Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Monday 12 February 2018

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Mike Davidson

Councillor Vicki Buck

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Anne Galloway

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Sara Templeton

 

 

7 February 2018

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

David Adamson

General Manager City Services

Tel: 941 8235

 

Samantha Kelly

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee - Terms of Reference

 

 

Chair

Councillor Cotter

Membership

Councillor Davidson (Deputy Chair), Councillor Buck, Councillor Clearwater, Councillor Galloway, Councillor Keown, Councillor Templeton

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies) is odd.

Meeting Cycle

Monthly

Reports To

Council

 

 

Responsibilities

The focus of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee is the governance of roading and transport, three waters, waste management, and natural hazards protection.

 

The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

·         Encourages opportunities for citizenship, community participation and community partnerships

·         Works in partnerships with key agencies, groups and organisations

·         Encourages innovative approaches and sustainable solutions

 

The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committte considers and reports to Council on issues and activites relating to:

·         Water supply, conservation and quality

·         Stormwater drainage including the Land Drainage Recovery Programme

·         Natural environment, including the waterways, aquifers, ecology and conservation of resources

·         Natural hazards protection, including flood protection and river control

·         Solid waste minimisation and disposals

·         Sewage collection, treatment and disposal

·         Roads, footpaths and streetscapes

·         Transport including road operations, parking, public transport, cycle ways, harbours and marine structures consistent with Greater Christchurch Public Transport Joint Committee Terms of Reference.

 

Delegations

 

The Committee delegates to the following working group the responsibility to consider and report back to the Committee:

·         Land Drainage Working Group matters relating to the Land Drainage Recovery Programme, including opportunities for betterment.

 

Major Cycleway Route (MCR) Programme

 

At the Council meeting of 9 March 2017:

 

It was resolved that the Council:

 

1.         Delegates to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee the authority to make all decisions in connection with the Major Cycleway Routes (MCR) programme, including final route selections and anything precedent to the exercise by the Council of its power to acquire any property, subject to:

a.         The Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee and affected Community Boards being briefed prior to any public consultation commencing on any Major Cycleway Route project.

b.         The relevant Community Board Chair(s) will be invited by the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to participate in the relevant Major Cycleway Route item discussion and give their Board’s feedback or recommendations.

2.         Notes and reconfirms Councils previous decision to designate the MCR programme a metropolitan project, as set out in the Council’s resolutions on 29 January 2015.

13.4    Agree to the Major Cycleway Route programme being declared a Metropolitan Programme and delegate to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee all decision making powers.

 

 

Christchurch Biodiversity Fund

 

At the Council meeting of 20 June 2017:

 

It was resolved that the Council:

 

5.         Delegate authority to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to consider and approve applications to the Christchurch Biodiversity Fund.

 

 

 

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 5

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 5

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 5

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 5

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 5

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 5

STAFF REPORTS

A       7.       An Accessible City Current State (2)............................................................................ 57

A       8.       Amendments to Delegations for new Bylaws............................................................. 75

A       9.       Heathcote River Dredging - Stage 1........................................................................... 105

B       10.     Transport Unit - Bi-Monthly Report.......................................................................... 119

B       11.     Three Waters and Waste report - January 2018....................................................... 143

C       12.     Resolution to Exclude the Public............................................................................... 174  

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 13 December 2017  be confirmed (refer page 6).

4.   Public Forum

There will be no public forum at this meeting

5.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

 

Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 13 December 2017

Time:                                    1.02pm

Venue:                                 Council Chambers, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Councillor Mike Davidson

Councillor Vicki Buck

Councillor Phil Clearwater

Councillor Anne Galloway

Councillor Aaron Keown

Councillor Sara Templeton

 

 

11 December 2017

 

 

 

Principal Advisor

David Adamson

General Manager City Services

Tel: 941 8235

 

Samantha Kelly

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6227

samantha.kelly@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00064

It was resolved on the motion of Councillor Cotter, seconded by Councillor Davidson that apologies for lateness from Councillors Keown and Buck be accepted.

Councillor Cotter                                                                                                                                                         Carried

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00065

Committee Decision

That the open and public excluded minutes of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 8 November 2017 be confirmed.

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                      Carried

4.   Public Forum

Part B

 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

4.1       Glen Koorey and Chris Abbott

Glen Koorey and Chris Abbott updated the Committee regarding the biketober event.

 

Councillor Buck arrived at 1:06 pm.

Councillor Keown arrived at 1:10 pm.

 

4.2       David Hawke – Halswell Residents Association

David Hawke presented to the Committee on the endorsement of Vision Zero.

The Committee requested a workshop in early 2018 on vision zero and safer journeys.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

7.   MCR Rapanui Shag Rock Section 2 - Detailed Traffic Resolutions

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Committee resolved the staff recommendations without change.

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00066

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.

2.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2) The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Committee meeting of 13 December 2017; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Committee resolutions on the Rapanui-Shag Rock Major Cycleway report at the Committee meeting of 13 December 2017.

3.         Linwood Avenue (at Chelsea Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 83 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street to a point 129 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

4.         Linwood Avenue (at Chelsea Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 83 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street to a point 129 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

5.         Linwood Avenue (at Chelsea Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 83 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street to a point 129 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a signalised pedestrian crossing be installed on the north side of Linwood Avenue, with the location of the crossing of the southeast bound traffic lanes being located 115 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street. This crossing facility is to be installed in accordance with section 8.5 (1) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a signalised cycle crossing be installed on the north side of Linwood Avenue, with the location of the crossing of the southeast bound traffic lanes being located at a point 111 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street in accordance with section 11.5 (5) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Linwood Avenue south eastbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 120 metres northwest of the intersection with Jollie Street to require the south eastbound cyclists exiting Linwood Avenue to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the north side of Linwood Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the north side of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 107 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

6.         Linwood Avenue (at Chelsea Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 83 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street and extending in a north westerly direction to its intersection with Chelsea Street. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 129 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Chelsea Street. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 92 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres. Note 2 applies.

7.         Linwood Avenue (at Linwood Park Entrance) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 232 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street to a point 264 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

8.         Linwood Avenue (at Linwood Park Entrance) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 232 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street to a point 264 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

9.         Linwood Avenue (at Linwood Park Entrance) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 232 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street to a point 264 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a signalised pedestrian crossing be installed on the south side of Linwood Avenue, with the location of the crossing of the northwest bound traffic lanes being located 257 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street. This crossing facility is to be installed in accordance with section 8.5 (1) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a signalised cycle crossing be installed on the south side of Linwood Avenue, with the location of the crossing of the northwest bound traffic lanes being located at a point 254 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street in accordance with section 11.5 (5) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Linwood Avenue north westbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 244 metres northwest of the intersection with Smith Street to require the north westbound cyclists exiting Linwood Avenue to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the north side of Linwood Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the south side of Linwood Avenue commencing at a point 239 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

10.       Linwood Avenue (at Linwood Park Entrance) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue north westbound traffic lanes from a point 232 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue north westbound traffic lanes from a point 238 metres northwest of its intersection with Smith Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. Note 2 applies.

11.       Chelsea Street / Linwood Avenue Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Chelsea Street be revoked.

12.       Chelsea Street / Linwood Avenue Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Chelsea Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Chelsea Street southbound approach to its intersection with Linwood Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

13.       Chelsea Street (Linwood Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Chelsea Street northbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional cycle path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 11 metres north of the intersection with Linwood Avenue to require the northbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Chelsea Road. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Chelsea Street southbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 6 metres north of the intersection with Linwood Avenue to require the southbound cyclists exiting Chelsea Street to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the north side of Linwood Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

14.       Linwood Avenue Median – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established in the Linwood Avenue central median commencing at a point 115 metres northwest of its intersection with Jollie Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Hargood Street and Keighleys Road in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the south eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Smith Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the north westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require north westbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Smith Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the south eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Hay Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the north westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require north westbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Hay Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the south eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Tilford Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the north westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Linwood Avenue median to require north westbound cyclists to give way to traffic using the Linwood Avenue U-turn facility opposite Tilford Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

15.       Linwood Avenue (at Thomas Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Thomas Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

16.       (at Thomas Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Thomas Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

17.       Linwood Avenue (at Thomas Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Thomas Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

18.       Linwood Avenue (at Thomas Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from its intersection with Thomas Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 5 metres northwest of its intersection with Thomas Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

19.       Linwood Avenue (at Gow Place) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Gow Place to a point 25 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

20.       Linwood Avenue (at Gow Place) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Gow Place to a point 25 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

21.       Linwood Avenue (at Gow Place) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Gow Place to a point 25 metres southeast of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

22.       Linwood Avenue (at Gow Place) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue north westbound traffic lanes from its intersection with Gow Place and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres. Note 2 applies.

23.       Linwood Avenue (at McGregors Road) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with McGregors Road to a point 25 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

24.       Linwood Avenue (at McGregors Road) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with McGregors Road to a point 25 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

25.       Linwood Avenue (at McGregors Road) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with McGregors Road to a point 25 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

26.       Linwood Avenue (at McGregors Road) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from its intersection with McGregors Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 10 metres northwest of its intersection with McGregors Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

27.       Linwood Avenue (at Tilford Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 22 metres northwest of its intersection with Tilford Street to a point 34 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

28.       Linwood Avenue (at Tilford Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 22 metres northwest of its intersection with Tilford Street to a point 34 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

29.       Linwood Avenue (at Tilford Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, south of the Linwood Avenue median, from a point 22 metres northwest of its intersection with Tilford Street to a point 34 metres southeast of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

30.       Linwood Avenue (at Tilford Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue north westbound traffic lanes from its intersection with Tilford Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue north westbound traffic lanes from a point 22 metres northwest of its intersection with Tilford Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 56 metres. Note 2 applies.

31.       Linwood Avenue Median (at Tilford Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls within the Linwood Avenue central median, from a point 37 metres southeast of its intersection with McGregors Road to a point 57 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

32.       Linwood Avenue Median (at Tilford Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes within the Linwood Avenue central median, from a point 37 metres southeast of its intersection with McGregors Road to a point 57 metres southeast of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the U-Turn facility on approach to the northwest bound traffic lanes on Linwood Avenue opposite Tilford Street as detailed on Attachment A.

33.       Linwood Avenue (at Damien Place) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Damien Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

34.       Linwood Avenue (at Damien Place) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Damien Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

35.       Linwood Avenue (at Damien Place) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Damien Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

36.       Linwood Avenue (at Damien Place) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from its intersection with Damien Place and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 5 metres northwest of its intersection with Damien and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

37.       Linwood Avenue Median – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls within the Linwood Avenue central median, from a point 52 metres northwest of its intersection with Ormandy Place to a point 64 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

38.       Linwood Avenue Median – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes within the Linwood Avenue central median, from a point 52 metres northwest of its intersection with Ormandy Place to a point 64 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

39.       Linwood Avenue (at Ormandy Place) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Ormandy Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

40.       Linwood Avenue (at Ormandy Place) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Ormandy Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

41.       Linwood Avenue (at Ormandy Place) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes on Linwood Avenue, north of the Linwood Avenue median, from its intersection with Ormandy Place to a point 19 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

42.       Linwood Avenue (at Ormandy Place) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from its intersection with Ormandy Place and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of the Linwood Avenue south eastbound traffic lanes from a point 5 metres northwest of its intersection with Ormandy Place and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

43.       Hargood Street / Keighleys Road / Linwood Avenue – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Hargood Street, Keighleys Road and Linwood Avenue be revoked.

44.       Hargood Street / Keighleys Road / Linwood Avenue – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Hargood Street, Keighleys Road and Linwood Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Hargood Street, Keighleys Road and Linwood Avenue be controlled by traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

45.       Keighleys Road (Linwood Avenue to Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Keighleys Road from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 79 metres east of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

46.       Keighleys Road (Linwood Avenue to Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Keighleys Road from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 79 metres east of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

47.       Keighleys Road (Linwood Avenue to Eastern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Keighleys Road from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 79 metres east of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

48.       Keighleys Road (Linwood Avenue to Eastern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Keighleys Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a north easterly then easterly direction for a distance of 79 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Keighleys Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres. Note 2 applies.

49.       Hargood Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Hargood Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 42 metres southwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

50.       Hargood Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Hargood Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 42 metres southwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

51.       Hargood Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Hargood Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 42 metres southwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

52.       Hargood Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of Hargood Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwest side of Hargood Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 41 metres. Note 2 applies.

53.       Linwood Avenue (Hargood Street / Keighleys Road to St Johns Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on the south side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Hargood Street to its intersection with St Johns Street be revoked. Note 1 applies.

b.         Approve that all traffic controls on the north side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Raupo Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

54.       Linwood Avenue (Hargood Street / Keighleys Road to St Johns Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Hargood Street to its intersection with St Johns Street be revoked. Note 1 applies.

b.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Raupo Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

55.       Linwood Avenue (Hargood Street / Keighleys Road to St Johns Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on the south side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Hargood Street to its intersection with St Johns Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands Linwood Avenue from its intersection with Raupo Street to a point 20 metres northwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north westbound cycles only, be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Hargood Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with St John Street as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane alongside Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Hargood Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with St Johns Street in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southeast bound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 158 metres southeast of the Linwood Avenue intersection with Hargood Street to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic travelling on the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northwest bound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 168 metres southeast of the Linwood Avenue intersection with Hargood Street to require northwest bound cyclists give way to traffic travelling on the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the northbound approach of the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane located 160 metres southeast of the intersection of Hargood Street and Linwood Avenue as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southeast bound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 200 metres to the northwest of the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic travelling on the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northwest bound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 192 metres to the northwest of the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street to require north westbound cyclists to give way to traffic travelling on the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the northbound approach of the access road between Linwood Avenue and the Linwood Avenue Residential Service Lane located 198 metres northwest of the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

56.       Linwood Avenue (Hargood Street / Keighleys Road to St Johns Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Hargood Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 158 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at a point 165 metres southeast of its intersection with Hargood Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 40 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeast side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Raupo Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Bus Stop be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at a distance 96 metres northwest of its intersection with St Johns Street, and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with St Johns Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 45 metres. Note 2 applies.

57.       Linwood Avenue / St Johns Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street be revoked.

58.       Linwood Avenue / St Johns Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St John Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the St Johns Street north eastbound approach to its intersection with Linwood Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the St Johns Street south westbound approach to its intersection with Linwood Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

59.       St Johns Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on St John Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 59 metres southwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

60.       St Johns Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on St John Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 59 metres southwest of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

61.       St Johns Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands on St John Street from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 59 metres southwest of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southeast bound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 28 metres southwest of the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street to require south eastbound cyclists to give way to traffic travelling on St Johns Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the north westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 30 metres southwest of the intersection of Linwood Avenue and St Johns Street to require north westbound cyclists to give way to traffic travelling on St Johns Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a bi-directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the southeast side of St Johns Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

62.       St Johns Street (Linwood Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwest side of St Johns Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 59 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of St Johns Street, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 59 metres. Note 2 applies.

63.       Linwood Avenue (St Johns Street to Dyers Road) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, from its intersection with St Johns Street to its intersection with Dyers Road be revoked.

64.       Linwood Avenue (St Johns Street to Dyers Road) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, from its intersection with St Johns Street to its intersection with Dyers Road be revoked. Note 1 applies.

65.       Linwood Avenue (St Johns Street to Dyers Road) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with St Johns Street to its intersection with Dyers Road as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a bi directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue from its intersection with St Johns Street to its intersection with Dyers Road in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north westbound cycles only, be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with St Johns Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Dyers Road as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

66.       Linwood Avenue (St Johns Street to Dyers Road) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with St Johns Street and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 187 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Bus Stop be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at a distance 187 metres southeast of its intersection with St Johns Street, and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at a point 201 metres southeast of its intersection with St Johns Street and extending in a south easterly direction to its intersection with Dyers Road. Note 2 applies.

67.       Linwood Avenue / Dyers Road Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Dyers Road be revoked.

68.       Linwood Avenue / Dyers Road Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Dyers Road as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the intersection of Linwood Avenue and Dyers Road be controlled by traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

69.       Dyers Road (Linwood Avenue to South Western Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on Dyers Road, from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 85 metres south of this intersection be revoked.

70.       Dyers Road (Linwood Avenue to South Western Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Dyers Road, from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 85 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

71.       Dyers Road (Linwood Avenue to South Western Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Dyers Road, from its intersection with Linwood Avenue to a point 85 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of northeast bound cycles only, be established on the northwest side of Dyers Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 85 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south westbound cycles only, be established on the southeast side of Dyers Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 85 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the CCC Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads and Traffic Lanes Restricted to Special Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

72.       Dyers Road (Linwood Avenue to South Western Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwest side of Dyers Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 85 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southeast side of Dyers Road, commencing at its intersection with Linwood Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 85 metres. Note 2 applies.

73.       Linwood Avenue (Dyers Road to South Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, from its intersection with Dyers Road to a point 125 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked.

74.       Linwood Avenue (Dyers Road to South Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, from its intersection with Dyers Road to a point 125 metres southeast of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

75.       Linwood Avenue (Dyers Road to South Eastern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, from its intersection with Dyers Road to a point 125 metres southeast of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a bi directional shared pedestrian / cycle pathway be established on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Dyers Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 125 metres in accordance with sections 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed in Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

76.       Linwood Avenue (Dyers Road to South Eastern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwest side of Linwood Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Dyers Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 125 metres. Note 2 applies.

Councillor Buck/Councillor Davidson                                                                                                                   Carried

 

 

8.   MCR Heathcote Expressway - Charles St to The Tannery - Detailed Traffic Resolutions

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Committee resolved the staff recommendations and included a note for staff to discuss the speed limits along Hopkins Street with the local Community Board.

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00067

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.

2.         For the purposes of the following resolutions: (1) An intersection of roadways is defined by the position of kerbs on each intersecting roadway ; and (2) The resolution is to take effect from the commencement of physical road works associated with the project as detailed in this report; and (3) If the resolution states "Note 1 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the kerb line location referenced as exists on the road immediately prior to the Committee meeting of 13 December 2017; and (4) If the resolution states "Note 2 applies", any distance specified in the resolution relates the approved kerb line location on the road resulting from the Committee resolutions on the Rapanui-Shag Rock Major Cycleway report at the Committee meeting of 13 December 2017.

3.         Charles Street (Western Extent to Barbour Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 70 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

4.         Charles Street (Western Extent to Barbour Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 70 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

5.         Charles Street (Western Extent to Barbour Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Charles Street from its intersection with Barbour Street to a point 70 metres west of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

6.         Charles Street (Western Extent to Barbour Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 29 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

7.         Barbour Street / Charles Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Barbour Street and Charles Street be revoked.

8.         Barbour Street / Charles Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes and kerb alignment changes at the intersection of Charles Street and Barbour Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Barbour Street southbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Barbour Street northbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

9.         Barbour Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Barbour Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 21 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

10.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Barbour Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northern direction for a distance of 21 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

11.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Barbour Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 21 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

12.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Barbour Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Barbour Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 21 metres. Note 2 applies.

13.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Barbour Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 18 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

14.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Barbour Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southern direction for a distance of 18 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

15.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Barbour Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 18 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

16.       Barbour Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Barbour Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 applies.

17.       Charles Street (Barbour Street to Grafton Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Charles Street from its intersection with Barbour Street to its intersection with Grafton Street be revoked.

18.       Charles Street (Barbour Street to Grafton Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Charles Street from its intersection with Barbour Street to its intersection with Grafton Street be revoked.

19.       Charles Street (Barbour Street to Grafton Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Charles Street from its intersection with Barbour Street to its intersection with Grafton Street as detailed on Attachment A.

20.       Charles Street (Barbour Street to Grafton Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 10 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at a point 26 metres east of its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at a point 27 metres east of its intersection with Barbour Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 23 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 43 metres. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. Note 2 applies.

21.       Charles Street / Grafton Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Charles Street and Grafton Street be revoked.

22.       Charles Street / Grafton Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Charles Street and Grafton Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Grafton Street southbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Grafton Street northbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

23.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Grafton Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 19 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

24.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

25.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Grafton Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 19 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

26.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

27.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Grafton Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 23 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

28.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 23 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

29.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Grafton Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 23 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

30.       Grafton Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Grafton Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. Note 2 applies.

31.       Charles Street (Grafton Street to Osborne Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Charles Street from its intersection with Grafton Street to its intersection with Osborne Street be revoked.

32.       Charles Street (Grafton Street to Osborne Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Charles Street from its intersection with Grafton Street to its intersection with Osborne Street be revoked.

33.       Charles Street (Grafton Street to Osborne Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Charles Street from its intersection with Grafton Street to its intersection with Osborne Street as detailed on Attachment A.

34.       Charles Street (Grafton Street to Osborne Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at a point 66 metres east of its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at a point 69 metres east of its intersection with Grafton Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Osborne Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Osborne Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres. Note 2 applies.

35.       Charles Street / Osborne Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Charles Street and Osborne Street be revoked.

36.       Charles Street / Osborne Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Charles Street and Osborne Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Osborne Street southbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Osborne Street northbound approach to its intersection with Charles Street as detailed on Attachment A.

37.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Osborne Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 22 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

38.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 22 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

39.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Osborne Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 22 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

40.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 applies.

41.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Osborne Street from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 22 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

42.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 22 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

43.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and road humps on Osborne Street, from its intersection with Charles Street to a point 22 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

44.       Osborne Street (Charles Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Osborne Street, commencing at its intersection with Charles Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 22 metres. Note 2 applies.

45.       Charles Street (Osborne Street to Ensors Road) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Charles Street from its intersection with Osborne Street to the head of the cul-de-sac near Ensors Road be revoked.

46.       Charles Street (Osborne Street to Ensors Road) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Charles Street from its intersection with Osborne Street to the head of the cul-de-sac near Ensors Road be revoked.

47.       Charles Street (Osborne Street to Ensors Road) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Charles Street from its intersection with Osborne Street to the head of the cul-de-sac near Ensors Road as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the pathway commencing at a point on the eastern end of Charles Street, 35 metres west of its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Ensors Road, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 35 metres west of its intersection with Ensors Road to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Charles Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

48.       Charles Street (Osborne Street to Ensors Road) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Osborne Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 35 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Charles Street, commencing at its intersection with Osborne Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the Charles Street cul-de-sac, commencing at a point 10 metres west of the shared path and extending in an easterly direction, following the kerb alignment, for a distance of 21 metres. Note 2 applies.

49.       Ensors Road (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Ensors Road from a point 44 metres north of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 24 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

50.       Ensors Road (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Ensors Road, commencing at a point 44 metres north of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction to a point 24 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

51.       Ensors Road (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Ensors Road, from a point 44 metres north of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 24 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a cycle crossing be installed on Ensors Road at a point 10 metres north of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue in accordance with section 11.5 (5) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a staggered pedestrian crossing be installed on Ensors Road, with the location of the crossing of the northbound lanes located 125 metres north of its intersection with Laurence Street. The pedestrian crossing, across the southbound lanes is located 24 metres north of the intersection with Mackenzie Avenue. This crossing facility is to be installed in accordance with section 8.5 (1) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the pathway on the west side of Ensors Road, commencing at a point 93 metres north of its intersection with Laurence Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 36 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Ensors Road, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Ensors Road northbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 130 metres north of the intersection with Laurence Street to require the northbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Ensors Road. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Ensors Road northbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 93 metres north of the intersection with Laurence Street to require the northbound cyclists exiting Ensors Road to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the west side of Ensors Road. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Ensors Road southbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 30 metres north of the intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to require the southbound cyclists exiting Ensors Road to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the east side of Ensors Road. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

52.       Ensors Road (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Ensors Road, commencing at a point 87 metres north of its intersection with Laurence Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 52 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Ensors Road, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 40 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Ensors Road, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 24 metres. Note 2 applies.

53.       Ensors Road / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Ensors Road and Mackenzie Avenue be revoked.

54.       Ensors Road / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the intersection of Ensors Road and Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue westbound approach to its intersection with Ensors Road as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that all Mackenzie Avenue westbound vehicles, when approaching the intersection with Ensors Road, be restricted to a left turn movement only as detailed on Attachment A.

d.         Approve that U-Turn movements by southbound Ensors Road motor vehicles through the Ensors Road median island be prohibited as detailed on Attachment A.

55.       Mackenzie Avenue (Ensors Road to Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Ensors Road to its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street be revoked.

56.       Mackenzie Avenue (Ensors Road to Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Ensors Road to its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street be revoked.

57.       Mackenzie Avenue (Ensors Road to Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and traffic islands on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Ensors Road to its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue westbound cyclists, required to cross from south to north, on the one-directional cycle path and that this Give Way control be located at a point 30 metres east of the intersection with Ensors Road to require westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Mackenzie Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 39 metres east of the intersection with Ensors Road to require the eastbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Mackenzie Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the pathway on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Ensors Road, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 36 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue westbound cyclists travelling on the one-directional westbound cycle lane on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 199 metres west of the intersection with Finlay Place to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Mackenzie Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue eastbound cyclists travelling on the one-directional eastbound cycle lane on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 193 metres west of the intersection with Hopkins Street to require the eastbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Mackenzie Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

58.       Mackenzie Avenue (Ensors Road to Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 50 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 45 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 126 metres east of its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 123 metres east of its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 228 metres east of its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 223 metres east of its intersection with Ensors Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 183 metres west of its intersection with Hopkins Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 35 metres. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 180 metres west its intersection with Finlay Place and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 35 metres. Note 2 applies.

i.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 88 metres west its intersection with Hopkins Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

j.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 88 metres west its intersection with Finlay Place and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

k.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Hopkins Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 21 metres. Note 2 applies.

l.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Finlay Place and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

59.       Finlay Place / Hopkins Street / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Finlay Place, Hopkins Street and Mackenzie Avenue be revoked.

60.       Finlay Place / Hopkins Street / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Finlay Place, Hopkins Street and Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Hopkins Street southbound approach to its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Finlay Place northbound approach to its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

61.       Hopkins Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Hopkins Street from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 17 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

62.       Hopkins Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Hopkins Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

63.       Hopkins Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Hopkins Street, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 17 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

64.       Hopkins Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Hopkins Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Hopkins Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

65.       Finlay Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Finlay Place from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 13 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

66.       Finlay Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Finlay Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

67.       Finlay Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Finlay Place, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 13 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

68.       Finlay Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Finlay Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Finlay Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

69.       Mackenzie Avenue (Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street to Keswick Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street to its intersection with Keswick Street be revoked.

70.       Mackenzie Avenue (Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street to Keswick Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street to its intersection with Keswick Street be revoked.

71.       Mackenzie Avenue (Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street to Keswick Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Finlay Place / Hopkins Street to its intersection with Keswick Street as detailed on Attachment A.

72.       Mackenzie Avenue (Finlay Place/ Hopkins Street to Keswick Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Hopkins Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Finlay Place and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 86 metres east of its intersection with Hopkins Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing its intersection with Keswick Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

73.       Keswick Street / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Keswick Street and Mackenzie Avenue be revoked.

74.       Keswick Street / Mackenzie Avenue Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Keswick Street and Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Keswick Street northbound approach to its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

75.       Keswick Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Keswick Street from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 19 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

76.       Keswick Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Keswick Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 19 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

77.       Keswick Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Keswick Street, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 19 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

78.       Keswick Street (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Keswick Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Keswick Street, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

79.       Mackenzie Avenue (Keswick Street to Palamino Place) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Keswick Street to its intersection with Palamino Place be revoked.

80.       Mackenzie Avenue (Keswick Street to Palamino Place) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Keswick Street to its intersection with Palamino Place be revoked.

81.       Mackenzie Avenue (Keswick Street to Palamino Place) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Keswick Street to its intersection with Palamino Place as detailed on Attachment A.

82.       Mackenzie Avenue (Keswick Street to Palamino Place) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Keswick Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Palamino Place and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 80 metres east of its intersection with Keswick Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 31 metres. Note 2 applies.

83.       Mackenzie Avenue / Palamino Place Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Palamino Place be revoked.

84.       Mackenzie Avenue / Palamino Place Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Palamino Place as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Palamino Place southbound approach to its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

85.       Palamino Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Palamino Place from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 16 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

86.       Palamino Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Palamino Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

87.       Palamino Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Palamino Place, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 16 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

88.       Palamino Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Palamino Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Palamino Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 applies.

89.       Mackenzie Avenue (Palamino Place to Seaforth Place) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Palamino Place to its intersection with Seaforth Place be revoked.

90.       Mackenzie Avenue (Palamino Place to Seaforth Place) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Palamino Place to its intersection with Seaforth Place be revoked.

91.       Mackenzie Avenue (Palamino Place to Seaforth Place) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Palamino Place to its intersection with Seaforth Place as detailed on Attachment A.

92.       Mackenzie Avenue (Palamino Place to Seaforth Place) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Palamino Place and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 9 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 42 metres east of its intersection with Palamino Place and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 33 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Seaforth Place and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

93.       Mackenzie Avenue / Seaforth Place Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Seaforth Place be revoked.

94.       Mackenzie Avenue / Seaforth Place Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Seaforth Place as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Seaforth Place northbound approach to its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue as detailed on Attachment A.

95.       Seaforth Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Seaforth Place from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 14 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

96.       Seaforth Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Seaforth Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres be revoked. Note 1 applies.

97.       Seaforth Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Seaforth Place, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 14 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

98.       Seaforth Place (Mackenzie Avenue to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Seaforth Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Seaforth Place, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

99.       Mackenzie Avenue (Seaforth Place to Richardson Terrace) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Seaforth Place to its intersection with Richardson Terrace be revoked.

100.    Mackenzie Avenue (Seaforth Place to Richardson Terrace) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Seaforth Place to its intersection with Richardson Terrace be revoked.

101.    Mackenzie Avenue (Seaforth Place to Richardson Terrace) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Mackenzie Avenue from its intersection with Seaforth Place to its intersection with Richardson Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue eastbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 3 metres west of the intersection with Richardson Terrace to require the eastbound cyclists exiting Mackenzie Avenue to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the west side of Richardson Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 23 metres west of the intersection with Richardson Terrace to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Mackenzie Avenue. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the pathway on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Richardson Terrace, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 21 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

102.    Mackenzie Avenue (Seaforth Place to Richardson Terrace) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Seaforth Place and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 12 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 49 metres west of its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at a point 49 metres west of its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Mackenzie Avenue, commencing at its intersection with Richardson Terrace and extending in a western direction for a distance of 34 metres. Note 2 applies.

103.    Mackenzie Avenue / Richardson Terrace Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Richardson Terrace be revoked.

104.    Mackenzie Avenue / Richardson Terrace Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the intersection of Mackenzie Avenue and Richardson Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Mackenzie Avenue eastbound approach to its intersection with Richardson Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

105.    Richardson Terrace (Southern Extent of Project to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Richardson Terrace from a point 18 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 26 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

106.    Richardson Terrace (Southern Extent of Project to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Richardson Terrace, commencing at a point 18 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending to a point 26 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

107.    Richardson Terrace (Southern Extent of Project to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and road humps on Richardson Terrace, from a point 18 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to a point 26 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the pathway on the west side of Richardson Terrace, from its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Richardson Terrace, commencing at a point 6 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 31 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path at the Heathcote River bridge, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 15 metres north of the intersection with Mackenzie Avenue to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Richardson Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

108.    Richardson Terrace (Southern Extent of Project to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Richardson Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 18 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Richardson Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Richardson Terrace, commencing at a point 18 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 51 metres. Note 2 applies.

109.    Heathcote River Bridge – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that the pathway across the Heathcote River Bridge between Richardson Terrace and Clarendon Terrace, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.

110.    Clarendon Terrace (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Clarendon Terrace from a point 19 metres north of its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 16 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

111.    Clarendon Terrace (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Richardson Terrace, commencing at a point 19 metres north of its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending to a point 16 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

112.    Clarendon Terrace (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and road humps on Clarendon Terrace, from the Heathcote River Bridge to a point 21 metres north of this bridge as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Clarendon Terrace, commencing its intersection with Sheldon Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path at the Heathcote River bridge, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 10 metres north of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the eastbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Clarendon Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 8 metres north of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Clarendon Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

113.    Clarendon Terrace (Northern Extent of Project to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Clarendon Terrace, commencing at a point 19 metres north of its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 41 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Clarendon Terrace, commencing its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Clarendon Terrace, commencing its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. Note 2 applies.

114.    Clarendon Terrace/ Sheldon Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Clarendon Terrace and Sheldon Street be revoked.

115.    Clarendon Terrace/ Sheldon Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Clarendon Terrace and Sheldon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Sheldon Street westbound approach to its intersection with Clarendon Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

116.    Sheldon Street (Clarendon Terrace to Radley Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Sheldon Street from its intersection with Clarendon Terrace to its intersection with Radley Street be revoked.

117.    Sheldon Street (Clarendon Terrace to Radley Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Sheldon Street from its intersection with Clarendon Terrace to its intersection with Radley Street be revoked.

118.    Sheldon Street (Clarendon Terrace to Radley Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Sheldon Street from its intersection with Clarendon Terrace to its intersection with Radley Street as detailed on Attachment A.

119.    Sheldon Street (Clarendon Terrace to Radley Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Clarendon Terrace and extending in a south easterly then easterly direction for a distance of 62 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Clarendon Terrace and extending in a south easterly then easterly direction for a distance of 24 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Radley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 66 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 31 metres west of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 77 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Radley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres. Note 2 applies.

120.    Radley Street / Sheldon Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Sheldon Street and Radley Street be revoked.

121.    Radley Street / Sheldon Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the intersection of Sheldon Street and Radley Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Sheldon Street westbound approach to its intersection with Radley Street as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Sheldon Street eastbound approach to its intersection with Radley Street as detailed on Attachment A.

d.         Approve that all Sheldon Street eastbound and westbound motor vehicles, when approaching the intersection with Radley Street, be restricted to a left turn movement only as detailed on Attachment A.

e.         Approve that a bi-directional cycle path be established within the Radley Street median at its intersection with Sheldon Street as detailed on Attachment A in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the eastbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path within the Radley Street median to require the eastbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Radley Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A.

g.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the westbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path to require the westbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Radley Street. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A.

122.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Radley Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 60 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

123.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Radley Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 60 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

124.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands on Radley Street, from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 60 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

125.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Radley Street, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Radley Street, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 37 metres. Note 2 applies.

126.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Radley Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 45 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

127.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Southern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Radley Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 45 metres south of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

128.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands on Radley Street, from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 45 metres south of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

129.    Radley Street (Sheldon Street to Southern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Radley Street, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 36 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Radley Street, commencing its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 42 metres. Note 2 applies.

130.    Sheldon Street (Radley Street to Cumnor Terrace) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Sheldon Street from its intersection with Radley Street to its intersection with Cumnor Terrace be revoked.

131.    Sheldon Street (Radley Street to Cumnor Terrace) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Sheldon Street from its intersection with Radley Street to its intersection with Cumnor Terrace be revoked.

132.    Sheldon Street (Radley Street to Cumnor Terrace) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Sheldon Street from its intersection with Radley Street to its intersection with Cumnor Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

133.    Sheldon Street (Radley Street to Cumnor Terrace) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 51 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 105 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 78 metres east of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 90 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 120 metres east of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 148 metres east of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 93 metres. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 192 metres east of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 8 metres. Note 2 applies.

g.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Sheldon Street, commencing at a point 209 metres east of its intersection with Radley Street and extending in an easterly direction to the intersection with Cumnor Terrace. Note 2 applies.

h.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Sheldon Street, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

134.    Cumnor Terrace / Sheldon Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Sheldon Street and Cumnor Terrace be revoked.

135.    Cumnor Terrace / Sheldon Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Sheldon Street and Cumnor Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace southbound approach to its intersection with Sheldon Street as detailed on Attachment A.

136.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Cumnor Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 19 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

137.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Cumnor Street from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 19 metres north of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

138.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Cumnor Terrace, from its intersection with Sheldon Street to a point 19 metres north of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

139.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Northern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. Note 2 applies.

140.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Chichester Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Sheldon Street to its intersection with Chichester Street be revoked.

141.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Chichester Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Sheldon Street to its intersection with Chichester Street be revoked.

142.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Chichester Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Sheldon Street to its intersection with Chichester Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at a point 22 metres south of its intersection with Sheldon Street, and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 44 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 19 metres south of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the northbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace southbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 22 metres south of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the southbound cyclists exiting Cumnor Terrace to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace northbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 63 metres south of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the northbound cyclists exiting Cumnor Terrace to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

f.          Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the southbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 66 metres south of the intersection with Sheldon Street to require the southbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

143.    Cumnor Terrace (Sheldon Street to Chichester Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 28 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at a point 42 metres south of its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 88 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

144.    Chichester Street / Cumnor Terrace Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Chichester Street and Cumnor Terrace be revoked.

145.    Chichester Street / Cumnor Terrace Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Chichester Street and Cumnor Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Chichester Street eastbound approach to its intersection with Cumnor Terrace as detailed on Attachment A.

146.    Chichester Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Chichester Street from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 20 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

147.    Chichester Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Chichester Street from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 20 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

148.    Chichester Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Chichester Street, from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 20 metres west of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

149.    Chichester Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Chichester Street, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Chichester Street, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

150.    Cumnor Terrace (Chichester Street to Marshall Street) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Chichester Street to its intersection with Marshall Street be revoked.

151.    Cumnor Terrace (Chichester Street to Marshall Street) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Chichester Street to its intersection with Marshall Street be revoked.

152.    Cumnor Terrace (Chichester Street to Marshall Street) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Chichester Street to its intersection with Marshall Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Marshall Street, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the northbound cyclists travelling on the bi-directional shared path on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 16 metres north of the intersection with Marshall Street to require the northbound cyclists to give way to other traffic on Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Give Way control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace southbound cyclists, and that this Give Way control be located at a point 14 metres north of the intersection with Marshall Street to require the southbound cyclists exiting Cumnor Terrace to give way to pedestrians and cyclists using the shared pedestrian / cycle pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace. This Give Way control is detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

153.    Cumnor Terrace (Chichester Street to Marshall Street) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Marshall Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 47 metres. Note 2 applies.

154.    Cumnor Terrace/ Marshall Street Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Cumnor Terrace and Marshall Street be revoked.

155.    Cumnor Terrace/ Marshall Street Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and raised platforms at the intersection of Cumnor Terrace and Marshall Street as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that a Give-Way control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace southbound approach to its intersection with Marshall Street as detailed on Attachment A.

156.    Marshall Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Chichester Street from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 9 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

157.    Marshall Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Chichester Street from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 9 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

158.    Marshall Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the lane marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Marshall Street, from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 9 metres west of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

159.    Marshall Street (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Marshall Street, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. Note 2 applies.

160.    Cumnor Terrace (Marshall Street to Garlands Road) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Marshall Street to its intersection with Garlands Road be revoked.

161.    Cumnor Terrace (Marshall Street to Garlands Road) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Marshall Street to its intersection with Garlands Road be revoked.

162.    Cumnor Terrace (Marshall Street to Garlands Road) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and traffic islands on Cumnor Terrace from its intersection with Marshall Street to its intersection with Garlands Road as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the pathway on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Marshall Street, and extending in a southerly direction to its intersection with Garlands Road, as detailed on Attachment A, be resolved as a bi-directional shared pedestrian /cycle pathway in accordance with section 11.4 of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004. Note 2 applies.

163.    Cumnor Terrace (Marshall Street to Garlands Road) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Garlands Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 39 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Cumnor Terrace, commencing at its intersection with Garlands Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 56 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

164.    Cumnor Terrace/ Garlands Road Intersection – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all existing traffic controls at the intersection of Cumnor Terrace and Garlands Road be revoked.

165.    Cumnor Terrace/ Garlands Road Intersection – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes and traffic islands at the intersection of Cumnor Terrace and Garlands Road as detailed on Attachment A.

b.         Approve that the Cumnor Terrace southbound approach to Garlands Road be controlled by traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004 as detailed on Attachment A.

c.         Approve that all Cumnor Terrace southbound and northbound vehicles, when approaching the intersection with Garlands Road, be restricted to a left turn movement only as detailed on Attachment A.

d.         Approve that a Stop control be placed against the Cumnor Terrace northbound approach to its intersection with Garlands Road as detailed on Attachment A.

166.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Garlands Road from its southern intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 51 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 Applies.

167.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Garlands Road from its southern intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 51 metres west of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

168.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and traffic islands on Garlands Road from its southern intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 51 metres west of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of eastbound cycles only, be established on the north side of Garlands Road, commencing its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 44 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound cycles only, be established on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 51 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

169.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Western Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Garlands Road, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a Bus Stop be established on the north side of Garlands Road, commencing at a distance 30 metres west of its intersection with Cumnor Terrace, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a Bus Stop be established on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing at a distance 13 metres west of its intersection with Cumnor Terrace, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing at a point 30 metres west of its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. Note 2 applies.

170.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Traffic Controls

a.         Approve that all traffic controls on Garlands Road from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 32 metres east of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

171.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Eastern Extent of Project) – Existing Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Garlands Road from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 32 metres east of this intersection be revoked. Note 1 applies.

172.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Eastern Extent of Project) – New Traffic Controls

a.         Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes, road surface changes, raised platforms and traffic islands on Garlands Road from its intersection with Cumnor Terrace to a point 32 metres east of this intersection as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that a cycle crossing be installed on Garlands Road at a point 4 metres east of its intersection with Cumnor Terrace in accordance with section 11.5 (5) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

c.         Approve that a pedestrian crossing be installed on Garlands Road at a point 7 metres north of its intersection with Cumnor Terrace. This crossing facility is to be installed in accordance with section 8.5 (1) of the Land Transport Act - Traffic Control Devices Rule: 2004, as detailed on Attachment A. Note 2 applies.

d.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of eastbound cycles only, be established on the north side of Garlands Road, commencing its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

e.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of westbound cycles only, be established on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres as detailed on Attachment A. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles. Note 2 applies.

173.    Garlands Road (Cumnor Terrace to Eastern Extent of Project) – New Parking and Stopping Restrictions

a.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Garlands Road, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres following the kerb line. Note 2 applies.

b.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Garlands Road, commencing at its intersection with Cumnor Terrace and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres. Note 2 applies.

174.    Approve that pursuant to Section 5 of the Christchurch City Council Speed Limits Bylaw 2010, speed limits be set as below in clauses a to f and include the resulting changes in the Christchurch City Register of Speed Limits and Speed Limit Maps:

a.         Approve that the speed limit on Charles Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Wilsons Road and extending to the head of the cul-de-sac near Ensors Road.

b.         Approve that the speed limit on Mackenzie Avenue be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Ensors Road and extending to its intersection with Richardson Terrace.

c.         Approve that the speed limit on Richardson Terrace be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at a point 18 metres south of its intersection with Mackenzie Avenue and extending in a northerly direction to a point 26 metres north of this intersection.

d.         Approve that the speed limit on Clarendon Terrace be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at a point 40 metres north of its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending in a southerly direction to a point 30 metres south of this intersection.

e.         Approve that the speed limit on Sheldon Street be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Clarendon Terrace and extending to its intersection with Cumnor Terrace

f.          Approve that the speed limit on Cumnor Terrace be set at 30 kilometres per hour commencing at its intersection with Sheldon Street and extending to its intersection with Chichester Street.

175.    Approve that the speed limit changes listed above in clauses 174 a to f are resolved on 13 December 2017 and will come into force on the date of the installation of the regulatory speed signs.

176. Notes that staff will discuss the speed limits along Hopkins Street with the local Community Board.

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                      Carried

 

 


 

9.   Major Cycleway Routes User Survey Results

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receives the Spring 2017 highlighted results of the users survey of the Major Cycleway Routes - Papanui Parallel, Uni-Cycle and Little River Link Routes.   

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00068

Part B

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receives the Spring 2017 highlighted results of the users survey of the Major Cycleway Routes - Papanui Parallel, Uni-Cycle and Little River Link Routes.   

Councillor Cotter/Councillor Davidson                                                                                                                Carried

 

 

10. Central City:  Proposed Bus Passenger Shelter Installations

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Committee accepted the staff recommendations and also noted a request for the bus passenger shelter adjacent to the Washington Way skate park to have a street art treatment, providing that there is evidence that this reduces graffiti.

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Approve the installation of a bus shelter at the following locations:

a.         38 Moorhouse Avenue (Attachment A); and

b.         Moorhouse Avenue adjacent to the Washington Way Skate Park (Attachment B).

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2017/00069

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Approve the installation of a bus shelter at the following locations:

a.         38 Moorhouse Avenue (Attachment A); and

b.         Moorhouse Avenue adjacent to the Washington Way Skate Park (Attachment B).

c.         Notes a request for the bus passenger shelter on Moorhouse Avenue adjacent to the Washington Way skate park to have a street art treatment, provided that there is evidence that this reduces graffiti.

Councillor Buck/Councillor Galloway                                                                                                                   Carried

 

11. Avon River Precinct: Victoria Square- Armagh and Colombo Streets

 

Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that Council:

1.         Revoke the Special Vehicle Lane (Cycle Lane) currently located on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 111 metres east its intersection with Durham Street North and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street.

2.         Revoke the Special Vehicle lane (Cycle Lane) currently located on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street.

3.         Approve that a mid-block shared pedestrian and cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals  be installed across Armagh Street located at a point approximately 105 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a width of 3 metres.

4.         Approve that a mid-block shared pedestrian and cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals  be installed across Colombo Street located at a point approximately 118 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street (measured along the eastern side of Colombo street) and extending northerly direction for a width of 5 metres.

5.         That a shared Cycle/Pedestrian path be installed across Victoria Square traversing the Square generally in a semicircle commencing from the proposed Colombo Street signalised crossing and extending to the proposed Armagh Street signalised crossing for a following the alignment of the Avon River for an a total distance of 186 metres.

6.         Note that the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee will consider the parking and stopping restrictions relating to the Victoria Square: Colombo and Armagh Streets as per paragraph 5.6 of the report.

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2017/00070

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Resolve the following, subject to the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee approving the parking and stopping restrictions related to the Victoria Square: Colombo and Armagh Streets, as per paragraph 5.6 of the report:

a.         Revoke the Special Vehicle Lane (Cycle Lane) currently located on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 111 metres east its intersection with Durham Street North and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street.

b.         Revoke the Special Vehicle lane (Cycle Lane) currently located on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Oxford Terrace and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Colombo Street.

c.         Approve that a mid-block shared pedestrian and cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals  be installed across Armagh Street located at a point approximately 105 metres west of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a westerly direction for a width of 3 metres.

d.         Approve that a mid-block shared pedestrian and cycle crossing, controlled by traffic signals  be installed across Colombo Street located at a point approximately 118 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street (measured along the eastern side of Colombo street) and extending northerly direction for a width of 5 metres.

e.         That a shared Cycle/Pedestrian path be installed across Victoria Square traversing the Square generally in a semicircle commencing from the proposed Colombo Street signalised crossing and extending to the proposed Armagh Street signalised crossing for a following the alignment of the Avon River for an a total distance of 186 metres.

2.         Note that the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee will consider the parking and stopping restrictions relating to the Victoria Square: Colombo and Armagh Streets as per paragraph 5.6 of the report.

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                      Carried

 

12. Three Waters and Waste bi-monthly report - October/November 2017

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Committee received the Three Waters and Waste bi-monthly report (October/November 2017).

2.         The Committee requested a report on the bank cutting trials, including the feasibility of not mowing all of the riparian areas of the river banks and information of the demarcation of land the drainage and parks.

3.         In addition, the Committee recommended that the Council oppose any government directive to compulsorily chlorinate the urban areas of Christchurch City secured water supply and write to the appropriate government minister to inform them of this position, advocating for exemption if required.

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the Three Waters and Waste October/November 2017 report attached.

 

Committee Resolved ITEC/2017/00071

Part C

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.       Receive the information in the Three Waters and Waste October/November 2017 report attached.

2.       Request a report on the mowing of river bank trials, including the feasibility of not mowing all of the riparian areas of the river banks, unless specified otherwise. This should include information of the demarcation of the land drainage and parks.

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                      Carried

 

Committee Decided ITEC/2017/00072

Part A

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Oppose any government directive to compulsorily chlorinate the urban areas of Christchurch City secured water supply and write to the appropriate government minister to inform them of this position, advocating for exemption if required.         

Councillor Davidson/Councillor Clearwater                                                                                                      Carried

 

Secretarial Note: At the Council meeting on 25 January 2017, the Council considered a report, Item 17: Below Ground Well Heads and Drinking Water Supply Update. In considering the report the Council resolved the following:

          7.       “Resolves that long-term the Council wants to retain its unchlorinated drinking                              water system. Accordingly the Council opposes any Government imposed                                       mandatory permanent chlorination.”

          8.       “Notes resolution 7. Deals with the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment                              Committee recommendation to the Council meeting of 20 December 2017, which                             was left to lie on the table to be referred to the Council meeting of 22 February                        2018.

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 3.18pm.

 

 

CONFIRMED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018.

 

Councillor Pauline Cotter

Chairperson

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

7.        An Accessible City Current State (2)

Reference:

17/918344

Contact:

Lynette Ellis

Lynette.ellis@ccc.govt.nz

941 6285

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to receive the report and recommend to the Council an adjusted programme for the delivery of An Accessible City and other related transport projects.  This report also notes that staff are intending to progress with engagement on the projects noted in the resolutions.  The final decision on the amended programme will be made as part of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is being provided to fulfil Council resolution (CAPL/2017/00022), referenced below, to report back on options for works on these streets prior to any work proceeding.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of high significance in relation to Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and the level of community interest in the An Accessible City programme.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Approves the continuation of the An Accessible City programme of work with the modifications identified in paragraph 6.1 of this report.

2.         Notes that before the Long Term Plan is approved staff will engage on the following:

a.         The proposed works on Kilmore Street between Colombo and Durham for the purposes of completing this section in line with the programme for the completion of the Town Hall restoration.

b.         The 30km speed limit on St Asaph Street.

c.         The proposed changes to High Street, including the tram track extension.

3.         Notes that a separate report will be presented to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee on Victoria Street as soon as practicable.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The Council’s resolution in June 2017 put on hold the An Accessible City work programme. This was for staff to consider options that better take into account competing community priorities.

4.2       Staff have engaged with key AAC partner agencies and considered other public information to understand the issues and refine the programme as detailed in this report.

4.3       This report does not address individual project design. Community views and preferences on design details will be managed through the usual project engagement process.

4.4       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.4.1   Activity: Roads and Footpaths

·     Level of Service: 16.0.3 Maintain resident satisfaction with roadway condition

4.5       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Modified programme for An Accessible City – consistent with the draft Long Term Plan (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Maintain the An Accessible City programme provided for in the 15-25 Long Term Plan as amended by the 17-18 Annual Plan.

·     Option 3 – Modified programme as per Option 1 with the addition of AAC Salisbury and Kilmore Streets.

·     Option 4 - Abandon the An Accessible City programme.

4.6       Option 1 - Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.6.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Will further progress completion of the transport network within the core of the central city.

·     Continuing to deliver the themes and components developed through Share an Idea

·     Enables completion of the proposed transport projects within timeframes that are sympathetic to private sector development work. This will minimise disruption to the private sector and established activities.

·     Links to the completion of Otakaro Ltd led projects. This includes some AAC projects, public transport improvements and pedestrian safety.

·     Completes connections to significant Major Cycle Routes projects and provides for east-west and north-south cycling connections. This provides road safety and connectivity benefits and realisation of the investment in the Major Cycle Routes programme.

·     Allows for the construction of the tram infrastructure and network extension to occur at the same time as the An Accessible City portion of construction on High Street.

·     Upgrading the Bealey Avenue/Papanui Road intersection relieves traffic congestion on Victoria Street and provides lane priority for buses at this intersection. Additionally the proposed work at the Bealey Avenue/Papanui Road intersection realises the benefits of the recent widening of Bealey Avenue and upgrading of the pedestrian crossings at Montreal Street and Durham Street.

·    Upgrades the poor condition storm water, road surface, footpath, kerb and channel assets on Victoria Street. This avoids the need to spend maintenance funds in Victoria Street and avoids the long term disruption to businesses as a result of ongoing maintenance activities.

4.6.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Concerns may be raised by some central business stakeholders that this option may adversely affect their business due to the disruption of the proposed road works. Therefore, it is critical that communications are timely, detailed and all affected parties are engaged.

·     Disruption to the inner city transport network.  This will be managed through the integration of project work, the careful management of contractors, the construction methodologies and with the support of CTOC.

·     Delaying the delivery of the two way conversion on Salisbury and Kilmore Streets causes a delay in realising some public transport benefits.

 

5.   Context/Background

An Accessible City Background

5.1       The Christchurch Central Recovery Plan was notified in the New Zealand Gazette on 31 July 2012 and had effect from that date.

5.2       An Accessible City is the transport chapter of the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan. An Accessible City also includes amendments to the transport provisions of Christchurch City Council’s District Plan.

5.3       An Accessible City aims to revitalise the central city transport system to provide a range of travel options that are flexible and resilient.  An Accessible City is designed to manage projected population growth as well as supporting growth in travel by public transport, walking and cycling. 

5.4       An Accessible City is a ten year transport plan which delivers central city transport projects in line with budget approvals, development, transport demand and long term plan approval processes.  

5.5       The 2015 to 2025 Long Term Plan outlined the initial programme for An Accessible City.

5.6       Stage one of the An Accessible City is well underway.  Stage one projects delivered by Council have largely been completed.

 

Refer to map 1 below, which outlines central city horizontal projects which are completed, under construction and proposed as per option 1 of this report.

 

 

Map 1 – Central city projects completed, under construction and proposed as per option 1 of this report

KEY: TP30 = Transport Project 30km speed reduction to central core and visual gateway installations at 30km entry points. 

KEY: Wayfinding = Installation of directional signage supporting the four modes of transport.

 

Interdependencies with other programmes

5.7       Major Cycle Routes (MCR).  The following MCR connect to the four avenues and continue connections into the central city:

·   Papanui Parallel along Colombo Street.

·   Rapanui-Shag Rock along Worcester Street.

·   Heathcote Expressway along Ferry Road and St Asaph Street.

·   Quarryman’s Trail along Antigua Street.

·   Uni-Cycle across Hagley Park to Armagh Street.

5.8       All MCR projects currently terminate at the avenues on the edge of the central city with the intention that the AAC programme will complete routes within the central city, including linkages to MCR’s. 

5.9       The critical routes for completion are:

5.9.1   Papanui Parallel – Colombo Street from Bealey Avenue to Cathedral Square.  This is the main cycleway connection to the central city from the north. When the Northern Corridor cycleway is complete this route will provide the connection north to the Hurunui Heartland Ride and further north to Kaikoura.

5.9.2   Heathcote Expressway – Ferry Road from Fitzgerald Avenue to St Asaph Street. This will complete the section into the central city and links past Ara Institute and Cathedral College and Marion College. Scheme design is underway and initial engagement has been undertaken with significant stakeholders.

5.9.3   Quarryman’s Trail – Antigua Street from Moorhouse Avenue to Hospital Corner.  This links Hoon Hay to the central city and provides access to destinations in the south west corner of the central city.

City Tram Network and High Street

5.10    The proposed tram network and installation was consulted on in 2009 and the budget for installation programmed in the Long Term Plan at the time.  The proposed construction programme had section 1 completed before the Rugby World Cup of 2011 and section 2 completed approximately two years later. 

5.11    Changes to the network have been required as a result of the earthquakes and the resulting programme of works in the central city. Community engagement will be undertaken as part of the standard project development process moving forward.

5.12    The current proposal for the next stage of the tram (Stage 1B) is to extend the track and overhead network from Polar Lane to High Street, at the intersection of St Asaph Street and Madras Street. The An Accessible City project that aligns with this installation is the High Street upgrade. Refer to figure 1 below which details section (1B).

5.13    The logic to undertake the tram extension at the same time as the High Street upgrade is to avoid digging up the road on two separate occasions.

5.14    It is noted that funding for the tram extension is not part of the An Accessible City budget and funding for the tram has been allowed for in the proposed 2018-2028 Long Term Plan and will be subject to the LTP engagement and decision making process.

 

Figure 1 – Proposed Tram extension Stage 1B showing cross over in High Street

5.15    Refurbishment of the heritage buildings along this section of High Street is underway and integration of the tram works with An Accessible City street works will positively support development and activity in this area.

Central City Development

5.16    Development activities have progressed in 2017 with the completion and opening of a number of new buildings and businesses. Staff note the current redevelopments along High Street and Hereford Street are specific examples where the continuation of future An Accessible City projects is particularly important.

5.17    Timing of development and infrastructure renewals is critical to the functioning and success of the central city. The importance of transport project timing and coordination with private sector development has been considered in the options put forward.

Competing Demands

5.18    There are three broadly competing project demands for AAC funding listed in the table below. These competing demands carry different benefits and risks which are considered in the options put forward.

Demand

Benefit

Risks

Keeping in time with development

Allows for road opening in time with vertical development

Commencing road construction once tenants have established trading, carries business disruption, financial and reputational risk

Completing links between MCR projects and AAC projects

Provides completed cycle links from MCR to AAC projects

MCR projects complete at the four avenues. Incomplete links (Colombo St, Antigua St, Ferry Rd) carry a level of road safety risk to cyclists

Public transport

(AAC Salisbury & Kilmore)

Increased passenger service and bus priority

Completion of the AAC Salisbury and Kilmore St projects would increase the level of service to public transport passengers

Table 1 – Competing demands for AAC funding

 

Engagement with Partner Agencies and others

5.19    Meetings with partner agencies were undertaken as a part of the programme development. Staff undertook discussions with Environment Canterbury (ECan), the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA), Regenerate Christchurch, Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet (DPMC) and Otakaro Limited.  On 13 December 2017 staff held a workshop to discuss the competing needs and funding issues with the Infrastructure Transport and Environment Committee. All feedback has been considered in the programme being proposed as part of the draft 2018-2028 Long Term Plan process.

5.20    Staff have also considered information from discussions with stakeholders in the community and information presented through public deputations and in media articles to inform this report. 

5.21    Engagement with the community and affected stakeholders on the programme of delivery for An Accessible City will occur as part of the Long Term Plan engagement and decision making process. Engagement on the details of individual projects, their function and the potential construction impacts will be undertaken as part of the project delivery process with all affected stakeholders.

5.22    It should be noted there has already been engagement undertaken on Victoria Street, which currently has an approved plan.  Staff will continue to engage with Victoria Street stakeholders to ensure the timing and phasing of any works is clearly understood and the construction impacts are minimised. This will be reported back to the committee.


 

6.   Option 1 – Modified programme for An Accessible City – consistent with the draft Long Term Plan (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Deliver the AAC programme in accordance with table 2 below:

Table 2 – Option 1 – Projects description

 

Figure 2 – Option 1 Funding - Modified Programme for An Accessible City – consistent with the draft 2018-28 LTP

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is high, consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for the proposed programme will be undertaken as part of the overall Long Term Plan engagement and decision making process. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Public consultation on An Accessible City took place from November 2012 to February 2013. Consultation occurred as part of the 2015-25 Long Term Plan and the amendments that occurred as part of the 2017/18 Annual Plan.

6.6       Community views and preferences will be sought through the 2018-28 LTP engagement and decision making process. Individual projects will undergo specific engagement through the project delivery lifecycle.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation – This report does not seek approval for additional costs, but seeks to identify potential alterations to delivery timeframes.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – This has been accounted for in the forward planning of existing maintenance budgets.

6.10    Funding source – AAC programme within the Long Term Plan.

Legal Implications

6.11    The AAC programme timing does not currently align with the future changes to one-way streets detailed in Council’s Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. However, the new Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 comes into force on 1 March 2018.  Staff are currently working on a report setting out the changes required by resolution to bring the list of one-way streets up to date.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.12    There is a risk that key stakeholders prefer the programme in the 2015-25 LTP because of the public transport benefits associated with converting Kilmore/Salisbury to two ways streets.  Staff have held meetings with the partners as referred to in section 5.19 of this report to reduce risks around competing demands and will have further engagement with the community during the Long Term Plan process. Continued clear consistent and regular communications with all stakeholders will continue.

6.13    There is a risk that some members of the community will not support the continued progression of the development of the projects in the programme as it stands.  This could result in increased stakeholder management and community engagement costs.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies ­- The implementation of the An Accessible City programme, the Major Cycle Routes Programme and the extension of the tram network all interact and need to be programmed appropriately.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – In line with budget timeframes and option description.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Will further progress completion of the transport network within the core of the central city.

·   Enables completion of the proposed transport projects within timeframes that are sympathetic to private sector development work. This will help to minimise disruption to the private sector and established activities.

·   Links to the completion of Otakaro Ltd led projects. This includes some AAC projects, public transport improvements and pedestrian safety.

·   Completes connections to significant Major Cycle Routes projects and provides for east-west and north-south cycling connections. This provides road safety and connectivity benefits and realisation of the investment in the Major Cycle Routes programme.

·   Allows for the construction of the tram infrastructure and network extension to occur at the same time as the An Accessible City portion of construction on High Street.

·   Upgrading the Bealey Avenue/Papanui Road intersection relieves traffic congestion on Victoria Street and provides lane priority for buses at this intersection. Additionally the proposed work at the Bealey Avenue/Papanui Road intersection realises the benefits of the recent widening of Bealey Avenue and upgrading of the pedestrian crossings at Montreal Street and Durham Street.

·   Upgrades the poor condition storm water, road surface, footpath, kerb and channel assets on Victoria Street. This avoids the need to spend maintenance funds in Victoria Street and avoids the long term disruption to businesses as a result of ongoing maintenance activities.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Concerns may be raised by some central business stakeholders that this option may adversely affect their business due to the disruption of the proposed road works. Therefore, it is critical that communications are timely, detailed and all affected parties are engaged.

·   Disruption to the inner city transport network.  This will be managed through the integration of project work, the careful management of contractors, the construction methodologies and with the support of CTOC.

·   Delaying the delivery of the two way conversion on Salisbury and Kilmore Streets causes a delay in realising some public transport benefits.


 

7.   Option 2 – Maintain AAC program provided for in the 15-25 Long Term Plan as amended by the 17-18 Annual Plan

Option Description

7.1       Deliver the AAC programme to the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan as amended by the 2017-2018 Annual Plan.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is high, consistent, with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance have been undertaken through the engagement on the 2015-25 Long Term Plan.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       Public consultation on An Accessible City took place from November 2012 to February 2013. The 2015-25 long term plan was consulted on from September 2014 and approved in March 2015.

7.6       The community views on this programme have already been sought through the consultation for the 2015-25 Long Term Plan. Individual projects will undergo specific engagement through the project delivery lifecycle.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.8       Cost of Implementation – No change to the current budgets in the agreed Annual Plan. Changes will be required to the draft Long Term Plan.

7.9       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs – This has been accounted for in the forward planning of existing maintenance budgets.

7.10    Funding source – AAC programme within Long Term Plan and Annual Plan.

Legal Implications

7.11    The AAC programme timing does not currently align with the future changes to one-way streets detailed in Council’s Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. However, the new Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 comes into force on 1 March 2018.  Staff are currently working on a report setting out the changes required by resolution to bring the list of one-way streets up to date.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.12    There is a risk that the community will not support the continued progression of the An Accessible City programme as it stands.  This would result in increased stakeholder management and community engagement costs.

7.13    Not completing street upgrades in the central core could see key developments completed ahead of major infrastructure construction.  This will potentially require major construction to be undertaken while businesses are trading increasing the construction impacts to stakeholders.

7.14    Not completing the links with the MCR projects increases the level of road safety risk to cyclists who will be coming off protected cycleways onto open streets within the four avenues.

7.15    Not completing the Kilmore Street/Town Hall section of street upgrade earlier could result in two rounds of construction in this street.

Implementation

7.16    Implementation timeframe – as identified the LTP and Annual plan.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Will complete the projects as identified and consulted on through the 2015-25 Long Term Plan and 2017/18 Annual Plan

7.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not rationalise the programme to ensure efforts are focussed on linking and completing the central city and supporting development within the central city.

·   Does not connect significant programmes such as the tram extension and Major Cycle Routes to ensure efficiency of implementation, minimise impacts on businesses and maximise the benefits.

·   Does not complete Town Hall section of road works in line with the completion of this building and street front refurbishment.


 

8.   Option 3 – Modified programme as per Option 1 with the addition of AAC Salisbury and Kilmore Streets

Option Description

8.1       Deliver the AAC programme in accordance with table 2 (paragraph 6.1) with the addition of Salisbury and Kilmore Streets as per their project timeframes in the 2015-25 Long Term Plan.

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is high, consistent, with section 2 of this report.

8.3       Engagement requirements for the proposed programme will be undertaken as part of the overall Long Term Plan engagement and decision making process.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.5       Public consultation on An Accessible City took place from November 2012 to February 2013. Consultation occurred as part of the 2015-25 Long Term Plan and the amendments that occurred as part of the 2017/18 Annual Plan.

8.6       Community views and preferences will be sought through the 2018-28 Long Term Plan engagement and decision making process. Individual projects will undergo specific engagement through the project delivery lifecycle.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

8.8       Cost of Implementation – Option 3 proposes to increase the Long Term Plan budget to allow for the inclusion of the projects Salisbury and Kilmore Street projects.

8.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – This has been accounted for in the forward planning of existing maintenance budgets.

8.10    Funding source – AAC programme within Long Term Plan.

Legal Implications

8.11    The AAC programme timing does not currently align with the future changes to one-way streets detailed in Council’s Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. However, the new Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 comes into force on 1 March 2018.  Staff are currently working on a report setting out the changes required by resolution to bring the list of one-way streets up to date.

Risks and Mitigations    

8.12    Same as for option one, with the exception of the risks relating to public transport.

8.13    Increased budget required for this option will affect the ability to deliver other projects within the wider transport programme, or other Long Term Plan projects.

Implementation

8.14    Implementation dependencies - The implementation of the An Accessible City programme, the Major Cycle Routes Programme and the extension of the Tram all interact and need to be programmed appropriately.

8.15    Implementation timeframe – as identified in figure 2, with the addition of Salisbury and Kilmore Streets.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.16    The advantages of this option include the advantages identified for option 1 plus:

·   Links to the completion of the partner agency delivered projects including AAC projects, public transport improvements and pedestrian safety.

·   Includes design and delivery of Salisbury and Kilmore streets realising the public transport benefits provided by the east west route which Kilmore Street will provide.

8.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   As additional funding is required this may impact on other Long Term Plan projects.

·   Given the complexities of changing Kilmore and Salisbury Streets from one-way to two-way this project may not be able to be delivered within the next three years. 


 

9.   Option 4 – Abandon the An Accessible City programme.

Option Description

9.1       This option would stop all work on the An Accessible City programme and the tram extension.

Significance

9.2       The level of significance of this option is high, consistent with section 2 of this report.

9.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance will need to be undertaken as part of the 2018-28 Long Term Plan engagement.

9.4       Additional consultation maybe required given the significance of stopping work all together.

Impact on Mana Whenua

9.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

9.6       The wider community are specifically affected by this option due to the comprehensive nature of the decision.  Their views will need to be sought. This may be possible through the engagement on the 2018-28 Long Term Plan.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

9.7       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

9.7.1   Inconsistency – Inconsistent with the current Long Term Plan, Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan, the Greater Christchurch Transport Statement and the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan.

9.7.2   Reason for inconsistency – Delivery is expected as part of the ongoing programme of work.

9.7.3   Amendment necessary – Consultation on the change would be necessary and could occur through the Long Term Plan engagement process.

Financial Implications

9.8       Cost of Implementation – no further costs against these projects.

9.9       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs – maintenance and operations costs are likely to increase as the damaged assets in the central city will require more attention. 

9.10    Funding source – not applicable.

Legal Implications

9.11    Additional legal advice will be required on whether amendments to the District Plan or other statutory documents are necessary to support this option.

9.12    The AAC programme timing does not currently align with the future changes to one-way streets detailed in Council’s Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008. However, the new Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 comes into force on 1 March 2018.  Staff are currently working on a report setting out the changes required by resolution to bring the list of one-way streets up to date.

Risks and Mitigations   

9.13    There is a potential risk of challenge from central government that Council has not upheld the agreed programme and development timelines to meet the requirements for the Central City Recovery Plan.

Implementation

9.14    Implementation dependencies - No implementation.

9.15    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

9.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Budget will be made available within the wider Capital Programme for other projects.

·   There will be less disruption to adjacent businesses

9.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The Council portion of the AAC programme will not be delivered and appropriate connections to partner agency projects will not be achieved.

·   Significant asset renewals will not be achieved within the central city, which may lead to continued asset degradation.

·   Consistency, cohesion and connectivity will not be easily achieved in the central city and this will not support the changes to the population base and the changing development within this area of the city.

·   Inconsistent with key strategic documents, such as Council’s Transport Plan, the Greater Christchurch Transport Statement and the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Lynette Ellis - Manager Planning and Delivery Transport

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

Stefan Jermy - Project Manager

Approved By

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

8.        Amendments to Delegations for new Bylaws

Reference:

18/19796

Contact:

Vivienne Wilson

Vivienne.wilson@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to recommend to the Council that it make changes to delegations to community boards, the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee, and the Chief Executive as outlined in this report.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommends that the Council:

1.         Relying on clause 32 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 and for the purposes of the efficiency and effectiveness in the conduct of the Council’s business, and relying on any other applicable statutory authority,

a.         Revoke the “Roads” delegations to community boards set out in part 2.0 of Subpart 1 of Part D of the Delegations Register (pages 175 to 179), and

b.         Revoke the delegations to the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee set out in Subpart 3 of Part D of the Delegations Register (pages 194 and 195), and

c.         Revoke the delegations  to the Chief Executive in respect of the Christchurch City Council Marine and River Facilities Bylaw 2008, the Christchurch City Council Stock Control Bylaw 2008 and the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 set out in Subpart 5 of Part A of the Delegations Register (set out on pages 43 and 44), and

d.         Delegate to community boards, the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee, and the Chief Executive the responsibilities, duties, and powers as set out in Attachment B.

2.         Approve that these changes to delegations come into force on 1 March 2018.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Amend the delegations to community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the chief executive (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do not amend the delegations to community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the chief executive

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     The community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and staff have the necessary delegations in place to act on any matter before the Council (except for those matters specifically reserved to the Council). 

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     There are no identified disadvantages.  Given that the Council has already determined to delegate many of these matters in the past, these changes will keep the Delegations Register current and fit for purpose.

 

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       On 23 November 2017, the Council resolved that three replacement bylaws come into force on 1 March 2018.  These are Christchurch City Council Marine, River and Lake Facilities Bylaw 2017 (“Marine, River and Lake Facilities Bylaw”), the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2017 (“Traffic and Parking Bylaw”), and the Christchurch City Council Stock on Roads Bylaw 2017 (“Stock on Roads Bylaw”). 

5.2       These replacement bylaws followed a review of the Christchurch City Council Marine and River Facilities Bylaw 2008, the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, the Christchurch City Council Speed Limits Bylaw 2010, and the Christchurch City Council Stock Control Bylaw 2008 (“the former bylaws”). 

5.3       The Council had delegated a range of powers under the former bylaws to community boards, the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and staff.  These delegations now need to be updated to reflect the new bylaw provisions.  It is also timely to clarify the wording of some existing delegations to ensure that Council delegations are fit for purpose. 

5.4       The Council’s Delegations Register is set out as follows:

·   Contents

·   How this delegation register works

·   Delegations policy

·   Part A – Statutory and Other Delegations to the Chief Executive

·   Part B – Statutory and Other Delegations to Staff

·   Part C – Statutory and Other Delegations from the Chief Executive to Staff

·   Part D – Council to Community Boards, Committees, Sub-Committees, and Other Subordinate Decision-making Bodies

5.5       Part A contains the principal delegation to the Chief Executive.  The Chief Executive has, for the purpose of performing her duties, all of the Council’s responsibilities, duties, and powers to act on any matter, subject to specific restrictions set out in the tables in Part A.  The Chief Executive may then sub-delegate a large number of matters to staff.  These sub-delegations are set out in Part C of the register, and are updated regularly. 

5.6       Part B of the Register provides for delegations directly to staff because the law does not allow for sub-delegations of these matters, or it has been determined to delegate these matters directly to staff.  For example, delegations under the Resource Management Act 1991 or the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002.

5.7       Part D of the Register contains the delegations to Community Boards, Council Committees, Officer Subcommittees, Hearings Panels and other subordinate decision-making bodies of the Council. 

5.8       Staff have identified a number of changes that need to be made to the Register in Parts A and D.  Once these changes have been made, the Chief Executive will be able to make a series of sub-delegations to staff. 

5.9       The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) emphasises that delegations are made for the purposes of efficiency and effectiveness of the organisation.  The Council’s Delegations Policy states that the Council supports the principle of delegating decision-making to the lowest competent level. 

Nature of proposed changes – Community Boards and roads

5.10    In terms of the changes to the Community Board delegations for roads, staff are proposing a new part 2 of Part D of the Register.  This is to provide for the new bylaw provisions and to better align the substantive delegations with the authorising legislation – for example Part 37 of the Local Government Act 1974. 

5.11    It is also the view of the Legal Services Unit that the community board delegations in relation to roads could be more clearly expressed.  For this reason the delegations to community boards with respect to roads look different to the current layout of delegations.  A copy of the current delegations is provided in Attachment A.  A copy of the proposed new delegations is found in Attachment B. 

5.12    The bylaw delegations relating to roads have been updated to reflect the wording of the new Traffic and Parking Bylaw.  For the most part the delegations relating to the bylaw clauses reflect the current delegations already held by Community Boards.  This means that the community boards retain delegated authority to make the following decisions:

·   Vehicle crossing objections

·   Road stopping

·   Naming of roads

·   Parking, stopping, standing prohibitions and restrictions

·   Approving concept plans for road alterations, traffic restraints and treatments

·   Traffic movements (eg stop, give way, no right turn, not left turn, no heavy motor vehicles)

5.13    However, it is proposed that three new delegations be given to community boards under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw.  These relate to clauses 20, 21 and 22 of the Bylaw:

·   Shared zones – the boards will have the power to resolve shared zones and the restrictions on the use of the shared zone

·   Shared paths – the boards will have the power to resolve shared paths and the priority of users on the shared path

·   Restricting the use of motor vehicles on unformed legal roads.

5.14    It is proposed that three delegations be removed from the current community board delegations.  These are as follows:

·   Garages on roads – the current delegation is the power of the Council to approve the erection of garages, parking platforms and structures related to vehicular access wholly or partly on road.  However, this has been superseded by the delegations contained in the Council’s Structures on Roads Policy 2010.

·   Temporary controls on any road for traffic and parking – the current delegation is for temporary controls at roadworks and building sites including Construction Site Loading Zones.  However, this matter is already delegated to staff.

·   Road markings – the current delegation is to make any changes to road markings after consultation with stakeholders.  In practice, the boards determine regulatory road markings after consultation with stakeholders.  This delegation effectively sits under section 334 of the Local Government Act 1974 and there will be an express exclusion for non-regulatory road markings which is delegated to staff.  Examples of non-regulatory road markings include centre lines, edge lines, lane arrows, and parking limit lines in certain circumstances.

Nature of proposed changes – Community Boards and marine, river and lake facilities

5.15    It is proposed that the community boards will have a new delegation under the Marine River and Lake Facilities Bylaw to resolve permanent no fishing zones to protect Council facilities from damage, to protect health and safety, or to protect against nuisance.  Other powers under this bylaw are exercised by authorised officers.

Nature of proposed changes – Community Boards and stock on roads

5.16    It is proposed that community boards will have a new delegation under the Stock on Roads Bylaw to resolve that any road or category of road be a restricted road for the movement of stock.  Other powers under this bylaw are exercised by authorised officers.

Nature of proposed changes – Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

5.17    The Parking Restrictions Subcommittee has a number of delegations under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw, primarily in relation to the central city area.  A copy of the map of the central city area is set out in Attachment C.  The current delegations have been added to over the last few years and also reflect provisions in the Annual Plan Fees and Charges Schedule.

5.18    The new delegations reflect the Traffic and Parking Bylaw – leaving the references to the Annual Plan Fees and Charges Schedule intact. 

Delegations to CEO

5.19    In terms of the delegations to the Chief Executive, it is proposed to revoke the current delegations under the former bylaws and delegate all remaining powers, functions and duties to the Chief Executive with the exception of the matters that are delegated to the community boards and the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee.  The Chief Executive will then be able to sub-delegate the powers, functions and duties to council officers.


 

6.   Option 1 – Amend the delegations to community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the Chief Executive (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Amend the delegations to the community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the chief executive as outlined in this report and shown in Attachment B.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       The community views are not specifically affected by this option because it relates to internal Council processes.  At the time of writing this report, staff are scheduled to speak at the Community Board Chairs Forum to brief community board chairs on the changes.  

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation – there is minimal staff costs to implement this change in delegations.

Legal Implications

6.7       Clause 32(1) of Schedule 7 of the LGA 02 provides a general power of delegation as follows: 

Unless expressly provided otherwise in this Act, or in any other Act, for the purposes of efficiency and effectiveness in the conduct of a local authority's business, a local authority may delegate to a committee or other subordinate decision-making body, community board, or member or officer of the local authority any of its responsibilities, duties, or powers except—

(a)       the power to make a rate; or

(b)       the power to make a bylaw; or

(c)       the power to borrow money, or purchase or dispose of assets, other than in accordance with the long-term plan; or

(d)       the power to adopt a long-term plan, annual plan, or annual report; or

(e)       the power to appoint a chief executive; or

(f)        the power to adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under this Act in association with the long-term plan or developed for the purpose of the local governance statement; or

(g)       [Repealed]

(h)       the power to adopt a remuneration and employment policy.

 

 

6.8       The proposed changes to the delegations do not infringe the restrictions in the LGA 02.

Risks and Mitigations

6.9       Risk – there are no identified risks caused by this option. 

Implementation

6.10    Implementation timeframe - the amended delegations will be recorded in the Council’s Delegations Register by the Legal Services Unit as soon as possible.  The amended delegations will be exercised as and when required by the community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and staff (once sub-delegated).

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.11    The advantages of this option include:

·   The community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and staff have the necessary delegations in place to act on any matter before the Council (except for those matters specifically reserved to the Council). 

6.12    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   There are no identified disadvantages.  Given that the Council has already determined to delegate many of these matters in the past, these changes will keep the Delegations Register current and fit for purpose.


 

7.   Option 2 – Do not amend the delegations to the community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the chief executive

Option Description

7.1       Do not amend the delegations to the community boards, Parking Restrictions Subcommittee and the chief executive as outlined in this report.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       The community views are not specifically affected by this option because it relates to internal Council processes. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - there are no implementation costs with this option

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – as above.

7.8       Funding source – as above.

Legal Implications

7.9       If the Council does not amend the delegations as indicated in Attachment A, the Council will be required to make all decisions under the new bylaws.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    The number of decisions to be made (particularly under the Traffic and parking Bylaw) is extensive.  From a practical perspective it would be unworkable to have all these decisions made at Council level.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - as above.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.12    The advantages of this option include:

·   There are no identified advantages of this option.

7.13    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Council time will be taken up with a myriad of community level decisions.  

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Current Community Board Delegations - Roads

83

b

Changes to Delegations Following Bylaw Changes

89

c

Plan A - Central City Area

103

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Vivienne Wilson - Associate General Counsel

Andrew Hensley - Traffic Engineer

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Approved By

John Higgins - Acting Head of Legal Services

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizen and Community

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

9.        Heathcote River Dredging - Stage 1

Reference:

18/69548

Contact:

Keith Davison

keith.davison@ccc.govt.nz

941 8071

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to recommend that the Council approve the Stage 1 Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River dredging physical works between Radley Street and the Woolston Cut barrage in FY18.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by considering the impacts on the community, cultural values, the environment, and the ability of Council to meet levels of service.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council:

1.         Approve that Stage 1 of the Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River dredging physical works between Radley Street (upstream) and the Woolston Cut barrage (downstream) be fast-tracked to begin in FY18 utilising reprioritised Land Drainage Recovery Programme budgets.

2.         Approve that delegation be granted to the General Manager City Services to award the Land Drainage Recovery Programme construction contract for the Stage 1 dredging works.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Flood Protection and Control Works

·     Level of Service: 14.1.5 Implement Land Drainage Recovery Programme works to reduce flooding

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Fast-track Stage 1 dredging works to begin in FY18 using existing budget (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Delay Stage 1 dredging works until budget is approved through the Long Term Plan

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Allows for an early start to the dredging works

·     Frequent flood reduction benefits achieved in the lower Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River sooner

·     Reduces impact on inanga spawning by prioritising works around spawning sites

·     Opportunity to improve the landscape values of this corridor

·     Works more likely to take place outside of the whitebaiting season

·     Maximises the benefits of other floodplain management works such as the Upper Heathcote storage scheme

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Higher risks of delays and cost escalation due to fast-tracking

·     Less time for consultation on the tree removals and landscape plan

4.4       The full Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River Floodplain Management Scheme was reported to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee on 8 November 2017 and a recommendation was made by the Committee to Council to approve the works.

4.5       Council approved the Scheme in Council resolution CNCL/2017/00326. This included approval for “progressing dredging in the Heathcote River through to detailed design and implementation”.

4.6       This report is to seek approval to implement Stage 1 of the works in FY18.

 

5.   Context/Background

Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River Floodplain Management Scheme

5.1       On 23 November 2017 Council approved (resolution CNCL/2017/00326) the following works:

·   The Upper Heathcote Storage Scheme, which is the foundation of all other options and is being progressed with implementation dependent on funding.

·   Dredging between Hansen Park and the Woolston Cut.

·   Flood Intervention Policy, which is currently being implemented for eligible houses along the Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River.

·   Low stopbanks. Further investigation into the technical feasibility is underway ahead of consultation with the community.

5.2       Bank stabilisation (which results in some channel widening) was not included in the options report, because although it is important for floodplain management, it was already fully funded and Stage 1 physical works has commenced. 

Dredging

5.3       The proposed dredging was outlined in the report to the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee (ITE) on 8 November 2017. The key points were:

·   Hydraulic modelling has demonstrated that flooding upstream of Radley Street is caused in part by the inadequate capacity of the channel to convey flood flows to the Woolston Cut and out to the estuary.

·   Dredging can increase channel conveyance, reduce water levels and frequent floods. Dredging can also reduce the length of time water occupies the floodplain, which has relevance where flooding displaces people from their homes or forces road closure and access restrictions.

·   Based on analysis of past channel profiles, the reach with the greatest raising of the bed (through sedimentation and earthquake impacts) and overall loss in cross-sectional area through sediment deposition and possibly earthquake effects, is between Hansen Park and the Woolston Cut.  

·   It is estimated that a volume of approximately 60,000 m3 of material needs to be removed to achieve the proposed design channel.

5.4       Some of the key outcomes from this modelling of the effects of dredging in frequent (1 in 10 annual exceedance probability, AEP) flooding include:

·   Reduction in the maximum water level over and above that provided by upstream storage by approximately 300 mm, around Hansen Park.

·   This water level reduction reduces to less than 100 mm around Ensors Road in an upstream direction and Radley Street in a downstream direction.

·   Reduces the number of dwellings at risk of flooding above the floor level in both frequent and extreme events.

·   Reduces the number of houses flooded beneath the floor, and reduces the length of roads affected by frequent flooding.

·   The benefits of dredging will be compromised in the future by sea level rise, but it is predicted that benefits will extend until approximately 0.25 metres sea level rise occurs. This is currently estimated to occur in 25-30 years.

5.5       The total cost of dredging is estimated at $16.5M. This includes costs for bank stabilisation which will need to occur in conjunction with the dredging.

5.6       To achieve dredging along the full reach within the project timeframes, address reach specific environmental constraints, and to meet public expectations, it is proposed to break the work into three distinct packages.  The three proposed stages are shown in Figure 1, and the key issues for each stage are given in Table 1.

Figure 1 Proposed Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River Dredging Stages

 

 

 

 

Table 1 Key issues for each stage

Stage

Length

Estimated Volume

Stage Issues

Proposed Physical Works Timing

Stage 1 Woolston Cut To Radley Street

700 m

15,000 m3

· Vegetation and trees along banks

· Limited access along bank

· No asbestos in 2 samples on this stage

Possible work in mid-2018 subject to landscape plan approvals, consenting and funding.

Stage 2 Radley to Brougham Street

1,200 m

20,000 m3

· Primary Inanga spawning area

· Bank stability and proximity to roads

· Tree retention along banks

· Limited temporary working space

· Asbestos in 2/6 samples on this area

Dredging Late 2018 – 2019 outside of Inanga spawning season (December – May) subject to consenting and funding.

Stage 3 Brougham Street to Hansen Park

1,500–2,000m

(upstream extent to be confirmed)

20,000 m3

· Limited road access

· Less critical area for dredging

· Impact on Inanga spawning habitat downstream

· Asbestos in 1/6 samples on this area

Dredging 2019 – 2021 in line with funding

 

5.7       Staging of the work in this manner will reduce the short term impact on ecological receptors and aid recovery of each dredged reach.  It will also allow work to progress in line with funding, contractor resource and disposal facility capacity. Stage 1 has been identified as having the least constraints to be able to allow work to progress in the first half of 2018.

5.8       Care will need to be taken in managing the environmental impacts associated with dredging. Fish populations have been observed in the area which included species with a conservation status of “at risk/declining”. Dredging works and associated bank stabilisation could impact upon inanga spawning areas. However, following discussions with aquatic ecologists specialising in this area, it is considered that these risks can be mitigated through both the timing of the dredging and through compensatory works, for instance, placing straw bales to increase spawning.

5.9       Initial assessment of sediment quality has been undertaken in the form of 14 samples along the length of the river.  Samples were analysed for metals, hydrocarbons and asbestos.  Key conclusions from the Engeo Ltd report were:

·   With the exception of lead at one location, all results for metals meet human health protection criteria for residential and recreational soil. 

·   All Petroleum Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) results meet available NZ guideline levels for residential and recreational values.

·   Several PAH results exceed the more conservative USEPA adopted values for residential land use criteria.

·   Concentrations of PAHs exceed the ANZECC guidelines in several locations (Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality)

·   Asbestos fibres were detected in three of the 14 locations.

5.10    The sediment analysis to date indicates that there will be some locations that contain asbestos and these will need to be identified, separated and disposed of appropriately.  Where the sediment is free from asbestos, contamination from metals and hydrocarbons is sufficiently low that there is unlikely to be a significant risk to human health of recreational, adjacent site occupants or contractors carrying out the work. 

5.11    Further investigation work is underway which will provide a more detailed picture of the quality of sediment at different layers of the bed sediment, and also the quality of sediment that will become exposed at completion of dredging works.

Stage 1 Dredging

5.12    The Stage 1 dredging works are proposed to take place between Radley Street and the Woolston Cut (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River Dredging Stage 1 location

 

5.13    A typical proposed dredging profile is shown in Figure 3, with the dark blue showing the existing profile and the red showing the proposed profile. This shows the increase in capacity of the river channel achieved by removing the accumulation of material between the lowest point and the banks. Where possible it is planned to also cut some of the bank to reduce steepness and improve stability.

Figure 3 Typical Stage 1 Dredge Profile

5.14    This stretch has a mix of pockets of native planting, specimen exotics (such as eucalypts), and invasive species such as white poplar. The works will likely impact on the banks, with some vegetation removal expected to be required. Native plantings will be prioritised for protection, as well as healthy specimen exotics. However, depending on the outcome of consultation with the community, invasive species such as white poplars may be removed and replaced with native plantings. This will build on work already begun by community groups in the area.

5.15    A landscape plan is in preparation for this area, and is being developed with the wider area in mind to ensure that there is a coherent landscape plan for the area. Consultation is required for the Stage 1 landscape plan and approval by the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board is necessary. If the Stage 1 landscape plan is consulted on early 2018 it will provide a valuable opportunity for feedback into a wider plan for the area, while not compromising the development of a comprehensive plan.

5.16    Inanga spawning occurs primarily between Radley Street and just upstream of Opawa Road.  There is also some spawning on the ‘loop’ below the Woolston barrage, however for reasons likely to be dominated by a lack of habitat there is no spawning between the barrage and Radley Street. 

5.17    By progressing dredging of Stage 1 first, it is expected that an increase in suitable habitat can be achieved on this reach as part of reinstatement plans.  This increased habitat, and additional temporary measures such as straw bale deployment will be mitigating factors for when the existing spawning habitat along Stage 2 (Radley Street to Opawa Road) is impacted by dredging on this reach.  Other inanga spawning mitigation strategies that will be considered will be timing of the works (the peak spawning season is over by May), possible limitation of work on spring high tides and maintenance of fish passage for inanga travelling downstream to spawn.

5.18    Prior to physical works occurring, trapping and relocation will be undertaken to reduce as much as practically possible the impacts on instream fauna.  The dredging undertaken in Woolston Cut and Stage 1 below Radley Street provides an opportunity to trial methodology and optimise site procedures to reduce the likelihood of significant impacts on the upstream reaches.

5.19    Sediment disposal options may include existing waste management facilities or alternative locations where the sediment may be used beneficially for land remediation.  Locations for sediment placement being considered include the former Bromley landfill where settlement following the earthquakes has left parts of the ground uneven and in some locations existing cover is not sufficiently thick to prevent breakthrough of refuse.

5.20    The estimated cost of the works along this stretch is $3M and is in keeping with the estimate in the report to ITE on 8 November 2017.

5.21    The works are currently being progressed on a fast-track basis to ensure the earliest possible delivery of flood mitigation benefits. Fast-tracking has involved: early engagement with runanga, community groups, Environment Canterbury and the Department of Conservation; having early contractor involvement; progressing sediment sampling early; and undertaking extensive survey work. However, fast-tracking the works does increases risks of cost escalations or delays, and reduces the timeframe for engagement. These risks are outlined in the risks and mitigations section below.


 

6.   Option 1 - Begin Stage 1 dredging works in FY18 using existing budget (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Stage 1 dredging works between Radley Street and the Woolston Barrage (Figure 1) begin in May 2018 (FY18) utilising reprioritised Land Drainage Recovery Programme (LDRP) budgets.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

6.5       Mahaanui Kurataiao Limited (MKT) has been informed of the works and the proposal for the Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River dredging was discussed at Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri kaitaki on 14 December 2017.  The feedback and comments that were brought up at the meeting are as follows:

·   “The Kaitiaki stated they were disappointed a global consent has been granted for dredging activities to occur within the Heathcote/Ōpāwaho. The Kaitiaki do not support global consents as these types of consents may limit future rūnanga input for works/projects which can occur under such consents.

·   The Kaitiaki however acknowledged that CCC are seeking feedback in this instance.

·   The Kaitiaki confirmed that they do have concerns with the proposed dredging activity.

·   The Kaitiaki Committee queried why it is necessary to dredge the entire proposed section of the river. Concerns were raised around the large length of the river subject to dredging and potential effects to mahinga kai species and habitats.

·   The Kaitiaki also queried whether the dredging would adversely affect the inanga spawning research exercise which involved creating alternative habitat by way of placing hay along the river banks. The Kaitiaki did not wish to see this positive work being essentially ‘undone” by the dredging.

·   The kaitiaki also confirmed that a section of the dredging appears to be within a known former Pā site (Māori occupation area).”

6.6       Ongoing engagement will take place with the runanga through MKT to address the concerns and work together to ensure that mitigation measures are put in place. In particular the Stage 1 section has been selected as there is no known inanga spawning in this section, but it is anticipated that by changing the bank slope in places spawning may take place. Hay bales are also proposed to be placed upstream while the Stage 1 works are taking place to increase habitat for spawning as a precautionary measure. Staff are working with two ecologists to ensure that the works have minimal impact.

6.7       The former pā site has since been confirmed as being outside of the Stage 1 works and will need to be dealt with in future sections. An archaeological survey has been commissioned, and there will be a separate process of engaging with Ngati Wheke and Ngai Tuahuriri around this.

Community Views and Preferences

6.8       Residents along the Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River are specifically affected by this option due to the flooding experienced particularly following the earthquakes. 

6.9       Their views have been expressed through a variety of forums, and most recently at two public meetings held on 17 and 18 October 2017. This generated significant media interest, highlighting the strength of feeling within the community.

6.10    The views expressed have been that flood mitigation works are required and that the current level of flood risk is unacceptable. Residents have reported high levels of anxiety in anticipation of further flooding.

6.11    A petition was also presented to Council on 23 November 2017 with 300 signatories, part of which requested “that the Christchurch City Council takes immediate steps to remove silt build up from the river by starting an effective river maintenance and dredging programme”.

6.12    Further consultation will be necessary regarding the tree removals and landscape plan for the public corridor affected by the works. If Council approves fast-tracking of Stage 1 then consultation would follow this, with a report to the Community Board for approval of the tree removals and landscape plan dependent on the outcome of the consultation.

6.13    There has been some initial engagement with community groups interested in the area ahead of formal consultation to ensure that their views can be incorporated into the landscape plan for consultation.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.14    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.15    Cost of Implementation - $3M, although there is a risk of this increasing should asbestos be found within this stage or significant instabilities identified.

6.16    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Maintenance dredging would be required, with an estimate based on current levels of sedimentation being in the order of $1.5M every 10 years.

6.17    Funding source –LDRP CPMS ID 46181. There is currently $1.995M in the budget for FY18 and $1.323M for FY19 (subject to LTP funding).

Legal Implications

6.18    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

6.19    This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

6.20    Resource consent is required to undertake the works within the watercourse. It is currently anticipated that the excavation can be undertaken using existing consents.

6.21    Tree removals and removal of bank materials may require separate consent from Christchurch City Council which will be applied for once the methodology is finalised.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.22    There is a risk of not meeting the fast-track programme due to unforeseen circumstances such as encountering asbestos, not obtaining agreement on tree removals or landscape plans, etc.

6.22.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) are implemented will be Medium.

6.22.2 The proposed treatment is to progress the investigations and approvals in parallel. If a significant obstacle or cost escalation is identified then the works can be delayed until these are overcome, although this will mean a delay in programme.

6.23    There is a risk of not obtaining approvals for the tree removals or significant objections from the community.

6.23.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) are implemented will be Low.

6.23.2 The current treatment is early engagement with community groups and to design the works to protect the most significant stands of trees. The risk is also mitigated by the fact that many of the trees are invasive species such as white poplar and the project provides an opportunity to improve the species diversity in this location.

6.24    There is a risk of discovery of significantly contaminated material resulting in delays and/or cost escalation.

6.24.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) are implemented will be Low.

6.24.2 The current treatment includes sediment sampling to quantify the risk. The initial screening tests have not identified contaminants which would delay the project or result in cost escalation. Further testing is currently underway to further quantify this.

6.25    There is a risk that a suitable disposal site cannot be found resulting in delays and/or cost escalation.

6.25.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) is implemented will be Low.

6.25.2 The current treatment is that a site for disposal has been identified on Council land adjacent to the wastewater treatment plant and the details of this are being negotiated. If this proves to be unsuitable then an alternative disposal site will need to be identified which may result in higher costs.

6.26    There is a risk of undertaking the works through the autumn/winter period as there is a higher probability of wet weather and consequent flooding.

6.26.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) is implemented will be Low.

6.26.2 The proposed treatment is to clearly identify the risk to the contractor and to have a robust wet weather plan in place. This may include provision to be able to remove any obstructions within a certain notice period or similar.

Implementation

6.27    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval of tree removals and the landscape plan.

6.28    Implementation timeframe – If approvals are granted then it is planned to begin the works in May 2018. It is anticipated that the works will take up to six months including landscape planting following the main physical works.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.29    The advantages of this option include:

·   Allows for an early start to the dredging works

·   Frequent flood reduction benefits achieved in the lower Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River sooner

·   Reduces impact on inanga spawning by prioritising works around spawning sites

·   Opportunity to improve the landscape values of this corridor

·   Works more likely to take place outside whitebaiting season

·   Maximises the benefits of other floodplain management works such as the Upper Heathcote storage scheme

6.30    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Higher risk of cost escalation or programme delay

·   Less time for consultation on the tree removals and landscape plan


 

7.   Option 2 - Delay Stage 1 dredging works until FY19 and onwards budget is approved through the Long Term Plan

Option Description

7.1       Stage 1 dredging works are delayed until FY19 and onwards budget is approved through the Long Term Plan.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is medium consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

7.5       As the impact of the works will be the same, there are no differences in impact to Option 1, except that there is more time for engagement.

Community Views and Preferences

7.6       At a number of forums, and most recently at the public meetings held on 17 and 18 October, the community has requested that flood mitigation is provided, particularly along the mid and lower Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River.

7.7       The Upper Heathcote Storage Scheme only provides limited benefit to this area without both dredging and the Flood Intervention Policy. A number of residents have described the mental strain which the flooding has put them under, with rainfall causing anxiety due to the frequent flooding post-earthquake. Implementing the storage scheme alone would not allow staff to provide reassurance that the mitigation is sufficient to alleviate this concern.

7.8       In addition there has been expressed a strong desire for dredging to recommence.

7.9       For these reasons it is considered that this option would not be preferred by the community.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.10    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.11    Cost of Implementation - $3M

7.12    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Maintenance dredging would be required, with an estimate based on current levels of sedimentation being in the order of $1.5M every 10 years.

7.13    Funding source – Land Drainage Recovery Programme CPMS ID 46181. There is currently $1.995M in the budget for FY18 (requiring carry forward) and $1.323M for FY19 (subject to LTP funding).

Legal Implications

7.14    There is not a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

7.15    This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

7.16    The legal considerations are as per Option 1.

Risks and Mitigations

7.17    There is a risk of discovery of significantly contaminated material resulting in delays and/or cost escalation.

7.17.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) are implemented will be Low.

7.17.2 The current treatment includes sediment sampling to quantify the risk. The initial screening tests have not identified contaminants which would delay the project or result in cost escalation. Further testing is currently underway to further quantify this.

7.18    There is a risk that a suitable disposal site cannot be found resulting in delays and/or cost escalation.

7.18.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) is implemented will be Low.

7.18.2 The current treatment is that a site for disposal has been identified on Council land adjacent to the wastewater treatment plant and the details of this are being negotiated. If this proves to be unsuitable then an alternative disposal site will need to be identified which may result in higher costs.

Implementation

7.19    Implementation dependencies – Long Term Plan funding confirmed and Community Board approval of tree removals and the landscape plan.

7.20    Implementation timeframe – If approvals and funding are granted then works will begin late 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.21    The advantages of this option include:

·   Confirmation of Long Term Plan funding prior to undertaking works.

·   Longer timeframe for engagement with the community

·   Lower risk of cost escalation due to unforeseen circumstances

7.22    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Delay to the delivery of flood mitigation benefits

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Peter Christensen - Senior Water Engineer

Sylvia MacLaren - Programme Manager

Approved By

Keith Davison - Manager Land Drainage

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

Peter Langbein - Finance Business Partner

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

10.    Transport Unit - Bi-Monthly Report

Reference:

18/47031

Contact:

Richard Osborne

Richard.osborne@ccc.govt.nz

941 8407

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to update the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee on the activities of the Transport Unit. The report details current network performance metrics together with a status update on the Major Projects, Maintenance and Operations.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the attached Transport Unit report.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The Major Cycleways programme, Sumner Road, Christchurch Northern Corridor and the ‘An Accessible City’ programme continue to dominate the transport major projects portfolio for 2017/18.  Highlights for November, December and January include:

3.1.1   The completion and opening of the Rapanui-Shag Rock (Stage 1) major cycle route between Fitzgerald Avenue and Linwood Avenue.

3.1.2   The excavation of the catch bench above Sumner Road has completed with only drainage works required to complete this feature.

3.1.3   Construction has started on North Avon Road, the first full street renewal since the earthquakes.  Staff are working closely with the community to minimise the impact of construction activities.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

2018-02-12 Transport Unit Bi-Monthly Report to ITE Committee attachment

120

 

 

Signatories

Author

Richard Osborne - Head of Transport

Approved By

Peter Ryan - Head of Performance Management

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

11.    Three Waters and Waste report - January 2018

Reference:

18/114918

Presenter(s):

John Mackie, Head of Three Waters and Waste

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to inform the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee of the activities undertaken by the 3 Waters and Waste Unit, who are responsible for the planning, asset management, operations, maintenance and capital project delivery for all 3 waters and waste infrastructure. This includes drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, land drainage and solid waste services within the city.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated at the request of the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee to keep them up to date with the current status of the Three Water activities in Christchurch.

2.   Significance

2.1       There are no decision(s) sought in this report and therefore the significance is low in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the Three Waters and Waste January 2018 report attached.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       Overview of Three Waters and Waste Operations.  

4.2       Drinking Water Assessor removes secure status of below ground well heads.

4.3       Progress update on temporary chlorination of Christchurch drinking water.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

ITE report Three Waters and Waste - January 2018

145

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

Approved By

Andrew Howe - Planning and Performance Advisor

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 

 


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

12.  Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

             (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

             (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee

12 February 2018

 

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

13

Property purchase approval - Flood Intervention

s7(2)(a), s7(2)(i)

Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons, Conduct Negotiations

To protect the privacy of the property owner and to enable negotiations to occur

after property is purchased

14

RFP 18200840 Streetlight Supply, Installation and Maintenance

s7(2)(h)

Commercial Activities

The report contains commercially sensitive information.

Following contract award