Shirley/Papanui Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 20 July 2016

Time:                                    4.00pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Davidson

Aaron Keown

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Ali Jones

Barbara Watson

Emma Norrish

 

 

14 July 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Judith Pascoe

Community Board Advisor

941 5414

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

 

 

Role of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board

 

Chair

Mike Davidson

Membership

Aaron Keown (Deputy Chair), Jo Byrne, Emma Norrish, Barbara Watson, Pauline Cotter, Ali Jones

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies is uneven.

Meeting Cycle

Twice monthly on the first and third Wednesdays of the month.

 

The role of the community board is to:

 

 

Shirley/Papanui Community Board Objectives

For the 2013-2016 Triennium

 

These objectives have been agreed to by the Shirley/Papanui Community Board. They are intended to guide decision-making and provide a basis for the Board's advocacy work now and in the future. These objectives will be achieved through partnerships with the community, community organisations, local businesses, government agencies and the Christchurch City Council.

 

§  Raise Board profile and strengthen communication

§  Work co-operatively with other wards and community boards

 

§  Empowering, enabling, supporting local communities

§  Giving the community its own voice and sense of involvement

 

§  Give the community an understanding of what is happening in the wards

 

§  Contribute to a sustainable, healthy city.

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4   

C       6.       Harewood Road Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions................................................ 13

C       7.       Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - St Thomas Canterbury College Rugby League Team, Goiteom Gebremedihin and Ruby Mae Allsop............................................................................................................ 19

B       8.       Shirley/Papanui Community Board Area Update...................................................... 23

B       9.       Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 37

B       10.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 37 

 

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

 

Shirley/Papanui Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 6 July 2016

Time:                                    4.00pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Davidson

Aaron Keown

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Ali Jones

Barbara Watson

Emma Norrish

 

 

4 July 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Judith Pascoe

Community Board Advisor

941 5414

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

Mike Davidson declared an interest in Item 9.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00090

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 be confirmed.

Member Watson/Member Norrish                                                                                                                     Carried

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Papanui High School

             Emma Fellowes reported back to the Board on behalf of the Papanui High School Students regarding their participation in the Secondary School Futsal Nationals in Wellington on 5-6 April 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Ms Fellowes for her deputation.

 


4.2       Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Isabella Ralston, Emma Logan, Catherine Hooker and Anna Hooker

             Isabella Ralston, Emma Logan, Catherine Hooker and Anna Hooker reported back to the Board regarding their attendance at the Australian Nationals for Rhythmic Gymnastics on 30 May to 5 June 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Ms Ralston, Ms Logan, Ms C Hooker and Ms A Hooker for their deputation.

 

 

 4.3      Heavy Traffic on Stapletons Road - Clarrie Pearce

             Clarrie Pearce, Northwest Richmond Residents’ Association, spoke to the Board regarding the ongoing issues residents were experiencing with heavy vehicles accessing the Worthington Contracting Ltd site on Stapletons Road.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Mr Pearce for his deputation.

 

Member Jones left the meeting at 4:28 pm.  Member Jones returned to the meeting at 4:33 pm.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There were no petitions presented.  

 

6.   Correspondence

 

Staff Recommendations

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board received the information in the correspondence report dated 06 July 2016.

 

6.1     Worthington Contracting Limited - Dr N Higgins

The Board received a letter regarding problems that residents are experiencing with the Worthington Contracting Limited work site situated in the residential area between Guild and Dudley Streets and Hills and Stapletons Roads.

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00091

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request that staff urgently investigate the compliance of Worthington Contracting Limited (particularly with reference to Point No. 4 regarding the selection of site) with the conditions of their resource consent taking into consideration the complaints received from residents as per the tabled correspondence.

2.         Request that staff investigate alternative solutions to alleviate the residents’ problems with regard to the operations of Worthington Contracting Limited at the current site.

3.         Request that staff approach Environment Canterbury (Ecan) about the number of complaints received regarding dust from the site and what actions have  been taken.

4.         Request that a report on the above be provided to the Board as a matter of urgency.

Member Jones/Member Cotter                                                                                                                           Carried

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00092

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

5.         Request that staff provide information on the enforceability of the current 30 kilometres  per hour speed limit in Stapletons Road.

6.         Request that staff investigate the condition of Stapletons Road and the appropriateness of heavy vehicles using the road considering the complaints regarding excessive vibrations in the surrounding residential area.

Member Watson/Member Norrish                                                                                                                     Carried

  Chairperson Mike Davidson declared a conflict of interest in Item 9, the nature of the interest being related to a resident in the area and vacated the chair.  Member Davidson retired from the Board table and took no part in the discussion or voting.

Deputy Chairperson Aaron Keown took the chair for the duration of Item 9.

9.   Blighs Road from Papanui Road to Watford Street

 

Community Board Recommendation (original Staff Recommendation)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve the option of do nothing along Blighs Road from Papanui Road to Watford Street at this time.

Aaron Keown moved the  motion.

The motion failed due to lack of a seconder.

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00093

Part C

             The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request that staff investigate up to three further options to reduce the dangerous behaviour of traffic crossing the centre line to access the right hand turning lane on to Papanui Road.

Member Jones/Member Norrish                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

Mike Davidson resumed as chair.


 

 

7.   Proposed Road Names - Thompsons Road and Blakes Road (RMA92028985)

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00094 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to approve the names listed below which are in the vicinity of Thompsons and Blake Roads.

·        William Nicholls Drive

·        Robert Duncan Road

·        Berg Way

·        Booth Way

·        McLendon Green

Member Davidson/Member Keown                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

8.   Proposed Road Names - 84 Tomes Road (RMA92030837)

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00095 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to approve the name Campana Lane for the road which runs off 84 Tomes Road.

Member Keown/Member Davidson                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

10. Shirley Community Facility - 10 Shirley Road

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Receive the information contained within this report and instruct staff on how to proceed regarding the reinstatement of a combined community facility at 10 Shirley Road.

 

The Board discussed the staff report and the potential options for the reinstatement of the facility.

 

The following Motion was moved by Member Keown and seconded by Member Watson.

 

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolve to accept the Shirley Community Facility Partnership Proposal (Option Two).

The Motion was put to the Board and a Division called.

 

 

 

The division was declared lost by 2 votes to 5 votes the voting being as follows:

For:                           Member Keown and Member Watson

Against:                 Member Davidson, Member Byrne, Member Cotter, Member Jones and Member Norrish

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00096

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Accept the Shirley Community Facility (Option One) and request that staff proceed with further investigation on the provision of a community facility at 10 Shirley Road for the Shirley community and report back to the Board.

The division was declared carried by 4 votes to 3 votes the voting being as follows:

For:                           Member Byrne, Member Cotter, Member Jones and Member Norrish

Against:                 Member Davidson, Member Keown and Member Watson

Member Keown/Member Watson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00097

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

             1.         Further request that the report on the provision of a community facility at 10 Shirley                          Road include an option to provide full delegation to the Shirley/Papanui Community              Board to facilitate the building of a community centre for the Shirley community.

Member Jones/Member Norrish                                                                                                                         Carried

 

 

11. Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund – Neighbourhood Trust

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00098 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Approve a grant of $4000 to the Neighbourhood Trust towards wages for Inclusive Holiday programmes from the Board’s 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund.

Member Keown/Member Watson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

12. Shirley/Papanui Community Board Area Update

 

12.1    Christchurch Draft Multicultural Strategy

The Board noted the opportunity to make a submission on the Christchurch Draft Multicultural Strategy which was separately circulated to members.

 

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00099

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Make a submission in support of the Christchurch Draft Multicultural Strategy and delegate authority to the Chairperson to sign off the final submission.

 

Member Byrne/Member Norrish                                                                                                                        Carried

 

12.2    Cycle Path Markings Gardiners Road

The Board were advised that the cycle paths installed around the road islands holding the 50 kilometres per hour speed limit signs on Gardiners Road 150 metres north of Sawyers Arms Road remained without signage which had resulted in cyclists continuing to use the narrowed roadway at that point putting themselves and motorists at risk.

 

It was noted that the appropriate road markings are to be installed shortly.

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00100

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Request that staff install the appropriate signage and surface markings for the cycle paths on the outside of the road islands on Gardiners Road, 150 metres north of Sawyers Arms Road as a matter of urgency.

 

Member Keown/Member Watson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

12.3    Manchester Street CCTV Camera

The Board noted that the Police have commissioned a new crime camera on Manchester Street opposite the temporary camera installed by the Board.

Part B

             The Shirley/Papanui Community Board agreed to remove the temporary CCTV camera.

 


 

 

12.4    Trees for Courtenay Street

Part B

The Board noted that staff have agreed to the planting of fruit trees in Courtenay Street as part of the Courtenay Street upgrade project. Residents will be consulted over the types of fruit trees to be planted and the timeframe for this.

 

12.5    Stapletons Road Traffic Survey

Part B

The Board noted the information provided by the Traffic Engineer and that this information was also considered during the discussion of Item 6 in these Minutes.

 

 

Community Board Decisions under Delegation

Part B

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board received the Shirley/Papanui Community Board Area Update.

 

13. Elected Member Information Exchange

 

Part B

There was no information exchanged at this meeting.

 

14. Questions Under Standing Orders

 

Part B

There were no questions under Standing Orders at this meeting.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 6.26pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY

 

Mike Davidson

Chairperson

   


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

6.        Harewood Road Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions

Reference:

16/660238

Contact:

Penny Gray

penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Shirley/Papanui Community Board to approve the parking restrictions on Harewood Road in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is being provided to fulfil a resident’s request to investigate parking on Harewood Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the south-western side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 41.5 metres north-west from its intersection with Matsons Avenue and extending in a north-westerly direction for a distance of 29 metres.  This restriction is to apply Monday to Friday from 8.00am to 6.00pm.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 – P120 Parking Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 – Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Creates a mixture of parking in this section of Harewood Road to allow both long term and short term parking

·     Aligns this section of Harewood Road with neighbouring streets that also have a mixture of parking

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes all day parking which could spread long stay parking into areas with low parking demands at present.

4.4       Community Feedback

4.4.1   Community consultation on the Harewood Road, Papanui - Proposed P120 parking changes was undertaken from Tuesday 17 May to Tuesday 31 May 2016.

4.4.2   A total of 70 leaflets were hand delivered to sections of Harewood Road, Chapel Street, Hoani Street, Langdons Road, Matsons Avenue, Marble Wood Drive, Sails Street and St James Avenue. The leaflet was also sent to 60 key stakeholders and 19 absentee owners. 

4.4.3   During the course of the engagement, Council received 15 submissions. 11 respondents were in support of the proposed parking changes and four respondents did not support the proposal.  

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       A resident of Harewood Road contacted the Council and requested time restricted parking outside of their home.

5.2       Harewood Road is a busy arterial road that is heavily parked with all day parkers from the local commercial area on Main North Road.

5.3       On the northern side of Harewood Road between Chapel Street and the railway lines there is a church and the new Mitre 10 Mega store.  There are no vehicular crossings on the church site and only two on the Mitre 10 Mega site.  This makes the north-east side ideal for all day parking because all the kerbside can be maximised with parking.  All parking in this section is unrestricted parking.

5.4       The south-west side of Harewood Road between Chapel Street and the railway lines is mainly residential.  There are numerous driveways and two road intersections.  All parking in this section is unrestricted parking.

Proposal

5.5       It is proposed to install P120 time restricted parking on Harewood Road.  These restrictions will apply Monday to Friday.  The parking is consistent with other streets in the area, namely Chapel Street and Matsons Avenue.

5.6       The time restricted parking will give residents and their visitors an opportunity to park outside of these residential properties.  All day parkers will still be able to park on the northern side.


 

6.   Option 1 – Install P120 parking restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install P120 Monday to Friday parking restrictions as shown on Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this low rating.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Submissions were received from Tuesday 17 May to Tuesday 31 May 2016, with 15 responses received.

6.4.1   11 respondents were in support of the proposed parking changes. Their feedback included:

·     The number of parked cars cause visibility issues

·     Requests for the P120 parking be on both sides of Harewood Road as visibility is an issue around the intersection

·     Good idea, especially with Mitre 10 due to open

6.4.2   Four respondents did not support the proposal and included the following feedback:

·     We will only support this if P120 parking is also installed in St James Avenue

·     Institutions should be supplying their own parking

·     P120 parking will make it more difficult for our tenants

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $400

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source – Traffic Operations budget

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    None identified.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board Approval

6.14    Implementation timeframe – Approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Creates a mixture of parking in this section of Harewood Road to allow both long term and short term parking

·   Aligns this section of Harewood Road with neighbouring streets that also have a mixture of parking

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes all day parking which could spread the parking into areas with no parking at present

7.   Option 2 – Do Nothing              

Option Description

7.1       Harewood Road remains as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this level.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       Please see sections 4.4 and 6.4.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Not applicable

7.8       Funding source – Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe – Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   No implementation costs

·   All day parking will not spread in the area

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the parking concerns in the area

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Shirley/Papanui Community Board - Harewood Road Proposed P120 Parking Plan tg129358

18

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Penny Gray,             Traffic Engineer

Steve Parry,             Manager Traffic Operations

Steffan Thomas,    Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory,         Head of Transport

David Adamson,     General Manager City Services

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

7.        Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - St Thomas Canterbury College Rugby League Team, Goiteom Gebremedihin and Ruby Mae Allsop

Reference:

16/793901

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Shirley Papanui Community Board to consider an application received for the Board's 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund.

1.2       There is currently $17,519 in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board consider two applications for funding.  The first application is from St Thomas of Canterbury College Rugby League team on behalf of Mika Moemalo, Seth Tauamiti, Faafetai Tuu, Auklani Tuu, Asoono Puni, Richmond Seve, Patrick Elia, and Isaac Bradbrook.  The other two applications are from Goiteom Gebremedihin and Ruby Mae Allsop respectively.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $800 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to St Thomas Canterbury College towards assisting  Mika Moemalo, Seth Tauamiti, Faafetai Tuu, Auklani Tuu, Asoono Puni, Richmond Seve, Patrick Elia and Isaac Bradbrook with the costs of attending the New Zealand Secondary Schools Rugby League National Tournament being held at Papakura in Auckland in August 2016.

2.         Approves a grant of $500 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Papanui High School on behalf of Goiteom Gebremedihin towards the costs of attending the Australian Secondary Schools’ Cross Country Championships in August 2016.

3.         Approves a grant of $200 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Ruby Mae Allsop towards the costs of attending the Christchurch Girls’ High School culture and language trip to France in September 2016.

 

4.   Applicant 1 – St Thomas of Canterbury College – Mika Moesmalo, Seth Tauamiti, Faafetai Tuu, Aucklani Tuu, Asoono Puni, Richmond Seve, Patrick Ella and Isaac Bradbrook.

4.1       The applicant, St Thomas of Canterbury College, is seeking financial support in assisting with the costs for young people who have been selected to attend the New Zealand Secondary School Rugby League National Tournament being held in Auckland from 29 August to 2 September 2016

4.2       Rugby league has become very popular at the College.  The teams have had some great results recently with the junior league team becoming regional champions and the senior team finalists in the National Development competition.  The team is hoping to gain valuable experience and there is an expectation of success.

4.3       All the players are involved in the school rugby league team, play club rugby league and some are members of Canterbury representative teams.

4.4       All the students have participated in the school's fundraising, these include two raffles and seeking sponsorship.

4.5       These tournaments are unique to the participants' school years and provide the opportunity for the students to grow, develop and mature in their sporting, social and personal skills.

4.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs per individual to attend New Zealand Secondary School Rugby league National Tournament:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfare

312

James Cook High School Marae

62

Van Hire

85

Food

63

Entry Fee

25

Logistical costs (first aid, petrol, etc.)

20

                                                                                                 Total

$567

 

4.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding on behalf of its students.

5.   Applicant 2 – Goiteom Gebremedihin

 

 

5.1       The applicant, Goiteom Gebremedihin, is seeking financial support to assist with the costs of attending the Australian Secondary School Cross Country championship being held in Canberra, Australia from 20 – 22 August 2016.

5.2       Goiteom Gebremedihin is a 17 year old from Papanui and currently attends Papanui High School in year 13.

5.3       Goiteom has been involved in Athletics since his arrival to Christchurch.  He is a member of the Toc H Athletics Club and is currently the South Island Champion.

5.4       Goiteom currently trains approximately 20 hours a week and his goal in competing in this championship is to gain a placing.  The championships will give him the experience of running in an international event.

5.5       Goiteom has been busy fundraising with the school and has been involved in delivering of phone books, being a marshal at Riccarton Mall, and helping with the AMI litter collection.

5.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Goiteom Gebremedihin:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Total cost of trip

2030

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$2030

 

5.7       This is the first time Goiteom Gebremedihin has applied for funding.

6.   Applicant 3 – Ruby Mae Allsop

6.1       The applicant, Ruby Allsop, is seeking financial support to assist with the costs of attending the Christchurch Girls’ High School culture and language trip to France in September 2016.

6.2       Ruby is a 17 year old from St Albans and currently attends Christchurch Girls’ High School in year 13.

6.3       Ruby has passion for language and has been studying languages at school gaining excellence at the NCEA level. She has been involved in tutoring younger students both in German and French.  Ruby’s goal for next year is a double degree focusing on law, languages and international relations.

6.4       This experience will not only improve Ruby’s language skills but will give her an understanding of different cultures and the diverse perspectives on current issues and how people approach these.

6.5       Ruby and her family are busy fundraising; selling chocolates, candyfloss and peonies.  Ruby has a part time job at New World and will be doing a quiz night with Christchurch Girls’ High School. 

6.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Ruby Allsop:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Total trip

5,500

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$5,500

 

6.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles,            Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey,        Head of Community Support, Governance & Partnerships

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

8.        Shirley/Papanui Community Board Area Update

Reference:

16/807431

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5405

 

 

1.   Board and Community Activities

1.1       Nil to report.

2.   Upcoming Community Events

2.1       Papanui Village Business Association AGM – 5.30-7.30pm, Thursday 21 July, West Coast Bar and Grill, corner Langdons and Main North Road, RSVP to davef@sbapapanui.co.nz.

2.2       Belfast Community Network AGM – 10.30am, Wednesday 27 July, Sheldon Park, Belfast.

2.3       Shirley Inter-Agency Community Network Meeting – 10.30am, Friday 5 August, Avon Baptist Church, 103 North Avon Road.

2.4       Papanui Inter-Agency Community Network Meeting – 10.30am, Tuesday 16 August, Board Room, Papanui Service Centre.

3.   Community Board Advisor’s Update

3.1       Information sent to the Board recently included

· Christchurch Multicultural Strategy (Draft)

· North Avon Road (Hills Road to North Parade)

· SCIRT Communication Snapshot June 2016

· Information on consultation for the Draft Housing Strategy

· Update re tree removals for SCIRT infrastructure repair projects

· Decision of Remuneration Authority

· Cranford Street Water Main Renewal Start Work Notice

· Neighbourhood Week Information

· Graffiti Scan – Comparison of 2015 and 2016 Results

· Information on the 30km/hr speed limits in suburban areas

· Local Government Act Bill Analysis

· Neighbourhood Week 2016 Information

· Adshell proposed digital advertising on 18 bus passenger shelters

3.2       Street Lighting – Prestons Subdivision Exit to Lower Styx Road

The Board noted visibility issues at this intersection and asked staff to investigate this. The Team Leader Asset Management has provided the following information:

“The intersection has been designed to a traffic route standard, lighting subcategory V4. This level of lighting complies with Council standards for an intersection on a rural high speed road.”

The subdivision was taken into account when the level of lighting was determined.

3.3       Marshland Road (south of Hercules Street), Shirley, Pedestrian Refuge Installation

At their 6 April meeting the Board received a deputation and then considered a report regarding the location of this pedestrian refuge and the nearby bus stop on Marshland Road close to The Palms.

Attached to the report as Attachment A (and previously circulated) is a memo from the Project Manager outlining the issues involved in making any changes to the existing location of the bus stop.

          The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.    Receive the information regarding the location of the pedestrian refuge and nearby bus stop on Marshland Road close to The Palms.

3.4       Abberley Park proposed Playground Upgrade

Information has been circulated to the Board on alterations made to the proposed Abberley Park playground upgrade in response to the discussion at the Board Seminar on 6 July.

3.5       Veitches Road – Traffic Counts

Attached to this report as Attachment B (and previously circulated) is a memo from the Traffic Engineer with information on traffic counts on Veitches Road. This is in response to a request from the Board at the 17 February meeting.

          The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.    Receive the information on traffic counts on Veitches Road.

3.6       Neighbourhood Week 2016 – 28 October to 6 November 2016.

Information regarding Neighbourhood Week has been previously circulated and further information will be available at this meeting. Closing date for applications to be received is 19 August 2016. Details of the 2016 Shirley/Papanui Ward applications will be considered by the Board at the meeting of 14 September 2016.

3.7       Parks Network Plans

The Senior Recreation Planner has provided the attached memo (Attachment C) with a summary from a seminar held with Community Boards in November 2015 and has provided the following information:

We are working to set up a reference group from the sports community to develop a draft framework for Sports Parks that will inform the draft Sports Parks Network Plan. We are aiming to organise some focus groups later in the year on specific play and recreation issues to inform the draft Parks Play and Recreation Facilities Network Plan.

 

4.   Community Recreation Advisor Update

4.1       Westminster Sports

Westminster Sports Incorporated (WSI) recently undertook a review.  At a Special General Meeting of WSI on Thursday 7 July 2016 it was decided to “wind up” the activities of WSI, a very difficult decision but one that reflects the significant challenges associated with running a viable sporting organisation in the current environment.

 

Westminster Sports would like to thank the Shirley/Papanui Community Board for all their support over the years.

 

The Community Recreation Adviser will be working with the group to assist with the consequences of this decision.

 

4.2       Papanui Amazing Race

A youth event being held on 20 July targeting tweenagers.

 

4.3       Spencer Park Strategic and Engagement Plan

             A verbal report will be made to the Board.

5.   Community Development Advisor Update

·    Collaboration with the CEPTED adviser around a project in Onawe Place with ongoing community involvement.

·    Visiting groups such as Te Puna and Neighbourhood Trust around the Pychosocial issues of child poverty, child illness, children and  earthquake  issues as presenting at schools, with Community Governance Manager.

·    Visit to Social Enterprise "Pay it Forward"- talked to a member of the Artists collective (one of 50) who are running/using the facility to enhance their connectiveness and gaining support needed to further their craft/art.

·    STYX land community consultation project continues with collaboration between 3 Waters and the Strategic Policy Unit. The project is continuing to develop questions and answers to issues identified by residents in the Styx catchment area with a view to community capacity development.

·    Liaison with the Spencerville Surf Club regarding the rebuild of the club rooms

 

 

6.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Marshland Road Pedestrian Crossing Facility and Bus Stop Memorandum

26

b

Traffic on Veitches Road Memorandum

28

c

Sports Parks and Parks Play and Recreation Facilities Planning

34

 

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe,         Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey,        Head of Community Support, Governance & Partnerships

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 


 


 


 


 


 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 


 


 

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

20 July 2016

 

 

9.    Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

10.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.