Te Hapori o Ōhinehou raua ko Te Ahu Pātiki

Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

Agenda

 

 

Notice of Meeting:

An ordinary meeting of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board will be held on:

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 18 May 2016

Time:                                    9.30am

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Lyttelton Service Centre,
15 London Street, Lyttelton

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Paula Smith

Christine Wilson

Denis Aldridge

Ann  Jolliffe

Adrian Te Patu

Andrew Turner

 

 

11 May 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

941 5602

liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

Note:  The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted.  If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.
To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Objectives

for the 2013 – 2016 Triennium

 

These objectives are agreed by members of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board. They are intended to guide decision-making and provide a basis for the Board's advocacy work in this triennium and beyond. These objectives can only be achieved in partnership with others, including community groups, Ngāi Tahu whanaunui, local businesses (including Lyttelton Port of Christchurch), Christchurch City Council and government agencies.

 

·           The challenges and strengths of increasing diversity in our communities are acknowledged and celebrated.

·           More and different people are involved in their communities.

·           The Board maintains and increases its leadership role as advocate for our communities.

·           Local partnership in earthquake recovery, regeneration and ongoing community development.

·           The community understands and has confidence in the Board's decision-making.

·           The relationship between the community and the port, including Lyttelton Port Company, is improved.

·           Protection, retention and restoration of natural and cultural heritage.

·           Avoid or mitigate negative effects of port traffic on community well-being.

·           Direct public access to the inner harbour and waterfront from Lyttelton town centre.

·           Strong physical and social links between harbour-side communities are maintained and enhanced.

·           Lyttelton town centre is rebuilt in a way which expresses its unique character.

·           All rebuild activity promotes social and economic vibrancy and / or wellbeing.

·           Lyttelton Urban Design Advisory Committee is established and operating effectively.

·           Arts and creative activities are supported and celebrated.

·           Lyttelton Harbour catchment water quality is steadily improving.

·           Significant progress on the Head-to-Head Walkway.

·           Landscapes are protected and sustainably managed.

·           Plans for Diamond Harbour town centre redevelopment are agreed upon and implemented.

·           Lyttelton Harbour is a destination of choice for visitors from Christchurch and beyond.

·           Lyttelton’s status as preferred port of call for cruise ships visiting Canterbury is restored.

·           Residents feel safe from natural hazards in all harbour communities.

·           There is access to suitable housing for all those who wish to live here.

·           Facilities for community activities, including recreation and sport, are repaired, rebuilt, maintained and well-used by all residents.

·           For local government and electoral purposes, Banks Peninsula remains intact and has effective representation, reflecting the Peninsula’s inherent integrity and particular interests.

 

Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

Proposed for Adoption:16 December 2015

 

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Karakia Timatanga.............................................................................................................................. 4 

C       1.       Apologies.......................................................................................................................... 4

B       2.       Declarations of Interest................................................................................................... 4

C       3.       Confirmation of Previous Minutes................................................................................. 4

B       4.       Deputations by Appointment........................................................................................ 4

B       5.       Presentation of Petitions................................................................................................ 4 

B       6.       Correspondence - Lyttelton Port of Christchurch Channel Deepening Project........ 9

B       7.       Correspondence - Dampier Bay Development in Lyttelton....................................... 13  

B       8.       Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee Minutes - 4 May 2016......................................................................................................................................... 15

C       9.       Ripon Street - St Davids Street Proposed Stop Control............................................ 37

C       10.     Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue Intersection- Safety Improvement Project......... 43

C       11.     Lyttelton/Mt Herbert 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund End of Project Report......................................................................................................................................... 51

B       12.     Community Organisation Report - Orton Bradley Park Board................................. 65

B       13.     Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Area Report.............................................. 71

B       14.     Elected Member Information Exchange.................................................................... 108

B       15.     Question Under Standing Orders............................................................................... 108

Karakia Whakamutunga

 

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

Karakia Timatanga 

1.   Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2.   Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

That the minutes of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4.   Deputations by Appointment

4.1

Ann Thornton, resident of Diamond Harbour, will speak regarding the proposed Marine Drive/Waipapa Avenue, Diamond Harbour Intersection Safety Improvement Project

 

5.   Presentation of Petitions

There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

 

Te Hapori o Ōhinehou raua ko Te Ahu Pātiki

Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 4 May 2016

Time:                                    9.30am

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Lyttelton Service Centre,
15 London Street, Lyttelton

 

 

Present

Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson

Members

Paula Smith

Christine Wilson

Denis Aldridge

Ann Jolliffe

Adrian Te Patu

Andrew Turner

 

 

4 May 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

941 5602

liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

Karakia Timatanga: Member Smith.

In Attendance:

Paula Smith (Chairperson), Christine Wilson (Deputy Chairperson), Denis Aldridge, Ann Jolliffe, and Andrew Turner.

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Apologies

Part C

Apologies

 

Community Board Resolved LMCB/2016/00069

It was resolved on the motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Wilson that the apology from Member Te Patu be accepted.

Member Smith/Member Wilson                                                                                                                          Carried

2.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3.   Confirmation of Previous Minutes

Part C

Community Board Resolved LMCB/2016/00070

That the minutes of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board meeting held on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 be confirmed, with the following amendments:

  1. Clause 4.2 Naval Point Boat Security and Safety Association

The cost of the project was $218,000 $318,000, of which the community could fund 30 per cent through volunteer labour.

Member Turner/Member Jolliffe                                                                                                                        Carried

 

Community Board Resolved LMCB/2016/00071

 

  1. Clause 23 - Committee Report - Lyttelton Reserves Management Committee Draft Minutes - 15 February 2016

 

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.       Receives the information in the draft minutes of the Lyttelton Reserves Management Committee meeting held on 15 February 2016.

2.       Notes that concerns were raised regarding the conduct of the meeting to which the draft minutes refer.

3.       Requests that staff remind the Reserve Management Committees in the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert area of the need to follow the Council's Standing Orders.

 

Member Turner/Member Jolliffe                                                                                                                        Carried

 

Karakia Whakamutunga: Member Smith.

 

Meeting concluded at 9.50am.

 

CONFIRMED THIS 18th DAY OF MAY 2016.

 

Paula Smith

Chairperson

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

6.        Correspondence - Lyttelton Port of Christchurch Channel Deepening Project

Reference:

16/513674

Contact:

Liz Beaven

Liz.Beaven@ccc.govt.nz

941 5602

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Peter Davie, Chief Executive, Lyttelton Port of Christchurch

Lyttelton Port of Christchurch Channel Deepening Project

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 18 May 2016 from Lyttelton Port of Christchurch (LPC) regarding LPC's Channel Deepening Project.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Lyttelton Port of Christchurch Channel Deepening Project

10

 

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

7.        Correspondence - Dampier Bay Development in Lyttelton

Reference:

16/534464

Contact:

Liz Beaven

Liz.Beaven@ccc.govt.nz

941 5602

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

Correspondence has been received from:

Name

Subject

Victoria Moore

Dampier Bay Development in Lyttelton

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the correspondence report dated 18 May 2016 from Victoria Moore regarding the Dampier Bay Development in Lyttelton.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Correspondence - Dampier Bay Development in Lyttelton

14

 

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

8.        Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee Minutes - 4 May 2016

Reference:

16/539774

Contact:

Liz Beaven

Liz.Beaven@ccc.govt.nz

941 5602

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

The Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee held a meeting on 4 May 2016 to formulate its submission on the Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25 (attached). The Board is circulating the Minutes recorded to the Board for their information.

 

2.   Recommendation to Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board receives the Minutes from the Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee meeting held 4 May 2016.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

A

Minutes Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee - 4 May 2016

16

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

 

Te Hapori o Ōhinehou rāua ko te Ahu Pātiki

Lyttelton-Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee

Open Minutes

 

 

Date:                                     Wednesday 4 May 2016

Time:                                    1.00 pm

Venue:                                 Boardroom, Lyttelton Service Centre,
15 London Street, Lyttelton

 

 

Present

Members

Denis Aldridge

Ann  Jolliffe

Paula Smith

Adrian Te Patu

Andrew Turner

Christine Wilson

 

 

9 May 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

941 5602

liz.beaven@ccc.govt.nz

www.ccc.govt.nz

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit:
www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/meetingminutes/agendas/index

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

Part A        Matters Requiring a Council Decision

Part B         Reports for Information

Part C         Decisions Under Delegation

 

 

 

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1.   Election of Chairperson

Part C

 

Committee Resolved LMSC/2016/00001

It was resolved  that Paula Smith be appointed Chairperson of this meeting of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Submissions Committee.

Member Smith/Member Jolliffe                                                                                                                          Carried

 

2.   Apologies

Part C

There were no apologies.

3.   Declarations of Interest

Part B

There were no declarations of interest recorded.

4.   Submission on Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25

4.1 Pony Point Maori Carving, Cass Bay

 

Committee Resolved LMSC/2016/00002

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.    Request that staff organise a site visit with staff and the Cass Bay Reserves Management Committee to investigate the history of the Pony Point Māori carving in Cass Bay, and to determine any interpretation information that may be required.

Member Smith/Member Jolliffe                                                                                                                          Carried

 

4.2 Submission on Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25

Board Comment

The Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board formulated its submission on the Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25 (attached).

 

 

Committee Resolved LMSC/2016/00003

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Resolve that the Board's draft submission on the Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25 be circulated to the Committee for comment prior to submission.

 

2.         Resolve that the Board's final submission on the Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25 be approved and submitted by the Committee Chairperson.

Member Smith/Member Wilson                                                                                                                          Carried

 

     

Meeting concluded at 2.38pm.

 

 

CONFIRMED THIS 18th DAY OF MAY 2016.

 


 

ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 4.2

TO:

Freepost 178

Annual Plan Submissions

Christchurch City Council

PO Box 73017

Christchurch 8156

 

Email: ccc-plan@ccc.govt.nz

 

SUBMISSION ON:

Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25

 

SUBMISSION BY:

Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

 

CONTACT:

 

 

 

 

Lyttelton Service Centre

PO Box 73027

CHRISTCHURCH 8154

 

Email: amy.hart@ccc.govt.nz

 

DATE:

10 May 2016

 

 

Te Hapori o Ohinehou Raua ko ahu Patiki/Lyttelton Mt Herbert Community Board represents the communities around Lyttelton Harbour and Port Levy. The Board's statutory role is, “to represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of its community” and "to prepare an annual submission to the territorial authority for expenditure within the community" (Local Government Act 2002, section 52). In this capacity the Board provides a submission on the Christchurch City Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 and Amended Long Term Plan 2015/25.

 

The Board appreciates the opportunity to provide this submission. However at the Council's request the Board provided many of the comments in the submission points below, as well as comprehensive comment on other matters, in December 2015. The Board did not receive proactive staff advice on these comments.

 

The Board's initial comment in December 2015 on preparation of the Draft Annual Plan 2016/17 is available at:

http://www.ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Community-Boards/LMHBoardInputonPreparationofDraftAnnualPlan.pdf

 

The Board supports all of the planned capital projects in the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert area proposed in the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan (refer Attachment 1), with any amendments outlined in the submission points below and except for Capital Project ID 18100 - Purau Foreshore and Reserves Project.

 

The Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Plan, referenced in the submission points below, is available at:

http://www.ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Community-Boards/LMHCommunityBoardPlan2015-12.pdf

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Paula Smith

Chairperson, Te Hapori o Ōhinehou raua ko Ahu Pātiki/Lyttelton Mt Herbert Community Board


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

1

Capital Project ID 18100 - Purau Foreshore and Reserves Project

The Board opposes funding for Capital Project ID 18100 as the community and Board's priority is reclassification of the Purau Foreshore as reserve, which is not a capital project.

 

The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended to reallocate all funding for Capital Project ID 18100 to a new capital project to progress the Stoddart Point Reserves and Coastal Cliff Reserves Network Management Plan in partnership with the Diamond Harbour Reserves Management Committee.

 

2

Capital Project ID 408 - Head to Head Walkway

The Head to Head Walkway is a longstanding community aspiration with social and economic benefits for the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert and wider area. The Board fully supports this project, which is one of its priorities in its Community Board Plan. It would be a lost opportunity to lose momentum by delaying this project as proposed in the Amended Long Term Plan.

 

The Long Term Plan allocated $334,000 in FY2016/17 for track construction, consultation and design, and additional funding in subsequent years.

 

The Amended Long Term Plan proposes the following: Allocate $50,000 for consultation and design in the capital works programme for FY2016/17. Phase the funding for the project over subsequent years as follows: 2018 = $326,000; 2019 = $22,000; 2020 = $348,000; 2021 = $22,000; 2022 = $326,000, understanding funding will be brought forward if project delivery is technically possible.

 

The Board supports $50,000 allocated for consultation and design in FY2016/17, and supports completion in FY2016/17 of any unfinished work budgeted for FY2015/16.

 

The Board also seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended to re-instate part of the original FY2016/17 budget for track construction, with the expectation that geotechnical work at Black Point will be completed which will enable construction.

 

 


 

3

Capital Project ID 357 - Lyttelton Marina Environs (Naval Point) Development

Metropolitan recreational assets at Naval Point (Lyttelton Marina Environs) have been neglected by successive Councils since the majority of the marina was destroyed by a storm in 2000. Community frustration is reflected in the submission on the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan by the Boat Security and Safety Association, who are keen to see progress on the ground. The Association proposes that capital funding be allocated for installation of a pontoon on the public slipway at Naval Point to increase boat safety.

 

The Board fully supports Capital Project ID 357, as supporting development of Naval Point is one of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan. The Naval Point Development Plan, funded by this project and currently underway, has as one of its objectives improving boat safety, which is also one of the Board's top priorities. If improving boat safety is one of the priority capital works identified by the Naval Point Development Plan following comprehensive consultation, the Board supports funding to implement these improvements.

 

The Long Term Plan allocated $409,000 in FY2016/17 and $419,000 in FY2017/18 for Capital Project ID 357 - Lyttelton Marina Environs (Naval Point) Development. The Amended Long Term Plan proposes that the project be delayed by one year, with $0 in FY2016/17, $418,000 in FY2017/18 and $343,000 in FY2018/19.

 

The Board has been advised that the Naval Point Development project is expected to fully utilise the original FY2016/17 budget, as any decisions around pending issues such as the location of a cruise ship berth in Lyttelton would likely influence design, staging and use of Naval Point rather than delay the project.

 

To enable timely development of a valuable community recreational asset, the Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended, with original funding of $409,000 in FY2016/17 and $419,000 in FY2017/18 reinstated.

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

Reserve Management Committees

There are five Reserve Management Committees (RMC), which are subcommittees of the Board, in the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert area: Lyttelton RMC, Lyttelton Recreation Ground RMC, Cass Bay RMC, Allandale RMC and Diamond Harbour RMC. One of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is to continue to support Reserve Management Committees, and identify new opportunities for more community management.

 

As the Council does not allocate funding directly to RMCs and the Parks Unit budget has decreased in recent years, RMCs have difficulty carrying out their work and levels of service have decreased.

 

The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan include a new line item allocating $1,500 in each financial year to each of the five Reserve Management Committees listed above.

Lyttelton Reserves Management Committee (RMC)

 

One of the priorities of the Lyttelton RMC is that a new access way from Reserve Terrace to Foster Terrace at Urumau Reserve in Lyttelton be completed. Stage 1 of this project is scheduled to be completed by the end of FY2015/16.

 

The Board seeks that funding for Stage 2 of this project be allocated from the FY2016/17 budget of Capital Project ID 2228 - Banks Peninsula Track Renewals, and that this project be completed by the end of FY2016/17.

 

Lyttelton Recreation Ground Reserve Management Committee (RMC)

 

The Lyttelton Recreation Ground RMC made a separate submission on the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan, which the Board supports.

 

In its submission, the Lyttelton Recreation Ground RMC requests funding for the Lyttelton Recreation Ground Pavilion project. Earthquake repairs to the pavilion are proceeding. However the project plan predates the earthquakes and includes improved kitchen facilities and showers, which would make the facility more versatile for groups such as the Sea Scout Jamborees.

 

The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended to include capital funding for the Lyttelton Recreation Ground Pavilion project, as one of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is that facilities for community activities, including recreation and sport, are repaired, rebuilt, maintained and well-used by all residents.

 

Cass Bay Reserves Management Committee (RMC)

 

The Cass Bay RMC's submission on the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan is attached (Attachment 2), which the Board supports. Please refer to 4.2 for requests for capital funding.

 

Under 4.1.2, the Cass Bay RMC requests that the history of the Pony Point Māori carving be investigated, and any interpretation information be determined. The Board has requested that staff organise a site visit with staff and the Cass Bay RMC to discuss this matter.

 

 


 

4.4

 

 

 

 

4.5

Allandale Reserve Management Committee (RMC)

 

At its meeting on 12 May 2016, the Council will consider a report regarding the Allandale transport yard site. The Board has recommended that, providing the lease of the site with Fulton Hogan proceeds, the Council assign a proportion of the rent to the Allandale Reserve Management Committee to support development and maintenance of Allandale Domain.

 

Diamond Harbour Reserves Management Committee (RMC)

 

The Diamond Harbour RMC's submission on the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan is attached (Attachment 3), which the Board supports.

 

The Board notes that levels of service have decreased for cliff track maintenance and pest plant eradication in Diamond Harbour reserves. The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan allocate additional funding to the Parks Unit operational budget to reinstate historical levels of service, as one of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is supporting re-vegetation initiatives in the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert area.

 

5

Draft Financial Strategy - Capital Release

The Amended Long Term Plan - Draft Financial Strategy proposes releasing $600 million of the investment portfolio held by Christchurch City Holdings Limited (CCHL), with $200 million released in FY2015/16 and the remaining $400 million in FY2017/18 and FY2018/19.

 

For the remaining $400 million, the Board would prefer that the Council explore options for capital release other than asset sales. The Board supports retention of 100% of the Council's strategic assets, namely Lyttelton Port Company, Orion and Christchurch International Airport Limited.

 

6

Capital Project ID 3355 - Former Council (Donald Street) Stables

The Amended Long Term Plan proposes that the Former Council (Donald Street) Stables in Lyttelton be allocated $815,000 in FY2020/21. The Board was advised one of the reasons the project has been deferred is that no use has been determined for the Stables. However following public consultation the Lyttelton Master Plan identified the Stables as part of the Donald Street arts precinct (Attachment 4).

 

One of the Council's priorities for the capital programme is to repair or rebuild facilities in the communities most affected by earthquakes, while one of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is that facilities for community activities, including recreation and sport, are repaired, rebuilt, maintained and well-used by all residents. The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended to allocate $815,000 in FY2016/17 and FY2017/18 to the Former Council (Donald Street) Stables.

7

New Capital Project - Norman Kirk Memorial Pool

One of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is that facilities for community activities, including recreation and sport, are repaired, rebuilt, maintained and well-used by all residents.

 

The Board supports the submission on the Draft Annual Plan and Amended Long Term Plan by Richard Homer on behalf of Lyttelton Harbour Timebank and residents of Lyttelton. This submission proposes that a new capital project be included in the Annual Plan 2016/17 to investigate key access to Norman Kirk Memorial Pool in Lyttelton, which would extend the opening season and hours.

 

8

Fees and Charges - Norman Kirk Memorial Pool

While the Board is comfortable with the small increase in fees for individuals and small families for the Norman Kirk Memorial Pool in Lyttelton proposed in the Draft Annual Plan, the Board seeks that the Draft Annual Plan be amended to cap fees at $20 per visit to reduce fees for larger families.

 

9

New Capital Project - Roly Poly Reserve Play Equipment

One of the Board's top priorities in its Community Board Plan is that facilities for community activities, including recreation and sport, are repaired, rebuilt, maintained and well-used by all residents.

With Lyttelton West School recently closed and the future use of this site uncertain, there is no play equipment in Lyttelton West. The Board seeks that the Amended Long Term Plan be amended to include a new capital project for new play equipment on the reserve known as Roly Poly Reserve on the corner of Harmans and Voelas Roads in Lyttelton.


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSED CAPITAL PROJECTS IN THE LYTTELTON/MT HERBERT AREA

 

Capital Project

 

1

ID 17908

Diamond Harbour Cemetery Drainage Works

2

ID 357

Lyttelton Marina Environs (Naval Point) Development

3

ID 994

Marine Structures Renewal Programme

4

ID 17744

Governors Bay Wharf Renewal

5

ID 17916

Port Levy Toilet Block Renewal

6

ID 1437

Banks Peninsula Walkways Development

7

ID 2228

Banks Peninsula Track Renewals

8

ID 408

Head to Head Walkway

9

ID 164

Footpath Renewals

10

ID 284

Drainage - Rural

11

ID 246

New Kerb and Channel - Rural

12

ID 245

Inner Harbour Road Improvements (Lyttelton to Diamond Harbour)

13

ID 288

New Retaining Walls

14

ID 166

Retaining Walls Renewals

15

ID 17208

Safety Improvements: Guardrails - Dyers Pass Route

16

ID 17211

Safety Improvements: Pedestrian / Cycle Fences - Dyers Pass Route

17

ID 17881

WW Banks Peninsula WTP Asset Renewals

18

ID 890

WW Lyttelton Harbour WWTP

19

ID 390

Banks Peninsula Stormwater Renewals

20

ID 479

Lyttelton Brick Barrels

21

ID 888

WS Lyttelton R&R Rail Tunnel Pipeline

22

ID 21096

Lyttelton Library EQ Repairs

23

ID 20119

Lyttelton Service Centre and Integration with Library

24

ID 20120

Lyttelton Mt Herbert Board Room Replacement

25

ID 3357

Governors Bay School Headmaster's House

26

ID 3379

Sign of the Kiwi

27

ID 3383

Stoddarts Cottage

28

ID 20050

Governors Bay Community Centre and Pottery Shed

29

ID 10862

Lyttelton Recreation Centre and Trinity Hall Repair

30

ID 7889

Cressy Terrace Tennis Courts

31

ID 7931

Coronoation Reserve Retaining Wall

32

ID 16134

Witch Hill War Memorial Earthquake Repair

33

ID 27272

Red Rock Retaining Walls

34

ID 17404

Lyttelton Wastewater Pump Station Renewals

35

ID 990

Open Drains - Reactive Work

36

ID 24762

Whero Avenue Wastewater Reticulation - Diamond Harbour

37

ID 479

Lyttelton Brick Barrels

38

ID 25088

Regional Parks Fencing Renewal

39

ID 3355

Former Council (Donald Street) Stables

40

ID 21096

Lyttelton Library Earthquake Repairs

41

ID 20119

Lyttelton Service Centre and Integration with Library Project

42

ID 20120

Lyttelton Mt Herbert Community Board Room Replacement

 


 

ATTACHMENT 2


 

ATTACHMENT 2


ATTACHMENT 2


 

 

ATTACHMENT 3


 

ATTACHMENT 3


ATTACHMENT 3


 

ATTACHMENT 3


 

ATTACHMENT 4

ATTACHMENT 4

ATTACHMENT 4


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

9         Ripon Street - St Davids Street Proposed Stop Control

Reference:

16/34461

Contact:

Peter Rodgers

Peter.rodgers@ccc.govt.nz

941 6303

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board to approve the installation of a Stop control on Ripon Street at its intersection with St Davids Street, as shown in Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated following a customer service request and subsequent staff investigations.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by assessment of the magnitude of the problem and number of properties affected by the preferred option. 

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment. 

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Revoke any existing traffic controls on Ripon Street at its intersection with St Davids Street.

2.         Approve the installation of a Stop Control on Ripon Street at its intersection with St Davids Street.

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

·     Level of Service: 10.0.31 Protect vulnerable users - minimise the number of fatal crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Approve Stop Control  (preferred option)

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Improves road safety as it requires vehicles to stop on Ripon Street before entering St Davids Street at this intersection, which has limited visibility.

·     Improves the safety of pedestrians crossing St Davids Street as it reduces the speed of left turning vehicles out of Ripon Street onto St Davids Street.

4.3.2   There are no known disadvantages to this option.

 

5.   Context/Background

 

5.1       St Davids Street is a 14m wide unmarked local road. Ripon Street is a 15m wide unmarked local road which intersections with St Davids Street at a T intersection. There is limited visibility from the Ripon Street approach to this intersection.

5.2       Review of crash data shows there have been no reported crashes in the last five years. However staff investigated this intersection due to concerns about the risk of crashes when drivers enter the intersection without fully checking for conflicts with other vehicles or pedestrians. Concerns were raised about the speed of vehicles turning left from Ripon Street onto St David Street conflicting with pedestrians crossing St David Street.

5.3       Staff investigations determined that the limited visibility at Ripon Street warrants a Stop control in accordance with adopted standards for intersection controls.

5.4       The nearby intersection of St Davids Street and Exeter Street also has limited visibility from the side street approach (Exeter Street) but is already controlled by a Stop Control. A Stop Control on Ripon Street ensures consistency.

5.5       Investigations found that drivers tend to look right for oncoming traffic, but do not look left for pedestrians.  Drivers turning left from Ripon Street onto St David Street are often not coming to a complete stop at this intersection and therefore do not have time for a sufficient check for conflicts with other road users.

 

 


 

6.   Option 1 - Install Stop Control (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       Approve a Stop control be installed on Ripon Street at its intersection with St Davids Street.

Significance

6.2       The level of significance of this option is consistent with section 2 of this report. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Māori, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.4       The community has not been specifically consulted on the proposed Stop control as there are no specific impacts on property owners. 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.5       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

6.5.1   Cost of Implementation - $500 for Stop control and road markings.

6.5.2   Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the area maintenance contract and the effect will be minimal to the overall asset.

6.5.3   Funding source - Traffic Operations budget - Signs Regulatory.

Legal Implications

6.6       Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for Community Boards includes the resolution of traffic control devices.

6.7       The installation of any sign and/or markings must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.8       None identified

Implementation

6.9       Implementation dependencies - Implementation of this option is dependent on the Community Board approving it.

6.10    Implementation timeframe - Implementation depends on contractor's workload but anticipated to be completed within one month of Community Board approval.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.11    This is the preferred option because it delivers improvements for road safety and protects vulnerable road users.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing (leave intersection uncontrolled)

Option Description

7.1       Do not install any traffic controls on Ripon Street at its intersection with St Davids Street.

Significance

7.2       The level of significance of this option is consistent with Section 2 of this report. 

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Māori, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       The community has not been specifically consulted on the proposed Stop control as this is considered a safety issue.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.5       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies

Financial Implications

7.6       Cost of Implementation - $0. 

7.7       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - $0. 

7.8       Funding source - Not applicable. 

Legal Implications

7.9       Not Applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.10    If the Stop control is not installed there could be issues raised with the Council for allowing no control to remain in place after it has recognised it is not the correct control in accordance with adopted standards.

Implementation

7.11    Implementation dependencies - Implementation of this option is dependent on the Community Board approving it.

7.12    Implementation timeframe - Implementation depends on contractor's workload but should be completed within one month of the Community Board approving it.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Ripon / St David Stop Control plan

42

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)    sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii)   adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Peter Rodgers

Ryan Rolston

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Consultant

Senior Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

10.    Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue Intersection- Safety Improvement Project

Reference:

16/409474

Contact:

Andrew Hensley

Andrew.Hensley@ccc.govt.nz

941-8999

 

 

1.   Purpose and Origin of Report

Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is for the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board to approve the installation of a Give Way control, kerb outcrop, no stopping restrictions and line marking changes at the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue intersection, as shown on Plan TP345701 -Attachment A.

Origin of Report

1.2       This report is staff generated and is in response to staff observations and community feedback.

2.   Significance

2.1       The decision(s) in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.1   The level of significance was determined by comparing factors relating to this decision against the criteria set out in the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

2.1.2   The community engagement and consultation outlined in this report reflect the assessment.

 

3.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Revoke any existing no stopping restrictions on the eastern side of the eastern branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) between its intersection with Waipapa Avenue and its intersection with Waipapa Avenue (north).

2.         Revoke any existing no stopping restrictions on the western side of the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) between its intersection with Marine Drive and its intersection with Waipapa Avenue (north).

3.         Revoke any existing no stopping restrictions adjacent to all sides of the triangular traffic island at the intersection of Marine Drive and Waipapa Avenue.

4.         Revoke any existing traffic controls on the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) at its intersection with the eastern branch of Waipapa Avenue (north).

5.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at all times adjacent to all sides of the triangular traffic island at the intersection of Marine Drive and Waipapa Avenue.

6.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) commencing at a point 11 metres south of the southern boundary of 11 Waipapa Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 13 metres.

7.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of the eastern branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) commencing at a point 10 metres south of the southern boundary of 10 Waipapa Avenue and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 56 metres.

8.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Marine Drive commencing at its intersection with the centre of Waipapa Avenue (north) and extending in a westerly then southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

9.         Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the southern side of Waipapa Avenue commencing at its intersection with the centre of Waipapa Avenue (north) and extending in an easterly then southerly direction for a distance of 25 metres.

10.       Approve the installation of a Give Way control on the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) at its intersection with the eastern branch of Waipapa Avenue (north).

11.       Approve the installation of a kerb outcrop on the western side of the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north), at its intersection with Waipapa Avenue (north).

 

 

4.   Key Points

4.1       This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2015 - 2025):

4.1.1   Activity: Road Operations

·     Level of Service: 10.0.6 Improve Road Safety: Reduce the number of reported crashes on the network

4.2       The following feasible options have been considered:

·     Option 1 - Install a Give Way control, kerb outcrop, no stopping restrictions, line marking and permanent warning signage (preferred option).

·     Option 2 - Do Nothing.

 

4.3       Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages (Preferred Option)

4.3.1   The advantages of this option include:

·     Option 1 will improve road safety at this location.

4.3.2   The disadvantages of this option include:

·     Removing four parking spaces.

4.4       Community Feedback

4.4.1   Community engagement on the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue intersection safety improvement project was undertaken from Monday 14 March to Tuesday 29 March 2016.

4.4.2   A total of 70 leaflets were hand delivered to sections of Marine Drive, Purau Avenue and Waipapa Avenue. The leaflet was also sent to 44 key stakeholders and 19 absentee owners.

4.4.3   During the course of the engagement, Council received comments and feedback from four individual residents and two organisational representatives. One respondent was in support of the safety improvements, two respondents were not in support, and three did not state their preference.

 

 

 

5.   Context/Background

Background

5.1       Traffic Operations staff have initiated a safety improvement project at the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue intersection to address safety deficiencies that can be effectively addressed through minor capital works. This project was initiated as a result of on-site observations and community feedback.

5.2       The project aims to improve and address the following issues:

·   Lack of visibility for right turning vehicles into the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north) from Marine Drive and Waipapa Avenue.

·   Inappropriate speed for the environment at and through the intersection.

·   Lack of clarity of priority at the intersection of the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north).

·   Delineation of the intersection.

·   Position of the informal school bus stop

5.3       Reported crashes at and within 50 metres of the project were retrieved from the NZTA Crash Analysis System for the period from 2010- 2015. There were two vehicles only crashes, both involving vehicles losing control on the bend where Waipapa Avenue intersects with Marine Drive, of which one resulted in a minor injury.

Site Information

5.4       The intersection of Waipapa Avenue with Marine Drive is effectively a T Intersection, with a large triangular island in the middle creating two approaches from Waipapa Avenue (north) which splits into an eastern and western branch to Waipapa Avenue (south) and Marine Drive.

5.5       There is a large retaining wall on the inside of the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue bend, which restricts visibility for right turning vehicles into the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north).

5.6       Both of the Waipapa Avenue (north) approaches to the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue intersection are subject to existing Give Way controls.

5.7       There is a steep super elevation on the Marine Drive / Waipapa Avenue bend and a change in gradient down onto Waipapa Avenue (north).

5.8       Waipapa Avenue (north) is the local road link to Diamond Harbour amenities including the cafes and shops, post office, library, medical centre, playing fields, Stoddart Point, wharf and ferry.

5.9       There is a lack of clarity of who has priority at the intersection where the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north) meet Waipapa Avenue (north).

5.10    There are no existing parking restrictions around these intersections.


 

6.   Option 1 - Install a Give Way Control, Traffic Island, No Stopping Restrictions, Line Marking and Permanent Warning Signage (preferred)

Option Description

6.1       This option includes the installation of a Give Way control and kerb outcrop where the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north) intersect to clarify the priority at the intersection and reduce vehicle operating speeds. The installation of no stopping restrictions and line marking to improve visibility for turning vehicles. The installation of curve speed advisory signage to reduce vehicle operating speeds and improve delineation.

6.2       School bus operators presently stop informally at the head of the triangle on Marine Drive on their outbound trips. There will be a safer stopping place on the western branch of Waipapa Avenue (north) to pull onto the road shoulder to allow passengers to disembark. Buses then utilise the proposed Give Way control to turn right to continue their outbound trip towards Purau Avenue.

Significance

6.3       The level of significance of this option is low consistent with section 2 of this report.  Engagement requirements for this level of significance are low.

Impact on Mana Whenua

6.4       This option does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does not specifically impact Ngāi Tahu, their culture and traditions.

Community Views and Preferences

6.5       Feedback was received from Monday 14 March to Tuesday 29 March 2016, with six responses received.

6.5.1   One respondent was in support of the safety improvements. Their feedback included:

-I commend the measures suggested.

6.5.2   Two respondents were not in support of the safety improvements. Their feedback included:

-Concern that the no stopping lines would prevent the school bus dropping children off and could reduce parking for trampers and swimmers.

-Suggestions that the money instead be spent on fixing the road into Stoddart Point.

6.5.3   Three respondents did not state their preference and included the following feedback:

-Concerns about where to stop the school bus.

-Concern the line marking will affect cycle safety.

 

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

6.6       This option is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

Financial Implications

6.7       Cost of Implementation - $21,000 is allocated to this project from the Safety Improvement Programme 2015-16.

6.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Covered under the existing Maintenance budgets and ongoing effect should be minimal.

6.9       Funding source - Safety Improvement Programme 2015-16.

Legal Implications

6.10    Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution.

6.11    The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations from the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions and traffic control devices.

6.12    The installation of any signs and/or markings associated with traffic control devices must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004.

Risks and Mitigations

6.13    Not applicable.

Implementation

6.14    Implementation dependencies - Community Board approval.

6.15    Implementation timeframe - before the end of the 2015-16 financial year (30 June 2016).

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

6.16    The advantages of this option include:

·   Improves road safety at this intersection by improving visibility for turning vehicles, reduces vehicle operating speeds, and defines the priority where the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north) intersect.

6.17    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Loss of four parking spaces.

7.   Option 2 - Do Nothing

Option Description

7.1       Install none of the proposed safety improvements.

Significance

7.2       See Section 6.3 above.

Impact on Mana Whenua

7.3       See Section 6.4 above.

Community Views and Preferences

7.4       See Section 6.5 above. 

7.5       No feedback supported this option.

Alignment with Council Plans and Policies

7.6       This option is inconsistent with Council’s Plans and Policies.

7.6.1   Inconsistency - It does not reduce the risk of crashes on the roading network.

7.6.2   Reason for inconsistency - Lack of visibility for turning vehicles. Lack of clarity of priority where the eastern and western branches of Waipapa Avenue (north) intersect. Operating speeds of vehicles are inappropriate for environment.

7.6.3   Amendment necessary - not applicable.

Financial Implications

7.7       Cost of Implementation - Not applicable.

7.8       Maintenance / Ongoing Costs - Not applicable.

7.9       Funding source - Not applicable.

Legal Implications

7.10    Not applicable.

Risks and Mitigations

7.11    Does not address identified safety risks.

Implementation

7.12    Implementation dependencies - Not applicable.

7.13    Implementation timeframe - Not applicable.

Option Summary - Advantages and Disadvantages

7.14    The advantages of this option include:

·   Does not remove any parking spaces

7.15    The disadvantages of this option include:

·   Does not address identified safety risks.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Marine Drive Waipapa Avenue Intersection- Safety Improvements TP 345701

49

 

 

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance

Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002).

(a) This report contains:

(i)  sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement.

(b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

 

Signatories

Authors

Andrew Hensley

Steve Parry

Steffan Thomas

Traffic Engineer

Manager Traffic Operations

Operations Manager

Approved By

Chris Gregory

David Adamson

Head of Transport

General Manager City Services

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

11.    Lyttelton/Mt Herbert 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund End of Project Report

Reference:

16/408237

Contact:

Nicola Thompson

nicola.thompson@ccc.govt.nz

941 8937

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       The purpose of this report is to provide the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board with a summary of the end of year accountability reports for projects that received funding from the Boards 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund End of Project report.

 

3.   Key Points

3.1       The amount allocated by the Board for their 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund was $38,398, comprising:

Category

Funded Applications

Total amount

Community Organisations

3

$32,498

Board Bids

4

$5,900

 

3.2       Successful applicants of the Strengthening Communities Fund are required to submit an end of project accountability report. Attached to this report (Attachment A), is a matrix detailing the information summarised from the end of project accountability reports submitted by recipient organisations for their 2014/15 Strengthening Communities Fund Projects.

3.3       Organisations are requested to submit their end of project accountability reports using the Results Based Accountability (RBA) framework. The RBA framework uses three key questions to measure the impact and efficacy of projects.

3.3.1   How much did you do?

3.3.2   How well did you do it?

3.3.3   Is anyone better off?

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

2014/15 End of Project Summary Report Lyttelton Mt Herbert SCF

53

 

 

Signatories

Author

Nicola Thompson

Community Funding Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey

Head of Community Support, Governance & Partnerships

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

12.    Community Organisation Report - Orton Bradley Park Board

Reference:

16/513717

Contact:

Liz Beaven

Liz.Beaven@ccc.govt.nz

941 5602

 

 

1.   Purpose of Report

1.1       This report presents the minutes of the Orton Bradley Park Board meeting of 15 February 2016.

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Receive the information in the minutes of the Orton Bradley Park Board meeting of 15 February 2016.

 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Orton Bradley Park Board Minutes - 15 February 2016

66

 

 

Signatories

Author

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

Approved By

Liz Beaven

Community Board Advisor

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

13     Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Area Report

Reference:

16/64229

Contact:

Joan Blatchford

joan.blatchford@ccc.govt.nz

941 5643

 

 

1.   Board Activities

1.1       Community Board Plan Update

1.1.1   The Community Governance Team will update the Board on the Community Board Plan at this meeting.

1.2       Reserve Management Committees

1.2.1   As discussed with the Board earlier in May 2016 the Board agreed to allocate an administration grant to the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board's Reserve Management Committees.  This grant is to assist the Committees with expenses such as office supplies, printing/photocopying.

 

 

2.   Staff Recommendations

That the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board:

1.         Receive the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board Area Report.

2.         Allocate an administration grant to each of the Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Reserve Management Committees to assist with administration expenses.

3.         Decide that the Board's draft feedback on the Council's Draft Business Improvement District Policy be forwarded to the Board for comment prior to submission, and that the final feedback be approved and submitted by the Chairperson.

3.   Community Activities

3.1       Lyttelton Museum

3.1.1   The Lyttelton Museum Newsletter - Autumn 2016 is attached for information.

 

3.2       Allandale Hall

3.2.1   A community consultation on the requirements for and facilities needed within a repaired Allandale Hall is being coordinated in partnership with the Allandale Reserve Management Committee.

3.3       Diamond Harbour Village Planning

3.3.1   Jenny Moore, Senior landscape Architect, has been appointed to lead the preparation of a Development Plan for the Stoddart Point area of Diamond Harbour. A meeting was held with representatives of the Diamond Harbour Community Association on 4th May to discuss CCCs role in preparing a Development Plan. This Plan is to focus on clear pedestrian connections throughout Stoddart Point. Community Association members also raised concerns about vehicle movement within the village centre, particularly around the cluster of shops, plus vehicle and pedestrian access to the community centre. The project brief has been amended to include consideration of these issues.

3.4       Governors Bay Community Centre

3.4.1   The Governors Bay Community Association have asked for a plan for the whole of the Community Centre and Pool Reserve site. An onsite meeting has been organised for Friday 13th May to include the Arborist, the Parks Maintenance Contract Manager, Recreation Planner and a member of the Project Management Team overseeing the build of the Community Centre. Staff will meet with three community representatives and the Community Board Chair.  

Council Activities and Decisions

3.5       Draft Business Improvement District (BID) Policy

3.5.1   A BID programme sees businesses in a defined area agreeing to work together to make the business district a more attractive place to do business. These businesses also agree to the Council levying a targeted rate on business premises in the area to fund the programme. 

3.5.2   A summary of the draft Policy is attached. Feedback is open from 22 April - 17 May 2016.

3.5.3   For the full draft Policy and details on how to have your say, visit the Council's Have Your Say website.

3.5.4   At its Submissions Committee meeting on 4 May 2016, the Board decided to provide feedback on the draft Policy. The Board will formulate feedback at this meeting.

3.6       Lyttelton Master Plan Progress

3.6.1   Please find attached a memo and monitoring dashboard for the Board's information.

4.   Funding Update

4.1       Board Funding - Unallocated Balances

A copy of the Board’s Discretionary Response Fund unallocated balance as at 18 May 2016 is attached for the Board's information.

4.2       Strengthening Communities and Small Grants Funding

To date, a total of 8 Small Grants Fund applications and 11 Strengthening Communities Fund applications (5 from the Board) have been received.

4.3       Youth Development Scheme Funding

A Youth Development Fund application has been received and is currently being assessed by staff.

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

a  

Lyttelton Museum Newsletter - Autumn 2016

74

b  

Draft Business Improvement District Policy - Summary of Information

78

c  

Memo - Suburban Centre Master Plans Report

82

d  

Suburban Centre Master Plans - Biannual Monitoring Report to end March 2016

84

e  

Board Funding bea- Unallocated Balances

107

 

 

Signatories

Authors

Joan Blatchford

Angela Abel

Liz Beaven

Amy Hart

Philipa Hay

Andrea Wild

Manager Community Governance - Lyttelton/Mt Herbert

Community Support Officer

Community Board Advisor

Governance Support Officer

Community Development Advisor

Community Development Advisor

Approved By

Jenny Hughey

Head of Community Support, Governance & Partnerships

  


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

PDF Creator

 


Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Community Board

18 May 2016

 

 

14.  Elected Member Information Exchange

 

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

 

 

 

15.  Question Under Standing Orders

 

Any member of the local authority may at any meeting of the local authority at the appointed time, put a question to the Chairperson, or through the Chairperson of the local authority to the Chairperson of any standing or special committee, or to any officer of the local authority concerning any matter relevant to the role or functions of the local authority concerning any matter that does not appear on the agenda, nor arises from any committee report or recommendation submitted to that meeting.

 

Wherever applicable, such questions shall be in writing and handed to the Chairperson prior to the commencement of the meeting at which they are to be asked.