Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 21 July 2017

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

17 July 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

jenny.hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Public Forum.................................................................................................................... 4

B       5.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       6.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4  

B       7.       Staff Briefings................................................................................................................. 17

STAFF REPORTS

C       8.       Tomes Road - School Patrol at Paparoa Street School.............................................. 19

C       9.       Shirley Road Proposed P3 Parking and No Stopping Restrictions............................ 37

C       10.     Papanui-Innes Proposed Time Restricted Parking Restrictions ................................ 43

C       11.     Dulles Place Proposed Give Way Control.................................................................... 51

C       12.     Abbey Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions....................................................... 57

C       13.     St Albans Skate Park - Feasibility of an extenstion to the existing skate park........ 63

B       14.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report.......................................................... 71

B       15.     Elected Members’ Information Exchange.................................................................... 79 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

1.   Apologies

An apology was received from Jo Byrne.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting both open and public excluded held on Friday, 30 June 2017 be confirmed (refer page 5).

Note: The public excluded minutes have been separately circulated.

4.   Public Forum

A period of up to 30 minutes is available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

4.1       Positive Youth Development Report – Angus McWilliam

4.2       Positive Youth Development Report – Nomads United AFC

4.3       Positive Youth Development Report – Caitlin Kennett

4.4       Santa Claus Workshop Charitable Trust

5.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

6.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

 

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 30 June 2017

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

27 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

jenny.hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

 

1.   Apologies

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00137

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved that the apology for absence from Emma Norrish be accepted.

Pauline Cotter/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                              Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00138

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Friday, 9 June 2017 be confirmed subject to the following amendment to item 17.2: replace the words “…on noise levels, vibrations, and air quality…” to “...on the feasibility and best way to obtain data regarding noise levels, vibrations and air quality...”

Pauline Cotter/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                           Carried

4.   Public Forum

4.1       Road and Intersection Safety

Part B

Rachael Lane attended and spoke to the Board about road and intersection safety in relation to the St Albans School pupils crossing the Berwick/Cranford Streets intersection.  Parents walk their children to St Albans School every day and are extremely concerned about the  illegal driving practices, in particular the running of red lights, and feel that this places their children at serious risk of injury.

The Police conducted an operation at this intersection that resulted in the ticketing of a number of red light offences.

Rachel asked that the installation of electronic school speed signs on Cranford Street be considered.

The Board noted that there are reports that these incidents are also commonly occurring at the intersection crossing at Westminster and Cranford Streets. The Board discussed meeting with concerned parties, including parents, police, school and Christchurch City Council traffic staff to identify issues and possible solutions and noted that these problems are occurring city-wide.

The development of a process/package for other affected areas was discussed as well as a city‑wide red light campaign.

The Chairperson thanked Rachael Lane for her presentation.

The Papanui-Innes Community Board decided to:

1.      Call for an urgent report from staff, including the option of a safety barrier, to address pedestrian safety issues at the Berwick/Cranford Street intersection.

2.      Call for a report from staff to address the issues for pedestrians around St Albans School following a meeting of affected parties.

         

4.2       Shirley Friendship Club

Part B

Sandra Alexander and Barbara Bone thanked the Board for the funding grant previously given to the Shirley Friendship Club. They noted that they are currently meeting outside the Shirley area and asked for information on the rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre.

Staff will liaise with the Club about available meeting space in Shirley.

The Chairperson thanked Sandra Alexander and Barbara Bone for their presentation.

         

4.3       The Papanui Village Church

Part B

Margaret Samson spoke to the Board about the pre-school music programme being run by the Papanui Village Church (previously known as St Giles). The programme is using a room at St Andrews College until the church and facilities are rebuilt.

The Chairperson thanked Margaret Samson for her presentation.

5.   Deputations by Appointment

5.1       Randall Street - Street Renewal

Part B

Leo Vanhanen spoke to the Board about the proposed street renewal for Randall Street (refer item 9).  Mr Vanhanen expressed his disappointment that part of Randall Street had not been included in the proposed street renewal and asked that the inclusion of this section be re-considered.

The Chairperson thanked Mr Vanhanen for his presentation.

6.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

7.   Correspondence

 

7.1  Parking Issues Gosset and Malvern Street

The Board requested that the Parking Compliance team be notified of these issues and asked to monitor this area regularly.

 

7.2  Speeding Vehicles – Tuckers Road/Farnswood Place

         The Board noted the issues raised in the correspondence, refer to resolution below.

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 30 June 2017.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00139

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 30 June 2017.

2.         Write to the Police to express its concerns about “boy racers” speeding up Farnswood Place as raised by residents at the Community Board meeting.

Mike Davidson/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                                              Carried

 

8.   Mary Street, Frank Street and Gambia Street Proposed Give Way Controls

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00140 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke the Give Way control against Frank Street at its intersection with Mary Street as shown as Location A on Plan TG131048.

2.         Resolve that a Give Way control be placed against the southern arm of Mary Street at its intersection with Frank Street, as shown as Location B on Plan TG131048;

3.         Resolve that a Give Way control be placed against the eastern arm of Frank Street at its intersection with Mary Street, as shown as Location C on Plan TG131048;

4.         Resolve that a Give Way control be placed against the northern arm of Gambia Street at its intersection with Frank Street, as shown as Location D on Plan TG131048.

Mike Davidson/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                                              Carried

Note: John Stringer voted against the motion.

 

9.   Randall Street (Petrie Street to North Parade) - Street Renewal Project

Board Comment

       Staff noted that the renewal of section of Randell Street between Petrie and Chrystal Streets is funded by SCIRT and the section between Chrystal and North Parade is funded through surplus street renewal funding. No funding is currently available  for the renewal of the Petrie Street to Stapletons Road section of Randall Street. The Long Term Plan gives a 5 year timeframe for this work.

 

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

2.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.

3.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

4.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

5.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

6.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

11.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

12.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

13.       Approve the general layout of Randall Street between its intersection with Chrystal Street and its intersection with North Parade, as detailed in Attachment A, including new kerb alignments, landscaping, surface treatments and line markings.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00141

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

2.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.

3.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

4.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

5.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

6.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 16.5 metres.

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with North Parade and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.

11.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

12.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Randall Street, commencing at its intersection with Chrystal Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.

13.       Approve the general layout of Randall Street between its intersection with Chrystal Street and its intersection with North Parade, as detailed in Attachment A, including new kerb alignments, landscaping, surface treatments and line markings.

14.       Request further staff investigation, together with all of the residents of Randall Street, into the choice of tree due to the toxicity of Kowhai trees and it being a large tree possibly affecting future operational expenditure regarding power lines.

Jo Byrne/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00142

15.       Request that staff provide street renewal costs for the final part of Randall Street between Stapletons and Petrie Streets with a view to informing a Board submission to the Long Term Plan.

Pauline Cotter/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

10. Property Review Process

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00143 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Receive the information in this report.

Jo Byrne/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

11. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Edgeware Tennis Club, St Albans Playcentre, St Albans Amateur Swimming and Life-Saving Club Inc. and Nor'west Brass

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $3,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Edgeware Tennis towards upgrading their water heater and stove.

2.         Approves a grant of $2,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans Playcentre towards funding wages for the Coordinator.

3.         Approves a grant of $2,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans Amateur Swimming and Life-Saving Club Inc. towards pool hire for their Learn to Swim programme.

4.         Approves a grant of $2,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Nor’west Brass Inc. towards the purchase of instruments.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00144

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $3,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Edgeware Tennis towards upgrading their water heater and stove.

2.         Approve a grant of $2,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans Amateur Swimming and Life-Saving Club Inc. towards pool hire for their Learn to Swim programme.

3.         Approve a grant of $2,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Nor’west Brass Inc. towards the purchase of instruments.

John Stringer/Jo Byrne                                                                                                                                             Carried

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00145

4.         Approve a grant of $2,500 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to St Albans Playcentre towards operational funding.

Mike Davidson/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                                              Carried

Note: Jo Byrne and John Stringer voted against the motion.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00146

5.         Approve that the balance of any funds remaining in the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund be transferred to the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2017/18 Discretionary Response Fund.

Ali Jones/John Stringer                                                                                                                                             Carried

 

12. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's Positive Youth Development Fund 2016/17 - Nick Andre Moulai

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00147 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $500 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Nick Andre Moulai towards representing New Zealand at the Youth Commonwealth games held in Bahamas from 14-26 July 2017.

Jo Byrne/Ali Jones                                                                                                                                                      Carried

 

13. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Is invited to consider nominating Jo Byrne to be a member of the Papanui Youth Development all access playground working party.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00148

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Nominate Jo Byrne and Mike Davidson to be members of the Papanui Youth Development all access playground working party.

Pauline Cotter/John Stringer                                                                                                                                  Carried

 

13.1   Removal of Bus Stop Main North Road

Board Comment

Board Members have been contacted by Papanui residents expressing concerns regarding the removal of the bus stop outside the Countdown Supermarket at Northlands Mall. The distance for bus patrons walking to the supermarket is now over 500 metres.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00149

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request that staff investigate the feasibility of providing a bus stop on Main North Road northbound lane between the Northlands Superstop and the next bus stop outside St Josephs School.

Mike Davidson/Pauline Cotter                                                                                                                              Carried

 

Jo Byrne left the meeting at 11:23am.  Jo Byrne returned to the meeting at 11:25am.

 

13.2   Road and Intersection Safety

Board Comment

The Board discussed the issues raised by Rachel Lane (refer item 4.1) and agreed that the both driver behaviour and traffic congestion in the Cranford Street area continues to be a major safety concern for both pedestrians and drivers.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00150

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request that staff investigate immediate possible options to alleviate current problems related to traffic congestion, speeding and failing to stop in the following area: Berwick to Westminster Street, Westminster to Rutland Street, Westminster to Trafalgar Street and the Westminster/Cranford Street intersection and report back to the first meeting of the Board in September 2017.

Ali Jones/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                          Carried

 

Pauline Cotter left the meeting at 11:30am.  Pauline Cotter returned to the meeting at 11:32am.

 

13.3   Skate Park Options for Papanui

Board Comment

Following the Board’s visit to the Te Ora Hou Te Kaupapa Whakaora (TKW) programme, Board members discussed options for a skate park for youth in the Papanui area.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00151

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to request that staff:

1.         Identify appropriate site/s in Papanui for the establishment of a skate park with free wi-fi.

2.         Provide costings for design, consultation and construction with a view to inclusion in the Long Term Plan.

Jo Byrne/John Stringer                                                                                                                                             Carried

 

13.4   Community Funding

Board Comment

The Board, through the Chair and Deputy Chair, will raise concerns at the next Community Board Chair and Staff Forum as the Board considered they had a lack of information about board funding bids for the 2017/18 year.

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00152

The Papanui-Innes Community Board agreed that the Chairperson raise the matter of lack of information on the Board funding bids with the General Manager.

Jo Byrne/John Stringer                                                                                                                                             Carried

 

 

14. Elected Members’ Information Exchange

Part B

·       Members requested that information on both the costings and the progress of the Redwood Plunket Rooms be brought to the Board.

·       Members asked the Chair and staff to draft a memo, should this be needed, opposing the use of vacant land on Guild Street as a works depot.

 

15  Resolution to Exclude the Public

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2017/00153

Part C

That at 12.26pm  the resolution to exclude the public set out on pages 56 to 57 of the agenda be adopted.

Jo Byrne/Mike Davidson                                                                                                                                            Carried

 

The public were re-admitted to the meeting at 12.31pm.

   

Meeting concluded at 12.32pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 21st DAY OF JULY 2017

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

7.        Staff Briefings

Reference:

17/751662

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

Styx River Update

Anthony Shadbolt

Landscape Architect – Asset Planning and Management – Parks Unit

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Staff Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

8.        Tomes Road - School Patrol at Paparoa Street School

Reference:

16/1358038

Contact:

Penny Gray

Penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941-8633

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to recommend to Council to approve a school patrol in accordance with the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, and accordance with the Land Transport Rule 54002, Traffic Control Devices Rule 2004. 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a request by Paparoa Street School, a resident and the Police Education Officer, to relocate the school patrol to a more appropriate position.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board recommends that  Council:

1.         Revoke Paparoa Street School’s authorisation to operate a school patrol on Tomes Road, located at a point 170 metres north-easterly of its intersection with Claremont Avenue.

2.         In pursuance of the powers vested in it by Section 8.3(1) of the Land Transport Rule - Traffic Control Devices 2004 ( Rule 54002), and pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 1974 and 2002, the Christchurch City Council hereby authorises the head teacher of Paparoa Street School to appoint appropriately trained persons to act as school patrols at the school crossing point at Tomes Road, located at a point more or less 161 metres north-easterly of its intersection with Claremont Avenue.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

·     Level of Service: 10.0.31 Protect vulnerable users - minimise the number of fatal crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists

         4.2      The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 2 – Relocate school patrol  to the west (preferred option)

·     Option 1 – Relocate school patrol to the east 

·     Option 3 - Do nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides supervision and priority for school children at a more suitable location, when needing to cross Tomes Road;

·     Cost effective solution to providing road safety for school children

·     Additional parking area outside 91 Tomes Road;

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Additional no stopping outside 85 Tomes Road;

 

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       At its meeting on 26 September 2002, the Council authorised a school patrol to be operated on Tomes Road, located at a point 170 metres north-easterly of Claremont Avenue. This was one of many existing school patrols that the author of this current report identified as potentially not having the legal authorisation to operate.

5.2       The school patrol is situated at the driveway to the school and also at the position of a     residential driveway opposite.  No physical changes were made to the patrol at that time as no safety concerns were reported to Council staff. The resident opposite did complain about delays while wishing to back out.

5.3       Recently, changes have occurred with the Tomes road entrance to the school and different people now live opposite the school. Both the school, Police and residents have raised concerns about the interaction of turning vehicles on both sides of the road, right at the school crossing point.

5.4       Following an on- site meeting with all concerned, the ideal solution is to relocate the crossing. This will separate children, both waiting to cross and crossing the roadway, from turning vehicles.

5.5       Relocating the kea crossing to the east and west were both considered and both have their positives and negatives.

Community Feedback

5.6       Affected residents were sent letters and submissions forms on 31 May 2017 and asked to respond by 22 June.  Residents were asked for their preferred option of three options: 

·     Option 1 was moving the school patrol to the east;

·     Option 2 was moving the school patrol to the west and;

·     Option 3 was no support for either option. 

5.7       There were 10 submissions.  Two were in favour of Option 1, seven were in favour of Option 2 and one was not in favour of either option.

6.   Option 2 – Install a new School Patrol to the west (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a new school patrol to the west of the existing one on Tomes Road for Paparoa Street School, in accordance with Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low, consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Affected residents were sent consultation letter and submission form on 31 May for responses by 22 June 2017.

6.6       There were 10 submissions.  Seven were in favour of Option 2, two were in favour of Option 1 and one was not in favour of either option.

6.7       The following issues and concerns were raised by submitters:

·     Distance between kea crossing and existing driveways

·     Service location in kea crossing area

·     Flooding on footpath and footpath surface

·     Sightlines from the crossing location

6.8       Due to the feedback there have been two minor alterations to Option two, which is the preferred option;

·     The kea crossing location will move one metre to the east to allow a three metre gap between the crossing and the residential driveway;

·     The support pole will move to outside 94 Tomes Road, three metres from the driveway of 90 Tomes Road.

6.9       The proposal relocates the kea crossing to a more suitable location with minimal effect on residents.  The additional no stopping restriction is alongside a fire hydrant where parents could drop off, if they didn’t leave their cars, but you could not park at that location (with a standard car) without either encroaching on the 1.0 metre from the driveway rule of 0.5m from the fire hydrant rule.

6.10    There is a 3 metre gap between the driveway of 85 Tomes Road and the proposed location of the school patrol.  This should ensure there is no over-flow into the driveway area as children queuing on this side will be exiting school and would likely therefore queue on the school side of the crossing rather than the residential side.  This is the desire line for the children and their care givers.

6.11    The tree is proposed to be replaced after the civil works are complete.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.12    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.13    Cost of Implementation - $10,000 for signs, poles and footpath connection.

6.14    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – approved Council maintenance budget.

6.15    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.16    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.17    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.18    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.19    None identified

Implementation

6.20    Implementation dependencies  - dependant on Council approval to authorise a new school patrol location

6.21    Implementation timeframe – October school holidays

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.22    The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides supervision and priority for school children at a more suitable location, when needing to cross Tomes Road;

·     Cost effective solution to providing road safety for school children;

·     Additional parking area outside 91 Tomes Road.

6.23    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Additional no stopping outside 85 Tomes Road.

7.   Option 1 – Install a new School Patrol to the east

Option Description

7.1       Install a new school patrol to the east of the existing one on Tomes Road for Paparoa Street School, in accordance with Attachment B.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low, consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See sections 6.5-6.11.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $10,000 for signs, poles and footpath connection.

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – approved Council maintenance budget.

7.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

7.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

7.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

7.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

7.13    None identified

Implementation

7.14    Implementation dependencies  - dependant on Council approval to authorise a new school patrol location

7.15    Implementation timeframe – October school holidays

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.16    The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides supervision and priority for school children at a more suitable location, when needing to cross Tomes Road;

·     Cost effective solution to providing road safety for school children;

·     No additional no stopping restrictions.

7.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Crossing location is still in close proximity to residential driveway;

·     Pedestrians might wait in residential driveway area during busy periods;

·     Potential removal of a healthy tree outside 91 Tomes Road.

8.   Option 3 – Do Nothing

Option Description

8.1       Do nothing

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is low, consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.4       See sections 6.5-6.11.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.5       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

8.5.1   Inconsistency – does not optimise road safety for school children.

Financial Implications

8.6       Cost of Implementation – not applicable

8.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

8.8       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

8.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations   

8.10    Ongoing concern from school community about safety of the children

Implementation

8.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

8.12    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.13    The advantages of this option include:

·     No additional cost to Council.

8.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Does not respond to the school and community’s concerns.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Tomes Road Proposed School Patrol Relocation Plan

26

b

Papanui-Innes Ward - Tomes Road Proposed Kea Crossing Relocation Plan tg131019 - Option 1

27

c

Papanui-Innes Ward - Tomes Road Proposed Relocation of Kea Crossing Tree Report 23 June 2017 - Paparoa Street School

28

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

9.        Shirley Road Proposed P3 Parking and No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/627158

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the P3 (drop off/pick up) parking on Shirley Road outside Shirley Primary School and changes to no stopping restrictions on Shirley Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to a request from the school to review parking on Shirley Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the north side of Shirley Road commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 199 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Shirley Road commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 65 metres;

3.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 82.5 metres east of its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres.

4.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 134.5 metres east of its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres;

5.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes on the north side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 166.5 metres east of its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 32.5 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only;

6.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the both sides of the service lane between Hills Road and Shirley Road commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in a south-easterly direction to its intersection with Shirley Road;

7.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-west side of the service lane commencing at its intersection with Shirley Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres;

8.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of the service lane commencing at its intersection with Shirley Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 10.5 metres;

9.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Shirley Road commencing at its intersection with Chancellor Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Slater Street;

10.       Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Shirley Road commencing at its intersection with Chancellor Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres;

11.       Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 33 metres west of its intersection with Chancellor Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres;

12.       Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 63 metres west of its intersection with Chancellor Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

13.       Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Shirley Road commencing at a point 83 metres west of its intersection with Chancellor Street and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Slater Street.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install P3 Parking and No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·     Removes redundant no stopping restrictions.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Drivers unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on signs.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Shirley Primary School’s main entrance is off Shirley Road.  There is a signalised mid-block pedestrian crossing outside of the school, a bus stop on either side of the road and unrestricted parking on both sides of the road.

5.2       The signalised crossing was installed in August 2014 and replaced a zebra crossing.  The signalised crossing was installed by SCIRT when they reconstructed Shirley Road. 

5.3       The no stopping on the approach and departure sides of the signalised intersection is in excess of what is required at a signalised crossing point.  The signalised crossing has 2.4 metre kerb buildouts which puts the waiting location beyond a parked car.

5.4       It is proposed to remove four sections of no stopping, creating approximately 4 extra car parks.

5.5       It is also proposed to install a section of P3 parking from the signalised crossing to the staff car park entrance.  The P3 parking will give parents an area to drop their children off at the school gate. 

5.6       The existing no stopping lines are ignored by motorists and this report ensures all line marking at the site is required for safety.  If this report is approved, parking enforcement will monitor the area and ensure that motorists are complying with the line marking.

6.   Option 1 – Install P3 Parking and No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install ‘P3 Parking’ and remove ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Shirley Road as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       There was no formal consultation undertaken for this project.  Shirley Primary School requested the P3 parking outside of their school frontage and are therefore in support of the P3 parking restrictions.  The change of no stopping lines increases parking in the area.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $600

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    None identified.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.15    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·   Removes redundant no stopping restrictions.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Drivers unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on signs.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Shirley Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See sections 6.5

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation – not applicable

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   None

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the issues that parents and caregivers require an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parking.

·   It does not address the issue that some of the existing no stopping is not required.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Shirley Road Proposed P3 Parking and No Stopping Restrictions Plan

42

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

10.    Papanui-Innes Proposed Time Restricted Parking Restrictions

Reference:

17/631498

Contact:

Penny Gray

Penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the time restricted parking on Innes Road in accordance with Attachment A and time restricted parking on Langdons Road in accordance with Attachment B.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a request by St Francis of Assisi School Board of Trustees and the operator of a new food truck.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the 10 criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

Innes Road

1.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Innes Road commencing at its intersection with Kensington Avenue and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Nancy Avenue be revoked.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Innes Road commencing at its intersection with Kensington Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Innes Road commencing at a point 39 metres west of its intersection with Kensington Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 47.5 metres.

4.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes on the south side of Innes Road commencing at a point 86.5 metres west of its intersection with Kensington Avenue and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 31.5 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only;

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times on the south side of Innes Road commencing at a point 142.5 metres west of its intersection with Kensington Avenue and extending in a westerly direction to its intersection with Nancy Avenue.

 

Langdons Road

6.         Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Langdons Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 32 metres be revoked.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Langdons Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

8.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes on the south side of Langdons Road commencing at a point 15 metres west of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 17 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday from 8am to 6pm.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Approve parking restriction changes (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·     Allows customers to food truck an area to park which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers. 

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Drivers unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on signs.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background: Innes Road

5.1       St Francis of Assissi School board of trustees contacted the Council regarding their existing P5 zone on Innes Road.  They actively monitor this parking area and parents are using their full allocation of 5 minutes to park, rather than just drop off.

5.2       They requested a drop off only zone but this is not a parking restriction that has been approved to install on roads.  A P3 area is most recent school drop off and pick up parking zone.

5.3       It is proposed to change the existing P5 parking area to a P3 parking area to encourage parents to just drop off in this area.

Background: Langdons Road

5.4       A new food truck has opened at the corner of Langdons Road and Chapel Street.  It has full resource consent to operate.  They have requested a change in parking in front of the food truck location to improve access for their customers.

5.5       The existing parking on Langdons Road is commuter parking with this location being in close proximity to Northlands Mall, Papanui High School and a local light industrial area.

5.6       The proposal is to convert 3 parking spaces into P60 parking.  This would allow a turnover of vehicles during the day for all businesses in the area.  The parking is directly in front of the food truck and the neighbouring property which is owned by the operators of the food truck.

6.   Option 1 - Approve the time restricted parking (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       As shown in Attachment A and Attachment B the proposal is for a change in the parking on Innes Road and Langdons Road.

6.2       It is proposed to change the parking on Innes Road outside of St Francis of Assisi from P5 to P3 parking and to change the parking on Langdons Road from unrestricted parking to P60 parking. 

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

6.4       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consultation with adjacent property owners and occupiers.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       There was no formal consultation undertaken for either of these schemes.

6.7       On Innes Road, St Francis of Assisi requested the change of parking and are therefore supportive of the change from P5 to P3.

6.8       On Langdons Road the owners of both the properties affected by the change from unrestricted parking to P60 parking are supportive of the scheme (the properties are owned by the same person).

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation – $880.

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Maintenance of road markings is covered by the existing maintenance budget and the impact will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.12    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.13    The Christchurch City Council, Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008, provides the Council with the authority to install stopping and parking restrictions by resolution.  The Council has delegated this authority for this part of the city to the Parking Restrictions Subcommittee.

6.14    The installation of any traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.  These markings will comply.

Risks and Mitigations

6.15    Risk – None identified

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.17    Implementation timeframe – Four weeks once the maintenance contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Allowing parents and caregivers an area to drop off and pick up their children which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers;

·   Allows customers to food truck an area to park which may have been otherwise occupied by all day parkers.

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Drivers unable to park for lengths of time other than what is stated on signs.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       The existing parking on Innes Road and Langdons Road remains as is.

Significance

7.2       See section 6.3-6.4

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       See section 6.5

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See section 6.6 – 6.8

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.8       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Risk: not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies – Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   No impact on on-street parking

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the issue that the school require a shorter time period to create a drop off zone.

·   It does not address the issue that commuter parkers are parking along Langdons Road, limiting short term parking opportunities.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Innes Road Proposed P3 Parking Plan

48

b

Papanui-Innes Langdons Road Proposed P60 Parking Plan

49

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

11.    Dulles Place Proposed Give Way Control

Reference:

17/661408

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve a Give Way control against Dulles Place in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is in response to a request from a resident of Erica Street.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Resolve that a Give Way control be placed against the southern arm of Dulles Place at its intersection with Erica Street.

2.         Approve No Stopping restrictions and line marking changes on Erica Street and Dulles Place as shown on Attachment A.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.32 Assess risks on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install Give Way Control (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Clearly identifies to road users who is required to give way

·     Gives priority to the main traffic route

·     Visually narrows the road through line marking

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Limited pedestrian crossing facilities at the intersection.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       The intersection of Erica Street and Dulles Place is a local T-intersection with Dulles Place having the priority over Erica Street.  However the southern arm of Dulles Place is a cul-de-sac so the main traffic flow is actually from Dulles Place (north) into Erica Street.

5.2       There is currently no Give Way controls on this intersection with the Give Way Rule applying to the intersection.  Drivers using this route frequently may become complacent giving way as there is very little traffic flow out of the cul-de-sac of Dulles Place.

5.3       This proposal changes the give way to the cul-de-sac arm of Dulles Place, thereby giving the main traffic flow priority.

5.4       The key benefits with this option are:

·     Main traffic flow has priority

·     Additional line marking visually narrows the road

Community Feedback

5.5       Initially staff proposed installing the Give Way control on Erica Street to just reinforce the existing give way arrangement.  One resident responded and noted that this did not give priority to the main traffic flow and was not consistent with other intersections like this in Christchurch.

5.6       Staff reconsidered their proposal and changed the proposal to install the give way control on the cul-de-sac arm of Dulles Place.  The second consultation letter was sent out on 11 May for replies back by 26 May 2017.

5.7       There were six submissions.  Four were in favour of the Dulles Place give way and two were in favour of the Erica Street give way.

6.   Option 1 – Install Give Way Control (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a Give Way control against Dulles Place as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       There were 2 consultations for this scheme.  The first consultation proposed the ‘Give Way’ control be installed on Erica Street, which would just reinforce the current situation.  Affected residents were sent consultation letters on 19 April.  They were asked to respond by Wednesday 3 May 2017.

6.6       There was one response to this consultation that suggested the Give Way control was changed to Dulles Place which is the minor arm of the intersection.

6.7       Staff reconsidered their proposal and agreed to change the Give Way control to Dulles Place.

6.8       A new consultation letter was sent to affected residents on 11 May.  They were asked to respond by Friday 26 May 2017.

6.9       There were six submissions.  Four were in favour of the Dulles Place give way and two were in favour of the Erica Street give way.

6.10    The following issues and concerns were raised by submitters:

·     Speed of cars turning left from Dulles Place into Erica Street;

·     Parking Loss;

·     Environmental effects such as fuel consumption and vehicle emissions;

·     Pedestrian facilities at this intersection and into Erica Street reserve;

·     Rubbish trucks performing U-turns at the intersection

6.11    There was one small change in the plan from the consultation feedback.  One parking space will be retained outside 1 Erica Street.  This will have the added benefit of physically narrowing the road at this location when a car is parked.

6.12    The proposal aims to address the speeding concerns through the use of line marking to visually narrow the road.

6.13    It is recognised that there is limited pedestrian crossing facilities at this location, however there are alternate crossing points away from the intersection.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.14    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.15    Cost of Implementation - $750

6.16    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.17    Funding source – Traffic operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.18    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.19    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.20    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations   

6.21    None identified

Implementation

6.22    Implementation dependencies - Community board approval.

6.23    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.24    The advantages of this option include:

·   Clearly identifies to road users who is required to give way

·   Gives priority to the main traffic route

·   Visually narrows the road through line marking

6.25    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Limited pedestrians crossing facilities at the intersection.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain the existing road layout.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5 – 6.13.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

7.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations   

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   None

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The give way rules at the intersection will remain and the main traffic route will have to give way.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Ward - Dulles Place Proposed Give Way Control Plan tg131042

56

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

12.    Abbey Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

17/687415

Contact:

Penny Gray

Penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve no stopping restrictions in Abbey Place in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a request from a resident of Abbey Place to investigate the parking at the intersection of Abbey Place and Hills Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the 10 criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

Abbey Place

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on both sides of Abbey Place commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

2.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with Abbey Place and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12.5 metres;

3.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the east side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with Abbey Place and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13.5 metres;

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the north side of Abbey Place commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres;

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the south side of Abbey Place commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 17 metres;

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12.5 metres

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the eastern side of Hills Road commencing at its intersection with Hills Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13.5 metres

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 -  Approve the no stopping restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes three parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background: Abley Place

5.1       Abbey Place is a narrow six metre wide cul-de-sac off Hills Road.  It is designed to function as an accessway for residents of the street. 

5.2       When cars are parked on both sides of the street it does not leave enough room for motorists to safely pass between these parked cars.  This current situation will also potentially hinder emergency vehicles requiring immediate access to residential properties on Abbey Place.

5.3       Since Abbey Place is a cul-de-sac, access can only be provided from Hills Road for residents.  It is therefore imperative that traffic flow is maintained in a safe and effective manner.

5.4       In order to mitigate this problem, it is proposed to install no stopping restrictions at the intersection of Abbey Place and Hills Road.  This will maintain safe traffic flow at the entrance to this cul-de-sac.

5.5       Generally drivers parking in this area are staff or customers of businesses in the area rather than residents of the street.

6.   Option 1 - Approve no stopping restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Approve the no stopping restrictions on Abbey Place, as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       All residents and absentee property owners were sent a letter on 23 June for responses by 5 July 2017.

6.6       No responses were received.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation – $200.

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Maintenance of road markings is covered by the existing maintenance budget and the impact will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.10    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.14    Risk – None identified

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – Four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines. 

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes three parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Abbey Place intersection with Hills Road remains as is.

Significance

7.2       See section 6.2-6.3

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       See section 6.4

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See section 6.5 – 6.6

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.8       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.10    Risk: None identified.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies – Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   No impact on on-street parking

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the parking at the intersection causing limited access and visibility to Abbey Place.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Abbey Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions Plan

62

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Team Leader Traffic Operations

Aaron Haymes - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

13.    St Albans Skate Park - Feasibility of an extenstion to the existing skate park

Reference:

17/545004

Contact:

Megan Carpenter

Megan.carpenter@ccc.govt.nz

941 6761

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to be informed about the feasibility of extending the skateboarding area at St Albans Park.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is being provided to fulfil  Papanui-Innes Community Board resolution PICB/2017/00064 from 10 February 2017;

The Papanui-Innes Community Board agreed that staff investigate the possibility of extending the skateboard park in St Albans Park to take in the current gravel area and to provide a memo to the Board at its 31 March 2017 Meeting.

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive this information.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       There is space for an extension to St Albans Skate Park and possibly activities could include street elements and an extension to one of the half pipes to make it an open bowl.

3.2       There is no current funding in Christchurch City Council’s Long Term Plan 2015 – 2025. A bid would be required to be included in the Draft Long Term Plan 2019-2029.

 

4.   Context/Background

Background

4.1       A Cheapskates Skate Skool Skate Jam was held at St Albans Park on Saturday 21 Jan 2017, at this event it was highlighted that the skate park at St Albans does not cater for skate and scooter users of a beginner skill level.

4.2       Staff have received requests from youth previously around extending the skate park, including a request from youth in 2014 who established a Facebook page with 272 likes and a request in March 2017 for an extension of the skate park to include building a skate bowl. Our response has been consistent as Council have not had funding available in the Long Term Plan and there is opportunity to enter submissions in Annual Plan processes and Long Term Plan processes.

4.3       Council is focusing on delivering skate parks in areas where there is no current provision as per Council’s Skateboarding, Inline Skating and Freestyle BMX Cycling Strategy 2004, our priority is to establish skating facilities in Halswell and Sumner/Redcliffs.

4.4       There is funding in the Long Term Plan 2015 – 2025 to renew the skate park at Bishopdale Park. This skate park in near the end of its life, therefore needs renewing. Renewal funding is over financial year 2019 and financial year 2020, therefore it is expected that we will start discussions with the community from July 2018.

4.5       Sheldon Park in Belfast had an upgrade/extension in 2015.

Feasibility

4.6       There is space for an extension to the St Albans Skate Park to the eastern side of the current facility (gravel area). The skate park is approximately 38m away from the nearest resident, therefore we would not consider extending the skate park further west. Refer attachment A for photos of existing Skate Park.

4.7       Activities could include extending one of the halfpipes to have a bowled end (if drainage suits), and integrating some street elements onto the gravel area (refer attachment B for some examples).

4.8       There is funding available in FY21 in the draft Long Term Plan, depending on budget approvals. There would need to be funding leading into this for community engagement and design. It is important to find out what the community would like to see in the space, to ensure ownership of the skate area.

4.9       An approximate budget would be $30,000 for design and consultation, with $150,000 the following year for construction.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

St Albans Skate Park Photos - June 2017

65

b

Skate Element Examples - June 2017

68

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Megan Carpenter - Recreation Planner, Greenspace

Approved By

Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks

Mary Richardson - General Manager Customer and Community

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


 


 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

14.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report

Reference:

17/635088

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to resource the Community Board to promote a proactive partnership approach to decision-making between the Council and Community Boards working together to achieve the best outcomes for the city with decisions being made with a good understanding of community views.

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations 

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the Area Update.

2.         Nominate the following two members (insert names) to the Combined Papanui-Innes/Coastal-Burwood Community Board Styx River catchment working party.

 

 

3.   Community Board Activities and Forward Planning

3.1       Community Board Plan update

3.1.1   A workshop was held on Monday 17 July 2017 to discuss the community board plan. Further discussions will take place before finalisation of the plan later in August.

3.2       Memos/Information reporting back on Community Board matters

3.2.1   Information sent to the Board

·        Land Drainage Recovery Programme – Richmond and Shirley Works Update

·        Consultation – Abbey Place Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

·        Land Drainage Recovery Programme – Dudley Creek mitigation scheme update

·        Information re investigation into property floor levels in the Mairehau catchment

·        CNC – QEII Drive site clearance, Hills Road tree felling

·        Resource Consent – Temporary accommodation 10 Shirley Road

·        Papanui Parallel Cycleway – Asphalting Rutland Street to Bealey Avenue

·        Information re Loftus Street proposed no stopping and P60 parking

·        CNC – Night works QEII Drive and Philpotts Road intersection

·        CNC – Update re Chaneys On-ramp and road diversions

·        Information re Marshland to Burwood safety improvements

·        Community Facilities and Heritage Programme update

3.2.2   Graffiti Suburb Report

The Graffiti Suburb report for June 2017 is attached, refer to Attachment A.

3.3       The provision of strategic, technical and procedural advice to the Community Board

3.3.1   Styx Information Sharing and Styx River catchment working party

The final Styx information sharing community meeting held on the 14 June 2017 supported the establishment of a joint Papanui-Innes/Coastal-Burwood Community Boards Styx Catchment working party. The first meeting will be held on the 2 August at the Spencerville Residents Association hall in Spencerville domain.

A Terms of Reference document for the working party is being developed.

Proposed membership includes the two Community Board chairs plus two members of each Community Board nominated by the separate Community Boards, and up to seven members of the community.

The focus of the Combined Papanui-Innes and Coastal-Burwood Community Board Styx River Catchment Working Party will be within the parameters of the Christchurch City Council’s vision for waterways.

The working party will consider and makes recommendations to the two Community Boards and through them to the Council on issues and activities relating to the Styx Catchment.

Action

The Board is invited to consider identifying two members who would be willing to be appointed as members of the working party, including whether there is any interest in chairing or sharing the chairing of the working party.

3.4       Board Area Consultations/Engagement

3.4.1   St Albans Park Pavilion Rebuild – Community Consultation

A Community Board Seminar was held on Wednesday 19 July 2017 to discuss the engagement and planning for this rebuild project.

3.5       Submission Opportunities

3.5.1   Proposed Third Lane on Waimakariri Bridge

Environment Canterbury has invited submissions on a proposed third lane on the Waimakariri Bridge. The Papanui-Innes Community Board has prepared a submission and this has been approved by the Chairperson and submitted by the due date of 13 July.

3.6       Annual Plan and Long Term Plan matters

3.6.1   Randal Street – Street Renewal

From the meeting of 30 August.

Residents of the section of Randall Street not scheduled for street renewal requested that funding be found to include this unfunded section. The Board agreed that this would need to be an item for their Long Term Plan submission to the Council.

3.7       Development of Civil Defence Emergency Plans

Nil to report.

3.8       Requests for information from Board meeting on Newsline

Members are invited to suggest items for inclusion in Newsline.

3.9       Significant Board matters of interest to raise at Council

Members are invited to suggest items of interest to raise at Council.

4.   Key Local Projects (KLPs) and Strengthening Communities Funded Projects

4.1       Heading

Nil to report.

5.   Significant Community Issues

Nil to report.

6.   Major Community and/or Infrastructure Projects

6.1       Community Facilities

6.1.1   Lions Club International Foundation gift of a building to the Council

Status: The Community Board considered this matter at the meeting held on 9 December 2017.

Action: Since that time developments have occurred with stage one of the programme which included the finalisation of arrangements with the Lions organisation to gift the building to the Council to hold in a guardianship role on behalf of the community.

With regard to the placement of the building at MacFarlane Park, regular meetings have been held with representatives of the Lions, members of the Shirley Community Trust and technical staff to plan the placement of the building on the park and the activation of the building for community use.

Arrangements have also been made with the Lions organisation for the relocation of the building from its current site in Colombo Street as the Transitional St Albans Community Centre to MacFarlane Park. 

Timeframe: A report recommending that the gift be accepted by the Council will be coming to the community board meeting on the 11 August.

6.2       Partnerships with the community and organisations

6.2.1   Nil to report

6.3       Infrastructure projects underway

Nil to report.

6.4       Events Report Back

6.4.1   Papanui-Innes Community Service Awards 2017

This function was held at 6.30pm on Wednesday 5 July 2017 at the Chapel Street Centre. Present were 16 individual, one couple and two group award recipients accompanied by family, friends and supporters.

The recipients were presented with framed certificates and gifts by the Papanui-Innes Community Board members. The Northcote School Kapa Haka group provided excellent entertainment and the feedback from participants was very positive and appreciative.

6.4.2   Dusk to Dawn

             The Dusk to Dawn 12 hour event co-hosted by the Papanui-Innes and Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Boards ran from 8pm Friday 7 July through to 8am Saturday 8 July 2017.

This event is an excellent example of strengthening community connectedness by supporting and promoting activities with local community organisations. 40 Youth Leaders worked with Council staff members to plan the event which was enjoyed by 150 local youth.

 

             Rock climbing at Papanui Youth Development, swimming and Laser Tag at Graham Condon, trampolining at Mega Air, movies and breakfast at Northcity produced a myriad of happy and exhausted youngsters.

 

             The collaborative effort between Council staff and local community organisations ensured that the night was a huge success. Aaron Campbell, member of the Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board, took amazing video footage and photos and Jo Byrne and Mike Davidson from the Papanui-Innes Community Board came to help with the 6am breakfast shift. Our heartfelt thanks go to all the staff and youth leaders who helped out at some ungodly hours throughout the night.

 

7.   Parks, Sports and Recreation Update (bi-monthly)

7.1       Local Parks Update

Parks are wet with recent rainfall and cold temperatures. Mowing is on schedule for one cut this month and gardens are still getting their annual clean-up which is on schedule. These are all going well and improving the presentation of the parks.

The citywide mulch programme is behind what was expected to date, i.e. currently around 40% completion. This is likely to increase over coming months as additional resources are engaged to this project. Once completed the plant borders for each park are handed back to the parks maintenance contract to be hard audited from the period of handover onwards.

·        Mowing and Spraying Programme

             Mowing frequency for amenity turf is one cut per month,

             Mowing frequency for sports field turf is one cut per month

·        Any field surface activities

             Irrigation systems are currently being checked for any faults to ensure functionality for the summer season.

             The sports field renovation was completed for all activities on what was identified in the autumn. Preparation for the spring programme will be required to start in August.

 

·        Sports Parks Update

             The higher rainfall over previous weeks has kept the fields soft resulting in high wear on many of these fields. Currently many are 80% worn. Field closure is increasing over coming weeks pending rainfall and degree of play as to what the field tolerance can withstand. Another six weeks till the winter season closes.

7.2       St Albans Park Pavilion

A community Board seminar was held on 19 July regarding this rebuild project.

8.   Community Board funding budget overview and clarification

8.1       Papanui-Innes Community Board 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund (DRF) and Positive Youth Development Fund (PYDF) balance sheet for financial year ended 30 June 2017, refer Attachment B.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Graffiti Team Suburb Report for June 2017

77

b

Papanui-Innes Community Board end of Financial Year Balances for PYD and DR Funds as at 30 June 2017

78

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Trevor Cattermole - Community Development Advisor

Christine Lane - Community Development Advisor

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

Lester Wolfreys - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

21 July 2017

 

 

15.  Elected Members’ Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.