Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Tuesday 5 July 2016

Time:                                    9am

Venue:                                 Boardroom,
180 Smith Street, Linwood

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Members

Sara Templeton

Alexandra Davids

Joe Davies

Yani Johanson

Paul Lonsdale

Brenda Lowe-Johnson

 

 

30 June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Barbara Strang

Community Board Advisor

941 6601

barbara.strang@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

 


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4  

B       6.       Staff Briefings................................................................................................................. 15

C       7.       Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Extraordinary Vacancy - Resignation of Deputy Chairperson Islay McLeod............................................................................................. 17

C       8.       Francella Street Proposed P120 Parking Restriction.................................................. 21

C       9.       Curries Road ,Tanner Street, Maunsell Street Intersection - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions..................................................................................................................... 29

C       10.     Bridle Path Road at Heathcote Valley School - Proposed  Mobility Parking Space 37

C       11.     Bus Stop Adjacent to 35 Buckleys Road: Potential for Relocation to Cranley Street 45

C       12.     Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association Incorporated - Memorial Plaque........................................................................................................... 51

C       13.     Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead 2016/17 - Kidsfirst Kindergartens - Linwood - Aoraki Woodlight.......................................................................................................... 55

C       14.     Establishment of a 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Youth Development Scheme........ 59

B       15.     Update to Community Board....................................................................................... 61

B       16.     Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 70

B       17.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 70

C       18.     Resolution to Exclude the Public................................................................................. 71  

 

 


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Ruth Dyson – Fast food outlets in Linwood

Ruth Dyson, Member of Parliament will speak to the Board regarding fast food outlets in Linwood.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

 

Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 15 June 2016

Time:                                    3.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom,
180 Smith Street, Linwood

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Sara Templeton

Islay McLeod

Alexandra Davids

Joe Davies

Yani Johanson

Paul Lonsdale

Brenda Lowe-Johnson

 

 

15 June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Barbara Strang

Community Board Adviser

941 6601

Barbara.strang@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

 

It was resolved that an apology for lateness from Brenda Lowe-Johnson be accepted.

 

Sara Templeton/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                      Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

 

Joe Davies declared an interest in item 12 and took no part in the discussion and voting on this item.

 

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00106

That the minutes of the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board meeting held on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 be confirmed.

Joe Davies/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

 

4.1       Proposed Bus Stop 321 Manchester Street – Rob Logie

             Mr Rob Logie, on behalf of 315 Limited, addressed the Board regarding the proposed new bus stop at 321 Manchester Street.  Mr Logie expressed his concern that there has been a gradual decline of on-street parking spaces on Manchester Street, in particular the area of the fringe Central Business District since the earthquakes of 2011, and that the proposed bus stop at 321 Manchester Street will further add to the loss of short-term parking. 

             The Chairperson thanked Mr Logie for his deputation.

             Item 7.7 of these minutes records a decision in relation to this matter.

 

Brenda Lowe-Johnson arrived at the meeting at 3.44pm.


 

 

4.2       Englefield Residents Association – Irinka Britnell and Robyn Kilty

             Ms Irinka Britnell and Ms Robyn Kilty addressed the Board on behalf of the Englefield Residents Association and provided an update for the Board on the Association’s recent activities.  Ms Britnell and Ms Kilty also expressed their concerns to the Board including the possible future demolition of Englefield House, the Willow trees along the Avon riverbank (Avonside Drive to Stanmore Road) and a tree removal on the corner of Avonside Drive and Fitzgerald Avenue. 

             Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00107

Part B

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board decided to request urgent information about the possible future demolition of Englefield House and of any proposed changes to Louise Chandler Lane access. 

Paul Lonsdale/Brenda Lowe-Johnson                                                                                                                Carried

 

Community Board Recommendation to the Council  HFCB/2016/00108

Part A

 

The Board considered the issues raised by the deputation at item 4.2 in relation to preservation of heritage buildings in the city and recent tree removals in the Hagley/Ferrymead ward. 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board recommend that the Council urgently develop a heritage strategy for natural and built heritage.

 

Paul Lonsdale/Brenda Lowe-Johnson                                                                                                                Carried

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

 

There was no presentation of petitions.

6.   Staff Briefings

 

6.1         Graffiti Team - Update

Sarah Gardyne from the Graffiti Team of Christchurch City Council provided an update on graffiti issues, including recent statistics on graffiti citywide, by suburb.

6.2          Public Transport – Update from Environment Canterbury

                Sam Wilkes, Contract Manager and Anne Heim, Operations Planner at Environment Canterbury provided an update for the Board on public transport, including information on the St Andrews Hill/Bridle Path intersection, implementation of smaller buses being introduced to the Christchurch bus network and patronage statistics.  Mr Wilkes and Ms Heim responded to questions raised by the Board including fares and the current review of bus routes in Christchurch.

 


 

7.   Authorisation of Bus Stops: 321 Manchester Street and 33E Rolleston Ave

 

Staff Recommendations

 

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

 

321 Manchester Street (Attachment A):

 

1.            Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 43 metres be revoked.

2.            Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

3.            Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 25 metres north of its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

4.            Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 39 metres north of its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of four metres.

33 Rolleston Ave (Attachment B)

5.            Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 40 metres south of its intersection with the extension of the southern kerb line of Armagh Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres be revoked.

6.            Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 40 metres south of its intersection with the extension of the southern kerb line of Armagh Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00109

Part C

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board resolved to:

 

321 Manchester Street (Attachment A):

1.            Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 43 metres be revoked.

2.            Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

3.            Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 25 metres north of its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

4.            Approve that the stopping of vehicles is prohibited at all times on the west side of Manchester Street commencing at a point 39 metres north of its intersection with Kilmore Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of four metres.

 

33 Rolleston Ave (Attachment B)

5.            Approve that all parking and stopping restrictions on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 40 metres south of its intersection with the extension of the southern kerb line of Armagh Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres be revoked.

6.            Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the west side of Rolleston Avenue commencing at a point 40 metres south of its intersection with the extension of the southern kerb line of Armagh Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

Sara Templeton/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                    Carried

 

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00110

Part B

 

7.         The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board discussed the issues raised by the deputation at item 4.1 regarding the decline in short term car-parking around the fringe Central Business District and decided to request that staff investigate the possibility of short term car parking spaces around Kilmore and Manchester Streets.

Yani Johanson/Paul Lonsdale                                                                                                                                 Carried

 

Islay McLeod left the meeting at 5pm at which point the meeting was adjourned until 5.10pm.

8.   Lease of Former United Bowling Clubrooms and Greens at Hagley Park

 

 

Community Board Recommendation to Council HFCB/2016/00111

 

(Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part A

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board recommend to Council:

1.         That it publicly notify the proposal to grant a lease to North Hagley Community Sports and Recreation Charitable Trust over that part of Hagley Park where the former United Bowling Clubrooms and green space is situated, an area of approximately 5387.5m2, part of Section 6 Survey Office Plan 467852 of 87.5600 hectares more or less, classified as a recreation reserve notified in New Zealand Gazette number 107 page 2706 on 11 September 1980 as shown on Attachment A, Lease Area Plan RPS 1332.

2.         In its capacity of holding the Minister of Conservation's Delegation, pending the outcome of 1 above, to give consent to the lease in accordance with 54(1)(a)and (b) of the Reserves Act 1977.

3.         To authorise the Property Consultancy Manager to manage and conclude all issues and processes associated with the above resolutions including, but not limited to:

a.         Convening a hearings panel to consider any objections and making a recommendation back to the Council for a decision.

b.         Finalising lease documentation to North Hagley Community Sports and Recreation Charitable Trust for a period of up to 33 years broken into three 11 year terms at an annual rental set in accordance with the Council's Sports Lease Charges Policy.

 

 

 

c.         Granting permission to North Hagley Community Sports and Recreation Charitable Trust to enter into hire and sublease arrangements for utilisation of the grounds and buildings contained within the lease area specifically to High School Old Boys Rugby Club Incorporated, United Croquet Club Incorporated and Christchurch Petanque Club Incorporated as well as other sport and recreation user groups on terms and conditions to be approved by the Property Consultancy Manager on behalf of Council.

Paul Lonsdale/Alexandra Davids                                                                                                                           Carried

 

9.   Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund - Friends of Beverly Park Heritage Rose Garden - Rose Garden Maintenance and Upgrades

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00112

 

Community Board Decision under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

 

Part C

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board resolved to grant $550 from its 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to the Friends of Beverley Park Heritage Rose Garden towards Rose Garden Maintenance and Upgrades.

Yani Johanson/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

10. Application to Hagley/Ferrymead 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund - Community Patrol City to Sumner Incorporated - Funding for Temporary Secretarial Support - 50/50 Split Lyttelton / Mt Herbert Community Board

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00113

 

Community Board Decision under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

 

Part C

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board resolved to grant $250, being a 50/50 split with the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board from its 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to Community Patrol City to Sumner Incorporated towards costs for temporary secretarial support.

 Paul Lonsdale/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                       Carried

 


 

 

11. Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board 2015/16 Youth Development Scheme - Seb Kaye Johnson

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00114

 

Community Board Decision under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

 

Part C

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board resolved to grant $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Seb Kaye Johnson towards competing in the 2016 World Rescue Championships in the Netherlands from 7 – 12 September 2016.

Joe Davies/Brenda Lowe-Johnson                                                                                                                       Carried

12. Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board 2015/16 Youth Development Scheme - Ryan James Nicholson

 

 

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00115

 

Community Board Decision under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

 

Part C

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board resolved to grant $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Ryan James Nicholson towards an international football tour from 18 July to 1 August 2016.

Brenda Lowe-Johnson/Yani Johanson                                                                                                               Carried

 

13. Update to Community Board

 

The Board considered the information in the Area Report, including a tabled memorandum on a Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team (SCIRT) tree removal at 227 Worcester Street. 

 

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

2.         Receive and note for record purposes the Board’s closing statement on the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Additional Proposal for Medium Density Zoning in Parts of Linwood.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00116

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board decided:

1.         To receive the report.

2.         To receive and note for record purposes the Board’s closing statement on the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Additional Proposal for Medium Density Zoning in Parts of Linwood subject to the following amendments (in bold and strikeout below) at paragraphs 3.1, and 5.1:

3.1          The Board is aware of community concern that developer led investment in multi-unit housing in this area may result in substandard ‘ghetto’ housing and exacerbate social issues facing the area.  Developers may view the area as an opportunity for a quick profit to capitalise on the RMD zoning without considering the real need of the community at large.  The basis of this concern stems from  the lack of regulation and design standards to ensure quality housing design and build, and fed by examples such as the Charleston/Phillipstown area where a neighbourhood plan was put in place but was let down in its implementation by District Plan and Resource Management Act processes.

5.1          Investment in the Linwood community is encouraged, but it should be led by the public sector with its commitment to wider community interests.  To this extent the Board would be prepared to accept the limited zoning proposed by Sarah Oliver at 8.6 of her evidence to facilitate the Housing NZ Corporation development. The Board further submits however that any such development should, in general, include an eight metre height limit overlay. 

Joe Davies/Brenda Lowe-Johnson                                                                                                                       Carried

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00117

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board considered the tabled report on a tree removal at 227 Worcester Street and decided to request information on monitoring of the replacement of trees post Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team (SCIRT) work.

 

Alexandra Davids/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                 Carried

14. Elected Members Information Exchange

Part B

14.1       Mural in Sumner

It was reported that an application for funding for a mural painted at Heberdeen Avenue to Scarborough Hill may be pending. 

         14.2        Bromley Odour

                                      Members discussed the recent odour in the Bromley area which has now disappeared.  Environment Canterbury have reported that no cause can be confirmed, however the odour may have emanated from the Bromley Wastewater Plant and was possibly due to weather conditions at the time.

 

 

 

 

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00118

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board decided to request a briefing at the next Board meeting regarding the Bromley odour issue and what can be done using smart technology to address these issues in the future.

Yani Johanson/Joe Davies                                                                                                                                       Carried

       14.3       Woodham Road Maintenance

 

               Residents on Woodham Road have reported that Woodham Road appears to have not been                swept recently. 

 

Community Board Resolved HFCB/2016/00119

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board decided to request that the gutters on Woodham Road are swept urgently and seek information as to the last time sweeping occurred.

Yani Johanson/Brenda Lowe-Johnson                                                                                                               Carried

 

15. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under standing orders at this meeting.

    

 

 

Meeting concluded at 6.07pm.

 

 

CONFIRMED THIS 5th  DAY OF JULY 2016

 

 

 

Sara Templeton

Chairperson

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

6.        Staff Briefings

Reference:

16/711450

Contact:

Barbara Strang

barbara.strang@ccc.govt.nz

941 6601

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

Update from Group Manager Canterbury Recovery (LINZ)

 

Jeremy Barr

Land Information New Zealand

Update from Earthquake Commission

Keith Land

Earthquake Commission

 

Update from Parks Advisor

Simon Curtis

Christchurch City Council

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Staff Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

7.        Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Extraordinary Vacancy - Resignation of Deputy Chairperson Islay McLeod

Reference:

16/507086

Contact:

Barbara Strang

barbara.strang@ccc.govt.nz

941 6601

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

         1.1     The purpose of this report is to outline the options available to the Board in respect of the extraordinary vacancy arising from the recent resignation of the Deputy Chairperson Islay McLeod.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Receives the notification of Islay McLeod's resignation from the Chief Executive Officer.

2.       Resolves pursuant to section 117(3)(b) of the Local Electoral Act 2001 to leave

unfilled the extraordinary vacancy created by the resignation of Islay McLeod, and that the Chief Executive Officer be requested to immediately give public notice of that decision.

         

           

 

3.   Key Points

 

3.1       The Board received formal notification from the Chief Executive Officer of Islay McLeod's resignation on 15 June 2016 (in accordance with Section 117 of the Local Electoral Act 2001).

3.2       Islay McLeod resigned as an elected member of the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board with effect from 15 June 2016.

3.3       Where a resignation occurs during the triennium an extraordinary vacancy is created and the provisions of Sections 117-120 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 apply.

 

3.4       Section 117 provides that where a vacancy occurs within 12 months of the next triennial local government elections a by- election is not required but the Board has the option to either leave the vacancy unfilled or to appoint a person to fill the vacancy for the balance of the current triennium.

 

3.5       If the Board resolves to leave the vacancy unfilled immediate public notice of that resolution is required to be given.

 

3.6       If the Board resolves to appoint a person to fill the vacancy for the balance of the current triennium, immediate public notice of that resolution is also required to be given including the name of the appointee and the process or criteria by which the person was selected for appointment.

 

3.7       In addition to the extraordinary vacancy on the Board Islay McLeod's resignation has left the position of Deputy Chairperson of the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board vacant. The Local Government Act 2002 enables the Board to elect a Deputy Chairperson, if it wishes to.

 


 

 

 

4.   Legal considerations

 

4.1      Section 117 of the Local Electoral Act provides:

 

                  (2)     If a vacancy occurs in the office of a member of a local authority or in the office of an elected member of a community board 12 months or less than 12 months before the next triennial general election, the chief executive of the local authority concerned must notify the local authority or community board of the vacancy immediately.

 

                  (3)     On receiving notice under subsection (2), the local authority or community board must, at its next meeting (other than an extraordinary meeting) or, if that is not practicable, at its next subsequent meeting (other than an extraordinary meeting), determine by resolution –

 

                           (a)     that the vacancy will be filled by the appointment by the local authority or community board of a person named in the resolution who is qualified to be elected as a member;

 

                                    or

 

                           (b)     that the vacancy is not to be filled.

 

                  (4)     If for any reason the person specified in the resolution is unavailable, or otherwise unable to be notified of the appointment, a further vacancy occurs in that office.”

 

         4.2.    Section 118 provides as follows in respect of any decision to make an appointment to fill an extraordinary vacancy:

 

                  “118   Notice of intention to fill vacancy by appointment

 

                  (1)     If, under section 117(3)(a) or section 117A, a local authority or community board resolves that a vacancy will be filled by the appointment of a person by the local authority or community board, it must immediately, unless the vacancy is for the office of mayor, give public notice of—

 

                           (a)     the resolution; and

 

                           (b)     the process or criteria by which the person named in the resolution was selected for appointment.

 

                  (2)     The local authority or community board must, at a meeting held not later than the expiry of the prescribed period, by resolution confirm the appointment described in the resolution under subsection (1); and the person appointed is for all purposes to be treated as having been elected to fill the vacancy on the date on which that resolution is made.

 

                  (3)     For the purposes of subsection (2), the expiry of the prescribed period is 30 days after the date of notification of the resolution under subsection (1).

 

                  (4)     If for any reason the person specified in the resolution is unavailable or otherwise unable to be confirmed in the appointment, a further vacancy occurs in that office”.

 

 

          4.3               Section 54 of the Local Government Act 2002 specifies that the provisions of Schedule 7 of the Act apply to Community Boards (with some minor exclusions) and with necessary modifications as if the Boards were local authorities.  A Community Board may appoint a Deputy Chairperson, Schedule 7 Clause 26 (4):

 

(4)      The local authority or the committee may appoint a deputy chairperson to act in the absence of the chairperson.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 

Signatories

Author

Barbara Strang

Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Murray Sinclair

Mary Richardson

Head of Community Support, Governance & Partnerships

General Manager Customer & Community

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

8.        Francella Street Proposed P120 Parking Restriction

Reference:

16/589924

Contact:

Ryan Rolston

ryan.rolston@ccc.govt.nz

941 8516

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to approve the installation of a P120 parking restriction at the Wickham Street end of Francella Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to a request from a business owner in the area seeking short stay parking.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northwest side of Francella Street commencing at its intersection with Wickham Street and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of seven metres.

2.         Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 120 minutes on the northwest side of Francella Street commencing at a point seven metres northeast of its intersection with Wickham Street and extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 51 metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install P120 Parking Restriction (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Facilitates short stay on-street parking for business customers

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Minor displacement of unrestricted parking

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       A business operator contacted Council staff regarding the lack of short stay parking for customers on Wickham Street and Francella Street. 

5.2       This is a light industrial area predominantly, with parking being largely unrestricted.  There are high demands for parking in the area. 

5.3       Short stay parking is a higher priority than long stay parking in industrial areas under the Council's Parking Strategy (2003). 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restriction (preferred)

Option Description

The preferred option involves creating a length of P120 parking on Francella Street that would accommodate seven short stay parking spaces.  There will be a small amount of parking displacement due to this scheme.  There are a high number of unrestricted parking spaces in the area.  The parking compliance team support the preferred option.  Significance

6.4       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.5       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.6       The preferred option is consistent with the community request for Council to install short stay parking.

6.7       All property owners were advised of the preferred option by letter.  Businesses on both sides of Francella Street adjacent to the proposed parking restriction were hand delivered a plan proposing the preferred option.  One response was received, which was in support of the scheme. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation - approximately $200 for the installation of signage.

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.11    Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.15    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.17    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Supports business's through facilitating short stay customer parking

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Minor displacement of unrestricted parking

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain unrestricted parking.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community request to create short stay parking. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support business

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Layout Plan Francella Street Proposed P120 Parking Restriction

26

b

Location Context Map - Francella Street Parking Restrictions

27

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

9.        Curries Road ,Tanner Street, Maunsell Street Intersection - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

16/597197

Contact:

Ryan Rolston

ryan.rolston@ccc.govt.nz

941 8516

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to approve the installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions at the intersection of Curries Road, Tanner Street and Maunsell Street in accordance with Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from a regular user of the intersection.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Tanner Street commencing at its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 21 metres. 

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Tanner Street commencing at its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. 

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeastern side of Maunsell Street commencing at its intersection with Tanner Street and extending in a southeasterly direction for a distance of 16 metres. 

4.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwestern side of Maunsell Street commencing at its intersection with Curries Road and extending in a southeasterly direction for a distance of 33 metres. 

5.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Curries Road commencing at its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 76 metres. 

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Curries Road commencing at its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 76 metres. 

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Curries Road commencing at its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 17 metres. 

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Curries Road commencing at a point 48 metres south of its intersection with Maunsell Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 33 metres. 

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northeastern side of Maunsell Street commencing at its intersection with Tanner Street and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 22 metres. 

10.       Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southwestern side of Maunsell Street commencing at its intersection with Curries Road and extending in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 28 metres. 

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 3 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the intersection and adjacent railway level crossing

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes car parking spaces

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Concerns have been raised about the proximity of parked vehicles to the intersection of Curries Road, Tanner Street and Maunsell Street from a truck driver that regularly drives through the intersection. 

5.2       There are high demands for all day parking in the vicinity of the intersection from staff working at nearby businesses. 

5.3       On investigation staff concur that parking close to the intersection makes it challenging for motorists to navigate the intersection due to limited visibility and is restrictive for heavy vehicle manoeuvring. 

5.4       The Traffic Control Devices Manual specifies a 20 metre length of No Stopping to be installed on the approaches and departures to urban level crossings. 

5.5       There have been no reported crashes at the intersection in the previous five years. 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       This option provides No Stopping restrictions on all arms of the intersection and at the Curries Road railway level crossing.  The extent of the No Stopping restrictions are designed to achieve an appropriate balance between parking loss and improved visibility and manoeuvring.  The option would displace the demand for up to 12 long stay parking spaces.  There is ample long stay parking in the area to accommodate displaced parking.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       Affected property owners, residents and businesses were advised of the original option by letter.  A total of seven responses were received.  One person indicated support for the plan, and the remaining six did not indicate a preference.  There were several requests to increase the extent of No Stopping restrictions. 

6.5       A revised plan was prepared with increased parking restrictions outside 65-73 Curries Road and also 64 Maunsell Street, in accordance with the consultation feedback.

6.6       A revised plan was circulated that accommodated these requests.  This plan was opposed by the owners of 67 and 69 Curries Road and the Body Corporate for 65-73 Curries Road.  The opposition relates to the reduced on-street parking fronting these properties.  The reason for increasing No Stopping at 65-73 Curries Road was because of the ability of trucks to park in this location.  The final option plan provides three parking spaces outside the property.  The layout of the parking in relation to the driveway servicing the property prevents trucks parking between the driveway and the Maunsell Street / Curries Road property. 

6.7       It is noted that the final design, whilst an improvement on the current situation, does not provide 20 metres of No Stopping on the departure side of the railway level crossing for northbound traffic on Curries Road.  The requirement for No Stopping on the approach to a level crossing ensures that visibility of the level crossing controls is not obstructed by parked vehicles.    The need for No Stopping on the departure side is less obvious.  The principle concern is that a vehicle manoeuvring to or from a parking space downstream of a level crossing may obstruct passing traffic, causing vehicles to queue on the level crossing.  This is low risk in this case because the width of Curries Road enables traffic to pass vehicles manoeuvring into car parking spaces with minimal disruption. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation - $200.

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.11    Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.15    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.17    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by improving sightlines at the intersection and level crossing

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes car parking

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing intersection layout with permissive parking

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the community requests for improvement to the intersection and the views of the submitters. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0.

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0.

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   It does not address the restricted sightlines at the intersection and therefore the safety risk is not dealt with.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Cumner Tanner Maunsell Proposed No Stopping Restricitons Layout Plan

35

b

Location Context Map - Tanner Street, Maunsell Street, Curries Road

36

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

10.    Bridle Path Road at Heathcote Valley School - Proposed  Mobility Parking Space

Reference:

16/539619

Contact:

Ryan Rolston

ryan.rolston@ccc.govt.nz

941 8516

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to approve the installation of a mobility parking space on Bridle Path Road to service the Heathcote Valley School, as shown on Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to requests from the school and parent of a mobility impaired child.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of persons affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Revoke all stopping and parking restrictions on the western side of Bridle Path Road commencing at a point 205 metres south of its intersection with Rollin Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 20 metres. 

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Bridle Path Road commencing at a point 205 metres south of its intersection with Rollin Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 12 metres. 

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be reserved at any time for vehicles with an approved disabled person's parking permit, prominently displayed in the vehicle, in accordance with section 6.4.1 of the Land Transport - Road User Rule 2004 on the western side of Bridle Path Road commencing at a point 217 metres south of its intersection with Rollin Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations:

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Provide a mobility parking space on Bridle Path Road (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do nothing

·     Option 3 - Provide a mobility space on the school grounds or Station Road

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Provides a facility for mobility parking in the desired location

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removes a single unrestricted car parking space

·     Parking space is not to full standard

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Council has been contacted by the Heathcote Valley School and a parent of a mobility impaired child seeking a mobility parking space on Bridle Path Road.  Currently there is no mobility parking that services the school.  The selected location is close to the front entrance to the school and the closest access point to the classrooms. 

5.2       Currently mobility impaired students make use of the unrestricted parking area on Bridle Path Road.  This does not guarantee that a space will be available close to the access point, and the only kerb cut down along the school frontage is at the main gate, making it difficult for a wheelchair to be moved from the roadway to the safety of the footpath. 

5.3       It is not possible to provide the mobility space to the full specification, which involves a 3.2m wide bay, as a result of limited footpath and road space. 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install Mobility Space on Bridle Path Road

Option Description

The recommended option is to install a mobility parking space on Bridle Path Road.  This is the preferred location for the school and parent with a mobility impaired child seeking the parking space.  6.2       It would be feasible to locate the space immediately outside the main entrance to the school, over existing no stopping lines, which would enable use of the existing kerb cut down.  However, doing so may create a safety issue by obscuring visibility of children crossing immediately outside the entrance.   

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       The location of the mobility space has been selected in consultation with school staff. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - Approximately $650 for markings signage and kerb cut down. 

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.9       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Provides a facility for mobility parking in the desired location

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Is not able to be constructed as a fully compliant parking space

·   Reduces the area for unrestricted parking by the one parking space.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing parking configuration

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with community requests for a mobility parking space. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Has no impact on-street parking.

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   There will continue to be no formalised facility for mobility parking at the school  

·   Is not supported by the community

8.   Option 3 - Provide a mobility space on the school grounds or Station Road

Option Description

8.1       Station Road is a cul de sac that terminates at the School's driveway.  There is angle parking on both Station Road and within the school grounds.   This option involves reallocating angle parking to provide a mobility space.  Angle parking spaces are the most common configuration for mobility parking. 

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

8.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.4       The Station Road entrance is considered too far of a distance to the class room to be convenient as a mobility parking area (approximately 150m).  Parking within the school grounds is also less convenient than a parking space on Bridle Path Road due to the distance to the class room.  There is additional complication created by a need to lock vehicular access to the school during school hours.  Consequently this option is not preferred. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

8.6       Cost of Implementation - Nil cost to Council if constructed on the school grounds

8.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

8.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

8.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

8.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

8.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

8.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Mobility parking is able to be provided in accordance with standards. 

8.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Lack of convenience means that the facility may not be utilised

·   Is not supported by the community

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Bridle Path Road Proposed Mobility Parking Space Layout Plan

43

b

Location Context Map - Bridle Path Road at Heathcote Valley School

44

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

11.    Bus Stop Adjacent to 35 Buckleys Road: Potential for Relocation to Cranley Street

Reference:

16/652210

Contact:

Brenda O’Donoghue

brenda.odonoghue@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       This report is to respond to the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board’s request for a staff report on the potential for shifting the bus stop from 35 Buckleys Road to Cranley Street as part of an integrated suburban bus exchange.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the report.

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       Public transport interchange studies undertaken to date indicate the existing bus stops on Buckleys Road, near Eastgate shopping centre, as the preferred interchange option due to accessibility for both passengers and buses.

3.2       The task of relocating the bus services and hence bus stops from Buckleys Road to Cranley Street is not an activity that can be achieved easily or in the immediate future.

3.3       Backing by the Greater Christchurch Public Transport Committee and the Council would be needed in commissioning a study to assess if a business case for the bus service relocation is warranted or not.  The Committee includes representatives of Christchurch City Council, Environment Canterbury, Selwyn District Council and Waimakariri District Council.  The New Zealand Transport Agency has an observer role within the Committee.

4.   Existing Situation

4.1       The existing bus stop facilities located near Eastgate shopping centre (the Mall), include the eastbound and westbound bus stops on Buckleys Road, located between Norwich Street and Russell Street.  The Buckleys Road bus stops function as the primary level stops for passengers travelling to and from the Mall. 

4.2       A set of secondary level bus stops are located on Linwood Avenue, by Chelsea Street.  These bus stops were considered to be disconnected from the Mall.  In recent years a bus stop has been installed on Cranley Street, in order to mitigate the disconnection, and allow passengers an easier route to interchange with the high frequency bus routes that travel along Buckleys Road.  Cranley Street is a short section of road controlled by Christchurch City Council (CCC) that provides access between Linwood Avenue and the Mall car-park network. 

4.3       Refer to Attachment A for an overview of the site location, inclusive of bus stop locations and road names.

4.4       Buckleys Road is a two-way, four lane road classified as a major arterial in the Christchurch City Plan, and so is Linwood Avenue.


 

 

4.5       Four bus routes pass through the Buckleys Road eastbound bus stop, which include two core bus services, the Yellow and Orbiter, plus two high frequency local bus services, the #80 and #140.  Six bus routes pass through the westbound bus stop, four of which are the bus services which travel through the eastbound bus stop, plus two low frequency local bus services, #145 and #535. 

4.6       There are two more services at the Buckleys Road westbound stop (#145 and #535) than the eastbound bus stop due to the right turn movement restriction from Cranley Street and Chelsea Street onto Linwood Avenue.  In order for the bus to turn around and start the return leg of the journey, the bus has to travel in an anti-clockwise direction via Chelsea Street and Russell Street.

4.7       During the hours of bus route activity on Buckleys Road, which is generally between 5:40am and midnight, about 750+ passengers will board a bus travelling eastbound, and about 710+ passengers will board a bus travelling westbound.  Passenger boarding data has been obtained from Environment Canterbury (ECan), and relates to an average weekday (Monday to Friday), in March 2015.

4.8       The passenger boarding data from March 2015 indicates that the Buckleys Road bus stops amount to being the third busiest public transport hub in Christchurch, followed closely by bus stops on Papanui Road near Northlands Mall.  The busiest public transport hub in Christchurch is the Central City interchange, followed by the Riccarton Road Interchange.

4.9       An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing is provided on Buckleys Road.  The crossing is in close proximity to the Mall and the eastbound bus stop.  The location of the crossing is considered to be in a good location relative to the desire line of pedestrians crossing to and from the eastbound bus stop and the Mall. 

5.   Eastgate Shopping Centre Development

5.1       As part of an approved development plan by the Mall, a short term lease exists between the Mall and CCC concerning the old Linwood library site, which is owned by CCC.  As part of the lease agreement the Mall has discretionary rights until December 2021.  The future use (after December 2021) of the CCC land is yet to be made.

5.2       The Mall, as the current lease holders, will install a car park access route and car parking as an interim use of the CCC land.

5.3       As a result of the Mall development plan, the #145 and #535 services will have a new anti-clockwise route to enable the return leg of the service to continue.  The bus services will travel anti-clockwise via the central car park access route instead of Chelsea Street.  The bus stop that is currently located on Cranley Street will be relocated to a new car park access route located within the leasehold area.

6.   Studies undertake to date

6.1       The bus stop facilities at Eastgate Mall have been included in three public transport interchange studies that have been carried out on behalf of CCC and ECan, by Beca Infrastructure in 2005 and Abley Transportation in 2008 and 2011.  The conclusion of all three reports was that the preferred interchange location is on Buckleys Road, in a location similar to the exiting situation.  The key factors influencing the selection of the preferred location were ECan’s desire for the interchange to be close to the Mall to maximise passenger convenience and to minimise diversion from existing bus routes.  All three reports indicated that improvements could be made to the passenger waiting facilities and Buckleys Road pedestrian crossing.  The advantages and disadvantages for keeping the bus stops on Buckleys Road were:


 

 

1.1.1                   Advantages:

6.1.1   Transfers between services can be made in the same location.

6.1.2   Routes are easily accessible for buses.

6.1.3   No or limited diversion for buses; little impact on through bus passengers.

6.1.4   Close to the Mall entrance.

1.1.2                   Disadvantages:

6.1.5   Bus service journey times can be impacted by on-street traffic delays.

6.1.6   Safety issues for pedestrians crossing Buckleys Road.

7.   Buckleys Road bus stop relocation to Cranley Street

7.1       The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board have requested staff provide a report on the potential for shifting the bus stop from 35 Buckleys Road (eastbound bus stop adjacent to the residential properties) onto Cranley Street as part of an integrated suburban bus exchange.

7.2       The Mall car park approved development plan allows for one bus stop.  A single bus stop does not provide sufficient stopping capacity to accommodate the additional demand associated with four bus services that currently pass through the eastbound Buckleys Road bus stop. 

7.3       Car parks are typically not designed to accommodate bus routes, which is due to the infrastructure requirements that a bus measuring 13.5 metres in length needs in order to turn or traverse, in addition to the impact the weight of the vehicle can have on vehicular routes that are not designed to the same standard as public roads operated by the Road Controlling Authority.  The following points outline some of the risks (but not limited to) in allowing bus routes to travel through a car park. 

7.3.1   Negative impact on road user safety associated with mixing heavy vehicle movements in an area with vulnerable road users, such as pedestrian movements that can occur a multiple locations within the car park.

7.3.2   Reduced level of personal safety of passengers waiting for a bus during the hours of darkness when the Mall activities have either closed or are not busy.

7.3.3   Negative impact to bus travel time reliability due to the delays associated conflicting vehicle manoeuvres into and of out parking aisles, speed restrictions within the car park, reduced speeds to safely traverse speed ramps and manoeuvring the bus at tight corners.

7.4       The task of relocating the bus services and hence bus stops from Buckleys Road to Cranley Street is not an activity that can be achieved easily or in the immediate future.  Significant capital investment in roading, land easement, land purchase and land sale are issues that would need to be quantified and addressed.  If such a significant project were to be backed by the Council, the project would require a robust business case that is compared to an agreed set of problems (e.g. increased travel time, unreliability issues, etc.) and benefits (efficiency, attractiveness, increased value for money, etc.).  The business case would then need to be evaluated by the New Zealand Transport Agency in order to establish project support.  If the Community Board wish to develop this concept further, then liaison with the Greater Christchurch Public Transport Committee would be the first step. 

8.   Future considerations

8.1       The following is an outline of the potential changes that could be made to the bus stops on Buckleys Road near Eastgate Mall.

8.1.1   The existing Buckleys Road eastbound and westbound bus stops remain in their current location.  Passenger waiting facilities are improved as part of an Adshel passenger shelter upgrade that is connected to the installation of digital advertising.  As part of the bus passenger shelter improvement work, Adshel would reduce the number of shelters on each side of the road from two to one.  The remaining shelters would be replaced with new shelters that are double length.  Each shelter will incorporate two wood panelled seats with arm rests.  The upgrade provides a significant benefit to the look of the bus stop, with no cost to CCC.  The shelter located adjacent to the residential properties would be installed with a mesh backing panel, to minimise the potential of broken bus shelter glass.

8.1.2   Not related to the bus shelter upgrades referred to in Section 8.1.1, await the installation of passenger facilities at the existing Buckleys Road bus stops that are in line with the recommendations (e.g. enclosed waiting area adjacent to the Mall, increased shelter provision adjacent to the residential properties, etc.) of the various public transport interchange studies. 

9.   Summary

9.1       The task of relocating the bus stops on Buckleys Road to Cranley Street (Eastgate Mall car-park) is not an activity that can be easily achieved or implemented in the immediate future.  If the Community Board wants to pursue this task, then backing by the Greater Christchurch Public Transport Committee and the Council would be needed in commissioning a study to assess if a business case is warranted or not against the previous studies undertaken and described in Section 6.  Until such decisions can be made, the most appropriate measure is to upgrade the existing shelters as described in Section 8.1.1, and optimise the management of the existing bus stop usage by buses.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Site Overview

49

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Brenda  ODonoghue

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Passenger Transport Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

12.    Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association Incorporated - Memorial Plaque

Reference:

16/745719

Contact:

Nicola Eccleton

nicola.eccleton@ccc.govt.nz

9415120

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to consider an application for funding from their 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

1.              Funding Request Number

2.              Organisation

3.              Project Name

4.              Amount Requested

5.              00055616

6.              Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents’ Association Incorporated

7.              Memorial Plaque

8.              $2,000

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents’ Association Incorporated.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Makes a grant of $1,500 to Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents’ Association from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund towards a memorial plaque.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$5,000

$0

$5,000

$3,500

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix - Mt Pleasant Memorial Community Centre and Residents' Association

53

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Nicola Eccleton,      Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga,  Manager Community Governance - Hagley/Ferrymead

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

13.    Application to the Hagley/Ferrymead 2016/17 - Kidsfirst Kindergartens - Linwood - Aoraki Woodlight

Reference:

16/749795

Contact:

Diana Saxton

Diana.saxton@ccc.govt.nz

941 6628

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Hagley/Ferrymead Board to consider an application for funding from their 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund from the organisation listed below.

Funding Request Number

Organisation

Project Name

Amount Requested

00055535

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Linwood

Aoraki Woodlight

$4,883

 

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from Kidsfirst Kindergartens - Linwood.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Makes a grant of $1,500 from its 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to Kidsfirst Kindergartens - Linwood towards installing the Aoraki Woodlight.

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       At the time of writing, the balance of the Discretionary Response Fund is as detailed below.

Total Budget 2016/17

Granted To Date

Available for allocation

Balance If Staff Recommendation adopted

$5,000

$0

$5,000

$3,500

 

4.2       Based on the current Discretionary Response Fund criteria, the application listed above is eligible for funding.

4.3       The attached Decision Matrix provides detailed information for the application.  This includes organisational details, project details, financial information and a staff assessment.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Decision Matrix Kidsfirst Kindergarten - Linwood 00055535 June 2016

57

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Diana Saxton,          Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga,  Manager Community Governance - Hagley/Ferrymead

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

14.    Establishment of a 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Youth Development Scheme

Reference:

16/746767

Contact:

Nicola Eccleton

nicola.eccleton@ccc.govt.nz

9415120

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to establish its 2016/17 Youth Development Scheme from the 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund.  This is a Community Board Initiative.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Establish a 2016/17 Hagley Youth Development Scheme.

2.         Approve the transfer of $1,500 from the 2016/2017 Hagley/Ferrymead Discretionary Response Fund to the 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Youth Development Scheme.

3.         Accept applications from young people school Year 7 up to 25 years old.

 

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The purpose of the Youth Development Scheme is to celebrate and support young people living in the Hagley/Ferrymead Ward by providing financial assistance for their development. The Community Board also seeks to acknowledge young people's effort, achievement and potential excellence in the community.

3.2       The Youth Development Scheme will consider applications for the following activities:

3.2.1   Personal development and growth – for example leadership training, career development, Outward Bound, Spirit of Adventure, extracurricular educational opportunities.

3.2.2   Representation at events – applicants can apply for assistance if they have been selected to represent their school, team or community at a local, national or international event or competition. This includes sporting, cultural and community events.

3.3       The following eligibility criteria must be met:

3.3.1   Applicant is in school Year 7 up to aged 25 years old.

3.3.2   Projects must have obvious benefits for the young person and if possible the wider community.

3.3.3   Only one application permitted per year. A second application will only be accepted in exceptional cases and considered at the discretion of the Community Board.

3.3.4   Applicants should be undertaking other fundraising activities and not relying solely on Community Board Support.

3.3.5   Successful applicants will be required to complete an accountability report.  Successful applicants may also be asked to make a deputation to the Community Board or attend an event hosted by the Community Board to report on their experiences.

3.4       Pertaining to the process for decisions on applications to the Youth Development Scheme:

3.4.1   Applications are often received close to the time of the activity or event the young person is taking part in.  Currently an application is made and staff responsible for assessments work to meet the deadline for the next deadline for the community board agenda.  This process can take between three and six weeks up to the Board decision meeting.

3.5       The purpose of the Discretionary Response Fund is to assist community groups where the project and funding request falls outside other council funding criteria and/or closing dates. This fund is also for emergency funding for unforeseen situations.

3.6       At the Council meeting of 22 April 2010, the Council resolved to change the criteria and delegations around the local Discretionary Response Fund.

3.7       The change in criteria limited the items that the local Discretionary Response Fund does not cover to only:

3.7.1   Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations or Community Boards decisions;

3.7.2   Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project; and

3.7.3   Projects or initiatives that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council.

Council also made a note that: "Community Boards can recommend to the Council for consideration grants under (4.5.2) and (4.5.3)."

4.   Financial Implications

4.1       The total budget available in the 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Discretionary Fund for allocation between 1 July 2016 and 30 August 2016 is $5,000.  This report seeks transfer of $1,500 from the 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund to establish the 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Youth Development Scheme.

4.2       This report seeks the transfer of funds from the 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund into a separate 2016/17 Hagley/Ferrymead Youth Development Scheme. This will in turn decrease the funding available for other applications to the Board’s Discretionary Response Fund.

4.3       Current recommendations align with the 2013-16 Three Year Plan, page 227 regarding community grants schemes including Board funding.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Signatories

Author

Nicola Eccleton,      Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Shupayi Mpunga,  Manager Community Governance - Hagley/Ferrymead

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

15.    Update to Community Board

Reference:

16/687051

Contact:

Shupayi Mpunga

shupayi.mpunga@ccc.govt.nz

941 6605

 

 

1.   Board and Community Activities

 

1.1       Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Plan

Board members started reporting activities they are engaged in that contribute to achievement of the Community Board actions.  Staff continue to monitor and record activities and other actions that contribute to meeting the aspirations of the Community Board Plan.

 

The Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Plan 2015-16 is available on the Board's webpage.  http://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/community-boards/hagley-ferrymead/plan/

1.2       Upcoming Board Meetings and Commitments

·   Tuesday 5 July, 9am, Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Meeting, Boardroom, 180 Smith Street

·   Wednesday 20 July, Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Meeting, Boardroom, 180 Smith Street

·   Tuesday 2 August, 9am, Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Meeting, Boardroom, 180 Smith Street

·   Wednesday 17 August, 3.30pm, Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board Meeting, Boardroom, 180 Smith Street

1.3       Community Activities and Events

·   Sumner Lyttelton Corridor Security Fencing Consultation Drop In Session 4 July, 4.30-6.30pm

·   North Avon Road Improvements Street Renewal Drop In Session 5 July 5.30-6.30pm

·   Winter Blast at Woolston Club Wednesday 6 July, 1.30 – 3.30pm

·   Big Chill at Linwood Park Saturday 9 July, 12 noon – 3pm

·   Sumner Community Facility sod turning, TBC.

2.   Consultation Calendar

Consultation Page

Consultation Dates

Draft Multicultural Strategy: Our Future Together

15/06/2016 - 31/07/2016 11:59pm

St James Avenue, Papanui, Proposed Parking Changes

17/06/2016 – 01/07/2016 5:00pm

Gasson Street, Madras Street, Moorhouse Avenue Intersection - Safety Improvements

23/06/2016 - 11/07/2016 5:00pm

50 Victoria Street - Electronic Billboard

25/06/2016 - 22/07/2016 5:00pm

Notice of Requirement - Simeon Quay Pump Station

25/06/2016 – 22/07/2016 5:00pm

Sumner Lyttelton Corridor - Security Fencing

27/06/2016 – 18/07/2016 5:00pm

North Avon Road (Hills Road to North Parade) - Street Renewal

29/06/2016 – 20/07/2016 11:59pm

 

3.   Funding Update

3.1       The balance of the community funds are as follows:

Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board 2016/17 Discretionary Response Fund - $7318

Youth Development Fund - $3950

Light Bulb Moments Fund - $1373

4.   Council Activities and Decisions

4.1      Vote for the New Sumner Library, Community Centre and Museum Name

Christchurch City Council received 175 suggestions from the public in a competition run from 23 May – 12 June 2016.  A panel have sorted through the entries and selected five finalists, which can be voted on by the public until Sunday 3 July at: www.yourvoice.ccc.govt.nz/sumnercentre

The names that will be voted on by the public are:

• Matuku Takotako: Sumner Centre

• Sumner Community Centre, Library and Museum

• Tuawera: Sumner Centre

• The Cornerstone

• Surfers Peak

 

The winning name will be announced in July, when the results will go to the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board for the final decision. The person, or people, whose suggestion get the most votes will receive $50 credit at Christchurch City Libraries.

For more information on this, you can visit www.yourvoice.ccc.govt.nz/sumnercentre

4.2      Decisions from the Council meeting held on 23 June 2016

Grant Approved

The Council approved a grant of $50,000 to the Residential Advisory Service from the Christchurch Earthquake Memorial Fund as a contribution towards its running costs for the remainder of the year.

Freight Management Plan Adopted

The Council adopted a Freight Management Action Plan that was prepared to ensure Council’s local road network supports the movement of freight in and around the city. The plan aims to improve the efficiency of freight movement by defining and protecting freight routes and managing freight in local areas.

Draft Housing Policy

The Council approved the Draft Housing Policy for public consultation. The policy was prepared to help better guide its decisions around social, affordable and market housing in Christchurch. Consultation will begin on 7 July 2016.

5.   Community Governance Team Activity

5.1       The Future Sumner Community Meeting was held on Monday 13 June. Approximately 200 residents attended the meeting and multiple council staff were present to speak to various projects including the Sumner Library and Community Facility, the Sumner-Lyttelton Corridor and the Sumner Village Master Plan. A debrief of the meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 30 June between organisers, community representatives and council staff.


 

 

5.2       Linwood College have been having their community workshops to consult the community on their aspirations for the new school. In addition to the community cafes, the school has also done extensive surveys and workshops/focus groups with students. All of which are reported to have been very successful.

5.3       The sod turning for Redcliffs Public Library was run very successfully on Friday 17 June with a very good turn out and good media coverage. Yani Johanson was the Master of Ceremony; representatives from the library committee said a few words; David Cox, patron of the library and two local children turned the sod and Mana Whenua Kaharoa Manihera completed the karakia and blessing of the site. The community expressed thanks to the Community Board for the support in the project to date. The CTV news bulletin can be viewed through the following link at 5.36 min into the video. http://ctv.co.nz/2016/06/17/17-june-2016-2/

5.4       A special event to mark the start of building the Heathcote Combined Community Facility was held on Friday 24 June.   Kaumatua James Robinson conducted the karakia of the site, the children of Heathcote Valley School sang a waiata, and community leaders said a few words and turned the sod. Heathcote Cricket Club hosted refreshments next door.  The building consent has been granted and Watts and Hughes will be starting work on Monday 27 June.

5.5       The Community Mobile Wellbeing Hub was successfully launched at Linwood College on 15 June.  This initiative has been facilitated by Early Childhood Education, Ministry of Education in collaboration with the Police and early childhood centres and community organisations in Linwood. Two community days followed at Bromley and Linwood North. http://ctv.co.nz/2016/06/15/15-june-2016-2/

 

6.   Items for Information

6.1       Englefield Lodge

Attached memorandum from the Senior Heritage Advisor (Heritage Unit) regarding Englefield Lodge, in response to a request for information by the Board and matters raised by the deputation (Englefield Residents Association) at the 15 June 2016 meeting of the Hagley/Ferrymead Board. 

6.2       Woodham Road Maintenance

A Customer Service Request was submitted by staff on 17 June 2016 for Woodham Road to be swept.

6.3       Sumner Community Centre and Museum Time Capsule

Attached memorandum from the Asset Engineer (Parks – Building and Heritage) inviting the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board to contribute to a time capsule for the Sumner Community Centre and Museum.

6.4       Christchurch City Council Report Template (Impact on Mana Whenua)

The Board considered the advice provided on 15 June 2016.  Brenda Lowe-Johnson will report back to the Board after receiving further advice on the matter.   

6.5      Canterbury District Health Board - Acute Services Building

A memorandum in response to a request for information by the Board will be separately circulated.

6.6       Tree Removals

   An information memorandum with an update regarding tree removals for SCIRT infrastructure repair projects will be separately circulated.

 

 

7.   Staff Recommendations

That the Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board:

1.         Receive the report and the attached memoranda. 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Sumner Time Capsule Memo - Board contribution

65

b

Fitzgerald Ave, 230 - Memo Hagley Ferrymead Community Board - Englefield Lodge

68

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Katie MacDonald

Vimbayi Chitaka

Nicola Eccleton

Diana Saxton

Brenda Preston

Barbara Strang

Governance Support Officer

Community Development Advisor

Community Development Advisor

Community Recreation Advisor

Community Support Officer

Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey

Manager Community Governance – Shirley/Papanui

  


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

16.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

17.  Questions Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.

 

 


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

18.  Resolution to Exclude the Public

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

 

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely items listed overleaf.

 

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7.

Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

 

Note

 

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

 

“(4)     Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

 

             (a)       Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and

             (b)       Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:


Hagley/Ferrymead Community Board

05 July 2016

 

 

ITEM NO.

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED

SECTION

SUBCLAUSE AND REASON UNDER THE ACT

PLAIN ENGLISH REASON

WHEN REPORTS CAN BE RELEASED

19

Hagley/Ferrymead 2016/17 Small Grants Fund Assessment Committee - Appointment of Community Representatives

s7(2)(a)

Protection of Privacy of Natural Persons

Names of applicants will be included in the report.

31 July 2016