Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Monday 4 July 2016

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Andrea Cummings

Tim Baker

David East

Tim Sintes

Linda Stewart

Stan Tawa

Glenn Livingstone

 

 

27 June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Croucher

Community Board Advisor

941 5305

peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4 

B       6.       Correspondence............................................................................................................. 13

B       7.       Staff Briefings................................................................................................................. 17

C       8.       Estuary Road P10 Parking Restriction......................................................................... 19

C       9.       Union Street Proposed P10 Parking Space................................................................. 27

C       10.     Burwood Pegasus Community Board Area Report.................................................... 33

B       11.     Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 43

B       12.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 43 

 

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board meeting held on Monday, 20 June 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared. 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

 

Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Monday 20 June 2016

Time:                                    4.30pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Corner Beresford and Union Streets,
New Brighton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Andrea Cummings

Tim Baker

David East

Tim Sintes

Linda Stewart

Stan Tawa

Glenn Livingstone

 

 

20 June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Croucher

Community Board Advisor

941 5305

peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

 

1.   Apologies

 

Part C

There were no apologies.

 

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

Chairperson Cummings declared an interest in Item 10.4 and took no part in the discussion or decision making.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00075

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board meeting held on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 be confirmed.

Member Baker/Member Sintes                                                                                                                           Carried

 

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1       Jeremy Barr, Group Manager Canterbury Recovery, Land Information New Zealand, provided an update for the Board including latest statistics for properties in the residential red zone.  Mr Barr undertook to supply the Board with statistics on rubbish dumping in the residential red zone. 

 

David East arrived at 4.37pm.

 

4.2       Betty Chapman (Wainoni/Avonside Community Services Trust), Rachel Vogan (Community Gardener) and Rodney Routledge spoke to the Board on plans for a transitional community garden associated with the Wainoni Playcentre.  A background document with a location map  was tabled and a short presentation was also given.  The Board were advised that the Trust had received financial support from the Red Cross which had to be used by December 2016. There was now urgency to obtain necessary Council approvals by the beginning of August.

             The Chairperson thanked Betty Chapmen and Rachel Vogan for their deputation.

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00076

Part C

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.             Supports in principle the aims of the Wainoni/Avonside Community Services Trust to develop a community garden on reserve land on Bickerton Reserve.

2.             Requests staff to undertake whatever actions are necessary to enable the Wainoni/Avonside Community Services Trust to implement the community garden on that site as soon as possible with a deadline of the beginning of August 2016.

Chairperson Cummings/Member Stewart                                                                                                       Carried

 

4.3       Garry House, Chairman of Christchurch Concerned Citizens Group (CCCG) spoke to the Board about issues in the eastern suburbs including New Brighton, South Brighton and North New Brighton.

             Of particular concern to CCCG was what they saw as sub-standard repair of roads and footpaths in the east and the patched repairs to the Pages Road bridge. CCCG believed that all carriageway repairs  needed to meet NZ Standards. The Group requested that the east receive the same level of repair that other areas of Christchurch enjoy.

             The Chairperson thanked Mr House for his deputation, noting that frustrations with the apparent lack of maintenance, as well as the standard of repairs in the east was shared by the Board.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.   

6.   Staff Briefings

6.1        Sarah Gardyne, Graffiti Business Coordinator – Graffiti Team

              Sarah Gardyne provided the Board with Burwood-Pegasus Ward graffiti incident counts by suburb for May 2016.  The Board indicated their interest in receiving comparisons with other Wards and also comparable statistics for May 2013 and 2015.  Ms Gardyne undertook to supply these. 

6.2        Richard Attwood, Acting Head of Events

              Richard Attwood was unable to attend the meeting.  Another time will be arranged for him to brief the Board.

6.3          Sarah Numan, Head of Customer Services Unit and Teresa McCallum, Programme Manager COMMIT

                Sarah Numan and Teresa McCallum were unable to attend the meeting.  Another time will be arranged for them to brief the Board on the Citizen Hub Strategy.

 

7.   Clarevale Street Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00077

Community Board Decisions under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Burwood Road commencing at its intersection with Clarevale Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres be revoked.

2.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Burwood Road commencing at its intersection with Clarevale Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

3.         Approves that that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Burwood Road commencing at its intersection with Clarevale Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 11 metres be revoked.

4.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Burwood Road commencing at its intersection with Clarevale Street and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

5.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the northern side of Clarevale Street commencing at its intersection with Burwood Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres be revoked.

6.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Clarevale Street commencing at its intersection with Burwood Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

7.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the southern side of Clarevale Street commencing at its intersection with Burwood Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres be revoked.

8.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Clarevale Street commencing at its intersection with Burwood Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

Member Baker/Member Sintes                                                                                                                           Carried

 

 

8.   Wainoni Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00078

Community Board Decisions under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Approves that any parking or stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Kerrs Road commencing at a point 48 metres north of its intersection with Pannell Avenue and extending in a northerly direction following the kerb line into Wainoni Road for a distance of 128 metres be revoked.

2.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Kerrs Road commencing at a point 48 metres north of its intersection with Pannell Avenue and extending in a northerly direction following the kerb line into Wainoni Road for a distance of 128 metres.

Member Livingstone/Member Tawa                                                                                                                  Carried

 

 

9.   Bowhill Road/Grantley Street - Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

 

Board Comment

With the replacement of North New Brighton School with a rebuilt Rawhiti School, which will have a larger roll and consequently more vehicle traffic, the Board noted that the narrowing of the  entrance to Grantley Street off Bowhill Road was creating congestion and traffic safety issues. 

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00079

Community Board Decisions under Delegation (Original Staff Recommendation Accepted without Change)

Part C

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the northern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres be revoked.

2.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 15 metres.

3.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the northern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres be revoked.

4.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the northern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

5.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the southern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres be revoked.

6.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 11 metres.

7.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the southern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres be revoked.

8.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Bowhill Road commencing at its intersection with Grantley Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

9.         Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Grantley Street commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 20 metres be revoked.

10.       Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Grantley Street commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 20 metres.

11.       Approves that all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the eastern side of Grantley Street commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 metres be revoked.

12.       Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Grantley Street commencing at its intersection with Bowhill Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 12 metres.

Member Tawa/Chairperson Cummings                                                                                                             Carried

 

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00080

Part C

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board requests staff to investigate options for the Bowhill Road and Grantley Street intersection in terms of improved traffic safety.

Member East/Member Baker                                                                                                                               Carried

 

 

10. Burwood/Pegasus Community Board Area Report

         An updated copy of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board Area Report was tabled.

 

10.1    Seagull-Proof Rubbish Bins

The Board noted that the new seagull-proof rubbish bins were affected by rust.  The Board decided to request staff to ensure that before any future rubbish bins are purchased for the greater New Brighton area, that options are brought to the Board for discussion and recommendation to utilise local knowledge. 

 

10.2    Riverbank Vegetation Mowing

The Board noted that on occasion mowing of the overgrown riverbank vegetation does not extend down to the water’s edge and that the banks are maintained by two different teams – Land Drainage and Parks.

 

Community Board Decided BPCB/2016/00081

Part A

The Burwood/Pegasus Community Board recommends to the Council that when the relevant waterways maintenance contract is reviewed, it considers awarding the mowing contract of the river banks to a single contractor to cover from the water’s edge to the road/land side of the stopbanks.

 

Member East/Member Baker                                                                                                                               Carried

 

10.3    Alteration of Previous Motion – Matariki Eastside Rocks Event

On 7 June 2016 the Board approved a grant of $5,031 towards Matariki Eastside Rocks event on 9 and 10 June 2016.

The grant should more correctly have been directed to Aranui High School and the Board is asked to consider the following resolution which corrects that and also specifies what the funds can be spent on.  Standing Order 3.9.18 enables a local authority to revoke all or part of resolutions previously passed at meetings.

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00082

Part B

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.      Revokes the following motion made at a meeting of the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board held on 7 June 2016:

1.1   That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board approves a grant of $5,031 from its 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund towards Matariki Eastside Rocks event on 9 and 10 June 2016.

2.         Approves a grant of $5,031 from its 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to Aranui High School towards Matariki Eastside Rocks event on 9 and 10 June 2016 being $3,500 towards stage, sound and lighting hire and $1,531 towards workshop costs.  

Member Baker/Member Sintes                                                                                                                           Carried

 

10.4    Conference Attendance – Building Resilient Communities

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00083

Part B

 

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

 

1.              Approves the attendance of Andrea Cummings at the Building Resilient Communities Conference in Wellington on Wednesday 22 June 2016.

2.              Notes that the cost of attending, including airfares is approximately $292 including GST per member attending.

Member Baker/Member Sintes                                                                                                                           Carried

 

11. Elected Member Information Exchange

11.1    Elected Member's Information Exchange

  • Consideration of the Draft Annual Plan 2016 and LTP amendments will take place tomorrow. A request to the Chief Executive has been made by elected members that in light of the Greater Christchurch Regeneration Act 2016, she take steps to resolve a number of matters including flood mitigation and estuary edge management.
  • A complaint had been received about the inadequate water supply for dogs at the Rawhiti Domain dog park.  Staff agreed to follow up on this matter.
  • It was agreed to seek a briefing from Civil Defence and Emergency Management staff on local civil defence arrangements.  It was noted that all elected members will be given the opportunity to train in civil defence and be advised of their role in an emergency.
  • The Board expressed the wish that local people and groups be sufficiently financially resourced (via an allocation to the Board) to engage with Development Christchurch Ltd and Regeneration Christchurch.

 

Community Board Resolved BPCB/2016/00085

Part A

The Burwood/Pegasus Community Board requests the Council to consider as part of their review of  delegations to Community Boards, giving Community Boards greater input into levels of service and the provision of local contracts.

 

Member East/Chairperson Cummings                                                                                                               Carried

 

12. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under standing orders at this meeting.

 

 

   

Meeting concluded at 6.36pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 4th  DAY OF JULY 2016

 

Andrea Cummings

Chairperson

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

6.        Correspondence

Reference:

16/711414

Contact:

Peter Croucher

Peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

941 5305

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Niki De Pina

Roads/Footpaths Repairs in Parklands

New Brighton Pier and Foreshore Promotion Society Inc.

Thank you letter regarding support for The Ray White New Brighton Duke Festival of Surfing 2016

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 04 July 2016

2.         <Enter text>

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Roads/Footpaths Repairs in Parklands

14

b

Thank You Letter Regarding Support for the Ray White New Brighton Duke Festival of Surfing 2016

15

 

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

7.        Staff Briefings

Reference:

16/717717

Contact:

Peter Croucher

Peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

941 5305

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

New Brighton Pier Update

Dave King, Project Manager

City Services Group - Transport

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Staff Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

  


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

8.        Estuary Road P10 Parking Restriction

Reference:

16/528329

Contact:

Mark Millar

mark.millar@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board to approve the installation of a P10 parking restriction outside 84 Estuary Road.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated after a request from the dairy owner.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Revokes all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Estuary Road commencing at its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 59 metres. 

2.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the western side of Estuary Road commencing at its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 21 metres. 

3.         Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the on the western side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 21 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 5 metres. 

4.         Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 30 minutes on the western side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 31 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 9 metres. 

5.         Approves that a Bus Stop be installed on the western side of Estuary Road commencing at a point 40 metres north of its intersection with Bridge Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 19 metres. 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install P10 park outside 84 Estuary Road (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Remove the parking space and replace with 'No Stopping'

·     Option 3 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Facilitates short term parking for the dairy

·     Retains current level of parking

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Does not ensure there will not be ongoing issues with parking over the driveway to 84 Estuary Road. 

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Estuary Road is classified as a Collector road and intersects with Bridge Street (Minor Arterial) at a roundabout. There is a dairy located on the northwest quadrant of the roundabout. 

5.2       Currently there is one P10 park adjacent to the dairy on Bridge Street.  Three P30 parks and then a bus stop are located on the western side of Estuary Road immediately to the north of the roundabout.  On Bridge Street the closest park on to the dairy is located outside 84 Estuary Road.

5.3       Council has been approached by the dairy owner on the corner of Estuary Road/Bridge Street to change the existing P30 parking space outside 84 Estuary Road to a P10 parking space to allow customers exiting the roundabout to pull in to a parking space close to the dairy.

5.4       All parking spaces are presently marked on-site individually. 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install P10 park outside 84 Estuary Road (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       To change a P30 parking space to a P10 parking space outside 84 Estuary Road.  Refer Attachment 1

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       This option is supported by the owner of the diary because it retains a parking space on the same side of the road as the dairy and for a more frequent turnover. 

6.5       Council staff consulted with the owner and tenants of 84 Estuary Road.  The property owner responded in opposition to the p10 parking space and seeking that the parking space is removed.  The following are the reasons for this request:

·    Tenants complaining that vehicles consistently park over the driveway of 84 Estuary Road.

·    To park there you have to go past the space and reverse back in which people don't bother doing.

·    Vehicles park there and leave the rear of their vehicles protruding into traffic lane.

·    There are plenty of alternative spaces for customers of the dairy to use on the opposite side of the road.

6.6       Council staff have spoken to Parking Enforcement who keep their own complaints database from 2011 - present.  They have stated there are no complaints logged for this property regarding a blocked vehicle entrance.  They stated that blocked vehicle entrances are treated as a priority within their team. 

6.7       The parking space is relatively easy access because of the shape of the kerb leading into the parking space and the driveway to the north mean that there are no adjacent parked cars to contend with when manoeuvring into the space.  There is no engineering design related reasons why drivers are not parking considerately in the space. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation - $200 for the installation of signage

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Covered under the area maintenance contract

6.11    Funding source – Traffic operations budget

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.15    May not resolve identified issue with parking over driveway. 

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board approval

6.17    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request. 

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Facilitates short term parking for the dairy

·   Retains current level of parking

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not ensure there will not be ongoing issues with parking over the driveway to 84 Estuary Road. 

7.   Option 2 - Remove the parking space and replace with 'No Stopping'

Option Description

7.1       Extend No Stopping along the western side of Estuary Road from Bridge Street to the driveway of 84 Estuary Road. 

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See Sections 6.4 to 6.7. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $200

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – Covered under the area maintenance contract

7.8       Funding source – Traffic operations budget

Legal Implications

7.9       See Sections 6.12 to 6.14.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    May not resolve identified issue with parking over driveway. 

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board approval

7.12    Implementation timeframe – Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request. 

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Is aimed at preventing drivers from parking over the driveway to 84 Estuary Road for up to 30 minutes 

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Removes a high profile parking space

·   Does not ensure there will not be ongoing issues with parking over the driveway to 84 Estuary Road. 

·   Does not meet the original objective of improving short stay parking for the diary using the existing parking space

8.   Option 3 - Do Nothing

Option Description

8.1       Retain existing P30 parking on the west side of Estuary Road north of Bridge Street. 

Significance

8.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Impact on Mana Whenua

8.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

8.4       Is not supported by the dairy or owner and tenants of 84 Estuary Road. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

8.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

8.6       Cost of Implementation - Nil

8.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs – n/a

8.8       Funding source – n/a

Legal Implications

8.9       n/a

Risks and Mitigations

8.10    n/a

Implementation

8.11    Implementation dependencies  - n/a

8.12    Implementation timeframe – n/a

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

8.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   Retains a parking space close to the dairy

8.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not facilitate short stay parking for the dairy

·   Does for mitigate the issue raised with parking over the 84 Estuary Road driveway

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Estuary Road Proposed P10 Parking Space Layout Plan

25

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Mark Millar

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Ryan Rolston

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Senior Traffic Engineer

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

9.        Union Street Proposed P10 Parking Space

Reference:

16/659994

Contact:

Mark Millar

mark.millar@ccc.govt.nz

941 8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board to approve the installation of a P10 parking restriction on Union Street south of Seaview Road, in accordance with Attachment 1.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated in response to a request from a prospective dairy owner to have improved access to short term parking on the corner of Union Street and Seaview Road.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Revokes all existing parking and stopping restrictions on the western side of Union Street commencing at its intersection with Beresford Street and extending to its intersection with Seaview Road. 

2.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the western side of Union Street commencing at its intersection with Beresford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. 

3.         Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 60 minutes on the western side of Union Street commencing at a point 16 metres north of its intersection with Beresford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. 

4.         Approves that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of 10 minutes on the western side of Union Street commencing at a point 29 metres north of its intersection with Beresford Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres. 

5.         Approves that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited on the western side of Union Street commencing at its intersection with Seaview Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 16 metres.   

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan  (2015 - 2015)

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

 

5.   Context/Background

5.1       Council has been contacted by the tenant of 2 Union Street, at the intersection of Union Street and Seaview Road, seeking changes to parking.  The property was previously occupied by the BNZ. 

5.2       It is sought that two existing P60 spaces fronting the property on Union Street be amended to P10 spaces, and that the landscaping area fronting the property on Seaview Road be converted to short stay parking. 

5.3       It is understood that the request is associated with converting the property to a dairy. 

5.4       The landscaping area on Seaview Road is designed to provide visibility for the raised pedestrian crossing between Union Street and Shaw Ave and is of insufficient width to be converted to parking.  As such, converting this area to provide additional parking has not been considered further within this report. 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install P10 Parking Spaces on Union Street

Option Description

Replace two existing P60 spaces with two P10 parking spaces on the west side of Union Street to the south of Seaview Road.  Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       The most affected business owner has requested the installation of the P10 parking restriction.  The business owner has written support from the adjacent Point Break Backpackers owner for this to occur.  There are no other properties fronting this section of Union Street.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $200 for revised signage.

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source - Traffic Operations Budget.

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - Approximately four weeks once the area contractor receives the request.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Supports the adjacent business

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Retain existing P60 parking spaces on Union Street. 

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the community request for short stay parking.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.9       Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None identified

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not support the adjacent business

 

 


 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Union Street Proposed P10 Parking Layout Plan

32

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Ryan Rolston

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

10.    Burwood Pegasus Community Board Area Report

Reference:

16/718257

Contact:

Peter Croucher

Peter.croucher@ccc.govt.nz

941 5305

 

 

1.   Board and Community Activities

1.1       Nil

2.   Funding Update

2.1       The final Board Funding Update for 2015/16 is attached.

3.   Report on Customer Service Requests

3.1       Attached is a summary of Customer Service Requests (CSRs) for May 2016 for the Burwood-Pegasus Ward and a comparison for all Wards.

3.2       Included in this information is a breakdown of CSRs for Street Cleaning, Street Maintenance, Parks Maintenance and Graffiti. 

4.   Action Updates

4.1       A document outlining the status of outstanding actions will be circulated separately to Board members. 

4.2       On 7 June 2016 the Board requested the removal of the dead/unhealthy/unsafe trees from the South Brighton Domain area including a special focus on those along the estuary edge from Bridge Street to Caspian Street.  The Board requested that this be dealt with urgently.

A Council Arborist has inspected these trees and verified that currently there are no health and safety issues. An ecologist has been engaged for early July to carry out an inspection. With his advice staff will formulate a plan which will be put in place if removal of the trees is required or not. Staff are also working on a design plan for this area.

 

 

5.   Staff Recommendations

That the Burwood/Pegasus Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a

Burwood-Pegasus 2015/16 Funding Update

34

b

Customer Service Requests - Burwood-Pegasus Ward - May 2016

35

c

Customer Service Requests - comparisons for all Wards - April 2016

40

 

 

Signatories

Author

Peter Croucher,     Community Board Advisor

  


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Burwood/Pegasus Community Board

04 July 2016

 

 

11.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

12.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.