Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 9 March 2018

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

6 March 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       7.       Colombo Street Parking Restriction Proposal.............................................................. 4

C       8.       Harewood Road No Stopping Proposal......................................................................... 4

C       9.       McFaddens Road No Stopping Proposal....................................................................... 4

C       10.     Perry Street No Stopping Proposal............................................................................... 4

C       11.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund - Shirley Boys' High School - Mostafa Rajabi............................... 4

B       12.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - February 2018................................. 4

B       13.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange...................................................................... 4 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 23 February 2018  be confirmed (refer page 4).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

 

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 23 February 2018

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

20 February 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Lane

Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

941 5213

christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

 

1.   Apologies

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00006

It was resolved that the apology for lateness from John Stringer be accepted.

Emma Norrish/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00007

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 9 February 2018 be confirmed.

Mike Davidson/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                          Carried

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

5.1       The Rutland Street Reserve – David Brown

David Brown spoke to the Board about the condition of the Rutland Street Reserve in support of his correspondence (refer item 7.2 of these minutes). Post-earthquake the land dropped and two springs appeared near the boundary drain. Trenches were dug to facilitate a direct flow from the springs to the drain which remediated the problem for a time.

However in wet weather this area of the reserve becomes saturated delaying grounds maintenance and mowing and causes a hazard.  Given the proximity of the children’s playground and neighbouring schools concerns were expressed about community safety.

 

John Stringer entered the meeting at 9:05am.

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.  

 

7.   Correspondence

 

7.1     Positive Youth Development Report – Kirah Willems

A written report was received from Kirah Willems regarding her participation as part of the  Canterbury Yachting Association’s team at the Australian National and World 420 Sailing Championships held in Perth from 14 December 2017 to 4 January 2018.

 

7.2     The Rutland Street Reserve – David Brown

Letter from David Brown regarding the condition of the Rutland Street Reserve.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00008

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 23 February 2018.

Emma Norrish/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                               Carried

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00009

Part B

2.         Request that the water logging of the Rutland Street Reserve and maintenance issues, as raised in the correspondence from David Brown, be referred to the Land Drainage Recovery Department and the Parks Maintenance Department respectively. Information was requested on the maintenance schedule for this reserve.

John Stringer/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                             Carried

 

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.1       John Allen – Cranford Street

Mr Allen spoke to the Board regarding the roading changes to Cranford Street and the effect that these have had on the residents with particular reference to property access.

The Papanui-Innes Community Board requested that any relevant Safety Audit Report related to Cranford Street be made available to Mr Allen.

 

 

8.   Papanui Bush at Bridgestone Reserve

Board Comment

Dennis McMurtree, Chairperson of the Papanui Rotary Club, was in attendance and confirmed that the Rotary Club wish to contribute to this planting programme. Papanui High School also wishes to be involved.

Initial funding for this project is available from the Three Waters Team for new stormwater developments.

The Landscape Architect also gave a brief report on the success of the ‘Summer in the Styx’ day and noted that 20 organisations had provided displays.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00010(original Staff Recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the attached report.

2.         Approve the implementation of the Stage-1 planting at the north and south ends of the Bridgestone Reserve.

John Stringer/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

9.   Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund - Matthew Philip Munro, Korfball New Zealand - Rosie Nixon and St Thomas of Canterbury College - Zavier Harema-Hughes

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00011(original Staff Recommendation adopted without change)

Part C

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve a grant of $300 from its 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund to Matthew Philip Munro towards the costs of participating in the Kiwi Caps India development tour from 16 to 28 April 2018.

2.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund to Korfball New Zealand towards Rosie Nixon’s costs at competing at the Korfball U17 World Cup in the Netherlands from 23 to 24 June 2018.

3.         Approve a grant of $150 from its 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund to St Thomas of Canterbury College towards Zavier Harema-Hughes’ costs to compete at the National 3x3 Schools Basketball Tournament in Tauranga from 20 to 24 March 2018.

Emma Norrish/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

John Stringer left the meeting at 9:54am. John Stringer returned to the meeting at 9:56am.

 

Mike Davidson left the meeting at 9:54am. Mike Davidson returned to the meeting at 9:56am.

 


10. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - February 2018

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2018/00012 (original Staff Recommendation adopted without change)

Part B

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Papanui-Innes Area Report for February 2018.

Jo Byrne/Emma Norrish                                                                                                                                           Carried

3.2.1 Environment Canterbury Long Term Plan

The Board noted that they could comment on the Council submission  and asked for information on the Council’s timeline for this.

3.3 Board Reporting

Newsline – Summer in the Styx event

Board Presentation to Council – Summer in the Styx event, Rutland Street Reserve

5.6 10 Shirley Road

The Board noted the need to ensure that funding for this project is in the Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP) and asked for a workshop to be held to discuss potential LTP items.

 

11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

 

11.1    Intersection of Westminster and Rutland Streets

The Board raised the issue of conflicting signage at the intersection of Westminster and Rutland Streets with two “No Right Turn” signs and one “Right turning traffic give way to cyclists” sign.

The Papanui-Innes Community Board requested that Traffic staff investigate the conflicting signage.

 

 

 

Meeting concluded at 10.18am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 9th DAY OF MARCH 2018.

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

   


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

7.        Colombo Street Parking Restriction Proposal

Reference:

18/166284

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of a P90 Parking Restriction on Colombo Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to a request from a resident to install a restriction to the parking space outside their frontage for clients accessing their business.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 90 minutes on the west side of Colombo Street commencing at a point 38 metres north of its intersection with Purchas Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of six metres. This restriction is to apply at any time.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - (Install a P90 parking restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing.

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     It provides an area for vehicle turnover for the business at #971 Colombo Street.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes an unrestricted parking space.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The owners of property #971 Colombo Street has been raising concerns regarding the unrestricted parking space adjacent to the front of their property. Currently the property owners maintain a business from this address called Casa Bella Beauty and Massage Salon.

5.2       During the recent Colombo Street cycle route and parking changes project the parking space outside this property was left unrestricted therefore vehicles have the ability to park there for any length of time. There is a P5 parking restriction south of this location and residents parking north of this location and although it is not Council’s responsibility to provide on street parking for businesses this proposal can be considered as the parking space to be restricted only affects the property owner’s frontage.

5.3       No further consultation has been carried out as this proposal does not affect any other business or residential frontage.

6.   Option 1 – Install P90 Parking Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a P90 Parking Restriction on Colombo Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       No further consultation has been carried out as this proposal does not affect any other business or residential frontage.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $300

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides an area for vehicle turnover parking for the business at #971 Colombo Street.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes an unrestricted parking space.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request to provide a parking turnover space to cater for the business at #971 Colombo Street.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   An unrestricted parking space is retained.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the request from the residents for vehicle turnover at this location.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Colombo Street Parking Restriction Diagram for Board Report

4

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

8.        Harewood Road No Stopping Proposal

Reference:

18/166532

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of No Stopping restrictions on Harewood Road and Sails Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from local residents experiencing sightline issues at this intersection.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Sails Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 22 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Sails Street commencing at its intersection with Harewood Road and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     By installing these restrictions it will provide a safer intersection where all road users will have sufficient sightlines.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes on street parking.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the operations of the Harewood Road/Sails Street intersection.  The intersection is an uncontrolled T-intersection with priority given to Harewood Road.

5.2       The issue is that this area can get heavily parked out mainly due to staff from the nearby Golden Age retirement Village and staff from the Aratupu Preschool which is located on the south side of Harewood Road opposite this intersection. After site investigations and sightline calculations were carried out, the proposal is to install No Stopping restrictions around the northwest side of the intersection. There are current restrictions in place on the southeast side of the intersection.

5.3       Consultation has been carried out with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions on Harewood Road and Sails Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Consultation has been carried out with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $180

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   It will provide a safer intersection with less congestion providing all road users can with sufficient sightlines.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes on street parking.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option does not address the request to improve safety at this location.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains on street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the request to improve safety at this location.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Harewood Road No Stopping Restrictions Diagram for Board Report

4

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

9.        McFaddens Road No Stopping Proposal

Reference:

18/166040

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of No Stopping areas on McFaddens Road and Redwood Place in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from Redwood Place residents.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of McFaddens Road commencing at its intersection with Redwood Place and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of McFaddens Road commencing at its intersection with Redwood Place and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

3.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Redwood place commencing at its intersection with McFaddens Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

4.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the northeast side of Redwood place commencing at its intersection with McFaddens Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres.

5.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Redwood place commencing at its intersection with McFaddens Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     By installing these restrictions it will provide a safer intersection where residents can obtain sufficient sightlines.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes on street parking.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been several recent concerns raised by members of the public regarding the operations of the McFaddens Road/Redwood Place intersection.  The intersection is an uncontrolled T-intersection with priority given to McFaddens Road.

5.2       This area can get heavily parked out due to numerous businesses at the east end of McFaddens Road and also various St Albans Baptist Church events on Redwood Place. After site investigations and sightline calculations were undertaken, the proposal is to install No Stopping restrictions around this intersection.

5.3       Consultation has been undertaken with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions on McFaddens Road and Redwood Place in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Consultation has been carried out with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $350

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   It will provide a safer intersection with less congestion where residents can obtain sufficient sightlines.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes on street parking.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option does not address the residents request to improve safety at this location.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains on street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the residents request to improve safety at this location.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

McFaddens Road No Stopping Restriction Diagram for Board Report

4

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

10.    Perry Street No Stopping Proposal

Reference:

18/166368

Presenter(s):

Wayne Anisy – Traffic Engineer

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the installation of No Stopping restrictions on Perry Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to resident concerns regarding vehicles parking over an on-road fire hydrant.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Perry Street commencing at a point 68 metres west of its intersection with Rayburn Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Enforcement actions will not be required by emergency services if the need arises to access this hydrant.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     On street parking is removed.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       There have been recent concerns raised by residents of Perry Street regarding vehicles parking over the fire hydrant situated between property #40 and #42. Residents were concerned that if there was a fire at one of their properties emergency services would not be able to access the hydrant.

5.2       After site investigations were carried out it was witnessed that on one occasion a vehicle had parked over the hydrant. The proposal is to install No Stopping restrictions either side of this hydrant so that access can be gained to the hydrant by emergency services without issues.

5.3       Consultation has been carried out with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping restrictions on Perry Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Consultation has been carried out with all affected parties and property owners and there were no objections to this proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $30

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Access to the fire hydrant can be gained on short notice without impediment.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   On Street parking is removed.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking and markings.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option does not address the request made by the residents at this location.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains on street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the resident concerns regarding access to the fire hydrant.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Perry Street No Stopping Restriction Diagram for Board Report

4

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Anisy - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

11.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund - Shirley Boys' High School - Mostafa Rajabi

Reference:

18/203871

Presenter(s):

Stacey Holbrough

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider applications received for the Board's 2017/18 Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $4,250 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated as a result of application being received.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $300 from its 2017/18 Positive Youth Development Fund to Shirley Boys’ High School towards Mostafa Rajabi to compete at the Futsal Schools National Tournament in Wellington from 20 March to 23 March 2018.

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Shirley Boys’ High School – Mostafa Rajabi

4.1       Shirley Boys’ High School are seeking funding to support Mostafa Rajabi to compete at the National Schools Futsal Tournament in Wellington from 20 March to 23 March 2018.

4.2       Mostafa is aged 17 years old and lives in the Innes Ward. Mostafa is a keen student and loves football and futsal.  Mostafa is an Afghanistan refugee and came to New Zealand in 2016.  Mostafa was selected to represent Shirley Boys’ High School in the Senior Boys Futsal Team. Mostafa’s future plans are to attend University and study engineering.

4.3       Mostafa wants to inspire and encourage other young Afghani people living in New Zealand to excel at school and participate in sports.

4.4       The benefits for the players attending this tournament include building confidence, improving skills in working as a team and experiencing a strong competitive environment.

4.5       Shirley Boys’ High School is contributing $200 towards the cost of the trip and Mostafa is earning funds through his part time job.

4.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Shirley Boys’ High School – Mostafa Rajabi:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares, van rental and accommodation

$600

Training

$55

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$655

 

4.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Stacey Holbrough - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

  


 

12.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report - February 2018

Reference:

18/193968

Presenter(s):

Christine Lane, Community Governance Manager

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

This report provides information on initiatives and issues current within the Papanui-Innes Community Board area, to provide the Board with a strategic overview and inform sound decision making.

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report for February           2018.

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Memos/Information/Advice to the Board

3.1.1   Information sent to the Board

·    LGNZ Conference registration information – to be held in Christchurch Sunday 15 July to Tuesday 17 July.

·    Memo from Acting Head of Parks re applications for the provision or use of funding to restore Council-owned heritage facilities – 16 February 2018

·    Memo from Acting Head of Parks re seminars to assist with prioritising heritage building projects in each community board area and noting no projects in Papanui-Innes – 22 February 2018.

·    Christchurch Northern Corridor – QEII Drive update and Grimseys Road intersection closure – 15 February 2018

·    Community Facilities and Heritage Programme – Update February 2018

3.1.2   Rutland Street Reserve

Subsequent to the Public Forum item at the Board meeting of 23 February regarding the condition of the Rutland Street Reserve an inspection has been carried out by staff. The unmaintained area is to be cut with a flail mower and the management of the stream will be discussed with the Land Drainage Team.

3.1.3   Conflicting signage on Westminster and Rutland Streets

This has been investigated and a temporary sign installed during the construction work at this intersection that conflicted with the permanent ‘No Right Turn’ signage has now been removed.

3.1.4   Edible Garden Awards

To date there are 43 entries in the Edible Garden Awards comprising entries from 27 residential units, 8 schools and 8 community gardens. The Awards will be presented at a function on Wednesday 21 March.

 

 

3.2       Board area Consultations/Engagement/Submission opportunities

3.2.1   Environment Canterbury Long Term Plan (LTP)

A Council submission is being prepared to the Ecan LTP and input has been requested from Community Boards. Board member have been invited to supply comments by Thursday 1 March and these have been collated and sent to the Strategic Policy Unit for consideration and inclusion in the draft submission that will be presented to Council on 22 March 2018.

There is an opportunity for the Board to make a deputation at the 22 March Council meeting should it wish.

3.3       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.3.1   A Board seminar was held on 7 March to discuss the Board submission to the Council’s Long Term Plan.

4.   Community Board Plan – Update against Outcomes

No update at this time.

5.   Significant Council Projects in the Board Area

5.1       Strengthening Community Fund Projects

5.1.1   Papanui-Innes Community Pride Garden Awards 2018

A verbal update will be given at the Board meeting regarding Tuesday night’s event.

5.1.2   Northcote Community Links

The Northcote Community Links are looking at options for programmes to support the Northcote area and to bring the community together on a weekly basis. Northcote School has been identified as the local hub that has the resources and space from which to base a programme. The Friday night sports programme for local children and youth has also recommenced on the Paddington Reserve. Te Ora Hou is running this programme in partnership with Community Links.

5.1.3   Belfast Residents Association

Belfast Residents’ Association are asking for information with reference to learning more about the history of the Belfast Museum, its exhibits and where they have been stored since they were removed from the Museum post-earthquake and how the Belfast Residents’ Association can actively work with the Council.

Local staff from both the Papanui‑Innes and Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood governance teams are working to support the Belfast Residents’ Association around this project.

5.2       Other partnerships with the community and organisations

5.2.1   Papanui Bush Bridgestone Reserve

Local staff are working to co-ordinate volunteers for a planting day. It is planned that this will be a group of volunteers from the local community organisations, schools, businesses and residents of the Papanui area.

5.3       Community Facilities (updates and future plans)

5.3.1   MacFarlane Park

The official building blessing will take place today at MacFarlane Park. Staff will continue to liaise with all parties involved in the build and management of the MacFarlane Facility and keep the Papanui-Innes Community Board up to date on progress.

5.3.2   St Albans Community Centre

No update at this point.

5.3.3   Redwood Plunket Rooms

The Papanui-Innes Community Board will receive an update on this project at the Board meeting on 23 March 2018.

5.3.4   St Albans Park and Pavilion

St Albans Park – Base works on the cricket blocks is underway plus work on the main line for the irrigation. Work on irrigation will continue.

Wet weather is causing small delays to work and the high water table is requiring extra gravel fill in the trenches to support the pipe. Extra costs are associated with this.

St Albans Pavilion – A sign board to inform the public of future works has been installed on the temporary fencing around the old pavilion site. The site has been excavated in preparation for the installation of the piles.

 

 

5.3.5   280 Westminster Street

The local staff and Neighbourhood Trust have completed a walkthrough of the facility and staff are awaiting the detailed report on the repairs needed to this facility before making a decision on the next steps.

5.4       Infrastructure projects underway

5.4.1   Shirley Road Bus Stop

Shirley Intermediate School have confirmed that they have no safety issues with the relocated bus stop. A report will be brought to this Board at a future date for its decision.

5.4.2   New Brighton Bus Stop

This is located within the Coastal-Burwood Community Board area. A revised design has been presented to the Mall and discussions are ongoing. Any subsequent report will be presented to the Coastal-Burwood Community Board for its decision.

6.   Significant Community Issues, Events and Projects in the Board Area

6.1       St Albans Preschool

St Albans Preschool has temporarily moved from their Thames Street site while their building is being repaired. They are operating from 102 Champion Street for the next six months.  

6.2       Styx Working Party Meeting

The minutes from the meeting held on Wednesday 21 February have been circulated.

6.3       Events Report Back

6.3.1   Children’s Day

A verbal report will be presented.

 

6.3.2   Community Waterways Workshop

This was held on 1 March 2017 and attended by representatives of the Papanui-Innes Community Board. A verbal report will be presented.

7.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

The next update is expected in April.

8.   Community Board Funding Update

8.1       Papanui-Innes Community Board Discretionary Response and Positive Youth Development Funds balance sheet (refer Attachment A).

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board DRF and PYDF Balance Sheet 2017-18.xls

4

 

Signatories

Authors

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Christine Lane - Manager Community Governance, Papanui-Innes

Approved By

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

PDF Creator 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 March 2018

 

 

13.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.