Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 13 February 2018

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Vicki Buck

Jimmy Chen

Catherine Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie Mora

 

 

7 February 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 8258

gary.watson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board – Community Board Plan 2017-2019

 

Community Outcomes and Priorities

 

1.       Strong Communities

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

1.1          A range of social and recreational initiatives which build and develop community wellbeing.

1.2          Culturally inclusive and celebrates diversity.

   

Our Board Priorities are to:

Community

1.3          Support and encourage the involvement of children and young people in all aspects of community life including decision making.

1.4          Support and advocate for initiatives that address poverty issues and improve the well-being of families and individuals.  

1.5          Support and advocate for activities for older adults in the ward to reduce social isolation.

1.6          Advocate for culturally inclusive practices, where diversity is supported. 

1.7          Consider disability access across all projects.

1.8          Ensure partnerships are created and strengthened with community organisations, schools and the University of Canterbury.

1.9          Foster the development of leadership and celebrate this across the wards.  

Community Board Engagement

1.10       Advocate for the promotion and accessibility of the Community Board and its members so as to enhance more active participation and transparency in the Board’s decision-making.

1.11       Supporting and enabling consultation to gain clear views from the community.

Social Wellbeing

1.12       Advocate for safe, well-run and attractive social housing and strategies that reduce homelessness in the city. 

1.13       Support the creation of safe, accessible and connected places for people to meet in the community.

1.14       Support local events and activities that bring communities together.  

1.15       Support innovative projects that enhance social wellbeing.

 

2.       Liveable City

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

2.1       Residents feel safe in their communities and neighbourhoods.

2.2       Residents have ready access to parks and greenspace for recreational facilities and activities.

2.3       The cultural, natural and built heritage is acknowledged, valued and enhanced.

2.4       Children are provided with fun and safe environments.

2.5       Community facilities are provided that meet the needs of communities. 

2.6       A safe, efficient and sustainable transport and local roading network.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

Roading and Transport

2.7       Work with schools and community groups to ensure safe crossings and road networks near schools and along key transit routes. 

2.8       Support public transport and cycling initiatives that promote increased usage.

Planning

2.9       Advocate for improvements to parks, greenspace and recreational facilities. 

2.10    Advocate for the protection of the quality of residential living. 

2.11    Monitor the issues of green field subdivisions and increasing intensification across the ward. 

2.12    Advocate for the community facing the challenges of growth. 

2.13    Advocate and make decisions on effective traffic management measures that contribute to meeting the needs and connectivity of local communities.

2.14    Monitor planning issues and support community concerns through appropriate channels.

Community Facilities and Playgrounds 

2.15    Ensure the new Riccarton Community Centre and the Hornby Library and Customer Services and South West Leisure Centre meet the needs of the community.

2.16    Advocate for the timely provision of local facilities to meet the needs of growing local communities.

2.17    Ensure that usage of Council facilities is being optimised.

2.18    Advocate for the provision of quality playgrounds throughout the wards. 

Heritage

2.19    Support and advocate for the enhancement and protection of local heritage assets.

  

3.       Healthy Environment

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

3.1       A commitment to protect and improve the local environment.

3.2       Climate change and environmental sustainability is considered by the Community Board in its decision making, including for all new facilities.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

3.3       Support and advocate to maintain clean drinking water and high standards of air quality.

3.4       Monitor pollution issues, quarrying effects and compliance of consents. 

3.5       Support local communities on land use, and air and water quality issues and where appropriate, advocate for and represent any community concerns arising.

3.6       Monitor and respond on parks and tree issues raised by the community.

3.7       Encourage and support the implementation of local sustainable greenspace use initiatives, for example, food forests and community gardens.

3.8       Support and advocate for initiatives aimed at addressing climate change. 

 

4.       Prosperous Economy

Outcomes for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board area:

4.1       Strong local business communities.

4.2       An environment where innovative projects are trialled and supported.

4.3       Has a strong social enterprise sector.

 

Our Board Priorities are to:

4.4       Continue to liaise with local business networks.

4.5       Support initiatives that promote a wide range of innovative practices. 

4.6       Foster social enterprise initiatives. 

4.7       Advocate for Council rate increases to be kept as low as possible.   

4.8       Support the provision of more affordable and social housing. 

 

 

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 5

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 5

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 5

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 5

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 5

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 5   

STAFF REPORTS

C       7.       Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Wards - Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions 17

C       8.       205 Cashmere Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions........................................ 25

C       9.       10 Ayr Street - Proposed Angled Parking Changes.................................................... 31

C       10.     Sutherlands/Hoon Hay and Sparks Road Stormwater Basins - Tree Removals....... 49

B       11.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 82 

 

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda, no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday, 30 January 2018  be confirmed (refer page 6).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

 

It is intended that the public forum session will be held at 4.30pm.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter(s) covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

 

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

 

Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 30 January 2018

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Fendalton Service Centre,
Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, Fendalton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Mora

Helen Broughton

Natalie Bryden

Vicki Buck

Catherine  Chu

Anne Galloway

Ross McFarlane

Debbie  Mora

 

 

30 January 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

941 8258

gary.watson@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00271

That the apologies received for absence from Jimmy Chen, and lateness from Vicki Buck, be accepted.

Natalie Bryden/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                             Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00272

That the minutes of the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board meeting held on Tuesday 12 December 2017, be confirmed subject to the following amendment:

Deletion of the words “apologies” and “and from Natalie Bryden for early departure” in clause 1, (Apologies) to now read:

That the apology received for lateness and for early departure from Anne Galloway, be accepted.

Natalie Bryden/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                                            Carried

4.   Public Forum

Part B

4.1       Phil McGoldrick - Ilam Upper Riccarton Residents' Association

Phil McGoldrick, Chairperson of the Ilam Upper Riccarton Residents’ Association, addressed the Board regarding the Association’s concerns around parking in the vicinity of the University of Canterbury and the difficulties he and local residents are having when accessing and exiting their properties. He gave support for the University of Canterbury Parking Review for Area 3 to proceed with urgency.

The Chairperson thanked Phil McGoldrick for his presentation.

 


 

 

4.2       Luke Goodseeker

Luke Goodseeker, local resident, addressed the Board regarding a lack of parking at the Wycola Courts and presented an option to address this matter aimed at improving traffic management and access to Wycola Park from Wycola Courts. 

The Chairperson thanked Luke Goodseeker for his presentation.

 

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

5.1       Halswell Junction Road Extension

             Hamish Clarke, Development Manager, Waterloo Business Park, addressed the Board regarding his support of the Halswell Junction Road Extension - Proposed New Link project. 

             Item 7 of these minutes refer.

             Vicki Buck arrived at 4.44pm.

             After questions from members, the Chairperson thanked Hamish Clarke for his presentation.

 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.    

7.   Halswell Junction Road Extension Project

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00273 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change with the addition of clause 28 below)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

9.         Approve the general layout of the Halswell Junction Road extension (new link) as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda, including new kerb alignments, landscaping, surface treatments and line markings.

10.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Halswell Junction Road, commencing at its intersection with the Main South Road, and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 80 metres north of Waterloo Road (east), as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

11.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Foremans Road (west), commencing at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road, and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 119 metres, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

12.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Halswell Junction Road (east), commencing at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road, and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 38 metres, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

13.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes at the north eastern most end of Halswell Junction Road (east), as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

14.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Waterloo Road at the previous intersection with Halswell Junction Road, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

15.       Approve the road marking changes, kerb alignment changes and road surface changes on Waterloo Road at the intersection with Halswell Junction Road, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

16.       Approve that a pedestrian refuge island crossing facility be constructed on Halswell Junction Road, at a point 16 metres north of Foremans Road, in accordance with Attachment A of the agenda;

17.       Approve that a pedestrian refuge island crossing facility be constructed on Halswell Junction Road, at a point 6 metres south of Foremans Road, in accordance with Attachment A of the agenda;

18.       Approve that a pedestrian refuge island crossing facility be constructed on Foreman Road (west), at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road, in accordance with Attachment A of the agenda;

19.       Approve that a pedestrian refuge island crossing facility be constructed on Halswell Junction (east), at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road, in accordance with Attachment A of the agenda;

20.       Approve that a pedestrian refuge island crossing facility be constructed on Foremans Road (east), at its intersection with Halswell Junction Road (east), in accordance with Attachment A of the agenda;

21.       Revoke the Stop control on Waterloo Road where it meets Halswell Junction Road.

22.       Revoke the Stop control on Foremans Road (east) where it meets Halswell Junction Road.

23.       Approve that a Give Way control be placed against Foremans Road east approaching Halswell Junction Road (east), as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

24.       Revoke the Stop control on Foremans Road (west) where it meets Halswell Junction Road.

25.       Approve that a Stop control be placed against Foremans Road (west) approaching Halswell Junction Road, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda.

26.       Approve that a Stop control be placed against Halswell Junction Road (east) approaching Halswell Junction Road, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda.

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

27.       Make the following resolutions relying on its powers under the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 and Part 21 of the Local Government Act 1974.  For the purposes of the Board’s resolutions below, the following notations apply: 1. An intersection of roadways is defined by the prolongation of the kerbs on each intersecting roadway; and 2. The resolutions are to take effect from the commencement of the physical road works associated with the project, as detailed in the submitted report.

a.   Revoke any existing parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Halswell Junction Road, commencing at its intersection with Main South Road and, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection of Foremans Road.

b.  Revoke any existing parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Halswell Junction Road, commencing at its intersection with Main South Road and, and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection of Foremans Road.

c.   Revoke any existing parking and stopping restrictions on Waterloo Road, at its current intersection with Halswell Junction Road.

d.  Revoke the marked bus stop on the north side of Halswell Junction Road (east) directly across from its intersection with Foremans Road (east) and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 15.5 metres.

e.  Revoke the marked bus stop on the south side of Halswell Junction Road (east) commencing at a point 12.5 metres northeast of its intersection with Foremans Road (east) and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

f.   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at a point 70 metres northwest of its intersection with Main South Road and extending in a northbound direction for a distance of 93.5 metres.

g.   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at the southwest corner of its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a southbound direction for a distance of 13 metres.

h.  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Foremans Road (west) commencing at the south west corner of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in a west bound direction for a distance of 25 metres.

i.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at the northwest corner of its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 30.5 metres.

j.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at a point 44 metres north of its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 253 metres.

k.   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Halswell Junction Road (east) commencing at the north east corner of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in an east bound direction for a distance of 39 metres.

l.    Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at the north east corner of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road (east) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 30 metres.

m. Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at a point 43.5 metres north of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road (east) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 159 metres.

n.  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Waterloo Road commencing at the south east corner of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in an east bound direction for a distance of 91 metres.

o.  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Waterloo Road commencing at the north east corner of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in an east bound direction for a distance of 77 metres.

p.  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at the north east corner of its intersection with Waterloo Road and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 90 metres.

q.  Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Halswell Junction Road (east) commencing at a point 210.5 metres north east of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in an north easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres including around the cul-de-sac head.

r.   Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Halswell Junction Road (east) commencing at a point 222 metres north east of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road and extending in an north easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

s.   Approve that the parking of vehicles be reserved for vehicles with an approved disabled person's parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4.1 of the Land Transport - Road User Rule 2004, on the west side of Halswell Junction Road, commencing at a point 13 metres south of its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a south bound direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.

t.   Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the west side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at a point 30.5 metres north of its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 13.5 metres.

u.  Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the east side of Halswell Junction Road commencing at a point 30 metres north of its intersection with Halswell Junction Road (east) and extending in a north bound direction for a distance of 13.5 metres.

28.       Approve the removal of the trees as described and marked in red in the staff memorandum (dated 23 January 2018) accompanying the report to the Board meeting of 30 January 2018 with the exception of the trees outside 344 Waterloo Road (HJR10 and HJR11) which are to remain.

Mike Mora/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                       Carried Unanimously

 

Community Board Decided HHRB/2018/00274

Part A

         That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board recommend to the Council that it:

 

1.         Approve the scheme design for the Halswell Junction Road Extension (new link), as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda.

2.         Approve that detailed design is progressed and progress with the physical works tender that is conditional on adequate funding being available in the next Long Term Plan.

3.         Approve that the intersection of Halswell Junction Road and Waterloo Road be controlled by traffic signals in accordance with the Land Transport Act – Traffic Control Devices: 2004, as detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. 

4.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of north bound cycles only, be established on the west side of Halswell Junction Road, commencing at its intersection with Main South Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 266 metres. This special vehicle lane is to be located against the west side kerb line and west side mobility parking space, detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

5.         Approve that a special vehicle lane for the use of south bound cycles only, be established on the east side of Halswell Junction Road, commencing 55 metres north of Main South Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 173 metres. This special vehicle lane is to be located against the east side kerb line and east side parking lane, detailed in Attachment A of the agenda. This special vehicle lane is authorised under clause 13 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, and is therefore to be added to the Register of Roads or Traffic Lanes Restricted to Specific Classes of Vehicles.

6.         Approve that a bi directional shared path be installed on the north west side of Halswell Junction Road for the use of north east and south west bound cyclists and pedestrians commencing  at a distance of 18 metres from its intersection with Foremans Road (west) and extending in a north easterly direction to its intersection with Waterloo Road (west).

7.         Approve that a bi directional shared path be installed on the south east side of Halswell Junction Road for the use of north east and south west bound cyclists and pedestrians commencing a distance of 20 metres from its with intersection with Halswell Junction Road (east) and extending in a north easterly direction to its intersection with Waterloo Road.

8.         Approve that a bi directional shared path be installed on the south east side of Halswell Junction Road for the use of north east and south west bound cyclists and pedestrians commencing at its intersection with Waterloo Road (east) and extending in a north easterly direction to its intersection with Waterloo Road (west).

 

Mike Mora/Ross McFarlane                                                                                                       Carried Unanimously

 

8.   23R Brusio Drive - Orion Easement over Local Purpose (Utility) Reserve

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00275 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve pursuant to Section 48(1)(d) and Section 48(3)(a) and (b) of the Reserves Act 1977, the granting of an easement giving Orion New Zealand Limited the right to convey electricity over the area outlined yellow and marked AM on the plan DP 506312 shown in agenda Attachment A, subject to:

a.         The consent of the Minister of Conservation or her delegate.

b.         All necessary statutory consents under but not limited to the Resource Management Act and Building Control Act, being obtained.

2.         Recommend that the Chief Executive, using the Council’s delegated authority from the Minister of Conservation, consents to the granting of the easement to Orion New Zealand Limited for the right to convey electricity as outlined in the staff report.

3.         Authorise the Property Consultancy Manager, should the easements be granted with the consent of the Minister of Conservation, to finalise documentation to implement the easements.

Vicki Buck/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

9.   Lodestar Avenue/Stark Drive Intersection, Wigram - Bus Stop and Intersection Sightline Improvements

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00276 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to approve the following parking restrictions:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at its intersection with Stark Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 17.5 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at its intersection with Stark Drive and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of Stark Drive commencing at its intersection with Lodestar Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of Stark Drive commencing at its intersection with Lodestar Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

5.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at a point 10.5 metres west of the prolongation of the western kerb line of Stark Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at a point 2.5 metres west of the prolongation of the western kerb line of Stark Drive and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

7.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at a point 2.5 metres west of the prolongation of the western kerb line of Stark Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all time on the north side of Lodestar Avenue commencing at a point 11.5 metres east of the prolongation of the western kerb line of Stark Drive and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

Natalie Bryden/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                             Carried

 


 

 

10. Skyhawk Road, Wigram - Access to Public Transport - Provision of Bus Stops

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00277 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to approve the following parking restrictions:

Bus stop 1 - Adjacent to 23 Skyhawk Road (Agenda Attachment A)

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 19.5 metres north west of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30.5 metres, be revoked.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 19.5 metres north west of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 5.5 metres.

3.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 25 metres north west of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18.5 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 43.5 metres north west of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 6.5 metres. 

Bus Stop 2 - Adjacent to 16 Skyhawk Road (Agenda Attachment A)

5.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 14 metres south east of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 36 metres, be revoked.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 14 metres south east of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 5.5 metres.

7.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 19.5 metres south east of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Skyhawk Road commencing at a point 37.5 metres south east of its intersection with Kittyhawk Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12.5 metres. 

Helen Broughton/Anne Galloway                                                                                                                        Carried

Ross McFarlane requested that his vote be recorded against the above decision.

 

 


 

 

11. Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Youth Development Fund 2017-18 - Application - Naia Toaolamai-Holden

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00278 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $300 from its 2017-18 Youth Development Fund to Naia Toaolamai-Holden towards representing Canterbury at the National Touch Tournament to be held from 9 to 11 February 2018 in Auckland.

Mike Mora/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                                Carried

 

12. Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Discretionary Response Fund 2017-18 - Application - Hornby Community Care Trust

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00279 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve the making of a grant of $2,000 from its 2017-18 Discretionary Response Fund to the Hornby Community Care Trust towards the funding of expenses for the Hello Hornby – Our Community Party in the Park event on 24 March 2018.

2.         Approve the making of a grant of $2,500 from its 2017-18 Discretionary Response Fund to the Riccarton Community Church Trust towards the funding of expenses for the Our Amazing Place event on 3 March 2018.

Mike Mora/Natalie Bryden                                                                                                                                     Carried

 

13. Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report - January 2018

 

Community Board Resolved HHRB/2018/00280 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board decided to:

1.         Receive the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board Area Report for January 2018.

2.         Nominate Ross McFarlane and Debbie Mora (with Mike Mora as alternate), as Board representatives to attend a Canterbury Water Management Strategy Zone Committees Community Waterway Workshops being held in February and March 2018.

Mike Mora/Helen Broughton                                                                                                                                Carried

 

 

14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

Board members exchanged information on matters of current interest.

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 5.45pm

 

CONFIRMED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018

 

Mike Mora

Chairperson

   


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

7.        Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Wards - Proposed Road Names - Various Subdivisions

Reference:

17/1352412

Contact:

Paul Lowe

paul.lowe@ccc.govt.nz

941 6481

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to consider and approve the proposed road names in three local subdivisions.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated resulting from naming requests received from subdivision developers.

1.3       This report relates to the following subdivisions - Riccarton Park, 165 Racecourse Road, Quarry View, 31 Provincial Road and, Country Palms, 43 Country Palms Drive.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

1.   Staff Recommendations

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to approve the following road names:

1.         Riccarton Park (RMA/2017/2099) - 165 Racecourse Road

·        Manakura Street

·        Grey Way Road

·        Horoeka Street

2.         Quarry View (RMA/2017/894) - 31 Provincial Road

·        Leyland Lane

3.         Country Palms (RMA/2016/3297) - 43 Country Palms Drive

·        Gammack Drive

·        Sheehan Street

·        Billington Drive

·        Flynn Lane

·        Saxby Lane

·        Fairbairn Close

 

 

3.   Background

3.1       Introduction

3.1.1   Road naming requests have been submitted by the developers for the following subdivisions - Riccarton Park (RMA/2017/2099), Quarry View (RMA/2017/894) and Country Palms (RMA/2016/3297). A preferred name and an alternative name(s) have been put forward by the developer for each road.

3.1.2   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against existing road names in Christchurch and bordering districts, for duplication, alternative spellings, or other similarities in spelling or pronunciation to avoid the potential for confusion. The recommended names are considered sufficiently different to existing road names.

3.1.3   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names have been checked against the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy dated 2 November 1993. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this policy.

3.1.4   The recommended road and/or right-of-way names and types have been checked against Australian and New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4819:2011 Rural and urban addressing. The recommended names are considered to be consistent with this Standard unless otherwise stated below.

3.1.5   Under the Roads and Right-of-Way Naming Policy the names considered must be requested by the developer. There is not an ability to consider alternative names without first checking whether there are any duplications or similarities with other road and right-of-way names.

3.1.6   Consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand who have raised no concerns with the proposed road names unless otherwise specified below.

3.1.7   The requests have been accompanied by an explanation of the background to the names which are summarised below.

3.2       Riccarton Park (RMA/2017/2099)

3.2.1   Road names have been requested by Ngài Tahu Property Limited for roads at the Riccarton Park Stage 1 subdivision in Riccarton which is bounded by Yaldhurst Road, Steadman Road, Buchanans Road and Racecourse Road. To view the roads subject to this application refer to Attachment A.

3.2.2   The names for Roads A and C have been chosen in accordance with the theme of Karamū.

3.2.3   The names for Road B have been chosen to acknowledge the significant history and future with the thoroughbred racing industry within and around the Karamū development.

3.2.4   Ngài Tahu Property Limited would like to use the proposed alternative road names for future roads within this development.

3.2.5   The names in order of preference for each road, are:

Road A

·        Manakura Street – Manakura is a native shrub that played an important role for Māori, traditionally it was used by Māori to treat blood related health issues, kidney problems and cuts. The scent was also used for cosmetic purposes by soaking it in shark oil.

·        Piripiri Street – Piripiri is the concept of forest lore and was traditionally used by Māori in the act of rongoa (Māori medicine). The leaves were used to make an infusion which was taken as a diuretic.

·        Horoeka Street – Horoeka is a New Zealand native tree and is one of the oddities in New Zealand forests. Its change of appearance from its juvenile form into a tall and slender tree, is believed to be a result of self-defence against the Moa.

Road B

·        Grey Way Road – Grey Way was a champion galloper, the horse of the year in 1973 and a winner of 51 races from 159 starts.

·        Nightmarch Road – Nightmarch was a champion galloper, winning the New Zealand Cup in 1930 and the Melbourne Cup in 1929.

·        Musket Road – Musket was a leading sire in both New Zealand and Australia in the late 1800’s.

Road C

·        Horoeka Street

·        Piripiri Street

·        Koral Street – Koral was a great jumper, winning the Homeby Steeplechase a record-breaking seven times at the Riccarton Racecourse.

3.2.6   The preferred name for each road is listed first and the alternative names thereafter.

3.2.7   Note: In regards to ‘Grey Way Road’ Land Information New Zealand has advised that while AS/NZS 4819:2011 Rural and urban addressing does not allow road types such as ‘Way’ to be used as part of the road name, they are happy for this to be used given the context and history of the road name. On this basis, the authors are satisfied with the proposed name.

3.3       Quarry View (RMA/2017/894)

3.3.1   Leyland Lane has been requested by GW West Melton for a right-of-way at Quarry View in Halswell which is within a greenfield area bounded by Provincial Road, Kennedys Bush Road, Sparks Road and Sutherlands Road (refer Attachment B).

3.3.2   The original street names were taken from the area with input from members of the community. The developer wishes to continue this theme throughout the remainder of the subdivision.

3.3.3   Foden Lane was proposed and approved by the Board on 26 September 2017 for this right-of-way. It was recently recognised that Foden Lane was already approved within Quarry View under RMA/2016/3488 on 13 June 2017. Leyland Lane is proposed to replace the duplicate Foden Lane.

3.3.4   The names in order of preference are:

·        Leyland Lane – a reference to the mining industry

·        Opencast Lane – a reference to the mining industry

3.4       Country Palms (RMA/2016/3297)

3.4.1   Road names have been requested by Suburban Estates Ltd for the roads at the Country Palms subdivision in Halswell which is bounded by Halswell Junction Road, Country Palms Drive, Quaifes Road and Murphys Road (refer Attachment C).

3.4.2   The suggested road names have come from the names of people who had a historical connection with the area.

3.4.3   The names in order of preference are:

·    Gammack Drive – James Gammack emigrated to Canterbury on one of the first four ships and farmed in Halswell before selling his farm to John Milne and David Lewis in 1863. Gammack provided funds to Christchurch City libraries as his intention was that people could better themselves through reading and study as he had done.

·    Sheehan Street – John Sheehan moved to Christchurch in 1860 with his parents, their ship docked at Lyttelton. Sheehan was a member of the Canterbury Agricultural and Pastoral Association and was well known as a breeder and prize-taker at the shows in connection with carriage, blood and draught horses. Married Miss Flynn.

·    Billington Drive – FW Quaife proprietor of the Halswell Bacon Factory and married Miss Billington Barcock. Mr Quaife was a Chairman of the Halswell School Committee; Chairman of the Halswell Roads Board, and the Halswell Domain Board.

·    Flynn Lane – Married to John Sheehan

·    Saxby Lane – Charles Benjamin Candy was a dairy farmer in Halswell and was in the cheese making industry. Retired from farming and moved to South Belt, Christchurch and was married in 1855 to Miss Saxby.

·    Fairbairn Close – St Mary’s Church in Halswell was built in 1863 and in 1957 the stained glass window above the altar was gifted from Eileen Fairbairn in memory of her family.

·    Alternative option is Luck Close – St. Mary’s Church in Halswell was built by Benjamin Mountfort and Isaac Luck in 1863 to accommodate about 100 worshipers.

·    Alternative option is Comer Close – C.W. Comer came to Christchurch in 1866 and farmed on Lincoln Road. He was the Secretary and Surveyor of the Halswell Roads Board and a progressive colonist who had always identified himself with the general welfare of the district.

3.4.4   Note: Callaghan Close was also a proposed alternative however Land Information New Zealand has advised that this was too similar to the existing Gallaghan Close in Wigram Skies.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

RMA/2017/2099 - Karamu/Riccarton Park - Subdivision Plan

22

b

RMA/2017/894 - Quarry View - Plan

23

c

RMA/2016/3297 - Country Palms - Plan

24

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Laura Braddick - Planning Technician

Paul Lowe - Team Leader Planning

Approved By

John Gibson - Head of Resource Consents

Leonie Rae - General Manager Consenting and Compliance

  


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

8.        205 Cashmere Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/1520491

Contact:

Edwin Tiong

edwin.tiong@ccc.govt.nz

941 8188

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions on both sides of the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road (Oderings Garden Centre) in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the Westmorland Residents’ Association.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the issue and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Cashmere Road commencing at a point 161 metres west of its intersection with Opihi Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 47 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations:

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

·     Level of Service: 10.0.31 Protect vulnerable users – minimise the number of fatal crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the 205 Cashmere Road driveway as indicated in Attachment A.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes car parking spaces in the immediate area of driveway.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The Council’s Traffic Operations staff have been contacted by the Westmorland Residents’ Association about concerns regarding the visibility of motorists being limited by parked vehicles when exiting the Oderings Garden Centre at 205 Cashmere Road.

5.2       Staff conducted a movement count and investigation on 15 November 2017. From that survey:

i)             The driveway exceeded 250 vehicle movements between 8am and 2pm.

ii)            There were a reasonable number of cyclists (students and recreational) as well as heavy vehicles using Cashmere Road.

iii)           Only two cars were parked on the street. The observed sight distance from the driveway is limited when vehicles are parked on the street. This encourages drivers to ‘nose out’ into the road for better visibility. A majority of the drivers are elderly but appeared to have no issue in exiting the driveway.

iv)           Cashmere Road is classified a Collector Road. Westbound traffic tends to speed up as it is in proximity to the rural/urban boundary with a 70 kilometres per hour/50 kilometres per hour posted change in speed limits.

5.3       From the correspondence with the Westmorland Residents’ Association, there is greater demand during the weekend, and the street will generally be parked with vehicles.

5.4       A ‘No Stopping’ restriction on the opposite side of the road from the driveway has been considered but cannot be justified as it is a driveway and not road. If vehicles parked on the opposite side of the road and there are vehicles waiting to turn right into the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road, through traffic would have to wait as there is not enough road space in which to pass.

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at in the vicinity of the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road as shown in Attachment A.

6.2       The option would theoretically remove five parking spaces. However, parking demands are usually low therefore the displacement of parking will be negligible.

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Two affected property owners and residents at 205 and 211 Cashmere Road were advised of the recommended option by letter. They support the proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $100

6.8       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving the sightlines at the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road as indicated in Attachment A.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes car parking in the immediate area of the driveway.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Maintain the status quo at the 205 Cashmere Road driveway as indicated in Attachment A.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for improvements at the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines at the driveway to 205 Cashmere Road and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

205 Cashmere Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions - Drawing TG132701 - For Board Approval

30

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

9.        10 Ayr Street - Proposed Angled Parking Changes

Reference:

17/1520694

Contact:

Edwin Tiong

edwin.tiong@ccc.govt.nz

941 8188

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the changes of the angled parking from 60 degree to 90 degree on the northern side of Ayr Street between Darvel Street and Deans Avenue in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated on behalf of the developer’s consultant, Novo Group, in response to a request arising from the resource consent application (RMA/2017/1552) for a residential development at 10 Ayr Street.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the matter and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Darvel Street.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

3.         Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 12 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 20 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

5.         Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 32 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of three metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 35 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

7.         Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 45 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 53 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres.

9.         Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 62 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 70 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of nine metres.

11.       Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 79 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

12.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 87 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of six metres.

13.       Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 93 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 8 metres.

14.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 101 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 13 metres.

15.       Approve the parking be restricted to 90 degree angle parking on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 114 metres west from its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

16.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Ayr Street commencing at a point 134 metres west of its intersection with Deans Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres to Darvel Street.

17.       Approve the removal and replacement of the three existing street trees (tree ID’s 36454, 36455 and 36456) at the applicant’s cost, with all work to comply with the Council’s Construction Standards and Infrastructure Design Standards.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install 90 degree angled parking (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Retain existing 60 degree angled parking

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Maximising the on-street parking (increase of six parking spaces)

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Requiring slightly more care when reversing out of the parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       The developer’s consultant, Novo Group, applied for a resource consent (RMA/2017/1552) for a residential development at 10 Ayr Street, which is pending of approval of Option 1.

5.2       The development is largely compliant with the Transport Chapter of the District Plan. The developer is seeking eight accesses on to Ayr Street whereas the District Plan only permits two with this proposal, however the existing titles and layout would allow multiple accesses. These accesses have an impact on the on-street car parking in Ayr Street.

5.3       According to the developers parking configuration plan, there would be a reduction from 17 existing car parking spaces to 13 proposed along the frontage of the development land on Ayr Street. They are also indicating that to achieve this 13 space configuration, the spaces will need to change from 60 degree angle parking at the moment, to 90 degree parking.

5.4       Under the Christchurch Road Classification Map, Ayr Street is classified as a local road. The applicant has used New Zealand Transport Agency Crash Analysis System database traffic volumes of 750 vehicles per day, which is reasonable given that Ayr Street is a local road.

5.5       The current demand for on-street parking in this street is high. Losing the four on-street parking spaces here would mean that parking demand would be dispersed elsewhere.

5.6       Ayr Street has a road width of 14 metres. The vehicle tracking curve has confirmed that the street has sufficient manoeuvring space to accommodate 90 degree angled parking. The parallel parking on the southern side of Ayr Street would remain unchanged.

5.7       The placement of the proposed vehicle entranceways for the new development indicates that the 90 degree angled parking, is better suited to this immediate road environment.

5.8       There are no known issues at the nearby Deans Avenue intersection.

5.9       From the operation and aesthetic context, it would be prudent to amend the remaining existing 60 degree angle parking on the northern side of Ayr Street between Deans Avenue and Darvel Street to 90 degree angle parking for consistency and uniformity. This will also provide additional car parking from an overall 18 to 24 spaces.

5.10    Issues relating to the consent on transport planning have been resolved (refer Attachments C and D – RMA 2017 10 Ayr Street Initial Transport Comments and RMA 2017 10 Ayr Street Final Transport Comments).

5.11    The existing trees on Ayr Street have been assessed (refer Attachment B – Street Trees Assessment Ayr Street 8.11.17). The tree species replacement will be the same as that existing unless mutually agreed between the Council and the developer to change the tree species.

5.12    Asset protection in relation to the vehicle crossing, footpath, kerb and channel have been discussed with the developer’s consultant resulting in the developer replacing any of these assets along the frontage of the development.


 

6.   Option 1 - Install 90 Degree Angled Parking (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install 90 degree angled parking on the north side of Ayr Street between Deans Avenue and Darvel Street. This would increase parking spaces from 18 to 24. Long term parking demands in this area are sufficiently high.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report. Engagement requirements for this level of significance are low.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Affected property owners and residents were advised of the recommended option by letter.

6.5       No replies were received from the property owner and/or residents.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $3,000 to remove existing parking lines and install new lines. The costs for street tree removal and replacement to be met by the developer.

6.8       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effects will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Subject to Community Board approval.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request. This will occur when the residential development at 10 Ayr Street is due for completion.

6.16    Developer to apply for each vehicle crossing and pay a fee of $153 per crossing when submitting the applications to the Council.

6.17    When appropriate, applications need to be sent to the Asset Protection Officer to approve the extent of kerb and channel, pavement and footpath, whether replacement is due to construction damage or the need for a new crossing and associated works.

6.18    The developer may be required to apply for temporary use of the Legal Road and possibly a Corridor Access Request.

6.19    The developer to consider during construction, temporary traffic management and signage to advise road users in advance of the future changes.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.20    The advantages of this option include:

·   Maximising the on-street parking (increase of six parking spaces)

6.21    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Requiring slightly more care when reversing out of the parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 – Retain Existing 60 Degree Angled Parking

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing 60 degree angled parking with the construction of the residential development at 10 Ayr Street. This will reduce the on-street parking on the north side of Ayr Street from 26 to 18 spaces.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the community requests for optimisation of on-street parking operational performance.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is inconsistent with the Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $1,000 to remove existing parking lines and install new markings.

7.7       Maintenance/Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies – Community Board decision

7.12    Implementation timeframe – If the Board chose this option, implementation would be from six to eight weeks prior to the completion of the residential development.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has less cost to the Council.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The parking layout on the northern side of Ayr Street along the development frontage will need four parking space removed to provide access to the new development proposed.

·   There is a likelihood that the consent may not be approved and would impose further design changes to the development plan potentially resulting in the construction not proceeding.

·   It does not maximise the number of on-street parking on the north side of Ayr Street.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

10 Ayr Street - Proposed Angled Parking Changes - Drawing TG132047 - For Board Approval

37

b

Ayr Street - Street Trees Assessment 8 November 2017

38

c

10 Ayr Street RMA 2017/1552 - Initial Transport Comments

44

d

10 Ayr Street RMA 2017 - Final Transport Comments

46

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Edwin Tiong - Traffic Engineer

Jonathan Hansen - Arborist South

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

10.    Sutherlands/Hoon Hay and Sparks Road Stormwater Basins - Tree Removals

Reference:

18/38921

Contact:

Keith Davison

keith.davison@ccc.govt.nz

941 8071

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board to approve the removal of:

·   Approximately 191 trees within the Sutherlands Basins site (noting that due to the dense grouping of trees it is not possible to accurately quantify the total number).

·   Approximately 36 trees within the Sparks Wetland site (noting that due to the dense grouping of trees it is not possible to accurately quantify the total number).

1.2       Decisions on the removal of healthy and structurally sound trees is delegated to the Community Board, under Part D, sub part 1, 5.15  of the Council’s Delegations Register:

·   Determine to plant, maintain and remove trees on reserves, parks and roads under the control of the Council within the policy set by the Council.

1.3       Landscape plans are to be finalised for both projects but will include the replacement planting of native and exotic specimen trees and increasing the mass native vegetation areas (including the wetland area).  At this stage it is estimated that more than 200 native and exotic trees will be planted within the Sutherlands site and approximately 160 native trees will be planted within the Sparks Wetland site.

Origin of Report

1.4       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the impact on the surrounding environment and the rural character of the land.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board resolve to:

1.         Approve the removal of approximately 191 trees within the Sutherlands Basins site generally in accordance with Agenda Attachment D.

2.         Approve the removal of approximately 36 trees within the Sparks Wetland site generally in accordance with Agenda Attachment D.

 

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Flood Protection and Control Works

·     Level of Service: 14.0.2 Resource consent compliance for consents held by Land Drainage Operations for discharge from stormwater system

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Approve the tree removals (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Decline the tree removals

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Water quality enhancement provided through the creation of treatment basins and wetlands

·     Enables flood protection works to proceed without delay

·     Additional native vegetation will be added through the creation of the basins and wetlands

·     Compliance with consent conditions

·     Maximises the flood storage area on the land

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removal of approximately 227 trees

·     Immediate loss of tree cover and amenity where this occurs

 

5.   Context/Background

Basin Sites

5.1       A location plan showing the sites of the two basins is shown in Figure 1.

5.2       The facilities are two of a number of stormwater facilities proposed in the south west of Christchurch as part of the South West Area Plan 2009.

Figure 1 Basin Location Plan

Sparks Wetland

5.3       The South West Christchurch Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) identified the need for a wetland on Sparks Road. 270 Sparks Road was purchased for this purpose.

5.4       The purpose of the wetland is to:

·   Provide secondary treatment of stormwater runoff discharged from the Halswell Commons Subdivision.

·   Treat other currently untreated existing catchments.

·   Meet the South-West Christchurch stormwater discharge permit CRC120223 requirements.

5.5       Attachment A shows the Sparks Wetland site and planting plan. Construction is scheduled to begin in February 2018 pending tree removal approval.

5.6       The use of the site has been optimised to maximise the treatment provided by the wetland and to provide room for naturalising Hendersons Drain along Sparks Road. Tree removals were minimised as far as possible, particularly for trees in good condition. Particularly the trees along the western boundary were maintained to maintain the character of that area.

Sutherlands and Hoon Hay Valley Drain Stormwater Basin

5.7       Sutherlands Basin is a stormwater and land drainage facility in south-west Christchurch.

5.8       The purpose of the facility is to:

·   Meet the South-West Christchurch stormwater discharge permit CRC120223 requirements.

·   Provide flood mitigation for mid Heathcote earthquake derived increases in flooding.

·   Treat expected higher sediment loads in runoff from erosion prone soils from a Port Hills catchment into Hoon Hay Valley Stream that has had vegetation destruction from the Port Hills fires.

5.9       In order to provide the required treatment and to maximise flood storage on the site, there will be a large number of tree removals (although it is noted that the majority are located in one shelter belt). Tree removals were minimised as far as possible, such as maintaining a buffer with Cashmere Stream to protect the existing trees along this stream.

5.10    The construction work for the facility will be completed in phases due to funding. This report relates to the tree removals for the initial stage of works covered by the area shown in Attachment B, with the works scheduled to begin in February 2018 pending tree removal approval.

5.11    The full landscape plan for this area is still in development as it forms part of the wider Sutherlands/Hoon Hay/Eastman Stormwater Management Area. A draft layout plan for this area is included as Attachment C. It is intended to present this to the Community Board for approval of the landscape elements, when completed.

Tree Removals

5.12    A tree assessment has been carried out within the project areas to assess the condition of the trees, and inform the design to minimise potential adverse effects on trees that are healthy and structurally sound (refer to Attachment D, the tree report from Arbor Vitae Ltd, dated 24 January 2018).

5.13    The condition of each tree was evaluated using the Christchurch City Council tree assessment system. During the tree survey, the results for some individual trees were documented but the majority of trees were assessed as groups with estimated quantities and dominant condition ratings.  Both sites are former farmland, and none of the trees to be removed are listed in the CCC tree asset database. 

5.14    It is intended that wherever possible existing trees will be retained and incorporated into the design and construction methodologies, and trees and other vegetation that are retained receive appropriate physical protection during the implementation of the construction works.  To achieve this, further arboricultural assessments and recommendations will be required during the works to ensure that appropriate tree protection measures are implemented.

5.15    The tree removals to be undertaken in the Sparks Wetland site are shown in Figure 2. Approximately 36 trees have been identified that require removal as shown on the plan. The remaining trees on site are to be retained. Full details are provided in Attachment D.

Figure 2 Sparks Wetland Tree Removals

 

5.16    For Sparks Wetland Area B could have been incorporated into the design and retained but trees within this group were found to be in poor condition due to structural defects and failures, extensive decay and crown suppression. It was therefore considered better to remove these and replace with native shrubs and trees. A portion of Area A and the trees along the western boundary, will be retained and incorporated into the design.

5.17    The tree removals to be undertaken in the Sutherlands and Hoon Hay Basins site are shown in Figure 3. Approximately 191 trees have been identified that require removal as shown on the plan. The remaining trees on site are to be retained. Full details are provided in Attachment D.

 

Figure 3 Sutherlands/Hoon Hay Basin Tree Removals

 

5.18    In Area 1 the removal of the tree is required for the installation of one of three stormwater pipes under Cashmere Stream, and the removal of this tree will allow for the retention of other healthy and structurally sound trees within this area.

5.19    The trees in Area 2 would have been retained if in good condition, however this area only contains trees in poor condition and the removal of these trees allows basin area to be maximised.

5.20    The trees in Area 3 are part of a shelterbelt and are located in the middle of the site of two of the flood retention basins. Unfortunately these trees could not be retained without significantly reducing the flood retention and sediment removal capacity of these basins. Without the full storage capacity of these basins then it would be difficult to comply with existing consent conditions.

6.   Option 1 - Approve the tree removals (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       This option allows for tree removals to take place to facilitate the water quality treatment and flood protection provided by the works.

6.2       This option will result in the removal of:

·   Approximately 191 trees within the Sutherlands Basins site (noting that due to the dense grouping of trees it is not possible to accurately quantify the total number)

·   Approximately 36 trees within the Sparks Wetland site (noting that due to the dense grouping of trees it is not possible to accurately quantify the total number)

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.4       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are to seek approval from the Community Board for the tree removals.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

6.6       The tree removals facilitate stormwater quality improvement works that will improve water quality in downstream rivers and the estuary however, and this is known to be an issue of concern to mana whenua.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7       The South-West Area Plan was approved in 2009 and the proposed stormwater basins are consistent with this plan.

6.8       At community meetings held in October 2017 the views expressed were that flood mitigation works are required and that the current level of flood risk is unacceptable. Residents have reported high levels of anxiety in anticipation of further flooding.

6.9       Water quality improvement is a significant issue for the community and the improvements provided by these basins will contribute to achieving healthy waterways.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.10    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.11    Cost of Implementation - The cost of the removal of the trees is included within the construction of these projects and there is no additional cost above that already approved.

6.12    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – The removal of the trees has no ongoing maintenance cost implications.

6.13    Funding source –Sutherlands/Hoon Hay Basin is funded from CPMS ID 32443 and Sparks Wetland is funded from CPMS ID 15751.

Legal Implications

6.14    There is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

6.15    This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

6.16    The legal consideration is that the facilities are required to meet the South-West Christchurch stormwater discharge permit CRC120223 requirements.

6.17    Resource consent requirements for tree removals from Christchurch City Council are still being confirmed.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.18    There is a risk that tree removals are not approved.  This may result in additional costs and time delays arising from redesign.

6.18.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) is implemented will be low.

6.18.2 The current treatment is to seek approval from the Community Board and provide sufficient information for them to make an informed decision.

Implementation

6.19    Implementation dependencies - Implementation is dependent on approval from the Community Board.

6.20    Implementation timeframe – If approval is obtained then the works will begin in February 2018.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.21    The advantages of this option include:

·   Water quality enhancement provided through the creation of treatment basins and wetlands

·   Enables flood protection works to proceed without delay

·   Additional native vegetation will be added through the creation of the basins and wetlands

·   Compliance with consent conditions

·   Maximises the flood storage area on the land

6.22    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removal of approximately 227 trees

·   Immediate loss of tree cover and amenity where this occurs

7.   Option 2 – Decline the removal of the trees

Option Description

7.1       This option involves declining the removal of the trees.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are likely to require community consultation to gather further information about the views and preferences of the community.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       Declining the removal of the trees impacts the delivery of the facilities and delay to the flood mitigation and water quality benefits of the works. This is not consistent with the feedback received to date on community views and preferences.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

7.6.1   Inconsistency - Level of Service: 14.1.5 Implement Land Drainage Recovery Programme works to reduce flooding would not be fully implemented.

7.6.2   Reason for inconsistency - the Upper Heathcote storage scheme cannot be fully implemented.

7.6.3   Amendment necessary - the design would require revision and further options would need to be investigated.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – the cost of re-design has not been quantified but could be significant.

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – no change from the current situation.

7.9       Funding source – Sutherlands/Hoon Hay Basin is funded from CPMS ID 32443 and Sparks Wetland is funded from CPMS ID 15751.

Legal Implications

7.10    There is a legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision.

7.11    This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit.

7.12    The legal consideration is that the facilities are required to meet the South-West Christchurch stormwater discharge permit CRC120223 requirements. If Sutherlands Basin is not constructed then action may be taken against Council for non-compliance with consent conditions.

Risks and Mitigations

7.13    There is a risk that if the Sutherlands Basin works are delayed then action may be taken against Council due to non-compliance with consent conditions.

7.13.1 Residual risk rating: The residual rating of the risk after the below treatment(s) is implemented will be Medium.

7.13.2 Planned treatment(s) include alerting Environment Canterbury to the delay and the reasons for it.

Implementation

7.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board decision

7.15    Implementation timeframe – Re-design may take a period of several months

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   No immediate loss of tree cover

7.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   High risk of action being taken due to delays in complying with CRC120223 consent conditions

·   Delay to the project delivery by up to two months design time, and potentially further delays due to working in the wetter winter period

·   Higher risk of extending the works further into the wetter winter period

·   Reduction in treatment and flood storage capacity of the wetlands and basins due to reducing the area available for use by retaining areas with trees

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Sparks Wetland Site and Planting Plan

59

b

Sutherlands and Hoon Hay Valley Stream Basins Outline Landscape Plan

60

c

Sutherlands/Hoon Hay/Eastman Draft Landscape Plan

61

d

Sutherlands Basins & Sparks Wetland Tree Report - 24 January 2018

62

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Peter Christensen - Senior Water Engineer

Approved By

Keith Davison - Manager Land Drainage

Brent Smith - Head of Parks

John Mackie - Head of Three Waters and Waste

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board

13 February 2018

 

 

11.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.