Shirley/Papanui Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 15 June 2016

Time:                                    4.00pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Davidson

Aaron Keown

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Ali Jones

Emma Norrish

Barbara Watson

 

 

8 June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Judith Pascoe

Community Board Advisor

941 5414

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

 

 

Role of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board

 

Chair

Mike Davidson

Membership

Aaron Keown (Deputy Chair), Jo Byrne, Emma Norrish, Barbara Watson, Pauline Cotter, Ali Jones

Quorum

Half of the members if the number of members (including vacancies) is even, or a majority of members if the number of members (including vacancies is uneven.

Meeting Cycle

Twice monthly on the first and third Wednesdays of the month.

 

The role of the community board is to:

 

 

Shirley/Papanui Community Board Objectives

For the 2013-2016 Triennium

 

These objectives have been agreed to by the Shirley/Papanui Community Board. They are intended to guide decision-making and provide a basis for the Board's advocacy work now and in the future. These objectives will be achieved through partnerships with the community, community organisations, local businesses, government agencies and the Christchurch City Council.

 

§  Raise Board profile and strengthen communication

§  Work co-operatively with other wards and community boards

 

§  Empowering, enabling, supporting local communities

§  Giving the community its own voice and sense of involvement

 

§  Give the community an understanding of what is happening in the wards

 

§  Contribute to a sustainable, healthy city.

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4  

B       6.       Staff Briefings................................................................................................................. 13

C       7.       Greywacke Road Proposed Stop Control.................................................................... 15

C       8.       Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions................................................ 21

C       9.       Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme - Phoenix Athletic Club........................................................... 27

C       10.     Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme - Meg Alexandra Glading........................................................ 29

B       11.     Shirley/Papanui Community Board Ward Area Update............................................ 31

B       12.     Elected Member Information Exchange...................................................................... 40

B       13.     Question Under Standing Orders................................................................................. 40 

 

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Serena White

Serena White will report back to the Board regarding her experiences attending the LA Dance Tour 2016.

 

4.2

Belfast Community Network – Joss Butriss

Joss Butriss, Community Development Worker, will update the Board on the Belfast Community Network’s projects for the 2015/16 funding year.

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

 

Shirley/Papanui Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 1 June 2016

Time:                                    4.00pm

Venue:                                 Board Room, Papanui Service Centre,
Corner Langdons Road and Restell Street, Papanui

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Mike Davidson

Aaron Keown

Jo Byrne

Pauline Cotter

Ali Jones

Barbara Watson

Emma Norrish

 

 

31 May 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Judith Pascoe

Community Board Advisor

941 5414

judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00073

Community Board Decision

That the minutes of the Shirley/Papanui Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 be confirmed.

Member Norrish/Member Byrne                                                                                                                        Carried

4.   Deputations by Appointment

Part B

4.1     Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Mykilah O’Sullivan

 

             Mykilah O’Sullivan reported back to the Board on her participation in the World Class Dance Tour in Los Angeles in early 2016.

Part B

The Chairperson thanked Mykilah O’Sullivan for her report.

 

4.2     Positive Youth Development Scheme Report – Belfast School

 

             Pupils from Belfast School reported to the Board on their attendance at the Leadership Camp, Te Koru Youth Facility from 1 – 2 March 2016

Part B

The Chairperson thanked the pupils of Belfast School for their report.

5.   Presentation of Petitions

Part B

There was no presentation of petitions.

6.   Notice of Motion

 

Recommendation to Shirley/Papanui Community Board

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Accepts the Notice of Motion from Mike Davidson regarding the proposed installation of a pedestrian refuge island.

2.         That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board requests that the Council investigate:

a.         Installing a pedestrian refuge island on the Main North Road between Harewood and Langdons Roads in the vicinity of Age Concern which is situated at 24 Main North Road

b.         Restricting traffic movements out of Loftus Road on to the Main North Road to left turn only in order to create a more pedestrian friendly environment to allow people, many of whom are elderly, to cross the Main North Road safely without having to walk to the signalised crossing points.

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00074

Part C

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Accepts the Notice of Motion from Mike Davidson regarding the proposed installation of a pedestrian refuge island.

Member Davidson/Member Watson                                                                                                                 Carried

 

Community Board Decided SPCB/2016/00075

Part A

The Shirley/Papanui recommended that the Council:

1.         Accepts the Notice of Motion from Mike Davidson regarding the proposed installation of a pedestrian refuge island, and

2.         That the Council requests that staff investigate:

a.         Installing a pedestrian refuge island on the Main North Road between Harewood and Langdons Roads in the vicinity of Age Concern which is situated at 24 Main North Road

b.         Restricting traffic movements out of Loftus Road on to the Main North Road to left turn only in order to create a more pedestrian friendly environment to allow people, many of whom are elderly, to cross the Main North Road safely without having to walk to the signalised crossing points.

Member Davidson/Member Watson                                                                                                                 Carried

 


 

 

7.   Correspondence

 

Staff Recommendations

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board received the correspondence from the Belfast Sports and Community Centre Incorporated thanking the Board for the grant made towards the costs of their Centenary Celebrations.

 

8.   Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Report on Onawe Place Walkway

 

Board Comments

The  Board discussed the CPTED report on the Onawe Place Walkway and noted that 60 residents had signed up in support of the retention of the Walkway as an important link through to the bus stop, shops and local school.

The Board understood that residents considered the lack of lighting outside the shopping precinct opposite the access to the Walkway was as much of an issue as the lack in the Walkway itself and should also be addressed as a priority.

 

Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Supports a joint Community Board/community response to make the Onawe Place walkway safer for residents to use and to live near.

2.         Allocates up to $5,000 to enable a one-off upgrade to the walkway, and to support a Neighbourhood Art Project.  The upgrade to include a contribution towards repairing the damaged fencing and a repaint of all fences in a light-reflective colour.

3.         The Neighbourhood Art Project will be led by residents and supported by local organisations.  It will improve the walkway by covering graffiti on the walkway surface with residents' designs, which will signal community ownership.

4.         Supports the report's recommendation for the Council to give priority to maintaining the bus stop near the Hills Road entrance to the walkway to ensure that it is safe and comfortable for users.

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00076

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

1.         Support a joint Community Board/community response to make the Onawe Place walkway safer for residents to use and to live near.

2.         Allocate up to $5,000 from its 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to enable a one-off upgrade to the walkway, and to support a Neighbourhood Art Project.  The upgrade to include a contribution towards repairing the damaged fencing and a repaint of all fences in a light-reflective colour.

3.         Support the Neighbourhood Art Project to be led by residents and supported by local organisations.  It will improve the walkway by covering graffiti on the walkway surface with residents' designs, which will signal community ownership.

4.         Support the report's recommendation for the Council to give priority to maintaining the bus stop near the Hills Road entrance to the walkway to ensure that it is safe and comfortable for users.

5.         Request that the improvement to the lighting in the Onawe Place Walkway be made a priority safety project and be actioned in the first quarter of the new financial year.

6.         Request that the lighting outside the shopping precinct on Hills Road opposite the Onawe Place Walkway entrance/exit undergo a CPTED assessment.

 

Member Keown/Member Jones                                                                                                                         Carried

 

Community Board Decided SPCB/2016/00077

Part A

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board recommended that the Council:

1.              Support the Shirley/Papanui Community Board’s recommendation for the Council to give priority to maintaining the bus stop near the Hills Road entrance to the Onawe Place walkway to ensure that it is safe and comfortable for users.

 

Member Keown/Member Jones                                                                                                                         Carried

 

9.   Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Fund - Jarvis Hans Leslie Hansen, Jayda Stewart, Katherine Helen Shirley Ellis, Brittany Zita Terrey

 

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00078 (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to approve:

1.         A grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Jarvis Hans Leslie Hansen towards representing New Zealand at the Junior World Athletic Championships in Poland which are being held from 2 - 27 July 2016.

2.         A grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Brittany Zita Terrey towards representing New Zealand at the Softball Friendship games in Sydney which are being held from 1 - 9 July 2016.

3.         A grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Katherine Helen Shirley Ellis towards competing at the U.S Outdoor Archery Nationals in Alabama USA which are being held from 13 July - 17 July 2016.

4.         A grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Fund to Jayda Stewart towards representing New Zealand at the Secondary Schools Girls Football U15 development tour  in Sydney which is being held from 17 - 23  July 2016.

5.         The transfer of $2,000 from the Board’s 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to the Board’s 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme to fund the above grants.

 

Member Keown/Member Norrish                                                                                                                      Carried

 

10. Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund - Edgeware Croquet Club

 

Community Board Recommendation (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved to:

          1.        Approve a grant of $2000 to the Edgeware Croquet Club towards repairs and maintenance.

 

Member Norrish/Member Watson                                                                                                                     Carried

 

Member Cotter left the meeting at 04:56 pm. Member Cotter returned to the meeting at 04:57 pm.

 

11. Shirley/Papanui Community Board Area Update

 

11.1   Spencerville and Chaneys Corner Intersection

The Board discussed concerns received from residents of Spencerville regarding the speeding through Spencerville by motorists using this route to avoid the traffic on Marshland Road.

The Board also noted the safety issues raised by residents regarding the lack of visibility at the Chaneys Corner/Spencerville Road due to parked cars.

A further concern raised was the lack of lighting at the exit from Prestons Subdivision.

Community Board Resolved SPCB/2016/00079

Part C

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board resolved:

1.         That the Traffic Engineer be requested to investigate speeding issues in Spencerville due to the avoidance of Marshland Road, and multiple safety issues at Chaney’s Corner/Spencerville Road intersection including visibility issues due to parked cars.

2.         That the Traffic Engineer investigate the street lighting at the exit from Prestons Subdivision on to Lower Styx Road with a view to assessing the possible visibility issues.

 

Member Cotter/Member Watson                                                                                                                       Carried

 

 

Community Board Recommendation (original Staff Recommendation accepted without change)

Part B

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board decided to:

1.              Receive the report.

Member Jones/Member Byrne                                                                                                                            Carried

12. Elected Member Information Exchange

Part B

·         Residential Housing Medium Density Proposal

The Board Chairperson attended the Mediation for the additional Residential Housing Medium Density Proposal Mediation on Monday 23 May.  Any further information regarding the Hearing to be held on 3 July 2016 will be circulated to members.

 

Member Cotter left the meeting at 05:18 pm.

 

13. Questions Under Standing Orders

Part B

There were no questions under standing orders at this meeting.

 

   

Meeting concluded at 05:26pm.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 15th DAY OF JUNE 2016.

 

Mike Davidson

Chairperson

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

6.        Staff Briefings

Reference:

16/570572

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Board will be briefed on the following:

Subject

Presenter(s)

Unit/Organisation

Redevelopment of St Albans Park

Andrew Rutledge

Head of Parks Unit

Christchurch City Council

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Notes the information supplied during the Staff Briefings.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

7.        Greywacke Road Proposed Stop Control

Reference:

16/518776

Contact:

Penny Gray

Penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Shirley/Papanui Community Board to approve the Stop Control on Greywacke Road as shown in Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is being provided in response from a request from the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) to formalise the control on Greywacke Road.  The road works are being constructed by NZTA as part of the Western Corridor project.  This is a retrospective request to formalise the change as due to high safety concerns the control has been changed on site during the construction works.

1.3       A duplicate report is being presented to the Fendalton/Waimairi Community Board to approve a Stop Control on Logistics Drive.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the project and number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Revoke the Give Way control currently against Greywacke Road at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road

2.         Resolve that a Stop control be placed against Greywacke Road at its intersection with Sawyers Arms Road

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install a Stop Control on Greywacke Road (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Reduces the risk of a crash by requiring all motorists to stop at the intersection.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     None

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       The Western Corridor (SH1) connects the north and south Canterbury with Christchurch International Airport.  It runs between Belfast in the north and the large industrial area at Hornby in the south.

5.2       The Greywacke Road extension and associated works is part of the Western Corridor localised package of improvements jointly agreed between NZTA, Christchurch City Council and the Christchurch International Airport Limited.

5.3       Greywacke Road now runs from SH1 to the intersection of Sawyers Arms Road and Logistics Drive, providing a local access connection to a number of industrial sites along these roads.

5.4       NZTA have recently constructed the Greywacke Road extension and installed the line marking and shared path as part of their Western Corridor works. 

5.5       Recently the community board approved a Give Way control on Greywacke Road.  This was in accordance with the design plan prepared by NZTA for changing this intersection from a tee intersect to a cross intersection with the construction of the Greywacke Road extension.

5.6       There have been at least 3 reported crashes at this intersection since it opened and further urgent investigations by NZTA and Council staff have shown that a Stop control is, due to visibility restrictions, the appropriate control for this intersection.  An additional flush median is also being added to further highlight this intersection.

5.7       Sawyers Arms Road, at Logistics Drive and Greywacke Road intersection, is the boundary of the Shirley/Papanui community board and the Fendalton/Waimairi community board.  This report, with different resolutions, is being presented separately at each community board meeting for the approval of the traffic controls in their ward.

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install Stop Control on Greywacke Road (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install a Stop control on Greywacke Road, as shown in Attachment A.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       No specific consultation has been undertaken for this traffic control change.  This is considered a safety issue.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.6       Cost of Implementation - $0 to Christchurch City Council (NZTA are funding the change)

6.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - covered under the area maintenance contract and effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.8       Funding source - not applicable

Legal Implications

6.9       Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.10    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.11    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.12    None identified

Implementation

6.13    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board approval to have legal effect.

6.14    Implementation timeframe - has been constructed

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.15    The advantages of this option include:

·   Reduces the risk of a crash by requiring all motorists to stop at this intersection.

·   Provides intersection control in accordance with guidelines and best practice.

6.16    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   None

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       The traffic control against Greywacke Road will remain as a Give Way control.

Significance

The level of significance of this option is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See section 6.4.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - not applicable           

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - not applicable

7.8       Funding source - not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Increased crash risk when compared to preferred option.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Potential legal challenge of traffic controls.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe - not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   None

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   The crash risk is not addressed.

·   Does not provide the appropriate intersection control.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Shirley/Papanui Community Board - Greywacke Road Proposed Stop Control PLan tg129374

20

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Penny Gray

Wayne Anisy

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Traffic Engineer

Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

PDF Creator


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

8.        Harewood Road Proposed No Stopping Restrictions

Reference:

16/465738

Contact:

Penny Gray

Penny.gray@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Shirley/Papanui Community Board to approve the no-stopping restrictions as shown on Attachment A and detailed in section 3 of this report.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is being provided to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board after a request by the owner of Mitre 10 Mega and to accommodate the land use changes in this area.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and the number of properties affected by the preferred option.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Revoke all existing parking and stopping restrictions currently located on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

2.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 13 metres;

3.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 64 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 77 metres;

4.         Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 141 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 14.5 metres;

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 155.5 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction for a distance of four metres;

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north-east side of Harewood Road commencing at a point 201.5 metres south-east of its intersection with Chapel Street and extending in a south-easterly direction to the railway lines.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Parking

·     Level of Service: 10.3.8 Optimise operational performance

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Increased safety at the entrances to Mitre 10 Mega;

·     Upgraded existing bus stop to meet current Council bus stop standards

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Displacement of two long stay parking spaces

 

5.   Context/Background

Context

5.1       The Sanitarium factory site is being redeveloped into Mitre 10 Mega.  As a result of this a number of existing vehicle crossings are changing.  Instead of there being six vehicle crossings into this site, there will be two.  These entrances are commercial entrances and will have in excess of 200 vehicle movements per day.

5.2       To reflect this change it is proposed to change the parking restrictions on Harewood Road.  The extension of the no stopping will increase the sightlines and improve safety.

5.3       This area has a high demand for long term parking with this section of Harewood Road usually fully parked.

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install No Stopping Restrictions (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Install No Stopping on Harewood Road at the vehicle entrances to Mitre 10 Mega.

6.2       It is proposed to install no stopping restrictions either side of the 2 new entrances.  These entrances are commercial entrances and will have in excess of 200 vehicle movements per day.  The extension of the no stopping will increase the sightlines and improve safety.  The main entrance is also near an existing pedestrian refuge island (with existing no stopping restrictions) and an existing bus stop.

6.3       The existing bus stop is being retained in its current position.  The bus stop is serviced by an Adshell bus shelter.  Relocation of the bus stop and shelter was considered to reduce the amount of no stopping required but this was not considered practical.

6.4       Before the start of the construction of Mitre 10 Mega there were eight car parks along this stretch of Harewood Road.  The current proposal allows for six car parks so there is a loss of two car parks overall. 

Significance

6.5       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this low rating.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.6       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.7       Andrew Smith, the owner of Mitre 10 Mega, requested and supported the no stopping restrictions.  The restrictions are proposed directly outside of this development.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.8       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.9       Cost of Implementation - $420

6.10    Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.11    Funding source - Traffic Operations budget.

Legal Implications

6.12    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.13    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations.  The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of stopping restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.14    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.15    None identified

Implementation

6.16    Implementation dependencies  - Community Board approval

6.17    Implementation timeframe - Approximately 4 weeks once the area contractor receives the request

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.18    The advantages of this option include:

·   Increased safety at the entrances to Mitre 10 Mega

·   Upgraded existing bus stop to meet current Council bus stop standards

6.19    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Displacement of two long stay parking spaces

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       The parking on Harewood Road will remain as is.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is low and is consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are consistent with this low rating.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       This option is inconsistent with the community request for no stopping to be installed.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable

Legal Implications

7.9       Not Applicable

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    Not applicable

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies  - Not applicable

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.13    The advantages of this option include:

·   No loss of parking

7.14    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Motorists will be able to park up to 1m of the Mitre 10 Mega entrances which will restrict sightlines for motorists exiting the store.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Shirley/Papanui Community Board - Harewood Road proposed no stopping restrictions Plan tg129369

26

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Penny Gray

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

PDF Creator


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

9.        Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme - Phoenix Athletic Club

Reference:

16/640389

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Shirley Papanui Community board to consider funding applications received from Thomas Maslin and Cameron Maslin for the Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme.

1.2       There is currently $0.00 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from Thomas Maslin and Cameron Maslin.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Youth Development Scheme to Phoenix Athletics Club to assist Thomas Maslin and Cameron Maslin to attend the DownUnder Athletics meet at the Gold Coast, Australia, from 6 to14 July 2016.

2.         Approves the transfer of $500 from the Board’s 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to the Board’s 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme to fund the above grant.

 

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Phoenix Athletic Club

4.1       From 6 to 14 July 2016, 13 athletes and seven support crew from the Phoenix Athletics Club in Christchurch, will be travelling to the DownUnder Athletics meet at the Gold Coast.

4.2       Two of the athletes from the club, who live in Belfast, have been asked to represent the club at this event.  They are Thomas Maslin, 18 years old, and his brother Cameron Maslin who is 16 years old.

4.3       The Club wishes to expose the young athletes to international competition to expand their horizons, strengthen their characters and inspire them to new levels.  These young people then become mentors and coaches of the next generation of young athletes. 

4.4       Other members of the team are also applying to the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board and the Selwyn District Council.  They have had $500 approved from the Lions Club of Halswell.

4.5       Senior athletes are currently selling raffle tickets to raise funds and have part-time jobs to support the trip.

4.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for each individual:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Return flight

$614

Accommodation 8 nights

$550

Share of vehicle hire

$183

Event registration and levies

$160

Uniform and gear bag

$150

Food allowance and fuel contribution

$550

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$2,207

 

4.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles

Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance - Burwood/Pegasus

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

10.    Application to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme - Meg Alexandra Glading

Reference:

16/644312

Contact:

Helen Miles

Helen.miles@ccc.govt.nz

9418999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for Shirley/Papanui Community Board to consider one application received for the Board's 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme.

1.2       There is currently $0.00 remaining in this fund.

Origin of Report

1.3       This report is to assist the Community Board consider an application for funding from Meg Alexandra Glading.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by the number of people affected and/or with an interest.

2.1.2   Due to the assessment of low significance, no further community engagement and consultation is required.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Approves a grant of $500 from its 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme to Meg Alexandra Glading towards representing New Zealand as part of the Junior White Sox U19 team at the Hawaiian Invitational Softball Championships.

2.         Approves the transfer of $500 from the Board’s 2015/16 Discretionary Response Fund to the Board’s 2015/16 Positive Youth Development Scheme to fund the above grant.

 

 

 

4.   Applicant 1 – Meg Alexandra Glading

4.1       The applicant, Meg Glading, is seeking financial support in assisting with the costs of attending the Hawaiian Invitational Softball Championships being held in Hawaii from 12 - 28 July 2016 as part of the New Zealand Junior White Sox's U19 team. 

4.2       Meg Glading is an 18 year old from Papanui and currently attends Canterbury University studying a Bachelor of Sport Coaching.

4.3       Meg has been playing softball since the age of five years and joined the Papanui Tigers Club last season when they moved into the area.  Last year Meg was selected and played for the U19 and the Canterbury Women’s softball team

4.4       Meg currently trains approximately 20 hours a week and her goal is to be part of the New Zealand Junior White Sox team at the Junior World competition next year.  This tournament will give Meg experience of playing against top players and looking at different techniques and hopefully cement her place in the team.

4.5       Meg and her family are busy fundraising; having raffles, hosting a meal night at Winnie Bagoes and assisting with Warehouse Stock taking.    Meg also coaches several school teams as a part time job.

4.6       The following table provides a breakdown of the costs for Meg Glading:

EXPENSES

Cost ($)

Airfares

2,395.34

Gear and equipment

110.29

Transport

250.00

Accommodation

705.88

Food

970.59

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                 Total

$4,4321.00

 

4.7       This is the first time the applicant has applied for funding.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments to this report.

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Author

Helen Miles

Community Recreation Advisor

Approved By

Gary Watson

Manager Community Governance - Burwood/Pegasus

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

11.    Shirley/Papanui Community Board Ward Area Update

Reference:

16/649770

Contact:

Judith Pascoe

Judith.pascoe@ccc.govt.nz

941 5414

 

 

1.   Board and Community Activities

1.1       Public Information Session re the new St Albans Community Centre – 6pm, Thursday 16 June 2016 at the St Albans Community Centre, 1049 Colombo Street.

2.   Upcoming Community Events

2.1       Papanui Inter-Agency Community Network Meeting - 10.30am, Tuesday 21 June 2016 at the Papanui Service Centre (please note the change of date).

2.2       Papanui Baptist Freedom Trust AGM – 7.30pm, Thursday 23 June, 144 Sawyers Arms Road, Papanui

2.3       Papanui Village Business Association AGM – 5.30-7.30pm, Thursday 21 July, West Coast Bar and Grill, cnr Langdons and Main North Road, RSVP to davef@sbapapanui.co.nz

3.   Community Board Advisor's Update

3.1       Information sent to the Board recently included:

·        Turners Road speed limit information

·        St Asaph St, Ferry Rd to Antigua St – separated cycleway and street works

·        Sails Street proposed parking changes

·        Wiremu Street proposed parking changes

·        Dalriada Street proposed no stopping

·        Breton Close proposed no stopping

·        Shirley/Papanui CHED report

·        SCIRT Communication Snapshot

 

3.2       Speed Limit Review Submission

The Council is seeking feedback on proposed changes to the speed limit on 31 roads in and around Christchurch. These are mainly in new growth areas where the speed limit of a once rural road is no longer considered safe in expanding residential and commercial zones.

 

The Council is also proposing to extend the inner city 30km/h limit – implemented on 12 March 2016 – to include sections of St Asaph Street and Hagley Avenue. This is to reflect the streetscape changes now underway on the one-way street for westbound vehicles. The reduction from 50km/h to 30km/h would also be consistent with Tuam Street, the partner one-way street carrying eastbound traffic.

 

The proposed speed limit changes affect roads in the Hagley/Ferrymead, Shirley/Papanui, Fendalton/Waimairi, Riccarton/Wigram and Burwood/Pegasus Community Board areas. Information is attached as Attachment A.

 

 

Roads proposed to be changed in the Shirley/Papanui Ward are:

·        Belfast Road – 180m west of Blakes Road to 50m east of Blakes Road. 80 to 50 industrial development area.

·        Blakes Road – 300m north of Belfast Road to 630m south of Belfast Road. 80 to 50 industrial development area.

·        Greywacke Road – entire length. 100 to 50 road extension, industrial development.

·        Highsted Road – 50m north of Claridges Road (existing 50/80 change point) to 500m south of Styx Mill Road. 80 to 50 residential development.

 

The Board may wish to make a submission in support or otherwise of these changes. Consultation closes on 21 July.

 

3.3       Residential Housing Medium Density Proposal

The Chair is seeking legal advice on making a further submission or statement re the Residential Medium Density Proposal. Should it be considered necessary to do this the Board may wish to authorise the Chair to approve the submission/statement.

4.   Customer Service Requests

4.1       Refer to Attachment B.

5.   Funding Update

5.1       Refer to Attachment C.

 

 

6.   Staff Recommendations

That the Shirley/Papanui Community Board:

1.         Receive the report.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Shirley Papanui Community Board - 15 June 2016 - Ward Area Update PIL Proposed speed limits 31 CHCH roads (1)

33

b  

Shirley Papanui Community Board - 15 June 2016 - Streets Maintenance CSR March to June 2016

36

c  

Shirley Papanui Community Board 2015-16 DRF and PYDS Tracker as at 2 June 2016

38

 

 

Signatories

Author

Judith Pascoe

Community Board Advisor

  


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 


 


 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 


 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 


 

 


Shirley/Papanui Community Board

15 June 2016

 

 

12.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

13.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.