Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

A meeting of the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 7 July 2017

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Council Chamber, Environment Canterbury, 200 Tuam Street

 

 

 

30 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           
                   


To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

Committee Members

 

 

 

UDS Independent Chair

Bill Wasley

 

Christchurch City Council

Mayor Lianne Dalziel, Councillors Phil Clearwater and Sara Templeton

 

Environment Canterbury

Chairman David Bedford, Councillors Cynthia Roberts and Peter Skelton

 

Selwyn District Council

Mayor Sam Broughton, Councillors Malcolm Lyall and Mark Alexander

 

Waimakariri District Council

Mayor David Ayers, Councillors Kevin Felstead and Neville Atkinson

 

Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu

Dr Te Maire Tau, Jane Huria and Gail Gordon

 

Canterbury District Health Board

Tā Mark Solomon

 

New Zealand Transport Agency (Non-Voting Member)

Jim Harland

 

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (Non-Voting Member)

Kelvan Smith

 

Regenerate Christchurch (Non-Voting Member)

Ivan Iafeta

 

 

 

Partnership Manager

Keith Tallentire

ph 941 8590

 

Committee Adviser

Aidan Kimberley

ph 941 6566

 


 

 

1.       TERMS OF REFERENCE

1.1.        The role of the Committee is to:

                                   i.            Foster and facilitate a collaborative approach between the Partners to address strategic challenges and opportunities for Greater Christchurch.

                                  ii.            Show clear, decisive and visible collaborative strategic leadership amongst the Partners, to wider stakeholders, agencies and central government and to communities across Greater Christchurch.

                                iii.            Establish, and periodically review, an agreed strategic framework to manage growth and address urban development, regeneration, resilience and long-term economic, social, cultural and environmental wellbeing for Greater Christchurch

                                iv.            Oversee implementation of strategies and plans endorsed by the Committee and ratified at individual partner governance meetings, including through the adoption and delivery of an annual joint work programme.

                                 v.            Ensure the Partnership proactively engages with other related partnerships, agencies and organisations critical to the achievement of its strategic goals.

1.2.        The functions of the Committee are to:

                                   i.            Establish an agreed strategic framework to manage growth and address urban development, regeneration, resilience and long-term wellbeing for Greater Christchurch. This is currently expressed through the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (2007) and the associated Strategy Update (2016).

                                  ii.            As required, develop new and review existing strategies and plans to enable Partners to work more collaboratively with each other and to provide greater clarity and certainty to stakeholders and the community. Existing strategies and plans endorsed by the UDSIC and inherited by this Committee are:

a.       Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (2007)

b.      Greater Christchurch Travel Demand Management Strategy and Action Plan (2009)

c.       Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Action Plan (2010)

d.      Greater Christchurch Transport Statement (2012)

e.      Greater Christchurch Freight Study and Action Plan (2014/15)

f.        Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Update (2016)

g.       Resilient Greater Christchurch Plan (2016)

                                iii.            Recommend to Partners for ratification at individual partner governance meetings any new or revised strategies and plans.

                                iv.            Adopt and monitor the delivery of an annual joint work programme to deliver on strategic goals and actions outlined in adopted strategies and plans.

                                 v.            Undertake reporting on the delivery of adopted strategies and plans, including in relation to an agreed strategic outcomes framework.

                                vi.            Identify and manage risks associated with implementing adopted strategies and plans.

                              vii.            Establish and maintain effective dialogue and relationships (through meetings, forums and other communications) with other related partnerships, agencies and organisations to the support the role of the Committee, including but not limited to:

a.       Healthy Christchurch (and any similar arrangements in Selwyn and Waimakariri Districts) and other health partnerships

b.      Safer Christchurch (and any similar arrangements in Selwyn and Waimakariri Districts)

c.       Greater Christchurch Public Transport Joint Committee

d.      Canterbury Mayoral Forum

e.      New Zealand Police and other emergency services

f.        Tertiary institutions and educational partnerships

g.       Regeneration agencies, including Ōtākaro Limited and Development Christchurch Limited

h.      Strategic infrastructure providers

i.         Government departments

                             viii.            Undertake wider engagement and consultation as necessary, including where appropriate seeking submissions and holding hearings, to assist the development of any strategies and plans.

                                ix.            Advocate to central government or their agencies or other bodies on issues of concern to the Partnership, including through the preparation of submissions (in liaison with the Canterbury Mayoral Forum as necessary).

 

1.3.        In undertaking its role and performing its functions the Committee will consider seeking the advice of the Chief Executives Advisory Group.

2.       QUORUM AND Conduct of meetings

2.1.        The quorum at a meeting of the Committee consists of the majority of the voting members

2.2.        Voting shall be on the basis of the majority present at the meeting, with no alternates or proxies.

2.3.        For the purpose of clause 2.2, the Independent Chairperson:

                                   i.            has a deliberative vote; and

                                  ii.            in the case of equality of votes, does not have a casting vote (and therefore the act or question is defeated and the status quo is preserved).

2.4.        Other than as noted in this Agreement, the standing orders of the administering Council at the time, shall apply.

 

3.       MEETING FREQUENCY

The Committee shall meet monthly, or as necessary and determined by the Independent Chair in liaison with the Committee.

 

 

4.       DELEGATIONS

4.1.        Establishing, and where necessary amending, protocols and processes to support the effective functioning of the Committee, including but not limited to those relating to the resolution of conflicting views, communications and public deputations.

4.2.        Preparing communication and engagement material and publishing reports relevant to the functions of the Committee.

4.3.        Undertaking engagement exercises in support of the terms of reference and functions of the Committee

4.4.        Making submissions, as appropriate, on Government proposals and other initiatives relevant to the role of the Committee.

4.5.        Selecting an Independent Chair and Deputy Chair in accord with any process agreed by the Committee and the requirements of the LGA 2002.

4.6.        Appointing where necessary up to two additional non-voting observers to the Committee.

 

5.       FINANCIAL DELEGATIONS

5.1.        The Committee can make financial decisions within an agreed budget envelope and as long as the decision does not trigger any change to the statutory plans prepared under the LGA 2002, the RMA 1991, and the LTMA 2003.

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

AGENDA ITEMS

 

1.       Apologies................................................................................................................................... 8

2.       Declarations of Interest............................................................................................................ 8

3.       Deputations by Appointment.................................................................................................. 8

4.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes.......................................................................................... 8

STAFF REPORTS

5.       Advice and recommendations from UDSIC - progress summary........................................ 13

6.       Urban Development Indicators - Quarterly Monitoring Report......................................... 17

7.       Urban Development and Regeneration Update................................................................... 59

8.       Resolution to Exclude the Public........................................................................................... 69  

 


 

Standing Items

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Deputations by Appointment

3.1

Barrier Free New Zealand

Lorraine Guthrie, Chief Executive of the Barrier Free New Zealand Trust, will address the Committee regarding a Canterbury Accessibility Charter.

Please see the separately circulated attachment relating to this deputation.

 

3.2

One Voice Te Reo Kotahi

Katherine Peat and Rex Gibson will speak on behalf of One Voice Te Reo Kotahi on its role and current focus in supporting third sector organisations and provide feedback from the Matakiri Forum held on 29 June 2017.

Please see the separately circulated attachment relating to this deputation.

 

4.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee meeting held on Friday, 2 June 2017 be confirmed (refer page 9).


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Friday 2 June 2017

Time:                                    10.30am

Venue:                                 Council Chamber, Environment Canterbury, 200 Tuam Street

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Attendance

Bill Wasley                                         

Councillor Peter Skelton , Environment Canterbury           

Mayor Sam Broughton , Selwyn District Council      

Deputy Mayor Malcolm Lyall , Selwyn District Council       

Councillor Mark Alexander , Selwyn District Council           

Mayor David Ayers , Waimakariri District Council    

Councillor Neville Atkinson , Waimakariri District Council 

Councillor Phil Clearwater , Christchurch City Council        

Councillor Sara Templeton , Christchurch City Council       

Dr Te Maire Tau , Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu    

Gail Gordon , Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu            

Tā Mark Solomon , Canterbury District Health Board         

(Non-Voting Member) Ivan Iafeta , Regenerate Christchurch

David Griffiths, Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet

 

 

1 June 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Aidan Kimberley

Committee and Hearings Advisor

941 6566

aidan.kimberley@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

 


  

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

The meeting adjourned at 10:39am and resumed at 11:10am.

1.   Apologies

 

 

Committee Resolved GCPC/2017/00001

That the apology from Mayor Lianne Dalziel, Jane Huria, Jim Harland, Kevin Felstead, David Bedford, Cynthia Roberts and Kelvan Smith be accepted.

Tā Mark Solomon/Neville Atkinson                                                                                                                     Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment.

4.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

 

 

Committee Resolved GCPC/2017/00002

That the minutes of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee meeting held on Friday, 5 May 2017 be confirmed

Mark Alexander/Peter Skelton                                                                                                                             Carried

 

5.   Partnership Communications Protocol

 

Committee Comment

During the consideration of this item the following points were raised:

·    Staff confirmed that the intention of paragraph 7.0 of the agreement is that the Chief Executives Advisory Group would act on the Committee’s recommendation.

·    Care needs to be taken to ensure that acronyms and terminology are used consistently to keep written material ‘layman friendly’.

 

Committee Resolved GCPC/2017/00003

Part C

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Endorse the Communications Protocol outlined in Attachment A so that it can be incorporated within the Partnership’s Memorandum of Agreement.

2.         Note the work underway involving partner staff to operationalise the Communications Protocol and convey the visible and collaborative leadership of the Partnership.

Malcolm Lyall/Peter Skelton                                                                                                                                   Carried

 

 

6.   Psychosocial Update

 

Committee Comment

Evon Currie, General Manager Community and Public Health (CPH), joined the table for this item. During the discussion, the following points were raised:

·    CPH consider the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee to be an appropriate local point of contact to mediate issues before escalating them to a national level.

·    CPH will review the ongoing benefits of its wellbeing surveys to avoid collecting data already available through other means.

·    There needs to be consideration for how to provide support for stress symptoms that are not earthquake related.

·    CPH are aware of issues related to stress symptoms remaining after people stop reporting them. As time passes it becomes more difficult to establish a cause and effect relationship but CPH will continue to monitor community wellbeing.

The Committee voiced concern at the low level of funding allocated for Mental Health services in Canterbury and requested that staff report back to the Committee with advice on how concerns can be escalated.

 

Committee Resolved GCPC/2017/00004

Part C

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Receive the update.

Sam Broughton/Sara Templeton                                                                                                                          Carried

 

 

7.   Urban Development and Regeneration update

 

Committee Comment

Councillor Sara Templeton reported that the Christchurch City Council is continuing to discuss the An Accessible City project and a broader group is being established to provide feedback and give the Council a wider perspective of community views.

Councillor Mark Alexander requested more detail about the MBIE monitoring project on page 28 of the agenda.

Bill Wasley thanked Milly Woods for her work as the Urban Development Strategy Project Assistant; This was Milly’s last meeting before leaving to a new role.

 

Committee Resolved GCPC/2017/00005

Part C

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Note the report and receive the attached Urban Development and Regeneration update.

Sara Templeton/Phil Clearwater                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 11:51.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 7th DAY OF JULY 2017

 

Bill Wasley

Chairperson

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

5.        Advice and recommendations from UDSIC - progress summary

Reference:

17/685253

Contact:

Keith Tallentire

ktallentire@greaterchristchurch.org.nz

941 8590

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to outline in summary the progress made against each of the recommendations contained in the paper prepared by the previous Committee prior to the current triennium.

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

 

 

3.   Background

3.1       At the last meeting of the Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee (UDSIC) prior to the 2016 local body elections the Committee endorsed a paper providing context and advice for the reconvened Committee, including ten recommendations for consideration.

3.2       This paper was represented to the reconvened Committee at its meeting on 9 December 2016 and each recommendation has been brought to subsequent Committee meetings during the first half of 2017.

3.3       In most instances the consideration of the recommendations included the provision of advice from the Chief Executives’ Advisory Group (CEAG).

4.   Progress summary

4.1       The table below reproduces each of the recommendations (a to j) from the UDSIC advice paper and provides a summary of progress against each:

UDSIC recommends to partners and the reconvened Committee the following:

Progress Update (June 2017)

a)    renaming the joint committee to better reflect its leadership and partnership aspects, and that the ‘observer members’ on the committee  be renamed non-voting members

Considered by the Committee at meetings in December 2016 and February 2017. The new name, the Greater Christchurch Partnership is incorporated into the renewed Memorandum of Agreement (recommendation b). Includes adding a māori component to the name.

Completed.

b)    the Committee’s Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) is reviewed early in the new triennium and adjusted as appropriate to reflect new circumstances

Considered by the Committee at meetings in March and April 2017 and the endorsed MoA was ratified by voting partners at individual governance meetings during May.

Completed.

c)    partners reflect on their nominated representatives for the reconvened UDSIC to support a level of consistency in UDSIC membership

Nominated representatives from all Partners, including Regenerate Christchurch now confirmed.

Completed.

d)    the continued appointment of an independent chair to chair the committee,  by the reconvened UDSIC early in the new triennium

Considered by the Committee at its meeting in February 2017 and resolved the continued appointment of the Chair until the planned strategy review has been completed. CEAG completed contractual requirements in February 2017.

Completed.

e)    partners establish arrangements within their organisation to broaden the awareness, understanding and commitment to the collaborative work of the Committee

Partnership matters incorporated within Council briefings for incoming councillors following elections. Key points summaries now prepared following each Committee meeting for circulation and reporting within partner organisations.

Ongoing.

f)     establishing a programme of informal and formal networking and reporting sessions between this Committee and key related partnership groupings to assist collaborative working

Mandate and approach included within new Terms of Reference for the Partnership. Work underway to establish links with Healthy Christchurch. Broader programme being developed linked to settlement pattern review work.

Ongoing.

g)    rather than establishing a standing stakeholder forum, an external reference group is formed to assist in the creation of fit for purpose engagement approaches as directed by the Committee

To be considered and implemented as part of the settlement pattern review community engagement phase.

To be completed.

h)    to daylight the Partnership approach the reconvened Committee consider preferred communications mechanisms and a renewed communications protocol early in the new triennium

Communications Protocol endorsed by the Committee at its meeting in June 2017 and incorporated within MoA. Operational communications plan implementation underway with partner staff.

Completed.

i)     following a short period to enable the reconvened Committee to take stock of the work of the Committee in this last triennium and understand the current operating environment it focuses on agreeing the scope, timing and project plan for a comprehensive strategy review and associated engagement programme.

Considered by the Committee at its meeting in March 2017 and endorsed an approach to the first phase of a strategy review being a focus on the settlement planning aspects necessary to meet the requirements of the NPS-UDC.

Completed.

j)     the reconvened Committee consider a strategic approach to the application of regeneration powers and that this Committee be the body for partners to communicate intentions on their use.

Considered by the Committee at its meeting in March and a Regeneration Protocol was endorsed by the Committee at its meeting in April 2017.

Completed.

 

4.2       As described above, some recommendations will require ongoing work by the Partnership, supported by the Partnership Manager and partner staff, but the key decision-making required by the Committee has largely been completed.

4.3       These Committee resolutions have helped establish the direction, procedures and priorities for a significant body of work over this triennium period, not least the Settlement Pattern Review and the coordination role of the Committee in supporting regeneration activity.

4.4       Having these arrangements in place strongly supports the visible and collaborative leadership role the Partnership can provide on matters of significance across Greater Christchurch.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

6.        Urban Development Indicators - Quarterly Monitoring Report

Reference:

17/685408

Contact:

Keith Tallentire

ktallentire@greaterchristchurch.org.nz

941 8590

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is seek Committee endorsement of the first Urban Development Indicators quarterly monitoring report, prepared as part of the settlement pattern review project and a requirement of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity.

2.   Relationship to Partnership Objectives

2.1       The quarterly monitoring report is the first milestone contained in the Settlement Pattern Review project brief and helps implement Priority Actions A and B as outlined in the 2016 Strategy Update document. 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Endorse the Urban Development Indicators quarterly monitoring report included as Attachment A to this report.

2.         Agree that, subject to any minor technical amendments, the final version of the quarterly monitoring report is made publicly available on the Partnership website and the websites of Partner Councils as appropriate.

 

 

 

4.   Context/Background

National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity (NPS-UDC)

4.1       The NPS-UDC directs local authorities to provide sufficient development capacity for housing and business growth to meet demand in the short (3 years), medium (10 years) and long term (30 years). The requirements of NPS-UDC policies variously relate to both territorial authorities and regional councils.

4.2       The NPS-UDC adopts a tiered structure that establishes additional requirements for local authorities with high-growth and medium-growth urban areas within their district or region.

4.3       The Christchurch urban area, as identified by Statistics New Zealand includes the towns of Prebbleton (Selwyn district) and Kaiapoi (Waimakariri district). The NPS-UDC specifies that the application of policies to ensure development capacity is not restricted to the boundaries of the identified urban area. The NPS-UDC also states that local authorities that share jurisdiction over an urban area are strongly encouraged to work together to implement the NPS-UDC.

4.4       Key deliverables and timeframes required by the NPS-UDC are:

·   quarterly monitoring of a range of market indicators (commencing June 2017)

·   a housing and business development capacity assessment (by December 2017)

·   setting minimum targets for housing in regional policy statement and district plans (December 2018)

·   prepare a future development strategy to demonstrate sufficient, feasible development capacity in the medium and long term (by December 2018).

 

Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy and Settlement Pattern Review

4.5       The Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Update was endorsed by the Committee in July 2016.  The document updates the 2007 Strategy to respond to the significant events and changes that have occurred since its release. It does not replace the 2007 Strategy, but rather complements it.

4.6       The Strategy Update did not attempt to revise the land use framework set out in the Land Use Recovery Plan (LURP) and included in Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement.

4.7       At the 3 March 2017 meeting of this Committee it was resolved that the first phase of a strategy review therefore has a focus on settlement pattern matters and that this integrates work necessary to meet the requirements of the NPS-UDC.

4.8       The Committee also resolved that the settlement pattern review is undertaken through a collaborative partnership arrangement.

4.9       At the subsequent meeting of this Committee on 7 April 2017 the initial project scope and key assumptions for the Settlement Pattern Review were agreed.

 

5.   Urban Development Indicators quarterly monitoring report

5.1       Partner staff have worked collaboratively to prepare the first Urban Development Indicators quarterly monitoring report, included as Attachment A to this report.

5.2       The NPS-UDC requires local authorities to begin monitoring a range of market indicators on a quarterly basis from June 2017. It encourages local authorities to publish the results of this monitoring.

5.3       The indicators specified in the NPS-UDS (Policy PB6) are:

·   prices and rents for housing, residential land and business land by location and type; and changes in these prices and rents over time;

·   the number of resource consents and building consents granted for urban development relative to the growth in population; and

·   indicators of housing affordability.

5.4       To assist councils in meeting this requirement the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) have sourced and made available certain data via a new Development Capacity Dashboard. This will become publicly available on 7 July 2017.

5.5       The attached Urban Development Indicators quarterly monitoring report uses data from this Dashboard and supplements this with other data from Statistics New Zealand and other sources, particularly in relation to business indicators.

5.6       The report includes clarifying notes and also observations to help provide an overall picture of what the indicators might mean in the local context.

5.7       The report also suggests possible improvements for future reports.

 

 

 

 

 

Next steps

5.8       If endorsed by this Committee, and subject to any minor technical amendments, the final version of the quarterly monitoring report would be made publicly available on the Partnership website (www.greaterchristchurch.org.nz).

5.9       Individual Partner Councils may also choose to include it on their respective websites.

5.10    As well as the suggested improvements contained in the report, general feedback will be sought from targeted stakeholders.

5.11    The second quarterly monitoring report may also include data resulting from work currently being undertaken on MBIE on indicators of price efficiency in the land and development market.

5.12    NPS-UDC Policy PB7 requires that local authorities shall use such information to understand how well the market is functioning and how planning may affect this, and when additional development capacity might be needed. An example of this is the price differentials between different zones in district plans.

5.13    The NPS-UDC timeframe for complying with PB7 is 31 December 2017.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Urban Development Indicators - Quarterly Moniotring Report (June 2017)

20

 

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

PDF Creator


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

7.        Urban Development and Regeneration Update

Reference:

17/689332

Contact:

Keith Tallentire

ktallentire@greaterchristchurch.org.nz

941 8590

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is receive the regular Urban Development and Regeneration Update. This provides brief updates on the broad range of urban development and regeneration activities underway across the Greater Christchurch area.

1.2       The Update collates contributions from partners and a range of other agencies and government departments.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

UD&R update June 2017

60

 

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 

 


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

8.    Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

             (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

             (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

07 July 2017

 

 

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

9

Settlement Pattern Review legal advice

s7(2)(g)

Maintain Legal Professional Privilege

The report contains legal advice.

The report is likely to remain confidential in perpetuity due to the possibility of judicial proceedings.