Papanui-Innes Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Papanui-Innes Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Friday 9 December 2016

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

6 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

STAFF REPORTS

C       6.       Stapletons Road Proposed No Stopping..................................................................... 13

C       7.       Main North Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions.............................................. 19

C       8.       Glenfield Crescent Proposed No Stopping Restrictions............................................. 25

C       9.       Blighs Road Proposed Lane Alterations....................................................................... 31

C       10.     St Albans New Community Centre - Cladding............................................................ 53

C       11.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Papanui Leagues Club........................................................................................ 55

C       12.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club................................................................................................... 59

C       13.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Community Pride Garden Awards.................................................................... 63

C       14.     Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Claudia Jane Rogers................................................................... 67

B       15.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update.......................................................... 69

C       16.     Papanui-Innes Community Board Recess Committee 2016/17................................. 77

B       17.     Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 79

B       18.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 79 

 

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Eloise Clark

Eloise Clark will attend to report back to the Board on her participation in the Papanui High School Cultural Tour of Japan in September 2016.

 

4.2

Sigjaws Charitable Trust – Gary Watts

Mr Watts will attend to present a number of concerns to the Board.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

 

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 30 November 2016

Time:                                    4pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Mike Davidson

John Stringer

 

 

28 November 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Jenny Hughey

Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

941 5412

Jenny.Hughey@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

Jo Byrne declared an interest in Item 15.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00019

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Papanui-Innes Community Board meeting both open and closed held on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 be confirmed.

Member Byrne/Member Stringer                                                                                                                       Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Connor Hill

             Connor Hill attended to report back to the Board on his participation in the Spirit of Adventure Trophy Voyage from 30 October to 3 November 2016.

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board Chairperson thanked Connor Hill for his report.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.    


 

 

6.   Main North Road Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00020

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke any P10 parking restriction on the east side of Main North Road between the intersections of Richill Street and Third Street.

2.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the east side of Main North Road commencing at a point 45 metres south of its intersection with Richill Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 48 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday from 9am to 6pm and on Saturday and Sunday from 8am to 6pm.

Member Byrne/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

7.   Harewood Road Proposed Relocation of Bus Stop

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00021

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 64 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 63 metres.

4.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 127 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 141 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 4 metres.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 202 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

Member Byrne/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

8.   Factory Road Proposed Give Way Control

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00022

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved:

1.         That a Give Way control be placed against Factory Road at its intersection with Guthries Road.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Byrne                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

9.   Belfast Road Proposed P120 Parking

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00023

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 46 metres.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 27 metres.

3.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of one hundred and twenty minutes on the south side of Belfast Road commencing at a point 27 metres east of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday only.

Member Stringer/Member Davidson                                                                                                                 Carried

 

 

10. Vagues Road Proposed P3 Parking

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00024

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 159 metres.

2.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north‑east side of Vagues Road commencing at its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 20.5 metres.

3.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes on the north-east side of Vagues Road commencing at a point 68 metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 46 metres.  This restriction is to apply between the hours of 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm on school days only.

4.         Approve that the parking and stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north‑east side of Vagues Road commencing at a point 114 metres north-west of its intersection with Main North Road and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 45 metres.

Member Davidson/Member Byrne                                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

11. Fraser Street and Cranford Street Proposed No Stopping Restriction

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00025

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the north-east side of Cranford Street commencing at its intersection with Fraser Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

2.         Revoke all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Fraser Street commencing at its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Cranford Street commencing at its intersection with Fraser Street and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 19 metres.

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Fraser Street commencing at its intersection with Cranford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

Member Davidson/Member Byrne                                                                                                                     Carried

 

 

12. Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restriction

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve to:

1.         Revoke any and all parking or stopping restrictions on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres;

2.         Prohibit the stopping of vehicles at any time on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00026

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Revoke any and all parking or stopping restrictions on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres;

2.         Prohibit the stopping of vehicles at any time on the south-west side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 66 metres south-east of its intersection with Marblewood Drive and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 51.5 metres.

3.         Request that staff investigate the installation of 120 minute restricted parking on the north and south sides of Harewood Road between Marblewood Drive and Chapel Street and report back to the Board.

 

Member Byrne/Deputy Chairperson Norrish                                                                                                 Carried

A division was requested and, when put to the meeting, the motion on division 1 was declared  carried by 4 votes to 2 votes the voting being as follows:

For:                           Chairperson Jones, Deputy Chairperson Norrish, Member Byrne and Member Davidson

Against:                 Member Cotter and Member Stringer

 

13. Establishment of the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00027

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Review the current criteria and approve the establishment of the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

2.         Approve the transfer of $2,000 from the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Byrne                                                                                                  Carried

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00028

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

3.         Request that an indication of when additional funding would be available to the Board, and the amount of this funding, be provided to the Board by the end of February 2017.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Member Byrne                                                                                                  Carried

 

14. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $2,000 to QEII Swim Club Incorporated towards pool hire.

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00029

Part C

It was resolved on the motion of Chairperson Jones that pursuant to Standing Order 3.12.1 that Item No. 14 Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund – QEII Swim Club, lie on the table and will not be further discussed at this meeting but will be reconsidered at the Board’s meeting scheduled to be held on Friday 9 December 2016.

                                                                                                                                                                                                            

 

15. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Luisa Portia Dewar

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00030

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $250 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Luisa Portia Dewar towards the cost of attending the New Zealand Scout Jamboree in Renwick, 29 December 2016 to 7 January 2017.

Member Stringer/Chairperson Jones                                                                                                                 Carried

 

16. Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund - Belfast School

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00031

(original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $665 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Belfast School towards the cost of Belfast School Prefects and House Captains attending the Leadership Camp at the Positive Youth Development Trust (Te Koru) Youth facility on 4 and 5 April 2017.

Deputy Chairperson Norrish/Chairperson Jones                                                                                           Carried

 

17. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update

 

17.1    464 Papanui Road Bus Stop Relocation

Part B

The Board noted the information contained in the memorandum provided by the Traffic and Passenger Transport Engineers regarding the feasibility of moving the bus stop outside 464 Papanui Road and agreed that no further action would be taken on this matter.

 

17.2    Redwood Plunket Rooms Update

Part B

The Board noted the Redwood Plunket Rooms need repairs before the community can use the building and the lack of a clear timeline for this to happen.

The Board decided to include this item in the Board’s Annual Plan submissions for funding and implementation.

 

 

Community Board Resolved PICB/2016/00032

Part B

The Papanui-Innes Community Board resolved to receive the Area Update.

Member Byrne/Member Davidson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

18. Elected Member Information Exchange

Part B

·    Member Cotter suggested the Board write to the two Mairehau High School arts students who were selected as finalists for the TSB Bank Wallace Secondary Schools Art Awards this year congratulating them on their achievement.

 

19. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

·    There were no questions under Standing Orders at this meeting.

   

Meeting concluded at 05:52pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 9th DAY OF DECEMBER 2016.

 

Ali Jones

Chairperson

   


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

6.        Stapletons Road Proposed No Stopping

Reference:

16/1237261

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve no-stopping restrictions on Stapletons Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to the Dudley Creek widening project and the final design requiring Stapletons Road to be narrowed.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Dudley Street and extending in a northerly direction to its intersection with Warden Street;

2.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction to for a distance of 110 metres;

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 440 metres;

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Stapletons Road commencing at its intersection with Warden Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 110 metres;

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Approve No Stopping Restrictions as per the Dudley Creek project design (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do not approve no stopping restrictions

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Maintains a two-way flow along Stapletons Road;

·     Provides excellent visibility for pedestrians crossing Stapletons Road from the Dudley Creek side.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes parking from the Dudley Creek side of Stapletons Road.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       The Flockton area was at risk of flooding before the Canterbury Earthquakes, but the risk significantly increased post-earthquake due to land settlement and deformation.

5.2       In June and July 2015 the Christchurch City Council consulted on 3 options for Dudley Creek downstream flood remediation.  Option C was chosen which involved localised widening of the Dudley Creek stream bed along Stapletons Road to increase capacity.

5.3       To achieve this stream widening, Stapletons Road is required to be reduced, in some sections, to seven metres width.

5.4       A seven metre wide carriageway can only support parking on one side of the road.  Generally on the Dudley Creek side of Stapletons Road there is limited access to residential properties.  It was therefore decided to remove the parking on the creek side rather than on the residential side as part of the scheme.  This retains parking on the residential side of Stapletons Road.

5.5       The removal of parking on this side also gives pedestrians good sightlines when crossing across Stapletons Road from the creek side.

5.6       These works are programmed to be completed in December 2017.

6.   Option 1 – Approve No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Approve No Stopping restrictions on the west side of Stapletons Road, as shown on Attachment A, which are to be installed as part of the Dudley Creek widening works. 

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       This scheme has not specially been consulted on.  The consultation was covered as part of the Dudley Creek widening works.  Stapletons Road is required to be reduced in width to accommodate the widening of the creek without the need to install large retaining walls.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $0 (works were undertaken by Dudley Creek project team)

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.13    None identified

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - delivered as part of Dudley Creek Widening package of works. 

6.15    Implementation timeframe – line marking will be installed once the roading works are complete.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Maintains a two-way traffic flow along Stapletons Road

·   Provides excellent visibility for pedestrians crossing Stapletons Road from the Dudley Creek side.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes parking from the Dudley Creek side of Stapletons Road.

7.   Option 2 – Do not approve no stopping restrictions

Option Description

7.1       Do not approve No Stopping restrictions on Stapletons Road. 

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies, as it could lead to line marking that is on the road which is not enforceable.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - Nil

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – None identified

Legal Implications

7.10    The existing road marking is not enforceable.

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    The existing line marking is not enforceable.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on the existing on-street parking

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the issues of the narrowed carriageway width, which could lead to a greater risk of a crash.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Stapletons Road Proposed No Stopping Plan

18

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Senior Traffic Engineer

Steffan Thomas - Operations Manager

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

7.        Main North Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

16/1157038

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve no-stopping restrictions on the exit lane on Main North Road, accessing Farquhars Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and was requested by a resident whose property is accessed from the exit lane.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Main North Road commencing at a point 266 metres north of its intersection with Barnes Road and extending in a northerly direction, along the exit lane, for a distance of 104 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides a suitable road width for large vehicles;

·     Provides improved access into properties along the slip lane.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes two car parks from this slip lane off Main North Road.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       Main North Road has an exit lane just before the Main Southern Railway lines to access Farquhars Road and the Redwood Springs subdivision.  The exit lane is 4.7 metres wide.

5.2       Generally a parallel car parking space is 2.0 metres wide, which leaves a 2.7 metre wide lane.  This is below our minimum standard of 3.0 metres.

5.3       There is a joinery business at the end of this off-ramp and this is the main northern access to Farquhars Road and the surrounding Redwood Springs subdivision.  Lane widths in this area should be able to accommodate large trucks comfortably.

5.4       It is proposed to install a no-stopping restriction for a length of the slip lane.  This will remove two car parks from along this slip lane.  Parking will still be available in the gravel area at the end of the slip lane, on Farquhars Road and on the southbound slip lane which has a width of 5.2 metres.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       It is proposed to install a no stopping restriction on the exit lane of Main North Road to Farquhars Road, as shown in Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       No Stopping was requested by a resident. 

6.6       Affected residents and businesses along this exit lane were mailed a letter on 21 October 2016.

6.7       The owner of the property where the joinery business operates was concerned about the loss of parking and requested that instead of removing the parking along this section the road could be widened.

6.8       The operator of the joinery business was also concerned about delivery trucks to his business being able to park outside of his business and unload stock.  There should be no change to this as the entire frontage along this business has a drop kerb and is therefore treated like a driveway.

6.9       No other residents contacted the council regarding this proposal.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.10    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.11    Cost of Implementation - $550

6.12    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on the overall asset is minimal.

6.13    Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.14    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.15    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.16    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

6.17    None identified

Implementation

6.18    Implementation dependencies  - Community board approval      

6.19    Implementation timeframe – Four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.20    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides a suitable road width for large vehicles;

·   Provides improved manoeuvring into properties along the slip lane.

6.21    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes parking from this slip lane off Main North Road.

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Main North Road off-ramp will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this option.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See section 6.5 – 6.9.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations    

7.11    Not applicable

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   No parking loss.

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Doesn’t address the issue of a restricted width carriageway when vehicles are parked on the slip lane.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Main North Road - Proposed No Stopping Plan

23

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

8.        Glenfield Crescent Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

16/1315097

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418666

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve no-stopping restrictions on Glenfield Crescent in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated after a request from a resident of Glenfield Crescent.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by an assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on south-western side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at its intersection with Roslyn Avenue and extending in a north-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a north-easterly direction for a distance of 92.5 metres;

2.         Revokes all parking and stopping restrictions on the south-eastern side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at its intersection with Bronwyn Street and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a distance of 132 metres;

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-western side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at a point 62.5 metres north-west of its intersection with Roslyn Avenue and extending in a north-westerly, then following the kerbline to a north-easterly direction for a distance of 30 metres;

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south-eastern side of Glenfield Crescent commencing at a point 100 metres south-west of its intersection with Bronwyn Street and extending in a south-westerly direction, then following the kerbline to a south-easterly direction for a distance of 32 metres.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines on a corner.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes four car parking spaces.

 

5.   Context/Background

Site

5.1       Glenfield Crescent has two ninety degree corners in it.  Around the western corner there is a high parking demand with the number of properties with driveways off this corner.  Cars are parking around the corner which is restricting visibility and creates a pinch point for drivers on this 9 metre road.

5.2       It is proposed to install no-stopping restrictions around the corner to prevent the parking.  This will remove any conflict around this corner and ensure appropriate sightlines.

5.3       Legally “a driver or person in charge of a vehicle must not stop, stand, or park the vehicle on any part of a roadway so close to any corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island, or intersection as to obstruct or be likely to obstruct other traffic or any view of the roadway to the driver of a vehicle approaching that corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island, or intersection”.  This is open to interpretation and as far as enforcement is concerned it is more easily enforceable through the installation of no-stopping restrictions.  No-stopping restrictions also make it obvious to drivers that they must not park on this bend.

6.   Option 1 – Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Glenfield Crescent as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Affected residents were sent consultation letters on Friday 4 November.  They were asked to respond by Friday 18 November.

6.6       Three residents responded to the request and all were in support of the no stopping.  After discussions with two residents the no stopping has been extended on the southern end by three metres outside 55 Glenfield Crescent and 6 metres outside 50 Glenfield Crescent.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.7       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.8       Cost of Implementation - $375

6.9       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal

6.10    Funding source – traffic operations budget

Legal Implications

6.11    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.12    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.13    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations  

6.14    None identified

Implementation

6.15    Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

6.16    Implementation timeframe – approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.17    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by increasing sightlines on the corner.

6.18    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes four car parking spaces

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Glenfield Crescent will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.3       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.5       See sections 6.5 and 6.6.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.9       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations  

7.11    None identified

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.13    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Does not remove car parking spaces            

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address the visibility issue and therefore the risk of a crash

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Glenfield Crescent Proposed No Stopping Plan

29

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

9.        Blighs Road Proposed Lane Alterations

Reference:

16/1174394

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider options to reduce congestion and improve safety on the Blighs Road approach to Papanui Road. 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is being provided to fulfil the Papanui-Innes Community Board action point SPCB/2016/00093:

1.2.1   Request that staff investigate up to three further options to reduce the dangerous behaviour of traffic crossing the centre line to access the right hand turning lane on to Papanui Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessing the impact of the project against the criteria set out in the Significance and Engagement assessment

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approve the road marking changes on Blighs Road as shown on Attachment G.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – Remove Kerb buildout and provide a traffic lane, cycle lane and clearway on the northern side (Attachment A)

·     Option 2 – Remove kerb buildout and install no stopping on northern side to create a left turning lane, cycle lane and right turning lane (Attachment B).

·     Option 3 – Remove kerb buildout and provide a clearway with sharrow markings (Attachment C).

·     Option 4 – Remove kerb buildout and widen carriageway on northern side (Attachment D).

·     Option 5 – Remove kerb buildouts on both sides of the road and remark entire road (Attachment E).

·     Option 6 – Optimise traffic signals

·     Option 7 – Install flexible posts on centreline (Attachment F).

·     Option 8 – Extend no passing line on centreline (preferred option)

·     Option 9 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     It addresses the safety concerns by making it illegal to cross the centreline to access the right turning lane.

·     It is a cost effective solution

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     It is reliant on drivers complying with road user rules. 

·     It does not address the key problem of limited access to the right turning lane in busy periods

4.4       The following is community feedback on Option 2 which was the only option consulted on.

4.4.1   In response to the Community Board’s request to investigate traffic queuing issues on Blighs Road near the Papanui Road intersection, information was sent to Board Members about proposed traffic improvement changes on 17 March 2016.

4.4.2   The consultation leaflet outlining proposed changes on Blighs Road was then sent to Board Members prior to consultation starting on 14 April 2016. The plans were designed to improve the road layout to limit the impact of queuing vehicles on other road users, including cyclists.

4.4.3   The leaflet was hand delivered or posted to local residents, absentee property owners, the Papanui Medical Centre and adjacent local businesses. Key stakeholders were also invited to comment on the proposed changes on Blighs Road.

4.4.4   There was strong local opposition to the loss of car parks and concern that the proposed changes would not address the major issue of queueing due to delays in the left turn from Blighs Road to Papanui Road.

4.5       Thirteen responses were received during the consultation which closed on 5 May 2016. Six supported the proposals, six were opposed, and one did not indicate a view.

Breakdown of responses

Total

Support

Against

Not indicated

Submissions received from residents

10

40% (4)

60% (6)

0% (0)

Submissions received from stakeholders

3

66% (2)

0% (0)

33% (1)

Submissions received with no contact details

0

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0)

Total

13

46% (6)

46% (6)

8% (1)

 

4.6       The Canterbury District Health Board submission said the Board believed the proposed changes would improve pedestrian and cyclist safety at the intersection, as well as reducing the risk of accidents.

4.7       Another submitter, representing the cycling advocacy group Spokes, thanked the Council for its efforts to improve traffic flow and make cycling safer. He said that parking recommended for removal should not be reinstated. Road safety, support for all transport modes and congestion concerns were paramount.

4.8       Four of the six submitters who opposed the proposal stated that the main causes of queueing on Blighs Road related to peak-hour traffic build-up along Papanui Road.  According to one of them, this congestion, and the resulting queuing, was limited to about three hours a day and was closely related to school and work traffic flows.

4.9       Two submitters were critical of the signal phasing which, they said, compounded problems at the Blighs Road/ Papanui Road intersection.

4.10    In its responses to submissions (see Attachment B), the project team acknowledged that peak hour heavy traffic on Papanui Road, especially in the evening, caused traffic to queue on Blighs Road. As Papanui Road was a major traffic route, signal light phasing at the Papanui Road/Blighs Road intersection gave priority to vehicles on Papanui Road and would continue to do so.

4.11    One submitter said current issues would not be solved by lengthening the existing turning lane on Blighs Road. Moreover, creating two lanes would seriously endanger cyclists and pedestrians, especially schoolchildren on cycles.  He added that there was no congestion on Blighs Road after 7pm and before 8.30am, when car parking was needed by residents, and periods during the day, when parking was used by local businesses.

4.12    Five submitters opposed the proposed permanent loss of on-street parking, some commenting on how this would significantly impact on them and surrounding properties.

4.13    After considering all responses the project team agreed that the 24-hour impacts of the proposed changes outweighed the expected intermittent benefits of the road layout changes.

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       A report was presented to the Shirley/Papanui community board recommending that the Blighs Road scheme is not progressed to detailed design stage based on community feedback.  The report focussed on the scheme that was presented to the community for consultation and not the options that staff had assessed before going out for consultation.  These options will now be discussed in detail below with three new options.

5.2       There have been 8 reported crashes on Blighs Road between the railway line and Papanui Road in the last 5 years, with the majority of those crashes occurring at the Papanui Road/Blighs Road intersection. 

5.3       One crash involved a driver crossing the centre line and crashing head on with on-coming traffic.  This was a non-injury crash and involved a west-bound motorist crossing the centreline.  This is in the opposite direction to the right turning bay.

5.4       Blighs Road is classified as a collector road in the District Plan and Papanui Road is a minor arterial which is a higher classification.  Therefore at the intersection of Blighs Road and Papanui Road, Papanui Road will be given the priority because of its strategic network function.

5.5       Papanui Road is identified as a local cycleway in the Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan (CTSP) and Blighs Road is not shown but it has existing cycling infrastructure.

5.6       Papanui Road is a core public transport route in the CTSP and Blighs Road has no public transport status.

Options

5.7       Five options were considered as part of the Capital Project Investigation process in June 2015 and are listed below as Options 1, 2 and 4-6.  The Shirley/Papanui community board also suggested installing flexi-posts on the centreline to deter drivers crossing the centreline.  This is option 7.  Extending the no passing restriction to make it illegal to cross the centre line is option 8.  Having a shared lane is Option 3 and rounds out the options discussed in this report.

5.8       Option 1 - Remove the existing kerb build out on the north side of Blighs Road at the start of the left turn slip lane with minor alteration to the road marking.  Install a clearway west of the kerb buildout to operate during the evening peak, with a cycle lane between the lanes, as shown on Attachment A.

·     This is the cheapest kerb buildout removal option, however the lane widths will be below the desirable 3 metres for traffic and 1.8 metres for a cycle lane.  The cycle lane will also run between two minimum width traffic lanes for over 100 metres in length.

5.9       Option 2 – Remove the existing kerb buildout on the north side of Blighs Road.  Install no stopping west of the kerb buildout and shift the cycle lane to the kerbside, as shown on Attachment B.

·     This is the option that was consulted on after safety audits were completed on option 1 and the scheme was approved by our internal technical team.

5.10    Option 3 – Remove the existing kerb buildout on the north side of Blighs Road.  Install a clearway west of the kerb buildout to operate during the evening peak with sharrow markings indicating to cyclists and drivers to share the lane, as shown on Attachment C.

·     This is the same cost as above, however it offers a decreased level of service for cyclists on this route as they have no dedicated facility to use and have to share the left turning lane during the clearway times.  

5.11    Option 4 - Remove the existing kerb build out on the north side of Blighs Road and the existing kerb and flat channel from the kerb build out to Watford Street with minor alteration to the road marking, as shown on Attachment D. 

·     This is the most expensive option as it removes the entire length of kerb from the buildout to Watford Street to widen the carriageway to allow for wider lane widths. 

5.12    Option 5 - The removal of three existing kerb build outs on Blighs Road (one on north side and two on south side).  There will be major changes to the road marking on Blighs Road.  The centreline on Blighs Road would move southward with the westbound cycle lane relocated to the kerb.  Clearway proposed on the north side of Blighs Road in the morning and evening peak times.   Loss of parking on the south side, as shown on Attachment E.

·     This option is less expensive than Option 4 but it still involves significant civil works.  All line marking would need to be removed and then reinstated, which can lead to confusions for motorists.

5.13    Option 6 - Investigate if any improvements could be made to the traffic signal phasing at the Blighs Road/ Papanui Road intersection, in particular for more phasing time to clear the right turning traffic from Blighs Road. 

5.14    Option 7 – Install flexi posts along the centreline of Blighs Road from Watford Street to the kerb buildout.  These will only be able to be installed where access is not restricted to properties along Blighs Road, as shown on Attachment F.

5.15    Option 8 – Extend the no passing line on Blighs Road to make it illegal to cross the centre line to access the right turning bay, as shown on Attachment G.

5.16    Option 9 – Do nothing.  Blighs Road remains as is.


 

6.   Option 1 – Remove kerb buildout and provide a clearway and cycle lane

Option Description

6.1       Remove the existing kerb build out on the north side of Blighs Road at the start of the left turn slip lane with minor alteration to the road marking.  Install a clearway west of the kerb buildout to operate during the evening peak with a cycle lane between the lanes, as shown on Attachment A.

6.2       The traffic lanes on this proposal are at a minimum of 3.0 metres for the right turning lane, 2.7 metres for the left turning lane and 1.5 metres for the cycle lane.  Having minimum against minimum traffic lanes leads to a safety risk as there is no ‘buffer’ between the lanes if road users need to take evasive action.

6.3       The left turning lane would only be operational in busy weekday periods and would be controlled by a clearway.  Outside of the clearway operation, parking would be retained and the cycle lane would meet the cycle guidelines.

6.4       Outside of the clearway operation, if no cars were parked, then road users could use the space to access the left turning lane.

Significance

6.5       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

6.6       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.7       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.8       This option was not consulted on, see section 4.4-4.12 for consultation results of option 2.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.9       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.10    Cost of Implementation – Approximately $92,000.  There is no funding allocated for this financial year for this scheme

6.11    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and the affect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.12    Funding source - None

Legal Implications

6.13    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.14    Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions and tree removal.

6.15    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004

Risks and Mitigations    

6.16    Not applicable

Implementation

6.17    Implementation dependencies  - securing funding for this project

6.18    Implementation timeframe – reliant on above funding

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.19    The advantages of this option include:

·   Allows east bound right turning vehicles to manoeuvre past queued vehicles without crossing into the oncoming west bound traffic lane

·   Does not impose a 24 hour restriction on the residents

6.20    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It is not supported by internal technical design team;

·   Clearways rely on enforcement and one car not complying can remove the advantage of this option.

7.   Option 2 – Remove kerb buildout and install no stopping on northern side of Blighs Road

Option Description

7.1       Remove the kerb buildout and shift the cycle lane to the kerbside to allow a traffic lane and a flush median to assist right turning traffic to access their lane, as shown on Attachment B.

7.2       This option reallocates the road space, so there is still only one traffic lane and one cycle lane but a flush median is installed to allow right turning road users to access the right turning lane.

7.3       The parking is permanently removed from the northern side, so at all times of the day both the left and right turning lanes will be able to be accessed.

Significance

7.4       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

7.5       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.7       This was the only option that went out for public consultation.  See sections 4.4-4.12.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.9       Cost of Implementation - Approximately $92,000.  There is no funding allocated for this financial year for this scheme

7.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal on the overall asset.

7.11    Funding source – None.

Legal Implications

7.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

7.13    Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions and tree removal.

7.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004

Risks and Mitigations    

7.15    Not applicable

Implementation

7.16    Implementation dependencies  - securing funding for this project

7.17    Implementation timeframe – Reliant on above funding.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   The design meets the minimum lane requirements for traffic and cycles

·   The design is self-enforcing as the parking is permanently removed

7.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Imposes a 24 hour restriction on residents on the northern side of Blighs Road for an intermittent issue. 

8.   Option 3 – Remove kerb buildout and provide clearway with sharrow markings

Option Description

8.1       Remove the kerb buildout and create a shared clearway controlled left turning lane and cycle lane, as shown on Attachment C.

8.2       The cycle lane and left turning lane will be shared during the clearway operation through the use of sharrow road markings.  These road markings are usually used in quiet, low volume roads to indicate to road users to share the road, although they are being proposed in left turning lanes leading up to signalised intersections in Christchurch.

8.3       Outside of the clearway times, cars will be able to park and cyclists will then have no dedicated facility to use.

Significance

8.4       The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

8.5       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.7       This option was not consulted on, see section 4.4-4.12 for the consultation information for Option 2.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

8.9       Cost of Implementation - $87,000 (there is no funding allocated for this financial year for this scheme)

8.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal.

8.11    Funding source – None

Legal Implications

8.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

8.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

8.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

8.15    Not applicable

Implementation

8.16    Implementation dependencies  - securing funding for this project

8.17    Implementation timeframe – Reliant on above funding

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Creates a shared lane which addresses the safety concern of minimum lane widths.

8.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the level of service for cyclists as it removes a dedicated cycle facility

·   Sharrow road markings may still be visible outside of clearway operation times if cars are not parked onto of the symbols, leading to confusion for road users

9.   Option 4 – Remove kerb buildout and widen carriageway on northern side

Option Description

9.1       Remove the kerb buildout and the northern kerb and channel and reinstate the kerb and channel approximately 1.0 metre from its current position.

9.2       This option extends the roadway on the northern side so two traffic lanes and one cycle lane can be created that exceed the minimum lane width requirements.

9.3       The cycle lane could be positioned on the kerbside which would require a permanent no stopping restriction or the cycle lane could be positioned between the two traffic lanes, depending on safety audit results.

Significance

9.4       The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

9.5       Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

9.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

9.7       This option was not consulted on.  See section 4.4-4.12 for option twos consultation.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

9.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

9.9       Cost of Implementation - $150,000 (there is no funding allocated for this financial year for this scheme)

9.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal.

9.11    Funding source – None

Legal Implications

9.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

9.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

9.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

9.15    Not applicable

Implementation

9.16    Implementation dependencies  - securing funding for this project

9.17    Implementation timeframe – Reliant on above funding

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

9.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Creates three separate lanes that are above minimum standards

9.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Cost of the civil works to extend the carriageway, for an intermittent problem

·   Permanent restriction on residents parking on northern side if cycle lane is kerbside

10. Option 5 – Remove kerb buildouts on both sides of the road

Option Description

10.1    Removes one kerb buildout from the northern side and two kerb buildouts from the southern side of Blighs Road.  Reconfigures all line marking along Blighs Road.

10.2    This option re-marks the entire section of Blighs Road.  With this option parking loss can be shared between the north and south side.

Significance

10.3    The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.

10.4    Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

10.5    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

10.6    This option was not consulted on.  See section 4.4-4.12 for option two’s consultation.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

10.7    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

10.8    Cost of Implementation - $120,000 (there is no funding allocated for this financial year for this project)

10.9    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal.

10.10  Funding source – None

Legal Implications

10.11  Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

10.12  The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

10.13  The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

10.14  Not applicable

Implementation

10.15  Implementation dependencies  - Securing funding for this scheme

10.16  Implementation timeframe – Reliant on above funding

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

10.17  The advantages of this option include:

·   Reconfigures the lane marking on Blighs Road so parking loss is spread between both sides;

10.18  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Cost of the civil works

·   Loss of parking

11. Option 6 – Optimise traffic signals at Papanui/Blighs Road intersection

Option Description

11.1    Optimise the traffic signals at the intersection of Blighs Road and Papanui Road.

11.2    The Real Time Operations team have recently optimised all the signalised intersections along Papanui Road to give the highest level of service to Papanui Road which is the minor arterial route.

Significance

11.3    The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

11.4    Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

11.5    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

11.6    Not applicable.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

11.7    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

11.8    Cost of Implementation – not applicable

11.9    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – not applicable

11.10  Funding source – not applicable

Legal Implications

11.11  Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

11.12  The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

11.13  The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

11.14  Not applicable

Implementation

11.15  Implementation dependencies  - Option has been implemented            

11.16  Implementation timeframe – Option has been implemented

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

11.17  The advantages of this option include:

·   Low cost to re-programme signals compared to civil works

11.18  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Lack of flexibility to increase capacity through intersection timing

12. Option 7 – Install Flexible Marker Posts along the centreline

Option Description

12.1    Install flexi marker posts along the existing centreline on Blighs Road.

12.2    Flexi posts are a very effective tool when used in the right situation.  The issue with using them on Blighs Road is the number of residential accesses along Blighs Road.  The posts would need to be position to still allow right turns into and out of residential properties. 

12.3    A desktop study shows that approximately 7 flexi posts could be installed along a 95 metre section.  This is obviously less than 1 every 10 metres and allows gaps for drivers to cross the centreline and then manoeuvre back in. 

12.4    It also raises safety concerns about forcing drivers to completely cross the centreline, whereas at the moment, generally, drivers are only crossing with one wheel.

Significance

12.5    The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

12.6    Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

12.7    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

12.8    This option has not been consulted on.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

12.9    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

12.10  Cost of Implementation - $350

12.11  Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract

12.12  Funding source – Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

12.13  Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

12.14  The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

12.15  The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

12.16  Not applicable

Implementation

12.17  Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

12.18  Implementation timeframe – four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

12.19  The advantages of this option include:

·   Deters drivers from crossing the centreline by using a physical barrier

12.20  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Due to the driveway layout only a minimal amount of flexi posts can be installed

·   Possibility of exaggerating the present situation by drivers overtaking on the outside of the flexi posts

·   Does not improve capacity

·   Unsightly and difficult to maintain

13. Option 8 – Extending the no passing line on Blighs Road (preferred option)

Option Description

13.1    Extend the yellow, no passing line, on Blighs Road to make it illegal to cross the centreline.

13.2    Extending the double yellow line is an easily achievable measure.  Residents can still cross the line to enter and exit their properties but it is illegal for drivers to cross the line to access the right turning bay. 

13.3    However, this puts the enforcement with the Police since it is a moving infringement.  Ideally any measure that we introduce we would like to be self-enforcing or enforceable by Council to get the maximum benefit.

Significance

13.4    The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

13.5    Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

13.6    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

13.7    This option has not been consulted on.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

13.8    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

13.9    Cost of Implementation - $750

13.10  Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect on overall asset will be minimal.

13.11  Funding source – Traffic Operations Budget

Legal Implications

13.12  Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

13.13  The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

13.14  The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

13.15  Not applicable

Implementation

13.16  Implementation dependencies  - community board approval

13.17  Implementation timeframe – four weeks once the area contractor receives the request

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

13.18  The advantages of this option include:

·   Cost effective and easy to install.

·   Parking is retained on both sides of Blighs Road.

13.19  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Possible compliance issues

·   It does not address the issue of vehicles queuing on Blighs Road and blocking the right turn lane and cycle lane.

14. Option 9 – Do Nothing

Option Description

14.1    This section of Blighs Road remains as it is.

Significance

14.2    The level of significance of this option is of low consistent with section 2 of this report.

14.3    Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

14.4    This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

14.5    This option was not specifically consulted on but is the default option when a consultation process is completed.  See section 4.4-4.12.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

14.6    This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

14.7    Cost of Implementation – Not applicable

14.8    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

14.9    Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

14.10  Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

14.11  The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

14.12  The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations    

14.13  Not applicable

Implementation

14.14  Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

14.15  Implementation timeframe – not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

14.16  The advantages of this option include:

·   Parking is retained along this section of Blighs Road.

·   No work required

14.17  The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address any of the identified issues. 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option One

46

b

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Two

47

c

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Three

48

d

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Four

49

e

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Five

50

f

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Seven

51

g

Papanui-Innes Community Board - Blighs Road - Option Eight

52

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Penny Gray - Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Ryan Rolston - Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas - Manager Operations (Transport)

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

10.    St Albans New Community Centre - Cladding

Reference:

16/1365537

Contact:

Kristine Bouw

Kristine.Bouw@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 8247

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve the cladding option presented by staff for the new St Albans Community Board. prepared in response to the resolution received from the Shirley / Papanui Community Board (now the Papanui – Innes Community Board)

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the Proposed New St Albans Community Centre – Cladding Options report.

2.         Approve the cladding option presented by staff for the new St Albans Community centre

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       On 17 August 2016, staff presented the updated design for the proposed new St Albans Community Centre. The new design represented a number of changes to the facility based on feedback provided through the consultation on the project.

3.2       On 17th August, Community Board resolved to:

1.    Approve the Concept Design for the new St Albans Community Centre provided under Option 1 of the report.

2.    Authorise staff to proceed with completing the design, consenting, procurement and construction work to deliver the new facility and request that the developed design considers external cladding that is more economic and in keeping with a more traditional appearance for the area.

3.3       On 7th December 2016, staff held a workshop with the Community Board and the Working Party for the new Community Centre in order to present options that would address the concerns of the Community Board in relation to the cladding of the new facility.

3.4       The selection of cladding options has included consideration of durability, maintenance and construction costs and liquefaction susceptible ground and overall fit with the street character and context of the new facility and budget.

3.5       A preferred cladding approach was developed and options are being presented to the Community Board for final approval.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Signatories

Author

Kristine Bouw - Project Manager

Approved By

Steve Orme - Facilities Leader Community and Service Centres

Darren Moses - Manager Capital Delivery Community

David Adamson - General Manager City Services

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

11.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Papanui Leagues Club

Reference:

16/1341564

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

55864

Papanui Leagues Club Inc.

Lighting for Papanui Domain

$30,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Papanui Leagues Club Inc.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $15,000 to Papanui Leagues Club Inc. towards the maintenance of their existing lights.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$25,104

$4,000

$21,104

$6,104

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix - Papanui Leagues Club Inc.

57

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

12.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - QEII Swim Club

Reference:

16/1412289

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

55675

QEII Swim Club Incorporated

Swim Coach and Facility Hire

$10,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from QEII Swim Club Incorporated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $2,000 to QEII Swim Club Incorporated towards pool hire.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$2,000

$0.00

$2,000

$0.00

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix (refer Attachment A) provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

4.4       This application is split between the Papanui-Innes and Coastal-Burwood Community Boards 35/65 respectively. Coastal-Burwood has approved their portion of the application for the amount of $5,000.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

QEII Swim Club Inc - Decision Matrix

61

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

13.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Community Pride Garden Awards

Reference:

16/1396237

Contact:

Christine Lane

Christine.lane@ccc.govt.nz

941 5213

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

55485

Papanui-Innes Community Board

Papanui-Innes Community Pride Garden Awards

$3,500

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from the Papanui‑Innes Community Board.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $3,500 to Papanui-Innes Community Board towards Papanui-Innes Community Garden Pride Awards.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2015/16

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$25,104

$0

$25,104

$21,605

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix - Papanui-Innes Community Pride Garden Awards

65

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Christine Lane - Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

14.    Application to the Papanui-Innes Community Board's 2016/2017 Positive Youth Development Fund - Claudia Jane Rogers

Reference:

16/1394762

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Papanui-Innes Community Board to consider one application received for the Board's 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund.

1.2       There is currently $1,085 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board to consider an application for funding from Claudia Rogers.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $500 from its 2016/17 Positive Youth Development Fund to Claudia Jane Rogers towards costs of attending the Christchurch School of Gymnastics development tour of United States of America in February 2017.

 

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Claudia Jane Rogers

4.1       The applicant, Claudia Jane Rogers, is seeking financial support in assisting with the costs of attending the Christchurch School of Gymnastics development tour of the United States America from 8 February through to 30 February 2017.

4.2       Claudia Rogers is 13 years of age, lives in Mairehau and currently attends Papanui High School in year nine.

4.3       Claudia has been doing gymnastics since she was three years old and competing since she was six.  She is currently training 16 hours per week as well as taking ballet classes.  Her goal for this trip is to develop her technical gymnastic skills.

4.4       Claudia, together with 11 other gymnasts from her team, will compete at two international gymnastics competitions: The WOGA Classic in Dallas, followed by the Houston National Invitational in Galveston.  These competitions are the two largest competitions in the United States of America attracting top gymnasts from around the world.

4.5       Claudia is also involved in swimming and surf lifesaving.  She is currently the South Island champion for beach flags.

4.6       Claudia has been part of the team’s fundraising efforts selling a variety of goods; including fudge, pasta, wine, bacon and chocolate.  The girls have also been involved in hosting a movie night, a quiz and sausage sizzles.  The team has currently raised $7,300.

4.7       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Claudia Jane Rogers:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares

2,155

Accommodation

471

Transport

300

Meals

700

Entry fees – competition

300

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$3,926

 

4.8       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles - Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

15.    Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Update

Reference:

16/1382812

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Board Activities

1.1       Information recently sent to the Board included:

1.1.1      Papanui Parallel Stormwater and Kerb works Rutland/Chapter Street and Rutland Street/Mays Road.

1.1.2      Papanui Parallel Stormwater and Kerb works Sawyers Arms Road and Sisson Drive/Sawyers Arms Road

1.1.3      Papanui Parallel Stormwater and Kerb works Sawyers Arms Road and Sisson Drive/Sawyers Arms Road 43-55 Rutland Street

1.1.4      Proposed Ouruhia School electronic school signage

1.1.5      Hills Road – proposed No Stopping Restrictions

1.1.6      Papanui Parallel Stormwater and Kerb works Colombo Street

1.1.7      SCIRT Communication Snapshot – November 2016

2.   Community Activities

 

2.1       10 Shirley Road Community Facility rebuild

             Information on the terms of reference and membership of the working party for this rebuild will be separately circulated for members’ consideration.  Also attached is a Memorandum on the Site Selection Process and the Terms of Reference for the 10 Shirley Road Community Centre Rebuild Project (refer Attachment A).

 

             Staff Recommended Resolutions:

 

             That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.    Approve the recommendation that the site of the new permanent Shirley Community Centre be confirmed as the existing site (10 Shirley Road).

2.    Approve the Terms of Reference for the Shirley Community Centre Rebuild Working Party for the rebuild of the Community Centre.

 

2.2       North Avon Road Renewal – Scheme Plan

             Information from the Project Manager giving responses to the resolutions from the joint meeting of the previous Burwood/Pegasus, Hagley/Ferrymead and Shirley/Papanui Community Boards on 4 October 2016 regarding this road renewal project is attached (refer Attachment B) to this report.

 

2.3       Removal of Street Trees

             A memorandum detailing the requirements for the removal of street trees will be presented to the Board early in 2017.


 

 

2.4       Ward Bus Tour

             Information on suggested sites to view has been circulated to Board members and further suggestions are welcome. Members are asked to give an indication of their preference for one longer tour or two shorter tours.

 

2.5       Rebuild of the QEII Swim Club Project

Staff will circulate the information requested via a memo prior to this meeting.   Any further questions can be addressed when this report is reconsidered.

 

2.6       St Albans Community Centre – Related Issues

             Additional information as requested by the Board has been separately circulated.

 

2.7       Papanui-Innes Community Board Meeting Arrangements

            

             Staff Recommended Resolution:

 

             That the Papanui-Innes Community Board resolve:

1.    To hold the first meeting of 2017 on Friday 10 February at 9am in the Papanui Boardroom.

 

             At that meeting the meeting dates for the remainder of February and for March 2017 will be presented to the Board for approval. It is proposed that the second meeting in February be on Wednesday 22 February 2017 at 4pm.

 

2.8       Belfast Emergency Response Plan (BERP)

Community Governance staff in consultation with Civil Defence continue to work alongside community organisations in Belfast with the continued development of the BERP. Due to recent events the plan is now being developed to include supporting the wider coastal community and BERP will support any further tsunami evacuations by opening as a support centre.

 

2.9       Redwood Plunket Rooms

A memo exploring the community need for the use of the Redwood Plunket Rooms will be provided to the Community Board at the first meeting in 2017 for Board consideration.

 

2.10    Shirley/Papanui Interagency December meeting

The notes from this meeting have been circulated to all Board members. At the meeting participants were asked to consider their organisation’s successes and issues for 2016 and major plans for 2017.

 

 

2    Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Memorandum on the Site Selection Process for the 10 Shirley Road Community Centre Rebuild Project

72

b

Memorandum to Community Boards in response to 4 October 2016 Joint Meeting Resolutions

74

c

DRF and PYDF Balances as at 30 Nov 2016

76

 

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

  


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

16     Papanui-Innes Community Board Recess Committee 2016/17

Reference:

16/1235493

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

03 941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Papanui-Innes Community Board to approve delegation arrangements for the making of any required decisions (including applications for funding) that would otherwise be dealt with by the Board, covering the period following its final scheduled meeting for the year on 9 December 2016 until its next ordinary meeting on 10 February 2017.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Papanui-Innes Community Board:

1.         Appoint a Recess Committee comprising the Board Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson (or their nominees from the Board), to be authorised to exercise the delegated powers of the Papanui-Innes Community Board for the period following its ordinary meeting on 9 December 2016 up until the Board resumes normal business on 10 February 2016.

2.         That the application of any such delegation be reported back to the Board for record purposes.

3.         Note that any meeting of the Recess Committee will be publicised and details forwarded to all Board members.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       In previous years it has been the Board’s practice to resolve to provide delegated authority to a Recess Committee comprising the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson (or their nominees from the Board), to make any needed decisions on the Board’s behalf during the Christmas/New Year holiday period.

 

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)    sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)   adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe - Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey - Community Governance Manager, Papanui-Innes

   


Papanui-Innes Community Board

09 December 2016

 

 

17.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

18.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.