Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 30 August 2017

Time:                                    3:30pm

Venue:                                 Committee Room 2, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

Richard Osborne - Head of Planning and Strategic Transport

 

 

30 August 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Saunders

Committee & Hearings Advisor

941 6436

Mark.Saunders@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

 


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Central City Coach Parking............................................................................................. 9

C       7.       Manchester Street Proposed P10 Parking Restriction............................................... 35

C       8.       Armagh St and Margaret Mahy Playground Proposed Parking Restrictions.......... 41

C       9.       95 Ferry Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions.................................................. 49   

 

 


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee meeting held on Monday, 31 July 2017 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

 

Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Monday 31 July 2017

Time:                                    10:08am

Venue:                                 Committee Room 2, Level 2, Civic Offices,
53 Hereford Street, Christchurch

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Members

Councillor Pauline Cotter

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

Chris Gregory - Head of Transport

Richard Osborne - Head of Planning and Strategic Transport

 

 

31 July 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Saunders

Committee & Hearings Advisor

941 6436

Mark.Saunders@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Committee Resolved PRSC/2017/00039

Subcommittee Decision

That the minutes of the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee meeting held on Thursday, 15 June 2017 be confirmed.

Member Gregory/Member Adamson                                                                                                               Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

There were no deputations by appointment.

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

 

6.   Armagh Street Proposed 5 minute Loading Zone (Crowne Plaza)

 

Committee Comment

1.         The Subcommittee accepted the Staff Recommendations without change.

 

 

 

 

 

Subcommittee Resolved PRSC/2017/00040

Part C

That the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee:

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 48 metres be revoked.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in a easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

3.         Approve that a Loading Zone (restricted to a maximum period of 5 minutes) be installed on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 32 metres east of its intersection with Colombo Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

Councillor Cotter/Member Gregory                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

 

7     Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Subcommittee Resolved PRSC/2017/00041

Part C

That at 10:19am the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 18 to 19 of the agenda be adopted.

Councillor Cotter/Member Osborne                                                                                                                     Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 10:20am.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 10:21am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 30th DAY OF AUGUST 2017

 

 

   


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

6.        Central City Coach Parking

Reference:

17/779252

Contact:

Wayne Gallot

wayne.gallot@ccc.govt.nz

941 5924

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee to approve the installation of nine tour coach and shuttle parking areas in accordance with Attachments A to J.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the industry for improved tour coach parking facilities within the Central City area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee:

1.         Approve the installation of the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking areas in general accordance with Attachment A and in accordance with the following staff recommendations and detail provided in Attachments B to J.

Moorhouse Avenue (Attachment B)

2.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north side of Moorhouse Avenue commencing at a point 73 metres west of its intersection with Antigua Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 54 metres be revoked.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited from 10pm to 6am (the following day) on the north side of Moorhouse Avenue commencing at a point 73 metres west of its intersection with Antigua Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 54 metres.

4.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only between 6am and 10pm on the north side of Moorhouse Avenue commencing at a point 73 metres west of its intersection with Antigua Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 54 metres.

Durham Street South (Attachment C)

5.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the east side of Durham Street South commencing at a point 6 metres south of its intersection with Alcester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 32 metres be revoked.

6.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the east side of Durham Street South commencing at a point 6 metres south of its intersection with Alcester Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

Colombo Street (Attachment D)

7.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a point 46 metres north of its intersection with Dundas Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 27 metres be revoked.

8.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the east side of Colombo Street commencing at a point 46 metres north of its intersection with Dundas Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 27 metres.

Cashel Street (Attachment E)

9.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 117 metres be revoked.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 67 metres.

11.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 5 minutes at all times on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at a point 67 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 6m.

12.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes and designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at a point 73 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 40 metres

13.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at a point 113 metres west of its intersection with Cambridge Terrace and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 4 metres.

Cashel Street (Attachment F)

14.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at a point 83 metres east of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 36 metres be revoked.

15.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the north side of Cashel Street commencing at a point 83 metres east of its intersection with Madras Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 36 metres.

Latimer Square West (Attachment G)

16.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the east side of Latimer Square West commencing at a point 23 metres north of its intersection with Hereford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 40 metres be revoked.

17.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the east side of Latimer Square West commencing at a point 23 metres north of its intersection with Hereford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 40 metres.

Gloucester Street (Attachment H)

18.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the south side of Gloucester Street commencing at a point 43 metres west of its intersection with Latimer Square (West) and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres be revoked.

19.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the south side of Gloucester Street commencing at a point 43 metres west of its intersection with Latimer Square (West) and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

Madras Street (Attachment I)

20.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the west side of Madras Street commencing at a point 9 metres north of its intersection with Chester Street East and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30 metres be revoked.

21.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes and designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the west side of Madras Street commencing at a point 9 metres north of its intersection with Chester Street East and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

Gloucester Street (Attachment J)

22.       Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the south side of Gloucester Street commencing at a point 13 metres east of its intersection with Montreal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres be revoked.

23.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes and designated for the parking of buses, coaches and shuttles only on the south side of Gloucester Street commencing at a point 13 metres east of its intersection with Montreal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install tour coach and shuttle parking in accordance with Attachments A-J (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Install tour coach and shuttle parking generally in accordance with Attachments A-J except for a minor variation to restrict parking to a maximum period of 30 minutes at the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on Durham Street (Attachment C).

·     Option 3 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Option 1 – preferred option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City to meet the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·     Supports the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·     Improves road safety by providing dedicated and suitably designed parking areas for tour coaches and shuttles to drop-off and pick-up passengers within the Central City, such that it may help to reduce instances of double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

 

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Installing the tour coach and shuttle parking in accordance with Attachments A-J will result in the loss of on street parking for approximately 36-38 cars (being a mixture of marked, un-marked, metered, time-restricted and/or unrestricted spaces).

·     Does not fully satisfy the preferences of all adjacent landowners, tenants and/or key stakeholders.

4.4       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Option 2 – variation to preferred option)

4.4.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City that generally meets the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·     Supports the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·     Improves road safety by providing dedicated and suitably designed parking areas for tour coaches and shuttles to drop-off and pick-up passengers within the Central City, such that it may help to reduce instances of double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

·     Satisfies the preference for time restricted coach parking on Durham Street by an adjacent business owner.

4.4.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Installing the tour coach and shuttle parking in accordance with Attachments A-J will result in the loss of on street parking for approximately 36-38 cars (being a mixture of marked, un-marked, metered, time-restricted and/or unrestricted spaces).

·     Does not fully satisfy the preference of tour coach operators and drivers for unrestricted coach and shuttle parking on Durham Street.

·     Does not fully satisfy the preferences of all adjacent landowners, tenants and/or key stakeholders.

4.5       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Option 3 – do nothing)

4.5.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Retains existing levels of on-street parking in the Central City.

4.5.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Does not provide tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City to meet the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·     Does not support the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·     Does not address potential road safety issues associated with instances of tour coaches and shuttles double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       With the re-establishment of visitor accommodation and attractions back into Central City, a need has arisen to provide for more on-street parking and drop-off / pick-up spaces for tour coaches and shuttles. Council is also receiving increased pressure from the tourism transportation industry to provide more tour coach parking in the Central City, particularly to meet demand during the peak summer season.

5.2       Council previously engaged Abley Transportation Consultants to consult with tourism transportation industry stakeholders in the latter part of 2016 and early 2017 to identify areas of demand for coach and shuttle parking, and also to identify any other issues of relevance. Based on that consultation and feedback, a number of locations were selected for an initial phase of implementation.

5.3       Special signage has been developed to clearly identify the areas as being available to both tour coaches and shuttles, and this signage has been trialled effectively on Rolleston Avenue. It is proposed that the locations identified for drop-off / pick-up will be subject to a P30 or P60 time limit, while the other locations will have no time restriction imposed.

5.4       A number of other locations were identified by the industry stakeholders as being desirable for parking, some of which involve streets that are still being developed. Those parking and drop-off / pick-up locations will be revisited as part of a second phase of implementation.

5.5       The proposed coach and shuttle parking on Rolleston Avenue that is identified on Attachment A is the subject of a separate report to the Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board being progressed by another member of staff.

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install Tour Coach and Shuttle Parking (preferred option)

Option Description

6.1       Install tour coach and shuttle parking areas generally in accordance with Attachment A, and in accordance with the detail provided below and on Attachments B-J.

Moorhouse Avenue (Attachment B)

6.2       The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 50 St Asaph Street (Moorhouse Avenue frontage) is located approximately 73m west of Antigua Street and will be marked 2.7m wide and 54m long, so as to accommodate three full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and/or shuttles. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed. Based on the current road markings, there will still be a 1.5m wide cycle lane maintained between the proposed 2.7m wide tour coach and shuttle parking area and the nearest traffic lane.

6.3       The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area has been located to avoid indicative vehicle access and align with indicative pedestrian access associated with the proposed Metro Sports Facility on the adjacent site. Ōtākaro (as owners and developers of the site) were consulted on this proposal, and they initially requested that consideration be given to imposing a time restriction on the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area rather than have it available for long-term parking. On the basis that the Metro Sports Facility was still some years from completion, it was subsequently agreed with Ōtākaro that possible time restrictions could be considered at a later date and possibly imposed on a temporary basis at times when there are special events at the Metro Sports Facility.

6.4       Based on the parking areas that are currently marked on-street and interspersed amongst a number of disused property accesses / vehicle crossings, the proposed coach and shuttle parking area will necessitate the removal of existing (P60) on-street parking for around five cars. Current levels of weekday parking demand in this vicinity are relatively low, as a result of the absence of adjacent business activity along this frontage that previously attracted short-term parking demand, and the current P60 time restriction that doesn’t allow for all-day commuter parking. Any parking demand displaced by this proposal can therefore easily be accommodated in close proximity. There is a notably higher parking demand on weekends, particularly Saturdays, that appears to be associated mostly with sport and recreation activities in Hagley Park. The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area will also be available as a lay-over parking area or drop-off/pick-up area for any coaches and shuttles chartered by sports teams participating in weekend sports activities in nearby Hagley Park.

6.5       There is a no stopping restriction along this section of Moorhouse Avenue that operates between 10pm and 6am, which helps to deter anti-social road user activity in this location. Due consideration was given to ensuring that the establishment of the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area did not inadvertently diminish the purpose of that no stopping restriction. Representatives of the Council’s Parking Compliance and Parking Operations & Appeals teams were consulted on what they considered to be the best solution from an operational and enforcement perspective. The preferred option of both parties was to retain the existing no stopping restriction between 10pm and 6am, and impose a 6am – 10pm time restriction on the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area. This approach is supported and adopted as part of the preferred option for this proposal.

6.6       It is proposed that the existing P60 parking and 10pm-6am no stopping restrictions be retained either side of the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area.

 

Durham Street South (Attachment C)

6.7       The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 551 Colombo Street (Durham Street frontage) is located approximately 6m south of Alcester Street and will be marked 2.7m wide and 32m long, so as to accommodate two full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and/or shuttles. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed at the southern end of the proposed parking area.

6.8       An alternate location north of Alcester Street was considered for the proposed parking area, but was dismissed due to potential visibility issues to the north for vehicles exiting Alcester Street. Similarly, the proposed parking area has been located so as to not affect visibility to the north for vehicles exiting Bath Street.

6.9       There appears to have previously been a P30 parking time restriction on the east side of Durham Street South between Alcester Street and Bath Street. While the parking sign poles are still in place, the signs have been removed, and the area is heavily utilised for all day commuter parking. Installing the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area will therefore removal of existing (unrestricted) on-street parking for around six vehicles. It is considered that the effects of displacing this relatively small amount of all day commuter parking is more than offset by the wider benefits likely to be realised by providing tour coach and shuttle parking to meet the needs of the industry.

6.10    In accordance with the preferences of the tourism industry stakeholders, it is not proposed to establish any time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location. Consultation was undertaken on this proposal with South City Holdings Ltd as land owners and operators of the adjacent South City Shopping Centre, who supported the proposal without change. Owing to earlier involvement and interest, Foodstuffs Ltd (a key tenant in the South City Shopping Centre) were also consulted. While Foodstuffs Ltd were generally supportive of the proposal, they requested that consideration be given to imposing a 30 minute time restriction on the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area. No specific reasons were provided in support of this request, and there do not appear to be any obvious benefits for that change. Nevertheless, Foodstuffs Ltd request has been incorporated into Option 2 of this proposal as a variation of the preferred Option 1.

Colombo Street (Attachment D)

6.11    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 550 Colombo Street is located approximately 46m north of Dundas Street and will utilise the existing 27m long parking bay that was historically used by the Central City Shuttle. The length of the proposed parking area will accommodate one full size tour coach and also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed.

6.12    It is not proposed to establish any time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location.

6.13    The proposed works will not necessitate the removal of existing on-street parking, as the location is still marked (but not signed) for its historical use as a Central City Shuttle stop.

6.14    Consultation was undertaken on this proposal with South City Nominees Ltd (as owners of the adjacent property) and Smiths City Ltd (as the tenant of that property). Both parties supported the proposal without change.

Cashel Street (Attachment E)

6.15    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 67 Cashel Street is located approximately 73m west of Cambridge Terrace and will be marked 2.7m wide and 40m long, so as to accommodate two full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and/or shuttles. The proposed coach and shuttle park is essentially an extension to an existing 31m long bus / coach parking area that was recently marked in this location but not formally established, resolved or signed. Rather, the location is currently signed for ‘pay and display’ parking up to 2 hours in duration and is currently heavily utilised for parking of contractors vehicles associated with the on-going development of the adjacent site. The area between the marked bus/coach parking area and the West End Car park laneway access (where there are currently no road markings) also appears to be heavily utilised for parking of contractors vehicles. Installing the proposed 40m long coach and shuttle parking area will therefore remove on-street parking for around five or six vehicles.

6.16    There is a 4m length of broken yellow lines currently marked at the western end of the marked 31m bus / coach parking area, and it is understood that this stopping restriction has also not been resolved. The currently proposed coach and shuttle parking area will retain that 4m length of stopping restriction. Other than that however, the 40m length of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area. As such, additional no stopping markings are not proposed at the eastern end of the proposed parking area.

6.17    Consultation on this proposal was undertaken with Ngāi Tahu Property, who are the owners and developers of the adjacent site. Ngāi Tahu are supportive of the proposal, but requested that consideration be given to providing for some short-term (P5 or P10) parking for users of the nearby post boxes on the corner of Cashel Street and Montreal Street which may (in future) be relocated further east towards the West End Car park laneway. Ngāi Tahu questioned whether the short term parking could perhaps be provided within the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on a time restricted basis (eg 7am – 9am, Mon – Fri), or individual parking spaces outside of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area. Ngāi Tahu were subsequently consulted on a proposal to include two P5 parking spaces immediately east of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area, however they expressed concerns around the proximity of the easternmost space to the West End Car park laneway access and the potential for it to obscure the access as well as pedestrian activity around the access. In response to the concerns expressed by Ngāi Tahu, the proposal was amended to remove one of the P5 parking spaces. The current proposal, incorporating only one P5 parking space, achieves around 6m clearance to the West End Car park laneway access. It is proposed that the P5 parking restriction apply at all times.

6.18    Historically (pre-quake), the northern side of Cashel Street immediately west of Cambridge Terrace provided for metered car parking. Currently, however, there are no parking signs or markings in this location. In conjunction with adjacent roading and private land development projects, the area has also been under temporary traffic management for an extended length of time. Based on an expectation that the proposed coach and shuttle parking area will result in more bus and coach traffic on the Cashel Street approach to the signalised Cambridge – Cashel intersection, it is considered beneficial to provide more storage capacity on the Cashel Street approach to the intersection by formally removing any historical parking that existed in this location. This current proposal therefore includes a recommendation to install broken yellow lines on the north side of Cashel Street between the intersection and the proposed P5 parking space.

Cashel Street (Attachment F)

6.19    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 225 Cashel Street is located approximately 83m east of Madras Street and will be marked 2.7m wide and 36m long, so as to accommodate two full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and/or shuttles. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed. It is not proposed to establish any time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location.

6.20    Land to the north and south of this section of Cashel Street is earmarked for development of a new stadium, being one of Christchurch’s key anchor projects for which Ōtākaro is responsible for delivering. Concept plans for the stadium development also indicate the stopping of this section of Cashel Street, however the Ōtākaro website indicates the project is currently on hold until the scheduling for funding is agreed with the Christchurch City Council and a business case is produced. Owing to the status of the stadium project, the Crown owned land adjacent to the proposed coach and shuttle parking area has not yet been transferred to Ōtākaro and is currently under the responsibility of Land Information New Zealand (LINZ). Consultation on this proposal was undertaken with both Ōtākaro and LINZ. While Ōtākaro had no objection to the proposal, LINZ did not initially support the proposal on the basis of the possible future stopping of Cashel Street to enable the development of the stadium project. Given the current status and future uncertainty of the stadium project, and noting that implementation of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on this section of Cashel Street would not impact on the legislative mechanisms that provide for the road stopping if necessary, it was emphasised to LINZ that the proposal would not affect the potential future stadium project. Furthermore, it was suggested to LINZ that the proposed coach and shuttle parking in this location would essentially be an interim solution until such time as the stadium project proceeds and/or other suitable locations come available following completion of some current Central City roading projects. LINZ subsequently responded in support of the proposal on an interim basis until the end of the current lease on the property at 239 Cashel Street, which expires on 31 May 2018.

6.21    It appears that the north side of Cashel Street between Madras Street and Barbadoes Street was previously subject to a P60 parking restriction, with the inclusion of some P5 spaces as well. Whilst the sign poles remain in places, the signs have been removed and the area is heavily utilised for all day parking (possibly by construction workers associated with a number of civic and private development projects in the vicinity. On-street parking also presently occurs over a number of disused vehicle crossings that related to previous land use activities on the adjacent properties. Installation of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area will therefore result in the loss of unrestricted on-street parking for around five or six vehicles.

Latimer Square West (Attachment G)

6.22    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 1 Latimer Square is located on the west side of Latimer Square approximately 23m north of Hereford Street. The parking area will be marked 2.7m wide and 40m long, so as to accommodate two full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and/or shuttles. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed. It is not proposed to establish any time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location.

6.23    Installation of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area will necessitate the removal of six existing marked (but currently not metered, or time restricted) on-street parking spaces. Other proposed works around the Hereford Street – Latimer Square intersection, including kerb extensions and the installation of a mobility parking space on Latimer Square, are associated with the Hereford Street AAC project and do not form part of the tour coach parking proposal.

6.24    Consultation on this proposal was undertaken with representatives of the Council’s Parks Unit. The staff consulted were generally agreeable to the proposal, but raised a potential maintenance issue if large numbers of coach passengers congregated in this area and spilt onto the grass adjacent to the narrow footpath. With no information on expected utilisation or passenger numbers associated with this location, it was agreed with the Parks Unit staff that the best approach would be to monitor its operation and take action if required.

 

 

Gloucester Street (Attachment H)

6.25    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 202 Gloucester Street is located approximately 43m west of Latimer Square and will be marked 2.7m wide and 25m long, so as to accommodate one full size tour coach and/or shuttles. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in length to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed. It is not proposed to establish any time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location. Installation of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area will necessitate the removal of four existing marked (but currently not metered, or time restricted) on-street parking spaces.

6.26    The location of the coach and shuttle parking area currently proposed is a result of consultation with Ōtākaro, who are developing the East Frame anchor project on adjacent land to the south and north of this section of Gloucester Street. Whilst Ōtākaro were agreeable in principle to an earlier proposal, which located the coach and shuttle parking area further west toward Manchester Street, they raised a concern in regard to the conflict between the proposed coach and shuttle parking area and planned roading improvements associated with the East Frame project. After being supplied plans of Ōtākaro’s planned road works, the coach and shuttle parking area was relocated to its currently proposed location which avoids those planned works.

6.27    Ōtākaro later sought clarification in regard to the future of coach parking that was historically provided on the north side of Gloucester Street east of Manchester Street. While it is acknowledged that the existing / historic coach parking would be removed as a result of the Manchester Street (TP4) and East Frame projects, Ōtākaro were advised that it fell outside the scope of this proposal. Ōtākaro also questioned the need to retain the existing Metro bus stops on both sides of Gloucester Street immediately east of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area, on the basis that they were in close proximity to the bus Super Stop being developed on Manchester Street. They also indicated a possible conflict between the existing Metro bus stops on Gloucester Street and indicative vehicle access locations associated with possible future residential development on the adjacent land. Ōtākaro were advised that the location and/or future viability of the Metro bus stops were outside the scope of this project, but would be considered separately by others. It was also suggested to Ōtākaro that the current lack of any definitive plans, and therefore likely timeframes for any residential development on the adjacent properties, meant that immediate changes to the existing Metro bus stops would be premature.

Madras Street (Attachment I)

6.28    The tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 295F Madras Street is located approximately 9m north of the realigned section of Chester Street East that now serves as an egress from the Margaret Mahy playground parking area. The tour coach and shuttle parking area is approximately 33m long, and can accommodate two full size tour coaches or a combination of tour coaches and shuttles.

6.29    The location is currently signed and marked to reflect an existing P10 bus parking restriction however, to provide more consistency with the other tour coach and shuttle drop-off / pick-up areas that are being proposed in the Central City, it is now proposed to change the time restriction to P30. The proposed P30 time restriction also aligns better with the mandatory 30 minute rest times for drivers, and the amended signage will also clarify that the parking area can also be used by shuttles as well as tour coaches. No other changes are proposed. The proposal doesn’t require the removal of any existing on-street parking in this location.

6.30    Consultation on this proposal was undertaken with representatives of the Council’s Parks Unit, who supported the proposal without change.

 

 

Gloucester Street (Attachment J)

6.31    The proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area adjacent the property at 49 Worcester Street (Gloucester Street frontage) is located approximately 13m east of Montreal Street and will be marked 2.5m wide and 28m long. The length of the proposed parking area will accommodate one full size tour coach. The 2.5m width of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area allows a 1.2m wide cycle lane to be maintained on the approach to the Gloucester-Montreal intersection. The length of the proposed parking area also incorporates the necessary lead-in and exit lengths to enable larger vehicles to safely and efficiently manoeuvre into and out of the area, thus additional no stopping markings are not proposed. It is proposed to establish a P30 time restriction on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area at this location, thus providing predominantly for the drop-off and pick-up of passengers.

6.32    The existing P5 parking space at the eastern end of the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area will be retained. Establishing the proposed tour coach and shuttle parking area will require the removal of five existing P120 pay and display parking spaces.

6.33    Consultation on this proposal was undertaken with representatives of the Christchurch Art Gallery. They were strongly supportive of this proposal, noting they had many school groups visit the Art Gallery by coach and currently have nowhere for these coaches to load/unload passengers. The Art Gallery staff also noted that there had previously been a bus stop in this location prior to the earthquakes, but it had been removed and replaced with the current P120 parking spaces during earthquake remediation works to the Art Gallery. It was also noted that the Art Gallery provides ample parking car parking in their basement parking area, such that the loss of the five on-street parking spaces is not significant.

Significance

6.34    The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.35    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.36    As noted in Section 5 of this report, Council previously engaged Abley Transportation Consultants to consult with tourism transportation industry stakeholders in the latter part of 2016 and early 2017 to identify areas of demand for coach and shuttle parking, and also to identify any other issues of relevance. At the end of that consultation process, Abley Transportation Consultants produced a map of the generally agreed locations that would be progressed by Council staff. That map, along with a summary letter of the consultation feedback, was distributed to the stakeholder group.

6.37    Following handover of the project from Abley Transportation Consultants to Council staff, each of the proposed locations was fully investigated for suitability and plans were developed for the purpose of consultation with adjacent landowners and occupiers. As a result of other processes, and communication between Council Traffic Operations staff and representatives of the Christchurch Art Gallery and Ngāi Tahu, two additional drop off / pick up areas were added to the proposal (being the Gloucester Street and Cashel Street coach and shuttle parking areas located between Montreal Street and Cambridge Terrace/Durham Street).

6.38    Adjacent landowners and occupiers for each location in the preferred option were then consulted as outlined in the detailed description of the proposal provided in Sections 6.1-6.33 of this report. Each person/entity was provided with a plan of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area adjacent to their property, a map of the proposed coach and shuttle parks within the Central City and a summary letter of the project and proposed coach and shuttle parking area adjacent to their property. Almost all parties were supportive of the proposals, with the exception of LINZ who initially opposed the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on Cashel Street between Madras Street and Barbadoes Street but later changed their position to support the proposal on the basis of it being an interim approach. Some parties also sought minor modifications to the proposals, such as the relocation of the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on Gloucester Street between Manchester Street and Latimer Square so as to avoid planned road improvements associated with the East Frame project. Most of the requested changes were incorporated into the preferred option, however the P30 time restriction sought by Foodstuffs Ltd for the proposed Durham Street coach and shuttle parking area has no obvious merit and has therefore been omitted from the preferred option but presented as a possible variation (option 2).

6.39    In addition, consultation was also undertaken with representatives of the Council’s Parking Compliance and Parking Operations & Appeals teams who had no objections to the proposals but provided specific feedback in relation to proposed time restrictions and the retention of the existing no stopping restriction at the Moorhouse Avenue location.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.40    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.41    Cost of Implementation – is estimated to be approximately $5,000.

6.42    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.43    Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.44    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.45    The Parking Restrictions Subcommittee has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.46    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.47    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.48    Implementation dependencies – Parking Restrictions Subcommittee approval.

6.49    Implementation timeframe – Owing to the non-urgent nature of this proposal, it is considered appropriate to wait until the recently awarded new maintenance contracts come into effect on 1 October 2017 before instructing the contractor to proceed. Allowing approximately 6 weeks from the time of informing the Contractor, indicates the likely timeframe for implementation will be mid to late November 2017.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.50    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City to meet the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·   Supports the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·   Improves road safety by providing dedicated and suitably designed parking areas for tour coaches and shuttles to drop-off and pick-up passengers within the Central City, such that it may help to reduce instances of double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

6.51    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Installing the tour coach and shuttle parking in accordance with Attachments A-J will result in the loss of on street parking for approximately 36-38 cars (being a mixture of marked, un-marked, metered, time-restricted and/or unrestricted spaces).

·   Does not fully satisfy the preferences of all adjacent landowners, tenants and/or key stakeholders.

7.   Option 2 - Install Tour Coach and Shuttle Parking (variation to preferred option)

Option Description

7.1       As outlined in the description of the preferred option (Sections 6.1-6.33 of this report), with the exception that a P30 time restriction is imposed on the proposed coach and shuttle parking area on Durham Street between Alcester Street and Bath Street (Attachment C).

7.2       Through the initial consultation undertaken by Abley Transportation Consultants with industry stakeholders, the Durham Street location was identified as being desirable for unrestricted coach and shuttle parking. This was adopted in the preferred option.

7.3       As property owners and operators of the South City Shopping Centre, South City Holdings Ltd supported the proposal without change, however Foodstuffs Ltd (a key tenant in the shopping centre) requested that a P30 time restriction be imposed rather than allowing coach and shuttle parking for an unrestricted time period. No specific reasons were given by Foodstuffs to explain and/or support their request.

Significance

7.4       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.6       Refer sections 5, 6.1-6.33, 6.36-6.40 & 7 of this report.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.8       Cost of Implementation – is estimated to be approximately $5000.

7.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

7.10    Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

7.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

7.12    The Parking Restrictions Subcommittee has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

7.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

7.14    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.15    Implementation dependencies – Parking Restrictions Subcommittee approval.

7.16    Implementation timeframe - Owing to the non-urgent nature of this proposal, it is considered appropriate to wait until the recently awarded new maintenance contracts come into effect on 1 October 2017 before instructing the contractor to proceed. Allowing approximately 6 weeks from the time of informing the Contractor, indicates the likely timeframe for implementation will be mid to late November 2017.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City that generally meets the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·   Supports the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·   Improves road safety by providing dedicated and suitably designed parking areas for tour coaches and shuttles to drop-off and pick-up passengers within the Central City, such that it may help to reduce instances of double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

·   Satisfies the preference for time restricted coach parking on Durham Street by an adjacent business owner.

7.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Installing the tour coach and shuttle parking in accordance with Attachments A-J will result in the loss of on street parking for approximately 36-38 cars (being a mixture of marked, un-marked, metered, time-restricted and/or unrestricted spaces).

·   Does not fully satisfy the preference of tour coach operators and drivers for unrestricted coach and shuttle parking on Durham Street.

·   Does not fully satisfy the preferences of all adjacent landowners, tenants and/or key stakeholders.

8.   Option 3 - Do Nothing

Option Description

8.1       Retain existing parking and stopping restrictions.

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.4       This option does not address the views and preferences of the industry stakeholders, who are requesting the provision of more tour coach and shuttle parking within the Central City.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

8.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

8.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

8.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

8.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

8.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

8.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

8.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains existing levels of on-street parking in the Central City.

8.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not provide tour coach and shuttle parking in the Central City to meet the needs and preferences of the tourist industry.

·   Does not support the tourism related economy of Christchurch.

·   Does not address potential road safety issues associated with instances of tour coaches and shuttles double parking and/or parking on no stopping restrictions to drop-off and pick-up passengers.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Attachment A to report 17/779252 (Title: Christchurch Central City Coach Stops Drop Off / Pick Up and Parking Locations)

25

b

Attachment B to report 17/779252 (Title: Moorhouse Avenue Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

26

c

Attachment C to report 17/779252 (Title: Durham Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

27

d

Attachment D to report 17/779252 (Title: Colombo Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

28

e

Attachment E to report 17/779252 (Title: Cashel Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

29

f

Attachment F to report 17/779252 (Title: Cashel Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

30

g

Attachment G to report 17/779252 (Title: Latimer Square Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

31

h

Attachment H to report 17/779252 (Title: Gloucester Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

32

i

Attachment I to report 17/779252 (Title: Madras Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

33

j

Attachment J to report 17/779252 (Title: Gloucester Street Proposed Coach / Shuttle Parking)

34

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Wayne Gallot - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

7.        Manchester Street Proposed P10 Parking Restriction

Reference:

17/865136

Contact:

Steve Dejong

Steve.Dejong@ccc.govt.nz

9416428

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee to approve a proposed 10 minute parking restriction at 273 Manchester Street.  

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a request to Ōtākaro Limited from the property owner at 273 Manchester Street.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing the factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee:

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 43 metres north of its intersection with Gloucester Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres be revoked

2.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes (At Any Time) on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 43 metres north of its intersection with Gloucester Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install a 10 minute parking restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Providing a drop off facility for the accommodation business located at 237 Manchester Street

 

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     There are no disadvantages to this proposal

 

5.   Context/Background

Proposed Manchester Street (No 237) 10 Minute parking restriction

5.1       On 10 September 2015 Council approved the Manchester Street parking and Stopping Changes to facilitate the rebuild of the Street to be delivered by Ōtākaro Limited.

5.2       These changes approved two metred parking spaces on the west side of Manchester Street outside number 273, the spaces were separated in the middle by a landscaped buildout. (See Attachment A)

5.3       Ōtākaro Limited are currently constructing the kerbs on the west side of Manchester Street but have not commenced construction of the build out outside number 273.

6.   Option 1 – Proposed Manchester Street (No 273) 10 minute Parking Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The owner of the accommodation house ‘Urbanz’ located at number 273 Manchester Street has approached Ōtākaro Limited requesting that a P10 parking facility be provided in front of his business to facilitate drop off and pick up of guests. This request is entirely consistent with approved CBD parking rational for hotels and accommodation facilities.

6.2       The owner of Urbanz also requested Ōtākaro Limited not to construct the landscaped build out in front of this premises as it presence would hinder manoeuvrability into and out of the parking spaces outside number 273 Manchester Street and its absence would enable the provision of an additional parking space to service his business.

6.3       Ōtākaro Limited supports the Urbanz requests and have contacted Council staff for their advice as to facilitate scheme changes. Council staff agree with the decision of Ōtākaro to support the scheme change request being consistent with Council’s CBD parking strategy.

6.4       It is therefore proposed to install the 10 minute (At Any Time) parking restriction directly in front of 273 Manchester Street between the existing vehicular entrance ways located on the north and south side of the property. This will provide 3 parking spaces to facilitate the operation of the Urbanz accommodation house.

Significance

6.5       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.6       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consultation with adjacent property owners.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.7       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.8       The only affected business in the area is Urbanz accommodation house, Ōtākaro and Council staff met with the manager of Urbanz who supports this proposal, being the person requesting the changes. Staff further called the owner to check if he was happy with the proposal, who stated that he was happy with what was proposed.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation - $0.00

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Are covered under the area maintenance contract

6.12    Funding source – Ōtākaro Limited

Legal Implications

6.13    Part 1 clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.14    The installation of signs and markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.15    Not applicable

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies - Ōtākaro project time frames.

6.17    Implementation timeframe - Ōtākaro Limited will install the Restrictions on the completion of the project.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Additional parking will be provided for Urbanz

·   Entry to and exit from the parking spaces will be easier

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Landscaping will not be installed

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Maintain the status quo, do not make changes proposed in Option 1.

Significance

7.2       N/A

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See 6.8 above.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       N/A

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation – N/A

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – N/A

7.8       Funding source – N/A

Legal Implications

7.9       See 6.13 and 6.14 above

Risks and Mitigations    

7.10    N/A

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies – N/A

7.12    Implementation timeframe – N/A

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Landscaping will be provided

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Parking entry and exit around the buildout will be more difficult

·   Provision of a drop off facility will not be provided for the Accommodation house

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Plan CERA Urbanz 273 Manchester St

39

b

Plan Otakaro Urbanz 273 Manchester St

40

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Steve Dejong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

8.        Armagh St and Margaret Mahy Playground Proposed Parking Restrictions

Reference:

17/881479

Contact:

Steve Dejong

Steve.dejong@ccc.govt.nz

9416428

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee to approve proposed parking restrictions in Armagh Street and the Margaret Mahy Playground carpark.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report a staff generated report following the completion of the project by Otakaro limited and the asset being handed to the Council. Council staff have also received a number of requests from the public for restrictions in this area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing the factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council’s significance and Engagement Policy

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee:

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north side of Armagh Street between Manchester Street and Madras Street be revoked.

2.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the south side of Armagh Street between Manchester Street and Madras Street be revoked.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction to its intersection with Madras Street.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

5.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and controlled by ‘Pay by Plate’ (or any form of approved payment) (Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm) (Friday, 9am to 8.30pm) (Saturday and Sunday 9am to 6pm) on the North side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 32metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 31 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 63 metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 44 metres.

7.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and controlled by ‘Pay by Plate’ (or any form of approved payment) (Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm) (Friday, 9am to 8.30pm) (Saturday and Sunday 9am to 6pm) on the North side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 107 metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 126 metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 55 metres.

9.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes and controlled by ‘Pay by Plate’ (or any form of approved payment) (Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm) (Friday, 9am to 8.30pm) (Saturday and Sunday 9am to 6pm) on the North side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 181 metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of Armagh Street commencing at a point 219 metres east of its intersection with Manchester Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 11 metres to its intersection with Madras Street.

11.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of the entrance to the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

12.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to 90 degree angled parking for vehicles displaying approved mobility cards only for maximum period of 120 minutes on the west side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark commencing at a point 19 metres north of its Armagh Street entrance and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 10 metres.

13.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the west side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark and further resolved as 90 degree angled parking commencing at a point 29 metres north of its Armagh Street entrance and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 28 metres.

14.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west side of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at a point 57 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 7 metres.

15.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the west side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark and further resolved as 90 degree angled parking commencing at a point 64 metres north of its Armagh Street entrance and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

16.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the west and north sides of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at a point 102 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction following the kerb line  around to the east for a distance of 30 metres.

17.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the north side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark and further resolved as 90 degree angled parking commencing at a point 17 metres west of its Madras Street entrance and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

18.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the north side of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark exit commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

19.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark exit commencing at its intersection with Madras Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

20.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of the entrance to the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

21.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the east side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark and further resolved as 90 degree angled parking commencing at a point 19 metres north of its Armagh Street entrance and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

22.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east side of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at a point 57 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 7 metres.

23.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the east side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark and further resolved as 90 degree angled parking commencing at a point 64 metres north of its Armagh Street entrance and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

24.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the east and south sides of the of the Margaret Mahy Carpark commencing at a point 102 metres north of its intersection with Armagh Street and extending in a northerly direction following the kerb line around to the east for a distance of 21 metres.

25.       Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the south side of the Margaret Mahy Playground Carpark commencing at a point 17 metres west of its Madras Street entrance and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – install parking restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Free up car parking for users of the playground.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     There are no disadvantages to this option

 

5.   Context/Background

Margaret Mahy Carpark and Armagh Street Proposed Parking Restrictions

5.1       The Christchurch Earthquake Rebuild Authority (CERA) completed the Margaret Mahy Playground several years ago. The asset then moved into the hands of Otakaro Limited following the dissolution of CERA.

5.2       For approximately a year now Council has been receiving requests from users of the Playground for parking restrictions to be imposed in the playground carpark to prevent all day commuter parking by workers in the city and free up parking for legitimate users of the Playground. 

5.3       Motorists have also requested parking restrictions to be imposed along the south side Armagh Street opposite the playground to improve road safety. 

5.4       The imposition of restrictions were opposed by Otakaro staff while the playground was still under their jurisdiction. Several months ago the asset was handed to the Council and is now under Council jurisdiction.

6.   Option 1 - Margaret Mahy Carpark and Armagh Street Proposed Parking Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       The construction of The Margaret Mahy Playground was a significant success to the rebuild of the CBD. On weekends and holidays the demand for user parking far exceeds supply. This is due to the lack of parking restrictions allowing commuters working in the city to park within the playground carpark and vicinity all day.

6.2       Commuters and playground visitors also often park on the south side of Armagh Street opposite the Playground adjacent to the rain gardens narrowing the this section of Armagh Street to one lane because No Stopping lines have not been in this location.

6.3       Following numerous requests from the public for restrictions to be imposed in the vicinity of the playground, staff propose that 120 minute parking restrictions be imposed; this will give playground users two hours to enjoy the facilities until they have to relocate their vehicle.

6.4       The playground carpark has provision for 76 vehicles including three accessible car parking spaces. (See attachment A). The proposed P120 restriction will prevent all day commuters from utilising this carpark as free all day parking.

6.5       There are a further 14 inset parking spaces on the north side of Armagh Street between Manchester and Madras Streets these 14 spaces are identified as P120 metered / pay by plate parking on the CBD Parking meters Tariff Master plan. It is proposed that theses spaces are resolved as such.

6.6       There are rain gardens along the south side of Armagh Street between Madras and Manchester Streets; this side of the road was never designed for parking and when vehicles are parked along the south side of the road this section of Armagh Street is reduced to one lane. It is therefore proposed to install No Stopping restrictions along the south side of the street.

Significance

6.7       The level of significance of this option is low and is consent with section 2 of this report.

6.8       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consultation with adjacent property owners. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.9       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.10    There are no effected businesses with the vicinity of the playground.

6.11    Council have received a number of complaints from users of the playground that they cannot use the parking because it is usually occupied by commuters working in the CBD.

6.12    Council has further received a number of complaints from motorists that the south side of Armagh Street is often parked out by users of the playground narrowing the road to one lane.

6.13    The lack of restrictions in the carpark has also received media attention.  

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.14    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.15    Cost of Implementation – approximately $3,000

6.16    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Maintenance budgets

6.17    Funding source – Traffic Operations operational budget

Legal Implications

6.18    Part 1 clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.19    The installation of signs and markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: traffic Control Devices 2004.

6.20    The Christchurch City Council Delegations Register sets out decision making powers that Council has delegated.  Council has delegated decisions relating to the installation of parking restrictions and charges for parking within the area identified by Plan A of the Delegations Register, for both on-street and off-street parking.  All decisions for this option relate to locations within the Plan A area. 

Risks and Mitigations   

6.21    Not Applicable

Implementation

6.22    Implementation dependencies – Parking Restrictions Subcommittee approval

6.23    Implementation timeframe – Approximately 4 weeks from Subcommittee approval

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.24    The advantages of this option include:

·   Free up car parking for users of the playground

6.25    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   There are no disadvantages to this option

7.   Option 2 – Do nothing

Option Description

7.1       Do not install proposed parking restrictions

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section two of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See 6.10 to 6.13 above.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       N/A

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation – N/A

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – N/A

7.8       Funding source – N/A

Legal Implications

7.9       See 6.18 & 6.20 above

Risks and Mitigations    

7.10    N/A

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies – N/A

7.12    Implementation timeframe – N/A

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Lack of parking for playground users

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Plan Margaret Mahy Carpark and Armagh St Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions

48

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Steve Dejong - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

 

9.        95 Ferry Road - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/900565

Contact:

Barry Hayes

barry.hayes@ccc.govt.nz

941 8950

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee to approve the installation of no stopping restrictions along the north side of Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown in Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report was staff generated in response to a request from a local business owner located adjacent to the site who uses a service entrance.

1.4       These measures have been requested for the safe operation for medium and large size commercial vehicles accessing these premises, which are often partly blocked by parked vehicles.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee:

1.         Approve that the restriction of parking for thirty minutes on the north side of Ferry Road commencing at a point 110 metres west of its intersection with Fitzgerald Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for 11 metres be revoked.

2.         Approve the No Stopping Restriction on the north side of Ferry Road commencing at a point 104m west of its intersection with Fitzgerald Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for 28 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides clear space for commercial vehicles to access local businesses

·     Ensures that good sight lines are maintained for vehicles turning out of the business access

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None identified

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local business raised concerns that their service access used by medium and large sized commercial vehicles is proving difficult due to the number of parked vehicles on the north side of Ferry Road which are mainly due to staff employed at nearby local businesses.

5.2       Consequently parking restrictions have been requested, to provide more road space for commercial vehicles to turn.

5.3       This request has been considered jointly with the project manager for the Major Cycle Route (MCR) scheme which will affect this section of Ferry Road. This proposal, which has yet to go to formal consultation, will include no stopping restrictions along this section of Ferry Road, to provide a clear route for a protected on-street cycle lane.

5.4       Consequently, the restrictions under consideration are consistent with the MCR proposals which, subject to consultation responses, are likely to be implemented within the next 2 years.

5.5       Upon investigation, council staff observed that parking takes place on this section of Ferry Road for most of the day, which results in unreasonable constraints to commercial vehicles servicing businesses as well as affecting the sight lines for vehicles leaving the access.

5.6       Staff consider that there are other parking opportunities on Ferry Road which require a slightly longer walk to the businesses situated in the area.

5.7       The installation of the no stopping restrictions will ensure that this section of Ferry Road will remain clear in the vicinity of the business accesses on both sides, to assist manoeuvring by larger vehicles and improve driver visibility.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Revoke a section of the existing 30 minute parking restrictions and install no stopping restrictions on the north side of part of Ferry Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Letters of consultation with a site plan have been issued to the tenants and property owners at 62-99 Ferry Road and 43 Fitzgerald Street.

6.5       No letters of objection or request for amendment were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies; it is also consistent with the parking restrictions planned within the Major Cycle Route scheme, which will be consulted upon separately.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $300 to install road markings and relocate sign and post.

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Parking Restrictions Subcommittee has delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installations of any sign and/or road markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies – Parking Restrictions Subcommittee approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe – approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides a clear route for commercial vehicles to access local businesses

·   Ensures that good sight lines are maintained for vehicles turning out of the business accesses

·   Is consistent with the long term proposals to restrict parking as per the MCR proposal

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing unrestricted parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the request for No Stopping Restrictions to support the safe movement of commercial vehicles accessing the local business.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

7.6       In terms of the proposed improvement of Ferry Road between St Asaph Street and Fitzgerald Street, this section of the proposal is consistent with the parking restrictions as already consulted upon.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  – not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support the transport demands of the local business.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

95 Ferry Rd NSR site plan

54

b

95 Ferry Rd NSR location plan

55

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Barry Hayes - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator


Parking Restrictions Subcommittee

30 August 2017

 

PDF Creator