Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 4 July 2017

Time:                                    5pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Beckenham Service Centre,
66 Colombo Street, Beckenham

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Karolin Potter

Melanie Coker

Helene Mautner

Phil Clearwater

Lee Sampson

Tim Scandrett

 

 

28 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere

941 6663

arohanui.grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


 

 

Spreydon / Heathcote Community Board

Te Poari Hapori o Te Waimōkihi rāua ko Opāwaho

 

   Vision:

To be an active, visible, accessible, responsive, and imaginative Board that works with individuals and our communities for the common good.

 

Objectives:

 

1.  Te Poari Hapori o Te Waimōkihi rāua ko Opāwaho (the Spreydon/Heathcote Community Board) honours the Treaty, the partnership it represents by the Crown and Tangata whenua / Maori and its inherent commitment to loyally and cooperatively act reasonably in the utmost good faith with one another.

 

2.  Actively engage and partner with ward communities to advocate for the protection and promotion of social, economic, environmental, and cultural wellbeing.

 

3.  Encourage greater community participation and awareness of the heritage, ecological values, and recreational opportunities of the ward, which includes the Opāwaho/Heathcote River, Port Hills, parks, and reserves.

 

4.  Encourage the ward-wide participation of individuals and all communities, including majority and minority ethnicities, older and younger people, and people with disabilities in public and neighbourhood life.

 

5.  Promote and encourage participation in healthy lifestyles by providing opportunities for sport and recreational activities.

 

6.  Build safer, more robust communities by promoting and facilitating the development of positive neighbourhood identities and social connectedness.

 

7.  To practice and support partnership with the community, good governance, and participation in local body planning and processes.


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4 

B       7.       Correspondence............................................................................................................. 11  

STAFF REPORTS

C       8.       348 Lincoln Road - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions.............................................. 23

C       9.       Property Review Process.............................................................................................. 31

C       10.     Youth Achievement and Development Scheme - Angus Hamilton........................... 49

C       11.     Spreydon-Cashmere Discretionary Response Fund Application - Arts Voice - First Thursdays Sydenham.................................................................................................... 51

C       12.     West Spreydon Community and School Pool DRF..................................................... 55

B       13.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 58 

 

 


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board meeting held on Friday, 16 June 2017 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes may be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

It is intended that the public forum session will be held at approximately 5.05pm.

 

4.1          Tree Planting and Pou in Ernle Clark Reserve – Megan McMahon

4.2          Healthy Families Christchurch – Jill Borland

4.3          Christchurch Resettlement Services - Shirley Wright 

4.4          Pedestrian Crossing on Tennyson Street  - Ester Vallero and Liz O’Connor

5.   Deputations by Appointment

Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

 

Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 16 June 2017

Time:                                    8.04am

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Beckenham Service Centre,
66 Colombo Street, Beckenham

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Karolin Potter

Melanie Coker

Helene Mautner

Phil Clearwater

Lee Sampson

Tim Scandrett

 

 

16 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Arohanui Grace

Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere

941 6663

Arohanui.Grace@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2017/00090

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board meeting held on Tuesday, 6 June 2017 be confirmed.

Melanie Coker/Lee Sampson                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Sport Canterbury and Healthy Families

The scheduled deputation did not attend.

 

4.2       West Spreydon School Community Pool Committee

Mr Duane Major spoke to the Board on behalf of the West Spreydon Community Pool Committee regarding the community pool that is being installed in the grounds of West Spreydon School to replace the pool that was severely damaged in the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes. 

Mr Major outlined the progress to date with the community pool project. A 25 metre long by 1.8 metre deep in ground  pool is to be installed. The aim is to construct a pool that is accessible and useable by the whole community.  It is planned to open the pool on 17 November 2017.

Following questions from members, the Chairperson, on behalf of the Board, thanked Mr Major for attending.

 

4.3       Christchurch Community Response

Mrs Janette Sprott of Christchurch Community Response spoke to the Board regarding the group’s recent door knocking campaign in north Spreydon to check on residents’ welfare and emergency preparedness. Mrs Sprott indicated that 1200 homes had been visited and that fewer earthquake issues were identified than in previous campaigns.  Overall, sixty percent of people spoken to said that they are prepared for another natural disaster, and forty percent identified that they were part of a community or neighbourhood group.

Following questions from members, the Chairperson, on behalf of the Board, thanked Mrs Sprott for attending.

 

4.4       Rapaki Road no stopping proposal

             The scheduled deputation did not attend.

 

4.5       Heathcote River Tree Planting

Part B

Ms Alice Shanks, local resident spoke to the Board concerning tree planting near the Heathcote River. She expressed concern about the species being planted in the area covered by the mid-Heathcote Linear Masterplan and whether the species were appropriate for the location and proximity to the river. After hearing from staff present and following questions from members, the Chairperson, on behalf of the Board, thanked Ms Shanks for attending.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.   

6.   Staff Briefings

 

Community Travel Education

Staff presented information about the work of the Travel Education Team, including the cycle safe programme and the Community Travel Advisers.

 


 

 

7.   Pioneer Basketball Club Discretionary Response Fund 2016/17 - Coaching in Low Decile Schools

 

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2017/00091 (Original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approves a grant of $2,300 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Pioneer Basketball Club towards the Coaching in Low Decile School's project.

Helene Mautner/Tim Scandrett                                                                                                                            Carried

 

8.   Discretionary Response Fund  2016/17 Application - Review of Community Development Addington

 

Staff advised that the application had been withdrawn.

 

9.   Youth Achievement and Development Scheme - Tuumana Winiata Kirner

 

Board Consideration

As part of its consideration of this application the Board noted the unusually high price of air fares for travel to the Cook Islands.

 

Staff Recommendation

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approves a grant of $750 from its 2016/17 Youth Achievement and Development Fund to Tuumana Winiata Kirner towards participation in the Shirley Boys High School Senior Maori Haerenga ki Rarotonga.

 

Part C

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2017/00092

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board approves a grant of $1,250 from its 2016/17 Youth Achievement and Development Fund to Tuumana Winiata Kirner towards participation in the Shirley Boys High School Senior Maori Haerenga ki Rarotonga.

Karolin Potter/Phil Clearwater                                                                                                                               Carried

 

10. Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board Area Report

 

Community Board Resolved SCCB/2017/00093 (Original Staff recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Receives the Area Update.

2.         Agrees that the following items to be reported by the Chairperson in her report to the Council:

·             Passenger Transport Services public meeting.

·             June Deputations.

Phil Clearwater/Helene Mautner                                                                                                                         Carried

 

11. Elected Members Information Exchange

Part B

Elected Members shared information on the following :

·        Rapaki Track –there is concern at the lack of toilets in the vicinity.

·        There is to be a meeting with Christchurch District Health Board representatives regarding the possibility of a Park and Ride facility at Princess Margaret Hospital.

·        Major Cycleways Nor’ West Arc Route –there is a question as to whether appropriate advice is being sought on the species of  trees to be planted along route .

·        Flooding in Beckenham Park- it was noted that the park continues to flood and the was discussion as to whether the installation of a stormwater swale could improve the situation.

·        West Spreydon School Fair --Board members plan to attend and undertake a Community Board Plan engagement at the fair.

 

Lee Sampson left the meeting at 10:42 am.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 10.49am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 4TH DAY OF JULY 2017

 

Karolin Potter

Chairperson

 


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

7.        Correspondence

Reference:

17/669042

Contact:

Faye Collins

faye.collins@ccc.govt.nz

941 5108

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Correspondence from DG Kinley 11 June 2017

Cashmere Tennis Club Lights

Correspondence from DG Kinley 14 June 2017

Cashmere Tennis Club Lights

 

2.   Staff Comment

2.1       The amendment referred to in the letter dated 14 June 2017 was recorded in the minutes OF THE MEETING ON 9 December 2016 as being carried as the substantive motion, however, the words “whilst daylight saving does not apply “ were not included at clause 3.1.5.a of the resolution.

 

2.2       The minutes OF THE MEETING OF 9 December 2016 were confirmed at the SUBSEQUENT MEETING.  An administrative note will be added to the online minutes ACKNOWLEDGING the discrepancy and the writer OF THE CORRESPONDENCE will be advised.

 

2.3       It should be noted that the application considered at the meeting was for use of the court lighting during the winter months outside of daylight saving hours only.

 

 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 04 July 2017

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Correspondence from DG Kinley 11 June 2017

12

b

Correspondence from DG Kinley  14 June 2017

19

 

 


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

8.        348 Lincoln Road - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions

Reference:

17/482951

Contact:

John Dore

john.dore@ccc.govt.nz

941 8875

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to approve the removal of three P60 parks and replace with three P10 parking restrictions to support parking demand for local businesses, in accordance with Attachment A.

1.2       The site is located within the road network as shown on Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated in response to requests from members of the public.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Revoke all parking restrictions on the South East side of Lincoln Road, commencing at a point seven metres South West of its intersection with Dickens Street, and extending in a South Westerly direction for 16 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of ten minutes on the South East side of Lincoln Road, commencing at a point seven metres South West of its intersection with Dickens Street, and extending in a South Westerly direction for 16 metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Remove existing P60 parking restriction and install three P10 parking restrictions (preferred option).

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     A P10 parking restriction reflects the actual parking demand in this area, and reduces the chance of a vehicle parking for 60 minutes and removing short term parking opportunities.

·     The pharmacy generates a relatively high number of customers with mobility issues, the availability of parking close by benefits these road users.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Reduction of available P60 parks, however enough supply in immediate area to accommodate.

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A local business recently raised concerns that the P60 parking restriction outside 348 Lincoln Road did not support the parking demand in the area.

5.2       Council staff have monitored Lincoln Road kerbside parking demand between Dickens Street and Parlane Street along the southern kerb, on three separate occasions from around 930am-10am.

5.3       On each occasion, three to four P60 southern kerbside parks between Dickens St and Parlane St were available during the survey times

5.4       The below was observed in the existing P60 parks outside 348 and 350 Lincoln Road.

·    Survey 1 – six vehicles parked for no more than ten minutes

·    Survey 1 – two cars parked for more than ten minutes

·    Survey 2 – three vehicles occupied all available spaces from 930-1000am

·    Survey 3 – vehicles occupied all available spaces from 930-1000am, one vehicle parked for less than ten minutes, a new vehicle arrived to take space immediately after leaving.

5.5       Overall the existing three P60 parks outside 348 and 350 Lincoln Road, have a high occupancy with some short term parking turnover observed. There was at least three P60 parks always available during the surveys on the same side of the street that can accommodate the P60 demand.

5.6       The proposed change from P60 to P10 will provide higher parking turnover in the area where short term parking is generated by a Pharmacy, cafe and other business. It is council’s staff view that there is adequate P60 parking supply to meet demand given that three P60 parks will be removed.

5.7       The Pharmacy reports some of their customers have mobility impairements and rely on availability of parking close by. A P10 restriction will help with parking turnover and parking availability.

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Remove existing P60 parking restriction and install two P10 parking restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

Install P10 parking restriction as shown on attachment A.6.2          This option removes three existing P60 parks, there is adequate P60 parking supply in the immediate area to accommodate the loss.

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       All business and property owners on the south side of Lincoln Rd from Tony’s Tyre Service to Coffee Culture, received letters advising the preferred option.

6.6       Consultation closed 31 May 2017.

6.7       The Pharmacy and Coffee Culture support the proposal.

6.8       One business owner provided feedback that neither supported nor opposed the proposal. The correspondence raised another issue that has been passed to the relevant project team.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation – No more than $500 to install signs and poles.

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.12    Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.13    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.14    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.15    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.16    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.18    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·   P10 parking restriction reflects the actual parking demand in this area, and reduces the chance of a vehicle parking for 60 minutes and removing short term parking opportunities.

·   The pharmacy generates a relatively high number of customers with mobility issues, the availability of parking close by benefits these road users.

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Reduction of available P60 parks, however enough supply in immediate area to accommodate

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking restrictions.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for improvement.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the issues raised by a local business.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Preferred Option

28

b

Location Plan

29

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

John Dore - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

9.        Property Review Process

Reference:

17/386118

Contact:

Angus Smith

Angus.smith@ccc.govt.nz

9418502

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to formally receive the list of properties in their area that are no longer required, or being utilised, for the purpose that they were originally purchased.

1.2       To initiate the process to review those properties for the purpose of making future use decisions.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is staff generated to follow up on a Council resolution of 12 May 2016 Council Resolved CNCL/2016/00242 and related workshops held with Community Boards.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined utilising the significance and engagement assessment worksheet.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect this assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

2.         Commence the Board’s review process to identify if the properties in Attachments B, C and D should be retained for alternative public uses, retained for strategic purposes/future decisions or considered for disposal.

3.         Being of the view that the sites listed below are unlikely to have alternative public uses or strategic purposes, and that the Board has sufficient information to form this preliminary view, recommends that Council directs officers to commence investigation processes regarding the potential to dispose of the sites:

a.         ______________

4.         To allow for the inclusion of advice in a report to Council, conclude this review and provide comment to staff, within six months of resolving to commence the process.

5.         Note that the final report containing the outcome of the process will come back to the Board for recommendation to Council.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       The Council has adopted a process for determining the future use of properties that are no longer being utilised for a public work i.e. delivering a service or activity.

4.2       That process has been socialised with Community Board’s on a couple of occasions and this report serves to formally commence that process.

4.3       A list of the properties in the Community Boards area is attached.

4.4       The next steps following this report are for the Community Board to either make some early decisions in respect of the specific properties, or develop and work through a process to develop alternative public uses to inform an options report in six months’ time.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       The Council purchases properties for the delivery of a service / activity / public work. They are held and funded by the business unit (titular asset owner) delivering that service / activity or project.

5.2       When a property is no longer required for the purpose for which it was originally purchased it is incumbent on the Council to make a decision to determine the future use of that property.

5.3       The Council adopted a process in May 2016 that is designed to facilitate and make decisions that support the active and prudent management of the Council’s property.

5.4       In general terms the Council should only hold land that is:

5.4.1   Required for a public work (either currently utilised to deliver an activity or service; or held for future delivery of the same); and

5.4.2   Held for strategic purposes; and

5.4.3   Held pending a future use decision i.e. under review in terms of future use. 

5.5       Holding land with an indeterminate purpose or reason is not prudent and may put the Council at operational risk. It also comes at a cost in terms of operating / holding, foregone capital, potential social, poor community outcomes and therefore imprudent custodianship of public assets / money.

Process

5.6       A flow chart of the process is attached, but in summary is as follows:

5.6.1   When a property ceases to be held for the purpose of delivering the activity or service for which it was originally purchased then it is circularised around business units, Community Boards and possible stakeholders to assess and identify community needs and develop options for alternative public uses.

5.6.2   This is done on a portfolio basis annually or as required.

5.6.3   A period of six months is provided to establish the alternative public uses and options.

5.6.4   The results are collated into an options report, which would usually incorporate as one of the options “sale”.

5.6.5   The Council then resolve future use based on staff and Community Board recommendations.

5.7       Retaining the property for an alternative public use needs:

5.7.1   To be rationalised,

5.7.2   A clearly identified need,

5.7.3   To be supported by a sound and robust business case,

5.7.4   Supporting Council strategies,

5.7.5   Established funding in the Council’s annual and long term plans

5.7.6   To have an identified sponsor i.e. end asset owner (titular internal owner) / sponsor and budget provision within the LTP

Process initiation

5.8       Attached are the following:

5.8.1   A list of properties in the ward that is no longer being utilised for the original intended purpose for which they were purchased.

5.8.2   A plan of the ward showing the property locations.

5.8.3   A brief status report, street view and aerial photo of each property.

5.8.4   A list of all the properties across the city grouped in terms of Board/Ward areas.

5.9       Next step is for the Board to consider how it approaches the process of considering alternative future public uses. This may involve:

5.9.1   Whether the properties can/should be prioritised.

5.9.2   Whether early decisions can be made e.g. retention for a particular use or purpose or to declare some surplus for disposal because it is obvious there are no practical alternative options

5.9.3   Develop a programme and process with the Community Governance Team to canvass the community’s needs and develop options over the next six months.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Process flow chart

35

b

Property list Cashmere

36

c

Property list Spreydon

41

d

City List

45

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy

Approved By

Bruce Rendall - Head of Facilities, Property and Planning

Anne Columbus - General Manager Corporate Services

  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

10.    Youth Achievement and Development Scheme - Angus Hamilton

Reference:

17/624418

Contact:

Emma Pavey

Emma.pavey@ccc.govt.nz

941 5107

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider Angus Hamilton's application received for the Board's 2016/17 Youth Achievement and Development Scheme.

1.2       There is currently $4,125 remaining in this fund with an application due to be heard on 16 June 2017 board meeting.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Angus Hamilton.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $500 from its 2016/17 Youth Achievement and Development Scheme to Angus Hamilton towards the Under 17's New Zealand Beach Handball Youth Championships in Mauritius, Africa on the 11th – 16th July 2017.

 

 

4.   Applicant

4.1       Angus Hamilton is a year 11 student at Cashmere High School and lives with his parents and 17 year old sister in Huntsbury.

4.2       Angus has been selected to represent New Zealand in the U17's NZ Beach Handball Youth Championship on the 11th – 16th July 2017 in Mauritius, Africa. 

4.3       Angus has been playing Handball for a number of years.  He is captain for the school team as well as captain for his Beach Handball team.  Angus also plays for the Canterbury Quakes team which is the men's Canterbury team. 

4.4       Angus' team recently travelled to the Cook Islands for the Oceania Beach Handball Championships where his team qualified for the World Championships.  From here they will be attempting to qualify for the 2018 Youth Olympics being held in Buenos Aires.

4.5       Angus helps coach the Cashmere Junior Handball team and has received a School Blues award for his contribution to the sport.  He is looking forward to experiencing the many different cultures at the championships, learning new skills and gaining more knowledge of the game which will assist him to further his coaching and playing expertise.

4.6       As well as Handball and Beach Handball Angus is interested in adventure racing (a mixture of kayaking, mountain biking, rogaining, abseiling and problem solving) and reading.  He is part of the Cashmere Student Volunteer Army and one of the creators of the Christchurch Youth Movement; a group of youth dedicated to providing opportunities for youth in Canterbury who are committed to exploring different avenues of volunteering. 

4.7       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for the NZ Beach Handball Youth Championship:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Uniforms

$646

Flights (Perth, Mauritius return)

$3,878

Accommodation (the International Handball Federation is paying)

$0

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$4,524

 

1.1.  This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Emma Pavey - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Arohanui Grace - Manager Community Governance, Spreydon-Cashmere

  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

11.    Spreydon-Cashmere Discretionary Response Fund Application - Arts Voice - First Thursdays Sydenham

Reference:

17/643705

Contact:

Jay Sepie

jay.sepie@cc.govt.nz

5102

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider an application for funding from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

56954

Arts Voice Canterbury

First Thursdays Sydenham

$4,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Arts Voice Canterbury. This is an application spilt with Linwood-Central-Heathcote Community Board.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $4,000 to Arts Voice Canterbury towards two First Thursdays Sydenham events.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$72,524

$24,918

$50,074

$46,074

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Spreydon-Cashmere DRF Matrix Arts Voice - First Thursdays

53

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Jay Sepie - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

12.    West Spreydon Community and School Pool DRF

Reference:

17/650387

Contact:

Emma Pavey

Emma.pavey@ccc.gvot.nz

941 5107

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

56979

West Spreydon School

West Spreydon Community and School Pool

$60,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from West Spreydon School.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $16,000 to West Spreydon School towards the West Spreydon Community and School Pool.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$72,524

$28,150

$44,374

$26,374

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

West Spreydon Community and School Pool Decision Matrix

57

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Emma Pavey - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton

  


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

PDF Creator

 


Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board

04 July 2017

 

 

13.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.