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part B

That the Regulation and Consents Committee note the content of this report.

 

Councillor Livingstone/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

8.   Resource Consents Monthly Report - October 2015

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee noted the good statistic that there were no requests for further information made for 55% of applications.

 

Staff Recommendation

1.         That the information in this report be received.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00004

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part B

1.         That the information in this report be received.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Livingstone                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

9.   Regulatory Compliance Activity

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the Regulatory Compliance Activity report.

2.         Recommends to Council that Council approach Government to review the Amusement Devices Regulations to assist the Council Regulatory Compliance Unit in dealing with issues surrounding amusement devices in the City.

 

 

 

Committee Decided RCCM/2015/00005

Part A

That the Council:

1.        Receive the information in the Regulatory Compliance Activity report.

 

2.        Approach Government to review the Amusement Devices Regulations to assist the Council Regulatory Compliance Unit in dealing with issues surrounding amusement devices in the City.

Councillor East/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

 

 

Meeting concluded at 10.50AM.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015.

 

Councillor David East

Chairperson


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

17     Regulation and Consents Committee Minutes - 17 December 2015

Reference:

15/1540809

Contact:

Liz Ryley

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

941 8153

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Regulation and Consents Committee held a meeting on 17 December 2015 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Council for their information.

 

2.   Recommendation to Council

That the Council receives the Minutes from the Regulation and Consents Committee meeting held 17 December 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Minutes Regulation and Consents Committee - 17 December 2015

172

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Regulation and Consents Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 17 December 2015

Time:                                    9.00am

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor David East

Councillor Tim Scandrett

Councillor Ali Jones

Councillor Glenn Livingstone

Councillor Paul Lonsdale

 

 

16 December 2015

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

Peter Sparrow

Director Building Control & City Rebuild

Tel: 941 8462

 

Liz Ryley

Committee Advisor

941 8153

liz.ryley@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

1)                                     

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Apologies

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00006

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Scandrett, seconded by Councillor Jones that the apology for absence from Cr Livingstone be accepted.

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                  Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

There were no minutes to confirm.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no Deputations by Appointment.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no Presentation of Petitions.    

 

6.   Mayoral Quality Regulation Review Taskforce Chairperson's Report

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee considered the Mayoral Quality Regulation Review Taskforce Chairperson's Report.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

1.         Receive the Rules Reduction Taskforce Report presentation.

2.         Recommend a report to the next Regulation and Consents Committee that the Chief Executive Officer undertakes a review of the Policy Register to review and identify out of date, duplicate or inconsistent policies and report back.

3.         Engage with Local Government New Zealand to identify opportunities to work with the Department of Internal Affairs and other government agencies in response to the Rules Reduction Taskforce Report.

4.         Receive the report and make it available to the next Regulation and Consents meeting as an update.

5.         Requests a review of the Artworks in Public Places Policy and any related policies to consider better integration of policies relating to the placement of arts or memorials in public spaces.

6.         Identify the policies that sit under the Public Places Bylaw that may be updated or may require updating by Council resolution.

7.         Identify internal processes and procedures which can be improved.

8.         Take a report to the Regulations and Consents Committee with recommendations for Council to consider.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00007

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

 

1.    Receive the Rules Reduction Taskforce Report presentation.

 

2.    Engage with Local Government New Zealand to identify opportunities to work with the Department of Internal Affairs and other government agencies in response to the Rules Reduction Taskforce Report.

 

3.    Receive the Great for Christchurch update.

 

4.    Request that the Mayoral Quality Regulation Review Taskforce action reports on the following in early 2016 in order to make recommendations to the Regulation and Consents Committee meeting, on:-

 

·       a review of the Policy Register to identify out of date, duplicate or inconsistent policies;

·       a review of the Artworks in Public Places Policy and any related policies to consider better integration of policies relating to the placement of arts or memorials in public spaces;

·       identification of policies under the Public Places Bylaw that may be updated or may require updating by Council resolution;

·       identify internal processes and procedures which can be improved in line with the work being undertaken through Great for Christchurch and the Customer, Community and Operating Model enabled by IT (CCOMIT) Programme.

Councillor Lonsdale/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

 

7.   Update of the Building Control and City Rebuild Group

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee acknowledged the work carried out by Jenny Harper, Art Gallery Director, and staff on the opening of the Art Gallery.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee note the content of this report.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00008

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Regulation and Consents Committee note the content of this report.

 

Councillor Jones/Councillor Scandrett                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

 

8.   Resource Consents Monthly Report - November 2015

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee acknowledged the work that staff had carried out in relation to Kaizuka Limited.

 

Staff Recommendation

1.         That the information in this report be received.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00009

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

1.         That the information in this report be received.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Jones                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

 

9.   Council Policy for Notification of Resource Consent Applications

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee considered the report on Council Policy for Notification of Resource Consent Applications.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

1.         Receive this report.

 

 

Committee Resolved RCCM/2015/00010

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part C

That the Regulation and Consents Committee:

1.         Receive this report.

 

Councillor Scandrett/Councillor Lonsdale                                                                                                            Carried

 

 

Committee Recommendation to Council/Committee

Part A

There were no Part A recommendations to Council from this report.

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 10.20am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016

 

Councillor David East

Chairperson


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

18     Strategy and Finance Committee Minutes - 19 November 2015

Reference:

15/1488294

Contact:

Margaret Henderson

Margaret.henderson@ccc.govt.nz

941 8185

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Strategy and Finance Committee held a meeting on 19 November 2015 and is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Council for information.

 

The following item was presented to the Council at its meeting on 26 November 2015:

·        Item 8            Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Development Christchurch Ltd Statement of                         Intent.

 

The following items were presented to the Council at its meeting on 10 December 2015:

·        Item 6            Residential Land Availability Report

·        Item 7            Lease Policy for the Creation of New Leases and Extension Requests Prior to Expiry

 

·        Item 9            Christchurch City Holdings Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2015

·        Item 10          2015 Annual Reports for Council Controlled Organisations: Vbase Limited, Civic Building Limited, Tuam Limited, Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust, The World Buskers' Festival Trust, Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust, Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited and New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited

·        Item 11          Debt Write Off Global Developments 511 Madras Street Limited

·        Item 12          Performance Report for the Three Months to 30 September 2015

·        Item 14          Corporate Finance Report for the period ending 30 September 2015.

 

 

 

2.   Recommendation to Council

That the Council receive the Minutes from the Strategy and Finance Committee meeting held 19 November 2015.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

A

Minutes Strategy and Finance Committee - 19 November 2015

178

 

 

Signatories

Author

Margaret Henderson

Committee Advisor

  


Council

28 January 2016

 

 

 

Strategy and Finance Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Thursday 19 November 2015

Time:                                    1.00pm

Venue:                                 Committee Room 1, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Raf Manji

Mayor Lianne Dalziel

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck

Councillor Jimmy Chen

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Jamie Gough

Councillor Yani Johanson

Councillor Andrew Turner

 

 

19 November 2015

 

 

Principal Advisor

Mike Theelen

Chief Planning Officer

Tel: 941 8281

Principal Advisor

Peter  Gudsell

Chief Financial Officer

Tel: 941 8528

 

Margaret Henderson

Committee Advisor

941 8185

margaret.henderson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Council

28 January 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

1)                                     

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

·    Councillors Vicki Buck, Jamie Gough Raf Manji and Yani Johanson declared an interest in the Christchurch City Holdings Limited section of Clause 10;

·    Councillor Gough declared an interest in the Civic Building Limited and the Vbase Limited sections of Clause 10;

·    Councillor Turner declared an interest in the Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust and the Christchurch Development Corporation sections of Clause 10;

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

There are no previous Minutes to confirm.

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no Deputations by Appointment. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

5.1     Petition

·    At its meeting on 15 October 2015, the Council received a petition, from Gen De Spa representing It's Our Future - Christchurch, against the Trans Pacific Partnership. The Council requested that this be sent to either the Strategy and Finance Committee or the Communities, Housing and Economic Development Committee for consideration.

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00001

Part B

The Strategy and Finance Committee decided to:

1.         Receive the petition.

2.         Let the petition lie on the table and requested that staff report back with an analysis on the report generated by the Local Government Association on the implications of the Trans Pacific Partnership when the Local Government Association report is available.

Mayor Dalziel/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                                     Carried

   

6.   Residential Land Availability Report

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee:

1.         Recommend the information in this report to be received.

2.         That the update reports be submitted half yearly rather than quarterly.

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00002

Part A

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that Council:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

2.         Approve that the update reports be submitted half yearly rather than quarterly.

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

7.   Lease policy for the creation of new leases and extension requests prior to expiry

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee requested that staff provide wording around investment into the business under 2.5 of the draft lease policy document.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that the Council:

a.         Adopt the attached operational Lease Policy.

b.         Delegate authority to the Property Consultancy Manager to implement the policy and in doing so make any decisions he considers necessary at his sole discretion.

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00003

Part A

That the Committee recommend that the Council:

a.         Adopt the attached operational Lease Policy with the recommended wording changes made.

b.         Delegate authority to the Property Consultancy Manager to implement the policy and in doing so make any decisions he considers necessary at his sole discretion.

c.         Staff prepare advice on the weightings and Community Board notifications and current delegations.

 

 

Councillor Gough/Turner                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

(Note: Cr Johanson requested that his vote against items a. and b. above be recorded.)

 

8.   Christchurch City Holdings Ltd - Development Christchurch Ltd Statement of Intent

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee requested that staff amend the Statement of Intent as discussed so that it can be considered.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee:

2.1          Receive the information in the report of the Chief Executive of Christchurch City Holdings                        Ltd; and

2.2          That Council provide feedback on the proposed Statement of Intent for Development                   Christchurch Limited.

 

 

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00004

Part A

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that Council:

2.1          Receive the information in the report of the Chief Executive of Christchurch City Holdings                        Ltd; with recommended word changes; and

2.2          Provide feedback on the proposed Statement of Intent for Development                             Christchurch Limited;

2.3          Approve the revised Statement of Intent and ask Development Christchurch Limited to move ahead and urgently report to Council on the New Brighton Implementation Plan, Peterborough Quarter land; and Lichfield Street car park.

Mayor/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

Mayor Dalziel left the meeting at 2:55 pm.

 

9.   Christchurch City Holdings Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2015

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee :

1.         Recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Christchurch City Holdings Limited.

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00005

Part A

That the Committee:

1.        Recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Christchurch City Holdings Limited.

Councillor Turner/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

10. 2015 Annual Reports for Council Controlled Organisations: Vbase Limited, Civic Building Limited, Tuam Limited, Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust, The World Buskers' Festival Trust, Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust, Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited and New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited

 

Committee Comment

1)         The Committee requested Canterbury Development Corporation to attend either the Strategy and Finance Committee December 2015 meeting or the first meeting of 2016 to update the Committee on its assets and what to do with them.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee:

1.         Recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Reports of

a.         Vbase Limited (Attachment A)

b.         Civic Building Limited (Attachment B)

c.         Tuam Limited (Attachment C)

d.         Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust (Attachment D)

e.         The World buskers' Festival Trust (Attachment E)

f.          Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust and its Annual Review (Attachment F and G)

g.         Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited (Attachment H)

h.         New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited (Attachment I)

 

 

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00006

Part A

That the Committee recommend to the Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Vbase Limited (Attachment A)

Councillor Chen/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00007

Part A

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Civic Building Limited (Attachment B).

Councillor Chen/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00008

Part A

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Tuam Limited (Attachment C).

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00009

Part A

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Christchurch Agency for Energy Trust (Attachment D).

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                              Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00010

PART A

 

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of The World Buskers' Festival Trust (Attachment E)

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00011

PART A

 

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Rod Donald Banks Peninsula Trust and its Annual Review (Attachment F and G)

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00012

PART A

 

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of Canterbury Development Corporation Holdings Limited (Attachment H)

 

Councillor Manji/Councillor Chen                                                                                                                           Carried

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00013

PART A

 

That the Committee recommend to Council that it receive the 2015 Annual Report of New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited (Attachment I)

Councillor Turner/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

11. Debt Write Off Global Developments 511 Madras Street Limited

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee :

1.         Write off the debt of $19,946.09 plus GST, owed by Global Developments.

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00014

Part A

That the Committee recommend that the Council :

1.         Write off the debt of $19,946.09 plus GST, owed by Global Developments.

 

Councillor Gough/Councillor Turner                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

12. Performance Report for the three months to 30 September 2015

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that Council receive the report.

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00015

Part A

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend that Council receive the report.

 

Councillor Chen/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                         Carried

 

13. Earthquake Claims Update as at 30 September 2015

 

Staff Recommendation

That the information in this report be received.

 

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00016

Committee Decisions under Delegation

Part B

That the information in this report be received.

 

Councillor Turner/Councillor Gough                                                                                                                      Carried

 

 

14. Corporate Finance Report for the period ending 30 September 2015

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Strategy and Finance Committee:

1.         Recommend to Council that it receive this report

 

 

 

Committee Decided SFCM/2015/00017

Part A

That the Strategy and Finance Committee recommend to Council that it receive this report

 

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Gough                                                                                                              Carried

 

 

15. Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Committee Resolved SFCM/2015/00018

Part C

The resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 520 to 525 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Clearwater/Councillor Gough                                                                                                              Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 4.35pm.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 4.35pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016

 

The Mayor


Council

28 January 2016